Slashdot Mirror


Comcast Training Materials Leaked

WheezyJoe writes: The Verge reports on leaked training manuals from Comcast, which show how selling services is a required part of the job, even for employees doing tech support. The so-called "4S training material" explicitly states that 20 percent of a call center employee's rating for a given call is dependent on effectively selling the customer new Comcast services. "There are pages of materials on 'probing' customers to ferret out upsell opportunities, as well as on batting aside customer objections to being told they need to buy something. 'We can certainly look at other options, but you would lose which you mentioned was important to you,' the guide suggests clumsily saying to an angry customer who doesn't want to buy any more Comcast services." Images of the leaked documents are available on the Verge, making for fun reading.

251 comments

  1. McDonallds should sue ... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... for pirating their upsell "do you want fries with that."

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    1. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Isn't it in McD's training manual to upsell as well. Not that I love Comcast or McDonalds, but if this isn't standard operating procedure, then you aren't doing your shareholders right.

    2. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by thaylin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Mc Donalds cashiers are there to sell stuff.. That is different from the people in the back making the food. How fast would they start losing customers if the cooks started coming up and tried to pressure you into buying stuff before they would make the food you already ordered and paid for... Or if you came to the manager with a mistake and instead of fixing the mistake they tried to sell you more stuff...

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    3. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by EmperorArthur · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Isn't it in McD's training manual to upsell as well. Not that I love Comcast or McDonalds, but if this isn't standard operating procedure, then you aren't doing your shareholders right.

      This is more like telling the person in McDonalds that your burger is nothing but two piece of bread and them saying, "Sorry this isn't close to what you ordered, but do you want fries with it?"

      Comcast can only get away with these scummy tactics because most of us don't have a choice. It's Comcast or no TV. More relevant to Slashdot, it's Comcast or dialup. Just think, if they buy Time Warner then almost everyone will enjoy the suffering.

      --
      So lets pretend that we've just completed writing this code, as opposed to having just completed sabotaging it -Altera
    4. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      of course it is! but this is completely different, the service I should get when calling a >>>HELP center is HELP. not a fucking advertisement!

    5. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I've never had a Mc Donalds manager refuse to let me leave before finishing 20 questions because I changed my mind and decided on Burger King.

      Um sir why are you leaving?
      Are you not happy with our burgers?
      What could we add to your burger to make you stay?
      What if we come to your house at 3:00AM and break your fucking legs?
      Would a knife in mother fucking head change your mind?
      What if we give you a discount on your burger?
      Explain to me again why don't you want this burger?
      I got these cheeseburgers man. Please man... I'll suck yo DICK!

    6. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by schnell · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Ugh. Please don't make me sound like I'm defending Comcast, which I loathe.

      But the fact is that every large consumer-oriented business has a part of their playbook that every employee who touches the customer should be a salesperson. Are you the McDonald's cashier? You're selling. Are you the rep in a Verizon store? You're selling. Those are easy. Do you work the fry machine? Then you don't talk to the customer, and you're not selling. That's the difference in your example.

      But pretty much every consumer services megacorp has done the research and learned that every "touch" you have with a customer needs to be a selling opportunity, and you get very good sales results - which seems counterintuitive, but it's true - if you do so. When you call for support, that's a touch and up-sell opportunity even if you were angry when you called in; same when the DSL/cable installer shows up to your house, even if they are late showing up. You may be angry at first, but a shitload of real-world research shows that most consumers are simply unaware of any given company's latest/greatest/whatever, and you might be interested in it once you have vented your frustration with $MEGACORP.

      Again, I have no love for Comcast (I am a Xfinity subscriber in Seattle for TV/Internet and for more than two years I have struggled to read my cable bill and figure it out in a line item fashion) but they are certainly no more evil than almost any other large company in this respect.

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    7. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, it's because people respond to it frequently enough. Personally, I'm not so easily manipulated. I think the main thing that gets me with any regularity is free stuff. I've quite Audible several times and I'll often times stay for the freebies. Then cancel afterwards.

      But, I'm not foolish enough to think those freebies are really free, they're there to try and get me to stay. Amazon is however transparent enough about it and only offers you it once before allowing a customer to cancel, which is quite reasonable.

    8. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by Gordo_1 · · Score: 2

      Not that most here will care very much, but that's technically a cross-sell. An upsell is when they ask "would you like to biggie size that?" or something along those lines. A cross-sell generally adds something onto your existing purchase, whereas an upsell replaces your purchase with something more expensive.

      I think it's worth understanding these things if only because the deeper your knowledge of these strategies, the better off you are to combat them when they're inevitably used against you.

    9. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by evilviper · · Score: 4, Interesting

      most of us don't have a choice. It's Comcast or no TV.

      TV antennas have worked since the 1940s. With the digital switchover is the 2000s, people even further out can get a digitally-perfect picture in higher quality with less artifacts than any cable or satellite provider offers. And you probably have several times more TV channels available to you than you would expect, possibly several good ones that are not even carried on cable.

      Since the 90s, direct broadcast satellite has been an option for the overwhelming majority of people. If you've got any way to put a tiny dish where it'll have a view towards the equator, you can get subscription TV while avoiding your local cable monopoly.

      And today, with high speed DSL and FIOS, you may be able to get more content than you can watch, for under $10/month. Even if you choose not to go this route, the threat of it is likely to keep your cable co in-line and behaving themselves.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    10. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Subway is even worse. They use to say "I can add cheese or bacon on that for just a dollar extra" and now those pushy money whores simply try to trick the customer by asking "which kind of cheese would you like on that sir?"

    11. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by DrXym · · Score: 3, Informative
      Unless they've changed from my McJob youth, the standard McDonalds policy was to upsell once according to what a customer didn't order or wasn't specific about. If you bought a burger you were asked if you wanted fries. If you asked for meal (without being specific) you were asked if that was a large meal. etc. You were only supposed to ask once and if a person said no that it was it.

      If they took a page from the Comcast book they wouldn't take no for an answer and would methodically break down your objections until you relinquished and bought that large meal. Oh and you'd have a 12 month contract for large meal with a huge penalty fees if you tried to escape from it.

    12. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by DrXym · · Score: 5, Insightful
      If a customer says no thanks then that should mark the end of the sales pitch. There are occasions when good customer service means not selling shit to them AT ALL. For example if someone rings because of a fault and you fix it with profuse apologies then they are a happy customer and likely to be remain loyal. If someone rings and you badger them to switch packages instead of focussing on the problem then the next time you may hear from them is when they call to cancel.

      And if you REALLY piss people off then sooner or later someone is going to recall that excrutiating call with customer retention and post it up on the internet. And then the reputational damage will far exceed any benefit of being incalcitrant with departing customers.

    13. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cuck Fomcast!

    14. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are no over the air broadcasts where I live. As a result I have dish for TV but am still forced to use Comcast for internet. Comcast of course dicks me over for internet as I don't use them for TV and I'm rural and have no recourse. It's still better than when I used them for TV though. It got to the point where we were paying almost 250.00/month due to mystery fees and the periodic expiration of "introductory" rates. Fuck that noise. I shouldn't have to re-negotiate with those fuckers every 6 months. Not to mention that they actually CHARGE you for "Detailed" billing. In other words you have to pay them an extra fee for them to detail exactly what they billed you for. God I hate comcast.

    15. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by sjames · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's a time and a place. Even the McD's employee mopping the floor knows better than to ask a customer who says "clean the bathroom, the stench makes me want to vomit" "Would you like to vomit some fries with that?"

      It's one thing if the customer has called to ask a "how can I" sort of question, it's another if they're calling because you are currently failing to provide what they already paid for. All you'll do that way is make them smile as they imagine sledghammering your balls.

      It's far worse if the customer only got angry during the call because your flipbook/flowchart isn't solving the problem. You've just convinced me that I know more about your network than you do and now you want to sell me more based on your "expertise"?!?

      There's a lot of data that suggests you can get a pile of cash robbing people in the park as well, but that doesn't make it right. The only reason the megacorps get away with it is where the competition is equally slimy.

    16. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by ruir · · Score: 1

      For 250 a month, do Internet by satellite...iDirect or whatever satellites services are accessible over you area.

    17. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      do you want fries with that.

      The difference is they take "no thanks" for an answer.

    18. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by rcharbon · · Score: 1

      Cable (or FiOS, if you're "lucky"), dial-up, or massive latency. O boy, what choices!

    19. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by ruir · · Score: 2

      Cannot understand pretty much of it. I am in Europe, in a somewhat backwards country, and speeds between 30Mbps - 100Mbps are pretty much prevalent at prices ranging from 18 to 50 Euros.

    20. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by kilodelta · · Score: 2

      In my case I have Cox and they too try to upsell all the time. It's gotten to the point where I'll assertively say "Cut the shit and address the problem". That usually works. I'm almost at the point where I'm going to tell Cox to stuff their TV and Phone services anyhow. All I really need is the net connection.

    21. Re: McDonallds should sue ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you you communist. Go take a months vacation!

    22. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by kilodelta · · Score: 1

      Well - the only data players where I live are Verizon FIOS and Cox. Both of which will charge you $70 per month for data only.

      Which is fine with me .A Roku box and my Wii with Netflix, YouTube and even Amazon will do the trick.

      And as to antennas - just an 8 foot length of 24 gauge or so wire inserted into the center pin of the F connector nets me about 12 stations. I suppose If I mounted a good omin-directional on the roof I'd likely see service clear into Boston.

    23. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by nabsltd · · Score: 2

      TV antennas have worked since the 1940s. With the digital switchover is the 2000s, people even further out can get a digitally-perfect picture in higher quality with less artifacts than any cable or satellite provider offers.

      I have several antennas (pointed at different cities), and so I can say with a lot of knowledge that you are generally wrong. I'm less than 30 miles from one set of towers and about 40 from the other, and I have far fewer dropouts from DirecTV than from antenna. Not that there's a lot on either, but OTA does have more uncorrectable errors over the long haul. For people farther away (but still in the same DMA, and still needing to get their signal from the same towers), it's even worse.

      As for picture quality when there are no errors, DirecTV isn't a noticeable dropoff, now that every OTA station has at least one sub-channel.

      And you probably have several times more TV channels available to you than you would expect, possibly several good ones that are not even carried on cable.

      There are OTA sub-channels not available on satellite, but many of them are available on the local cable provider (Comcast). I do watch some of these channels quite often, and they do offer programs I can't get anywhere else. That said, if I only had OTA, I wouldn't be able to watch most of the shows that I actually like.

    24. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by kilodelta · · Score: 1

      Problem is they won't renegotiate with you. They'll just tell you tough luck. Complain to your legislators both local and federal about that. Make it a point to do so. Call, email, visit. But make sure they know we're not going to take the shit any longer.

    25. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by kilodelta · · Score: 1

      That's $23 to $66 per month here in the U.S.

    26. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you mean is that in US the free market failed? I am deeply shocked.

    27. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whenever I go to Subway, the sandwich cost the same whether I get cheese or not.

    28. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, it's because people respond to it frequently enough.

      Right- like spam.

    29. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by punkr0x · · Score: 2
      I have no doubt if McDonald's was the only place to get food, they would be much more aggressive about their policies.

      Sure, you can buy just a burger, but the Big Mac combo meal is only $10.99... a single burger will cost you $23.
      Your fries are cold? Well I see here that you ordered the basic meal.. for just $5 more you get the premium meal, which gives you a maximum fry temperature of 160 degrees. Actual temperature may be less depending on time of day and drive-thru congestion.
      Oh you want ketchup? Sure, you can get that in our add-on package, which comes with ketchup, mustard, relish, vinegar and "special sauce," for just $14.99!
      5 minutes after leaving the restaurant, you would get a phone call asking if you would like to come back and order dessert.
      And your only alternative is to have frozen food delivered to you from space. Sure, it takes 2 weeks, and the options are limited, and most of the food you tastes like rubber, and it costs twice as much as McDonald's... but at least you have options!

    30. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by timeOday · · Score: 2
      You just described the problem in more words.

      Yes, there are reasons for things. Even stupid, annoying things.

    31. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by dskoll · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I understand upselling. I run a business and can appreciate its effectiveness. However, there's a time and a place for everything, and customers who do not want to be sold anything should always have their wishes respected.

      When I deal with large corporations who try to upsell me, I tell the reps to stop doing that and deal with my question. It usually works. If it doesn't work, I cut them off and ask to speak to the manager. That always works.

    32. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by dskoll · · Score: 1

      It's Comcast or no TV.

      This is a concept I do not understand. Paying someone to watch TV shows riddled with commercials?

      We use an antenna and receive about 12 channels very clearly. I have yet to see a TV show I would pay for. I spend 8 hours a day in front of a computer; not being able to spend another 3 hours vegging in front of the 500-channel universe is not a big loss.

    33. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 1

      Which is still a better value than $50 for a max of 10Mbps.

    34. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      This may have some to do with the topology in you area. I live in a low area in my neighborhood and while the main 2 antennas, they are on the north side of the cities about 1/4 mile apart, are close, there isn't a clear line of sight to them from my house, even with a 16' mast and large antenna point correctly. I gave up on TV with the switch to digital and I find that I really haven't missed much.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    35. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      I doubt it - people would just make their own hamburgers. People can, and do, live without cable tv or internet access. It's not the end of the world. One way to "vote with your wallet or purse" is to just keep it closed.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    36. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      I'm on CA and I pay $30 for 30 up, 30 down.

    37. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      If McDonald's messes up your order, they don't ask you if you'd like to order a milkshake while they fix it.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    38. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. If anything you said was true, that would be great! But it's not, so it isn't.

    39. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      You call them cooks. They would be flattered.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    40. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by saleenS281 · · Score: 1

      I work in a large IT organization. Our tech support deals with our customers. Exactly 0% of their training is geared towards selling the customer anything. And their bonuses are based 100% off customer satisfaction. Needless to say, our customers don't hate us - and we do more business with them because of it.

    41. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by saleenS281 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Your reputation only matter when your customers have an alternative.

    42. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by saleenS281 · · Score: 2

      That's patently false. The digital switch was a knife to the back of anyone using an antenna. I can tell you first hand at our cabin - we got about 20 channels. Since the digital switch, none of them work. When it was analog, you might get a little static every now and then, but at least you'd get SOMETHING. With digital, you either get it, or you don't. There's nothing in between. That means if you were remotely on the edge of the signal before, you're getting nothing now. And I can tell you at least where we're at, the broadcast signal strength they're using for digital is significantly lower than it was before.

    43. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      You don't eat that shit, do you?

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    44. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      Who pays $250 per mo for internet? That is insane. I pay $30 and while not blazing fast, is sufficient for all of my streaming/downloading needs. TV is dead to me. Has been for 10 years or more.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    45. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      You are trying to watch television. That is the root of the problem.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    46. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by danomac · · Score: 1

      Since the 90s, direct broadcast satellite has been an option for the overwhelming majority of people. If you've got any way to put a tiny dish where it'll have a view towards the equator, you can get subscription TV while avoiding your local cable monopoly.

      Maybe. Where I am the most popular satellite company (Star Choice) was bought out by the cable company (Shaw.) They even named the satellite company to Shaw Direct.

      Can you guess what happened with the service and prices? Yep, prices skyrocketed, the satellite prices are on par with the cable prices now, when they used to be less than half. As for service, good luck trying to talk to someone there. Hold times are atrocious.

    47. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 0

      So this is it then, we've accepted that when the grizzled wild eyed man comes from the bowls of some mega corp and screams; "Soylent Green is PEOPLE!" That he will then add, with no change in tempo; "...And as a result, we'd like to offer our customers a 30% discount on burgers."

      We're all on board with this because if we don't upsell everyone's dog, at all times, we don't get any burgers, even if they are made of grandma.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    48. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that there is some marketing research that has found "Would you like fries with your post vomit repast?" actually has sales value.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    49. Re: McDonallds should sue ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, some allegedly "backwards states" in the US are getting gigabit internet courtesy of Google (in limited locations admittedly).

    50. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by david_thornley · · Score: 2

      I once worked on a contract basis for Wells Fargo, a big bank. As a short-term contract employee working on some Perl scripts, I was required to go through certain training videos, which included such things as going up right to the legal edge of spam.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    51. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by BringsApples · · Score: 2

      Not paying for the internet is always an alternative. A friend told me that most of these internet users that do like to be sold to, also like for their equipment to be setup in default mode, whereby there is no wireless security. If my calculations are correct (everyone that's stuck with a shitty ISP, has neighbors that are also stuck), then there should be enough suckers for the mad people to steal service from.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    52. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm in North America, in a somewhat backwards country (crappy health care system, overflowing prisons, that sort of thing), living in the heart of a major metropolitan area, and I can't get deals anywhere near that good.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    53. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "... they are certainly no more evil than almost any other large company in this respect."
      is a bit like saying "cancer is no more evil than any other potentially fatal disease''.
      If you consider Netflix' CEO recent statement, Large ISPs are the REASON we cannot achieve broadband potential.
      They are deliberately monopolizing and restricting the market and gouging customers for massive profits.

    54. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      That's patently false. The digital switch was a knife to the back of anyone using an antenna.

      No, it was a huge improvement. I use an antenna, and there was no knife in my back.

      I can tell you first hand at our cabin - we got about 20 channels. Since the digital switch, none of them work.

      Is it a VHF-only antenna? Did all your local VHF channels switch over to UHF where your antenna doesn't work?

      Or was it an indoor set-top antenna with a little tuner knob on top of it, that badly distorts the signal and makes it impossible to pick-up digital signals, where you just need a $6 replacement?

      Or are you using a very old 1st gen ATSC tuner? They get better every few years, better at picking up weak signals and better at rejecting interference.

      With digital, you either get it, or you don't. There's nothing in between. That means if you were remotely on the edge of the signal before, you're getting nothing now.

      No, it goes the other way. When you were getting a mess before, that could barely be distinguished from the background static video and audio, now you can get a crystal-clear picture.

      And I can tell you at least where we're at, the broadcast signal strength they're using for digital is significantly lower than it was before.

      I find it hard to believe that 20 different channels all reduced their broadcast power. Maybe one or two would do that, but it's more likely you've run into some other reception problem that you haven't figured out.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    55. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      . I'm less than 30 miles from one set of towers and about 40 from the other, and I have far fewer dropouts from DirecTV than from antenna.

      I didn't say crap TV antennas don't exist.

      Buy a Winegard 8800 and a Boost XT preamp, and that distance should be no problem. I happen to be 50 miles away from the towers, with mountains in the way, and lots of local interference, and still get very good reception.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    56. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Blame your government. They allowed the merger, and their screwy "culture" laws are the only thing keeping you from signing-up with other DBS services in the first place.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    57. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Well - the only data players where I live are Verizon FIOS and Cox. Both of which will charge you $70 per month for data only.

      I had Cox at pretty good speeds for about $30/month.

      That was true of FIOS, but they currently have a $30/month option with 25/25Mbit symmetric service with 2-yr contract. They also force a $5/month router rental on you, but if you do things right, you can send it back right after installation:

      http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/ind...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    58. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      there isn't a clear line of sight to them from my house, even with a 16' mast and large antenna point correctly. I gave up on TV with the switch to digital and I find that I really haven't missed much.

      A 16' mast? That's tiny for my area. My parents have a two story house, plus attic, so the building's got to be at least 27 feet high, maybe over 30. The antenna is a good 10 feet higher than the highest part of the roof, so it's got to be 40 feet high.

      My brother has a ranch, with attic, and his isn't as tall, but it's still got to be 20 feet, and it's the shortest antenna I've seen anywhere.

      I don't have an antenna, because I'm in town, and use satellite.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    59. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      Buy a Winegard 8800 and a Boost XT preamp, and that distance should be no problem.

      I have an 8800 (and a 4400) and a low noise pre-amp on each. I didn't say OTA TV was unwatchable...it's actually quite good. Some signals are so strong that the antenna pointed 90 degrees from the source still gets a signal well over 24dB C/N. On the "proper" antenna, signals can hit 30dB C/N.

      But, DirecTV still has fewer dropouts than even the strongest channels, since multiple reflected signals can wreak havoc, and stronger signals are often affected even more. I can't control airplanes, moving trees, or other intermittent reflectors, and these happen far more often than really thick clouds, so OTA fares worse than satellite.

    60. Re:McDonallds should sue ... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      multiple reflected signals can wreak havoc

      Each generation of ATSC tuner has gotten progressively better at rejecting such interference, to the point that DVB-T no longer has any advantage.

      I can't control airplanes, moving trees,

      Airplanes are a FAR bigger problem for satellite, and usually don't affect OTA reception at all. Moving trees are absolutely something you can control, and is easier to do so with OTA antennas than satellite.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  2. Just don't deal with Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    American companies are rabid, toxic predators. Don't deal with them if you can avoid it.

    1. Re:Just don't deal with Americans by Travis+Mansbridge · · Score: 2

      That's just the thing, the customers have no choice. As they maneuver to buyout Time Warner, Comcast themselves state plainly, "Comcast and TWC do not compete against each other in any area"

    2. Re:Just don't deal with Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because a company that sells stuff tries to sell you stuff? That's not predatory.

    3. Re:Just don't deal with Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:Just don't deal with Americans by Livius · · Score: 1

      And to make it worse, outside companies that enter the US market are corrupted by it.

    5. Re:Just don't deal with Americans by thaylin · · Score: 1

      Only so many areas that are covered by fios, and only so many houses in those areas, or good jobs in those areas.. Even then we would be dealing with Verizon which is just as bad.... I mean when you have 2 of the lowest rated it is not hard to beat them...

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    6. Re:Just don't deal with Americans by preaction · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm assuming this is a joke, because a lot of people cannot afford to just up and move because they don't like what a utility company is doing.

    7. Re: Just don't deal with Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's too bad no one has launched anything into space that could beam a signal using the magic of the ether.

    8. Re:Just don't deal with Americans by tysonedwards · · Score: 1

      "My fellow Earthicans, we enjoy so much freedom it's almost sickening. We're free to choose which hand our sex-monitoring chip is implanted in. And if we don't want to pay our taxes, why, we're free to spend a weekend with the Pain Monster." ~Richard Nixon

      --
      Thirty four characters live here.
    9. Re:Just don't deal with Americans by msauve · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Of course it's a joke. Because it's nowhere close to a free market - all utilities use public "rights"-of-way to make a profit. That legitimately exposes them to regulation. If a real free market is desired, then they would all have to negotiate rights-of-way with every property owner along their routes. And that includes the public (government), from which the price is regulation.

      Even under a system similar to that in place (access in exchange for regulation), unless those rights-of-way are made available to all providers, there is no free market competition. There is no "free market" unless all competitors can compete in every market (location).

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    10. Re: Just don't deal with Americans by msauve · · Score: 1

      "It's too bad no one has launched anything into space that could beam a signal using the magic of the ether."

      You're right - if gas, electric, and water could be delivered that way it would really open up competition for utilities. If you're referring to satcom, you seem to be confused, because it's even more regulated than wireline due to it being a naturally constrained, shared medium.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    11. Re:Just don't deal with Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      western governments aren't any better these days.

    12. Re:Just don't deal with Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CenturyLink is rolling out fiber in 16 more cities, and Google is strategically adding cities over time. I think that eventually all major cities will be covered, it's jus taking way too damn long.

      Around here our options are Comcast and CenturyLink, when I'm dealing with CenturyLink employees there is no illusion that I'll be taking my service elsewhere as there might as well not be any other ISPs. All providers other than Hughes and Comcast use CenturyLink infrastructure and Comcast might as well not exist, I know that they couldn't ensure that I was getting service more than 20 hours a day.

    13. Re: Just don't deal with Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's too bad no one has launched anything into space that could beam a signal using the magic of the luminiferous ether.

      There. FTFY.

    14. Re:Just don't deal with Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CenturyLink is rolling out fiber in 16 more cities

      Hahahahahaha... You fell for Fiber to the Press Release.

    15. Re: Just don't deal with Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's too bad no one has launched anything into space that could beam a signal using the magic of the ether.

      It's also too bad that no one's figured out how to compensate for the horrible latency incurred by routing through something in geostationary orbit.

    16. Re: Just don't deal with Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two alternatives doesn't provide competition. They just follow each other.
      Five is close but not enough. Everyone is keeping tabs on what everyone else is doing so competition doesn't happen.
      When you have 20 or more alternatives, that is when competition happens.
      You usually only see that with pizzerias.

    17. Re: Just don't deal with Americans by ruir · · Score: 1

      I would prefer the latency any day than dealing with pricks like comcast. And I think I am paying too much to cable here.

    18. Re:Just don't deal with Americans by kilodelta · · Score: 1

      Um, I've heard MANY complaints about FIOS in my area so YMMV!

    19. Re: Just don't deal with Americans by tepples · · Score: 1

      Satellite's 10 GB/mo cap is even worse than Comcast's 300 GB/mo cap.

    20. Re:Just don't deal with Americans by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      Those rights of way ARE available to other providers, and to new providers. You want to build network and launch your own ISP? Go right ahead. You'll have to show the municipality that you have the financial resources to be viable, of course, and, if you want to offer TV service, you'll need to reach a franchise agreement (including a revenue share with the city, typically free services to schools, city hall, etc. etc., and public access channels), but you can do it. You may also need to agree to wire up the entire city, rather than just certain sections of it, but that's negotiable.

      It's a terrible business model, and you're almost guaranteed to lose money, but you can do it.

    21. Re:Just don't deal with Americans by jbmartin6 · · Score: 2

      No, those rights are not available to other providers, that is part of the problem. Typically the local governments grant a monopoly to one provider and keeps out all others, in exchange for some consideration from the cable operators. This is one reason why Comcast and Time Warner don't directly compete in any areas.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    22. Re:Just don't deal with Americans by jratcliffe · · Score: 2

      Except in a VERY few instances (essentially, housing developments), there are no exclusive franchises or right of way agreements in the US. They're (again, with a very small number of exceptions) prohibited by law (see 47 U.S.C. 253(a)). Comcast and Time Warner cable don't compete with each other because, again, it's a terrible business model. The standalone operators (RCN being the best example) who have tried it have almost universally gone bankrupt in the process. The only ones who have done it/are doing it (i.e. Verizon with FiOS, Google with Google Fiber) are either (a) not making a return on their investment (i.e. if they were a standalone business, they'd have gone bankrupt), or (b) have been able to negotiate very attractive terms without things like citywide buildout requirements, allowing them to cherry-pick areas where the service can be profitable.

    23. Re:Just don't deal with Americans by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      That is really interesting, thanks for this correction! I am inconvenienced by having to reassess my opinions, but I do not blame you for this. ;-)

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    24. Re:Just don't deal with Americans by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      You're very welcome! Doesn't really make things any better for the consumer (still stuck with just one cable company), but at least you know why. :)

    25. Re:Just don't deal with Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they aren't a "utility company" they are an "information service" company

    26. Re:Just don't deal with Americans by cusco · · Score: 1

      It's a common mistake, made more common by the fact that at one time it was more-or-less true. Many municipalities did grant exclusive franchises (generally for 20 years) during the initial cable build-out in the 1950s and '60s, but those agreements have long ago expired. The nominal justification was that it would take companies that long to recoup their investment (the actual time to break-even was closer to 10 years, but cable companies were already earning their well-deserved reputation as liars.) It's become a major plank of the Libertaridan platform now so it gets repeated a lot, never mind that it's every bit as inaccurate as most of the rest of their talking points.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    27. Re:Just don't deal with Americans by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      Yes THEY are all retards, aren't they? Or at least, that is a major plank of the youtard platform.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    28. Re: Just don't deal with Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excede apparently allows a five hour early morning window of unmetered downloads. Most slashdot users could schedule for this.

    29. Re:Just don't deal with Americans by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info. So, it isn't a regulatory problem, but a matter of natural monopolies that aren't regulated?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    30. Re: Just don't deal with Americans by tepples · · Score: 1

      Netflix, Hulu, and the like do not offer arrangements to take advantage of this "five hour early morning window of unmetered downloads". I can explain how they could technically do so and still appease the movie studios, but they happen not to do it.

    31. Re:Just don't deal with Americans by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      Basically, yes. There's also the problem that the interests of the consumer and the entity which writes the franchise agreements (the city) aren't always aligned. For example, if city X said "when the franchise comes up for renewal, we'll waive the franchise fee (or eliminate the requirement that you show city council meetings, etc. etc.) if you cut prices by the same amount," most cable companies would go for it (would effectively lower their price, helping volume, without taking any net cash out of the cable company's pocket). Oddly enough, cities aren't inclined to do that.

      There are also equality issues involved. Take Baltimore, for example. Verizon wanted to only build FiOS in certain areas (wealthier areas, where they can expect higher take rates, and better returns) - Baltimore said "no, you have to cover the whole city," Verizon said "well, then, we're not going to do it at all, never mind."

      Seems to me the most straightforward solution to the natural monopoly problem is municipal fiber builds, but they're expensive, and there's a legitimate debate about whether they're a good use of tax money. Certainly, though, the FCC's move to override state laws that try to prohibit them is the right move: if the citizens of city X decide they want to build a municipal fiber network, I'd be pissed off if I were the cable company or telco in town, but, fundamentally, I've got no real grounds to complain, any more than a cab company would have a right to complain if a city launched new public bus service. It might not be a _good_ expenditure of tax dollars, but it's certainly something that a city _can_ decide to spend its dollars on.

    32. Re:Just don't deal with Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For some reason, where there is competition the pricing is the same as areas without competition. My town is fully cabled for Comcast, RCN, and FIOS, yet the pricing for each of these is the same as neighboring towns where they have a monopoly. The only restriction the town placed on the providers was that they had to cable the entire town, not just the easy or high-income sections. Sure sounds like price fixing to me. BTW this isn't some small town in the middle of nowhere. It's Framingham MA, the largest Town (Town is a form of government) in the US and less than 20 minutes outside of Boston.

    33. Re:Just don't deal with Americans by cboslin · · Score: 1

      Loved your post, esp the reality that Version which is just as bad... as the Cable providers....so true. While FIOS is better than Cable, usually, its not Symmetrical and they still throttle / limit bandwidth.

      There are less than 41 communtiies with Symmetrical / Synchronous Fiber To The Home (FTTH).

      DSL is usually better than throttled Cable internet. (You don't want DSL from AT&T, or affiliates of Cable providers, do your homework to avoid problems) And the price of DSL, $30 or less...often $15 or less, is way better than FIOS. Just move to a true FTTH community. Do not waste your time with Verizon FIOS or anythingG (ie. 3G, 4G, 5G, etc...).

      Warning: if you do get service from FIOS...get in writing that FIOS will NOT cut your premise wiring while installing theirs, (if they cut it, they should replace it or do not accept their service). Too many have complained that Verizon does this to cost you $200+ (to run new uncut premise wiring) if you try to switch away from them. There is no other reason for their techs to cut your premise wiring when installing FIOS.

      Just say no to 20Mb/4Mb, 100Mb/10Mb, 100Mb/5Mb, etc... if the upstream (second value) is not the same as the downstream value, that provider will throttle your service.

      Is the upstream bandwidth the same as the downstream bandwidth ie. 10Mb/10Mb, 50Mb/50Mb, 100Mb/100Mb, 1Gb/1Gb, etc... than that fiber might be Symmetrical and Synchronous, meaning the provider will not throttle your bandwidth.

      FIOS is not Fiber To The Home (FTTH). FIOS is not Symmetrical. With true FTTH, there is absolutely no business incentive to throttle bandwidth as that one fiber link goes from the switching station (best if owned by the community) to your home. Its not shared, thus no reason to limit it. Remember that FTTN, FTTP share parts, which ultimately end up allowing/causing the provider to limit your bandwidth un-necessarily.

      Best of all, it costs a $1,500 - $3,000 to run that one link of fiber to your home and increases the re-sale value of your home by $5,000. In communities where this is successful, that link is owned by the homeowner and sold with the home. The providers compete for your service at the community owned switching station, meaning there is plenty of competition and you fire the bad players when they mess up. Added plus: FTTH communties have cheaper Cable internet rates...no surprise there.

  3. Grabbing Hands by AlecDalek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The grabbing hands, grab all they can...

    1. Re:Grabbing Hands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...all for themselves, after all.

    2. Re:Grabbing Hands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a competitive world.

    3. Re:Grabbing Hands by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      ew

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    4. Re:Grabbing Hands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This wasn't leaked. A leak implies it was accidental. Verge is a Comcast property. There have been suggestions by the author that this was given to Verge by Comcast as a strategic mitigation to hedge against recent negative publicity.

      "The Verge obtained some of the internal training materials and metrics for customer service employees, which show the company considers sales to be worth about 20 percent of performance."

  4. Just doin' business by slowdeath · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why is this a surprise? Or even 'newsworthy' on slashdot? This is just good business. When I go to a store, any store, they try and sell me more stuff. Ask me if I found everything I need. Have I tried this new brand of drink? When I have a meal in a restaurant they ask me if I want coffee or dessert. If you don't want it, just say no.

    1. Re: Just doin' business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Sure, but in those stores, they don't hold credit - damaging overcharges and fees over your head, either. Comcast has your ass in a sling, and wants to keep it there- and will, until you threaten to sue.

      Sound like your local Walmart, still?

    2. Re:Just doin' business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably for 2 reasons
        - Comcast has had a lot of customer service issues brought to mainstream attention recently
        - Comcast is the only choice for some US customers

      Your example is fair - upselling is great and a lot of places to it. But this is very aggressive and your example, following comcast, would sound more like this.

      "Would you like coffee with your food? No? Our coffee is the best. You won't get it elsewhere. I can get you your meal, but without coffee it's going to be pointless"

    3. Re:Just doin' business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some say no, others stop going to those places because they got tired of assholes trying to sell them crap they don't want. Of course, the first group is way larger so it's worth losing the business of the second group. Not that Comcast has much to worry on losing business, since there aren't many alternatives in their market.

    4. Re:Just doin' business by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Some say no, others stop going to those places because they got tired of assholes trying to sell them crap they don't want. Of course, the first group is way larger so it's worth losing the business of the second group.

      Amazon would disagree...

    5. Re:Just doin' business by Fulminata · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, but the description above indicates that they are trained not to take "no" for an answer.

      It's not good business to irritate your customers, unless it doesn't matter because you have them locked into your service due to a virtual monopoly.

      Looking to find and fill a genuine need for your customer = good.

      Trying to sell them something they obviously aren't there for (such as additional services when they are looking for tech support) = bad.

      Continuing to bother a customer when they tell you that they're not interested = terrible.

    6. Re:Just doin' business by Livius · · Score: 2

      Because sales, particularly if an employee's performance/compensation is based on it, becomes predatory, and is the opposite of jobs described as technical support or customer service.

      Because some people don't understand that no means no.

    7. Re:Just doin' business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's the kind of world I want to live in: one that communicates and connects by simply reciting the commands of our bean counting overlords.

    8. Re:Just doin' business by thaylin · · Score: 3

      Wait so this is similar because when you go to a store, whose employees sole job to sell you something, it is like when you go to technical support, expecting someone whose sole job is to support your issue? They are 2 distinct types of employees. When I go to a store I expect to be upsold. When I contact customer service for a problem I do not expect to be sold something.

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    9. Re:Just doin' business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this a surprise? Or even 'newsworthy' on slashdot? This is just good business.

      When I go to a store, any store, they try and sell me more stuff. Ask me if I found everything I need. Have I tried this new brand of drink?

      When I have a meal in a restaurant they ask me if I want coffee or dessert.

      If you don't want it, just say no.

      Because Comcast is a monopoly in many places. That means that they can take this as far as they want, to what most people would consider abuse. How many times would you have to say no to them before you considered it abuse? 3? 4? 10? How long would you need to be talking to them before you considered it abuse, when all you want to do is cancel? 10 minutes? 30 minutes? 1 hour? That's why this is on slashdot and that's why you're a dumbass.

    10. Re:Just doin' business by jopsen · · Score: 1

      Why is this a surprise? ..... When I go to a store, any store, they try and sell me more stuff.

      If you go the service desk for any reasons (the equivalent of calling tech support) the personal there is not instructed to try and sell you more stuff :)

    11. Re:Just doin' business by future+assassin · · Score: 1

      I don't upsell in my store and its succesfull and I refuse to upsell unless the customer asks me if there's anything else I can recomend. I give them one example and thats it. Knowing your customer base and products is the key.

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    12. Re:Just doin' business by Mr.+Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Obligatory car analogy: Would you like it if you took your car in for blown head gasket and they tried to up sell you on a paint job or new tires?

      The problem isn't so much that the sales people are trying to make sales(it's what they do), it is that the customer service and tech support is being recruited for that too. If I am calling support for something that means they have failed to deliver on my existing service(billing or technical). That is not when I want to be asked about upgrading a currently unsatisfactory product. And having to barrel through a sales speech just to get a problem fixed is not something anyone should have to put up with, any other industry with true competitors would have them drummed out of business with that level of customer care.

      --
      Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the (supposed) good of its victims may be the most oppressive
    13. Re:Just doin' business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I contact customer service for a problem I do not expect to be sold something.

      Funny, I expect to be sold a lie and company bullshit. But, yea, I don't expect to then be pressured to buy something else which will also have problems. Well, not except maybe an extended warranty. j/k

    14. Re:Just doin' business by penix1 · · Score: 1

      Shit... Now I'm in the position of defending Comcast...

      Trying to sell them something they obviously aren't there for (such as additional services when they are looking for tech support) = bad.

      If you read the document, you would see that upselling BEFORE the tech support issue was solved is enough to get you a "0" score. Upselling doesn't occur until their issue is resolved and the call is on track to end.

      Trying to sell them something they obviously aren't there for (such as additional services when they are looking for tech support) = bad.

      Even Comcast agrees with this which is why the score will drop to 0 if the support tech doesn't solve the reason for the call before trying to upsell.

      Now I feel dirty for defending Comcast... Thanks a lot fella!

      --
      This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
    15. Re:Just doin' business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the spam sketch from Monty Python highlights the situation better.
      You want egg and bacon? Here, have some spam with that?
      Oh, you'd rather have the sausage to avoid the spam? Well, it has spam with it too.

    16. Re:Just doin' business by sjames · · Score: 1

      The difference is they don't keep badgering you about it. They especially don't try to block your path on your way out the door.

      They also aren't generally the only store reachable from your home.

    17. Re:Just doin' business by ruir · · Score: 1

      Any URL for the documents?

    18. Re:Just doin' business by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Wait so this is similar because when you go to a store, whose employees sole job to sell you something, it is like when you go to technical support, expecting someone whose sole job is to support your issue? They are 2 distinct types of employees. When I go to a store I expect to be upsold. When I contact customer service for a problem I do not expect to be sold something.

      You may not expect it but many companies, that sell to customers as opposed to those who manufactur a product and sell through retailers, expect anyone who regularly deals with customers to try to upsell. Some are low key and others pushy. Airlines for example ask if I need a hotel or car at my destination. When I say no there is no they say thanks have a nice flight. Trying to camel SiriusXM was a nightmare of "no I don't x free months. Just cancel it" before the retention guy cancelled it.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    19. Re:Just doin' business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, i had the exact same problem with XM radio tryign to offer me X free months instead of cancelling as I asked.

      I PAID for commercial free, you (XM) plugging yourself with ("you are listening to XXXX on XM") between nearly every song counts as commercials. I know i am listening to XM, I pay for it every month and the XM box tells me what station i have on.

      Getting them to cancel was challenging. Not sure how offering me X months free would change the fact i did not want to listen to their commercials?

    20. Re:Just doin' business by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but they're being told not to take no for an answer. Using your car analogy, it would be like this:

      Mechanic: "So your car has a blown gasket which needs to be replaced. I also noticed what might be a tiny spot of rust. Would you like a whole new paint job?"
      Customer: "No thanks. Just the gasket now."
      Mechanic: "Are you sure? Your car would look great with a new coat of paint."
      Customer: "No paint. Just the gasket."
      Mechanic: "We could even change the color."
      Customer: "Just the gasket. I don't want any paint."
      Mechanic: "Ok, I hear you. I'm just trying to figure out why you wouldn't want a nice, new coat of paint on your car. Don't you want your car to look nice?"

      (Repeat for 20 minutes until they finally, grudgingly replace JUST the gasket.)

      Mechanic (presenting you with the bill): "Before you pay, would you like an air freshener for your car? Or how about these lovely fuzzy dice? We can also sell you new mats for your car. Your old ones looked a bit worn....."

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    21. Re:Just doin' business by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      Upselling doesn't occur until their issue is resolved and the call is on track to end.

      And that's still a problem. If I call to have a problem fixed, then that's all they should do. The dozens of ads per day they insert into the video, the 2-3 pieces of snail mail I get per week, and the annoying calls that I can't stop because I have a "business relationship" with them are more than enough "upsell" for me.

      Luckily, my providers (DirecTV for video and Verizion FiOS for Internet) don't do any a lot of this crap (DirecTV does insert a lot of ads for themselves). The only "upsell" I get from a support call to either one of these is a "is there anything else I can help you with?" at the end. I don't get any snail mail ads from either one, and neither call me. DirecTV tells me about new services by messages that appear on my STB (not intrusive...must be accessed manually via a menu choice), and at least one of which I have purchased.

    22. Re:Just doin' business by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2

      This is not good business.

      This is institutionalized harassment. The training materials suggest squeezing the customer, selling them things they don't need, and convincing them they'll lose something of value--manufactured, if necessary--if they don't buy things. The employees have 1/5 of their job performance predicated on sales success. It's pressure on the employees to put pressure on the customer.

      This is actually illegal. High-pressure sales tactics will get people taken out in handcuffs by the FTC OIG.

    23. Re:Just doin' business by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      It really depends on how it is done. If the rep says "You know with your usage this other plan would provide the same options and be $10 less" (I know, when would that really happen) or "I see you are close to the limit, for $10 more you would get the next biggest tier", I would agree that there is no problem. If they go overboard and start yammering about "get our phone service for just $50 more!" on a call about Internet service then I'll have a problem.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    24. Re:Just doin' business by MondoGordo · · Score: 1

      it's newsworthy because Comcast went on the record denying that this is their policy ... http://corporate.comcast.com/c...

    25. Re: Just doin' business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I quit working for them (doing phone / Internet support 3 years ago), referring the customer to a 3rd party pc repair company was considered resolving the issue (even if it was a legitimate is issue).

      If someone calls in for support with due to Shitty internet, I can guarantee they will Shitty phone service if I sell it to them. We were told to "Just Ask" for any line of business the customer did not already pay for.

      About the time I quit I'd notice a job posting for my department on Craigslist that actually stated "Technical experience not required, sales experience a plus". I can only imagine how much worse it has gotten.

    26. Re:Just doin' business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Die faster!

    27. Re:Just doin' business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you expect a store employee to upsell you? Just because some stores have started doing that? Maybe you're young and just don't know any better. No one needs some jackass cold-talk pressuring you on the spot. If I wanted that I'd wait by the phone for the next telemarketer to call.

      Given the choice between a store that simply shows what wares are available while making themselves available for questions, and a store that asks "Will you be buying the extended warranty with that? No? Are you sure? It's a really good deal.", I'll go with the store that treats customers respectfully.

    28. Re:Just doin' business by LienRag · · Score: 1

      I guess you know of this joke?

      A young guy from Alberta moves to Vancouver and goes to a big “everything under one roof” department store looking for a job.
      The Manager says, “Do you have any sales experience?”
      The kid says, “Yeah. I was a salesman back in Alberta.”
      Well, the boss liked the kid and gave him the job. “You start tomorrow. I’ll come down after we close and see how you did. His first day on the job was rough, but he got through it. After the store was locked up, the boss came down.
      “How many customers bought something from you today?”
      The kid says, “one”.
      The boss says, “Just one? Our sales people average 20 to 30 customers a day. How much was the sale for?”
      The kid says, “$101,237.65.
      The boss says, “$101,237.65? What the heck did you sell?”
      The kid says, “First, I sold him a small fish hook. Then I sold him a medium fishhook. Then I sold him a larger fishhook.
      Then I sold him a new fishing rod. Then I asked him where he was going fishing and he said down the coast, so I told him he was going to need a boat, so we went down to the boat department and I sold him a twin engine Chris Craft. Then he said he didn’t think his Honda Civic would pull it, so I took him down to the automotive department and sold him that 4×4 Expedition.”
      The boss said, “A guy came in here to buy a fish hook and you sold him a BOAT and a TRUCK?”
      The kid said, “No, the guy came in here to buy Tampons for his wife, and I said, Dude, your weekend’s shot. You should go fishing.”

  5. I have worked at a few ISPs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is totally normal for ISPs. up-selling, attempts to retain customers at any cost. At comcast it was pressed on our call center tech support guys fairly hard but moreso on customer service reps in the billing/accounts department. at AT&T there was literally a whole department called "the save team" who got financial incentives to retain customers. if you called to cancel, you would be put on the line with the save team. they could get credit for a save if they could transfer a customer back to technical support "oh, our tech guys can fix that problem for you and your service will be fine, plus i gave you a month credit" (or something to that affect). and then the tech staff would get this transferred call about how their printer didnt work. completely unrelated, and after being bounced around and on hold, then being told "uhhh. we cant help you with that", they got right pissed and demanded to cancel again. the save team rep, already got a notch on their saved belt but the customer still quit. it was a corrupt system right to the core :)

    1. Re:I have worked at a few ISPs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hehe, I'm getting ready to cancel one of my PSTN lines soon. The DID has already been ported over to my voip account. How can I entertain these poor souls when I call to cancel my line and they try the upsell stuff?

    2. Re:I have worked at a few ISPs by blue+trane · · Score: 2

      Great example of the perverse incentives of capitalism. Selling provides a higher return than investing in technical innovation.

    3. Re:I have worked at a few ISPs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cablevision is just like that. Except "the save team" was called "retentions" internally but the subscriber be be told it was the disconnect department. I'm sure it is the same at other cable/ISP companies.
      And that Training Materials isn't like some big secret. Most CSR's probably get something similar during their first few weeks of trainings, they just didn't care about it enough to 'leak' it.

    4. Re:I have worked at a few ISPs by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Great example of the perverse incentives of capitalism. Selling provides a higher return than investing in technical innovation.

      At least that's the perception of the bosses, which is why the programmers who create the product are regarded as simple "hired help, interchangeable, not worthy of respec, etc." See Dilbert. Or get a cattle prod (you can probably order one from the BOfH).

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    5. Re:I have worked at a few ISPs by sheetsda · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "...attempts to retain customers at any cost."

      I use this to my advantage.

      1. A competing trash service sent me a flier offering the same service at about 60% of the price I was paying. The current service matched the price for 1 year. Even if they're not making a dime on me they're dividing their fuel cost one more way.

      2. Last month I called Time Warner and told them I wanted them to match the introductory price of competing internet service (~75% of regular price for 1 year). They did. This is the second time I've had my price lowered to an introductory rate without being a new customer.

      When these prices run out I'll call again and get the rate lowered again. Or I'll cancel and go to the competitor. Either way, these add up to about $360 saved this year for two 15-minute phone calls. Pretty good $/hr.

    6. Re:I have worked at a few ISPs by blue+trane · · Score: 2

      The idea of an ongoing struggle between results-oriented managers and technical visionaries is not new. Economist and sociologist Thorstein Veblen noted it in his 1904 book The Theory of Business Enterprise.1 Eighty-some years later, John Kenneth Galbraith cited Veblen's view to describe a dynamic still at work in a more modern economy:

      "The businessmen, for good or ill, keep the talents and tendencies of the scientists and engineers under control and suppress them as necessary in order to maintain prices and maximize profits. From this view of the business firm, in turn, comes an obvious conclusion: somehow release those who are technically and imaginatively proficient from the restraints imposed by the business system and there will be unprecedented productivity and wealth in the economy."

      From Bridging the Gap Between Stewards and Creators.

    7. Re:I have worked at a few ISPs by rainmaestro · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Must be nice to have competitors. One ISP in my area that provides anything beyond DSL speeds. Bundled utilities that you can't split: water, sewer, stormwater, waste pickup and recycling all in one bill. Even if you go with WM privately, you still pay for county collection as part of your utility bill. Same for recycling.

    8. Re:I have worked at a few ISPs by Amouth · · Score: 1

      From this view of the business firm, in turn, comes an obvious conclusion: somehow release those who are technically and imaginatively proficient from the restraints imposed by the business system and there will be unprecedented productivity and wealth in the economy."

      From Bridging the Gap Between Stewards and Creators.

      We had that for a short while, example would be bell labs.. then the business got greedy and killed innovation.

      You know it's interesting when you look at organizations, people seem to think that innovation is focused in start-ups but once they get large you can't have it, but this just isn't true. If you look at a lot of the really successful organizations (compare Market Cap vs. Head count) you will see a trend where the culture values the thoughts and ideas of the engineers, the problem solvers, over that of the sales, market, MBA crowd. The business group is there to watch, and see what they can monetize, but they do not control the problem solvers, they just figure out how to sell what they are creating. (Apple, Google, Intel, + many more). Sadly it is just so damn rare that it says that way.. i applaud the few that have kept it going.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    9. Re:I have worked at a few ISPs by schnell · · Score: 2

      example would be bell labs.. then the business got greedy and killed innovation.

      The Slashdot crowd can't have their cake and eat it too. "Classic" Bell Labs did a tremendous amount of innovative research that transformed the telecommunications and computer industries. But they did it precisely because they were a regulated monopoly that had no competitors and fat, government-regulated margins. In essence, the old AT&T spent lavishly on Bell Labs projects that in many cases they not only didn't make money on but were actually forbidden (like UNIX) to make money on because they had no need to be competitive.

      But on the flip side, everyone here seems to agree that monopolies are bad and competition is good. Which, for consumers and shareholders, I agree is ideal. But if you're looking for someone to subsidize basic research with little or no investment return potential, don't look to a competitive company to do it. Even Google's "research" is almost always connected to a profit-making initiative, although whether they actually bring it to market is a much different question.

      So long story short - the old Bell Labs only made sense as a luxury that could be afforded by a monopoly that had cash to burn. If you want competition, you don't get businesses that can throw cash into a burn pit for the benefit of science.

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    10. Re:I have worked at a few ISPs by blue+trane · · Score: 1

      Xerox PARC didn't break even. But it contributed interfaces still in use.

    11. Re:I have worked at a few ISPs by Technician · · Score: 1

      I used this to ditch them.

      When they were the monopoly high speed provider in my neighborhood, they tried to push the Triple Play package even though I was set on Internet Only. As a new customer, they had a $100 connection fee where the teck comes out to "Verify" the connection and assist with router install. Could not get the fee waived for a self install even though I already had a router, wireless set up, NAS, Net printers, etc. Modem was an Actiontech Dual PC modem, so the only item need to connect was unplug the router from one modem and connect the other.

      Connected under protest of the excess fees. Ran into their throtteling of torrents where they start fast, slow to a crawl and never finsih even after running for days on a small file.

      Ran into their begging to upgrade all the time.

      As soon as DSL arrived in my neighborhood, I switched. Improved speed from 2 meg to 6 meg for a reduction in cost of $20 plus a comptetive switchover bonus of $100. Self install was painless Punched 1 DSL filter in at the Demarc so I didn't have in home stubs to the various phones and filters on each phone.. (RF Transmission line basics)

      They have tried to sway me back with their Xfinity product. It may be faster, but I'll take functanality over speed. Netflix doesn't stop to buffer. The 3 VOIP lines don't cut out (not throttled to upsell POTS instead.) or other games. When comcast calls, I tell them they blew their chance as customer retention efforts were non existant forcing me to flee at first chance. Please explain why I would want to try that again?

        If my DSL provider doesn't abuse me, they can retain me. They must be proactive in retention efforts.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    12. Re:I have worked at a few ISPs by evilviper · · Score: 1

      One ISP in my area that provides anything beyond DSL speeds.

      DSL isn't dial-up. I don't see why people act like 5Mbps internet access is unacceptable, substandard and inhuman.

      Besides, they know people want better, and keep their prices low to compensate... That should help you negotiate a better deal with your cable company, who doesn't know you really want the higher speeds.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    13. Re:I have worked at a few ISPs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a new model for this that uses competition as a tool to encourage innovation.

      As the telecoms industry is already regulated, regulate the money they can charge per customer. Just fix it at some level, be it high or low. The single customer always pays the same. Now, you do need several competing companies for this, so nationalize and monopolize the underlaying physical layer, (copper wires, cell towers etc.) This access is rented out by this monopoly to the service companies. They charge every company the same per customer, to ensure entry to the business isn't too costly. As in basic free market theory entry block to market ruin the free market. This is done to encourage easy entry to the business.

      Now we have companies that have to charge every customer the same amount, and pay as much for the use of underlaying infrasturcture. How do they compete with eachothers? Price competition is out, you can't lock customers in. That only kinda leaves better quality and service.

    14. Re:I have worked at a few ISPs by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Never say no, never say yes. Just remain silent. Or non commital non-rejections, like "I understand." Drag it out for hours. They'll never hang up.

    15. Re:I have worked at a few ISPs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because an average Full HD stream at any decent quality starts at 8Mbps. If you have several people in the house you may want a little more than that, or just one person streaming HD video can clog your internet access.

      I currently have 20Mbps, when someone starts watching TV I have 12Mbps left, If I start downloading something large, I have nothing left at all.
      Switching to 160Mbps this friday. costs me 20€ more per month that what I have now, but fsck that, I had 20Mbps 5 years ago, that was awesome then but times have changed.

    16. Re:I have worked at a few ISPs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, this honest to god does not work with Comcast, even when you have the option to switch to FIOS instead. Trust me here, I tried.

      They simply don't give a fuck, and will just abuse the ever loving shit out of you.

    17. Re:I have worked at a few ISPs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Getting at or above 5Mbps on DSL in some/most areas is a joke. The infrastructure just can't handle it.

      5Mbps in a metro area *is* "unacceptable, substandard, and inhuman". The only reason for it is greed on the ISP's part. If you're a single user trying to us a 5/5 line, then you'll be fine. But rarely is your line 5/5; it's more line 5/768Kbps. Now try adding two moderate users on that line and it folds like a cheap suit.

    18. Re:I have worked at a few ISPs by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      But if you're looking for someone to subsidize basic research with little or no investment return potential, don't look to a competitive company to do it...

      ...or to Bell Labs. It's a common misconception that Bell Labs existed for nothing more than the pursuit of knowledge, but nothing in Bell Labs was meant for mental masturbation, or "little or no investment return potential." Discoveries were made as a consequence of trying to solve technological problems, but they weren't just standing around "doing science" for its own sake.

      CMB was discovered while looking for noise sources in microwave communications. Transistors weren't patented because the lawyers thought it wasn't new. (Arguably a huge mistake.) UNIX made money by being used internally, and was marketed within a few years, both directly through AT&T as System V, as well as licensed to third parties. Every famous accomplishment was the direct result of looking for technologies to either add new commercial offerings, improve existing offerings, or reduce operating costs.

      If you're looking for research for its own sake with little or no direct goals for commercialization, you'll only find it at a very small subset of colleges, universities, and government/NGO enterprises like CERN. Even then, it often becomes necessary to license inventions to stay afloat.

    19. Re:I have worked at a few ISPs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why I'm at AT&T --- they kiss my @$$ when I have a problem, when I complain the bill is too high (because promos expired), they give me new promos, sometimes 'upselling' to something better at a a cheaper price.

      That I understand. Calling to cancel comcast because AT&T was faster (at the time) and cheaper, they offered me something faster than their existing plan, for $5 more, but still slower than AT&T. Don't get it.

    20. Re:I have worked at a few ISPs by Jawnn · · Score: 1

      This is totally normal for ISPs. up-selling, attempts to retain customers at any cost. At comcast it was pressed on our call center tech support guys fairly hard but moreso on customer service reps in the billing/accounts department. at AT&T there was literally a whole department called "the save team" who got financial incentives to retain customers. if you called to cancel, you would be put on the line with the save team. they could get credit for a save if they could transfer a customer back to technical support "oh, our tech guys can fix that problem for you and your service will be fine, plus i gave you a month credit" (or something to that affect). and then the tech staff would get this transferred call about how their printer didnt work. completely unrelated, and after being bounced around and on hold, then being told "uhhh. we cant help you with that", they got right pissed and demanded to cancel again. the save team rep, already got a notch on their saved belt but the customer still quit. it was a corrupt system right to the core :)

      Horseshit! The way to keep me as a customer is to deliver good value for my money. Presumably, that means at least delivering what we agreed upon when I signed up. If I call because you're not delivering that, fucking fix it and then give me my month's credit. I will go away happy. But do not, under any circumstances, try hardball tactics to get me to give you still more money for things that I'm now certain you can't/won't deliver. You will only solidify my opinion that you are a bad bet and that I should buy my service from one of your competitors. Hey! Stop laughing. There might be one...

    21. Re:I have worked at a few ISPs by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Sure. They did some great things. Now, consider:

      "Yeah, boss. We could do a great job here. Just like Xerox PARC."

      "How much money would we make? Ballpark estimate here."

      "Well, we wouldn't make money on it, but -"

      "Okay, we're not doing it."

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    22. Re:I have worked at a few ISPs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in many cases it isn't the 5mbps download that's the problem. but the 768k or so upload.

      in the modern era, DSL is to cable / fiber as dialup was to DSL 10 years ago.
      the amount of bloat in normal network traffic has reached levels where DSL is borderline too little to manage.
      that is only magnified if you have multiple users on your home connection. (kids and the like)

      additionally, many who are stuck on DSL don't have any other options.
      regional monopolies being what they are. in my case, there is no cable run on my road. (~8 houses) and the same telco through whom i purchase phone/dsl is also the cable provider. they want $6000 to run a cable line 1800' over existing poles. (at least 3.5x the cost because they want me to foot the bill to run the cable to the rest of the houses down the road instead of just to me)

      this is a company who charges me $80 / month for a 15 year old DSL. and my family has been their customers for over 30 years.

      as much as i loathe and despise comcast, i'd take them over the crap i'm dealing with any day of the week.
      gaming a large company like comcast is far easier to deal with than a small regional isp / telco / cable company that holds all the cards.
      competition is what is needed to solve these net-neutrality arguments and allowing companies like TWC and Comcast (and in my case ETC) an unrestricted monopoly on their region (as well as ownership of the infrastructure) is what is allowing them to continually run roughshod over the populace.

      moving to a system similar to the UK would be far preferable to these types of nightmares.

    23. Re:I have worked at a few ISPs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jeez, thanks for all the help, morons

  6. Anecdote by tepples · · Score: 1

    I recently had to get my cable TV fixed, as the cable box wasn't syncing for more than a minute after being plugged in. After about six calls the "customer account executive" finally determined that I should bring the box in and swap it. During the last of these six calls, the rep asked me if I wanted to upgrade to 105 Mbps Internet. I told him my computers are too low-end to make good use of that, and when I see speed problems, it's usually on the other side. I forget what else I had to embellish my "no thanks" with to get him to back off.

  7. Dead end job by sinij · · Score: 1

    T1 call center is a dead-end job that nobody does by choice. Who cares what the performance goals are, do they fire for not up selling? yes/no

    1. Re:Dead end job by scoticus · · Score: 1

      you may not get fired for not selling, but they will certainly find a reason if they want to get rid of you. And then they will fight your unemployment claim tooth and nail. Source: my own experience. I won the unemployment claim btw, after two appeals and an appearance in front of a judge type guy.

    2. Re:Dead end job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      T1 call center is a dead-end job that nobody does by choice. Who cares what the performance goals are, do they fire for not up selling? yes/no

      There are many things I can say to this post, not the least of which would be that some of my greatest accomplishments started with this 'Dead end job'. Some time back I started to work for Clear as T1 tech, working my way up through to the senior tier supporting the techs that supported the customer base, then onward to working in the service-desk, developing their knowledge base(which eventually expanded to support the entire enterprise), launching an initiative to better regulate the implementation of new systems and ensure appropriate support, and eventually worked my way up to a role of administrating the core ITSM Platform in the company. I can tell you that working a Tier1 position in a call center is as far from dead-end as you can get, you only have to choose to work hard and forge a path to where you want to be.

      With that said, I can tell you a few tings about call-center policy when it comes to up-selling and metrics. T1 call center metrics are driven as much by how well the customers are supported as they are by how well the techs promote the services to the customer. Up-selling a customer on new service is held as impactive as it is to the agents metrics due to it increasing the ongoing revenue to the company for that customer. An agent who successfully and consistently up-sells, whether on purpose or just by general practice, is far more valuable to the company and thus receives higher ratings. While it can be argued that the job of a T1 Tech Support agent isn't to up-sell, it is regarded as a prime position to be able to do so. I won't defend it myself as I don't agree with it, however, I can't refute that it is responsible for a good amount of revenue.

      Back to the metrics though; Your question was whether they fire or not for an agent which doesn't up-sell. I can't speak for all ISPs but I can say that in the case of the one that I worked for, there were agents released for insufficient up-selling in their performance reviews. With that being said, those agents were also very weak in other areas which contributed to this. It was expected that you would at minimum probe for opportunities, regardless of up-selling something. In the case of the company I worked for, it was driven by the perception that we wanted to offer the customer any service they could benefit from (which of course could also make us money.. lol). Failing to do this could potentially lead to being released for failing to meet performance objectives, though this was more often connected to already low performance metrics from a poorly performing tech (read: "if you can't fix anything... you could at least try to up-sell a router to be worth us paying you").

      TLDR? 1) No, T1 work is never a dead end unless you're lazy, 2) Yes, in some cases a T1 agent can be released for not up-selling if its part of his/her performance objectives.

    3. Re:Dead end job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There needs to be actual criminal penalties associated with HR reps handing in false evidence and adjudicators openly advocating for the employers. Ultimately the system is so incurably corrupt that it needs to be nuked from orbit.

    4. Re:Dead end job by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      They will give you the worst shifts, and poor reviews (yes, including up to "firing") for not performing to their satisfaction.

    5. Re:Dead end job by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      T1 is dead end. The place I worked T1, there wasn't a single manager in the place that had ever worked T1. Being one of the best they had, when I put in my notice, they offered me a "promotion" that came with lower pay. If that's progress in T1, I was glad I did it only once, and only 9 months.

    6. Re:Dead end job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I can't argue that Tier1 sucked where you were if that's the case. I didn't mean any offense by my post here, it was only intended to point out that in my experience starting in Tier1 support lead to many great things. Given how the company you were with handled things I'm glad you were able to get out of there as its not a good place to stay for long.

    7. Re:Dead end job by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      It may have worked out differently for you, but T1 where I was was all about call time, nothing else mattered. So long as no official complaint was lodged, hanging up on people was allowed (and unofficially condoned/supported). For most, it's a dead end.

  8. Empathize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's when the customer rep. tries to empathize that pushes me over the edge, even if it's the beginning of the call. It makes it look like they are untrained.

  9. Rediculous, but nothing new by scoticus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I worked tech support for Time Warner about 5 years ago. We were not 'required' to sell, but we were most certainly pushed to. We were reminded constantly, and people who did sell a lot were praised while the rest of us got the 'why aren't you more like this guy?' treatment. Our calls were randomly selected for review, and if there wasn't 'sufficient' effort put into selling, we were criticized heavily. In these reviews, it seems selling was weighted more heavily than whether we actually solved the issue properly or according to procedure, since nobody really gave you guff for failing to satisfy a customer's tech needs as long as you didn't piss them off. You would think that sending onsite techs out to jobs that could have been solved over the phone would get you in trouble. But as long as you sell, sell, sell, you got a gold freakin star. You ever wonder why you are on hold for so long? Because techs are trying to sell shit after they fix the customer's problem instead of hanging up the damn phone and taking the next call. Multiply that by 30+ calls per tech, 3 or so minutes per call, and you see what a giant waste of time that is. I left that horrible job after six months. I spoke with one of my old coworkers who lasted a little longer than I did, and he said nearly half of the 'veteran' techs left shortly after I had, some of them quite spectacularly. ID badges were thrown, "fuck this sales bullshit" was heard often. These bloody companies have dedicated sales staff, why load down techs with this shit?

    1. Re:Rediculous, but nothing new by MBC1977 · · Score: 1

      Because techs can provide targeted and pertinent up-sell suggestions to customers due to being onsite and being able to see exactly what a customer needs. (Full disclosure, I resigned from TWC not to long ago). Hate to beat a dead horse, but a good tech who also understands the sales process and how they can assist in it; is far more valuable to the company (any company), than just a plain tech guy who fixes the issue and moves on.

      If you don't up-sell, your competitor will.

      --
      Regards,

      MBC1977,
    2. Re:Rediculous, but nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a customer, if you try to push your shit when all I need is some techy thing done your competitor will get a new customer. I know I'm in a minority, and a majority of people will just sheepishly buy anything they are being offered, but damn, maybe some company want the niche audience that doesn't take bullshit.

    3. Re:Rediculous, but nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every place I've worked in the past that pushed the non-tech side of stuff on tech just results in the good techs leaving due to frustration, and the dregs that cant/wont do better bail for greener pastures.

    4. Re:Rediculous, but nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked in business services until the department was consolidated out of state. We supported MN and Kansas City residents.

      During my time there I came to learn of the flaws in their network (paired nodes so when one goes down, they both do), taps that would produce ingress in the lines and knock the whole node pair down and best yet, mainline repairs with residential RG6 in KC. Eventual pressure to the local NOC and corporate led to them caving and replacing every tap in the MN market to stop the outages. This fixed a lot of network issues up here, but it was a constant battle to get it implemented.

      When our department was moved we were all dumped into residential support. This in itself really wasn't that bad, but because of our experience, tenure and access to tools the regular techs didn't have (switch access, number porting, access to push bin files to modems) we were able to handle many more calls per hour than the usual user. In most cases, I would handle 10-12 calls per hour roughly (depends on the issue, ofc). I was taken into a conference room and told to 'walk around or something' because I was 'making the other techs look bad'. This was because their metrics required 4-6 calls per hour (FOUR?). Most of their techs can't even grasp the underlying concept of the cable network, let alone fix your PC issues. I eventually found a much better opportunity elsewhere taking my pay from $14 to $22 - and the work was EASIER. I actually put in my 2 weeks notice in a conference room right after being told I was being put on a "coaching plan" for my lack of sales - bear in mind I was taking and resolving 75+ interactions a day vs the average techs 30-40.

      In conclusion: Comcast investors make upper management set sales requirements, middle management enforces it, and customer support agents get worn down until all they want to do is get paid and go home. Even now I still retain a large amount of my knowledge, I would love to go back to work if they could just get their act together.

  10. Protection plan` by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For fifty dollars more you can get out Ass Rape Plan

  11. Leaches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only way to do business properly is to find out what people need and want and fulfill their expectations.

    Comcast is a leach. I'm glad I never was in their service area and never needed their 'services'.

    1. Re:Leaches by blue+trane · · Score: 2

      Why does capitalism reward leaches so lucratively?

    2. Re:Leaches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think this is Capitalism?

  12. 'probing' customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought that only happened with the aliens?

    1. Re:'probing' customers by Livius · · Score: 1

      Hang on a minute - where does Comcast recruit from?

  13. Comcast training materials? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    What type is the blood, and how do they get the organ and speakers compact enough to install in a call center?

  14. Is there an counter to this? by paiute · · Score: 2

    Does anyone have a script a customer can stick to when dealing with Comcast?

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:Is there an counter to this? by EmperorArthur · · Score: 1

      Does anyone have a script a customer can stick to when dealing with Comcast?

      The Comcast call center script, with points values, was leaked a while ago. If you want to annoy the other person then you can just read off what number and the section heading as they go through it.

      Just don't forget to record the call, otherwise they'll do things like charge you for something that they said was free.

      --
      So lets pretend that we've just completed writing this code, as opposed to having just completed sabotaging it -Altera
    2. Re:Is there an counter to this? by Charliemopps · · Score: 5, Informative

      Does anyone have a script a customer can stick to when dealing with Comcast?

      I used to work in and run call centers for years. (don't anymore, but I manage software that's used in them in some ways) They want to make money off you. You want them to do what you want? Cost them money. The following works every time, I do it myself.
      The key is to:
      A: Do not be reasonable or polite, they count on that. Remember you're in the midst of a con. The person you're talking to is reading a scripted con, that they relies on you being polite and normal. Being not polite and not normal ruins the process.
      B: Do not get upset or use poor language, that's a free ticket to hang up on you. Passive aggressive is the key here.
      C: Waste as much of their time as possible.
      D: Never let them put you on hold. That gives them a mental break, this is a test of endurance. They've been it for hours, you're fresh and can eat chips and drink soda while you ruin their day.

      For example, if you want to disconnect.
      Comcast: Thanks for calling in... long nonsense fill speech later... How can I help you?
      You: I would like to disconnect my service effective immediately, if you waste my time and/or do anything other than disconnect me immediately, I will request a supervisor, I will accept nothing less than a supervisor, I will not allow you to put me on hold, and I will make this call miserable for the both of us until my service has been satisfactorily disconnected.
      *at this point 90% of agents will just do it and take the hit on their stats to not deal with you, but if they wont, read on*
      Comcast: I'm sorry to hear that sir, but I will have to transfer you to our disconnect department...
      You: *cut them off* Please get your supervisor, do not put me on hold. Thank you.
      Comcast: But my supervisor can't...
      You:You're wasting both of our time, call your supervisor over, I'd like to speak to them immediately. Inform them that if THEY can't disconnect my service, I'll be asking for their manager as well. This will continue until my service is disconnected, I will not be put on hold.

      I doubt the supervisor will even get on the phone. Continue down this path, ask for higher and higher level supervisors. There is a chance you will run into a hardass. Don't worry, take down his name, hang up, call back, get someone else. You're shooting for the weakest link. You will find it, they will get sick of talking to you. You'll ruin their stats for the night and they will eventually just say "Screw it" and give you what you want. Their stats are the only measure by which they keep their jobs. You're a loss either way by acting like this so eventually they'll take the hit on the Sale/disco instead of letting you screw up their call times or keep the manager from browsing Slashdot. Remember, the person you're talking to doesn't hate you, doesnt like doing what they are doing and doesn't care if you buy anything. They are required to keep their average call times under X minuites, to make Y sales per month, to have under Z disconnects. Make it clear which stats they are not going to be able to save on this call and which ones they could make up for them on... namely, this could be a very short call and they could stop talking to you, who's clearly unhinged sooner.

    3. Re:Is there an counter to this? by timholman · · Score: 5, Informative

      For example, if you want to disconnect.
      Comcast: Thanks for calling in... long nonsense fill speech later... How can I help you?
      You: I would like to disconnect my service effective immediately, if you waste my time and/or do anything other than disconnect me immediately, I will request a supervisor, I will accept nothing less than a supervisor, I will not allow you to put me on hold, and I will make this call miserable for the both of us until my service has been satisfactorily disconnected.
      *at this point 90% of agents will just do it and take the hit on their stats to not deal with you, but if they wont, read on*
      Comcast: I'm sorry to hear that sir, but I will have to transfer you to our disconnect department...
      You: *cut them off* Please get your supervisor, do not put me on hold. Thank you.
      Comcast: But my supervisor can't...
      You:You're wasting both of our time, call your supervisor over, I'd like to speak to them immediately. Inform them that if THEY can't disconnect my service, I'll be asking for their manager as well. This will continue until my service is disconnected, I will not be put on hold.

      This is way too much effort, unless you happen to enjoy yanking some chains over the phone.

      Here's how you quit Comcast:

      (1) Disconnect every piece of Comcast equipment in your home.
      (2) Load it in a box, and put the box in your car.
      (3) Drive to the nearest Comcast customer center.
      (4) Dump the box on the counter and tell the rep: "I wish to terminate my service immediately."

      No one will argue with you. You have completely bypassed Comcast's customer retention process by doing this. Pay the amount due on your bill, get a receipt with a complete list of the equipment you've turned in, then go home.

    4. Re:Is there an counter to this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to say this as well. I had Charter TV -- went to the local Charter office with the cable box and remote, returned the equipment, signed off on it. Done and done. They have far less wiggle room when you're standing there in-person.

    5. Re:Is there an counter to this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone have a script a customer can stick to when dealing with Comcast?

      Here you go:

      CSR: I see you only have two of our crappy, overpriced services. Perhaps you'd like our other one? We have a great promotion this week. We'll actually give you 3ml of lube while we rape you. It's really a great deal!

      Customer: Is the crappy service actually working now?

      CSR: [snickers]...As good as it's going to get. Did you know that if you increase the speed of our crappy service by .07%, we'll only charge you 80% more? You won't get a deal like that from anyone else!

      Customer: You know, when I was fucking your wife last night, she mentioned that promotion. She was really happy with the $0.15 tip I gave her after jizzing in her eyes. Perhaps I'll go over some of the promotional materials you have on your coffee table after I fuck your daughter up the ass tonight. And you thought you were the only one who got to do that? Silly boy.

      Try that. If nothing else, the CSR won't be trying to upsell you any more. :)

    6. Re:Is there an counter to this? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      call your supervisor over, I'd like to speak to them immediately. Inform them that if THEY can't disconnect my service, I'll be asking for their manager as well

      There's no legal obligation for them to transfer you to their supervisor. You can ask a dozen times, and the "supervisor" or "manager" you get, will keep being the guy in the next cubicle over.

      http://www.icmi.com/Resources/...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    7. Re:Is there an counter to this? by spiritplumber · · Score: 2
      I go for the "befuddled foreigner" approach.

      "Please cut service. I no pay."

      "Please cut service. I no pay."

      "Please cut service. I no pay."

      "Please cut service. I no pay."

      "Thanks you. Glory to Artsozka!"

      --
      Liberty - Security - Laziness - Pick any two.
    8. Re:Is there an counter to this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Having worked in a similar environment I'd say that you are only partly on target. The problem I see with your approach here is that you're implying that initiating management escalations up the technical support side of the house will result in a cancellation. I can't speak for Comcast but in our environment that would be completely and entirely pointless as the access to perform a cancellation was completely out of scope from what tech support was able to do. Had you attempted this with the company I was with you would have eventually been transferred over to the cancellation department whether you wanted it or not... or you'd have just been disconnected with your account noted to have you transferred to cancellation when you called in next.

      Another item with respect to your escalation tactic; I was a member of the senior support team which also handled corporate escalations. We were granted absolute authority to pretty much tell you no, in no uncertain terms. Your tactic of escalation would have just eventually reached us, and we would have happily, and gleefully told you no, and advised you to speak with the appropriate department. Escalating over us would only result in being routed to an executive who would explain that we were the final authority. While I appreciate the enthusiasm with which you like to escalate, I would have just put you on mute, discussed your case, and advised you that you options were to either speak with the correct department to cancel your service, or continue to use it.

      Dealing with stubborn customers was almost as much fun as handling AUP and DMCA notifications. Yes, we did those manually by phone. :}

      Bottom line, being nice would have gotten your account cancelled in about 5 minutes. Escalating, you'd have wasted about an hour and accomplished nothing by the time you got what you wanted. Either way, I'd have been happily enjoying my coffee.

    9. Re:Is there an counter to this? by iCEBaLM · · Score: 1

      A: Do not be reasonable or polite, they count on that. Remember you're in the midst of a con.

      No, no, no, a hundred times no. Always, always, always be polite first. Even FLAs (front line agents) have small, non-inconsequential, amounts of power that can cause you headaches. If you are rude and/or a dick right off the bat, they can do things like screw with your account, or "forget" to document some important part of the call that can cause you a lot of pain down the road to fix. There are times to get belligerent, the beginning of the call is *not* one of them.

      B: Do not get upset or use poor language, that's a free ticket to hang up on you.

      This is true, almost all companies instruct their phone monkeys that they do not have to take verbal abuse from a customer. Most institute a "three strikes" rule, where if you warn a customer twice and they continue then you are free to disconnect.

      C: Waste as much of their time as possible.

      Again, no. This is a high stress job. Wasting time for the sake of wasting time will just piss them off more and give them less incentive to help you, and possibly an incentive to fuck with you.

      D: Never let them put you on hold.

      There are times when FLAs *have* to put you on hold. The two main reasons are to transfer the call, or to speak to a (mentor | senior | team lead | supervisor | group coordinator | authorizer | ). Transfers are pretty self explanatory, however as someone who doesn't understand how call centers work, speaking to a supervisor may not be. There are various reasons why an FLA may need to speak to one without prompting from a customer, usually it's to obtain authorization of some kind. FLAs fuck up a lot, it's just part of human nature. When you have so many of them, it happens, because of this there are usually a smaller group of second level agents (I've seen ratios as low as 25:1 and as high as 50:1), that can go by various different designations, that FLAs can contact for help, or FLAs are *required* to contact to get an authorization to do something. Everything is monitored in a call center, maybe the FLAs have been sending out too many replacement cable modems lately, or maybe there is a company edict that credits of a certain amount must be authorized by second level agents. They need to put you on hold to do this, they can't do it while the line is active, period, because technically customers aren't supposed to even know these second level agents exist, and if you ask for one, you will never get one.

      The best advice I can give, is to just state what you want, if it's not being delivered, ask for a supervisor. If the agent offers any kind of upsell, just decline it politely.

    10. Re:Is there an counter to this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alternatively, just lie and say you're moving to London.

    11. Re:Is there an counter to this? by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      call your supervisor over, I'd like to speak to them immediately. Inform them that if THEY can't disconnect my service, I'll be asking for their manager as well

      There's no legal obligation for them to transfer you to their supervisor. You can ask a dozen times, and the "supervisor" or "manager" you get, will keep being the guy in the next cubicle over.

      http://www.icmi.com/Resources/...

      Did I ever say there was? You're not trying to get a supervisor, you're trying to waste their time. I am fully aware that you get transferred to the guy in the next cube in a lot of cases. But, you refuse to be transferred, nearly all call centers have a policy on "Warm transfers" meaning, they have to first get your permission and then transfer you in person (i.e. this is frank, he has x problem, etc...) But you refuse to give permission. I guarantee their policy doesn't govern that.

      The end result in the call center is the agent can't transfer you or put you on hold per policy, so they have to mute you and walk over and ask what to do. They will either give up on the spot, send a real manager over or have an agent get up from his cube and take over the call to pretend to be supervisor. You'll then ask for another, and they'll switch, and another agent walks over. Soon there's a crowd around this cube, no ones getting anything done, you've created total chaos on the sales managers floor. Keep in mind, the manager (the real one) has stats to. His are for the entire team. You're not just hurting those agents stats, you're hurting HIS stats now. Weather he gets on the phone or not, he knows who you are, what you want and he wants you off the phone.

      I know this happens, I've been that manager and I've had that done to me a few times. As soon as I would hear someone was pulling that on one of my agents my reply would be "Give him what he wants, get him off the phone asap" With the caveat that what the person wants is possible. I had one guy try that and want a years refund. I ended up getting on the phone and being frank with that guy "Listen, I want this to be over as much as you do. But there are limits to what I can do. I have no '1 year refund' button on my screen. No amount of arguing can change that. If you want that kind of restitution you're calling the wrong place, you need a lawyer or something." He seemed to accept that I'd done what I could and went on his way.

    12. Re:Is there an counter to this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Frankly, I wonder if you people who are having so much trouble are just socially maladjusted idiots...

      It's entertaining, in a sort of morbid way, to watch posts like the parent's where a single personal anecdote is deemed representative enough to reliably invalidate the numerous experiences of other people, just like that.

      I could insert a personal attack here, but I won't.

    13. Re:Is there an counter to this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess that kind of drama would work, but I just cancelled my Comcast today. I had no significant problems...

      I guarantee you that at the end of next month you will still receive another bill, even though you "cancled".

    14. Re:Is there an counter to this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, that worked for me. Also I was moving at the time; I wonder if another easier way is just to say your moving (even if you aren't). I do still get monthly advertisements from Comcast, even at bulk rate mail it sure seems they waste a lot of money on me over the years.

    15. Re:Is there an counter to this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Most importantly: RECORD IT. Even with a receipt they can still try to screw you.

    16. Re:Is there an counter to this? by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      When dealing with a telco, I just told them I wasn't going to pay anymore and this phone call constituted their notice. Then off I went. Of course, I didn't care about the fallout when they tried to pursue collections and did their credit reporting thing. I understand that not everyone is able or willing to take that hit. It didn't affect me at all.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    17. Re:Is there an counter to this? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Comcast itself records the call too... last time I had a dispute like that, I told them to go listen to their own recording, which would prove I was correct. They refused until I filed a Better Business Bureau complaint, but once they did they honored their CSR's promise.

      (You should still record the call yourself instead of relying on Comcast's copy, though!)

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    18. Re:Is there an counter to this? by r_jensen11 · · Score: 1

      This is way too much effort, unless you happen to enjoy yanking some chains over the phone.

      Here's how you quit Comcast:

      (1) Disconnect every piece of Comcast equipment in your home.
      (2) Load it in a box, and put the box in your car.
      (3) Drive to the nearest Comcast customer center.
      (4) Dump the box on the counter and tell the rep: "I wish to terminate my service immediately."

      No one will argue with you. You have completely bypassed Comcast's customer retention process by doing this. Pay the amount due on your bill, get a receipt with a complete list of the equipment you've turned in, then go home.

      The process Comcast has for this involves:
      1) Finding a customer center that's open when you're available
      2) Returning the equipment to the counter
      3) Take a ticket
      4) Wait 1+hrs while other people complain about their bills
      5) Get confirmation from the customer service rep that your account is in good standing and now closed

    19. Re:Is there an counter to this? by david_thornley · · Score: 2

      When going in, you don't know whether politeness or rudeness will work, really. However, if you start polite, and get nowhere, you can get rude. If you start rude, and get nowhere, you're not going to have much luck getting polite.

      I have moral and social reasons to start polite, too, but I think the tactical advantages are convincing on their own.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    20. Re:Is there an counter to this? by almitydave · · Score: 1

      I didn't see anyone else post this info, but in the doc displayed in TFA, right there on page 11 of the S4 Quality Program manual under the section titled "Transition to Offer is not Applicable in the Following Scenarios" is the bullet point:
      -Customer volunteers a "Do not sell to me" statement

      So there're your magic words. Just finish your initial statement with "...and don't sell to me."

      --
      my, your, his/her/its, our, your, their
      I'm, you're, he's/she's/it's, we're, you're, they're
    21. Re:Is there an counter to this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's not like they're being all nice and polite now that the internet exploded in their faces.

      Comcast is in the middle of a buyout and part of the story they're telling the gov to allow them to do it is that they're just a nice cable company who takes good care of their customers and having an even bigger monopoly won't change any of that.

    22. Re:Is there an counter to this? by cboslin · · Score: 1

      This is way too much effort, unless you happen to enjoy yanking some chains over the phone. Here's how you quit Comcast: (1) Disconnect every piece of Comcast equipment in your home. (2) Load it in a box, and put the box in your car. (3) Drive to the nearest Comcast customer center. (4) Dump the box on the counter and tell the rep: "I wish to terminate my service immediately." No one will argue with you. You have completely bypassed Comcast's customer retention process by doing this. Pay the amount due on your bill, get a receipt with a complete list of the equipment you've turned in, then go home.

      Its how you quit any cable provider that plays BS games with you...take the equipment to the office, pay the final bill and churn away from them. No time wasted on the phone at all.

      DSL will always be better than throttled Cable Internet and 100% of Internet providers throttle to less than DSL speeds!

      Someone mod this back up...the only effective way to combat this insanity is to leave them...cut off the service and churn.

      Only one exception, if there is no other service available in your area, than your screwed unless you move!

      I have been with DSL (not provided by a Cable company) for a few years and love it. All the Cable operators throttle the upstream bandwith to lower than 40Kbps and the downstream bandwidth to lower than 200Kbps and DSL is way faster than this.

      To see it first hand as I did, get dd-WRT on a supported firewall/router and you will see the millisecond the speed test begins the bandwidth pipe opens full speed. The millisecond the speed test ends, the service is throttled back to the less than 200Kbps/40Kbps levels.

      Occasionally if you are lucky, if you are able to stream video and/or download a video the pipe will open a little more and the download will happen faster.

      Ironically, a dd-WRT enabled firewall router reveals this level of throttling with Cable internet 24 x 7 x 365 days...like the pipe is saturated late at night when people are sleeping and/or when others are working during the day. Ironic and pathetic.

  15. It could be worse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    UPS required internal techs to try upsell when they only would talk to internal employees...

    Man was that place a hell hole.

  16. Tech Support.... by SlowCanuck · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I used to work for Fedex tech support - we were supposed to: - Have the call answered by the second ring - Not up sell anything - Be polite and courteous at all times - Troubleshoot anything that is wrong with the computer - the job started back in the day before all software had TCP/IP, and we had to dial in, Oh and Win95 was supported. - All our calls were to be logged and notes made for helping the next guy if they ever called in again. In the same building we had AT&T WorldNet, they had to: - Not answer unless the customer was on hold for at least 1/2 and hour - Priority was given to new customers setting up - When they closed for the night - all calls were left in Que and answered in the morning, if still there. For some reason AT&T always had openings?!?

  17. /. forgets to remember Robin Williams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing of value was lost.

  18. I'd love to see a customer lawyer up by RevWaldo · · Score: 1

    Someone moves to an area where Comcast is basically the only game in town for broadband, and at every step of their signing up for residential service, they have their lawyer in tow, reading and challenging everything. "Equipment rental, no, early termination fee, that's not going to work for us..."

    .

    1. Re:I'd love to see a customer lawyer up by j2.718ff · · Score: 1

      I'm sure in this case, comcast would be more than happy to lose you as a customer.

      If this actually worked, I think we'd already be hearing about it. Lawyers need ISPs just as much as the rest of us.

  19. I spent 3 hours trying to upgrade service... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I spent 3 hours trying to just upgrade my TV service and being told repeatedly that my only option was the triple play package, after 4 or 5 phone calls and various web chat idiots I got someone to actually do it:
    http://g0thicicecream.wordpress.com/2014/08/17/oh-woe-is-comcast-customer-service/

    1. Re:I spent 3 hours trying to upgrade service... by onproton · · Score: 1
      All the major telecoms have been trying to push landline services on their consumers - every single time I get new service or transfer they tell me I "have" to get a phone line because it's cheaper. In what world does that make sense?

      Verizon stopped offering dry-line DSL about 2 years ago and forces all their customers to also pay for phone service - not because of technical implications, mind you, solely because they want it to look like people are using it, and they can do whatever the hell they want because no one is competing with them.

    2. Re:I spent 3 hours trying to upgrade service... by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      you big fault was holding on to a cable box for 1+ year unused that may of dropped off of the system or that you where in area of Chicago land that still had a big analog lineup. I also think that in the past parts of the city of Chicago systems had most of the analog lineup scrambled. But the city of systems where on of the first Comcast systems to go all digital.

      Comcast found a way to really rip off most of Chicago land and did some odd stuff. In some areas in the past

      TCM is limited basic in some areas and in preferred in others. (not any more)

      AS some systems (but not all) in the area have speed in the sports pack. out side of chiagoland land on comcast it is in Analog / digital expanded basic?

      some systems had

      also is sci-fi in comcast digital preferred / classic. (costs about the same as Direct tv HD DVR) to get hd dvr on comcast add $15-$20/m per box.
      out side of chiagoland land on comcast it is in Analog / digital expanded basic. (back in 2007-2009)

      the real killer was where they where doing the big analog to digital about half way though it they changed it so you did not get CLTV on the DTA's. But that also meant that you lost most CSN + games unless you got a full SD or better cable box at $6-$8 a TV.
      At the same time WOW cable had CSN and CSN + on analog. The DTA where billed as get the same as your old analog lineup. As for why they did not give CSN + SD it's own channle was very odd as the HD one (took over the old MOJO HD for part time needs) that just shows looping help videos. useing cltv for over flow dates back to the old sports channel days.

      It get odder later on as when CLTV added an HD feed RCN seemed to put in there CSN + HD slot (they also have both an CLTV SD and an CSN + SD slot).

      Comcast did not add the HD feed of CLTV or spilt off CSN + to it's own channel. (other then a few events / games that have been on CN101)

      also other systems that did not have CLTV even doing the time CLTV was Comcast only still had ALL CSN feeds. There was even an time where both att-uverse and directv had 3 live HD feeds of CSN CHI (there where 3 live games on at the same time) but Comcast only had 2 in HD.

    3. Re:I spent 3 hours trying to upgrade service... by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      more about Comcast

      http://www.dslreports.com/foru...

      the Chicago area was even more a odd ball as in the past the old digital pack (that had some of the old analog channels moved to digital along time ago) became preferred or classic. That was before DTA and analog and digital channels having the same number Then (in the city of systems) killed alot of the analog but did not move the channel numbers but the rest of Chicago land lost some analogs to digital where you had to pay more + about $5 per tv for the box.

    4. Re:I spent 3 hours trying to upgrade service... by macbeth66 · · Score: 1

      No. I have FIOS for cable and internet service with NO phone service. I have a cell phone and don't need landline. I simply called them and said that I want this and this. They asked if I wanted their triple play thingie. They had a special limited time price which would have made it cheaper. I declined. No mess, no fuss.

    5. Re:I spent 3 hours trying to upgrade service... by speedlaw · · Score: 1

      What also changed with the analog switchover was that QAM signals suddenly became encrypted service wide, not just premium tiers, so they monetized all those secondary sets which would get connected over time. There was a year of "free box" but then you were paying for equipment needed to decrypt a signal YOU are already paying for.

    6. Re:I spent 3 hours trying to upgrade service... by onproton · · Score: 1

      Was talking about the DSL lines. But it's good to hear that some customers are not having issues.

  20. Discount please! by penguinoid · · Score: 1

    It would be news for nerds if someone would be kind enough to summarize what to say to get special discounts for internet service.

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    1. Re:Discount please! by pslytely+psycho · · Score: 1

      Please disconnect my services.

      Why?

      I am going with Century Link.

      6 more months of new user discounts.

      Been doing this since Hughsnet and Century Link came to town several years ago.
      I hate to say this, but Comcast is much better in my area. Hughsnet reminds me of dialup. Century Link is more like DSL. In this area their customer service has vastly improved too, amazing what even inferior competition can do for a market. I used both trying to cut Comcast. I came back to Comcast and now use the competition to wrangle better prices out of them. I hope they never call my bluff.

      --
      Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable
  21. Not suprised by Munchr · · Score: 2

    I'm not surprised at this, it is par for the course for many telephone support agents. I used to do telephone support for Hewlett Packard, until they let me go because I couldn't meet the sales quotas. Not because customers disliked me, not because I couldn't fix customers pc's, but because I couldn't meet a goal of $80.00-$100.00 average revenue per call. Most companies treat their support departments as a revenue drain, since the price of support is no longer built into the purchase price of the item sold in the race to reach the cheapest prices to gain market share. In the case of Comcast, it's pure profit since they overcharge on the services anyway.

  22. FIRST fix the problem. Happy customers buy more by raymorris · · Score: 0

    In my business, about 90% of customers who called to cancel ended up buying more, and leaving happy.
    The difference is, we solve their problem, make them a HAPPY customer, THEN see what more we can offer that further meets their needs.

    Here's a typical call:

    Customer: I want to cancel.
    Me: Sure, no problem. While I do that, I'm curious, is there something about the product that wasn't meeting your needs?
    C: Your product doesn't do X.
    Me: Oh, yes, that is important. Our product can actually do that for you, one second ...
    [keyboard tapping]
    Me: You're now configured for X, and the cool thing about the way we do X is ...
    C: Oh, uhm, that's cool I guess.
    Me: If you ever want to do X++, we can certainly do that for you too.
    C: That's pretty cool. I never knew you could do that.
    Me: Our product has a lot of features that aren't immediately obvious, so if there's ever anything you need, just let us know and we can probably help you.
    C: Hidden features? Like what?
    Me: Y, and Z are kind of handy. Come to think of it, since you said you want to do X, you might want to do ABC with that. Last week we just released an addon that does ABC.
    C: Gee, I could really use ABC. How do I get that addon?

    1. Re:FIRST fix the problem. Happy customers buy more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's for business that has competition, the telco/ISP has monopolies. The customer has 2 choices if they're lucky, most of the time, there's only one offering real high-speed broadband. This is why they can screw you as much as they want, you have nowhere else to go. Until the cable network is unbundled like the UK, we'll never see anything like competition.

    2. Re:FIRST fix the problem. Happy customers buy more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, my experience with Charter was when I called to cancel my service, I talked to a manager and was told to take my price to leave it. He even scoffed when I mentioned I was changing ISPs. He said something like "Good luck finding anyone else that can offer 30mb in your area". He obviously didn't know the other ISP just installed fiber.

  23. Reasonable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their manual looks pretty reasonable - I think all of the complaints are about agents that don't follow the guidelines, which are pretty complicated.

  24. Very normal by Orgasmatron · · Score: 2

    And has been for decades. Every customer contact is a sales opportunity. EVERY contact.

    After the dot com bust (the first one), I had bills to pay, so I ended up in a call center for the local cable company. It wasn't quite the low point of my life, but it was in the running.

    The call center was brand new, and the high speed data side was briefly allowed to operate normally, but soon company politics pushed out the (technical) director, and replaced him with a MBA (and EEOC-bingo winner).

    We were all trained to sell, instructed to sell on every call, and evaluated on selling. This was policy from day one, but widely ignored in my department until the MBA took over.

    I earned a reputation for solving problems. Incompetent or uncaring employees would fail to fix things over and over again, pissing off customers. After months of continuing problems, they would call to yell. Usually, they'd end up getting more excuses and empty promises. Sometimes they'd get me (or one of a handful of other fixers).

    I'd mute my microphone until they were done venting, then I'd figure out what the hell was wrong, and get it fixed, often with a generous service credit to appease them for the months that we'd dicked them around.

    Over a few months, I solved hundreds of problems (some going back for many months or years), probably prevented at least a couple of suicides (monopoly, it was us or nothing) and maybe a mass shooting or two (yes, some of them really were that angry).

    One thing I know for sure is that none of those problem calls wanted a fucking sales pitch. "Mr. Smith, now that I've fixed the problem that has prevented you from using the service that you've been paying for these last six months, and you've put your guns away, can I upsell you into a premium package?" Yeah, right. Maybe they'd be interested in an upgrade in a few months, after we'd re-established a bit of trust, but not right away.

    One of my randomly selected evaluation calls happened to be one of my problem calls. The recording followed the call through our system, so it started with 20 minutes of him yelling at one of the sales girls, then her calling me in tears asking to transfer the call, then him yelling at me, then me figuring out the problem and fixing it, then him thanking me, almost in tears himself.

    I had an awesome score on that call, but still failed the review because selling was mandatory. I told my supervisor that he'd better screen my review calls from then on because I had no intention of following the policy. He could either run interference for me and keep me around until one of my interviews panned out, or he could write me up for my second and third strikes as they came up.

    I was gone before my next review came up, so I have no idea what he decided.

    I kept in touch with some friends, and still lived in their service area. The call center went downhill from there. They switched to a voice attendant, so even the people that were happy when they dialed their phones were pissed off by the time they managed to talk to a human. I know I always was. (At first they had a backdoor, swearing three times would get you to a human quickly, but word got out and they disabled that feature.)

    Moving to a non-monopoly town (three[!] fiber lines in my yard! 75 meg up/down for cheap!) was the wisest move of my internet life.

    --
    See that "Preview" button?
    1. Re:Very normal by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      At first they had a backdoor, swearing three times would get you to a human quickly, but word got out and they disabled that feature.

      Priceless!

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  25. Almost all tech support requires upselling by iCEBaLM · · Score: 2

    I've worked in the telephone tech support business for 10 years. I have performed tech support for fortune 500 companies you would instantly recognize.

    towards the half-way point of my stint, upselling became a *required* part of the job, a metric on which your performance was measured.

    First incentives were put in place to weed out those who didn't upsell: shift bids started being held every 90 days instead of "as the business needs dictated" with top sellers given first picks. This caused those who didn't sell to get terrible shifts, requiring many to quit due to life obligations.

    Then those who failed to sell were given bad reviews, causing them to lose out on annual salary increases.

    When I left poor sellers were being written up, put on notice, and eventually terminated.

    Note, that positions these people were initially hired for were inbound technical support jobs with no mention of selling anything. These people would be manning the technical support lines for major corporations that you have heard of, and no one calling any of them would expect to be given any kind of sales pitch.

    1. Re:Almost all tech support requires upselling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds exactly like you worked for Cox. Worst job I've ever had. Not the company mind you, the idiots you talked to on the phone.

    2. Re:Almost all tech support requires upselling by iCEBaLM · · Score: 1

      I never worked for a cable provider, but I knew plenty of people who did. Terrible job indeed...

    3. Re:Almost all tech support requires upselling by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      My girlfriend had same issue doing call center for a large telecommunications company (cable, cellphones, internet, etc...). These places are terrible employee mills. She eventually quit because she couldn't take it anymore. Shift bid were every couple of weeks, sometimes not even that, every other week. They would even play games with tenure, by moving everyone with long tenure into the same group so that they only compete against each other in shift bids, making tenure largely worthless. They don't really give a shit about retaining employees anyway, as they have a rotating training program to get new employee's in to replace those leaving due to the high attrition and turnover rate. Everything is evaluated about selling, even if it has nothing to do with what the customer is calling about. Anyway for me the worst part was the constant screwing around with shift bids, working weekends and odd hours, never the same in a given week. It is hard to maintain a relationship or any kind of life with that sort of uncertainty all the time. Hopefully she has better luck at her new employment.

  26. Hey Pal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We noticed you're reading slashdot, do you want to upgrade to Reddit? 4chan? We'll throw in a bunch of (dead (4chan special)) kittens as well! We'll harass you till you say yes..."

  27. I'd love to see a customer lawyer up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Comcast wil ljsut tel lthe terms are mom megotiable. Go monopolies, go! Free market and all. You are free to set up your own ISP and start competing.. or are you?

  28. I had Bank of America do this same shit to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have BOA try to sell me on a new credit card when I called to ask about a fraudulent charge on my current card, the lady tried to act like she was a friend trying to help me and just mention how great this card was and how I would love it before transfering me to someone that could help.
    I find it makes the company look bad in my eyes when they do this, but I guess they do not care.

    1. Re:I had Bank of America do this same shit to me by ruir · · Score: 1

      And I had a seller in FNAC telling me "you have gotta to change to the new card, you just need to bring the old card, your ID, and your bank account number..." (the current one is not linked to the account number). When I asked, what do I gain with the change? "Well, you will have a new card..." Right, dream on...

  29. Very normal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your problem was that you had skills that you didn't monetize. If you could actually fix problems you didn't belong in a customer call center, you belonged in a much higher paid IT position.

  30. Cox is the same. by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    I used to do tech support for Cox (by way of a outsourcer) and they started doing the same thing (this was about three years ago). The reason, straight from (Cox's) own mouths, was that customers were more trusting of the tech support agents than they were the sales department.

    We (on the team) were quick to point out that we would be flushing that very credibility away if we started trying to sell people stuff, and it would make it more difficult to deal with the customers in our actual jobs as tech support then (folks would be less likely to follow directions, accept explanations for issues, etc).

  31. Any Comcast engineers reading slashdot today? by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

    If so, please include 20% upsell in your comments in this thread.

  32. true. laws against competition suck. Google fiber by raymorris · · Score: 1

    That's true, they have little reason to care about serving the customer. All that does is help them upsell to a more expensive package, voip, etc. There's no competition , due to legally enforced franchise monopolies.

        Some people correctly point out that in a perfect world, with perfectly unselfish people, and people who all have identical preferences, it would be most efficient to have only one company providing lines to each home.

    That's true of course. In a perfect world, it wouldn't make sense to have two cell towers covering the same area. It would be more efficient more Verizon to build towers in one state, Cricket to build towers in another state, and Cricket to cover a third state. Of course, people are not perfectly unselfish, and people do have preferences. Because Boost Mobile doesn't have a monopoly, because other companies have towers covering the same homes, Boost has to compete on price and service. It's not perfectly efficient, but it works much better than an "efficient" monopoly like cable.

    Come to think of it, it's pretty inefficient to have two grocery stores right next to each other, Whole Foods and Walmart. It would be more efficient for one store to serve the neighborhood, getting rid of the duplication. Rather than arbitrarily allow one company to run the store, we could have the government run the store in each neighborhood. Like the USSR. It sounds stupid when you replace "cable service" with "cell phone service" or "grocery service", but the facts are the same- avoiding duplication would be more efficient. It only works well if people are perfect, though; perfectly competent, perfectly unselfish, and if people don't have different preferences.

    I want a strong signal on my cable modem, so it is very reliable, and fast response to problems because I rely on my cable internet. For my phone, price is more important. Your preferences may be the opposite. That's fine, I can use Boost Mobile because they're cheap and in the same place you can whichever company gives you what you want.

    I can't wait until Google fiber comes to town and the cable company has to start competing on speed, price, and service.

  33. Doesn't surprise me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to work for Wells Fargo in customer service, NOT sales, and we had to constantly sell during the call... To the point that I was fired for not making sales quotas in my customer service position... That's how serious they take sales...

  34. All companies are the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was at AOL doing tech support for dial up they made no secret that they wanted us to try and sell broadband to customers because customers trusted tech support more than sales. You would fail a call monitoring if you didn't at least ask them.

  35. Just doin' business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Overdoing it is not good business. If I decline the coffee, the waiter won't bother or harass me. If you start with "I have this problem, and don't try to sell me anything", will they comply? I go shopping now and then - and I don't go into the shops where thy bother me too much. I prefer the shops where I ask them when I need to, rather than they initiate conversations. If I can't have that, no sale. I won't mind the occational "may I help you", but they had better leave me alone when I turn them down once.

    Similarly, I know people who don't vacation in Turkey because tourists are constantly harassed by locals selling stuff on the streets. It might 'work' for those street salesmen, but lots of tourists got to Greece instead. The same kind of sunny beaches, but the locals are nicely quiet.

    And when I call tech support, it is because of a real fault, or at least issue so complicated that I couldn't figure it out by combining considerable skills with the information available through google. That is not a point in time where I'd consider a purchase! I want to discuss the problem, and have it solved.

    When I want to buy products, I start by visiting webshops and websites. Big bonus if the website go straight to the full selection of products. Skipping bland company pages with almost no information. If they have "for investors", then they apparently need investors, not customers. If they display a few "featured products" with no easy way of getting to the rest - forget it. If they want to sell at every opportunity, start with a good homepage designed for just that. Except for webshops, surprisingly few does. And even the webshops mess it up sometimes - starting with "feature pages" instead of going straight to the shop section with all categories available. Have a feature/popular category if need be, but don't hide the main page behind another click. That click might not happen.

  36. Customer Service Should Try to Keep Customers by Streetlight · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that customer service should try to fix things that are broken rather than sell additional services delivered to a customer with a broken set up. Why would I want something new that requires a working system when I can't get what I'm paying for now with a broken system?

    --
    In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
  37. Re:McDonalds should sue ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The thing is, that the company puts intense pressure on "customer service" or "tech support" to sell, when the customer only wants to fix a problem and they are unhappy. You can't upsell to these people unless you fix the problem, and 75% of the time, multiple contacts are necessary to fix problems. If the customer keeps hearing the same sales pitch without the problem being fixed, they're going to quit calling in to get a problem fixed and just switch to another service provider who's less obnoxious.

    When ALL the ISP's in this case do the same thing, it frustrates people and that's when you get all the hate for companies showing up on social media, and that is a MUCH harder heard of cats to control.

  38. No surprise here by Lockdev · · Score: 1

    Used to work for a large cable company as a repair technician. My job was threatened because my sale rate wasn't over 9%.
    Lot of shady stuff happened because of this policy.
    Very difficult to sell something to someone who is paying for a service that already isn't working.

  39. Critical quote from TFA: How to understand it by idontgno · · Score: 1

    "I donâ(TM)t want any of our employees to feel that pressure to go through and sellâ¦or [strong]feel[/strong] like theyâ(TM)re going to get fired," Tom Karinshak, Comcastâ(TM)s senior vice president of customer experience, tells The Verge. "Thatâ(TM)s not good for us."

    We don't want our employees to "feel" like they'll be fired if they don't upsell aggressively. We want them to know it, be sure of it, fear it to the core of their beings. "Feeling" isn't sure enough. We want bone-deep certainty and visceral dread. We want our employees to completely understand that not selling in every breath and every moment of interaction with a customer is high treason, malfeasance, and heresy, and such dereliction of sacred duty will be treated with appropriate harshness.

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  40. Glenwarner Glen-Cast by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    Interesting bit of the training material I found:

    "Fuck you,"-- that's my name. You know why, mister? You drove a Hyundai to get here. I drove an eighty-thousand dollar BMW. THAT'S my name. And your name is "you're wanting." You can't play in the man's game, you can't close them - go home and tell your wife your troubles. Because only one thing counts in this life: Get them to sign on the line which is dotted. You hear me, assholes? ABC. A, always. B, be. C, closing. Always Be Closing. Always Be Closing!

  41. Re:BarbaraHudson: Step inside & backup your b. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Barb's using her sockpuppets to minus mod you as usual since she messed up again.

  42. Re:BarbaraHudson: Step inside & backup your b. by Wandering+Idiot · · Score: 1

    Oh wow, it's the frothingly-insane hosts file obsessed guy! You're still around! I haven't been by /. much the last few years, but this is like seeing an old, rambling, combative, monomaniacal friend, of sorts.

  43. Re:BarbaraHudson: Step inside & backup your b. by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

    Hey, it's an APK sockpuppet, which doesn't really count as a sockpuppet, because everything APK posts is AC. Stop trying to pretend you have supporters here, by posting without your APK sig.

    Maybe if you weren't such an abusive asshole, you wouldn't get karmaslammed into oblivion, and you'd actually be able to use a real account, instead of your AC crap.

    It doesn't matter if what you say is true or not (and I'm not saying it is completely, even though you do have some legit points at times), but when you present your points like a maniacal raving psychotic, it doesn't matter. You're branded an asshole from the beginning, and rightly so.

    --
    "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
  44. This is not news to me. by weweedmaniii · · Score: 1

    I worked for 11 years as a line technician for a mid size cable company, during that time the field teams were trained in sales but never mentioned after training. I left that company and after a couple of years decided to go into customer service for Charter. their metrics are the same 20% of your call is attempting to upsell. Nowhere in the manual does it explain how to upsell to a user is screaming "You cut off my f*ck!ng Monday Night Football" or "I want my f*ck!ng porn g0dd@mn!t" After a few weeks and carrying a bottle of antacid tablets in my bag and several 80% scores on my metrics (conveniently the minimum passing is 85%) I decided to leave and go back into the IT field. Oh another jewel that most customers don't know....every call is recorded and probably half are reviewed every day, but you will never get your hands on that recording, intellectual property of Charter.

    --
    "If stupid things work...then they are not stupid."