Slashdot Mirror


Astronomers Find Star-Within-a-Star, 40 Years After First Theorized

derekmead writes: After 40 years, astronomers have likely found a rather strange celestial body known as a Thorne–Zytkow object (TZO), in which a neutron star is absorbed by a red supergiant. Originally predicted in the 1970s, the first non-theoretical TZO was found earlier this year, based on calculations presented in a paper forthcoming in MNRAS.

TZOs were predicted by astronomer Kip Thorne and Anna Zytkow, who wasthen postdoctoral fellow at CalTech. The pair imagined what might happen if a neutron star in a binary system merged with its partner red supergiant. This wouldn't be like two average stars merging. Neutron stars are the ancient remnants of stars that grew too big and exploded. Their cores remain small — about 12.5 miles across — as they shed material out into space. Red supergiants are the largest stars in the galaxy, with radii up to 800 times that of our sun, but they aren't dense.

72 comments

  1. Who wasthen postdoctoral fellow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not exactly English, but definitely in the Germanic family.

    1. Re:Who wasthen postdoctoral fellow? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm sure the postdoc herself would prefer a somewhat more polished text.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:Who wasthen postdoctoral fellow? by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 2

      I thinkyou mean:

      "It isnot exactlyEnglish, but definitelyin theGermanic family."

      It isokay noteveryone is goodat grammar.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  2. Wait, these are for real? by tulcod · · Score: 0

    IANAA, but this sounds like an extremely unstable setup. What am I take make of this?

    - Is the research reliable?

    - How can such a thing be stable? Is there any particular process that keeps one star inside the other?

    - What even /is/ such a body? If you were to travel from the outside to the midpoint of the body, would you encounter two barriers of destructing heat, with some emptiness (I'd like to say "vacuum" but of course space is not exactly a vacuum) in between?
    Or is it actually just something entirely unlike what you would imagine when someone says "star within a star"?

    1. Re:Wait, these are for real? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 4, Informative

      - Is the research reliable?

      Well, the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomy Society is one of the longest running astronomy journals in the world, and, to my knowledge, has never done anything substantial to impugn its reputation. It also has a comparatively large impact factor. All signs that the peer review is considered of good quality.

      - How can such a thing be stable? Is there any particular process that keeps one star inside the other?

      Why wouldn't it be stable? More gravity means more fusion, not less.
      The theory says it's a companion star that goes nova, and then is gradually de-orbitted into the larger gas giant.

      - What even /is/ such a body? If you were to travel from the outside to the midpoint of the body, would you encounter two barriers of destructing heat, with some emptiness (I'd like to say "vacuum" but of course space is not exactly a vacuum) in between?
      Or is it actually just something entirely unlike what you would imagine when someone says "star within a star"?

      Oh, and just now I realize you hadn't read the summary. It's a neutron star inside a star. A neutron star is essentially a block of neutronium(essentially a gigantic neutron only nucleus) with some attached hanger on high energy plasma around.

    2. Re:Wait, these are for real? by Himmy32 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      One is a neutron Star. So a object multiple times more dense than the Sun but only a 5-15 miles wide. The other a red giant (when our Sun becomes a red giant it'll be as big as Earth's orbit). So the first barrier you would cross working for the middle is a iron polymer a million times stronger than steel as you crossed out of the tiny tiny neutron star into the absolutely enormous red giant. An analogy would be a BB gun pellet inside of a balloon.

    3. Re:Wait, these are for real? by Drethon · · Score: 1

      Maybe it is just a red giant with abnormally high concentrations of lithium, molybdenum, and rubidium.

    4. Re:Wait, these are for real? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      The outside of a Red Giant may be thought of as very tenuous, but the core is still a very dense place. The heat of the core would supply enough energy to the plasma so that it can, on average, escape being pulled into the neutron star. The extra gravity would actually increase the nuclear fusion rate, and generate more heat. Then again, on average, some of the plasma would be pulled into the neutron star. Slowly, the star core would be consumed.

    5. Re:Wait, these are for real? by Paxinum · · Score: 1

      "Multiple times more dense than the sun" is the understatement of the year. The sun in average is about 1.5 the density of water, perhaps like maple syrup. A neutron star has average density which is far denser than the densest material on Earth, about 3.7×10e17 kg/m3. A neutron star is therefore 100000000000000 times denser than the sun. It is a tad more than "multiple times".

    6. Re:Wait, these are for real? by Nimey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ^^^ That's a place where "average" can be quite deceiving. The sun's atmosphere is rarefied but its core's density is up to 150 g/cm3, or 150x that of water.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    7. Re:Wait, these are for real? by onepoint · · Score: 1

      Just the way they write about it, it's like we can watch the entire process from almost start to finish in less than 10 lifetimes. Seems rather fast.

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
    8. Re:Wait, these are for real? by towermac · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah I clicked through to the article. No idea why I did that but:

      It's red supergiant with too much lithium, molybdenum and other metals. There's 'something' in there.

      Gravity keeps one star inside the other, as in, the neutron star fell into the supergiant. It sank to the center.

      Around the surface of the neutron star is now where the 'core' of the red supergiant is, still burning hydrogen (or was it helium?) as a red supergiant should.

      Sounded like some subtle measurements to distinguish this one from all the other red supergiants they looked at.

      I should get karma for this. Just sayin'.

    9. Re:Wait, these are for real? by towermac · · Score: 2

      That would be a bummer man. Let's go with the star in a star thing. Almost as cool as guns that shoot guns.

    10. Re:Wait, these are for real? by BringsApples · · Score: 2

      ...a BB gun pellet...

      Typical scientist. Explain away all these "hard-to-understand" principals, but totally crash on a simple analogy. ;)

      I'm assuming that you meant "BB".

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    11. Re:Wait, these are for real? by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Quite honestly, some people here wouldn't know what a BB is.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    12. Re:Wait, these are for real? by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 4, Funny

      Guns don't shoot guns. Guns that shoot guns shoot guns.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    13. Re:Wait, these are for real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a small very dense object floating through a red fog, slowly spiraling in. Some of the fog gets stuck on the little object and accumulates until it fuses and goes boom. But it's a little boom, inside a star. Eventually the little object will eat the big one, but it takes a long time for an object the size of a city to splatter against everything inside a star, even with gravity helping nearby.

    14. Re:Wait, these are for real? by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      I'm just glad that Slashdot nerds are arguing about this, instead of physicists. That could get ugly.

    15. Re:Wait, these are for real? by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      What do you mean by a stable star anyway?

    16. Re:Wait, these are for real? by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      Quite honestly, some people here wouldn't know what a BB is.

      ...but they know what a "BB gun pellet" is?

      Just havin a laugh mate. Cheers!

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    17. Re:Wait, these are for real? by chgros · · Score: 2

      I think it should have been multiple times more massive then the sun.

    18. Re:Wait, these are for real? by Beck_Neard · · Score: 1

      No star is stable, if you look at long enough timescales :)

      But you're right, this isn't a stable configuration at all. It only lasts thousands of years, compared to millions or billions for other star types. That's partly why it was so hard to find one.

      Red giants are huuuuge, we're talking a hundred million kilometers in diameter at least. Neutron stars, on the other hand, are only about 20 km in diameter. So you'd have to go really deep - basically to the exact center - to actually find the neutron star. But once you did, you would definitely notice an abrupt phase change.

      --
      A fool and his hard drive are soon parted.
    19. Re:Wait, these are for real? by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Well sure, everyone knows what a BB gun is.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    20. Re:Wait, these are for real? by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      Why wouldn't it be stable? More gravity means more fusion, not less.

      That's exactly why you might expect it not to be stable for long. The mass transfer to the neutron star would be presumably quite large since it is inside the companion, and then, at some point, it will go nova again. Would the companion star survive that?

    21. Re:Wait, these are for real? by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 2

      Actually if the neutron star is in the center then the added gravity in the layer near it will cause greater fusion, when increases pressure causing the layer to expand outward. As it expands it encounters the next layer, which will absorb the energy and begin the same process on a smaller scale. So forth untill it reaches the photosphere. In the mean time the inner layer has transfer excess momentum, has cooled some from it's expansion, it rate of fusion decreases and it collapses to the point it was before, actually a little less. Then it begins the process again. The result is a slightly variable vibrating star. I wonder is it might be possible to create sympathetic vibrations that way. Probably not, It would be most interesting.

      There is however one major flaw in the above model. Supposedly the neutron star was once part of binary system with the red giant. It is not suddenly going to appear in the core. Instead, it is going to slowly absorb material until it's orbit "decays" into one below the photosphere. I don't know if parts of star will be eject when gases impinge. Certainly tides on the star will help. ( Also the neutron star will generate tides on the giant affecting it's weather. )

      So the neutron star will act like a giant stirring, slowly stirring up layers of the gas. The romantic in me would like to think this is going to generate some massive and quite interesting effects. The realist though says that any effects will probably be small and hardly noticeable after a few millennium.

    22. Re:Wait, these are for real? by gsslay · · Score: 1

      If only there was an answer to your questions. Perhaps some reliable source on the subject could publish details on it that we could link to. We could then RTFA.

    23. Re:Wait, these are for real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I understand what a BB gun pellet is, but would draw a total blank at a "BB" in that context. (If I knew you were talking about a BB gun I might in some context be able to deduce that "BB" would have to be the shot, but I didn't know that until I went looking after your comment.)

    24. Re:Wait, these are for real? by Talderas · · Score: 1

      Guns that shoot bees are better.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    25. Re:Wait, these are for real? by Talderas · · Score: 1

      Did we have a recent article about missing lithium.... maybe this star is the culprit that stole it all.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    26. Re:Wait, these are for real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite honestly, some people here wouldn't know what a BB is.

      It's a grade of pencil, somewhat softer and darker than a B, but not as soft and dark as a BBB. Of course, a BB is not nearly as hard as the F or H grades of pencil. So yes, he needed to say "BB gun pellet" to avoid ambiguity.

    27. Re:Wait, these are for real? by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Why wouldn't it be stable? More gravity means more fusion, not less.

      That's exactly why you might expect it not to be stable for long. The mass transfer to the neutron star would be presumably quite large since it is inside the companion, and then, at some point, it will go nova again. Would the companion star survive that?

      I wouldn't really expect the mass transfer to be that great. The neutron star is quite small and the red giant, quite large. Also, the neutron star, while inside the red giant, is most likely in a very low density region, it just happens that what is in that low density region is very hot plasma. There might even be other conditions such as a hot boundry layer around the neutron star that prevents too much from falling in like a stellar Leidenfrost effect. Sure, it's not stable, but the lifetime of such a thing is probably lasts far greater than our ability to watch it.

    28. Re:Wait, these are for real? by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      I should have phrased this better. I realize it sounds like I am making a derogatory statement about people who don't know what a BB is. In fact, I was doing just that, but in jest. I'm not sure if the 'in jest' part comes through.

      Some people are not raised in a place that every other kid has a BB gun. I didn't have one myself, actually, but the neighbor kid did. Also, there are so many things classified by letters, the term BB could mean a credit score or, as an AC pointed out, pencils.

      I even just now googled "BB", and didn't get the explanation I assumed it would give. The top references were all about BlackBerry. All of this and more could make it difficult to figure out what "a BB inside of a balloon" means.

      In light of that, and having seen my original comment for a day, it does sound like a dickish line. It wasn't meant as such.

      So, for those who for whatever reason don't think of air guns when seeing "BB", I do apologize for making it sound like you are stupid or ignorant.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    29. Re:Wait, these are for real? by Himmy32 · · Score: 1

      Massive was indeed what I meant.

    30. Re:Wait, these are for real? by Triklyn · · Score: 1

      yeah, that 2 order of magnitude correction did a lot :)

  3. The merging must be dramatic by i+kan+reed · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just imagine a block of the most dense visible thing in the universe crashing into a star so large you could fit a good chunk of the inner solar system in.

    I can't be the only person who'd want to watch that firework display.

    1. Re:The merging must be dramatic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hmm ... interesting to think about. A red giant is much bigger than our sun, yes, but its mass is typically similar. Think of it as red-hot vacuum, except for the core. But as the neutron star fell into it, it would draw out a visible tendril of material - and when that tendril touched the neutron star, *then* you'd see fireworks. Gravitational accretion is more efficient than fusion at releasing energy: you'd see a point of bright blue light (peaking in x-rays) at the neutron star, with the pressure of the emitted light probably blowing a cavity into the side of the red giant.

      Until the neutron star fell deeply into the red giant, the top of the cavity closed over, and you had just a red giant with a little surprise inside. From the abstract of the paper, the only way they could even identify this object as a special red giant is the presence of certain chemicals in its upper layers, probably produced in the hot-burning region around an included neutron star.

      (Astrophysicist here, but not the right kind to be an expert on this.)

    2. Re:The merging must be dramatic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm ... interesting to think about. A red giant is much bigger than our sun, yes, but its mass is typically similar.

      The article is talking about supergiants, which are considerably more massive than the sun: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_supergiant

  4. Tequila Sunrise? by TWX · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sounds like a mixed-drink with specific gravity setup...

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:Tequila Sunrise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get your hydrometers ready.
      It's been a long one.
      She's gonna pour herself a strong one.

  5. Yo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yo Dawg, we heard you like stars.

    1. Re:Yo by tepples · · Score: 1

      The other meme, of course, is starception.

    2. Re:Yo by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      It's the Dawg Star, but navigating with it will be difficult. Too dim.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:Yo by mrbester · · Score: 1

      I'm sure there's a "yo mama" joke in there, but I can't be bothered.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    4. Re:Yo by TeknoHog · · Score: 2

      It's the Dawg Star, but navigating with it will be difficult. Too dim.

      Are you sirius?

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  6. The merging must be dramatic, explosive even... by TiggertheMad · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was thinking the same thing, it would be an interesting event to witness. The only sad thing about living when we do, is we will never get to watch solar collisions from under 100 AU.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:The merging must be dramatic, explosive even... by towermac · · Score: 1

      I think it would take too long. Even if the explosion was relativistic it would still be days in the unfolding, wouldn't it? An explosion worth looking at would be weeks? Months in the unfolding? I guess I'm asking as mush as saying.

      But no matter, I have a method to see the whole thing in a couple of hours. You.. just.. fly towards it at relativistic speeds, compressing the 'video stream' into a fast forward. You can run it as fast as you can go. You'll need a fancy screen to downsample the view, as what should be visible light, are x-rays to you, or at least UV; again, depending on your speed.

      And don't forget to turn off quickly and go back home, right before the show appears to be over...

    2. Re:The merging must be dramatic, explosive even... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is good in with the bad here. While we don't get to watch these spectacular events up close, we do get to live through them due to being far enough away not to be injured by the radiation...

    3. Re:The merging must be dramatic, explosive even... by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 2

      The only sad thing about living when we do, is we will never get to watch solar collisions from under 100 AU.

      Given that the only star within 100AU is our sun and we are rather reliant on that continuing in a very stable way for our continued existence "sad" is not exactly the word I would use.

  7. It is not stable by bigsexyjoe · · Score: 4, Informative

    It lasts for several hundred thousand years but the red giant is eventually absorbed into the neutron star which becomes a slightly larger neutron star or possibly a black hole.

    So the red giant is just a big meal that takes a while to eat. But if you look around enough, you can find one in the middle of its course.

  8. Readers Find Post-Within-Post by jovius · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Re:Readers Find Post-Within-Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i laughed so hard at this.

  9. Some fucker tried the Klikiss torch *again*? by tibit · · Score: 1

    Shit people, the Oncier experiment with the Klikiss torch was the beginning of a fucking mess with the Hydrogues. Some race or two, somewhere, are gonna get annihilated over that.

    --
    A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  10. Compulsory by baudilus · · Score: 1

    Yo dawg... I heard you like shining. So I put a star inside your star, so you can shine while you shine.

    1. Re:Compulsory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's Johnny!

  11. Star Star by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    you are....Rolling Stones. TFA said star within a star.

  12. recursive... by schlachter · · Score: 1

    with in a post - within a post - within a post - (it's posts all the way down!)

    --
    My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    1. Re:recursive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but that one was posted by Soulskill 3 months ago, and this one is posted by... Oh, I see now, is the same 3-seconds-attention-span gold fish....

  13. Hmmm. by jd · · Score: 0

    If Kip Thorne can win a year's worth of Playboys for his bet that Cygnus X1 was a Black Hole, when current theory from Professor Hawking says Black Holes don't really exist, then can Professor Thorne please give me a year's subscription to the porno of my choice due to the non-existent bet that this wasn't such a star?

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Hmmm. by Guy+From+V · · Score: 0

      Will the original Hawking please stand up?

  14. Dr. David Bowman was contacted for comment... by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

    All he had to say was, "Oh my god, it's full of stars" and the line went dead.

  15. are you for real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm impressed, you wrote all that an couldn't even be bothered to read the summary.

    Perhaps, yeah, um, you could go back and actually, you know, read the summary?

    Yeah. That would be nice.

  16. Dupe ... by gargleblast · · Score: 1

    ... and it took all of three seconds to find the article-within-the-article. Star Within a Star: Thorne-Zytkow Object Discovered (04 June 2014)

  17. It's Caltech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... not CalTech.

  18. Bad translation into American by quenda · · Score: 1

    Their cores remain small — about 12.5 miles across

    Looks like a vague "20km" gained a couple of orders of magnitude in precision (2 extra significant figures).
    This is bad journalism even when its not science.

    "Mr Smith was reported as saying 'You look like 772,000 Euros!'"

  19. Explosive may be wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just think about the tidal forces associated as that neutron star enters the red giant.

    It could go straight, or nearly straight in, or they could have been locked in a death spiral as the neutron star spirals in, causing massive deformation to the surface of the star as the plasma impacts impenetrable mass of the neutron star.

     

    There's a limit to how fast the neutron star can impact the RG. If the NS is going too fast, it will simply blast through and they will never be locked together. Perhaps even blast through the core and making for a really big boom.

  20. The interesting thing is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These things are really really stable, well in theory.

    The fusion on the surface of the neutron star keeps the red giant inflated so the normal evolution doesn't (shouldn't happen :) ).

    IF there were a long lived star traveling race, this might be a good place to set up shop.

  21. Wouldn't it punch right through it? by Rich0 · · Score: 1

    You have a few stars worth of neutornium the size of a big asteroid or maybe a small moon moving towards a red giant that is perhaps similar in mass to our own sun.

    I can buy that eventually the one ends up inside the other. What I wonder about is how you get from a neutron star falling towards a red giant to a neutron star inside a red giant.

    I'd think the neutron star would have so much momentum that it would basically blast right through the star and come out the other side.

    Of course, a more likely scenario is a mutual orbit where over many orbits the stars interact via their extended atmospheres/etc slowing their orbits until they merge. Still, I'd think that neutron star would keep making orbital passes deeper and deeper into the red giant's atmosphere, basically plowing a trench into the red giant which of course fills right back in each time.

    I just don't see either star changing velocity enough on a single pass for them to merge.

    1. Re:Wouldn't it punch right through it? by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Hate to self reply, but think of it like shooting a rifle round at a blimp. The bullet is going to just sail right through both sides, with neither object being affected all that much.

    2. Re:Wouldn't it punch right through it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most likely started off as a binary system with the precursor of the neutron star within the envelope of the red giant.

      The neutron gets slowed by friction and the ferocious thrust caused by infalling hydrogen and helium fusing on the leading face. I'd imagine with a braking engine that powerful it doesn't take long to fall into the core.

  22. To my moderator above... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.

    Also, knocking me down to -1 won't bring you the love of your father or the respect of your superiors which you crave.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens