Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Announces 'Fire Phone'

Amazon has unveiled the Fire Phone. It runs a modified version of Android, and it will launch exclusively for AT&T's network. The screen is a 4.7" IPS LCD (they tested from 4.3" to 5.5", and decided 4.7" worked best for single-hand use), with an emphasis on brightness. It runs on a quad-core 2.2GHz processor with 2GB of RAM, and an Adreno 330 GPU. It has a rear-facing, 13-megapixel camera using an f/2.0 five-element lens with image stabilization. There's a dedicated physical button on the side of the phone that will turn it on and put it into camera mode when pressed. The phone comes with dual stereo speakers that produce virtual surround sound. Amazon wants the phone to be distinctive for its ability to provide video content, both from a hardware and software perspective.

The Fire Phone runs Mayday, Amazon's live tech support service for devices. They also demonstrated Firefly, software that recognizes physical objects using the phone's camera, as well as TV shows and songs it hears. It runs quickly, often identifying things in less than a second (and it pulls up an Amazon product listing, of course). It can even recognize art. Firefly has its own dedicated physical button on the phone, and Amazon is providing a Firefly SDK to third parties who want to develop with it. Another major feature of the Fire Phone is what Amazon calls "dynamic perspective." Using multiple front-facing cameras, the phone tracks the position of a user's head, and uses that to slightly adjust what's displayed on the screen so content is easier to see from the new angle. It allows for gesture control of the phone — for example, you can tilt the phone to scroll a web page or move your head slightly look around a 2-D stadium image when browsing for available seats. Putting your thumb on the screen acts like a mute button for the head tracking, so it isn't confused when you look up from the screen or turn your head to talk to somebody. It's an impressive piece of software, and they've made an SDK available for it.

192 comments

  1. Perhaps not the best name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...for any device that has batteries inside it. All you need is one faulty batch, and this is quickly confirmed as the phone that burns people's hands off.

    1. Re:Perhaps not the best name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Perhaps one of the buttons can be set to directly call the Fire Dept.

    2. Re:Perhaps not the best name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe they should have called it the Phire Phone

    3. Re:Perhaps not the best name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this isn't an apple product....but Im sure we'll have a lawsuit soon enough http://www.siliconbeat.com/2013/08/29/local-man-burned-up-by-apples-response-to-iphone-fire/

    4. Re:Perhaps not the best name by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      At least it's not a new phone from Sony themselves.

    5. Re:Perhaps not the best name by tooslickvan · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually, Fire Phone is a great name the phone because if it catches fire but with a battery defect that causes it to catch on fire it will be too difficult to write headlines like Amazon CEO fired for Fire Phone fires that no one will be fired since no one will understand what's going on.

    6. Re:Perhaps not the best name by dtmos · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, "halt and catch fire" has a new meaning when the device has a lithium battery.

    7. Re:Perhaps not the best name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you'd prefer the "iRe phone" as it's sure to raise Apple's ire, since it's a rectangle with rounded corners, they're gonna sue...

      If they don't sue, then Samsung can get all prior cases reversed.

    8. Re:Perhaps not the best name by neilo_1701D · · Score: 4, Funny

      Perhaps one of the buttons can be set to directly call the Fire Dept.

      Mayday, perhaps?

    9. Re:Perhaps not the best name by steelfood · · Score: 2

      It's probably not the best name for any device.

      I can see people going to a Fire Phone sale thinking they were going to get phones at a heavy discount. And you could describe early adopters of this phone as having caught onto fire.

      It's just a bad name in general.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    10. Re:Perhaps not the best name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a typo - Apple sells locked down, expensive, retro-featured Dire phones.

    11. Re: Perhaps not the best name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Here, take a Popsicle, young boy, sit down and shut up. And get off my lawn.

      Stupid trolls.

    12. Re:Perhaps not the best name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Probably easier to remember than 0118 999 881 999 119 7253.

    13. Re: Perhaps not the best name by johnsnails · · Score: 1

      No its not... Haven't you seen IT Crowd

    14. Re:Perhaps not the best name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps they're referring to the song:

      you had a hold on me right from the start/a grip so tight I couldn't tear it apart

  2. Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too late? by CRCulver · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    I loved my Nokia N900 phone (sadly lost somewhere in the wilderness of Africa), and I was long looking forward to the Neo900 project that would give me a slightly upgraded device with the same hackability and (for privacy fanatics) cell modem walled off from device RAM. But every time I read a new phone announcement, like this Amazon one, my enthusiasm wanes. Even lower-end phones have increasingly fine resolution and RAM, while the Neo900 looks antiquated with its 3.5" TFT, 800x480 screen and paltry 1GB RAM. Mass production has been pushed back to Q4 2014, and will seem even more of a dinosaur once it's finally released.

    It's sad that the only real chance for a nerd-friendly, hackable phone (Jolla is not open in some key respects) missed the boat.

  3. You're Fired! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plus $5 Microsoft patent fees per phone?

  4. prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to AT&T's site, the phone will cost $199 with a two-year contract for a 32GB device and $299 for a 64GB device. The phone will cost $650 off-contract, which is common for high-end smartphones.

    1. Re:prices by jayveekay · · Score: 1

      None of the top-100 off-contract smartphones on Amazon.com are more than $250. I'm sure there are off-contract phones that cost $650+, but not a lot of people are buying them on Amazon.

      http://www.amazon.com/Best-Sel...

    2. Re:prices by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      but not a lot of people are buying them on Amazon

      Yup. The top two selling phones are Windows, so obviously Amazon top-100 sellers are not representative of larger trends in the marketplace.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    3. Re:prices by tooslickvan · · Score: 1

      It seems like Amazon equates off-contract with prepaid. Try searching for unlocked phones and the Galaxy S5 ($589) is number 6 on the top sellers. http://www.amazon.com/Best-Sel...

    4. Re:prices by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      The off-contract Fire Phone is still locked to ATT.

    5. Re:prices by tysonedwards · · Score: 1

      The phone has *the same* specs as the OnePlus One, minus the head tracking camera. The OnePlus One costs $299 *off contract* while the Fire Phone costs $649 off contract. Are the head tracking cameras on the front are worth $350 extra versus an otherwise identically specced phone from a company that is actually turning a profit? The "value add apps" on the Fire Phone would seem more like an avenue for trimming margin rather than adding it, since they exist solely to sell you more things through Amazon.

      --
      Thirty four characters live here.
    6. Re:prices by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I am fairly certain one will be able to buy an Amazon Fire Phone, unless one is really lucky at begging, one cannot buy a Oneplus One.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    7. Re:prices by Albanach · · Score: 1

      I wonder if this price is more about maintaining AT&T exclusivity than being a real reflection of the phone cost. Still, I think the contract requirement while being tied to a single network is going to be a deal breaker.

    8. Re:prices by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Do we have confirmation of that? Amazon is marketing it as an AT&T-exclusive device but I haven't seen any statements on whether the no-contract version is carrier locked. And interestingly, the Fire Phone includes AWS band coverage, which is unnecessary for the AT&T network but is needed for full use on T-Mobile US.

  5. Sounds cool except for ATT by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Can't wait for the phones to be available used. Well, yes, yes I can wait, especially until I hear whether there's going to be a uSD slot

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Sounds cool except for ATT by nmr_andrew · · Score: 1

      Well, let's see, the AT&T contract price will be $199 for 32 GB and $299 for 64 GB. I just recently bought a class 10 32 GB uSD card from a reputable manufacturer for <$20 delivered. I think you have your answer if you read between the lines.

  6. Not feeling it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The web interface for almost every Amazon service is so abhorrent that I seriously doubt Amazon's ability to make a smooth phone experience for all of their offerings. And the quality outside of the interface is pretty scattershot. Do I really want to pay Amazon Prime for this weird hodgepodge of services (with variable quality) all under a single provider's thumb? And do I want to buy a new phone to do it? Absolutely not.

    Seems like the answer to a question nobody was asking.

  7. Holy crap that's expensive by timeOday · · Score: 2

    According to Amazon's website, the phone will range from $649 to $749 with an AT&T contract and will be available starting July 25.

    cite. Even if that's a misprint and that's the price without a contract, that is WAY too much money!

    It is amazing how much phone you can get for $100 now - GPS, decently high-res screen, MicroSD slot. If you ask me the movement is towards off-contract phones that provide a decent value, and $749 phones are going the way of the $3500 PC.

    1. Re:Holy crap that's expensive by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      What's funny is that for a lot of us, our first PC probably cost around 3500$ back in the day and now most people think the Mac Pro is a really expensive computer.

    2. Re:Holy crap that's expensive by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Once you have several phones the cost of an on-contract phone is $40 including $17 (though usually closer to $20+) in subsidy i.e. only really about $18-23 on contract + $5g for extra data. The off contract prices in the USA aren't close to that low.

      For an individual off contract makes a lot of sense but once you are buying 2, 3, 4 the on-contract experience is just too good.

    3. Re:Holy crap that's expensive by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      A lot of people spend a lot of time on their phone. Maybe 30 minutes or more. If your phone lasts you a couple years, paying a dollar a day for a phone that is (and let's be honest) substantially better is probably worth it.

      If you don't use your cell except for emergency phone calls, yeah what the hell, get whatever's cheapest.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    4. Re:Holy crap that's expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're the kind of person who needs workstation-class GPUs, the Mac Pro is an absolute steal - but that's more because margins on workstation cards are insane even by Apple standards.

    5. Re:Holy crap that's expensive by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

      What's funny is that for a lot of us, our first PC probably cost around 3500$ back in the day and now most people think the Mac Pro is a really expensive computer.

      That's true. But when I bought my first computer, there wasn't one sitting next to it for $200.

    6. Re:Holy crap that's expensive by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Well, I tossed out the figure of $100 is pretty low, but even an LG G2 is right about half that. Then again, if you're resigned to being on contract with AT&T, I guess it makes sense to go with the phone that gets the biggest subsidy.

    7. Re:Holy crap that's expensive by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      A lot of people spend a lot of time on their phone. Maybe 30 minutes or more. If your phone lasts you a couple years, paying a dollar a day for a phone that is (and let's be honest) substantially better is probably worth it.

      If you don't use your cell except for emergency phone calls, yeah what the hell, get whatever's cheapest.

      If we're actually going to use logic on this... You're likely to drop/break that phone in the first 6 months. We either need more durable phones are cheaper phones. Less durable, more expensive phones are definitely the wrong direction. I had a Chinese phone for a while that was waterproof, shock proof, dual sims, etc... I loved that phone but it only worked on 1 US carrier and they dont have service where I live now.

    8. Re:Holy crap that's expensive by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      $400 LG G2s are nowhere near as good as a $650 Galaxy S5, though. I can't tell strangers how to spend their money, but personally most people I know, and myself, use their cell phone enough that it's worth spending an extra $250 spread out over the course of two years.

      And whether you have a 2-year contract or not is basically not a factor, my wife and I don't, and it seems T-Mobile and AT&T have both made monthly plans the focus of their marketing. I just said 2 years because that makes it about a dollar/day and sounds like a reasonable length of time to hold on to a phone.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    9. Re:Holy crap that's expensive by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      If we're actually going to use logic on this... You're likely to drop/break that phone in the first 6 months.

      I've never broken a phone. If 6 months was the expected lifetime, I'd pay extra for some kind of insurance plan.

      Chinese phones work on unlocked GSM and work fine on AT&T, TMobile, or all the various cheap monthly plan services.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    10. Re:Holy crap that's expensive by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 3, Informative

      A walk down memory lane:

      • Apple Lisa: January 19, 1983: US$9,995
        Macintosh 128k: January 24, 1984: US$2,495
        Macintosh 512k: September 10, 1984: US$2,795
        Macintosh XL: January 1, 1985: US$3,995
        Macintosh Plus: January 16, 1986: US$2,599
        Macintosh 512Ke: April 14, 1986: US$2,000
        Macintosh SE: March 2, 1987: US$2,900 (dual floppy) US$3,900 (with 20 MB hard drive)
        Macintosh II: March 2, 1987: US$5,500
        Macintosh IIx: September 19, 1988: US$7,800
        Macintosh SE/30: January 19, 1989: US$6,500
        Macintosh IIcx: March 7, 1989: US$5,369
        Macintosh IIci: September 20, 1989: US$6,269
        Macintosh IIfx: March 19, 1990: US$9,900
        Macintosh Classic: October 15, 1990: US$999
        Macintosh IIsi: October 15, 1990: US$2,999
        Macintosh LC: October 15, 1990: USUS$2,500 (plus monitor)
        Macintosh Portable: February 11, 1991: US$6,500
        Macintosh Classic II: October 21, 1991 (MCII): US$1,900
        Powerbook 100: October 21, 1991: US$2,500
        PowerBook 140: October 21, 1991: US$2,900
        PowerBook 170: October 21, 1991: US$4,600
        Macintosh Quadra 700: October 21, 1991: US$5,700
        Macintosh Quadra 900: October 21, 1991: US$8,500
        Macintosh LCII: March 1992: USUS$1,400 (plus monitor)
        Powerbook 145-180 + Duos: October 19, 1992: US$2,150 - USUS$3,870
        Macintosh IIvx: October 19, 1992: US$2,950
        Macintosh IIvi: October 19, 1992: US$3,000
        Color Classic: February 10, 1993: US$1,400
        Macintosh LCII: February 10, 1993: USUS$1,350 (plus monitor)
        Color Classic II: October 1, 1993: US$1,400
        Too many to list: 1993: US$900 - US$5,900

      I figured that would provide a useful summary of how prices on Macs were trending 30-20 years ago. These prices aren't adjusting for inflation.
      Notable standouts: Quadra 605 in 1993 for $900 (sans monitor) and Mac Classic in 1990 for $999 - the two dips below $1,000 for Apple.
      So compare prices:
      All-in-one 1994: $1200-$1700
      All-in-one 2014: $1099-$2199
      Laptop 1994: $1450-$5200
      Laptop 2014: $899-$2799
      Desktop 1994: $1280-$6700
      Desktop 2014: $2999-$6999
      Handheld Device 1994: $500-$600
      Handheld Device 2014: $229-$929

      Summary: more range/options for all-in-one, laptop and handhelds today, less for desktop.

    11. Re:Holy crap that's expensive by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Silly me; forgot the Mini. Change to this:
      Desktop 1994: $1280-$6700
      Destop 2014: $599-$6999 ...and desktop has more range/options now too.

    12. Re:Holy crap that's expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you dont need a contract, and you dont need a telco branded phone, you fucking pay out your ass for nothing morons.

    13. Re: Holy crap that's expensive by the_humeister · · Score: 1

      How so? LG G2 has a similar processor as the S5 (Snapdragon 800 vs 801) but a larger screen and similar camera. Plus all carrier variants of the G2 are rootable now. That's not the case for the S5.

    14. Re: Holy crap that's expensive by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      S5 is smaller, better screen (even if it's .1" smaller), better camera, faster, has a micro SD slot, replaceable batter better build quality (my wife recently got the S5 over the similar Nexus 5). Water resistance is kind of cool, I've heard of people destroying their phones that way.

      Not that the G2 is a crap phone, I just think something you spend a lot of time on is probably worth spending an extra $.35/day or whatever that works out to.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    15. Re:Holy crap that's expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry. Just wait for the Fire sale.

      Should be tons cheaper by then. ;)

    16. Re:Holy crap that's expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of people spend a lot of time on their phone. Maybe 30 minutes or more. If your phone lasts you a couple years, paying a dollar a day for a phone that is (and let's be honest) substantially better is probably worth it.

      If you don't use your cell except for emergency phone calls, yeah what the hell, get whatever's cheapest.

      Bingo. Given how much I use my phone, I have no problem paying for the best.

    17. Re:Holy crap that's expensive by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      A lot of people spend a lot of time on their phone. Maybe 30 minutes or more. If your phone lasts you a couple years, paying a dollar a day for a phone that is (and let's be honest) substantially better is probably worth it.

      I get the argument if you're getting something for it.

      However, I think a phone needs to be the very best on the market to command that kind of price. That should be a no-compromise price. From what I've seen about the Fire, it isn't THAT good.

      I don't care if the Nexus 5 doesn't have the nicest camera of any phone, because it is 60% of the price of those other phones. If they wanted $700 for a Nexus 5, then I'd be much more critical of any flaw, though I wouldn't expect the camera to be as nice as what I'd get if I spent $700 on a dedicated camera.

    18. Re:Holy crap that's expensive by rochrist · · Score: 1

      Also the iMac. The current iMacs are pretty attractively priced. You can get the 27 inch one with a 3.2gHz i5 for $1349.00. When you take into account the 27 inch monitor, that's not a bad price.

    19. Re:Holy crap that's expensive by rochrist · · Score: 1

      Sorry, didn't notice you included an all-on-one catagory. :)

  8. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My enthusiasm is dead not because of the tech, but because of all the handcuffs that come with today's devices.

    This stupid Amazon phone, for instance, only works on the AT&T network. WTF? AT&T is probably the worst of the bunch. That alone disqualifies it for me. The bit about it spamming me with Amazon ads doesn't help. I don't need a phone that tries to sell me stuff.

    Other Android phones aren't much better; they're closed-source and don't get updates for more than a few months after they're released. CyanogenMod may be a good alternative here, but you have to select your phone carefully here since only a few select phones have good CM support.

    Apple phones are the epitome of lock-in. And Windows phones are, well, Windows phones.

    What I want is a well-made Android phone that runs CyanogenMod, has an easily-replaced battery and SD card, and works on T-mobile (at least until they get consumed by some shitty company like Verizon).

  9. Are they providing an SDK for Firefly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wasn't able to tell from TFS.

    1. Re:Are they providing an SDK for Firefly? by ubrgeek · · Score: 1

      Yes, but they'll cancel it as soon as it gets popular.

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
  10. Is it locked to the Amazon app store like... by Assmasher · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...the rest of their stuff?

    If so, not only a "no thanks" but I would like to add a "I hope you die a flaming fiery death and nobody is stupid enough to buy you..."

    --
    Loading...
    1. Re:Is it locked to the Amazon app store like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is locked to the Amazon ecosystem. There is no access to Google Play, or anything else. The operating system is Fire OS, which is an incompatible fork of Android.

      The phone is packed with proprietary software and DRM. There's no possibility of flashing your own Android image, (not to mention, a Free operating system like Replicant).

      Here's yet another proprietary phone I'm not interested in.

    2. Re:Is it locked to the Amazon app store like... by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Of course it is - they're running a heavily modified version of AOSP, not Android.
      Even if Android and the Play store were free and open, Amazon wants you to buy shit from their own store, not Google's.

    3. Re:Is it locked to the Amazon app store like... by MindStalker · · Score: 3, Informative

      That may have been true in their first release, but Fire devices have been able to incorporate Google Play for a while now. There as "Apps from unknown sources" option now. Though it still a little tricky to copy over the apx file.

      http://www.gizmag.com/how-to-i...

    4. Re:Is it locked to the Amazon app store like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The A in AOSP stands for...

    5. Re:Is it locked to the Amazon app store like... by GweeDo · · Score: 1

      I assume the parent is actually meaning applications that use Google Play Services (http://developer.android.com/google/play-services/index.html). These will never work on any Fire product.

    6. Re: Is it locked to the Amazon app store like... by the_humeister · · Score: 2

      There's always going to be a flaw such that a new ROM can be installed. It's just a matter if whether there are enough interested technical people to figure it out. The Kindle Fires are rootable and have Cyanogenmod ROMs.

    7. Re:Is it locked to the Amazon app store like... by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      sideloading an APK is not incorporating Google Play.

    8. Re: Is it locked to the Amazon app store like... by odie5533 · · Score: 1

      We want to discourage this type of behavior so we don't have to rely on hackers finding vulnerabilities.

    9. Re: Is it locked to the Amazon app store like... by the_humeister · · Score: 1

      Get an HTC. That's what I did. The HTC One M8 is a pretty solid phone. Or get a Nexus phone or the OnePlus One.

    10. Re:Is it locked to the Amazon app store like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it is - they're running a heavily modified version of AOSP, not Android.
      Even if Android and the Play store were free and open, Amazon wants you to buy shit from their own store, not Google's.

      The interesting question will not be whether the stock software can run play. The question would be whether we can get an Cyanogenmod install on this and then have both Amazon and Play market places. So far Amazon stuff has not been very jailbreak friendly. If they did open this up soon and made a good SDK then they are actually pretty much poised to take over AOSP from Google.

      What would be most interesting is if they actually copylefted (e.g. AGPLv3) their SDK so that Google couuldn't close the features into Play. Google has long had a religious thing against GPL based software which would make it more difficult for them to steal other people's work and keep it in their data centre. This may finally be coming back to haunt them if Amazon ends up being able to use their own weak licences against them.

      Personally I think Amazon is pretty evil (much more so than Google who are pretty much "evil lite") so I hope this doesn't happen. Probably their own greed (they almost never give anything back to FOSS) is going to keep them out of this.

    11. Re:Is it locked to the Amazon app store like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple?

  11. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That shitty company will be Sprint, you're welcome.

    http://www.theverge.com/2014/4/30/5669598/sprint-will-try-to-buy-tmobile-in-june-or-july

  12. AT&T exclusive? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    So much for being free of old-tech companies. I guess the "free to use" phone will have to come from Google.

  13. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by jbolden · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with the Google Nexus as a nerd-friendly hackable phone?

  14. Pre-order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This item will be released on July 25, 2014.

  15. "Fire Phone", "Mayday service" by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

    Is it a smartphone or a boat flare?

  16. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by thaylin · · Score: 1
    --
    When you cant win, ad hominem.
  17. Kindle, ... fire ... next in line is: by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    Inferno. Unfortunately the next product in line to take that brand name happens to be a line of refrigerators.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  18. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

    Estimated price is between $800 and $1150. For a phone with an 800x480 screen? Seriously?

  19. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    What's wrong with the Google Nexus as a nerd-friendly hackable phone?

    Lack of a card slot and battery door. Otherwise nothing.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  20. wi-fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is the first phone that I have seen that includes 802.11/ac. I wonder if any public hotspots uses ac or a.

    1. Re: wi-fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moto X supports wireless ac and it's been out for a while.

    2. Re: wi-fi by Russ1642 · · Score: 2

      Microsoft says you shouldn't need ac. Just roll down the window.

    3. Re:wi-fi by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      1 year old phones (gs4) support ac. look harder, man.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
  21. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What I want is a well-made Android phone that runs CyanogenMod, has an easily-replaced battery and SD card, and works on T-mobile (at least until they get consumed by some shitty company like Verizon).

    How about a Galaxy S4? That's what I'm running. I have a Sprint-branded model running on Verizon MVNO prepaid (only carrier around here - sounds like it's different where you live). I got mine from Amazon, as it happens - looks like they have a T-Mobile model too.

    Mine's running 4.4.2 CM milestone, fully encrypted. 64GB SanDisk SDHC (make sure you do an aligned format under Linux) w/ Incipio Dual Pro case. Battery pops out on demand. Make sure you get Odin for Windows if you intend to install custom ROM's.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  22. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't speak for the OP, but I won't touch any device made by Apple or Samsung.

  23. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Oh right, that's what I was thinking of.

    Anyway, I can only hope the deal falls through for some reason. The state of telecom in this country is simply horrible, and another merger will only make it worse.

  24. Resolution is 1280x720 by sexconker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This thing should fail and fail hard.

    AT&T only.
    1280x720 resolution.
    $649 or ridiculous contracts.
    No external sd support.
    Not real Android.
    No Google Play store or Google apps.
    Weakly specced.
    Nonstop monitoring and control by Amazon.

    It's going to sell like fucking hotcakes, isn't it?

    1. Re:Resolution is 1280x720 by Charliemopps · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Never underestimate the stupidity of the general public.

    2. Re:Resolution is 1280x720 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AT&T only.
      1280x720 resolution.
      $649 or ridiculous contracts.
      No external sd support.
      Not real Android.
      No Google Play store or Google apps.
      Weakly specced.
      Nonstop monitoring and control by Amazon.

      It's going to sell like fucking hotcakes, isn't it?

      Better res and cheaper than iphone 5S (1136x640, $749 or ridiculous contracts)
      No external sd support....just like the apple crap

      Not real Android? I bought a Kindle Fire just to play with and it is very much android, yeah it is locked down unless you jailbreak it.

      No Google Play store or Google apps. Who cares, you can still use a bunch of free sites and assuming it is like the kindle fire you can sideload *.apk files.

      Weakly specced. compared to what? it beats the iphone 5s again
      CPU: 2.2GHz quad-core snapdragon vs 1.3GHz dual core A7
      RAM: 2GB ram vs 1GB ram
      battery: 22hrs talk/ 285hrs standby vs 10hrs / 250 hrs

      I'm not saying its a great phone, it certainly isn't a HTC one or galaxy S5 but it isn't horrible and if more people to switch to "Not real Android" phones from completely shit ios phone it'll be an overall win for society.

    3. Re:Resolution is 1280x720 by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Not sure all of your criticisms are fair, though I agree generally it's ridiculously expensive and locks the user into bad things, like AT&T. Other items on your list that I agree are bad are issues you and I are in a minority with - SD card support, for example.

      To be fair though there are some interesting UI innovations there. I'd be interested to see if other phone companies follow suit.

      And I hope they weren't stupid enough to give it a glossy screen if the UI is based on creating an optimal view based upon how the phone is tilted.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    4. Re:Resolution is 1280x720 by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I don't think it will sell to well. The Kindle Fire had the advantage that it was cheap... This isn't really that cheap.
      Apple iPhone or the Samsung Galaxy looks sharp. This just looks like generic Smart phone.

      The feature that is has is cool for a few seconds then you get sick of them.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:Resolution is 1280x720 by tapi0 · · Score: 1

      Let me help you out...

      **

      This thing should *sell* and *sell* hard.

      AT&T only. (Amazon customers know they're using the same provider that supports kindle data, so are assured that Amazon know that their partner will deliver a good service)
      1280x720 resolution. (matches the films resolution that they'll get from Prime)
      $649 or ridiculous contracts. (includes Prime ! Yay! ....And 24hr direct support)
      No external sd support. (important to an amazon customer?)
      Not real Android. (important to an amazon customer?)
      No Google Play store or Google apps. (But has an app store that already provides thousands of apps for kindle and *other* phones and tablets)
      Weakly specced. (important to an amazon customer? no, really - look at the video, it shows it *doing stuff* and that's all that matters, not your gigabitz and mega hurts)
      Nonstop monitoring and control by Amazon. (*important* to the amazon customer - as before, it *works* and when it doesn't, or I don't know how to make it work then there's that friendly Amazon to the rescue)

      It's going to sell like fucking hotcakes, isn't it?
      *yes*

      Don't underestimate how most of the things you or I may see as a negative, are actually welcomed by others (Oh..... "and it's 3D!!! ")

    6. Re:Resolution is 1280x720 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better res and cheaper than iphone 5S (1136x640, $749 or ridiculous contracts)

      Some people care more about pixel density than resolution.

    7. Re:Resolution is 1280x720 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think that was the primary intent.

      AT&T has a big 4G service contracts if I remember correctly for iPad and other eReaders, and used to be with providers before B&N and Borders stores died. Think of this as a synergy to add to the existing Kindle / Nook base for AT&T and for Amazon to increase visibility and reach a market they don't directly tap. They do now.

      1) Most users don't use external SD ( you and I do, but that doesn't mean we are the majority )
      2) Most users won't notice the resolution difference for the reason they are buying the phone. I would still argue that anyone who is trying to compare Retina or HD resolution on a phone probably will buy an iPhone anyway due to branding rather than practical use. After all, what difference can you see on a ~5" screen SD versus FHD? Color contrast and light probably make more of a differentiator from a review perspective.
      3) I'm not to fond of "fake" Android either, but this hasn't stopped Kindle yet. Will the typical user notice or care? Particularly if there are features that improve upon the user experience. I'd rather wait and see if Amazon's platform is getting better each generation or stagnating rather than pre-criticize it.
      4) Yes. No Google Play store, but they have their own App Store which offers pretty much the same Apps. They __might__ even screen them better than the Google Play Store at some point. Hopefully soon, that's actually a major feature I'd like to see with Android as a platform.
      5) Selling isn't always the point. It is probably more a show of force and advertising and trying to expand existing market to users that cannot be tapped otherwise. It probably won't sell well... and there are a bunch of Apple products that don't sell in iPhone/iPad numbers, and that does not mean it doesn't have a place in their strategy.

    8. Re: Resolution is 1280x720 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The AT&T lock-in, 3D UI, and Amazon-only Appstore make this a niche device by default. Hence this device will not sell like hotcakes.

      It will probably have a similar overall marketshare of that of the Kindle Fire tablets, around 5-ish%. But that could be enough to be worthwhilr. This device will really only appeal to those that are interested in, or currently are, using the Amazon ecosystem.

      The masses are fine with the range of non-forked Android and iOS devices. Especially with the rise of decent spec'd low-cost Android smartphones like the Moto E and G.

      At best, this phone simply encourages the Amazon Fire OS to further fragment the mobile landscape. I'm guessing most app development shops will still look at this device like most 2nd tier app marketplaces. Doubtful it will gain importance like the iPhone is currently; afterall, it ain't 2007 anymore as Microsoft now understands.

    9. Re:Resolution is 1280x720 by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      iPhone has similar pixel density, actually.

      But the CPU and RAM specs are nearly meaningless when considering that the OSes that run on top of them are wildly different, and the CPUs themselves are also likely to be different. I don't think this is running the 64 bit variant of the Snapdragon 800 CPU either. That's not to say that Apple couldn't stand to have an iOS device with more than 1GB of ram though.

      In real world benchmarks the A7 still holds its own against existing Snapdragon 800 powered devices and it's nearly a year old at this point with half the ram.

      So at this point, specs are becoming less and less meaningful and software is becoming more and more critical.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    10. Re: Resolution is 1280x720 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Edit: it will have 5-ish% marketshare *at best*.

    11. Re:Resolution is 1280x720 by Albanach · · Score: 1

      1280x720 resolution on a 4.7" screen is plenty.

      My Moto X and Nexus 4 are both clear. of course they're both half the price of Amazon's offering.

    12. Re:Resolution is 1280x720 by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      That's because no benchmark is using any significant amount of RAM. Any benchmark using just 1.5GB RAM would make the iPhone rank near the bottom. Most CPU benchmarks are actually javascript benchmarks and tells more about the software (javascript engine) than the performance of the CPU. Also, there is nothing wrong with releasing a phone with low specs. But the price should be lower. The Moto G is an excellent phone for the price. The Fire Phone shouldn't be more expensive than the Nexus 5 to begin with.

    13. Re:Resolution is 1280x720 by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but in the real world specs matter less and less.

      We also don't know what Amazon's paying for their parts, or what their expected profit margins are. If they're finally looking to make money off of ... well anything at this point, then $650 price point seems about right.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    14. Re:Resolution is 1280x720 by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      On one hand you want Google Play store and Google apps but on the other you don't want Nonstop monitoring.

      hmm.

    15. Re:Resolution is 1280x720 by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      The 64 bit Snapdragon 808 and 810 are not yet available, and aren't expected until 2015. The lower end 64 bit Snapdragon processors (410, 610, and 615) are expected later this year, but I don't expect them to cause a lot of excitement because they don't match the performance of the 32 bit 800 and 805.

      I am surprised by the pricing, especially given that it's an Amazon-captive device. At the price point of the Fire Phone it should have a Snapdragon 805, a 1080p display, and 3GB RAM; that's the current level for a state of the art Android smartphone. At its actual spec level it should be about $150 cheaper.

    16. Re:Resolution is 1280x720 by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      That's really hard to say. If Amazon's done anything under the hood to Android, then, maybe not. I'm guessing not bloody likely, but...

      Faster SOC, more RAM and bigger display also have the huge drawback of sucking power. What's odd is that this thing has 1.5 times the mAh(2400 mAh vs 1560) than the iPhone 5S but the battery life isn't matching. Same with the Galaxy S5 at 2800 mAh.

      I guess that's the price of having a giant display, a bunch of cores and gobs of RAM.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  25. $750??? HAHAHAHAH!!! by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    Fuck you, Amazon. I'm not paying $750 for your spyware-ridden piece of garbage.

    1. Re:$750??? HAHAHAHAH!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $649 for the base one, the same as basically all other flagship smart phones... and other Android phones aren't spyware ridden?

    2. Re:$750??? HAHAHAHAH!!! by uCallHimDrJ0NES · · Score: 2

      $649 for the base one, the same as basically all other flagship smart phones... and other Android phones aren't spyware ridden?

      Jeff, is that you?

      --
      Cloudiot: A person who does not see offsite storage as a way to lose control over access to his or her own data.
    3. Re:$750??? HAHAHAHAH!!! by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      $649 for the base one, the same as basically all other flagship smart phones...

      no flagship phone released in the last year has 1280x700-ish resolution.

      regardless. you can't be a newcomer and expect people to pay the price that they're paying for established, loved brands. it's the same mistake made early on by android tablet makers. they released tablets that cost as much as an iPad. however, when people want an iPad, they're going to by an iPad if everything else is about equal (price, etc). the newcomer has to lure you in with lower prices or massively better specs (which is almost impossible).

    4. Re: $750??? HAHAHAHAH!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iPhone 5S.

  26. Re:VIDEO??? by Russ1642 · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised AOL doesn't have a link on their homepage for you to click on. Remember, 'clicking' means left mouse button and 'right-clicking' is the right mouse button.

  27. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by CRCulver · · Score: 1

    Unless I am mistaken (and please point me to a reference if so, I can't find one), GNU/Linux can only run in a chroot environment on recent Google Nexus phones, on top of CyanogenMod. The N900 booted into the same desktop Linux environment one is used to from one's PC without almost no tweaking.

    Furthermore, I assume that the Nexus talks to its cell modem through shared memory, whereas the Neo900 promised to separate the modem from the rest of the system for the sake of security.

  28. Nooooo... $199 on contract. by jpellino · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The higher numbers are for without a contract. Dynamic perspective is Apple's current feature plus flagpole-sitting. Firefly is nice, it's their version of Delicious Library plus Shazam plus ABC, "It even tells you where to buy it!" Really? Guess where it's going to tell you to buy it... That one handed tilt feature will come in very handy while walking or being the passenger in a vehicle. Repurpose it as a speed reading app.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  29. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Thanks, I'll check it out. I'd like to just keep my HTC Sensation 4G, but it doesn't seem to be that well supported by CM.

  30. Why ex clusive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh goodie. A phone that only a fraction of potential customers can buy. Yep. That makes sense.

    Why not limit use of amazon.com to AT&T customers too?

    1. Re:Why ex clusive? by narcc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, being an AT&T exclusive is exactly why Apple's iPhone failed.

    2. Re:Why ex clusive? by Concern · · Score: 1

      Actually, now that you mention it, being AT&T exclusive pretty much is why Android is the world's most popular mobile OS and iOS is a minority operating system.

      Meanwhile, is Amazon as good at this as Apple? Is it 2007, or 2014?

      --
      Tired of Political Trolls? Opt Out!
    3. Re:Why ex clusive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a difference, Apple products were/are "cool", the iPhone was far better at usability for a normal person than any other smartphone out at the time and the first iPhone didn't support 3G so needed a network that supports EDGE to get acceptable (for the time) data speeds, and for that last issue Apple really needed to partner with a network to get the network to invest in its EGDE network to improve user experience. None of these apply to Amazon's Fire Phone. A lot fewer people will be willing to switch networks just for this phone than would for the original iPhone.

  31. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A telecom that bends over for the NSA, and a CIA contractor have a cellphone for you.

  32. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only absolute retards will buy it, instead of any number of well supported Android phones that developers and hackers play with daily...

  33. Niche phone on exclusive carrier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... expensive. ... all the features are around buying things, which I use my phone for... basically never. ... why?

  34. Hard to see the point by DrXym · · Score: 5, Funny

    When shopping for phones I always look for one which runs a fork of Android, which is locked into Amazon services, which is tied to a phone provider and doesn't cost any less than a regular unencumbered phone.

    1. Re:Hard to see the point by uCallHimDrJ0NES · · Score: 1

      I agree. The AT&T exclusivity is particularly unappealing. Does Amazon think they have something desirable here? Where is the hook that makes the exclusivity worth it? It's hard to fathom what they are thinking.

      --
      Cloudiot: A person who does not see offsite storage as a way to lose control over access to his or her own data.
  35. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

    Wait, the fact that it's a $200+ physical shopping app with monthly charges doesn't bother you?

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  36. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

    Did you miss this line? "I don't need a phone that tries to sell me stuff."

    Besides, you're not paying to be sold stuff, you're paying for a phone and the other functionality that comes with that. But the shopping stuff is an add-on that spoils the utility of the device IMO.

    Still, I wonder how good the hardware is. If the phone is being subsidized by Amazon, and if CyanogenMod can make a new firmware for it (which doesn't have any shopping stuff or other crapware), then it might be worth it. Of course, Amazon probably wouldn't like that too much.

  37. This reminds me of the ROKR E1 by sirwired · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This phone strongly reminds me of the Motorola ROKR, a pre-iPhone device whose sole redeeming quality, vs. any other dumbphone of the time, was that it could play tracks you downloaded from iTunes and manually transferred to the phone over USB 1.0. It would only accept 100 songs and/or 1GB of files, whichever limit you hit first. It wouldn't play MP3's.

    Amazon has released a phone that has nothing to distinguish itself from the competition other than the fact it is hog-tied to the Amazon ecosystem. It's does not have any particularly interesting features that could not be implemented in pure software, and the price is nothing to write home about either.

    I don't see any reason why anybody would purchase this over the Moto G LTE, or any number of other smartphones that are available for a heckava lot less money. If you really don't mind being tied to a contract, there are better phones for less than the $200 they want.

  38. Brick and Mortar stores are going to love this by robstout · · Score: 1

    Thank you Amazon for making it that much easier to browse items at my local Best Buy, and then purchase from amazon. I'm wondering how many stores will be willing to carry this if/when it becomes more widely available.

    1. Re:Brick and Mortar stores are going to love this by Russ1642 · · Score: 1

      How exactly would this phone make it any easier?

    2. Re:Brick and Mortar stores are going to love this by robstout · · Score: 1

      Based on TFS, the phone is running a program that identifies devices, and then pops up amazon's part number, etc. Sounds like Shazaam, but for stuff, instead of music.

    3. Re:Brick and Mortar stores are going to love this by Russ1642 · · Score: 1

      Nothing they can't put in a normal app.

    4. Re:Brick and Mortar stores are going to love this by praxis · · Score: 1

      Nothing they can't put in a normal app.

      That's true, but just because they could does not mean they (or someone else) will. My reading of the announcement is that Amazon feel this is a selling point.

    5. Re:Brick and Mortar stores are going to love this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And in fact already have. The Amazon app can scan a barcode and you can buy with one click. And it's been out for years. And is actually quite nice.

    6. Re:Brick and Mortar stores are going to love this by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Firefly takes it a step farther. The existing Amazon app lets you scan a bar code and buy. Firefly lets you take a picture of the THING ITSELF or its package and buy without needing to scan the bar code. (It will be interesting to see how well that works.) Making that kind of recognition work probably requires the combination of a high end sensor and image stabilization that are featured in the Fire Phone; there are a few other devices that can match that but the average smartphone cannot.

  39. Fanboys.. by sqorbit · · Score: 1

    The Kindle Fire seems to have fans just like Apple. While not nearly coming close to Apple fans numbers they are just as set in their ways. It will sell to those fans. The media/books/apps they suck down from the Amazon store and the shopping they do with Prime it should do well enough to stick around as a niche product.

    --
    Sent from my TARDIS
  40. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by SpzToid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Have you considered a Fairphone to meet your specifications, which among many other redeeming qualities prides itself on its repairability, which includes being able to root your own phone whenever you want? So you can install CyanogenMod, or perhaps Jolla's Sailfish OS (that can also run Droid apps). It has a *lot* going for it, especially its designer's goal of staying out of the scrap heap as long as possible. About the only downside is the one attribute they didn't prioritize by design is being the fastest phone with the latest technology; but you must also consider the upsides when doing your own research to see if this is a good phone for you.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06...

    https://www.fairphone.com/

    It uses a GSM SIM card, so it'll work on T-mobile worldwide as you require. I've held one and it's plenty classy in the hand.

    --
    You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
  41. Incredibly HOT product name by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    No doubt whoever came up with the name "fire phone" will continue to enjoy a long and prosperous career at amazon long after typing "fire phone" into Google and clicking image search.

    1. Re:Incredibly HOT product name by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      There have been lots of jokes about the name, but it is consistent with Amazon's branding of other products. They already have the Kindle Fire and the Fire TV.

  42. Maybe this is for our parents? by Schnapple · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Fire Phone runs Mayday, Amazon's live tech support service for devices.

    I haven't experienced it myself but when I see the Amazon Kindle Fire commercials where they demonstrate you can talk to a live Amazon person to help you use your tablet, my first thought was "that would be great for my parents", especially since it would lessen the number of calls I would get from them on how to do something with their technology device du jour.

    You would think that something locked down like an iOS device wouldn't lend itself to needing this kind of tech support help, but in certain areas - especially phone calls - there's a certain level of resistance to technology complexity with the older crowd. It sounds like I'm being mean with regards to age but I have known several older people over the last few years who went out and bought an iPhone because it was the new shiny thing and then took it back because they couldn't figure out how to use it or didn't like how complicated it made things. As much as it makes perfect sense to you and I that the phone is a more generalized computing device nowadays and wanting to make a phone call is basically launching a program, the older set knows that you used to just open the fucking thing and start dialing.

    I'm not sure if the Fire Phone will make all that better (in particular I can almost guarantee my parents in particular would fucking hate the 3D screen thing) but I do think perhaps there's an untapped market out there for people who want a less-smartphone. After all, isn't that basically what "locked down" Android tablets like the Kindle Fire and the Nook are? Google, Apple and Microsoft are all trying to outdo each other on technical whiz-bang, and this entry from Amazon doesn't seem to impress the Slashdot crowd at all. Maybe this one is for our parents?

  43. Creeeepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These cameras on the front look creepy.

  44. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As I post, your comment is rated 0, and it does not deserve the low score. I hope mods will read my comment and agree.

  45. How is it weakly spec'd by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    Specs look in line with other phones to me. The Note 3, which ran me like $700 (no contract), is 2.3Ghz quad core and an Adreno 330. So this seems pretty similar.

    Only thing I see is the screen rez, but that really isn't that big a deal. The ultra high rez for phones thing is a little silly. Once you get around 300PPI or so, which this is, there really isn't any visual detail to be gained. Pixels are too small to be perceptible. So it is spec wanking to go higher and higher on small displays.

    Criticizing the lock-in is very valid, but the price and specs seem in line with the other stuff out there.

    1. Re:How is it weakly spec'd by sexconker · · Score: 2

      The Note 3 has a 1920x1080 screen (ruined by fucking pentile though), has a stylus, has a larger screen (obviously), runs real Android and comes with Google's apps and the Play store, has much better battery life, supports micro SD cards, supports all carriers and bands, and will have been on the market for 10 months (almost an eon in the mobile world) before Amazon's phone is in anyone's hands.
      For the Fire Phone to be similar (yet obviously inferior) to a phone that's nearly a year older isn't a good thing.

      I'm going to completely disagree on 1280x720 being enough. The jump from the Nexus 4 (1280x768) to the Nexus 5 (1920x1080) is strikingly obvious, despite the small increase in screen size (4.7 inches to 5 inches).

    2. Re:How is it weakly spec'd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the note 3 is bigger, indeed. That's not an advantage.

  46. As if the Android market needed more fragmentation by Begemot · · Score: 1

    I hope this thing doesn't take off, or we'll have to test our apps on yet another device running a heavily polluted Android

  47. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I understand some people want the SDHC slot and a spare battery many of us use and have used Nexus 4 and Nexus 5 phones with no problems. I handed my N4 down to my daughter when her old phone bit the dust and got an N5. My wife has the N5 and my son has the N4. None of us care that it doesn't take an SDHC card (we have no reason to use one) and the battery lasts more than all day for our usage pattern so it is all good. You may well use more battery and storage than we do and need those options. I'm not about to say your usage pattern is wrong; it isn't. But many folks are just fine with the Nexus phones as they are.

  48. Why get into the phone biz? by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

    This is really all about their extra software. Why not just license it to phone mfgs?

    1. Re:Why get into the phone biz? by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      "People who are really serious about software should make their own hardware." - Alan Kay

      Facebook tried that strategy and it failed miserably.

      One could argue that Windows Phone and Android are living proof that this isn't a profitable strategy.

      I'm not even joking about Android not being profitable for Google, or anyone else really.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    2. Re:Why get into the phone biz? by tepples · · Score: 1

      For the same reason that the iPhone is currently the only brand of phone with Amazon Instant Video.

  49. Dedicated camera button? by kbahey · · Score: 1

    There's a dedicated physical button on the side of the phone that will turn it on and put it into camera mode when pressed.

    What?

    I've had that since 2013 on my Sony Xperia ZL.
    And even before that on the Sony Xperia Arc.
    And even before that on the Sony Xperia X10 since 2011.

  50. Poorly Priced by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    Let's see.... either you pay $199 and get locked into an AT&T contract and then have to pay even more money to get your phone unlocked at the end of it, or you pay $349 and get a Nexus 5/6 and use it with any carrier you want. Oh and did I mention it also has access to the Play store?

  51. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by BigBunion · · Score: 1

    Amazon doesn't seem like the type of company to negotiate exclusive (restrictive) deals like this. I'd bet that they decided to use a GSM radio in the phone, which will work around the world. Verizon and Sprint use a CDMA network that pretty much only exists in the US. Sometimes we tend to forget that the US only makes up 5% of the world's population.

  52. What's up with the bigger screen sizes in phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm terribly disappointed that Apple doesn't offer the iPhone 5s in 4s screen size (less than 4 inches) because I can't use it easily with one hand, which I could on the iPhone 4. Same thing happens on other Android phones, you have to look for budget versions but then other components like camera or storage suffer. And here comes a phone with 4.7 inches screen? What are these guys smoking? Who the hell can operate such a monstrosity with one hand?

    PS. Yes, I need it for fapping.

  53. What are the rest of the specs? by anchor_tag · · Score: 1

    I stopped reading once I hit AT&T

  54. don't use video when Roaming att will bill $15+meg by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    don't use video when Roaming att will bill $15 + meg and no you can't unlock and use a local sim.

  55. Re: Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too la by the_humeister · · Score: 1

    I ran into this issue since I'm on AT&T. Originally bought a Samsung Galaxy
      S 5 and promptly returned it because it's currently not rootable. So then I bought an HTC One M8 when I found out there's manufacturer support for rooting. You can also wait for the Cyanogemod Official phone (looks pretty nice too)

  56. This is the smartphone for your tech-dumb parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I teach techie sorts of classes to older folks who are relatively savvy when it comes to technology. My students are mostly electronics or process control guys who are trying to pick up more skills on the computer side of things. These guys aren't dummies.

    But smartphones are absolutely horrific to teach, because in the Android world, absolutely nothing works the same way across every device. No one has completely stock everything (not even a Nexus, which has Chrome as a default browser instead of the stock Android browser which is just called "Internet"). From a teaching standpoint, iOS is a step up, but in any given class half the people will have phones so old that they're stuck on some ancient revision that can't do the things the newer ones can: "I paid $400 for this thing. What do you mean I don't get a Siri?"

    I wind up being more productive teaching people this stuff one on one, simply because everyone's device is different. Even in an All-Apple or an All-Samsung class. Older people in particular just don't have their heads wrapped around ideas like storing things online, or when the devices are or are not on the internet, or why they should turn their GPS, 802.11 or Bluetooth on or off.

    One really nice thing about Kindle devices is that there is very little variability between them. The Fire HD and HDX tablets are practically identical from a software standpoint. Amazon's launcher definitely isn't MY favorite, but it's relatively streamlined and straightforward in a way that Android generally isn't. And Mayday - the ability to get a real human being to talk you through tech support needs - is absolutely wonderful. My Mom, who is so technologically inept that she's afraid of using the any TV that requires a remote control, can't live without her Fire HDX. If she gets confused by something, she knows she can use Mayday instead of having to go get my dad or to call me. I spent 10 minutes making sure my mom knew how to get to the Mayday button and on that day I was given freedom from a lot of random, weird mom questions.

    This is not the smartphone for Slashdotters. This is the phone for their parents or grandparents so that they can have a moment's peace at family gatherings instead of spending the whole time explaining navigation software or transferring playlists.

  57. Who cars? Want Kindle! by YoungManKlaus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I finally want a new kindle with a high-dpi e-ink display, everything else I could not give two fucks about.

  58. Re: Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too l by the_humeister · · Score: 1

    Oh, looks like Geohot figured out how to root the AT&T and Verizon S5s. Guess he gets the $18k bounty!

  59. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by jbolden · · Score: 1

    You just load a rootkit or just go into developer mode if you want pure root: http://trendblog.net/how-to-ro...

    As for the configuration, its hackable. Load the OS configuration you want.

  60. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by serbanp · · Score: 1

    Verizon and Sprint use a CDMA network that pretty much only exists in the US

    Meet Japan, the 51st state...

  61. Re: This is the smartphone for your tech-dumb pare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting post. Basically, this Amazon smartphone sounds like it could be a niche product for older folks/neophytes, or those that want to primarily use the Amazon ecosystem.

    My issue with the parents angle is that most tech neophytes don't have much interest in whizbang 3D UI features, esp. if it can't be permanently turned off (not sure if this version of the device will allow this or not.)

  62. GSM vs. CDMA2000 by tepples · · Score: 1

    Chinese phones work on unlocked GSM and work fine on AT&T, TMobile, or all the various cheap monthly plan services.

    That's fine for voice, but data is painful unless a phone can use the same UMTS or LTE frequency as AT&T or T-Mobile. And no, not "all the various cheap monthly plan services" work with "unlocked GSM". Sprint MVNOs in particular work with Sprint-blessed devices because Sprint uses some variant of CDMA2000 and will probably continue to do so until VoLTE matures. Besides, I get the impression that the only carrier that works in Charliemopps's neck of the woods is Verizon, another CDMA2000 carrier. Am I right?

  63. Unknown sources by tepples · · Score: 1

    Yes, it is locked to the Amazon ecosystem. There is no access to Google Play, or anything else.

    No access to Google Play I can understand. But if "anything else" is true, it'd be a departure from Amazon's previous Kindle Fire tablets that have one checkbox to allow installation of applications from unknown sources and another checkbox to allow installation of applications through a USB connection to a computer running Android Debug Bridge.

  64. Nexus hackable about as long as locked devices by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with the Google Nexus as a nerd-friendly hackable phone?

    Mostly nothing - except for the Nexus One, which got orphaned at gingerbread after 18 months (vaguely understandable, since it was underpowered) and the Galaxy Nexus, which got orphaned at about 2 years (which stinks, because it still has plenty of power).

    I'm on the Nexus 4, hoping it doesn't meet a similar fate. This thing has plenty of life left in it, and if Google/LG went with components for which drivers become unavaliable at the next major Android update, I'm giving up...

    --
    Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
  65. Movies for Prime subscribers by tepples · · Score: 1

    As far as I can tell, the advantage of the Fire Phone over Android phones with Google Play is that the Fire Phone lets U.S. customers who already subscribe to Amazon Prime shipping watch movies without having to pay extra for Netflix or an iPod touch or iPhone.

    1. Re:Movies for Prime subscribers by Matheus · · Score: 1

      I can already do this on my non-Amazon Android Phone... Amazon's pushing that pretty hard actually "Hey download this app and get new capabilities from your Prime account!"

    2. Re:Movies for Prime subscribers by tepples · · Score: 1

      How? The only "compatible mobile devices" on this list are Kindle Fire tablets and Apple products.

    3. Re:Movies for Prime subscribers by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      You can only play Prime movies on older Android phones unless you jump through hoops. Amazon hasn't released a movie viewing app for stock Android; you have to use the player in your web browser, which means that you need Flash, and Flash is unsupported in Android versions after 4.1. You can get it on 4.2 or 4.3 by installing an alternate browser and sideloading the Flash APK. For KitKat you also need to get a hacked Flash APK because the standard one is incompatible with 4.4.

      Once you've gone to all that trouble, you have a unstable way to play Prime movies. And it eats your battery life because it doesn't take full advantage of hardware video acceleration.

      There is no good technical reason why Amazon couldn't release an Android app. They have released one for iOS, and doing one for Android should be even easier since Fire OS is based on Android. They don't do it because they want you to buy a Kindle Fire or a Fire Phone and be totally tied to their ecosystem, but they can't afford to ignore the huge iOS market and they probably can't convince Apple fans to come over to their platform no matter what Prime benefits they offer.

    4. Re: Movies for Prime subscribers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not too surprising. But not too many would buy a Fire product just to get streaming video service from Amazon for a smaller-screen phone.

      Also the smartphone can't be as useful with a second tier app store whereas a tablet can get away with it a little better.

  66. The alternative to Apple's Walled Garden by Snufu · · Score: 1

    Bezos' Walled Flea Market with Free Spyware

  67. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My enthusiasm is dead not because of the tech, but because of all the handcuffs that come with today's devices.

    This stupid Amazon phone, for instance, only works on the AT&T network. WTF? AT&T is probably the worst of the bunch. That alone disqualifies it for me. The bit about it spamming me with Amazon ads doesn't help. I don't need a phone that tries to sell me stuff.

    Other Android phones aren't much better; they're closed-source and don't get updates for more than a few months after they're released. CyanogenMod may be a good alternative here, but you have to select your phone carefully here since only a few select phones have good CM support.

    Apple phones are the epitome of lock-in. And Windows phones are, well, Windows phones.

    What I want is a well-made Android phone that runs CyanogenMod, has an easily-replaced battery and SD card, and works on T-mobile (at least until they get consumed by some shitty company like Verizon).

    There isn't anything stopping you from loading up linux on your phone bro. Not sure how you got modded +5.

  68. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "What I want is a well-made Android phone that runs CyanogenMod, has an easily-replaced battery and SD card, and works on T-mobile (at least until they get consumed by some shitty company like Verizon)."

    Here is your problem. You represent ~0.0001% of the mobile phone market. Sorry, the economics aren't there to satisfy your needs.

    I'm a geek, too, and I just want a phone that can browse and make phone calls. I don't want to sit around writing code for my phone. I just want it to work. Like most other people.

  69. Let me guess... by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    They have patented the one-click photo taking with that button and everybody else now has to use at least 2 clicks to take a picture.

  70. This will suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its very easy to tell that this will be a horrible experience because they choose to launch it exclusively with ATT. Thats like deciding buying a Ferrari and switching out the engine for one from ford pinto.

  71. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by exomondo · · Score: 1

    My enthusiasm is dead not because of the tech, but because of all the handcuffs that come with today's devices.

    That's because people just want a phone that also has the ability to browse the web and run applications. If you are one of the few that want a phone without such "handcuffs" to be able to use it for other things then go with a Nexus phone.

    Apple phones are the epitome of lock-in.

    You aren't "locked in", don't be ridiculous. That is just the excuse of lazy people, if you want to change there is nothing stopping you from changing though oddly enough it's often geeks complaining that they are "locked in" so what exactly is it that you are having so much trouble that stops you from being able to change? What is keeping you "locked in"?

  72. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by narcc · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it could be that, but it's actually $650 off-contract.

  73. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    >I'm a geek, too, and I just want a phone that can browse and make phone calls.

    Yeah, that'd be nice too, but (stock) Android is so unreliable it can't even do that very well. Almost every time I load the web browser on my phone, it crashes. On the second or third try, it'll work for a while. For many other tasks, it just hangs for 10-20 seconds with a blank screen before proceeding.

    The whole reason I want an open-source phone is so I can remove all the crapware that the regular vendor-built Android software stack contains, and which is causing all these problems, not just so I can fiddle with it pointlessly. It's the same reason my wife's laptop runs Linux Mint: it "just works" and rarely has any kinds of problems, unlike Windows which it used to run.

  74. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Here is your problem. You represent ~0.0001% of the mobile phone market. Sorry, the economics aren't there to satisfy your needs.

    Nevertheless, Samsung's new Z phone is based on Tizen, the spiritual successor to Meego, with plenty more to come.

    Maybe the market isn't as committed to lockin as you think.

  75. Amazon may have made a strategic error in launchin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check this out - https://www.linkedin.com/today/post/article/20140618231436-3892043-amazon-violated-its-fundamental-business-model-with-its-new-fire-phone-will-it-succeed

  76. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with the Google Nexus as a nerd-friendly hackable phone?Lack of a card slot and battery door. Otherwise nothing.

    While I understand some people want the SDHC slot and a spare battery many of us use and have used Nexus 4 and Nexus 5 phones with no problems.

    Way to completely fail to follow the conversation there, coward. I have an N4 and I even have a N7-2013 and the lack of a card slot is stupid and annoying in both cases. But then, I'm a nerd who hacks his Android devices. The lack of a card slot is unacceptable.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  77. Apple needs to hide the specs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm reminded how Apple used to obfuscate their systems specifications back in the 1990s. This photography blog did a quick comparisons of the imaging/camera capabilities of the newly announced Fire versus the iphone (I assume 5S). http://digitalimagehut.com/2014/06/18/amazon-fire-smartphone-review/

    As poor Nikon and Canon fade into the sunset because nobody is buying point-and-click cameras anymore, the smartphone market continues to grow. The smartphones today can compete with digital camera made just 10 years ago. What's particularly striking about the Fire is how they've upped the imaging capabilities above the iphone (which was always ahead of of the Samsung/LG stuff). Who needs a point-and-click camera anymore?

    I believe it is now safe to consider, with the exception of the very high end, digital cameras are now obsolete.

  78. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by JimSadler · · Score: 1

    I wish Ebay would develop a similar product. I like to shop on Ebay and find Amazon a bit strange.

  79. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can unlock the bootloader on a Nexus device and install whatever you want. The fact that GNU/Linux has failed to keep up with the times is irrelevant to how hackable the device is. There are alternative OS's out there that run on mobile - such as Firefox OS (which even supports the Nexus S and Galaxy Nexus).

  80. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Android devices are fragmenting the market and likewise making "one more" is just returning wireless to the status quo it was pre-smartphones, where everyone needs to throw away the device every two years and be handcuffed by 2+ year contracts to pay them off, accepting more expensive wireless plans to boot.

    The perfect device to me would be one that I can install any ARM OS on (Android, straight linux/freebsd, windows, iOS, etc), have replaceable batteries, easily remove SIM and SD card (which I mean micro/nano sized that have UHS-1 speed) and have decent camera optics. The best optics right now are in the Apple devices, but even that is pretty pathetic because the sensors are so small. IPS display is desirable but I'm more concerned about having a device I can use, not one that is hamstrung with low amounts of RAM and CPU power because of the need of the device to be stupidly thin.

  81. Image recognition fail by Wowsers · · Score: 1

    Try out the phones image recognition system, aim it at a politician, but it doesn't tell you how much it costs to buy the politician. So the phone needs more work.

    --
    Take Nobody's Word For It.
    1. Re:Image recognition fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's only because Amazon doesn't yet sell politicians. I'm sure it will start listing a price for them as soon as someone advertises them for sale on Amazon marketplace.

  82. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by Ambiguous+Puzuma · · Score: 1

    I don't know about Nexus phones specifically, but unless the hardware is locked down you should be able to put Android in a chroot jail instead, with a proper GNU/Linux environment on the outside. Then in the Android world you can run a VNC client app, or ssh in a terminal app (with optional X server app), to break back out.

    I got it working on my N900 substitute, a $200 "Samsung Galaxy S Relay 4G" (SGH-T699), which has a great 5 row slide out keyboard to make up for its otherwise unremarkable (but still better than N900) hardware. There are still a lot of rough edges to smooth out--currently to direct audio to the headphone port I use a shell script with 9 amixer commands, for example--but I get the sense that this is just a matter of putting in more time tinkering.

  83. Burner Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one to think that "fire phone" seems to be another name for "burner phone"?

  84. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're talking about the Neo900 in this thread, which the guys making it estimate will cost between 500 to 700 EUR for the motherboard and another 100 to 150 EUR for a complete device. Convert that to USD and the get the figures Ralph Wiggum mentions. It's a good idea to read a thread before replying to it if you don't want to look like a retard.

  85. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I'd like to have one with the same features, but I wouldn't mind if it's twice as thick as an iPhone, if that means I get better performance and more battery life. And being able to install any OS is important too; then there would be community-supported OSes available.

  86. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My enthusiasm is dead not because of the tech, but because of all the handcuffs that come with today's devices.

    This stupid Amazon phone, for instance, only works on the AT&T network. WTF? AT&T is probably the worst of the bunch. That alone disqualifies it for me. The bit about it spamming me with Amazon ads doesn't help. I don't need a phone that tries to sell me stuff.

    Other Android phones aren't much better; they're closed-source and don't get updates for more than a few months after they're released. CyanogenMod may be a good alternative here, but you have to select your phone carefully here since only a few select phones have good CM support.

    Apple phones are the epitome of lock-in. And Windows phones are, well, Windows phones.

    What I want is a well-made Android phone that runs CyanogenMod, has an easily-replaced battery and SD card, and works on T-mobile (at least until they get consumed by some shitty company like Verizon).

    Sounds like you need to Look into the One Plus. CynogenMod is the default OS and it is not locked into a carrier. It does not work with CDMA however, so yeah, you are still kind of limited.

  87. Sincerely, Only A Moron... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would Buy This 'Phone'...

    Oh, wait, I forget, I live in America which has been renamed 'Merica' by the lazy and obese slobs that inhabit its shores. AmazSlime realizes the dumbing down is complete. The consumer has no idea, interest or comprehension about the demise of their privacy and the resultant damage that is rapidly approaching.

    Sorry, Merica, you are getting your just desserts. No pity from me.

  88. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

    i wanna flash cm onto my s4, but i haven't because i don't wanna lose the gesture and hover features. are those implemented on cm?

    --
    Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
  89. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

    Lack of microsd is simply unacceptable, imo. non-replaceable battery i might put up with. this is the main reason i bought an s4 and not an n5.

    --
    Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
  90. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

    So you're more interested in buzzwords that freedom.

    That's ok, you are mainstream.

    I'm weird and I know it.

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  91. Re:Anyone else think Neo900 is too little, too lat by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

    Is that supposed to be a reply to CRCulver's post?

    He's lost enthusiasm for free (libre) phones, not handcuffed android thingies.

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video