Slashdot Mirror


Celebrated Russian Hacker Now In Exile

An anonymous reader writes: VKontakte is a Russian social network, more popular there than even Facebook. Its founder, Pavel Durov, was a celebrity for his entrepreneurial skills, much like Mark Zuckerberg elsewhere. But as Russia has cracked down on internet freedoms, 30-year-old Durov had to relinquish control of the social network. He eventually fled the country when the government pressured him to release data on Ukrainian protest leaders. He's now a sort of roving hacker, showing up where he's welcome and not staying too long. "Mr. Durov, known for his subversive wit and an all-black wardrobe that evokes Neo from the Matrix movies, is now a little-seen nomad, moving from country to country every few weeks with a small band of computer programmers. One day he is in Paris, another in Singapore." Durov said, "I'm very happy right now without any property anywhere. I consider myself a legal citizen of the world."

130 comments

  1. Snowden revenge? by dskoll · · Score: 5, Funny

    With Putin giving the US a black eye by harbouring Edward Snowden, maybe this guy will find sanctuary in the US? :)

    1. Re:Snowden revenge? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe Edward can rent him his house, he won't be using it any time soon.

    2. Re:Snowden revenge? by unixisc · · Score: 2

      Looks like a good use of a J1 visa. Durov for Snowden

    3. Re:Snowden revenge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Unlikely. The US government will find a compliant country to indict him on fake rape charges so he can be held in custody and then get him sent back to Russia.

    4. Re:Snowden revenge? by xaotikdesigns · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that our privacy laws and internet freedoms would be more in line with his ideals...

      --
      XDInd
    5. Re:Snowden revenge? by dskoll · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When all is said and done, the US is still a helluva lot freer than Russia. But I was being facetious; the last place he should go is the USA or we'd see a Snowden - Durov swap in the blink of an eye.

    6. Re:Snowden revenge? by xaotikdesigns · · Score: 2

      I don't know that Russia would agree though. They may want the USA NSA guy more than the Russian Facebook guy.

      --
      XDInd
    7. Re:Snowden revenge? by flyingsquid · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or maybe both of them can go into exile together in a third country. And Julian Assange can go there too. And they'll share an apartment together. It'd make a great sitcom. "Three hacker dissidents exiled from their native countries... now they're all living in one house! See what kind of wacky adventures they get into!"

    8. Re:Snowden revenge? by flyingsquid · · Score: 1

      When all is said and done, the US is still a helluva lot freer than Russia.

      Not to be that guy who says we're living in a police state and quotes Orwell while knowing damn well the government isn't going to bust him in his mother's basement... but in at least one way, I would be willing to bet that we are far less free than Russia. And that would be freedom from surveillance. Between the various NSA programs to log our emails, track our calls, and monitor our online activity, I would be willing to bet that the average U.S. citizen sees far more surveillance than the average Russian citizen. It's not that Russia is morally superior here, it's that the NSA is probably a lot better at monitoring communications than its Russian counterpart. That being said, I suspect Russia has the ability to target dissidents, is more willing to use it, and is far more likely to act on intercepted data than the NSA. The NSA is probably a better spy, but not nearly as dangerous a spy.

    9. Re:Snowden revenge? by GigaplexNZ · · Score: 1

      More likely the US would detain him and trade him for Snowden.

    10. Re:Snowden revenge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure that our privacy laws and internet freedoms would be more in line with his ideals...

      Your sarcasm is palpable. From the article I got a chuckle out of this statement, "I consider myself a legal citizen of the world." The United States Government welcomes such delusional beliefs because it makes their own "ruler of the world" mindset.

    11. Re:Snowden revenge? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      It depends upon what Russia really wanted. Based upon US decelerations over the years and their desire to politically corrupt other countries social networks, likely what Russia was really after was not protesters but US espionage agents and proof of US espionage. So Russia now would be swapping for nothing. Right now Russia can gain huge global political advantage by acting as a refuge for people targeted by US political enforcement agencies (many claim absolutely zero requirement to obey other countries laws when operating in them) from all over the globe, not the terrorists that US unfortunately has a history of doing but simply political activists.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    12. Re:Snowden revenge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, the only thing that prevents a totalitarian regime from abusing its people is the staggering laziness and incompetence of its hired bullies? That confirms it,
      Russians are the White Trash of the world.

    13. Re:Snowden revenge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they should also invite these ladies who lived with John McAfee; this would make a deadly show

    14. Re:Snowden revenge? by murdocj · · Score: 3

      I wondered how long it would take someone to hijack this thread into "USA evil". Congratulations.

    15. Re:Snowden revenge? by murdocj · · Score: 0

      Right. Let's compare running for president against Mr. Putin vs running against Obama. One of those cases makes you a politician. The other puts you in jail till you decide to give up.

    16. Re:Snowden revenge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool story, brah.

    17. Re:Snowden revenge? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      The average US citizen doesn't do anything online that it would be worth the government surveilling them to detect. Most criminals and malcontents in the US engage in low tech offline crime. The online life of most USians is boring beyond tears.

    18. Re:Snowden revenge? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      To spice it up, they could put Chelsea Manning in the apartment too.

    19. Re:Snowden revenge? by dskoll · · Score: 1

      Actually, I do not rely on stories from the media, but on talking to Russian friends who have left Russia. Say what you like, but people vote with their feet... hence the huge flow of "enslaved" Americans into "free" Russia... yeah, that's it.

    20. Re:Snowden revenge? by dskoll · · Score: 1

      I expect Russia has already got everything out of Snowden that it ever will.

    21. Re:Snowden revenge? by quenda · · Score: 1

      I expect Russia has already got everything out of Snowden that it ever will.

      What they get from Snowden is PR. Makes it harder for the US to criticise Russia on human rights.
      And it gives a big middle finger to the US administration, showing that Russia is one of the few countries who can afford to not be subservient to the US.

      Do you think Snowden had much that the Russians were not already well aware of? He did not research military secrets.
      If he is helping the Russians technically, it is in teaching them how to spy on their own people more efficiently.

    22. Re:Snowden revenge? by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      This is actually an observation with a perfectly fit and relevant analogy, though not particularly insightful. There are certainly examples abound of "USA evil" posts that aren't, so I'm not sure why you picked this one.

    23. Re:Snowden revenge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PBS will get right on that!

    24. Re:Snowden revenge? by dskoll · · Score: 1

      No, I don't think Snowden gave the Russians much... that's why I said they've already got all they can. And the PR value diminishes daily; no-one cares about old news.

    25. Re:Snowden revenge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usually, along with religious young girls there might be a bunch of religious brothers, uncles and other (often spiritual) relatives and acquitances around. And one to get with a religious girl could face a religious slap into face with religious fist, club, rocks, lead chunks, axes, showels, or, in bad case, blessed and religious marriage and the whole righteous family.

      They say, it's a bad sign, to be in an own car's trunk, in the night, on a hidden forrest path, in different bags. Meeting with religious girls gets you to signs like this in a just a tiny fraction of New York minute. Your milleage may vary, though

      Or, if you're one damn-lucky-fcuk, you'll get a furious intercourse in not so traditional way, in not really protected fashion, as she just saves herself for a husband, get some std's and be happy.

  2. In Russia, Facebook destroys YOUR privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Oh, wait...

  3. So you think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... America is a police state... Really? The Galaxies bless the U.S.

    1. Re:So you think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, it is. That one police state is slightly less worse than another doesn't change that both are police states.

    2. Re:So you think... by JRV31 · · Score: 0

      What smells better dog shit or cat shit.

    3. Re:So you think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dog shit - but luckily, cats bury theirs.

    4. Re:So you think... by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      Cats shit inside though. Dogs generally shit outside, where it can be left to naturally degrade in peace.

  4. A Ukrainian joke by mi · · Score: 3, Funny

    One Ukrainian says to another:

    • Hey, whatever you say about the rest of them, I still know one good Russian...
    • Who?!
    • Gérard Depardieu!
    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:A Ukrainian joke by SLot · · Score: 4, Funny

      A better joke:

      Two Ukranian men are sitting in Odesa, discussing what is going on in Ukraine over a drink.

      Man 1: I stopped speaking Russian.
      Man 2: Why? Afraid the Ukranians will beat you?
      Man 1: No, that Russians will come to protect me.

    2. Re:A Ukrainian joke by mi · · Score: 1

      That one is even better, when told not about Ukrainians in Odesa, but about Soviet expats (of whatever ethnicity) in Brooklyn...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    3. Re:A Ukrainian joke by unixisc · · Score: 2

      Those countries are now in NATO, which is theoretically supposed to go to war if any of its members are attacked. So if Russian tanks move into Riga, would that mean NATO i.e. the US going to war against Russia? It would be interesting to see if it does. Otherwise, my point - that after the Cold War, NATO should either have been retired, or coopted everyone including Russia - would be proven valid

    4. Re:A Ukrainian joke by SLot · · Score: 5, Funny

      Haha, touche! Half of me wants very much to see my friends in kyiv, dnepropetrovsk & lviv, but the other half says wait a little while longer....

      also: What do Putin, oil and the ruble have in common? They all hit 63 next year. ;)

    5. Re:A Ukrainian joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      western Europe seems to be in a surprised position ("NATO was in past decade just a gentlemans club, no weapons involved") while CEE "new Europe" really trusted it had capability to protect/defend them.
      Now russian forcess escalate provocations, which proves that at the moment many NATO countries have hardly any efficient defence. But the side effect of that will be "all that nato stuff" taken more seriously in western european capitals. Outcome? It really depends on how long Russia will want to "just provoke" and when will it decide to reach for more.

    6. Re:A Ukrainian joke by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Taking seriously doesn't mean squat, when the West has been disarming ever since the Cold War ended. Even the wars in the Middle East didn't cause a resumption in the West arming itself, since the enemies in question are savages w/ far inferior weapons - there is a major difference b/w running a war in Afghanistan, Iraq or Syria, where the enemy has no air defenses, vs running one against Russia.

      Yet, even against Afghanistan & Iraq, the US at least wanted, if not needed, a coalition. During the Cold War, the US could have held its own against the Soviets. That's no longer true today vis a vis the Russians

    7. Re:A Ukrainian joke by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Here is another one:
      An Ukrainian sees his neighbor felling trees on his property and asks puzzled:

      - Why are you cutting down all these beautiful birches?
      - I don't want the Russians to come and say: that landscape looks just like home

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    8. Re:A Ukrainian joke by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      And if your country has oil, keep quiet about it or the US will come free the shit out of you.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    9. Re:A Ukrainian joke by mi · · Score: 1

      And if your country has oil, keep quiet about it or the US will come free the shit out of you.

      The US is the world's biggest oil producer nowadays. Getting Iraq's oil back then — which anti-Americans like yourself keep alluding to — would've been far simpler by simply lifting the embargo, not go to war. Oil is much cheaper than blood — both to humans and the "evil KKKorporations"... Venezuela — not anyone from the Middle East — used to be our main foreign oil supplier, but we neither attacked it nor planned to, even though its leaders kept talking up the threat of "American invasion" to justify their own failures.

      Will this stupid meme ever die? Not as long as Kremlin propagandists keep pushing it, I suppose... Meanwhile, Russia itself is busy sabotaging — and even invading — anybody with gas deposits, that might compete with Gazprom. Putin much?

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    10. Re:A Ukrainian joke by SLot · · Score: 1

      Q: What do Putin, oil & the ruble all have in common?

      A: All three will be 63 next year.

    11. Re:A Ukrainian joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not true at all. The US wanted a coalition to seem like it was an international effort and to keep costs down. If the US wanted to actually engage in war, instead of the killing of combatants who don't wear uniforms, then Afghanistan would have been over much quicker. Hell, the actual invasion of Iraq was really fast. The US is great at crushing conventional militaries.

    12. Re:A Ukrainian joke by unixisc · · Score: 1

      True about militaries like Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan. Not so true about militaries like Russia or even China. It's one thing for the US to have invaded Iraq and liberated Kuwait in 1991, and a totally different thing for the US to send troops into Donbass and drive out the Russians. Heck, the most that the West can do if Russia decides to re-annex all ex-Soviet republics and Eastern Europe would be to impose sanctions, which would do squat, since oil alone can float the Russian economy.

  5. Re:Commie Critter On The Lam? by unixisc · · Score: 0

    Anywhere in the west - just need to make sure that the SVR/FSB doesn't get to put some Polonium isotopes in his food

    So who runs VKontakte now? Durov himself, or has ownership passed on to someone else? If it has, surely the Kremlin can target that guy?

  6. Re:Commie Critter On The Lam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Run?

    He's in Exile living well. I've thought of going there but plane fare is expensive to Exile and there's this long layover in Timbuktu.

    It's even harder when you are on a Lamb. The TSA won't let you through security on the Lamb and let's not get into bording the plane.

  7. Yeah, easy for you by OverlordQ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When Mr. Durov sold his stake in VKontakte last December, there was speculation it was worth a few hundred million dollars. Mr. Durov would not give a specific figure, citing a nondisclosure agreement.
    [...]
    “I’m very happy right now without any property anywhere,” he added. “I consider myself a legal citizen of the world.”

    When your net-worth is 7 figures at a minimum, that's a bit easier to do.

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    1. Re:Yeah, easy for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7 figures and the USA hasn't welcomed him with open arms? We ARRRRE slipping.

    2. Re:Yeah, easy for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when a country which would gladely coin up 7 figures+ for his head (despite the crisis) hunts for him, nothing can give hi safety.

  8. Re:Hackers = Criminals by geekmux · · Score: 1

    Hackers are criminals. Why am I supposed to feel sorry for a criminal?

    Why am I supposed to feel sorry when you are wrongfully accused as one?

    It's always funny to see that ignorant look on people's faces as the shoe slips on the other foot...

  9. Re:Commie Critter On The Lam? by SLot · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://dealbook.nytimes.com/20...

    The Russian Internet giant Mail.ru said on Tuesday that it had bought the remaining stake in Vkontakte, the country’s largest social network, that it did not already own for $1.47 billion.

    Mail.ru is owned by Alisher B. Usmanov.

    From http://qz.com/268023/this-puti... :

    Usmanov is one of Russian president Vladimir Putin’s “oligarchs,” a group of businessmen with close ties to the Kremlin, and last year Putin awarded him Russia’s highest civilian award, the Order for Service to the Fatherland.

    That ought to clear up who is running/owns VKontakte.

  10. Re:Hackers = Criminals by armanox · · Score: 1

    Hackers are not criminals. Hacking is not illegal (not in the US nor Russian Federation).

    --
    I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
  11. Re:Snowden vs Durov by armanox · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And what has Durov done that was traitorous or cowardly?

    And for that matter, Snowden was a patriot, and far from a coward. A coward would have kept his mouth shut.

    --
    I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
  12. Re:Commie Critter On The Lam? by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    lam 2 |lam| informal noun (in phrase on the lam) in flight, esp. from the police: he went on the lam and is living under a false name.

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  13. Red Cloth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I consider myself a legal citizen of the world

    I'm sure the Putinist nationalists are gaining a healthy, communist red glow to their faces from such offensive characterizations!

  14. Joke fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Joke is supposed to have *some* truth to it.

    1. Re:Joke fail by mi · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Joke is supposed to have *some* truth to it.

      Ask any Russian today, why his country invaded Crimea — and they'll tell you, it was done to "protect the Russian-speaking population from the Nazis in Kiev". The joke has plenty of truth to it, though, I suppose, Germans in Czechoslovakia were making similar jokes in 1938...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  15. hacker my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he is kgb administrator trying to show he is "different"

  16. He sounds like an idiot by eyegone · · Score: 2

    He may consider himself a citizen of the world, but the people with guns do not. I don't see this ending well.

    --
    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    1. Re:He sounds like an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that 'passport menace' thing. Got papers, citizen? No? Oh, well we're going to have to put you in a cage until we are sure of where you belong. Oh, that other guy in cell? He's only been here 15 years waiting to get a VISA from any country at all.

      That "Death Ship" novel is very illuminating to a modern person. It showed the absurdity when this stuff was new.

  17. If he's wanted by Virtucon · · Score: 1

    how is moving around the world on a Russian passport?

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    1. Re:If he's wanted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      With enough money a nationality and passport are trivial to acquire.

    2. Re:If he's wanted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one said he is wanted. He "fled". This can mean a lot of things.

      He legally sold his state to the mail.ru guy. I am sure he did this in person at some government office. Do you know how much paperwork there is in Russia to sell ANYTHING of consequence?

    3. Re:If he's wanted by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      TFS doesn't say that he's "wanted", only that he's been "pressured" (undefined) to release information (also undefined) about Ukrainian activists (also undefined) .

      Which is pretty peculiar, since it implies one of two fairly unlikely events : that the Russian authorities can't get someone of their own into the administration system of VKontact (which I think implausible for a multi-million userbase system), or that the way the system has been set up by Durov has him mis-trusting his own administrator staff to the extent that everything is encrypted everywhere (where are the keys???) and that Durov set the system up like this years ago. Which is a pretty major piece of paranoia, as well as making a lot more work for himself to do.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    4. Re:If he's wanted by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      pressured in Russia means you're wanted. I'm sure if Putin wanted this guy he could get him but it seems a bit Kim Dot Comic to me. Maybe he'll wind up in New Zealand.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  18. What's the Kremlin really after, then? by unixisc · · Score: 2

    I'm not getting it, then. If the Kremlin now has its guy owning VKontakte, why would they give a shit about Durov? They wanted data on Ukrainian protest leaders, which they can now get from Mail.ru, so why would they care about him one way or another? The big reason to go after him would be that ostensibly, he has all that data, but if he doesn't and his (now ex) company has it, and would give it, then what's his value to Moscow?

    Also, Ukrainian protest leaders means what? Pro-Russian separatists in the Donbass, right? If that's the case, it should be easy for Moscow to get their details, since they're supporting them. Why would they need a third party - Durov/VKontakte - to spill their guts for them?

    If it means anti-Russian protesters in Ukraine, those guys are morons to put their data w/ a Russian organization, of all things. Doesn't FaceBook support Ukrainian, amongst other languages?

    1. Re:What's the Kremlin really after, then? by SLot · · Score: 1

      As far as protest leaders go, they meant the people on the maidan from a year or so ago - i.e. Ukranians protesting against Putin's puppet Yanukovich. As for why they prefer VKontakte to Facebook? No idea as I don't use either, but I'm sure there are "reasons".

      Durov just has the potential to raise all sorts of hell if he should like to - I don't personally think he has that information, and it this point, the accounts in question have probably long since been deleted. It's more of political in nature than actual hard data that can be gleaned from him. The original article in summary goes into a little more detail on that aspect.

    2. Re:What's the Kremlin really after, then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moscow does not work logically. Hell, even the Moscow of the Soviet times was much more coherent in its actions. For today's Moscow people like Durov are a threat. They simply scare the shit out of the leaders/despots of Russia. Durov and his like are people who are able to speak for themselves, who are able to build up businesses which the state does not directly own and more importantly are able to put out information which is not directly influenced by the goverment. Remember, 99% of Russian newspapers and television channels are state owned.

      In the eyes of Kreml Durov is an activist and activists go to jail, activists get their heads bashed in with baseball bats and their bones literally broken with metal pipes. Some might get it easy and just have their fingers twisted and broken. In modern Russia there are plenty of journalists, writers and other free speech activists who now sit in a god damn wheelchair because they tried to put the word out. The scary and sick part is that the Kreml does not even try to hide these people. They allow interviews and documentaries of the assaulted journalists to be made especially by foreign media. Seeing someone getting severely disabled for writing articles just scares the shit out of a lot of people. It is an effective way to shut people up. Some of the beatings even end out being taped by surveillance cameras and naturally those videos get out just to scare people more. You can even find them online on Russian sites.

      Many people do not understand how hostile, illogical and uncontrollable the situation in Russia is. The goverment (which translates to Vladimir Putin and his gang of sick old men) are so afraid of activists that they are even willing to break out an all out war between Ukraine just to shut the Ukrainian activist up. Now they are developing tv and radio channels for neighbouring countries such as Finland and Estonia. The motive could not be any clearer and these countries should be really worried since now they have been targeted. Really dangerous and sad times.

      Even the Soviet Union had some sort of a higher goal and some type of power play between the party leaders. Nowadays Russia has none of these. It is just a bunch of old men having thugs beating the shit out of all the nay-sayers. Fucking mafia it is.

    3. Re:What's the Kremlin really after, then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Now they are developing tv and radio channels for neighbouring countries such as Finland and Estonia.

      Russia never learns. In 1939-40 the Red Army marched against the finns to carve away half of Finland. Six months later they came back 200k soldiers less, with a rather hollow victory and minimal territorial gains. Finland fought all alone, yet their losses were "only" 25k.

      On the other hand, 200k conscripts KIA was just rounding error for Stalin and co. They continued this mindset until the very end of WW2, when they finally realized a full 95% of the soviet male age group 17-25 was either killed or maimed in the war and there was nobody left to rebuild the economy. Then they started to collect everybody plus dog off the streets in soviet occupied estern european zone to produce enough "POWs" for forced labour in Siberia. The lucky minority were returned by 1955, the less lucky majority died.

      Putin is the direct descendant of the soviet-russian communist regime. Not just that he's a veteran KGB agent, but his grandfather was actually the personal kosher-chef of Isaac Blank, nom'd guerre Vladimir Lenin, the infamous communist mastermind, tsar-killer and founder of the USSR.

    4. Re:What's the Kremlin really after, then? by GbrDead · · Score: 1

      > then what's his value to Moscow?

      What about revenge? Dictators a big on this.

    5. Re:What's the Kremlin really after, then? by Xest · · Score: 1

      Because Putin holds grudges. Defy him and you're on his hit list.

      Putin's regime has a long history of not just seizing companies or putting a stop to things that dare defy it but also crushing the lives of the people who carried out the defiance in the first place.

      Look at Litvinenko, he hadn't been in Russia for years, was a British citizen, yet they were still willing to send Lugovoi to poison him in London with Polonium.

      Like all brutal authoritarian regimes, it's about sending a message - do as we say without question, or we'll kill you.

  19. Re:Hackers = Criminals by mSparks43 · · Score: 1

    citation needed

  20. Re:Hackers = Criminals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hacking is illegal. There are US statutes covering it.

    Depends on your definition of "hacking".

    "Hacking" your Roomba to fetch you a beer from your fridge clearly isn't illegal.

    "Hacking" Home Depot's servers and downloading customer credit card numbers is clearly illegal.

  21. Durov is lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Durov is hacker? Come on. He's just a kid with rich parents who was placed as a figurehead for a stupid facebook clone. Vk was created by people from russian government in the first place.

    Meanwhile, there's a more important news from Russia - the government blocked github, because there's a txt file with suicide methods in one of the repos.

  22. Re:Commie Critter On The Lam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lam 2 |lam| informal
    noun (in phrase on the lam)
    in flight, esp. from the police: he went on the lam and is living under a false name.

    Are you thick, or just pretending?

  23. I've met the guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's mostly just an irrelevant player now making a few me-too products (Telegram) with little actual business knowledge.

  24. Re:Snowden vs Durov by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sort of. Snowden joined the NSA with the explicit goal of "exposing" them. I don't disagree with his actions, but it's not like he was an unwitting dupe that stumbled onto wrong-doing. He had an agenda; mission successful.

  25. Re:Hackers = Criminals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hacking is illegal. There are US statutes covering it.

    Depends on your definition of "hacking".

    "Hacking" your Roomba to fetch you a beer from your fridge clearly isn't illegal.

    DMCA has another opinion on modifying the Roomba.

  26. Re:Hackers = Criminals by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

    Are you sure that hacking your roomba wouldnt be illegal? I'm sure there's some kind of esoteric clause in the TOS/EULA/70 page licensing agreement. and god help your soul if you try teaching other people to modify iRobot's intellectual property on their 'own' device.

    replace 'hacking roomba' with 'jailbreaking* your phone' or "modifying your console's firmware"

    *is the exemption to this still in place?

  27. Re:Snowden vs Durov by Phil+Urich · · Score: 1

    Not quite true, he was initially involved in the industry and became concerned, then deliberately took a job to give himself higher access so he could act on that concern.

    --
    I remember sigs. Oh, a simpler time!
  28. Tired of this bullshit by loonycyborg · · Score: 1

    All those 'businessmen' tend to dump all results of their incompetence and infighting on government. Always government at fault in Russia, even for things it's not remotely involved in. Local cultural flavor. Pretty much everyone has proven and detailed theory that the government is after him personally! It's easier to pretend to be Sakharov than getting actual work done.

    Also Dunning - Kruger effect applies to selection of government officials too, especially elected ones. Anyone remotely skilled would stay out of government and procrastinate. Putin is a lot better than he could be(at least he's not near senile like Yeltsin), but mostly parroting western ideas of governance.

    1. Re:Tired of this bullshit by Xest · · Score: 1

      "Always government at fault in Russia, even for things it's not remotely involved in."

      Given that the Russian government involves itself in everything from who you have sex with to running of companies, to how sovereign states should vote to annexation of their territory the number of things it's not involved in is pretty much nil anyway.

      "Putin is a lot better than he could be"

      Yes, he could do worse, he could actually fire the nukes. Unfortunately doing everything but that doesn't exactly act as a valid argument for not viewing him as an absolute wanker with a severe case of little big man syndrome that the world would be better off without.

    2. Re:Tired of this bullshit by loonycyborg · · Score: 1

      Emotional nonsense like this is exactly the thing I'm tired of. Way to put out fire with gasoline, bro!

    3. Re:Tired of this bullshit by Xest · · Score: 1

      It's no more emotional nonsense than your apologism of Putin's authoritarianism is. If you want to discuss the issue rationally you'll have to start by quitting with the apologism and start accepting reality - that numerous companies have been hijacked by Putin and his cronies not because those companies were failing (how could anyone call VKontakte failing under this guy? It's been growing like crazy in Russia) but because they didn't do what Putin wanted.

      You blame the business leaders and offer excuses for Putin like all too many Russians do, when in reality Putin is the problem. Until you can accept that Russia is going to continue it's century long problem of failed imperialism and subsequent eras of abject poverty when it keeps on collapsing then nothing will change with Russia.

      Russians need to start recognising their leaders are the problem time and time again if they've ever any hope escaping their constant cycles of weak rises followed by massive falls.

    4. Re:Tired of this bullshit by loonycyborg · · Score: 1

      Where do you see apologism? I called him a western parrot without own vision. No apologism of Putin here. He's just a figurehead of various business elites. Which are prone to infighting like above article demonstrates.

    5. Re:Tired of this bullshit by Xest · · Score: 1

      Well you're shifting the blame of arbitrary seizures of corporations away from him and onto the victims so how can that be seen as anything other than apologism?

      I'm not terribly sure how Putin can ever be called a Western parrot when he's spent the last decade or more so desperately trying to stir up confrontation with the West.

      I can only conclude that you're an incredibly confused individual as nothing you say bears any resemblance to reality or makes any kind of sense.

    6. Re:Tired of this bullshit by loonycyborg · · Score: 1

      Western countries constantly stir confrontations with each other. So Russia is no difference. In fact if you look closely there's no such thing as unified west, only some groupthink Putin attempts to became part of.

    7. Re:Tired of this bullshit by Xest · · Score: 1

      Okay I guess you're living in your own world and I can't really discuss things any further. I really have no idea what's going on in your world but it has nothing to do with what's happening to reality.

      There is plenty of unified stances in the West, and Russia doesn't want to be part of it, he wants his own groupthink that he controls.

      That's what's happening in the real world FWIW, what's happening in your world may be completely different so there's no point comparing.

    8. Re:Tired of this bullshit by loonycyborg · · Score: 1

      You're just wrong and being obstinate about it. Why should I buy into artificial Russia - West conflict when it's already long obsolete? There's one humanity and there's no reason for any national states to exist. We can be one unified Humanity now, thanks to Internet that largely abolishes barriers to communication. There may be different viewpoints on governance, but it doesn't map to nationalities. But pretty much all what Putin's government does would be ignored if he was, say, French president. And such double-standard is what I abhor. PR efforts like demonization of Putin are part of political infighting between national states and are harmful for humanity as the whole let alone for poor sods that happened to be citizens of Russia.

    9. Re:Tired of this bullshit by Xest · · Score: 1

      You say I'm wrong but nothing, absolutely nothing backs up your claims. It's all nonsensical bullshit that is completely contradicted with what's actually happening in reality.

      "Why should I buy into artificial Russia - West conflict when it's already long obsolete?"

      Because some people still crave power and suffer tribalist tendancies? Do you really have this little understanding about the world, how old are you, 10?

      "But pretty much all what Putin's government does would be ignored if he was, say, French president. And such double-standard is what I abhor. "

      No it wouldn't. The US and the UK suffered a massive blow to their reputation due to their shenanigans in Iraq. There is no double standard - you invade a neighbouring country, you create laws that discriminate against minorities, and you get called out on that. Look at Uganda, it similarly got attacked for it's anti-homosexuality laws.

      Again, I can only assume you're about 10, or 13 or something. Your complete naivety of the world is astounding and I can't believe anyone could reach adulthood with such an insanely weak understanding of the world around them.

    10. Re:Tired of this bullshit by loonycyborg · · Score: 1

      No. There definitely exists double standard. US didn't call out Saudi Arabia and other Muslim countries for anti-apostasy laws for example, not sanctions for this or anything. All human rights issues are pressed only if it serves US's geopolitical interests, otherwise they tend to get ignored. So now Russia protects interests of minorities in other countries too, so yeah, US parrot.

    11. Re:Tired of this bullshit by Xest · · Score: 1

      Sure and Russia doesn't spot the double standards of annexing Crimea saying it's what the people whilst hanging on to Chechnya which isn't what the people want. You can spot double standards everywhere, but quite how you jump to this absurd conclusion that it's about picking on Russia but that Russia and the West are all in it together I don't know. Do you take way too many drugs or something?

    12. Re:Tired of this bullshit by loonycyborg · · Score: 1

      Actually, Chechen fighters were the most active part of Russian forces in Georgia conflict. They just like war. They just changed their commanders from Arab to Russian ones.

    13. Re:Tired of this bullshit by Xest · · Score: 1

      Is there anything in your world of paranoia that isn't an absolute conspiracy theory? I mean, are you one of those guys who think 9/11 was done by the Jews, and NASA never actually made it the moon?

      I have to wonder if people as batshit insane as you are have any grasp of how crazy you actually sound?

    14. Re:Tired of this bullshit by loonycyborg · · Score: 1

      You mean those guys are a conspiracy theory?

    15. Re:Tired of this bullshit by Xest · · Score: 1

      Oh I see, so you're confusing Russian regulars with Chechen guerillas? If you can't even tell the difference between the two sides it's no wonder you're more than a little confused about it all. I'll give you a hint, the Russian regulars of Chechen descent aren't the same as the vast amount of Chechens that want independence.

    16. Re:Tired of this bullshit by loonycyborg · · Score: 1

      Vast amount of regular Chechens don't care about independence. They just do what armed clans of fanatics tell them to. And those fanatics just changed their mind, switched to become 'federals' now, because it's more advantageous for them.

  29. Re:Hackers = Criminals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm certain hacking a Roomba wouldn't be illegal for a variety of reasons.

    The DMCA Is a copyright law that is concerned with copying protected works primarily. This law has no affect on a persons ability to alter the software on a device, only if they wanted to copy or distribute it. Maybe if they Roomba had specific "Copyright protection" on it somehow you could get busted for circumventing copyright protection, but it seems unlikely.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Act

    Also I can easily replace "hacking a roomba" with 'jailbreaking* your phone' or "modifying your console's firmware" and the the exemption absolutley stands. We have had court battles that determined this very thing and this article explains pretty clearly those rules.
    http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/illegal-root-android-jailbreak-iphone/
    Basicly as long as you arent Jailbreaking or rooting for the the purpose of doing something that would be illegal(running pirate software or something like that) than it is perfectly legal.

    Violating a "TOS/EULA/70 page licensing agreement" is not in fact illegal. what it does do is break the "contract" between you and the manufacturer that is your warranty as well as remove any obligation the manufacturer might have had for updates or access to ongoing premium services.

  30. So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Still not a coward. Still performed a valuable civil service. Still deserves a whole lot better from us than what he got.

  31. Re:Spy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -1? Uh, oh, someone believes his story of SWAT team at his door politely leaving when he did not let them in.

  32. USA is worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The NSA has direct access to Facebook so it doesn't need to resort to tactics like Russia does.

  33. US Feminist country. Is Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In USA if you have young girl you go to prison and are raped by homosexuals.
    (Young girl fine for man in old testament: Deut 22 28-29 hebrew)
    How is it in Russia?

    Why are all countries actually cuntries?

    1. Re:US Feminist country. Is Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you even actually don't get to prison to have a homosexual sex. Frankly, russian jail culture is VERY traditional in orthodox way. Last year the trends are keen to bloody suicide, of 20 or something knife wounds.

  34. Re:Hackers = Criminals by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    I 'rooted' my phone a few weeks ago, and discovered that the Kindle books on it could be pulled out of the hidden directory onto my PC and converted to unlocked EPUB files using calibre.

    That borders on hacking, though it's really just script-kidding at the level I did it (easy to follow guides online.)

  35. Re:Hackers = Criminals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry? Surely you are not referring to section 1201(a)(3), the anti-circumvention clause?

  36. Re:Commie Critter On The Lam? by grcumb · · Score: 1

    eggcorn |egg korn| noun In linguistics, an eggcorn is an idiosyncratic substitution of a word or phrase for a word or words that sound similar or identical in the speaker's dialect (sometimes called oronyms). The new phrase introduces a meaning that is different from the original, but plausible in the same context, such as "old-timers' disease" for "Alzheimer's disease".

    humor
    (h)yoomr
    noun
    noun: humour
    1. the quality of being amusing or comic, especially as expressed in literature or speech. "his tales are full of humor"

    --
    Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
  37. I hope he didn't do a mistake... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and not wipe out the servers when he left.

  38. Yet another red herring by barcarolle · · Score: 1

    But as Russia has cracked down on internet freedomsæ

    Yet another red herring from âoeanonymousâ/PsyOps. There are no such things as Internet âoefreedomsâ anywhere that Russia could have âoecracked downâ on.

  39. I'd take that kind of Exile by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    So the guy's rich enough to fly himself to a different country every day, and the only downside is he can't go back to Russia?

    Where do I sign up?

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:I'd take that kind of Exile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > So the guy's rich enough to fly himself to a different country every day, and the only downside is he can't go back to Russia?

      There are other caveats involved. Don't ever drink tea without Geiger-Muller testing first, avoid icepicks like plague or scream "Comrades don't shoot!" before committing suicide... Please be suspicious if people try to stab you in the leg with an umbrella "accidentally". Sometimes you briefcase disappears, no matter how much you watch it. Anyhow, please be careful not to end up in a mental asylum, where anti-collectivist thought-crime is cured by the copious application of electro-shocking, powerful psychiatric drug mixtures and non-medical x-ray exposures.

      Clues for the clueless:

      1. Litvinenko in London, + 2000-something
      2. The revolutionary Trotsky in Mexico, + 1940
      3. The progressive poet Majakosvky, circa + 1936
      4. Geogii Markov, bulgarian dissenter in exile in London, + 1976
      5. Manuscript of the Gulag Archipelago by Solzhenicin
      6. Countless many opposition and free-thinker people during the soviet and east german rule, 1950-1980

    2. Re:I'd take that kind of Exile by guacamole · · Score: 2

      A rather pointless and misguided post and a list.

      Trotsky was Stalin's own arch-enemy. It's very hard to think of who could possibly play such role to Putin's regime today. Berezovski was the last one, and he was a non-player since the end of 20th century. The other guy, Khodorkovky, the CEO of now dead Yukos, has already served a decade in prison and has been pardoned.

      Litvinenko's killing in London was clearly a very public execution to send a message to major politically involved oligarchs in exile, such as Berezovski, who used to think he owns and runs the Kremlin in the 90s. Durov is a very small fry, and one out of hundreds. I can't imagine that FSB is possibly losing sleep over him.

    3. Re:I'd take that kind of Exile by guacamole · · Score: 1

      My thoughts exactly. One week in Paris, and then another in Singapore. What a horrible life. Where is it going to take Durov the following week, perhaps Buenos Aires, Tokyo, or Morocco? Hard to say... such crazy world.

  40. It is delicious ironic by ruir · · Score: 1

    That we heard rumours facebook in the bed with the government, and the russian equivalent fled because of life principles and getting a spine. Very telling.

  41. Re:Commie Critter On The Lam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Putin awarded him Russia’s highest civilian award, the Order for Service to the Fatherland

    Correction: Fatherland is Germany and putin's empire is called Mother Russia.

    Thereby, USA could be named Uncland after "Uncle Sam"?

  42. Re:Commie Critter On The Lam? by SLot · · Score: 1

    Correction: Fatherland is Germany and putin's empire is called Mother Russia.

    Correction to your Correction:

    The Order "For Merit to the Fatherland" (Russian: ) is a state decoration of the Russian Federation. It was instituted on March 2, 1994 by Presidential Decree 442.[1] Until the re-establishment of the Order of St. Andrew in 1998, it was the highest Order of the Russian Federation, though it is still the highest Civilian decoration of the state.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O...

  43. Re:Commie Critter On The Lam? by unixisc · · Score: 1

    So Mother Russia is a fatherland? No wonder Putin cracks down on gays

  44. The oil fallacy by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Not just that, if oil was the overriding factor, then in 1991, when Saddam conquered Kuwait, the US could have simply recognized his annexation, and that would have opened up the oil of both Kuwait & Iraq to the US. Had Saddam gone on to overrun Saudi Arabia, Qatar & Emirates, then the US would have had to grease the palms (in a manner of speaking) of just one man - Saddam - to get all the oil it wanted at the price it wanted. And have a Damocles sword hanging over him threatening to remove him if he dared hike prices.

  45. Its 2015 in a few weeks and its clear by davydagger · · Score: 1
    Its 2015 and its clear, this generation doesn't take nationlist sides when it comes to freedom. Nations might celebrate eachothers critics, but we the people celebrate them all, the further the mudslinging contest goes, the less legitimacy and of the states have.

    Its not the US vs Russia vs China vs Iran anymore

    Its the collective people vs the state.