Slashdot Mirror


The Raid-Proof Hosting Technology Behind 'The Pirate Bay'

HughPickens.com writes Ernesto reports at TorrentFreak that despite its massive presence the Pirate Bay doesn't have a giant server park but operates from the cloud, on virtual machines that can be quickly moved if needed. The site uses 21 "virtual machines" (VMs) hosted at different providers, up four machines from two years ago, in part due to the steady increase in traffic. Eight of the VMs are used for serving the web pages, searches take up another six machines, and the site's database currently runs on two VMs. The remaining five virtual machines are used for load balancing, statistics, the proxy site on port 80, torrent storage and for the controller. In total the VMs use 182 GB of RAM and 94 CPU cores. The total storage capacity is 620 GB. One interesting aspect of The Pirate Bay is that all virtual machines are hosted with commercial cloud hosting providers, who have no clue that The Pirate Bay is among their customers. "Moving to the cloud lets TPB move from country to country, crossing borders seamlessly without downtime. All the servers don't even have to be hosted with the same provider, or even on the same continent." All traffic goes through the load balancer, which masks what the other VMs are doing. This also means that none of the IP-addresses of the cloud hosting providers are publicly linked to TPB. For now, the most vulnerable spot appears to be the site's domain. Just last year TPB burnt through five separate domain names due to takedown threats from registrars. But then again, this doesn't appear to be much of a concern for TPB as the operators have dozens of alternative domain names standing by.

144 comments

  1. RAID-proof? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 5, Funny

    I mean, 620 GB of storage isn't much, but I'm sure some people would want to RAID it anyway. Although I've heard that Police RAID only works with write-only storage...

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
    1. Re: RAID-proof? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Raid proof. Not RAID.

      As in, resilient to police officers not disk failure.

    2. Re: RAID-proof? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 5, Funny

      My storage wanted to make a "whoosh" sound, but ever since I switched to SSDs, it has had difficulty with whooshing at people.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re: RAID-proof? by r1348 · · Score: 0

      Whoosh I guess?

    4. Re: RAID-proof? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My storage wanted to make a "whoosh" sound, but ever since I switched to SSDs, it has had difficulty with whooshing at people.

      As long as the SSD is whooshing the data, you can invoke relativity. From the data's point of view, the people are the one's being whooshed. Problem solved.

    5. Re: RAID-proof? by DickBreath · · Score: 4, Funny

      You've got it wrong. This is not talking about Redundant Array of Inexpensive Drives, this is talking about how to protect The Pirate Bay data from a specific brand of insecticide.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    6. Re: RAID-proof? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You get the friendly and familiar whoosh-like sound from your SSDs when the power-loss protection capacitors go in flames. You just have to listen closely. If you don't want to wait for at least Carrington event you can connect the storage rack frame directly into a 480 V three-phase connection.

    7. Re: RAID-proof? by penguinoid · · Score: 2

      Raid proof. Not RAID.

      As in, resilient to police officers not disk failure.

      Relevant Assortment of Incriminating Data?

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  2. Traffic is up? by Seumas · · Score: 0

    Their traffic is up that much?! I assumed they were all but dead.

    Also, I thought they sold themselves to GGF and went legit half a decade ago?

    1. Re:Traffic is up? by NotDrWho · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Their traffic is up that much?!

      I imagine it has a lot to do with more and more countries coming online with broadband in recent years--countries where people often don't have any legal options to purchase movies, or the money to purchase them even if they did.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    2. Re:Traffic is up? by Zedrick · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's perhaps part of it, but the main reason is that TPB is still the best place to get new stuff. I always download all new TV-series there, except netflix-series that I can get on... netflix.

      As for games, I recently wanted to buy a few games on stream, but they demanded a copy of my id because my card was issued in another country than the one I live in at the moment. Fine, goodbye. Downloaded the games at TPB instead.

      It should not only be possible but also convenient to buy media. Netflix and GOG are great and get my money, other places that are less great and makes it difficult can keep their digital copies while I go browsing at the Pirate Bay.

    3. Re:Traffic is up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      went legit half a decade ago?

      According to many people, they have always been just as legit as Google or Bing.
      They just provide more accurate search results for certain types of searches.

    4. Re:Traffic is up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      " but they demanded a copy of my id because my card was issued in another country than the one I live in at the moment"
      Sounds like Steam was trying to prevent credit card fraud, most people think that is a good thing and it is not exactly a privacy concern since your id is tied to your credit card to start with.

    5. Re:Traffic is up? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      To be fair he didn't say it was a privacy concern. I have had to deal with similar processes for different reasons and, only did so because there was something I wanted and couldn't get another way on the other side of that process. Any way you slice it, its more work, frustration, and waiting around.

      any barrier thrown up, even for the best of reasons, is going to dissuade some amount of people you were not intending to.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    6. Re:Traffic is up? by blackraven14250 · · Score: 2

      but they demanded a copy of my id because my card was issued in another country than the one I live in at the moment.

      You need to give them your name and address anyway for a credit card transaction, and you were being subject to fraud prevention. That's an excuse to pirate, not a reason.

    7. Re:Traffic is up? by wisnoskij · · Score: 2

      I would say sort of the opposite. It became the best place when pretty much every single one of its competitors was raided or threatened out of the business. I burned through a few I liked more before TPB was the only left.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    8. Re:Traffic is up? by qwijibo · · Score: 1

      Privacy isn't the only reason to not provide a copy of ID. Consider how often we hear of payment data being stolen. When the legitimate company asks for a copy of your ID, they are trying to protect themselves, not you. If someone stole your payment card info and copy of your ID, they have everything needed to "prove" to someone else that they're you. It's not like the old days where you could fax in a low resolution copy of your ID and rest assured that the piece of paper lives in a file that will never see the light of day.

    9. Re:Traffic is up? by pegdhcp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My reason not to give my ID, (even if it means paying for a service which can be taken free by showing an ID Pardus anyone???) is simply that I do not know when the database they use to store my ID will be either hacked by a script kiddie or raided by a foreign government. My domestic government already has full access to my person and data, there is no need to increase my accessibility (!)....

    10. Re:Traffic is up? by pegdhcp · · Score: 1

      They are basically providing meta-data (even meta-meta-data). Aside from RIAA and clueless judges, I was assuming most people are seeing their service as legit as it gets.

    11. Re:Traffic is up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it's a damn fine excuse.

    12. Re:Traffic is up? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      You need to give them your name and address anyway for a credit card transaction, and you were being subject to fraud prevention. That's an excuse to pirate, not a reason.

      So? It's still inconvenient because now you're stuck in a manual process that they will eventually get around to when you want to play right now. I've done something similar when a game without warning refused to activate - granted, I'd been playing with WINE settings and uninstalled/reinstalled quite a few times but this was Friday afternoon. A few hours later and no reply, I said fuck it and downloaded a cracked version off TPB. Support came back to me on Monday and started asking questions about why I'd used so many activations, I just sent back a reply basically saying I've found a permanent solution so go fish. Okay so fraud prevention is a bit more valid reason but it still doesn't fix the immediate problem.

      We've had this discussion many times before here on /. with regards to Linux, no matter how many valid reasons there is for "CANTFIX" problems ranging from crap Linux support, undocumented formats and hardware, "embrace extend extinguish" incompatibility and lockout users don't care. This doesn't work, give me something that works. I must admit my tolerance has grown extremely slim, when you know that there's a not-so-legal alternative that always works flawlessly it really doesn't take much before I say "screw this, I'll get it from TPB. Heck, I still download GoT even though I pay for HBO Nordic.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    13. Re:Traffic is up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I gave up on steam once they demanded mandatory binding arbitration. Odd the only way you can avoid MBA nowadays is through pirating the material, in which case you get to go to a real court.

    14. Re:Traffic is up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ID contains more than name and address, too many personal data.

      And if he moved, he has an ID with another address. Why do they need an address to provide a virtual service anyway.

    15. Re:Traffic is up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I need to find a library with scan machine or something similar to make a purchase from my chair (I didn't have access to digital camera, including phone with camera, or scanner until recently), I would probably pass.

    16. Re:Traffic is up? by hoggoth · · Score: 0

      I just assume that all torrented programs come with key-loggers these days.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    17. Re: Traffic is up? by Threni · · Score: 1

      Yeah you run it on a VM. Everyone's using VMs all the time now, right?

    18. Re: Traffic is up? by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      Have you tried running Battlefield 4 inside a VM?

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    19. Re:Traffic is up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nope. TPB is the only moderately trustworthy public tracker through which to obtain anything, other than kickass.to. Most downloaders that I know use a private tracker site where there is a history of quality and community, but for everything else TPB is really the only solution.

    20. Re:Traffic is up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your response to a completely legal and reasonable request to confirm your identity -something literally all retailers who accept credit cards are actually SUPPOSED to do when you pay with a credit card - is to say fuck it and torrent the product instead.

      I had a similar reaction once. I tried to buy my first XB360 and they asked for my ID. I didn't have my ID with me, because what the fuck do you ever use it for? So I left. Fuck them.

      Then a few years later someone, somehow, "swiped" my credit card in a Las Vegas walmart. I lived in Cincinnati, like 2000 miles away. Never been to Las Vegas in my life. I live in Houston now, still probably wont go to Vegas for years to come. I now understand the value of people following the damn laws and rules they are supposed to and I get pissed off when I don't get carded.

      Adulthood changes a lot of things.

    21. Re:Traffic is up? by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I wonder if the EULA was left in the pirated material whether that could be used to insist on MBA in the case of being caught for said piracy.

    22. Re: Traffic is up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you tried running Battlefield 4 inside a VM?

      No, because I hate origin. But other Crysis or graphics intensive programs? They work fine:
      http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/16652.remotefx-vgpu-setup-and-configuration-guide-for-windows-server-2012.aspx#What_is_RemoteFX

    23. Re:Traffic is up? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      We have laws regarding processing of personal data in my country, specifically to prevent their misuse, and this process completely circumvents the protection of my person by stringent local regulations, since I don't think that foreign companies without any legal presence here just happen to be compliant. Yet you claim that by giving up my rights, I actually gain them? That doesn't sound quite right to me.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    24. Re:Traffic is up? by Seumas · · Score: 1

      That's what I thought had happened. I remember TPB selling themselves to a software company for like ten million bucks with plans to turn into a "legitimate tracker of licensed/contracted content". Everyone went nuts over it. Then they all switched to private trackers.

      I've actually always been highly suspect of TPB. Not because of those behind it, but because it is such a high value target, compared to other trackers that you could use (especially private, obviously -- though then there are situations like Demonoid and others that become really iffy due to certain events).

    25. Re:Traffic is up? by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Wait, what? Since when are retailers supposed to ask for your identity when using a credit card? My understanding was that they were actively discouraged from doing so by credit card companies. In fact, I remember they used to have a toll free number you could call to report a retailer if they refused to accept your VISA without giving them ID.

    26. Re:Traffic is up? by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      You reason is entirely valid IMO - you bought the game, and it didn't work under WINE. This guy is saying straight up he doesn't want to buy it because the sellers asking for basic information, and specifically, that they're doing a job that protects both the credit card company (they're liable for fraud, at least here) and himself (since if they're liable for fraud, they need to raise rates to compensate). Those are two entirely different leagues, and comparing them as if they're equal is disingenuous.

    27. Re:Traffic is up? by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      Billing addresses are a thing, you know. They use it as verification.

    28. Re:Traffic is up? by strikethree · · Score: 1

      As for games, I recently wanted to buy a few games on stream, but they demanded a copy of my id because my card was issued in another country than the one I live in at the moment. Fine, goodbye. Downloaded the games at TPB instead.

      There are two other very good reasons to use TPB, Very recently, I downloaded Civ V from TPB. I have not enjoyed any of the series since Civ 2 but this one seemed to have enduring good feedback so I wanted to try it out. I downloaded it and started playing it. I looked at my clock and realized I was 20 hours into my first session. My how time flies. I went ahead and bought it on Steam. By the by, I do not currently reside in the country my card is issued from. apparently, if you hit cancel (back?) and submit enough, it becomes confused and allows the transaction anyways.

      The other reason I use the TPB is to have a copy of a game that I already own that does not have to "install". I just zip up the directory along with a .reg file and whenever I move to another computer, I unzip it and run the .reg file if necessary and WHAM. Instantly playable. Screw installing StarForce and trying to authenticate against a server which no longer exists. I paid for the game and I will play it. On my terms. My access to the game does not stop just because someone wants to shut down their authentication servers. That is fraud on their part. They should release a patch to not require authentication if they do not feel like running the servers anymore.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    29. Re:Traffic is up? by doccus · · Score: 1

      Well, all the free publicity as of late....

    30. Re:Traffic is up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus Christ, they made buying inconvenient, so he didn't buy it. It's that simple.

      You go ahead and twist yourself into a morality knot over just how badly a company has to treat you for it to be okay to download a game, or whether they have to treat you badly deliberately or by accident, or whether there is a "legitimate" reason for buying the thing to be tedious and unpleasant, and just how paper-thin the company's justification can be to be valid. But please do it by yourself because the rest of us would like to get on with our lives.

    31. Re:Traffic is up? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      often don't have any legal options to purchase movies, or the money to purchase them even if they did.

      Examples of such countries?

      From what I was seeing in Gabon last week (last time I'll be there for several years, 3rd or 4th visit in the last year, IIRC), they have no shortage of legal options for buying movies, and many more for buying discs which are commercially stamped from probably illegal copies of discs. I fail to think of any other reason for a Francophone country with an Anglophone minority to be selling DVDs in Chinese (originals imported by migrant workers, probably) and Russian language (source unknown).

      Bandwidth on the other hand? Downloading a standard-resolution DVD would take several days if you could steal all the bandwidth of a major (200+ bed) hotel. That would cost ... well, several days of wages, plus several months of income for the downloading machine.

      Remember when you had dial-up. Remember web-surfing on 33.6bps? Actually, no, I suspect that you don't. You're taking for granted bandwidth which for much of the world simply does not exist. You should try being on my work vessel for a time : a 4Mbps satellite link with 2Mbps allocated to one particular service, 1Mbps for phone lines in and out (about 1 in 5 phone calls fails due to no line available - retry in 30 seconds), and the remaining 1Mbps allocated for all business and personal use between 180 people on board. (And we're a hundred kilometres from any mobile phone coverage, so forget that. Not that mobile phones are allowed outside the Faraday cage when we go into radio silence for explosives/ flammables operations.)

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  3. Mhmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should make a torrent of all the VMs and serve it to the world

    1. Re:Mhmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been done. At least all of their content has been bundled and torrented. That's great and all, but doesn't work for new stuff.

  4. The total storage capacity is 620 GB. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which truly is astounding . . .

    If this were 1994.

    Ziggy

    1. Re:The total storage capacity is 620 GB. by Eunuchswear · · Score: 5, Informative

      So, you're like the last person in the world to understand that TPB holds no content, just pointers to content?

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    2. Re:The total storage capacity is 620 GB. by Eunuchswear · · Score: 3, Funny

      (RIAA, MPAA and various law enforcement agencies not counting as "people").

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    3. Re:The total storage capacity is 620 GB. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have to agree. Any PIRATE knows this. Few law-abidiing citizens would know this. The PB is, by definition, for PIRATES.

    4. Re:The total storage capacity is 620 GB. by rvw · · Score: 1

      (RIAA, MPAA and various law enforcement agencies not counting as "people").

      They do know this! And their tactic is to let you think that they don't.

    5. Re:The total storage capacity is 620 GB. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter who it's for, TPB is doing nothing wrong by simply providing directions to content. It would be like me telling you that you can buy drugs from random people in a certain area of the city. I'm not selling you drugs, I'm only telling you where you can get them.

    6. Re:The total storage capacity is 620 GB. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

      The PB is, by definition, for PIRATES.

      Are you saying that everyone who uses The Pirate Bay is also hijacking ships in the Indian Ocean and holding the crews for ransom? I had no idea.

      I thought they were just downloading porn and Transformers movies.

      Silly person.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:The total storage capacity is 620 GB. by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      I was surprised it was so humongous. I think Wikipedia is like a tenth that size and it is based on hosting its own content.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    8. Re:The total storage capacity is 620 GB. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      It would be like me telling you that you can buy drugs from random people in a certain area of the city.

      Well, don't hold out. Where can I get some weed already?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    9. Re:The total storage capacity is 620 GB. by Caedite+Eos · · Score: 3, Funny

      Colorado. Washington. (You're welcome.)

    10. Re:The total storage capacity is 620 GB. by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      I have sometimes said that the torrent file (or magnet link) is a virtualization of the actual data files, kind of a seed which you plant and from which the data grows. Even when the torrent does not contain the actual data files, you "see" the files through the torrent.

    11. Re:The total storage capacity is 620 GB. by fuzzywig · · Score: 1
      Apparently the main bulk of that 620GB is forums and comments, they did a dump of all the torrent files a year or so ago and it was just 80MB.

      Personally I'm more impressed by something that's small and efficient in these days, rather than something massive.

    12. Re:The total storage capacity is 620 GB. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Out of interest, is this illegal in the US? Has anyone ever been convicted of supplying information about where to buy drugs? I'm genuinely curious.

    13. Re:The total storage capacity is 620 GB. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The practical reality in Washington at least is still:

      A) Medical dispensary
      B) Some guy in a certain area of the city

      Because there are so few legal recreational stores, and the few legit growers are having trouble keeping up with demand.

    14. Re:The total storage capacity is 620 GB. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would guess that most places have is some sort of delightful "accessory to distribution of controlled substance" charge that the prosecutor could bring if they were so inclined.

    15. Re:The total storage capacity is 620 GB. by deltaromeo · · Score: 1

      It does seem like a lot. In 2012 someone ran a scaper on tpb to grab all of their magnet links, it came in at under 100MB compressed. Of course this didn't include the comments or the .torrent files. https://torrentfreak.com/downl... The torrent is available at https://thepiratebay.se/torren...

    16. Re:The total storage capacity is 620 GB. by irq-1 · · Score: 1

      44GB. Surprising. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W...

      Current revisions only, no talk or user pages. (This is probably the one you want. The size of the 13 February 2014 dump is approximately 9.85 GB compressed, 44 GB uncompressed).

    17. Re:The total storage capacity is 620 GB. by Kjella · · Score: 4, Informative

      So, you're like the last person in the world to understand that TPB holds no content, just pointers to content?

      With TPB mainly running on magnet links, it's not even that it's a hash of pointers to content these days. Even the actual pointers have gone off-site, which reduces the bandwidth by 99%. My guess is TPB actually serves up more ads than content, if you count bytes.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    18. Re:The total storage capacity is 620 GB. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've had too many seeds...

    19. Re:The total storage capacity is 620 GB. by Nyder · · Score: 1

      The practical reality in Washington at least is still:

      A) Medical dispensary
      B) Some guy in a certain area of the city

      Because there are so few legal recreational stores, and the few legit growers are having trouble keeping up with demand.

      There a few (illegal) delivery services that operate and anyone who smoked weed already has a connection.

      Why would I leave my great connection to buy from a store? My dude is never out, has a few varieties.

      Growers make more money selling to their normal connections then going legit. IMO they government got a little too greedy with all the taxes on it...

      --
      Be seeing you...
  5. I'm so leet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "One interesting aspect of The Pirate Bay is that all virtual machines are hosted with commercial cloud hosting providers, who have no clue that The Pirate Bay is among their customers

    Well, that's pompous. More likely they don't care, and would rather pretend they didn't know, because it's another paying customer, right?

    All traffic goes through the load balancer,"

    Well, no single point of failure there, then.

    Fact it is nobody except the copyright cartel cares about TPB. Sure, the cartel is powerful, but everyone else will leave TPB alone, given the chance.

    1. Re:I'm so leet. by Kokuyo · · Score: 2

      Single points of failure aren't that much of a factor in virtual machines. If the hardware goes down, the VM is restarted elsewhere. If the machine dies, you copy it from backup... or have a copy on standby (which can be and often is the same thing). After all, there aren't many changes on a worker machine like that.

      Not to forget, nothing stops you from clustering that shit from Microsoft's to Amazon's cloud.

      Considering that I've never found TPB to be down when I needed it and haven't heard many complaints in that direction, I'd say their system works pretty well for them.

    2. Re:I'm so leet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was down when I needed it a couple of days ago. It is just that it came back when I next needed it.

    3. Re:I'm so leet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he was pointing out that if all traffic goes through a load-balancer, then the load-balancer itself is a single point of failure..

    4. Re:I'm so leet. by mlts · · Score: 1

      With some VM architectures, the VM may not even need to be restarted. With IBM's POWERVM and vSphere's FT, it actually runs multiple VMs at the same time executing the same instructions in lockstep. That way, if the primary fails, it is only seconds before the secondary takes over.

    5. Re:I'm so leet. by TTL0 · · Score: 2

      "The remaining five virtual machines are used for load balancing...."

      --
      Sanity is the trademark of a weak mind. -- Mark Harrold
    6. Re:I'm so leet. by sexconker · · Score: 1

      "The remaining five virtual machines are used for load balancing...."

      There's one controller though (there's ALWAYS one controller).

    7. Re:I'm so leet. by proibido · · Score: 1

      No need for a controller, you can always do a round-robin DNS server list.

  6. Raids are like censorship. by Thanshin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Raids only make sites become raid-proof. Just as monitoring creates encryption and oppression creates rebellion.

    But of course one cannot fight the core problem when the core problem is oneself.

    1. Re:Raids are like censorship. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Stopping rape just makes people better rapists."

      The Internet is a highly centrally controlled and well monitored collection of routers and servers. if something is getting away with pissing off a group of people, it's merely that the group of people being pissed off aren't important enough.

      RIAA/MPAA/etc. are just not that interesting to people who matter.

      A site which makes a few sincere threats, let alone organisational efforts, against the wrong people will be identified very quickly, because, well, all traffic has a source and a destination.

    2. Re:Raids are like censorship. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As antibiotics create antibiotic-resistant strains but still are still being massively used in the farming industry just because the huge economic savings/profits for those running the show business.

    3. Re:Raids are like censorship. by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      "Stopping rape just makes people better rapists."

      You're equating "raids" with "stopping", in a thread about how raids didn't stop anything.

      A site which makes a few sincere threats, let alone organisational efforts, against the wrong people will be identified very quickly, because, well, all traffic has a source and a destination.

      And once it's been identified it will be... What exactly? Raided? Censored with an internet censoring machine?

      Are you really suggesting that one can't discuss criminal activity online? What medium do you think abductions, homicides and terrorist attacks are planned with? Postcards? The ultra-secure, never tapped phones?

    4. Re:Raids are like censorship. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What medium do you think abductions, homicides and terrorist attacks are planned with? Postcards? The ultra-secure, never tapped phones?

      Criminals are very seldom in the more educated class of the population. Abductions, homicides and terrorist attacks are most likely planned in person.

    5. Re:Raids are like censorship. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That explains all of the meetings that politicians hold.

    6. Re:Raids are like censorship. by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

      Sure one can fight oneself. One can start by shooting oneself in the foot. ;-)

    7. Re:Raids are like censorship. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Criminals are very seldom in the more educated class of the population.

      Criminals *that get caught* are very seldom in the more educated classes of the population.

  7. Why do they take the risk? by mark_reh · · Score: 1

    Are they making $ off this or just doing it for the lulz?

    1. Re:Why do they take the risk? by Danathar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Both. You can make money and have the lulz...

    2. Re:Why do they take the risk? by rasmusbr · · Score: 4, Informative

      When you click the search box it often triggers a popup ad. I would imagine that ad sees hundreds of millions of impressions per month, which would translate to hundreds of thousands of dollars in monthly revenue at an average of $1 per 1000 impressions.

      There are also some regular ads on the site. They could easily be making more than $10 million a year in ad revenue.

    3. Re:Why do they take the risk? by Thanshin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Some people out there have motivations other than "money" and "lulz".

      Things like "respect of one's peers", "ideology", "non-conformism" or even "the challenge of doing something hard no one else can do", can make some people take quite large risks.

    4. Re:Why do they take the risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, but who would want to advertise on a site frequented almost exclusively by cheapskates who would rather steal content than pay for it? Even if they found your ad compelling, they're way more likely to steal your product than buy it.

    5. Re:Why do they take the risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Unlikely. The userbase they have is much more likely to block ads, there is also no way they can get as much for ads as the more legit pages.

    6. Re:Why do they take the risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Studies have consistently shown that people who pirate things like movies, albums, etc are also far more likely to purchase them as well. So, the people advertising on TPB are the ones smart enough to ignore the RIAA's and MPAA's misled war against their best customers.

      Also, you can answer your own question for yourself by simply going to TPB and seeing what kind of ads they have.

    7. Re:Why do they take the risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Copying, downloading or illegally streaming, none of those constitute stealing. Nice try though.

      Oh, and by the way, those cheapskates? Yeah not so much. Turns out there are a number of different reasons people resort to piracy to get what they want. Unsurprisingly, price really has very little to do with it. I'd link a bunch of articles for your dumb ass to read, but, yeah what's the point?

    8. Re:Why do they take the risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know. Why are you a cunt who spends his free time shilling for the RIAA and the MPAA?

      I fear it will take greater minds than ours to unravel these timeless mysteries, cuntface,

    9. Re:Why do they take the risk? by rasmusbr · · Score: 2

      Most of the ads are for things that you can't pirate, like online casinos, free to play games, "dating" sites...

    10. Re:Why do they take the risk? by Rich0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yup. I recently bought a game on a steam sale. For as little as I paid for it, the hassle of pirating it would not have been worth it.

      On the other hand, apparently many parts of the game aren't actually working now due to a bad update. Of course, the advantage of Steam is that I'll probably get that update automatically within a few days. On the other hand, if I had obtained it from TPB I probably would be playing it now instead of waiting, since the pirated version would be an older known-good one (though obviously missing whatever was in that update).

      I also saw a "# activations remaining" message when registering my CD key with the game, which wasn't terribly comforting. I suspect that Valve would take care of any actual issues down the road, but who knows, maybe in 10 years I'll end up stopping by TPB to get a crack for the game that I just bought.

      Stuff like this is why there is piracy.

    11. Re:Why do they take the risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tend to use TPB as a way to try before buy. If I like the game/film/music/book, I'll buy it. gog.com, Amazon and Google Play have gotten a TON of business from me, thanks to TPB.

    12. Re:Why do they take the risk? by waspleg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you watched the documentary (TPB: AFK) you'd know why. Most of them are pro-freedom. Their network engineer does it "for the challenge".

    13. Re:Why do they take the risk? by gsslay · · Score: 1

      But in this case, TPB are making money. Lots of it.

      But I'm sure they're happy for you to suggest nobler causes for their business model.

    14. Re:Why do they take the risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is why I have set all those sites to 127.0.0.1 in my hosts files. bet365.com is one of the offending sites that tends to popup in lot of shaddy places.

    15. Re:Why do they take the risk? by ajzimm3rman · · Score: 0

      Probably just the money tho, tbh.

    16. Re:Why do they take the risk? by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 0

      If you continue to try and disaccosiate the lablel "stealing" because of the implication that its something that everyone agrees is wrong, I'm not going to believe that your motives have nothing to do with the fact that they are availible without charge.

      It really looks like you are trying to say " Even though its illegal, and I'm doing it to get free stuff, don't think bad of me because I don't like thinking of myself as someone who does bad things". Its got all of the logic and reasoning of a three year old.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    17. Re:Why do they take the risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better to be called a cunt than a thief. At least you can trust a cunt.

    18. Re:Why do they take the risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? That would not be a cunt then.

    19. Re:Why do they take the risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll answer the question.

      PORN.

      All torrent sites are drenched in Porn ads and maybe 1 game ad. All of them, TPB is by no means an exception.Dating sites, Fuckbook, porn, and shitty mobile or browser F2P games.

    20. Re:Why do they take the risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adblock doesn't block all ads. In fact it blocks almost no ads - just on YouTube. Even sites that recognize AdBlocker enabled still show you their ads. I use it and I have never once been to Kickass.to, TPB, Torrentfreak, Seedpeer, or any other public tracker torrent site that wasn't absolutely covered in ads.

    21. Re:Why do they take the risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They make money but they also spend money on running ThePirateBay. duh

    22. Re:Why do they take the risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From my experience, TPB ads are exclusively sketchy quasi-porn site ads. They're definitely not content ads by content creators. Just people looking to make a quick buck with a sex site.

    23. Re:Why do they take the risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disk vendors.
      ISPs (in competitive markets).
      VPN providers.
      etc.

    24. Re:Why do they take the risk? by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      I'll answer the question.

      PORN.

      All torrent sites are drenched in Porn ads and maybe 1 game ad. All of them, TPB is by no means an exception.Dating sites, Fuckbook, porn, and shitty mobile or browser F2P games.

      This but don't forget the gambling sites. 32 red seem awful keen for the pirate gamblers to come play recently.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    25. Re:Why do they take the risk? by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      If you continue to try and disaccosiate the lablel "stealing" because of the implication that its something that everyone agrees is wrong, I'm not going to believe that your motives have nothing to do with the fact that they are availible without charge.

      It really looks like you are trying to say " Even though its illegal, and I'm doing it to get free stuff, don't think bad of me because I don't like thinking of myself as someone who does bad things". Its got all of the logic and reasoning of a three year old.

      People try to disassociate pirating from stealing because stealing is set thing where you, without permission take things that belong to other people and keep them for yourself. Which is not what pirating is. Pirating is copyright infringement, so call it that instead of something that's almost kinda but not really like it but sounds much worse. Even a three year old could tell the difference between taking something and making a copy.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    26. Re:Why do they take the risk? by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      Both Stealing and Copyright infrigment are both illegal in most jursisdictions.

      So specifying one over the other, just reeks of attempting to get rid of a guilty concious.

      Which runs counter to the self professed notion of not being a cheap skate.

      The poster I was replying to feels guilty about his actions, no doubt.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    27. Re:Why do they take the risk? by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Both Stealing and Copyright infrigment are both illegal in most jursisdictions. So specifying one over the other, just reeks of attempting to get rid of a guilty concious.

      So are murder, rape, fraud, drug use and loads of other things but you don't say it's them. You're trying to call a spade a digger when they're not the same.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  8. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...all that has to happen is the load balancers be compromised in some way, and the keys to the kingdom are found.

    so much for "raid-proofing"

    1. Re:So... by naughtynaughty · · Score: 3, Informative

      The "keys to the kingdom" point to virtual machines that can be rehosted faster than the raider can work the legal system in multiple countries to get to the next level of servers after raiding the load balancer. The point is not that they can prevent raids but that any raids will be ineffective at shutting them down for more than a few minutes. That effectively discourages raids as a strategy as they are expensive and ineffective.

  9. They deserve praise by Katatsumuri · · Score: 1

    The Pirate Bay definitely deserves praise for staying up, despite being famous and constantly attacked by the media mafia. They bring hope that one day we may live in a world where sharing of knowledge, art and data is encouraged rather that prosecuted, and that some of today's files will survive until then, as well.

    It will require a lot of work until we get there in the social realm (fighting the abusive law). It may help if technical solutions exist (decentralization, anonymity, security) that allow everyone to ignore the nonsensical law, to make the case even more obvious and to get by with our files in the meanwhile.

    1. Re:They deserve praise by Punko · · Score: 1

      The cost of movies, even today, is based on what the market will support. Yes, sometimes movies make a ton of profit, but sometimes they lose. If you don't want to spend big bucks on a big name actress, then don't. But the risks of not making any money might go up. Its all risky, and large corporations tend to be risk averse.

      To be honest, the budgets for most movies is driven by labour costs, and the largest component of that is for A-listers.

      --
      If only we could fall into a woman's arms without falling into her hands
    2. Re:They deserve praise by StripedCow · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, there are independant film makers out there, but without those box-office sales, we wouldn't have Avengers, Guardians of the Galaxy, or a slew of the other CGI-dependant movies with big-name actors/actresses.

      Oh, the horror!

      --
      If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
    3. Re:They deserve praise by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Movies and pharmaceuticals are similar in that regard - they have huge up-front costs (sure, those costs are often debated, but nobody disputes that what gets spend is huge no matter whose estimates you use), and low marginal production costs.

      Music does have higher up-front than marginal costs, but the main "cost" is the creative serendipity that led to the work in the first place. You don't necessary need a lot of infrastructure for that to happen, even if it is something that should be rewarded in some way. Otherwise, producing a song does cost money, but not a very great deal of it (a few band members for a few days, a few engineers/etc for a few days, etc). The costs are real, but the fact is that a garage band could produce their own song that is competitive with a major label song if they had the talent, while a garage movie production simply couldn't compete with a first-line movie production on talent alone.

      Now, one element of music that also involves large up-front costs is the concept of taking any song that appears half-decent, signing the artist, and then trying to market an album after the fact. I imagine most of the artists that get money up-front turn out to be bad investments. So, when an album sells, it is in part supporting unsuccessful artists as well as successful ones. Of course, it is supporting a lot of middle-managers and executives as well.

    4. Re:They deserve praise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot more goes into the workings of music recording, producing, and touring. If only it were as simple as picking up some cheap used gear off of Craigslist to put together a recording studio and touring PA. It is also no where near as simple as putting up a page on facebook to make a name for yourself.

      A significant amount of time and money goes into creating a major album or a tour. You are equating a backyard band type production with a AAA Hollywood Movie.

    5. Re:They deserve praise by Jesrad · · Score: 1

      Very bad examples here. In both cases of pharma and music, the up-front costs are vastly inflated because of the existence of "intellectual property" laws. This is a basic mechanism: your costs adjust up by the amount of guaranteed income, in the absence of any additional marginal wealth production. Or to put it another way: actual value you produce eventually adjusts down to the amount of value you need to convince other people to pay you. The amount you do not need to convince them to pay, trades for nothing. That's why monopoly rents even exist in the first place: laziness.

      --
      Maybe we deserve this world ?
    6. Re:They deserve praise by Bruinwar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't get me wrong, I hate the MAFIAA as much as the next guy, but people seem to forget about following the money.

      Music is one beast that can thrive from independant distribution and marketing. It's relatively cheap to build your own recording studio and make a name for yourself on facebook.

      Movies on the other hand, do take years and millions to make. The money comes up-front from a studio and the studio hopes (expects?) to make money off of ticket sales, merchandise, DVD/Blu-Ray, etc... Yes, there are independant film makers out there, but without those box-office sales, we wouldn't have Avengers, Guardians of the Galaxy, or a slew of the other CGI-dependant movies with big-name actors/actresses.

      Would anybody mind sharing how we can get to this eutopian world where every multi-billion dollar produced movie can be made free to the unwashed masses? It's not like a movie can tour the countryside and get money from concert sales...

      Make a kick-ass movie, I will likely buy a ticket. Make a decent movie, one that I really want to see but not at current ticket prices, I will wait for it a while. But not forever. If it does not show up on Netflix I might rent it, burn it, then watch it at my convenience, then toss the disk. If I really want to see it & missed it at the flicks due to time constraints, I will download it. If the entertainment industry wants me to pay, make it convenient, let me watch it how & when I want to, & keep the price point reasonable. $6.99 for On Demand is too much as I can rent it for less. They can make money this way, but they might have to let go of their old business models.

      --
      SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT
    7. Re:They deserve praise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. You are typing this crap on a site where people know better. Garage band is dirt cheap compared to *any* starving artists income (you can waitress and afford garage band). Quality instruments can be expensive (a fender strat. can cost you upwards of $700), but again, its not millions and millions. Record, tweak to your hearts content, put it on Youtube. Tell them that the download version sounds better, $0.99 per song. *CRAPLOADS* of artists have done this. Anyone who, after 2000 says 'oh my gosh teh recording studio cost millions and meeeeliions, whew!' is selling a pile of stinking steaming crap. I've seen a lot of 'way A-list' music producers with a first quality recording studio that costs $20,000 *MAX*! Including the computer, software, and all the mics. Its like film processing. When things went digital, all the fancy stuff done in the dark room with fancy chemicals went to photoshop and 'magic airbrushing' is something done by a 6 year old. When I was in university (about 15 years ago), I took pictures of myself, and incorporated them into a picture taken off the net. Scale, tilt, change color gamut, change focus, add grain, reflection, radiosity and no one gives it a second glance. And that was 15 years ago. You can record and re-record songs 1000 times, on a million tracks. There are even musicians who can't play (any) instrument, but can pluck single notes, mix it with other 'good sounding' notes, and make all the music they want. They can't sing either, and have millions of youtube followers. Sorry, no live performances, but they sell songs anyway. But go ahead, mutter about the demise of the A&R man.

    8. Re:They deserve praise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See the problem is you're pretending it's a noble crusade.

      I'm going to let you in on a secret, and I say this as someone who used to torrent all the time - someone whose computer is at home trying in vain to download some porn that fuckers WILL NOT seed. Fuck people who seed to 80% and then quit, you are useless. I lost a 2tb drive, what do you expect me to do? Have to replace those files.

      Here's the secret:

      WE'RE DOWNLOADING COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL.

      Not "knowledge." Not open-source GPL material.

    9. Re:They deserve praise by Rich0 · · Score: 2

      Very bad examples here. In both cases of pharma and music, the up-front costs are vastly inflated because of the existence of "intellectual property" laws.

      I'm talking about actual costs, not accounting games. It costs thousands of dollars to produce a record album, and I don't think anybody would really dispute this (maybe you can get people to work for free, but if you add up the hours and reasonable compensation it works out to something on that scale). If you factor in failed bands that were funded whose costs have to be recouped I'm sure the figure will be 10x higher.

      With drugs the costs are in the tens to hundred of millions of dollars. Much of that goes to pay doctors to participate in clinical trials, but there are a lot of other costs as well. Hundreds of scientists are involved in the development and testing of a drug, and they are expensive to hire.

      Now, some will argue if the cost is $100M, or $1B, or $10B. Few are going to argue that drugs are the sort of thing that a few people can develop in their kitchen (complete with supporting double-blind clinical trial data, and a robust manufacturing process that consistently turns out pills that work and are safe). If you don't want IP laws for drugs, then somebody has to spend that $100M+, and I think the real cost is closer to the $1B figure (factoring in the costs of drugs that are tested but turn out to not work - it isn't like somebody doing R&D can choose in advance to only research the stuff that works out).

    10. Re:They deserve praise by strikethree · · Score: 1

      I pretty much agree with you. I would rather do without than suffer this copyright bullshit. I do enjoy those "big" movies and I am willing to put up with some amount of copyright laws if that will allow me to enjoy those movies... but this forever copyright regime with the insane "enforcement" scheme is beyond the pale. It is better to burn it all to ashes.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  10. Only 20 GB left by mutu310 · · Score: 0

    ... because 640 GB is enough for anybody :)

  11. International Waters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Harr, they have a hiding place in a small island in the Caribbean Sea, just outside of reach of the hovering fleets of the colonial powers, arrgg. Harr, they change hiding places constantly and attack from the cloud of the morning mist, arrgg. Harr, their infamous captain is called [please insert next name of the domain list], arrgg.

  12. Good job! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's great to see people do the heroic work of breaking through publisher monopolies. I pay for almost all my content but pirateers force publishers to provide much better service. Now if only lawmakers will see that monopolies are a bad thing. Only they spend hundreds of years making pirateers look like criminals, so they would look bad if they admit reality. Which is that pirateers where traders, trading goods governments had given monopoly to one company. That is something necessary, not criminal.

    Still designing a system without monopolies will be hard, I have an idea:
    The content maker should always have the right to allow a distributor to distribute their content, even if they already sold that right to someone else. So selling distribution rights will make the content maker much less money, because it's not a monopoly anymore. But because publishers will be competing on distribution, there will be much more distribution, and markets will be unlocked much faster. So in the end it should make the content maker more money.

    Of course the system is not perfect and will need to be adapted to reality and government oversight (as any system). But I think it will address the current problem where publishers only compete on the side of gaining content and not at all on the side of distributing content.

    1. Re:Good job! by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      I agree, "exclusive distribution rights" should be illegal unless you are the content creator. Capitalism is supposed to be about competition.

    2. Re:Good job! by FlyingGuy · · Score: 1

      should be illegal unless you are the content creator.

      A small problem with your idea. Who is "you" ? So if an author enters into an agreement to have his book made into a movie by say, The Disney Company who is the "content creator"? Is it the author? The screen writer?, The shareholders in Disney Stock? The CEO of Disney?

      Lets say for instance you arcademan come up with a really cool video game that seems to be an absolute hit. Do you have the resources to put up a server farm that can distribute that content to the masses? Let's say I do and I put my considerable resources to work on your behalf for some fee per distributed unit. I really have no sure way of knowing if you will sell 100, 1000, 10000 or even a million units. So I want an exclusive agreement because I have made those resources available to you and therefor have tied those up.

      --
      Hey KID! Yeah you, get the fuck off my lawn!
    3. Re:Good job! by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      As a content creator, I would prefer spending time creating content.

      And, if I sell the rights, like Notch sold minecraft, he would be the only rights enforcer under your plan, and he is only interested in making cool little games. No sale would be possible.

      Care to reconsider?

  13. Can't stop the signal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd love to see the technology behind this. Maybe something in Github? TPB seems quite successful at avoiding shutdowns, and many other sites could absolutely benefit from this.

  14. Wait, wait, wait by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

    Most musicians I know make money doing gigs (i.e. working for a living). Movies are generally profitable or not based on theatrical sales - a time when there are no quality online versions; sales after a theatrical run is complete rarely changes a flop to profitability.

    Interestingly, there are troupes of actors travelling all over the country and world who make money night after night performing in venues all over the country side. It's called theater, and - interestingly - when you put a "star" in a show you don't even have to travel. Have you seen the sellouts for Neil Patrick Harris, or Patrick Stewart on Broadway? Even if you ignore the fact that people can still make money performing live, the top movies, since 1920 have *the theatrical receipts* often exceeding the production cost by a factor of 4. That's a margin even the stingiest of capitalists drools over. In fact, the top 50 theatrically grossing movies (which are mostly from the last 20 years) grossed no less than 775 Million dollars EACH, and only 7 of them cost more than 200 Million to make, with none more than 300 Million. It's probably okay not to worry too much about being able to feed the families of the poor movie executives, even if by some strange change in the copyright law they lost all rights to their films at the close of the production run.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  15. They will go after the banks by laughingskeptic · · Score: 1

    TPB will get sued in a favorable location for the plaintiff. The plaintiff will use the judgment to go after TPB bank accounts. The back accounts are much harder to hide than the servers because TPB wants to get paid for the ads it displays.

    1. Re:They will go after the banks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean you haven't heard of bitcoin ads?

  16. Wait... registrars DOING something? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    Interesting that registrars will threaten sites that assist in obtaining illegal copies of software or media, but will do nothing whatsoever when they are shown that their customers are selling kiddie porn, illegal / counterfeit drugs, counterfeit anything else, etc...

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  17. Technical details? by waspleg · · Score: 1

    There are some on the wikipedia page but I suspect some of them are outdated given what's said in the article. I was interested in reading about their VM setup and how they communicate with each other and what platform they're using, etc, but I can't find any details anywhere. I went through their blog, their forums, the affiliated articles, etc. Does anyone know where one might find more details of their infrastructure?

  18. Something tells me... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    That soon a DEA SWAT team will attack VMWare development facilities and smash everything up, using trumped-up drug charges.

    1. Re:Something tells me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering VMWare are a legit business product being developed by Cisco and other major IT players, I highly doubt that.

    2. Re:Something tells me... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      If any copy of VMWare is suspected of being used for an illegal purpose, the DEA has the right to swarm in and confiscate everything. The evidentiary standard for this action is "probable cause."

  19. Real Pirates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not true. Credit card information is often protected by law, but if you provide the personal information that is not included in a cred card transaction, they can pretty much do whatever they want with it.

    Companies are over reaching, and it has gone on way too long. They sell frauds all the time, like soundtracks to movies that don't have all the original music, or movies that we can't even get to play because of DRM, or other problems.

    The real pirates are the RIAA, MPAA, Sony, etc. etc.

  20. It's NOT illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not illegal. The problem is, those in power have been abusing and exceeding their authority and nobody has held them to the fire.

    It's not illegal to point to pirated material. That's like telling a minor there is alcohol at the gas station. Any issue is between the gas station and the kid.

    Copyright provides legal protection so others can't profit from it, but if you are not selling it, and you were never going to purchase it anyway, then you did not deny them property.

    There are laws that require a license to drive a car, fly a plane, practice law, practice medicine, but there is not one single law that requires you to have a license to use software, listen to music, or watch a movie.

  21. Cloud Pirates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Ernesto reports at TorrentFreak that despite its massive presence the Pirate Bay doesn't have a giant server park but operates from my butt, on virtual machines that can be quickly moved if needed.
    [...]
    One interesting aspect of The Pirate Bay is that all virtual machines are hosted with commercial butt hosting providers, who have no clue that The Pirate Bay is among their customers. "Moving to my butt lets TPB move from country to country, crossing borders seamlessly without downtime. [...]"

    Moments like this remind me why I installed that firefox extension.

  22. Raid-resistant, not raid-proof by davidwr · · Score: 1

    The technology listed is not raid-proof, only raid-resistant.

    It is still vulnerable to legal attack IF the governments in the countries where the servers are located are willing to use subpeonas or other means to "quietly" (i.e. without TPB finding out) determine what the next "downstream" server is until they have a full list, then do a coordinated takedown.

    All it takes to stop this is to make sure that at least some key servers are in countries in which such court orders could not be legally issued.

    The summary didn't say it, but I would think that after all that they have been through, TPB also has recent-enough "disconnected" backups of all of their key servers that they could bring it all back up within a matter of days if their servers were all seized at the same time. I would also think that they have a "shadow staff" who can take over in the event that the people currently running the show are arrested or ordered by a court to not participate in the project.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  23. not trying hard enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Most of the ads are for things that you can't pirate, like online casinos, free to play games, "dating" sites..."

    nah, you are not trying hard enough.