Slashdot Mirror


Raspberry Pi A+ Details Leaked

mikejuk writes Despite trying to keep it secret, a major Raspberry Pi retailer has published some details of the upcoming model A+ Raspberry Pi thanks to a product page that went live early. The board layout looks different and is much smaller than the model A or B+. Judging from the photograph, the A+ board encompasses the four standard mounting holes, which makes it approximately 56x65mm — the model B+ is 56x85mm.

The key improvement is the new 40-pin GPIO socket, which makes the model A+ fully compatible with the HAT expansion standard. This means that any new HAT expansion cards should now work with the A+. It also has what's likely a connector for the yet-unreleased Raspberry Pi touchscreen. Another welcome change is the micro SD slot. One downside of the A+ is that it still has only a single USB 2 connector.

141 comments

  1. A great family of products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I know, the Raspberry Pis are not truly powerful, but because of their low price and easy expandability, they are useful for so many creative projects.

    For my own use, I was thinking of turning mine into an airplay-compatible receiver (I found that there is software for for that) and built it together with (wifi dongle and a little amp) into a very old radio cabinet. Nice to put in the kitchen.

    1. Re:A great family of products by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 4, Interesting

      For my own use, I was thinking of turning mine into an airplay-compatible receiver (I found that there is software for for that) and built it together with (wifi dongle and a little amp) into a very old radio cabinet. Nice to put in the kitchen.

      If your radio is still in semi-working condition, it might be possible to inject the audio signal from the Pi into the radio's existing amplifier. I almost certainly broke all kinds of audio design rules, but in my instance it sounds brilliant. I (briefly) got it working as an Airplay receiver, but for nearly two years it's been doing sterling stuff as a time-delayed BBC Radio 4 device.

      (I would definitely recommend against blindly doing this with stuff that's directly mains-powered - I know that a lot of old radios, especially in the USA, did scary things with mains voltages. For a battery-powered transistor radio? Certainly worth a try.)

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    2. Re:A great family of products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We used a Raspberry Pi, an old USB computer keyboard and an ancient set of Labtec amplified speakers. Pressing any one of 90 keys selects a different pre-programmed station. Cursor Up/Down changes volume and the Space key does Mute/Unmute. We reserved Ctrl-Break for shutdown and Ctrl-Scrlk for reboot. However, since all logging goes to a ramdisk, we can safely turn it off by just pulling the power cord.

      Our design was inspired by Volker Ziemann ( http://ziemann.web.cern.ch/ziemann/gadget/raspiradio/ ). So it also includes a nice Web interface. About the only thing we had to add was the local keyboard interface. ( EVDEV is your friend.)

      There is no display and the keyboard provides all the buttons - nothing else required. So it was incredibly cheap and easy to get running in a weekend.

      In my office it gets plugged into a router, but in the garage, we just plug in a wifi dongle. Best radio we have ever owned. The sound may not be as great as our Bose, but we use it a lot more!

  2. What did you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's still the same old slow chip designed for phones and tablets of years past. No USB3 and Ethernet sockets there.

    1. Re: What did you expect? by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      Damned socialist chipmakers. You just know those bastards are going to take our pi's away from us.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  3. Re:Will it have the same garbage CPU? by ssam · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The popularity of the arduino shows that CPU performance is not everything. rpi is fast enough to do many tasks, it is small, cheap, widely available, well documented and well supported. That's why its popular.

  4. Down side by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One downside of the A+ is that it still has only a single USB 2 connector.

    There are two down sides worth noting. That's one of them; have they got USB figured out yet? Just one port is bad enough but if they bugger the polyfuses again... But the real problem is the RAM. 512MB is cramped. 256MB is unacceptable.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Down side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RPi A seems to be targeting embedded DIY market. What kind of shitty software you write that needs more than 256MB?

    2. Re:Down side by sithlord2 · · Score: 4, Informative

      If I recall correctly, the USB issues have been fixed for quite a while now. Only the first-gen Pi's suffered from this, I think. I have a working wifi adapter on my Pi, and it never gives me issues.

      Since the model B was upgraded to 512Mb, I think the Model A will upgraded too.

      --
      ...You are over-qualified and under-paid. If we give you a raise, we will break the cosmic balance of the universe.
    3. Re:Down side by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      One downside of the A+ is that it still has only a single USB 2 connector.

      There are two down sides worth noting. That's one of them; have they got USB figured out yet? Just one port is bad enough but if they bugger the polyfuses again... But the real problem is the RAM. 512MB is cramped. 256MB is unacceptable.

      A modern standard ARMv7 instead of the odd ARMv6 would be greatly appreciated too.

    4. Re:Down side by ssam · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Arduino has 2k of RAM and people do all sorts of interesting things with it. rpi is definitely not suitable for everything, but is already overkill for many tasks people use it for.

    5. Re: Down side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with the pi is the USB bandwidth. It can't handle much.

    6. Re:Down side by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      the Arduino doesn't run Linux, support video, or networking.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    7. Re:Down side by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      The Linux that runs on it by default? Want to run something other than Linux such as your own OS? CAN'T! Proprietary GPU Boot blob that requires you to essentially be a Broadcom employee to know anything about it.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    8. Re:Down side by amiga3D · · Score: 2

      I've been running the original B version with 256MB with XBMC as a media player and it's worked well for that. As a general computing platform though that does cause big slow downs if you multitask the machine as you run out of ram pretty quickly. I'm about to order some B+ models for a surveillance setup but I think now I may wait to see what the A+ looks like.

    9. Re:Down side by amiga3D · · Score: 2, Funny

      Really, why would anyone ever need more than 640K?

    10. Re:Down side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *networking

      They why do they sell network shields for them?

    11. Re:Down side by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      A modern standard ARMv7 instead of the odd ARMv6 would be greatly appreciated too.

      Connecting up the performance counter interrupt line would, but ARMv7 wouldn't. Having to have different OS images for different models of RPi makes them a lot less interesting. If you want an ARMv7 board, then go and buy one - there are loads of them.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    12. Re:Down side by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      The network shields have a processor that handles the TCP/IP stack for them.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    13. Re:Down side by Narishma · · Score: 1

      There's nothing stopping you from running other operating systems on the Pi. There are plenty of them around and you can write your own if you want, all the necessary documentation is available, or you can just look at the Linux source code if it's not clear enough for you.

      --
      Mada mada dane.
    14. Re:Down side by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      There are two down sides worth noting. That's one of them; have they got USB figured out yet? Just one port is bad enough but if they bugger the polyfuses again... But the real problem is the RAM. 512MB is cramped. 256MB is unacceptable.

      The USB hasn't been an issue in a long time. RAM isn't too much of an issue either. If you want a general purpose computer then this is not it. It's not for multitasking or anything fancy at all, but there are plenty of other products on the market to cater to your needs.

      On the other hand I find a lot of the projects for the RPi appear to be more CPU constrained. But given it's 256MB of RAM it has had absolutely no problem performing as a media centre, or a mame arcade, or the many far simpler and less resource intensive applications I've seen them used in I would definitely NOT call it "unacceptable".

      Remember in it's price category it is more comparable to a high end Arduino than a computer, and it's finding a lot of applications in systems where it doesn't even need a GUI.

      Though some ideas are just simply retarded.

    15. Re:Down side by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      And the RPi does, and supports all of the above within the 256MB of RAM quite comfortably leaving space for running games, decoding high def movies, acting as a file server etc.

      What's your point?

    16. Re:Down side by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Informative

      512MB is massive. It's the same as an XBOX 360. Even 256MB is more than enough for XBMC and a full desktop environment.

      It's a £25 computer and it does an incredible amount, at extremely low power. There are other ARM boards out there with more RAM and better CPUs, but they cost more too. Take your pick.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    17. Re:Down side by fisted · · Score: 1

      One downside of the A+ is that it still has only a single USB 2 connector.

      There are two down sides worth noting. That's one of them

      That's not a downside.
      The onboard USB hub of model B is one of the main perpetrators responsible for the high power consumption. It would defeat the point of model A if it was present.

    18. Re:Down side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know all that offhand but you don't know that it's means it is?

    19. Re:Down side by ssam · · Score: 1

      They released the docs http://www.raspberrypi.org/a-b...

      You can run several non-linux OSs on it RISC OS, FreeBSD, NetBSD, Plan 9. Or you could write your own http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/projec...

    20. Re:Down side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do USB and ethernet still share the same bus? The last time I looked at the Pi, the lack of fast networking with USB storage rendered it a toy for those that can't build their own circuits.

    21. Re:Down side by timeOday · · Score: 1
      I have a 512 one and the slow CPU is a bigger issue for me. It is too slow to comfortably run a web browser. It is also too slow to use as an X server using ssh tunneling. Opening up the X display to accept unencrypted connections from remote hosts, it is kind of OK (no videos, obviously).

      I am sure it's great for lots of things, but if I were buying something to plug a screen and keyboard into, I would go the route of a used Core 2 duo laptop next time. YMMV.

    22. Re:Down side by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      You know plenty of XP boxes which represent up to % 15 of us Internet users work just fine with 512 megs.

      People everyday use word, excel, video editing, and a few tabs in IE 8 just fine with it. I think it's plenty for a hobbyist board. Also Intel makes $200 atom based pie based devices too with USB 3 and hdmi and more ram if you want power. Folks these are $49! That is the appeal for a cheap hacking board. $200 is a little much to goof with in comparison

    23. Re:Down side by itzly · · Score: 1

      It would have been nice if ARM had kept their improvements backward compatible.

    24. Re:Down side by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Apples to Oranges as even a circa 2001 P3 will run rings around the CPU in the Pi and I can state for a fact the average 512Mb system still in use is a P4 between 2.4Ghz-3.4GHz, which will totally curbstomp the Pi in any task you can think of.

      RAM size alone does not a system make and the Pi has a pretty shitty Broadcom chip which does cut its performance by a great amount. Of course with several of the Pi developers being Broadcom employees this isn't surprising, they were probably given orders to clear out the warehouse of those lame duck chips. Is there anybody but the Pi even using that particular Broadcom chip? It reminds me of how Intel made MSFT hobble the Vista launch with the "Vista capable" bullshit just so they could unload those crippled 9xx chipsets before folks realized how truly weak and behind the curve they really were, because just like in that case you have the corp hobbling performance for sake of the bottom line.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    25. Re:Down side by Goody · · Score: 1

      The Arduino Yún runs Linux, albeit on a core separate from the Arduino ATMega device. As others have mentioned, networking can be done with shields. If you really want video and hardcore networking, you probably want a Pi. But the Pi is overkill if you have a task that can be automated with a microcontroller, and the Pi doesn't handle raw pin I/O as nimble as a microcontroller.

      --
      Tired of being "punished" by the Slashdot $rtbl since 2002. I'm now over at http://soylentnews.org/ .
    26. Re:Down side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are other customers using the chip, because for the purpose they need, it's a great chip - great ISP, great 3D, great video decode/encode. And its very cheap. Roku is one/was of them. There are others.

      You are confusing the need for you to have a fast processor, with the rest of the world needing a fast processor. If the device does what is required, use it. Don't install something with 10 times the CPU grunt if you don't need it.

      And your statements about warehouses etc are complete bollocks. That is not what happened (ex Broadcom employee here). Broadcom don't stockpile chips, they generally make to order. Hence delays when the Pi first came out and sales were so much higher than anticipated. The chips had to be made...

      The Pi does exactly what it says on the tin. It's fast enough for a hell of a lot of tasks, in fact too fast in many cases. It works fine in education, because unlike laptops or desktops, has GPIO which children find much more fun to use. They are very cheap. and have a great support community.

      If they don;t do what YOU want, don't buy one, but please don't spout bollocks you know nothing about.

    27. Re:Down side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a similar device and its 512MB of RAM are more than enough for me. It's using 67MB right now, with rtorrent and samba running.
      You aren't supposed to run Crysis on embedded devices. If you need more RAM you probably want a desktop.

    28. Re:Down side by itzly · · Score: 1

      the Pi doesn't handle raw pin I/O as nimble as a microcontroller.

      You can fix that with a kernel module.

    29. Re:Down side by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      They are backwards compatible. The problem is not ARM - it's the rest of the SoC. If you can find exactly the same other components on an SoC with a newer ARM core, then it will be fine. The problem is that ARMv6 didn't standardise things like the interrupt controller (ARMv7 does, but only in a later revision) or the bootloader interface. You'll need a different kernel to support a newer SoC, because most of the other components will be different..

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    30. Re:Down side by itzly · · Score: 1

      If the difference is just the SoC and not the core, it would be easy enough for Broadcom to produce an SoC with the same (or backwards compatible) peripherals, but with a newer ARM core.

    31. Re:Down side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Works fine for me. If you need 512MB you are using the wrong device for your application. To meet the Pi's goals 256MB is plenty.

    32. Re:Down side by Goody · · Score: 1

      I was referring more to the hardware limitations. The Pi has only 8 digital I/O pins, and I think one serial port and an I2C port? Microcontrollers like the ATMega 2560 (and Arduino Mega board) have 50 some I/O lines (with some analog ones in there) and four serial ports. The 8 pins on a Pi you can eat up pretty quick on a project. Of course you can use the I2C port to add peripheral chips to get more I/O, but microcontrollers in general do this a lot better.

      --
      Tired of being "punished" by the Slashdot $rtbl since 2002. I'm now over at http://soylentnews.org/ .
    33. Re:Down side by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I've been running the original B version with 256MB with XBMC as a media player and it's worked well for that.

      It doesn't even support 1080p (at least in the GUI) in the 256MB version. So that's really a failure in my book. Also, XBMC is slow. as. fuck. on the Pi. The GUI is actually less responsive than the last version of XBMC which runs on the Xbox. No idea what that's about, but it's unacceptable.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    34. Re:Down side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem is not just shitty hardware with pi, but shitty os x. Windows XP for all it's flaws is 2000 times more efficient OS than shitty mess of Linux on Raspberry pi. Good luck with systemd on your pi.

    35. Re:Down side by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      comfortably? Well until you run out of ram that is. You can never really have too much ram on a system.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    36. Re:Down side by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      The Arduino Yun is an Arduino that uses a separate Linux WiFi router that is in fact a lot more powerful than the Arduino. The network shields are much the same.
      Saying that the Pi doesn't need more than 256mb because the Arduino only needs 2k just does not make any sense.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    37. Re:Down side by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      First, 'just producing an SoC' is not trivial. The interrupt controllers designed for ARM11 are not going to work well with a Cortex A9, for example. DMA units will have different interfaces. The amount of effort required to try to shoehorn older on-chip peripherals to work with a new core is pretty large. Imagine trying to fit a Pentium into a 486 motherboard - it was possible, but only with a custom Pentium chip designed for it (and only on motherboards designed for the P24T 'Pentium Overdrive'), but the result was a really slow Pentium. The coupling between parts on an SoC is far tighter than between components on an x86 motherboard.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    38. Re:Down side by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      512MB is massive

      I think you and I have fairly different definitions of "massive". I don't actually expect massive, which for a device of this class would be 4 or 8 GB IMO. But 1GB would be welcome, and 2GB would not go amiss. Remember, typical el-cheapo Android tablets (which have a lot more hardware) are now coming with RAM like that. The R-Pi had pretty decent specs when it was released, and if you had been permitted to use the full potential of the GPU at the time, it would have been actually kind of powerful.

      So here's my argument; the Pi was meant to be some kind of educational toy, but it's become far more than that. People are using it for real things now. As such, the additional RAM means the difference between being able to perform complete tasks on-device, and having to offload parts of the process to other systems. It also means that doing on-device troubleshooting of software is much less painful, as the system will better support the GUI.

      It's a ã25 computer and it does an incredible amount, at extremely low power.

      I don't know that it's that incredible, unless you are able to make good use of the GPU. Then it can be fairly compelling. Why don't I think it's incredible? Because you can get a pogoplug brand new for $20. It's got working USB3 as well as SATA, not to mention a case... and a wall wart. You can get the mobile even cheaper (at $10) and it has USB2. Did I mention both of these devices have GigE? For those people who think that 256MB is a lot of RAM and who aren't using the GPU, it's a much cheaper way to get approximately as much processing power into operation without having to worry about the inherent USB flaws in the Pi's SoC.

      With that said, I run into real-world limitations when I try to use such low-memory devices. It's OK for an asterisk server, for example, but no good for the web interface. The Pi is marginally acceptable in that department, but no Pogoplug is really up to the full task that you really want it to do. Sadly, 256MB isn't really enough for that either, so my Pi mostly languishes. I put it into a PS2 TOOL HDD case with a nice power supply (8-18V) and a USB2 hub, and I have a cute mini keyboard and mini mouse that go with it. So it's very cute. Luckily I didn't expect it to be more than that for me. I did expect it to have working USB, which it doesn't really.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    39. Re:Down side by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I have run 1080p content okay. The UI is sluggish but the movie played fine which is really my main concern. It's pretty workable but I'm sure more ram would improve it.

    40. Re:Down side by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      A modern standard ARMv7 instead of the odd ARMv6 would be greatly appreciated too.

      The problem is not the SoC - the SoC was designed like that on purpose. It has a powerful GPU coupled with a relatively weak CPU because the CPU's job was just to get the GPU fed.

      As in, the chip was designed for media players - where the CPU is only managing how to get the media and feeding said media to the GPU (and the CPU is more than fast enough to do basic audio decoding at the same time).

      In fact, if you look around, you can find the same SoC in products you can buy off the shelf today (look in the media player section. If you can buy a Roku 2 or something, guess what? Same SoC).

      The Roku 3 uses a much more advanced SoC that is vastly underutilized (dual core A9 plus dual VideoCore) because the SoC was designed for another purpose.

      In fact, the SoC is really just a package variant of other SoCs - the silicon is identical to several different part numbers (because designing new SoCs is expensive and takes time, so if you can re-use the silicon to produce 10 different parts for different purposes, it's far more economical).

    41. Re:Down side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not funny. Also, damn you for beating me to it.

    42. Re:Down side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you and I have fairly different definitions of "massive"

      Wouldn't it be sad, and a little weird, if you didn't?

      One of the things that's apparent when you start looking at these little computers, is that there are so many different things, filling so many niches. To some people, the Pi is a humungous beast of an overkill machine, and to some people it's a crippled toy. And for some peoples' project, it's Just Right. What we're talking about, though, isn't a quality of the Pi: it's a quality of your project.

      The good news is that there almost certainly is something out there, that fits you. It's just that the more picky you are about not overkilling it (maybe you're trying to maximize battery life or want a smaller solar panel), then the more niche you are. Some people are going to say Arduino is too wimpy and Pi is too much for a certain project, so maybe they're using Teensy. Some people think Pi is almost enough for a certain project, so they are using Beaglebone. There are even scaled-DOWN(!!) Arduino-like variants.

      It's when people make blanket statements, that they reveal themselves to be wearing blinders. 512MB is both massive and not-enough. Know what I mean? It's not enough for your video editor and it's too much for your garden lamp controller.

    43. Re: Down side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the first truly useful comments in this thread.

    44. Re:Down side by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      If the bounds of your system are known then you most definitely can have too much RAM. It's not a general purpose computer, the goal is not to run multiple workloads of unknown size, the goal is to develop an application that fits within the bounds of the hardware.

      A lot of the PC types here on Slashdot don't get this and think it's underpowered.
      A lot of the engineering types who realise that the Raspberry Pi is the same cost as the Arduinos they have been using but has 15x the clock speed and 100x the RAM do.

    45. Re:Down side by tibit · · Score: 1

      For a streaming video display or a full-screen terminal, it's peanuts. I've seen one application of the A model that was brilliantly executed and saved gobs of money over legacy Wyse boxes. There's a business somewhere that runs about 200 A's and all they do is pretend to be 3270 terminals. At boot you get the mainframe login screen. Works a treat. Sure, if you were a masochist, you could probably squeeze that functionality into a low-end 8 bit Atmel, but why bother. It would never pay off unless you had a PO for a million TN3270 devices :)

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    46. Re:Down side by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      " It's not a general purpose computer"
      Yes it really is. HDMI, USB for keyboard and mouse, and boots Linux with a GUI.
      I can see your point if you treat it as an embedded system but just as people can use an x86 itx in an embedded system you can use a Pi.
      As to having too much ram? Well I would see the pi as more of prototyping tool than a cost optimized solution for a production product. On a prototyping tool you can never have too much ram because debug code always takes up more space than production.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    47. Re:Down side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course you can have too much RAM, everything over the 640K mark is too much.

    48. Re:Down side by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I should clarify what I mean by general purpose computer is more akin to it being a PC. Yes it does do things we expect of normal general purpose computers, but you should not expect to use it as such.

      Forget multitasking, fancy graphics, and hardcore processing. It seems that many of the comments here seem to want the RPi to do just those things, as if you can never run a GUI program on a 700MHz processor with 256MB of RAM. But really I think the real problem is that most of the complainers have no idea what they would do with the Raspberry Pi so they default to what they know (browse the internet, email, edit word documents) for which it becomes a damn slow computer.

      I also don't know why you would necessarily prototype on the RPi, but then I don't do any development work with it so I will happily admit I'm completely ignorant in most things software development which don't include running application specific code on a microcontroller. Couldn't you emulate it on a PC? Shouldn't the code be portable in such a way that you can test it on another platform? I will also admit that I'm a great fan of running microcontroller emulators and hate JTAG debuggers.

    49. Re:Down side by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      The Pi was supposed to be a cheap educational computer and was supposed to do things like surf the net and allow people to develop software for them.
      The funny thing is that I am sitting here with an Cortex M4 on and ST-Link JTAG right next to me. But others have Bones, RasPis, and even a few Arduinos that we use for prototyping stuff.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  5. Re:Will it have the same garbage CPU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What the fuck is wrong with people who think that difference in clock speed over a couple of years is worth anything? The earth is millions of years old. If your imagination fails to think of something interesting to do with well-documented, well-supported technology because it's not precisely what the latest fashion demands, your contribution will be worthless.

  6. Arietta G25 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Raspberry Pi A+ is too late. There is much better alternative for DIY embedded purposes - Arietta G25 (http://www.acmesystems.it/arietta). No kernel blobs needed, much smaller (53mm x 25mm) and comparable price.

    1. Re:Arietta G25 by ssam · · Score: 1

      Interesting board if you don't need all the features and performance of the pi. Though it says "Since this is early stage of development, no documentation is available".

    2. Re:Arietta G25 by amiga3D · · Score: 2

      The reason the Pi is so much bigger than this is because of all the things the G25 is missing. The USB ports, the ethernet connector, HDMI port and such take up a lot of room. I'm sure omitting all those things helped keep costs down.

    3. Re:Arietta G25 by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      On the plus side multiple accessible USBs (one of which can be used for a wifi module if desired). On the downside much weaker CPU, no evidence of a GPU or video output at all

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  7. Re:Will it have the same garbage CPU? by jones_supa · · Score: 5, Informative

    The processor in the existing rpi is so slow compared to other (even similarly clocked) modern arm cores that one might seriously wonder if Intel isn't paying these folks to sabotage arm in the minds of developers.

    Raspberry Pi is not a product that follows the latest computing advancements but it is about keeping a stable platform. A program written for C64 works on another C64. A program written for Raspberry Pi works on another Raspberry Pi.

    It would make cooperative education and hobby projects more difficult if people had to continuously negotiate about "is this the 700MHz or 1000MHz version we are talking about". It's more straightforward to have a common ground.

    Of course there's plenty of other ARM boards with the latest hot chips if that's what your project requires. :)

  8. Re:Will it have the same garbage CPU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well documented, is it now? Where's the rest of the SOC datasheet?

  9. Re:Raspi Ripoff by CaptainOfSpray · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Name those boards, or didn't happen.

    --
    "Cock Up Your Beaver" does not mean what you think. This sig is intended to clog filters and annoy do-gooders
  10. Re:Will it have the same garbage CPU? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's also about being cheap. The Pi was expressly designed for use as an educational platform for use in schools. Children break everything, so the pi needs to be cheap enough that a school can keep replacing all the ones that get snapped/squished/thrown/scratched/smashed.

  11. Re:Will it have the same garbage CPU? by ssam · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually they have made pretty good progress in this area. Ahead of most (maybe all) other arm boards and most PCs.
    http://www.raspberrypi.org/ope...
    http://www.raspberrypi.org/a-b...
    http://www.raspberrypi.org/qua...

    Though i suspect when most people say well documented they mean that pretty much whatever you want to do with a pi you can easily find good tutorials. Want to hook up some electronics to so you can read/control them over a network, raspberrypi is probably the easiest (and cheapest) option.

  12. Re:Raspi Ripoff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting comment about 4 Pis dying.

    Did you use the same power supply for all 4?

  13. HAT? by Mirar · · Score: 1

    The HAT sounds very much like it would become very, very useful. Automatically installed avanced I/O cards under Linux.

    Easier than Groove or similar under Arduino.

    I can't complain.

    (I currently use two Raspberry - one Razberry and one Raspbmc. One for controlling LED strips would be great.)

  14. Really? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    They still spread the ports along two sides sides of the board! Put then on one side people and make the cases a lot easer to to make.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    1. Re:Really? by psergiu · · Score: 1

      Raspberry Pi compute module is already available and it has all the connections on a single side of the board.
      Go wild with your case.

      --
      1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
  15. Re:Raspi Ripoff by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    I've mistreated the hell out of mine and they both live. One is now missing the big capacitor, C6 I believe, and it still works fine. I suppose if you step on it then it might fail.

  16. Disappointment on the info and product. by danknight48 · · Score: 1

    There is also no word on what the device's power consumption is, but it has to be lower than the model B+ because it is basically the same design minus the Ethernet chip.

    These no denying, the A+ is cute. RPI fans will stock up on them for more interesting projects that are slightly smaller than before (little sarcasm).

    My only gripe, CPU is still the same, no USB3. Its as if the Raspberry Foundation made a great product a few years ago and are scared to try something new.
    Just wish they would move on to another project with current/next gen tech, instead of rehashing the same old tech that doesnt really benefit anyone.

    However, my Model B 256mb still runs great, so no reason to buy another model yet.
    Upgrade the CPU and i'll buy one. Each to their own i guess.

    1. Re:Disappointment on the info and product. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Stable hardware choices mean stable development platform.

      Really if you want anything go buy it. It's all out there. There are faster boards, more memory, more I/O (not sure about USB3 though, and I'm not sure that would even be relevant or possible given the slow SD card interface and small memory / poor CPU speed).

      But think of the RPi like a console. These changes are cosmetic so that a "design once run anywhere" type development community is built around it.

    2. Re:Disappointment on the info and product. by tibit · · Score: 1

      There's no point to USB3 with that CPU. None whatosever.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  17. Re:Will it have the same garbage CPU? by f3rret · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well supported? What? Seriously, what are you talking about? A bunch of random idiots on some forum that don't know jack shit about the hardware or the software does not make it well supported.

    Just stop trying to pretend the Pi is awesome. It was an awesome idea before it came out, everything since then has been horrible. Production delays, lack of supply (Seriously, how the fuck can you not meet demand for years on end), bad hardware design, closed source GPU blobs that only work on specific linux distros and NOTHING ELSE.

    Its crap. Wake up and smell the shit on your nose.

    So cus' the thing doesn't do exactly what you want, it's bad?

    It's not the holy grail of anything, but it's available and it does its just just fine.

    --
    Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
  18. Re:Will it have the same garbage CPU? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There's a lot of overlap between those constraints. Cheap doesn't just mean cheap to buy, it means cheap to replace. And that means that when you break one, if the exact model doesn't exist anymore then you need to be able to run everything that was working on the old one on a newer model. The advantage of the RPi over more powerful ARM boards is that it comes with that guarantee - the A+ will run everything (including the same OS image) as the A and B.

    The hypothetical 700MHz vs 1GHz issue that the grandparent talks about isn't that much of a problem. More importantly, a new SoC would likely be dual (or quad or octo) core and would be ARMv7, not ARMv6. That's a big change. I expect that the RPi will skip ARMv7 entirely and that eventually there will be an ARMv8 model (possible ARMv8.1 / ARMv8.2), but the jump to 64-bit gives a good excuse for needing a new OS image.

    Disclaimer: I work a couple of floors below several of the RPi Foundation, but the only thing that they've told me about their future plans is that they have some. Everything in this post is uninformed guesswork.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  19. Re:Will it have the same garbage CPU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The CPU will stay the same until A) Broadcom have recouped the cost of designing the chip in the first place, and B) until they design a replacement, which may be never, since the current chip showed there's no market for one.

  20. Price Drop Also? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  21. FTFY by kenh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "One downside of the A+ is that it still has only a single USB 2 connector."

    "One downside of the A+ is that it still has fewer features than the B+ version."

    --
    Ken
  22. Re:Will it have the same garbage CPU? by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Informative

    A few basic tasks. Saying many is pushing the definition of many.

    I invite you to actually go and see what people have used the device for. You're talking about a full Linux computer with GPIO, SPI, UART, Network, USB, HDMI, Audio, and composite out, not to mention the many optional addon cards. If you think it's capable of only a few basic tasks then you are showing an incredible lack of creativity.

    it is small

    Compared to what? Its not really that small, there are certainly smaller in the same class and for less money. Realistically though, for experimentation its exactly the wrong size. For requiring a pin header to do anything, it should be way smaller, and its too small to do anything directly on the board. They picked essentially the exact wrong size.

    In its class, its not that cheap. Its average at best, a bit pricey if you have to wait for it since you can get cheaper ones on a slow boat from china for better prices. This comes up every time some fanboy tries to make out like the Raspberry Pi is worth a shit. Its not. Stop trying to pretend its got good value. Its not the cheapest and the hardware is fundamentally flawed from the start because apparently making a minor rev to the board takes 5 years or more.

    There's nothing cheaper in it's speed class available from any electronics store. Importing something on a slow boat from China doesn't compare, especially if it lacks the features and support of this product. As for hardware being fundamentally flawed... the fact that it has remained a stable platform shows how good the hardware is save for the initial poly fuse issue which was fixed in the second batch.

    Is it? After waiting several years for it to finally get to the point where it wasn't constantly out of stock everywhere, I moved on.

    How's the ebola risk going in that 3rd world wasteland you live in? No seriously there were supply issues for the very first batch. Element14 then had them in stock all over the world within a month. I assume you gave up after a day or live on the moon. Either way that's not something anyone can help you with, save for maybe a slow boat from china.

    well documented

    Bullshit. The GPU is STILL locked down, and thats the part of the device thats actually useful. Broadcom released some specs a while back about the GPU that everyone went ape shit over ... but wasn't useful for actually doing anything and nothing at all actually came to fruition from it.

    And the lack of an open source driver for the GPU means precisely dick when the entire world has a massive community developing for the platform. Every function of the device is well documented including how to use the GPU and access any and all I/O functions of the chip. Somehow the locked down GPU hasn't stopped the device being used in media centres to decode high-def video, or in arcade cabinets playing games at full speeds. But clearly this function must be important to you so why not buy something else and leave the rest of us alone.

    Well supported? What? Seriously, what are you talking about? A bunch of random idiots on some forum that don't know jack shit about the hardware or the software does not make it well supported.

    You didn't need to say this. We already realised you had absolutely no idea long before you spurted out this crap.

  23. Can't call it that... by Dogtanian · · Score: 3, Funny

    I thought the Raspberry Pis were meant to be named after BBC Micro models. We got the Model B and Model A (the latter of which mimicked the Model A BBC Micro in being less popular than the Model B), then the Model B+, which mimicked the short-lived improvement to the original BBC B.

    There was never a BBC Micro Model A+, though. The next one in the series should be a Raspberry Pi Master Series, with numeric keypad. ;-)

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    1. Re:Can't call it that... by John+Bokma · · Score: 2

      And somewhat later an Raspberry Archimedes, with an ARM processor .... wait....

    2. Re:Can't call it that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The early Acorn machines ran on 6502 processors, then the later ones on their own "Acorn Risc Machine" or ARM processor. Similarly, the early Raspberry boards ran on ARM processors, then the later ones on their own "Risc Machine, Raspberry", fondly known for what it did to knock-off such as the Beaglebone, Galilleo and other crap, as the "RM -R" processor.

  24. Re:Will it have the same garbage CPU? by ssam · · Score: 4, Informative

    Many tasks,
    http://hackaday.com/tag/raspbe...
    http://makezine.com/category/e...
    Seems to me like thousands of people are finding interesting things to do. Of course it is not fast enough for everything, but nor is my i7 laptop, or the 48core server box I use at work.

    Small. Ok, that's relative. Its been fine for my uses, smaller than the beagleboard and mini-itx boards I used before. The A+ is even smaller. Interested to know what project you are doing where the pi is too big and too slow, what do you use instead?

    Cheap. sorry if $25/$35 is too expensive. Its a quarter the price of the beaglebaord that I used before. Maybe you can find something cheaper for your specific task.

    Widely available. In the UK there are several high street shops with it in stock, and lots of online retailers.

    Documentation. Personally GPU docs don't interest me (though they are now released, so its the most open arm SoC). When I have wanted to use the pi in a project I have found lots of documentation and tutorials to help me.

    Well supported. 2.5 years after release they are still doing regular software updates, including big things like wayland support. Compared to lots of hardware that is released with some old distro image that never gets any updates.

    So yes the raspberrypi is awesome. It lets lots of people do interesting things at a good price. Sure for certain things an atmega, beaglebaord, banana pi, gumstix, galileo, an old pc or something else might be better.

  25. Re:Complaint to Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have never witnessed such reordering. Maybe you simply wrote a first post and then in your current page it appeared at the first comment, but in reality other comments were already posted, but you didn't see them until you reloaded the page.

  26. Re:Raspi Ripoff by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    Hmm, C6 seems to indeed be the main smoothing cap.

  27. Re:Raspi Ripoff by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    Yes that's what I read too. Apparently it's there in case there are problems with poor power supplies. Mine has worked fine in the weeks since I broke the cap off.

  28. Re:Will it have the same garbage CPU? by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "A program written for C64 works on another C64"

    Not always. There were enough differences between the revisions to make some programs break. Then you add the C128 and it also added some differences.

    The various C64s had different CPUs with different undocumented opcodes, and there were two revisions of the video chip and two of the sound chip (if not more).

    --
    Mostly random stuff.
  29. Not very secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They can't have been trying to keep it secret very hard, cause they've been waving the boards about in TV interviews for a month at least.

  30. Re:Will it have the same garbage CPU? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    Sounds like you need this if you want to blow $200 for a real desktop like system. Sure some emedded uses would call for an atom.

    For building robots and doing simple things an ARM is fine and most importantly cheap! Folks still use XP machines with 512 megs of ram and cpus not much faster to this day. Postgresql, php, image recognition, and other clients tools ran fine on a pentium III. He'll Debian demoed a 1000 users with apache on a 75 mhz pentium back in the day!

    These are not made to run VMware and virtual ized oses and video editing and compiling code. That's what a workstation like my i7 is for.

  31. Re:Will it have the same garbage CPU? by mnmn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It is garbage because a very closed CPU is used as an educational platform without datasheet availability.

    This Broadcom SOC is great for mass-produced routers, bad for sharing with people trying to learn how Linux boots, learning assembly and possibly advancing to their own RTOS. I'm aware of the measly peripheral datasheet sections that are available online, but for Atmel and NXP chips one has to read a LOT more to make basic hardware level programs (how are the VICs nested, timing and boot issues/settings, other exceptions made by Broadcom i their ARM11 implementation etc).

    Consistency is unimportant if youre giving people a board with the OS pre-installed, the kernel can handle different CPUs while users use different programs. But if you want to learn a bit more and go lower level (for example from Arduino), you're screwed by Broadcom SOC's severe lack of documentation. And forget about learning to code for the GPU.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  32. Hrmmm... where have I seen this idea before? by Predius · · Score: 2

    Finally we know why Ebon and Co stomped on the Odroid-W.

    1. Re:Hrmmm... where have I seen this idea before? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the RPi's going to get stiff competition with the Intel Edison--lots of big competitors getting into the space.

    2. Re:Hrmmm... where have I seen this idea before? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that is why I won't touch the Pi.

    3. Re:Hrmmm... where have I seen this idea before? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Intel has been saying that they're going to release chips that compete with ARM (usually the time frame is "next year") for about a decade now. Everyone knows that they really are determined to do so, but it has taken them an awfully long time. From M chips to atoms to to this edison thing, they've all been heavily marketed and set the tech news websites on fire when they were announced. When they are actually released, the movement is small and the features not as groundbreaking as the press release claimed.

      Right now it still isn't available and the size has increased. I would not be surprised if they had to add heatsinks and fans and a power brick before it makes it to market.

      I'm old enough to read Intel's press releases with a little more skepticism.

  33. Re:Complaint to Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It happens all the time. The first post doesn't keep its position if its rating is low enough to expunge it from the first 50 comments loaded. Comments which are loaded with the "Load all comments" button always appear below the initially loaded comments, even if they were posted earlier.

  34. Re:Will it have the same garbage CPU? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    The hypothetical 700MHz vs 1GHz issue that the grandparent talks about isn't that much of a problem.

    I think he was being metaphorical. It's more like "Is it the one with a shitachi KZ415 chipset or the one with a bogocorp 3712A, which both have exactly the same PLU/SKU, unless it was shipped from Hungary on a Friday in which case..."

    WiFI & TV cards seem very prone to this.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  35. Re:Will it have the same garbage CPU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hahah yeah, I had a good laugh at that. The Commodore/MOS semi folks did something incredible stuff, but it was often really dodgy. Bil Herd, the lead designer on the Commodore 128 talks about that in a brilliant and funny 2 hour interview.

  36. Re:Will it have the same garbage CPU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    @BitZtream

    Your post has a number of glaring inaccuracies, ones that could easily have been corrected with minimal Googling, or had you known any thing about what you are attempting to write about.

    It is widely available, and has been for well over a year. If you have a product that isn't meeting demand, you don't sell 4M devices - in 2 years. You can buy one next day delivery from dozens of different suppliers around the world.

    Documentation. For 99.999% of people, there is perfectly good documentation, and for those of a particularly masochistic bent, you have the full GPU documentation to play with. As for everything else, well, it's Linux - how much more documentation do you need? Raspberry specific stuff if fairly well dealt with ton the Pi site, but Google will almost always find you answers - its all out there, if you care to actually look.

    It IS the cheapest device you can get with the spec. That's pretty clear. And I don't count devices that you find on some knock off Chinese supplier with no support whatsoever. That's not cheap, that's throwing money away.

    You do the huge number of people who give time on Raspberry Pi forums, or YouTube, or Blog about the device ,by calling them all idiots. They clearly are not, and that's easy to discover. Of course, there clearly are idiots out there, and some of them try and answer questions they shouldn't - you for example - but hey, name me a product where that doesn't happen..

    There are a number of OS's available on the device - Raspbian, Arch, RISCOS, PLan9 and some baremetal stuff going on. That's fairly good support. The Foundation is continually updating the kernel, there are various projects funded by the Foundation to make the experience better. That's better support than Beagle and the like. But then, after selling 4M devices compared to 150k BBB's I guess they have the money to spend...and they are spending it, on education and improvement.

    The capabilities of the Pi and the breadth of projects that engenders are well known. Try looking past the end of your nose. No, it's not a panacea - it was never meant to be, but to say its only capable of basic tasks is so far wrong you clearly cannot use Google.

    Basically, your entire post is complete bullshit.

  37. Re:Will it have the same garbage CPU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You know what? Datasheet availability for education make no fucking difference. If you are trying to teach how linux boots, use a different platform (and try GPU programming on your desktop if its so important - which it isn't). This strawman argument comes up all the time, and its pathetic. You really DONT NEED THE FUCKING DATASHEETS to teach children because children ARE NOT FUCKING INTERESTING IN THAT SHIT. Even grad level stuff ISNT INTERESTING IN THAT SHIT.

    It's completely irrelevant. The number of people who actually need/want to know that stuff is insignificant compared with the number of people who need a basic grounding in computing.

    And of course, people have got their own OS's running on the Pi, can program baremetal, can run interrupt routines so you are talking shit anyway.

    Why do people who are so far behind the latest progress feel the need to slag an educational charity who are actually doing stuff to educate?

  38. Re:Will it have the same garbage CPU? by itzly · · Score: 2

    It is garbage because a very closed CPU is used as an educational platform without datasheet availability.

    That would depend on what the education is about. If it's about teaching kids to program in Python, then the lack of datasheets is a non-issue. Even if you wanted to hack the Linux kernel, 90% of the code is architecture independent.

  39. Re:Will it have the same garbage CPU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was under the impression that the Pi is aimed at introductory learners. That is people who will be writing their first "hello world" program and new to the concept of variables. It is cheap as possible so children can buy and play with them.

    Even when I kid and learned programming on the Apple II E one did not start with assemble as one's first language and write an operating system as ones first program.

    By the time one is advanced enough to want to learn some assemble langue and alter Linux at the level of detail requiring data sheets for the processor, one probable has a target processor in mind. Or at the very least an application which would drive the process of selecting the best hardware. In either case, it is probable the time to speed the money to buy products/tools for professionals not an educational item made for a child's budget.

  40. Main USB fault remains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    If I recall correctly, the USB issues have been fixed for quite a while now.

    There were several kinds of USB issue. Those related to USB power and polyfuses have been remedied. The B+ (and now A+) power circuitry is now done properly, not a cheap hack like on the models B and A.

    But the biggest USB issue of all remains and will probably never be solved, because it is a hardware problem deep within the Broadcom BCM2835 SoC. This SoC contains just a partial USB controller which requires the CPU to handle in software some of the USB functionality that is missing in the hardware. Unfortunately the CPU cannot provide the required 1ms realtime response to USB events when it is busy, and so USB events are occasionally lost. That wreaks havoc on mice and keyboards, producing stuck keys, dangling or missed mouse clicks, and on the B/B+ also contributing to Ethernet packet loss because Ethernet runs over USB.

    That fundamental USB problem isn't really fixable except by using a different SoC.

    1. Re: Main USB fault remains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it hard to believe that. There are people running Guitarix on an RPi, turning it into a modeling amp. That could never work if it would drop frames!

    2. Re:Main USB fault remains by tibit · · Score: 1

      "Unfortunately the CPU cannot provide the required 1ms realtime response to USB events when it is busy" That's a kernel issue, not a SOC issue.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  41. Re:Will it have the same garbage CPU? by hodet · · Score: 1

    Ok you hate it, we get it. What would you suggest then?

  42. Re:Will it have the same garbage CPU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "lack of supply" LOL

    You can buy the Pi by the pallet load if you want. I've just picked a random idiot. It's you! Congrats.

  43. Re:Will it have the same garbage CPU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So why does a 10 year old need a CPU datasheet? No one in the past has ever learnt anything on a purely opensource platform so why the issue with the SoC on the Pi? I've learnt plenty using a PC. No idea how the CPU works. Don't need to know. Is the device you are using now 100% open source? No. Of course it isn't.

  44. Re:Will it have the same garbage CPU? by Narishma · · Score: 1

    I don't think they will jump directly to ARMv8 because of the price point. Unless they wait 3 or 4 years for their next update, I don't see ARMv8 SoCs being cheap enough to use.

    --
    Mada mada dane.
  45. Re:Will it have the same garbage CPU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You managed to troll a bunch of people. Happy now?

  46. Still missing an audio-in jack by LaughingRadish · · Score: 1

    Since the beginning of the Pi, a big problem has been its lack of an audio-in jack. Instead tinkering about with that has required us to fiddle around with USB-based audio interfaces. Ick.

  47. Re:Will it have the same garbage CPU? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    A couple of nitpicks on your post.

    Documentation. For 99.999% of people, there is perfectly good documentation,

    The docs are pretty poor though, for example there is no proper documentation on the electrical characteristics of the IO pins.

    and for those of a particularly masochistic bent, you have the full GPU documentation to play with.

    Depends how you define "GPU", theres docuementation for the 3D core but not for many other blocks.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  48. Re:Will it have the same garbage CPU? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    there were supply issues for the very first batch. Element14 then had them in stock all over the world within a month

    and the second batch. And element14 reports them as "in stock" when what actually happens (or did back then) is the order was actually forwarded along to another warehouse. so in actuality they had 0 in stock, but were reporting having them in stock to capture sales. If I'd waited a month, I'd have bought something else. element14 can DIAF.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  49. Re: Will it have the same garbage CPU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Banana Pi is a much better choice, dual core CPU, 1g Ram, 1g Ethernet , Sata, power button, reset button, same gpio , same price level:
    http://www.bananapi.com

    I switched to banana pi from RPi

  50. Re:Will it have the same garbage CPU? by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 2

    Could not agree more, rpi is fit for purpose. The company where I work has displays in their branches - before the rpi they were buying PC's with multiple display cards - with the rpi they glue it to the back of the TV, power it from the tv usb port and it costs a tenth of what the PC used to cost. They literally bought out the entire countries stock of rpi's.

    --
    There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
  51. Re:Will it have the same garbage CPU? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    The A53 cores (the 64-bit equivalent to the A7) are already starting to get pretty cheap. I wouldn't be surprised if they become cheap enough for the RPi Master (or whatever they call it) some time next year. Especially as they can guarantee that whichever chip goes in the RPi is going to have a lot of third-party software spending on it. That is very valuable to SoC makers: knowing that anyone who wants to do some embedded project can already get well-tested and well-supported off-the-shelf toolchains and operating systems for their part.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  52. Re:Will it have the same garbage CPU? by Kartu · · Score: 1

    Beaglebone Black does not cost 4 times more (anymore?), last time I've checked it was about 2 times more expensive.(about 60 Euro for BB vs 30 Euro for RPI)

  53. Re:Will it have the same garbage CPU? by ssam · · Score: 1

    I had a beagleboard http://beagleboard.org/beagleb... , $125, though about £120 GBP to order in the UK. So switching to the pi gave me something smaller, cheaper, more reliable (I had various issues with the USB on the BB), with ethernet and accessible GPIOs.

    Beaglebone Black is quite nice, and closer in price to Pi, but I have not personally made any projects where it would be an advantage over a Pi. I for the Pi that I use as a desktop (mostly with just a bunch of terminals SSHed to big machines), it might be a bit faster, but I'd need to add a USB hub to connect a mouse and keyboard.

  54. Mains by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    I've never understood the British use of the word 'mains' when talking about household wiring; it seems to imply there was / is 'secondary' or 'auxilliary' wiring.

    1. Re:Mains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's one of those slightly misleading usages; the mains supply is actually the supply to the house, and the internal electrics are referred to as mains because the power comes from the mains. It's kind of short for "mains-supplied electricity".

    2. Re:Mains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never understood the British use of the word 'mains' when talking about household wiring; it seems to imply there was / is 'secondary' or 'auxilliary' wiring.

      See, you did understand, all along. There was/is a British thing called a shaver plug which was/is indeed secondary wiring. Most English homes I've been in have had a shaver plug, but I'm told many new homes are being built without them now.

    3. Re:Mains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Britain we have Mains Services. Basically what in America are the public utilities.

      We have Mains Water, which is water supplied from a utility company via a network of main pipelines (the mains), By extension we also have gas supplied on the Mains as well as electricity.

      The alternative to Mains Utilities are, of course, private or local supplies that are not part of a national or regional grid or network of services such as a private well, a wind turbine, generator or, even, storage batteries.

    4. Re:Mains by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Mains is short for "mains power". This differentiates it from backup power, UPS, generator, solar or other local generation. In the US, you'd specify the non-standard power source, but in the UK, you just call it "mains" if it is connected to the main power grid.

    5. Re:Mains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Australia too.

    6. Re:Mains by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      it seems to imply there was / is 'secondary' or 'auxilliary' wiring.

      There was. It wasn't at all uncommon to have things like door bells (and servant's bells - I've excavated the wiring from the walls in the former servant's level) to be powered from a battery system.

      Also, with the analogue telephone system, that has a low DC voltage on it, from batteries/ UPS in the exchange. So that was another powered wiring system in some houses. Actually, you should still be able to run a ringer off the telephone line, and dial out using connect-disconnect pulses on the line. I used to be able to dial with the handset hook only, but haven't practised it for years.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  55. Re:Raspi Ripoff by mnt · · Score: 1

    pretty much everything from olimex. faster, equally cheap, and what not.

  56. Re:Will it have the same garbage CPU? by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

    The payoff of the A+ board is not the price. Its supposed to use significantly less power, which would make it more desirable if you needed to leave a remote device alone for a longer period of time, or place it on a drone, where the battery would need to be lighter, or needed to solar power the device on a small cell, and have it run overnight on the rechargeable battery. Still can't beat the power consumption of an arduino, but there's probably applications (drive a webcam) which the arduino can't meet with its CPU.

    --
    There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
  57. I like them by corando · · Score: 1

    For what it's worth, I have a first-run model B (256mb RAM) and yes the supply was short back then, I ordered it at launch (Feb) and got it in July, but i expected as much so it was never an issue. Last year I got a later model B (512mb RAM), no wait at all.

    I've never had any problems with either; the older one runs as a web and VoIP server, the second is my used by my 7 year old to play with Scratch. I have never regretted either purchase, although I will admit running Scratch can tax the Pi, but it is cheap enough to introduce my kid to Linux without making it their main machine.

    For goodness sake, I have a 13year old desktop sporting a 1Ghz Celeron with 512MB ram that is hooked up to a tv and serves as a media player for my youngest. If you can't find a use for a cheap linux box with a somewhat modern GPU, stop whining and use Google.... or just don't buy it. :)

  58. Raspberry Pi Calculator by Mr_Wisenheimer · · Score: 1

    I was thinking that the Raspberry Pi would make a great calculator (with the inclusion of Mathematica and GNU tools), but there are no good cases to achieve this.

  59. Re: Will it have the same garbage CPU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree that not many people will need the documentation, but as a matter of principle, I think it is better to have a better documented chip for an educational project. The BBB uses an TI Sitara, which is extremely well documented. It also has the additional benefit of having two real time microcontrollers onboard which can be programmed which a very nice assembly language. I have been playing a lot with the BBB and really like it. It is however significantly more expensive that the RPi.

  60. Re:Will it have the same garbage CPU? by tibit · · Score: 1

    It has been sitting on the shelves of a local MicroCenter for years now. Get over yourself. I never had any trouble getting one.

    --
    A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  61. All BCM2835 SoCs have this issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unix is not a realtime operating system. Likewise, normal mainline Linux is not a realtime operating system either.

    Every systems designer creating a board for Linux would be expected to know this, so picking a SoC that requires realtime response from a mainline Linux kernel was a severe design mistake by the board's designers.

    You can call the inherent USB problems a fault with the SoC or a fault with the designer's choice of SoC, but playing with words won't make the problem go away. The undeniable fact is that this problem exists, has affected countless users of Raspberry Pi, was confirmed and explained by RPF hardware developers in the extremely long "Elephant" thread on the RPF forum, and is still in that very same state today because it is unfixable in practice.

    Every use of USB that involves USB Split Transactions is affected by this fault and will see intermittent dropping of USB events. If your board doesn't exhibit any USB problems then it's not that your board doesn't have the fault (all BCM2835 have it), but simply because you are not currently using USB Split Transactions.

  62. Re:Will it have the same garbage CPU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd say that 99.9% is about right, so I was a bit off with my 99.999. That 4000 people from the 4M devices sold for whom the docs are inadequate to the point of not being able to complete a project.

    As for GPU, yes it does depend on the definition. For example the camera ISP is undocumented (but can be used via libraries as can everything else), as are some other areas, although the Foundation are attempted to get permission from Broadcom to release more.

  63. Re: Will it have the same garbage CPU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's a trade off that you have hit there. Cost vs everything. Is is better to have full docs, most of which would never be used, or a cheaper device? Or is community support more important?

    School always need cheaper. They also need hand holding.