Slashdot Mirror


Core Secrets: NSA Saboteurs In China and Germany

Advocatus Diaboli writes with this snippet from The Intercept: The National Security Agency has had agents in China, Germany, and South Korea working on programs that use "physical subversion" to infiltrate and compromise networks and devices, according to documents obtained by The Intercept. The documents, leaked by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden, also indicate that the agency has used under cover operatives to gain access to sensitive data and systems in the global communications industry, and that these secret agents may have even dealt with American firms. The documents describe a range of clandestine field activities that are among the agency's "core secrets" when it comes to computer network attacks, details of which are apparently shared with only a small number of officials outside the NSA.

228 comments

  1. They really need to pardon Snowden... by Karmashock · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... so he'll not feel inspired to keep leaking.

    I'm all for the leaks when it concerns stuff the NSA does against civilians. But against foreign governments? The point of the NSA is to do that sort of thing. And anyone that thinks these other governments aren't doing the same thing back are kidding themselves. The US is just walking around with their fly down until they get Snowden home. And he can be brought back at any time for the low low price of just pardoning him. Do that, admit fault, have a national/international discussion about it, and then as part of that he stops.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by dbIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

      With respect - Snowden dumped the documents with journalists so "The US is just walking around with their fly down until they get Snowden home" doesn't apply. The fly is down until there's nothing left in the pile worth releasing as news whether anything happens with Snowden or not.

    2. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      > But against foreign governments? The point of the NSA is to do that sort of thing.

      You don't spy friends, because friends give you unfettered access. Friends have no secrets to friends.

      > And anyone that thinks these other governments aren't doing the same thing back are kidding themselves.

      Yeah, sure.
      Fool everyone, ok... just don't fool yourself, like Shakespeare said...

      > And he can be brought back at any time for the low low price of just pardoning him. Do that, admit fault, have a national/international discussion about it, and then as part of that he stops.

      You seem to underestimate some things: doing that is like stopping a sheep's bleat by leaving it in a forest with wolves.

      Having saboteurs in another country is very hard to explain. This is not what I expect from any country. And "everybody does it" never was an acceptable excuse.
      That's not cool when others do it -- how come when the US does it, it's business as usual?

    3. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by CanEHdian · · Score: 2

      But foreigners themselves are loving this stuff, as they can use this against their own governments, often "sharing" (actually: just handing it over, but that paints too much a picture the actual situation) intercepted data with the NSA. Did you hear any arrest warrants being issued against UK citizens by Belgian authorities regarding the Belgacom hack by GCHQ? What DID the Belgian government/intelligence services know?

      I say it's time to pull their pants down. You won't see any balls, but you will see how they soiled themselves, and where they wiped themselves with their citizens' rights to privacy.

      --
      When the copyright term is "forever minus a day", live every day like it's the last.
    4. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Foreign powers hand over their intelligence because that is the price of US intelligence which is highly desired by all allied powers. US intel is extensive. But it is a pay to play system. You want intel? You have to give intel.

      And even then... there are rules.

      The concept is valid and I don't have a problem with it.

      The issue is that the data being collected is often something the intelligence services shouldn't have. Intel on you and me for one thing. The dragnet intel gathering is not acceptable. If they stop doing that then I am generally fine with the NSA playing spy vs spy with whomever.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    5. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Then why do allies of the United States spy on the United States? We've caught them at it on occasion and even have some of their spies in our prisons.

      Here is what I'll offer on the whole spying thing.

      I think the US should put an "agreement not to spy on each other" document out there that binds all signing nations not to spy on each other. And sets out heavy consequences in the form of trade sanctions etc if they violate the terms. The trade sanctions would have to be imposed by all signing powers in the event that any member of the group was found to violate the rules.

      I'd then sign it and anyone else that wants to sign it as well is free to do so.

      The thing is that all these powers pretending to be holier then thou spy all the time. Possibly they're less effective at it but being less competent doesn't mean you're more ethical.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    6. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Then why do allies of the United States spy on the United States?

      An ally is not a friend. An ally is someone who has the same interests you have.

      A friend is someone whose interest is your well being. You seem to confuse "interest" with "friendship".

      > I think the US should put an "agreement not to spy on each other" document out there that binds all signing nations not to spy on each other.

      If someone doesn't act honestly on principle, he/she won't be honest because of Law. Forget sanctions, threats etc. What counts is being good from the inside, all the rest is BS.

      Above all, don't have double standards: whatever the King does is not automatically right because he is the King.

    7. Re: They really need to pardon Snowden... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol. How cute. I can just see the EU burning all their chances of an economic recovery by imposing trade sanctions on China because they spied on Belgium. Grow up and think like an adult, will you?

    8. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

      ... so he'll not feel inspired to keep leaking.

      I'm all for the leaks when it concerns stuff the NSA does against civilians. But against foreign governments? The point of the NSA is to do that sort of thing. And anyone that thinks these other governments aren't doing the same thing back are kidding themselves. The US is just walking around with their fly down until they get Snowden home. And he can be brought back at any time for the low low price of just pardoning him. Do that, admit fault, have a national/international discussion about it, and then as part of that he stops.

      Because 2 wrongs make a right? Is that how it goes?

      We're talking about deliberate sabotage of our allies telecommunications networks. It'd be one thing if this were with countries we're at war with, but it's not.

    9. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that many of the documents are encrypted.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    10. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      I have no interest in hamstringing my nation unless the other nations are willing to accept similar limitations with consequences if they violate the rules.

      Absent that, I must assume you are spying on me and I will respond in kind.

      Thus the US spying on foreign governments is a non-issue since those governments likewise spy on the US.

      Is the US more competent at it? Perhaps. But being competent or incompetent does not render you unethical or ethical respectively.

      if you want to talk about the NSA spying on civilians... I agree that is bad unless they're actually suspected of terrorism or some other misdeed. If they are domestic then that should go through the FBI and require a warrant. If foreign, then the NSA can just do whatever as usual.

      As to the holier then thou crap you're about to shovel at me... limit your own nation to the same standard with consequences if they break the rules IF you want the US to take your position at all seriously. Absent that... it again just sounds like you want other people to play by rules that you probably won't follow yourself.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    11. Re: They really need to pardon Snowden... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      China wouldn't sign such an agreement so there's no danger of having to do that. However, if Belgium spied on the US or Spain... and they were all signatories then you would be required to impose sanctions.

      Another idea might be raising their interest rates of debt. Something simple that is hard to avoid.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    12. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      I think the US should put an "agreement not to spy on each other" document out there that binds all signing nations not to spy on each other.

      This is a bad idea. Countries spying on each other is a good thing. It is better if we understand each others' intentions, motivations, and capabilities. Exactly a hundred years ago, millions of men across Europe were dying in a war they blundered into because of serious diplomatic misjudgements, and secret treaties. That could have been prevented with better spying. For a more recent example, the Cold War had repeated escalations because of over estimations of enemy capabilities, such as the famous and non-existent "Missile Gap" that led to the American Minute Man program.

      To say that spying is bad, is the same as saying that lies and secrecy are good.

    13. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Hilariously, you can blame Russians for this one.

      See, when they took in Snowden, they had a list of terms for him. One was that he would not leak anything while he was in their country.

      Snowden agreed, and before accepting asylum he sent everything he had to a few responsible outlets, who are now doing the staggered release of information.

    14. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Where did you get this understanding from?

    15. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Karmashock · · Score: 2

      I guess my real point wasn't clear. I don't expect countries to sign such an agreement.

      I expect them to be forced to admit that they want to retain the ability to spy by refusing to sign it.

      And as such we get past this absurd holier then thou phase of the discussion where nations pretend that OF COURSE THEY don't spy on allies. Which is of course either wrong or a lie depending on whether the person saying that knows better.

      once we all admit that we want to retain teh ability to spy we can talk about what limits we want to put on each other as regards such things.

      If the europeans want the US to do X Y and Z... then naturally the US can require the same in turn. And oh by the way, if they get really obnoxious on the point the US can just stop sharing its intel with allies that it feels are being uncooperative.

      We have a good bargaining position if we can just get these people off their soap box for two seconds.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    16. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by jopsen · · Score: 1

      I'm all for the leaks when it concerns stuff the NSA does against civilians. But against foreign governments? The point of the NSA is to do that sort of thing.

      Spying on allies? really? This borderlines to act of war...
      By the way, foreign governments holds a lot of information about their citizens, social security numbers, medical records, tax records, etc. The NSA has no business doing mass surveillance on on civilians just because they aren't American!

      And anyone that thinks these other governments aren't doing the same thing back are kidding themselves.

      I'm fairly confident my government doesn't. In fact most intelligence gathering isn't necessarily illegal at all. Mostly you gather intelligence about political issues in foreign countries, but watching the news, reading news papers, public records from parliament, blog posts, twitter, or just plain asking politicians what they think about an issue.
      You don't do it by tabbing phones of allied politicians! Or intercepting mail (physical or electronic).

      By the way, I'm sure the German democracy is more transparent than the American, if you want to know what goes on... just read the records.

    17. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by jopsen · · Score: 2

      We're talking about deliberate sabotage of our allies telecommunications networks. It'd be one thing if this were with countries we're at war with, but it's not.

      Thank you!

      Because 2 wrongs make a right? Is that how it goes?

      But let's not kid our selves... Most countries don't have offensive intelligence capabilities.
      Just because the US intelligence community has a history of murdering and selling drugs to fund illegal wars, doesn't mean other civilized countries do...

    18. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's certainly one way to misremember things, sure.

      But for the rest of us that are able to properly remember things that only happened a little over a year ago, he had already handed over the documents well before even leaving China, let alone landing in Russia and being "taken in" weeks later.

    19. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Have these allies sign an agreement to never spy on the US and I'll support the US signing a similar agreement. Short of that... we all spy on each other.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    20. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the US should put an "agreement not to spy on each other" document out there that binds all signing nations not to spy on each other. And sets out heavy consequences in the form of trade sanctions etc if they violate the terms. The trade sanctions would have to be imposed by all signing powers in the event that any member of the group was found to violate the rules.

      There needs to be a clear understanding what the act of spying really is. UN and others have been incapable of defining the war crime of aggression for obvious reasons. Some countries seem to think reading their newspapers and interviewing people who have no requirements of keeping secrets is spying. With allies, neighbors and almost anyone with diplomatic ties, it's common to invite the military "spies" to observe shows of force during exercises and other events, and speak "military smack" during these social events. It's the actual operational plans which are not shared.

    21. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      If it bordered war then we've all been guilty for it for as long as we've been allies.

      It doesn't. You just weren't aware of it. Countries spy on each other all the time. The only thing that stops them is resources and inclination.

      As to you saying you wouldn't do such a thing... I believe you... just sign an agreement not to do it that has penalties if you're caught doing it. Then I'll be happy to sign the same agreement and we can both stop spying.

      If you are unwilling to sign such an agreement then I'll assume your statements are made in bad faith and that you really want to continue spying while tying our hands so we can't spy back.

      I really have no patience for these holier then thou arguments. They're at best naive and at worst hypocritical.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    22. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Sure... and on top of that all players in the game insert covert agents that gather information that other players don't want to share.

      We all do it to each other.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    23. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weirdly (as a non-US, non-EU (think opposite side of planet person) I remember a while back that the US policy had shifted to "if we experience cyberattack, it's an act of war". http://www.forbes.com/sites/reuvencohen/2012/06/05/the-white-house-and-pentagon-deem-cyber-attacks-an-act-of-war/ But if directed at other countries, with or without their agencies local assistance, then it's OK for USA but not for anyone else? What will happen when EU or China passes the same bill?

      Very risky behaviour will lead more quickly than ever before to escalation. Global activity means global escalations. Maybe more than just a country at a time when previous efforts were discovered or leaked by friendly nations...

    24. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I have no interest in hamstringing my nation unless the other nations are willing to accept similar limitations with consequences if they violate the rules.

      That would be a good thing to have. Unfortunately, there's a lot of ground to be covered until we get UN to hold such level of power. And I expect the US to be one of the last countries to accept such an agreement... right beside Russia and China.

    25. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      The UN doesn't have to hold that power. Sign a treaty and its done.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    26. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm all for the leaks when it concerns stuff the NSA does against civilians

      So by your own admission, you like his leaks as far as civiliain interests goes.

      But against foreign governments? The point of the NSA is to do that sort of thing. And anyone that thinks these other governments aren't doing the same thing back are kidding themselves.

      Also by your own admission again, Snowden isn't divulging anything new regarding foreign interests.

      So Snowden has done absolutely nothing to offend your sensibilities.
      Which makes your following statement all the more enigmatic:

      Do that, admit fault, have a national/international discussion about it, and then as part of that he stops

      What "fault"? Why "stop"?
      Karmashock? I think you have a bit too much ejaculent-shock clinging on your face and it's messing up your powers of clear thinking.

    27. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Snowden is disclosing too much information about NSA operations against foreign governments. That interferes with the correct function of that organization and should be stopped.

      At this point, the best move would be to grant him amnesty.

      As to your pathetic little insult... is that really the best you can do?

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    28. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by echnaton192 · · Score: 1

      If it bordered war then we've all been guilty for it for as long as we've been allies.

      It doesn't. You just weren't aware of it. Countries spy on each other all the time.

      Repeating that lie does not make it true. The German Government declared the US off limits. They accidently taped Ms. Clinton while she flew across fucking Afghanistan. They did not delete her conversations immediately and YOUR government used that as an example that Germany spied on the US too. Look it up for fuck's sake.

      You think that Mass Surveillance on this level is OK?

      F..k you! F..k you! F..k you!

      Our human rights include privacy too. And we are no second class humans just because we happen to be Germans. I am so angry about your uninformed stupidity and I have some karma to spend on you, you uninformed, stupid, a...ole.

    29. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >And anyone that thinks these other governments aren't doing the same thing back are kidding themselves.

      First, most don't spy on their allies. Next, most others put a freaking insignificant amount of money in spying (NSA: Annual budget Classified estimated $10.8 billion, 2013). Finally, the remaining governments are bullies like USA.

      American Dream, my ass ( But you know, you are already watching it) !

      As my mother use to say: if others jumps from the cliff, would you follow ?

       

    30. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Snowden is disclosing too much information about NSA operations against foreign governments. That interferes with the correct function of that organization and should be stopped.

      "too much"?
      Let's refresh our memories of what you said earlier:

      And anyone that thinks these other governments aren't doing the same thing back are kidding themselves.

      How can he be revealing "too much" when you said yourself if anyone thinks this type of thing aren't going on are kidding themselves?
      It's like you ejaculated onto your own face.

    31. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Snowden isn't in control of the information he gathered...he gave it all away to the media before leaving on his trip....there may be a "dead man's file," but otherwise, it's the media that's spoon feeding it....

    32. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by dbIII · · Score: 2

      Snowden isn't sitting in Russia handing out press releases. This stuff was dropped off a long time ago.

    33. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why Real Sovereigntly(TM) only comes from the pointy head of a Topol-M launcher hidden in a forest. The Russkies could turn off the U.S. finance system plus the internet without real recourse. Now, if Ireland did this, they would be bombed to rubble by 11:35.

    34. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bill, my mod points ran out, but I would mod you up quickly.
      The East/West cold war never went hot (close, but still did not). A LARGE part of why it never went hot, is that the Russians had spies all over the west, and knew that overall, we were not going to nuke them first.
      And China today, knows what we are up to, BUT, they are hard at work hiding everything that they are up to.
      There is a REALLY high chance that we will get a hot war with China because of their attitude. That is scary.

      Windbourne, modded page earlier.

    35. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      What do you think the Germans and English are trading for US intelligence? Their own intelligence.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    36. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by echnaton192 · · Score: 1

      Yes. Sadly, this is true. Our secret services traded intelligence for US intelligence and collaborated in the mass surveillance on my country. I can only hope they did not collaborate in the manipulation of our infrastructure.

      But your original lie was that my government spies on the US. And that is simply that: A lie to deflect the fact that the USA are overstepping every bound. And that is not OK.

    37. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You think pardoning will change Snowden's mind? You think Obama, or even NSA's chief callng him a hero would change his mind? The point is he has an agenda, plain and simple. His actoins made it clear he's keep that agenda. You agree with it or not--that's your choice. Judgment on his actions? That's based on one's decision, not someone elses' (any everyone has a say in that). This is not physics, it's social law.

      Everyone here talks about information wants to be free and all that Kumbaya, and guess what, communication is the tool. And guess what? anyone can listen, anyone. You all wanted it, you all got it from gov't agencies (worldwide) to Apple, Google, Nokia, Siemens, China telecom.... to even slashdot.

      Actions speak louder than words. Vote.

    38. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Your ejaculation comments just make you sound stupid... just fyi.

      As to my quote, just because other countries are doing it doesn't mean it is helpful to the US to have our actions disclosed.

      Twit.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    39. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Inability to do a thing is not the same thing as moral or ethical aversion to do that thing. You are not holier then us because you are incapable. You are just incapable.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    40. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no idea what you're talking about and you clearly don't work in the intelligence industry. And yes, I do. We're all spying on each other and we're also all sharing secrets about each other with each other. There are entire networks of information that you have no access to so you can't be sure of anything. Even with the level of clearance I have, I still know very little because everything is compartmentalized.

    41. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But against foreign governments? The point of the NSA is to do that sort of thing

      That makes the NSA a criminal organisation.

    42. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      You can't distill every opinion 150 million voters think to a single binary choice every 4 years and expect to be able to send a complicated message.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    43. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      It isn't a lie. Name your country and I'll pull up evidence of spying.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    44. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by ultranova · · Score: 1

      But against foreign governments? The point of the NSA is to do that sort of thing.

      The point of the NSA is make enemies of everyone?

      Actually, that makes a lot of sense, from the military-industrial complex's point of view. If your continued existence depends on having enemies to fight, you'd better make some.

      And anyone that thinks these other governments aren't doing the same thing back are kidding themselves.

      Really? Because as recent events have shown, this kind of activities are not without a cost. Simply having your embassies read newspapers and watch television will fulfil the need for peacetime intelligence. What did the USA gain for going beyond this?

      Also, you should not underestimate the impact watching the entire continent burn to ground left to European culture. The whole point of EU is to transform international relations from chaotic violence to ordered, law-based bureaucracy. People growing up in such a climate are not going to make a 180 degree turn when they join the local intelligence agency.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    45. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      No, the point of the NSA to get all information deemed useful for the US strategic, tactical, economic, and political defense.

      It is important that they do this in a sustainable manner that doesn't cause problems.

      They've badly mismanaged the situation.

      Again, the big mistake they made was in not shaming noisy holier then thou types that are often either misrepresenting or simply misinformed about the nature of the world.

      Again, If you are willing to sign an agreement not to spy on the US and will accept stipulated penalties if you violate the terms. I would support the US signing a similar agreement.

      I noted that in this discussion none of the people saying the US violated their countries think their countries should sign such an agreement. The reason being that you know your countries do spy on the US all the time or you fear that they are without you knowing it. And you know that if the US could use a treaty to get a fine or settlement out of them that it would be an embarrassment to your countries.

      Lets just cut to the chase... you spy... we spy. You're mostly mad because we're better at it.

      Beyond that, the NSA is not respecting civilian privacy. But as to government spying... it will not stop unless you agree to stop doing it yourself.

      You won't. And so we have no reason to stop either.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    46. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      No more so then any government on earth.

      Tell me, what law is the US government in violation of that the US government signed or otherwise agreed to honor?

      Can you cite a treaty ratified by our congress? Or do you think your national laws have meaning to a foreign government?

      I feel like I'm arguing with children. How old are you people? These are the sorts of things I'd expect to hear from 12 year olds or something.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    47. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Again, the big mistake they made was in not shaming noisy holier then thou types that are often either misrepresenting or simply misinformed about the nature of the world.

      Really? Because it seems that it was the NSA that made a grave miscalculation about "the nature of the world". All this talk about "holier than thou" is trying to assert that people are wrong to react like they do, as opposed to how you think they should. And to paper over this cognitive dissonance, you insist this is evidence of their hypocrisy, not you being wrong.

      Your masters are still fighting the Cold War, and refuse to admit the world is changing. You aren't doing any favours to them by letting them stay delusional. The wakeup call will get louder and ruder the more times it needs to be repeated.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    48. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      No.

      The problem here is that I generally agree with you but I am not seeing things in an oversimplified Black/White image.

      lets just go through your post one point at a time.

      1. My comment about holier then thou is responding to people that suggest that the US government is the only one in the world to spy. This is quite obviously nonsense.

      2. As to my masters fighting the cold war, the US government has tried to wind down its military presence. Do you think 9/11 caused the US to engage or disengage with world politics? See what happened when Osama attacked us? we were disengaging. Then they attacked us and forced us to fight the war on terror... or whatever you want to call it. We didn't trigger that. They did. They attacked us.

      3. As to wake up calls, give me some examples of what you consider to be a wake up call? We're bound into strategic alliances your governments won't break. Most your "loud" and "rude" comments are just that... its just a lot of noise. But what have you actually changed? Consider that the US still commands a superior bargaining position. It is not in your interest to shut us out because we'll respond by shutting you out. And which of us will be the poorer for that?

      4. Further, consider the Russians, consider Ukraine, consider a world where people are crucified when order breaks down. Do you really want to take this hissy fit that far?

      The NSA definitely stepped out of line and it will need to have its wings cut. But lets not be silly.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    49. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you seriously expect the US to sign such an agreement? Most countries they currently spy on do not spy on the US at all, so they would have very little to gain. Many American companies are highly dependant on trade secrets stolen from Europe and Asia, so they would have a lot to lose. Even if they would agree to such an arrangement, nobody would expect them to keep word. They have simply lost all credibility.

    50. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No more so then any government on earth.

      While I agree that the US is not the only country doing this kind of thing, most governments do not engage in criminal activities in other countries.

      Tell me, what law is the US government in violation of that the US government signed or otherwise agreed to honor?

      Can you cite a treaty ratified by our congress? Or do you think your national laws have meaning to a foreign government?

      In most if not all countries, being employed by a foreign government does not exempt one in any way from the law. NSA employees or contractors spying outside the U.S. are in almost all cases breaking laws, regardless of whether the US government happens to agree with those laws.

      I will leave your childish remarks for what they are...

    51. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      The agreement only works between countries that mutually signed it. So if the US signs it and you don't... the US doesn't have to abide by the treaty in your case.

      As to whether the US would sign such a thing? We could make it work.

      I do question whether your supposedly spy free countries would sign it though when the chips were down.

      Regardless, would you sign it?

      Lets say I'm the US... what country are you from? I'm just curious if for the sake of argument you would sign such an agreement?

      Currently the US is under no such prohibition. There is no law preventing us from spying.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    52. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      If you think the US government has broken laws then please prosecute them in a formal court of law. If you like you can try to take the US to the Hague for war crimes.

      Absent that you have no conviction and therefore no guilt and therefore no sentence.

      If you actually think an american broke your law... arrest him.

      Isn't that what you do with criminals? You get can get your lawyers and we'll get our lawyers... and we'll just see where that goes.

      Sound like fun to you? It sounds hilarious to me.

      Put up or shut up.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    53. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Snowden is disclosing too much information about NSA operations against foreign governments.

      Apparently not, since the operations are still ongoing and the people responsible are not yet in jail.

      That interferes with the correct function of that organization and should be stopped.

      Criminal activities are never 'correct'.

    54. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      If disclosing more would stop it, it would have stopped already.

      The one point I'll give you is that a lot of people, especially older people, don't understand the issue. And that's not to say that lots of younger people are just completely oblivious to everything. In any case, it unlikely to change with more disclosures.

      What we have are two options.

      1. everyone just adapts to the new normal.

      2. the NSA gets cut down by some law.

      In either case, the NSA is going to continue to spy on other countries. It is their function and all major powers have something like the NSA. The US isn't going to get rid of any more then China is going to get rid of its airforce.

      You can try to moderate the NSA but saying it shouldn't do anything is a non-starter.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    55. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regardless, would you sign it?

      I would sign it in a heartbeat, but let us be honest: unless a serious change in the political climate in the US happens, the US will not sign such an agreement. They love spying and they will always claim they need to break the law to 'combat terrorism'.

      Currently the US is under no such prohibition. There is no law preventing us from spying.

      There might be countries where spying on individuals or government agencies is legal for non-government agencies, but I am not aware of any. Within the US, the US government may spy much as their own laws allow, but elsewhere they have to obey the same laws as everyone else, which generally means they cannot intercept any communication without prior permission from the parties involved.

    56. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      nah... we're better at manipulation then that.

      Give us some credit. ;-)

      For one thing we have a lot of information you want and we can make you pay for it. If you have something we want, we'll trade for most things or get you to give us exemptions to the treaty in exchange for access to our data.

      Any such treaty would of course have loopholes to account for special circumstances. And we'd quietly set things up so we could drive freight trains of intelligence through the loopholes. We are quite good at his as anyone familiar with US legal code should be aware by now.

      And if that proved to be ineffective, we'd probably set up honey pots and entrapments to trick you into violating the terms... then embarrass or blackmail you into being more cooperative.

      Sound nasty? Its geopolitics. Toughen up or bow out.

      We are your friends but we are also playing a very serious game. This is a not a fucking children's dress up tea party. It is international power politics.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    57. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what NO ONE is discussing is ALL governments spy on other governments -its just not discussed publicly -trust me Germany spies on other countries and their officials.

    58. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your ejaculation comments just make you sound stupid... just fyi.

      Your defensive fixation with ejaculation just makes you look guilty as charged...just fyi.

      As to my quote, just because other countries are doing it doesn't mean it is helpful to the US to have our actions disclosed.

      So after all that sucking and blowing, you're the one who's kidding yourself?

    59. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      This is what I am saying and what the fools arguing against me don't grasp. They think the US is the only one.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    60. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      I can only take your non-rebuttal as a concession.

      Better luck next time and good day.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    61. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Snowden documents make abundantly clear that Americans have broken laws on a large scale. The problem is finding out which Americans have done so and formally proving their guilt. Since the NSA consist of cunning criminals, this will not be an easy task. Furthermore, they will never be extradicted by the US.

      If I remember correctly, a few German NGOs have filed police reports about the NSA's criminal activities in their country. I agree with you that victims of the NSA's data theft should be doing the same everywhere.

    62. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Liechtenstein.

    63. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Ironic choice given that Liechtenstein is accusing Germany of spying on it and Germany is accusing the US of spying on Germany.

      Couldn't find anything on spying from that country. However, given their place as an international tax shelter, I would be surprised if they weren't keeping a close watch on other nations that might try to remove their ability to access that market.

      Further, I suspect you're just citing the smallest most inconsequential country you can think of to make your point. I let you do that because I wasn't careful. I should have said to name a major country that hasn't spied recently. There isn't one. The tiny players probably do spy as well it is just that no one cares. Annoying at best but not threatening.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    64. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      And if the US pressed charges against something we felt was illegal would your country naturally extradite them to the US?

      Obviously not. So what are you talking about.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    65. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that this will go the same way as with many other international agreements: the US will grossly violate the terms, trade sanctions will be imposed by the coutries viactim to US spying and then the US will just retaliate with their own trade sanctions. The US is a party which cannot be trusted, as they have proven to abuse their position as the largest economy time and again.

    66. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet it has happened many times. Many countries have an extradiction treaty with the US.

    67. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Only if you agree with why we are doing it.

      If we want someone because we say they broke our law and you disagree. You won't give him to us.

      Likewise, if you file some bullshit legal claim against a US intelligence agent then neither of us will be surprised if the US refuses to cooperate.

      And if we did the same thing to you, you wouldn't cooperate either.

      So at best you're simply confused because you didn't think this through. At worst, you do understand this and are simply pushing a dishonest narrative.

      The fact is that nations spy. They spy on each other. That has always been and shall probably always be. So lets get past that point.

      What we need is an understanding of what is considered reasonable and unreasonable spying. Think of it like the Geneva convention but for spying. We can talk about that. We can decide as a council of nations what is and is not acceptable. Then nations will sign or refuse to sign the treaty. If many people don't sign then you need to go back and try again... possibly moderating your position.

      Once you get most nations on board especially powerful nations that are most likely the core focus of the treaty... we can change things.

      But just saying country X broke country Y's laws is meaningless. Country X isn't beholden to country Y's laws. Now you'll say but they are within the borders of country Y. Okay... but the internet is a global network. If I hack into your system from one country then I'm not in your country. Now what if I do something while my body is physically inside your borders? Then catch me, accuse me in a court of law, and convict me. Until you've done that... you have nothing.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    68. Re:They really need to pardon Snowden... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can only take your non-rebuttal as a concession.

      Better luck next time and good day.

      I can only take your senseless gobbledygook as a lack of intelligence.
      I suggest you might be the one who need the better luck.

  2. Pardons are for the guilty. by jcr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Snowden is a whistleblower. He deserves our thanks, and an apology from everyone who's demanded that he be prosecuted.

    Using classification to cover up billions of felonies is something the American people should never tolerate again.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Pardons are for the guilty. by ebno-10db · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Snowden is a whistleblower. He deserves our thanks, and an apology from everyone who's demanded that he be prosecuted.

      I agree, but now he's gone too far. The crimes were spying on the American people without warrants. But this sort of interception of information is exactly what the NSA is supposed to do. There has never been any secret about that, and I support it as useful intelligence. If Snowden keeps this up, he's going to alienate his supporters, or at the very least give a lot of ammo to his detractors.

    2. Re:Pardons are for the guilty. by russotto · · Score: 1

      I agree, but now he's gone too far. The crimes were spying on the American people without warrants. But this sort of interception of information is exactly what the NSA is supposed to do. There has never been any secret about that, and I support it as useful intelligence. If Snowden keeps this up, he's going to alienate his supporters, or at the very least give a lot of ammo to his detractors.

      This leak covers NSA actions both domestically and abroad. Expecting Snowden to leak only a pound of flesh and not a drop of blood is quite unreasonable under the circumstances.

    3. Re:Pardons are for the guilty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The fact that they are secretly infiltrating American companies who are otherwise cooperating with them to get even more information is not important? .....

    4. Re:Pardons are for the guilty. by Karmashock · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly. He needs to keep his leaks to what the NSA does wrong... not what they do right.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    5. Re:Pardons are for the guilty. by F34nor · · Score: 1

      You are right but this is espionage so he shouldn't have leaked THIS information.

    6. Re:Pardons are for the guilty. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly. He needs to keep his leaks to what the NSA does wrong... not what they do right.

      1. If the government doesn't want broad unofficial leaks, then they should have a functional and safe channel for internal whistleblowing.
      2. Snowden offered the NSA a chance to vet the material. They refused. So it is silly to now complain that it wasn't vetted.
      3. Loyalty is a two way street. Citizens should be loyal to their country. But countries should also be loyal to their citizens.

    7. Re:Pardons are for the guilty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're a fucking fascist if the mere mention of China immediately makes you approve the program. The NSA should not be going around the world weakening everyone's encryption tools, period. Americans, Iranians, Germans, Chinese, Palestinians, French, etc. should not have their encryption tools nefariously weakened. American government agencies should not go around the world slowing the progress of technology.

      Now we can discuss this disclosures outcome :

      Did China learn anything from this? Unlikely. They actively spy on the U.S. embassy in China, U.S. intelligence agencies here, etc. If China didn't know, it's only because they chose to ignore American spies and focus on industrial secrets. If this scares them, then maybe they'll spend more spy money on traditional spy shit, and improving their own technology, and less on stealing American industrial secrets. Net impact America from China known : Only positive.

      Did Germany or South Korea learn anything? I donno maybe, maybe not, but they're our allies so who cares. Did their people know? As Slavoj Zizek said, "The greatest achievement of Wikileaks, is that we ordinary people are no longer allowed to pretend that we don't know." That applies here too.

      What is the overall effect on you and I? There are more people and organizations interested in using encryption. There are now countries interested in making their own electronics, including microprocessors. It's all beneficial for folks who work in IT, software, etc. because it means they need more tech workers, more tech workers get to do really interesting work around security, and more tech products come out from more different countries.

    8. Re:Pardons are for the guilty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, but now he's gone too far. The crimes were spying on the American people without warrants. But this sort of interception of information is exactly what the NSA is supposed to do.

      Since when is it NSA's job to make the entire world think of USA as the enemy?

    9. Re:Pardons are for the guilty. by Karmashock · · Score: 0

      I agree.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    10. Re:Pardons are for the guilty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Snowden is a whistleblower. He deserves our thanks, and an apology from everyone who's demanded that he be prosecuted.

      Using classification to cover up billions of felonies is something the American people should never tolerate again.

      -jcr

      Our constitution defined court process disagrees with you as well as most Americans.

    11. Re:Pardons are for the guilty. by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      No government agency is supposed to criminalise and corrupt the citizens of another state. This is in essence the core of organised crime. Where does it end, how about assassination to keep secrets, random murders to hide activities or hiding criminal activities behind innocent people so they get blamed and imprisoned. So white collar crimes are acceptable when governments are involved, economic warfare, currency forgery, forging electronic bank transactions emptying accounts and shifting the money to more approved accounts. How about extortion, finding evidence of criminal activities in other countries and keeping it secret in order to extort the cooperation of the criminal. So actively promoting organised crime in other countries to enable espionage is a good thing and quite simply fuck the victims of those criminals. Do you not see how this activity does not prevent wars but directly leads to them, it just gets worse and worse, with more extreme measures becoming more acceptable until finally war is the only recourse.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    12. Re:Pardons are for the guilty. by houghi · · Score: 1

      Using classification to cover up billions of felonies is something the American people should never tolerate again.

      Again? As in it stoped and should not restart? When did it stop? Why was I not informed of this?

      It has never stopped. There was a temporary relaps in the disagreement in what governement wants and what the people want in around 1776, but it went downhill from then on.

      But don't worry. This is not the first country where this has happend and it won't be the last. On the downside, histrory has shown us that it can get worse, much, much, much worse.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    13. Re:Pardons are for the guilty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are right but this is espionage so he shouldn't have leaked THIS information.

      If the NSA were an organisation acting, as it is supposed to, to defend America then you might be right. However the NSA and it's related bodies have been acting to endanger the US, the allies of the US and many people related to them. They have knowingly acted to reduce the security of cryptosystems relied on by US citizens; they have knowingly spied on and gathered together information about US citizens and their allies in databases which can be and has been accessed by people who may leak the information or pose a threat to those citizens. The NSA is a threat to America and it's allies. This means that all their activities should be published whether or not they claim they are unrelated to their crimes.

      If someone commits a murderer then you do not stop investigating his visit to his daughter in the morning of the murder just because he says it's private. Until there is a serious and effective investigations of the crimes committed by the NSA and their ilk by an independent body with no reason to protect the NSA and a proven track record of prosecuting people up to and including senior political leadership then there is no reason to call for their other activities to be allowed to be kept secret.

    14. Re:Pardons are for the guilty. by doccus · · Score: 1

      Snowden is a whistleblower. He deserves our thanks, and an apology from everyone who's demanded that he be prosecuted.

      I agree, but now he's gone too far. The crimes were spying on the American people without warrants. But this sort of interception of information is exactly what the NSA is supposed to do. There has never been any secret about that, and I support it as useful intelligence. If Snowden keeps this up, he's going to alienate his supporters, or at the very least give a lot of ammo to his detractors.

      The original thread poster had it right. By placing a death sentence on him for treason instead of pardoning him, he's gonna just keep on keepin' on. And if , as seems likely, they promise to pardon him and then execute him instead, tons more "whistleblowers" are gonna come out ofd the woodwork. It'll be a never ending problem. Corrupt governments can never control their citizens.

    15. Re:Pardons are for the guilty. by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      Snowden is on record stating that the only reason he took the NSA job was to steal top secret information. Snowden has yet to produce any actual evidence that he even tried to use the internal process. There have been reports that NSA can't find records of him doing so. You would think that since he managed to steal 1.7 million documents he might have managed a copy of an email or two.... funny that he didn't get anything to bolster his case. So much for Snowden and your first point.

      Exposing foreign intelligence operations harms American national security. That takes Snowden out of the realm of "whistleblowing" if he was ever in it.

      Snowden has demonstrated the opposite of loyalty to the US and its people. Snowden rejects and undermines the process of representative government. If the Constitution permits something he doesn't like he simply ignores it. Snowden is acting like an anti-democratic vigilante, trying to impose his view of the world and how it should be on all of us as he continues to damage America and aid its enemies.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    16. Re: Pardons are for the guilty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, an individual Citizen has no wide picture of what is going on with which to make a proper decision about how US intelligence is collected. On the other hand, it seems evident that some of our systems are "coloring outside the lines" quite a bit. HOPEFULLY, EVERYONE WILL EVENTUALLY REALIZE WE SHOULD ALL BE ON THE SAME TEAM AND THAT CANNABALISM., BOTH PHYSICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL.....IS BAD.

    17. Re:Pardons are for the guilty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is how I feel too.

  3. Does look like they need adult supervision by dbIII · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Does look like they need adult supervision - sentry hawk, owl, raven etc it's so fucking comic book that you wonder if they spend all their time dreaming up James Bond plot lines instead of actually getting some work down. Get rid of these toy soldiers and replace them with real ones.

    1. Re:Does look like they need adult supervision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Intelligence analysts are office temps with a security clearance. It's dull, dull work, suited to those who do indeed require adult supervision.

  4. You don't know what a traitor is, asshole. by jcr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The traitors are all the apparatchiki who routinely violate their oath to the constitution by violating the fourth amendment on a routine basis. Snowden was the only man at the NSA who did his duty.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:You don't know what a traitor is, asshole. by jcr · · Score: 1

      He is HARDLY the only man at the NSA who did his duty

      Oh really? How many other NSA employees objected to routine violations of the fourth amendment? Tell me all about how the program came to a screeching halt because of all the NSA men who refused to break the law.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  5. well duh by thesazi · · Score: 2, Informative

    Isn't this EXACTLY what the NSA's job is?

    1. Re:well duh by ebno-10db · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yes, which is why he's gone too far. I think the people wiping their asses with the 4th Amendment should be prosecuted (note that may include high office), but this is the NSA's job, and like most people I support it as necessary and useful.

    2. Re:well duh by krigat · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Rethink what you are saying. "It's against the constiution, but it's their job, so it's OK."

      So if, let's say, a hired assassin would kill someone from you family, would you say "well, it's against the law, but it was his job, so it's OK"? I doubt it...

      If the NSA's job is to sabotage allies, then they've a wrong job. Period.

    3. Re:well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually it is insulting and horrifying when these tactics are used against foreign nations considered to be allies.

      Not only does it do that but it also isolates the USA from the rest of the world, it is not without reason that we Europeans look bleakly on the US and have a feeling of distrust while as allies we should have a different outlook.

      The same goes for this when corporations are concerned, corporate espionage especially when done by a government agency is just plain wrong.

    4. Re:well duh by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      Rethink what you are saying. "It's against the constiution, but it's their job, so it's OK.

      An unclear antecedent, not unclear thinking. Warrantless wiretapping is against the 4th Amendment, but foreign SIGINT (what the latest news is about) is their job.

    5. Re:well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rethink what you are saying. "It's against the constiution, but it's their job, so it's OK."

      So if, let's say, a hired assassin would kill someone from you family, would you say "well, it's against the law, but it was his job, so it's OK"? I doubt it...

      If the NSA's job is to sabotage allies, then they've a wrong job. Period.

      What the fuck?!?! Where is espionage against the Constitution? Jesus fucking Christ, SLAVERY wasn't against the Constitution until 1865 or so. It sure as hell doesn't prohibit espionage against other countries.

      And nations don't have allies - they have interests.

    6. Re:well duh by Skarjak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Precisely. I am appalled by the number of Americans in this discussion who seem to think this is fine. I can understand doing this to China cause they're pretty brazen about their espionage, but Germany? Added to the leaks about the surveyance of the Chancellor, this clearly shows the profound lack of trust the Americans have in their allies. With friends like that, who needs enemies?

    7. Re:well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Isn't this EXACTLY what the NSA's job is?

      Is it the NSA's job to cajole companies into weakening their crypto and putting backdoors into products (Sentry Owl)? What if someone else finds the backdoor?

      As Bruce Schneier just wrote:

      Ah, but that's the thing: You can't build a backdoor that only the good guys can walk through. Encryption protects against cybercriminals, industrial competitors, the Chinese secret police and the FBI. You're either vulnerable to eavesdropping by any of them, or you're secure from eavesdropping from all of them.

      https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2014/10/iphone_encrypti_1.html

      Yes, the NSA's job is to get into other countries' systems, but putting backdoors into potentially everyone else's systems makes things less secure: which is the NSA's other job--keep American data systems safe.

    8. Re:well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are friendly nations, but no friendly intelligence services.

    9. Re:well duh by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Let me requote the grandparent post to you so you can read it again:

      If the NSA's job is to sabotage allies, then they've a wrong job. Period.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    10. Re:well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how about gchq, then? pretty much sucks nsa dick all day long.

    11. Re:well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > the profound lack of trust the Americans have in their allies.

      Anyone who has followed European opinions over the last 50 years (as I have, in person) knows that Europeans also have a rather profound lack of trust in America. Both sides could fairly claim "With friends like that, who needs enemies?" Indeed, well-educated people on both sides of the pond have claimed this.

      Yet, despite it all, we really ought to find ways to create a better context for working together. It's looking like, much as we distrust each other, Europeans and Americans are both faced with troubles -- from diseases to political extremism -- which are going to need all the resources and organization we can manage to actually master.

    12. Re:well duh by jopsen · · Score: 1

      Isn't this EXACTLY what the NSA's job is?

      Cooperate espionage?
      Acts of war against allies?

      Gathering intelligence is about reading records from parliament than anything else. Especially when dealing with democracies more transparent than your own.

    13. Re:well duh by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Anyone who has followed European opinions over the last 50 years (as I have, in person) knows that Europeans also have a rather profound lack of trust in America. Both sides could fairly claim "With friends like that, who needs enemies?" Indeed, well-educated people on both sides of the pond have claimed this.

      Again with the "both sides" canard. How many military bases does the EU have stationed across the United States? Has the EU been busted for spying upon the communications of every person living in the United States?

    14. Re:well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Precisely. I am appalled by the number of Americans in this discussion who seem to think this is fine. I can understand doing this to China cause they're pretty brazen about their espionage, but Germany? Added to the leaks about the surveyance of the Chancellor, this clearly shows the profound lack of trust the Americans have in their allies. With friends like that, who needs enemies?

      Germany started two world wars in the past century... And you're surprised people spy on the Germans?

    15. Re:well duh by echnaton192 · · Score: 1

      Mass surveillance on every German citizen? Very nice.

    16. Re:well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mr Schneier is what we call a Fachidiot here. If NSA simply leaks some user's crypto material which is encrypted with their pubblic keys, ONLY THEY can decrypt the key mat. This is a 100% secure backdoor, as long as NSA can keep their private key, well, private. Maybe that is how they do it with Skype.

    17. Re:well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anglo-Saxons labelled them "World Wars". How about Anglo-Saxon colonialism to the present day ? You set the entire arab world on fire on a regular basis. Your nice "allies" of Wahabistan do the dirty work to start the fire - UNDER YOUR PROTECTION.

      You moral credibility is zilch and we will first look down on you and then kick your troops out of country. As soon as your lackeys are out of power, that is. Folks like Merkel and SchÃfuble who conspire agains the German nation in order to destroy her.

    18. Re:well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anglo-Saxons labelled them "World Wars". How about Anglo-Saxon colonialism to the present day ? You set the entire arab world on fire on a regular basis. Your nice "allies" of Wahabistan do the dirty work to start the fire - UNDER YOUR PROTECTION.

      You moral credibility is zilch and we will first look down on you and then kick your troops out of country. As soon as your lackeys are out of power, that is. Folks like Merkel and SchÃfuble who conspire agains the German nation in order to destroy her.

      I'm not american, bro.

    19. Re:well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many military bases does the EU have stationed across the United States?

      The EU is more than welcome to get off their sorry asses and scrape together enough budget to field a military to take part in global peacekeeping. Until they do, they're really in no position to complain.

      (The fact that that the EU member states could never afford to do so without imploding their economies is strictly their problem.)

    20. Re:well duh by bussdriver · · Score: 1

      Since when did the prohibitions on government only apply to citizens? Free Press etc does not mean only in the USA. It doesn't say that those limits on government to infringe upon inherent "inalienable" human rights are not for other humans.

    21. Re:well duh by jandersen · · Score: 1

      Isn't this EXACTLY what the NSA's job is?

      It probably is - what I am worried about is not spying, in the sense of gathering intelligence, or even stealing industrial secrets - it's the complete lack of transparency and real oversight. And the very real and likely possibility, that agencies lie NSA and CIA instigate civil unrest in other countries. Take the infamous Tiananmen Square Massacre - there has been persistent rumours ever since, that this was largely a CIA operation that blew up. It may or may not have been the case, but the point is: we just don't know, and with these revelations all the time, we can't even say that it sounds unlikely. And are they at it again in Hong Kong now?

      Trust takes long and hard work to build up, but it can be blown apart in an instant. And it seems that we send our most immature and narrow-minded people out there to do this kind of hugely sensitive jobs; what could possibly go wrong?

    22. Re:well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlike some other countries, the Federal Republic of Germany has never started a war.

    23. Re:well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many times has the USA been invaded and requested military aid?

    24. Re:well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That they are paid to break laws does not make it any less criminal or wrong.

  6. Not Snowden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Snowden doesn't leak these reports anymore. He doesn't even have access to the files. It's all reporters doing it now.

    1. Re:Not Snowden by PPH · · Score: 1

      And its entirely possible that there are other leakers inside the NSA feeding this info out. And Snowden is just the codeword for an ingenious parallel construction program that the press is using.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  7. Re: the guy is a traitor, and so are the reporters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My first instinct was to reply to you with a dismissive expletive - thus having shown in my reply as much critical thought as you did in your post.

    But I realized that I too once came from the Stephan Decatur school, and should be gentle with a previous self. You see, as one grows older and the rose colored glasses begin to loose their tint, one realizes that one may be patriotic AND critical simultaneously. Couple that with the growing realization that the country which we love has almost certainly committed crimes against her own people, and it becomes a moral imperative for her citizens to wake from their stupor and attempt to regain the power over government and basic human freedoms so eloquently elucidated in our Constitution.

    Did Snowden break the law? Certainly. Was the law Constitutional? Not if the Executive Orders were being used to shield malfeasance (and despite Tricky Dick's assert actions, simply because a President does it does not MAKE it legal). Should you, as a responsible citizen you loves his country stop to think on his own for once instead of making a knee jerk assessment? For the sake of the Republic, I hope so,

  8. Re:the guy is a traitor, and so are the reporters. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What is the point of US citizenship if there is no difference in treatment? If US citizenship is nearly unique in that there is a tax liability for income earned anywhere in the universe based on that nexus of citizenship, it BETTER be worth something like immunity from NSA spying.

  9. Spies are spying by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    You don't say.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  10. You don't know what a traitor is, asshole. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    He is HARDLY the only man at the NSA who did his duty, that's totally nieve and foolish to say.

    Clearly you think the sun shines out of his arse because of his good deed. Clap clap.

  11. what do you expect? by silfen · · Score: 1

    The NSA is a spy agency. Its job is to spy, which involves secretly doing illegal things in other countries. The problem with the NSA is secretly doing illegal things in this country.

    And if you think that's hypocritical, think again I expect European and Asian countries to spy on us too. It's part of international relations, and it's good for countries to be able to check up on each other, instead of having to rely merely on official statements.

    1. Re:what do you expect? by Livius · · Score: 2

      You're saying the US does not treat its friends any better than it treats its (sometimes imaginary) enemies.

      Interestingly, the US's friends have also noticed this.

    2. Re:what do you expect? by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, the US's friends have also noticed this.

      Uh, they've known it all along. Stuff like being "shocked, shocked I tell you" when they find out the German Chancellor's phone is monitored is to reassure the public that they are indeed appropriately shocked about finding out what they've probably known all along.

      The NSA spies on everybody. The allies probably even help them with it in exchange for getting access to some of the juicy tidbits. Heck, if there was a place to sign up I'd gladly let the NSA stick an appliance on my home LAN if it meant that I could access things like backup copies of everything on my systems. I run a tor relay so I imagine they've already rooted everything on my LAN anyway, and they probably keep a copy of everything just because it is easier to do that then to go through it all and figure out that I'm boring along with 99% of the rest of the folks they rootkit. Why not actually get some benefit from the situation? That is how the NSA probably gets its claws into 99% of the network closets out there. That obviously won't work in China, so there they use other ways.

    3. Re:what do you expect? by silfen · · Score: 1

      You're saying the US does not treat its friends any better than it treats its (sometimes imaginary) enemies.

      Europeans are our allies: we have some shared goals. We aren't militarily hostile to each other. But they certainly also compete with us, and they pull no punches. Their governments engage in anticompetitive behavior and protectionism, make secret agreements, and sell weapons across the globe. European leaders also widely use anti-Americanism for their domestic political gain, and European populations have been predominantly anti-American for most of the past two centuries.

      Our enemies, we just bomb. I think we should do less of that, but hey, that's what you get from electing the kind of losers we are electing.

      Interestingly, the US's friends have also noticed this.

      They'd be stupid not to, and they aren't stupid.

    4. Re:what do you expect? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, the US's friends have also noticed this.

      I don't think the US has any "friends" any more.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    5. Re:what do you expect? by Livius · · Score: 1

      Lots of countries could be their friends if they just treated them as equals.

    6. Re:what do you expect? by Livius · · Score: 1

      Regarding your friends as mere tactical allies is exactly the point.

    7. Re:what do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > That is how the NSA probably gets its claws into 99% of the network closets out there. That obviously won't work in China, so there they use other ways.

      So, basically you're saying whatever evil you do, it doesn't work with China. So, China is the victim?

      Just asking, I'm not American or Chinese. Also, I'm still considering 50% of all Americans as good people, in spite of the bad ones being more vocal (and active). But there's a saying about one rotten apple...

    8. Re:what do you expect? by silfen · · Score: 1

      Regarding your friends as mere tactical allies is exactly the point.

      I'm not "regarding" them that way, I'm telling you: they have never been anything more than tactical allies.

      Europeans call us their "friends" when they want something; it's propaganda, nothing more. Stop falling for it.

    9. Re:what do you expect? by jopsen · · Score: 1

      The NSA is a spy agency. Its job is to spy, which involves secretly doing illegal things in other countries.

      Really? Intelligence gathering is more about reading records from parliament (the ones nobody reads). Or showing up at political meets to hear what people say. In transparent democracies (unlike the US), you don't really need to do anything illegal to find out what is going on.

      And if you think that's hypocritical, think again I expect European and Asian countries to spy on us too.

      Thief thinks every man steals. Most countries don't have offensive intelligence capabilities.
      And they certainly don't conduct mass surveillance of civilians, just because you're not an American citizen, doesn't mean you're not civilian.

      It's part of international relations, and it's good for countries to be able to check up on each other, instead of having to rely merely on official statements.

      Or you could send someone to takes notes at a political meeting.. .Or read the news paper, or read public records from parliament.
      In real democracies governments rarely lies to their constituents. I know the US has a long and proud history of lying, but most other western democracies don't.

    10. Re:what do you expect? by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Europeans are our allies: we have some shared goals. We aren't militarily hostile to each other. But they certainly also compete with us, and they pull no punches. Their governments engage in anticompetitive behavior and protectionism, make secret agreements, and sell weapons across the globe. European leaders also widely use anti-Americanism for their domestic political gain, and European populations have been predominantly anti-American for most of the past two centuries.

      By that reasoning, the Vatican guards are in the same league as the U.S. Marine Corps, because they have firearms. Funny how all these "nothing to see here, move along" defenses of the American Empire require shutting off one's sense of proportion.

    11. Re:what do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course! Western democracies just opportunistically collaborate with neighboring dictators and mass murderers because that's what the bourgeoisie wants, before finally deteriorating into an insignificant third rate state in the EU. That's what real Western democracies are.

      Your own country is an object lesson in why European nations can't be trusted and how to run a nation into the ground. And you're bitter because you actually deep down realize it.

      Fortunately, I don't live in a typical Western democracy anymore: they are full of people like you.

    12. Re:what do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm very much against empire building. I think the US should withdraw its troops from Europe, Asia, and the Middle East.

      Spying isn't about empire building, it's about making sure that you don't get screwed over by other nations, and we can't trust European nations not to screw us over: they have done it in the past and they'll do it again.

    13. Re:what do you expect? by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      > That is how the NSA probably gets its claws into 99% of the network closets out there. That obviously won't work in China, so there they use other ways.

      So, basically you're saying whatever evil you do, it doesn't work with China. So, China is the victim?

      I'm not quite sure what you're asking here.

      The way the NSA gets into most wiring closets is most likely that they just ask the local government to let them install some boxes, and they do. The local government of course isn't going to advertise that. However, I think that it is unlikely that the Chinese would allow the NSA in, so the way the NSA would probably get intel on what goes on in China is with clandestine/illegal/whatever taps.

      Just look at what the Navy+NSA did to the USSR back in the day with Ivy Bells. The USSR was also a lot more naive about the NSA's capabilities so it was a lot easier to just pick up signals sent in the clear or with poor encryption systems (either the algorithm or its use). People are just as naive today with their LAN traffic - chances are that the secret document being sent to your printer goes out over the LAN in the clear, to be trivially intercepted by the compromised IP phone sitting on your desk or whatever. And hey, let's not get started on just compromising the printer itself...

    14. Re:what do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the people you bomb are sorry Cannonfodder which you and your Saudi friends created in the first place. In other words: Lockheed feeds on Arab Flesh.

    15. Re:what do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can agree that the west is quite a bit of a rotten thing from Seoul to Vilnius ? Have a beer ?

    16. Re:what do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The NSA is a spy agency. Its job is to spy, which involves secretly doing illegal things in other countries. The problem with the NSA is secretly doing illegal things in this country.

      You seem to have matters reversed. Although the NSA should, like any other organisation, never break any applicable laws, it is worse if they violate laws in other countries than in their own country, since the citizens of the USA have, at least theoretically, some influence over the NSA (being an agency of their democratically elected goverment), whereas other victims of the NSA's criminal activities have no say in the NSA's activities at all.

    17. Re:what do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their governments engage in anticompetitive behavior and protectionism, make secret agreements, and sell weapons across the globe.

      The U.S. does the same on a much larger scale, so why do they also need to steal trade secrets?

    18. Re:what do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you think that's hypocritical, think again I expect European and Asian countries to spy on us too.

      It is telling that you have low expectations of other countries, but the fact of the matter is that most of these countries do not spy on the United States and its citizens, while the U.S. does spy on their citizens, governments and companies.

      It's part of international relations, and it's good for countries to be able to check up on each other, instead of having to rely merely on official statements.

      I am sorry, but I really do not see how intercepting private communications between citizens and stealing trade secrets improves international relations.

    19. Re:what do you expect? by jopsen · · Score: 1

      ...before finally deteriorating into an insignificant third rate state in the EU. That's what real Western democracies are.

      I'm sorry what nations in the EU are deteriorating?
      Sure the financial crisis hit some of countries hard, but that is short term, in general most poor EU member countries are getting dramatically better: http://www.theguardian.com/com...

      I don't think you can claim that long term EU member countries are deteriorating, northern Europe all the way down to Germany and France aren't doing bad.

  12. While I will agree with that.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Physical subversion of foreign intelligence assets is CIA territory, not NSA. While that certainly IS a way to perform Signal Interception, I'm cautiously optimistic that is outside the scope of their charter.

    There's a reason these powers were supposed to have been segregated between multiple branches of the government/military and not just consolidated all under one roof. One of those reasons was accountability to their constituents, the other being so they couldn't use this to subvert the rule of law.

    Now that neither is true, we need to look long and hard at what steps to take to suitable resolve this dilemma while not letting outside forces dominate our internal and international landscapes.

    1. Re:While I will agree with that.... by hey! · · Score: 3, Interesting

      SIGINT is the NSA's bailiwick and nothing in the mission statement of the NSA precludes using physical intrusion to obtain it.

      What's more NSA is part of the DoD, and the DoD has been conducting physical intrusion to obtain SIGINT for years. In the Cold War American subs tapped undersea cables believed by the Soviets to be impervious. That was a joint NSA, Navy, CIA program, which makes sense.

      It also makes sense that physical intrusion to obtain SIGINT would be a joint NSA/CIA operation, which means that someone with access to the NSA family jewels can also compromise CIA "assets" overseas.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:While I will agree with that.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This included tampering with Crypto AG cipher machines. Mr Hagelin was factually an NSA double-crosser. So your Samsung smartphone probably looks like swiss cheese, security-wise. Now that NSA probably walks in and out of Samsung R&D offices on a regular basis.

  13. Saboteurs? More like daily bread and butter by Trachman · · Score: 2

    This is a classic way technical intelligence specialists operate. Lets analyze practical example: the target is a database. The potential attack vectors are following (but obviously not limited to): a)compromised hardware which allows to download data from the server b) compromised software which allows to download data from the server c) compromised specialist (s) which download the data d) intercepted communications,

    Rule #1: any gathered data is verified by comparing it to independent source. Rule #2: the sources cannot know about each other. Only if these two rules are met the data can be considered as data which has passed basic verification. "Physical subversion", "blackmail", "infiltration" are day to day activities, the bread and butter, for all those agencies.

    1. Re:Saboteurs? More like daily bread and butter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rule #1: Start a new war based on flimsy evidence from a single source. There can never be enough war for the MIC.

  14. Are people being killed because of Snowden? by wisebabo · · Score: 0, Troll

    When Snowden released documents that indicated that (amongst other things) Huawei had been compromised, I wondered if human intelligence or "social engineering" may have been used to obtain some passwords. If so, and if the Chinese govt. found out who (perhaps inadvertently) gave them away, that person would at the very least seen their employment terminated and perhaps even been terminated themselves!

    Now with the frank admission that there are human spies at work in China for the NSA, I'm sure the Chinese govt. has redoubled their efforts to find (and kill) them. If so, then these leaks may be directly responsible for the deaths (probably after considerable torture) of individuals who, for whatever reason, were helping the U.S.

    So, this is a very serious consequence of the leaks. Do you still agree that Snowden was justified in leaking all of this presumably without giving the U.S. advance warning of what he was going to release (so that they could get vulnerable individuals to safety?).

    1. Re:Are people being killed because of Snowden? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you could cite a report within the last, say, 20 years or so of an American spy caught in China that was put to death. The fact is, China is, or at aspires, to be a First World nation. It's got extensive trade relationships with the US and other Western countries. It's also got extensive diplomatic relationships with Western countries. Nowdays, if a spy is caught in China, they'll either be privately swapped for some kind of consideration, or they'll be publicly arrested and prosecuted. China has too many outside relationships that they're not going to jeopardize over a spy. You've really got a bad case of Cold War hysteria. You should see a psychiatrist or something.

    2. Re: Are people being killed because of Snowden? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's funny about your post isn't the content itself, per se, but the appearance of certainty on your part when you happen to be dead wrong. :) I didn't laugh out loud, but I did smile. Thank you.

    3. Re: Are people being killed because of Snowden? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cite or STFU

    4. Re: Are people being killed because of Snowden? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mr Jerk, here is a little nugget: Both the U.S. and the S.U. (see the mirror :-)) simply put most "opposite" intel officers onto a plane and shipped them back home. No legal proceedings whatsoever. Only the "big" cases make it into the media and the courtrooms.

  15. This may no be a popular idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but really, guys, rather than worry about some government agent seeing some of your metadata or even outright data, shouldn't we just be going about our lives and not really worry about this stuff. I've worked IT security for many years and I'm under no illusions that the Internet is basically an open book. I'm not advocating "if you've gotten nothing to hide, don't worry". Just live life and don't worry. To be honest, you've got more to worry about from corporations selling your data and your insurance rates going up that to worry that Uncle Sam may know you look at pr0n.

  16. Re: the guy is a traitor, and so are the reporters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    release details of wrong doing and violations against US citizens... maybe illegal, but understandable.

    releasing national security secrets that can very realistically results in the deaths of americans and their supporters, financial losses to us corporations, and threatening national security? I would not hesitate to pull the trigger on this guy. His life isn't worth the lives and losses he has likely caused.

    as for the reporters, it might have been a good idea to take out the sources (illegal and costly though it might have been), to prevent most of these leaks and to set a detterent. The parties involved were not american, and while legally dubious, and politically costly, it would have been worth it in hindsight.

  17. Snowden by BringsApples · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Here goes me getting modded into slashdot hell...

    Am I the only one that is still wondering why these "snowden leaks" are still coming out in the way that they are? I mean, are we all going to be sitting around 30 years from now, still hearing about these leaks?

    The year is 2045: Snowden leaks - The NSA has been watching all of you guys' teleport activity since the early 1980's! They used physical hardware hacks that you could have never known about... and they're doing it to foreign countries too!

    Seriously, it all seems like the information that we're getting is being spooled in a prefabricated way, as to serve the fear propaganda more so than it should. I'm just waiting for the "NSA actually created the universe" leak.

    --
    Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    1. Re:Snowden by JazzHarper · · Score: 1

      When Snowden's material runs out, he becomes worthless, so it makes sense for him (and his masters) so string it out as long as possible.

    2. Re:Snowden by Livius · · Score: 1

      I'm just waiting for the "NSA actually created the universe" leak.

      I don't know about that one, but you might be living in a "the NSA actually created the leak" universe.

    3. Re:Snowden by Luckyo · · Score: 2

      Snowden didn't have any material for about a year now. He surrendered everything before accepting asylum in Russia, as that was one of their terms for offering him asylum. It's all in hands of journalists now.

      Staggered release is done so that problem stays on the news, and people don't forget that his problem persists.

    4. Re:Snowden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It was done in this way to properly explore the contents of the documents and report on them in an appropriate manner. Snowden and the journalists involved believe that an open society should be aware when it slips into a surveillance one. That, if we are going to live in surveillance society, we are at least aware of it and accept it.

      Releasing the information over time allows society to become better informed of the full impact of the revelations. A single dump would have been overwhelming and largely ignored. Keeping it in focus allows for real pressure to be applied, for change to be affected.

      I mean, just take a look at all that's been revealed over the past 16 months: http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/multimedia/timeline-edward-snowden-revelations.html

    5. Re:Snowden by TubeSteak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Am I the only one that is still wondering why these "snowden leaks" are still coming out in the way that they are?

      Yes.

      The rest of us remember the wikileaks document dump and how important stories got did not get appropriate attention because of the sheer volume that was getting reported at once.

      Another (perhaps unintended) aspect of the continuous reporting is that almost every time a denial is issued, the NSA is subsequently revealed as lying to the public and Congress.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    6. Re:Snowden by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one that is still wondering why these "snowden leaks" are still coming out in the way that they are? I mean, are we all going to be sitting around 30 years from now, still hearing about these leaks?

      No, but you might get sued by some of the other concern trolls for infringing on their conspiracy theories.

      Seriously, it all seems like the information that we're getting is being spooled in a prefabricated way

      Seriously, as another poster pointed out, it's because a massive dump will be ignored by the media, as WikiLeaks found out years ago. Any more Concerns?

    7. Re:Snowden by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 1

      but each time they are "revealed" after the first two or three just sounds like repetitive droning that no one pays attention to. If everyone let it slide as "the NSA need to be allowed to lie" after the first few, that isn't going to change after the thousandth muted bleat from the distant back-row of reported news 15 years later.

      --
      (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
    8. Re:Snowden by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      No, but you might get sued by some of the other concern trolls [youtube.com] for infringing on their conspiracy theories.

      Not sure where you're going with this. Pointing out conspiracy theories as being a theory alone, seems to go against the grain of what has been discovered from the snowden leaks. Are you saying that there is no conspiracy; that the NSA is a one-man show?

      Seriously, as another poster pointed out, it's because a massive dump will be ignored by the media, as WikiLeaks found out years ago. Any more Concerns?

      Well, not that there are more concerns, but the concern that I'm talking about seems to be a moot point, I guess. But that point is that the order in which the info is being released. We were first told that the NSA is looking at all of the data on the internet. Snowden was reporting that there is still a good way to keep "clean" on the internet, and that it's to use VPN tunnels. Then later, we learn that the NSA has backdoors in router hardware, circumventing any encryption anyway. It's information that, to me, seems to be contradicting itself in the overall scheme of things. This makes me think that perhaps Snowden did find something that needs to be addressed, and released it, but that maybe the news media has been compromised by some secret government agency (gag order?), or whatever, and releases it's own version of "the snowden leaks", in order to take advantage of our fear. I'm just not one that takes any of the snowden leaks seriously anymore.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
  18. oh dear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Glenn is going to die screaming. But first, David is going to be fed to the dogs while Glenn watches. :-)

    1. Re:oh dear by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Is that before or after the angry mob tears most of the NSA bosses to bloody pieces on the streets?

      Because it will require some hardcore desperation on part of intelligence to do something that stupid and self-incriminating, and suggests complete lack of options.

    2. Re: oh dear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever heard the sound of dogs wolfing down (excuse me, no pun intended) chunks of meat? It's quite something, really. Mostly it just sounds "wet," but there's something... unseemly about it, too. Something base. It's the smacking, I think. The urgency of the smacking.

    3. Re: oh dear by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      There is? I've been in quite a few kennels and I find the sound to be quite normal.

      Of course, I'm not a complete idiot and a raging psychopath who thinks that intelligence agencies go around openly and brutally killing their noisiest critics instead of discrediting them.

  19. unless the NSA has the key. sometimes it does by raymorris · · Score: 1

    What you quoted is often true. It's either secure or not.

    On the other hand, If I encrypt some data, it can only be decrypted with the key. Theoretically, only I have the key, so only I can decrypt it. However, in at least one major instance, it's believed that the NSA also has a key*. If only me and the NSA have keys, the data is available to me and the NSA, but no one else. Whether that's good bad, the idea is that only two parties have keys. The attacker doesn't have my key, and the attacker doesn't have the NSA key.

    * Actually more like NSA has half the key, and therefore only needs to construct the other half on a per-user basis. This is because each user's key is derived partially based on NSA-controlled numbers. (Initialization vectors) .

  20. Re: the guy is a traitor, and so are the reporters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some people love their country as an adult loves another adult: I love you, even as I realize that you are finite and make mistakes and we can get through them together. Others love their country as a child loves their mother: Mommy is perfect and can do no wrong and if you're mean to mommy you're a horrible person!

    Needless to say, when mommy's lover comes over and finds mommy strung out on heroin, things tend to get loud.

  21. Both a whistleblower and a traitor ... by drnb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Most of you have it wrong. Its not is he a whistleblower or is he a traitor? Is the situation white or black? The simple truth is that he is now beyond debate **both** a whistleblower and a traitor. The two are not mutually exclusive. The whistleblower actions do not negate the traitorous actions.

    Revealing mass surveillance of US citizens is obviously whistleblowing.

    However revealing clandestine cyber operations against China, a country that routinely conduct cyber espionage against US commercial, governmental and military computers, is traitorous.

    Plus it makes it more difficult to blow off as a coincidence the fact that he revealed the mass surveillance just as President Obama was about to publicly criticize China for cyber espionage actions against the US; and he fled to China for sanctuary and protection - something that would come with a price tag given the diplomatic heat China would take. These facts are a bit less tin-foil-hat than there were previously.

    We are now seeing how Snowden paid the rent in China and Russia.

    1. Re:Both a whistleblower and a traitor ... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      I am prepared to forgive it to end this nonsense. Nothing is gained by keeping him out of the country. Bring him in, give him amnesty... and then tell him if he keeps going then he'll be back on the list.

      its the best option we have left.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    2. Re:Both a whistleblower and a traitor ... by drnb · · Score: 1

      I am prepared to forgive it to end this nonsense. Nothing is gained by keeping him out of the country. Bring him in, give him amnesty... and then tell him if he keeps going then he'll be back on the list. its the best option we have left.

      The disclosures will most likely continue though. He seems not to be the lone holder of the data nor the keys.

      Plus it is very likely Chinese and Russian security services have the info. As I said, he had to pay the rent somehow. The leaks will continue to strategically undermine US efforts. The US and Germany need to cooperate in order to address the crisis in Ukraine, coincidentally its leaked that the US conducted cyber operations against Germany?

      It probably as coincidental as the mass surveillance being leaked just as Obama was about to criticize China for Chinese cyber attacks.

    3. Re:Both a whistleblower and a traitor ... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      The US says that hypocritical crap the chinese every other day of the week. Its nothing special.

      As to leaks being done to drive a wedge between the US and germany... maybe... rather doubt it.

      As to paying rent, he doesn't need to pay more. Simply causing problems for the US intelligence services for any reason is payment in full.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    4. Re:Both a whistleblower and a traitor ... by drnb · · Score: 1

      The US says that hypocritical crap the chinese every other day of the week. Its nothing special.

      It is quite special when the Presidents of the US and China are going to meet at a face-to-face summit and the President of the US is going to formally complain about cyber attacks at such a high publicity event.

      As to leaks being done to drive a wedge between the US and germany... maybe... rather doubt it.

      Whether highly effective or not isn't the important part, the timing itself that can be incriminating. If releases continue to appear strategically timed then coincidental seems less likely and the planned more likely.

      As to paying rent, he doesn't need to pay more. Simply causing problems for the US intelligence services for any reason is payment in full.

      For intelligence agencies payment in full has not been met until **every** piece of information you have has been shared.

    5. Re:Both a whistleblower and a traitor ... by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      the logic is circular so there isn't much I can say.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    6. Re:Both a whistleblower and a traitor ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >However revealing clandestine cyber operations against China, a country that routinely conduct cyber espionage against US commercial,

      Let me laugh. YOUR ARE F*CKING GIVING THEM AWAY BY BUILDING ALL YOUR SHIT IN CHINA ! Do you really think they are damn stupid and won't under how to make everything themselves ?

      >governmental and military computers, is traitorous.

      Given the very higher rate of news about espionage from US either:

      - US sucks at espionage or China is far better
      - China is doing that far less (this seems reasonable given the military expenditures: $640 vs $188 bn)

  22. Traitor due to the China disclosure by drnb · · Score: 1

    The traitors are all the apparatchiki who routinely violate their oath to the constitution by violating the fourth amendment on a routine basis. Snowden was the only man at the NSA who did his duty.

    Your own logic proves you wrong. He did his duty by revealing mass surveillance targeting US civilians. However he **also** violated his oath and committed treason by disclosing cyber operations against China. A country that routinely conducts such operations against the US. So by your criteria, he is a traitor due to the China disclosure. He committed separate acts of disclosure, one commendable and one traitorous.

    And we now know how Snowden pays for the rent in China and Russia.

    1. Re:Traitor due to the China disclosure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Snowden pays for the rent in China and Russia."

      What we know is that you are an enemy of Magna Charta and therefore an enemy of ANY true Anglosaxon Person. Crawl back under your stone, COMMUNIST.

    2. Re:Traitor due to the China disclosure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any true Anglo-Saxon person (unrelated to any true Scotsman) would recognize that Snowden is this generation's Kim Philby.

  23. our american friends by Tom · · Score: 2

    I'm from Germany. Ever since it was leaked that the NSA was spying so extensively on our government that by international standards it could reasonably be considered an act of war, I wonder what it'll take for our USA-lapdog chancellor to grow a spine and do more than giving Obama a stern talk.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:our american friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We were spying on you because you were listening to Embassy, DoS, and SecState phone calls.

    2. Re:our american friends by echnaton192 · · Score: 2

      Spying on the Government is one thing. But this is mass surveillance. Every system in our countries might be compromised. Every router might be sending the information to the NSA. How to flash a fritzbox so that everyting is deleted? How could this be done with a mandatory router from the ISP?

      The Chilling Effect is the problem here. Every second of every day is recorded and our Government conspires with the NSA to get the job (mass surveillance) done.

      Spying on our Government is bad enough, but it does not effect NGOs, citizens and the the freedom of the press or the privcacy of 80 million people.

      But these leak prove that there is no limit to our "allies" - and to our lapdog government. Mister Steinmeier is a Collaborator. And the US seem to be the enemy he is collaborating with.

    3. Re:our american friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Based on my communications with AVM, I say they are an NSA front. Or at least, they try their best to suck NSA's dick.

    4. Re:our american friends by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      There is not much any nation can do anymore. All the top staff gov or mil crypto staff are of the same mind set going back to the 1950's. Thats generations that got cleared by the US and where educated into UK and US methods in West Germany. They then ensured like minded West German staff where selected to replace them years later.
      They all know how to keep the optical sites running data to the US and UK. They know how to pass crypto that is just good enough for German use but is open to the US and UK as used and is kept degraded over decades.
      Crypto at an international and US domestic level seems to be favoured front companies, tame staff, turned staff or have staff trained to a mid or top level over years.
      Products sold or pushed on a US domestic or for international standards would seem to be safe from man in the middle efforts but very open to the US, UK, cleared staff, ex staff, former staff.
      Germany would need to find staff not tainted, trained, cleared or selected by the US and UK with the skills to create new German crypto.
      Word would get around within the German academic community and the US and UK would ensure any such effort was tamed or defunded.
      Back to face to face meetings or one time pads.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    5. Re:our american friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any proof of these claims or are you full of shit ? German cities were by 90% razed by 1945 and nobody had any desire to play games with the new rulers. YOU ARE FULL OF SHIT.

    6. Re:our american friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me assure you, we have this capability. The Americans know it and they are kinda nervous. That's why they tap Merklines phone. And mine, too.

      But yeah, your observations are correct. All army officers and the top bureaucrats, professors and the like are Collaborateurs. But hey, if they could for Austria, why not work for America ? After all, American meals have more calories !!!

    7. Re:our american friends by echnaton192 · · Score: 1

      Are you the same Anonymous Coward as above? Being paranoid does not mean that they're not after you. They might. But it makes ongoing discussions very annoying. 9-11 was an inside job in your opinion, yes?

    8. Re:our american friends by echnaton192 · · Score: 1

      They know how to pass crypto that is just good enough for German use but is open to the US and UK as used and is kept degraded over decades.

      Crypto at an international and US domestic level seems to be favoured front companies, tame staff, turned staff or have staff trained to a mid or top level over years.

      It is difficult to compromise open source crypto. True Crypt works. PGP works. Snowdens leaks show us exactly that. Being angry is one thing. Freaking out or not using crypto is not the way to deal with the leaks. Even iMessage is safe. Or red phone. Or Signal. There are many options. If people simply use crypto mass surveillance would at least be more difficult.

      For example you could sign up to an voip-provider with nomadic use like easybell and use linphone with zrtp for everyday calls with friends. And for more secret conversations, use redphone / signals.

      Getting more paranoid than the Snowden leaks suggest does not help. One time pads are not usable on a daily basis. Not using encryption even though Snowdens leaks suggest that it works makes it easier and cheaper to spy on us.

    9. Re:our american friends by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      re 'It is difficult to compromise open source crypto."
      If the crypto is quality and correctly used every time, just follow the use down the tame network to the tame operating system or charm, make friends with the users.
      Over time the message entry and decryption side reverts to plain text, thanks to understood OS, tame network, turned staff, users with new friends, new staff, malware or physical access.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    10. Re:our american friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not the same coward but in my opinion, no. Still, the more I learn about how these spooks have been operating the less implausible it seems that there was some degree of insiderness involved. These people are unimaginably powerful.

  24. Re: the guy is a traitor, and so are the reporters by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    releasing national security secrets that can very realistically results in the deaths of americans and their supporters, financial losses to us corporations, and threatening national security? I would not hesitate to pull the trigger on this guy. His life isn't worth the lives and losses he has likely caused.

    Then you're a willfully ignorant nazi shitbag using talking points that turned out to be BS when they were first used against Manning.

  25. when ever a catapillar bites a optical data cable by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    ... I'm quite certain 'elsewhere' a sniffing device is installed.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  26. Snowpup - get yourself shot --- and soon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Traitor!

    1. Re:Snowpup - get yourself shot --- and soon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Mr General, your dope is getting bad. Order a fresh delivery from your paymasters at Raytheon.

    2. Re: Snowpup - get yourself shot --- and soon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, attack the commenter and not the comment. Because ad hominem is so very compelling.

      *golf clap*

  27. Re: the guy is a traitor, and so are the reporters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What Republic?

    Most if not all of the policies passed is the last 20 years have not been to the benefit of the public which means absolutely no 'power resides with the people':

    http://www.princeton.edu/~mgilens/Gilens%20homepage%20materials/Gilens%20and%20Page/Gilens%20and%20Page%202014-Testing%20Theories%203-7-14.pdf

    These laws being passed by the Federal Government are nothing short of being legalized crime. Look no further than Civil Forfeitures and the rampant destruction it is causing.

    "one may be patriotic AND critical simultaneously."

    To be a 'patriot' is to be ignorantly loyal to the scum that are destroying our nation.

  28. Re: the guy is a traitor, and so are the reporters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your way of thinking is very scary...

  29. Very nice $hill. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me say you a full-hearted FUCK YOU. You Americans have a total-control complex. Did you learn that from your Saudi "Allies" ?

    1. Re:Very nice $hill. by Karmashock · · Score: 2

      You say that from which country's perspective? It helps me understand where you are coming from.

      As to the American control complex... it is because we are responsible for global peace. Your country isn't.

      We are a super power. We have responsibilities. If we drop the ball, billions might die. We have more responsibility every day then your culture has probably had in the last thousand years combined.

      Dare to contest me. You might not like how irrelevant you are or how important the US is... and it is a problem because we're human just like everyone else and we make mistakes.

      But that doesn't mean we're not the people that keep things calm enough for people to live. We keep international trade flowing. We back the international treaties that maintain world peace. We control nuclear arms. We control biological weapons. We control chemical weapons. We deny expansionist powers the ability to claim territory simply with force of arms. We forge peace and we build nations.

      Are we perfect? Hardly... we're people just like everyone else. But we are far more powerful then you and with that power comes responsibility. And with that responsibility comes the right to use it.

      I don't like it either. I really don't. I'd just assume retreat all US forces back to our country and let the world take care of its own problems. But we tried that after WW1 and what happened? The europeans were killing each other almost immediately. And it has only been through US military force that europe has remained peaceful. The europeans basically don't even have militaries now and they is because we protect them. And in protecting them we have restrained their old imperialist ambitions. And through that we have prevented them from killing each other again.

      Think about it.

      Did the US start or cause WW1?

      Nope.

      Did we start WW2?

      Nope.

      Did we start the cold war? Nope.

      What wars did we start? Second Iraq war possibly though that is debatable. Short of that... none of them.

      And you presume to judge us. Which country do you represent?

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    2. Re:Very nice $hill. by echnaton192 · · Score: 0

      As to the American control complex... it is because we are responsible for global peace. Your country isn't.

      We are a super power. We have responsibilities. If we drop the ball, billions might die. We have more responsibility every day then your culture has probably had in the last thousand years combined.

      You REALLY are that stupid, eh?

      You are responsible for the whole mess that is causing all the trouble now.

      1. You disposed of the elected laicistic Iranian president and installed the Shah. Consequence of his brutality, your country condoned: Khomeni and the problems caused.
      2. You made Saddam start a war with Iran. And your country knew of the gassings of innocent people. And you gave him weapons.
      3. In order to get rid of the USSR in Afghanistan, you supported the Taliban. Consequence: 9-11.
      4. Because of 9-11, you invaded Afghanistan. But before you finished the Job, you invaded Ira with no plan what so ever hat will become of this country when you left. With made up WMD. And lies about babies ripped out of their incubators.

      And you even had the chuzpa to call french fries "freedom fries" because the french and the german government called out your bullshit. Consequences after you pulled out prematurely: Instable Irak and instable Afghanistan.

      5. You supported even the crazies in order to get rid of Assad. And now you have the crazies invading Irak and Syria.

      What about Vietnam? Burning women and children in order to free them from communism. I am shure they felt free while being burned alive.

      You made a mess out of the whole world. You alone are responsible.

      Until WW 2, your records are quite clean. The records of my country weren't. I am German. I am thankful for the allies that forced us into democracy. I really am.

      But from that time on, except for the fact that you kept the USSR in europe at bay, you made every mistake possible. You made your own foes and built up your own nightmares. And the Ukraine? The NATO promised Russia it would not come nearer to russian soil. And did exactly that. And when Putin stopped you right before you could assimilate the haven were they keep their marine, you cried foul. And started another civil war.

      The list goes on and on and on. Thank you for protecting us from the USSR and for getting rid of the Nazis. But you are NOT beneficial to this world any longer. You are a menace. So stop being so full of yourself. The IS is your problem. And you expect Turks to solve the problems you have caused. This is not a reasonable position.

      The correct procedure to dispose of the IS would be to get a UN mandate. You did'nt even bother. Russia does not trust you, because you already overstepped the UN Mandate in Irak. Who could trust a liar?

      You have the chief of the NSA lie to congress without any consequences.

      Start looking around. The hatred against america has its reasons. Ignoring them like you do is a dangerous thing.

    3. Re:Very nice $hill. by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      As to stupidity, that is something you'll have to back up.

      1. Cold war. Many of the things the US has done over the years that people like you don't understand are related to that conflict. You don't understand it because you didn't fight it.

      2. Cold war again.

      3. Cold war again.

      4. Nuclear containment. It revolves around our fears of WW3 which are central to US strategic policy. Again, minor powers tend not to understand such things because they have no capability or responsibility for managing long term global peace.

      5. Current US foreign policy is profoundly confused and I don't know exactly what they think they're doing. I think the current US president just reads opinion polls and does whatever they say. He appears to be a profoundly rudderless individual. What ideas has he come up with that are his own? Think about it. Nothing. So I don't take the current administration as especially representative of anything.

      As to Vietnam, Cold war again. Further, consider the difference between North Korea and South Korea. Vietnam could have been like South Korea. They chose poorly. Regardless... Cold War.

      As to Germany, I hold no animosity towards modern Germans. I just think you're a bit naive to think the violence stopped just because you haven't had to fight in a long time. You have been under our Aegis. Absent the US, the Soviets would have absorbed you into the USSR and you'd be there still.

      You are free because we won the cold war. You have a democracy because we won the cold war.

      I think I'm going to let Jack break it down:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      The salient point is that without America guarding the walls... you would not be free today. Germany would not exist. Europe would not exist. You would have been subsumed into the soviet empire.

      As to the US not being beneficial to the world anymore. I disagree, HOWEVER I am very happy to back off and let nature take its course here.

      This is a difference between my generation and my father's generation and my grandfather's generation. They valued europe. They valued this alliance. They felt your freedom was worth American blood and treasure.

      Mine doesn't. So you want us gone? We will pull back as soon as the baby boom generation leaves power. Count on it.

      US strategic policy will likely start winding down our international commitments. We'll probably sell weapons and train people if they want. But we'll not put drones in the sky or boots on the ground. And that will mean that nations that haven't had to defend their borders for two generations will suddenly find themselves as the only thing stopping their own country from enslavement.

      I wish no ill upon your people. I wish no ill upon any people that leave my people alone. I am very happy to retire the American giant back to its island where we can finally sleep. Think of how long we have been fighting? We are beyond tired of it.

      We have fought the good fight and we are weary. Everywhere we are met with people asking us to do things for them and saying we have a responsibility to fight.

      We're tired. But we feel obligated to help. Think of the people that came to the aid of europe THREE times.

      We came to help in WW1.
      We came to help in WW2.
      We came to help in the Cold War.

      We are still those people. And you can hate us for that... but were we any different your society would not exist. We are however very tired... and the ignorance and ingratitude of your society makes us all the more tired. We don't want to spill our blood for you anymore. We wish to sleep the dream of peace. A dream you have only enjoyed in Germany at our expense. It is our turn to sleep... and probably soon to be your turn to fight again.

      Good day.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  30. A$$hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So NSA has to fuck up ALL computers and relevant software of something like 3000 million people in order to do their job ? I am sure Lenin and Tshershkinsky would have concurred...

  31. Yeah, Mr INSCOM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course you and your fellow little-sized dick-wearers need to bug 100% of communication devices. It does not suffice to spy on the 0.1% real decisionmakers. Like your great role model Wladimir Illitch Uljanov, aka LENIN. Dont trust - CONTROL !

  32. As a German Patritot I Can Say This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take the Berlin Collaborateurs with you to New York and please leave Germany alone. Verpisst Euch, Amerikaner.

  33. Kleiner Tipp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aufhören, die Amerikaner als "die Guten" zu betrachten. Wir müssen ALLE Besatzer loswerden, auch die angeblich so netten Engländer und Amerikaner. Diese Länder betreiben regelmäßig blutige Neu-Kolonialkriege und wollen uns neuerdings zu Kumpanen dieser Verbrechen machen. Erst vor Monaten haben sie massenhaft Waffen nach Syrien gepumpt, welche jetzt "aus der Luft neutralisiert" werden müssen. Nur die Waffenindustrie lebt von diesem Menschen-Fleischwolf, den McCain und Co. dort installiert haben.

    1. Re:Kleiner Tipp by echnaton192 · · Score: 1

      There are no "occupants" any more since the 2+4 treaty. The NATO covered our ass for the last 60 years and the allies brought us the little freedom we had since WW 2.

      Beyond doubt they are taking away this freedom and try to implement an orwellian surveillance state of unbelievable proportions, just like they did in the US und GB. And yes, the problems in Irak, Iran und Syria are direct results of american interventions.

      But "getting rid of them" is no realistic option. The German reunion was granted only if Germany stays in the NATO. Whether we like that or not.

      But being allies does not mean that we could not demand the end of this surveillance or threaten them to leave the NATO. But neither Merkel nor Steinmeier will do that. You might not have noticed, but they are collaborators. And concerning our freedom and privacy, they are collaborating with enemies of our constitutional rights. But in order to stop that, there needs to be a change in government first.

      It will take time for an election that does not result in "Social Demokrats" (neither social nor democrats) or "Christian Demokrats" (not being democrats) in the government.

      First things first. As long as the traitors that collaborate with the five eyes against our constitutional rights are in the government, there won't be a chance to convince the members of the five eyes that we are serious about the demands to stop spying on each and every German citizen.

    2. Re:Kleiner Tipp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree they are Collaborateurs. But I have also seen the NSA-INSCOM Spy Palace in Erbenheim near Wiesbaden. They only way we can get freedom for Germany is to have the occupying forces leave. Just like the Russkies did. And yeah, NSA-GCHQ will do their best to aid all the collaborateurs from CDU, SPD, FDP and GRUENE (the latter ones are especially loyal collaborateurs).

    3. Re:Kleiner Tipp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And regarding the "Russian threat" - it was German aggression which lead to Russian occupation of Germany. All Russians I know seriously shit into their pants when they think of German industry, German weapons and German military power. Even if it is objectively not justified. Russia was almost concquered by Germany, that's the truth.

      What we need to do is to behave like the Swiss and keep PRUSSIAN IMPERIALISM under control. It is already alive again, this time under the guise of "Europa". Merkel stated she wants a Euro Imperium (my words, but her semantics).

      Every man a G3 rifle, every village a MILAN anti-tank missile and the Russkies will not every touch us. Yeah, some nukes on Tornados, too. But no need for Leopard, whatever the bastards of Krauss-Maffei say.

  34. Fantastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...how many AFISR soldiers now show up for propaganda purposes. You and your buddies at Raytheon, CSC and the like must be really badly scared about losing your PORK.

  35. Stop the DOUBLETALK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Europe" is a bunch of Vasalls, like Vichy France was the vasall of Germany then. Except that the U.S. is not as heavy-handed in their methods. I concede that. But still, we are not America's allies. We are America's Bitches.

  36. NICE LIE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What they actually do is to insert backdoors into VHDL designs and C code of foreign router makers. So 100% of devices have an NSA-GCHQ backdoor after this "treatment". You want to make us think they need to physically access "closets". No, they physically access R&D labs and have their undercover developers add backdoors to "systems which are too secure".

  37. PLUS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...GCHQ "coincidentally" had a backdoor for Firefox, so that they could hack their way into Belgacom and commandeer their network to perform SIGINT on ANY person in Belgacoms telecom network.

    In my opinion, GCHQ and NSA have their DEVELOPER MOLES at Mozilla. That's how it works.

  38. "financial losses to us corporations" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BINGO. Snowden threatens the business interests of the War Industry. Folks like Raytheon, L3 Communications, Lockheed, CSC, Booze Allen Hamilton and the like. In other words, he hinders the flow of PORK.

  39. Indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Upholding ancient traditions like Magna Charta is at the core of patriotism and those who support the Elektrik Tskeka are the traitors. The truth is that the vast majority of ANY people are fucking cowards who will ALWAYS go with the government line, no matter whether it is run by Bu$h, Blair, Hitler or Obama.

  40. False Comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What they did then was comparatively "targeted". Now they aim for browser source code, OS source code and processor VHDL designs. In other words, they want to pwn ANY COMPUTER OR TELECOM DEVICE. It seems Huawei did not cooperate as nicely as Siemens and Cisco. Therefore they were stigmatized witht the very own shit allegations which are the truth with U.S. companies.

  41. Not Correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You want intel ? Give us 100% of your citizen's communication and information. Thank you very much". U.S. "allies" are mostly bitches, except for some nice countries like Pakistan who manage to lead the U.S. with a nose-ring through the manege.

    1. Re:Not Correct by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Looks like it is working out great for Pakistan. I think the whole world admires what a wonderful place that is to live.

      Who doesn't want to live there? Raise a family... start a career...

      Oh that's right... no one. It is a shithole. And the betrayals do not go unnoticed. The reason we didn't tell them about the Osama raid was because they had been lying to us. Because of that they are cut off. We will only tell them what they need to know when they need to know it.

      What is more, they are cut off from our tech and we're not going to do more then the bare minimum to maintain the that relationship of convenience. Ultimately we're going to ally with India instead. Much more rational country.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  42. When NSA becomes Worthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the flow of PORK will dry up. Or is it the other way around ? YOU are the TRAITOR here. You are treasonous relative to freedom.

  43. Plus the Officers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...must be dis-powered. Most of them are loving collaborateurs first with the Austrian, now with the Americans. They are scumbags who sell out the German people. We need to control them, not the other way around. They must fear us, not we them.

    1. Re:Plus the Officers by echnaton192 · · Score: 1

      You Sir are insane. Stop posting as "Anonymous Coward" and come forward with your real ID. I risked some Karma to tell " Karmashock" that he is an uninformed idiot and why.

      You are proposing that Germany should "rise up" again and spread fear on the american and russian people. This opinion is a neclectable minority in Germany, and rightfully so.

      You learned nothing from our history. EOT.

  44. You mean as a Neo-Nazi ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a German Patritot I Can Say This ... Take the Berlin Collaborateurs with you to New York and please leave Germany alone. Verpisst Euch, Amerikaner.

    By "German Patriot" you really mean Neo-Nazi. You use of "New York" is old Nazi symbolism for US Jews. The Nazis also like to use the word "collaborator" with respect to the Jews since the "Communists and Jews collaborated with the west to destroy Germany in 1919", this was a popular delusional belief to avoid admitting Germany's utter military defeat and imminent collapse during the 1st World War. It seems idiocy in Germany lives on to this day in the minds of those unable to function in civilized society and ignorant of history. Is two complete and utter ass whooping not enough, is that ass whooping your thing, do you like it ... the Nazis always did seem a bit of the self hating closet masochist so I guess its your thing.

  45. Re:the guy is a traitor, and so are the reporters. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whil I agree that Edward Snowden has participated in the NSA's treasonous activities, he did realise the errors of his ways and he used his position to publicise the NSA's criminal and unethical behaviours in ways no-one else has been brave enough to do. In view of this, I think his former contributions to the NSA's activities can be forgiven.

  46. I am shocked, shocked I tell you by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    That we are still doing what we have been doing since the War of Independence.

    Not.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --