Slashdot Mirror


Senator Who Calls STEM Shortage a Hoax Appointed To Head Immigration

dcblogs (1096431) writes The Senate's two top Republican critics of temporary worker immigration, specifically the H-1B and L-1 visas, now hold the two most important immigration posts in the Senate. They are Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), who heads the Senate's Judiciary Committee, and his committee underling, Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), who was appointed by Grassley on Thursday to head the immigration subcommittee. Sessions was appointed one week after accusing the tech industry of perpetuating a "hoax" by claiming there is a shortage of qualified U.S. tech workers. "The tech industry's promotion of expanded temporary visas — such as the H-1B — and green cards is driven by its desire for cheap, young and immobile labor," wrote Sessions, in a memo he sent last week to fellow lawmakers. Sessions, late Thursday, issued a statement about his new role as immigration subcommittee chairman, and said the committee "will give voice to those whose voice has been shut out," and that includes "the voice of the American IT workers who are being replaced with guest workers."

83 of 514 comments (clear)

  1. No way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sudden breakout of common sense??

    1. Re:No way! by bloodhawk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, common sense is appointing someone with an unbiased view in either direction, not someone walking into the job with a preconceived position.

    2. Re:No way! by mythosaz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's perfectly reasonable to have a position on a subject and still posses common sense.

      It's obvious to pretty much everyone that a fleet of off-shore or H1B programmers bill cheaper to your customer than supplying them with actual citizens who can do the same job.

      That's common sense.

    3. Re:No way! by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, they just wanted more money. Once the lobbyists line the pockets of those two, they will tell everyone they have come into possession of 'new facts' and change their stance to allow more off shoring and Indian and Chinese workers in.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    4. Re: No way! by deanc · · Score: 2

      There is a right and wrong answer to the question. It is completely fair for a senator to actually have an answer to the question we he assumes his position, rather than being a blank slate.

    5. Re:No way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd be happy if they got rid of the H-1B process altogether, just due to the abuse. There are many, many other types of visas people can get to work in the US, and someone who wants to work here can still freely enter and do that on their own merit, and not just they are just cheap labor.

      Immigration is needed -- the golden door still needs to be there... but there should be some fairness of who gets to enter, and someone who is there just because they will displace a US worker shouldn't get to be first in line.

    6. Re:No way! by Murrdox · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Having an unbiased view? In the realm of POLITICS?! If that is your criterion then nobody in politics should ever get appointed to anything, ever. They're politicians, not judges. It's not their job to be unbiased. In fact their job is completely the opposite, to be biased in favor of those who elected them. I wish it weren't the case, but it is.

    7. Re:No way! by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The only way to find someone who has no 'preconceived position' is to find someone who knows nothing about the topic. Anyone who looks deeply at the topic is going to see that H1Bs are underpaid, and that to hire one, you might need to interview fifty different people (and find legitimate-sounding reasons they couldn't do the job) who respond to your fake job posting.

      That is the reality of the situation. The tech industry does want "cheap, young and immobile labor." Saying that does not make you biased.

      Whether or not there is a shortage depends on your point of view. It's a supply and demand situation. We have the supply, but there will never be enough supply for the people who want to hire programmers at $2 an hour. If there are fewer programmers, salaries will rise until companies who can't afford them drop out, and the demand matches the supply.

      There can never be an absolute shortage of programmers, there can only be a shortage of programmers willing to work for a certain salary.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    8. Re:No way! by Layzej · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is good for Canada which is concerned about the 'brain drain' and would welcome U.S. companies thinking of setting up shop in Canada to take advantage of the cheaper labour.

    9. Re:No way! by AK+Marc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you get what you pay for is "common sense" then "the more you pay the more you get" should be true as well, so if you pay $500 for a widget, and someone else pays $100 for the same widget, yours is provably better, since it cost more.

      Common sense is wrong more than it's right. It's only good for making guesses about things you don't understand, and is worthless for evaluating things you understand.

    10. Re:No way! by digsbo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "You get what you pay for when you understand what you're buying" is true more often than the simpler form you offered, which implies what you're buying is a known quantity. As many of us know, STEM talent is quite difficult to gauge effectively for most management teams.

    11. Re:No way! by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2

      The only way to find someone who has no 'preconceived position' is to find someone who knows nothing about the topic.

      Not really true. Plenty of people know nothing about biology and yet have plenty of preconceived notions about evolutionary theory. The only people without preconceived notions would be newborns.

      No, it is definitely true. The person you replied to did NOT say that someone who knows nothing about the topic would not have a preconceived position, merely that ONLY a person who knows nothing about the topic MIGHT have no preconceived position.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    12. Re:No way! by Immerman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > and is worthless for evaluating things you understand.

      I disagree - generally the things you understand get incorporated into your common sense as well - you develop a more accurate "intuition" about how things work after seeing multiple examples, letting you "guesstimate" outcomes far better than you could otherwise. Generally not as good as reasoned analysis, but much, much faster, which is often important. That intuition will help you avoid dead-ends in reasoned analysis, and in situations where there's multiple powerful contributing factors that you understand incompletely, intuition will often guide you better than a reasoned analysis could.

      Of course for something like social policy where there's very few examples to draw upon, it's not so easy translating understanding into intuition. But then you could also make similar arguments against the value of reasoned analysis - analysis must be grounded in theory, and an accurate theory needs to be tested against lots of data points.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    13. Re:No way! by Jack9 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Common sense is wrong more than it's right.

      This is inaccurate.

      > It's only good for making guesses about things you don't understand, and is worthless for evaluating things you understand.

      You are intentionally perverting the meaning. Conscious understanding is less used than common sense. You survive because of common sense, not despite it.

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
    14. Re:No way! by sjames · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One criterion for a shortage would be the point where actual technical progress is impeded. We are nowhere near that.

      Another would be the point where reasonably structured companies start to drop out. We're nowhere near that either.

      Without the H1-Bs, profits might be squeezed a bit, but in one of the most profitable industries we have, that's just a correction.

    15. Re:No way! by sconeu · · Score: 3, Funny

      They're busy herding spherical cows... And applying for the "perfectly spherical astronaut" jobs.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    16. Re:No way! by sjames · · Score: 2

      In the neonatal ward, but I don't recommend electing them just yet.

    17. Re:No way! by stephanruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's obvious to pretty much everyone that a fleet of off-shore or H1B programmers bill cheaper to your customer than supplying them with actual citizens who can do the same job.

      Even the workers on H1B know the real reason for the H1B program.

      After all, they're not idiots. They realize that the H1B program was designed to prevent them from leaving their original H1B sponsor, than staying in the country working for a different US-based employer, so this guarantees them that they have very little negotiating power when it comes to negotiating salary increases, or negotiating for better working conditions.

      This works the same way indentured servitude used to work for immigrants two hundred years ago. Except now, there is no need to hold a financial note over one's head, in exchange to have paid for their trip, now the builtin limitations of the H1B visa fulfill that purpose instead.

    18. Re:No way! by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      One criterion for a shortage would be the point where actual technical progress is impeded. We are nowhere near that.

      Oh, we actually are. Cheaper resources almost always open more options. If you could get programmers for $2 an hour, it would mean that all your QA resources could be programmers too. You could build each project twice, then take the better of the two.

      And there are plenty of boring automation tasks that businesses do that they can't afford to have automated. Microsoft CRM is incredibly customizable in order to meet this market. Another example is SAP. It sucks in so many ways, companies would be better off writing their own custom software in-house. But they can't afford that, so they go with SAP instead.

      As something becomes more affordable, legitimate uses open up for them. Think of secretaries: a good secretary that can take dictation is much better than computer-dictation software, but they're too expensive, so the software is a secondary substitute.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    19. Re:No way! by smooth+wombat · · Score: 4, Insightful
      then "the more you pay the more you get" should be true as well

      That's the specious logic corporations use to justify the exorbitant salaries of their CEOs despite numerous studies showing the person at the top has little to no impact on the performance of the company.

      Then again, when corporations say they can't their workers more they are by default stating they don't want the best workers because they're not willing to pay the folks on the front line what they're worth.

      Some reference material:
      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    20. Re:No way! by erapert · · Score: 2

      Everyone is biased. In fact, even your idea that someone shouldn't have preconceived notions is a preconceived (biased) notion. What is important is whether his bias is correct or not. Then the questions which remain are:
      1. How do we determine if his bias is correct or not?
      2. Who gets to determine if his bias is correct or not?
      3. Who gets to hold him accountable for what has been determined to be the correct bias?
      4. What will those who're responsible for holding him accountable do if he decides to renege or otherwise fail in upholding what has been determined to be the correct bias?

    21. Re:No way! by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Old Wives Tale means "common sense we now think is false". Common sense does work for being risk-averse without understanding. That's what's behind Leviticus. Homosexual sex (anal sex of any gender) is more likely to cause certain diseases, make it "illegal". Pigs are dirty animals full of disease, ban eating them. Though I have no idea why blended fibers was banned by the Bible.

      All those Old Testament things were "common sense" coded into law. They were guesses and suggestions that weren't understood. Eat pigs, get sick was known, but germ theory was thousands of years away.

      Common sense is fearing something without understanding. After all, run away to fight another day is common sense.

    22. Re:No way! by fightinfilipino · · Score: 4, Informative

      the American Competitiveness in the 21st Century Act permits H-1B portability, provided another employer is willing to sponsor the H-1B worker. claims that H-1Bs are indentured servitude are entirely baseless.

    23. Re:No way! by AK+Marc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      your common sense

      You'll have to define "common sense" for me. My understanding of it is incompatible with your description of it. Common sense is a groupthink. It's a moron-level competent man standard. Everyone knows how to [whatever] it's common sense. It's not something You or I have, it's a form of the "reasonable man" standard used in court. Should you have known that running over your foot with a lawn mower was harmful? Yes? Then that's "common sense". Do "you" know that running over your foot with a lawnmower was harmful? That's personal knowledge, and unrelated to "common sense".

      But for the expert, you don't just reboot before asking for help (the "common sense" answer), because you want to see the error messages and research them later if the reboot doesn't permanently fix the problem. So common sense is wrong, and actually harmful.

      That *I* know to look at errors and investigate before rebooting doesn't mean that's part of my "common sense" part of being "common" is being shared by many people. When my sense doesn't agree with everyone else's, it's no longer "common".

    24. Re:No way! by ubrgeek · · Score: 2

      No. It was because cotton had better lobbyists.

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    25. Re:No way! by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2

      So what exactly is the difference between a shirt made from quality cotton with $15 an hour labor that costs $25 and a shirt made from quality cotton with $1 a day labor that costs $5?

      What is the difference between a standard business program (nothing super advanced- a well recognized pattern) turned out by a $9,000 a year programmer in india vs the same program turned out by a $90,000 a year programmer in a 1st world country?

      Get what you pay for mainly applies when the savings came from material quality. It is very hard to judge the quality of human labor other than by results.

      Indian and Chinese labor have challenges (face being a big one- never saying "no, that's impossible" is another one) but they are on parity with u.s. workers and have been for the last 5 to 7 years.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    26. Re:No way! by monkeyzoo · · Score: 2

      Clearly progress is being impeded by a lack of STEM talent! (sarcasm) If we had an infinite supply of laborers, we could have an infinite supply of technology solutions for teens to send dick pics amongst themselves on their cell phones digitally. Instead, the STEM labor market supply shortage is limiting us to only having hundreds of equally inane startups launched each year.

      As long as I keep seeing such a huge portion of our "technology innovation" resources going into ideas to accelerate the coddling of the male 20-25 demographic, I can't be convinced we need more STEM workers imported to support the unmet demands of companies claiming they can't make a buck because programmers are too expensive for them to launch their world-changing idea.

    27. Re:No way! by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      LOL that's precious. Meanwhile, the H-1B employees I know - my personal friends, people I hang out with and trust - describe a legal hellscape that's pretty much exactly indentured servitude. One of them managed to escape a bad situation by hooking up with a major corporation who could expedite the process to have the transfer done within a couple of months. That's two months of walking on eggshells so that they didn't get fired and deported. Another wasn't quite as lucky and had to ship out to the European branch of their new employer so that they can come back to America in a year or so, presuming everything is in order by then.

      You're on crack if you think an H-1B isn't a recipe for suckishness. Regardless of what it hypothetically sounds like on paper, the situations I witnessed firsthand were terrible for the workers involved.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    28. Re:No way! by sjames · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Let's be honest, companies go with SAP and their expensive consultants because the upper management falls for the sales pitch. They would still fall for the sales pitch if programmers cost $2 an hour. SAP rarely costs less (once once installation and customization is included) than a custom solution created by a good team of programmers.

      They don't skimp on automation because of the cost of programmers. They skimp because that cost (however small) is up front and visible while the higher cost of not automating is hidden away and takes a million nearly invisible bites at the budget.

    29. Re:No way! by stephanruby · · Score: 5, Insightful

      the American Competitiveness in the 21st Century Act permits H-1B portability, provided another employer is willing to sponsor the H-1B worker. claims that H-1Bs are indentured servitude are entirely baseless.

      Yes, I know this, but how many H-1B employees do you know who have made the successful transition?

      I know it happens, but it's an incredibly stressful event for the employee in question and there is actually no guarantee that it will succeed considering the temperamental nature of the INS and the unnecessarily small pool of companies willing to go through the trouble of sponsoring a worker already in the US.

      I was personally involved in the sponsorship of one Indian employee who had gotten their doctorate from a top US Ivy school, and yet the INS still delayed the visa unnecessarily by an extra year. Thankfully, that person was living in India at the time and my company could afford to wait for the paperwork to finally settle, but imagine if that person had been already living in the US, or if my company had been less patient.

      I guess one could try to say the same thing about employment in general. There is actually no guarantee of a job for anyone, even for US workers, but my point is that the constraints are completely different when you're under an existing H1B visa.

      And my comparison with indentured servitude is still just as valid. After all, indentured servants in Colonial America were still free to find new employers, assuming those new employers bought out their original contract.

    30. Re:No way! by anonymous_echidna · · Score: 3, Informative

      The claim is not that the H1-B is indentured servitude, rather that the restrictive nature of the H1-B puts the employee at a significant disadvantage, even with the portability that you mention. Having been there and done that myself, I can tell you that I had job offers I could not take up because of the H1-B visa restrictions.

      --
      In most times, most places, by most people, liars are considered contemptible. - Ursula Le Guin
    31. Re:No way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're missing the point. These companies don't want to import H1-B's so that they can fire a $120,000 a year US born programmer and replace him with a $100,000 foreign worker. That is chump change. The true intention, what saves them TONS of money, is using this system to suppress wages across ALL of their US programmers. This is a big part of why wages have been stagnant for 15 years now in STEM.

    32. Re:No way! by Jack9 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > Common sense is fearing something without understanding.

      Continuing to try to redefine the concept to fit your beliefs, is disingenuous.

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
    33. Re:No way! by anonymous_echidna · · Score: 5, Informative

      I've lived in the US on an H1-B visa - it's not hearsay to me. Despite portability provisions allowing workers to move, the moving positions is time-consuming and costly. It is illegal to be in the country the day after employment ceases, meaning that there is no legal way to organise your affairs appropriately if you suddenly find yourself out of a job. The system is set up in a way that supports the anecdotes given by Just Some Guy. If it is more helpful to you, then consider those stories as "use cases" (plausible ways of interacting with the system) instead of "anecdotes" (hearsay that should be dismissed because it is hearsay).

      --
      In most times, most places, by most people, liars are considered contemptible. - Ursula Le Guin
    34. Re:No way! by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You'll have to define "common sense" for me. My understanding of it is incompatible with your description of it. Common sense is a groupthink. It's a moron-level competent man standard.

      But how far does it extend?

      Everyone in the developed world thinks it's common sense to provide healthcare to all of one's citizens. Not the USA - That's commie talk.

      Everyone in the developed world thinks it's common sense to restrict access to firearms. Not the USA - That's Theft of Freedom.

      So sure, it's common sense not to run over your foot with a lawnmower, but anything more complicated than that...

    35. Re:No way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      People should be allowed to come to the US and compete. We are kidding ourselves if we think that bringing a billion, educated, hungry, motivated people into the world labor market is not going to stress us. It has and is happening and that is the way it is. Ultimately it is a good thing. Many many millions are living better lives (at least physically). If it means I have to work harder or be smarter and/or make less, so be it. The H1-B visa program seems to be designed to enslave. It is the leverage H1B provisions give employers that make these workers attractive. I work with lots of Indian IT workers, some are very good, most are ineffective. I dont know what they are paid. But this is no different than I would expect to find among "native american" IT folks. The real issues seems to be complete ignorance in management who makes the decision to hire large groups of credentialed, but low skilled offshore folks. Generally its very damaging to the companies themselves. Most companies I deal with, that are dominated by Indian IT staffs are mind numbingly burdened with process. Let people come to the US and compete without all the procedural nonsense designed to enslave them. Let them come and become americans. Require English everywhere. Require documentation of identity. Block them from access to entitlements until they become citizens.

    36. Re: No way! by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Simple. An employee who has fewer practical choices once employed at a given co. is easier to take advantage of.

    37. Re:No way! by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 3, Insightful

      oh, they BILL exactly the same amount. As in, the company their working for still charges the same amount as if they had American workers. They just get to pay the H1B's far less, so it's more profit for the contracting company itself.

    38. Re:No way! by ganjadude · · Score: 2

      i think a "think american workers first" concept is in fact the right answer even if biased

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    39. Re:No way! by BVis · · Score: 3, Informative

      If the IT consulting company can deliver the results for less money

      Which they can't. Have you ever SEEN some of the pureed shit that masquerades as code from (some) overseas developers? More often than not domestic coders have to be called in to un-fuck their shit, resulting in additional expenses that wipe out any savings realized from outsourcing the initial development.

      "You get what you pay for" doesn't really work when the ignorant suits who make the decisions don't understand what they're getting. All they know is that they gave the developers a vague set of specs and instead of domestic workers demanding more complete descriptions, the overseas workers keep their mouths shut and do whatever they think is what the customer wants. When the overseas devs send back their crap, all the suits know is that it cost less RIGHT NOW to get that work done. Never mind that they've doubled (or more) their future maintenance costs, it's all about quarterly results.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    40. Re:No way! by RabidReindeer · · Score: 2

      But the Free Market says that anyone who doesn't like the job conditions can just go look for a higher/better bidder! (just don't expect to find one.)

    41. Re:No way! by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2

      The enlightened self interest angle is that I don't want corporations treating H-1Bs like crap, because it enables the companies to get them for cheap, which depresses salaries in my career path. I want companies to have to treat H-1B visa holders well because 1) it's the right thing to do, and 2) so that I'm not competing against guys who'll work for 2/3 my salary for fear of being deported.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    42. Re:No way! by Coren22 · · Score: 2

      Thankfully, that person was living in India at the time and my company could afford to wait for the paperwork to finally settle, but imagine if that person had been already living in the US, or if my company had been less patient.

      What if the company was less patient? By applying for H1B status for this employee, the company is saying that they cannot find this talent AT ALL in the US, so than they better be patient, because this is a damn special person.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  2. Yeah! by jbolden · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Score one for the Republicans! I'm a pretty solid democrat, don't live in Arizona but I'm starting to like Jeff Sessions.

    1. Re:Yeah! by roc97007 · · Score: 2

      Score one for the Republicans! I'm a pretty solid democrat, don't live in Arizona but I'm starting to like Jeff Sessions.

      I admire your intellectual honesty. I'm conservative-leaning libertarian, currently registered Republican, but I don't let this prevent me from really liking Ron Wyden.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    2. Re:Yeah! by TigerTime · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Definitely agree on this one topic. We need to quit outsourcing our jobs overseas and importing temporary labor. Especially when there are people graduating in these degrees locally. I've noticed a serious trend over the last 10 years at my corporation where they use either contractors overseas, or just hire local contractors. And of course all the local contractors are super cheap foreign labor with H1-B visas. They have NO desire to make quality products because they don't plan on working for their contract long (because they know they are essentially working for experience as opposed to salary). All they want is a few years of experience and then bolt for better pay.

      However, the corporation i work for will just sub them out and hire more contractors at bargain base prices and moving forward. Overall, American workers are getting screwed. our customers are getting a shitty product, corporations are loving the super cheap labor, and foreigners are getting experience that they can take back to their homeland, which long term does not help America way ahead of other countries in these fields.

    3. Re:Yeah! by hey! · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't worry. They'll find a way to disappoint you.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:Yeah! by rtb61 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The carrot works best when the donkey doesn't eat it, just as it held in front of it's muzzle and this in conjunction with the fear of the stick keeps the donkey ie the masses in check. Don't fall for the promises only congratulate actions. The reality is for decades the general public has only been getting promises whilst the corporations got all the action and that is regardless of which party was in charge and working in collusion with the other party whilst pretending not to.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    5. Re:Yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I admire your intellectual honesty.

      Many of us are - we take in new information and change our opinions. I used to be a Libertarian
      (note the capital 'L' as in Harry Browne Libertarian) but as I learned more and more about economics, history(especially economic history), the complete randomness of life and economy, travels around the World and my own financial ups and downs, I have changed my views.

      I see how much chance has contributed to my successes and failures. I have worked my ass off many times and failed and other times, have sat on my ass and did quite well and of course, the other way around. To say that everything I have is 100% the result of my own effort is extremely naive and shortsighted.

      I see how many opportunities that I had and have were handed to me by the sheer accident of birth has given me a leg up as well as some special people in my past who have aided me. For that I am grateful.

    6. Re:Yeah! by Burdell · · Score: 2

      Not sure what Arizona has to do with Jeff Sessions, although if they'll take him, some of us in Alabama would appreciate it (although he was reelected in an unopposed election, so I guess not too many of us).

    7. Re:Yeah! by mycroft822 · · Score: 2

      I would look into this guy a little more before you get too excited. Even broken clocks... yada yada

    8. Re:Yeah! by reikae · · Score: 2

      Agoraphobia and anxiety disorders in general can absolutely be disabling and I wouldn't wish them on anyone. Also, where in the world is any disability benefit high enough for someone to buy even one car and enough gas to drive around leisurely? (Unless I misunderstood and your sister only bought the 4-wheelers and the RV after earning the money for them in a truly American way: winning lawsuits :-))

    9. Re:Yeah! by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2

      It would be nice if it were that simple.

      How can a corporation paying $80k to workers compete with another corporation paying $15,000 per year for similarly skilled labor?

      The H1B is abusive and addressing it will slow down the trend.

      But indian and chinese (and other) labor won't equalized until after 2045 and they will have a competitive advantage until wages equalize.

      I wish addressing H1B's would fix the problem. But fundamentally, as long a 6 year masters degree can live "well" on $30,000 in china or india (and costs under $16k) while an 6 year masters degree (that cost $80 to $160k) requires $70k to live "fair" and $120k to live "well" things will stagnate or get worse for the higher paid person.

      Chinese and Indian labor have challenges but they are "good enough" in most cases.

      So if the door is shut- the likely result will be
      a) wholey owned subsidiaries in other countries.
      b) outright elimination of IT function here and purchasing it cloudwise from there.

      It's not just IT- it's also radiologists, actuarials, and any other kind of easily offshorable expensive highly educated positions.

      For India- at current rates we won't be at parity until 2065.

      We really need to stop pumping inflation in the 1st world countries and deflate for a while to equalize labor costs.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  3. IEEE: The STEM Crisis Is a Myth by kootsoop · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder why the IEEE agrees with them? http://spectrum.ieee.org/at-wo...

    --
    "Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get" - Jerry Avins
  4. it IS a hoax by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Informative

    To the outside world, my manager says there is a shortage of qualified labor. In managerial meetings, he states openly that his intention is to replace all new openings with H-1B workers for budgetary reasons. Entirely coincidentally, during that time it has become less and less pleasant to work here, and also coincidentally, all of the attrition last year was amongst regular (non-H-1B) employees.

    What I take away from this is that "qualified" in this context means "willing to work for third world wages and no benefits".

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:it IS a hoax by Kaenneth · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Be a real shame if a recording of that were to leak.

  5. Must choose someone clueless? Let me guess ... by raymorris · · Score: 4, Funny

    Common sense requires choosing someone who doesn't have any ideas about how the job should be done?

    Let me guess ...
    You voted Obama, didn't you.

    1. Re:Must choose someone clueless? Let me guess ... by Livius · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That actually narrows down the voting options very little.

  6. I agree by msobkow · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Both Canada and the US have no shortage of tech workers. What they have is a shortage of companies willing to pay the prevailing wage, benefits, etc.

    I've lost three jobs over the years to "lowest price" bidders -- every single one of which was an Indian-run sweatshop bringing in their workers from overseas and working them to death without paying overtime.

    I worked in the US on temporary visas for up to three years at a time (annual renewals), spending over 12 years in the US in total. Was I ever sponsored for residency? Of course not -- then I'd have had some rights and freedoms. The money was good, and I don't regret the time I spent there, but I'm firmly on the side of the anti-H1-B crowd -- it's all a scam to benefit the bottom line of big business, not a legitimate shortage of skilled workers.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:I agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What they have is a shortage of companies willing to pay the prevailing wage, benefits, etc.

      Not really.

      What you have is a handful of companies (Facebook, Google) paying absofuckinglutely outrageous salaries and benefits. Then you have no shortage of companies paying obscenely good salaries and benefits. Then you have the massive sprawl of the country, where no, you're not going to be buying a Tesla because you're a developer in Ass End Of, Kansas.

      Somehow, that final item gets translated into, "DEY TOOK ER JERBS."

    2. Re:I agree by msobkow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bullshit.

      Those jobs I lost paid $80K/yr. and were undercut by Indian sweat shops paying their people $20/hr. without overtime.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  7. Re:Can't suspend my disbelief. by OrangeTide · · Score: 2

    It's a tough problem to fix. If we come down too hard on companies for hiring guest workers, they'll often open off shore offices. If I had a choice between competing with a guest worker and competing with someone working in a country that has a cost of living that is a fraction of mine, I guess I'd rather have the guest worker. At least he's paid marginally more an will pay US taxes. Either way I'm out of a job though.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  8. We're all just 'disposable employees' by david.emery · · Score: 3, Insightful

    (And without the advantages of being part of the Borg Collective.)
    http://venturebeat.com/2015/01...
    Pay particular attention to the chart showing -layoffs- across the IT sector!

  9. Re:You see that too? by Grishnakh · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Neither party is for the big guy or the little guy. They are each allied to certain interests and industries, and have certain positions on things that make sense to people with different ideologies.

    The Republicans are traditionally allied to (dirty) energy industries: coal, oil, gas, as well as Big Ag, and military/defense contractors.

    The Democrats are traditionally allied to finance (Wall Street), big media (RIAA/MPAA)/the "copyright cartel", unions (not so much these days), and these days, the tech industry (the CEOs, not the STEM workers).

    They also push certain ideologies: the GOP is anti-abortion, anti-immigration (or at least anti-relaxing of immigration policy), anti-gun control, pro-religion, and get their votes from people who value these issues. The Democrats are pro-choice, pro-open borders, pro-gun control, pro-separation of church and state, and pro-environmentalism, and get their votes from people who value these issues. Once in office, they only do so much on these issues, while spending most of their energy working for the moneyed interests who got them there. Sometimes this results in some actual progress, usually to keep their "base" happy, sometimes perhaps because they actually want to do something good, other times probably because their interests (and the moneyed interests behind them) actually align with those of many of us peons.

    Recently, Eric Holder **finally** did something about the ridiculous civil forfeiture rules at the federal level, something both parties have done nothing about for ages. This guy sounds like he's finally going to work for American STEM workers, something the Dems seem to oppose for some reason. Honestly, I can't think offhand which moneyed interest this guy's position would benefit, since the big tech companies and assholes like Mark Zuckerberg and Steve Jobs just want to exploit us for greater profit, and there's no STEM worker unions. It could just be like Obama: tough talk to appease the base, with zero actual results forthcoming. Or he's genuinely concerned about us STEM workers. Or the GOP wants to get STEM workers to switch sides (we're generally very strongly Democrat voters).

    Personally, I agree with him, which is odd because I find most actions and positions of the GOP abhorrent. But like with Obama, who didn't really do much while in office despite all his grand rhetoric, we'll see how much progress this guy really makes. Maybe they'll blame it all on "Democrat obstructionism".

    I do wonder, however, why Democrats seem to prioritize the interests of foreigners over those of American Citizens, even though what they're in effect doing is turning the job market into a libertarian hellhole, and doing the exact opposite of what Democrats of yore did in being big supporters of unions and workers' rights. Unionization is, at its very core, all about restricting the supply of labor to industry, so that a company can't just fire disgruntled workers and hire all-new staff so they can save some money; it's an attempt to give more power to the lower classes this way. Opening the borders to foreign workers is the exact opposite of this: it gives an endless supply of cheap labor to employers so they can exploit it and treat workers as disposable commodities. When exactly the Democrats became better friends of management rather than labor, I'm not sure.

  10. He needs to told: Management can be outsourced by CQDX · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hire enough H1-B's and it becomes more likely you'll just outsource the entire project to some contracting company overseas. And those companies also have their own management structure possibly eliminating your own boss' position.

  11. Re:You see that too? by Crashmarik · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I do wonder, however, why Democrats seem to prioritize the interests of foreigners over those of American Citizens,

    Democrats traditionally favor large government and using government assistance programs to buy votes of immigrants who in effect become their clients. Their problem is that they perpetually need to replenish the underclass as it becomes depleted by people pulling themselves up into the middle or upper class.

  12. FTFY by CaptainDork · · Score: 2

    "My position on the subject has evolved."

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  13. Re:You see that too? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 5, Funny

    their problem is that they perpetually need to replenish the underclass as it becomes depleted by people pulling themselves up into the middle or upper class.

    Wall Street has eliminated *that* problem.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  14. Re:You see that too? by Magnus+Pym · · Score: 2

    Democrats are trying to avoid a worse alternative of everything getting outsourced, and jobs in the US disappearing. Take a look at the US networking industry for an illustrative example.

  15. I predict... by ixs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I predict that this senator will be swimming in campaign contributions from the tech industry in the future. And of course he'll see the light afterwards and understand how misguided he was as he was lacking crucial information about the desolate state of the US STEM sector and increased allotment of H1B visas is the only short-term solution to the industry's plight... But of course, long term solutions will be found. Certain industries have already shown that with depressed wages it is indeed cheaper to manufacture certain items in the US again. I am sure a similar solution can be found for the IT industry...

  16. Re:No Shortage But... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

    While there is no shortage, it's just business wanting cheaper labor, that isn't why they're taking this position, it's because they just want to halt ANY immigration. So much so that they'll do it even when it's against something they care as much about as business.

    Or maybe they realize that H1B workers don't vote, but the out-of-work STEM workers they displaced do. And has been complaining to all and sundry that they lost their last job and can't get another one because of H1B workers.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  17. I've been trying to hire a Senior EE for a YEAR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've been trying to hire a Senior-level EE for over a year. I have interviewed 2 candidates every week during that time, so basically 100 people.

    These are people with 8-12 years experience as design engineers.

    These are also people who can't tell me what the current in an inductor does when you put a DC voltage across it. It's one of my standard lead-in interview questions - some basic principles of EE that everyone working as an EE should know. I am shocked at how many people don't know it.

    Usually, my interviews only go downhill from there. I will draw, for example, a very basic DC-DC or AC-DC converter and ask things like "what happens when this FET is turned on?" "What happens when it is turned off?" "What do the phase dots on this transformer symbol mean?" "What must you do to ensure this top-side FET is fully turned-on?"

    These people can't figure it out. They can't reason their way through it. Most of them just end up guessing, and proving the point that there is, in fact, a dire shortage of QUALIFIED engineers in this country. These are all very simple questions that anyone working as a senior-level EE should know off the top of their head.

    I think people are getting way too accustomed to having Google do their jobs for them, to be honest. "I don't have to know anything, I just have to know how to find a how-to online."

    1. Re:I've been trying to hire a Senior EE for a YEAR by LifesABeach · · Score: 2

      The first thought that came to mind was, "did you tell them that this is part of the interview?" another idea was, "are you the moron that will pay $15 an hour if the right person has a masters in EE?" It appears that you have no idea as to how to conduct an interview.

      Journeymen as unsupervised managers; another reason mig's are allowed to wonder around and foolishly get into trouble.

    2. Re:I've been trying to hire a Senior EE for a YEAR by Moof123 · · Score: 2

      When you have interviewed that many people without success I would really encourage you to look in the mirror, something isn't right about your story. At the very least you need to do more phone screening (unless that is what you are calling an interview?).

      My only thought is that it sounds like you are doing power electronics of some flavor, which at the moment is in a big upswing thanks to solar, EV's, and so on. Lots of converters and inverters are getting designed into things at the moment. As such, demand is going to outstrip supply for a bit.

      In general, engineering has gotten much more specialized than when I started 17 years ago. It is harder to get any old EE and ask them to quickly go from analog circuits to switching power supplies than it used to be. So don't be surprised if you have to either train someone up, or throw money at someone to poach them.

  18. Re:You see that too? by Crashmarik · · Score: 2

    their problem is that they perpetually need to replenish the underclass as it becomes depleted by people pulling themselves up into the middle or upper class.

    Wall Street has eliminated *that* problem.

    LOL I read that and laugh like a madman. Google "The Great Depression" then you will see an example of bad fiscal policy and an out of control market really screwing up people's lives yet somehow people actually managed to improve their lot during that mess. The biggest problem the current generation has, is they have accepted the idea they can't when all the ones that have come before knew they could.

  19. Re:You see that too? by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Informative

    Cisco is still here in California. This outsourcing scare is just like the terrorism boogeyman, an excuse for them to bring in more Democrat voters (or so they think). Companies are not going to relocate everything to India; does anyone really think the corporate executives are going to pack their bags, sell their mansions, and cruise in their megayachts over to Mumbai and set up new lives over there? You can't run a company with the executives in one country and all the operations somewhere else.

  20. Doesn't work like that either. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

    The carrot works best when the donkey doesn't eat it, just as it held in front of it's muzzle and this in conjunction with the fear of the stick keeps the donkey ie the masses in check.

    If you don't let the donkey have some real carrot now and then it will just sit there and tell you to go to hell, no matter how much you dangle.

  21. Re:Bay Area by AaronW · · Score: 3, Informative

    The company I work for has fairly good diversity. The company is a chip company with a number of software teams for things like compilers, SDKs, drivers, the Linux kernel, bootloaders, etc. While it isn't 50:50 there are a lot of women developers and while the majority are indian there are a fair number of caucasian and other minorities as well. We hire what we can get. We have positions that have been open for months and the majority of those that we interview are of indian descent. We have a hard time finding good engineers, the key word being good. I have interviewed a lot of engineers of all nationalities who I do not consider competent. The competent ones usually have multiple offers.

    The problem with the H1Bs are that they are abused by companies like Infosys and for less skilled engineers and IT people. Some companies also seem to have an inordinate number of H1Bs like Cisco. I'm of the firm belief that we need more good engineers and that we need a lot more people graduating from college with degrees in science and engineering.

    --
    This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
  22. Re:You see that too? by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Informative

    Everything Warren spouts has been contrary to everything the Dems have been doing since the mid-2000s. She is no more representative of Democrats than Ron Paul was representative of Republicans.

  23. Implement a 90% rule by tlim · · Score: 2

    Pay for the tech worker is 90th percentile of industry standard or 90th percentile at the company, which ever is higher.

    Quick, simple, and will truly take into account the company's "needs".

  24. Kill THe Wrong Bird by JimSadler · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes these tech worker visas are corrupt nonsense and we should limit the importation of skilled workers more than we do. But what we must not do is fail to import the cream of the crop of Asian engineers and scientists as well as the same from Europe or anywhere else for that matter. It would have been so easy to deny Einstein admission to the US as well as Goddard and many others. Some of the programmers coming out of places like Taiwan and Hong Kong are miraculously gifted and we would be fools not to ease the path for them to come here permanently. There may be many geniuses born but very few of those geniuses are trained in skilled areas that a nation must have to prosper and those people must be treasured if we are to survive as a nation. Yet I have seen immense prejudice against foreign workers who were highly skilled. One advanced engineer that I knew was working in a labor position and a school board thought he was some sort of lite weight with degrees from Romania. His boss was shocked when i told him that the man was a certifeied engineer with the American Association of Engineers. He got a much higher paying job in another branch of government as an engineer. A liberal arts degree from Romania might not mean much but a Ph.D. in a science or engineering means a person is quite skilled. One fellow told me he was a genius in France but every time his foot crossed our border he was instantly an idiot.

  25. It is funny reading all the comments... by Karmashock · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... from people that are just mad it was a republican.

    We need to get beyond this tribal shit, chaps. There are a lot of people on both sides of the line that are complete fucking assholes. And there are a lot on both sides that are honestly trying to do good things.

    Fuck the line. And saying "if you disagree on even one thing I believe in then I hate you" or other intolerant shit. People are going to have some differences of opinion.

    Focus on what is important. Ignore the stuff that isn't... nearly all the things people bitch about are not important. Abortion for example doesn't matter because republicans aren't going to repeal it. Same thing for gun control... democrats aren't going to take your guns away. Neither side can do that. Focus on something that might actually happen and focus on the issues that actually matter.

    We need to come together and solve common problems with solutions that most of us can accept. Anyone that says otherwise is literally the problem. Those guys thrive on the conflict and don't care if anything ever works. They just want to fight and start fires.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  26. The real reason by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Hey, Silicon Valley: we need paid-off with massive contributions or we'll grandstand on this (while not really giving a shit, other than having red meat to throw to our racist base)." -- GOP