Slashdot Mirror


Chelsea Clinton At NCWIT: More PE, Less Zuckerberg

theodp (442580) writes "Among the speakers at last week's National Center for Women & Information Technology (NCWIT) Summit was Chelsea Clinton, who spoke fondly of the Commodore she received as a kid on Christmas Day in 1987. During the Q&A, Clinton was asked (Vimeo), 'What do you see as some of the right policies that could help put Computer Science — which is undeniably the most important 21st Century skill — into our classrooms?' To which the former First Daughter responded, 'I won't quibble with the fact that I think it's very important. I also think other things admittedly are important.' Such as? Aligning Computer Science with Common Core, for one thing ('Ensure that Computer Science is part of the definition of science'). Using state budget surpluses to hire additional physical education teachers for elementary and middle school students, for another ('For Computer Science, as any subject, kids that are well-fed with healthy food and who have been activated in their bodies will able to learn and retain information in any subject better than if they're not'). And, last but not least, 'continuing to tell stories of people that are not...people who don't look like Mark Zuckerberg as successful in Computer Science and technology.' NCWIT, by the way, was listed as a "major partner" on last December's Hour of Code, which arguably made Mark Zuckerberg the face of Computer Science for K-12 students in the nationwide campaign embraced by President Obama during CSEdWeek."

255 comments

  1. Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why do we care what she thinks?

    1. Re:Wait... by umdesch4 · · Score: 0

      I suspect it might be because her mom might end up becoming a presidential candidate soon...or am I wrong about that. I confess to being a non-American only somewhat up-to-date on the current state of US politics.

    2. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Clinton rattled off a series of discouraging numbers that relate to tech education. The share of female computer-science grads has declined during the last decade, from 21 percent in 2001 to as low as 16 percent, a trend she finds “deeply challenging.”"

      Well female graduates from veterinary science programmes have been steadily rising to the point women now outnumber men in the practice of veterinary medicine. I dare say veterinary science is more difficult and demanding than any computer science curriculum. Who's smarter - women choosing a career in veterinary science or women not choosing a career in computer science? I'd say they're both smarter than most men pursuing a career in computer science which in most workplaces means some IT role where a science background is all but useless.

    3. Re:Wait... by jcr · · Score: 0

      I don't.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    4. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do we care what she thinks?

      Because she hopefully will be running for president after her mom serves an 8yr term. Vote Clinton 2016, 2020, 2024, and 2028!!!

    5. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't.

      Yet you posted anyway. You literally could care less!

    6. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Anyone who's anti-Facebook should be heard.

    7. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      We don't. She's just a mouthpiece who happens to have famous parents.

    8. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do we care what you think? You're an even bigger nobody than she is.

    9. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Actually you're in all likelihood more cognizant of U.S. politics than most U.S. citizens. We're currently steeped in a very, very divisive society with a small extremist conservative sector, an even smaller liberal one, and a massive apathetic, generally-misinformed middle. Give us a few decades to sort our shit out, we'll either crumble under our own doing or bounce back into something more relevant again.

    10. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Ex-pres. of USA (and their families) have very big impact on the public thru interviews, meetings with the public etc.
      We may not "care" what they are saying but we have to care about the impact (and use it to our advantage whenever possible)...

    11. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do we care what she thinks?

      Blonde joke.

      2 stupid 4 McKinsey too talentless for television not good enough at Hedge Fund managing

      "Clinton rattled off a series of discouraging numbers that relate to tech education. The share of female computer-science grads has declined during the last decade, from 21 percent in 2001 to as low as 16 percent, a trend she finds “deeply challenging.”"

      quoting the wrong stats because you did not do your research the dispacable spawn of Hillary "Insider trading corrupt as fuck" Clinton and William "I rape wimmin and feminsts approve" Clinton is a warning about the failed drunkard secretary of states presidential ambitions.

    12. Re:Wait... by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      Why do we care what she thinks?

      Because she was in the Beavis and Butthead movie of course.

    13. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Chelsea Clinton has no special qualifications other than her parents. The only thing she has in common with them is playing manipulative divisive politics - gender against gender and one race against another. While the poor and the middle classes fight amongst themselves, the elite continue to gain more power with mouthpieces like this.

    14. Re:Wait... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      He could care less, but only if he cared to make the effort to do so. Which he doesn't. Or something.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    15. Re:Wait... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      You may be correct but i suspect it might be more to do with her making an entry into politics. The key for me was the using state surpluses bit. The president cannot tell the states what to do with its money but a governor or state politician has a lot of direct influence.

      Hillary, for what it is worth, likely will not be running for president. There are too many negetives about her that would fire up the republican base and unit branch groups who typically vote third party or claim to anyway, more than any candidate running against her could.

    16. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because she is a member of your country's aristrocracy, and stands a good chance to be crowned que^H^H^H president in some future election?

      What on earth do they teach you on school these days?

    17. Re:Wait... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not sure about the USA, but veterinary graduates in the UK have the highest suicide rate of any discipline. It turns out that most people who go into the subject do so because they like animals, and much of the job of a qualified vey (especially a newly qualified vet) involves killing animals. With that in mind, a career in IT doesn't sound so bad.

      Here, by the way, the veterinary school has the most unbalanced gender ratio of any department in the university (more so than computer science), but (as you say) it's female dominated. I suspect that the reason this is seen as of less concern is that our society is increasingly dependent on computers and decreasingly dependent on animals.

      I don't believe that an uneven gender ratio is necessarily a bad thing, but I do mind that we're not getting the best students in computer science, and when only around 10% of our applicants are female then it looks like there's a good chance that we're missing some very competent people.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    18. Re:Wait... by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Why do we care what she thinks?

      Because serfs should know what their hereditary rulers think.

      You'll know it's all over when you hear of the first Bush/Clinton intermarriage.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    19. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hillary, for what it is worth, likely will not be running for president. There are too many negetives about her that would fire up the republican base and unit branch groups who typically vote third party or claim to anyway, more than any candidate running against her could.

      I'm a centrist who is not a Hillary fan.. but explain to me how a drone-striking surveillance state black man (which is the way racist see him, not half white) with a borderline racist attorney general got reelected?

      Hillary is going to run, and from what I'm seeing on the Republican front with respect to candidates she's going to win.

      I'm a bit maudlin about the best both sides have to offer; I'm all out of outrage.

    20. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say they're both smarter than most men pursuing a career in computer science which in most workplaces means some IT role where a science background is all but useless.

      And I'd say you're incorrect. Have you calculated the ROI of a veterinary doctoral (DVM) degree lately? It's as bad of an investment as law school with 60-100k of student debt loading excluding undergrad, so no 'they're not smarter'.

      Average salary of 50-70k where I live with a DVM, 80k when they finally get their own practice. In fact there are too many vets in my state. I've got kids running around here with associate degrees doing mobile apps for 60-80k and old electronics technicians with a telecom background who have gotten Cisco CCNP certs doing 80-100k.

    21. Re:Wait... by swb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not sure about the USA, but veterinary graduates in the UK have the highest suicide rate of any discipline. It turns out that most people who go into the subject do so because they like animals, and much of the job of a qualified vey (especially a newly qualified vet) involves killing animals. With that in mind, a career in IT doesn't sound so bad.

      And as it turns out, much of the job of new CompSci grads involves killing application systems and designing database entry screens. The question isn't why is the suicide rate so high for veterinarians, but why isn't it higher for CompSci grads?

    22. Re:Wait... by pla · · Score: 1

      And as it turns out, much of the job of new CompSci grads involves killing application systems and designing database entry screens.

      Support has always counted as one of the biggest PITAs in software engineering. Reducing that to something we can handle server side has made a world of difference to how much it sucks to take a nice clean app and actually give it to (ugh!) users.

      Now, I'll agree data-entry front-ends have very little glamor to them. But keep in mind, someone gets to write the back-end code - Data entry doesn't accomplish much if you don't do something with the data.

    23. Re:Wait... by Grey+Geezer · · Score: 0

      "Hillary, for what it is worth, likely will not be running for president. There are too many negetives..."

      Those "negetives" were, for the most part, there in 2008, and that did not stop her then. She has bee a Republican punching bag ever since her comments about not being a "baking cookies" kind of wife.

      --
      The USA is only 4X older than me...perspective
    24. Re:Wait... by tommeke100 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There was a girl in our first year of CS who was a very hard worker, but just couldn't handle the advanced math.
      She switched to med school after she flunked and passed with flying colors.

      It really depends on what you take as basis for a 'tough' curriculum.
      Med school and veterinary school may require you to work 'harder'. But with CS and Math, if you don't get it, you just don't get it. No matter how hard you work.
      I wouldn't be able to do Med school though, I faint at the sight of a needle ;-)

    25. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Attack the messenger again? Sigh...

      Forget for a moment who she is, and look at the arguments that are being made. Is she right? Should CS be in core curriculum? Should we be hiring more phys. ed. teachers and getting kids off the computer and into more dual role lifestyles of technology and athleticism?

      Now back to the messenger. Is she using her name and the oppurtunities awarded to her to spread a seemingly positive message and bring to light issues that should obviouslybe addressed but likely aren't? That's awful isn't it!

    26. Re:Wait... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I don't think most people look at the entire range of available careers and pick one based on their job/life prospects. They choose something they are interested in and can stand to study in depth for a few years, and which they have some talent at.

      In other words it isn't about ratios or numbers. All that matters is if someone who is interested in studying or having a career in engineering is put off for some reason other than lack of ability. We want a meritocracy, right? So if a guy can't afford it but has talent there should be a fund to help him, and if a woman is put off by all the brogrammers on the course being dicks to her they should stop.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    27. Re:Wait... by necro81 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't believe that an uneven gender ratio is necessarily a bad thing

      I have not particular evidence to back up this next assertion, but...

      Men and women utilize and consume technology is roughly equal amounts. Not just sitting in front of computers trolling facebook, but also driving cars, accessing medical care, communicating on mobile devices, pay taxes to fund the military-industrial complex, and burning through a whopping amount of energy in the process. So, to the extent that men and women are equal users of technology, I think it prudent to make sure they are equal contributors in technology. Put differently (and along the lines of your final statement) - if women aren't helping to develop new technology, then we're probably missing something important.

    28. Re:Wait... by Missing.Matter · · Score: 1

      For some people, careers aren't about ROI. I wouldn't do mobile app development for a million dollars.

    29. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Hillary, for what it is worth, likely will not be running for president. There are too many negetives..."

      Those "negetives" were, for the most part, there in 2008, and that did not stop her then. She has bee a Republican punching bag ever since her comments about not being a "baking cookies" kind of wife.

      I thought that was from the time she was kicked of the Watergate Committee for lying and other unethical behavior which saw her lose her law license so she went to some backward Southern State and married the Governor who was then and still is a crook.

    30. Re:Wait... by stdarg · · Score: 1

      if women aren't helping to develop new technology, then we're probably missing something important.

      So your argument is that women bring something different than men. Well what if what they bring is not important or is actually detrimental somehow, and that's why they are underrepresented?

      I mean, if you're arguing from the stance that men and women are that different, then you have to admit both possibilities.

    31. Re:Wait... by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Because Ex-pres. of USA (and their families) have very big impact on the public ....

      Only recently. Most ex-presidents simply faded into the shadows. As for their families, how much national attention are the Bush twins receiving? Or Reagan's or Carter's adult children?

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    32. Re:Wait... by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Why do we care what she thinks?

      Blonde joke.

      2 stupid 4 McKinsey too talentless for television not good enough at Hedge Fund managing

      "Clinton rattled off a series of discouraging numbers that relate to tech education. The share of female computer-science grads has declined during the last decade, from 21 percent in 2001 to as low as 16 percent, a trend she finds “deeply challenging.”"

      quoting the wrong stats because you did not do your research the dispacable spawn of Hillary "Insider trading corrupt as fuck" Clinton and William "I rape wimmin and feminsts approve" Clinton is a warning about the failed drunkard secretary of states presidential ambitions.

      [citation needed]

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    33. Re:Wait... by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      qualifications?!? When it comes to politics even I could run for president I'm over 35, born and live in the US, have never been impeached, and have never been part of a rebellion.

    34. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the components that I never see in this discussion is that veterinarians euthanize animals to end suffering. The process of euthanasia tends to be a fairly painless death. I doubt anyone would be surprised when people who view painlessly ending suffering repeatedly decide to end their own suffering.

    35. Re:Wait... by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 1

      Because she works at NYU as an assistant vice provost recruiting students. One of her jobs is to go out and find academic talent and bring it to NYU. So her job is to determine what skills are most valuable in an academic sense, which is exactly what NCWIT is talking about with concerns about women in technology.

      --
      The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
    36. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure about the USA, but veterinary graduates in the UK have the highest suicide rate of any discipline. It turns out that most people who go into the subject do so because they like animals, and much of the job of a qualified vey (especially a newly qualified vet) involves killing animals. With that in mind, a career in IT doesn't sound so bad.

      The situation sounds terrible in the UK. I was speaking about Canada where most veterinarians, at least in the small animal practices, tend to be women. While euthanasia is part of the life of a veterinarian I understand how it could lead to traumatic effects for the veterinarians especially when perfectly healthy animals are brought into the clinic because the owner doesn't want to treat their pet for some ailment. The industrial meat plants must be hellish for any veterinarian.

    37. Re:Wait... by kick6 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We're currently steeped in a very, very divisive society

      One could go so far as to say that society has already shit the bed, and what we're actually in is a heavily-policed anarchy.

    38. Re:Wait... by kick6 · · Score: 1

      I'm a centrist who is not a Hillary fan.. but explain to me how a drone-striking surveillance state black man (which is the way racist see him, not half white) with a borderline racist attorney general got reelected? Hillary is going to run, and from what I'm seeing on the Republican front with respect to candidates she's going to win. I'm a bit maudlin about the best both sides have to offer; I'm all out of outrage.

      I'm saddened to say I agree with you.

    39. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And as it turns out, much of the job of new CompSci grads involves killing application systems and designing database entry screens.

      Support has always counted as one of the biggest PITAs in software engineering. Reducing that to something we can handle server side has made a world of difference to how much it sucks to take a nice clean app and actually give it to (ugh!) users.

      Now, I'll agree data-entry front-ends have very little glamor to them. But keep in mind, someone gets to write the back-end code - Data entry doesn't accomplish much if you don't do something with the data.

      I have long contended that applications whether desktop or server should not require constant maintenance and the installation and configuration should be as simple as possible. These days with virtualisation being prevalent the deployment of application systems should be a trivial drop into place and answer a few configuration questions. I have developed systems and supported systems developed by third-parties so I have experience from both perspectives.

      As for the unglamorous data-entry screens a well-implemented data-entry system can prevent errant data from ever reaching the back-end system. The trouble with IT is when everything works smoothly nobody thinks it's difficult, but as soon as a problem arises the pitch forks come out of the desk drawers. ;-)

    40. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say they're both smarter than most men pursuing a career in computer science which in most workplaces means some IT role where a science background is all but useless.

      And I'd say you're incorrect. Have you calculated the ROI of a veterinary doctoral (DVM) degree lately? It's as bad of an investment as law school with 60-100k of student debt loading excluding undergrad, so no 'they're not smarter'.

      Average salary of 50-70k where I live with a DVM, 80k when they finally get their own practice. In fact there are too many vets in my state. I've got kids running around here with associate degrees doing mobile apps for 60-80k and old electronics technicians with a telecom background who have gotten Cisco CCNP certs doing 80-100k.

      DVMs can open their own veterinary practice and can choose their working hours and even the types of clients (animals) they treat. Sure the people bringing their animals are a source of frustration for the veterinarian but improving the well-being of a living creature seems more appealing to some people than any alleged amount of money in some facet of IT. The issue of too many practitioners in any field is a valid point but it can be seen in every field including your much vaulted "mobile app developers" and "network wiring techs."

    41. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      qualifications?!? When it comes to politics even I could run for president I'm over 35, born and live in the US, have never been impeached, and have never been part of a rebellion.

      What a dull life you've led. LOL

    42. Re:Wait... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      There are too many negetives about her ...

      Her negatives are high with people that would not vote for any Democrat. When matched up head-to-head against plausible Republicans, Hillary polls better than Joe Biden or any other plausible Democratic nominee. Also, the Republicans don't have a deep bench, so she may be going against someone like Rand Paul or Paul Ryan, who also have plenty of negatives too.

    43. Re:Wait... by JeffOwl · · Score: 1

      Clinton rattled off a series of discouraging numbers that relate to tech education. The share of female computer-science grads has declined during the last decade, from 21 percent in 2001 to as low as 16 percent, a trend she finds “deeply challenging."

      But she isn't concerned about the gender disparity in primary education, which is arguable more important to the health of society, or the vast number of other career fields that are dominated by women. I also note that she did not choose to go into CS herself. Why? Probably because, like many women I know, it didn't interest her as much as the fields she did choose to study: History, International Relations, and Public Health. Clearly she would rather be a politician than a computer scientist. Should we have spent a bunch of resources trying to change her mind? There are many programs out there to get girls interested in STEM. Universities and industry are actively recruiting women. Clearly the real issue isn't being addressed, the questions are: what is the real reason and should it be addressed?

    44. Re:Wait... by knarf · · Score: 1

      One of the reasons why veterinarians score so high on the suicide front is that they've made an industry of the 'humane termination' of their subjects. For a vet, the act of ending life is often weekly, if not daily business. It does tend to take the drama out of ending a life by injecting pentobarbital. Combine this with the readily available means of 'termination' and the often stressful work environment and you get the noticed over-representation.

      Source: my wife is a horse vet.

      On the matter of gender over/under-representation I'd advise everyone to give it a rest already. I studied forestry at the agricultural university in the Netherlands. There were some girls there, maybe 5%? We just organised parties together with the nutrition department which had the opposite gender imbalance - problem solved :-).

      --
      --frank[at]unternet.org
    45. Re:Wait... by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      Too bad someone downvoted you. That's most unfortunate. A reasonable comment to boot.

    46. Re:Wait... by Kilo+Kilo · · Score: 1

      I'm saddened to say I agree with you.

      I'll second this. The Republicans can't put up anyone decent, so the Dems really don't have to try. I live in NY and I was shocked that she was elected as a Senator since she never lived here before deciding to run for the seat. She literally just walked in and said, "I'll represent this state that I don't live in," and won. This was some weird combination of the Republicans running a moron and people saying, "Bill Clinton did such a good job, his wife will do a good job too." The same thing could happen for his daughter.

    47. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put differently (and along the lines of your final statement) - if women aren't helping to develop new technology, then we're probably missing something important.

      What a meaningless but feelgood statement.

      Congrats on saying nothing in support of your agenda.

    48. Re:Wait... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why you bring race up. But how Obama got elected was a fragmented right. Look at the candidates and the campains they ran. McCain picked Palin who is probably smarter than Biden but was made to look a fool even when she was right ( Russia). But their entire campain strategy was to claim they were maverics, you never knew what they would do. Doesn't hardly energize the base or even sympathetic voters when the message is we will do whatever. Then you had Romney who was a mormon- something the fundementalist see as a cult branch of their religion. But lets not forget that no matter how many pick up trucks he bought to show he was just as common as everyone else, he had democrat plants recording and releasing comments that show otherwise like the 47% one.

      I just don't think Hillary will run. She will likely support someone else and get them elected and pull strings from behind the sscenes.

    49. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hillary is going to run, and from what I'm seeing on the Republican front with respect to candidates she's going to win. I'm a bit maudlin about the best both sides have to offer; I'm all out of outrage.

      This.

      With Jeb as a contender on behalf of House Bush, Hilary about to reign on behalf of House Clinton, the stage is set for two terms of Clinton, a turnover to Jeb in 2020 for a term or two, which is more than enough time for Chelsea to represent House Clinton in 2024-2028.

      Counting the Reagan years as Bush years (the Alzheimer's patient had the title, with Bush I as VP and the real power behind the throne), I can easily see having lived my entire life under two political dynasties, and I see no reason, pun intended, to hope that this will ever change.

    50. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure why you bring race up.

      Original coward here (as in author of the GP):

      I brought race up because it matters. I know southern Democrats who had no problem voting for Bill Clinton who did NOT vote for Obama. Among cappuccino Democrats (affluent, educated) it doesn't matter. Among the working class dems (Wal-Mart dems) it sure as hell does matter.

    51. Re:Wait... by sandytaru · · Score: 1

      They also work 60 hour works and have six figure student loan debt in the US. My best friend is a vet. She is incredibly stressed out most of the time, mostly because of how much money she owes. Her income is higher than mine, but her debt to income ratio is significantly higher. She'll be paying off her loans for thirty years.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    52. Re:Wait... by gizmo2199 · · Score: 2

      "McCain picked Palin who is probably smarter than Biden"

      What evidence are basing this on? It took Palin 5 years and 3 different colleges to earn a BA (in communications). The totality of Palin's government experience before she became governor was 10 years as city councilor and mayor of a town of 5,000 in Alaska. Biden, in addition to a law degree, was a well-respected U.S. Senator for 40 years. He served on the Judiciary and Foreign Relations committees.
      Moreover, since losing, Palin has made some pretty questionable decisions regarding her public persona. Nobody takes her seriously as a political contender any more.

      --
      This Sig does not Exist.
    53. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moreover, since losing, Palin has made some pretty questionable decisions regarding her public persona. Nobody takes her seriously as a political contender anymore.

      Anymore?? As if people ever did?

    54. Re:Wait... by metlin · · Score: 1

      Did you really just compare working on a computer with taking a life?

      Most veterinarians I know love animals, and it is heart wrenching to take the life of something you love.

      No matter how "hard" you think normalizing a database is, it doesn't come close to look at a puppy's eyes as you give it a lethal injection, or as they try to get away.

      I have volunteered at an animal shelter, and I can tell you that it is gut wrenching to see these animals in pain, and there isn't ANY comparison whatsoever.

    55. Re:Wait... by nickittynickname · · Score: 1

      This is my anecdotal experience with a company that built a software product. The majority of engineers were men. The product owners (those that had final say) were not engineers but business majors. They had more influence as to the product result than the engineering team did. Just because engineering isn't 50/50 doesn't mean that women are not adding to technology development.

    56. Re:Wait... by swb · · Score: 1

      Oh please.

      I was at the vet and watched/held my poor old dog as she was euthanized. I was glad to see it happen as she was sick and suffering. Sad to lose my dog, happy she didn't suffer any further.

      I also have done a bit of bird hunting and have broken the necks of more than few pheasants who didn't die immediately. I may enjoy shooting and eating them, but I don't want to see them suffer, either.

    57. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am the AC who posted the GF post and I now get it. Thank you for your insightful response.

    58. Re:Wait... by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      Heh, really? I'd do just about any professional job for a year for a million dollars. Heck, I'd probably double down for a second year and then retire. But mobile app development? That sounds like enough fun I'd be doing it now if I thought I could keep my current wage.

    59. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry that not all of us are as heartless as you. Some of us actually *gasp* feel the pain of other living things.

    60. Re:Wait... by MBC1977 · · Score: 2

      Aside from the questionably stupid|baiting statement, that Palin is smarter than Biden. One word stands out: quitter. She quit because she didn't want the job anymore. If your elected to an office and quit, you should never again consider running for office, much less attempt to offer any sort of discourse. I (and probably many other rational thinking individuals) will never look at you the same way again.

      --
      Regards,

      MBC1977,
    61. Re:Wait... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      There was nothing stupid or baiting about the comment. It was specifically meant to illistrate the contrast from what we had to reality. Just do a google search for Biden wrong on foreign policy and you will find many in depth discusions on the topic complete with examples.

      Palin quiting happened after the timeframe i spoke about. The race was over and Obama was already elected by that time. I'm not sure why you even brought it up in this context. I don't disagree with the context, just the time span to what was being discussed.

    62. Re:Wait... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I know plenty of people with walls full of degrees and diplomas who aren't very smart outside of that. You brought law and i remember trying to help a lawyer find pictures on his computer. My boss kept telling him to go to my computer and he kept fighting it. Finally after explaining the we weren't going to help him if he didn't follow directions, he replied "well, ok. So where is your computer at".

      All you have to do is a google search for biden on foreign policy and you will see how i quantify that. Sure, biden may be able to recite a peom of cite a specific law, but when he does stupid stuff like confuses robbert gates with bill gates, you have to wonder if he isn't a few fries short of a happy meal.

  2. Role Models by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why, Chelsea herself demonstrates that there are options for people who don't look like Mark Zuckerberg. All you need to do is be born into the right family and you too can be Vice Chair of a foundation you basically can't be fired from.

    1. Re:Role Models by SternisheFan · · Score: 1, Insightful

      She seems to me to be an intelligent young woman who is, yes, born and raised in a background most people don't get to experience. This doesn't necessarily mean that she isn't and won't a force for good in her lifetime. You post is based on assumptions you hold about her, you really don't know the woman, or her true ideals. How about we have a wait and see approach before condemning the young lady, hmm...

    2. Re:Role Models by youngone · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Of course it means that she won't be a force for good. She'll be exactly what every member of the American ruling class is: a force for whatever is good for the American ruling class.

    3. Re:Role Models by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering she is the most successful woman of our generation, how can you say such a thing? I wouldn't be surprised if there is a Nobel Peace Prize in her future.

    4. Re:Role Models by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Young woman? More like at the threshold of middle age. Time really flies, doesn't it?

    5. Re:Role Models by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically the ultimate example of how the notion of male white privilege is false, all privilege is based on money and connections - true regardless of race or gender.

    6. Re:Role Models by Opportunist · · Score: 0

      Sorry, our notion of rich bitches is kinda twisted, we've had too much exposure to rich chicks with nothing between their ears. We kinda expect that now.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:Role Models by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Chelsea Clinton exists. Therefore millenia of sexism and male-dominated society is false!

      I rest my case, judge!

    8. Re:Role Models by Trepidity · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While we're at it, it's worth noting the other person mentioned in this headline, Mark Zuckerberg, is also part of the American ruling class, and acts accordingly.

      He was raised nearly from birth to fill that role, too, attending an elite private boarding school that's basically a finishing school for members of that class.

    9. Re:Role Models by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Young woman? More like at the threshold of middle age. Time really flies, doesn't it?

      I'm not old! I'm 37!

    10. Re:Role Models by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What cheap, easy cynicism.

    11. Re:Role Models by youngone · · Score: 1

      I was not aware of that, but I'm not surprised.

    12. Re:Role Models by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We weren't talking about Miley Cyrus.

    13. Re:Role Models by bouldin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Can we please choose a role model for children in CS who is not ethically challenged?

      Zuckerberg may have escaped arrest when he stole passwords to build his hot-or-not website (he should have been arrested), but he was clearly caught red handed.

      Combine that with all the dishonesty and contempt for individual privacy he has expressed, and I would feel like a parental failure if my kids turned out like him.

    14. Re:Role Models by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I suppose you *also* have degrees from Stanford, Oxford, and Columbia.... No? Didn't think so.

    15. Re:Role Models by umghhh · · Score: 1

      so we have truly unbiased and non-discriminatory society where built-in attributes like gender and race play no role. Fantastic news! Pity majority of us cannot even dream of socializing with this noble group of people....

    16. Re:Role Models by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that many of the major drives of the current administration were peppered into what she said doesn't make her seem like much more than another talking head. Albeit, a different head then all the other ones we are used to seeing. I mean, pushing school lunches? Give me a break. She can get some credibility when she seems to do something apart from just pushing the agenda of her family and their friends.

    17. Re:Role Models by afidel · · Score: 1

      American ruling class, the Clintons?!? Hillary came from a background where her dad was a small business owner whose parents were both the children of immigrant coal miners and Bill was the son of a salesman and stepson to an auto dealer. They both attended public high schools. These are people who succeeded through brains and hard work, not through birthright and who their parents knew.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    18. Re:Role Models by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, come on. I'm sure she'll send you a dollar. Would that make her a force for good?

    19. Re:Role Models by kick6 · · Score: 1

      You post is based on assumptions you hold about her, you really don't know the woman, or her true ideals. How about we have a wait and see approach before condemning the young lady, hmm...

      Neither do you, but you're more than willing to state that "she seems to be an intelligent young woman." What's so different about your assumptions?

    20. Re:Role Models by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      We have tons of equally dumb women here in Germany. They already rose into the highest ranks.

      You have nobody to blame but yourself, you elected her... it... whatever.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    21. Re:Role Models by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      American ruling class, the Clintons. Chelsea came from a background where her dad was the president of the USA and her Mother held various high ranking political and legal positions at elite firms. She attended elite private schools and has access to vast political and economic resources. This is a person who succeeded through some combination of brains and hard work as well as through birthright and who her parents knew.

    22. Re:Role Models by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

      You post is based on assumptions you hold about her, you really don't know the woman, or her true ideals. How about we have a wait and see approach before condemning the young lady, hmm...

      Neither do you, but you're more than willing to state that "she seems to be an intelligent young woman." What's so different about your assumptions?

      Well, in the limited video clips I've seen of her, she is well spoken, poised, and speaks intelligently. Just out of college, so she's no imbecile, though I don't know what her gpa is. Just what makes anyone posting here cutting her down such rocket scientists and so-o-o much better? Hopefully she'll have more empathy for people than some of the morons who post their vitriol on /. .

      She also comes from two intelligent parents who raised and schooled her well. I'll be interested in see where this young woman's life goes.

  3. Fuck Common Core. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That crap needs to die a horrible death QUICKLY.

  4. What's the point of getting CS in the classroom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When in the end Republican or Democrat they're just going to listen to Google, Facebook, Apple, MS, ETC and just flood the market with H1B's.

    1. Re:What's the point of getting CS in the classroom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smoke and mirrors.

    2. Re:What's the point of getting CS in the classroom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      need the PE to be able live in the prison as under the GOP that will be your primary care doctor

  5. How is she relevant by Gothmolly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    She's just a political Kardashian, why do people pay any attention to her?

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:How is she relevant by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because Americans love dynasties. Duh!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:How is she relevant by jcr · · Score: 1

      That's a very good way to put it. Her only claim to notoriety is that she's the offspring of a pair of depraved power-seekers.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    3. Re:How is she relevant by ClickOnThis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      She's just a political Kardashian, why do people pay any attention to her?

      Well, her dad was POTUS, and her mom just might be the same in the near future. That, and she's intelligent and well-spoken (PhD in International Studies.)

      I don't think the Kardashian sisters can match the above.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    4. Re:How is she relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, glad that's an American thing.

      It could probably cause problems if it ever happened elsewhere...

      Duh indeed.

    5. Re:How is she relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who are you to speak for "Americans"? That's just you trying to use others as cover for being a moron.

    6. Re:How is she relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because she is right. PE and healthy foods help to balance out the unhealthy sedentary lifestyle of a coder.

      And Zuckerburg sucks. I don't see how Facebook is worth 1/100th of what it is.

      But, as for how to teach CS, the whole system needs to be looked at. It works a lot better to focus only on one subject for 2 months instead of bouncing between classes first of all. Then you need to have interesting projects and challenges to solve. They need to be real world applicable. And then you need to have classes to teach the basics and some advanced techniques. And at the end, you go into how they can use computer software that they created in their other classes and in the real world.

    7. Re:How is she relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fail at reading comprehension.

      If he had written "a pair of gorgeous power-seekers" would you be asking "How is power-seeking gorgeous?"

      I think he's just being a trite shit. But you aren't helping by going off half-cocked.

    8. Re:How is she relevant by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Informative

      Because Americans love dynasties. Duh!

      It's weird. You go and found a country that forbids noble titles and state religions and you get the US. You head across the pond to the UK, and you've got a monarchy less influential than some congressional committee positions and a state religion that can't even get people out of bed and into church one day a week(and the remaining subscribers are greying out pretty dangerously).

      Not sure how that happened.

    9. Re:How is she relevant by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Informative

      He didn't say that 'power-seeking' was depraved, he said that two specific people were both depraved and power-seekers. Slight difference.

      Though, since you ask, exercising power over others is something of a necessary evil, so while I don't rule out the possibility of perfectly decent people who also hold positions of authority, I do tend to default to skepticism about the character of anybody who appears too fond of it (and if they treat it as theirs by right? Very. Bad. Sign.)

      Seeking to perfect power over the ever-troublesome natural world and self are, certainly, noble endeavors; but with power of the political flavor, the only honor is in exercising it as sparingly and judiciously as you can.

    10. Re:How is she relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Americans love dynasties. Duh!

      It's weird. You go and found a country that forbids noble titles and state religions and you get the US. You head across the pond to the UK, and you've got a monarchy less influential than some congressional committee positions and a state religion that can't even get people out of bed and into church one day a week(and the remaining subscribers are greying out pretty dangerously).

      Not sure how that happened.

      Lets not forget who the elites of the nation were pre - A.Jackson. Andrew Jackson was the first american president elected by the masses of pioneers heading westwards. Political dynasties took a seat back while the US was being formed (excuse me while the US was committing an act of genocide versus the indians). Once the pioneers reached the west coast and the unity of the nation was made things went downhill pretty fast. And things went back to how they were in the pre A. Jackson days. Ironic isn't it ?

    11. Re:How is she relevant by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the kardashians have earned more money than she has.

      Lots of stupid people are rich. It's mostly about finding someone even less intelligent to give them money (using marketing to sell products), or convincing someone above them professionally they are worth more than they are.

    12. Re:How is she relevant by Darinbob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, I think she said the right thing. Too many of the politcal Kardashians keep saying things like "we need more knowledge workers". In other words, they want more workers, not more people who are genuinely interested in computers or technology or even science. More workers means more economic strength, which is good for the country but not necessarily the best for the actual people involved if they would be happier elsewhere. We're already glutted with computer workers who have little aptitude for it all. It's best to focus on the basics first instead of worrying about the electives.

    13. Re:How is she relevant by jcr · · Score: 1

      with power of the political flavor, the only honor is in exercising it as sparingly and judiciously as you can. ...which is why I despise the Clintons.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    14. Re:How is she relevant by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Inconveniently, it would be hard to argue that we've made an improvement with any of our succeeding choices, especially if you like your exercises of power to be sparing and judicious.

    15. Re:How is she relevant by JWW · · Score: 1

      The only problem I have with what she said is that it basically boiled down to, "we need to improve Computer Science education by educating kids in a whole bunch of other basically un-related things."

    16. Re:How is she relevant by Beck_Neard · · Score: 1

      ...and other times it's simply just having a nice ass and having the good fortune of being thrust into the spotlight.

      --
      A fool and his hard drive are soon parted.
    17. Re:How is she relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unless you also despise the bushes you have absolutely no credibility

    18. Re:How is she relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have the kind of intelligence that knows when to make a sex tape, what celebrities to date/marry to help keep their names in the press, and how to parcel out their inane activities to keep people watching their reality shows without having to overdo it on big life events -- e.g., marrying and divorcing too often will start to make the public/audience wane. In other words, they have tremendous intelligence in an assortment of media manipulation. Past that, all indications are that they're talentless idiots.

    19. Re:How is she relevant by jcr · · Score: 1

      The Clintons are the subject at hand. Why would you assume that they're the only depraved power-grubbing autocrats I would despise?

      Try to break out of your team mentality.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    20. Re:How is she relevant by jcr · · Score: 1

      I shudder to think what they would have gotten away with if 9/11 had happened on their watch.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    21. Re:How is she relevant by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Reverse psychology. You don't HAVE to, so you WANT to.

      We should maybe outlaw elections and/or caring for political decisions.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    22. Re:How is she relevant by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Being famous in the US is a bit like surviving being hunted by a lion. You needn't be the fastest of the pack to be successful.

      You just need to be better than someone else who will pay for you.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    23. Re:How is she relevant by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I don't really believe in "good fortune". Usually (actually, nearly all of the time) it's someone who knows how to milk idiots notices that there's money to be made with you and rips you off to use you for it.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    24. Re:How is she relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a load of poppycock.

    25. Re:How is she relevant by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      or in kim's case.. having something thrust.. oh nevermind. using a 'leaked' sex tape as a vehicle to stardom is just pathetic.

    26. Re:How is she relevant by Beck_Neard · · Score: 1

      It's usually their employers and myriad agents and publicists who realize that, actually.

      --
      A fool and his hard drive are soon parted.
    27. Re:How is she relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I shudder to think what they would have gotten away with if 9/11 had happened on their watch.

      -jcr

      Maybe the reason it didn't was that Bill was trying to bomb the Taliban training facilities in Afghanistan instead of coming up with excuses to invade Iraq.

      But they made him stop. Said it was just a "Wag the Dog" to get people's attention off the vital issue of Monica's dress.

    28. Re:How is she relevant by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Irc, the criticism was more about the training camps being deserted and one target being an aspirin factory in which the government of sudan demanded an appology for. Only one person was confirmed killed- a canadian- and estimates think up to six people died in the bombings.

      Sure, some people latched onto the tail that wagged the dog due to the closeness of these operations and Clinton's woes in the paula jones case bur the majority of criticism i can remember was about the innefectivness of them. It should also be noted that the movie about the same subject just came out so it was popular to compare scenarios to it.

      But as for 9/11, it can be said that if the strikes weren't so impotent, 9/11 wouldn't have happened either. The blame game is an easy one to play here.

    29. Re:How is she relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure the kardashians have earned more money than she has.

      Lots of stupid people are rich. It's mostly about finding someone even less intelligent to give them money (using marketing to sell products), or convincing someone above them professionally they are worth more than they are.

      Dunno about stupid but there are plenty of examples of the second half of that statement. Some of my favourite scammers of all time must be the clergy. They have managed to get a obscenely wealthy borderline fascist over class with distinctly racist tendencies to worship a Jewish carpenter who preached socialism and and women's rights and on top of that the clergy has persuaded these people to give them money. That being said at least some of the clergy does get some points for spending at least a portion of that money on socially beneficial things like hospitals, orphanages. soup kitchens and so on but you have to admire their moxy, selling socialism to Republicans and White supremacists by dressing it up as religion.

    30. Re:How is she relevant by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The only problem I have with what she said is that it basically boiled down to, "we need to improve Computer Science education by educating kids in a whole bunch of other basically un-related things."

      Computer science education is pretty fucking far down on the list of worries, and there's a long way to go in our education system before it's worth including significantly to begin with. Basic education of the sort required to comprehend computer science like mathematics and god forbid logic are not in a state to prepare students for CS.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    31. Re:How is she relevant by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

      PhD in "International Studies" doesn't mean "intelligent and well-spoken". A PhD means that your professor knows that your dad is Bill Clinton.
      I feel for her - if she succeeds nobody will buy it, because of all the political shenanigans her family has been involved in. Look at all the useless Kennedys.

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    32. Re:How is she relevant by Libertarian_Geek · · Score: 2

      I have an idea... let's just make her Ambassador to Lybia and station her in Benghazi for a few years. If she does OK there, we'll see what difference it makes and if it improves her public image.

      --

      www.facebook.com/DareDefendOurRights

      www.fairtax.org
    33. Re:How is she relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      9/11 happened because you Americans (don't tell me it is just CIA) cultivate Islamic Terror in the form of the Saudi-Arabian state. It was quite convenient to inflame the Muslims agains the Russkies and you never dismantled the Saudi Wahabist Terror system.
      Rather, you used it to destabilize the Yougos and the Russians and now Syria. Then you hit Saddam instead of smoking out Mecca.

      All you got you deserved.

    34. Re:How is she relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The meaningless blurbs of the story at hand suggests she is rather dumb. She reiterates Feminist Claptrap. And her "studies", well, these consist of writing some nicely worded papers. I can to that too, but I can also build software and circuits which actually do something useful.

    35. Re:How is she relevant by operagost · · Score: 1

      What difference would that make?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    36. Re:How is she relevant by stdarg · · Score: 1

      Saying they need to learn math and logic to prepare for CS is not an argument AGAINST it. Sometimes if you give kids a goal, they are more motivated to learn the prerequisites. Who knows if it would work, but it seems reasonable.

    37. Re:How is she relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I shudder to think what they would have gotten away with if 9/11 had happened on their watch.

      Really? Just what are you so worried about? Seems to me what we got was about as bad as it could get no matter who was in office.

    38. Re:How is she relevant by dave420 · · Score: 1

      In several thousand years, maybe. Get a grip.

    39. Re:How is she relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point. I'm torn about that - I'm against state religions, but the high level of religiosity (not to mention personal armament) makes me nervous. I'm less worried about state abuse than I am about posses hearing voices and carrying weapons.
      Maybe we need a state religion. In Europe that has often resulted in a population relatively disenchanted with and disinterested in religious observance. I'd like to see more of that here.

    40. Re:How is she relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's weird. You go and found a country that forbids noble titles and state religions and you get the US.

      As a country, in terms of age, we're still pissing and shitting ourselves.

      Our current insanity is much like kids and movies with ratings they're forbidden from seeing. We're not allowed to see it because of our age? Doesn't matter how terrible the movie is. We're sneaking in. It's going to be sooo cooool zomg.

    41. Re:How is she relevant by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      While i don't nessecarily disagree with your premise for the root cause, i do disagree with deserving it.

      No civilians took part in that. Innocent civilians were deliberately targeted in retribution. The citizens or people as they weren't all Americans, had no say in the policy leading up to 9/11 with a portion of the victims not even born when it took place.

      I don't see any legitimate reason to specifically target civilians. If there had been a military value, i might be pursuaded. But there wasn't and those behind 9/11 where cowards who didn't think we would come after them

    42. Re:How is she relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is all part of a Chelsea Clinton fanfic that Libertarian_Geek is writing!

    43. Re:How is she relevant by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      I don't see how Facebook is worth 1/100th of what it is.

      Then you probably do not understand the value Facebook can offer to its customers (advertisers, not you or me) by virtue of its unique understanding of people's social relationships, networks, knowledge, skills, and likes. Only Google can come close.

  6. Shove your "undeniably" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    'What do you see as some of the right policies that could help put Computer Science — which is undeniably the most important 21st Century skill — into our classrooms?'

    "Undeniably", technology buffoon? Scavenging for food and repairing shelters and small machines are much more likely to be the most needed skill in the not too distant future.

    1. Re:Shove your "undeniably" by almitydave · · Score: 1

      I deny that Computer Science is "the most important 21st Century skill" on the basis that it's not a skill, it's a field of study. The most important skill of the 21st Century is the same one as all the previous centuries: the ability to use your well-formed intellect to make rational decisions. This is what education is for. Learning a trade is generally necessary to earn a living, and maybe college is a good place to do this, but your options and potential will be more limited if you're not educated.

      I studied Math and Computer Science in college (my degree is math). Ultimately, the mathematics courses were a better formation for the type of thinking I needed in my career as a software developer (not a dig on the quality of the CS courses I took - they were quite good).

      --
      my, your, his/her/its, our, your, their
      I'm, you're, he's/she's/it's, we're, you're, they're
  7. collgle does not need PE class at full price by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    maybe in K-12 but at collgle if they want to to take PE it better be free not at the a price that is way over the cost of a 2 year plan at a good GYM just for the price of one class before fees..

    1. Re:collgle does not need PE class at full price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      maybe in K-12 but at collgle if they want to to take PE it better be free not at the a price that is way over the cost of a 2 year plan at a good GYM just for the price of one class before fees..

      Plugged this into Google translate without success. Can anyone help?

    2. Re:collgle does not need PE class at full price by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      While many colleges offer (arguably unecessarily) cushy gym facilities, they also tend to price anything they can describe as a PE 'class' more or less the same as anything else with credit-hours attached, though obviously only some majors accept many or any such credit hours for anything being fulfilling distribution requirements, at schools where those exist.

      Now, I'm actually not sure if gym/coach staff are lower-paid than adjunct professors anymore; but you can pay some pretty silly prices on campus if you want some fairly minimal coaching or oversight, rather than just making things up in the gym; but that gets classed as a class. The base charges for whatever facilities are there, though, tend to either be low or Mandatory, so if self-directed is your thing, it's less of an issue.

    3. Re:collgle does not need PE class at full price by youngone · · Score: 1

      it's written in College Student I think. Hard to translate, even for native Speakers.

    4. Re:collgle does not need PE class at full price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work at a college.

      Annual fee for the gym is almost nothing and gives you access to all facilities (weight room, gym, squash courts, pool (previously), etc) and athletic trainers (basically just a med station, but certainly worth more than the price you'd pay outside of the athletics facility). Then again, I don't know if my school offers PE classes at all.

    5. Re:collgle does not need PE class at full price by sandytaru · · Score: 1

      My school did. All "PE" type classes were 1 credit hour. One such class was required to fulfill graduation requirements. I picked Golf I. I learned how to properly hold a club and how to putt. It was pretty nice, actually - I took it during a short session, when I had a writing class in the morning. So I'd write in the morning and then go play golf all afternoon.

      Then there were the actual kinesiology labs, which had some of the effects of PE classes but were much more difficult. You would take it as a 1-hour lab alongside your 3-hour kinesiology lecture, and then use your own body for the experiments in the lab. I heard it was rough and junior year kinesiology could feel like basic training if you took multiple classes.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
  8. fondly remembering bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    she was 7 in '87, she would of been playing with dolls and kindergarten

    1. Re:fondly remembering bullshit by westlake · · Score: 1

      she was 7 in '87, she would of been playing with dolls and kindergarten

      You do know Chelsea holds two masters degrees and a newly minted doctorate from Oxford?

      She attended Forest Park Elementary School, Booker Arts and Science Magnet Elementary School and Horace Mann Junior High School, which are public schools in Little Rock. She skipped the third grade.

      At age four, Clinton had begun taking dance classes in Arkansas, and she continued her dance training at the Washington School of Ballet for several years.

      Chelsea Clinton

    2. Re:fondly remembering bullshit by Adriax · · Score: 1

      Same age as her and that was the year we got an apple IIe from a fire sale (literal, some kids tried to end school forever), cleaned it up, and upgraded from the C-64.

      I'd have to agree with that 95% part. Given the opportunity any kids can learn the basics of a command line interface once they start to learn to read, and earlier with a GUI. My 6 year old loves playing on computers.
      Heck my 18 month has figured out how to unlock my phone and loves seeing the screen change when she pushes buttons. That's a fascination that will bloom into true geekdom as she grows.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    3. Re:fondly remembering bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know Chelsea holds two masters degrees and a newly minted doctorate from Oxford?

      Are there still people dumb enough to be impressed by pieces of paper?

      Tell you what: When she does something as impressive as, for instance, solving a previously unsolved problem that increases our understanding of the universe (like a millennium prize problem), then there would be a reason to be impressed. Until that time, she's just good at school. And yes, that logic applies to everyone, not just her. Oh, and public schools aren't even notable; they're trash.

      She's just a scumbag like her politician parents, and like a grand majority of politicians, regardless of party. She's part of the ruling class that only seeks to increase the power of the ruling class.

    4. Re:fondly remembering bullshit by _merlin · · Score: 1

      I got a second-hand Mac Plus when I was that age, and I'd already tried to learn BASIC on a friend's Apple II.

    5. Re:fondly remembering bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heck my 18 month has figured out how to unlock my phone and loves seeing the screen change when she pushes buttons. That's a fascination that will bloom into true geekdom as she grows.

      Or an addiction to slot-machines.

    6. Re:fondly remembering bullshit by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      My first computer class was at a county 'adult education' campus. It was in 1978 or '79, and I was 7 or 8 years old. My next one was in the fourth grade with Apple ][e computers.

      And that was out in farm area. I'm sure people with more metropolitan lineage had access to more than that at that age.

      And by 1987, many people had Commodore or Tandy computers, even Atari made one.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    7. Re: fondly remembering bullshit by MarkVVV · · Score: 1

      Are you dumb or what? I was five ('89) when my dad gave me my first computer (MSX, a very popular z80 based platform here in Brazil, and also on Europe and Japan). I still remember how to use it, and that's what got me started...so yeah, people van remember stuff from a young age.

    8. Re:fondly remembering bullshit by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      whoa, skipped third grade? awesome.

    9. Re:fondly remembering bullshit by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      After reading this comment, I'm sure I will be just as unimpressed with any pieces of paper that verify your intelligence.

  9. Re:Good grief. That's all.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oOOOOoooo! Chelsea Clinton! Sexy!

    Tacky and lame when Rush did it 20 years ago. Now just desperate and pathetic..

  10. fondly remembering bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I played with a Commodore too when I was that age. I'm sure 95% of us here played with computers at that age. And today my 5 year old plays with a computer way more powerful than a Commodore 64.

  11. Re:Good grief. That's all.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oOOOOoooo! Chelsea Clinton! Sexy!

    It looks like she put on some weight.

  12. How many code monkies do we really need? by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

    Here's a hint: The most important 21st century skill is going to be heathcare. You're not going to have your job outsourced to India or worry about the company you work for going under because no one notices their crappy mobile application amongst the thousands of others in the market. The IT industry is brutal.

    Sure, provide opportunities for kids who have the aptitude, drive and desire to go into IT, but don't cram it down the throats of those who have no interest in it. There's already enough people trained in IT that open source projects have no problem being maintained by people who are willing to work for free. It's a bit irresponsible to steer kids toward a field that is already over saturated with workers.

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    1. Re:How many code monkies do we really need? by biodata · · Score: 1

      Healthcare will be redundant fairly shortly. The main problem facing humanity is too many people and not enough food and water, not too many sick people. The most important 21st century skill is going to be agriculture, and the production of more food from less resources.

      --
      Korma: Good
    2. Re:How many code monkies do we really need? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      The number of people will stabilise when poor areas get their healthcare and education (as we have seen in recently-developed areas). There is already enough food production, the problem being that lots of it is simply wasted, and is not in areas where it needs to be. Fresh water is also not a problem, but getting it to the people who need it is, but that is getting better every day. Making more food from less resources is a great idea - I honestly support it - but at the moment it seems reducing the amount of food humanity currently wastes is a great place to start.

  13. uhh... by buddyglass · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...which is undeniably the most important 21st Century skill...

    Computer science is not a skill. Even if it were, however, I'd regard its status as undeniably the most important 21st Century skill to in fact be fairly deniable.

    1. Re:uhh... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I'm putting 'the ability to read' as a strong candidate for most important 21st century skill. Anyone have another more important skill?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:uhh... by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Interesting

      OK, after watching the movie, it was the interviewer who claimed that CS is the most important 21st century skill. Chelsea looked at the interviewer as though it was the stupidest thing she had ever heard, and then said, "uh.....it is very important, but there are other things that are also very important."

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:uhh... by buddyglass · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I didn't mean to suggest Clinton said the bit I quoted.

    4. Re:uhh... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Yeap, I didn't mean to imply that you suggested it lol

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say the ability to speak and understand the local language as probably more important.

  14. Re:CS is not IT by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

    As best I can tell, the closest things to 'IT unions' are employer cartels (like the one that settled as fast as possible relatively recently, lest the discovery get really interesting). Despite any empirical evidence to the contrary, the employees have substantially bought the line that they are just too special and above average to be dragged down by obstructionist union thugs who worship only seniority.

  15. She's incredibly wealthy by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    or will be. She's a member of the American Ruling Class. The working class is hoping she's turn on her own and help us out....

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  16. I Don't see CS as being that important by rsilvergun · · Score: 1, Insightful

    if you ignore the Math then "Computer Science" is writing if-elses and for loops. As near as I can tell this is just a bunch of rich people tired of paying programmers 6 figures. Points to Ms Clinton for asking that money be put to fundamental development and the general betterment. The cynic in me wonders if she means it (who watch half his career go overseas and the other half eroded by cheap 'n easy work visas) hopes she means it...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I Don't see CS as being that important by cluening · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Computer science _is_ the math. If you ignore the math, you're ignoring the entire field.

      --
      Posted from the wireless couch.
    2. Re:I Don't see CS as being that important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Computer science _is_ the math. If you ignore the math, you're ignoring the entire field.

      Watch it. That's like saying that Christianity, or even Islam_is_ the Judaism.
      Sadly it seems the math-centric CS supporters never got the memo. There's a place where one stops and the other takes over. Everyone outside of CS sees CS as Tech and not math, including HR

  17. General Betterment by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Points to Ms Clinton for asking that money be put to fundamental development and the general betterment.

    How sad that more people do not realize computers have brought "General Betterment" to more people than most inventions in history.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:General Betterment by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 2

      Points to Ms Clinton for asking that money be put to fundamental development and the general betterment.

      How sad that more people do not realize computers have brought "General Betterment" to more people than most inventions in history.

      Sanitation? Fresh water? Roads? Irrigation? Medicine? Education?

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    2. Re:General Betterment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but besides that, what have the Romans ever done for us?

    3. Re:General Betterment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Failure to read much? The statement did not mention the 21st century, but it did mention "most inventions in history". That allows the inclusion of all of Rob the Bold's inventions.

    4. Re:General Betterment by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Is computer science an invention of the 21st century? No doubt the most important invention of the 21st century is the cloud. Followed closely behind by Web 2.0.

      Actually it's hard to think of an important invention of the 21st century, but there's some interesting potential with some discoveries in biotech.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:General Betterment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is computer science an invention of the 21st century? No doubt the most important invention of the 21st century is the cloud. Followed closely behind by Web 2.0.

      Bzzt! Wrong. The "cloud" is just a marketing term for "someone else's server." That's not an invention. In fact, that was the norm 50 years ago. Why is it that so many people have exactly zero historical perspective?

      Posting Anon to save my mods on this thread.

    6. Re:General Betterment by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Bzzt! Wrong. The "cloud" is just a marketing term for "someone else's server." That's not an invention. In fact, that was the norm 50 years ago. Why is it that so many people have exactly zero historical perspective?

      Please tell me, how do you feel about Web 2.0? Or do you think you might have missed some sarcasm?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    7. Re:General Betterment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoooooshhhhh

    8. Re:General Betterment by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      How sad that more people do not realize computers have brought "General Betterment" to more people than most inventions in history.

      Sanitation? Fresh water? Roads? Irrigation? Medicine? Education?

      All of which are implemented today through the auspices of computing. Our current financial boon would also not be possible without computing. Now if only we spent it on betterment instead of private yachts or worse, not spending it at all.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:General Betterment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rounded corners! Gradient backgrounds! Every site looks the same! Woooooooooooooooooo 2.0!

    10. Re:General Betterment by umghhh · · Score: 1

      I missed sarcasm and web2.0 too - stopped reading at the word starting wioth c and ending with loud. Not sure why.... Must be late hour or so because GGP post was actually worth reading in whole.

  18. Re:Good grief. That's all.... by antdude · · Score: 1

    Because she's pregnant. :P

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  19. Excessive focus on women by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    I respect Chelsea Clinton a lot, among other accomplishments she was an excellent model of self control, poise and intelligence when she helped her mother campaign for president.

    That said it's clear that women far out number men in college especially in graduate school. At some colleges the ratio of women to men is so high that it's a problem for the school. Decades of focus on female opportunity and empowerment at the cost of ignoring young males is now becoming a crisis (crime, unemployment, lack of suitable fathers...). I'm all for women's opportunity and empowerment but there needs to be some balance, far more than there currently is. I wished the plight of young males had been mentioned.

    Just my $0.02

  20. She's great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But Common Core is shit, and it's robbing children, notably poor minority children, of their education.

    What works? Letting teachers teach and putting the administrators on a tight leash.
    What doesn't work? Micromanaging all teachers, telling them how to do their job, and letting administrators run the show.

    Let's stick with what works. We don't need iPads in every classroom, we don't need to teach every kid C++, and we don't need bizarre curriculum revamps or biased and unproven testing methods like Smarter Balance.

    1. Re:She's great! by sandytaru · · Score: 1

      NPR did a story this morning on common core in a poor school. The kids, a bunch of 5th grades, apparently LOVE it. And once the methods they were used were explained to me, I went "duh." Common Core's methods, when applied properly, are teaching these kids how to do math in their heads instead of crippling them by always needing a pencil and paper.

      The example problem was 8x14 - you can write it out formally and get the answer in about a minute, or you can break it down as 8x10 (80) + 8x4 (32) and get the answer in about twenty seconds - in your head.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
  21. Back at you. by westlake · · Score: 0, Troll

    Why do we care what she thinks?

    Why should we care what an anonymous coward thinks?

    Chelsea received an undergraduate degree at Stanford University and later earned master's degrees from Oxford University and Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health and a DPhil in International Relations from the University of Oxford in May 2014.

    Chelsea Clinton

    These are not trivial achievements.

    Nor perhaps the pursuits one might expect from a financially secure young woman married, pregnant and living in a $10.5 million dollar condo in Manhattan.

    The Clinton family is widely respected and feared politically. It is easy to visualize her mother winning the Democratic nomination, perhaps even taking the White House herself.

    1. Re:Back at you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      I'm sorry, a master's degree in what? History? Who gives a shit.

    2. Re:Back at you. by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      No, history was her bachelor.
      Her masters degree was in international relations.
      Her second masters degree in public health.

      Obviously the main reason she's asked for these kind of things is because of her parents, but she's no dummy herself.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    3. Re:Back at you. by DerekLyons · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But interestingly enough... no matter how much smoke you blow, you failed to answer the question.

    4. Re:Back at you. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Meh. History is international relations that happened back then, whereas international relations is history that's happening right now.
      --
      Henry Ford, I think. Or maybe Gerald.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:Back at you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ideas should live and die based on their own merit, not the person you who said them.

    6. Re:Back at you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was the original question important tho?

    7. Re:Back at you. by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 2

      History is extremely relevant. If you don't chronicle your past, and learn from it, you're doomed to repeat it. You can learn a lot from how people used to do things.

    8. Re:Back at you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But interestingly enough... no matter how much smoke you blow, you failed to answer the question.

      No, he answered it very clearly. Your reading comprehension is the problem.

  22. Re:What? Where are the cries of racism? by phantomfive · · Score: 0

    That Zuckerberg is a self-made man who earned every penny? That he really did hit a home run instead of being born on third?

    Do you really consider Zuckerberg a self-made man who earned every penny? Do you realize he stole someone else's idea and cheated all the way? Also, he went to a prep school, which isn't exactly working your way up.......

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  23. "Undeniably" by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

    Most people who need to use computers don't need to know how they work inside or how to program them. There is no "undeniable" need to boost CS anymore than there is a need to teach the masses about the details of running a farm.

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
  24. Commodore 64 by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    Here's a link to where she talks about the Commodore 64, check at 1:45. She also mentioned that she liked Carmen Sandiego.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:Commodore 64 by twistedcubic · · Score: 1

      I would expect her to have gotten a Commodore 128 in 1987. Did she say she got a 64? I didn't hear it in the video.

    2. Re:Commodore 64 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There were 2-3 times as many C-64s as C-128s sold. There was very little C-128 specific software; mostly it ran C-64 and CP/M software.

    3. Re:Commodore 64 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She essentially says nothing about the computer, or, god forbid, developing a simple program on that computer. I would have been amazed if she talked about how she automated her homework with some BASIC programs or the like.

      All she talks is the lefty idealist "women are soooo disadvantaged" crap. Why does she not transform himself into a guy and actually DEVELOP technology ? I can tell you - she is a pampered kid of rich people and never did any hard technology work. Because it is a lot of effort with little gain as compared to inheriting power and wealth.

      It almost hurts to listen to her entirely predictable useless politico blurbs.

  25. All are bettered by computers by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Computers mean efficient communications and stored knowledge. ALL of the things you mention have been made better through information stored and shared via computers.

    Computer Science is thing thing that amplifies everything else, making it more accessible to everyone and not just first world countries.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  26. Yeah whatever, more charlatans by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    Zuckerberg built a mediocre site that was in the right place at the right time to make a quick buck off of it, and the modern iteration is not maintained by him. The only reason we're hearing from him is because of how much money he makes. The only reason we hear from chelsea clinton at all is because she's a clinton, and she's just repeating her mother's party line, nothing new.

    Neither are 'computer scientists' nor are they informed enough to speak for education or technology in general. One speaks from arrogance and self interest and the other from ideological assumptions. At best, zuckerberg is the better of the two, but only because he's actually written a few lines of code.

    1. Re:Yeah whatever, more charlatans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but only because he's actually written a few lines of code.

      Are you sure about that?

    2. Re:Yeah whatever, more charlatans by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      No, I'm not.

  27. Interesting that state surpluses were mentioned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't just say "spend the surplus on [insert worthy program]".

    States can't print money, so they have to save money during the good years so they don't have to raise taxes or layoff people in the midst of the next economic downturn. If the surplus is more than enough to cover the next recession based on historic averages, if the state's tax rate is inline with other states, if basic services are up to par, sure than we can talk.

    1. Re:Interesting that state surpluses were mentioned by hubie · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure whether most states are allowed to sit on money to be used at some unknown point in the future (a "rainy day fund").

    2. Re:Interesting that state surpluses were mentioned by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Actually, nearly all can. However, when you have a 5 year slump and you go through one of hardest recessions/depression, you burn it all up in the first year or two.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  28. Celebrity journalism at it's finest. by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

    So why is Chelsea Clinton's opinion any more important than the flavor-of-the-month reality TV star(let)?

    1. Re:Celebrity journalism at it's finest. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because compared to her mother, chelsea has a much, much better chance at being the first female president. that's why.

    2. Re:Celebrity journalism at it's finest. by hsmith · · Score: 1

      Why? She has done absolutely nothing of note in her entire life besides going to school.

  29. Re:Good grief. That's all.... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Dude, she ain't pregnant with an elephant...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  30. She has not learned to hide her indoctrination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a bunch of left wing drivel. "Continuing to tell stories of people that are not...who don't look like Mark Zuckerberg"? You know what this is not even code for right? I'll join the Zuckerberg hate club, but the reality is he has billions of dollars and made something that people pay for (as misguided as that may be). Chelsea does not like that he's a white man. Just like Bill Gates and Steve Jobs (who was ethnically Syrian, but he looks mostly white, so who cares). So, reality be damned, we need to show more transgendered, red headed, female, black, hispanic, native american, Eskimo billionaire leaders in computer science.

    And what the heck does "aligning computer science with common core" mean? Big difference between that and "aligning common core to computer science". The order is everything. The common core kooks want subjects to align to the curriculum, because the curriculum is what is really important, not the subject. Curriculum should be aligned to the subject and the knowledge.

    1. Re:She has not learned to hide her indoctrination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow. You neo-con/tea* nut jobs are out in force tonight.
      And Jobs was 1/2 Syrian, and 1/2 swiss, which is why he looks white, all of which had NOTHING to do with the rest of your wrong rant.

  31. Re:Good grief. That's all.... by antdude · · Score: 1

    Are you sure? She might have mated with one. :P

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  32. Re:What? Where are the cries of racism? by Opportunist · · Score: 0

    Should Sugarhill ever do anything worth praising, don't worry, I will. So far he's basically the equivalent of an industrial that took over a Jewish company in the Third Reich, producing war materials and pretending to be a shrewd businessman.

    And before you mod me down, think about it for a moment. He stole the idea of someone else and broke a deal with the surveillance state and its corporate outlets. Tell me how the comparison is not apt.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  33. Re:Good grief. That's all.... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Gee, thanks for that mental picture. I'll name my next nightmare after you.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  34. Re:Good grief. That's all.... by antdude · · Score: 1

    Haha, no problems. ;)

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  35. GADS by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Skip the focus on fucking Comp. Sci.
    America has, overall, great schools in the k-6 realm. I have seen kids come from Germany, Austria, China, Sweden, Britain, Thailand, Japan, etc, and over and over, most of the K-6 are BEHIND American student. It appears that around 6-8, we are similar. It is in high school where we appear to fall behind, but not really. In all of the other nations, they spit the kids out in our high school arena. Most of them will not go to college so start working on learning simple skills such as shop, construction, home-ec, cooking, etc. America USED to be like that. We need to return to that. In those levels, teach things like how to use a 3D printer. Likewise, how to use other tools. etc.

    But, Comp Sci at grade school is a waste. Far better to get kids through algebra by say 8-9th grade.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:GADS by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      interesting this is your experience. My experience is the exact opposite (and was educated in a public school in the US, in central Florida so not a well monied district). My experience was that language barriers existed for those who came here randomly at young ages and they struggled at US history because they spent their time learning the history of their own country, but in mathematics, Americans were regularly 1-3 grade levels behind those educated abroad. The worst gap was against Indians at young ages, but in general it was just gaping by late middle school and then high school.

      The gap got a lot wider at the high school level though, where most americans don't ever touch things like calculus and it seems like everyone in those countries does by 11th grade.

    2. Re:GADS by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Math is a sore point for America these days.
      I had calculus in 9th grade, but that was in the 70s. Now, I have seen poorer school districts cut out most math beyond 6th grade to focus on teaching the illegals english. BUT, in the average k-6, we are well above other nations. Even our testing shows that, since we test EVERYBODY starting in 3rd, while most other nations only test at around 10-12th grade. Heck, China and India test less than 10% of their kids and all of those are their top students. And the kids that come here from those other nations are the BEST OF THE BEST that they have to offer. So, do not feel so bad.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    3. Re: GADS by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      I actually went and dug and could find only one comparison internationally for 4th graders, and we don't look that bad till you see that Japan, Korea, Singapore, and a whole host of other countries don't participate in those studies. On the other hand by 8th grade we are comfortably behind, so much so that only 7% of our students score at the highest level! while in the best countries that number is around 47%.

      This was the study: http://nces.ed.gov/TIMSS/

      Are there others? I couldn't find any.

  36. A time for Plato by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Computer science _is_ the math. If you ignore the math, you're ignoring the entire field.

    ...and math is logic and logic is a branch of philosophy, therefore all programs have been written by philosophers. Who would have thought that we are living in Plato's republic after all?

  37. Most important? by jandersen · · Score: 1

    ... Computer Science â" which is undeniably the most important 21st Century skill...

    I sort of stumbled over this one - it stands out as blatant nonsense, IMO, at least when picked out of its context. There is no doubt that information processing is important, but all the important, fundamental research has been done, really, and we are just polishing up and filling gaps now. I would say that most of what computer science has brought us, now belongs to the basic skill set along with things like literacy, numeracy and the ability to eat and drink through the right orifices. All very important, but there are unsolved problems that are far more important now, in my view. I'll just mention three, that I can think of:

    - Us and the environment: not just climate change and the sadness of losing cute animal species. Once, only about 30 or 40 years ago, it was generally believed that we could survive even if we wiped out all other species than humans and the few we directly exploit; we now know that everything is intimately connected, and that even what might seem like a minor extinction may have the potential to topple the whole load. In my estimation, understanding this well enough should be a top priority - our survival as an advanced civilisation might depend on it. On the plus side, it isn't actually all that difficult to sort out.

    - Theoretical physics: We are now standing in a similar place as about 100 years ago, when everybody was trying to get to grips with the strange observations that lead to General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. We know that our current understanding is incomplete, because we can't explain all our observations, but haven't yet had that moment of brilliant insight that makes everything obvious (for a certain value of "obvious" - GR and QM aren't all that simple). We are probably on the verge of it - and who knows what may be waiting just around the corner? FTL travel? Unlimited, clean energy?

    - Biology: We are gaining huge, new insights almost every day into aspects of life and medicine, that I could hardly dream of when I was young. We almost know what life itself is. We are close to beating cancer. We may be able to overcome death itself. We have technology that can see what goes on inside the brain as we think. We are beginning to understand mental illness. The potential benefits are obvious.

    There are also obvious dangers in knowing so much - but we have taken the step already, simply by taking an interest and asking the questions. Knowledge is power, and we are always going to have to learn how to use our powers responsibly. That, perhaps, is always going to be the most important challenge.

  38. Because her "Uncle" Al invented the internet.... by Grey+Geezer · · Score: 1

    Maybe? I don't know why else she may have been invited to speak there. Except that someone thinks she may run for elected office someday?

    --
    The USA is only 4X older than me...perspective
  39. What PE is this... Physical Education? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The trouble with acronyms is that they don't mean the same for everybody. There are so much of them, there'll always be people mislead into a different meaning. It is not explained, not by the headline, nor by the introduction, what this PE means.-Ignacio Agulló

  40. zzzz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only occasional /. visitor any more. I don't know how you people manage to engage with useless news like this, containing and so much appeal to the state to do the right thing. Snore.

    You can tell it's an ageing crowd.

  41. If you are CS today looking at a job that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pays 50 an hour. by the time you finish school the very same job will be 10.00.

    This is why the same amount of students go there as did when dos 1.1 was out.

  42. She got her letters wrong by wezelboy · · Score: 1

    It should be more RMS, less Zuckerberg.

    Fixed that for ya Chelsea.

  43. forced beta? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is beta forced on this particular article?

  44. Re:What? Where are the cries of racism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to the REAL WORLD. Almost all super-rich capitalists "cheated" their way to massive riches. See Bill Gates, Larray Ellison, the Standard Oil guy, the Rockefellers and many others.

  45. Not. Rocket. Science. by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why do we care what she thinks?

    Because she is a visible public-speaking figure with the power to lobby for or against things. For better or worse what matters in this world is not what you know but your power to influence policy making. This is not to say knowing and ability to influence are mutually exclusive, nor I'm saying whether Chelsea Clinton is qualified to say what is needed or not in STEM education.

    I'm simply saying that if *you* (the generic you) do not care what a public speaker with the potential power of influence (directly or by political/family ties) says simply because some perceived or real lack of technical acumen, *you* are an idiot.

    It is like saying "why should we care what a Creationist politician thinks?" and then wondering why state legislation bodies keep passing idiotic laws regarding STEM education in public schools.

    Stupid, right?

    Against, this is not say whether Chelsea Clinton is onto something or is completely unqualified to speak about the subject, but more about an indictment in ./'s collective technotard arrogance and cluelessness on how the world operates. That your post actually gets modded as insightful is a pathetic example of that sad state of affairs among people who consider themselves techno-illuminated.

  46. Was this a Racist Clinton Statement? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    What did Chelsea mean by "not look like Mark Zuckerberg"?

    Was this a racist statement because he is white, he shouldn't be looked at as a 'face' of computer science success?

    Of course my statement here is a bit tongue in cheek, but if this had been said about a dark skinned person, I'd lay money on it, that THAT would be called out as a racist statement.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    1. Re:Was this a Racist Clinton Statement? by x_t0ken_407 · · Score: 1

      It's stupid to fight stupid with stupid.

      -black guy who's tired of "racism" being thrown around haphazardly

    2. Re:Was this a Racist Clinton Statement? by Optali · · Score: 1

      why, if I may ask? It makes no fucking sense at all. And in fact what she was saying is not to tale ZB as example but any other of the guys who code but aren't rock stars, and if you haven't noticed yet this means a fuckload of Indians of several skin tones and shitload of Asians... and yes, some Europeans too (I mean inhabitants of Europe not 'white USians').

      --
      -- 29A the number of the Beast
  47. Re:CS is not IT by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

    and IT needs unions to stop the h1b

    OH goodness NO!!

    Please, no unions. What we need is for congress to manage, and regulate PROPERLY, immigration into the US. Enforce out borders, and effectively regulate who comes and goes.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  48. Undeniably not by gizmo2199 · · Score: 1

    "the right policies that could help put Computer Science — which is undeniably the most important 21st Century skill..."

    Isn't this a bit like saying: in the 1950's undeniably the most important skill was operating and repairing TVs and video transmission equipment.

    Just because a technology's new, doesn't make it the most important. If anything skills making pharmaceuticals and treatments for human diseases is a much more important skill, let alone robotics and engineering.

    There's only so much you can do with a compiler, OS, or a database after all.

    --
    This Sig does not Exist.
  49. Re:CS is not IT by armanox · · Score: 1

    The last thing IT needs is Unions. End of story.

    --
    I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
  50. State budget surpluses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what state budget surpluses? I live in CA, ya insensitive clods!

    Must be that mythical "balanced budget" where they count income before expenses, and just decide certain bills are not going to be paid this term, kicked down the road for the next guy to deal with.

    The Power of Brown.

  51. What she thinks (about computers) doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Common Core: This political message brought to you by the Clintons (and PE? maybe the Obamas)

  52. What's PE? by OneAhead · · Score: 1

    What is meant by "more PE" in the title?
    Premature ejaculation?
    Penis enlargement?
    Physical education?
    Pulmonary embolism?
    Polyethylene?

  53. Re:CS is not IT by Hodr · · Score: 1

    I haven't ever heard it put in exactly those terms, but it makes more sense to me now. We are all going to get old, and while we may or may not be as effective as a younger (and cheaper) employee, that doesn't mean we are valueless or unable to do the work. By and large the young can pickup and move more easily (god knows I did my fair share of that to advance my career), and they can take more chances. When you are old and just need to hang on 5 more years to retire, that Union starts to look a lot more beneficial.

  54. Better Talk from the NCWIT conference by hackajar1 · · Score: 1

    Don't let Chelsea's out of touch talk throw off your opinion of NCWIT. Here is what probably should have made slashdot from conference: http://www.ncwit.org/video/201...

  55. Was this a Racist Clinton Statement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What did Chelsea mean by "not look like Mark Zuckerberg"?

    She doesn't like jews.

  56. Celebrity journalism at it's finest. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because she came from Clinton's bush?