Slashdot Mirror


Court Shuts Down Alleged $120M Tech Support Scam

wiredmikey writes A federal court has temporarily shut down and frozen the assets of two telemarketing operations accused by the FTC of scamming customers out of more than $120 million by deceptively marketing computer software and tech support services. According to complaints filed by the FTC, since at least 2012, the defendants used software designed to trick consumers into believing there were problems with their computers and then hit them with sales pitches for tech support products and services to fix their machines.

According to the FTC, the scams began with computer software that claimed to improve the security or performance of the customer's computer. Typically, consumers downloaded a free, trial version of the software that would run a computer system scan. The scan always identified numerous errors, whether they existed or not. Consumers were then told that in order to fix the problems they had to purchase the paid version of the software for between $29 and $49. In order to activate the software after the purchase, consumers were then directed to call a toll-free number and connected to telemarketers who tried to sell them unneeded computer repair services and software, according to the FTC complaint. The services could cost as much as $500, the FTC stated.

86 of 129 comments (clear)

  1. Why... by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 4, Informative

    did this take so long to occur. It amazes me both that people fall for this, and that the credit card companies allow these services to operate under merchant accounts.

    1. Re:Why... by TigerPlish · · Score: 2

      did this take so long to occur.

      Big ship turns slow -- the inertia of government / judiciary is fearsome.

      Maybe they spent the time gathering intel and evidence, dotting Is and crossing Ts. Building a case. Due process and all that.

      Either way.. win!

      --
      The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    2. Re:Why... by khasim · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My guess is that someone important was scammed OR the money got to the level of "important" for the banks. This has got to be one of the easiest things that the FBI could track and bust.

      A related question, though. As anyone who's ever done support knows, the average computer is awash with problems. How different would the situation have been if the scan had been real instead of a scam?

    3. Re:Why... by Pablew+Nopl · · Score: 5, Funny

      Man, these people are idiots. Why didn't they just use MyCleanPC?

    4. Re:Why... by arth1 · · Score: 1

      It amazes me both that people fall for this, and that the credit card companies allow these services to operate under merchant accounts.

      The latter shouldn't amaze you. The credit card companies get a cut, I mean transaction fee.

    5. Re:Why... by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Why would the credit card companies allow this?

      1) It brings in money to the credit card companies. They have no incentive to stop a money flow from coming in.
      2) If the scam gets too much negative PR, the credit card company can "discover" the scammer, cut off their accounts, and publicly declare how shocked (SHOCKED!) they are that this scam was taking place.

      In other words, scams like this are free money to the credit card companies with no downside.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    6. Re:Why... by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 2

      Legitimate AV software that will scan for free will also fix for free. You never see it scan but refuse to fix until you pay up unless it is a scam, AFAIK.

    7. Re:Why... by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Man, these people are idiots. Why didn't they just use MyCleanPC?

      I'm surprised it is not posted here many many times as, for once, it may be on topic.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    8. Re:Why... by knightghost · · Score: 1

      If something takes forever then it's not a win. Maybe the FCC needs an app like Mr. Number.

    9. Re:Why... by smallfries · · Score: 1

      And yet this has reached a conclusion, so it did not take forever. Sounds like a win?

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    10. Re:Why... by quantaman · · Score: 1

      did this take so long to occur. It amazes me both that people fall for this, and that the credit card companies allow these services to operate under merchant accounts.

      More than that. Why isn't this criminal?

      I understand why you may not want to criminalize every dubious business practise, but these folks were literally telling straightforward lies to consumers to make the sale. Why isn't that fraud?

      --
      I stole this Sig
    11. Re:Why... by smallfries · · Score: 1

      Yeah the telephone support is amazing.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    12. Re:Why... by Zibodiz · · Score: 1

      Kaspersky and McAfee both publish scan-but-don't-fix AV software. I'm sure others do as well.

    13. Re:Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Legitimate AV software ...

    14. Re:Why... by Wootery · · Score: 1

      But the whole story is that the court shut them down. Surely it is considered fraud (or something similar), no?

    15. Re:Why... by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      Where does Bennett stand on the MyCleanPC vs telemarketer controversy...?

    16. Re:Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      did this take so long to occur. It amazes me both that people fall for this, and that the credit card companies allow these services to operate under merchant accounts.

      They weren't infringing on Disney copyright.

    17. Re:Why... by qbast · · Score: 1

      And how many chargebacks?

    18. Re:Why... by kmoser · · Score: 1

      Legitimate AV software that will scan for free will also fix for free. You never see it scan but refuse to fix until you pay up unless it is a scam, AFAIK.

      My Windows XP has known bugs which Microsoft refuses to fix. Instead, they are asking me to upgrade to Windows 8. Scam!

    19. Re:Why... by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      did this take so long to occur. It amazes me both that people fall for this, and that the credit card companies allow these services to operate under merchant accounts.

      The credit card companies like these guys. After all, they did not steal the card numbers, payments were made and there are no losses, as would happen if the card/card number was stolen.

      As the card companies would say

      "There is a sucker born every second".

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  2. Let's just execute the principles live on TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If we consider the aggregate harm of these scams, they're on the order of mass murder, possibly up there with actual war. Thus the punishment should fit the crime. It's not even like these people have the Moist von Lipwig excuse of scamming the scammers.

  3. To be honest... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This sounds a lot like getting medical treatment in America.

    1. Re:To be honest... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up!

  4. Small fish by lucm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just change a few words and multiply the numbers:

    Typically, consumers downloaded a free, trial version of the software. The business analysts always identified numerous suboptimal business processes, whether they existed or not. Consumers were then told that in order to fix the problems they had to purchase the paid version of the software for between $290,000 and $490,000. In order to customize the software after the purchase, consumers were then directed to call a certified partners network and connected to consultants who tried to sell them unneeded upgrades and tools. The services could cost as much as $500 per hour.

    ...and you get a typical SAP implementation scenario.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
    1. Re:Small fish by RandomAdam · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wanted to mod this "funny" but it is too close to the truth....where is the "sad but true" mod!

      --
      @Random_Adam

      Sometimes a sig doesn't have to be funny!!
    2. Re:Small fish by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      so what you're saying is, the real value of SAP is $29 per site license?

      (next dumb question: does SAP actually do what it says on the tin?)

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  5. PC Cleaner by budgenator · · Score: 1

    I kind of figure something was up when PC Cleaner said my linux machine had currupt entries in the registry; but al you can say is P.T. Barnum was right, there is a sucker born every minute.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    1. Re:PC Cleaner by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 5, Funny

      I kind of figure something was up when PC Cleaner said my linux machine had currupt entries in the registry;

      Wait a year or two. They're just getting ready for systemd.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  6. You know what's really sad? by sribe · · Score: 2

    Given that: 1) people were actually spending money with strangers who called them on the phone, and 2) how many home Windows machines are infested with malware, this shows that you could make a hell of a lot of money by modifying the operation just slightly--have people download legitimate scanning software which would only report real problems. You trade away some of your profit margin in exchange for not going to jail. (Granted, you might still run afoul of telemarketing regulations, but that's a whole lot less serious than fraud, civil vs criminal.)

    1. Re:You know what's really sad? by youngatheart · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Greed.

      There is/was a popular scam that involved getting people to look at their Windows error log in order to convince them that they needed "help." It was quite effective because the average user easily accepts that errors are the same as problems.

      My mom and a co-worker were both targets of this particular scam. The target would receive an unsolicited phone call from someone who made the target think the caller was associated with Microsoft who would show them the errors on their computer. The caller would then try to convince the target to let the caller have access to their computer. Neither of the targets had a clue that the errors they were seeing were normal and it could have gone quite badly for them. Both my mom and co-worker declined to let the caller do anything on their computer saying that they had someone who handled this kind of stuff for them (me.) Naturally I received a not quite panicked call shortly after and was able to reassure them it was only a scam and their computer was fine, but I think either could have been victimized if they hadn't had someone they know and absolutely trust to handle serious computer issues for them.

      My company gives me a phone and it's an iPhone so I can give good tech support to the boss who "needs" an iPhone. Because it is a company phone, I can't jailbreak it or hack around on it in good conscience, but it chafes. I can't put whatever software I want on it or make it work the way I would prefer because Apple makes their customers a deal: trust us completely and we'll make your device work the way it should.

      As much as it chafes me to deal with such a walled garden, I can't help but think it's the way consumer products need to be designed. The harder it is for my mom and co-worker to mess up their device, the less time I have to spend fixing it.

      With that background in mind, I can't help but hope MS goes more and more down the road toward building in their own computer security because it removes the incentive to get an anti-virus package which has to "solve" issues that aren't really problems in order to appear useful.

      If the scammers were just a little less greedy, they could have used the same approach to sell actual anti-virus packages. I think most anti-virus companies are just slightly less greedy or they'd be running the same scams.

      Greed is the thin greasy line that separates "legitimate" anti-virus vendors from criminals. For decades I've told people they needed antivirus and security software despite knowing the big vendors introduce a new set of problems, because it was necessary. Now MS is building it in and I can tell them to just use the free MS software that's built in and I get less support headaches. I'm sure it's hurting the AV vendors, but I've had to fix too many problems they caused to feel much sympathy.

    2. Re:You know what's really sad? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      to bad apples walled garden was to much censorship

    3. Re:You know what's really sad? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      My father and my wife's grandmother were both hit by this scam. My dad almost ran their software until the guy mentioned how it would let him remote in. This worried him enough for him to call me. (Though he still tried arguing with me for a bit that "it might be real" when I told him it was a scam.)

      My wife's grandmother only escaped from being victimized due to extreme technological non-savvy. Yes, talking her through downloading and running a file was *SO* horrible that the scammer gave up! (They called back another day to try again but by that time, we warned my wife's grandmother and she was prepared.)

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    4. Re:You know what's really sad? by matria · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the time my Cuban refugee ex-husband wanted me to help him work with the widow of a deceased Spanish ambassador to Nigeria, who needed to move several million dollars out of a Nigerian bank account before the Nigerian government seized the money. It took a while to convince him that it was a scam.

    5. Re:You know what's really sad? by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Greed.

      There is/was a popular scam that involved getting people to look at their Windows error log in order to convince them that they needed "help." It was quite effective because the average user easily accepts that errors are the same as problems.

      Fortunately, many of the scammers aren't to bright either and are easily played if they think you're a mark. I get those calls every now and then and drew with them until they are clearly really pissed. Then I tell them I'm bored and thank them for the free entertainment. That causes them to blow a gasket and I start laughing and hang up. You can go many ways with the game and if you slowly and progressively win their trust ask all kinds of strange questions.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    6. Re:You know what's really sad? by youngatheart · · Score: 1

      Really! You were an Apple fanboi until you said this.

      I'm an admin, so that probably accounts for a lot of my perspective. I judge a system by more than how convenient it is for me. Most systems have good and bad parts and I've rarely used something I couldn't find both the good and the flaws in. It's not totally unfair to call me a Unix geek, Linux zealot, Apple fanboi and MS shill if you must, they've all helped me earn a paycheck. Even Xenix and SCO had good points. About the only OS I didn't care for at all was an NCR ATM system but even that probably had something good about it if I'd looked harder.

      When has Microsoft ever increased security in a application release? There's Vista, where the security was so anal, everyone turned it off. Just about everything else was worse, usually because the microsoft 'extensions' were designed to break the previous version.

      I didn't turn off the UAC in Vista for myself or our company; I learned how to work with it. When we moved to Win7, we already had the skills and experience to use it, but I was really speaking of Security Essentials and Windows 8 and 10 building in anti-virus and malware protection. MS had done plenty that they deserve to be faulted for but UAC and integrated AV and Malware protection are things that I think have been good for the industry. It's no SELinux (love it) but it is a step in the right direction.

      We would still be limited to Genie/CompuServe/AOL, if that model was really followed.

      The open internet seems obviously the way things should have gone now, but back in the days of running a bulletin board system, it wasn't so obvious. Genie/CompuServe/AOL provided a necessary stepping stone. If you think the internet would have developed as quickly as it did without AOLs send everyone a disk approach, you're overestimating the average consumer.

      You say how great training wheels are and then whinge you don't want them.

      If everyone was like me, there wouldn't be a need for anti-virus and malware protection and UAC. There wouldn't be a need or market for Microsoft for that matter. I can accept that most people need protection from their own bad decisions because not everybody has the aptitude or interest or even energy to learn the things they need to in order to work with computers safely. I'm a long, long way from being an average computer user. It is a hobby, a career and a friggin' paycheck for me. Of course I don't want to follow the normal computer user recommendations, I'm not the normal computer user.

      That Windows is a less stable and less secure system is a different issue. Yet many people like you, demand that everyone else be shoved into the walled garden as a solution.

      Windows is a quite stable and secure system handled correctly. Microsoft has made the decision to offer backwards compatibility over and over again and there is no doubt that has hurt their ability to make Windows as stable and secure as I wish it were, but Win 7,8,10 have made significant and important strides. Vista had some serious growing pains, but if you move someone from Win7 to Vista now, it is nearly painless, proving the industry was more of the problem than Vista was. When you consider how many programs used to be designed to have free reign without ACL controls, it is clearly Vista that was on the right track. Look what disdain it got them. (Metro was a terrible decision, but it wasn't about security or stability.) The average consumer will make bad decisions even if you try to protect them from it, but making it take more thought is not a bad thing.

      Walled gardens have yet to be designed so that people like me can't get around them. (Can I get a woot woot from the Cyanogen crowd?!) If every system was a walled garden, then I might be on the other side of the debate, but the way things are now, people using aptitude, yum, ports and

  7. Good! I hope they burn. by Chas · · Score: 2

    BOTH of this shit companies have damaged clients of mine and cost them insane amounts of money to repair the crap they broke.
    Luckily they never got far enough in with my customers that they could damage their backups. So actual business data loss was minimal...

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  8. About time! by roc97007 · · Score: 2

    "Hello I am being Jim and I am with the Microsoft. I am calling you to tell you that your computer is infested with the viruses."

    Alternately it's "The Internet" rather than "The Microsoft". (For some reason, you have to include the "The" both for Microsoft and viruses.)

    Man, they're annoying. I'm not sure why I find them more unbearable than the usual offshore telemarketer. Perhaps because the lies are so brazen. The last time, I asked him if his mother knows he cheats people out of money for a living? He insisted no, he's trying to help me! He got really excited about it. Probably because he desperately needed this call's rupee for food that night.

    Surveying friends and family (including a couple hundred facebook friends), calls at first seemed random, but in more recent months, appear to specifically be targeting people over 50. The most recent calls have asked for me by name. This leads me to believe that they're using someone's pilfered (or purchased?) address list. Has AARP had any breaches lately?

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:About time! by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Alternately it's "The Internet" rather than "The Microsoft".

      It might be worth getting that scam call if only to reply: "The Elders of the Internet know who I am?!!!"

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    2. Re:About time! by ShaunC · · Score: 1

      Surveying friends and family (including a couple hundred facebook friends), calls at first seemed random, but in more recent months, appear to specifically be targeting people over 50. The most recent calls have asked for me by name. This leads me to believe that they're using someone's pilfered (or purchased?) address list. Has AARP had any breaches lately?

      Curious, what type of lines are the calls coming in on? There's a huge list of folks, mostly over 50, listed by name, freely available to scammers... The White Pages. Many of them are online and easy to spider. Most telcos still print the physical books, too, although you have to request one now instead of having them dropped off by default. Since these directories are comprised primarily of landlines, it's a safe bet that whoever answers most of the calls will be a baby boomer.

      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
    3. Re:About time! by smallfries · · Score: 1

      If they claim that they are from The Microsoft you could say that you are "Bob from the Internet" or vica versa. Spend some time finding out if you have friends in common, maybe from back when you worked at the Facebook. Did they know June from the New York office? Really? Because June died five years ago!! etc etc...

      They can be a lot of fun. When you get bored with them just ask how they *feel* about scamming people for money. Good times.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    4. Re:About time! by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Landlines, exclusively.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    5. Re:About time! by Theaetetus · · Score: 1

      Surveying friends and family (including a couple hundred facebook friends), calls at first seemed random, but in more recent months, appear to specifically be targeting people over 50. The most recent calls have asked for me by name. This leads me to believe that they're using someone's pilfered (or purchased?) address list. Has AARP had any breaches lately?

      You're right regarding age - they've hung up on me in the past if I've sounded too youthful, so when I'm trying to get a scammer to stay on the line, I make my voice all quavery like an old man.
      I have a friend who signed me up for a free trial of adult diapers as an April Fool's joke... my guess is that's how they got my number.

      Incidentally, the Fake name generator is great for keeping them on the line for a long time, giving fake credit card numbers and addresses until they catch on.

    6. Re:About time! by Control-Z · · Score: 1

      The calls I've received say something like (in an Indian accent) "This is Robert from Windows, we are calling because it has been reported your computer has errors and is sending them over the Internet."

      I've also given them the "Does your mother know what you do for a living?" line. They try to justify what they're doing and I cut them off and say "You're a scammer and you're stealing people's money and you should be ashamed." That's when they hang up.

      Anyway TFA doesn't specifically say this operation is the one with the Indian accent callers, but I sure hope so. Although the "cardholder services" robo-calls got shut down a few years ago only to re-emerge strong as ever in the last year or so. I even resorted to pressing 5 to opt out, which actually seemed to work for while, but now I'm back to 1 or 2 calls a day from them. :(

  9. But Geek Squad is still safe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    right?

    1. Re:But Geek Squad is still safe? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      at least they are doing it your face and selling real software but Norton is a bloated POS and there real name is the UPSELL squad

    2. Re:But Geek Squad is still safe? by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      yep, and keep the bend radius over five inches.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  10. Re:Good! I hope they burn. by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Agreed. They desperately need to burn in hell.

    I've been blessed by customers who contact me when they get suspicious calls or emails, and can be trained to not click on scareware popups. When a computer is infected, it's almost always because someone's kid got access to it. But I still deeply resent these scam calls. They're directly interfering with *my* livelihood!

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  11. just kill them by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    SERIOUSLY, just kill them. Just rip their intestines out and hang them by them. I am so fucking sick of people walking into my repair shop and telling me I'm wrong, they're not scammers, they didn't fall for anything, and they don't want to lose their alleged lifetime membership to unlimited support. In fact, everyone stupid enough to fall for this bullshit should be thrown into a volcano with the people who originally did it.

    1. Re:just kill them by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > I am so fucking sick of people walking into my repair shop and telling me I'm wrong, they're not scammers, they didn't fall for anything, and they don't want to lose their alleged lifetime membership to unlimited support.

      At that point I say "I can't do anything for you. Thanks for dropping by."

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    2. Re:just kill them by ihtoit · · Score: 3, Informative

      been here too. Someone walks in with a computer and a subscription to some nanny software (big name, can't remember it. Net Nanny? No, one of the other ones). Says it's riddled with pop ups. Five minutes in and I've isolated the problem to a redirect to a proxy (clearly in an attempt to get around the softwall), I tell her, "This should have been blocked by the software you've got installed." Asked ME for her money back, I'm like, "You didn't buy it off me, I'm not a software vendor for a start and for two, I don't have a support contract with these guys."

      At which point, she takes her computer and leaves, comes back three hours later with a trading standards officer in tow. I tell him what I told her. Not my problem, she's trying to get her computer fixed for free after the software she paid for elsewhere failed to do what she expected.

      TSO leaves.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    3. Re:just kill them by TheGoodNamesWereGone · · Score: 1

      About a year ago I went on a service call to a customer's house. The wife had gotten one of those calls and wisely called her husband to the phone; he talked to them and downloaded the malware they were offering but did not install it. They called us to 'fix' it. When I got there there was a mild, unrelated adware infection that I cleaned. I explained to the husband that everything was okay now, but I couldn't convince the wife that there wasn't anything wrong; she was absolutely convinced that what the scammers had told her was true & that their machine was just riddled & infested. She got angry to the point of tears with me AND her husband, for believing me, and ran to the bedroom and slammed the door loudly behind her. I hope they're still married...

    4. Re:just kill them by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      It's hard enough fixing people's computers. You can't be expected to fix their marriage as well.

  12. Re:"This is windows support calling... by RandomAdam · · Score: 1

    I have had this exact thing happen; "press F8 when booting to get into safe mode"...."but I just said I'm not running windows, there is no 'safe mode'....what should I do?"...usually results in a confused silence.... :)

    --
    @Random_Adam

    Sometimes a sig doesn't have to be funny!!
  13. Re:These scumbags ought to be in jail next to Mado by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

    Maybe Charlie Manson wants to consummate his marriage second hand since he's not allowed conjugal visits.,/i>

    Go ahead. You stick your wang in that bit o crazy. I'll pass.

  14. Re:Free speach by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

    This isn't free speech. Freedom of speech means that you can stand on a street corner, speak your mind, and the government can't say "We don't like your opinion so we're sending you to jail." Freedom of speech doesn't mean that you can lie to people to get money from them. This is called fraud and is illegal. Try claiming "free speech" if you are on trial for fraud and you'll see how quickly the judge brings the hammer down on you.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  15. Re:You know what's "really" really sad? by s.petry · · Score: 2

    That we don't prosecute enough false advertising and deception with intent to defraud claims!

    It's hard to blame the root cause of the problem on anything but the current levels of corruption infesting our Government. Instead of agencies built to enforce regulations doing what they are intended, they are investigating bullshit to make corporations more and more money and keep the cronies in office so that their circle continues to have revenue while the "common" people suffer.

    Yup, stories like yours are a shame. These scams have been known about for at least 4-5 years (if you don't remember the my clean PC bullshit.. well, you could be a n00b), but instead of putting these shitbags out of business we have agencies focusing on Youtube videos that have background audio of a song, or grandma downloading a free MP3 file, or heaven forbid a goddamn whistle blower that must be lambasted and castrated.

    Don't get me wrong, "Greed" is a problem but it's a problem we have known about for at least as long as we have been able to write and read. The whole point of Government is to enforce regulation and prosecute snake oil salesmen to protect the populace from greedy fucks that gain power (in some/any form). The fact that this shit has gone on for this long demonstrates that our Government is a failure. Massive bureaucracies are a failure! (The problems with journalism today, or more properly the lack thereof, fall into these categories so I can't blame them separately).

    I'll get off my soap box now.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  16. Expect the next tier of fraudsters to fill the gap by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 2

    This kind of fraud is much like multi-level marketers and other spammers.I'm afraid that those fradulent companies which are even less traceable, and have overseas offices to avoid US prosecution, will fill the ecological niche very quickly.

  17. Re:"This is windows support calling... by rjstegbauer · · Score: 1

    I've gotten two of these phone calls in the past few months. The first time I followed their instructions up until the point that they wanted to take over my computer. They pointed me to a legitimate screen sharing application. I gave them the wrong access code. Once the caller realized I wasn't going to fall for the scam, he got ANGRY and told me that *tomorrow* he was going to destroy my computer. I challenged him to do it now. :-) I should have told him my IP address was 127.0.0.1.

    I still wonder *what* he was going to do once he took control. Setup a remote control SPAM bot? Encrypt everything? Or simply ask for $500.00 to "fix" all the problems?

    If I had an old throwaway system, I would have pointed him to that...but then I would be worried that he would have been able to infect my other computers on my network...maybe.

    Randy -- regardlessitwasfun

  18. haven't read the fuckin' article by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    ...but is that one of the scammers that was shut down?

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    1. Re:haven't read the fuckin' article by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      ...but is that one of the scammers that was shut down?

      We can only hope...

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  19. Re: "This is windows support calling... by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    so many times I've had this happen... you're a milk bone to the telemarketing dogs if you run a small business.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  20. Re:Free speach by ihtoit · · Score: 2

    freedom of speech does not extend to the right to commit fraud.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  21. Re:"This is windows support calling... by spiritplumber · · Score: 1

    I used to do this on IRC with scriptkiddies... I told them that I was behind a proxy (usually true) but my "real" IP address was 127.(somenumber).(somenumber).(somenumber) and then watch them ping-o-death themselves. The nineties were fun.

    --
    Liberty - Security - Laziness - Pick any two.
  22. More importantly.... by sasquatch989 · · Score: 1

    Have I answered your questions satisfactorily and offered good customer service?!

    http://cart.mn/CstmrServc

  23. Government jackboots by paiute · · Score: 1

    I cannot wait until the Republican Congress gets the government out of the way and lets small businesses get on with their work.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:Government jackboots by operagost · · Score: 1

      Please go back to the basement with the other kids, Captain Straw man. The grownups are typing to have a discussion

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  24. Re:Never give a sucker an even break by Lord+Maud'Dib · · Score: 1

    You mad bro?

  25. Re:Which is why PDFCreator is now on the shit list by Khyber · · Score: 1

    I hope you're not that blind to miss the obvious answer, here.

    Make shitty scareware to get you to download the REAL spyware.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  26. Re:"This is windows support calling... by NotSanguine · · Score: 1

    I've gotten two of these phone calls in the past few months. The first time I followed their instructions up until the point that they wanted to take over my computer. They pointed me to a legitimate screen sharing application. I gave them the wrong access code. Once the caller realized I wasn't going to fall for the scam, he got ANGRY and told me that *tomorrow* he was going to destroy my computer. I challenged him to do it now. :-) I should have told him my IP address was 127.0.0.1.

    I still wonder *what* he was going to do once he took control. Setup a remote control SPAM bot? Encrypt everything? Or simply ask for $500.00 to "fix" all the problems?

    If I had an old throwaway system, I would have pointed him to that...but then I would be worried that he would have been able to infect my other computers on my network...maybe.

    Randy -- regardlessitwasfun

    Hey! don't give that out, that's my IP address!

    I've gotten a few of those calls too and played the same game. But before he could (in his thick Hindi accent) express his outrage, I verbally abused him until he hung up.

    I do have a spare Windows VM for the next time, assuming I have time to block all network access except the screen sharing app. That could be fun. A waste of time, but possibly amusing.

    --
    No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
  27. Only had one call and laughed... by EzInKy · · Score: 2

    ...in his ear. He said a problem was detected on my Window's computer. Being every box in my house is running one Linux distro or another I had a problem picking myself up off the floor. Just think of how many people would fall for these scams if everyone really had Window's on some device in their house.

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
  28. Re:You know what's "really" really sad? by FrankHS · · Score: 1

    I agree completely. We need a law that says simply: It shall be illegal to do any misleading advertising.

    Financial penalties would rapidly escalate and repeated offences would subject company owners to jail time.

    The offender would be required to publish in a similar venue a statement admitting to, and apologizing for, the misleading advertising.

    The test of misleading would be if average people would believe something untrue after viewing the ad.

  29. About damn time! by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 2

    As recently as this week I've still been getting one of those goddamn calls every couple days. I just hang up on them, usually after saying something along the lines of "Do me a favor and kindly jump up your own ass."

    My father gets them too... He likes to string the bastards along for a while though. Constantly asking them stuff like where they're calling from and why, requesting specifics until he catches them contradicting themselves and then tells them off and hangs up. (Personally, it drives me nuts listening to him do that, I'm just like "Oh my god hang up on those assholes already!") He does the same thing to the medicaid scam phonecalls but those are far less frequent.

    --

    Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
  30. Re:"This is windows support calling... by BVis · · Score: 1

    You ever want to really confuse them? Tell them your keyboard doesn't have a Windows key, like my old IBM model M. They'll spend all kinds of time walking you through trying to find it..

    "Please to be looking at the left side of your keyboard, do you see the button C T R L?"
    "Yes, I see it."
    "The Windows key is being right next to that one"
    "No, there's no key right next to it, there is one that says A L T a little further over"
    "No, there has to be a key between that has the Windows logo"
    "I'm telling you, there isn't. Why don't you tell me what you're trying to do and I'll find a different way"
    "You are lying! You have a Windows key there, you have to"
    "Nope, old keyboard. What are you trying to do?"
    Then you listen to them flip through the script and again insist you must have a Windows key if it's a Windows computer.

    It's great fun. I've wasted 90 minutes of their time this way. Another thing I like to do is, when they say there's a problem with my Windows computer, I ask them "Which one? I have several", which is true. I ask them for the machine name, the IP, everything they should know if they're getting a trouble report, right?

    The goal is to get them to hang up on YOU.

    --
    Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
  31. Re:Never give a sucker an even break by BVis · · Score: 1

    /thread

    --
    Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
  32. Re:"This is windows support calling... by rjune · · Score: 1

    I talked with one of them on Saturday. After spending about 25 minutes acting like a total doofus - I asked him if it made any difference which enter key I used because they are shaped differently. It was really fun thinking up stupid things to ask him. After about 25 minutes, we were at the point where he wanted to open an internet connection, I called him out and hung up. (I had also drank a lot of coffee and really needed use the bathroom) He called back 5 times to cuss me out. Name an insult and he used it (I have one, but I'm not one!) After the third call, my wife wanted to talk to them and he asked her for oral sex, she accused him of stalking and said she would notify law enforcement. Perhaps we could start a contest to see how badly the scammers have been annoyed.

  33. Re:"This is windows support calling... by azadrozny · · Score: 1

    My personal best is about 50 minutes, before I got bored with them. I told them I only had flaky dial-up service. I kept playing the modem connection sound, then tell them that their software was downloading. After waiting for 5 minutes, asking them rude personal questions in the interim, I tell them that I am at 90%, then shout a lot of expletives, saying that the connection went down, and need to reconnect. Once they passed me off to their tech support people because I told them the issue was on their end of the dial up connection.

  34. Stop government oppression! by plopez · · Score: 1

    This is just another example of government interference in the market place and driving free enterprise out of business! Let the industry regulate its self!

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  35. How to hurt them? by TheGreatMcCluck · · Score: 1

    I wonder if everyone who knows these calls are a scam were to do the following, if it would kill their throughput enough to stop them: "Hold on a minute... my computer is off. It's a little slow to boot. I'm going to put you down for a minute, just hold on, I'll be right back." Then just put the phone down on a table and walk away.

    Of course, once enough people were using this exact scam on the scammers, they'd know that anyone giving them this routine was to be hung up on. I'm certainly not willing to invest any time stringing them along to keep them busy.

    It's a shame. I'd love to get one over on these jack asses. I get two or three calls "from Microsoft" a year now. I did get a chuckle out of the last one, where the guy told my wife he was calling from Microsoft, she replied only, "No you're not", and they hung up without evening anything else.

    1. Re:How to hurt them? by coniferous · · Score: 1

      I wonder how to get on one of these lists. I love wasting their time. I need to install a XP virtual machine with a snapshot of a perfectly working system. As soon as they connect, restore the snapshot. See how many times I can get them to connect to me before they hang up.

    2. Re:How to hurt them? by vandamme · · Score: 1

      "Hold on, I'll get my credit card". Go to bathroom with telephone, hold it so the scammer gets an earful. Extra points for a #2. "Sorry, I had to go potty. Oh, I just remembered, my PC runs openSUSE and that's not a real Windows, is it?"

  36. Re:Free speach by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

    There are always issues. If that's how you define free speech, it's interesting to see how broadly fraud can be defined.

  37. Just wait for tech support to call you by Puppet+Master · · Score: 1

    They call me regularly to tell me there's a problem with my Windows computer and they wish to help me. I really like stringing them along.. Sorry, but my Linux desktop doesn't have a Windows key.

    --
    The day Microsoft creates a product that doesn't suck, it will be known as the Microsoft Vaccuum Cleaner!
  38. Re:You know what's "really" really sad? by sribe · · Score: 1

    ...but instead of putting these shitbags out of business...

    You seem to be assuming that they're operating from countries with competent law enforcement available to cooperate with ours, and that they stay in one place long enough to find them. Both assumptions are incorrect.

  39. Re:You know what's "really" really sad? by s.petry · · Score: 1

    Your straw man is not a very good one. If you read TFA you would have seen that _all_ of the companies in the decisions are US companies.

    As part of the legal maneuver, the state of Florida joined the FTC in filing two separate cases against companies who allegedly sold the bogus software and the telemarketers who sold the unnecessary tech support services. In the first case, the defendants selling software include PC Cleaner Inc.; Netcom3 Global Inc.; Netcom3 Inc., also doing business as Netcom3 Software Inc.; and Cashier Myricks, Jr. The telemarketing defendants include Inbound Call Experts LLC; Advanced Tech Supportco. LLC; PC Vitalware LLC; Super PC Support LLC; Robert D. Deignan; Paul M. Herdsman; and Justin M. Wright.
    In the second case, the defendants selling software include Boost Software Inc. and Amit Mehta, and the telemarketing defendants include Vast Tech Support LLC, also doing business as OMG Tech Help, OMG Total Protection, OMG Back Up, downloadsoftware.com, and softwaresupport.com; OMG Tech Help LLC; Success Capital LLC; Jon Paul Holdings LLC; Elliot Loewenstern; Jon-Paul Vasta; and Mark Donahue.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  40. Re:You know what's "really" really sad? by sribe · · Score: 1

    Your straw man is not a very good one. If you read TFA you would have seen that _all_ of the companies in the decisions are US companies.

    Yes, but... Those are the companies which our government DID shutdown. Your post that I responded to was complaining about the government not shutting down such scams. So if you really want to get picky like this, your argument itself was a misdirection. So, show me the scammers that are operating out of the USA, and which the FTC is not taking action against.

    What? Not got any examples? Because the ones still being run are in India? Yep, thought so.

  41. Re:You know what's "really" really sad? by s.petry · · Score: 1

    What? Not got any examples? Because the ones still being run are in India? Yep, thought so.

    The examples are in the complaints that took YEARS to receive any action on. There is no reasonable or efficient mechanism for dealing with these companies in the US. How long were each of those companies listed in the order operating in the US? Some were operating for as long as a decade, so perhaps you should validate facts before attempting to claim that everything scam related is from overseas.

    Researching a few facts is all that is required to demonstrate that your arguments are invalid.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.