Slashdot Mirror


Sony Forgets To Pay For Domain, Hilarity Ensues

First time accepted submitter Dragoness Eclectic writes Early Tuesday, gamers woke up to find out that they couldn't log in to any Sony Online Entertainment games--no Everquest, no Planetside 2, none of them. Oddly, the forums where company reps might have posted some explanation weren't reachable, either. A bit of journalistic investigation by EQ2Wire came across the explanation: SOE forgot to renew the domain registration on SonyOnline.net, the hidden domain that holds all their nameservers. After 7 weeks of non-payment post-expiration, NetworkSolutions reclaimed the domain, sending all access to Sony's games into an internet black hole. Sony has since paid up. SOE's president, John Smedley, has admitted that the expiration notices were being sent to an "unread email" address.

277 comments

  1. oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    LOL

    1. Re:oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I want more DRM. It is so nice to see the things I paid for just stop working like that. DRM FTW!!!

    2. Re:oops by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 0

      I guess those renewal notices went straight to the bit bucket.

    3. Re:oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I'd definitely love it if my non-DRM online multiplayer games continue to operate without server access.

      Down with DRM!

  2. Black hole? by djupedal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hole in someone's head, maybe - after all, a simple spreadsheet to track something this basic or a reminder in a calendar with alerts with someone assigned to keep an eye on things would take care of things like this. They're lucky it wasn't held hostage...

    1. Re:Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You want to assign someone to keep an eye on things that can be fully automated? Is your hair pointy?

    2. Re:Black hole? by lgw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Same thing happened to Turbine a couple years back: DDO, LotR, etc all down for exactly the same reason. You wouldn't think this would be that hard to get right, but chances are no one in dev at either company survived from the early days to when the problem happened, so the tribal knowledge was lost.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    3. Re:Black hole? by peragrin · · Score: 1

      the problem is you fire someone and those alerts and reminders and tracking spreadsheets are lost in the change over.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    4. Re:Black hole? by geekoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

      " simple spreadsheet to track something"
      that is the bane of corporations. Important info sitting in a spreadsheet, somewhere.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Black hole? by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      They're lucky it wasn't held hostage...

      Lucky, indeed! Next expires 26-may-2020. Lets see how that works for them next time around.

      I'm pretty sure also they're required by law to put ACCURATE contact info into the registry...

    6. Re:Black hole? by rhodium_mir · · Score: 1

      Also, for $1000 they could have simply registered the name for one hundred years.

      --
      You can't spell "oneiromancy" without "roman".
    7. Re: Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no law. Stop saying things to sound smart.

    8. Re:Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The data stores associated with a system should be modeled with as much care as the system components themselves. DNS registration failure is likely a failure of not including the NetworkSolutions provided data store as part of the system design, but instead thought as a clerical duty of an unspecified person in an unspecified location.

    9. Re:Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When I fire someone, I redirect their email to their supervisor. It's right there in their employment contracts that their work email address and any correspondence are the property of the company (as if that wasn't obvious, but CYA applies). For things like this we have title addresses like dnsadmin@example.com, noc@example.com etc. which are broadcast to several staff responsible for the management of such affairs.

      Also payments such as these are lodged in our recurring expenses ledger and paid by accounts payable. You can't incur recurring expenses here without making a ledger entry as the account would not get paid thus the domain name would never have been registered. I guess if you were a total dick you could try and sneak a recurring expense invoice past AP as an NRE, though I kind of hope our AP people are clueful enough to catch shenanigans of that sort.

    10. Re:Black hole? by nobuddy · · Score: 1

      1) Uh. No, there is no such law.
      2) If there was such a law, it would not require the email address listed to be read by a human being.

    11. Re: Black hole? by Narcocide · · Score: 0

      There is no law. Stop saying things to sound smart.

      REFUTED
      Stop contradicting things I say just to try to astro-turf over your own misbehavior.

    12. Re:Black hole? by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      1) Uh. No, there is no such law.
      2) If there was such a law, it would not require the email address listed to be read by a human being.

      REFUTED on both counts.

    13. Re: Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's a law?

    14. Re:Black hole? by theskipper · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's no law per se, but there is a recent ICANN requirement called "Whois Accuracy Data Specification". It requires registrars to contact the registrant and click an emailed link as validation that their whois info is correct. The domain can be suspended if the validation isn't done within 15 days.

      The intent is good but the implementation is pretty mindboggling. They're expecting every owner of a domain name to check that the email sent to them is not a phishing attempt...how that's supposed to work reliably is anyone's guess.

      So, yeah, owners are supposed to verify to the registrars that the info is accurate which you could say is "ICANN's law". But not legally. Here's one of many articles that goes deeper into the issue:

      http://blog.easydns.org/2014/0...

    15. Re: Black hole? by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      So you've also demonstrated you don't know what a law is.

    16. Re:Black hole? by raftpeople · · Score: 4, Funny

      Good point, I better print the email reminder and place that in the three ring binder that sits behind my desk.

    17. Re:Black hole? by Qzukk · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is apparently my president's nightmare because he will call me at midnight and ask me when our domains and SSL certs expire.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    18. Re:Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is apparently my president's nightmare because he will call me at midnight and ask me when our domains and SSL certs expire.

      How many employees at your company? I'm guessing 25.

    19. Re: Black hole? by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      come on don't be egomaniacal or lazy. you can google this yourself. its a law. https://www.govtrack.us/congre...

    20. Re: Black hole? by Narcocide · · Score: 0

      https://www.govtrack.us/congre...

      no that was icann's policy. here's the law. you want me to do any of your other homework for you?

    21. Re: Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not a law, it's a customer service agreement.
      The account has to be read long enough for initial verification. After that unless the registrar is seeing bounced mails it can sit unattended til doomsday.

    22. Re: Black hole? by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      https://www.govtrack.us/congre...

      while you're right that was a customer service agreement, a simple internet search will show you a ton of references to the text of the actual law.

    23. Re:Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, moron. ICANN doesn't pass laws. Get your head out of your ass.

    24. Re:Black hole? by LordKronos · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, 10 years is the max registration. And that's exactly what I do. Throwaway domains that I'm experimenting with might only get a year or 2, but once anything becomes important to my business, it gets renewed for 10 years. The same is true for my personal domain. And every couple years I go through and bump it back up to the max. I'd literally have to go 10 years without remembering to renew a domain before one would expire. I can't see why any business would do otherwise.

    25. Re:Black hole? by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      There actually IS a law, its called the "Fraudulent Online Identity Sanctions Act" and its an ammendment to some other law I forget the name of but I'm sure is as easy to google.

      Federal crime, 7 years in jail yo.

    26. Re:Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Such a thing is so ridiculous. For a company a domain name is so crucial that I can't even begin to think of how this could happen. Forget about reminders, heck you can pay hundreds of years in advance without it making ANY dent in a companies bottomline. And I'm not kidding at all. At current prices 100 years would be ~$1000. Invest $1k, no domain worries for the coming decades.

    27. Re:Black hole? by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      google the "Fraudulent Online Identity Sanctions Act", moron.

    28. Re:Black hole? by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      Well, its really no more ridiculous than storing authentication on the client-side. You'd be shocked how often this basic foolishness flies with very large companies.

    29. Re: Black hole? by thunderclap · · Score: 1
      Originally I haven't planned on entering this but when I clicked the link I got this.

      This bill was introduced on May 12, 2004, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted.The text of the bill below is as of Jun 09, 2004 (Reported by House Committee).

      To be clear this means president Bush never signed it into law. It also means, that as it isn't a law the other person is right unless you can find one that was. As for SonyOnline.net the best thing would be a redirect to Piratebay.se

    30. Re:Black hole? by theskipper · · Score: 1

      It looks like that is specifically tied to using false whois info if there is a subsequent copyright or trademark infringement, not if Joe Average decides to put 123 Main St. as his contact address. Seems like the law is a tool that can be used to help prosecution of Lanham violations (there probably aren't many criminals who keep their whois info up to date ;)

      Here's the text copied from wikia:

      http://itlaw.wikia.com/wiki/Fr...

      "Fraudulent Online Identity Sanctions Act, Tit. II of the Intellectual Property Protection and Courts Amendments Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-482, 118 Stat. 3912, 3916 (Dec. 23, 2004).
      Overview Edit

      This Act increases criminal penalties for those who submit false contact information when registering a domain name that is subsequently used to commit a crime or engage in copyright or trademark infringement."

      If it's broader than that then please correct me (IANAL).

    31. Re: Black hole? by pla · · Score: 3, Informative

      here's the law. you want me to do any of your other homework for you?

      Not the GP, but yeah, I do - Can you explain what an anti-domainsquatting law that specifically deals with trademarks and identity theft, and absolutely nothing to do with simply giving fake info to a registrar, has to do with your original claim that giving ACCURATE contact info counts as US law?

      Now, ICANN can enforce its policies on the registrars themselves, simply by virtue of the fact that a registrar requires ICANN's continued blessing to operate. But the only recourse they have about (non-identity-stealing) fake registration info comes down to taking the domain away from you. For someone like Sony, that might look like an end-of-the-world scenario. For someone who just wants a named place to stick stuff online for my own personal use? Meh, worst case, I've lost $10-$15 and I have to wait three days for a new domain to propagate (and not always even out the money - Much to my surprise, I actually had GoDaddy refund me when I flatly refused to send them a photocopy of my license, three months into a registration).

    32. Re:Black hole? by thunderclap · · Score: 1
      No, there isn't. There is a dead and now archived House resolution.

      This bill was introduced on May 12, 2004, in a previous session of Congress, but was not enacted. The text of the bill below is as of Jun 09, 2004 (Reported by House Committee).

      It was never signed into law as it never made it out of committee. That link you so nicely offer up also offres this:

      H.R. 3754 (108th): Fraudulent Online Identity Sanctions Act Introduced: Feb 03, 2004 (108th Congress, 2003–2004) Status: Died (Reported by Committee) in a previous session of Congress

      How about this one. Its currently alive. S. 2588: Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2014

    33. Re:Black hole? by Nevo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, somebody should absolutely be assigned responsibility to keep up with things like this. Because when no one's assigned the responsibility, well, then you get things like domains expiring.

    34. Re:Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you HEARD of automatic bill-pay??

    35. Re:Black hole? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      IIRC 10 years is the max on com/net/org

      How it could happen is pretty simple, someone is working on a new service, they are in a hurry and just buy the domain with a company credit card or a small one time PO or whatever putting their individual work email address as the contact info. They register it for a few years, maybe even the maximum of 10. Maybe they set a reminder for themselves to renew it, maybe they don't bother as they think it unlikely the domain will stay in use that long.

      The project grows in importance but noone notices that the domain behind it is associated with one employee, then that employee becomes an ex-employee and their email is shut down

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    36. Re:Black hole? by rhodium_mir · · Score: 2

      Network Solutions offers kinda-sorta-100 year registration. Technically it's just a ten year registration that they automatically renew for you every ten years, but it still would've saved Sony a lot of trouble in this case.

      Network Solutions price chart

      20 and 100 Year Domain Registration Service - If the domain name registry of a particular third level domain does not provide for an initial registration term of 20 or 100 years, then Network Solutions will register your domain name on your behalf for the maximum term available at the respective registry, and as long as your domain name is registered with us, we will continue to add additional years to your registration on an annual basis up to the total of 20 or 100 years, depending upon the term you select from the date of purchase.

      --
      You can't spell "oneiromancy" without "roman".
    37. Re:Black hole? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Domains and SSL certificates. It seems nobody can handle these things expiring until OMG IT'S HAPPENING TOMORROW!!!

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    38. Re: Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Somebody's parents didn't hug him

    39. Re:Black hole? by TitusGroan8856 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      have you heard of automated systems breaking? this is why someone should be assigned and responsible for it.

    40. Re:Black hole? by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm afraid that the current "whois" practices were deliberately set up to allow plausibility deniability, to protect the domain owners from being actually reached by the spammers and numerous sales people or lawyers with cause to contact domain owners. The domain vendors benefit from this: they can follow the letter of the law, but not actually support contacting the domain owners to handle criminal or abuse behavior, and wait for days, weeks, or years while lawyers collect the evidence and chain of repeated contact failures before a court order can be obtained.

      In the meantime, they're collecting the registration fees, in bulk, for the relevant domain and all the related domain names. The current system is a critical revenue stream, which the domain and SSL key vendors have no need or desire to encumber by enforcing legitimate contact information.

    41. Re: Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Developer team, testers, project manager, and systems administrator. Automating things employs people.

    42. Re:Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " simple spreadsheet to track something"
      that is the bane of corporations. Important info sitting in a spreadsheet, somewhere.

      You are right. Excel is the wrong tool. They should be using Access.

      Now, off to update my spreadsheet databases...

    43. Re:Black hole? by rossdee · · Score: 1

      The place that hosts my domains sends me an email, and then charges my credit card automatically if I don't respond.

    44. Re:Black hole? by ArcadeNut · · Score: 2

      Or....... just buy the domain for 100 years... it's not like Sony wouldn't make the registration fees back and they would never have to worry about it again....

      --
      Visit the Arcade Restoration Workshop @ http://www.arcaderestoration.com
    45. Re:Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't think you could buy a domain for more than a couple of years at a time.

    46. Re:Black hole? by DigiShaman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've fucked up and forgot when an SSL cert was about to expire. I found out the next morning when their iPhones could no longer access the Exchange server. Shit happens. This time I include SSL, Domain, and Server hardware warranty expiration notices scheduled way in advanced in my calendar as an event.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    47. Re: Black hole? by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      ..perhaps giving him a uniquely wise view of the world.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    48. Re: Black hole? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Come on, read the content of what you googled.

      That's an amendment to the Trademark Act of 1946
      Nothing in that act is applicable outside the context of a trademark violation.

    49. Re: Black hole? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      It was done as part of another act in December 2004. If you look at the Trademark Act 1946, it contains the amendments in GP's link.
      Regardless, it only applies to calculating the damages provided in a trademark violation involving a domain name.

    50. Re:Black hole? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Read the "Fraudulent Online Identity Sanctions Act", moron.

    51. Re:Black hole? by ketomax · · Score: 4, Informative

      I bought mine for 10 no problems.

    52. Re:Black hole? by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

      Hole in someone's head, maybe - after all, a simple spreadsheet to track something this basic or a reminder in a calendar with alerts with someone assigned to keep an eye on things would take care of things like this. They're lucky it wasn't held hostage...

      I'm sure someone that spreadsheet with a calendar reminder, but then they probably got laid off and didn't bother give the info to anyone else.

    53. Re:Black hole? by ArcadeNut · · Score: 4, Informative

      Network Solutions offers it:

      http://www.networksolutions.co...

      --
      Visit the Arcade Restoration Workshop @ http://www.arcaderestoration.com
    54. Re:Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Under this act, providing false information in a domain registration is only a violation if it's connected to another crime. Specifically, in connection with a violation of the Trademark Act of 1946 or violation of Title 17 USC. Providing false information to a registrar just because you don't want to give real information is, in and of itself, not a crime, JACKASS!!!

    55. Re:Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure what the right answer is to counter 'tribal knowledge' issues, as they seem to be called these days. Any solution on paper, electronic, or wetware is bound to fail if it isn't attached to some hierarchy.

      Electronic documents: important information lays hidden 10 subfolders deep on the 'shared drive', but hey - at least 'it got documented.' Nobody knows which of 10,000 files named "important notes.docx" has the proper authority, or which is the latest copy.

      Paper: same basic problem, but not visible to remote offices or anyone outside your office, for that matter. But it least you can be reminded by it's tangible presence. Others may discover it in the event of your sudden departure or demise.

      Wetware: actually works when you have people that give a damn and have good memory. Human talent and memory are ultimately what drive a company even with the best technology. However, no backup plan is generally possible unless a lot of cross-training sessions are conducted. It is tedious and inefficient to keep asking the 'go to guy' every time something is needed. You are beholden to that person who no doubt has earned job security.

      The only perfect solution I could imagine is a document management system that indexes and references every document in a hierarchy. Both the presence, authority and scope of every document is derived from one root authority. Now figure out how to make this system affordable, intuitive, and available to all employees.

    56. Re:Black hole? by pushing-robot · · Score: 2

      Because something that has to be done every year gets done every year, like taxes.

      Something that has to be done every 10+ years is a lot more likely to get lost and forgotten. Sure, you could set a reminder...but where? Staff get replaced, calendars get replaced, software gets replaced, computers get replaced, offices get cleared out, and the people who trained the current employees weren't even around themselves the last time it needed to be done.

      It's like the hundred year $DISASTER, which kills hundreds and causes billions in damage simply because it's so rare. If it happened every year, damages would paradoxically go down because building codes would improve and the public would be better prepared.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    57. Re:Black hole? by Ixokai · · Score: 1

      Read it. Its just a booster. It makes intellectual property violations considered 'willful' if involving a fraudulent domain name, and takes on extra penalties if you commit a crime involving a fraudulent domain name.

      It doesn't make anything illegal, nor does it give ICANN force of law.

    58. Re:Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is an agreement, not law!

    59. Re:Black hole? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Do you have any idea how that's gonna look on your quarter report? Not to mention that you might not be around in 10 years, let alone 100, so why bother paying for the domain so far in advance?

      Welcome to corporate thinking!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    60. Re:Black hole? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Lately? Hmm... I bought some pizza, got a haircut, hired a plumber...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    61. Re: Black hole? by thunderclap · · Score: 1

      Okay, are you suggesting that accurate reporting to ICANN is covered by the Trademark act? The point I made was the bill he offered and promoted as a refutation was never a law because it died in committee. If you have the other acts name please share

    62. Re: Black hole? by mwvdlee · · Score: 2

      Just to add my 2c. A while ago I was working on a project which could use data in WHOIS records. Ultimately this failed because the data is very unreliable and mostly unavailable, but I did come accross some laws.

      Seems the U.S. is pretty much the only country that has a law on this, and it just says that it is illegal to have inaccurate information in a WHOIS record if and only if you're using that inaccurate information to scam people. So basically you can use inaccurate information all you want but if you're conficted of scamming people online, the use of inaccurate WHOIS information can be used to add some additional jailtime.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    63. Re:Black hole? by Koutarou · · Score: 1

      SSL certs are pretty trivial to track in Nagios or whatever your monitoring software of choice is.

      No two domain registrars seem to format their WHOIS data the same though, making it a lot harder.

    64. Re:Black hole? by cryogenix · · Score: 4, Insightful

      100 year registration is dirt cheap compared to what happened as a result of it expiring :)

    65. Re:Black hole? by cryogenix · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It wouldn't hurt to have a distribution group for this and then make yourself and others a member of the group, even if it's your boss. Best case scenario, he gets the alert and says, Bob, did you see the alert about... Already took care of it this morning. Good man.

    66. Re:Black hole? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It's pretty easy to forget when the renewal date is so far off. Plus if they do everything online and via mail it's easy to lose the reminders and email addresses change all the time in corporations, but snail mail often gets to the right department at least. Even if it's on someone's calendar, that person gets laid off or quits or transfers. IT groups especially have high turnover from top to bottom. If someone pays for the upcoming 5 years, that person will almost certainly be gone from that job when it expires.

    67. Re: Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Christ, I own a little over 50 domains from quite a few places and I get everything short of being beat by baseball bats, despite having most of them on auto-renew and I always pay a month or so in advance on the ones that don't.

      Sometimes three months before they expire they will start calling me. Sometimes 6 times in a day or more. "Hi we noticed your domain, bigtits.com is about to expire, would you like to renew it?" Yes, yes I would like to renew it, just like I did the last 11 years one month prior to it expiring. Wtf. And they often have a different person call about each one of my domains and what annoys me most is when they ask out of curiosity what I use the domain for.

    68. Re:Black hole? by lgw · · Score: 2

      Wow, that's a non-sequitur (and, BTW, like most things on Slate, the argument fails: the SCOTUS ruling explicitly hinged on the fact that Hobby Lobby was a closely held corporation, and thus no different from a partnership It was not a broad ruling applicable to corporations in general, where the linked argument might have been relevant.)

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    69. Re:Black hole? by war4peace · · Score: 1

      When I fire someone, I redirect their email to their supervisor.

      Isn't that illegal?

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    70. Re:Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting, really. I think there is someone in Sony's HQ with a credit card and fingers on a keyboard to register it...

    71. Re:Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, that's FOUR times you've posted the same misinformation... How many more times are you going to do that before you finally admit you were wrong...

    72. Re:Black hole? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      When my certs expire I sign myself a new request. 30 seconds, mostly to find the script.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    73. Re:Black hole? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      I got that email.

      Of course I always click the links in emails claiming to be important.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    74. Re:Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you transfer it. They renew it yearly 100 times, they don't give you a 100-year registration period. They also have "domain protection" for $9.99/domain/year. For that price, you could just register the domain for two years. https://www.networksolutions.c...

    75. Re:Black hole? by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Automated systems? Well maybe as long as they update the Visa card's expiry date.....

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    76. Re:Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But but but... Self signed certs...

      How are the intelligence agencies around the world going to MITM your SSL connections?

    77. Re:Black hole? by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      It was not a broad ruling applicable to corporations in general, where the linked argument might have been relevant.

      You mean it doesn't apply to around 90% of all corporations according to the IRS' definition of the term, and that it absolutely doesn't apply to companies like Cargill, Koch and Mars?

    78. Re:Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, they clicked accept on the EULA and as we are all well aware EULA's trump law 100% of the time.

    79. Re: Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nitpick: The President doesn't have to sign a bill for it to become law. If the President doesn't approve or veto it within 10 days, it becomes law by default.

      In this case, Congress never sent it to the President.

    80. Re:Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It still cracks me up the way employers describe themselves like this.

      The worker is a job creator for the shareholder, not the other way round.

    81. Re:Black hole? by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      Because something that has to be done every year gets done every year, like taxes.

      Something that has to be done every 10+ years is a lot more likely to get lost and forgotten.

      And yet, here we are...looks to me like it DIDN'T get done.

      See, the thing is, like I said I do, you DON'T have to wait 10 years. If you want to make it a policy to bump it up to 10 again EVERY year, then do that. You stay in the habit, but you've still got that huge buffer. Your policies and procedures would have to fail you 10 TIMES IN A ROW for it to even get to this point. It seems pretty likely to me that at SOME point in those 10 years, some sysadmin or manager would come along and say "so who handles domain renewals around here", and everyone would look at each other, and they'd figure it out these domain's have been neglected for 5 years, and then they'd be able to fix the problem before it was a problem.

    82. Re:Black hole? by Frigga's+Ring · · Score: 1

      I can't speak to other countries, but in the US it's not illegal. Employers will put a section right in their Employee Handbook or contract that states the company owns all of the data that employee creates, their work email, their work documents, etc. In InfoSec, we're often called to perform an investigation on what a user has been accessed and what they're doing, and we can do legally this because having that ability is noted in the employee handbook.

    83. Re:Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no law per se, but there is a recent ICANN requirement called "Whois Accuracy Data Specification". It requires registrars to contact the registrant and click an emailed link as validation that their whois info is correct. The domain can be suspended if the validation isn't done within 15 days.

      The intent is good but the implementation is pretty mindboggling. They're expecting every owner of a domain name to check that the email sent to them is not a phishing attempt...how that's supposed to work reliably is anyone's guess.

      WDRP has been in place since 2003. Hardly recent by internet time lines

    84. Re:Black hole? by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      No.

      Theres generally no expectation of privacy; the email account is company property, sitting on a company server, on company storage. In what universe would the company not have rights to it?

      Not only that, but most sane companies have an acceptable use policy that generally indicates "no expectation of privacy, and we are likely snooping on everything".

      The only exceptions I've heard thrown around (not sure if these would even hold up in court) are if there is personal stuff in there, and the company is aware of it but snoops anyways.

    85. Re:Black hole? by necro81 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure also they're required by law to put ACCURATE contact info into the registry...

      "It's impossible! I never broke the law. I AM THE LAW!"

    86. Re:Black hole? by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      And ICANN makes laws now? You "refuted" that there is a ICANN policy, not a law.

    87. Re:Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Corporate email address, corporate property. This is SOP where I work also. If you are using your work email address for personal business and don't get notifications out to people to switch addresses that is your problem not theirs.

    88. Re:Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone probably was assigned to track this. They probably haven't worked there in a long time

    89. Re: Black hole? by Talderas · · Score: 2

      bigtits.com?

      It's obviously an avian enthusiast website. What else would something think it be?

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    90. Re:Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think that nobody was assigned responsibility in this case ?
      Just because it's part of someones job description it doesn't mean they're not going to fuck it up at some point.

    91. Re:Black hole? by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

      That works well for people. But if a corporation gets a 100 year registration, they are practically guaranteed to forget to renew it. Remember the guy that said "Why do we need 4 digit dates, a 100 years is good enough for me."

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    92. Re:Black hole? by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      Do you have any idea how that's gonna look on your quarter report?

      Too small to appear as a rounding off error in the smallest item on the balance sheet of the smallest subsidiary of the Sony Online Entertainment division of the Sony Group?

      $35/yr, 100yrs? $3500. For their top level global nameserver.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    93. Re:Black hole? by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 2

      You want to assign someone to keep an eye on things that can be fully automated?

      It's a basic accounts payable function, so yes.

      Someone has to have authority to maintain and modify the automated payment schedule, otherwise either anything can be added/removed or nothing can be added/removed. Moreso, someone within their accounts payable department should be specifically responsible for all these particular kinds of payments: trademark fees, site ownership fess, official registrations, patent renewal fees, etc. That person should have lost their job today.

      I'm a bookkeeper, I would lose my job if my employer's domain was cut off because a) I didn't pay the account, and b) my excuse was, "<shrug>I don't read that email account any more."

      Hell, SOE is a large enough corporation in its own right that they should have someone whose sole job is to make sure contact information at vendors is up to date in response to structural changes and staff movements, as well as checking email accounts for employees who are no longer at the company or divisions that no longer exist to ensure that critical info isn't being lost. And an entirely separate person (but working in the same section) whose job is to make sure SOE's internal contact & billing information is updated for all of the major clients, to ensure that SOE itself is also sending accounts to the right companies/divisions and contacting the right people at those companies, to prevent SOE from causing similar embarrassments to SOE's major clients/partners/etc.

      And Sony Corporation (the parent) should have at least one person whose sole job is to liaise between those "Contact Managers (internal/external)" in the different subsidiaries and major divisions of Sony, to ensure that the whole group is up to date.

      And that person should have lost their job too.

      Seriously, fuck that guy.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    94. Re:Black hole? by cryogenix · · Score: 1

      On the bright side, whoever selects that will be long dead by the time it happens and thus fully protected from ever having to deal with being blamed :)

    95. Re:Black hole? by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Such emails should never go directly to a person but rather to an alias, preferably one which goes to a group of people.

      One of my tasks for one company I worked for was domain name manager. We were in an aggressive acquisition phase so I was dealing with new integrating new companies with their own domain names (which we kept) constantly. Gaining control of those was often somewhat crazy with the companies not knowing who was responsible or the person having left/dead or just a a-hole about getting back to me. We even had one domain snatched up by a squatter (not my fault) that cost $5000 to get back. Damn right you manage these things properly. I would check the folder those emails went to regularly and we had monitoring processes in place to ramp things up as domain expiry drew near if for some reason I missed something. This isn't rocket science.

    96. Re: Black hole? by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      OK so even when you do find out what a law is you demonstrate you don't know how to read them.

    97. Re:Black hole? by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      The best way is to scrape (or API) the domain registrar. Sometimes takes a bit of work but you have a 100% up-to-the-minute completely accurate list.

    98. Re:Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think a 100 year domain purchase is necessary. However, it looks like the 100 year plan costs about $9.99 per year. $1000 will mean absolutely nothing on a quarter report from Sony.

    99. Re:Black hole? by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      Theres generally no expectation of privacy; the email account is company property, sitting on a company server, on company storage. In what universe would the company not have rights to it?

      There are countries that do give employees an "expectation of privacy" from employers snooping on email accounts (& phone calls, toilet breaks, etc), even though those are hosted on company equipment. And since it's the law/right/reg/ruling/etc, a mere employment agreement or company policy can't usurp that. The US is unusual in that it not only doesn't have anything like that, it so doesn't have it to such a degree that people can't even imagine having it. It's funny that the master-servant relationship is the default assumption in the US.

      However, even those laws or regs would still only apply during the employee's tenure, not after they leave. And would have big fat exceptions for transferring job-title and task-title based email addresses (admin@fatass.com, renewals@fatass.com).

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    100. Re:Black hole? by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Wait, wait.

      Having appropriate people access employee's X e-mail account is one thing. Security group, Legal group, etc.
      Having someone's e-mails forwarded to their manager is outside of those bounds.

      One example would be me sending an e-mail to a colleague who works under the same manager telling them that I'm dissatisfied with how the manager performs, or an e-mail exchange between me and HR about my manager's misconduct in this or that area. These are things that are company-owned, but my manager should not be able to access.

      Where I work, nobody can access my e-mail address (legally) unless they have legal approval. Ironically, it's a company which is rather hated here on /. - not that I care, it's just a job.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    101. Re:Black hole? by war4peace · · Score: 1

      I live in one of those other countries, that's exactly why I asked.
      It's amazing how people rush to say "nah it's normal" while at the same time they fume about NSA meddling. Heh. Go figure.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    102. Re: Black hole? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      If I were their registrar, I'd probably resell the name to someone who would hold it hostage, just to make a point. This is the easiest thing in the world to avoid, just by having some basic policies in place.

      Require that all ongoing accounts be set up to send email to role accounts that forward to multiple people (an email list). Have a policy where any employee termination/retirement triggers an automatic check of all role accounts, and if it results in a role account with no recipients (or, ideally, below some higher threshold), the current IT head has to start contacting managers until they can sort out who should be responsible.

      Had Sony done this, it wouldn't be a problem.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    103. Re:Black hole? by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      While the way Sony is behaving they are unlikely to survive 100 years, but if they do, they are sure to forget to renew after 100 years. Some bean counter will fire the guy responsible for keeping track of those 100 years and that email address will be abandoned.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    104. Re:Black hole? by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      As has been explained numerous times, there are gigantic differences between a company-provided email and what the NSA did.

      1) MOST employers have an employee conduct agreement, or a computer-specific Acceptable Use Policy. This usually lays out the reality that you will be monitored.
      2) The NSA does not have ownership rights over the servers hosting your personal email or comms. The company does have ownership rights.
      3) Often companies have a legal liability if they do not monitor the communications-- for instance, if PII is transmitted in violation of HIPAA, both the employer and the employee could be legally liable.
      4) Often companies have technical liability if they do not monitor the communications-- for instance, you could find your domain blacklisted if the email leaving your network is spam or virus-laden.

      You really cant compare the two.

    105. Re:Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you heard of someone responsible for something effing up?

      Automate it. It's easy. Done it before. Was just checking certs via the regular monitoring system we used to alert us when it was near expiry. What "near" means depends on how hard it is in your organization to get the right department to purchase a new cert for you and funnel it back to you ...

      There you go automated and still someone is responsible. Can both still break? Yes, you forgot to automate that one cert. Or whoever was responsible for looking at alerts missed that one. Or your estimate of what your organization's "speed" is was wrong. Been there. Had to bubble up to one under the CEO to get the cert bought. Spent weeks with a chain of people needed to buy it not doing anything about it.

    106. Re:Black hole? by Frigga's+Ring · · Score: 1

      I can definitely imagine situations where email forwarding isn't the best answer. My company has a lot of interaction with outside businesses and if John Doe leaves the company, any businesses he has a relationship with still need to be able to communicate with my company. Whether that means that John Doe's manager has John's email forwarded to him or simply adds it as a secondary inbox within Outlook is a matter of company preference. Regarding your example of criticizing your manager to another employee via company email, that is a terrible idea and you can be fired for it so please be careful. Make sure you're absolutely clear on your company policy and any EULA you accept before you end up in a position you don't want to be in. In the case of communication to HR, my advice would be to use email only to ask HR to set up a meeting so you can discuss your issue and leave the details to an in-person meeting. Your manager should not get access to view those complaints nor should they hold it against you if they did, but this is hardly a perfect world. If your manager makes the case that they have a business need to access your email (either auto-forwarding or another method), the Legal, HR, and InfoSec teams I've worked with won't bat an eye at granting that access just as easily as they can get a list of websites you're visiting at work if your company uses any sort of web filter.

    107. Re:Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then 100 years later, we'll have the SAME story in Slashdot...

    108. Re:Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's happened at every company you've worked at, what makes you so sure you're not the problem?

    109. Re:Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone should be responsible for fixing the broken automated system, sure.

      The domain names should be set to auto-renew.

      Those are two separate things though.

    110. Re:Black hole? by lonecrow · · Score: 1

      Yes sometimes automated systems fail. So I wrote an automated audit system that sends up alerts in case the automated systems fails. But then I worried about what would happen if both my automated system and my auditor failed, so I wrote a system to monitor the auditor. But I was in a nasty situation once on an ocean fish boat where three systems failed or had issues at the same time and it was really bad. So I think I will write an auditor to audit my auditor monitor.

    111. Re:Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember the guy that said "Why do we need 4 digit dates, a 100 years is good enough for me."

      Off-topic perhaps, but no I don't recall anyone saying any such thing.

      I do however remember when a 64 KB RAM chip cost over $400, or put another way a megabyte of ram cost roughly $6500 which back then was on par with a new car.

      I also remember most of us writing software so unimportant that assuming it would still be in use in 10 years let alone 30+ is not just insane but expensively insane!

      [to customer] "Yes not only is our amazing software $X but you must purchase a hardware upgrade for $Y if not replace your whole computer setup for $Z!"
      Where Y has 2-3 more zeros than X, and Z has 4-6 more zeros than Y.

      So I have to question your logic, wanting to basically drop $250,000,000 on resources today to continue using your MS Access software in 300 years from now, as a good idea or even possible with todays technology...

    112. Re:Black hole? by lgw · · Score: 1

      I don't know about those specific examples, but yeah, it was not a broad ruling. It was also key to the ruling that Hobby Lobby is self-insured. Both factors together were needed to make the argument that the owners would effectively be paying for (what they saw as) abortions out of their own pockets, against their religious convictions. Many (most?) closely held corporations don't self-insure, so it's pretty narrow.
       

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    113. Re:Black hole? by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      Admit being wrong? No thanks, I've been trying to cut back.

    114. Re:Black hole? by Ozymandias_KoK · · Score: 1

      What would be illegal about a company managing it's email accounts?

    115. Re:Black hole? by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Shit, man, I really don't want to live in the States, and that comes from a guy located in Eastern Europe.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    116. Re:Black hole? by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Nothing. It wouldn't be kosher though for a manager to gain access to one of his directs' e-mail address.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    117. Re:Black hole? by hermitdev · · Score: 1

      I went through this at my new employer this month. I started this past December and our code signing cert expired this month. Thing is, I noticed back in around February/March timeline that this was going to happen, so I filed a ticket and added a personal reminder to tick off last month. Took us close to 2 weeks to get a new cert from our vendor (they were questioning our identity for some reason). By the time I got the new cert, it was 2 days before I went on vacation. I thought I had everything setup correctly and merrily went on my vacation. Turns out the wrong type of cert was sent and shit blew up after our old cert officially expired. Unlucky coworker had to pick up the pieces.

      So, the moral here is, even if you do plan ahead an try and coordinate these things, sometimes it still blows up, and you still end up with unhappy customers.

    118. Re:Black hole? by houghi · · Score: 1

      Businesses are not one person. You can do this, because it is important to you. For companies there is a difference. Many people are involved. Perhaps over several IT departments in different continents.
      Thos epeople get sick, have holidays and leave the company for several reasons.

      First what often happens is that there is no group email adress like dnsadmin@example.com, but rather john.doe@example.com. Then they might split up the company and first just for tax purposes.

      Oh and sometimes they need a domain NOW while no IT people are available, so they do it quicly and will do the the transfer later.

      And then you have those domains that you do not realy use anymore.

      So it is normal that things get forgotten. So here is an idea for allthose who say that never happens to them:
      Make a business case out of it and sell the service to companies. You can inlcude gthe service of doing their worldwide DNS service and deal with each local company and department. You can inlcude everything that is included in DNS.

      All others are basically looking for technical solutions for a social problem.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    119. Re:Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people responsible for firing the previous people have been sacked. But in all reality, how do you keep track when the person doing the firing is laying off whole teams? It's not like that doesn't happen regularly in corporate America so some dickhead rolling in money makes their bonus and has their company stock pop.

    120. Re:Black hole? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      The root is self signed obviously.

      Everyone should have their own CA. The cert nag tax is only for web sites.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    121. Re: Black hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not a law.

      https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/108/hr3754
      "H.R. 3754 (108th): Fraudulent Online Identity Sanctions Act

      Introduced:
              Feb 03, 2004 (108th Congress, 2003–2004)
      Status:
              Died (Reported by Committee) in a previous session of Congress "

      It was only ever a bill.

    122. Re: Black hole? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      I'm suggesting that the Trademark Act was amended to increase the damages and penalties if false information is provided by a domain squatter.

      Or you know, you could like, read the legislation.

    123. Re:Black hole? by fisted · · Score: 1

      You need to arrange them in a circle. Auditor A audits Auditor B, which audits Auditor C, which in turn audits Auditor A. Together, using a distributed auditing algorithm, the three systems audit the original system which needs those audits.

    124. Re:Black hole? by CHIT2ME · · Score: 0

      All this will get you is a "circle jerk"!

      --
      My karma is bad. Don't get too close!!!
    125. Re:Black hole? by cavebison · · Score: 1

      I find an easy solution is to make sure those sorts of emails all go to a single internal address which is then forwarded to *2 or 3 other people*. That way the IT manager gets it, the individual responsible for actually doing it gets it, and someone else as a backup.

      This reminds everyone how important it is, and people communicate to make sure it happens. The manager or backup person gets it and goes "ah, that guy isn't here anymore, we'd better sort that out".

    126. Re:Black hole? by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      Those specific examples are closely-held, according to the only legal definition I was able to find. I also looked up self-insurance, and found a citations that say anywhere between 50 million and 90 million people are under corporate self-insurance health plans. "Pretty narrow" doesn't seem to apply when it's somewhere roughly between a third and two thirds of the entire insured workforce.

    127. Re:Black hole? by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      I'm honestly surprised it wasn't set to auto-renew.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    128. Re:Black hole? by lgw · · Score: 1

      Did you have a problem with those specific companies or something? I'm not sure why you called those out.

      Narrow or broad, I can't fault the reasoning here. The government can't ask someone to (directly) act against their religious beliefs without clearing the bars of compelling state interest and least-burdensome (most narrow) approach. When you hand out waivers left and right, you don't have much ground to stand on there.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    129. Re: Black hole? by thunderclap · · Score: 1

      I did and it wasn't. You know you could put a link to the actual legislation that you believe was amended.

    130. Re: Black hole? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      How about if you want to see the proof, go look for it. I've told you where it is. I'm not your mother.

      Look at the GP's link, it tells you what the amendments to the Trademark Act are. It also says it has not been enacted.

      Now look at the Trademark Act at where those amendments were supposed to be. Notice how they are there.

      How did that happen? The same amendments were enacted under a different bill.

    131. Re:Black hole? by PIBM · · Score: 1

      100 years registration is offered at 999.00$ - they 'give' you a 70% discount!!! =)

    132. Re:Black hole? by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      I was pointing them out specifically because they're very large, well-known companies. If someone is thinking of "closely held" and imagining a mom-and-pop candy shop with 4 employees, those companies (and plenty like them) dispel that notion entirely. These are massive employers that would easily be near the top of the Fortune 500 is they were public. For example, in the case of Koch, Forbes has said that if they were public, they'd rank in at number 17 of the list. Cargill is larger than Ford, and would have been at #7 in 2013.

  3. ring ring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it that hard to pick up a phone?

    1. Re:ring ring by Zaelath · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I immediately thought this too, but you try ringing one of these corporations and see how far you get.

    2. Re:ring ring by rudy_wayne · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you try ringing one of these corporations and see how far you get.

      Exactly. Unless you know someone or have some inside connections, it is virtually impossible to contact someone, who actually knows something, using publicly available information. And I'm sure that NetworkSolutions really doesn't want to spend time calling everyone who lets their registration lapse.

      The real problem is that Sony couldn't be arsed to register the domain names using a working e-mail address that actually goes to the person at Sony who is responsible for such a thing.

    3. Re:ring ring by perpenso · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ]The real problem is that Sony couldn't be arsed to register the domain names using a working e-mail address that actually goes to the person at Sony who is responsible for such a thing.

      Not quite, it should be a special purpose email like domain_registration@sony.com rather than an employee email. However the special purpose email should forward to those responsible, involved or overseeing the particular thing. The special purpose email should not be something that someone is supposed to log in to.

    4. Re:ring ring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to this article:

      On Twitter, however, SOE President John Smedley suggested that the company had failed to pay its website bills.

      "The payment notifications went to a junk email box," Smedley tweeted, adding, "Someone left and it got caught in the replacements junk filter. Simple as that. Embarrassing as that. No point dodging."

      "DNS problems could take up to 48 hours to resolve," he wrote, adding, "We are really really sorry on this one folks. Embarrassing and preventable. We screwed up."

    5. Re:ring ring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but I wonder how Sony fixed it? I would of liked to be a fly on the wall and see how they sorted it.

    6. Re:ring ring by Time+Ed · · Score: 1

      You're all close.

      Along time ago, all of a company's DNS belonged to the admins, and Network handled the bill - which was lumped in with the one for the Internet connection.

      These days, external DNS aka "The Brand" is usually managed by either Legal or Marketing. In those organizations, the common 'dnsadmin@company.com' email is redirected to someone who neither knows nor cares what DNS is. Even internally, no one knows whos responsible for external domains. And when the bill comes, it just sits on the department secretary's desk.

      Every. Single. Time.

  4. 7 weeks? by MrLogic17 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wow, giving the company 7 weeks before Network Solutions took the site down? That's going way above & beyond. The average luser like me would be taken down the day of expiration.
     

    1. Re:7 weeks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get months of warning from GoDaddy *prior* to expiration. Don't know what they do after, though.

    2. Re:7 weeks? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I've gone weeks. For the same reason Sony did, oddly enough.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:7 weeks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's a 10 day grace period, then another 10 days until it is disabled.

    4. Re:7 weeks? by rmdingler · · Score: 2
      That's the problem with too much leeway.

      The procrastinator in us invariably assumes there is seemingly an infinite amount of time to take care of this... by the time they send the We really fucking mean it this time! notice, well hell, they've been crying "wolf" so long it doesn't mean anything.

      And to be fair, didn't the nerdtastic Mecca website herself forget to renew a certificate recently?

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    5. Re:7 weeks? by ghn · · Score: 1

      Managing hundreds of domains here, from various registrars. Expiration date is expiration date with all of them, it just stops working at midnight. Period.

      The only intriguing thing about this article to me is how they got that special treatment of 7 weeks leeway..

    6. Re: 7 weeks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lies. They beat you with rubber dildos whilst repeatedly asking "Who's your Daddy?" until you pay up.

    7. Re:7 weeks? by Threni · · Score: 1

      Because you don't want to annoy large customers with requests for small amounts of money you know they can afford and will pay for at some point.

    8. Re:7 weeks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time we had a domain expire (despite me forwarding the monthly,weekly and daily warning emails to my boss and his promise of "leave it with me, I'll sort it out") the domain was still fully working until a month after the expiration date when the registrar finally pulled the plug.

      And yes, I had an angry PHB stumble in raging that his email had suddenly stopped working !

    9. Re:7 weeks? by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      Coming from a small business background, sometimes this is the only way to deal with a corporate customer. Or you simply will not get paid.

      Being a bookkeeper (and a pedantic nerd who pays things on time), I've always found it stunning how little respect corporations have for their own accounts payables and the consequences of not paying accounts properly. The only businesses which are worse are law firms.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  5. Sony playing catchup with Microsoft by basscomm · · Score: 0

    Looks like Sony's playing catchup with Microsoft. Honestly, this is one of the lamest blows in the so-called 'console war' to date.

    --
    http://crummysocks.com
    1. Re:Sony playing catchup with Microsoft by bad_fx · · Score: 2

      How on earth do you figure this is a "blow" in the console war? Are you suggest that Microsoft was somehow behind this? Or is everything that gets reported on and is related to Playstation\Xbox now some sort of insidious plot to discredit one or the other console?

      In reality it sounds like pure incompetence at Sony (and the same in the story you link about Microsoft) and I think when many people are affected by this sort of thing it's fair enough that it's covered on tech sites. It doesn't have to be part of some 'console war' that you parenthesize with apparent disdain while at the same time perpetuating the idea.

    2. Re:Sony playing catchup with Microsoft by careysub · · Score: 1

      Remember, Microsoft did not learn from their 1999 fiasco, they did it again 4 years later, though only in the UK.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    3. Re:Sony playing catchup with Microsoft by basscomm · · Score: 1

      How on earth do you figure this is a "blow" in the console war? Are you suggest that Microsoft was somehow behind this? Or is everything that gets reported on and is related to Playstation\Xbox now some sort of insidious plot to discredit one or the other console?

      In reality it sounds like pure incompetence at Sony (and the same in the story you link about Microsoft) and I think when many people are affected by this sort of thing it's fair enough that it's covered on tech sites. It doesn't have to be part of some 'console war' that you parenthesize with apparent disdain while at the same time perpetuating the idea.

      Or, it could have been that I was making a terrible joke.

      --
      http://crummysocks.com
    4. Re:Sony playing catchup with Microsoft by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Didn't affect PSN/SEN on the PS3/PS4/PSP/Vita, it doesn't use SOE logins. In fact, as far as I know, only one sony console game used an SOE based login, and that was Everquest Online Adventures, which is no longer running.

  6. LOL timing is everything by hurfy · · Score: 1

    I went to a training session for our new $50k accounting system. They had forgotten to renew their own license for the training classroom. Took an extra hour to get their tech in there to get it fixed. Yup, should have got up and went home at that point.

    sigh

    We bought it cause it was industry specific (well focused at least) and by a small company that only did this for 20 years. Next year they are bought by a national company and instead of being 1 of 200 customers now we were 1 of 20000 on a minor product. Not exactly the same experience :/ Naturally, followed a couple years later by a purchase from a multinational software company :(

  7. Sony Computer Entertainment is full of morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I programmed videogames for 17 years, worked on all of the Sony consoles except the PS4.
    They're dumber then a bag of hammers over there. I'm glad I'm out.

  8. Black hole? by Bovius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This sort of lapse has happened in every company I've worked in, big and small, when the person formerly responsible for this kind of thing leaves the company and someone else has to pick up their responsibilities. Sloppy, unorganized? You betcha. Also what I've come to expect.

  9. Special email addresses ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

    This is why you don't directly use employee email addresses for certain business activities. These activities get their own emails which forward to whoever the responsible person or persons are. Ex. domain_registration@sony.com. Note "forward to", these would not be standalone email addresses that someone has to log in to.

    1. Re:Special email addresses ... by msauve · · Score: 1

      So, forward domain_registration@sony.com to former_employee@sony.com. Let us know how that works out for you.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    2. Re:Special email addresses ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

      So, forward domain_registration@sony.com to former_employee@sony.com. Let us know how that works out for you.

      That's why I wrote person or persons. Plus when someone is told they are now responsible for or involved in domain registration they go update the recipient list for the email address. There is no need to update some outsider's records. There is no need to get into the former employee's email. It really is an improvement over using employee emails directly.

    3. Re:Special email addresses ... by nobuddy · · Score: 1

      Group mailboxes are a thing, and very useful for such as this.

    4. Re:Special email addresses ... by msauve · · Score: 0

      Whoosh. That only make it easier. It doesn't fix the process, which still requires tracking and making changes to make it effective.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    5. Re:Special email addresses ... by Solandri · · Score: 1

      So, forward domain_registration@sony.com to former_employee@sony.com. Let us know how that works out for you.

      It works a lot better because if domain registration emails are being sent directly to former_employee@sony.com, then only he knows that domain registrations are being sent to him. There is no record at Sony saying that he was the one getting those emails.

      If you instead have it sent to domain_registration@sony.com with a forwarder, when former_employee is fired, the sysadmin can look at the entire list of forwarded addresses, grep for every instance of former_employee, and re-forward them to other employees.

      See the difference? With your method, only the former employee knows what emails he was getting that need to be redirected. And if he was fired, he certainly isn't going to cooperate at providing a list. With forwarded email addresses, Sony has a list of all important emails which were going to the former employee.

      All this is kinda moot though. In this case with a company the size of Sony, they should've just paid the $1000 or so to register the domain for the next 100 years.

    6. Re:Special email addresses ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Domain registration isn't exactly a full time job at most companies. It's a minor side-task that gets tossed to some guy, who does it for a few years, then quits/dies/whatever, and nobody updates the distribution list since they long forgot about that task. Until something like this happens.

    7. Re:Special email addresses ... by msauve · · Score: 2

      It still requires tracking and making changes. It's easier to change the local email system than a registrar's database, but in either case, updates must be made to be effective. With 10 year registrations available, there's no guarantee that former_group_members@example.com is much better than former_employee@example.com, especially in fast moving industries. If company X acquires company Y, dns@y.com is apt to be forgotten, too.

      You're suggesting a tactical solution to a process issue. Better to have the responsible group track and update necessary renewals on a regular basis, instead of depending on notifications from external parties being received.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    8. Re:Special email addresses ... by msauve · · Score: 1

      So, your plan is that former_sysadmin@sony.com makes the change. OK, but how is keeping track of what emails need redirection when an employee arbitrarily changes more reliable than keeping track of when registrations expire, which is known well in advance? Is it somehow easier to remember to grep email accounts for "dns@example.com" than to query a database for "domain_expiration<90days?"

      See the difference? One places responsibility for a mission critical function on an external party, and the other doesn't, it fixes the process.

      Why not just have responsible_group keep track of registrations on a regular basis, and renew them when necessary. You do know that registrars aren't required to email anyone about pending expirations (most/all do, though), so nothing you can do with emails will really fix the process? Really, if a company can't take responsibility for tracking and renewing their registrations, they deserve to lose them. If you can't keep track of expiration dates, you've likely lost the security info required to renew, too.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    9. Re:Special email addresses ... by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      You're suggesting a tactical solution to a process issue. Better to have the responsible group track and update necessary renewals on a regular basis, instead of depending on notifications from external parties being received.

      I only hold a couple of dozen domains, but this is exactly what I do. I get notifications from the registrar directly to a specific e-mail address I've set up for that purpose, but I also automatically generate an email to my personal account on the first of each month reminding me to check with the registrar to see if anything needs attention anyway.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    10. Re:Special email addresses ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

      Whoosh. That only make it easier. It doesn't fix the process, which still requires tracking and making changes to make it effective.

      Actually you might want to re-think who is having the woosh moment. :-) I never said it fixed the problem. I offered a practice that is an improvement, i.e. forwarding and multiple recipients, that reduces the opportunity for unread emails.

    11. Re:Special email addresses ... by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Because domain guy is responsible for the domain names and mail guy is responsible for the mail stuff. Trust me, no company neglects email and it turns a one-person requirement for failure into a two-person requirement for failure.

      Not to mention if you have a specific address for such things, you can do all sorts of tricks like having the address forward to both your domain manager *and* inserting a ticket into your ticketing system.

  10. Not the first time! by rstanley · · Score: 2

    I long for the good ole days when they actually send out paper invoices in envelopes! ;^)

    And from the archives:

    "In December 1999, Microsoft forgot to renew the domain name Passport.com,
    and so rendered its Hotmail service partially crippled. A Linux
    programmer, Michael Chaney, paid the $35 fee and promptly handed over
    ownership to Microsoft."

    It happened again in 2003:

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2...

    Will they ever learn? ;^)

    1. Re:Not the first time! by zephvark · · Score: 2

      I long for the good ole days when they actually send out paper invoices in envelopes! ;^)

      You actually still look at your paper mail? I tend to assume it's all just spam. Then again, I tend to assume that of my email, too. What was the last year we had a communications system that had more signal than noise? It seems to have been a while.

    2. Re:Not the first time! by gangien · · Score: 1

      A guy who posted on /. renewed one of the MS domains. Or atleast, that's what I recall.

    3. Re:Not the first time! by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Last I saw, he has the check from Microsoft hanging on his wall.

  11. and your suprised why?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to work @ sony playstation. Yes I spelled it right. they dont deserve the capitalization as it would show some form of respect..
    moving past that,
    sony is a bunch of teenagers with money..
    what would happen if someone had trolled this action and somehow managed to pick it up before sony pulled their heads out.
    Moving forward, this should be an indicator of how much sony staff and its associates care about you. They care about the money, in this instance it wsa not the public out cry, but more an alert that sony was not making any money off their "cool" portal thingy, once it was discovered, validated and assessed for impact, then action was made.

    Whats an even bigger shame, if you dont wear a suit they wont pay you enough to live any where reasonably close to the office..
    bt i could go on, but wont..
    peace be with you all,

    1. Re:and your suprised why?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I too used to work @ SCEA. I too would have to agree with your assessment. I too am also not suprised @ this blunderfu*k. Stuff like this allways happens up there..
      Too focused on making the money, and not the individual..

    2. Re:and your suprised why?? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      This isn't SCEfoo, this is SOE, Sony's PC gaming centric division.

  12. An "unread email address"?? by Rone · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If the address was unread now, it must have been monitored originally.

    What are the chances that the original recipients were RIFed at some point to goose the quarterly numbers?

    1. Re:An "unread email address"?? by pla · · Score: 1

      If the address was unread now, it must have been monitored originally.

      Not necessarily - I have a domain. It has a "real" administrative contact email (a throwaway GMail account). I haven't checked it since I had to confirm it as valid (the registration just autorenews - Pssst, SCEA, you live off subscription models, ever thought of using the same damned idea to keep your domains/certs/etc active?).

      Administrative contacts for a domain amount to nothing more than a pre-confirmed spam address. Why the hell would anyone use an address where they actually have to suffer through reading the crap that comes in?

    2. Re:An "unread email address"?? by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      I use Google Apps. Spam is never an issue.

      It interesting, though, that the requirement for verifying your contact information goes (essentially) entirely unheeded. Perhaps there should be a 2% audit of addresses every year, with a 30 day response time and mandatory permanent loss of domain name and $10,000 fine for incorrect information.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    3. Re:An "unread email address"?? by scsirob · · Score: 4, Funny

      Must have been "support@sony.com"

      --
      To Terminate, or not to Terminate, that's the question - SCSIROB
    4. Re:An "unread email address"?? by timftbf · · Score: 1

      Administrative contacts for a domain amount to nothing more than a pre-confirmed spam address. Why the hell would anyone use an address where they actually have to suffer through reading the crap that comes in?

      My personal domains have my correct contact info on - email, snail-mail and mobile. I occasionally get stuff like the definitely-not-a-renewal notices from the Domain Registry of America and friends, but it's noise in amongst the general spam and junk-mail I have to filter anyway.

      More to the point, it's the Right Thing to do, because the *privilege* of occupying a chunk of Internet resource comes with the *responsibility* of being contactable if bad things are emanating from it. Then again, my oldest registration dates to when you still had to write a justification to a human as to why you should be granted a domain, and wait a few days for a response. (I suspect in the twilight years when this was a rubber-stamping exercise, but you *did* still have to write it.)

    5. Re:An "unread email address"?? by pla · · Score: 1

      More to the point, it's the Right Thing to do, because the *privilege* of occupying a chunk of Internet resource comes with the *responsibility* of being contactable if bad things are emanating from it.

      Bullshit, straight-up.

      The right of all humans to communicate freely with one another - and to avoid communicating with those they don't want to - trumps archaic administrative nonsense about the accuracy of a DNS record as enforced solely through US hegemony over the internet.

      Once upon a time, if you had a problem coming from a domain, you would contact the admin as a peer, explain the situation, and he'd put the smack-down on whichever of his users had screwed up. Today? Even at the likes of Sony they admit they don't monitor it, so why bother having it there at all? If you have a problem coming from a domain today, you either report it to the FBI (if a credible attack), or you blacklist them at the router (if a mere nuissance). The days of getting things done on the internet through the mutual respect of admins ended a looong time ago.

    6. Re:An "unread email address"?? by phorm · · Score: 1

      Honestly, so what if they were? People change positions and come/go a lot, and the bigger the company the more the churn. Could have been a retirement, a job offer elsewhere, somebody died, or a firing. I doubt that somebody's primary job was watching domain expirations, so likely this got lost in a transition among a bunch of other job functions. IMHO, the best way to take care of this would be to have checks for primary domains in the central monitoring/alerting system, and flag them yellow 15-30 days from expiration (and red a few days before).

  13. I was really worried by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    And then I realized I never use PSN, but just play games I have discs for on my PS4.

    Second Son rocks. It's like Seattle, but more.

    What GTA should have done for GTA: Emerald City but they were too chicken to mess with the best!

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:I was really worried by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      And then I realized I never use PSN

      Wouldn't matter, this was an SOE issue, not SCE-foo. Sony handles it's PC games separate as Sony Online Entertainment. The consoles are operated by Sony Computer Entertainment

      As I posted earlier, there was only one console game that ever used an SOE login, that being EQOA on the PS2.

  14. Sony Doesn't Use Databases to Track Filings? by BoRegardless · · Score: 1

    Well, dinosaurs did die out.

  15. "Hilarity Ensues" by steelfood · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hilarity Ensues

    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

    Now, if some domain squatter had taken over the name the moment the domain expired, that would be funny. Giving them 7 weeks is just ... well, sad.

    --
    "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    1. Re:"Hilarity Ensues" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The domain is a behind the scenes thing, nothing funny could have happened whatsoever. No one ever sees it. The only humor would be DNS hijacking and redirecting all Sony sites to something like the XBone's homepage. But that would lead to the perpetrator getting sued into oblivion.

    2. Re:"Hilarity Ensues" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think it's referring to this.

    3. Re:"Hilarity Ensues" by Dragoness+Eclectic · · Score: 1

      I think it's referring to this.

      Yes, exactly.

      --
      ---dragoness
  16. This type of proplem by y5t3m · · Score: 1

    Isn't a people problem, or a company problem, or a technical problem. Like the majority of company fuckups it a procedural problem. There is no documented procedures for anyone to follow, and it's a SPOF in a service.

    1. Re:This type of proplem by ledow · · Score: 1

      So, whose responsible for not documenting it?

      Somewhere in Sony, some IT guy KNOWS what would happen if that domain went offline. He knows that it shouldn't be allowed to happen. The beancounters know that it costs to much for the consequences, so they'd have to authorise it whatever.

      Thus, someone, somewhere KNOWS this critical business element is a possible point of failure but NOBODY bothers to create that documented procedure.

      It's not like the process is opaque, or that nobody could have predicted it... enough people inside Sony should know that there should be a procedure, and thus someone, somewhere is responsible for making sure that procedure is scheduled, documented, well-known and that it "belongs" to someone.

      It's a company problem, because none of that happened. And it didn't happen because of a people problem. The technical problem? You're telling me that NOT ONE SYSTEM inside Sony was set up to check that the domain doesn't expire, to fallover to a second domain in the case of problems, to check that email account that was mysteriously unchecked for several weeks despite being the WHOIS contact, etc.?

      It's not "none of the above". It's "all of the above".

      Stop blaming some mystical, magical entity when - actually - some guy in Sony fucked up and the people above him weren't doing their job to check he hadn't fucked up and/or hadn't taken account of what to do if he had fucked up.

    2. Re:This type of proplem by Eristone · · Score: 1

      The thing you aren't taking into account is things like reorgs and reductions in force. You have the process and procedure - and a distribution list is set up for domain-renewal@mycompany.com which has as members the manager Jane and the senior sysadmins John, Jill and Juan. Jane gets promoted and the group gets put under a different manager - Scott from Business Systems. Scott says "why am I getting all this junk from this address -- take me off the list" - he's the new manager and they follow instructions. Juan moves to a different group with different responsibilities and is not replaced. John and Jill are both laid off because they became redundant with the staff from the Bangledesh office. Now the list is an empty list that no one sees the mail going to it. Mail administration *might* catch this, or they might not - or it may get removed automatically because company policy has some silly rule like "no lists with less than 4 members" or "empty lists are removed if they remain empty for 30 days". So through policy, you've now shot yourself in the foot and don't even realize it.

  17. And making Monumental Public Disasters is ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. abnormal for this company? .. the company that Thumbed their Nose at the iPod because they had the Walkman? .. the company that Thumbed their Nose at the iPhone because they had dial up? .. the company that sets new standards for giving away business like Christmas Gifts ? .. it's no Wonder Steve Jobs loved this company.. wouldn't you? in Steve's position

  18. That department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "SOE's president, John Smedley, has admitted that the expiration notices were being sent to an 'unread email' address"

    You mean the e-mail address belonging to the IT department you banished last year? :D

  19. Or, as seen in this comic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think this comic is incredibly apropos:

    http://www.wastedtalent.ca/nod...

  20. Yet another reason to insist on software freedom by jbn-o · · Score: 2

    Early Tuesday, gamers woke up to find out that they couldn't log in to any Sony Online Entertainment games--no Everquest, no Planetside 2, none of them.

    Could the users have used another server to connect with each other? Or is this a case of DRM ("Digital Restrictions Management", when properly viewed from the perspective of its effect on the users) and, more generally, nonfree software restricting users from running the games with other people?

  21. DNS & SSL cert expiration by wmute · · Score: 1

    I work as a sys admin at a medium sized medical research institute, one of the things I made sure to do was to add nagios scrips to throw alerts for important licenses, certs, and domain names. I'm not sure why an organization as huge as Sony Online would not have added these kinds of checks to whatever monitoring system they are using. Having had this happen to me once nearly a decade ago with a SSL cert I can promise that the 10min of coding to add in a check is much more pleasant than a day of meetings to describe to everyone what went wrong.

    1. Re:DNS & SSL cert expiration by junkgoof · · Score: 1

      Or use something automated. Tools like xymon (http://xymon.sourceforge.net/) do it out of the box.

      --
      You got me into this! You were the ideologue! I'm only a poor assassin! - Twenty evocations, Bruce Sterling
  22. GoDaddy Does It Right by njhunter · · Score: 1

    Any time I have a domain about to expire, GoDaddy is right on top of things with a phone call; Really good follow-up as well. I guess Network Solutions is more akin the government. I'm sure if one renews for ten years, the IT guy that was there at the beginning has moved on and his email address goes no where, except a honeypot.

    1. Re:GoDaddy Does It Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      too bad godaddy does it wrong

      http://www.examiner.com/article/godaddy-pleads-for-customers-to-stay-wake-of-sopa-fiasco

  23. If Sony insolvent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not just liquidate the company. That's the correct procedure. At least in my country.

  24. If it's good enough for microsoft by trollboy · · Score: 1

    I still remember when someone got sued/threatened when MS did the same thing and it killed passport. After calling and unsuccessfully telling them how to fix the problem, he registered the domain, and pointed it back to where it should have been pointed and mailed them saying he would give them back the domain, he just wanted his stuff to work. They unleashed the vicious attack lawyers anyway.

    --
    That which is not dead may eternal lie,and in strange aeons even death may die
    1. Re:If it's good enough for microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their lawyers probably told them they had to do so, otherwise it would give precedent for his actions being legitimate.

      Then the next time something like it happens, somebody else does it, and demands compensation for it, and where is Microsoft? Dealing with somebody who can claim that Microsoft let it happen without comment or criticism, so why wouldn't they expect to be paid for the work they did.

      Yeah, if nobody ever was a dick, that wouldn't be a problem. But that is not the case, so pre-emptive dickery happens.

      Same thing happens with renters, auto mechanics and more. Heck, I won't even try to catch a stray animal anymore after one of my neighbors complained about me grabbing their dog and putting it on a run, in the shade, with water. Now I just call animal control.

    2. Re:If it's good enough for microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, they sent him $500. No lawsuit. Check his account of the story:

      http://www.doublewide.net/

    3. Re:If it's good enough for microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No they didn't. Jeeze, know the story before you post BS and lies: http://jeffmilner.com/index.php/2005/11/06/hotmail-user-restores-usage-to-20-million/

      > On 24 December 1999, MSN Hotmail, the free web based email service owned by Microsoft, became inaccessible for a couple of days when the domain name registration lapsed for passport.com – which Hotmail uses for user authentication.

      > The registration fee for the expired domain was paid by Hotmail user Michael Chaney on December 25 as a Christmas present to Microsoft and the 20 million users that were unable to access their mail.

      > Microsoft confirmed to Chaney a couple of days later that his $35 payment to Network Solutions did in fact solve the Hotmail outage problem. As a reward for Chaney’s quick thinking and generous move, Microsoft sent him a check for $500 and a copy of Visual Studio 6.0.

    4. Re:If it's good enough for microsoft by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I don't know about your country, in mine MS would probably get into hot water with that procedure. Suing for what the other party already willingly offers is not something judges enjoy presiding over. I would see something like this in the pre-ordeal:

      Judge: MS, what's your claim?
      MS: He registered our domain.
      Judge: To keep it?
      MS: No, he pointed it at our servers.
      Judge: So ... it worked like you wanted it to?
      MS: Yes, but he still had the domain.
      Judge: Did he plan to keep it?
      MS: No, he wanted to hand it over to us.
      Judge: So you're suing for...
      MS: Umm... him to do what he wanted to do the whole time?
      Judge: GTFO of my courtroom!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  25. idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's why you don't send it to a single email, you send it to a distribution list.

    1. Re:idiots by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Now how the heck is it my problem if you can't get your domain registration sorted out?

      The registrar did actually more than he really had to do. It's YOUR responsibility to remember your domains.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  26. Also human by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Anyone on Slashdot who gets smugly superior about this and how "stupid companies are" is just being a hypocrite. We have ALL forgotten things in our lives. We've all forgotten an event we were supposed to be at, a bill we were supposed to pay, something we were supposed to bring with us. It happens.

    What's more, everyone has been in a situation where something didn't happen because they, and everyone else, assumed someone else was going to deal with it. You don't go and check on everything that ever happens around you or involving you, you mentally categorize things you are and are not responsible for and ignore the latter.

    So ya, companies, which are made up of people, can fuck up too. It's amusing, but perfectly normal.

    1. Re:Also human by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Thats why you build in redundancies.

      Companies are STUPID because they've gotten hooked on the idea of "employee efficiency" to the point that employee efficiency is being negatively impacted. In the past, when a mistake was made, you could easily nail multiple employees simply because they were supposed to be watching/covering one another. If one (or more) screwed up, it meant the others weren't doing their job so they all got punished. It cost a lot more in payroll, but it made sure the job got done, on time, correctly (as far as procedures were concerned). Nowadays, GM can't even find ANYONE to pin the blame on for the ignition switch recalls.

      So yeah, companies can fuck up too. But when you can't even find someone within the company you can point to say "that person is the one who fucked up", what does that say about the company?

    2. Re:Also human by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone on Slashdot who gets smugly superior about this and how "stupid companies are" is just being a hypocrite.

      Not smugly superior. Annoyed because companies are supposed to be designed that this sort of stuff happens very, very infrequently.

      We have ALL forgotten things in our lives.

      We, as in individuals, sure. But as another side poster mentions, this is why companies should have redundancy and scrap the idea of cutting corners to such a degree.

      We've all forgotten an event we were supposed to be at, a bill we were supposed to pay, something we were supposed to bring with us. It happens.

      And what were the consequences for us? A little bit of embarrassment--because even if "it happens", it's still a failure? Perhaps your life insurance lapses for forgetting one bill and...a company decides that you shouldn't have made the mistake and jacks up your rates. Really, if all Sony gets out of this is some smug superiority out of a few people and some snickers and laughs at their expense, they're really suffering virtually nothing for their failure.

      What's more, everyone has been in a situation where something didn't happen because they, and everyone else, assumed someone else was going to deal with it.

      Funny. That's why companies have Presidents who have Vice Presidents who have sufficiently further hierarchies of sub-management. It's why the President of the company is the one who is quoted as the source of the failure--an unread email account. At some level, the President of SOE is responsible and accountable for this mistake. Most likely, it won't even take sweet, sweet nothings of this sort of mistake not happening again nor is there any real risk of any potential bonus being docked or future pay raise being dented in any way.

      You don't go and check on everything that ever happens around you or involving you, you mentally categorize things you are and are not responsible for and ignore the latter.

      Yep. And SOE was responsible for keeping track of its domain registration(s). Whether it was Bob, some guy 20 levels down from the President, or the President himself who was personally responsible to "get it done", the end point is that a system or systems should have been in place to make sure a thing like this didn't happen, especially given the obvious PR flub property of it.

      So ya, companies, which are made up of people, can fuck up too. It's amusing, but perfectly normal.

      Thanks Captain Obvious. It's also normal that there's wars, plague, rape, etc. That doesn't change the fact that a single reasonable reaction today is in any way invalid or needs to be coldly explained away just because it won't fundamentally change the nature of the universe or people. There's no real need to down play this fuck up as if, you know, it has any more real consequence other than, perhaps, lowering people's estimations of John Smedley or SOE--which is, btw, precisely what should happen given that in the grand scheme of the currency of the universe, reputation is one of the few things you really can't buy (although some people are really good at twisting it for most of the people most of the time but obviously not all of the people all of the time).

    3. Re:Also human by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone in IT has done this themselves.

    4. Re:Also human by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This. A billion times this.

      Corporations are stupid for simply assuming that people are automatons. You come to work and do it flawlessly, always following the ISO 9001 standard. Yeah. Sure. And monkeys fly out of my butt.

      People are people and people are making mistakes. Always. Every single day. Anyone in security learns that VERY quickly. And he also learns quickly that you cannot trust humans to be flawless. Not because people are stupid but because people are NOT automatons and make mistakes. Yes, even (actually, especially) if doing the same job for ages. Show me a person who makes no mistakes and I show you a person who does no work!

      Security is FINALLY starting to get wise and build systems that are tolerant of human error. Let's see how long it takes 'til the rest of the system catches on.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Also human by Opportunist · · Score: 1, Troll

      Companies are designed to maximize profit for those in power. This almost always means that redundancies are eliminated even where they would be sensible from a risk management point of view.

      Marginal short term profit trumps long term risk any day.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Also human by Oligonicella · · Score: 1, Troll

      Dude/tte, I have five domains. All are paid up through 2020. In 2015 I shall extend them until 2030. It's not hard to do and it's not hard to remember, FFS. For a company that large to neglect is inexcusable. Just buy them for then next 20 years, it doesn't cost all that much.

    7. Re:Also human by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      everyone has been in a situation where something didn't happen because they, and everyone else, assumed someone else was going to deal with it.

      Yeah, on Monday.
      Then, on Tuesday, people get a bit less patient.
      By Thursday, threats are being made.
      Critical infrastructure like this should have scheduled events that alert people 30 days in advance. If there's a hiccup, that's fine. But there's no reason why this should still be going on during week 2.

    8. Re:Also human by cryogenix · · Score: 1

      Nah. Spiceworks reminds me on the off chance my brain cells have completely checked out.

    9. Re:Also human by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Are you going to properly transfer all the knowledge and email accounts and contact information when you leave the job, or get fired?

    10. Re:Also human by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Companies are designed to maximize profit for those in power.

      More fundamentally, companies are for profit organizations that only incidentally do anything beneficial for said profit.

      This almost always means that redundancies are eliminated even where they would be sensible from a risk management point of view.

      Except that given the current system, there's basically no risk to a large company losing its domain as ICANN will simply strip any squatter of the domain. Like I said, the only real possible risk is "reputation" and honestly as the metric of money goes--which you note, that's all that companies are designed to care about--, there's no real risk.

      Marginal short term profit trumps long term risk any day.

      And generally failing in most ways to deliver for customers need not necessarily hinder one's profitability if there's enough of a barrier for people to switch to other options--all the sunk cost of consoles and games, the high cost to try to trade over to a different console/platform (especially as enmass conversion inherently causes a glut in the market and further screws the conversion rate), and the real possibility of any other platform doing the same thing (and this is why Sycraft-fu's "it's normal" is so bad because it legitimizes any avenue of escape from abusive companies with the notion that company abuse must inherently be accepted). The best one can do is try to switch from one scam conglomerate undercutting the current monopoly to the next one because it's clear the FTC is not interested in any way, shape, or form at regulating trade except to the extent that it might be beneficial to companies. I wouldn't even call it regulatory capture. I'd say it delusional acceptance of companies being *the* market and consumers and people in general just being chaff.

    11. Re:Also human by Sockatume · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The whole point of having a corporation (or any other sort of team for that matter) is that you find ways to be less failure-prone than you are as individuals. You have to do this to offset the fact that a failure of the group affects every member - the cost is multiplied.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    12. Re:Also human by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We have ALL forgotten things in our lives."

      How often have you forgotten where you live? Perhaps where you work?

      This is the equivalent to what Sony has forgotten. It's a pretty big thing, and for a billion dollar company, it's something that just shouldn't have been forgotten because as people mention, this can be 100% automated (like how people have various monthly payments set up for auto-payment so they don't have to "forget" it.)

      We're human. We can make these little mistakes and people will understand (but we'll still have to face the consequences for it.) A company, especially a large one like this, has the ability to make sure such things don't happen. They have departments set up to ensure bills are paid.

      On the plus side, nothing bad happened that we can see, and it's a safe bet that Sony already has a system set up to make sure it doesn't happen again. But that doesn't counter the fact that it shouldn't have happened at all.

    13. Re:Also human by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1, Troll

      We have ALL forgotten things in our lives

      It seems Sony doesn't attach the right amount of importance to domains. Domains should be renewed for 10 years (sony.com has just been renewed, 4 days before expiration, for 2 years), and registrar mails should be directed to a person mailbox. This again shows that Sony neglects its IT infrastructure / (people?) Remember how many times Sony was hacked in recent years...

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    14. Re:Also human by SparkleMotion88 · · Score: 1

      Except this isn't "I forgot to turn off the coffee maker and my coffee burned" territory. It is closer to "I forgot to de-ice the Pitot tubes and a plane full of people crashed." Companies have figure out how to manage stuff like this when it is important enough (process, checklists, redundancy, etc), Sony just failed to do so.

    15. Re:Also human by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I checked, I don't get paid to remember things in my life. However, I do get paid to make sure the systems stay up, and things get taken care of. Forgetting something as important as a high functioning domain, for a multi-billion dollar International company, falls into a realm of slight importance. That someone, ANYONE, let this lapse in a company the size of Sony, tells me there are loads of other problems within its organization. Nothing to be really surprised about really, given Sonys track record.

      As far as this being normal? Sure. It's normal. People forget things and things slip through the cracks. Now, this coming from a multi-billion dollar International media and gaming bohemoth like Sony? ABSOLUTELY UNACCEPTABLE! However, it is completely and utterly unsurprising.

    16. Re:Also human by fibonacci8 · · Score: 1
      However when you forget once for several thousand customers all at once, each one is likely to take it as a seperate occasion. It's also perfectly normal to treat a mistake that affects orders of magnitude more people as orders of magnitude more irritating. Also it wasn't amusing for anyone affected that I've talked to, it was a combination or irritating and annoying.

      Sincerely,
      Someone who worked around the issue himself, but then got to spend hours via ventrilo and skype helping other players adjust their DNS settings so they could play the game they'd paid for.

      P.S. Dear Sony: I would gladly maintain correspondence with your name / hosting providers in exchange for continued all-access membership during such periods.

      --
      Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
    17. Re:Also human by doccus · · Score: 1

      Anyone on Slashdot who gets smugly superior about this and how "stupid companies are" is just being a hypocrite. We have ALL forgotten things in our lives. We've all forgotten an event we were supposed to be at, a bill we were supposed to pay, something we were supposed to bring with us. It happens.

      What's more, everyone has been in a situation where something didn't happen because they, and everyone else, assumed someone else was going to deal with it. You don't go and check on everything that ever happens around you or involving you, you mentally categorize things you are and are not responsible for and ignore the latter.

      So ya, companies, which are made up of people, can fuck up too. It's amusing, but perfectly normal.

      Hah . This is a little bit more than "just forgetting things" It's their bloody JOB.. I mean.. "aw shucks general, I forgoit to reset the safety on that nuke over there" "That's OK sonny boy, we all forget things once in a while..Heck I remember when mah division flattened that village because I forgot to send the recall order" .

    18. Re:Also human by Haegar · · Score: 1

      These long expire times are worse for a company than things happening every year!

      When you leave, the next guy retains perhaps 80% of your knowledge about this, the guy after him still has maybe 50% of your info, with less and less stuff still known after each new person or reorg.

      If the renewal is supposed to happen in 10 years - how many people will have it on their radar THEN?

      "But it always just worked, we never had to do anything"

      --
      c'ya haegar
    19. Re:Also human by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Error tolerant systems only temporarily stave off the inevitable: The discovery of new and innovative ways to fail.

  27. Network Solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not surprising really, but I would partially suspect that it has to do with network solutions being the worst possible domain registrar. Yes, Sony should have renewed the domain, yes they should have updated their info with network solutions, but it would surprise me if that was made very difficult by this being such a terribly outdated and overpriced registrar.

  28. come on... by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

    come on guys.. There's lots of reasons to hate on SOE. Hell, I haven't bought an SOE product in 10yrs because of the Foglok fiasco... I was actually banned from their forums for a few months back in the day for suggesting they didnt exist, only later find out I was right. The title of the freek'n thread to announce the disappointment was "CharlieMopps was right, not a troll, there are no frogloks!!!" (paraphrased, the threads been deleted for some time now) If you don't know what thats about you've no reason to hate on SOE. Ok ok, I'm just tryning to point out I have no love for them...

    Anyways... Managing a domain is a pain in the ass. I've worked in a few places with large website, I'm sure a few of you have. Maintaining that domain registration is deceptively difficult. Think about it as if you were the one in charge of it.

    You tell your staff "Register out domain!"
    They go off and come back "well, it appears we can register it for anywhere from 1yr to 5yrs, which you would like?"
    You say "5yrs of course!"
    They tell you "how would you like it billed? We can pay it one time now... or put it on the company credit card?"
    You say "The company card of course! It will renew!"
    ***5yrs later your site goes down***
    How could this happen?!?! An in-depth review shows that the entire team you assigned to take care of that task has either moved on or transfered elsewhere in the company. Doh! Even worse, credit cards only last for 5yrs before they are canceled and reissued, you were doomed from the start. All the phone numbers you gave them were moved, the people gone, and those that answered barely knew what a domain was in the first place. You're biggest fault was apparently setting the renewal so far out. If you'd set it for 1yr at least you could have a repeating process for people to get use to as newhires rolled in and out.

    But wait! There's a "contracts" department that should have cought this!
    Well "contracts" kind of sorts things in order of importance by cost and that domain registration cost what? $20? So that out it between free Twinkie Friday and the new coffee pot... not really on their radar.

    As many times as I've seen this happens it still baffles me to this day why there isn't a service that went something like "$10k per year and you'll never have to worry about any of your domains... ever... pay us, we take care of it"

    anyways, whatever... point is, it's not as simple as it appears on the surface.

    1. Re:come on... by ledow · · Score: 1

      IT department.
      List of all domains.
      Expiry date of those domains, culled from WHOIS.

      How hard is it? Ten minute job. And you KNOW what domains you have to use - you've been including them in game titles, software on the systems you put out, and keeping those domains running somewhere.

      This is NOT a huge task. Even for a multi-million dollar company with 10,000 domains. Hell, it's barely an IT task... more an office admin kind of thing (did they have to "renew" their subscription to the newspapers and tech journals? Were they caught off-guard? Did they have to budget and contract for that? And they're not even business-critical).

      Sorry, but I'd go straight to the head of IT, demand to know how it was allowed to get close to expiration, let alone past it. And I guarantee you they'd have a spreadsheet to hand on with their documentation to their successor, who will have on their job description "Manage domain renewals" (if they haven't already).

      Fuck, this is an Outlook calendar kind of note, if that. But if I was Sony, I'd be fucked if I wouldn't have it plugged into bog-standard IT helpdesk software like every other contract, renewal and scheduled update required.

    2. Re:come on... by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      I haven't bought an SOE product in 10yrs because of the Foglok fiasco... I was actually banned from their forums for a few months back in the day for suggesting they didnt exist, only later find out I was right.

      What do you mean froglok's don't exist, I've seen them. There was a HUGE underground fortress/city FULL of them down south near the Ogre/Troll town in EQOA. High level Froglok paladins and such.

      They were NPC's in the original EQ release too. Ykesha made them playable.

    3. Re:come on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But whAt about "fogloks?" Frogloks? Fogloks? Nothing you said explains the frogloks. Fogloks. Whatever, shill!!!!!

    4. Re:come on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As many times as I've seen this happens it still baffles me to this day why there isn't a service that went something like "$10k per year and you'll never have to worry about any of your domains... ever... pay us, we take care of it"

      Actually, there is. ThompsonReuters' service "MarkMonitor", for example. (Disclaimer: I do not work for Thompson Reuters,although it's certainly possible that someone else who posts anonymously here does.)

    5. Re:come on... by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      I haven't bought an SOE product in 10yrs because of the Foglok fiasco... I was actually banned from their forums for a few months back in the day for suggesting they didnt exist, only later find out I was right.

      What do you mean froglok's don't exist, I've seen them. There was a HUGE underground fortress/city FULL of them down south near the Ogre/Troll town in EQOA. High level Froglok paladins and such.

      They were NPC's in the original EQ release too. Ykesha made them playable.

      lol... Ok, I'll enlighten you.
      I was hardcore into EQ1. I played on a PVP server and we did all the hardcore raiding stuff... we carried pagers so when rare mobs popped we'd get paged and go home from work sick. Some of us carried laptops to work so we could log in from there, etc...

      So EQ2 was a highly anticipated release. We all had the game and were in it within seconds of the servers coming up. Our guild was formed and we were off. One of my primary roles was cataloging and documenting quests. My guild (and a few others) solve a lot of the original quests and raid content. You know all those guides you follow to finish a quest? I (and others like me) wrote a lot of the first ones. I loved doing that... there were many in my guild that solved the riddles, or sometimes it would be a combination of the top raiding guilds. My guide for Nektropos Castle was one of my favorite's because it reminded me so much of EQ1's crazy complicated quests.

      But at the time of the games release, THE quest to solve was the Froglok unlock quest. SOE said the game included frogloks from the start and that there was simply a quest we had to figure out to unlock them. No one had done it, if they had it would have been obvious because we'd see a froglok running around. From the start we suspected something was up. We invested huge amounts of time trying to solve the riddle. I was personally putting in 12hrs a day trying to figure it out. We went to every corner of every map, talked to every NPC. We had spreadsheets filled with data but none of it made sense. It seemed like there were broken quests related to it all over the place. But the real giveaway that something was wrong was the fact that the few Froglok npc's in the game never moved. We suspected they'd not finished the animations in time. So we took to the forums. I cataloged what I could, and made my points. We got posts from SOE themselves stating they were in the game, we had to just keep trying. So we did, for months. Then a guy hacked the client, and got it to load the character creation screen for the froglok and took screenshots. It was missing bits and pieces of its body. That was it, they were lying. So we went back to the forums, I got into a huge argument with moorguard amongst others and got banned for spreading misinformation or some such... I suspect there were others that got banned but was never sure. Then a few weeks later they had a press release... Frogloks were never in the game, they were going to patch them in, the quest didn't exist yet. We'd pushed them to ask enough questions and the truth was revealed. Quietly my ban was lifted without apology. I suspect upper management had been lying to the community team for plausible deniabilities sake.

      A while later, maybe a few months? There was a big patch and unlocking the frogloks was one of the simplest, stupidest quests you can imagine. It was clearly an afterthought. The entire "unlock the froklok" thing was a lie to cover up the fact that the game hadn't been finished at release. I quite playing and later entered the Vanguard Alpha testing... but that's a tale for another time ;-)

      I got a 6yr old now... no more time to waste on MMOs.

  29. Re:Yet another reason to insist on software freedo by Cl1mh4224rd · · Score: 1

    Early Tuesday, gamers woke up to find out that they couldn't log in to any Sony Online Entertainment games--no Everquest, no Planetside 2, none of them.

    Could the users have used another server to connect with each other?

    Not much of a gamer, I take it? Most, if not all, of the games affected are not peer-to-peer style multiplayer games; they're MMOs. There's no matchmaking servers involved here.

    --
    People will pass up steak once a week, for crap every day.
  30. A Phone call wouldnt of hurt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Phone call wouldnt of hurt? since a non-used email address was to blame!

    1. Re:A Phone call wouldnt of hurt by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I'm usually not a grammar-, spelling- or other language Nazi. But where the fuck does that "of" come from? That's really a mistake I've never seen from anyone but a native speaker, nobody who learned English as a second language would ever think that this could for some odd reason function.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:A Phone call wouldnt of hurt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Phonetically it sounds sort of like "have." He meant would not have. For example, "would've", the "'ve" sounds much like of.

    3. Re:A Phone call wouldnt of hurt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what happens when you don't pay attention in English class - you never learn that contractions are a thing, and, hearing the sound of 've, figure it must be "of" because there's nothing else you know that matches that sound.

    4. Re:A Phone call wouldnt of hurt by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      "wouldnt of" should be "wouldn't have" or "wouldn't've". Yes, it's a native speaker sort of mistake. What's amazing is that this guy managed to get through elementary and high school still doing this.

      As I've said before, never try to type a word or phrase you've only heard spoken.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    5. Re:A Phone call wouldnt of hurt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a verbal contraction of would-not-have. But "wouldn't've" looks so wrong he changed it to "wouldn't of".

      http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/wouldn't've

    6. Re:A Phone call wouldnt of hurt by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      I actually ran across this in one of GRR Martin's books the other day. Very sloppy proofreading. He sometimes writes the accents but this wasn't one of those cases.

    7. Re:A Phone call wouldnt of hurt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm usually not a grammar-, spelling- or other language Nazi. But where the fuck does that "of" come from? That's really a mistake I've never seen from anyone but a native speaker, nobody who learned English as a second language would ever think that this could for some odd reason function.

      If comes from the word "of" being pronounced in the same way as the contraction of the word "have".

      Consider: "It would have hurt" with a contraction become "It would've hurt" which sounds similar to "It would of hurt".

      Native speakers make this mistake because they acquired the language organically based on what they heard instead of systematically based on the actual morphology.

    8. Re:A Phone call wouldnt of hurt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is because natives sometimes say "wouldn't've" (contraction of "wouldn't" and "have") and the "ve" part sounds similar to "of".

  31. Did is what they get for outsourcing IT by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Did is what they get for outsourcing IT.

    Even if they still had some stuff still in house things can get lost in the shuffle

  32. Memo by bdwoolman · · Score: 1

    From: Kazuo Hirai

    To: John Smedly

    Re: SOE Rego

    @#$$%^&*()!) (*$%@#$$%^&*()!)(*$%@#$$@ #$$%^&*()!)(*$%% @#$$%^&*()!)(*$%

    --
    "No fear. No envy. No meanness." Liam Clancy
  33. Stop thinking in terms of employees ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

    With 10 year registrations available, there's no guarantee that former_group_members@example.com is much better than former_employee@example.com, especially in fast moving industries.

    Stop thinking in terms of employees, that's the point of this exercise, the email addresses on the distribution list can include functional roles. company_web_site_manager@sony.com, senior_web_admins@sony.com, etc. Basically the slots in the corporate org chart come with an email address based on the function so you don't necessarily have to know who the person in that role is nowadays.

    You're suggesting a tactical solution to a process issue. Better to have the responsible group track and update necessary renewals on a regular basis, instead of depending on notifications from external parties being received.

    So your calendar server has a list of people rather than your email server, that's not much of a difference.

  34. Happens more often than you might expect by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Another big company that I worked for, curiously also starting with S, had exactly the same problem. With an internal server, so nobody buy the people working there noticed it. Why? I have no idea.

    But once you spend a few years working, you notice that the term "professional" only means "doing it for money". Not "doing it professionally". So please, don't think corporations are in any way more efficient than you are, or that they would or could do a better job. And how should they? It's just people doing for money what other people do for you as a favor.

    In other words, if you need to get something fixed, ask a friend. Don't hire someone.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  35. I don't understand how that could be common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Germany, you order a domain, and the company you ordered from charges your bank account automatically every month or year, depending on your contract.

    So you can "never" forget to pay a domain. Why is this not common outside of Europe?

    1. Re:I don't understand how that could be common by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      And if you forget, you may not put money in that account, or even close the account. Then how does the automatic payment work?

  36. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fucking billionaires... SMH

  37. And you think the phone number was correct? by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    They can't bother to keep their (required annually) admin whois contact email up to date, but their phone number is going to be a working one that connects to someone who can resolve the problem?

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  38. As we suspected by HangingChad · · Score: 4, Funny

    SOE's president, John Smedley, has admitted that the expiration notices were being sent to an "unread email" address.

    The same one used for customer service inquiries.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:As we suspected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't played an SOE game in a long time, but I played Planetside through Beta and release and when I got my disks they were unusable. I shot an e-mail to them asking for replacements and providing info they requested and not only received new disks, but also a new key so I had 2 copies AND they included EQ as well. Like I said it's been a while, but at one point I was blown away by their customer service.

  39. Fired by Bengie · · Score: 1

    I bet they fired the person who was responsible for this and no one checked his email.

    What's a DNS admin? Do we need him? You, PHP programmer, you now have his job on top of what ever you already do.

  40. SONY BMG Rootkit: Anyone jailed for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because some of us never forget.

    Hello?

  41. Happens all the time... by RoloDMonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have been doing web work for a decade, and I can tell you this happens all the time. In fact, older employees in marketing have told me horror stories about 800 numbers and mailing addresses that were never set up, misprinted, or never updated.

    I always tell clients that they should set up emails that describe the job/function, like marketing@example.com and webmaster@example.com, and make sure that those emails go to a distribution list that goes to at least two people.

    You wouldn't believe how often critical accounts and webforms are only accessible with the email addresses of Sally the Secretary or William the Webmaster. When they leave, no one knows there is a problem, until it is a big problem.

    --
    Long live the Speaker Bracelet
    Rolo D. Monkey
  42. It's still not working!! by NotDrWho · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm still not able to log on to Star Wars Galaxies.

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    1. Re: It's still not working!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right in the feels, man.

  43. Everquest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are people left playing Everquest to notice they couldn't log in?

  44. You're a fucking jinx, Joyce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sort of lapse has happened in every company I've worked in

    Hmmm. Have you considered that you might be the problem?

  45. Hilarity Ensues? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find nothing funny about not being able to access a big website or to play a game that I subscribe to. I also want to play Vanguard and Wizardry online before Sony discontinues it. I was not able to access the forums to read the latest news regarding the next versions of Everquest.

    I do not share the same sense of humor that Dragoness Eclectic shares.

  46. SNASU by meglon · · Score: 1

    Situation normal, all Sony'd up.

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  47. Addendumdum by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

    and b) my excuse was, "I don't read that email account any more."

    Apparently the actual excuse was "Went to my junk filter lol."

    [Someone else pointed out that sony.com itself was only renewed 4 days before expiry, and only for two years. What, are you worried about paying too far in advance in case the company decides to stop using the internet and you can't get your $35 back? I mean, fuck.]

    --
    Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  48. Meh... by SanDogWeps · · Score: 2

    EVE Online still holds the record for most epic fallout from not paying a bill...

  49. HOSTS FILE by IntrepidDreams · · Score: 1

    I had to edit my HOSTS FILE.

    But I'm not that guy.

    I tried to play Planetside 2 on Tues. The launcher got an error message. Their website down too... Was odd. Reddit to the rescue. Someone posted the domains and IP addresses necessary to add to the hosts file. Worked fine but game pop was way down. Lowest I think I've seen since the recent server merger.

    There were other recommendations to switch to Google's DNS servers wich apparently updated much faster after SOE fixed it, but like I really need Google to know every single domain name I connect to.

  50. LUL by Jeruvy · · Score: 1

    Ya, John Smedley is a moron.

    --
    Jeruvy