Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: What's the Most Hackable Car?

An anonymous reader writes: When looking for a new (or used) car, I have readily available information regarding features, maintenance history, and potential issues for that specific model or generation. What I would really like is a car that is readily hackable on the convenience-feature level. For example, if I want to install a remote starter, or hack the power windows so holding 'up' automatically rolls it up, or install a readout on the rear of the car showing engine RPMs, what make/model/year is the best pick? Have any of you done something similar with your vehicle? Have you found certain models to be ideal or terrible for feature hacking?

195 comments

  1. Which part? by TheMiddleRoad · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Mitsubishi Evo and Subaru WRX probably have the most hacked ECUs around. Loading something like ECUTek onto a BRZ or FR-S gives you equal control. Convenience systems are usually controlled with some kind of aftermarket device, though for Toyotas, you can download Techstream and control a few options via a cheap cable off ebay. A Tesla offers the most toys to play with out of the box, but you can't do a think with the actual drive system. An M-series BMW like an old M5 will give you loads of settings to play with between the engine, transmission, and suspension.

    1. Re:Which part? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Gumpert lets you control damn near everything on it.

    2. Re:Which part? by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      Too bad they wet bankrupt last year. And it's not exactly the most practical. car. Or did they make something other than the one-million dollar Apollo

    3. Re:Which part? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Very nice car. Costs more than half a mil though 8-(

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    4. Re:Which part? by DigiShaman · · Score: 2

      Hondata.com as some pretty sweet gear for Honda. But, I've been out of the street modding scene (I grew up). Stock cars produce power at maximum efficiency as it is; unless you don't mind slurping more gas for HP.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    5. Re:Which part? by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected. The last time I heard they were being liquidated. But apparently they've come back fron the dead with a (somewhat) more practical car. The Explosion is around a quarter the price of the Apollo. So probably still not in the price range the poster was looking for.

    6. Re:Which part? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is about what I was going to suggest. However, this is probably the wrong forum for it. Better forums would be to cruise around the hot rod modder forums. You could get a better feel for what is possible and not. They will also have suggestions on exactly what to buy and not to buy.

      The most hackable ones will probably be the more popular 'ricer' type cars. As those guys want to get everything out of them and aftermarket is about the only place you can get that from. You will also find it is older cars that are hacked on. Probably 2007/8 and lower these days. As the warranties have long run out and they are cheap to get. The manufacture doesnt really care about them anymore so all that is left is DIY. If the only features are what you are asking for you can get all of that out of the box with a newer BMW and the right feature package (usually performance and/or M and the LCD in dash display) plus a trip to the dealer and have them turn things on and off (about 50-150 depending on the dealer). If you get the dealer software (about 50-150 bucks) you can fiddle a bunch more stuff over the ODBII CAN port. Just depends on what you want to 'hack'.

      10-12 years ago you probably could have asked something like that here and got a decent set of responses. Now days... Not so much without it degenerating into some sort of political discussion. :(

    7. Re:Which part? by Jaime2 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, most of the stuff mention in the OP aren't controlled by the ECU. Windows, lights, starter, really anything other than the engine aren't controlled by the ECU. The climate system is wired to it, but only so that the ECU can adjust the radiator fans to handle A/C load.

      BTW, I'm certain of this because I just used the ECU/engine from a WRX to build a custom car.

    8. Re: Which part? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not sure about other cars but you can hack BMW like you mention. It is not easy but people do things like hack it to close sunroof when rain detected, you can control all the lights and when they come on and how bright. These are not manufacturer features but under the hood settings you can get at if you know how. There are forums for it.

    9. Re:Which part? by Kagetsuki · · Score: 2

      First off I'm a GT86 [FR-S/BRZ] owner and let me say if you're ready to put down the money it is an absolutely fantastically hackable car. If you're only talking about electronics the entire dash is super easy to take apart and it's super clean and organized in back with very nice access to core system lines and power. There are plenty of aftermarket ECUs and ECU extension units and of course it's a new generation Toyota so if you wanted to you could hook up to one of the data lines and play with all sorts of things. ODB-II in the vehicle also seems to have some extensions and I've seen people getting oil temp/pressure from add-on sensors through it. As for performance the ammout of engine, drivetrain, footwork and body mods available for them is insane. Here in Japan they actually have huge monthly catalogues of new parts just for the 86/BRZ. Of course stock is pretty nice as-is if you have a model with the torsen diff (but if you get an R grade a helical would be a superior addition).

      As for the EVO vs WRX I'd argue for the WRX Impreza just from the ammount of fantacism that continues around them continuing to drive aftermarket parts production. Case in point: find a bolt on turbo for an Impreza GC or GD - you can get one brand new / an older EVO? good luck. For a used WRX I'd actually recommend looking for something between a later GC and a GG because they were built in an era when constant adjustments and part swaps for different rally types was the thing and also because a lot of the fantics tend to center on those "glory days" models. Of course owning an 86 it's not like I'm baised toward Subaru or anything *cough* *cough*. I'm super curious about the new WRX STI but I've only seen one once and never handled one.

      One addition: the Mazda Roadster [Miata]. It's pretty much the "hackable" car of the century for anyone who cares about road handling over numbers (sorry Civic). They're super easy to mod, there are plenty of parts, and there is enough cross-modle compatibility in parts you can pick up scrap spares fairly easily. Just the fact it's a well built, small sized, convertable FR makes me want one for the weekends. Only demerit is apparently in the US they are considered "hairdresser cars"; but a nice beefy rollbar, a spoiler and some badass footwork should get rid of that image.

    10. Re:Which part? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The Mitsubishi Evo and Subaru WRX probably"

      Thanks for proving the make up of Slashdot readers are ricer hipsters.

    11. Re: Which part? by headnodda · · Score: 1

      Can you please give examples of BMW platforms that support these sorts of mods? Sounds like fun.

    12. Re:Which part? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      For an older car, the Nissan Silvia (S13/14/15, 180sx, 200sx) is considered a modders car. Considerably cheaper than a WRX or EVO.

      There's also the R32/33/34 Skylines... but they were never made in LHD.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  2. I just want to... by dlkwnt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...turn that damned chime off. Why can't I leave my keys in the ignition and the drivers door open at the same time??? Yeah, I know, blah blah blah, people forgetting their keys blah blah blah, but at least give me the option of turning it off without having to start pulling fuses.

    1. Re:I just want to... by Maxwell · · Score: 3, Informative

      have you searched online? There is sometimes a way to "program" it. On a modern GM (2010+ ) hold the Information and Reset buttons at the same time. A menu will pop up on the multi display and you can set various things. There are often hidden codes (Chrysler used to use the headlight switch as a selector, with the horn as feedback - so you are sitting in your driveway , honking horns and flashing lights :) as well...

    2. Re:I just want to... by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      NO KIDDING!! We needed a new car back in 2012 and we decided on a 2012 Ford Escape. Oh if I had it to do over, I would SOOOOO not buy that vehicle.. We went with Ford, since I wouldn't touch a GM car for all the tea in China.. Let me count the ways I hate it...The braindead beeper that beeps endlessly with the key in the ignition EVEN if I'm sitting there in the drivers seat... The way the radio shuts off after 10 min EVEN if the key is in the ignition and I'm sitting there listening to it.. You have to flick the key on and back off to get Ford to grant you another 10 min to listen to YOUR radio.. This hits me a lot as I hate going into stores with the wife, thus I sit in the car listening to the bazillion Sirus/XM channels.. Another BIG hate is the braindead Microsoft/Sync abortion that passes for a radio/entertainment center in this car.. I suppose I should have realised that when Microsoft is involved, its gonna be crap... witness Windows 8... Getting the bluetooth to connect up to my common-as-dirt android phone is a non-starter, nor the wife's equally common android phone.. Not to mention, the endless dropouts the satellite radio gets, mostly sitting at a stoplight.. I suspect there is *some* RF source from the traffic control system that is causing desense in the likely crappy satellite radio front-end... Once again, Microsoft was involved with it, and lemme tell you, the user interface leaves sooooo much to be desired... But then, UI design and Microsoft?? need I go any further??... Sorry about the rant...

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    3. Re:I just want to... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      I'd like my passenger to be able to program an address into the navigator without having to have the darn parking brake on. Yeah, I know, safety blah blah, but why is it less safe for a passenger to manipulate the console while I'm driving? (Assuming we aren't watching a movie or some other profoundly stupid thing.)

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    4. Re:I just want to... by PRMan · · Score: 2

      Moral of the story, you shouldn't touch a GM, Ford or Chrysler for all the tea in China...

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    5. Re:I just want to... by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

      Why not just have a decent aftermarket radio installed and be done with all those problems?

    6. Re:I just want to... by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      To counter this; I have a 2014 ford fusion, and love it.

      Sync works flawlessly over bluetooth with my cheap as shit tracfone (flip phone!) The 10 minute timeout thing is your own fault, just put the car in 'accessory mode', voila! (half turn of the key)

      Mine has remote start/RFID fob, so the ignition thing is a non-issue.

      The one thing i truly don't like about it is the leaving the car running in park causes the horn to honk if i stray more than 5 feet from the car (IE, checking the mail.) With a keyless entry code, or the fact that the door is unlocked, makes this useless -- and there's no way to disable it.

    7. Re:I just want to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to know who hired Siri to be the voice of Ford Sync.

    8. Re:I just want to... by nabsltd · · Score: 3, Informative

      We needed a new car back in 2012 and we decided on a 2012 Ford Escape.

      Most of your complaints can be fixed with various tweaks listed in the manuals. For example, you don't have to listen to chimes because the key is in the switch. As for Sync, update the software (easy to do with a download to any USB stick) and you should be able to connect any Android at least for voice, but your phone has to support a later level of Bluetooth to support reading/sending texts using the car.

      I can't help you on your satellite drop outs, as that's caused by brain-dead placement of the antenna by Ford. No, that thing sticking up at the back of your car is not the satellite antenna. The sat antenna is pretty much inside your glove compartment.

    9. Re:I just want to... by bws111 · · Score: 1

      You do know about the 'accessory' key position, right?

    10. Re:I just want to... by DigitAl56K · · Score: 2

      Why not just have a decent aftermarket radio installed and be done with all those problems?

      Assuming the manufacturer hasn't stuffed major functionality of the car inside the radio/nav system and you're willing to risk a hit on resale value by losing some of the standard features.

    11. Re:I just want to... by neoritter · · Score: 1

      When you run the radio with the engine off, doesn't that drain the battery though?

    12. Re:I just want to... by Reapy · · Score: 1

      Yes sir. Waited for a friend to have an interview in my car when I was in highschool, listened to the radio for about 45 minutes. When he got back, went to turn the car on and, boop, no power... Had to get a jump from the guy my friend was interviewing with.

      Pretty ignorant on my part but lesson learned. Could have used a 10 min shut off timer ;)

    13. Re:I just want to... by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 2

      Waited for a friend to have an interview in my car when I was in highschool, listened to the radio for about 45 minutes.

      Wow. That's bizarre. Back in the 80s you could listen to a double-feature at the drive-in on your radio then easily start up your car and drive away. 4+ hours of the radio had little to no impact on the battery.

    14. Re:I just want to... by michrech · · Score: 2

      Unless you had a giant booming stereo system installed in that car, your battery should not have died after 45 minutes of the radio being on. You *should* have gone and had your battery / alternator checked, and replaced whichever was defective. :P

      --
      bork bork bork!
    15. Re: I just want to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you should easily get 1/2 - 1 1/2 days of radio usage before the battery dies

    16. Re:I just want to... by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

      " (Assuming we aren't watching a movie or some other profoundly stupid thing.)"

      That's why :)

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    17. Re:I just want to... by pinzvidz · · Score: 1

      Too bad it wasn't a VW. They have engineered their BCMs to monitor the battery voltage and automagically switch the radio off (in accessories or key off/radio power button override mode) when it drops to a certain voltage, to save the battery from getting too flat and not being able to start the car. Depending on the volume level is how long you get out of it before it turns off. Awesome German engineering. Shame about their DSGs, though... :P

    18. Re:I just want to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Ford Escape is designed by Mazda... It's also known as the "Mazda Tribute."

      Overall not to bad of a car, but definitely has some brain-dead design decisions. I've worked on these a lot in my shop.

    19. Re:I just want to... by kilodelta · · Score: 1

      You do know there's an upgrade for Sync right? It's just the Ford makes it nearly impossible to get said upgrade. And yeah, the fact the Microsoft has it's mitts all over Sync leaves me with the same feeling.

      And what scares me more - the CAN buses have almost zero security. The reason behind the fear is that certain geniuses in the NHTSA think it'd be good to have the cars communicate with each other. And you just know the comms will be tied into the CAN bus. Think of what a nefarious actor could do in that situation.

    20. Re:I just want to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      resale value on an american car - har har har har! good one

    21. Re:I just want to... by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Unless you had a giant booming stereo system installed in that car, your battery should not have died after 45 minutes of the radio being on. You *should* have gone and had your battery / alternator checked, and replaced whichever was defective. :P

      Indeed. A car battery is on the order of 50 Amp hours capacity, and I doubt most car sound systems would draw more than about 5 amps continuous, or that the average person could sit in the car with a sound system that was so loud that it was drawing 5 amps.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  3. Nothing made after 2000 by sinij · · Score: 0

    Modern cars use proprietary designs and even smallest modification would require you to re-flash software. While it is possible, and there are 'dealer' keys out there, modern cars are overly complex.

    Your best bet is to get something classic and not too rare.

    1. Re:Nothing made after 2000 by Havokmon · · Score: 1

      Modern cars use proprietary designs and even smallest modification would require you to re-flash software. While it is possible, and there are 'dealer' keys out there, modern cars are overly complex. Your best bet is to get something classic and not too rare.

      I agree. Get a Honda from the 90s. OBD2 will give you good insight into the ECU, plus there won't be engine components crammed into every nook and cranny of the engine bay. And the Keys - my god the keys. If you don't want to pay $100 just to copy your key, avoid that proprietary garbage.

      I've got a '93 Del Sol. Only OBD1, but fun to drive, parts are easily found and there's a ton of info available about Civics. My 2005 Pathfinder needs a new key, and I can't bring myself to spend that kind of money for what's worth $1 to me.

      --
      "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
    2. Re:Nothing made after 2000 by jddj · · Score: 1

      No. Really, no.

      VW owners with a VAG-COM can do a number of tunes, mods and adaptations with just the software and the cable.

      Modern cars run a CAN BUS (Car Area Network) and you can probably do a great deal on a number of vehicles. Certainly VW and Audi, but I can't imagine the rest of the industry is sitting still.

      A VAG-COM is just about standard equipment for a VW owner who does his/her own repairs. Wouldn't think of doing more than regular maintenance without it. And for some of that (flushing brake fluid, f.e.), it's still necessary.

    3. Re:Nothing made after 2000 by sinij · · Score: 1

      A copy of touchless Mercedes key fob is easily $500.

    4. Re:Nothing made after 2000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CAN BUS is Controller Area Network not "car"... that's just stupid... it was originally intended for the trucking/off highway industry. Had nothing to do with cars until the last decade or so. Older car companies used a derivative of CAN, but mostly proprietary applications.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAN_bus

    5. Re:Nothing made after 2000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With a name like VAG-COM I would expect something entirely different.

    6. Re:Nothing made after 2000 by jddj · · Score: 1

      Good point - I stand corrected.

    7. Re:Nothing made after 2000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a fellow del Sol owner (a 95 and a 96 at the moment), I have to agree - nothing like a Gen5 or 6 Civic platform in terms of cheap, reliable, and easy to hack anything you want into it because it's both electrically and mechanically very simple. They're getting old enough now, though, that finding one where the body is in good shape is a challenge. If you're like me and picky about your car's appearance, prepare to look for a while or make friends with the local body shop...

      Compared with my 2004 S2000 and my 2009 Ridgeline, the Sols are my favorite to work on because it's so damn simple. And it's not nearly the pain in the ass to drive that my 1932 Chevy is. :)

    8. Re:Nothing made after 2000 by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      First off there are aftermarket ECUs but to be perfectly honest all the current and last generation Toyota and Subaru I've dealt with have easily tunable and easy to flash ECUs. You do of course need hardware to do a flash on an original ECU but they aren't limited to dealers.

    9. Re: Nothing made after 2000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. VOLKSWAGEN BEETLE. There isn't a more modifiable rig on the road.

      And in case it's not clear, I'm talking oldschool beetle, not the "new" or "new new" pieces of scheisse.

    10. Re:Nothing made after 2000 by Le+Grande+Raoul · · Score: 1

      There is something called a "vag-com". I don't know what this world is coming to...

  4. Remote starters are worse than you might expect by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    There are a lot of cars out there that don't take well to remote starters, due to the electrical systems that are found in most cars now. Even if you fancy yourself an electronics god, you'll find that there are some cars where people have basically thrown their hands up in the air and given up on trying to install starters.

    Generally, the newer the car is, and the more sophisticated the manufacturer-installed electronics care, the harder it will be to hack it. If you want something that won't leave you bashing your head against the wall in frustration you might not want to look at anything from the past decade or two. Some cars are so resistant to hacking that you'll find the "cool upgrade" you wanted to try has left you with a car that you can't even start any more.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Remote starters are worse than you might expect by bws111 · · Score: 1

      This is true. I got a remote starter for a Hyundai Santa Fe, and it took the installer several days to get it working 'mostly' right. And this is a very experienced car electronics guy. It involves a whole lot of things - door locks, headlights, brake lights, security system, and obviously iginition and starting systems. He finally got it to the point that it starts the engine, but once the engine is started (with the remote) you can no longer use the factory remote door key, you have to use the physical key in the lock.

    2. Re:Remote starters are worse than you might expect by nwf · · Score: 1

      I'd suspect that's a safety feature, so you don't accidentally use the remote to open the trunk while driving or something. I know my car does that.

      --
      I don't know, but it works for me.
    3. Re:Remote starters are worse than you might expect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a 2010 Santa Fe. I bought the factory remote starter kit - pretty much plug an play. Not easy to install because its very cramped where you have to work, but no splicing and it works perfectly. Just FYI. Search on ebay for your year, or the web for the part number for your specific year/engine and then search dealers and ebay. Cost like $120 and saved me DAYS of screwing around.

    4. Re:Remote starters are worse than you might expect by bws111 · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm sure that it is something like that. My only point is that it is very hard to 'hack' it to get the feature that the manufacturer could have put in. The systems are all related. I am sure that if you had the 'official' starter it would work correctly, because the car would know that you remote started it, thus the key fob should still let you in the car.

    5. Re:Remote starters are worse than you might expect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have installed remote starters for over 10 years. There are only 3 caveats with a remote starter being difficult. 1) buying a new 2015 vehicle in 2014 and expecting
      to be able to install a remote starter without waiting for the immobilizer companies to test their products.... there is always bugs...so you need to wait 3-6 months.
      2) expecting remote starts being put into high end vehicles. Want a remote start for your porsche, or mercedes benz? Go see the dealer.
      3) you bought some piece of shit remote start from canadian tire or ebay? I charge my guys out at $125 an hour to troubleshoot, my $400 remote starter is rarely
      the problem, your $90 remote starter IS the problem.

    6. Re:Remote starters are worse than you might expect by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      Total. Fucking. Bullshit.

      Unless you're trying to use some remote starter kit from the caveman era there are plenty of ways to implement a competent remote starter system. If you already have a keyless starter you can actually do it with an ODB-II plug-in - no line splicing and no engine bay work.

      Of course I'd really question why people want remote starters in the first place. And while we're on the subject cruse control and throttle control are two things I continue to think are awful ideas.

    7. Re:Remote starters are worse than you might expect by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Of course I'd really question why people want remote starters in the first place.

      I guess you live in the tropics...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    8. Re:Remote starters are worse than you might expect by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      No, but I also don't live in a place that gets extremely cold either. The thing is if you want to heat the engine then you should get a block heater. If you want to heat the cabin there are separate and add-on heater units and modular heaters specifically designed to do this without having to turn on the engine. Of course in general you should probably be winterizing your car so you don't need a block heater; EG: insulated heavy-duty battery and a bottle of fuel line condensation remover at least.

      If I'm not mistaken most hybrids actually have an electric pump and heater on the coolant or water line that functions as sort of an active block heater.

      Also if you have a manual it's common practice to leave the vehicle in gear, so besides the fact you usually need to de-clutch just to start if you did disable the cutch sensor you'd also have to worry about accidentally leaving the car in gear - and if you aren't leaving the car in gear you have to worry about fogetting the e-brake or an unreliable e-brake on an older vehicle.

      So I maintain my position that remote starters are a bad idea.

    9. Re:Remote starters are worse than you might expect by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      So I maintain my position that remote starters are a bad idea.

      Eh, maybe they are, but we never had a problem. Granted, this was back in the 60s, we didn't have to deal with all these silly computers. And it was for the Cadillac, not the MG... I sure do remember liking the car to be as warm as the toilet seat when I sat down.

      You don't feel the same about remote control garage doors, do you? I can tell you those were a pain in the ass, opening and closing every time an airliner flew over the house. The thing is, if I can build/use a machine to make my life a little more convenient, damned if I won't do it. It's why we invent them to begin with.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    10. Re:Remote starters are worse than you might expect by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      Whoa whoa whoa, you forgot the context there! In the 60's absolutely none of what I said was valid or at least I'm sure it wasn't common place. My point was that *today* if you said you wanted a remote starter I'd ask you why and try to recommend a device that solves your specific problem in a secure and efficient manner.

      Wait... you had remote starters in the 60's?

      As for garage doors, we have a shutter at our office that constantly gets messed up and requires a complex, very analog reset process. On top of that we're right in front of a busy street. It's not uncommon I have to pull into a side street, open up the side door, manually lift the shutter, run back to the car, make three left turns and pull into the garage. So believe me when I tell you that my opinion on garage doors is that they are absolutely wonderful (when they work).

    11. Re:Remote starters are worse than you might expect by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Ah today... Today I couldn't recommend buying any vehicle made after 1971. Something you can fix with a screwdriver and a hammer, and if you're well off, a pair of vice grips.

      Wait... you had remote starters in the 60's?

      Absolutely. You seen surprised. And a couple of neighbors also had phones in the car. Both the garage door opener and the phone had to be built in. Neither were portable. The remote starter was one of the earliest handhelds. The funny thing was sometimes you would still have to get inside the car to set the automatic choke if you wanted the engine to actually start. But there it was, a big old radio controlled starter solenoid. And yes, we did actually like our electric garage doors also, despite them opening and closing like a cartoon show.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    12. Re:Remote starters are worse than you might expect by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's pretty amazing!

      So these remote starters you had were very analog devices. Today the engine initialization sequence requires a variety of digital magic and proper remote starting requires encrypted signals and identification. NOW your original comment makes perfect sense to me.

      Thanks for the interesting sub-thread!

  5. Almost any car from the last 5-10 years should do. by Higaran · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure why you'd want to display the RPM to anyone but the driver, that should be very simple to pull off. The windows SHOULD already work the way you describe, as for the remote starter, those are VERY common now a days and you can get off the shelf parts to in stall one in a few hours.

  6. VW Bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The bug circa 1960's was the best one out there... Everything since is crap from a hacking perspective...

    1. Re:VW Bug by Brandano · · Score: 1

      I was about to suggest exactly the same. You can do any sort of stuff on the Beetle, from fitting a Porsche engine in it, to replacing the entire front half with that of a chopper bike, to cutting the engine in half to use it on a microlight. And it will just run forever.

    2. Re:VW Bug by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      There is also a guy in the Daytona area that was making adapters to let you put a Harley engine in any vehicle wiht teh 200mm Porsche/VW clutch (so 356B or C/SC, 912 - but not hte E from '76, 914, VW bug or bus made after '65). And there is an outfit in Tampa that has electric conversions for same that run about $9k.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    3. Re:VW Bug by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      My dad says in the early models you had to crack the window to get the door closed because it was so hermetically sealed air pressure wouldn't let you slam the door.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  7. Mercedes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mercedes are the best.

    1. Re: Mercedes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you get an old 70s or 80s turbo diesel, you have an amazingly hackable car. Instead of software, everything is mechanical, and you hack vacuum signals, screw angles, turbo pressures, injection, fuel formulation, etc. I miss my tire smoking 300SD.

    2. Re: Mercedes by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      old diesel? ...are you SURE the smoke was actually coming off the tyres and not the exhaust?

    3. Re:Mercedes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many mid-2000's Chrysler vehicles had this as well, since Daimler owned them during those years. I'm thinking specifically of the large RWD cars (Charger, 300, Magnum, Challenger). There are accessories you can buy for those cars that operate via the CAN bus.

  8. 1953 chevy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1953 chevy sedan.

    big enough to add any hardware
    you want to do anything you want

  9. Not necessarily by langelgjm · · Score: 1

    Not necessarily. I've no idea about remote starters; the window deal could probably be accomplished with basic electronics, though sounds like a pain. But you can get RPM readouts and many other stats through the ODB II interface required for all normal cars in the U.S. since 1996. There are bluetooth and USB adapters available; I imagine you could probably put together a project with an Arduino that would display RPM readout on whatever display device you want. It's probably already been done.

    --
    "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    1. Re:Not necessarily by sinij · · Score: 1

      OBD II, while universally adopted, is poorly supported by manufacturers. It will still allow access to some basic information, will let you read error codes, but as far as modifying anything you will need to get always-proprietary software. Even with that you will be hard-pressed to redesign how something works, at best you will be able to toggle some values. Adding new functionality - good luck with that.

    2. Re:Not necessarily by show+me+altoids · · Score: 1

      It's actually OBD II, not ODB II. I bet you are in the software industry. :)

      --
      I feel sorry for people that don't drink, because when they get up in the morning, that's as good as they're gonna feel
    3. Re:Not necessarily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. He's a fan of the Wu-Tang Clan.

    4. Re:Not necessarily by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      OBD II will allow you to get real time RPM data very easily. It's simply a matter of building the display and electronics to read the signal. I have a code reader that will display real time RPM, ignition advance, MAP, MAS, and O2 data, speed, coolant temperatures, etc.

      Everything else the OP asked about sounds like basic electronics to me. I don't think (s)he is trying to re-purpose the gauge cluster to play Tetris or anything.

    5. Re:Not necessarily by sinij · · Score: 1

      Yes, you are correct, OBD II will show RPM through the port. The OBD port itself is the size of a DB-25 connector, so neatly wiring it could be tricky.
       
      As far as modifying functionality of anything, like implementing one-touch windows, will not be possible through OBD. The port is diagnostic in nature.

    6. Re:Not necessarily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't OBD II wire into the CAN bus on all reasonably modern cars?

    7. Re:Not necessarily by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      I guess my post wasn't very clear. The other stuff is basic electronics. Nothing to do with OBD II. I never suggested it be used for anything other than the RPM readout.

      Wiring it (OBD II) would be the easiest part. If you can build the circuits needed to read the RPM output and build a display for it, then you can sure as hell figure out how to wire it neatly. As far as I've seen, no manufacturer uses all of the pins in that connector. You could probably splice into it before the connector with CAT 5 if you really wanted to go cheap. Though I wouldn't recommend solid core wires in an automotive application.

    8. Re:Not necessarily by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      There's no good reason for trying to make your own OBDII reader. There's a good bit to it. Get an ELM327 compatible reader. I strongly recommend the bluetooth versions, not the serial/USB. You end up with some funny problems, like if there is a difference in ground potential between the computer reading it and the OBDII bus, you can fry the reader.

      My bluetooth OBDII reader has been great. I plug it in, or have the driver plug it in, and then I can read data from the passenger seat while we're driving. No wires required, except possibly to charge my laptop, tablet, or phone. They only cost a few bucks on eBay, and despite what you may see some brand name purists say, the generic bluetooth ones work fine.

      I lost two name brand serial readers from "mysterious" circumstances (i.e., ground potential difference), at over $30/ea. I've only replaced my cheap bluetooth OBDII reader when I misplaced it. Since I spent about $7 on it, that didn't hurt as much. If it fell under a friend's car seat, I won't care if they keep it.

      If you read up on the ELM327 chip , you'll see that it uses 2, 3, or 4 pins from the OBD connector for data. The bluetooth ones also use 2 more pins for power. (block diagram, page 1)

      That also gives you all the information you need, if you want to code your own interface (like you would with an Arduino or Raspberry Pi.

      Just to answer everything including the original post...
      His remote start, door lock, etc, may be possible on some CAN bus vehicles. That's not an OBDII thing. It may be best to do those functions with good old fashion relays. I just finished decomputerizing a 1999 truck (EFI to carb conversion). It's amazing how many miles of wires are no longer necessary, and I still have all the gauges working. :) Actually, they work better than before, which is interesting. Gauges that were jumpy for no good reason are now stable and accurate. I guess there were more than mechanical issues.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    9. Re:Not necessarily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or a member of the Wu Tang clan.

  10. Automatically Holding Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "or hack the power windows so holding 'up' automatically rolls it up, "

    -- Windows already do this when you hold the up button. If you mean you press it once and it rolls up automatically, this is a really bad idea. Kids and animals do stupid things and if you have a mechanism that will continue to go up while their heads and necks are sticking out the window, you have a recipe for disaster.

    -- MyLongNickname

    1. Re:Automatically Holding Up by Maxwell · · Score: 1

      "One touch up" is common on just about every new car. There is a sensor that detects stoppage and sends the window back down. Simple.

    2. Re:Automatically Holding Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes those have a sensor simply hacking the firmware or whatever to add this feature, will not add the sensor magically

    3. Re:Automatically Holding Up by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      If you mean you press it once and it rolls up automatically, this is a really bad idea. Kids and animals do stupid things and if you have a mechanism that will continue to go up while their heads and necks are sticking out the window, you have a recipe for disaster.

      Yeah, but I bet the little bastards listen the next time you tell them to stop sticking their head out of the window.

    4. Re:Automatically Holding Up by bws111 · · Score: 1

      Well if you have that feature then there is no need to hack it, is there? The point is that having a SAFE 'automatic up' is considerably more difficult than just making it appear that the 'up' switch is held for an extended period of time.

    5. Re:Automatically Holding Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a 2008 and 2007 and neither have this. When did this become available on just about every new car?

    6. Re:Automatically Holding Up by jgarry · · Score: 1

      2001 bug has it.
      2008 Chrysler has it. It stopped working, would go halfway up then detect "interference" and go back down, took it to dealer, dealer replaced something on other side. Then when I pointed that out he fixed it.
      2008 Edge has it, drivers side only. Also has it for up or down of hatch, though it sometimes false-positives interference on the down.

      But you can still slam your finger in any door.

      I wouldn't want to hack any of those. When I got a new battery for the bug at Batteries+, the listing said "Do Not Even Attempt To Install This For Customer." Installer ignored that, no problem.

      I once had a Fiat 128 with a different engine swapped in. The schematics didn't agree with what was there or had been there. In Italian.

      --
      Oracle and unix guy.
  11. car as guillotine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "hack the power windows so holding 'up' automatically rolls it up,"

  12. Replying to myself by langelgjm · · Score: 2

    Poor form, but here are some examples.

    --
    "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
  13. OBD2 by magarity · · Score: 1

    All new cars have something called OBD2 and it is a connector down under the driver's side dash. There are plenty of brands/models of bluetooth and wifi dongles you can get to plug in to it ($20 and up)and a matching array of iOS and Android apps that will read all the engine stats off the dongle onto pretty dials on your phone or tablet.

    1. Re:OBD2 by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Most of those stats are pretty mundane and generic. It might get you somewhat to what you might be looking for, but I wouldn't exactly call it "hacking". And unless you have the diagnostic tool specific to that manufacturer/make/model, you are unlikely to do anything than read those generic values and reset the check engine light.

    2. Re:OBD2 by sinij · · Score: 1

      OBD II is diagnostic tool/protocol/format. It will let you read error codes, it will show some information about operational parameters that might not normally be available through dashboard functions. It will not allow you to modify. To make things worse, to access advanced diagnostic features on a modern car you will need to have proprietary software and/or dealer keys.

      To further educate yourself, look into work done by Charlie Miller and Chris Valasek.

    3. Re:OBD2 by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      OBD2 + Proprietary extensions. There's a whole lot of extra sensory data that isn't standard these days. I doubt modern apps can access that portion of the computer, only basic OBD2 standard data.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    4. Re:OBD2 by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      and a matching array of iOS and Android apps that will read all the engine stats off the dongle onto pretty dials on your phone or tablet.

      Yet some OBD2 ports output certain data elements and other don't.

      I was looking for battery voltage with Torque on my Forester, and it's a non-reported value, though other cars support it.

      I'm sure somebody maintains a wiki with the matrix of models and values.

      Though when he said "most hackable" I was thinking '82 F150 - no special tools required at all.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    5. Re:OBD2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is absolute bullshit, there are several cars that can have their ECU programmed via OBD2.

    6. Re:OBD2 by jgarry · · Score: 1

      I discovered the hard way that resetting the OBDII on the bug meant driving the car at least 40 miles on the highway. Since my whole purpose was as a station car, train to work to lunch only, that was a real PITA.

      --
      Oracle and unix guy.
    7. Re:OBD2 by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "It will not allow you to modify"

      Yea, which is why I can change my injector fuel/air ratio on the fly through the ODBII port using an ODBII-USB cable and my laptop.

      And have been since street racing in the 90s/early 2000s.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    8. Re: OBD2 by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Not via OBD2, via the OBD2 connector. Most manufacturers will do that these days because CAN is now mandatory in the OBD2 port to get realtime emissions diagnostics. But for programming they use proprietary protocols that are additional to the standard OBD2 protocols.

    9. Re:OBD2 by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

      OBD II is diagnostic

      That's bull. Since 2007 all OBD II ports on cars made for sale in the USA have had the CAN bus on the OBD II port (and many had it before that). With the CAN bus you can send commands to lots of different stuff. The trick is finding out the commands to send, which isn't well documented and varies between manufacturers. But a heck of a lot more than just diagnostics can be done by sending the right commands down the CAN bus.

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  14. Instrumentation by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

    Back in the day, when I had time for such things, for me 'hackability' meant lots of additional useful instrumentation. For example, in my 1988 Nissan Hardbody Pickup I had additional gauges for things like -

    - Oil pressure
    - Rich / lean fuel mixture (via O2 sensor)
    - Vacuum
    - Coolant temperature
    - Oil temperature
    - Volts
    - Amps
    - Fuel pressure

    If I wanted to wind down the windows I just turned the conveniently located crank-handle.

    1. Re:Instrumentation by wcrowe · · Score: 1

      That's kind of what I was thinking. The most "hackable" car I ever owned was a 1980 Jeep CJ7. It was super easy to work on. Lots of room in the engine compartment to put extra stuff. If you wanted something aftermarket in the interior or on the dashboard, you just drilled a hole or two and bolted it on. You could go with a hardtop, softtop, doors on, doors off, bikini top, or no top at all. And you could drive your hacked vehicle virtually anywhere. I wish I still had one.

      --
      Proverbs 21:19
  15. Community is just as important as car by StatureOfLiberty · · Score: 4, Informative

    You need to find a car that has a strong community of people who like to make these kinds of changes. I have a Prius (actually 2). There is a ton of information on the car. For example, someone posted instructions for ordering parts and wiring in accessories that allow you to unlock the car by touch from the passenger door handle and the rear hatch. That feature was only offered by Toyota on the top models in 2011.

    PriusChat is my favorite place for researching maintaining and enhancing my 2 Priuses. Good luck and have fun!

    1. Re:Community is just as important as car by TubeSteak · · Score: 2

      More importantly, community will tell you what's not possible.
      For example: or hack the power windows so holding 'up' automatically rolls it up

      AFAIK, almost all auto features on power windows are pure hardware and you have to replace the entire module if you want that feature.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Community is just as important as car by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

      Of course holding it up already rolls the window up, but if the person asking the question wants to do something stupid and have the windows roll up with a single touch, that could be implemented without replacing the window regulator. You'd just have to hack together some electronics the latch the circuit in the roll-up position until the current being drawn spikes indicating that it's rolled all the way up.

    3. Re:Community is just as important as car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The post you responded to mentioned nothing about replacing the regulator. He said replacing the module, which is darn near what you are describing by hacking together circuitry to achieve additional features.

      One touch up is a semi-common feature on car windows now, but the factory implementations have additional safeties built in so that if there is resistance to closing and the window isn't all the way up they stop and lower immediately.

    4. Re:Community is just as important as car by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 2

      Not some half-a$$ed go cart that can't keep up in traffic.

      I didn't realize the hundreds of Prius taxis that are zooming all over my city can't keep up in traffic. You learn something new every day.

      I'll also have to let my friend who just drove his Prius cross-country that it couldn't keep up.

    5. Re:Community is just as important as car by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      , that could be implemented without replacing the window regulator. You'd just have to hack together some electronics the latch the circuit in the roll-up position until the current being drawn spikes indicating that it's rolled all the way up.

      Not the regulator, the actual door pod with the switches.
      Some models can be modified with a little soldering and some trimmed plastic,
      but, because of how they're designed, most require a complete replacement of the entire unit.

      That said, there are aftermarket control units that you can splice onto the existing wiring.
      But you should really only go that route if there's no OEM pod you can pull out of a higher trim level or another model.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    6. Re:Community is just as important as car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like a booby trap for unsuspecting dogs and toddlers. That's what you get for not sitting down when I told you!

    7. Re:Community is just as important as car by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, he's probably just angry at Prius hypermilers taking 'advantage' of speed limits - by not breaking them ;)

    8. Re:Community is just as important as car by StatureOfLiberty · · Score: 1

      You obviously have never driven a Prius.

  16. Hacking in convenience features? How Inconvenient by jeffmeden · · Score: 2

    Seriously, if you want a car that's fun to hack go as old as you can find that still looks nice, runs smooth, and has 100k miles (to reduce the odds that poor maintenance habits have caught up with the motor). Avoid any car with theft provention since that will totally block the remote starter unless you get the factory-approved option.

    Which brings me to the next point: If you want convenience you won't get it by spending days hacking your car... You will get it by buying a convenient car. There are so many low and mid model cars that offer complete convenience packages, so just buy it if you want it. Unless you are already an experienced automotive engineer you just won't be able to come out ahead by doing it yourself. Then, to get your geek on buy a OBD-2 to Bluetooth adapter, and a nice app (like Torque) for your smartphone.

  17. Re:Almost any car from the last 5-10 years should by Sowelu · · Score: 1

    Personally I'd be happy to hack my car's windows in the opposite direction. On the driver side only, if you tap "up", it rolls up all the way--you have to hold it down for it to not do that. Which means if you want to adjust it a quarter of an inch, you have to go down and then up, or up too far and then back down.

  18. BMW by m2pc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Most of the BMWs from the 90's onward are fairly hackable. You can find copies of the dealer software and production line tools on the web, and tools like NavCoder and similar allow you to control tons of the "convenience" features. Most of the modules have had their options decoded by interested individuals wanting to customize their vehicles.

    Some info here.

  19. It's all CAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For ease of use I would recommend something newer than 2008. Any older than that and some of the communication is going to be going over different types of networks like LIN, J1850 etc.. The other decision you'll have to make is are you modifying existing modules on the car to activate these additional features or are you adding a plugin that's just going to send the can messages to continue rolling up the window... A lot of the newer cars already have features like one press to roll the window up. It might be easier to buy a vehicle that already has the feature and the included safety sensors. I usually prefer Chrysler/Ford vehicles for ease of modification.

  20. How deep do you want to get? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Or more to the point, how good are your skills?

    Displaying sensor values (rpm, speed, etc.) on any kind of display is relatively simple, because you can just plug into the OBDII connector that is under the dash. There are lots of different adapters for this purpose.

    But the other things are impossible- it's all proprietary. If you get a car that uses a CAN bus for its communications, then you MIGHT be able to use a CAN bus adapter and see what's going on in the bus when you hit the window switch, for example... then you could duplicate whatever you see and have the window go down. But this is EXTREMELY dangerous unless you REALLY know what you're doing... you don't want the transmission to suddenly shift into two gears at once when you're going 75mph on the freeway and hit the window switch.

    A good example of a rather hackable CAN bus is in the Chrysler large RWD cars from about 2006-2010. (Charger, Challenger, 300, Magnum) You can buy aftermarket accessories that, for example, alter the transmission shift patterns, or let you shift via steering wheel radio controls. They do this via the CAN bus.

  21. Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Air-cooled VW Beetle

    1. Re:Simple by jgarry · · Score: 1

      They'll run forever. Badly.

      (Seriously, electric choke???)

      --
      Oracle and unix guy.
  22. Some BMWs by unencode200x · · Score: 1

    Spend some time on Bimmerfest.com there are a ton of BMW enthusiasts and there are all sorts of ways you can hack into the cars' various electronic systems and change things. For example, mirrors fold in automatically when you lock the doors. Windows roll up and moon roof closes at push of a remote button, turning on cameras, feeding video to your GPS or HUD display (from your cameras or another sources), change the cluster display's colors, info, etc., and lots of other things. Mine already has a digital display (called the "sports" display) that shows most of what you're talking about. You can also put the vehicle in different modes (Eco, comfort +, comfort, sports, sports +, and M) that changes both the feel of the vehicle and the displays. For example, sport mode changes the HUD and cluster displays to digital readouts, in comfort and below they are analog displays (digital but the images are of a needle speedometer and tachometer, etc.). Of all the cards I've had this one is the funnest and most hackable.

    --

    Chance favors the prepared mind.
    Perfect is the enemy of good.
    1. Re:Some BMWs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most hackable are all the cars that use the Motronic I module: The BMW 745i, the Volvo 740, and some Porsche ( 944 Turbo )

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motronic

      http://www.powerprom.com/

  23. Original Volkswagon Beetle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everything that could be done to that car has been. You can even turn it into a dune buggy.

  24. VW familywith VCDS by Nexus7 · · Score: 1

    You can set many convenience features (and some drivetrain-related ones too, I believe) in VW-family cars. You buy a dongle and software (runs $200 and up) called VCDS (used to be VAG-COM) and connect the car to a PC or smartphone, and go to town. For example, if your car doesn't already have it, you can install a rain-light sensor, and then tell the car to roll up windows and the sunroof when it rains.

  25. For VW/Audi by toonces33 · · Score: 1

    You need to get VAG-COM from Ross-Tech. A little pricey but it does an incredible job of letting you configure the car.

    1. Re:For VW/Audi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VAG-COM is really dirt cheap compared to what you have to buy to do similar things with other brands. I've had one for a long time, and it's paid for itself several times over.

    2. Re:For VW/Audi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh the VAG. I boosted the turbo, fixed my window problem, and reset a bad MAF sensor on my 2000 A4 with the elusive VAGCOM. Practically a requirement for any Audi/VW/Porsche owner. It costs ~$100, but it also costs ~$100 just to diagnose electrical errors, so it pays for itself if you need to use it just once.

  26. Just get some older boxy VOLVO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    VOLVO with thick rubber window rims and it should do for what your intentions are.

  27. 1966 Ford Mustang by Giant+Electronic+Bra · · Score: 1

    Remember to get the high performance model, not the crappy one!

    Oh, you didn't mean "drop in a new tranny when you said 'hack'??" Damned lazy kids.

    --
    "Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem." -- Jefferson
    1. Re:1966 Ford Mustang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shitty year for that deathtrap.

    2. Re:1966 Ford Mustang by Giant+Electronic+Bra · · Score: 1

      Hey, ALL 60's cars were deathtraps! The OP never said anything about it had to be safe. Not sure why you hate on the '66 though, its a very classic model. The disc brakes were pretty much crap, but you can easily fix that (and by now if you own such a car it has long since been dealt with). The drive train in the performance model is pretty much standard Ford. The Windsor HiPO with the 4 barrel is a pretty nice engine.

      --
      "Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem." -- Jefferson
  28. 1977 Oldsmobile cutlass/GM equivalent by Maxwell · · Score: 1

    Totally open platform, well documented, simple wiring and so common that replacement parts are easy to find. Also acceptable, Malibu, Monte Carlo, etc. Get the 350/3speed auto version. I recommend Olds because most them have power windows, 4 speaker radios and other 'luxury' items.

    In 1978 the emissions regs kicked in and things started to get weird.

    Hacking a modern car is not for the hobbyist, the nanny state and sensor system are complex proprietary, closed systems.

  29. Mitsubishi hands down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mitsubishi has the most hacked ECU around.

    It runs the "M32R" instruction set and the assembler can be dumped by running the ROM image through gcc.

    People are hex editing the ROM images and adding new functionality to the ECU such as having it flash the check engine light when the engine detects knock.

    Theres routines to change rev limits, boost targets, ignition timing, fuel maps, wastegate duty cycle maps, and even No-Lift-To-Shift modes were hacked in that cut ignition when the clutch is pressed so the right foot can remain floored across many shifts.

    We can datalog and tune the ECU while it's running. The software is free and the cable is $120. It can also log without a computer since the cable has an SD card and an ADC built in to convert raw voltage to things like AFR from a wideband.

    I can edit the assembler of my ROM in my car. No one else is doing that.

  30. Vw beetle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real one, not the POS designed in the late 90's, you can do anything like rebuild your engine from scratch with DIY fuel injection and what not.

    1. Re:Vw beetle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a VW powered dual engine sand dragster called "Cor Blimey" that was keeping up with V8's. No fan, no shroud, no alternator, just a couple bare engines, 4 Weber carbs, and NOS.

    2. Re:Vw beetle by jgarry · · Score: 1

      I wandered into this place looking for an oil change on my NB: http://www.paradisemotorsport....

      --
      Oracle and unix guy.
  31. Mercedes by rob135724684285 · · Score: 1

    Get a Mercedes. Literally *everything* you could want is available on the CANBUS. This includes control of remote start functions, windows, doors, all buttons, all data from engine, climate control, radio etc. Once you are on the bus you have control of the entire vehicle.

  32. A lot of info is available via ODB2 by Mantle · · Score: 1

    Most modern cars will provide interesting diagnostic data via the ODB2 interface. Something like this would be a good first project: http://forum.arduino.cc/index.php?topic=95037.0

    1. Re:A lot of info is available via ODB2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hate it when I see this. ODB = Ol' Dirty Bastard (RIP) of Wu-Tang. OBD = On Board Diagnostics

  33. Give it a rest already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's just a fucking car. Who gives as hit? You get in and go from one place to another.

  34. Look for Active Enthusiast Communities by EndlessNameless · · Score: 1

    Since cars have little security and minimal documentation, being the most hackable is simply the result of having a large enough group of people reverse engineering it.

    The Nissan 350Z/370Z, Mitsubishi EVO/Lancer/Eclipse, and Subaru WRX/BRZ/Impreza are the standouts as far as being affordable for a hobby endeavour. Mercedes vehicles are also fairly well-explored.

    Related models such as the Infiniti G/Q series (premium 350Z/370Z) inherit most of the same benefits from their mainstream brethren, and pretty much all Subaru cars have a decent aftermarket parts and mod community.

    --

    ---
    According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
  35. Someone needs a car metaphor . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is this on /.?

    Learn a little bit about cars and you'll find they were always hackable (modable), and are becoming more closed with digital information, rather than wiring and pulse information . . .

    Start by going to a CAR FORUM and asking about Modding. Don't use the correct but pretentious word "hack".

    Move to car alarm forums/car stereo forums.

  36. Saturn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a few 4 cylinder ecotecs running nearly 1000 HP.

    1. Re:Saturn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a few 4 cylinder ecotecs running nearly 1000 HP.

      Going with a Saturn has the added benefit of never giving you the urge to buy a newer model.

    2. Re:Saturn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chevy has the same models with a different name. Ecotecs are still being used in new ones.

  37. Subaru Impreza by Midnight_Falcon · · Score: 1
    I'm biased here because I drive one, but, Subarus are known for being "lego cars." They are ridiculously easy to take apart and put parts in, everything is setup very logically, and parts are interchangeable within a few years of the model. Also, there's a huge community at NASIOC that will give you lots of information and people to ask about whatever you'd like to do.

    So far, I have (previously having no experience doing work on cars):
    Installed Pioneer head unit w/ DVD player + ebrake bypass (no I do not watch DVDs while driving, it's just easier to bypass than connect the ebrake :) )
    Replaced speakers with SEAS Lotus
    Replaced battery with an optima yellowtop for the soundsystem (stock 90A alternator works great though)
    Installed subwoofer in custom enclosure (easy to find custom fiberglass for these cars)
    Installed remote starter
    Disabled the blasted beeping when a passenger doesn't put on their seatbelt

    I'm sure you could do a lot more with one of these, but that's just what I've been able to do in a year or two of playing around with it. I am no longer at all intimidated by opening my car up and doing work on it, if you can put together a PC and do legos, you can work on a Subaru.

    1. Re:Subaru Impreza by sinij · · Score: 1

      Only I wouldn't buy a new one, since they seem to have severe ring problems and a lot end up burning oil while still new.

    2. Re:Subaru Impreza by Midnight_Falcon · · Score: 1

      Hadn't heard about this, but my model is a 2010 (I got it new in 2010), and has had zero problems at 40k miles. Still haven't had to even get a brake job done. Worst I've had to do is plug a couple tires -- but really can't blame the car for placing nails in the road :)

    3. Re:Subaru Impreza by twdorris · · Score: 1

      They are ridiculously easy to take apart and put parts in, everything is setup very logically, and parts are interchangeable within a few years of the model.

      Kind of a bummer, though, that the fun version had port-side injectors and a top-mount intercooler. How long to change plugs? Seriously?

    4. Re:Subaru Impreza by Jaime2 · · Score: 1

      If you really want to have fun with a Subaru, do this to it.

  38. Ooops! by Chocolate+Teapot · · Score: 1

    I have a Prius (actually 2).!

    You forgot to post anonymously!

    --
    Modest doubt is called the beacon of the wise. - William Shakespeare
    1. Re:Ooops! by StatureOfLiberty · · Score: 1

      Touché! LOL

  39. JEEP by blue_teeth · · Score: 1

    JEEPS are built, not bought.

    No, I am not talking about the latest contraptions but older Jeeps...CJs

    1. Re:JEEP by ControlsGeek · · Score: 1

      Newer Jeeps are eminently hackable. Check out this guys hack. http://chadgibbons.com/2013/12...

  40. Wrong, just wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod parent down for ignorence.

    1. Re:Wrong, just wrong. by jddj · · Score: 1

      Mood pareant down for poro spleeling.11!!!

  41. Depends on how you want to hack it. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    The Jeep CJ/Wrangler has amazing aftermarket support. You can build a CJ from aftermarket parts with no real problem. The old Cherokee is in the same level of support. The old First Gen 1960s Camaro and the Corvette line is the same way. You can build a 64-68 Stingray from parts you order online if you want to.
    For a modern car Subarus, Jeeps, and so one are high on the list.
    What kind of car do you want? A people mover, Jeep, or a sporty car? US or japanese? Are you in the States?

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  42. Yep by djupedal · · Score: 1

    I have a 1990 Ford that I've done so many mods to in that example....but it's not alone, so i'd say the most is anything you're not making payments on and is out of warranty.

  43. liability? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    With all the past lawsuits over sudden accelerations and other safety issues blamed (correctly or incorrectly) on software bugs, why would any automobile manufacturer in their right minds allow the customer to flash their own firmware? Seems to me that this is something to which any manufacturer who wants to stay in business (and out of jail) would be violently opposed.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:liability? by Jaime2 · · Score: 1

      why would any automobile manufacturer in their right minds allow the customer to flash their own firmware?

      Because that has nothing to do with their liability. As long as they make the lamest attempt to prevent modifications, their PR department and legal team will both simply say "the customer had made unauthorized modifications to the car". The most common reason to lock stuff down is to create a captive market that they can sell to. Tens of thousands of people are driving with tweaked computers in their cars, yet all of the "car software bugs" you see on the news are on unmodified vehicles.

      My first 2014 Mazda 3 was so buggy that they gave me a new one. Some of the bugs had safety implications - it caused me to be unable to see the speedometer and gave me false GO TO THE DEALER NOW, YOUR CAR IS HORRIBLY BROKEN messages.

  44. Definition of Ricer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a readout on the rear of the car showing engine RPMs

    Combine this with a fart can exhaust and driving around in 2nd gear you can sound Too Fast Too Furious and people can see by your LED scrolling display changing from green to red when you approach the 4000 redline on your mother's civic.

    1. Re:Definition of Ricer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm gonna drill holes in my muffler to go faster also.

  45. Not that I tried one by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

    Local Motors, I guess.

    --
    ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
  46. Mazda by Jaime2 · · Score: 1

    Current Mazdas use OpenCar for their infotainment system. Wireless is enabled by default and the root password is out there on the Internet.

  47. Re:Hacking in convenience features? How Inconvenie by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

    Project cars are wonderful. Depending on how far you want to go just having most of the pieces initially is enough even if they are in rough shape. With the right project car there can be a very large community and market so tinkering and getting what you want or need is easy. I have a MG midget that I am in the process of restoring and basically you can get every part ever made for them so part availability is a non issue. Add in the large number of vehicles with A-Series engines that weren't really developed much during their production and a healthy racing series for little British cars and you find that there are lots to hacks and improvements that can be made. Personally I am going for a lightened, better handling, supercharged, alcohol burner for mine.

    --
    Time to offend someone
  48. Mercades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just ask that reporter.

  49. Hack the windows by evanh · · Score: 1

    so that they stay operating, period! I hate being a passenger in modern cars.

  50. Software or Hardware? by sdguero · · Score: 1

    If we are talking about both, I'd vote for one of my vehicles, a 2003 Dodge Ram 1500 with the HEMI engine. I bought it for $7500 (in 2012), spent $200 on a cold air intake, $600 on a magnaflow exhaust (got a deal), and $300 on a perofrmance tuner for it ( allows adjusted ECU, shift points, rev limiter, top speed governor, etc). It was quick before, but now the thing HAULS ASS. I never Dyno'd it but I'd guess I'm making an extra 40-50 HP from the combined effect of those changes and runs a high 14 sec 1/4 mile now, which is friggin fast for a full size truck that weighs over 5000 pounds. For reference that is about as fast as a 90's era Mustang GT, or corvette. And because it's a cheap truck I beat on it, haul dirt/wood/concrete/whatever, and pretty much do whatever i want to it as far as interior/stereo etc. It's fun to have a vehicle that large, and that performant that I can modify however I want. Gas mileage sucks (around 11 MPG), but otherwise I love it.

    Here are similar trucks at the drag strip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  51. How much of the work do you want to do? by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

    As others have said, Subarus and Hondas are fairly easy to hack if you want to change existing ECU's.
    But if you want a car the way you want it, and are going to do more work, look for older cars.
    I have a 1975 Triumph Spitfire. I added electronic ignition, replaced the mechanical speedometer and tachometer with electronic ones, and am working on a custom fuel injection setup. If I want to put seat heaters in the car, removal of the seat pan doesn't take any bolts at all. It takes four screws to pull the door apart.
    The problem, of course, is that I have to do ALL the work myself. There isn't anyone else doing stuff like this, so every project is brand new.
    But there are precisely zero software or firmware barriers to doing anything I want, and the only hardware barriers are my skill limitations.
    It's an easy way to sink 3000 hours into a car only worth $2000USD, though, and at the end you still have an old car with very dubious reliability.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  52. Try CAN. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anything with full-blown CAN-bus. The bus itself has no security at all so you can attach your own programmable device to it and order any device on the bus to do whatever you want.

    That's more hacking options than most people even want.

    Learning curve is quite steep but the skills apply to any car with same devices, not just one car or model.

  53. Volkswagen-Audi group by shuz · · Score: 3, Informative

    VW/Audi group cars can all be easily hacked via a Vag-com http://www.ross-tech.com/vag-c... device which is a relatively cheap hardware/software alternative to the programmer used at the factor or at a dealership. There are great community sites. for instance: http://www.audizine.com/forum/...

    One simple hack I performed for instance was to enable bluetooth hud. Default from the factory the contact list from my phone would not be displayed one the radio or on the instrument heads up display. One simple code change displays my contact list, last calls received, and last calls made. The only negatives to the vag-com are that engine performance and emissions are locked out. Which means you can't disable the ~130MPH governor for instance.

    --
    There is or can be built a machine that can simulate any physical object. -Church-Turing principle
  54. CAN bus enables access by itomato · · Score: 2

    Check out the CANBus Triple: https://www.kickstarter.com/pr... They have huge adoption in the Mazda community

  55. CAN bus enables access by itomato · · Score: 1

    Check out the CANBus Triple: https://www.kickstarter.com/pr... They have huge adoption in the Mazda community

  56. 1968 VW BEETLE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The most hackable and probably the most hacked.

  57. sense of the word by DriveDog · · Score: 2

    I think of hacking as almost anything to alter almost anything about the car, but it sounds like you're thinking mostly interfacing with the electronics to get there. I can't answer who's best, but I know for sure that some manufacturers make accessing and interpreting CAN bus information a lot easier than others. Search for CAN bus interface info for various makes in which you're interested and see how much is out there and how difficult it looks. When I find time (yeah right) I want to grab events from pushing steering wheel buttons and use it to control my own devices. So I'm not really looking to put messages on the CAN bus, just read from it. In general, models that have cult followings (not just "ricers") will have a lot more info out there that their owners have accumulated and shared. MINIs are not among the easiest cars to interface with (as with other BMWs), but there's a lot of info out there because of the interest among owners. On the other hand, something like a Camry, popular as they are, is unlikely to have been explored as much because they're appliances that people buy to reliably get them where they want to go and not for providing fun or making a statement.

  58. What do you mean by "hackable"? by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    If we're talking about the kind of hacks you'd normaly think of when thinking of cars that would probably be some 2-3 decade old ex-soviet military car. In a pinch you can repair those with a paperclip. Some of them also have awesome features. I've heard of a transporter that can deflate and inflate its tires... while driving! They used that feature to adjust the tires to the ground the transporter would pass over. More traction in snow and sand and stuff like that.

    An old us-army jeep probably is pretty hackable aswell. As goes for dune-buggies and other kit-cars.

    As for hackable electronics in cars - I'd rather add those myself.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  59. Land Rover by Martin+S. · · Score: 1

    Land Rovers are like Meccano for grown men.

    Chassis come in 90,110,127 inchs. Engines in V8 Petrol, TDI, Drive/Transmission in 4x4, 6x6 and even tracked varients.

    Bodies include Utility, Pickup, Van, Station Wagon, Double Cab, Hicap, Light Weights and Forward Control, Trybacks.

    Special Vehicle varients as Ambulances, Fire Tenders and Pumps, Armoured, Recovery Truck, Fire Tenders, amphibious and breaching vehicles to name a few.

  60. Build your own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Build your own with lego or 3d printing, let it run on somekind of linux distro then proceed with a camera for live stream and put the controls online for other people to drive you around

  61. Damn Kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get a carbuerated pickup. You can hack everything in it.

  62. In a Soviet Lada by rvw · · Score: 1

    In a Soviet Lada, you will be hacked!

  63. Why mess around? Why not go Open Source? by bdwoolman · · Score: 1

    With a Tabby

    Get yours today!... Er, tomorrow... Would you believe...

    Okay, okay, already. Apologies in advance for the snark. This really is a cool project.. And one worth watching. I do think the name is poorly positioned, however. Hey! What about Carduino? No? Anything but Tabby. I got it.. I got it... The Stallman! Hmmm. On second thought not for a car. I'll keep thinking.

    --
    "No fear. No envy. No meanness." Liam Clancy
  64. Motorcycle by LionKimbro · · Score: 1

    Must it be a car? How about a motorcycle? HUGE modding community; Long history. Also, helmets like the Skully AR-1.

  65. How many times have I flashed my ECU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I use a Cobb Tuning AccessPort to flash my ECU way too often.

    You have full control over timing, air fuel mixtures, RPM limits, you can also disable specific engine trouble codes if wanted.

    Their "stuff" works with Subaru, Ford, some Mazda and the Nissan GTR.

  66. BMW by maz2331 · · Score: 1

    BMW's are very hackable - there's hundreds of little settings that can be coded in nearly every module of the car, there's 3rd party ECU firmware available as well to boost power, especially on the turbo models.

  67. Re:Hacking in convenience features? How Inconvenie by jgarry · · Score: 1

    I once worked for a place that restored a Sprite (the later version rebadged midget). Positive ground! Evil!

    We put on the cutest little headers too.

    --
    Oracle and unix guy.
  68. Not sure about most hackable, but... by wolrahnaes · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The BMW E46 (3 series between 1999 and 2005) and other BMWs from that era all use an in-vehicle network called "I-Bus" which operates things like the windows, the sound system, the lights, and more. Most non-critical vehicle functions are exposed there and are fairly well documented by the community. You only need an inexpensive adapter that looks like a serial port as far as the computer's concerned to access it.

    IIRC the first generation or two of Mini as well as a few Land Rovers of the time that used BMW engines also have I-Bus.

    Newer models have an optical system called MOST running the infotainment system, I'm not sure where the windows and lights are connected in these days.

    --
    I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
  69. Re: Remote starters are worse than you might expec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Toyota is tied to whether the car is in Park, rather than whether the engine is running. I suspect that is what you need to successfully get an aftermarket remote starter working properly. As for hacking, turning off the various chimes is possible in most Toyotas using a CAN capable ODBII connector and Techstream software which you can freely download from Toyota. Various other comfort features can be adjusted, depending on the car, and youbcan get a lot of realtime data from the various ECUs like engine RPMs and outside temperature from the engine ECU and cabin temperature from the climate ECU along with more obscure sensor information.

  70. Hack this, hack that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one tired of the overuse of the verb "to hack" everywhere? Everything is being hacked all over the place, it has totally lost its long-term association with computers.

    The downfall probably started when "to hack" started being used to mean "to crack"... and then the Matrix movies...

  71. Re:Almost any car from the last 5-10 years should by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My car (Holden Astra Olympic Edition, manual hatch, ie October 1999 build Opel Astra TS3 CD) has power windows that, on all doors, if you hold up/down for ½ second, it goes all the way up/down when you remove your finger. The driver can control this from their 4 window control on the armrest (one of which is for his window).
    Adjusting it a few mm at a time is easy, you just tap the button a few times, not hold it.
    Oddly, since this is on a 15 year old car, it seems that this basic intuitive functionality is still rare and/or expensive even now!?

  72. Hacking in convenience features? How Inconvenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    here is a Torque companion tool that may be interesting
    http://torqueloganalyzer.blogspot.it/

  73. Ford Mustang and Chevrolet Camaro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Both the Ford Mustang and the Chevrolet (for the past 15 years or so) feature fully programmable ECU's through the OBD II port. You can remove the speed limiter, remap the A/F ratio, chane the shift points and do pretty much anything else you'd want to do

  74. My car by SinisterEVIL · · Score: 1

    I was driving home one night when my car became hacked. It was a physical/social hack. A man approached me and shoved a gun in my face at a stop light, he was able to take full control of the vehicle and my wallet within 15 seconds. The zero day exploit has yet to be patched and the uber 1337 haxor pwned me.

  75. A Good Suggestiona and a Terrible Suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better: Any VW made car. VAG COM is an amazing tool if you know what you're doing. I'm jealous of what all some of the guys can make happen with it. (And of course, you can completely screw up the car by not knowing what you're doing with it.)

    Worse: Jeep or any other Chrysler product. My understanding is that 97-02 Wranglers (and presumably Cherokees) have a non hackable ECU, which prevents most decent power mods from working with their engines. My understanding is that the 2011 model Wrangler has the same issue. Why its only one model year, I don't know. I'd love to add some oomph to my '98 Wrangler, but with an ECU that is so cranky about anything (and STILL can't tell me if I have a bad O2 sensor), I see no need in trying. Almost all turbocharger and supercharger kits don't work with the first few model years of the TJ Wranglers. And don't get me started on how awesome the data bus is in these model years. How about a gauge cluster that just loses its mind because Chrysler decided to cheap out on the connectors on the back?! That being said, I do love my '98 and '10 Wranglers. My '10 has a few decent options for displaying data if I wanted it to. My understanding is that due to the ECU, my '98 (and the one I WANT all the feedback I can get from), is useless for hacking. There was a guy on Jeep Forum that got a JK (2007-current) Wrangler to do some custom messages and whatnot on his display.

  76. Obviously... by Spugglefink · · Score: 1

    The most hackable car is obviously the Adobe. You can hack it into damn near anything.

  77. Wrong forum. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The slashdot audience seems to be only interested in cars that reduce your ability to control the vehicle at all. Leave it up to these guys, it will be illegal to drive your car, much less modify it. They dream of a life of having no vehicular control and only get transported in predetermined routes. You are better off posing your questions to people that actually care about cars, than to a large nerd base that dribbles pee down their legs at the thought freedom.

  78. Jeep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If by hackable you mean you want other people to be able to hack into your Bluetooth head unit and get drive-by-wire functionality to take over your car... it was recently stated that the 2014 Jeep Cherokee is the most hackable car around: http://tech.slashdot.org/story/14/08/04/2343226/least-secure-cars-revealed-at-black-hat