Slashdot Mirror


Neil DeGrasse Tyson Explains His Christmas Tweet

140Mandak262Jamuna writes Neil DeGrasse Tyson tweeted on christmas day what appeared to begin as a tribute to Infant Jesus, but ended up celebrating Isaac Newton. Apparently this was retweeted some 77000 times, far above his average of 3.5K retweets and caused many to be angry. He doubled down on it by tweeting about people being offended by objective truths. Then wrote a fuller explanation.

46 of 681 comments (clear)

  1. No group "owns" any day on the calendar. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "On this day long ago, a child was born who, by age 30, would transform the world. Happy Birthday Isaac Newton b. Dec 25, 1642"

    The only thing offensive is that some people continue to belief that their religious beliefs should be accepted as "universal truth".

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    1. Re:No group "owns" any day on the calendar. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 5, Informative

      What's even worse is that Jesus was born in the spring "while shepherds were watching their flocks by night." The actual date is unknown. The date was moved to December 25th to compete with the feast of Saturninus.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    2. Re:No group "owns" any day on the calendar. by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 5, Informative

      The only thing offensive is that there are still people who think that Christmas is Jesus' (Joshua, Yeshua) was born on Christmas day.

      Sorry, Christmas (Christ's Mass) celebrates the birth of Jesus (Joshua, Yeshua) of Nazareth, but doesn't actually claim to be his birthdate. Note that the Gospels that even mention his birth include elements that are not consistent with a December birth.

      Okay, there are TWO things that are offensive - the other is that nominally educated people can't spell "believe".

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    3. Re:No group "owns" any day on the calendar. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's a bit further than that: Tyson's tweet was entirely orthogonal to Jesus and Christianity: The fact that Newton was born on the 25th of December, and that he'd revolutionized physics with extreme prejudice(among a variety of other interesting jobs, apparently he was a brutally efficient administrator of the royal mint for a while in there) before he hit middle age are true independent of the truth or falsity of any tenet of Christianity. There simply isn't any relation between Tyson's tweet and any theological position.

      Whoever was offended apparently wants their beliefs to not only be the universal truth; but to get all the airtime, when they want it.

    4. Re:No group "owns" any day on the calendar. by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That's the thing; a lot of 'christians' do, in fact, think it to be a literal birthday.

      The fact that they're so incorrect about a basic tenant of their faith is telling.

      Also, anybody who claims Christianity is pro-family obviously hasn't read Luke.

      I've always wanted to make a movie that was Matthew, Mark, Luke and John getting together to reminisce about the good old days, then getting into arguments over the differences in their gospels. 'Wait, that's not how *I* remember it...'

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    5. Re:No group "owns" any day on the calendar. by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      TBH, it doesn't matter, though you are incorrect on more than a few points: Saturnalia ends a few days prior to Christmas. Traditionally, Christmas begins on December 25th and lasts until Epiphany (January 8) - well outside of most pagan calendars, which centered around or ended on the Winter Solstice (Dec. 21).

      You fudged the dates a bit. "Dies Natalis Solis Invicti" (Birthday of the unconquered Sun) was celebrated on Dec 25th. It was replaced by Christmas during the reign of Constantine.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    6. Re:No group "owns" any day on the calendar. by jbssm · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What's even worse is that Jesus was born in the spring

      I think that's exactly the kind of thought Neil Tyson wants people to avoid. There is absolutely no factual evidence Jesus was born at all, just some book written centuries after his supposed death that got more and more fantasias about his accomplishments as the years passed by.

    7. Re:No group "owns" any day on the calendar. by SpinyNorman · · Score: 4, Informative

      Close, but no banana.

      The Dec 25th date was co-opted from the Roman holiday/feast of Natalis Invictus (= birth of the sun-god Sol Invictus), the date being chosen as it was then (re: procession of the equinoxes) the winter solstice when the days start to get longer again (i.e the sun is reborn). This holiday was created by the Roman emporor Aurelian in the 3rd century AD, and was co-opted by the Christians maybe a 100 years later.

      Saturnalia was a separate - very popular - Roman holiday in (if memory serves) November/December, which FWIW had a present giving component.

      However, the gross external form of modern Christmas - Tree, Holly, Mistletoe (i.e. general greenery) and Yule log all come from a different, northern European, winter solstice celebration called "Yule".

      So, the Xmas feast/date comes from Natalis Invictus, the Tree/Holly/ etc from Yule, the presents *perhaps* from Saturnalia, and we'll have to concede the nativity (there's that "natalis" again) to the Christians, who prior to 300AD would never have celebrated Jesus' birth!

    8. Re:No group "owns" any day on the calendar. by meglon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you're "life" is almost entirely constructed by committee to serve as a figurehead, as Jesus' was at the Council of Nicaea, there's a pretty good chance that most all of it is nothing more than bullshit. The Romans kept fantastic records, and were probably on that border between anally retentive and accountant level.... yet they have no records of any of the bullshit that makes up the new testament. The only remotely contemporary is a notation in one of Josephus' works, except that is widely considered to have been added in by someone else at a much later date (the information was not found in previous works by Josephus, and the writing style is radically different than Josephus). For such a massive event that the Bible portrays it to be, you'd think someone there would have written down something like: "Socialist hippie rises from the dead; papyrus at 11."

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    9. Re:No group "owns" any day on the calendar. by Minwee · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's the thing; a lot of 'christians' do, in fact, think it to be a literal birthday.

      It's funny, I can't think of ever meeting a person who doesn't understand that it's a celebration, not an anniversary.

      Indeed. Who could forget traditional songs like this one?

      God rest ye merry gentlemen / Let nothing you dismay.
      Remember Christ our Savior / Was born on an unspecified date in the late summer, but we celebrate the event on Christmas Day...

  2. Eh by halivar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everyone has the right to mock, and everyone has the right to be offended. Some mocking is silly, and some offense-taking is silly. As a dispassionate third party observer, I'm having a hard time deciding why I should care about this episode.

    But still, never forgiving him for Pluto. Next time pick on a planet big enough to fight back, tough guy.

    1. Re:Eh by Stormwatch · · Score: 5, Funny

      But still, never forgiving him for Pluto. Next time pick on a planet big enough to fight back, tough guy.

      But if Pluto was bigger, it would actually be a planet.

    2. Re:Eh by DutchUncle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I see no mockery here. No mention of anyone or anything other than the person he is celebrating. In any group of 23 or more people, there's a 50% chance two will have the same birthday. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    3. Re:Eh by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, but his followup was intended to offend Christians....along the lines of..."A pagan holiday, which became a religious holiday, which became a commercial holiday"

      Reciting unvarnished facts without a single loaded adjective is offensive to Christians? That says much more about Christians than it does about astrophysicists.

  3. Only people offended by OverlordQ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The only people offended are the religious people who dont really know anything about their religion.

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    1. Re:Only people offended by N1AK · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My wife was offended, and she's not even Christian.

      Your wife was offended by a tweet celebrating Isaac Newton because it could be construed to relate to Jesus, because of a shared birthdate, even though she isn't christian? Perhaps he should of said "the only people offended are fools and religious people who don't really know anything about their religion." because that's one of the most retarded examples of someone being offended for no reason I've seen.

  4. Re:Kind of disappointed in him. by Your.Master · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Tyson's job is to explain things to the masses.

    It's his job.

  5. For fuck's sake people... by bigsexyjoe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Some conservatives seem to hate him just for being a smart black guy who is associated with science. He's not even really an outspoken liberal or anything. He's just a smart black guy and it drives them CRAZY.

    1. Re:For fuck's sake people... by LordLimecat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Who exactly is this them? I know very few people who have an opinion either way regarding Tyson.

    2. Re:For fuck's sake people... by morcego · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Some liberals seem to cry racism where none exists.

      I find it hard to understand the rightwing usage of "liberal". When we study State Theory, the US constitution is used as the greatest example of a Liberal Constitution. John Locke, one of the fathers of liberalism, preached basically the same thing right-wingers do.

      The only possible explanation for this is the US education system being extremely flawed, and people using the words "liberal" and "liberalism" don't know what they mean. Liberalism is pure right-wing.

      Do no confuse the Liberal Party with liberalism. Do not confuse the Democratic Party with democracy. Do not confuse the Republican Party with republic. Or are members of the Republican Party anti-democracy? Are members of the Democratic Party anti-republic?

      Considering how often and loudly people talk about politics, one would expect they would take the time to at least study it a little bit.

      Maybe you should say "Some members of the liberal party seem to (...)", or "Some left-wingers seem to (...)". Even if you say "socialists", which would still be wrong, wouldn't be as wrong as saying "liberals".

      --
      morcego
  6. tonight at 11 by nimbius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    outspoken popular black science man uses internet to tell people something fascinating and true that really happened. Outraged and offended group who tell people something bombastic and farcical condemn black science mans refusal to adhere himself instead to their thing they tell people, which is absurd and not science. In response, infuriating white television man who 'cant explain that' demands action and protection from imaginary war on pagan shopping holiday. When asked, average American man became furious that neither group were offering a deep fried food he was never promised.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:tonight at 11 by Millennium · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To be fair, though, that's the date Newton would have understood and recognized. England didn't adopt the Gregorian calendar until 1752, and Newton had been dead for several decades by then.

    2. Re:tonight at 11 by morcego · · Score: 4, Interesting

      to tell people something fascinating and true that really happened

      Of course, he had to use the Julian Calendar to make it "true", since under the Gregorian Calendar, Newton was born in January of 1643....

      Actually, that is both right and wrong. Newton was born on Christmas day. You can't change the frame of reference for just one, while leaving the other intact.

      --
      morcego
  7. Re:Kind of disappointed in him. by LordLimecat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ever heard the term flamebait?

  8. Re:Dude, wait... by Calydor · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why are you blaming Neil?

    Blame Isaac for having the NERVE to be born on December 25th! After Jesus was (not) born on that date NO ONE ELSE should be born then!

    --
    -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  9. Re:Dude, wait... by itzly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Tact is nice, but why does it always have to come from the side of the non-believer ?

  10. Damn that Pope Gregory XIII... by mschaffer · · Score: 4, Funny

    Damn that Pope Gregory XIII. He should have left the calendar as it is. It would prevent any alchemists or astronomers born on January 4 from being praised on their birthday when it gets shifted to December 25. What was he thinking! So much for papal infallibility.

  11. Re:Kind of disappointed in him. by B33rNinj4 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Very true, but you are missing the point. If I make the statement: "I feel like McRibs are the best damn thing ever" I am entitled to do that. If you, as a vegan, flip out over my choice of words, that's fine too. You can be offended all you want, but I am not obligated to care. Tyson shouldn't clarify his statements to appease people who are offended, because it's implying that he "may" be wrong. It's hamstering, and that's not what men do.

  12. Kind of Disappointed in You by rubycodez · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Tyson's life work is education, when he explains something to the masses and someone learns something, he wins. You, on the other hand, want him and others to be losers. This says a lot about you.

  13. Re:Dude, wait... by mangobrain · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What part of his tweet constitutes telling Christians that Christmas is "bullshit"? The part where he celebrates Isaac Newton's birthday, or the part where.... Oh, wait; that's the ONLY part. It is not mutually exclusive with celebrating the birth of Jesus, and nowhere in the original tweet - or the following explanation - does he imply that it should be.

    Should the world at large be banned from honouring the memory of anyone else on that date, just because it happens to be a Christian religious festival? Sounds remarkably like religious discrimination to me.

  14. Re:Kind of disappointed in him. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    On the other hand, sometimes a strategically applied barb can be pedagogically useful:

    In this case, Tyson tweeted something that was orthogonal to Jesus(not that he is actually suspected by scholars of even the distinctly pious persuasion of having been born conveniently on a pagan holiday that needed assimilating; but that's another matter). It didn't denigrate him, question his existence, use the phrase 'purportedly magic jew', laugh at the peasants who were putting up their nativity idols, none of that. It just wasn't about him, it was about Isaac Newton, who was born on that day, and who was a pretty damn titanic figure in the history of science(although also intensely pious, though his religious works are not of much broader interest).

    It is, arguably, rather interesting that he provoked a minor firestorm just by talking about someone else. It's a commonplace that some anti-jesus flamebait spread in the right areas would have caused a moderate shitstorm, and so nothing would be proven except one's own somewhat juvenile sense of humor by doing so; but that isn't what he did: he just celebrated a different guy(and pretty damn arguably a worthy one) who shared the same birthday. The fact that that caused a ruckus is frankly interesting, informative, and perhaps even food for thought for those offended. Is Jesus really incapable of gracefully sharing a birthday with one of history's more remarkable physicists? He certainly manages to share it with a load of consumerist gluttony without much comment.

    I (mostly) grew out of baiting people purely for sport years ago; but I still think that there is room for discomfort, even unrest, in the context of discourse; and this seems like a good example. Not just flamebait, which would be trivial; but prove nothing; but willing to risk kicking up a fuss. Hopefully a least a few people asked themselves why it was so necessary that exclusivity be defended(especially when other 'meanings of Christmas' like family, presents, pagan conifers, assorted ritualized meals, etc. are handled in parallel without issue. If Jesus can share a birthday with the Jones' traditional honey glazed ham, surely he can share one with Isaac Newton?).

  15. Re:Kind of disappointed in him. by mjm1231 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I actually read Mr. Tyson's post. I found no hamstering in it. Your problem appears to be with Slashdot characterizing it as an "explanation". In fact, it didn't contain any explanation about the motives or meaning of the tweet. Perhaps it is time to stop blindly believing what the news media feeds you, including Slashdot's slapdash editors.

    --
    Ideology: A tool used primarily to avoid the bother of thinking.
  16. Re:Kind of disappointed in him. by Your.Master · · Score: 4, Informative

    I don't quite know how to address this other than to say that I don't think anything you've said in this thread makes any sense. My best guess is maybe you didn't read his actual explanation and assumed it said something it does not?

    Point by point:

    - The (strange) strawman about a vegan who hates McRibs is an argument about why we shouldn't get mad at Tyson if he didn't make an explanation, but it does not argue against making an explanation in the first place. It's the one point where I agree with you, but it's completely irrelevant to the situation at hand.
    - Explaining something to the masses does not mean you lost anything.
    - Giving into criticism is not what he did (pulling his tweet or apologizing would be giving in).
    - In this case I feel he was right not to give into criticism, but in general, I don't think it's good to imply that giving into criticism is necessarily wrong.
    - I don't see any appeasement from Tyson.
    - Talking about a thing doesn't in any way imply that what you previously said about that thing may be wrong.
    - I had to look up "hamstering" on urban dictionary, and I have to disagree that he did that at all.
    - "It's not what men do"? That's a literary flourish without any meat behind it.

  17. Re:He must enjoy preaching to the choir. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What is funny is so many people will just not get it.
    It doesn't matter if he is right which he isn't since that day means different things to different people.
    He has just alienated a large number of people for no good reason. His tweet will change no a single mind. All it will do is get praises from his fans.
    That is not good science, education. or frankly good manners.

    Bullshit. People that were upset are just pissed as someone tweeted something that wasn't about Jesus. As he has stated in his full post, he's tweeted about Jesus before and didn't get the type of uproar that he got over this tweet.

    People just need to calm down and realise that the world doesn't resolve around their religious event on a particular day of the year. You won't change the mind of anyone that is offended by his tweet anyway.

  18. Re:Kind of disappointed in him. by blagooly · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This was my reaction. He trolls the people, then protests getting flamed. A follow up of, "ha ha made you look" would have been fine. My general impression is that Tyson thinks a lot, sometimes even of subjects that are not himself.

  19. Back to the Future by williegeorgie · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This whole thing reminds of the Back to the Future movie. I was 10 or 11 or so when it came out and I distinctly remember seeing that movie with a kid raised in a fundamentalist baptist household. When Doc Brown said "so do you want to see the birth of Christ" and then set the time machine to Dec 25 0000 I laughed quite hard. The other guy asked me why I thought that was so funny and I spent about 45 minutes trying to explain it to him after the movie. He never got it and was somewhat offended that I found it so funny. After another couple of days discussing this and other things (like creation in 6 days etc.) I finally realized how deeply misinformed people become by being taught about literal interpretation of the bible. I was absolutely amazed at that understanding of the world and it was my first real exposure to this insanity. Up to that day I had always understood bible stories as being just stories (I was raised mildly Catholic but my family was really just going through the motions). It actually makes me very sad to think back to that experience.

  20. Re:Kind of disappointed in him. by DutchUncle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I see no mockery whatever. A surprise ending, perhaps, worthy of O. Henry, but no mockery. Now, if you want mockery of someone's birthday, go watch "Monty Python's Life of Brian".

  21. Re:Kind of disappointed in him. by SoCalChris · · Score: 4, Informative

    I didn't ask him to, I didn't hire him to, I didn't indicate any desire on my part for him to do so.

    So his tweet just randomly showed up without you following him, or without someone you follow retweeting it? I'd contact Twitter, it sounds like you've found a bug.

  22. He is my hero. by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Any scientist that is absolutely OK with pissing off uneducated rabid republicans is a hero in my book.

    Carl Sagan and others had no problems calling the uneducated what they are. And none of the best human beings on this planet backed down in the face of religious stupidity.

    Just Ask Galileo and Giordonano Brunio what it was like to be imprisoned by a bunch of idiots in power.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  23. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  24. Re:Kind of disappointed in him. by operagost · · Score: 4, Interesting

    According to your logic, we should also despise Newton because he was a follower of Jesus. At the very least, we should also despise Newton if anyone who ever favored him committed a crime.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  25. Re:Kind of disappointed in him. by hawguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Only Slashdotters would defend this guy for what was clearly a calculated and unwarranted troll towards Christians on their numero uno holiday.

    Commercial interests have turned the Christmas holiday into a shop-till-you-drop marathon, and you think Christians are under attack from a simple factual tweet? If he had posted "If you love Jesus, you'll love these deals on Telescopes!" then it'd have been ok, right?

    Really, does Tyson have nothing better to do than use Twitter to mock Christians? Are there no pressing issues in the world of astrophysics that could use his towering intellect and staggering genius?

    The most pressing issue that he's been working hard to fight against is the lack of science literacy in the country, and open hostility to Science to the point where a science educator can't post a Christmas Day related fact without coming under attack -- and at least Newton was actually born on Christmas (depending on your calendar), as opposed to Jesus -- most biblical scholars agree he was not born on Dec 25th, even if they disagree on when his birth was.

  26. Re:Kind of disappointed in him. by Rei · · Score: 4, Informative

    Even if one wanted to do a misdirection about Christmas in a tweet, there are tons more offensive targets one could have chosen related to 25 december:

      * The Malkh festival formerly practiced by the peoples of present-day Chechnya, celebrating the birthday of the sun.
      * Pakistan celebrates the birthday of the Great Leader, Muhammad Ali Jinnah
      * Residents of Chumbivilcas Province in Peru celebrate Takanakuy ("To Hit Each Other"), a fighting-themed holiday where the goal is to get back at people who wronged you during the year, while wearing a traditional ski mask.
      * Michael Palaiologos, ruler of Constantinople, has his 11-year-old second cousin blinded so that he is no longer qualified for the throne.
      * Columbus runs aground in Haiti due to incompetent management, then proceeds to abuse and enslave the natives that helped rescue his men and supplies.
      * Conquistador Pedro de Valdivia is defeated in battle, captured, then roasted and eaten.
      * A drunken mutiny involving 1/3rd of the candidates at West Point is finally put down by force and their whiskey is taken away.
      * Future president Zachary Taylor leads his troops into an obvious ambush by the Seminoles, leading to serious losses; gets promoted for it.
      * The Vietnamese National Party is founded and quickly begins a campaign of assassinations against French officers and Vietnamese collaborators.
      * Henri Nannen, later-rehabilitated Nazi propagandist, born.
      * A 7,6 earthquake kills 275 people in China
      * Scottish nationalist students steal the British coronation stone.
      * 44 untouchables in India massacred in revenge for them campaigning for higher wages.
      * Cyclone Tracy destroys more than 70% of the buildings in Darwin, Australia
      * Jesus Christ, aka messianist Marshall Fields, drives a Chevy Impala through the White House gate.
      * Charlie Chaplain dies
      * Porn actress Joanna Angel born
      * Deposed Romanian dictator Nicolae Ceauescu and his wife are captured, convicted by tribunal, and summarily shot.
      * The "underwear bomber" fails
      * Plane crash kills 27 people near Shymkent.

    --
    I am a proud traitor to my species in alliance with my mother the Earth in opposition to those who would destroy her.
  27. Re:Kind of disappointed in him. by jmac_the_man · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At the very least, we should also despise Newton if anyone who ever favored him committed a crime.

    Based on the number of people who use weapons based on Newtonian physics to kill, Newton may be the biggest mass murderer of all time.

  28. Re:Kind of disappointed in him. by quantaman · · Score: 4, Informative

    Except he never intended it to be flamebait.

    There's two general camps among science communicators, there's one camp that goes straight for the hard truths and controversial subjects with the idea that you fix the root cause and the rest is easy, this tends to be the Richard Dawkins camp.

    The other side basically says communicate as much as you can but try to avoid offending people by being non-controversial as possible, I've always thought of that as the Neil DeGrasse Tyson camp.

    The tweet here essentially a corny joke ie "huh, Tyson is writing about the birth of Jesus, I didn't think that was his thing... ohh Newton, now I get it, haha Mr. Tyson". There is nothing flamebaity or controversial about it as he intended it.

    The problem is the religious right is embracing a culture of victimhood to compete with the left, attempts to reduce the degree of Jesus talk around Christmas become an attack to their right to talk Jesus, hence the "war on Christmas".

    Viewed through that light the joke now becomes "Hey Jesus-folk, I'm on your side putting Jesus back in Christmas... ha ha! Just kidding, it was just Newton!"

    And since they're actively looking for reasons to become offended, they become offended.

    --
    I stole this Sig
  29. Martthew 24:10 by wcrowe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'll throw my two cents worth into the noise. I am an Orthodox Christian clergyman, and I think Neil DeGrasse Tyson's tweet is humorous, as well as objectively true. I am at a complete loss why anyone would be angered by it. People are so quick to hate these days, for no reason whatsoever. Truly we are in the end times.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19