Slashdot Mirror


Russia Prepares For Internet War Over Malaysian Jet

An anonymous reader writes The investigation of a Malaysian passenger jet shot down over Ukrainian rebel held territory is heating up. U.S. and U.K. news organizations are studiously trying to spread the blame, Russian ITAR, which, just earlier today was celebrating the downing of a large aircraft by rebel missiles in Torez (Google cache) is reporting that the rebels do not have access to the missiles needed for such attacks. The rebel commander who earlier today reported the downing of the aircraft has also issued a correction to earlier reports that they had captured BUK air defense systems with Russian sources now stating that the rebels do not posses such air defenses. The Ukrainian president has been attempting to frame the incident as a "terrorist attack". President Obama made contact with Vladimir Putin and has been instead treating it as an accident, calling it a "terrible tragedy" and saying that the priority is investigating whether U.S. citizens were involved. With control of the black box and its own internet propaganda army Russia may be in a good position to win the propaganda war.

95 of 503 comments (clear)

  1. Black box data streaming by justcauseisjustthat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why haven't all airplanes been upgraded so the black box data is streamed to satellites/ground stations? It's so dumb to have to search for a airplane to find the data, that should be the fallback plan. Hey FAA, you listening?

    1. Re:Black box data streaming by acoustix · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My guess is cost. Sending data via satellite is very expensive, and there's a lot of data recorded. As for ground stations, I'm not aware of any plane-to-ground data communications currently in use (other than radio for voice) so that would need a completely new infrastructure built.

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    2. Re:Black box data streaming by justcauseisjustthat · · Score: 5, Interesting

      So we can put Wifi internet on airplanes, but not a virtual black box?

    3. Re:Black box data streaming by FireFury03 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why haven't all airplanes been upgraded so the black box data is streamed to satellites/ground stations? It's so dumb to have to search for a airplane to find the data, that should be the fallback plan. Hey FAA, you listening?

      Because there's probably way too much data for that to be a reasonable idea. Have you any idea how many planes there are flying at once?

    4. Re:Black box data streaming by acoustix · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's a good point, but its a small percentage of flights that have Internet access. Even in the US.

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    5. Re:Black box data streaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's a good point, but its a small percentage of flights that have Internet access. Even in the US.

      The US is not always the best indication of what is possible or reasonable (or sane) in regards to mass transportation.

    6. Re:Black box data streaming by dfn5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because the pilot union doesn't want that data to be available for anyone to look at outside of an accident situation. Consider if your car had a black box, which it should. But in addition to collecting the data was transmitting that information continuously to the government for them to peruse any time they wanted. One already gets speeding tickets automatically when your fast lane toll pass records you traveling between toll plazas faster than you should be. Imagine if that was all the time.

      --
      -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
    7. Re:Black box data streaming by c · · Score: 2

      Why haven't all airplanes been upgraded so the black box data is streamed to satellites/ground stations?

      In general, I don't entirely disagree. In this case... I'm not sure how useful the black box would be in the event of a missile strike. I wasn't aware the civilian aircraft had the kind of gear to track a missile, or that the kinds of collision sensors they have would be fast enough to catch it. It's definitely not going to be able to tell who shot the missile or where it came from. Heck, I'd be surprised if the black box could tell the difference betwen a missile strike and a large suitcase bomb in the cargo hold. So unless it actually was an mechanical or aircrew failure (and I highly doubt it), I think the black box is a red herring.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    8. Re:Black box data streaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      My guess is cost. Sending data via satellite is very expensive, and there's a lot of data recorded. As for ground stations, I'm not aware of any plane-to-ground data communications currently in use (other than radio for voice) so that would need a completely new infrastructure built.

      Nope. Sorry to interrupt your speculation, but the reality is that there is technology available for that. It's been used in corporate private aviation etc. many decades already. It costs some money, it will cost something to install and operate, but it's not too expensive any more. The reasons why it isn't been used in commercial airliners is mainly it's just not been a requirement to install, there have not been accidents which would had it made a requirement and because airline operators are business trying to make money they avoid any extra costs they can.

      There is a very good summary of the state of this in Science Friday May 30, 2014 story following previous Malesian Airlines plane case.

      ac

    9. Re:Black box data streaming by Charliemopps · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's a good point, but its a small percentage of flights that have Internet access. Even in the US.

      Even in the US? I've never seen internet access on a US flight. Flying across Europe, the middle east and Africa, pretty much every plane I got on either had direct internet access or the plane offered streaming data you could pay for (i.e. it had internet, just no wifi) The lack of internet access in the US is entirely due to the FAA being stuck in the 1950s.

    10. Re: Black box data streaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      It wouldn't matter in this case. We know where the plane is and what happened to it. The most you would see is a big acceleration or yaw as the missile detonated, might hear the explosion on the voice recorder, or whatever before it stops recording as the plane came apart. The US is reporting their military surveillance saw the missile radar light up as it tracked the plane.

      There are now reports of monitored chatter among the separatists where they figured out it was civilian instead of military after the shoot down. There was also the tweet by the separatist general where he celebrated shooting down another Ukrainian plane and then deleted it. It really looks like it was the separatists who did it, using Russian weapons.

      This shoot down and the loss of innocent life is the direct result of Vladimir Putin's reckless behavior and fomenting violence in the Ukraine as he injects weapons, advisors, and military to try to take the Ukraine over. This rests squarely on his shoulders. He might as well have killed those 290 people with his own hands.

      The black box really won't provide anything not already known. What we need are radar tracking and satellite photos that show the position of the missile launcher before the missile was fired. That is the smoking gun needed to hang that communist megalomaniac bastard.

    11. Re:Black box data streaming by Charliemopps · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why haven't all airplanes been upgraded so the black box data is streamed to satellites/ground stations? It's so dumb to have to search for a airplane to find the data, that should be the fallback plan. Hey FAA, you listening?

      Because there's probably way too much data for that to be a reasonable idea. Have you any idea how many planes there are flying at once?

      And how much data does the flight recorder capture? 56k? and it doesn't even need to send it all. Location and some very low quality audio of radio communications would solve 99% of the problems we're having. It's kind of like the brain implants they've built for the blind in recent years. The first one they put into a guy only had a resolution of about 20 x 20 pixels. When asked how it was to see with such terrible resolution he said "I don't mind. If it stops me from getting hit by a car, I'll worry about being able to see a sunset for another day.

    12. Re:Black box data streaming by Charliemopps · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Consider if your car had a black box, which it should.

      No it shouldn't. It's my car, go to hell. If I drove a buss or something, that would be different. But you can't preemptively determine that at some point in the future I will break the law, cause an accident and therefor put a surveillance system in my car. By your logic I should be required by law to have video cameras in my home filming me just in case I murder someone so the police can come along later and watch the video.

      One already gets speeding tickets automatically when your fast lane toll pass records you traveling between toll plazas faster than you should be. Imagine if that was all the time.

      Why does everyone always think "Where I live, things are like X, therefor things are like X everywhere on earth"???
      We don't even have TOLLS in my state, much less tickets by toll. In the states that border mine they have tolls and they don't do that.
      I think I've only driven through one state where they can legally give you a ticket for speeding based on when you get on and off the tollway. They said I was speeding, I said "No I wasn't" and they said "oh... well be careful" and no ticket.

    13. Re:Black box data streaming by Kythe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's not a matter of technology. It's a matter of satellite bandwidth, given the number of flights in the air. One possible solution has been developed that predicts imminent disaster and rapidly commences data upload. I'm not sure whether that would work in the case of a missile attack, though.

      --

      Kythe
    14. Re: Black box data streaming by falcon5768 · · Score: 2

      You do realize all new cars and a lot of cars 2000+ already have black boxes in them right? You just don't get access to them the law and lawyers do.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    15. Re:Black box data streaming by TerraFrost · · Score: 2

      My guess is cost. Sending data via satellite is very expensive, and there's a lot of data recorded. As for ground stations, I'm not aware of any plane-to-ground data communications currently in use (other than radio for voice) so that would need a completely new infrastructure built.

      Quoting wikipedia.org's entry on Gogo Inflight Internet,

      Air-To-Ground (ATG) Gogo's ATG network is a cellular based network that has more than 160 towers in the continental U.S., Alaska and soon, Canada. The towers are cellphone towers that have been outfitted to point their signals at the sky rather than along the ground. The aircraft picks up the signal through a receiver installed on its underside. When it reaches the aircraft, the data signal is distributed throughout the cabin via a Wi-Fi system.

    16. Re:Black box data streaming by Sobrique · · Score: 2

      Unless the aircraft is destroyed out right by the explosion, it'll be damaged and start to crash. I would hope that the onboard monitoring would notice that damage and start warning the pilots, which is a really good cue to start uploading your black box data. Anything where the black box actually survives, there's something to notice 'things going wrong'.

    17. Re:Black box data streaming by budgenator · · Score: 2

      You do realise that US satelite scrutiny of the area is extremely intense, we saw the heat signatures of the launch, we have radar tracks of the missile trajectories, It's just a matter of analysing the data, figuring out who in the area, and putting everything together in a way that doesn't reveal classified capabilities.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    18. Re:Black box data streaming by Talderas · · Score: 2

      Sequence of events may make it possible to identify where the missile struck the plane. If that is the case that may be able to limit the trajectories from which the missile could have approached the plane. All sides are denying culpability right now.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    19. Re:Black box data streaming by Kythe · · Score: 2

      I work in this field (aeronautical communications, including satellite systems), and specifically with FAA personnel who are tasked with knowing and regulating such systems (spectrum managers). What I'm saying comes directly as an answer from them in response to a query about why we don't do exactly as you suggest. It's not merely a question of the total satellite bandwidth available. Satellite bandwidth is used for a lot of things, remember -- and only a small subset is used for protected aeronautical satellite (AMS(R)S) assignments. It's not as simple as you suggest.

      --

      Kythe
    20. Re: Black box data streaming by Blaskowicz · · Score: 2

      Why is there that talk that it's all Putin fault.. The whole thing started with the US backing national-socialists to make a putsch. Ukrainian nazis did atrocious crimes like torching buildings with the people inside and preventing them from escaping. So by your rhetoric, it's like Barack Obama and Victoria Nuland personnally suffocated and burnt to death dozens of people while grinning and laughing.

      That said I'm not saying that to downplay Putin's cynicism and duplicity or what atrocity the russian Ukrainians have made themselves guilty of.

  2. meanwhile overnight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    meanwhile overnight it's been reported by the telegraph.co.uk that a mobile launcher was seen headed back toward the russian border with two of it's four missiles missing, short video clip provided of one on the move at the website.

    1. Re: meanwhile overnight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There is video of the Buk system crossing the border from Russia with 4 rockets two days ago and crossing back into Russia this morning with one missing. These rockets are large and wouldn't just go missing. The rebels are correct, they don't have these weapons, the Russians do and it looks like they let the rebels borrow one.

    2. Re:meanwhile overnight... by OzPeter · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here is the story Malaysia Airlines plane crashes on Ukraine-Russia border - live

      The video is referenced as

      12.20 Tom Parfitt has picked up an intriguing Russian-language detail.
      Anton Gerashchenko, an adviser to Ukraine's interior minister, has made the latest of a series of claims that a Buk missile launcher allegedly used by pro-Russian rebels to knock down Flight MH17 was smuggled away into Russia overnight. He highlights a video which purportedly shows the launcher with two of its missiles missing, writing "it's not hard to guess why".
      “It was exactly these missiles which brought death to almost 300 innocent passengers of the ill-fated Malaysian Boeing,” he added.
      Mr Gerashchenko says the video was made by Ukrainian intelligence agents at 4.50am as the launcher was on the move towards the Russian border near the town of Krasnodon.
      We obviously can't confirm it's authenticity.

      The video is found here Buk launcher video

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    3. Re:meanwhile overnight... by pahles · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      Sig?
    4. Re:meanwhile overnight... by timrod · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The question is, was this really a launcher that the Russians gave the rebels? I looked up the Wikipedia page for the BUK missile system last night, and there was a link on that article to a report from Jane's that said Ukraine had some in their possession from their days as a Soviet satellite state. It makes me wonder if the BUK (being a Soviet-era weapons system dating back to 1979) wasn't just misplaced somewhere - if the National Institutes of Health can misplace 300 vials of deadly diseases and biological weapons, it's not a stretch to think that the Ukrainian military might've had a BUK somewhere and forgotten about it.

      To me, this almost sounds like the Twitter messages from the rebels claiming that they captured a BUK were correct - the Russians didn't directly lend the rebels a BUK, but they're helping them cover it up after the fact in order to stop any news coming out that goes against their message of the rebels being poor, oppressed ethnic Russians who need protection from their "home country".

    5. Re:meanwhile overnight... by OzPeter · · Score: 2

      To me, this almost sounds like the Twitter messages from the rebels claiming that they captured a BUK were correct - the Russians didn't directly lend the rebels a BUK, but they're helping them cover it up after the fact in order to stop any news coming out that goes against their message of the rebels being poor, oppressed ethnic Russians who need protection from their "home country".

      What sort of "rebels" would have the training an ability to set up and operate a crew served weapon? I severely doubt that such a system is "point and shoot" as it has 3 separate, independent mobile systems.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    6. Re:meanwhile overnight... by invid · · Score: 5, Informative

      The only way the Russian's can "win" this propaganda war is if they can somehow convince those Europeans who make decisions about sanctions that they had nothing to do with the downing of the passenger jet. People will want to know where that Buk missile launcher came from, who gave the order to shoot, and where that missile launcher is now. If there is any evidence that the Russians had any direct involvement with this, no amount of propaganda will help them outside of the regions where they have complete control of the media.

      --
      The Moore-Murphy Law: The number of things that will go wrong will double every 2 years.
    7. Re:meanwhile overnight... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

      Generic, knuckle-dragging rebels one step away from cavemen, no. Former Soviet military with experience of a 1979-era system, yes. There's probably a numner therr. However, I still think it's a loan with helpers. They're just code red, ass deep in the worst case scenario of needing to CYA with fallback stories.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    8. Re:meanwhile overnight... by Xest · · Score: 4, Informative

      Janes suggests that whilst training is needed, the launcher can operate in stand alone mode and even be set to fire autonomously at anything approaching it:

      http://www.janes.com/article/4...

      I suspect setting it in this mode could be done by a Ukrainian military defector, a Russian operative, or possibly even just by a smart operative being told over the phone or whatever how to set it into this mode. I doubt there's something mystical about it that stops someone being able to be talked through it, people have been talked through how to land aircraft before over comms with zero experience so it seems reasonable.

      Besides, it was only the other day the rebels were gloating about having shot down an actual Ukrainian transport at that sort of altitude, so they've already admitted they have the capability to launch this sort of missile anyway so that's not even in doubt at this point either way.

      It's not as if they haven't been able to launch massively succesful MLRS attacks in the last week either. There's clearly some extremely skilled military players working for the "rebels". I say rebels in quotes because the entire lineup of the rebels top team are actual Russians, or Ukrainians who have served with the Russian military I believe without exception. They're more actual Russian than they are Ukrainian rebel or separatist.

    9. Re:meanwhile overnight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://ukraineatwar.blogspot.ca/2014/07/russian-transport-of-buk-that-shot-down.html

      The above has a direct link to the video and it shows a blown up picture that one of the four missiles is missing -- it was shown close to Krasnodan 2014-07-18 4:50 AM Kyiv time heading in the direction of the Russian border (at a Russian controlled border point)

      Krasnodan is in the Luhansk Oblast, very close to the Ukrainian border
      https://www.google.ca/maps/@48.299252,39.7498181,11z

      Here is a photo of the BUK Missile System in the vicinity of Snizhne on 2014-07-17 13:30 hours -- four hours before the downing of Malaysian Airlines MH17
      http://sprotyv.info/ru/news/2426-foto-kolonny-rossiyskih-terroristov-perevozivshey-zrk-buk-k-mestu-strelby-po-malaziyskomu

      This photo shows a BUK Missile System in Snizhne on 2014-07-17 and just 12 km away from the crash site -- this system has a range of 28 km
      http://nvua.net/ukraine/Spryatannyy-ZRK-Buk-terroristov-byl-sfotografirovan-v-12-km-ot-mesta-padeniya-Boinga-3988.html

      This is a video of a BUK missile system moving from the town of Torez to Snizhne
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WjhUAZNHBM&list=UUMgrofT7rfqEPxzicmfdo9w&index=1

      Location of the towns of Torez & Snizhne, Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine
      https://www.google.ca/maps/@48.039368,38.7504295,11z

      BTW here is a situational map dated 12 Noon Kyiv time, 2014-07-18
      http://gdb.rferl.org/69CCAD96-D1DB-4F66-8455-41C079FCAC83_w974_n_s_s.jpg

      BTW here is a situational map dated 12 Noon Kyiv time, 2014-07-17
      http://gdb.rferl.org/A18E8EAD-04DB-4EBB-892E-1EAA82655E00_w974_n_s_s.jpg

    10. Re:meanwhile overnight... by Xest · · Score: 2

      Nope, read the link I posted in the post you were replying to, specifically:

      "Although it has its own identification friend or foe system, this is only able to establish whether the target being tracked is a friendly aircraft. It is the electronic equivalent of a sentry calling out: "Who goes there?". If there is no reply, all you know is that it is not one of your own combat aircraft. It would not give you a warning that you were tracking an airliner."

    11. Re:meanwhile overnight... by happy_place · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A reporter on location reported on NPR this morning that they had a couple witnesses that saw a flash prior to the downing of the launch. Apparently due to the pro-russian population of the village where it was downed, this is a very unpopular confession to make. This is a HUGE snafu for Russia, who has been arming the rebels, so they can continue to humiliate Ukrainian air power. I also think it is ridiculous that Obama is only speaking out of concern for possible US Citizens missing. The Netherlands are a solid ally, this is a terrible attrocity...

      --
      http://www.beanleafpress.com
    12. Re:meanwhile overnight... by alphatel · · Score: 2

      Igor: Why makes Google this clip? I need remove
      V.Putin: Use "Right to be forgotten!"

      --
      When the foot seeks the place of the head, the line is crossed. Know your place. Keep your place. Be a shoe.
    13. Re:meanwhile overnight... by Xest · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Right, but there's a difference between ethnicity and nationality. I'm referring to Russian nationals.

      Even those born in Ukraine, but who served in the Russian army post-soviet split up will also likely have Russian nationality.

      This, for what it's worth describes the "separatist" leadership. Igor Girkin the military leader of the "separatists" and Alexander Boradai, the political leader of the separatists are actual just plain old Russians, no natural Ukrainian association at all and don't even live in the Ukraine (well, not until this separatist movement started), they're both from Moscow.

      When the Ukrainian military destroyed a truck transporting I believe about 30 rebels, their coffins were all sent to Russia, because that's where they were all from.

      This is really the problem with the battle, a lot, possibly even a majority of those doing the fighting aren't even actually Ukrainian, they're simply out and out Russian, nationals, citizens, residents, fighting in the Ukraine for Russian ultra-nationalist expansionism. I'd say it's a new form of imperialist expansionism, but it's really not new. It actually harks back more to the days of the crusades where civilians often acted not in a state capacity, but simply only with the implicit support of the state to invade foreign lands to try and take them for their own.

    14. Re:meanwhile overnight... by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 3, Informative

      A reporter on location reported on NPR this morning that they had a couple witnesses that saw a flash prior to the downing of the launch. Apparently due to the pro-russian population of the village where it was downed, this is a very unpopular confession to make. This is a HUGE snafu for Russia, who has been arming the rebels, so they can continue to humiliate Ukrainian air power. I also think it is ridiculous that Obama is only speaking out of concern for possible US Citizens missing. The Netherlands are a solid ally, this is a terrible attrocity...

      I just watched the entire speech, he went out of his way to mention the Netherlands and the bloodlettign they have had to suffer..

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    15. Re: meanwhile overnight... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      What is the video of Buk crossing the border from Russia? The one video that I'm aware of that predates the attack shows a Buk driving around somewhere close to the area where the plane was shot down; it's not the border.

      Also, the rebels themselves boasted of capturing two Buks from an Ukrainian military base that they took over recently. Ukrainian side has confirmed that the base was taken over, and that it had Buks in it, though they dismissed the threat saying that those Buks are "deactivated" and "inoperable". But then again, three days before the attack, Sergey Kurginyan, one of the rebel sympathizers, have mentioned the Buk in a lengthy video and claimed that they have "genius technicians" that have already got the thing running.

      So it seems that the rebels "borrowed" the launcher from Ukrainians, but Russia is now aiding them in trying to hide it to block the investigation.

    16. Re:meanwhile overnight... by budgenator · · Score: 3, Interesting

      When I was in the US Army, I was a Hawk Missile and Launcher repairer, and work in IGLE, Internal Guidance and Launch Equipment back in 1974-78 and I can say with pretty good authority that the technology available in that era required pretty much constant maintence. The Guidance packages was all electron tubes except for one transistor, the microwave reciever was klystron based so everything drifted constantly. When something drifted out f spec it's not amatter of twisting a reostat either, you have to take it apart, unsolder a fixed resistor, and replace with a resistor of different value, potentiometers would never hold their value durring launch G's or after bouncing acrost the grond on top of a tracked vehicle. It's highly unlikely that the rebels could have just stubled upon a lost or abandoned weapon system and have gotten it working with out highly trained support personnel and operators. It takes a lot of finesse to work the old stuff, modern systems just work or not.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    17. Re:meanwhile overnight... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      Read these links in order, paying close attention to the dates of each article (use Google/Bing/Yandex Translate if you don't know Russian, it's good enough to understand the meaning). They pretty much answer all the questions: who did it, what they did it with etc. Note that ITAR TASS is the Russian official state media, so while it is obviously propaganda, in this case it only gives credence to the claims, since the result is strikingly not in their favor:

      http://itar-tass.com/mezhdunar...
      http://itar-tass.com/mezhdunar...
      http://www.vz.ru/news/2014/7/1...
      http://itar-tass.com/mezhdunar...
      http://itar-tass.com/mezhdunar...

    18. Re: meanwhile overnight... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      The original capture report listed two Buks, according to Ukrainians.

      I've no doubt that Russia supplies arms to the rebels, but the source of this particular AA remains unclear, and could be either. Now that it has been hastily removed from the scene, and probably destroyed, I doubt we will ever find out.

  3. It is the fault of.. by EasyTarget · · Score: 2, Insightful

    .. Nationalism: the single biggest source of evil on this planet.

    --
    "Oops, I always forget the purpose of competition is to divide people into winners and losers." - Hobbes
    1. Re:It is the fault of.. by jbmartin6 · · Score: 2

      Not really. Look at the vicious atrocities of the Mongols. They were hardly what we would call nationalistic. Sadly, it is human nature that devalues the Other and makes it possible to rationalize anything.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    2. Re:It is the fault of.. by Bengie · · Score: 2

      Only a few hundred years ago it was religion. Flavor of the century. Ass holes will always be assholes, they just use whatever is the current popular tool to accomplish their misdeeds.

  4. Let loose the dogs of misinformation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Counter propaganda is rife, backpedaling at the speed of light by the ukrainian "rebel" commander (who's actually Russian) and hordes of incoherent babblegaffers vehemently denying everything and making it even more painfully obvious what's plain for everyone to see.
    Ukraine did not shoot down the Malaysian passenger jet, the rebels did, and boasted about it (then quickly removed the post).
    Just watch what happens in this thread.
    It will be very enlightening

  5. 04.10.2010 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Russia already has a history of, at the very least, being a prime suspect for taking down a plane. The only difference now is that the world is actually watching this show more carefully.

    1. Re: 04.10.2010 by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 2

      Both Russia and the USA have a history of supporting rebellions and shooting down passenger jets. America's was an Iranian Airbus.

    2. Re:04.10.2010 by rasmusbr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Russia already has a history of, at the very least, being a prime suspect for taking down a plane. The only difference now is that the world is actually watching this show more carefully.

      So does the US: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I...
      And Ukraine: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S...

      The only real lesson is that surface to air missiles are way to dangerous to be put into the hands of the military. Now think about putting them into the hands of rednecks and other idiots who fancy themselves rebels. In retrospect it is pretty obvious that this had to happen sooner or later.

  6. Active ops by eddy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seeing a lot of pro-russian "psyops" on one local forum attached to a news outlet focused on economics, so much so that it's pretty obvious that it's organized. Massive amounts of downvotes on anything negative to the pro-russian side, and weak conspiracy theories written in broken english moderated up.

    Not sure why they're wasting their time, but there you go. I guess the proud Cheka men have nothing better to do than troll forums.

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
  7. Propaganda won't help this time by Rhywden · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That kind of propaganda might help them inside Russia where Putin has almost complete control over the press. But outside? With all the incriminating stuff that's already turned up?

    I really don't think that the other major players will be impressed by Russian propaganda. The Ukraine certainly won't. The US won't as well, due to their longstanding tradition of mistrusting Russia, in addition to having lost citizens in the crash. Neither will several states in the EU - the Netherlands won't be happy with an "accident" explanation, particularly in light of the fact that an anti-air missile cannot really be considered an accident.

    1. Re:Propaganda won't help this time by bhcompy · · Score: 2

      Then you read sites like Reddit and Twitter and see all the Russian apologists, just like the Hugo Chavez apologists that used to exist. The problem is that the news agencies now quote/source directly from those sites. Eventually, you get a 9/11-Afghan War situation where you're damned if do and you're damned if you don't

    2. Re:Propaganda won't help this time by Rhywden · · Score: 2

      I agree with your post in general, but I want to point out a couple of exceptions. In English you're supposed to say "Ukraine" and not "the Ukraine" since Ukraine is an independent country and not a part of the USSR. The only people who know the difference and insist on "the Ukraine" are Russian sympathizers, so you're actually picking a side you may not wish to pick by saying "the Ukraine". Rules for languages other than English may be different. Don't agree with me? Then go to a website for a Ukrainian embassy in an English speaking country and you will see that they only say Ukraine and not "the Ukraine". I've been to Ukraine. I know.

      Sorry, but I'm not a native speaker and such intricacies sometimes elude me. Seems strange to me that such a little article makes all the difference, because after all, you yourself call other countries "the US" or "the Netherlands".

      And last time I looked both the US and the Netherlands were independent countries.

    3. Re:Propaganda won't help this time by OzPeter · · Score: 2

      Sorry, but I'm not a native speaker and such intricacies sometimes elude me. Seems strange to me that such a little article makes all the difference, because after all, you yourself call other countries "the US" or "the Netherlands".

      And last time I looked both the US and the Netherlands were independent countries.

      The US and the Netherlands are special cases. For example in English you don't say "The Australia", "The Brazil" or "The Canada".

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    4. Re:Propaganda won't help this time by Rhywden · · Score: 2

      Whatever. As I said, I'm not a native speaker and to determine affinity towards one side or the other merely through the usage of an article strikes me as foolishness at best.

      It actually reminds me of the Jehovah-scene from Life of Brian.

    5. Re:Propaganda won't help this time by Talderas · · Score: 2

      And last time I looked both the US and the Netherlands were independent countries.

      America is an independent country but the United States are not. Netherlands is an independent country but the Netherlands is not.

      The key is that "the" is referencing a portion of country or grouping. So with the United States of America the article 'the' is reference the individual states which constitute America. The same thing applies for the Netherlands except you're dealing with an overloaded term. The Netherlands is a constituent member of the Kingdom of Netherlands which also includes Aruba, Curacao, and Sint Maarten. The Netherlands references that member country while Netherlands references the Kingdom.

      That is why "the Ukraine" could be considered offensive to Ukraine. It's a phrase that is held over from the time when Ukraine was not sovereign and were constituent of the USSR.

      "The" is not required when dealing with dependent territories, like Scotland, but it shouldn't be used when dealing with a sovereign and independent entity.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    6. Re:Propaganda won't help this time by Rhywden · · Score: 2

      You're wrong on the US part. You're also wrong on the Netherlands part. http://www.bbc.com/news/magazi...

    7. Re:Propaganda won't help this time by TangoMargarine · · Score: 2

      The US [...] in addition to having lost citizens in the crash.

      Last I heard they hadn't.

      BBC article:

              Netherlands: 189
              Malaysia: 44 (including 15 crew)
              Australian: 27
              Indonesia: 12
              UK: 9
              Germany: 4
              Belgium: 4
              Philippines: 3
              Canada: 1
              New Zealand: 1
              Unverified: 4

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
  8. To me it's pretty clear. by Qbertino · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Slavian Farmers Militia ("Seperatists") bored and trigger-happy and with easy access to Russian military hardware. To dumb to doulbe-check their targets or to dumb to care. Wether this is Ukranian seperatists or not is of no significance - there all just pawns in a Game. I think Putin has since this begun weighing the risks of supporting seperatists and making russia fell big again - whatever that is - and keeping a low(er) profile. This could shift sentiment considerably.
    Either way, I don't trust the guy but I don't consider east-ukranian militia folks rational enough to be under any usefull control by russian. When push comes to shove, they'll do whatever they feel like doing, as long as they've got enough ammo and toys and enough dumbwits who support their cause - whatever that's supposed to be.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:To me it's pretty clear. by Rei · · Score: 2

      The militias controlling Donbas have repeatedly complained about how little material support they've gotten from the locals and how few people have enrolled (although it supposedly varies a great deal from place to place). They get more than enough cheers and pats on the back (pre-conflict polling suggested about a quarter to a third would rather be a part of Russia than Ukraine and a majority are unhappy with Kiev - and I'm sure the remainder know well enough to keep their mouths shut), but the percent willing to put their lives on the line for Russia is apparently quite low. The local Ukranians involved are often reported a lot "softer" - the Russian commanders are more of the "shoot you if you don't obey orders" type.

      --
      People said I was dumb, but I proved them.
  9. The Kremlin are busted by Katatsumuri · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Too much evidence this time. Now it's only a matter of due diligence, and choosing to put them on trial as war criminals, or as terrorism sponsors, or both.

    1. Re:The Kremlin are busted by amiga3D · · Score: 2

      It's no big conspiracy. This is what happens when you start handing out weapons to radical people. "If it flies it dies" makes a great motto for anti-aircraft missile batteries. That's what you get from the crazies operating this weaponry. Not a lot of skill needed to use it so they also don't have the skill to tell a military cargo aircraft from a civilian passenger liner even if they did give a shit. I'm sure Russia didn't want this but they handed out the weaponry to these idiots.

  10. Russian Internet propaganda army by ArcadeMan · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hell, they were even able to enlist "Weird Al" Yankovic.

  11. Russia has no choice by conquistadorst · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Russia has no choice, they have to do everything in their power to stem the international avalanche of disdain that would otherwise befall them. Think about it:
    1. 1. Russia denies wanting to annex eastern Ukraine
    2. 2. Russia denies supporting rebels
    3. 3. Russia denies arming rebels
    4. 4. Rebels then shoot down an international civilian aircraft using the very weapons they weren't supposed to have

    If the rebels are ever confirmed to have shot down the plane all of Russia's denials fall apart like a house of cards. Caught red handed. Except now there's international blood on their hands instead of just Ukrainian. Unfortunately for Ukraine, nobody really cares about them except their neighbors. So on that note, you can be guaranteed they will stop at nothing to prove rebels were not at fault. I have no doubt there will be people that will be "silenced". The stakes are simply too damn high.

    1. Re:Russia has no choice by ericloewe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not like their denials were ever worth anything.

      Putin denied having a single Russian operative in Crimea... until after the annexation, when he admitted that was a lie.

      Given all the evidence of Russian involvement, denials are pure soviet-style bullshit.

    2. Re:Russia has no choice by AlterEager · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Putin has effectively already admitted that the rebels did it:

      The state over whose territory this occurred bears responsibility for this awful tragedy.

      -- Vladimir Putin.

      Note that he doesn't say "Ukraine did it", he says "It's Ukraine's fault", i.e. that it would never have happened if Ukraine hadn't made such a fuss about having its territory annexed.

      Classic victim blaming. "You made me do it, it's your fault".

    3. Re:Russia has no choice by Kagato · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think you are putting too much value in Russia actually caring what the rest of the world thinks. The EU and US have zero treaty obligations to the Ukraine. It was never going to be a Military altercation with the West. It was always going to be a series of trade and diplomatic sanctions. All Russia has to do is weather the sanctions until the Winter and then bend over Western Europe who needs Russian Natural Gas to survive.

      Worst case, 5 years down the road North American liquified Nat gas might be able to replace Russian pipeline shipments... Maybe.

    4. Re:Russia has no choice by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      There are many other gas suppliers in the region - Azerbaijan is the most obvious one, but then there's Turkmenistan, and hell, why not, even Iran. The trick is building new pipelines such that they don't end up on Russian territory. But that is already in progress.

  12. Wrong priority! by Aethedor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... the priority is investigating whether U.S. citizens were involved.

    Seriously, is that really what matters now? What an arrogant *****. What really matters is who did it and why. What's the risk for other planes. If it were the rebels, how did they get their hands on such advanced weaponry. 298 people died. Who they were is something to find out by the airliner company. A president, and specially one from the USA, should really have other things to worry about.

    --
    It doesn't have to be like this. All we need to do is make sure we keep talking.
    1. Re:Wrong priority! by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      Winston Churchill confessed, guiltily, in his History of WWII, to being happy at the news that the Japanese had attacked Pearl Harbor, because he knew at that moment, the Germans had lost the war.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Wrong priority! by Rei · · Score: 2

      Not much for the US to do? So you presume, for example, that punitive sanctions aren't an option? This could finally be the impetus to lay on some "more than just a slap on the wrist" sanctions. I mean, they haven't even banned the export and import of luxury goods yet. There's a long way to go down that road. The big effects come in creating a business environment in which any company that has any operations in the US or Europe is afraid to touch Russia out of fear of massive fines, causing them to over-self-sanction as a precaution (this usually has the greatest effect on sanctioned countries).

      There's really no way to ever *totally* stop travel between the borders, and even very strict measures well beyond what we could reasonably expect here would leak like a sieve. But the key is to ruin the ratios in Russia - to devalue their exports, hike the cost of their imports, and raise the interest rate on their borrowing. Which in turn would render most of their business activity except that with a very high profit margin uneconomical, as well as smashing their per-capita buying power.

      Yeah, Russia's energy weapon can be used, and that's a big weapon, although it'd aim even more back at Russia (that's the foundation of their economy). Europe has the operational LNG terminals to import enough (even without usage displacement, which would happen en masse - welcome back, coal!) to replace Russian gas, for example, and there's more than enough exporters (Qatar alone could offset it). But Europe would pay out the nose for it - LNG is expensive to begin with and they'd be competing against other buyers all over the world. Again with oil, Saudi Arabia alone has nearly enough reserve capacity to offset Russian oil. But you better bet OPEC will let the price float up a several dozen dollars a barrel in the process. (OPEC really has to be thrilled about the prospect - Russia's been a pain in their side for ages).

      So yeah, the EU, and to a lesser extent the US, would really hurt from such a full-out trade war - probably a 5+% loss of GDP in Europe, a brand new recession. I could even picture on the order of a 10% hit in some parts of Europe. But Russia would literally become a third world nation without that income.

      A more interesting - and realistic scenario - would be if they can render new investment in the Russian oil and gas industry uneconomical, but not take sanctions too far otherwise. In that case, Russia would continue selling oil and gas from their existing fields - which are largely only set up to export to Europe - and Europe would continue to buy. But Russia's production - and economy - would keep slowly tapering away as the fields aged without replacement. The rest of the world would at the same time have ample time to develop alternative production and Europe would have ample time to adjust.

      Whatever happens, I doubt we'd see the necessary support to lift any sanctions on Russia unless they give up Crimea. That is to say, I don't think we'll see anything lifted from Russia for a long, long time. Whatever hits Russia today is probably going to become the status quo for decades.

      --
      People said I was dumb, but I proved them.
  13. Re:If only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not his dick size, it's that he can't psychologically accept that he is homosexual. Therefore he's obsessed with appearing as masculine as possible. (With the hilarious side-effect that he spends more time in homoerotic shirtless man-wrestling than he would if he was straight or out-gay. And the less hilarious side-effect of, you know... Russia.)

  14. Casualties by Celarent+Darii · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "In war, the first casuality is truth".
    Aeschylus (525 BC - 456 BC)

    Res eo magis mutant quo manent.

  15. Video URL by cmholm · · Score: 2

    The Telegraph screwed up the link within their site. Google turned it back up: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/new...

    --
    Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
  16. Re:Who benefits by abies · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Separatist have motive - they are trying to shoot Ukrainian military planes. They have means - they were showing BUK launchers themselves, Ukraine later said that they won't be able to operate them, but might have been wrong, especially given technical support from next country.
    They had means and motive. And no clue this is rerouted civilian plane, because despite having enough capability to fire BUK (few people with neccessary skills), they weren't up to date on flightwatch... and decided to not ask on radio first.

    So, in certain sense it is an accident. Same kind of accident as when sniper tries to kill person A, but person B moves in the way at last second. Sniper is still at fault, even if he had no motive to kill person B.

  17. Re:If only... by Rei · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Oh come on now, how could anyone mistake this guy for being gay?

    Seriously, though, some of his publicity stunts are almost Kim Jong-* level. While the "flying with geese to lead them home" one was funny, and the saving his camera crew from a savage tiger one was conveniently off camera, my favorite has to be the "finding ancient Greek pottery while diving in two meters of clear water on a popular beach" one. ;) Of course that one was so over the top even for him that they had to backtrack:

    But his spokesman Dmitry Peskov said in an interview shown Tuesday on the Dozhd TV channel that the jugs had been found earlier by archaeologists and placed there for Mr Putin. ... 'Of course, they were left there or placed there. It's completely normal. There's no reason to gloat about this and everything else.'

    Mr Putin is noted for his habit of appearing in vigorous and adventurous settings, including fishing and hunting while stripped to the waist and riding with leather-clad bikers.

    Again, though, let me stress - not gay! ;)

    --
    People said I was dumb, but I proved them.
  18. US and UK "spreading the blame"?? by steveha · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From the summary:

    U.S. and U.K. news organizations are studiously trying to spread the blame

    WTF? Is this intended to somehow suggest that the USA and/or UK share some portion of blame?

    The article linked in that part of the summary is a CNN article making the case that shoulder-fired missiles cannot reach 33,000 feet, so it must have been military gear. That's it... it even notes that both Russia and the Ukraine have such missiles.

    This is news, and a news organization is reporting on it. Go figure. "trying to spread the blame"? "studiously", even! Really?

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    1. Re:US and UK "spreading the blame"?? by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

      I think the poorly-written sentence (on Slashdot?) is trying to say that US and UK media generally isn't trying to pin the blame on one party or another (yet).

    2. Re:US and UK "spreading the blame"?? by Cederic · · Score: 2

      shoulder-fired missiles cannot reach 33,000 feet, so it must have been military gear.

      Where can I get me one of these civilian shoulder-fired SAMs?

  19. To whoever did this by Rashdot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    To whoever is responsible:

    You make think that you're a big balled freedom fighting hero, but in fact you are the worst kind of coward. Instead of admitting what happened, and apologizing, and turning yourself in to the International Crimes Court, you're trying to put the blame on others.

    You're a despicable coward. I hope you'll never be able to have good night's sleep for the rest of your stupid life.

    --
    This is not the sig you're looking for.
  20. Ooo...not an INTERNET war...ooo... by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Russia: guns, oil, money and thousands of practicing hackers
    US: very, very peezed bloggers and president "with a pen and a phone"

    Unfortunately, my money here is on Putin...again.

    1. Re:Ooo...not an INTERNET war...ooo... by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 2

      >> Care to put a dollar amount out there?

      Sure. $100 says that Putin comes out of this thing looking like a world-class statesman to his allies - much like he did walking out from the Syria standoff (where the US also backed down).

      For example, I already read a story this morning that Putin has "offered a cease fire" (ah, truly a man of peace!):
      http://www.jsonline.com/news/u... ... even though he's the guy who invaded Ukraine and armed the f***ers who shot the plan down.

  21. "treating it as an accident" by DarthVain · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As someone pointed out in the first thread of this tragedy, this is not the first time something like this has happened.

    Obama may be being diplomatic so as to not call the kettle black so to speak. The US accidentally did the same to Iran years ago, except they were in Iran air space, the weapons were fired from a warship, by professional soldiers. Consequently rebels accidentally (and I have no doubt they did) shooting down an airliner, using stolen unfamiliar technology with little or no training by militia in the middle of a civil war seems rather less bad.

    Also it dredges up the result which was all dead, and the USA not admitting any blame or fault, and instead writing a check for a few million to throw at the hundreds of victims families.

    1. Re:"treating it as an accident" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The US admitted fault and paid restitutions.

    2. Re:"treating it as an accident" by rahvin112 · · Score: 2

      In addition to admitting fault and paying restitution, the US punished the guy in charge of the boat (it ended his career), changed policy on shoot first and installed civilian radios in all anti-aircraft systems.

  22. Re:US wars with Congressional approval since 1945: by halivar · · Score: 4, Informative

    13, actually. But please, continue with your rant.

  23. Re:Who benefits by nemyax · · Score: 2

    Have they been forced on this path by Ukraine air control?

    Here's the airline's writeup: http://www.malaysiaairlines.co...

    MH17 filed a flight plan requesting to fly at 35,000ft throughout Ukrainian airspace. This is close to the ‘optimum’ altitude. However, an aircraft’s altitude in flight is determined by air traffic control on the ground. Upon entering Ukrainian airspace, MH17 was instructed by Ukrainian air traffic control to fly at 33,000ft.

    Looks like Ukrainian air control knocked them down a notch. BAM!

  24. Re:If only... by gmhowell · · Score: 4, Informative

    He's one cowboy away from a Brokeback Mountain.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  25. Re:Who benefits by Xest · · Score: 2

    Worse, apparently the type of buk in question can be set into autonomous firing mode such that it fires at any aircraft approaching from it's frontal position.

    The rebels could well have not realised civilian flights were still heading over Ukraine and could've set it into this mode and no human intervention would've even been necessary.

    It's possible that by the time this aircraft was visible and they could see it didn't look like another AN-24 that the missile had already left it's rails and it was too late.

  26. Re:Who benefits by TangoMargarine · · Score: 2

    Because 35,000 vs. 33,000 is going to make so much difference to a missile battery with a maximum engagement altitude of 72,000, sure.

    --
    Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
  27. Re:believe everything you are told! by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

    You know, I'm beginning to think conspiratorial thinking is just another form of apathy. "Oh well, it's probably made up, so I'll sit in my cocoon, spout my paranoia on the Internet on occasion, and play PS3 the rest of the time."

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  28. Data is sent by satellite ... by perpenso · · Score: 2

    Data is sent by satellite in some newer aircraft. Recall the French jet that went down in the South Atlantic. When abnormal events occurred the aircraft sent some text messages to the airline. Full telemetry would be very expensive. However occasional texts for abnormal events, and maybe an occasional gps coordinate, would be reasonable.

    That said, black boxes and such telemetry would be of limited to no value in the Ukrainian shoot down case. The black box won't tell us what type of missile destroyed the aircraft and where it was launched from.

  29. Re:Who benefits by oobayly · · Score: 2

    Have a look at this image - A track of all MH17's flights since May 14 - Id definiteyly wasn't rerouted into a dangerous area - it flew the same route over and over again (which incidentally is very close to the great circle between Amsterdam and KL).

  30. Re:US wars with Congressional approval since 1945: by halivar · · Score: 2

    The implication of the statement: "US wars with Congressional approval since 1945: 0" is false by the common sense understanding of the word "war". That it is defensible only by a technical legal definition of "war" that does not, in fact, include real, actual wars means that such defenses are picking nits to win debate class, not proffering an actual point.

  31. Re:believe everything you are told! by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

    Because some relatively small number of events may have a conspiratorial aspect does not mean all events do. In this case, it does appear that a bunch of separatists in Ukraine got their hands on some pretty sophisticated hardware and, obviously by accident, blew a civilian airliner out of the sky. Now, that's not as sexy an explanation as secret US operatives standing in the bushes near the separatists, or secret Russian operatives bringing the plane down in an even more elaborate scheme to make the West look bad by making themselves look bad so they can say "Those rotten Americans are trying to make us look bad."

    Something like this was bound to happen when relatively poorly trained and disciplined weekend warriors get their hands on serious military hardware. The Russians have been quite keen to back the separatists with weapons, intelligence and some of their own personnel. It would be nice that if they are going to allow these separatists to use advanced AA equipment that maybe they have someone nearby who actually knows how to use such equipment, or at very least to put a bullet in the head of some daft nimrod who thinks he knows how to use the equipment.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  32. Lies and damn lies by mi · · Score: 2

    That Russia's officialdom is lying is a given. What is truly troublesome is that the vast majority of citizenry not only accept these lies, but are passionately spreading them around. Decades ago this phenomenon was blamed on the "Iron Curtain" — which no longer exists. Though Russian ISPs are blocking certain sites, most of the Internet is perfectly accessible to Russians. But they choose to believe the TV instead — and independent TV-channels no longer broadcast in Russian Federation.

    It would seem, neither the Iron Curtain nor even the Great Firewall are necessary — as long as the government controls the media, whatever foreigner enemies, spies, and subversives may say on the Internet will be derided and discarded.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.