Home Depot Says Breach Affected 56 Million Cards
wiredmikey writes: Home Depot said on Thursday that a data breach affecting its stores across the United States and Canada is estimated to have exposed 56 million customer payment cards between April and September 2014. While previous reports speculated that Home Depot had been hit by a variant of the BlackPOS malware that was used against Target Corp., the malware used in the attack against Home Depot had not been seen previously in other attacks. "Criminals used unique, custom-built malware to evade detection," the company said in a statement. The home improvement retail giant also that it has completed a "major payment security project" that provides enhanced encryption of payment card data at point of sale in its U.S. stores. According to a recent report from Trend Micro (PDF), six new pieces of point-of-sale malware have been identified so far in 2014.
Cash usually works better.
Political correctness is really just herd psychology pushed by insecure people who desperately seek social conformity.
And Canadian stores get nothing?
So what would have happened to someone who didn't use their card, but an iPhone 6 with Apple Pay? I take it they would be completely unaffected?
I'm currently on the phone with my bank dealing with this.
Thanks Home Depot!
After you're done cleaning up this mess, could you clean up the bolt isle so I can actually find what I'm looking for should I ever decide to return to your store?
Chip&Pin in 3... What? No? Insurance still costs less than deploying this hippy technology?
Is that more than 10 people got helped and completed a transaction.
Wait until they start falling out of the skies, then we act!
What did they do?
How did you recognize it?
Was it a $10,000 charge with no details or did it show up as a $1,457.24 Home Depot purchase? Or what?
From their website. This is the official Home Depot statement.
Really, this symbolizes the lackadaisical attitude people have when it comes to security - that a breach is not going to happen to them. You'd think after Target major companies like Home Depot would have audited their own security processes.
Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
Where I live, I must do business with Home Depot. My iPhone 6 arrives today. I would be stupid not to use Apple Pay (if Home Depot will accept it). Surely Home Depot is rushing to adopt?
Whenever this story pops up, it's always "US and Canadian stores affected..." followed by a bunch of frustrated comments about how the US isn't using chip and pin yet. Well Canada *is* using chip and pin, and I can never find any details about weather or not Canadian customers should actually be worried (unless they had to fallback to the old magstripe stuff, of course), because if chip and pin was breached too then it's not going to do the US a lot of good to upgrade to it. Anyone know the details?
When I watched Justin Ross Harris' Preliminary Hearing, I was stunned by how little work Home Depot's developers seem to do.
Harris worked for Home Depot's ".com business" per a quote from the Home Depot Corporate Communications Manager in this CNN article. The Preliminary Hearing did an amazing job of describing his typical workday: After watching cartoons with his child, then taking him out for breakfast, Harris eventually arrived at his office at about 10 AM. About 90 minutes later, he went out for a long lunch, with a carload of coworkers. After eating, the group stopped at a store to puchase some items. After lunch, Harris is at his desk for a few hours, but then he was out the door at 4 PM, off to watch a movie with some of his coworkers.
The hearing documented that he put in, at most, about five hours of work. During those five hours, he was IMing women on dating sites and also IMing a couple coworkers about a small startup/consulting business they had.
56 million people shop there? What the hell is wrong with people? Do they only have Home Depot in their community? Their lack of any customer service of any kind, confusing aisles, and inability to carry anything anyone needs makes me wonder why anyone would still shop there.
If companies cared more about their software's quality maybe this wouldn't be so rampant a problem. But software quality - things like robustness and security of that software - too often is secondary to features and schedules and the CIOs CTOs and CEOs are ultimately to blame for this.
This cat and mouse game will go on indefinitely.
Wansu, th' chinese sailor
It sounds like this sort of thing takes a scale of resources to accomplish that wouldn't be used idly.
So why are we hearing about a lot of cracks lately that get huge amounts of payment information, but apparently don't lead to massive numbers and dollars of thefts from accounts?
Is someone testing experimental weapons for a future cyber war that would aim to create enough financial chaos to crash our economy?
Or conversely, is there a secret government project to deliberately crack corporate financial systems, to scare them into getting more secure?
http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-09-18/home-depot-hacked-wide-open
Once again, cost cutting and management inertia are more significant than providing barely adequate security
"The retailer left its computers vulnerable by switching off Symantecâ(TM)s Network Threat Protection (NTP) firewall in favor of one packaged with Windows. âoeIt is highly advised and recommended the NTP Firewall component be deployed and that Windows Firewall be discontinued,â the report states."
See, wasn't that easy?
A bullet may have your name on it, but artillery is addressed to " Whom It May concern"
Home Depot assuredly better contact every bank and card institution so these financial corporations can notify card account holders their accounts are breached. It is Home Depot's responsibility to notify not our responsibility to ascertain.
I understand that security breaches happen but I think if its discovered that companies are running servers on computers that aren't regularly patched or ran on Windows 95/Nt4 then they should be held liable for the cost to the consumer. The customer should not have to suffer because companies are too cheap to keep their servers up to date.