Slashdot Mirror


Former Infosys Recruiter Says He Was Told Not To Hire US Workers

dcblogs writes: A lawsuit by four IT workers alleging that outsourcing firm Infosys favored hiring Indian workers over U.S. workers now includes an account from a former Infosys recruiter about the alleged practice. It includes accounts by Samuel Marrero, who worked in Infosys's talent acquisition unit from 2011 until May 2013, of meetings with executives at the India-based IT services firm. Marrero and other recruiters "frequently complained" to higher-ups at Infosys during these weekly calls that many of the highly qualified American candidates they had presented were being rejected in favor of Indian prospects. In response to one of these complaints, Infosys' global enterprise lead allegedly said, "Americans don't know $#!%," according to the lawsuit. Infosys has denied allegations that it discriminates.

65 of 293 comments (clear)

  1. Typical by sycodon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Management doesn't know shit.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:Typical by TemporalBeing · · Score: 4, Informative

      Management doesn't know sh**.

      No, actually they are often masters of BS, at least BS good enough for the short-term.

      This isn't a matter of having a degree in BSing; it's a matter of racial prejudice and promotion. I've seen it at several other "Indian" firms as well; and typically the positions are written such that only people from their Indian offices qualify so that they can pump them into their US branches under H1Bs. There's a strategy to it; however subtle they may try to make it.

      In TFA is true, then the recruiters are trying to call them out on it, and Good for them for doing so.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
  2. Well duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's an outsourcing firm. Of course they'll prefer candidates from India. That's kind of the point. Americans can't compete in that arena.

    1. Re:Well duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Americans can't compete in that arena.

      In this case "can't" means not allowed to compete because they are discriminated against based on race.

    2. Re:Well duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In this case "can't" means not allowed to compete because they are discriminated against based on geography.

      Fux'd that fer ya

    3. Re:Well duh. by daemonhunter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, based on nationality, actually. American isn't a race.

    4. Re:Well duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Americans can't compete in that arena.

      In this case "can't" means not allowed to compete because they are discriminated against based on race.

      Actually, no... They are discriminated against based on salary expectations.

    5. Re:Well duh. by B33rNinj4 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Have you been to Texas?

    6. Re:Well duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      One American salary is still lower than the 35 Indian salaries and data breach penalties that you end up paying if you go the outsourcing route.

      We had 3 American's replaced with 45 India Indian outsourced contractors, spent 6 months training (the outsourced people kept rotating out delaying the handover of the support), after the handover, within 6 hours, the accounts were off by over 160,000 dollars, by then end of the first day, they were off by almost 750k.
      It took the same 3 American's about 6 days to fix all of the problems caused by the outsourced employees, and cost our company half a million in penalties because of the errors occurring in the first place.

      Outsourcing never pays, unless you're in upper management and want to pad your golden parachute so you can leave before it fails due to your mismanagement.

    7. Re:Well duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But it also says they discriminated in favor of Indians.

      What's amazes me is how surprised white people are when they find out that other groups don't believe in non-discrimination as much as they do.

      Around the world hiring those from one's own group is pretty standard practice.

    8. Re:Well duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You mean native Americans? First Nations peoples? That's the only "American race" I know of.

    9. Re:Well duh. by NatasRevol · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Aren't they really discriminated against based on salary?

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    10. Re:Well duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Indians are not a single race (they call it subcontinent for a reason), and as a matter of fact they DO have some pure breed Aryans. Likewise, Americans are not a single race either, so if what its argued is accurate it means ** if the applicant is black, white, purple or for that matter an Indian living in America, he won't get the job and thats it.

      So, yes is discrimination but based on geography, not even in race or nationality.

    11. Re:Well duh. by pointbeing · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, no... They are discriminated against based on salary expectations.

      This. This right here.

      I'm an American working for an Indian IT company in a middle management position. The company for which I work seems to believe that employee attrition is cost of doing business and although I'm compensated fairly (which was a pretty good trick all by itself), the majority of my peers and subordinates are not. I wouldn't blame any of them for leaving. If my company hadn't made things right with me I'd have left a year and a half ago.

      Most companies based in India don't pay anywhere near market; that's how they win contracts. Sad to say, but the customer gets what he pays for; if you want to outsource and want American workers the customer has to be prepared to pay the price. There is one client at this location that requires their service desk to be all native speakers; since this will be staffed with all US employees they're gonna pay more than if the company had outsourced some or all of that service desk to India.

      High employee attrition appears to be an acceptable business risk to most of these companies.

      --
      we see things not as as they are, but as we are.
      -- anais nin
    12. Re:Well duh. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Informative

      they are discriminated against based on geography.

      Wrong. These are US based jobs. They hired South Asian immigrants for jobs in America in preference to people of other races. Infosys has about 15,000 employees in America and 90% of them are South Asian. I doubt that happened by random chance.

    13. Re:Well duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Thats a different SPECIES. Please, don't mix your terms or the discussion will get confusing.

    14. Re:Well duh. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Informative

      Aren't they really discriminated against based on salary?

      If so, then that is also illegal. It is illegal for them to pay H1B employees less than they pay American residents with the same capability. So they cannot use the lower cost of H1Bs as a defense.

    15. Re:Well duh. by sabri · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But it also says they discriminated in favor of potential H1-B servants.

      Fixed that for you.

      That's the story. Infosys is nothing more than an H1-B mill.

      --
      I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
    16. Re:Well duh. by lgw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Have you tried outsourcing within the US? We have to because of certain regulations? It's the same. Nothing to do with India or Indian outsourcers (or outsorcerors!). The business model of an outsourcing company is very similar to that of your building contractor. They'd like to stay on till the next big project is lined up and then they flee as fast as they can.

      This can't be emphasized enough. Ignore the racist cries that the brown-skinned programmers aren't as good. The simple truth is: outsourcing blows goats. Hire your own, or move everything to the cloud if you must save a few bucks (and hire your own to stay on top of that).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    17. Re:Well duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So, as long as I hire white South Africans, I don't have to have any negroes on my payroll?

      Oh, what's that? There's more to the legal definition of "race" as it applies to anti-discrimination laws than a third-grade definition provided by an internet lawyer? Well! Imagine that!

    18. Re:Well duh. by sjames · · Score: 3, Informative

      Since this is for people working in the U.S. and the choice is between H1-B and a citizen, it is actually illegal for them to pay less than the typical American salary expectation.

    19. Re:Well duh. by whitroth · · Score: 2

      Um, more likely price. Or didn't you see the lawsuit, months ago, from the former Oracle exec, who was alleging that Oracle management underpaid him, becuase $10k or $20k less per year was "good enough for an Indian".

                    mark

    20. Re:Well duh. by boristdog · · Score: 4, Informative

      Exactly. My company, based in the US, had [contractor name redacted] take over our IT. [contractor name redacted] is based in India. They slowly got rid of all the American IT employees over about 2 years and replaced them with Indian nationals. They would rotate them in an out based on whatever kind work visa they had. None of them ever really learned our system and eventually they had to hire back some of the Americans they got rid of.

      Fortunately management has started to wake up and we're ditching [contractor name redacted] at the end of their contract.

    21. Re:Well duh. by torkus · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well attrition is NBD these days anyhow. Any time your stock price isn't high enough and the CEO wants to sell some shares to buy his next mansion or bonus time is coming and his $retarded bonus is directly related to share prices ... they just lay off a bunch of people to 'fix' the P/L and bump up the share price.

      While above is trollish, it's also VERY much true. Layoffs almost invariably raise the stock price of a company so they've become yet another tool in doing business. Spending a career at one company is virtually unheard of in the US. It's a sad state of being.

      Let's lay off 10% of our workforce and outsource another 15% (which basically means laying off 25% and giving some outsource company a fraction of what that 15% was paid). Hey look, we reduced our employee compensation costs by 20% ... now look at how much money the company is earning for investors! Go us! Woohoo! Stock market is on the riseeeeee...economy is doing welllllllll....things are all sunshineeeeeeee.....happy dance down the street

      Oops...

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    22. Re:Well duh. by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe on paper at first, but I had a team of Indian's replace me - I was a TAM (technical account manager for a really big software company). Basically it was 7 people replacing 1 person. I don't think those 7 people were cheaper than just me.

      Also - I heard they lost nearly every single account I had - which was easily 12m a year in total.

    23. Re:Well duh. by Livius · · Score: 2

      So, foreigners are uninformed? That's, um, not racist, exactly...

    24. Re:Well duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Those Indians are some of the dumbest people around. I am not talking about lack of experience and knowledge, although many of them fall into that category too.

      We had servers running out of disk space and rather than be proactive, they continued to treat each incident as they came up. This went on for years. Alerts were not taken seriously. IT would sit on tickets when they had no idea how to respond. The Indian staff would agree to take on all work even though there was no way they could do so; they would never tell you no or give differing view points. I got sick and tired of the company approved monitoring (which was not working) and installed my own monitoring using Nagios and Cacti, which sent alerts to technical engineering leads. IT supposedly used Puppet but only a few people in IT could make changes. In two weeks I wrote a system that could push out changes and implemented it over a weekend.

      When I asked IT management how one person could do all this within 30 days (and I don't do grunt work anymore, I am middle level management) and IT could not do this in over 2 years with its staff, their response, "they are only L1s" I know teenagers with more skill than our staff.

      The Indians lack initiative and common sense. It was explained to me by another Indian that it is cultural and not easy to change. Indians are "yes men", teams are run on consensus and projects are committee driven. They do well in large organizations like Oracle, Cisco, and SAP. They fail in small companies where people have to wear many hats and it is a sink or swim operation.

      I asked many of our IT staff if they tinker with BSD or Linux systems at home. Nobody had such a system. When they go home they are off the clock and don't spend any time on work related tasks. So, they lack curiosity too. They are damn cheap, even though it kills our productivity.

    25. Re:Well duh. by reboot246 · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, the definition got screwed up years ago. "Native Americans" really should mean anyone born in America (North, Central, and South America).

      I was born in America. I'm a native American. Take all the modern definitions and politically correct garbage and throw it out of the window.

    26. Re:Well duh. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      I stopped reading that bullshit after the "universal leftist tendency to ignore unpleasant facts" part.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    27. Re:Well duh. by mrchaotica · · Score: 2

      I can't tell if you're joking, trolling, or if the irony was accidental.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    28. Re:Well duh. by tlim · · Score: 2

      We have a winner. Now proving it is harder, which is Infosys' game.

      And even after it is very close to be proven, the company will take a penalty and absolve themselves with a "no-fault" settlement. SOP for these types of companies.

    29. Re:Well duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This exactly describes the situation in our company. The Indians have no initiative, no desire to learn things off the clock. They ignore production alerts until they pile up and then look for somebody else to blame. They ignore everything. They are uncreative and cannot come up with any solution to save their lives. I have had to deal with this in various companies over the last 15 years. They are just stupid and useless. They all want us to believe that Indians are smart but where is the evidence? If you research it, you discover that Indians universities are rife with cheating and when they come to universities in the US, they are terrible cheaters.
      In short, that is the Indian way and that is one reason that India itself is such a total shithole.

      In NYC, we had a terrible problem with Indians in that they never flushed their own toilets and often pissed on the toilet seats, as if they were high caste and expected someone else to do it. Their code was just as sloppy and slapdash. Every company I have worked for eventually gets the picture that they are terrible workers, stupid and not worth even the piddling money they earn. I have been gratified to see them driven out of every company I work for. It's a damned relief.

    30. Re:Well duh. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      The problem is that it's not limited to any easily defined specific population. Each group seems to have its own set of delusions for which they refuse to face facts. (The unvoiced implication in that statement being "unlike us, of course".)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    31. Re:Well duh. by david_thornley · · Score: 2

      It's not that the brown-skinned ones aren't as good. It's more that the really cheap ones aren't good. There are very good software people in India, but they're going to charge accordingly.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  3. Corporate Malfeasance by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If Infosys is in fact guilty of discriminating against American workers by refusing to hire American workers for American jobs, then such malfeasance should be punished by confiscation of all of Infosys assets located in the United States, and by banning Infosys or any subsidiary of Infosys from operating on American soil.

    Unfortunately, we can't just kill Infosys because they are a foreign corporation based in India. But we can damn well kick them out, and we probably should.

    1. Re:Corporate Malfeasance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Unfortunately, we can't just kill Infosys because they are a foreign corporation based in India. But we can damn well kick them out, and we probably should.

      Cancel their H1B's and 90+% of their workforce (i.e., income) disappears. I'm not sure any company could survive an overnight 90% drop in revenue.

    2. Re:Corporate Malfeasance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      easy enough

      http://www.myvisajobs.com/Visa-Sponsor/Infosys-Technologies/263060.htm

      All the visas they are using are immediately revoked. Obviously they do not need them. Deny any future ones. Tax them extra and then fine them. That should clear up the issue nicely. I'm sure someone can find a congress critter who would like to draw up the law.

    3. Re:Corporate Malfeasance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If Infosys is in fact guilty of discriminating against American workers by refusing to hire American workers for American jobs, then such malfeasance should be punished by confiscation of all of Infosys assets located in the United States, and by banning Infosys or any subsidiary of Infosys from operating on American soil.

      Unfortunately, we can't just kill Infosys because they are a foreign corporation based in India. But we can damn well kick them out, and we probably should.

      While you are at it, you should also roll up your sleeves and kick out most of the other US based companies. Because at some point in their lives, they have
      - either colluded together to suppress salaries
      - or have colluded together for anti-poaching reasons
      - or have spied on their consumers
      - or have used their patents in an abusive manner to strongarm competition
      - or have abused their financial might by lobbying and bribing
      - or have done something flat out illegal and have got away with it with a slap on the wrist (too big to fail?)

      Sure, that doesn't make this incident any better. But just sayin, you might want to dial down the indignation a bit. Everyone is riding this gravy train.
      And maybe it is time to remember Doug Stanhope: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    4. Re:Corporate Malfeasance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      White people being discriminated against have little to complain about"

      And why is that, exactly? What part of this particular race discrimination makes it magically acceptable?

      Is it just because whites have been in the majority in America? What happens when they aren't?
      Was it OK for blacks to be discriminated against during apartheid in South Africa? THEY were in the majority at the time.

      What makes this racism harmless, just because it's directed at whites?

      I thought we were looking for equality in society, not for a chance to drag down the latest group to reach the top of the totem pole.

    5. Re:Corporate Malfeasance by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      Cancel their H1B's and 90+% of their workforce (i.e., income) disappears. I'm not sure any company could survive an overnight 90% drop in revenue.

      That has secondary side effects in companies that hired the workers.

      No, what you do is every H1B they hired is converted into permanent residency or citizenship, sponsored completely by Infosys. Which means even if the company fires the employee, he's still on a permanent resident/citizenship track except now Infosys is responsible for his well-being. Living expenses, housing, etc, like if an American was sponsoring someone.

    6. Re:Corporate Malfeasance by sjames · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No. A company that selects an applicant from one country over another in a particular case is quite different from one that instructs it's hiring manager to not hire anyone of X nationality.

      For one thing, in this country, the latter is illegal. Given that Infosys itself is a guest in this country, it's well beyond rude. If they think so little of Americans IN AMERICA, they should go to some other country where they like the people better.

    7. Re:Corporate Malfeasance by mlts · · Score: 2

      I'd rather not punish the individual worker. They are here to try to eke out a decent living, improve skills, and generally try to fit in.

      If I had my say, I'd dispense of the H-1B program entirely, and convert them into work visas or permanent resident cards. That way, the H-1B system which is an abomination is tossed, while the individual people who are here are not punished.

    8. Re:Corporate Malfeasance by umghhh · · Score: 2

      This is all bull - there is a price tag for a job. If you pay half of that you probably will get half things done and have to redo at least part of it hence bad reputation. This is true for US, German, Zamundian or Indian workers. This results in a situation that in their business model there is certain max hourly wage they can pay. For this they can get a mediocre guy from India and miserable guy from US. No wonder then that they can claim what they allegedly do. It is not even that outsourcing is evil but race to the bottom can only be stopped in some formal way like enforcing rules of the game. Nobody that has something to say in this matter is going to do something unless their ass is on the line, which is entirely different subject. At the end - it is not worth it to fight for jobs that are so easily outsourced. If they can be easilly outsourced then they can be automated in just as simple way albeit this can be a slightly bigger upfront investment than hiring some proles somewhere beyond big water.

    9. Re:Corporate Malfeasance by neoritter · · Score: 2

      I'm giving up my mod points on this page to refute your absurdity here.

      http://domesticviolencestatist...

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v... - about 1:20 in has statement from a psychology professor about domestic aggression: "Men cause more damage, but women hit more."

      It's hard to prove the AC's second sentence. But it's known that male victims of domestic violence is under-reported. For a variety of reasons.

  4. and people go out with people based on race too by roman_mir · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So what, in many cases people choose mates and friends based on their race preferences.

    Many clients choose which businesses they will deal with based on the origin business owner (some prefer to frequent or to avoid Indian or Middle Eastern or Asian establishments for example).

    People must be able to discriminate however they see fit and I am talking about people in their individual lives and I am also talking about businesses obviously.

    Yes, it should be possible to discriminate based on race, absolutely. Race, age, sex, any form of discrimination must be absolutely legal (and by the way it is unconstitutional, illegal for the federal government to regulate businesses and the entire concept of interstate commerce does not allow government to regulate business, it is only there to prevent individual States from erecting barriers of entry, which are still all there, so the federal government is not doing what it's job is and instead it constantly harasses businesses for no reason whatsoever).

    Now, government must not be able to discriminate against anybody based on age, race, sex, ethnicity but that is also constantly happening for example with the war on drugs, with the so called 'war on terrorism', with every war that government runs.

    Government must not be able to discriminate because it destroys the rule of law, destroys the free market (which is already destroyed in USA of-course) and eventually destroys the economy and thus the society. Government must be forced to treat people equally regardless of their natural characteristics, individuals must not be forced into anything.

    If you will not accept government forcing you to marry any particular person or to frequent any particular business then it is inconsistent for you to be cheering for the government forcing a business to either hire or to serve any particular person. Cheering for it is the real discrimination and helps the government to grow its gigantic poisonous tentacles that end up stealing and murdering everything on their path.

    1. Re:and people go out with people based on race too by roman_mir · · Score: 2

      Wait wait wait, never mind 'rights', you are saying that companies have 'fewer responsibilities', are you serious? Even a little bit serious?

      A company that hires employees and has clients and is bound by various government regulations has fewer responsibilities than an individual who is not a company? Oh boy, I see where the problem here is, you have such a case of tunnel vision on this, it's not going to get any better any time soon.

      Actually it is the case that people are losing rights as they start running businesses. As an individual you are free to discriminate as much as you like, it's not a government regulated offence.

      As a business if you discriminate you are absolutely liable legally. You are liable when you hire people. You are liable when you fire people. You are liable when you build a product.

      You are liable by the very fact that you are perceived to have more money than a non-company, you are sued simply because you are seeing as somebody that has money, nothing else matters and in such cases the courts are very receiving to the individuals and are very negative towards the businesses, they always see a business as a source of cash and an individual for some reason is always somebody that should get some of that cash. The anti-business environment is such that hiring people in USA is the worst possible thing you can do as a business, it's the worst idea at this point.

    2. Re:and people go out with people based on race too by roman_mir · · Score: 2

      I have seen companies go bankrupt because of insane lawsuits that made 0 sense, where an ex employee maintained contact with a client and offered the client to gamble (literally) with his money, the client provided the ex-employee with 200,000, which was lost and the company was sued for this amount because it was the last entity where this ex-employee worked and the guy who lost the money was awarded it back from the company and the company went bankrupt, and this is one of many cases where liability of the company extended beyond any reason and the jury saw it fit to award insane non-existing damages that the company was absolutely not responsible for.

      I saw many situations where companies were destroyed by insane anti-business laws and court decisions. I know of people who went to jail (owners / management) because they would not cooperate with insane government demands against the clients of the company.

      You may want to think hard, when was the last time an ex-employee was sued by a company for leaving?

      Now compare it to this: when was the last time a company was sued for firing somebody?

      Now think about that and shut up.

  5. Re:Merka by meerling · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Have you seen how many companies that have outsourced to save money have ended up cancelling it because they need people that can actually do the work and not just phone answering list monkeys? There are more than a few.

    Before any of the hypersensitive cretins that love to take everything the wrong way start yelling about racist comment or something equally inane, a "list monkey" is some that just reads down a list or script and displays no more skills than a trained monkey pushing buttons, aka a "list monkey". If you don't know what a trained monkey is, you are a sad excuse for someone that is supposed to be literate.

  6. Harley-Davidson laid off 125 Americans. by Animats · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Harley-Davidson laid off 125 Americans and replaced them with people on H-1 visas from Infosys. H-D's biker customers aren't going to like this once the word gets out.

    1. Re:Harley-Davidson laid off 125 Americans. by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      H-D's biker customers aren't going to like this once the word gets out.

      You know, as often as not these days, HD's customers are accountants and lawyers and doctors who would be on side with these decisions.

      Just sayin', it's now well-heeled middle-age people who have the money to buy these things.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  7. Americans don't know what? by baudilus · · Score: 5, Funny

    I would probably agree, given that the Indian government had to release a PSA music video called "Take the poo to the loo" in an effort to combat the epidemic of its citizens defecating in the streets. They definitely know their shit.

    1. Re:Americans don't know what? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 2

      I figured you MUST be making this up...

      No, you were not:

      http://www.poo2loo.com/

      "Close to 594 million which is 48 percent of population in India practices open defecation. That's half the population dumping over 65 million kilos of poo out there every day. If this poo continues to be let loose on us, there will be no escaping the stench of life threatening infections, diseases and epidemics."

      ------------

      Holy crap! Literately!

  8. Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Americans don't know $#!%"

    If that's true, why is India scrambling to send all their children to U.S. colleges and universities? Sounds like just plain ole racism to me. I hope they get fined out the wazoo, have all their current contracts revoked and end up being banned from doing business in the U.S. (although the latter is probably never going to happen, we can dream).

  9. There's no "coding" in "consulting" by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 2

    The goal of Infosys employees is not to provide solutions to Infosys's marks^b^b^b^b^bcustomers. No, the goal is to push projects over budget while giving customers just enough hope and management cover that they reup for the next phase. Something that a couple of American type-A coders would have done in six months could take a team of 50 offshore Infosys consultants 3 years, so why would Infosys ever staff its ranks with competency?

  10. Y'all are so cute.... by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...talking like employees are anything but serfs and like the USA is some sort of democracy instead of an increasingly minor subsection of an international oligarchy.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  11. Re:... Wait what? by Karmashock · · Score: 2

    while you're clearly joking that statement if taken seriously would imply that classification is superior otherwise the privilege wouldn't exist.

    White guys didn't steal the internet from the brown people. They created it out of nothing.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  12. Re:It isn't just Infosys' fault. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

    Dont' forget having five years of experience in a new technology that came out six months ago.

  13. Re:On the recieving end of racism. by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

    You forgot Somalia! Yeah, strawman argument is complete. Because it is all or nothing!

    It is a global market, because labor in China (and elsewhere) is cheap. Move your factory to China, build the product saving tons in labor, increase profit, lower prices. Move your factory to China, avoid environmental regulations in the US, and the US is polluted with China Smog, and you get to save on costs, increasing profit, lowering prices.

    Most decisions aren't stupid. See the above, moving to China was "smart", right up and until American Workers can't buy what you're manufacturing, because nobody has jobs. Short Term decisions keeping you competitive isn't stupid, Long term decisions that put you out of business aren't stupid either. What is stupid is having policies as if they have no impact on costs of doing business and doing proper cost benefit analysis. Which is part of the point I was trying to make.

    Having Kyoto rules in place in the US, makes no sense when China and India (1/3 Population of the world) are busy taking all the slack created by companies unable to compete ... globally ... because it costs them a lot more. At that point, you're saying you'd rather them go out of business, the jobs moved to China, and China export its smog to the US. It solves NOTHING while making policy makers feel good (while flying around on corporate jets, living in mansions).

    I don't believe what you're trying to say I believe. There has to be some sort of balanced approach to global economies and managing to grow our economy with good paying jobs so we don't have to have 50 million people on food stamps because good jobs are gone and the only place hiring is Walmart (selling Chinese goods).

    If you believe the 5.9 % unemployment rate is accurate, by all means, keep voting more Obama and Democrats, and blaming evil corporations and republicans. EVERYONE has a role in our collective failure.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  14. Do we really need to hear this from someone by nomad63 · · Score: 2

    I mean c'mon. They make money exploiting workers from India, making them work for peanuts, dangling a green card in front of them. I am sharing a cubicle with one of these folks and he is making 2/3 of what I make doing the same shit I am doing. Guess where the remaining 1/3 is going to. It doesn't need rocket science to understand how these outfits are meking their money. The bad thing is, Facebooks and Microsofts of the American economy is pressing for laxation of the H1B visa quotas. And we end up with ass hole of companies like Infosys and Tata Consulting, stealing jobs from American workers. A real pity. I hope the politicians will get the heads out of the asses of these companies and think about the people they are representing for a change.

    --

    __________
    The more I know people, the more I love animals
  15. If company claims to *need* H-1B workers... by mpercy · · Score: 2

    Then they won't mind paying annual H-1B visa fees in the amount of 250% of said worker's salary.

    I mean, their argument is there there exists no local workers, or even workers within the *entire* US, that they can hire that could perform the same job.

  16. Here no evil, see no evil by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    they know, they choose to ignore it and pretend otherwise. But it's painfully obvious by anyone in the tech industry that the H1-B program exists to replace expensive local talent with cheaper imports. And yes, I've heard from more than one recruiter that they weren't hiring Americans for certain position, and seen posts looking for an H1-B specifically. What am I gonna do? I'm in no position to sue over it...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  17. Not so much salary as training by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    the schools in India churn out pre-trained folks with a very, very specific skill set. They also can train at a fraction of the cost of a US employee since the cost of living in India (thanks to rampant poverty) is much much lower. We Americans just live too well. Now if we can just put half our population in tent cities and take away their access to clean water maybe we can compete...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  18. Go to the Philippines by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    little or no accent. Dirt cheap and native speakers. The only problem is the floods mean you'll have to keep a small group of Indians for backup and put up with their accents every now and then. But they're fine technically and all you really need to do is get a remote desktop session going and then they stop talking.

    We're all easily replaced these days. I wish more people realized that and pushed for protectionism. We employees are not global, while our employers _are_. At this rate they're gonna win this fight, and we're gonna lose. We'll be back to the 1800s. Nasty, brutish and short lives.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  19. Re:They're not incompetent by ChrisMaple · · Score: 2

    Their the same as you and me

    Quod erat demonstrandum.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate