Slashdot Mirror


German Intel Agency Helped NSA Tap Fiber Optic Cables In Germany

An anonymous reader writes Der Spiegel has written a piece on the extent of collaboration between Germany's intelligence agency, Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND), and the U.S.'s National Security Agency (NSA). The sources cited in the piece do reveal BND's enthusiastic collusion in enabling the NSA to tap fiber optic cables in Germany, but they seem inconclusive as to how much information from the NSA's collection activity in the country is actually shared between the NSA and BND. Of note is evidence that the NSA's collection methods do not automatically exclude German companies and organizations from their data sweep; intelligence personnel have to rectro-actively do so on an individual basis when they realize that they are surveilling German targets. Germany's constitution protects against un-warranted surveillance of correspondence, either by post or telecommunications, of German citizens in Germany or abroad and foreigners on German soil.

59 of 103 comments (clear)

  1. End-run around everyone's rights by sir-gold · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wow, this is an impressive loophole that the NSA and BND have found. The BND can't spy on Germans, and the NSA can't spy on Americans, but they CAN spy on each other, and then share whatever they find.

    The sharing doesn't even have to be official, the BND and NSA could just claim that the information was "leaked" to them by some anonymous 3rd party, allowing them to gain all the intelligence they wanted on their own citizens without actually spying on them directly.

    1. Re:End-run around everyone's rights by Thanshin · · Score: 2

      Except for the little detail about the NSA not being allowed to spy Americans indirectly either.

      The problem is not that they find creative ways to bend the law, it's that they didn't really need to. It's been proven over and over again that even in the cases where they did break the law without any loophole or excuse, nothing happened anyway.

      The problem is reality itself. The reality that since the beginning of times governing people requires spying that same people. We've gotten much more civilized in that now we make an effort of keeping that people in ignorance, so they are a bit happier; but the spying continues.

      The government needs spies as it needs assassins and torturers and all kinds of evil agents. If the people keep pushing to reveal the truth, the result won't be the disappearance of evil agents but the removal of the pink veil.

      At some point, if the kid insists enough, the parent's patience ends and he replies "because I say so, now shut up."

    2. Re:End-run around everyone's rights by SpzToid · · Score: 1

      What you call an impressive loophole seems to be modus operandi for these allied intel agencies. How is this any different than what has been revealed about cooperation revealed in the last year between the British GCHQ and the NSA?

      --
      You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
    3. Re:End-run around everyone's rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The problem is reality itself. The reality that since the beginning of times governing people requires spying that same people. We've gotten much more civilized in that now we make an effort of keeping that people in ignorance, so they are a bit happier; but the spying continues.

      The government needs spies as it needs assassins and torturers and all kinds of evil agents. If the people keep pushing to reveal the truth, the result won't be the disappearance of evil agents but the removal of the pink veil.

      At some point, if the kid insists enough, the parent's patience ends and he replies "because I say so, now shut up."

      Yes, look how well that turned out for East Germany and the Stasi.

      The only reason to spy on your own citizens is to take advantage of them - benefit for a few in power at the expense of the many.

    4. Re:End-run around everyone's rights by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      The main difference is that the "Five Eyes" 'intelligence cooperation' between the US and its Freedom Friends in Canada, the UK, Australia, and New Zealand wasn't really news (though the extent of its activities, the fact that it wasn't only for spying on wicked commies, and the fact that what had previously been ECHELON conspiracy kook stuff was now stuffy official newspaper material was); but Germany made a big show of being Shocked, Shocked, and horribly wounded by the revelations that the NSA had been spying on them. Amazingly, this outrage appears to have been less that totally sincere.

    5. Re:End-run around everyone's rights by sumdumass · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure it is a loophole. Sigint has been participating in schemes like this since the cold war. I think project echelon and project magic lantern grew out of one of these efforts.

      When you hear about inteligence communities cooperating and that's how we found a bad guy or foiled some sinister plot, it was likely something like this. The real difference is the scope and the ability to process the communications.

    6. Re:End-run around everyone's rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wow, this is an impressive loophole that the NSA and BND have found. The BND can't spy on Germans, and the NSA can't spy on Americans, but they CAN spy on each other, and then share whatever they find.

      There is no loophole there, it is strictly illegal for both parties to participate in this. The means used to acquire the information is irrelevant.
      Legally there is no difference between NSA planting a bug in your house or having someone else to do it for them.

      The loophole is in that not everyone gets punished when they break the law.

    7. Re:End-run around everyone's rights by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Wow, this is an impressive loophole that the NSA and BND have found. The BND can't spy on Germans, and the NSA can't spy on Americans, but they CAN spy on each other, and then share whatever they find.

      That is supposed to no longer be the case, but you know how that goes

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:End-run around everyone's rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Are you suggesting this is where the US of A is heading to (/already is)?
      Oh noes... but ... but... we are the stallwarth of freedom, liberty and errr... stuff US-A, US-A, US-A! We're number one! ...and all that

    9. Re:End-run around everyone's rights by Warbothong · · Score: 2

      The reality that since the beginning of times governing people requires spying that same people.

      The government needs spies as it needs assassins and torturers and all kinds of evil agents. If the people keep pushing to reveal the truth, the result won't be the disappearance of evil agents but the removal of the pink veil.

      At some point, if the kid insists enough, the parent's patience ends and he replies "because I say so, now shut up."

      At "the beginning of times" governments used targetted spying. They couldn't tap intercontinental fibreoptic communication cables, run the output through face recognition algorithms and automatically build huge databases of everyone's correspondance.

      As an analogy, I accept that police and handcuffs are necessary evils. What I don't accept is that we may as well have everyone wear electromagnetic bracelets, which police can remotely switch into a pair of handcuffs.

    10. Re:End-run around everyone's rights by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Its not really as big a problem as you're making it, though. Everyone already knows that foreign agencies will try to spy on us, and honestly I'd rather the NSA have that info than not, if someone else already has it. At least the NSA is more "on our side" than the BND is.

      The reason domestic spying is such a problem is because the NSA has huge leverage and access that the BND does not. A US company is going to have a pretty easy time securing itself from foreign agencies if it uses a bit of common sense and proper security. That is not the case vs the NSA, as they have access to do things like install taps at ISP levels.

    11. Re:End-run around everyone's rights by zedaroca · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The BND can't spy on Germans, and the NSA can't spy on Americans, but they CAN spy on each other

      Except that it is illegal for anyone to spy on Germans, the NSA CAN'T do that from anywhere in the world without violating the German constitution. When they do it on German soil the Germans have the legal authority to arrest the criminals and they should do so. Not doing so is to disobey their laws and law enforcement duties. When the crimes against their citizens are committed from other countries, the appropriate thing to do would be to ask for the criminals extradition.

      It is the BND's job to keep their people safe from foreign criminals who violate their constitution, specially on their own territory. They are not doing their job properly and even if they claimed it as "leaked" information, they still would have to investigate if there are indications that the constitution is being violated.

    12. Re:End-run around everyone's rights by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Germany traditionally did not get the data product back from the USA vs UK (GCHQ ) and USA share their data. Germany allows the NSA to fully tap all of Germany in any way they like and expects/asks for nothing back in return.
      Over time the German gov or mil will get a good deal on US export grade mil equipment or US mil signals hardware as a thank you from the US gov.
      Cooperation with the NSA comes in stages from a full two way sharing (rare) to a massive data dump for the USA without sharing (more common and global now) from helpful nations and their tame telcos.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    13. Re:End-run around everyone's rights by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Then you are free to willingly supply that information to them,

      Thats not what Im saying, at all. Im pretty anti-authoritarian. Im just not crazy. If North Korean spies know a bunch of stuff about me, I would rather that the NSA ALSO know that info, and that those spies know it. I would much prefer that noone has that info, but sometimes that isnt an option.

      The rest of your post is strawman building, not gonna address that. You want to choose to ignore key words, dont try to have a disucssion.

  2. no surprise by Tom · · Score: 2

    Sadly, this kind of stuff has been modus operandi for Germany for two decades now. You see, there's a whole generation that was raised on the concept of "our american friends". And that generation is in power now.

    You see it in Merkel, who is basically a lapdog to America.

    You see it in our financial industry, which was basically sold bridges by "our american friends" - guess who sent 400 million to Lehman Brothers literally (not metaphorically, literally) the day before they collapsed? Correct, a german bank.

    And you see it in your secret services, which are basically a laughing stock the world over, but try to pretend they can play with the big boys. When in fact they can't even convince our own government members to actually use the cryptophones that they developed for them. *facepalm*

    We are doing some really cool stuff over here, but our people in charge are idiots.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:no surprise by Trepidity · · Score: 1

      By two decades, don't you mean six? It's not like it started recently; what do you think Adenauer was doing?

    2. Re:no surprise by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      In what way exactly is Merkel an american lapdog? Or is that just a fancy way of saying "you dont like her"?

    3. Re:no surprise by Tom · · Score: 1

      No, if I want to say I don't like her, I will say I don't like her.

      I don't like her.

      She is an american lapdog in many ways. In her entire time as chancellor, I cannot remember one time where she stood up for the interest of her country (that she swore an oath to protect) when it was in opposition to american interests. When it was discovered that the NSA had tapped her phone, which quite frankly should be a major diplomatic incident, her reaction was a stern phone call with Obama. She has brought the IWF into inner-european issues (I hope I don't have to explain that the IWF is about as pro-american as it gets). She is either incredibly incompetent or willingly accepted CIA activities such as abductions and what the media calls "torture transports". When a german national was caught in that net, and released after 3 years of Gitmo with no charges, her government did everything it could to obstruct justice.

      Do I need to go on or is that enough?

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    4. Re:no surprise by Tom · · Score: 1

      Since they are at least allegedly on my side, I'd rather have them be competent.

      Even if they were my enemies, I'd rather have that. I've been in competitive environments professional, and I don't mean trying to look better than your co-workers, I mean negotiations and court cases. I would choose a competent, professional enemy over a bumbling idiot every day. Maybe I can't fool him as easily, but I will get more, faster and better results. The idiot is only good when you want a quick win. If you're shooting for the long term, take a competent enemy, it'll be less trouble and you can focus more on your actual goals.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    5. Re:no surprise by Tom · · Score: 1

      No, I mean 2 decades. Adenauer was before my time, what I know about him is from history books and I don't trust them on the details.

      But we also had Brand and Schmidt, for example. We had Kohl who, even though I massively disliked him, cannot be said to have been anyones pet. And SchrÃder was... not exactly great, but he did have the guts to stand up to Bush and tell him that his war in Iraq is stupid and we will have no part in it.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    6. Re:no surprise by Tom · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I think the RAF people are largely fanatical assholes. Doesn't mean everything they thought was bullshit, but there's enough bullshit in it that I'd rather make up my own mind.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  3. Are the Stasi already forgotten? by decaffeinated · · Score: 1

    It seems inconceivable that a country where half the citizens cowered under the Stasi, would ever consider rolling over and asking the NSA for a tummy rub.

    Worldwide cooperation with NSA seems rather extensive, does it not?

    1. Re:Are the Stasi already forgotten? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The German spy organization BND isn't so much related to the Stasi as it is a descendant of the Nazi regime and grandfathered in by the US: The predecessor of the BND was called "Organisation Gehlen", named after Reinhard Gehlen, later the first president of the BND.

    2. Re:Are the Stasi already forgotten? by fazig · · Score: 1

      From the perspective of a citizen it seems inconceivable, yes, but from the point of view of certain politicians and organizations not so much.
      In 2009 there were controversial laws and actions within Germany concerning privacy and surveillance, that prompted videos like this, which was then adopted as a campaign commercial for the Pirate Party in the same year.
      The "Vorratsdatenspeicherung", for example, was actually implemented and had to be ruled as unconstitutional by the Bundesverfassungsgericht in 2010 before it could be abolished.
      For me as a Germany citizen it was inconceivable that the BND couldn't possibly be involved. As long as they don't have to spent a lot more money on their part, get some benefit from direct cooperation, and on top of that keep up good relations with a US intelligence agency, why would they refuse?

    3. Re:Are the Stasi already forgotten? by moronoxyd · · Score: 1

      East Germany had about 16 million citizen, West Germany about 70.
      So it's more like 20% who had experience with the Stasi.

      Just saying.

    4. Re:Are the Stasi already forgotten? by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      He's an American. Just knowing that there used to be two Germanies puts him in the top 5%.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:Are the Stasi already forgotten? by stooo · · Score: 1

      Yep. Even worse, the Verfassungsschutz (interior "security" agency, created by the USA after the war by recruiting former nazis) is even more implied in (neo)nazi affairs from '45 until today. They basically fund the neonazi party by having half the party being "undercover agents" (thus paid by the government) ....

      There's only one way to deal with it : close the BND and the Verfassungsschutz.

      --
      aaaaaaa
    6. Re:Are the Stasi already forgotten? by stooo · · Score: 1

      The other 60M experienced the Verfassungsschutz, which had (has) the same practices, but on a "smaller" scale

      --
      aaaaaaa
  4. rectro-actively? by RuffMasterD · · Score: 1

    I don't like the sound of that at all...

    --
    Human Rights, Article 12: Freedom from Interference with Privacy, Family, Home and Correspondence
  5. Bundesnachrichtendienst by MindPrison · · Score: 1

    Try to say that repeatedly:

    Bundesnachrichtendienst
    Bundesnachrichtendienst
    Bundesnachrichtendienst

    Now, have a few beers, and try it again.

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    1. Re:Bundesnachrichtendienst by Carewolf · · Score: 2

      Now try to say Federal Intelligence Service. In German they drop the spaces between nouns that form a new whole, but you have similar syntax in spoken English, you just put spaces between the nouns when you write them.

  6. Just like the DDR or the 3rd Reich never happened by gweihir · · Score: 2

    These people are doing the same things that were the very basis of oppression of any and all freedoms on German soil in these two regimes. It is like these cretins _want_ that state of affairs back.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  7. Re:Little Brother Looking Up to Big Brother by gweihir · · Score: 1

    If Hitler was still alive, the NSA would probably try to get advice from the GeStaPo on how to spy on people and deal with anybody that has an undesirable attitude. The 3rd Reich was the very first real surveillance state, even if mostly non-technical.

    The US already has copied the idea of secret laws and secret courts that the 3rd Reich pioneered. Cannot have oversight by the very people these courts and laws are targeted against, now can we? Also makes it far simpler to remove people from society that have actually done nothing wrong.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  8. Re:Oblig german spy humour by gweihir · · Score: 1

    Indeed. Simply because

    "Die Deutschen Buerger sind alle verdaechtig! Wir mussen sie alle bespitzeln!"

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  9. Old Hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Joint NSA + BND operations have been known about since the Cold War, and the white "Radomes" in Bad Aibling and elsewhere in Germany have been well-known surveillance sites since at least the 1980ies. Also, the ECHELON program has been known about since at least those days. Numerous newspaper articles appeared back then, and The Spiegel seems to have forgotten about its own articles from that time. With ECHELON, it was possible to monitor the entire radio and phone communication of Europe and especially, Eastern Europe. The West relied on these facilities for intelligence about the Eastern Bloc (COMINTERN states). Everybody knew about it. During the Cold War, it was pretty obvious where everybody's surveillance sites were. When the German Telecommunication Law was reformed in the 1990ies to include tap provisions for intelligence agencies (every German Internet provider must provide a tap interface for intelligence agencies), it was clear back then that they would introduce automated surveillance facilities. There was even activism and protest trying to prevent that law reform, to no avail. Also, the US export restrictions for encryption during those days made it clear just how good the decryption facilities of the NSA were. When that limitation was lifted, everybody knew the NSA can now decrypt all standard encryption algorithms. Plus, occasionally, the press released information about new kinds of software the NSA was working on. So, all of these were indicators that there is an automated surveillance facility used by the NSA and probably other intelligence agencies (like the BND). Intelligence agencies are all about spying, and they do it all day, every day. No surprises here...

    1. Re:Old Hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When that limitation was lifted, everybody knew the NSA can now decrypt all standard encryption algorithms

      That has never been substantiated. Everything released by Snowden so far heavily suggests that the NSA focuses a lot on things like implants, software vulnerabilities, and other forms of endpoint attacking so that the data can be seen before it is encrypted or after it is decrypted.

      The reason why strong encryption is exportable is because it became a moot point as the knowledge and technology existed and was being developed outside of America too.

    2. Re:Old Hat by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      ECHELON was super fast voice to text and then working of key phrases and words from known and new phone calls, faxes world wide.
      The limitations of ECHELON was you had to have a telephone number to watch or hope the 'bad' people used the correct word in a random call.
      Storage was then for the calls known or new calls to known numbers. Later voice prints where used to pick up known people using new/random phone system.
      The NSA now keeps aspects of all calls, data and then looks back in its own time. The need to drop a call and move to the next or not keep details has been solved.
      The same storage methods now work for computer networking - dont just look in real time, just keep all data and sort as needed.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  10. Re:Germany is America's lapdog by umghhh · · Score: 1

    germans love to be abused obviously.

  11. Re:Just like the DDR or the 3rd Reich never happen by jovius · · Score: 1

    The traumas are still unhealed and they are passed on to the next generations, so the world has become a giant festival of self whipping. To avoid talking about the issues huge defenses are erected along with complex system of hierarchy. The totality is nonetheless based on a fragile illusion of power, which can be penetrated by anyone regardless of the applied conditioning - like what Snowden did for example. As long as people believe the illusion it stays together, but it's also possible to voluntarily change one's path and actions. The sum is less than the value of the parts.

    Because ultimately it's impossible to have a complete control of a human being the mechanism needs to be paranoid to the infinity, and everybody is treated as a suspect. The problem is not however the humanity but the mechanism, which is in denial. For sure the ones in the core understand this, but the reward system in the brain can be really tricky...

  12. Re:Just like the DDR or the 3rd Reich never happen by jeti · · Score: 1

    The terms were dictated by the US. They are part of the agreements that regulate(d) the occupation of Germany (see Truppenstationierungsabkommen).

  13. Merkel is a hypocrite by dirtyhippie · · Score: 1

    She was so mad about her phone being wiretapped. And yet, she was playing along with the American surveillance machine the whole time. Serves her right.

    1. Re:Merkel is a hypocrite by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      As the joke goes: Merkel was mad about her phone being tapped, then our prime minister Rutte (in NL) got mad about his phone not being tapped, as if he's not important enough...

      What I find interesting is that she's mad about her phone being tapped (and others are mad about it too, I heard they're launching an official investigation now). So tapping phones of all other Germans, from fry cook to captain of industry, apparently doesn't merit any outrage. I'd argue that it's the other way around: if there's any phone that the US has any business listening in on, it's hers.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re:Merkel is a hypocrite by Warbothong · · Score: 1

      Serves her right.

      Two wrongs don't make a right.

    3. Re:Merkel is a hypocrite by stooo · · Score: 2

      >> our prime minister Rutte (in NL) got mad about his phone not being tapped ...

      That, sir, is impossible. We monitor everything ! We record every phone call !
      An official not being listened to ? I call BS.

      --
      aaaaaaa
  14. NSA and BND by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

    The missing manual.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  15. Huh? by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    I thought the chancellor was mad about NSA spying in Germany?

  16. Re:Little Brother Looking Up to Big Brother by gweihir · · Score: 3, Informative

    Stop lying. Or at least have the decency to lie only to yourself and do that in private.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  17. They by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    They always return to their true nature.

    It is left to the reader to define who 'they' are.

  18. Re:Just like the DDR or the 3rd Reich never happen by Warbothong · · Score: 3, Insightful

    These people are doing the same things that were the very basis of oppression of any and all freedoms on German soil in these two regimes. It is like these cretins _want_ that state of affairs back.

    They want that level of power, but since it's *them* this time, they'll only use it for "good" (ie. what *they* want).

    Of course, they neglect to realise that's exactly what the Nazi's thought.

  19. Re:Little Brother Looking Up to Big Brother by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

    Oversight which they manage to pretty much completely evade if said parties aren't already conspirators.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  20. Re:I thought they ***HATE*** the Stasi !! by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    We love to paint ourselves as modern and tech-savvy, but only ~10% voted for parties opposed to government spying in the last election. The others act outraged when foreign governments or Facebook spy on them but are a-ok with our own government doing it.

    I can only hope this latest revelation shakes them up a bit.

  21. Broken electoral systems by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

    The others act outraged when foreign governments or Facebook spy on them but are a-ok with our own government doing it.

    Why would you think that? Just because a majority of people voted for a certain political party, it certainly doesn't mean they necessarily support all of that party's policies. If you only get one vote every few years at a general election, then it is almost certain that you will have bigger concerns than "mere" spying activity that is potentially going to be harmful to you if abused or if someone makes a mistake. For example, you might be concerned about your child's education, or having a roof over your family's head tonight, or being able to afford to buy food without working three jobs at once.

    The curse of modern party politics is that it reduces a very complicated issue (national government) to a single decision between a small number of often similar choices. Elections are dominated by a very small number of very high profile issues, even though the people elected will be responsible for a very large number of issues that can still affect many people during their term in office.

    This is why I am increasingly in favour of a power of recall (where any individual elected office holder who isn't doing a satisfactory job can be kicked out by the same electorate) and of an overriding power of referendum (where a sensibly large proportion of the population can force a national vote on any single issue they want, and the result is then binding on the government).

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  22. Re:You've forgotten 1 thing Tom by Tom · · Score: 1

    The real world is not that simple.

    There are some psychopaths, especially in politics, who are not driven by money but by power and control. They've intentionally moved into politics because of that. Merkel is actually a good example of that, she spends considerable amounts of her efforts on getting rid of every potential rival around her, and she's quite good at it. She's the most popular politician in Germany largely because she's made sure all the others woke up to a knife in the back one day.

    These kinds of people are not looking for big money, and are not easily bought, because they're looking for a different drug.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  23. Calling nurse Merkel by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Bring 800ccs of faux outrage, stat!

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  24. Re:Just like the DDR or the 3rd Reich never happen by gweihir · · Score: 1

    Indeed. "Am Deutschen Wesen soll die Welt genesen" (roughly: "German nature will cure the ills of the world"). The Nazis though that the wold was corrupt and weak, and that they were doing something to fix that because they believed they had found out how to be better human beings. Kind of like the US portrays itself these days. Of course, the Nazis also though that some could not be "cured" and should therefore be just exterminated. But this feeling of ultimate superiority is a slippery slope and Gitmo, murder-by-drone, global surveillance, etc. may just ultimately end in something just as catastrophic.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  25. Re:Oblig german spy humour by Bugamn · · Score: 1

    Nine? Where?

  26. Re:Industrial espionage by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Thats what so many Germans just dont seem to get.
    This is all banking data, legal data, gov databases, cryptography, trade negotiations, science funding, export opportunities, advanced aerospace, computer support is just gifted to the USA for free.
    Everything Germany is considering internally on its own networks is been given to the US military industrial complex with the help of German telcos and a select few German gov staff.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  27. Re:THE REAL QUESTION IS ... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Think of it more as US staff moving between gov jobs and the US private sector.
    Think of it more as German crypto staff enjoying US mil methods, hardware, software and shared sites.
    Generations have long friendships and private jobs waiting.
    From big brands to startups, front companies to open source :)

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  28. The Bundesnachrichtendienst ??? by OurDailyFred · · Score: 1

    Didn't Lewis Carroll mention them in Jabberwocky? I seem to recall in the second stanza:

    "Beware the Jabberwock, my son!
    The jaws that bite, the claws that catch!
    Beware the Jubjub bird, and shun
    The frumious Bundesnachrichtendienst!"

    --
    If your only tool is a hammer, you'll approach every problem as if it were a nail. - Abraham Maslow