Slashdot Mirror


VLC Acquiring Lots of New Features

jones_supa writes: Two weekends ago an update for VLC media player was shared during a presentation in Brussels at FOSDEM. Lead developer Jean-Baptiste Kempf covered VLC's continued vibrant development, as well as features that are coming for VLC 2.2 and VLC 3.0. VLC 2.2.0 will feature automatic, GPU-accelerated video rotation support, extension improvements, resume handling, support for new codecs/formats and rewrites to some of the existing formats, VDPAU GPU zero-copy support, x265 encoder support, etc. Further out is VLC 3.0.0, which is planned to have Wayland support, GPU zero-copy support for OpenMAX IL, ARIB subtitle support, HEVC / VP9 hardware decoding on Android, a rework of the MP4 and TS demuxers, and browsing improvements. The VLC FOSDEM 2015 presentation is available in PDF form. The VLC Git shortlog can be used to follow the development of the project.

121 comments

  1. GPU/HW accell :D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    VLC has always performed pretty badly compared to other media players, but whatever file I throw at it, it Just Works

    Well maybe subtitle support could be better too.

    1. Re:GPU/HW accell :D by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 3, Insightful
      TFS

      VLC Acquiring Lots of New Features

      Fine. But the essential features we do need all the time, like acceleration, streaming: buffering during 'pause', random access to a position while keeping in memory the part that was loaded 30 seconds before [algo], general ergonomics and intuitiveness - are they finally working well? (On Linux at least, that's far from working well)

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    2. Re:GPU/HW accell :D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why I use PotPlayer. It will play anything I throw at it, has way better performance than VLC, way better subtitle support than VLC and can use external codecs if desired. Oh and it doesn't have a hideous UI like VLC does.

    3. Re:GPU/HW accell :D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes! subtitle support. not everyone speaks English!!. And a sub down loader that works! so frustrating!! but i love VLC, it plays everything!

    4. Re:GPU/HW accell :D by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      I have found consistently that MPC "just works" slightly more often. Its interface and controls are completely crap compared to VLC, but its video playback is significantly better. As in, videos that will not play in VLC, will play in MPC.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    5. Re:GPU/HW accell :D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VLC has supported GPU/HW acceleration for years. Maybe there's a bug causing it to not get used in your setup, but the support is there. The summary mentions a few improvements to that support.

    6. Re:GPU/HW accell :D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UI is not really an issue since I watch everything fullscreen so it's completely hidden.

      PotPlayer would make a good contender, if it ran on linux.

    7. Re:GPU/HW accell :D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. It's always been lacking in many important ways, like H.264 decoding (better recently, was horribly broken before), its UI and controls are pretty damn awful, and the whole "rebuiling the font list" that takes forever all the time sucks. Please fix those.

      Until then, I'll keep using MPC-HC which is all-around better.

    8. Re:GPU/HW accell :D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MPC doesn't work at all on linux. VLC does.

      Not gonna reboot to watch a video.

    9. Re:GPU/HW accell :D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See, I use my video player for much more than just movies so most of the time it's windowed. Don't really want to waste an entire screen just to watch YouTube videos and instructional videos necessitate being in a window. VLC also doesn't have proper bookmarking support, nor resume on playback, nor proper stereoscopic 3D support (no active shutter, polarised passive, amber/blue anaglyph, magenta/green anaglyph) and lacks many features that PotPlayer has.

      Then go ask the author to port it. I'm sure he will if you can show that it's worthwhile. You might need to round up the other 3 desktop Linux users in the world to help your case.

    10. Re:GPU/HW accell :D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you use CoreAVC with VLC yet? If not, then VLC is crap.

    11. Re:GPU/HW accell :D by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Well, should have added to my rant some fair positiveness: as it's been said on this page, whenever something is a bit exotic and other players cough to death, usually VLC manages to read the file and show something. That's ok. And thank you for that. But, seriously, the main features really need some improvement. Please :-)

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    12. Re:GPU/HW accell :D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      XVideo acceleration is plenty for me (and VLC's had it for ages), although I can understand the need for GPU decoding for battery/low-powered devices.

    13. Re:GPU/HW accell :D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MPC doesn't work at all on linux. VLC does.

      That is hardly an advantage for the vast majority of computer users.

  2. Chromecast? by lillgud · · Score: 5, Interesting

    No news about supporting Google Chromecast? The discussion on the forum[1] has been dead quite some time. I can see in the git repo that there actually *is* code present (cast.cpp) and I would guess that this would be a really appreciated feature.

    [1]: https://forum.videolan.org/vie...

    1. Re:Chromecast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm willing to bet VLC are losing users hand-over-foot because of this. I gave up waiting, and now copy videos to my tablet and use Allcast instead.
       
      I would gladly have paid, as VLC has been a mainstay for my media consumption for years. Sadly, they're just too late to the game.
       
      CAPTCHA: reinvent

    2. Re:Chromecast? by nonsequitor · · Score: 4, Informative

      You CAN use VLC with Chromecast already though. It's not supported in the desktop application yet, but the VLC plugin for the Chrome browser already meets this need. It's fairly easy to make work:
      1) Install VLC plugin for Chrome
      2) Enter URL for video on your filesystem file://path/media.file
      3) Hit the cast button on your browser

      I think official support is on hold until Google releases a Chromecast SDK for desktop applications, otherwise it'll be a hack and could break at any time if Google changes stuff. As far as I know, Google has only released an API for web based services.

    3. Re:Chromecast? by Kevin108 · · Score: 1

      ES File Explorer can browse your local network. Add the ES Chromecast plugin and you are able to stream many media formats with it. There are audio issues with certain formats, but I imagine that will be addressed at some point.

      The better solution is simply to install the Plex server on your computer and drop $5 on the app for your tablet. Create a free Plex account, install the app on your phone, and you can access all of your media with a clean, professional interface anywhere you can get online.

      --

      It's a perfect time for being wasted.
      A perfect time to watch the stars.
      - Burden Brothers, "Beautiful Night"
    4. Re:Chromecast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Looking at Git changelog for 3.0.0 at http://git.videolan.org/?p=vlc.git;a=blob;f=NEWS;h=815cb5e60e3e6a8adbb8ae413fed59de5c2b8764;hb=815cb5e60e3e6a8adbb8ae413fed59de5c2b8764 shows that 3.0.0 is scheduled to have a "Chromecast output module"

    5. Re:Chromecast? by Chuk · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's just me but ES File Explorer over wifi has been pretty much a non-starter for most of my local network shares.

      --
      chuk
    6. Re:Chromecast? by Kevin108 · · Score: 1

      For me it behaved a bit inconsistently but it did work. You're not missing much though.

      --

      It's a perfect time for being wasted.
      A perfect time to watch the stars.
      - Burden Brothers, "Beautiful Night"
  3. VLC implements this one new trick in their... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...fix the totally cluttered preferences please.

    1. Re:VLC implements this one new trick in their... by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ...fix the totally cluttered preferences please.

      Hey! If a product isn't popular enough, it's because it doesn't have enough features!

      The more features you have, the more likely someone will want to use the product for that feature. Look at Mozilla, for example.

      Were you asleep in your "marketing for engineers" class?

      (My personal foible: I stop and start videos a lot, and hunting with the slider to find out where I left off is a royal pain, so I googled "how to make VLC remember position". Big mistake.

      VLC doesn't implement this simple feature, but you can get a plugin that does. Download and install the plugin (copy a DLL library to the install directory? That's totally something the end user should be doing in a mature product!)

      The plugin creates a checkbox which you can then check to save your place when you stop viewing a movie. Woohoo! ...except that now VLC won't run at all, and you have to forcefully delete the plugins and reboot your system just to go back to the old version.

      Who implements some of the obscure, little-used, weird options in VLC but doesn't give the user the option of saving their place?

      VLC is totally something Franz Kafka would design.)

    2. Re:VLC implements this one new trick in their... by jones_supa · · Score: 2

      (My personal foible: I stop and start videos a lot, and hunting with the slider to find out where I left off is a royal pain, so I googled "how to make VLC remember position". Big mistake. VLC doesn't implement this simple feature, but you can get a plugin that does.

      I encountered the same problem and VLC does seem to have some kind of built-in bookmark feature, but in my case the "go to bookmark" hotkeys did not work.

    3. Re:VLC implements this one new trick in their... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You should bitch and get your money back.

    4. Re:VLC implements this one new trick in their... by kosmosik · · Score: 4, Informative

      > My personal foible: I stop and start videos a lot, and hunting with the slider to find out where I left off is a royal pain

      In the PDF linked from this post there is a slide (on 20th page) showing just that functionality so I guess they wish to add it.

    5. Re:VLC implements this one new trick in their... by reikae · · Score: 1

      Woohoo! ...except that now VLC won't run at all, and you have to forcefully delete the plugins and reboot your system just to go back to the old version.

      Why would you need to reboot?

    6. Re:VLC implements this one new trick in their... by fisted · · Score: 1

      That's totally something the end user should be doing in a mature product!

      In a mature product? Have you ever looked at the icon VLC uses?

    7. Re:VLC implements this one new trick in their... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Overall UI experience need full overhaul.

    8. Re:VLC implements this one new trick in their... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should bitch and get your money back.

      Cut the bullshit, please. Just because a program is free does NOT make it immune to criticism. It simply means that you can't make demands of the developers if you're not putting your own money towards its development. But you can still express concerns about it.

      It's this type of response that pisses me off with certain people in the Linux community - sure Linux is free, but if it's a pain to use compared to Windows, then fuck it, I'll pay for the license if it means I don't have to deal with the bullshit associated with a poorly supported distro.

    9. Re:VLC implements this one new trick in their... by Fallso · · Score: 0

      (My personal foible: I stop and start videos a lot, and hunting with the slider to find out where I left off is a royal pain, so I googled "how to make VLC remember position". Big mistake. VLC doesn't implement this simple feature, but you can get a plugin that does.

      I encountered the same problem and VLC does seem to have some kind of built-in bookmark feature, but in my case the "go to bookmark" hotkeys did not work.

      Woe is me! This FREE software that I don't pay anything for doesn't fulfill every niche requirement I want! Have you even submitted a bug report for this? Perhaps you could even contribute a fix if said issue irks you so?

    10. Re:VLC implements this one new trick in their... by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      You're correct. I should submit a bug report or patch.

    11. Re:VLC implements this one new trick in their... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MOD UP

    12. Re:VLC implements this one new trick in their... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a media player, not a web browser.

    13. Re:VLC implements this one new trick in their... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...fix the totally cluttered preferences please.

      DIAF. Preferences are good things. They give users control over their software. Take your tabletcentric, no-options, UXtardery and fork the project yourself if you want a skin with an "uncluttered" UX.

    14. Re:VLC implements this one new trick in their... by tepples · · Score: 1

      Because rebooting Windows isn't really that much slower than logging out and logging back in. To close all open processes without fiddling in Task Manager, you need to log out. And if other users have VLC processes open, you need to log them out too. With all the work that has gone into optimizing the startup time of Windows, it ends up taking more time to close your applications and reopen them than to close the NT kernel and reopen it.

    15. Re:VLC implements this one new trick in their... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, he could just switch to an already existing player that is better than VLC and not waste his time on inferior garbage.

    16. Re:VLC implements this one new trick in their... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it's not, it's a video player which means the UI is all that much more important. A web browser needn't be anything but a viewport to a web site, with the site itself handling its own UI.

      It's also utterly ridiculous when there are numerous video players that not only have more and better features, but also better UIs than VLC. Sorry to break this to you, but VLC is crap. The only people who like it are those who have never tried anything else.

    17. Re:VLC implements this one new trick in their... by Vastad · · Score: 1

      Remembering where I last stopped is great. Would love to be able to specify hours and minutes into a given video as well.

    18. Re:VLC implements this one new trick in their... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > hunting with the slider to find out where I left off is a royal pain

      I've still to find a video player that beats XBMC on an original xbox with a wired controller.
      Last time I checked, XBMC for Linux/Windows no longer even had a slider for audio files.

  4. But the big question is... by Sir_Substance · · Score: 1

    Have they fixed the issue where other software transitioning to fill screen mode sometimes causes VLC to crash? Pretty sure I've been reporting that crash for about 5 years now.

    1. Re:But the big question is... by jones_supa · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I would test a nightly build and then report your experience to bug #11060.

  5. Email support by Centurix · · Score: 1

    Good candidate for Zawinski's law. This thing needs email support.

    --
    Task Mangler
    1. Re:Email support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, when systemd assimilates VLC's functionality, it already has the email support it obtained from emacs.

    2. Re:Email support by jones_supa · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's funny because SystemD integration of VLC has actually begun.

    3. Re:Email support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's impressive that you can do hyperlinks with text-to-speech. I assume that you're using text-to-speech because you can't seem to read. Yeah, it makes you wonder why I'm typing this, but in case anyone else with reading ability encounters this post, the above link says the reverse of what the parent thinks it does, VLC is integrating with systemd not the other way around. This should surprise no one because it was in TFS.

      Mod parent down. This is the opposite of informative.

  6. PotPlayer vs. VLC - which is better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NT

    1. Re:PotPlayer vs. VLC - which is better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PotPlayer by miles. Seriously, VLC is so far behind that it's not even competition.

  7. DLNA Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This has not been working for ages on OSX and other platforms.

  8. Tech Features Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A listing of new technical features and not a listing of UX 'upgrades'.

    1. Re:Tech Features Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I am surprised too. It is nice to see a application that has not yet been ruined with the UX-plague. Perhaps on the next version the buttons are randomized across the screen and the screen estate used for actual content is minimized while the amount of whitespace in screen is maximised. It would also bee so hip to remove half of the configuration items, as they are said to confuse the stupid user.

    2. Re:Tech Features Yay by jones_supa · · Score: 3, Funny

      Also make a minimalistic website with the only VLC cone logo with a drop shadow, along with a text "Simple. Beautiful. Elegant. Media the way you want it." Then just a big download button.

    3. Re:Tech Features Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop making me rage!

    4. Re:Tech Features Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooh.. would the website also have parallax scrolling to make it so hot?

    5. Re:Tech Features Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The VLC website is pretty much as minimalistic as the app. It mostly is just download links.

  9. Re:Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What can this do that emacs can't?

    Play audio/video files.

  10. Re:Yawn by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

    What can this do that emacs can't?

    Keyboard shortcuts that don't give you carpal tunnel in 2 minutes flat.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  11. Overrated software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It crashes a LOT, and has a really hard time playing a lot of files. Gray screen, stuttering, long time to start, etc...

    1. Re:Overrated software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think I've ever had VLC crash. Which OS are you using? Did you download the binaries, or compile it yourself?

      As for the gray screen and stuttering, I've only noticed that across network streams, not playing local files, so I'm not entirely sure that's an issue with VLC as it could just as easily be due to the network or host computer.

  12. Frame-interpolation. by Gaygirlie · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Personally, I would like to see them add frame-interpolation to VLC. There is Smooth Video Project that can be used with several other players and you could use it even with XBMC, though I don't know if it works with Kodi anymore, but SVP doesn't work with VLC. I really do enjoy watching videos in 60 fps, it's like a night and day compared to the usual 23.976 or 25 fps, even if it's just interpolated.

    1. Re:Frame-interpolation. by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the tip, I will see how the result is when I go back to home

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    2. Re:Frame-interpolation. by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      You'll need a quite beefy computer for SVP and you need to have the SVP Manager running whenever you want to see videos in 60 fps, the website or the installer doesn't make it clear enough IMHO, so I thought to mention. The included MPC-HC works great for watching stuff and I can bet you'll see the difference, but oddly enough the installer doesn't create a shortcut for MPC-HC, you need to find it in the installation folder and create a shortcut for it manually. I hope this gets you going and hooked to high-framerate videos :)

    3. Re:Frame-interpolation. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      though I don't know if it works with Kodi anymore

      Nope, not really. Only with a build over a year old.

      Thanks for putting me up on this though, I guess I'll use MPC-HC on Windows from now on. Might as well uninstall VLC.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Frame-interpolation. by Daniel+Hoffmann · · Score: 1

      How does frame-interpolation works out? It is playing at 60 fps but interpolating frames would surely reintroduce some motion blur.

    5. Re:Frame-interpolation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it doesn't introduce any motion blur. It's pretty amazing.

      I will admit that for certain videos it can be somewhat headache inducing, but for any kind of action and especially CGI stuff, it looks great.

    6. Re:Frame-interpolation. by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      Oh God, why? This is the first thing I turn off on new TVs :S

    7. Re:Frame-interpolation. by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      Oh God, why?

      Because to my eye movies and TV-shows looks a whole lot better and more enjoyable in high framerates, granting a much smoother movement to everything.

    8. Re:Frame-interpolation. by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

      Same here, without it stuff just looks choppy and pans are jittery.

  13. Just me? by ledow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is it just me?

    "VLC 2.2.0 will feature automatic, GPU-accelerated video rotation support, extension improvements, resume handling, support for new codecs/formats and rewrites to some of the existing formats, VDPAU GPU zero-copy support, x265 encoder support, etc."

    I have little interest in this. It seems to be performance improvements. As someone who just rolls out VLC in preference to WMP on all my domain-connected machines, some of them with only Intel-video, I don't actually have any performance problems. I have ten times more problems with just random crashes etc. but fortunately VLC is small enough to just load up again. But performance? What I throw at it, gets rendered to the screen.

    So what's new in VLC 3?

    "Further out is VLC 3.0.0, which is planned to have Wayland support, GPU zero-copy support for OpenMAX IL, ARIB subtitle support, HEVC / VP9 hardware decoding on Android, a rework of the MP4 and TS demuxers, and browsing improvements."

    Again, mostly "performance improvements". The support for other formats is unlikely to ever be used by any of my users but that's the reason I use VLC - just throw stuff at it and without needing codec packs, it just plays what it can.

    I'm sure there's someone out there doing 4K on multi-screens and needs a beefy setup and a top-notch bunch of hardware accelerated features. But, to me, I'd rather we didn't have that and instead fixed the crashes in VLC which seem common enough that someone on a VLC team just loading in random web videos all day would hit several a day at least, that they could then start down to road to debug,

    If anything, all this passing off to hardware is probably MORE likely to cause me problems than anything else - no doubt the support won't be perfect and it'll put the onus of rendering properly on the graphics driver rather than the VLC software itself.

    1. Re:Just me? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If anything, all this passing off to hardware is probably MORE likely to cause me problems than anything else - no doubt the support won't be perfect and it'll put the onus of rendering properly on the graphics driver rather than the VLC software itself.

      No, no it probably won't. VLC already lets you configure out the hardware acceleration.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Just me? by Narishma · · Score: 3

      Anything with a battery (which is the vast majority of things nowadays) will benefit hugely from hardware acceleration.

      --
      Mada mada dane.
    3. Re:Just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who just rolls out VLC in preference to WMP on all my domain-connected machines...

      May I ask how you go about doing this without repackaging the hell out of it? VLC is a royal pain in the ass to deploy in enterprise environment with auto-updaters that can't be disabled, preferences kept in files and shitty silent installation options, plus, developers are enterprise hostile and seem to think we have secret developers on standby all the time...

    4. Re:Just me? by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      Isn't HWA off by default?

  14. Re:VLC preferences by hackertourist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While I agree that the prefs interface could use improvement, please don't suggest they reduce the number of preferences. I use VLC because it's configurable to my tastes.

  15. Decent UI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or howabout a playlist function that doesnt choke when you toss more than 10 files at it.

    1. Re:Decent UI? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      That's the number one thing I would like to see. I'm still using Winamp (with all its video-related quirks) as it's the only video player I have found that has a good playlist.

  16. Any one for by invictusvoyd · · Score: 1

    mplayer and plain commandline ?

    1. Re:Any one for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Commandline in 2015 ? Yeah no. No no no no.
      Especially for a fucking media player.

    2. Re:Any one for by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Take your Mac, your stupid baggy trousers, your fixie and sod off to Starbucks with all the other hipsters, you raving Nancy-boy.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:Any one for by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Yep.

      That's my favourite way of playing videos.

      Except Ubuntu 14.04 installed a fux0red version of MPlayer which can't properly seek on DVDs which is really sodding annoying. Compiling the latest version from source worked just fine, of course.

      I also rather like the -ap volnorm because these days it seems to be the fashion to master films with such extreme dynamic range that if you can hear the quiet dialog clearly you'll get deafened, or at least seriously piss off the neighbours on a loud bit.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    4. Re:Any one for by invictusvoyd · · Score: 1

      Try finding all videos in your collection containing the word "startrek" , sorting them randomly and playing them with VLC .... some of us still need the commandline in 2015 ;)

      find . -iname "startrek" " | sort -R | xargs -d '\n' mplayer -af volnorm

    5. Re:Any one for by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Take your Mac, your stupid baggy trousers, your fixie and sod off to Starbucks with all the other hipsters, you raving Nancy-boy.

      So wait, you're trying to claim that the hipster position is the one where you use a GUI for your media player instead of the command line?

    6. Re:Any one for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      xargs -d '\n'

      On GNU use -print0 in find and -0 in xargs (It's posixly incorrect because people whined that if someone added -print0 to find then people would expect other programs to be able to handle them. -0 is not supported in xargs because you can pipe the output through a crazy sed recipe to deal with any whitespace, and people would expect programs to be written to output null terminated strings. Seriously, it's in the manpage)

    7. Re:Any one for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the hipster position is to react the way that AC did to someone who just stated their preference. They're just too damn cool for the commandline, like any good hipster.

    8. Re:Any one for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I type *startrek* in the search bar, then drag the found files to VLC. Make sure VLC has random shuffle selected. Easy.

  17. Whoops, spoke too soon by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Sadly, it doesn't fucking work

    I have a supported video card (nvidia 2xx) and errythang

    But when I try to play a video in MPC, I just get the audio. Works fine in VLC.

    Maybe when SVP works, VLC can worry about working with it.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Whoops, spoke too soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's probably because you have a shit GPU. A 200 series? Really? That's almost a decade out of date. I'm guessing you're probably on an ancient CPU too.

      SVP + PotPlayer works great, even on my laptop.

    2. Re:Whoops, spoke too soon by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      A 200 series? Really? That's almost a decade out of date. I'm guessing you're probably on an ancient CPU too.

      Whoops, that's my old card. I typed it by reflex. I have a 450 GTS OC now. Going to get a 750 Ti shortly. Maybe I'll try again.

      CPU is a Phenom II X6 1045T, which yeah is pretty old, but which is also still pretty fast. Not really fast, or even quite fast, but pretty fast.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  18. Bug fixes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    More time spent on more features? How about fixing long standing bugs eg browsing uPnP on Win 7 64bit crashes VLC. Everytime.

    https://forum.videolan.org/viewtopic.php?t=117206

    Been at least 12 months

  19. Hate to piss on the parade... by SkunkPussy · · Score: 2

    ...but its been missing some basic features for years (in the windows and android versions):

    1) preserve playlist between invocations of the programme (playlist resets every time you close vlc)
    2) preserve state of music library as soon as you make changes to it (add music to vlc library, don't close vlc, library never gets saved)

    --
    SURELY NOT!!!!!
    1. Re:Hate to piss on the parade... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, make the damn Equalizer either save its settings or actually have any sort of preset/profile support.

    2. Re:Hate to piss on the parade... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      1) save your goddamned playlist. Two keystrokes.
      2) see 1)
      3) Just use AIMP with the appropriate plugins.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    3. Re:Hate to piss on the parade... by SkunkPussy · · Score: 1

      Manually saving an application's state doesn't make sense

      But in summary your advice is not to use the application :)

      --
      SURELY NOT!!!!!
    4. Re:Hate to piss on the parade... by odie5533 · · Score: 1

      Would be nice if Bookmarks worked at all. I'd like using VLC for audiobooks, but without a decent bookmarking system it's not really possible.

      DAUM Potplayer is my main media player. It's closed source, but it has better options than anything else out there including a great bookmark/playlist system.

    5. Re:Hate to piss on the parade... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Automatically saving an application's state isn't always the best thing, either.

  20. UPnP/DLNA by ArchieBunker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wish they would implement the ability to stream to UPnP devices like a TV over ethernet/wireless. I can't watch movies without the audio compressor plugin. The music and movie sound engineers need to trade places. Going from whispers to ear blasting volumes does not make movies any better. And before you ask no I don't have a surround setup, only left and right Infinity Qe speakers. Surround sound is a cheap gimmick.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:UPnP/DLNA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > audio compressor plugin

      That would be really nice considering how much VLC distorts sound. I feel for the main dev that is partially deaf, but he shouldn't be making audio decisions. The audio in VLC is horrific with the odd-order harmonic distoration from the clipping. It's nice that you can raise the volume to make quiet passages louder, but without compression, the loud passages clip badly.

    2. Re:UPnP/DLNA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surround sound is awesome unless you're cheaping out on the speakers or don't know how to wire a room. Watch Jurassic Park in the dark on your giant plasma screen with surround sound in full effect and you'll believe.

    3. Re:UPnP/DLNA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Audio compression is built-in. I see it under Tools > Effects and Filters... and it's right in the audio effects tab. Many movies are unwatchable (unlistenable?) without it.

  21. Gapless playback by dogvomit · · Score: 2

    Still no word on gapless playback for audio files? It would be a great music player, but lack of gapless playback is a showstopper. No one can listen to side 2 of Abbey Road with gaps and stay sane.

  22. Re:VLC preferences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It is hard to design a really good preferences interface. Much easier to just rip everything out and pretend that's good enough for everyone.
    Kind of like it is hard to govern well, easier to just starve the beast and pretend that's good enough for everyone. Initiate hackertarian cognitive dissonance in 3 ... 2 ... 1.

  23. How about stutter-free playback? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    x264 video (on Windows, at least, but I'm not sure why it would be any different on another OS) stutters on playback unless you disable one of the postprocessing options, and it's been that way for ages, so I ditched it and went with MPC-HC.

    It's subtle, and I think most people just don't notice it.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  24. Please fix the sound! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I understand the main developer is mostly deaf, but please start accepting patches to fix the bad audio. I work in IT for a company that makes Facebook and casual games, and VLC has gotten so bad that I can typically tell when a coworker is using it just by the way the distorted audio sounds. The idea that it is OK to add a slider that adds massive clipping to the audio is ridiculous. With digital audio, you can't go past 100% without bad distortion. The odd order harmonics on speech are especially grating.

  25. Not on Linux by HalAtWork · · Score: 2

    Just spent a good deal of time looking for solutions for Linux and I can't seem to find one, that's too bad. SVP is windows-only :(

  26. PLAYLIST!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Posting AC cuz I just don't care anymore.

    I know this is probably redundant since others may have mentioned it, but I think this deserves its own topic... you know... a playlist that remembers where it was the last time?

    Zoom player does it.
    Winamp does it.

    How hard is it to set a currently playing flag in the playlist, and when you close the program it saves the playlist with the current file marked? The only way it will remember for me is to delete the files I just watched from the playlist, and then save it.

    I am not a programmer. I am not a computer scientist. I am not a math nut. I am not a rocket scientist. I am not a frickin lawyer for that matter...

    This does NOT sound difficult to me!

  27. Re:Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Edit text?

  28. Too bad.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad as VLC has become so slow to start that I have to set an alarm clock to let me know when it is ready to play a video.

    With these enhancements I'll probably have to get a calendar.

  29. More features is not what it needs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish VLC would acquire a usable interface. I keep switching back and forth between MPC-HC and VLC (on Windows) because MPC has a decent UI and VLC has features that I need sometimes, but I can't use VLC as my everyday player because the interface drives me mad.

  30. Soap opera mode by tepples · · Score: 1

    I guess it'd do like smart TVs with their "motion flow" or "soap opera mode": guess the motion vector between successive frames and interpolate along it.

  31. Blu-ray by phorm · · Score: 2

    I wonder if/when they might get blu-ray support? DVD support has tended to be a gray area for a lot of things, but VLC happily supported it. No such luck for Blu-Ray BD+ yet (I thought it had been cracked, but perhaps not).

    1. Re:Blu-ray by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blu-Ray support is available and works, but for some reason they don't release binaries and it isn't included in the default VLC distributions. It's like they want to drive people to use MakeMKV's library shim instead.

      https://www.videolan.org/developers/libbluray.html
      https://www.videolan.org/developers/libaacs.html
      https://www.videolan.org/developers/libbdplus.html

      Here's the latest "release" which is actually just a news post saying "download the source and good luck building our complex project!": http://www.jbkempf.com/blog/post/2015/Blu-Ray-libraries-releases
      It's a pain to build on Linux, IME, and downright labyrinthine on Windows. How hard is it to put up some DLLs? Apparently too hard.

  32. What about the core? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    VLC's biggest problems is it has horrible response lag (500ms to respond to a pause?!), take friggin' ages to load compared to every other media player you can get.

    Other stupid problems include broken hardware MPEG1 acceleration (Which they always blame on the graphics chip and drivers...), and general random crashiness when manipulating the playlist, not to mention a weird UI hijacking thing that seems to trigger if more than one VLC instance is loaded.

    They need to fix the core functions before they start adding feature bloat IMHO...

    And when are they going to bring back MIDI support?!
    Even with the excuse that Fluidsynth has some vague security exploit, I have a friggin' hardware MIDI chip on my soundcard that it could off-load soundfont and MIDI playback to!

    At the moment I tend to use XMPlay and Mediaplayer Classic Home Cinema - In combination they blow VLC out the water in terms of responsiveness and performance.
    I do still use VLC, but mainly for things that don't work properly in either of the other two.

  33. There are hidden hot keys by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    There's a lot of hidden stuff in VLC, but these hot keys come from it's beginnings, it started as a music player something I hadn't known.

    I'm coming close to claiming there isn't much you can't do with VLC, the problem is the program changes so much it doesn't keep up with the Wiki or other sources of how to's.

    Can't rip that movie, heck VLC will copy it for you, not capture it but copy it to your specs. It is mentioned it's not a good choice and references a couple of programs that would serve you better.

    VLC is a must have on hand for me - but the damnedest thing for me is while it's in my path and I know it is

    C:\Windows\system32>path
    PATH=C:\Program Files (x86)\NVIDIA Corporation\PhysX\Common;C:\Windows\system32;C:\Windows;C:\Window
    s\System32\Wbem;C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\;D:\MISCPRGS;D:\MISCPRGS\aUPX;C:\Program
    Files(x86)\VideoLAN\VLC
    ;D:\MISCPRGS\BATfiles;C:\Program Files\OpenVPN\bin;C:\Program Files (x86)\Ult
    raEdit\;D:\MISGPRGS\Audacity2x6\LV2

    it won't start by calling it.

    Target from Icon: "C:\Program Files (x86)\VideoLAN\VLC\vlc.exe"

    Even put quotes on each end in the path, I'm embarrassed to say but was trying anything. It will run if called from it's own directory. It's the only program I've come across that won't run from a path. Mayhap's a syntax error, you'll never see it, but one showing to the better half and they spot it right off.

    Process Explorer shows it's command line as simply: VLC. I just made a hot key for it.

    1. Re:There are hidden hot keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed the space between "Files" and "(x86)" - try that.

    2. Re:There are hidden hot keys by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      You missed the space between "Files" and "(x86)" - try that.

      Correct you are, and it was a copy and paste. Here's an odd thing I just went through, it would take the space yet wouldn't save it, so figured using %path% might be a better way, found a great source of Windows Resource kits
        http://ss64.com/links/windows.... yet nothing of value for this.

      Going back to the environment variables I find a new variable PATH with two paths taken from the original path and the space left intact for VLC, so did the obvious, searched for the maximum length the path can be (I've never run into it before) https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-... says 256 mine is 346 and helps explain some phantom situations (or not).

      Note: To specify an extended-length path, use the "\\?\" prefix. For example, "\\?\D:\very long path". where the max length can be 32,767 characters.

      Thank you very much I looked at it a lot and couldn't find an error; akin to the in your face syntax error one keeps missing.

      Without your reply, well I'm a bit brighter now path wise. and yes VLC will open now from anywhere.

      Thanks again for your reply, now just need to start transferring a few paths for that 256 goal.

  34. "Missing" Feature by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    I use VLC when I have to, because even with all the tweaking and technical magic I do, I cannot get Windows MP to reliably play all video formats, and/or reliably display all subs. I have gotten to the point that I can get MP to handle 90% of things, but there are still 10% of things that I have to boot up VLC.

    Why use MP? Only one reason: Media Center uses MP. That's it. If I had a media center, and here's the important part, that I could use with a standard windows remote, that wasn't Windows and was't MP, I would do it in a heartbeat. While I have to do all sorts of trickery to get MP to work with anything, VLC just works, without a lot of fooling around.

    So the ONE feature they could have added to VLC that would made a huge difference (and I am sure for a lot of others) it would be to add a Media Center interface and remote support. I have tried a number of third party VLC addons and skins that pretend to do the same, but unfortunately they all suck, and they all seem to be half done. Currently I can use my remote a little bit with VLC, but it is limited to play/stop and volume, that is it. I can't browse my library of videos, I have to physically walk over to my computer and click with a mouse to start the thing.

    Anyway if they are looking to take over market share, that would be the way to do it. Frankly I am amazed they haven't yet.

  35. VLC could use some better streaming by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

    I use VLC for anything video and it always works fine. A few weekends ago I tried its streaming feature. Not only is it needlessly complicated to configure, there appears to be no way to save the settings and after a few hours streaming it just dies. Currently settling on Plex, which is great when it works, but it often takes many tries to make it work.