Slashdot Mirror


Too Much Privacy: Finnish Police Want Big Euro Notes Taken Out of Circulation

jones_supa writes The Finnish Police are concerned that larger banknotes, namely the €200 and €500 banknotes, encourage criminal activity and should therefore be removed from Finnish cash circulation. Markku Ranta-aho, head of the Money Laundering Clearing House of Finland, says criminals prefer cash because it is harder for police to track. In contrast, a record of electronic money transfers remains in the banking system, which makes the police's job considerably easier. Ranta-aho also says citizens rarely use the larger banknotes anyway, with which The Bank of Finland's advisor Kari Takala agrees. However, The Bank of Finland is skeptical about the ability of a ban on €500 banknotes to eliminate underground labor and trade in Finland. Takala suggests criminals would just switch to smaller bills. More illegal transactions take place via bank transfers, he says.

60 of 314 comments (clear)

  1. if you ban cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you ban cash, the four bogeymen (need I mention them?) and the wobbly anarchist menace will create their own cash.

    Oops, it's been already done, not once but a dozen times.

    1. Re: if you ban cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "You got the stuff?"
      Yeah.
      "You got the money?"
      Yeah. My trunk is full of unmarked quarters.

    2. Re:if you ban cash by fustakrakich · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The big crooks are the ones making the rules.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    3. Re: if you ban cash by St.Creed · · Score: 2

      You may laugh. But last week I got a serious request from an acquintance to verify whether 2000 Kg. of unsorted Euro coins were real or fake. Pretty weird. So I did some research.

      In 2012 in Germany, some folks managed to trade in 29 tonnes of coins at the Central Bank of Germany. Must have been quite a counting machine :) But they got 6 million euro in return (in notes) so I guess the trunk full of unmarked quarters was a pretty good deal. However, they weren't legit.

      In 2013 some entrepreneurs tried it again with a container full of "old metal" that turned into Euro coins after customs, which they tried to trade in at the Central Bank of Belgium. Having been forewarned by the Germans, they had the enterprising Chinese arrested.

      So I declined the opportunity to trade in 2000 Kg. of coins :)

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    4. Re:if you ban cash by St.Creed · · Score: 2

      If I lived in Finland I'd probably want to get out too. You know how little daylight they have there? I'd rather be in prison in Spain at this time of year :)

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    5. Re: if you ban cash by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Because 5,000 Euros worth of diamonds is totally as easy to hide & carry as ten small pieces of paper.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re:if you ban cash by TriCCer · · Score: 2

      If I lived in Finland I'd probably want to get out too. You know how little daylight they have there? I'd rather be in prison in Spain at this time of year :)

      Huh I didn't know this was a thing... http://www.thelocal.es/2013121...

      --
      c0w goes moo.
  2. Not only in Finland. by NettiWelho · · Score: 4, Interesting
    1. Re:Not only in Finland. by rossdee · · Score: 3, Funny

      And of course all the money in Swiss bank accounts is honestly earned and legit...

    2. Re:Not only in Finland. by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You joke but the US took larger bills out of circulation a long time ago over nonsense like this.

      The irony of course is that inflation has devalued what's left to the point where it actually makes some sense to bring some of those larger bills back.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    3. Re:Not only in Finland. by PPH · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not a problem. We've switched our organized crime over to using mortgage and insurance backed securities.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    4. Re:Not only in Finland. by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 2

      Actually, they bundle most of those and sell them as politicians nowadays.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    5. Re:Not only in Finland. by gnasher719 · · Score: 2

      I remember seeing 1000 dollar bills as a small child, about 20-25 years ago. I don't think they exist anymore.

      See this article for genuine current 1 million British Pound and 100 million British Pound notes: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/maga...

    6. Re:Not only in Finland. by kilfarsnar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not only in Finland! I've heard that in the United States aswell the police is very proactive about taking notes out of circulation.

      Civil forfeiture has got to be the biggest truckload of bullshit I have heard in a while. So now the state can just take my money because of what they think I might do with it? How can we be expected to respect law enforcement when they pull crap like that?

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    7. Re:Not only in Finland. by fnj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's legal tender. They will take it and like it, or I will call the cops.

    8. Re:Not only in Finland. by ultranova · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How can we be expected to respect law enforcement when they pull crap like that?

      Because they'll kill you if you don't.

      The problem with getting though with crime is that it means the police is expected to be though. And this is how though guys act. This is, always has been, and always will be, the price you pay for demanding "thoughness": you'll get fascism.

      Americans brought this on themselves.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    9. Re:Not only in Finland. by mythosaz · · Score: 5, Informative

      Oh man, I hope I'm there when you call the police, so when the police and the store laugh at you, I can join in.

      http://www.treasury.gov/resour...

      This statute means that all United States money as identified above are a valid and legal offer of payment for debts when tendered to a creditor. There is, however, no Federal statute mandating that a private business, a person or an organization must accept currency or coins as for payment for goods and/or services. Private businesses are free to develop their own policies on whether or not to accept cash unless there is a State law which says otherwise. For example, a bus line may prohibit payment of fares in pennies or dollar bills. In addition, movie theaters, convenience stores and gas stations may refuse to accept large denomination currency (usually notes above $20) as a matter of policy.

      Hilarious indeed.

    10. Re:Not only in Finland. by sjames · · Score: 2

      You mis-understand. If you already owe them money, they are obligated to accept your legal tender to satisfy the debt. If you are trying to buy something, then no debt exists and they are free to decline the transaction.

    11. Re:Not only in Finland. by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 2

      In the US, any cash transaction over $10,000 requires some paperwork and an ID. It doesn't matter if the transaction is at a bank, casino, or car dealership.

      The Governor of New York got busted because an automated search of his bank records found a large number of similar transactions for $9000. Breaking up one large transaction into multiple smaller ones, under $10k, is a common evasion tactic called "stacking". It turns out he just banged a $9000 hooker a bunch of times.

    12. Re:Not only in Finland. by roman_mir · · Score: 2

      That law is unconstitutional and cannot stand in an honest, law abiding society, but the fact is that your society is not an honest, law abiding one. The Constitution is thrown out of the window, the socialist movement destroyed the principles that the system was built upon, the principles of equal treatment under law. It did so by promising 'fair' outcomes. The mob believes it's unfair somehow that a millionaire factory owner has more than some window washer, so we must make it 'fair', but that means we are going to destroy the law, the equal treatment of people under law and once we do that the law doesn't matter and you have no private property rights and there is no free market capitalism without equal protection against government abuse under the law.

  3. To their defense by Meeni · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As a normal person I never had use of large bills like that. Even 100 is an annoyance as you have to get it accepted for change somewhere. So in essence nothing of value would be lost. Then the claim that it would be effective at curbing illegal business is not very strong either.

    1. Re:To their defense by r1348 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It would do nothing to curb criminality, it's just another excuse to privatize the circulation of money. Want a cash-free economy? Fine, give me my free State debit card.

    2. Re:To their defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      As a normal person I don't use Raspberry Pi boards or metal lathes, either. There's no reason anybody should be allowed to have those, either.

    3. Re:To their defense by The+Ickle+Jones · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That would do nothing to ensure anonymity, which is another huge advantage of cash.

    4. Re:To their defense by pz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In contrast, as a normal person, I've used EUR 100 and EUR 500 bills regularly to take care of, well, large transactions that need to be confirmed and delivered faster than a bank transfer would allow (and when the people involved rile at paying 3% for credit card fees, or aren't set up to take credit cards in the first place), like paying vendors, or hotel bills outside of big cities.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    5. Re:To their defense by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

      So using large notes makes you abnormal?
      It's not illegal to be abnormal?
      Because, that's where you're headed with your statement.

    6. Re:To their defense by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It would do nothing to curb criminality

      The best way to curb criminality is to have fewer crimes. Most of the "crimes" involving the exchange of cash are transactions between consenting adults, for goods and services that should not be illegal in the first place. The solution to oppression and prohibition is not more oppression and prohibition.

    7. Re:To their defense by Sique · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I use the 100 EUR bill all the time. My average weekend shopping tops 100 EUR easily (we are a family of four), and then paying with the 100 EUR bill and additional cash just makes sense. And yes, I prefer paying cash. Maybe you are the exception?

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    8. Re:To their defense by TWX · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The larger the bill, the more profitable it is to counterfeit it, and the less likely that a shop clerk will recognize it for a counterfeit due to the small number of them handled over time.

      Bill-denomination is something that's interested me for awhile actually; it seems from my limited view of time like in the United States, the $20 has been the standard bill for 30+ years. I can remember as a child, my dad sending me into the convenience store to prepay so the clerk would activate the fuel pump, and usually going back for just a couple dollars change at the most. I wonder if stores' unwillingness to take $50 and $100 bills actually helps work against inflation as consumers end up putting a relative-value compared to the $20 on items for sale.

      I've also wondered about the $1 bill in the same way, for lesser goods and vending machines and the like.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    9. Re:To their defense by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      Those big bills are wonderful for getting discounts from contractors. To do the same with twenties, you would have a huge stack. Maybe just annoying, but it certainly does invite wheelbarrow jokes.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    10. Re:To their defense by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      Large bills were a problem 40 years ago perhaps.

      In this century, I have never had problems using a large bill. They simply aren't as valuable as they used to be and people are no longer quite so impressed by them.

      It's not 1980 anymore. Inflation has taken it's toll.

      Sorry JR.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    11. Re:To their defense by necro81 · · Score: 2

      It would do nothing to curb criminality

      Some kinds of criminality would be harder. If you have to move, say, €10 million in cash, whether you do it in €500 bills or €50 bills makes a large difference. In the first case, you only have to move 20,000 pieces of "paper" (a stack about 2 m tall). If you are constrained to €50 bills, you have to move 10x as much cash. Now, instead of a single briefcase that can easily be carried onto a railcar, you need a few duffel bags.

      Not that this is an insurmountable obstacle to criminals - it just makes certain transactions harder to execute and hide.

    12. Re:To their defense by Immerman · · Score: 2

      Actually rejecting huge bills is pretty reasonable - otherwise that coffee shop is going to have to have several thousand euros in the till before they even open the door, just in case a few folks come in early with 500s. That makes them a much sweeter target for theft by both employees and others.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    13. Re:To their defense by ncc74656 · · Score: 2

      Bill-denomination is something that's interested me for awhile actually; it seems from my limited view of time like in the United States, the $20 has been the standard bill for 30+ years.

      As far back as I can remember, $20 has been the denomination dispensed by nearly all ATMs. A handful of ATMs might mix in $50 or $100 bills for larger total amounts (Wells Fargo has some that do $20s and $50s, but most of theirs still just do $20s), and there were some ATMs outside the student union that used to dispense $5 bills (this was at UNLV in the early '90s), but most of the time, you'll get $20s.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    14. Re:To their defense by JamieMcGuigan · · Score: 2

      Currency Density Euro vs Gold €500 Euro note (1.1g + 1440 mm^3) €454/g = 0.0022g/€ 2.88mm^3/€ = 0.347€/mm^3 Gold (€973.8/troy ounce) €31.27/g = 0.031g/€ 1.657mm^3/€ or 0.6€/mm^3 So in terms of currency density, the €500 euro note weighs 14x less than gold, but is 1.7x more voluminous.

    15. Re:To their defense by gnasher719 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Since you don't use cheques in most of Europe, how do you manage large transactions for things like vehicles? There are certainly electronic means here, but they are far from ubiquitous and with every other company getting hacked, no one is inspired to shuttle their money through them.

      My wife once bought a brand new car that was paid for with 17 banknotes showing a picture of the Grimm brothers..

    16. Re:To their defense by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 2

      As a normal person I never had use of large bills like that. Even 100 is an annoyance as you have to get it accepted for change somewhere. So in essence nothing of value would be lost. Then the claim that it would be effective at curbing illegal business is not very strong either.

      I purchase my latest car with cash. It was $2400. The bank refused to give me $100 because of "the drug war". It would have been a lot more convenient to carry 24 $100 bills instead of 120 $20 bills. But that's o.k., because of the children.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    17. Re:To their defense by roman_mir · · Score: 3, Informative

      I normally have 4-6 500 Euro bills on me at any time and maybe 2 200 bills and a few hundreds and some change. It is much more convenient than having stacks of twenties or tens. I move from place to place, it's business related and I don't want to be in need of quick cash and have to run around searching for an ATM.

      The criminals will not have a problem with any of this, this will only inconvenience the rest of the people, just like everything that governments do.

    18. Re:To their defense by kilfarsnar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In contrast, as a normal person, I've used EUR 100 and EUR 500 bills regularly to take care of, well, large transactions that need to be confirmed and delivered faster than a bank transfer would allow (and when the people involved rile at paying 3% for credit card fees, or aren't set up to take credit cards in the first place), like paying vendors, or hotel bills outside of big cities.

      This is another good point. Without cash, every transaction will have an added tax paid to the payment processor. Think your "no-fee" credit card is really free? You're paying for it one way or another in the form of higher prices. Visa, or whomever, has to wet its beak in every transaction. It's one more way the financial industry skims off the top of the economy. They would love to get rid of cash. Then every time anyone bought anything they'd get paid.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    19. Re:To their defense by Corbets · · Score: 2

      As a normal person I never had use of large bills like that. Even 100 is an annoyance as you have to get it accepted for change somewhere. So in essence nothing of value would be lost. Then the claim that it would be effective at curbing illegal business is not very strong either.

      As a normal person in Switzerland, I regularly use 1000 CHF notes (about 800 Euro, give or take). Grocers accept them and ATMs give them out; not considered a big deal here.

    20. Re:To their defense by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Taxes on property require similar intrusion as income tax.

      Nonsense. Property records are already public records, viewable at any county clerk office, and often on-line as well. Anyone can view them, for any reason.

      Taxes on consumption are much easier to circumvent

      More nonsense. If I hide 10% of my consumption, I avoid 10% of the tax. If a business with a 10% profit margin can hide 10% of their revenue, they can avoid ALL of their income tax.

  4. Methinks there's more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember when the Euro was first rolled out. Finland did't bother minting 1c and 2c coins, 5c was the minimum. I think they just don't see the point in the big notes, not just that there only use is crime but probably Finns just don't use them at all. I would say they are the most progressive Europeans.

    1. Re:Methinks there's more by Z00L00K · · Score: 2

      The most progressive Europeans don't use the Euro in the first place. But maybe the Finns are the most progressive Euro-users.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    2. Re:Methinks there's more by marsu_k · · Score: 2

      While I'm not sure getting rid of the big notes would solve anything, I thought not minting 1c and 2c coins was brilliant. Just a trip to another Euro nation makes you remember why as your walled is stuffed with them.

      (The system works thusly: prices can be whatever, but when you pay the total it is rounded to the nearest 5c - it might be just a bit more or just a bit less than the total of your purchases, but it'll even out in the long run. If you're picky about paying the exact amount, use your card.)

  5. Great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When you start banning things just to make the job of police easier, you know that your government has at least a few problems with freedom. If freedom means that police have a harder job, then so be it.

    1. Re:Great. by Bengie · · Score: 2

      They should just ban procreation. The problem will sort itself out in a century. No more crimes.

  6. Warped logic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In contrast, a record of electronic money transfers remains in the banking system, which makes the police's job considerably easier.

    Yes because our lives should be dedicated to making the police's job considerably easier. Welcome to the new fascist state, it's the same as the old one. It just doesn't have all the goose stepping and death camps.....yet.

  7. USA 1969 by musterion · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And just why do think the Federal reserve retired anything abouve $100 on July 14, 1969?

    1. Re:USA 1969 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And with inflation, it's today as if they retired everything above the $10 note in 1969.

    2. Re:USA 1969 by sudon't · · Score: 2

      In 1969, $100 was real money - a good week's pay for working people. Today, $600 isn't that much dough.

      --
      -- sudon't

      Air-ride Equipped

    3. Re:USA 1969 by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "I don't need it; therefore nobody else does."

      People reserve unto themselves the right to purchase things anonymously. It's a check on government power, a kind of spying.

      How disturbed I am at the surity with which people view modern government as nearly perfected, and worthy of such spy powers, when nothing in all human history should give you confidence in that.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    4. Re:USA 1969 by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Only if you believe BLS numbers. Their latest "basket" offsets the inflationary impact of wheat doubling and heating fuel and beef quadrupling by counting in the rapid fall in prices of flat-screen TV's.

      That's not how inflation was measured in 1969, but it's better for the politicians this way.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    5. Re:USA 1969 by radarskiy · · Score: 2

      "That's not how inflation was measured in 1969"

      Merely because there were no flat-screen TV available then at any price, so if they were included in the 1969 basket of goods that would give infinite deflation.

      The basket of goods in not a recent invention. it is good for econometrics because it reflects how people actually spend their money. If it fails to support the political axe you wish to grind that does not make it bad science.

  8. In twenties by Roodvlees · · Score: 2

    It's not like every criminal in movies demands their cash transactions in twenties because they don't raise any flags, like bigger bills would. Maybe in Finland it's perfectly normal to have a bunch of big bills in daily use.

    --
    Thank you, Bradley Manning, Edward Snowden and so many others, for courageously defending humanity, my freedom and more!
  9. Welcome to the Eurozone by hackertourist · · Score: 2

    I wonder if the Finns can unilaterally decide that the 200/500 Euro notes are no longer legal tender in their country. Then again, maybe they don't have to. Many stores over here (.nl) already don't accept large denominations.

  10. treatment denied by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    we see your purchased some burgers and fries when your doctor told you not to. services denied / co-pay raised.

    but I only bought those to give to the homeless...

    DENIED

  11. Criminals don't want these by whyAreAllNicksTaken · · Score: 2

    What criminal wants to be paid with a bunch of $500 bills. How do you launder that? Wouldn't it be preferable to have a bunch of $20's which you could use anywhere without anyone batting an eye? Sure the larger bills are easier to sneak through a border or something, but they come with their own set of problems too. If my extensive knowledge is to be believed, and I've seen a lot of movies, criminals prefer a variety of small unmarked bills with non-sequential serial numbers.

  12. GBP50 = 63 Euro by ledow · · Score: 2

    In the UK the biggest denomination in public operation is actually just GBP50. And even that - try giving it to a taxicab driver at 3am and see what he says - most small shops will refuse them precisely because they are the main target of fraud.

    I was once given lots of £50's by a relative. It was an absolute pain trying to use them for day-to-day expenses. Some of the large supermarkets will take them but they'll scan them and test them and all sorts before they'll accept them. And a lot of places just won't accept them (sure, you can cause a fuss - but who wants to argue everywhere they go to shop?).

    It was just easier to put them in the bank and draw out the equivalent in 20's while I was there.

    The one good thing about the modern age is electronic money. I can't remember the last time I had to carry cash (coin or note). And without electronic money can you imagine trying to do Internet shopping etc.

    Hell, last time I ordered a pizza, I did so online precisely because I couldn't be bothered to go withdraw some cash just to pay the guy.

    It does make money-laundering harder. It does make mistakes easier to make (but there are processes for that, and I've never had a bad experience cancelling a payment even when the company on the other end was entirely unco-operative). And, yes, it does put a lot of your life in the hands of the banks. But I can't really see a future for cash. And certainly not cash in those denominations.

    I don't have a tap-to-pay card, however. The problem needing to be solved is how do I pay for JUST a pack of mints with my card? That's tricky in terms of equipment, commission, hassle (entering codes, etc.) and security (I don't trust tap-to-pay yet).

    To be honest, last I hear most counterfeiting in the UK is actually on 1GBP coins. Because they are made of cheap metal, they tend to be easier to forge than expensive security features like holograms, etc. The only "solution" is to follow what happened with the 2GBP coin, and that's to make it bi-metallic - which is the next plan from the Bank of England.

    P.S. Slashdot really need to sort their systems out. Can't put in a proper bloody pound sign.

  13. Re:Makes sense by reikae · · Score: 2

    Because 200 euro and 500 euro notes are all that stands between total anonymity and letting the government track your every step...

    Maybe I'm not paranoid enough; many posters seem to consider this a huge issue but I don't see it. If getting rid of 500 euro notes means loss of freedom, what does the lack of 1000 euro and higher notes mean? I realize cash would be effectively banned for many uses if all coins/notes above, say, 1 euro were taken from circulation, but I don't think the Finnish government could even succeed in doing that.

  14. ID For Cash Transactions by Scot+Seese · · Score: 2

    Or, they could.. you know - require photo I.D. for large cash purchases, much like the U.S. post-911.

    Try going to Sears and paying $1500 for a new stove in 2002. Drivers license sir? We have to record your name and address.

    --
    THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.