Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Are Any Certifications Worth Going For?

An anonymous reader writes: I am an IT professional in my 30s and have had some form if IT employment for the last 15 years. I've worked my way from technical support to IS manager, but my career seems to have stalled. I have a fancy 4-year degree in Information Systems (I was never much of a programmer) from an actual college, and a good deal of real-world experience combined with reading the odd technical book here and there to keep abreast of what's going on in the world of tech, but what I don't have is any certifications. None.

When I was a poor student fresh from college, I decided that certifications were a waste of money, since the jobs I was applying for at the time didn't care about them, and the tests were several hundred dollars each. Now, it seems most jobs I see listed want some certifications, and I suspect HR systems are weeding out resumes that don't have the correct alchemical formula of certifications.

So my question is: are any certifications now worth it? If so, where do I start? I will probably stick to the track I'm on (I'm better at managing than developing). Going to classes might be an option, but I'd prefer to be able to self-study if possible to work around being on-call constantly (and, to be blunt, classes are expensive). I don't want to stump up for a class only to find out I don't actually like the class or the material or the certification isn't actually what I thought it was.

31 of 317 comments (clear)

  1. practical-based certs hold their value by scubacuda · · Score: 4, Informative

    I would argue that certs with practicals (CCIE, JNCIE, RHCE, etc) tend to hold their value much better than those that can simply be gotten by taking tests.

    1. Re:practical-based certs hold their value by ruckc · · Score: 4, Informative

      I agree with this. I just took the RHSA, and I can honestly say that having book knowledge wouldn't allow you to pass if you've never done some of the tasks before.

    2. Re:practical-based certs hold their value by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, showing up for the RHCE and correcting their questions..... does not endear you to the instructor or the class.

      Then don't do that.
      Or be satisfied with not being endeared to the instructor.

      There are two reasonable options here.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:practical-based certs hold their value by ruir · · Score: 2

      Yep, over the years I learned that in classes professors do not like to be corrected. The best strategy is to keep unnoticed.

  2. Practical certs like GIAC help and hold value by UnderAttack · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you are serious about infosec certifications, check out GIAC (http://www.giac.org) . The certs are very applied and test practical knowledge (e.g. they are open book... no need to test how well you can memorize stuff). CISSP is good to get you started in the field.

    --
    ---- join dshield.org Distributed Intrusion Detec
  3. Get an MBA by plopez · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You are already moving in that direction and admittedly not a programmer. It is basically a paper chase not too far removed from a cert but non-revocable. You will have an IS degree + years of experience + an MBA. There s a large amount of career potential in that.

    But stop hanging out at /., instead lurk around at CO.com and datamation.com to ensure you know all the latest trends.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    1. Re:Get an MBA by plopez · · Score: 2

      oops cio.com

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    2. Re:Get an MBA by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 2

      Actually, being in the IT field with an aptitude for management would make him the ideal candidate for a PMI PMP (Project Manager Professional) certification. You need to know some stuff about IT, like the effort it takes for development, the kinds of tools and system available, the tradeoffs between budget, time, and quality, etc. Lots of companies (and governments) look for PMP certifications for project manager positions. And since the OP doesn't particularly like coding, he can spend his whole day in meetings, compiling reports, evaluating build progress, and writing memos. No coding required.

      Pays really well, too.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    3. Re:Get an MBA by Maxwell · · Score: 2

      You sound like a horribly bad PM, the things you complained about are the PM's responsibility . I am sure no one was sad to see you go....

      sheesh.

  4. PMP, if you aren't a technical person by Crazy+Taco · · Score: 2

    Since it sounds like you aren't really technical anymore and don't have a desire to be technical, then I wouldn't recommend any of the technical certifications (RHCE, etc). Those are going to get you job offers for things you don't want to do. You should probably look for something more along the lines of Project Management Professional (PMP) certification, or something of that ilk. That will really help you manage projects and it probably looks good on a resume. Just my 2 cents.

    --
    Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
  5. Re:Just Lie by bobbied · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just lie about what certs you have, in 12 years I've never had a single company ever ask me for proof of any of my dozens of certs.

    Really bad advice. NEVER lie to a prospective employer. Sure, it may get you an interview and you might be able to BS your way into a job by claiming stuff you don't officially have, but is it worth it?

    Is it worth it to be sitting on pins and needles waiting for them to check up on you and fire you? The IT world is generally pretty small in most areas. Unless you live in an area where there are a LOT of employers, lying to get a job is a reputation killer. You may think you can just walk away and get away with it, but don't be so sure.

    However, the best reason to not lie is that it is not ethical. ALWAYS do the ethical thing. Stay above the fray, tell the truth and get the certifications for real. It may take longer and be harder, but in the long run it will be worth it.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  6. ITIL by Sivaraj · · Score: 2

    For you profile, ITIL certification may be worth looking at. It gives knowledge essential for managing large IS departments, implementations, and data centres. It may not be as glamorous as PMP, but is essential part of managing IT for large companies. It is still a rare certification so it may actually be worth it. Being an IS manager you may appreciate many sections of the standard and contrast it with the way of doing things in your previous jobs.

  7. Six Sigma / Lean / PMM by Proudrooster · · Score: 2

    It doesn't sound like you are a in the trenches programmer / admin so, why not take the strengths that you have (higher level technical ability and management) and work toward becoming a business process person. Being able to speak tech and business is quite valuable. Six Sigma / Lean are quite popular these days in organizations looking to become more efficient in their process then support the process with technology systems if appropriate. PMM is some sort of Project Management Methodology Certification, don't know much about it, but it seems popular in tech management circles.

    1. Re:Six Sigma / Lean / PMM by MTEK · · Score: 2

      There's probably a nicer way of expressing that, but I've been a contractor in a big organization for 10-years now, and understand the resentment. Self-motivated professionals need not apply; you'll be outnumbered by people who are simply out to check the boxes.

  8. Some advice.... by erp_consultant · · Score: 2

    It looks like you want to continue on the management track. In that case, your best best is to get an MBA. Yes, it's difficult and expensive but you might be able to get your employer to pay for at least part of it. I think that certifications are generally better for hands-on types. As a manager you're not likely to get much of that. If you just want to nibble around the edges in the technology then look at taking some of the free online courses. You won't get degree or any course credit out of it but it will give you an exposure to it.

  9. There is a reason for this! by s.petry · · Score: 5, Informative

    The multiple guess tests show no practical application for knowledge. I have met plenty of people with certifications that are worthless, and the people with them were just as useless.. sometimes with dozens of these tests. These people were duped into spending tons of cash to get these certificates and had no practical knowledge. Knowing how to enter a netmask in someone's GUI does not mean you understand what a netmask is, or what a broadcast address is, or how to calculate either from the other.

    RHCE, CEH, etc.. require practical knowledge. Having work experience can be, and usually is, enough to compensate for the lack of a certificate. The more experience you have the less essential a certification is. I have been in the business for nearly 3 decades, and quite honestly I'm never asked about certificates. Go back even 15 years and people did ask, and I did have some certificates. Today, I'm never asked and have a steady stream of requests to review job offers and even suggest candidates.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:There is a reason for this! by BenFranske · · Score: 2

      Many more recent certs are no longer relying solely on multiple choice. For example, the past several revisions of the CCNA exam have become more and more focused on network simulator questions and multiple choice has been relegated to checking for things best asked through multiple choice. The multiple-choice only cert test is a relic which is well on the way to being gone (at least in the networking area).

    2. Re:There is a reason for this! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Understanding netmasks and broadcast addresses is worthy of a certification? Really? Are there really people who work in IT who don't understand the basic concepts of networking? Isn't this taught in the first year of college? I mean we're not in 1980 anymore!

      Yes, Yes, Yes, Maybe - but the first year of college is about booze and women - P's get Degrees!

      It is worth certification because it is such a fundamental component of the job of an IT person now that the Internet is ubiquitous, and because such a horrifying number of IT people don't have any understanding of switching, routing and subnetting is.

      There is a reason CCNA qualifications are so widely sought - it teaches the fundamentals of networking that every IT professional should know.

      The CCNA in its current iteration is ridiculous. It is the hardest now of all the tests and requires 5 months and buying your own switches and routers as the training material and simulators do not cover everything. It is says associate but it is like requiring a WAn engineer to take the MCSE so he can troubleshoot login issues. Yes I know the tests progress supposedly but the CCNA you need to know not just subnetting, but span trees, tons and tons of theory, CIDS, and a dozen other topologies and requires like 1500 page books to master the material.

      I would think more entry level certifications would be better for a non network engineer to take. If you can pass the CCNA you can setup a network of any size with ease. Not just tell me what a subnet mask is which is the intention of taking it.

    3. Re:There is a reason for this! by mysidia · · Score: 3, Informative

      What the vendor calls the device is more about what the primary intended place for the device is on the network; it is a reflection on the "standard" configuration of the device, or at least the defaults.

      The problem with this assessment "Switches use ASICs; routers don't" is it is only true for low-end devices. The only way you are getting away without ASICs is if you are in a small-business, branch office, or Enterprise WAN with little traffic.

      Switches require ASICs, but "routers" need them too. Routers typically need more advanced ASICs, since they need to look at Layer 3 network prefixes, not just a simple list of MAC addresses for L2 bridging.

      The Cisco ASR routers use ASICs extensively, ditto for 76xx routers; in fact, they are exclusively used for forwarding, there is very little or no software-based switching through a high-end router. If a condition occurs where you run out of hardware TCAM or lose CEF and revert to non-ASIC-based software switching, it will be a very bad day indeed.

      Juniper M/T/MX series edge routers are the same way. All forwarding is done in a separate ASIC-based hardware forwarding plane. Packets are not interpreted or forwarded by software. Even firewall rules, QoS policies, etc, are handled by ASICs on a reasonably high end router.

      Once upon a time there were cases where you needed to upgrade PBB cards or policy feature cards on routers to add to policy management/access list functionality. These are definitely hardware-driven functions.

      Common Layer 3 switches in fixed access configs have similar capability in some respects but more limited featuresets and limited capacity for table sizes, typically; you often don't have quite the same IP policy management features as on a full blown router; some of the L3 switches don't even have decent QoS (which is terrible).

      Also if you need to take a full BGP table; you are not going to want to use a fixed-configuration Layer 3 access switch to do that --- since it probably lacks the memory, and even if it had the memory, generally there will be no supervisor redundancy.

      The requirement to support a huge IP forwarding table, which requires extra memory and CPU, is what an Edge router needs on a multihomed network.

      So there are clearly devices that specialize in being better edge routers than switches.

    4. Re:There is a reason for this! by ruir · · Score: 2

      The problem is more than "opening tickets". A sysadmin without some basic networking knowledge is a serious shortcoming.

    5. Re: There is a reason for this! by afidel · · Score: 2

      You're misreading, the QuantumFlow Processor IS the ASIC
      Further, each PPE can access hardware feature acceleration of network address and prefix lookups, hash lookups, WRED, Traffic Policers, range lookups, and TCAM for advanced classification and access-control-list (ACL) acceleration as it processes packets

      If you turn off dCEF and force all packets through the RP CPU you'd quickly bring an ASR to it's knees. By comparison the Cisco 7200 did everything in CPU, but it had much lower bounds to its capabilities.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  10. Please don't get an MBA by Matt_Bennett · · Score: 4, Insightful

    An MBA is a vehicle to convince other people that have MBAs that you believe that an MBA is necessary to work with other people that have MBAs that share in the misguided notion that having an MBA qualifies you to manage a business. Really, it is a ticket into a network of folks that believe that shortcuts and not actual work create a business.

    Most certifications are like MBAs- except that they are shortcuts for HR resume screens, who use them as an easy filter and to avoid accountability that the people that they let through are qualified... "these applicants are CERTIFIED!" ... If you have the experience and you know someone, you will get the job, if not, you're in the pool of "everyone else" that has a certification. The most important factor in getting a job is networking.

  11. Been there done that. Get very expensive TShirt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That won't work. I did it. Getting a MBA will not automatically get you into management or into the business side.

    What will happen is that after 2+ years and a ton of money, you'll be back to doing what you were doing but with very expensive letters after your name - that no one in technology really cares about. I went to a top 40 school - not good enough for a lucrative consulting gigs like the Harvard guys get.

    What I advise people who ask is first move into the business side or leadership roles - like a tech lead.

    And keep moving towards management - many companies have that kind of career path.

    As far as the MBA. Only get it if you really need it to get a job or to keep your job. And ideally have your company pay for it and allow for you to take time to take classes, work on projects, and study during business hours and even on company time.

    Then there's this advice I received from a senior VP of a very large job site (via a common friend who forwarded his email to me): "MBA degrees are worthless."

    Shit. Too late.

  12. Some suggestions by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Go to Toastmasters and get a CC ("Competent Communicator") or any of theit further awards. It'll teach you how to present and interact with others in a professional scenario.

    Pick a karate school you like and get a black belt. It'll teach you discipline and focus, and help you keep your health as you get older.

    Join the SCA and work yourself up to becoming a knight. If you take it seriously it'll teach you honor and integrity.

    Take first aid, CPR, and EMT training. Take some survival courses.

    Take MIT courses from edX or Coursera for the certificate and grade.

  13. The Problem With Certs by afabbro · · Score: 2

    The main problem with certs can be demonstrating by googling the cert title or number + "dumps". You will find the exact questions and answers for most tests. (More on "most" in a moment.) I don't mean a detailed outline - I mean the full text of the question, the possible answers, and which one is correct. Memorize the answers and you pass the cert.

    As someone who periodically participates in hiring, I don't see much value in certs. I've had the experience of people who had certs who didn't know their stuff. I've never known any employer who given a choice between someone with many years of experience and someone with a cert, would choose the latter.

    There are other problems with certs. I've always found the format is quite ridiculous. Why should I memorize things? If they test concepts, that'd be one thing, but often certs are "which of these commands is correct" kind of questions. What, am I trapped on a desert island with a datacenter to administer and no manuals?

    That said, certs can't hurt. I find them valuable to study for though less to actually take. Vendors outline everything to get a basic knowledge, and that's useful to go over. The only time I see real value in certs is

    • Your employer is a government agency or some kind of big bureaucracy and they require the cert for a position.
    • Some vendors will only extend certain partnerships ("Gold VAR" or whatever) to companies that have X number of certified technicians
    • Your company is providing services and wants to be able to say "all our techs are certified in X" for marketing purposes

    All that said...the exception to the above is the certs that do have some value. These are the certs that you have to pass a lab for: RHCE, Oracle Certified Master, Cisco's CCIE, etc. A CCIE is highly valuable - those guys bill very well.

    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
  14. H1B and the will to work 60-80 hours a week by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    H1B and the will to work 60-80 hours a week

  15. Masters Degree.... by David_Hart · · Score: 2

    If you are in IT management and feel that your skills are best suited to spend the rest of your career in management, then you should work on a Masters degree (i.e. MBA or Masters in IT Management). Certifications are largely for skilled IT workers who actually do the work. Managers, on the other hand, tend to focus on strategy, keeping track of work and work assignments, reporting, etc. Usually for management positions, relevant experience covers any hands-on IT knowledge needed.

  16. depends by Tom · · Score: 2

    So my question is: are any certifications now worth it?

    Depends on who pays for them.

    Your current employer, or the unemployment agency or someone else? Go for any and all you can get.

    You yourself? Check the job offers of jobs you care about. Make a list of the certifications that are mentioned there and check the top two or three (most mentionings). Do them if they are affordable.

    Certifications are largely a scam or a shakedown, take your pick. They teach you nothing, and they check your ability to memorize test questions more than they test your actual abilities. I've got the test papers from CISM still here, and while my 15 years of IT security experience helped me pass it almost without learning, any buffon who's never even seen a computer could've passed the test by simply learning by heart the contents of one folder.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  17. Re:Certs are for grunts by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Steve Jobs and Bill Gates are business men that just happened to make their fortune in IT. Ofcourse they're not going to need IT certification.

    99% of us are grunts, including you and me.
    Very few of us have that unique combination of sufficient skill and lots of luck to have a positive reputation that preceeds us.
    Pretty much all us grunts are hired going through an HR department grunt.
    The HR grunt doesn't know anything about IT, but he knows certifications.
    Certifications have value not because they represent any qualifications, but because HR grunts aren't going to be fired if they select employees based on certifications.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  18. Re: certification came to earth by a-steroids by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 2

    Definitely. If a 5-year old boy can manage it then it is worth aspiring to. I'm assuming his programming skills are thin on the ground as well.

    --
    Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
  19. I disagree by s.petry · · Score: 2

    I don't believe someone should be able to pass a RHCE or even a higher level MCSE without understanding something so basic as a netmask and broadcast address. I have seen plenty of Junior level admins stuff a /24 netmask into a /25 and have network problems that they can't explain. A "good" SA should be able to catch and correct this without need to find the network team to debug the issue for them. And yes, I have seen many MSCE holders have to traverse that path and bother their Network team for a simple SA error.

    I happened to pick the Netmask and calculation as an easy target, but there are plenty of low level concepts that I believe all SAs should know. I don't care if you can give me all 7 layers of the OSI model by rote, I care that you can at least debug your area of responsibility as a SA.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.