Slashdot Mirror


Study Shows How Humans Can Echolocate

sciencehabit writes: Blind from infancy, Daniel Kish learned as a young boy to judge his height while climbing trees by making rapid clicking noises and listening for their echoes off the ground. No one taught him the technique, which is now recognized as a human form of echolocation. Like Kish, a handful of blind echolocators worldwide have taught themselves to use clicks and echoes to navigate their surroundings with impressive ease — Kish can even ride his bike down the street. A study of sighted people newly trained to echolocate now suggests that the secret to Kish's skill isn't just supersensitive ears. Instead, the entire body, neck, and head are key to 'seeing' with sound — an insight that could assist blind people learning the skill.

136 comments

  1. Give me a ping... by TWX · · Score: 2

    ...one ping only...

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:Give me a ping... by Dins · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Anybody else read the headline as "Study Shows How Humans Can Echocolate"?

    2. Re:Give me a ping... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes

    3. Re:Give me a ping... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aaaand... the Dallas just fired off two fish. Sorry, Ramius.

    4. Re:Give me a ping... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10/10 read it like that

    5. Re:Give me a ping... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Sadly, I"m guessing this won't work too well if he is trying to ride a nice loud Harley.

      :(

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    6. Re:Give me a ping... by ByTor-2112 · · Score: 1

      Yes. I must be hungry.

    7. Re:Give me a ping... by Immerman · · Score: 1

      No, but I did initially read yours as "Echo-collate" and wondered what exactly you do for a living.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    8. Re:Give me a ping... by marcello_dl · · Score: 3, Funny


      $ echo locate
      locate
      $

      IT WORKS

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    9. Re:Give me a ping... by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 1

      Anybody else read the headline as "Study Shows How Humans Can Echocolate"?

      I first thought it said "eat chocolate", but I guess I was hungry.... :/

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
    10. Re:Give me a ping... by 2centplain · · Score: 1

      Yup!

    11. Re:Give me a ping... by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Everybody already knows that chicks can do that.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    12. Re:Give me a ping... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no such thing as a nice harley.

    13. Re:Give me a ping... by durrr · · Score: 1

      I read it as "Study Shows How Humans Can Eat Chocholate"
      It was very confusing until I reread it for the third time.

    14. Re:Give me a ping... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      at first, i thought it was about a cocoa alternative to e-cigarettes

    15. Re:Give me a ping... by carrier+lost · · Score: 1

      I read it first as "Humans can Echo Chocolate"

    16. Re:Give me a ping... by jasper_amsterdam · · Score: 0

      Only the first 3 times I reread it, trying to make sense of it.

      --
      Let's put the genes back in Genesis.
    17. Re:Give me a ping... by TheTerseOne · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. Then I want and had some dark chocolate because someone somewhere said it was good for me.

      --
      "Newspapers: A tiny little part of the internet, printed out yesterday, and delivered to your house"
    18. Re:Give me a ping... by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Yeah where's my e-chocolate dammit! That sounded soooo fucking good, maybe chocolate flavoring over WiFi? I already have delicious chocolate over USB thanks to this nummy chocolate vape (tastes just like Special Dark BTW, love it!) hooked into this USB adapter but I thought this would cut out the middleman and finally give us the ultimate human achievement, a candy equivalent of push button bacon!

      Oh why u so mean /. non-editors? teasing us with great candies only to show us bat dudes, and he don't even have a cool car or a bat credit card...lame.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  2. Never do this in a dungeon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't want to be mistaken for a Hook Horror or something.

  3. This is just now being covered? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guy was on the TV show Sightings 15-20 years ago

    1. Re:This is just now being covered? by Immerman · · Score: 1

      That it can be done is old news - sounds like this is beginning to understand HOW it can be done. Like that guy who could levitate without understanding the science behind it, who let scientists study him in action so they could unlock the secrets of antigravity and eventually produce the cheap, efficient flying cars we all drive today.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    2. Re:This is just now being covered? by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

      Daredevil has been doing it for even longer.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    3. Re:This is just now being covered? by cyberchondriac · · Score: 2

      I'd like to live in your universe.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
  4. ZATOICHI!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See Hulu.

    1. Re:ZATOICHI!! by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      I was thinking Toph, from Avatar: The Last Airbender.

      Toph is awesome.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  5. Sounds tasty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't be the only person that read the headline and thought it was about some sort of electronic candy.

  6. Chocolate by Dimwit · · Score: 3, Funny

    I read that as "eat chocolate" even after readreading it twice. I still would've been interested, though, since it's toxic to some mammals.

    --
    ...but it's being eaten...by some...Linux or something...
    1. Re:Chocolate by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 0

      Funny, I was just going to post that same thing. I keep parsing it as "eat chocolate".

    2. Re:Chocolate by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 2

      I came close - I kept thinking "But eChocolate is a noun, not a verb!"

    3. Re:Chocolate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real question is, "who puts the 'chocolate' in echolocate?"

      Our best minds are searching for an answer.

    4. Re:Chocolate by Immerman · · Score: 1

      I would think it's obvious, 'e does it (points off stage)

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    5. Re:Chocolate by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Actually it's toxic to us as well, just a bit less so. If you eat a lot of raw, unprocessed chocolate (which has a higher concentration of toxic theobromine than most processed forms), you're likely to have some problems yourself.

      Theobromine Oral toxicity LD50 (mg/kg)
      Cat ---------- 200
      Dog --------- 300
      Human -- 1,000
      Mouse ----- 837
      Rat ------- 1,265

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    6. Re:Chocolate by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      Actually it's toxic to us as well, just a bit less so. If you eat a lot of raw, unprocessed chocolate (which has a higher concentration of toxic theobromine than most processed forms), you're likely to have some problems yourself.

      Well, we have two things going for us.

      First, we can tolerate a lot more theobromine. Second, we're heavier and thus we can take in a lot more theobromine on an absolute basis.

      Third, our livers process theobromine a lot faster - a dog or cat's problem with chocolate is that they can't tolerate a lot of it, they don't have a lot of mass, and they can't process it fast enough for the amount they nibble on.

      Still, it's funny how the difference between "echocolate" and "echolocate" is swapping two letters. Though I don't want to experience fake eChocolates, I'd prefer the real stuff myself.

    7. Re:Chocolate by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Huh, hadn't heard about the slower liver processing before, but wikipedia does state a biological half-life for theobromine of 17.5 hours for dogs, versus the 7.1 hours (presumably for humans) in the non-poisoning theobromine article. So they get poisoned by much less and remain poisoned for much longer - not a good combination. Especially combined with the fact that they're, well, dogs. "I eat therefore I am" and all that.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    8. Re:Chocolate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only smarties have the answer

      (for all USAians that is a reference to a UK confectionary advert)

    9. Re:Chocolate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Facebook is where you shit out every random thought that pops into your bone box, facebook, yes.

      Instead we have a dozen posts from people tittering about their own semi literacy while the interesting stuff is at the bottom of the page.

  7. under pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ears sense the pressure difference when close to an object, that's all it is. clicks would be something else.

  8. Haha, very funny... by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You guys can cack as many jokes as you want but being able to navigate in pitch darkness using echolocation is a pretty awesome skill to have.

    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
    1. Re:Haha, very funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys can cack as many jokes as you want but being able to navigate in pitch darkness using echolocation is a pretty awesome skill to have.

      And being able to navigate in pitch darkness while eating chocolate is even more awesome.

    2. Re:Haha, very funny... by spire3661 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      My only reaction to this article is "Duh". We use echolocation every single day, most people are too 'blind' to actually consciously process it.

      --
      Good-bye
    3. Re:Haha, very funny... by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 4, Funny

      You guys can cack as many jokes as you want but being able to navigate in pitch darkness using echolocation is a pretty awesome skill to have.

      Especially when there is a blackout and you are looking for your chocolate.

    4. Re:Haha, very funny... by CWCheese · · Score: 1

      It's not just navigating in pitch darkness, echo location is useful for all manner of things. How many times have you talked to an auto mechanic about a problem and he asks you 'where did you hear the noise...' to narrow down the location of the issue? It is extraordinary to be able to control it and use it more directly.

      --
      Have a Day!
    5. Re:Haha, very funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well yeah, but so is navigating noisy environments by sensing electromagnetic radiation.

    6. Re:Haha, very funny... by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Well, usually not a lot of echos in that scenario, except as confounding factors. So more sonic-location than echo-. On the other hand if you walk into a large room in the dark you probably have a sense of it's size before flipping on the lights due to the change in the reverberation of your footsteps. That would probably be getting at least borderline.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    7. Re:Haha, very funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are likely to be eaten by a grue.

    8. Re:Haha, very funny... by tibit · · Score: 1

      Most of us actually have this skill and use it, perhaps without realizing it. We go a step further, though: we are passive echolocators. We don't click, but we listen for the multiple echoes of sounds that are emitted by other things, including other people.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    9. Re:Haha, very funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use echolocation on the darknet...

    10. Re:Haha, very funny... by Kjella · · Score: 2

      My only reaction to this article is "Duh". We use echolocation every single day, most people are too 'blind' to actually consciously process it.

      No. To use echolocation would imply that you're making the sound yourself trying to find where it reflects back to you and people generally don't do that. Even in pitch dark most will try using their night vision or feel their way around rather than making noises to nobody in particular. Picking out the direction a sound is coming from or noticing obstacles altering the sound is not the same.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    11. Re:Haha, very funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So is seeing in 3D. Sure echolocation is awesome, for people who are forced to live their life in pitch darkness. However, most people who have their vision will never see pitch darkness unless they go look for it, and are probably still better off using their eyes even under the darkest conditions they will encounter. As a skill for a seeing person I don't think it would be worth spending the effort to train it well enough to be able to use it outside laboratory conditions.

      I have seen some articles on a guy like this one (might be the same, I don't recall) where they scanned the bloodflow in his brain and it was suggested he was using at least part of the brain that is usually associated with vision to perform his feats. So the reason he is so good at it is probably because he is blind and has a part of the cortex to spare to visualize the world using echo location. It shows the elasticity of the brain, but also that it is unlikely anyone with normal vision would ever be anywhere near as good unless they are willing to atrophy their vision for it.

      It's also likely there is a particular (young) age beyond which training this is much harder, perhaps even impossible, something that is known for language learning in humans, but also seen very strongly for vision in cats. If kept in the dark for some time at the start of its life, a cat will never learn to see. It will be blind for life even though the oculary system is perfectly OK. The brain just hasn't learned how to process the information in the period it was susceptible to that learning process, and does not seem to be able to form those patterns later in life.

    12. Re:Haha, very funny... by ccanucs · · Score: 2

      It's one of the potential reasons that people who stand in an anechoic chamber (I had the opportunity to many years ago now and it was an eerie sensation) can feel very unsteady on their feet.

    13. Re:Haha, very funny... by tibit · · Score: 1

      I concur. There's one in a science museum I go to often, and it never fails to make me feel wobbly.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    14. Re:Haha, very funny... by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

      You guys can cack as many jokes as you want but being able to navigate in pitch darkness using echolocation is a pretty awesome skill to have.

      Especially when there is a blackout and you are looking for your chocolate.

      Mmmmmm..... chocolate.....

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    15. Re:Haha, very funny... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Actually, I tend to use ambient sound. You can hear a wall approaching without making a sound yourself.

    16. Re:Haha, very funny... by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      I don't think so. People with normal eyesight probably lack this ability entirely, mainly due to a lack of "hardware" that has to be developed over time. There was some research done that found that the visual cortex can eventually rewire itself to process audio instead. That said, you'd have to be blind at a relatively young age to "learn" this skill, and you'd also need a functioning visual cortex. (Some blind people are blind solely because of a non-functional visual cortex. If they ever picked up this ability, it probably wouldn't work as well if at all.)

    17. Re:Haha, very funny... by budgenator · · Score: 1

      No actually anyone can supposedly do it,

      A study of sighted people newly trained to echolocate now suggests that the secret to Kish’s skill isn’t just supersensitive ears. Instead, the entire body, neck, and head are key to “seeing” with sound—an insight that could assist blind people learning the skill. ... Although some people are more naturally talented than others at echolocation, most got “quite good” after 2 to 3 weeks of training, Wiegrebe says, and could reliably orient themselves to walk down the corridor without running into any walls using just clicks and echoes.How blind people use batlike sonar

      does seem like they learned to do it about twice as fast as I've seen reported elsewhere too.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    18. Re:Haha, very funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given legs I can see how this could take off.

      Then, of course, natural selection is very real.

      Who cares?

      Using Echolocation, I realised news for nerds has disappeared...

    19. Re:Haha, very funny... by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but for some reason, anytime I find myself in complete darkness, I'm also trying to be really quiet. >:)

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    20. Re:Haha, very funny... by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      That's not what I'm seeing:

      http://www.cbc.ca/news/technol...

      If what's described in that article is correct, then this isn't happening without a functioning visual cortex.

    21. Re:Haha, very funny... by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Research suggests that blind people are superior to sighted in echolocation, but systematic psychoacoustic studies on environmental conditions such as distance to objects, signal duration, and reverberation are lacking. Therefore, two experiments were conducted. Noise bursts of 5, 50, or 500 ms were reproduced by a loudspeaker on an artificial manikin in an ordinary room and in an anechoic chamber. The manikin recorded the sounds binaurally in the presence and absence of a reflecting 1.5-mm thick aluminium disk, 0.5 m in diameter, placed in front, at distances of 0.5 to 5 m. These recordings were later presented to ten visually handicapped and ten sighted people, 30-62 years old, using a 2AFC paradigm with feedback. The task was to detect which of two sounds that contained the reflecting object. The blind performed better than the sighted participants. All performed well with the object at 2 m was not by chance. Detection thresholds showed that blind participants could detect the object at longer distances in the conference room than in the anechoic chamber, when using the longer-duration sounds and also as compared to the sighted people. Audiometric tests suggest that equal hearing in both ears is important for echolocation. Possible echolocation mechanisms are discussed. Human echolocation: Blind and sighted persons' ability to detect sounds recorded in the presence of a reflecting object.

      I would certainly suspect that a non-sighted person who echo-locates would be far better than a sighted person, if for no other reason than getting much more practice, I would be interested in comparing a non-sighted and sighted echo-locator in a similar investigation. Could be that that part of the visual cortex could be used in both eyesighted and earsighted vision to varying degrees.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  9. Chocolocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always turn Chocolocation off in the Settings menu.

  10. It is not that hard by gweihir · · Score: 1

    for basic use. I have done it myself when in the dark. Slowly, and carefully of course, but usable. I have no doubt that training can turn it into an impressive tool.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  11. over 40 comments so far and no one by tekrat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    and no one has mentioned Daredevil?
    Either turn in your geek cred cards, or admit that the Ben Affleck movie was so terrible that you've erased any mention of Daredevil from your minds....

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:over 40 comments so far and no one by funkymonkjay · · Score: 0

      just came here late but you're not alone!

    2. Re:over 40 comments so far and no one by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Either turn in your geek cred cards, or admit that the Ben Affleck movie was so terrible that you've erased any mention of Daredevil from your minds....

      What are you talking about?

      All Ben Affleck movies are terrible, you're going to have to be more specific.

      Dwardovil? Never heard of it.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:over 40 comments so far and no one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Daredevil was AWESOME compared to Spider Man 3. And X-men 3. And Matrix 3.

      Apparently, the rule of thumb here is "stop at 2."

    4. Re:over 40 comments so far and no one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always figured that Jennifer Garner played the main character. Just saw now on Wikipedia it was Ben Afflek. Which to my surprise is married to her.

    5. Re:over 40 comments so far and no one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even the Kevin Smith ones?

    6. Re:over 40 comments so far and no one by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Real geeks read the comics and piss and moan that the movies suck donkey's balls.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  12. Nothing new by Charliemopps · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Anyone can do this. You're probably even aware of it if you're married.

    You arrive home after work, walk in through the garage and immediately know somethings different but you don't know what it is. You round the corner and your wife has bought a new rug... or cabinet... or something. Do you have ESP? No... the room "sounds" different. How do you know when someones creeping up behind you? Same thing...

    I used to deer hunt with my father, and his tree stand was insanely high at over 70ft (he liked to think of himself as a sniper) and you could definitely hear the difference when you were the high in the trees than if you were in my stand which was at a much less terrifying 20ft off the ground.

    1. Re:Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      I used to deer hunt with my father, and his tree stand was insanely high at over 70ft (he liked to think of himself as a sniper) and you could definitely hear the difference when you were the high in the trees than if you were in my stand which was at a much less terrifying 20ft off the ground.

      To be fair that isn't hunting.

    2. Re:Nothing new by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      You're probably even aware of it if you're married.

      You arrive home after work, walk in through the garage and immediately know somethings different but you don't know what it is. You round the corner and your wife has bought a new rug... or cabinet... or something. Do you have ESP? No... the room "sounds" different

      Are you sure you just haven't been rigorously conditioned to come in and assume she's done something that you need to identify?

      'Cuz, really, I have no idea of WTF you're talking about.

      Then again, my wife accepts that she's never going to have someone who fawns over such things ... mostly because she doesn't give a shit either.

      It's nice not to have to play the "notice anything different?" game ... which with a few past girlfriends has led to some awkward moments as I say "look, if you want me to notice something, tell me ... if you want me to guess what you're thinking give me a hint ... if I'm supposed to know why you're angry and you won't tell me, I'm going to ignore you for a while and assume this has nothing to do with me".

      Some of us really are un-trainable, and have no interest in being trained even if we were. Some of us are lucky enough to have wives which don't expect that.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a very long, very personal way of saying "I can't detect a change in the acoustics of a room." Sorry about your past girlfriends.

    4. Re:Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its even worse when you comment on a change and get the "your comment was not sincere" reply with ensuing guilt trip and tears.

    5. Re:Nothing new by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      I am sure that some people are better or more sensitive to this sort of thing than others. Personally, I've been a musician for decades. So Sound is something I've very keyed in on. I can be laying on the couch and know if one of my totally silent cats enters the room. Something furry like that definitely impacts the sound. It's something I've noticed for a long time. I can actually follow a moving object around the room with my hearing.

      Now, I should clarify, my house is all 1950s hardwood floors. So a furry animal against a wood floor, sound wise, is like throwing red paint on a white canvas. It's a very obvious affect. A cat moving around a carpeted room might be a lot harder to pick out. But it's all the same affect.

      For a more dramatic example of what I'm talking about. Sit in a room with an open door. Then have someone stand in the door way. That should make the effect clear as day to just about anyone. The entire shape of the room changes. They are blocking sounds that you should be hearing from down the hall.

    6. Re:Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have suboptimal hearing due to some "hunting" (more accurate would be "culling") done in my youth with a pump action shotgun and without hearing protection. Are you suggesting I have a disability that prevents me from being happily married?

    7. Re:Nothing new by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

      No, that disability probably makes it more likely you will be happily married.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    8. Re:Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To those of us who actually "hunt" deer instead of prefeeding and waiting for them to find us, that is called "deer shooting". Hunting is a skill that you cannot claim by sitting in a tree.

    9. Re:Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like you, I have this very visceral "room shape" sense. I experienced it sub-consciously as a boy, but quickly developed an ability to focus my attention on this hearing task, a bit like shifting from a dream to a lucid dream. I also confuse people with the way I am always over-hearing conversations that they would think are inaudibly quiet or covered by ambient noise. Similarly, I seem to be more able to locate and track things visually, such as small animals in a cluttered forest environment or subtle hazards when driving. Together, these senses seem to give me a much higher situational awareness than other folks I compare notes with...

      I actually think the difference is in the brain and signal processing layers, not just pure sensitivity to stimulus. At 40 years old, I don't feel like my ears nor eyes work as well as they used to. I sometimes liken it to having a low-pass filter applied to everything these days. But, I still seem to be better than my peers at pulling signal out of the noise.

    10. Re:Nothing new by H725_IT · · Score: 1

      let's be honest... what's warn you about something new is the credit card sms alert you received! (well, my credit card send me sms alert whenever I pay over 50 €)

  13. Khoisan languages by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

    Could this be an element that led to Khoisan languages? Maybe, for some reason, they were wandering around in dark more than other groups.

  14. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean everyone hasn't learned how to do that to some extent? Does everyone walk into hotel room walls instead of having some idea of when they're close to an object?

  15. We echolocate all the time by Stardner · · Score: 1

    When we walk through traffic and hear cars coming up on us, or know people's position in a room from the direction and magnitude of their voice. It's no surprise that someone lacking an important sense like sight will have much better developed echolocation ability.

    1. Re:We echolocate all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When we walk through traffic and hear cars coming up on us, or know people's position in a room from the direction and magnitude of their voice. It's no surprise that someone lacking an important sense like sight will have much better developed echolocation ability.

      No, what you're talking about is more like passive sonar. Echolocation is an active form of sonar.

    2. Re:We echolocate all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just location, not echolocation. I'd like to think I've got pretty good hearing but I definitely can't hear any echos from any sounds I'm making unless I'm in a tiled hallway.

    3. Re:We echolocate all the time by SpaceManFlip · · Score: 1, Informative

      Really what Stardner is describing is called "hearing"
      Or even more accurately "hearing with both ears" because the stereo sound field is processed by the brainworks computrons to sense direction of sounds etc

    4. Re:We echolocate all the time by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Have someone blindfold you and walk you back and forth through a door between a tiny and huge room (say between an auditorium and the attached AV room) in a situation without any change in the flooring. Talk, click, clap your hands, whatever, and I bet it doesn't take you long before you can detect the exact moment when you step through the doorway.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    5. Re:We echolocate all the time by BellyJelly · · Score: 1

      When we walk through traffic and hear cars coming up on us, or know people's position in a room from the direction and magnitude of their voice. It's no surprise that someone lacking an important sense like sight will have much better developed echolocation ability.

      That's hardly echo location. That's just stereo hearing. The best example I have of that is when I'm skiing - I process where people skiing behind me are by using 2 ears, so that I don't suddenly turn in front of them. No sound generation or echos required....

    6. Re:We echolocate all the time by budgenator · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure it's something that can be consciencely heard, they just learn to echolocate.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  16. I can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can active echolocate, but I can also do it passively. Does requires more than total silence to do it, but the sounds levels requires are amazingly faint. When it is very quite, it requires more head motion and is slower (1/2 - 1/4 foot/sec).

    1. Re:I can by SpaceManFlip · · Score: 1

      How do you get more than total silence?

    2. Re:I can by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      He turns it up to 11

    3. Re:I can by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      How do you get more than total silence?

      With Dark Silence, bitches!! :-P

      Silence which is so quiet it can't even be detected, only theorized!

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  17. Mmmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    eChocolate

  18. This is just ableist talk... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...for people who have heads, necks or bodies.

    I love listening to crazy people who actually talk like that.

  19. Re:I do this with water temp. by Immerman · · Score: 1

    I've noticed a similar effect, though I haven't really thought much about *what* qualitative change I'm hearing. Makes sense though - water changes density with temperature, so it's acoustic properties should also change.

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  20. tapping keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I knew a blind guy who used to walk home from the pub without a stick by tapping the keys in his pocket and listening for the echo, the different envirnoments to the side making different sound as he would walk past.

  21. Timing or volume? Double distance = 1/10th as loud by raymorris · · Score: 1

    TFA says (assumes?) that these people's brains measure the tiny difference in how long it takes for the echo to come back. Perhaps, but for every doubling of distance, the strength (spl) of the echo drops by about 90%. That seems like a much, much easier thing for humans to detect. I know the change in reflected volume is obvious when I'm driving next to a concrete wall versus an open lane.

    -- Technical details --

    Yes, my subject line says "loud", then I gave a measurement in sound pressure level (SPL). I know they aren't exactly the same thing, but the subject line has limited characters and I wanted to get the idea across in a way that is easily understood.

    How do I figure the 90% reduction? It's supposed to be 6db, or about 75% reduction right? For a point sound source in free air, yes. This can be analyzed as two sources in free air - source to target, then target to source. The SPL hitting the wall is reduced by 75%, which directly reduces the amount of echo at the wall by 75%. That echo then travels twice as far going back, for another 75% reduction. Additionally, there is the frequency-dependent damping effect, which also varies by humidity. "High frequency" clicks will have significant damping as well, which is also relative to distance.

  22. eChocolate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All I saw was chocolate!

  23. Re:I do this with water temp. by tibit · · Score: 1

    Not only you're not alone, this is a rather common physics experiment (or should be), but it doesn't have much to do with density - it doesn't change fast enough with temperature. But there is something about water that changes rapidly as you go from cold to hot water: viscosity.

    Water's viscosity decreases rather dramatically with temperature - about 25% per 10deg C or so. The Reynolds number, a key descriptor of the fluid flow in a given situation, is inversely proportional to viscosity, with factor 1. Thus, in the flow of water in the tap, as you go from "cold" (around 10C) to "hot" (around 60C), the Reynolds number increases by a factor of ~3.5. In the turbulent flow, such a change is easy to hear.

    --
    A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  24. I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've already used it to navigate in the dark and avoid obstacles. Also to detect cars passing by with my eyes closed when bored and waiting for my ride to arrive.

  25. Torso and Head and "Seeing" by SillyHamster · · Score: 1

    Instead, the entire body, neck, and head are key to 'seeing' with sound

    The way this is written up, it makes it sound like the body/head are part of the sensors.

    When you read the article, you find the significance is that in one scenario, the blindfolded participants "couldnâ(TM)t move their heads or torsos" and were unable to navigate a virtual corridor. So it's not that the body/head are part of the listening, it's that the person wasn't able to move their ears to listen from different locations. By the same logic, your body/head are key to "seeing" with your eyes ... which is stretching it.

    Parallels can undoubtedly be drawn with SAR. Amazing how this capability is built into the human brain (and other animals).

    1. Re:Torso and Head and "Seeing" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parallels can undoubtedly be drawn with SAR. Amazing how this capability is built into the human brain (and other animals).

      Parallels could be drawn to RADAR or SONAR, because it is SONAR. And RADAR is just SONAR with radio waves instead of sound. It's nothing like Synthetic Aperture RARAR, which relies of phase correlations between many hundreds (or thousands) of separate radar pings.

    2. Re:Torso and Head and "Seeing" by SillyHamster · · Score: 1

      Parallels could be drawn to RADAR or SONAR, because it is SONAR. And RADAR is just SONAR with radio waves instead of sound. It's nothing like Synthetic Aperture RARAR, which relies of phase correlations between many hundreds (or thousands) of separate radar pings.

      The important bit of SAR is not that there are hundreds/thousands of separate radar pings, it's that the effective aperture is increased by moving the antenna around to collect signal returns from multiple locations serially.

      Note how the ability to move the head/torso (and thus ears) was important to successful navigating. That means the brain is collecting extra information from the movement. Would be interesting to measure how much freedom of motion is needed.

  26. No, that was stereo hearing by PaulBu · · Score: 1

    There is a reason we have two ears -- to be able to distinguish the direction the sound is coming from!

    But it is not actively clicking and listening to the echo (though probably it would work much worse for a blind person who is also deaf on one ear!)...

    Paul B.

  27. Up From Dragons by Amorymeltzer · · Score: 1

    This topic was covered about a decade ago in the truly excellent Up From Dragons: The Evolution of Human Intelligence. One of the authors is Dorion Sagan, son of Carl Sagan, who wrote the also-excellent Dragons of Eden. A bit outdated, perhaps, but the concepts and ideas stand. I cannot recommend them enough.

    --
    I live in constant fear of the Coming of the Red Spiders.
  28. Re:I do this with water temp. by Immerman · · Score: 1

    Ah, that would make a lot more sense, and thus is my personal world-myth is yet again updated with a more plausible explanation in the face of contradictory evidence. Ain't science wonderful?

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  29. The bike riding is less than impressive.. by Midnight_Falcon · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you'e seen videos of him doing the supposed "riding bike down the street," he only gets a handful of meters, slowly, and it is a very painstaking bike ride. They even edit his video to show the more successful parts. I looked into this after seeing his TED talk -- while echolocation seemed pretty neat, it definitely seems like his foundation is exaggerating its efficacy. It definitely does something, his bike riding is awkward at best but I think it's talked up in an effort to encourage others to learn it as well.

  30. Batman by istartedi · · Score: 0

    Da-na-na na-na na-na Batmaaan!

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:Batman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I honestly expected "I'm Batman" jokes to be much higher in the comments. This site really is going downhill....

    2. Re:Batman by ccanucs · · Score: 1

      I think your sig needs hospitalization. Probably in intensive cares... ;-) ;-)

  31. J.J. Gibson already said this by t4eXanadu · · Score: 1

    The noted perceptual psychologist and founder of ecological psychology already stated this in his The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. He states that visual perception doesn't involve just the brain and the eyes, it is dependent upon the head, neck, and the entire body. Although he was referring to visual perception specifically, he regarded all modalities as being dependent upon the body and it's parts in relation to one another and in relation to the environmental layout. His theories have largely gone unnoticed. I consider this to be another confirmation of his ecological psychology. A shame his work will probably continue to go unnoticed (although concepts he proposed, such as affordances, have been slowly creeping into the psychology literature).

  32. Re:I do this with water temp. by jafiwam · · Score: 1

    I always thought this was the pipe, the faucet head and aerator and sink changing temp. Not the water itself.

    You can hear the difference between a mug of hot water and a mug of cold water if you tap the outside of the mug with a spoon as well. That doesn't have any turbulent flow to it...

  33. So, how about by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    Since the operation is performed with fixed ears and the angle of the ears must be changed to catch the various reflections...

    Seems to me that there are two obvious technological solutions.

    First, one could create a 360 degree sensor on the horizontal plane (Collinear with the ground), that listened for returns, and shifts/recasts them in frequency based on the return angle, then sends the mixed tones on to the ear. So tone is angle(s), and delay is radius. One obvious initial benefit is that echoes can be sensed from any angle, including the reverse, without waving one's ears/head around. Second, by adding frequency to delay, a 2nd easily perceptible dimension replaces that motion of the head. Another is that a single click emission can serve to "Illuminate" surroundings at many angles in the plane, because all return angles are covered simultaneously by the sensor.

    Second, the device could be the emitter of the pings, could do so supersonically, and then translate down on echo. This would serve four purposes:

    First, to move the clicking out of the normal audio range, so as to not distract others.

    Second, to free up the mouth for speech

    Third, to gain resolution -- higher frequencies consist of shorter wavelengths, and so they bounce more fully off smaller objects.

    Fourth, it provides the same potential you get with sonar and radar: the ability to narrow the ping emissions to a zone of particular interest, with the added bonus of upping the radial resolution as the same tonal range could then be utilized to resolve detail across the smaller zone.

    I'm pretty sure there are more implications lurking, but I haven't had my coffee yet. :)

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  34. Re:I do this with water temp. by godel_56 · · Score: 1

    I do something like this when I'm in the bathroom at work.

    I can literally turn on a faucet here without touching the temperature of the water and the instant the water starts coming out warm I can hear the sound difference.

    It's like the sound gets more "noisy" and less "linear" when it's hot water coming out. I can even tell as it's warming up since the pitch changes as well then holds steady at full-hot.

    Anyone else do this? I'm starting to wonder if I'm alone here.

    It's more likely a change in the physical dimensions of the pipe with temperature, rather than anything to do with the density of water. The pipe expands and its resonant frequency decreases.

  35. Doc Watson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The famous musician Doc Watson was blind since about 3 years old and in interviews he used to talk about hearing echos off all sorts of things - including tall grass and bushes. He also related to playing hide-and-seek as a kid and being able to tell people apart by listening to them breathing.

  36. Artificial Clicker/ by godel_56 · · Score: 2

    I wonder if some sort of artificial pulse generator would be an improvement, rather than producing the clicks yourself.

    You'd be guaranteed repeatability and might be able to shape the pulses in order to get a better result. Would differently formed clicks work better at different ranges or with different surfaces?

    1. Re:Artificial Clicker/ by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Users don't necessarily want the same clicks, as you yourself pondered. It's far easier for them to figure out which clicks work best for them, and then what variations of those work best in different situations. Just like glasses are different for everyone (who needs them), the clicks would be different too. From what I've seen, yes, different clicks are more useful in different circumstances, more so than just "indoor clicks" and "outdoor clicks".

  37. Re:I do this with water temp. by tibit · · Score: 1

    Sure, but with changing viscosity the sound propagation in the liquid changes - especially that the quality of the resonance in the liquid scales with viscosity (viscous damping!). The speed of sound in the liquid changes too, but the change in the 0-60C range is about a factor of magnitude smaller than the change in viscosity.

    --
    A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  38. I had a blind friend in college... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the college had some covered sidewalks between buildings, held up by metal 'poles.' I forget how wide the poles are. 6"? 12"? He could here them ringing and could walk down these sidewalks and stay toward the middle.

    ==
    As a result of being small and being bullied a studying martial arts and chi gung, I have a strong sense of people around. Hypervigilance? Eyes in the back of my head. The most annoying aspect is that the average person are fairly oblivious to the presence of other me, and more oblivious to me (I walk like a Ninja), and, when on foot, are often in my way, or blocking an aisle. Getting such people's (and 80% this includes you) often require me to yell at them. An I guess than makes me rude.

  39. musicians know this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked at an opera institute in Austria in the 1970s, and met a blind opera singer who could navigate around the buildings this way, making little clicking sounds. I asked her how she did it and she told me she mostly just listened to the sounds made by her shoes on the floor. So I tried it and sure enough I could detect walls and especially hallways, which would suddenly boom with reverb when you walked past them. As a sound engineer, I can pretty much always tell the size of a room the music was recorded in, even when masked somewhat by artificial reverb.

    Try rolling down your windows when you drive and listen to the echo of the whitenoise generated by your wheels. I can hear telephone poles as I drive by, parked cars, even foliage (it sounds "soft") and the doppler shift of the curb as the car gets closer and further away, or a turn lane appears.

    Pretty cool.

    dpa

  40. I do it a bit. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    You mean everyone hasn't learned how to do that to some extent?

    I do it a bit.

    I get a sensation of presence of something nearby when there IS something close and I am making sounds I know I'm making (mouth clicks, footsteps, etc.) in an otherwise reasonably quiet environment, or when well-locatable sounds with bursty high-frequency components are present in the environment to provide a sonic "light source" of suitable form and predictability.

    It's usually enough to keep from bumping into things. (Even soft, sound-absorbing things like plush furniture, are "visible" as a "quiet lump" - especially if there are hard things around to create acoustic contrast.)

    It's not usually consciously apparent that sound is involved, rather than some "extra sense", unless there are really loud echos, like one's footsteps while walking in a concrete or tiled tunnel. (Haven't you had a sense of ambiance in such situations?)

    The sensations are so well tuned as an input for moving, dodging, grabbing, and the like, that I've been assuming it's an evolved mechanism (that might have needed exercise in youth to develop properly), like vision, rather than something purely learned.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  41. E-Chocolate = 3rd rate bought from Ebay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and later after you've eaten it you find out it was meant to be cheap laxative but failed quality control.

  42. Re:I do this with water temp. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surface tension is dependent on temperature, so the water will splash differently when warm.

  43. Doc Watson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard that interview, he said that the breath went through the vocal cords and he could hear them if people were breathing harder than normal (like his friends playing.) He also talked about climbing (and falling out of) trees.

  44. Too long in front of the computer by Trogre · · Score: 1

    It took nearly a minute before I realised that this article is not in fact about electronically transmitting aspects of a certain popular confectionery.

    echolocate != echocolate

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  45. echolocate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The movie Ray claimed that Ray Charles had this ability; using the sounds from his hard soled shoes.

  46. I thought it was about eyaculating chocolat by Optali · · Score: 1

    ROFLMAO... I was reading e-chocolate X-D and I thought they figured out how to make you cum chocolate
    Fuck! Now it will take me hours to stop laughing... fuckssake mates, use hypens XD

    --
    -- 29A the number of the Beast