Slashdot Mirror


$10k Reward For Info On Anyone Who Points a Laser At Planes Goes Nationwide

coondoggie writes: "The FBI today said it was making national a pilot program it tried out in 12 locations earlier this year that offers up to $10,000 for information leading to the arrest of anyone who intentionally aims a laser at an aircraft. According to the FBI, the pilot locations have seen a 19% decrease in the number of reported laser-to-aircraft incidents. Those locations included: Albuquerque, Chicago, Cleveland, Houston, Los Angeles, New York City, and Philadelphia."

264 comments

  1. Profit! by Darth+Muffin · · Score: 5, Funny

    1) Aim laser pointer at my own plane, parked in a hangar. 2) Turn myself in for "intentionally aiming a laser at an aircraft" 3) Profit!

    --
    Real programmers use "copy con program.exe"
    1. Re:Profit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ah but you have to be arrested for the payout to happen. and you cannot profit from your own crime

    2. Re:Profit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and you get two years in club fed

    3. Re:Profit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      1) Aim laser pointer at my own plane, parked in a hangar.
      2) Turn myself in for "intentionally aiming a laser at an aircraft"
      3) Profit!

      4) Serve up to 5 years in prison and pay a fire of up to $250,000
      5) Be unemployable with a prison record.

      Brilliant plan there, sport. Go for it.

    4. Re:Profit! by durrr · · Score: 3, Funny

      Pay homeless people $100 to point lasers at airplanes while recording them.

    5. Re:Profit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you have a friend with a prison record it (who is thus employable therefore broke anyway) it might be a good deal. He goes to prison, gets 3 hots and a cot, and when he gets out you split the reward. Prison really sucks, but for some people getting out can suck worse.

    6. Re:Profit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Most homeless people know better than to commit Federal crimes. If they want 3 hots in local jail, they tend to disturb the peace. I'm sure the street has its own advice on what crimes are good for people that want into the system, and which ones aren't. Most of them don't want into a system of any kind though. Many refuse shelter because shelters (which aren't even prisons) are bad. Prison is worse.

      So yeah, whatever...

    7. Re:Profit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A secure room and meals with free clothing and exercise club access.

    8. Re:Profit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have a friend with a prison record it (who is thus employable therefore broke anyway) it might be a good deal. He goes to prison, gets 3 hots and a cot, and when he gets out you split the reward. Prison really sucks, but for some people getting out can suck worse.

      You left out the bit about daily gay gang rapes but perhaps if you are good at sucking they'll go easy on you.

    9. Re:Profit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds like conspiracy to commit fraud. I don't think you'll like what happens to you when your felon 'friend' rats you out.

    10. Re:Profit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The FBI would charge those who do that with, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act(RICO act)...

    11. Re:Profit! by jbmartin6 · · Score: 2

      I expect they could get you under RICO

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    12. Re:Profit! by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Unless, of course, it were FBI informants committing the crime...

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    13. Re:Profit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A secure room and meals with free clothing and exercise club access.

      Don't forget a brand new "husband".

    14. Re:Profit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Hah! Man, I'm so glad we live in a society where rape is funny! Good stuff!

    15. Re:Profit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or bankers.

    16. Re:Profit! by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      What is the suspect has multiple personalities?

    17. Re:Profit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > You left out the bit about daily gay gang rapes but perhaps if you are good at sucking they'll go easy on you.

      No, I covered that in the part about "for some people getting out can suck worse."
      I am fully aware that in the USA, more men are raped than women because of the prison system. But that doesn't mean all men in prison are raped.

    18. Re:Profit! by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 2

      I expect there are many laws that someone who was caught implementing this plan could be convicted under. A crucial part of the plan was not getting caught.

    19. Re:Profit! by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      and the part of getting a doctor the covers stuff the ER does not.

    20. Re:Profit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hah! Man, I'm so glad we live in a society where rape is funny! Good stuff!

      It is very interesting how very American this is, the fascination with prison rape. It seems an odd combination of America's blood thirsty revenge-oriented attitudes towards criminal punishment (you have capital punishment for crying, together with Sharia law countries, China, and, well mostly that) combined with a very schizophrenic double standard attitude towards sexuality and good old fashion moral.

    21. Re:Profit! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Even for minors? How about a group of 12 year olds. They pair off, and one shines a laser at a plane and the other calls it in. Are you going to send the 12 year old to prison for 2 years?

    22. Re:Profit! by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

      A crucial part of the plan was not getting caught.

      A crucial part of the plan is identifying yourself to the police as someone who knows about a crime and turning someone else in. That pretty much rules out "not getting caught" as any significant concern, since if nobody gets caught you don't get the reward.

    23. Re:Profit! by mythosaz · · Score: 2

      In Texas, sure.

    24. Re:Profit! by runeghost · · Score: 1

      If I was a bad person, $10,000 would be enough to get me thinking, "Okay, now, how can I convincingly frame someone I don't like for this?"

    25. Re:Profit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless hes a politician!

    26. Re:Profit! by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      Identifying yourself to the police as someone who committed a crime is different than identifying yourself to the police as someone who witnessed a crime and wants to collect a reward.

      The fall guy is supposed to get caught for point a laser at a plane. The person collecting the reward not supposed to get caught for fraud.

    27. Re:Profit! by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Identifying yourself to the police as someone who committed a crime is different than identifying yourself to the police as someone who witnessed a crime and wants to collect a reward.

      I know that, so that's maybe why I said that part of the plan was "identifying yourself to the police as someone who knows about a crime and turning someone else in" and not "identifying oneself as the criminal". Someone has to get caught, and YOU are the one who is making sure they do. "Not getting caught" is not part of the plan, since nobody gets paid if nobody gets caught.

      The point is that you are making sure that someone gets caught, AND the person who is getting caught is the one you conspired with to commit the crime, who knows you conspired with him and can easily turn you in for a lighter sentence, keep the money, and probably wind up with less jail time than you get.

      The person collecting the reward not supposed to get caught for fraud.

      No, he's trying not to get caught for conspiracy to commit the same crime as the guy he's turning in, and turning in your co-conspirator is a really bad way of trying not to get caught.

    28. Re:Profit! by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      If I was a bad person, $10,000 would be enough to get me thinking, "Okay, now, how can I convincingly frame someone I don't like for this?"

      Not sure how it works in the USA. In the UK, if there's one thing that both police and judges hate, is people interfering with the law. People go to jail for giving false evidence to avoid getting a speeding ticket.

      And I think if you were a bad person, you'd fall into the category "bad and stupid" person. Framing someone is difficult. So your plan is to commit a crime, then create false evidence to prove someone else did it. Big mistake is that you plan to commit a crime while being known to the police. And most likely you are hugely overestimating your abilities.

    29. Re:Profit! by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      The fall guy is supposed to get caught for point a laser at a plane. The person collecting the reward not supposed to get caught for fraud.

      It wouldn't be fraud. It would be conspiracy to point a laser etc. etc. so you would get convicted just as the person who actually did it.

    30. Re:Profit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to how prisoners are mollycoddled by the Eurotrash Union.

      Since y'all are so fucking good at rehabbing prisoners we 'muricans should simply stop incarcerating our criminals and fly them over to Europe (or "Disneyland" as the criminals would call it.) Once they commit a crime over there you can apprehend them, or try to with your unarmed police, and then try to fix them.

    31. Re:Profit! by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      I started writing a comment to explain it to you in a way I thought you could understand it. Fuck it. If you can't understand it, you are on your own.

    32. Re:Profit! by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      Fraud is a deception deliberately practiced in order to secure unfair or unlawful gain.

      The fraud is pretending to catch a criminal in order to secure a reward from the government.

    33. Re:Profit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then it's $20,000

    34. Re:Profit! by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      If you can't understand that somebody has to get caught in order for a plan to split the reward with the guy you're paying to commit a crime to work, then who's the one who doesn't understand? I thought it was pretty clear: "not getting caught" means nobody gets the reward. That's a failed plan.

    35. Re:Profit! by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      There are 2 crimes being committed as part of the plan. 1 crime is meant to be discovered, and the other is not.

      You don't seem to be able to understand that when I wrote "A crucial part of the plan is not getting caught ", it was in the context of the crime referred to by the comment I was responding to (i.e. violating RICO laws), and not to both crimes.

      I thought it was pretty clear: "not getting caught" means nobody gets the reward.

      It should be pretty clear that I was not suggesting that nobody gets caught for anything, especially since this was the crux of the plan I described.

    36. Re:Profit! by Kittenman · · Score: 1

      What is the suspect has multiple personalities?

      I'm in two minds about that.

      --
      "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
    37. Re:Profit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you can't comprehend that you have the witness that will report the crime not be the same person who conspired with said bum, then you're just an amateur and will get caught. 10k isn't worth the trouble though.

    38. Re:Profit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      0) buy a plane
      1.a) make sure it's your own plain you point it at

      Now your the one who will prosecute yourself, this becomes pure profit.

    39. Re:Profit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should be pretty clear that I was not suggesting that nobody gets caught for anything, especially since this was the crux of the plan I described.

      It's also pretty clear that you haven't thought it completely through ...

      When your patsy is in the court house and hears that he is facing a 10 year sentence and $100,000 fine, just how committed to the plan he will be? Will the $8000 that you promised to him be enough for him to not sing like a canary?

      Your plan is one of those classical criminal plans: high-risk, low-reward.

    40. Re:Profit! by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      You might be on to something there, if you plan it carefully. The text doesn't say it has to be a justified arrest. So you might indeed say "I pointed a laser at an aircraft", get arrested, then explain "but it was my own plane parked in a hangar", get released, but still qualify for the bounty because you did actually get arrested.

    41. Re:Profit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Find someone who doesn't mind going to jail that much (e.g. a homeless guy, someone with a terminal illness, etc).

      2) Offer to pay him $8K for pointing a laser pointer at a plane and going to jail.

      3) Profit!

      You could probably find a more erratic person willing to take less than $8K of the 10K, but I would imagine you'd want to deal with a fairly rational person who doesn't feel resentment towards you (i.e. for getting ripped off). The goal of this plan is to rip off the government and the tax payer, not the fall guy.

      What the government should do, is offer $20K for turning in the orchestrator of a laser pointer arrest reward scheme.

      1) Find someone who knows someone who doesn't mind going to jail that ...
      Solution $40K reward for orchestrator of orchestrator.

      This is a pyramid scheme....nice recursion you got there!

    42. Re:Profit! by jsh1972 · · Score: 1

      might even get probation if it's your first offense, especially with a good lawyer.

    43. Re:Profit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to how prisoners are mollycoddled by the Eurotrash Union.

      If you look at crime rates and re-offending rates, the mollycoddling seems to win, big time.

    44. Re:Profit! by boris111 · · Score: 1

      Humor comes from sorrow. Its a sad reality in prison. Why are you so judgy?

    45. Re:Profit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is just a fact tho, whether you find it funny its a different story.

    46. Re:Profit! by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      shht, let him shoot himself in the foot.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    47. Re:Profit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5 years in prison for $5000? where do I sign up?

  2. What if you point a friken shark? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the reward then?

    1. Re:What if you point a friken shark? by plover · · Score: 4, Funny

      One Hundred BILLION dollars!

      --
      John
    2. Re:What if you point a friken shark? by PPH · · Score: 1

      The shark fires back.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  3. Free room and board for two years for 10k by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not a bad deal, especially when you receive the money up front

  4. Coondoggie clickbait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I see Michael Cooney at Network World (coondoggie) is submitting his own blog posts again.

    1. Re:Coondoggie clickbait by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      Not as punchy as "ohnoitsroland" though.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    2. Re:Coondoggie clickbait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really cause neither of the links in TFS point to his blog.

  5. Off the Flight Path... by jaeztheangel · · Score: 1

    Planes get lost, re-routed etc ALL the time. Think a nightclub with laser advertising, plane flies overhead, or helicopter. Can they be punished?

    1. Re:Off the Flight Path... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends,

      Do they point them at the plane on purpose?

    2. Re:Off the Flight Path... by MozeeToby · · Score: 4, Insightful

      [...]offers up to $10,000 for information leading to the arrest of anyone who intentionally aims a laser at an aircraft.

    3. Re:Off the Flight Path... by heypete · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Planes get lost, re-routed etc ALL the time.

      Think a nightclub with laser advertising, plane flies overhead, or helicopter.

      Can they be punished?

      Major astronomical telescopes often use lasers for their adaptive optics systems. They coordinate with relevant authorities to insure they don't zap sensitive optics on satellites and post "plane spotters" outside so they can shut down the laser if a plane comes too close to the beam.

      Of course, those lasers tend to be considerably more powerful (>5W) than handheld laser pointers (~5mW), so it might not be directly comparable, but I'd hope that any organization that is shooting lasers into the sky would have someone keeping an eye out for aircraft.

    4. Re:Off the Flight Path... by gweihir · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Laser advertising needs special permissions and is either focused at a billboard, wall, etc, or if aimed at the sky under permanent direct control of an expert and only permissible with similar restrictions as fireworks. Your question is stupid.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    5. Re:Off the Flight Path... by jaeztheangel · · Score: 1

      [...]offers up to $10,000 for information leading to the arrest of anyone who intentionally aims a laser at an aircraft.

      That is precisely my point. The fact of aiming a laser can't be enough - so it comes down to intentions. Those of the person accused - and their accuser.

    6. Re:Off the Flight Path... by jaeztheangel · · Score: 1

      Definitely! Good point.

    7. Re:Off the Flight Path... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Major astronomical telescopes often use lasers for their adaptive optics systems.

      Why don't they just use non-visible lasers?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    8. Re:Off the Flight Path... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      They coordinate with relevant authorities to insure they don't zap sensitive optics on satellites and post "plane spotters" outside so they can shut down the laser if a plane comes too close to the beam.

      Also the most thankless jobs on The Death Star...

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    9. Re:Off the Flight Path... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      5mW at an area of 1mm^2 corresponds to 50W at an area of 100cm^2.
      This means that looking into a 5mW laser, and assuming it is concentrated in 1mm^2, corresponds to looking at a 50W lightbulb at a distance of 2.82cm.
      Ouch.

    10. Re:Off the Flight Path... by riverat1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just because the light isn't visible doesn't mean it's not harmful. After all, it's the invisible to you ultraviolet light from the Sun that gives you a sunburn.

    11. Re:Off the Flight Path... by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      Second point. Since the telescopes themselves are working in the visible light range the lasers for the adaptive optics systems need to be there also because distortions of the light is what they're adapting to telescopes optics to.

    12. Re:Off the Flight Path... by camperdave · · Score: 3, Informative

      The primary thing that makes lasers harmful to planes is that the brightness temporarily blinds the pilot. It's like looking directly at the flash from a camera, or an oncoming car's high beams at night. invisible frequencies don't cause temporary blindness (although prolonged exposure can cause permanent damage).

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    13. Re:Off the Flight Path... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel I should defend that post slightly, I don't think it was a stupid question, just a question that needed an answer/response, which you provided.

    14. Re:Off the Flight Path... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There's also this system where the FAA sends notices to airment (pilots), we call one of these notices a NOTAM. Things like laser light shows are published so pilots will stay away from them.

    15. Re:Off the Flight Path... by camperdave · · Score: 2

      The adaptive optics are run by computers. They could be programmed to compensate for any "chromatic" aberration induced by the frequency difference. However, the visibility or invisibility of the laser is not the real issue. The real issue is that the adaptive optics work by calibrating a flexible mirror based on light received from a reference star. The laser creates an artificial reference star by exciting sodium vapour high in the upper atmosphere, causing it to glow. The laser must therefore be tuned to a specific frequency, or the sodium vapour doesn't glow. No glow, no reference star. No reference star, no adaptive optics.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    16. Re:Off the Flight Path... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fun thought: if one of these telescopes is used to find exoplanets that have intelligent life, our first action toward them will literally be shooting them with lasers.

    17. Re: Off the Flight Path... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Making pilots go slowly blind isn't exactly safe for planes either.

    18. Re:Off the Flight Path... by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Ok, I will modify "stupid" to "clueless".

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    19. Re: Off the Flight Path... by s0nicfreak · · Score: 1

      It doesn't really matter since pilots have to have regular eye exams and are not allowed to fly at a certain amount of vision impairment.

  6. I see what you did there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "The FBI today said it was making national a pilot program it tried out in 12 locations earlier this year that offers up to $10,000 for information leading to the arrest of anyone who intentionally aims a laser at an aircraft.

  7. huh by Charliemopps · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You'd think they'd have just put polarized glass in the cockpit by now if it were that big of a deal. Oh wait... that's right, it's not that big of a deal.

    Why do we continue to allow things like this to get blown so far out of proportion that we end up sending 16yr olds to prison for something that never really had a chance to do harm to anyone in the first place? A landing aircraft is moving faster than freeway traffic at it's slowest. Without computer control and actuators there is no way a person could, by hand, hold a laser on a cockpit window for more than a tenth of a second. If a pilot is unable to land a plane after a flash of light that brief, we'd better start making lightening illegal because it's a hell of a lot brighter, and more common than a laser strike.

    1. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Fear mongering does not need to be rational, this is citizen training so that they hear and see how rewarding it can be to turn in people for cash.

    2. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Polarized glass will do nothing. The issue with the laser is that, by time it reaches the plane, it's spread a fair amount. When it hits the glass of the cockpit, which has various minuscule scratches and dirt and whatnot, it gets lit up like a Christmas tree. Polarized glass will suffer the same fate. It's the dirt and imperfections that blind the pilot.

    3. Re: huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is utterly retarded. A quick flash can bounce into an eye and do serious damage. Even with a short exposure time. It can disorientate somebody at the worst possible time. There are hundreds of people on airliners.

    4. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you blowing this out of proportion?

      It is much easier to avoid pointing a laser pointer at an aircraft than it is to, say, avoid paying a frivolous parking ticket. Frivolous parking tickets are intentionally written, to the detriment of innocent people, every day. How often do you find a need to point a laser pointer at an aircraft?

    5. Re: huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Prove it. Can you name one instance where an aircraft was brought down by someone shining a laser pointer at it? I wanna read an actual NTSB report that says pilot blindness caused by an ordinary retail store bought laser pointer located on the ground resulted in a subsequent crash. There's no such thing.

    6. Re:huh by Drago3711 · · Score: 5, Informative

      You'd think they'd have just put polarized glass in the cockpit by now if it were that big of a deal. Oh wait... that's right, it's not that big of a deal.

      If it were as simple as polarized glass they might actually go that route. Unfortunately for everyone, it is much more complicated than that. You need specific lenses to protect from specific wavelengths (of which there are many).

      [...] hold a laser on a cockpit window for more than a tenth of a second. If a pilot is unable to land a plane after a flash of light that brief, we'd better start making lightening illegal because it's a hell of a lot brighter [...]

      With high powered lasers (that are surprisingly easy to come by) a fraction of a second is all it takes to cause serious and often permanent eye injury.

    7. Re:huh by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Polarized for which orientation?

    8. Re:huh by dinfinity · · Score: 5, Insightful

      QFT, last year I sat in the cockpit during an evening landing in Egypt (Sharm-el-sheik) and where I had previously dismissed the whole pointing lasers thing, that landing quickly brought me around. Granted, pilots generally land on the instruments anyway, but looking out the windows was certainly not an option anymore because of the effect the laser pointers had on the canopy.

      One of the things I had always wondered (and asked the pilots) was 'Who would do such a thing? What do they gain from it?' until we were walking around in the (touristic) city centre at night. Tons of shops that sold massively overpowered laser pointers and more importantly: lots of small kids waving those things around.

    9. Re:huh by ericloewe · · Score: 1

      How about you learn how electromagnetic waves propagate before spreading bullshit?

      How will a polarizer magically prevent pilots from being blinded by a high-power laser?

    10. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and what about the rotary winged aircraft (helicopters) where normally it would be incredibly hard to polarize such complex glass surfaces. Those aircraft also fly closer to the ground meaning that the flash of light is much more intense. they also are not normally moving at speed and hovering making it easier to aim said light at the cockpit and longer flashes of laser light can blind or ruin a pilots career.

      Way to jump to conclusions. every think why New York City was a pilot location? if you read the fbi site it even mentions helicopters..

      also consider that up there there isnt as much ambient light as down here. so when even a momentary flash of intense light down here may not cause such huge a problem, up in the air where the pilots pupils are fully dialiated it can be even worse.

      do some research on the issue before you jump to conclusions.. or better yet go fly an aircraft (fixed or rotary wing)

    11. Re: huh by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Planes can land on instruments only. It's a much more complex and difficult operation, but it's becoming more and more common during the evenings because of the green lasers pointing at cockpits.

      So while you have massively increased risk, it hasn't materialized into a crash yet as far as we know because safety precautions in aviation are massive. But poking those precautions "because they haven't crashed yet!" is about as good of an idea as jumping in front of cars because "it hasn't hit me yet". Eventually someone will not hit brakes on time.

    12. Re:huh by gweihir · · Score: 1

      You have no clue. While a 5mW legal laser pointer is not that much of a deal, you can get far larger ones online. And they can blind pilots longer, or permanently. The analogy to lightening also cannot hold water, because that does not come without warning (remember that planes always have good weather reports...). And then there is an indirect kill possibility. In some places cretins shining lasers at air ambulances are a problem. If the pilot has to do an emergency landing while transporting a patient in critical condition, the added time can kill the patient. Also don't forgot that occasionally planes have problems and all the pilot's skill is needed to bring them down safely. A laser pointer can then make all the difference.

      And if you think changing cockpit windows design is easy, then you have not heard anything about the problems that are being encountered with them.

      Or to put it simple: the $10k is to catch idiots like you.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    13. Re: huh by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Pilots are complaining of near accidents. Some had to set down helicopters (air ambulances carrying patients in critical condition, no less), others had to do blind instrument landings without manual safety intervention possibilities and go-arounds with little notice. As nobody wants to spook the public, unless something crashes and people die and it is absolutely certain that a laser was the cause, things are being hushed up.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    14. Re:huh by Charliemopps · · Score: 0

      Polarized glass will do nothing. The issue with the laser is that, by time it reaches the plane, it's spread a fair amount. When it hits the glass of the cockpit, which has various minuscule scratches and dirt and whatnot, it gets lit up like a Christmas tree. Polarized glass will suffer the same fate. It's the dirt and imperfections that blind the pilot.

      Ok, wheres your studies to prove this?

      Remember, we're talking about sending stupid per-pubesent teenagers to prison. I'm not saying they shouldn't get in trouble. I'm saying $10,000 rewards are insanely excessive. And if polarizing the glass wont work, something equally as silly likely would. This isn't a hard problem to engineer your way out of. Trying to pass laws that make being young and stupid illegal haven't worked very well in the past.

    15. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      helicopters are aircraft too. you hurt their feelings by only talking about fixed wing aircraft.

    16. Re:huh by Charliemopps · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Because in Egypt the military was using aircraft and snipers to shoot protesters. So it's common there now to "lase" aircraft to point them out to other people so they know to take cover.

      http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/wwfeat...
      http://static2.businessinsider...
      http://s3files.core77.com/blog...
      http://media3.s-nbcnews.com/j/...

      Notice there are hundreds of lasers on these things... yet there's a a surprising lack of blind pilots or aircraft crashing into crowds.

      Yes, it's technically possible this could hard the pilot. But practically? Not very likely. These pilots circled the crowds for hours every night for months with hundreds of lasers trained on them the entire time without incident.

    17. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Since laser light isn't polarized maybe they should put two layers of orthogonally polarized glass.

    18. Re:huh by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Completely blind the flight crew during lift off or landing isn't a 'big deal'? heicopterpilots that have there eyes damaged is no big deal?

      Please, please try to understand why polarized glass would not solve this problem.

      "cockpit window for more than a tenth of a second. "
      which is all you need to lose focus and be distracted as is, can see the instruments. sure, it's may only be for 4 or 5 seconds, but by then you have hit the ground.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    19. Re:huh by Your.Master · · Score: 3

      So we have to wait until the average slashdotter knows people who have been blinded by lasers in order to do anything about it? I don't know anybody who was seriously injured because somebody threw a tennis ball at them out of a fast-moving vehicle without realising that their throw speed plus the speed of the car made for a fairly high velocity. This is still illegal and dangerous and reportable. I don't think there's a 10000 dollar reward for it, and I don't know how common it is compared to aircraft lasering, but I do support taking measures against it because I know it happens a nontrivial amount of time (the extent of the measures can be debated). These things aren't just potentially harmful, they're aggressively and unnecessarily harmful. We're not talking about making it illegal to blow bubblegum bubbles because it might pop and then a little bit might splash into the mouth of somebody else with a deadly bubblegum allergy. We're talking about pointing lasers at aircraft generally for reasons of dickishness.

    20. Re:huh by geekoid · · Score: 3, Informative

      10,000 is a good number becasue it will raise awareness; which is what causes the real decline. People, many posting on slashdot, are really clueless about the impact a laser can have on a flight deck, and on pilots. So you need to get there attention some how.

      and here.

      http://www.pangolin.com/faa/la...

      You should look into this great tool called 'Google'

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    21. Re:huh by Obfuscant · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ok, wheres your studies to prove this?

      You need a study to know that laser pointers are non-polarized and that shining a bright, non-polarized light through a polarizing filter doesn't stop the light from passing through? And even if the filter is 100% efficient, which none of them are, you only cut 1/2 the light that passes, and none of the light that lights up the crazing or other imperfections in the windows.

      Remember, we're talking about sending stupid per-pubesent teenagers to prison.

      No, we're talking about a $10,000 reward for information about people committing a crime.

      I'm not saying they shouldn't get in trouble. I'm saying $10,000 rewards are insanely excessive.

      Do you not know the difference between a fine, which is punishment for the criminal, and a reward, which isn't?

      Trying to pass laws that make being young and stupid illegal haven't worked very well in the past.

      Too late. It is already against the law to point a laser pointer at an aircraft. The law says nothing about "young and stupid people who point laser pointers", it covers old and smart people too. And if you think that pointing a laser pointer at an airplane will make it "fall out of the sky", you're wrong.

    22. Re:huh by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      Why do we continue to allow things like this to get blown so far out of proportion that we end up sending 16yr olds to prison for something that never really had a chance to do harm to anyone in the first place?

      So essentially blinding someone who is supposed to be in control of a vehicle which weighs several thousand pounds, carrying potentially hundreds of people and gallon upon gallon of highly explosive fuel does no harm? What a strange, twisted world you must live in where you think it's acceptable to potentially cause a catastrophic accident.

      The next time you're out walking, I'll just flash one of these laser pointers at you because obviously they don't do any harm. If I happen to hit you in the eye and you lose your sight, oh well, no biggee.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    23. Re:huh by geekoid · · Score: 2

      it happens all the time.
      here is a pilot that ahd eye damage?
      http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/he...
      http://www.wfaa.com/news/local...

      Permanently blinded? I don't know. Temp blinded, often.
      There are hundreds of cases.

      Learn to fucking use Google.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    24. Re:huh by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I feel sorry for these kids prematurely losing their vision at such a young age. It's just a matter of time.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    25. Re:huh by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      When it hits the glass of the cockpit, which has various minuscule scratches and dirt and whatnot, it gets lit up like a Christmas tree

      no it doesn't and i say that being someone that's shined lasers through glass many times. and i can guarantee a plane's cockpit window is much cleaner than the windows i'm talking about.

      if the glass is clean you'd see basically nothing. if it was dirty, you might see a bit of color. that's it.

    26. Re:huh by Obfuscant · · Score: 5, Interesting

      ok, and how many people do you know that have been permanently blinded by a laser? Any?

      Yes. And your implication that it is ok to temporarily blind someone who relies on "see and avoid" to keep from running into other traffic is just pathetic.

      How about this? It took all of five seconds to find using Google.

      I can't even find anything on a lab experiment gone wrong or military laser accident. Nothing.

      Why yes, of course, every lab accident makes the 11 o'clock news so you can find out about it.

      The only thing I can find are articles from pilots complaining, and they have an understandable axe to grind.

      Yeah, I supposed it's a surprise that people who are the targets of attempts to blind them, even temporarily, might have "an axe to grind" with those people.

      But what's the practical chance of that happening?

      It's documented fact. The chance of a documented fact happening is not "damn near 0".

      You're worried about people going to prison for trying to blind a pilot of an aircraft carrying upwards of 200 passengers? Here's the simple way to avoid it: DON'T SHINE A LASER POINTER AT AN AIRPLANE. Problem solved.

      OT: what the hell is wrong with /. today? It keeps telling me I'm not logged in and it ignores the "ads disabled" flag completely? Five different views of the same discussion in five tries at reading it.

    27. Re:huh by VoiceOfDoom · · Score: 1

      Don't lase me, bro!

      --
      "Life is pain Highness. Anyone who says otherwise is selling something"

      Westly, The Princess Bride

    28. Re:huh by Obfuscant · · Score: 2, Informative

      no it doesn't and i say that being someone that's shined lasers through glass many times.

      Many cockpit windows are not glass, they are plexiglass. Glass is very heavy. Plexiglass tends to pick up lots of micro-scratches from improper, and even proper, cleaning, and it crazes over time from stress and sunlight. Even properly cleaned plexiglass cockpit windows suffer from glare and light splatter, and after a short bit of time during a flight they can have a lot of insect dirt on them, too.

      and i can guarantee a plane's cockpit window is much cleaner than the windows i'm talking about.

      I don't know how you can guarantee any such thing unless you are personally cleaning every one of them prior to each flight, and I can guarantee that you aren't doing that.

    29. Re:huh by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      And if you think that pointing a laser pointer at an airplane will make it "fall out of the sky", you're wrong.

      Naw, man, that requires a grandma reading her Kindle in-flight.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    30. Re: huh by pspahn · · Score: 1

      Can you prove that feeding elephant dung to your toddler is unsafe? Name once instance of where a toddler ate elephant dung and was harmed as a result. You can't, and therefore feeding toddlers elephant dung must be safe.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    31. Re:huh by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      With high powered lasers (that are surprisingly easy to come by) [wickedlasers.com] a fraction of a second is all it takes to cause serious and often permanent eye injury. [wikipedia.org]

      Ahem. Beam divergence.

      At the distance an aircraft would be from the laser-pointer, the spot will have spread sufficiently that this is not the case.

      If you solve this problem (you're not), the Navy and Air Force will make you rich.

    32. Re:huh by Charliemopps · · Score: 4, Insightful

      http://www.usnews.com/news/art...

      14yrs in prison. Most people in prison for HOMICIDE serve half that.

      This is the definition of unfair sentencing .

    33. Re:huh by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      A typical flash from a hand-held laser at 1000 feet lasts about 1/50 of a second. In the FAA simulator studies, the flash used was one second long. The animation above "splits the difference" by using 1/2 second flashes. We feel this is a realistic portrayal of how long a typical exposure might last.

      I don't even need to refute that link. It refutes itself.

    34. Re:huh by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      Polarized for which orientation?

      All. I propose NON-transparent aluminum.

    35. Re:huh by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      Do you know how diffused the beam is by the time it gets to the cockpit's dirty plexiglas window?

      Plenty of first-hand observations in this thread tell you that you're flat out wrong.

    36. Re:huh by mpicpp · · Score: 2

      A laser is more highly focused than lightning, so your theory is problematic. And how many times is lightning aimed a cockpit? http://www.laserpointersafety.... Here is a description of an incident of lighting blinding a pilot, causing the loss of control and 25 deaths: http://avstop.com/news/strikeb...

    37. Re:huh by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Ok, wheres your studies to prove this?

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iI7Qq1mYQlI

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    38. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      With high powered lasers (that are surprisingly easy to come by) a fraction of a second is all it takes to cause serious and often permanent eye injury.

      At short distances, that is true. At 10,000+ feet, the beam has spread quite a lot, and is unlikely to cause serious eye damage. Not to mention the angle of the cockpit makes a direct shot from laser pointer to cornea difficult.

      What is likely is reflections and temporary flash blindness. This is dangerous to the safety of the plane, even if it is unlikely to cause direct physical harm to the pilots.

    39. Re:huh by farble1670 · · Score: 0

      Plenty of first-hand observations in this thread tell you that you're flat out wrong.

      zero actual incidents of plane crashes confirms that you are wrong.

    40. Re:huh by Threni · · Score: 1

      You're one of these people who believe the point of light is the same radius at any arbitrary distance as it is when you shine it on the wall of your mum's basement, right?

    41. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you wanna do so from a thousand feet away for a 50th of a second, by all means go ahead. I'm not paranoid and delusional about ZOMG!! SCARY LASERS!!11

    42. Re:huh by HeckRuler · · Score: 2

      Go to Cairo, breath the leaded-gas fume encrusted air, fight off the wandering dogs, dodge traffic, learn that their more important industry is tourism of all things and that it's on shaky grounds with the country undergoing political turmoil, that their whole economy is tanking, that the nation's credit rating is falling, and then reflect on the need to keep laser pointers out of the hands of children.

      I mean, I get the sentiment. That some of these kids are going to look into the things and have their vision damaged. And that's sad. And you feel for these kids.

      But it's like commenting on a guy's stubbed toe when he's currently bleeding out from a gunshot wound mid-revolution. Because holy shit have you BEEN to Egypt?

    43. Re:huh by dinfinity · · Score: 1

      1. Sharm-el-sheik isn't really the center of protests (certainly not when I was there). I'm going to have to doubt your assertion "it's common there now".
      2. Helicopters have this unique feature of being able to hover in the air and move in all directions at very low speeds. Landing airplanes don't have that luxury.
      3. I'm pretty sure the instruments in a military chopper are a lot more capable to deal with loss of visual capabilities than civilian aircraft. Infra-red vision may well have been available to the pilots and, if I'm not mistaken, would not be bothered by the green lasers.
      4. Article concerning the incident: http://theaviationist.com/2013... - No information as to whether this type of flying went on for months every night.
      5. Again, like I said: most flying is done on instruments anyway. That it is usually possible to work around or even not really a problem at all, doesn't mean that it is okay to do it. Does a lased plane with broken instruments need to crash before something is done about the lasing? I think being proactive is a better idea than waiting for the calf to drown.

    44. Re:huh by Obfuscant · · Score: 2, Insightful

      14yrs in prison.

      Good. You picked a perfect example of your "young and stupid" "pre-pubescent" teenager here. A 26 year old deliberately trying to down a police helicopter, and his twenty-something girlfriend, who were probably the same source of the laser used to attack a hospital transport helicopter that the police were looking for.

      Most people in prison for HOMICIDE serve half that.

      Citation required, and so what? He was trying to kill a cop. Deliberately. After trying to kill people who fly in a hospital helicopter.

      This is the definition of unfair sentencing .

      I think it is quite fair. It will send a message that doing this kind of thing isn't a game to people like you who think that all it takes is "polarizing filters" installed on every aircraft so "pre-pubescent teens" can have their fun interfering with the pilots of aircraft, who have no real complaint because there aren't rampant stories about blind pilots and aircraft "falling out of the sky". (Free clue: if a pilot is blinded by a laser and his aircraft "falls out of the sky" and he dies in the subsequent crash, who is going to tell the NTSB the crash took place because of the laser? How many passengers have to go down with him before protecting pilots from temporary blindness from idiots is a good idea in your mind?)

      The story here is about expanding the use of $10,000 REWARDS (not fines) to help catch people who endanger innocent people. I guess, since you didn't answer the question, you really don't understand the difference between "reward" and "fine", or how polarizing filters work, and that the idea of temporary blindness for a pilot in command of an aircraft isn't a problem for you.

    45. Re:huh by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

      Non zero incidents of pilots injured by lasers says you are wrong.

      http://newyork.cbslocal.com/20...

    46. Re: huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Do we always have to wait for people to get killed before doing something?

      Does not seem very smart to me.

      Some Accidents/Incidents: (Accidents because pilots were hurt, even if minor)

      Kelowna B722 at Regina on May 13th 2013, laser beam incapacitates first officer
      http://avherald.com/h?article=46251419&opt=0

      American B752 at San Juan on Nov 16th 2012, laser beam injures pilot
      http://avherald.com/h?article=4594849f&opt=0

      Germanwings A319 near Stuttgart on May 12th 2012, first officer partially incapacitated by laser
      http://avherald.com/h?article=452f4411&opt=0

      Only a wuick search and quite a few more to be found in the same database...

      Sadly enough thats a real problem.

    47. Re:huh by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The blast of light can prevent seeing the instruments, or anything else. Just seeing out the window isn't the biggest problem.

    48. Re:huh by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      Did you even notice that most of these laser were pointed at the biggest part of the aircraft and not the cockpit? The pilots are also probably using very expensive visors and cameras to see where they are going and not actually looking out the window. You are comparing military aircraft to civilian aircraft. Not a valid comparison.

      But practically? Not very likely

      It has happened

    49. Re:huh by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 2

      I like the part where you assume you know what his argument is.

      As a passenger coming into Seatac, I got hit in the face with a green laser pointer, we were probably well below 3000 feet. It was bright enough to completely mess up the vision in my left eye for about 30 seconds. Such a lovely neighborhood.

      So, you can argue on the internet all you want about what the divergence of the laser should be, having personally witnessed a green laser in my face during final approach, I can assure you it is capable of messing up your vision.

      --
      Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
    50. Re:huh by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      With time of for good behavior and mandatory parole he will be out in 8 years.

      Most people in prison for HOMICIDE serve half that.

      Citation needed.

    51. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Very expensive"?

      Get a visor that filters out the green, blue, and red that is emitted by common high-intensity green, blue, and red lasers, respectively and you're done.

      That's how the ten-dollar pairs of plastic safety goggles in laser labs work.

    52. Re:huh by Threni · · Score: 1

      I like the part where you completely failed to notice that you've essentially just agreed with precisely the point I was making.

    53. Re:huh by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      I don't know who the first person was to aim a laser at an aircraft, but because the pilots made such a big deal out of it, it is now very widespread. If they had just said nothing, the kids with laser pointers would have gotten bored, and returned home to shine it at the cat.

    54. Re: huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prove it. Can you name one instance where an aircraft was brought down by someone shining a laser pointer at it? I wanna read an actual NTSB report that says pilot blindness caused by an ordinary retail store bought laser pointer located on the ground resulted in a subsequent crash. There's no such thing.

      Not quite a crash, but is this "good enough" for you? Even if it isn't, the other commenters here, saying you don't have to wait for the first accident to happen before you do, are correct.

    55. Re: huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "get their attention"

      Moron.

    56. Re:huh by ATMAvatar · · Score: 1

      You may take note that the lasers pictured in that article are a far cry from the 5mw laser pointers which are most commonly available. Instead, those look like the 100mW-1W lasers you get off a site like wickedlasers.

      The fear mongering is that the FBI is not making any distinction between 5mW lasers, which are too low power to damage eyesight easily, and higher-powered lasers, which will not only damage eyesight, but can also be used to pop balloons and burn through things like black electrical tape.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    57. Re:huh by qparadox · · Score: 2

      Ahem. Beam divergence. At the distance an aircraft would be from the laser-pointer, the spot will have spread sufficiently that this is not the case.

      Incorrect. Even if the beam has increased significantly in size (to tens of cm), your eye is great at focussing light coming from infinity. This means the intensity at the back of the retina can still be high enough to cause damage. Remember that the pilots are also in the dark so their pupils are fully dilated and their blink reflex may be slowed. With the multi-watt laser pointers available online, its only a matter of time before we see pilots being permanently blinded in these cases. Of course, permanent damage is irrelevant if the plane crashes because the pilot has been temporarily blinded by a lower intensity beam.

    58. Re: huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can prove to you that the bones in my body are unbreakable. I haven't broken one yet.

    59. Re:huh by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      How is the pilot supposed to know the difference? He will take action before his eyes burn out. One also does not need to blind the pilot to cause problems. glare on the windscreen at the wrong time cane cause disasters.

    60. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We'd be better off if we intentionally killed some cops. Fuck tha police!

    61. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I guess you just shit your pants when it lightning outside huh. We better ban acts of God...because God is a douchebag.

    62. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With time of for good behavior and mandatory parole he will be out in 8 years.

      I hope he gets out in 8 months... What a stupid reason to potentially ruin a life. I like the $10k reward thing as long as light sentences are given out and it is made widely known so people are more likely to be caught/don't try it.

    63. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      trying to kill != kill

    64. Re: huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i don't understand how braindead you are. Airplanes carry hundreds of people... putting them in danger is attempted mass murder!

    65. Re:huh by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      ok, and how many people do you know that have been permanently blinded by a laser? Any? Can you find ANY evidence that it's ever happened? I can't even find anything on a lab experiment gone wrong or military laser accident. Nothing.

      Yes I have seen evidence. Or rather I can't see the evidence. I'm not totally blind but I can't see out of my peripheral in my right eye. Lab accident as it happens. I bent down beside a table with a near-IR laser which was on. Caught the beam with the corner of my eye. I didn't notice a thing other than I felt suddenly nauseous and had difficulty sensing things around me. It took a while to diagnose that half my right eye was blinded by a fleeting glimpse of a laser that didn't even produce a visible wavelength.

      As an aside I hope you don't seriously think that lasers are safe do you? That would quite possibly be the dumbest thing I've read on the internet this week, and I've been watching a lot of retarded cat videos. There's a reason that laser safety is the subject of several international and domestic standards.

    66. Re:huh by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      All lasers have a finite beam divergence. The light is not perfectly collimated (it is not from infinity).

    67. Re:huh by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      At best, the lasers are "only distracting."

      Distraction clearly raises the chance of an error.

      Errors by pilots can lead to crashes.

      Multiple pilots have commented to exactly that in this thread.

  8. Profit! by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 4, Funny
    1) Find someone who doesn't mind going to jail that much (e.g. a homeless guy, someone with a terminal illness, etc).
    2) Offer to pay him $8K for pointing a laser pointer at a plane and going to jail.
    3) Profit!

    You could probably find a more erratic person willing to take less than $8K of the 10K, but I would imagine you'd want to deal with a fairly rational person who doesn't feel resentment towards you (i.e. for getting ripped off). The goal of this plan is to rip off the government and the tax payer, not the fall guy.

    What the government should do, is offer $20K for turning in the orchestrator of a laser pointer arrest reward scheme.

  9. Does a laser pointer have any noticeable effect? by maliqua · · Score: 2

    I can't imagine it would have any real affect or we'd read about planes falling out of the sky left and right all over the world.

  10. Pointing lasers at UFOs is still cool... by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2

    right? Right?

  11. How about laser pointing SAM missiles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    US army got plenty of those.

  12. Right - I've just read the headline by Chrisq · · Score: 0

    Right - I've just read the headline. I'm going out with my laser pointer, and since I live under a flight path 10k$ here we come!

    1. Re:Right - I've just read the headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      2 years without Chrisq's racist rants, sounds like heaven.

    2. Re:Right - I've just read the headline by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      2 years without Chrisq's racist rants, sounds like heaven.

      Its lucky that you weren't around during WWII. You would have been insisting that complaining about Hitler and the Nazis was racist and "anti German"

  13. They'll never pay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I used to believe in police rewards...until I tried to claim one.

    Pigs lie.

  14. Re:Does a laser pointer have any noticeable effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you familiar with wicked lasers?

  15. Re:Does a laser pointer have any noticeable effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    its not just about fixed wing aircraft. this is a huge deal for helicopters.. including the ones used by the police force. It doesnt cause them to fall out of the sky but it can ruin a pilots career.

  16. This is getting so old. by anolisporcatus · · Score: 2

    Why do the decision makers in this country have an insatiable urge to ruin everything for everyone by making needles, useless, delusion, meaningless legislation that makes our culture, our lives, our freedoms the governments issue, make normal every day illegal? It is so ludicrous, like one person stated, why do we have such a strange system in which 16 year olds, young, respectable people with futures going to jail for YEARS for stupid frivolous crap, this overly litigated country we live in now is becoming a nightmare, I read recently over FORTY-THOUSAND laws were passed last year alone, do you know what any of them are? I don't.

    1. Re:This is getting so old. by Shados · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Its a knee jerk overreaction to people being so freagin retarded in this country. If you don't have laws, enforced laws, with teeth, people do whatever to the full extent of what is allowed, with no common sense whatsoever.

      Now, everywhere in the world has that issue, but just not to the full extent the US has it (as far as the "first world" goes). I've lived in multiple countries for a number of years, and now I'm in the US, and its just shocking. People smoking while leaning on a no-smoking sign. People screaming on top of their lungs in the street at 3 in the morning. People letting their dog bark for hours while cheering it on. Lines while waiting at a busy bus stop? Hell no! If there's no risk of jail time, not only someone will do it, but a LOT of people will do it.

      And people pointing laser pointers at anything and everything.

      Its such a ridiculous society that doesn't give a flying duck about their neighbor. EVER. So you end up in a world where everything has to be fucking spelled out with someone in uniform wacking them behind the head all the time like little babies, or they won't apply the slightest bit of common sense.

    2. Re:This is getting so old. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You need to read a better source. 40,000 laws is pure grade balognium
      And blinding a flight crew is not frivolous.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:This is getting so old. by anolisporcatus · · Score: 1

      I'll have to research accidents and fatalities proven without a doubt to be linked to laser pointers when i get off work.. Thanks for the advice.

    4. Re:This is getting so old. by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 3, Informative

      This one isn't frivolous. It has put pilots and crew in the hospital with eye burns.

      http://www.wfaa.com/news/local...

      http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/he...

      While it hasn't led to air crashes YET it is still a serious form of assault on someone in a critical position.

      Some states still have the death penalty for attacking a first responder. Something to think about.

    5. Re:This is getting so old. by anolisporcatus · · Score: 1

      I agree, it isn't frivolous, however the penalty imposed is a bit extreme. Won't just making the offender pay a fine == $10000 to the reporter make more sense lol I guess the real issue is making things that should be civil offenses criminal is what yanks my chain

    6. Re:This is getting so old. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the country pays legislators. If you stop employing legislators and instead pay those hundreds of millions of dollars into the elk farming industry you will be asking 'why do these elk farmers have an insatiable need to farm elk, why can't they do something more useful?'

    7. Re:This is getting so old. by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      http://www.laserpointersafety....

      You think these penalties are too extreme? Messing with pilots while they are controlling aircraft is a very serious activity.

    8. Re:This is getting so old. by orgelspieler · · Score: 0

      wacking them behind the head all the time like little babies

      What kind of fucked up place are you from where they whack little babies upside the head all the time?! And you think WE have issues?

    9. Re:This is getting so old. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some states still have the death penalty for attacking a first responder. Something to think about.

      Yup, you can count Texas among them. If they kill a public servant, which includes most 'first responders', it's a capital felony. Plus if two or more persons die in the resulting crash, it's a capital felony.

      When that happens, most people's understanding of double jeopardy are going to be blown away when the suspect gets charged in both state and federal courts.

    10. Re:This is getting so old. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wacking them behind the head all the time like little babies

      What kind of fucked up place are you from where they whack little babies upside the head all the time?! And you think WE have issues?

      Proper means of punishment should be to break their neck.

    11. Re:This is getting so old. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile in Thailand.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

      rocket festival. packing 10-100kg of black powder into tubes and shooting them to the sky. You think these puppies have parachutes? fuck no.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    12. Re:This is getting so old. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does one point a laser directly into a cockpit from 5,000 feet? I doubt that I could see a cockpit from 5,000 feet. I have a hard enough time hitting my neighbors stationary mailbox 50 feet away from my front window.

    13. Re:This is getting so old. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's take something frivolous, like tickling. Woo, hee-hee-hee, stoppit, stoppit. There that was fun.

      Now if you go onto the flight deck and start tickling a plot whist he's trying to land a plane that is the polar opposite of frivolous. Any of the souls on board and all of their relatives will be lining up to beat twelve shades out of you if you try that.

      Come to think of it, think locking the offender in a room with the passengers and their families so that they could "discuss" it would probably be a suitable arangement.

    14. Re:This is getting so old. by anolisporcatus · · Score: 1

      I do. Jail time (too me) seems a bit excessive when taxing their wallets would be a sufficient learning experience. perhaps, a repeat offense would warrant more stringent measures.

  17. noobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just call the cops on anyone you know who owns one. It's not like "their word" will be much protection. You can even shine the laser yourself, just time it when they're home.

    My point about an allegation-based law system made, anyone that actually shines lasers at cockpits is a fucking idiot and more juvenile than any "manchild" who still reads fairy tales.

    -AC.Falos

  18. That is not how you go to prison. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2
    There are well documented ways to go to jail for hot meals and the cot. Throw a brick through the store window, or eat in an expensive restaurant without money to pay for the meal, or steal an umbrella or pretend to be publicly intoxicated, or harass a woman, or as a measure of last resort, loiter.

    What the world is coming to now a days, lasers and aircraft.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:That is not how you go to prison. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of those net you $5K though.

    2. Re:That is not how you go to prison. by camperdave · · Score: 3, Funny

      None of those net you $5K though.

      Depends on the umbrella.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    3. Re:That is not how you go to prison. by KamikazeSquid · · Score: 1

      or harass a woman

      Based on some statistics from the Department of Justice, "harassing a woman" is the one thing on your list that is wildly unlikely to result in a conviction or jail time.

    4. Re:That is not how you go to prison. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably because harassment is defined very narrowly by the law, yet interpreted very broadly by women.

      OH NO! AC MADE A COMMENT ABOUT WOMEN! WHITE KNIGHTS ASSEMBLE!

    5. Re:That is not how you go to prison. by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      wow, one of your only 6 comments, 4 of which are vitriolically feminist... making a difference are we?

    6. Re:That is not how you go to prison. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you actually have something useful to contribute?

  19. Shouldn't they have announced the pilot locations? by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

    I live in the Chicago area and have never heard about this pilot program for rewards. How could an un-announced program have any effect at all?

    --

    -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
  20. simplier fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop flying and polluting the atmosphere with jet exhaust. There's also the noise around airports, planes always flying overhead, mostly needless fuel consumption. I won't get into the big brother issues.
        I know, how about just driving and actually seeing the country you live in and just maybe, MAYBE, slowing life down a little?
    There's always the train, ship, or bus as well that doesn't pollute everyone else's view of the sky.

    celle

    P.S. Of course, now that I've stated the non-starter, how about just banning open-ended laser applications or open-ended lasers or even requiring termination for laser beam applications like many other em.spectra technologies.

    1. Re:simplier fix by lgw · · Score: 1

      Driving uses about the same amount of fuel, creates about the same amount of pollution, and is far more dangerous than flying.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  21. Drones will be active soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Laws that benefit the use of surveillance drones should be expected before they become commonly used. A cover story for the public should keep them calm while military and police drones are placed in the sky.

  22. Should we be nervous? ;) by Shag · · Score: 1
    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  23. Re:$10,000 for handing in amateur astronomers by Shag · · Score: 1

    Any "amateur astronomer" who tries to do their laser-assisted star tour somewhere as light-polluted as the surroundings of a typical airport needs clue.

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  24. Laser pointers are not so harmful for airplanes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I was developing Ronja OSHW FSO and contemplating using a laser pointer.

    I called an authority asking if hitting a pilot's eye would be a problem.

    They said absolutely no problem. The pointer has a small aperture causing divergence by diffraction. So after a few kms, the light spot would be diluted.

    They said the biggest reason is the pilots have to be used to random intense lights on the horizon. City's windows cause pretty intense sunlight reflections.

    Of course different thing is if you use high powered laser pointers as some sold on the internet or other kind of laser with precision optic of large apeture.

    Other factors (they didn't mention): atmospheric jitter, speed of airplane. Pilots eye at 200 km/h spends 1.8 msec in a 10 cm beam.

    I think this is scare mongering unless they go after higer powered lasers which I think should be illegal in public for eye safety reason anyway.

    My latest OSHW project

  25. Re:Does a laser pointer have any noticeable effect by RandCraw · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Yep. Precisely how many planes has any laser brought down so far? Have lasers become a standard military weapon yet? If so I'd expect to see Al Caida and the Taliban routinely using laser pointers to crash US aircraft. But oddly enough, we don't...

    Let's get real. Is a laser pointer a mile away going to disable both of a pilots eyes? AND both of a copilot's eyes? And how long were you blinded when a supermarket checkout scanner laser last caught your eye? Did you crash your shopping cart? Did you call in the FBI?

    This mountain is such a molehill. It makes me wonder why the FBI is overselling this schtick so hard. It's easier than working for a living, I guess.

  26. That is FBI, ATF and DEA model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They always find weak minded individuals who could be influenced easily. The promised payout is not necessarily monetary. The real beneficiary is a three letter agency that not only can justify it's existence, but also get internal promotions, more money and more resources. Most importantly you could call somebody as a domestic terrorist.

    Current laser reward scheme is just unnecessary publicity.

  27. A first-hand perspective for the doubters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm an airline pilot who has been lased three times, and I'm probably one of the only pilots in the country to have also earned a degree as a laser technician. With these credentials I was chosen to represent my airline at the ALPA Laser Illumination Conference in 2011. http://laserconference.alpa.or... The threat is real. It's easy to dismiss it as a "what are the odds" type of event, but the truth is that it happens far too frequently. People can buy these 1+ watt diode lasers very easily online and do with them what they will, and they frequently choose to point them at airplanes. What does it look like in the cockpit? Pretty much like an intense green strobe effect. And the worst thing is that once the light is seen the first time it's human instinct to look out the window to try and find the cause of the flash. Then the second blast hits as the pilot is looking directly at it. Depending on altitude and beam divergence, there's a real possibility of permanent eye damage. The lower to the ground, the more likely the damage. At night a pilot's vision is kept adapted to the ambient light in the cockpit, so their pupils are dilated to allow more light in. This also increases likelihood of damage. Flash blindness can last for many minutes, and it's a very bad thing to have your pilots flash blinded. It is a real issue, and having personally experienced it, I can say it's a problem.

    1. Re:A first-hand perspective for the doubters by Xaedalus · · Score: 1

      Please mod up--this is insightful. We've got too many anti-nanny state commenters on here, and while their general points are valid, they're drowning out the experienced posters who are coming forward to explain why this is a problem.

      --
      Here's to hot beer, cold women, and Glaswegian kisses for all.
    2. Re:A first-hand perspective for the doubters by OneAhead · · Score: 1

      How about the commonly sold 5mW Class IIIa laser pointers? I find it difficult to believe those causing flash blindness at the distances and speeds encountered when you're in a cockpit (physical explanation here). If those are not a problem, enforcing a law that prohibits aiming more powerful ones at aircraft would become a lot easier.

    3. Re:A first-hand perspective for the doubters by PPH · · Score: 1

      So, what? You are asking for an exemption to allow illuminating an aircraft with a Class IIIa laser? Why?

      If you run into a movie theater waving a pistol, I'm fine with the sheriff gunning you down. That it actually was a look-alike squirt gun is your problem.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    4. Re:A first-hand perspective for the doubters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think your comment is very valuable. Can you please describe for each of the 3 cases what colour the light had, for how long did the beam fall into your eye (subjective perceptiion), was the source stable or flickering, how long were you temporary blind, how long you couldnt see well because of adaptation to bright light, what kind of injuries you had to your eye, whether they were permanent or temporary, and if temporary how long did they last?

      Thank you for sharing your valuable first hand information.

    5. Re:A first-hand perspective for the doubters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a Safety Manager for an GA operator I too can attest to this threat being very real, we have a few incident reports a year regarding this issue and it's always on landing. We've had a number of missed approaches and go-rounds due to the problem. I don't see why so many people here a bitching about enforcement, any attempt to interfere with an aircraft is flight is a federal offence nearly everywhere in the world, why do people think it's OK to do this when people's lives are at risk? We all know about countless incidents which were caused by nothing more than a distraction, a good example is forgetting landing gear. Ideally, pilots need to be able to handle these situations but with falling training standards this is not always the reality of the situation. Why are some people OK with increasing the risk of an accident? I'm guessing those people would much rather be in an aircraft not being lased on finals than one that is.

    6. Re:A first-hand perspective for the doubters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the commonly sold 5mW Class IIIa laser pointers?

      Why are you even trying to make distinctions? Stop pointing lasers at other people, especially if they currently are attempting to prevent hundreds of people from dying, especially if they are going hundreds of meters per second.

      I, for one, would welcome rewards leading to the arrest of people intentionally pointing any laser pointer of any kind towards any person or animal. But perhaps I value people and animals more than I value shiny new toys.

    7. Re:A first-hand perspective for the doubters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People can buy these 1+ watt diode lasers very easily online

      Yes, someone really needs to shoot the people responsible for wickedlasers.com. The only people who buy those things are complete fucking idiots, because anyone intelligent realizes that such a powerful laser isn't a fucking toy. Every time I hear of someone using one of them, it's truly frightening what they do with them.

    8. Re:A first-hand perspective for the doubters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All three cases were in the green spectrum. The ambient flashes as the beam traverses the arc of movement is anywhere from a split second to maybe a half-second at a time, with incidents lasting from anywhere between 2-15 seconds from first light until last. There is little to worry about with the ambient light (although it is very distracting), but as I said the natural instinct is to look out to try and find the source, and therein lies the problem. We now train pilots to go "heads down" and not try and locate the source of the beam. Pilots immediately report the lasing incident to air traffic control and remain heads-down until the event is over. When I foolishly looked down the first time I was lased, I was flash blinded to the point I would have had a difficult time landing the airplane for maybe a couple of minutes. I had a significant flash blind spot right in the center of my vision for probably 15 minutes afterwards. I went to an eye doctor and was tested for eye damage, and fortunately no permanent damage existed in my case. The second two incidents I had had time to plan out my response, and went heads-down immediately with no further issues.

    9. Re:A first-hand perspective for the doubters by OneAhead · · Score: 1

      So, what? You are asking for an exemption to allow illuminating an aircraft with a Class IIIa laser? Why?

      So now it's forbidden to ask questions out of technical curiosity? What's next? "Why do you want to know that anyway? Are you planning to try something?" It's that line of thinking that paves the way towards tyrannic surveillance states.

      If you really need to know, what I had in the back of my head is that it would be pretty straightforward to tell the TSA to add lasers > Class IIIa to the list of "check-in only" items, so that people in departure/arrival halls don't have them. That would be a very easy and inexpensive way eliminate a large fraction of potentially dangerous incidents. Yes, there will still be people attempting to shine high-powered lasers at aircraft outside the airport. (which would still fall under conventional law enforcement), but it's somewhat less easy to blind the pilots if the plane has already gained some speed and altitude. If you really want to go all-out oppressive, you could even propose a perimeter around airfields in which you get arrested if you are in the possession of an operative laser > Class IIIa. Bona fide laser pointer are never that strong, and technical lasers are usually not connected to a power source (and thus not operative) in transport.

    10. Re:A first-hand perspective for the doubters by OneAhead · · Score: 1

      Answered here.

    11. Re:A first-hand perspective for the doubters by PPH · · Score: 1

      So now it's forbidden to ask questions out of technical curiosity?

      No. Your assertion that a law affecting only higher powered lasers would somehow be 'easier to enforce' is incorrect. Law enforcement cannot determine by mere observation the power class of the laser. So giving immunity for lower powered devices would discourage them from engaging in what might be a wild goose chase. And it would open up an avenue for idiots to run the cops around in circles.

      They put the police chopper in the air and scramble a few squad cars. An hour (of the taxpayer's money) later and all they find is some jackass rolling on the ground, laughing, because it was only a 5 mW laser. Think of it this way: We are saving your life. Because instead of going to a nice comfy federal prison, the cops might have just gone Rodney King on your ass.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    12. Re:A first-hand perspective for the doubters by OneAhead · · Score: 1

      Sheesh, you seem to be going out of your way to misrepresent everything I'm saying here. The second idea (which, again, is just a thought experiment because it would probably be too oppressive to implement in reality) would be to forbid the mere possession of an operative higher-powered laser within the perimeter. Where did I say I would make it legal to shine lower-powered lasers at aircraft?!

      To anticipate the next misrepresentation, no, making the high-powered ones illegal would not force the cops to search every car in the perimeter for them, just like the cops are not searching every car on the highway for illegal drugs or testing every motorist for alcohol. My point is, right now, it's very difficult for law enforcement to catch culprits in the act of shining a laser at an aircraft, so it's easy to avoid getting caught, or to say: "well yeah, you found me with a laser in the general area, but that doesn't prove it was my laser shining at the aircraft". With the oppressive second idea, if the cops have reasonable suspicion, they can search for a laser, and if they find a higher-powered one, they won't have to go through the legal trouble trying to argue it was you, because you shouldn't be in the possession of it anyway. If it's not a higher-powered one, it's still just as easy to get off the hook if the cops didn't catch you in the act, but it's not as bad an offense anyway.

      And as for the difficulty to test power; the stronger retail lasers pointers have a hazard sticker attached to them. If the sticker is missing, or if the laser shows signs of tampering, then the cops have reasonable suspicion to investigate closer (but not with their remaining good eye).

  28. Re:Shouldn't they have announced the pilot locatio by geekoid · · Score: 1

    You didn't hear it ,therefore it didn't happen?
    I guess no trees make noise when you aren't around.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  29. If I had mod points you would have mod points! by TheRealSteveDallas · · Score: 0

    Fear mongering does not need to be rational, this is citizen training so that they hear and see how rewarding it can be to turn in people for cash.

    +1

  30. 5 milliwatts vs 10 kilowatts perhaps? by Reibisch · · Score: 1

    NT

  31. Re:Does a laser pointer have any noticeable effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep. Precisely how many planes has any laser brought down so far? Have lasers become a standard military weapon yet? If so I'd expect to see Al Caida and the Taliban routinely using laser pointers to crash US aircraft. But oddly enough, we don't...

    Let's get real. Is a laser pointer a mile away going to disable both of a pilots eyes? AND both of a copilot's eyes? And how long were you blinded when a supermarket checkout scanner laser last caught your eye? Did you crash your shopping cart? Did you call in the FBI?

    Yes, really, let's get real. Do you really think every person able to fly the plane has to get blinded on both eyes before it gets dangerous, and is it really ok as long as pilots only loose their sight on one eye? It's all about safety margin, and the lasers eats up a lot of it.

    The reward needs to be this high because catching these terrorists is very difficult. The current level of penalty and the reward is the only way to do it as long as the risk of getting caught is as low as it is, and people are as ignorant about the dangers as you.

  32. Actual Crashes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quick internet search and wiki page on the subject and I can't find a single aircraft incident caused by lasers, even a few coordinated attacks that did nothing.

  33. I Never Liked Him by Princeofcups · · Score: 1

    Damn, everyone and his brother should accuse their worse enemy. $10,000 is $10,000. Oh wait, no one is actually going to prosecuted and this is all just a mind fuck? Say it isn't so.

    --
    The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
  34. Wow! by Petersko · · Score: 2

    "One Hundred BILLION dollars!"

    It just occurred to me that when the movie came out a hundred billion was a lot of dollars.

    How quaint.

    1. Re:Wow! by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      How about one hundred BILLION satoshis!

    2. Re:Wow! by Zynder · · Score: 1

      I'll wager 1 BILLION quatloos and not a quatloo more!

  35. Re: Shouldn't they have announced the pilot locati by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

    Yep, and lasers shoot themselves at airplanes.

    --

    -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
  36. The TSA will fix this! by DigitAl56K · · Score: 1

    Just remove the windows from all planes, and install body scanners everywhere within a hundred miles of any route.

  37. Then stop flying your damn planes over my house! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My airspace, MINE!

  38. Used for enemy revenge by Cito · · Score: 1

    Get a family dollar pointer, point a plane, toss pointer by enemy neighbor porch/car door.

    Call report strange laser

    Profit...

    Government is going after "snitches" Supreme Court just stood behind forcing Time's reporter to turn over his anonymous source over a CIA operation he wrote about. They want to arrest Assange/Snowden, they got Manning, making government employees scared to snitch on illegal government activity. Yet the government wants citizens to snitch on each other!?

    Fuck off, I ain't reporting shit, you can't have different rules, you want people to leak on neighbors then stop killing/attacking/threatening government whistleblowers.

  39. Re:Does a laser pointer have any noticeable effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally common sense. If lasers are so effective, then we would use them. They would be more powerful and computer guided to stay on the enemy cockpit. From these comments it would be cheap and effective. The enemy would also be using them on us. But why don't we have hundreds of soldiers reporting their experiences with them?

  40. Badly written offer. by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    One can report someone for shining a laser pointer, they are arrested but not convicted -as they didn't shine it at a plane, in fact at the time no planes were in the air.
    Profit (just a bit of your time)

  41. Only if they are white. by publiclurker · · Score: 1

    Otherwise, it's the chair.

  42. Re:Then stop flying your damn planes over my house by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    My airspace, MINE!

    I read a book of that nature. I can't remember it's name, but the jets were flying over his house due to a new airport, so he floated Barrage balloon above his place.
    It was a fairly decent book but he'd most likely be shoot in this age. - They downed the balloon with the after burners of a jet.

    -A barrage balloon, sometimes called a "blimp," is a large balloon tethered with metal cables, used to defend against aircraft attack by damaging the aircraft on collision with the cables, or at least making the attacker's approach more difficult.

  43. too bad reality by publiclurker · · Score: 0

    doesn't care about uninformed opinions. both about the known damage caused by handheld lasers and what little effect polarized filters would do to prevent it.

  44. Re:Then stop flying your damn planes over my house by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    My airspace, MINE!

    -A barrage balloon, sometimes called a "blimp," is a large balloon tethered with metal cables, used to defend against aircraft attack by damaging the aircraft on collision with the cables, or at least making the attacker's approach more difficult.

    Found this gem reading further: " They proved to be mildly effective against the V-1 flying bomb, which usually flew at 2,000 feet (600 m) or lower but had wire-cutters on its wings to counter balloons. 231 V-1s are officially claimed to have been destroyed by balloons." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B...

    Something I didn't realize is how many freaking V-1's were set off.

  45. If it's not that hard by publiclurker · · Score: 0

    then you do it instead of trying to come up with lame excuses why self-important idiots shouldn't be expected to follow the same rules as everyone else.

  46. I'd rather... by publiclurker · · Score: 0

    put people like you in your place before a plane goes down due to your delusions of adequacy and belief that you should be able to do whatever you want.

  47. no, the moral of the story... by publiclurker · · Score: 0

    is to not waste time arguing with idiots like you, as you seem to think that being a dense moron somehow legitimizes your willful ignorance.

  48. A cheap device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amazing how a cheap device an compromise a multi-million dollar piece of equipment. Don't give the terrorists any ideas!

    1. Re:A cheap device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, this is too crazy. instead of saying "please don't shine that nasty light at us", there should be mitigation measures in place to protect the pilots and passengers. planes fly all over the world, do you really think the bad guys won't try to hurt you?

    2. Re:A cheap device by Pumpkin+Tuna · · Score: 1

      Arresting the nitwits who shine lasers in people's faces is a mitigation measure.

  49. Re:Does a laser pointer have any noticeable effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally common sense. If lasers are so effective, then we would use them. They would be more powerful and computer guided to stay on the enemy cockpit. From these comments it would be cheap and effective. The enemy would also be using them on us. But why don't we have hundreds of soldiers reporting their experiences with them?

    Just like chopping a person in the head with an axe can't possibly be dangerous. If it was then the army would only axes.

  50. Easier to get rid of the windows? by sir_eccles · · Score: 1

    It's just a source of structural weakness in the airframe anyway. Just get rid of the windows and replace with cameras.

    1. Re:Easier to get rid of the windows? by s0nicfreak · · Score: 1

      So what about smaller planes that are flown by sight rather than instruments?

  51. Looked at by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the other side of the argument.

    Where does shining a laser into anyone's face fall under the bill of rights?

    Where does interfering with a pilot or driver while performing their duties fall under things you can't live without?

    The safety of the aviation industry isn't built around guessing how likely it is for someone doing reprehensibly stupid things to cause accidents. The safety is built around minimizing stupid behavior in general.

    Is there a legitimate (non war zone) reason for firing a laser that has a non zero chance of interfering with a pilot at an airplane?

    No there is not.

    There's no need to debate the likely hood of some specific set of circumstances that could potentially cause a crash, since there's no need to excuse criminally stupid behavior of this sort in the 1st place.

    It's a $10,000.00 bounty on people who are risking the lives of others for fun. It's not denying you your rights, it's not an issue subject to debate on the pros and cons of how and when you should fire up a laser at planes. It's just another tool to prevent heinously stupid things from happening.

    ~G

    (Every simple ass problem here seems to turn into a debate on the odds of it happening, how about we decide not to play the game to begin with? )

  52. great idea! until the camera or monitor fails. by Ionized · · Score: 1

    then they're fucked.

    seriously, what a terrible idea.

    1. Re:great idea! until the camera or monitor fails. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a window with a retractable cover, like the passengers have? Camera dies? Open the blind.

    2. Re:great idea! until the camera or monitor fails. by s0nicfreak · · Score: 1

      And then immediately get hit by a bunch of lasers that are shining at the plane because people think it's fine, since the blinds are most likely closed. No, it's much easier to stop people from shining the lasers at planes.

  53. Re:$10,000 for handing in amateur astronomers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do love fucking up imaging star parties from 80km away :)

    *wide beam*

  54. Re:Does a laser pointer have any noticeable effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  55. Chemtrail Jets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad the Chemtrail jets are likely remote operated.

  56. Leave now by publiclurker · · Score: 0

    I'm sure they can find someone else to mes sup everyone's orders.

    1. Re:Leave now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But can they find anyone to mess up your shitty posts anymore? L2SPEEL N00B

  57. Re:Does a laser pointer have any noticeable effect by Pumpkin+Tuna · · Score: 1

    Al cicada?
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cicada

  58. Evil + profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shine laser at aircraft.
    Wipe laser of all fingerprints.
    Place laser on hated neighbors backyard patio table.
    Call police.

    Watch neighbor get arrested and get $10k payout.

    Guess we can call it " lasing " vs " swatting ".

  59. Loophole ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Screw lasers. Rent one of those bazillion candlepower spotlights you see at kickoff events and shine THAT at the aircraft.

    Since it's not a laser, tell the LE's that show up to piss off.

  60. Re:Does a laser pointer have any noticeable effect by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Planes don't fall out of the sky when hit by lasers any more than cards spontaneously burst into flakes when a driver looks at their phone. The question is of risk. Do you want a pilot to be unable to see a runway during the most critical maneuver of the entire flight? It's not at all dissimilar to not wanting some idiot behind me on the road to be smsing his bro while I'm performing an emergency break in front of him. It's a risk to other's life. Don't do it. Note I say others, not your life. Your life is yours to end whenever you want.

  61. Great idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will try it out tonight. (I don't live in US)

  62. Unusual Chinese solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chinese already plan to build a tunnel under the Bering strait.

    And since the trains will be Chinese I think they will be probably faster than American airplanes.

    So I guess we all change from planes to trains and the problem will be solved forever. No more pointing of lasers at airplanes.

  63. Re:Does a laser pointer have any noticeable effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't imagine it would have any real affect or we'd read about planes falling out of the sky left and right all over the world.

    /facepalm
    You have no clue about how flying works. There are many levels of redundancy to everything. This is to keep planes from falling out of the sky.
    You get blinded, hopefully your right seat can still see, if both right and left seat are blind. Do a go around and turn on the auto pilot or grab the pilot who is dead headding on the flight; or for long flights the extra flight crew(s) who is/are sleeping. Hey look the plane didn't fall out of the sky.

    It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt

  64. and he drops back to pass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh so now it's plexiglass instead of glass. Keep moving those goal posts. You people who get your panties in a bunch about people with lasers are just fucking stupid. Bitching to be bitching I call it. How about you go bitch about the kids playing with the real guns and not the laser pointers.

    1. Re:and he drops back to pass by s0nicfreak · · Score: 1

      Maybe because people already understand the danger of kids playing with guns?

  65. One is technically some by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Some" air ambulances. You know that is ONE air ambulance right?

    1. Re:One is technically some by gweihir · · Score: 1

      No, it is actually a few more.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  66. lightning is different by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of the commenters are claiming that a laser pointer is much the same as a flash of lightning. As a practical matter, they are not.
    When you are flying in or near a thunderstorm (I have), you know the flashes are coming, and you keep your head down. You might even wear a instrument training hood and you're focused entirely on the instruments. You also turn up the cabin lights as bright as possible, which isn't a problem, because you're not looking outside.

    With a laser pointer on a visual approach or low level flight (thankfully, never encountered this), you're looking outside, you've got the cabin lights down low so your night vision is fully adapted. Your pupils are fully dilated and you definitely would be temporarily blinded, and possibly at just the wrong time.

  67. yes! Don't point club lighting skyward. by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Absolutely they can and it's not unusual. I'd you operate a laser more powerful than a handheld pointer, you ccarb easily get busted for pointing skyward whether aircraft fly by or not. Any decent DJ or light jockey knows not to point lighting upward outdoors.

    You may have noticed in the last few years club lasers have almost universally switched to scatter effects, where there are two hundred weak beams rather than one strong beam. That's largely because a strong beam can get you in trouble in several ways. Heck, just having an overpower laser at a show without a permit is a big fine - even if it is pointed at the ceiling.

  68. ps - without FAA approval by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Ps - the local FAA field office can approve unterminated (or terminated) laser effects outdoors, so it IS possible to do it safely and legally. The FAA might just tell the operator to point the laser this direction, not that direction (such as not toward the approach corridor for a local airport).

  69. lol try that while posting to Slashdot by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Lol. Try filtering red, blue, and green while making a post. You'll notice that you can't, because you couldn't see anythind. Red is at one end of the spectrum, so you can filter it and everything just looks a little blue, because you've filtered out the low end of the spectrum. You can filter out blue by filtering the high end of the spectrum. You can filter green by filtering the middle of the spectrum.

    If you block the low end (red), the middle (green) and the high end (blue), you've just blocked ALL light.

  70. Multiple personalities? Here's what to do by golodh · · Score: 1
    I propose a simple but elegant solution to this conundrum. In case of people with multiple personalities you proceed as follows:

    (1) Establish how many personalities can be distinguished within the defendant's mind.

    (2) Try to identify the personality who was in charge at the time, and do him/her for pointing the laser.

    (3) Prosecute all the other personalities for being accessory and/or accomplice to the act of pointing the laser.

    (4) Depending on how tightly the personalities are linked, you may optionally prosecute each of them for conspiracy to commit a crime, or even taking part in a criminal organisation.

    (5) Add all sentences together. This is how long the body pointing the laser should go behind bars.

    I suspect that the defense of "multiple personalities" will lose its popularity very quickly.

  71. Re:yes! Don't point club lighting skyward. by jaeztheangel · · Score: 1

    Thank you! I didn't know this. :-) Much appreciated.

  72. omg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why would be someone as stupid to intentionally aim at aircraft in the night with laser lights. it's attempted murder...

  73. Oculus Rift by bentcd · · Score: 1

    Give the pilots an Oculus Rift headset with images fed from cameras mounted on the headset. Make sure you don't get a high-end headset "now capable of accurate reproduction of laser beams". While you can still blind the cameras with a laser you cannot burn out the pilot's retinas.

    (I do hate myself a little for plugging a Facebook product.)

    --
    sigs are hazardous to your health
  74. Re:Does a laser pointer have any noticeable effect by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Phone fail. "cars spontaneously burst into flames"

  75. Re:Does a laser pointer have any noticeable effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who says that the military does not have any?
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dazzler_%28weapon%29

    Well ones that blind you for life are outlawed by this:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protocol_on_Blinding_Laser_Weapons