Slashdot Mirror


Alcohol's Evaporating Health Benefits

New submitter Heart44 writes: A study in the British Medical Journal shows that consuming alcohol — any volume, any type — does not increase life expectancy. The full academic paper is not paywalled. From its conclusions: "Beneficial associations between low intensity alcohol consumption and all cause mortality may in part be attributable to inappropriate selection of a referent group and weak adjustment for confounders. Selection biases may also play a part." The associated editorial adds, "Firstly, in health as elsewhere, if something looks too good to be true, it should be treated with great caution. Secondly, health professionals should discourage suggestions that even low level alcohol use protects against cardiovascular disease and brings mortality benefits. Thirdly, health advice should come from health authorities, not from the alcohol industry, and, finally, the alcohol industry and its organizations should remove misleading references to health benefits from their information materials."

47 of 305 comments (clear)

  1. I love you man by goombah99 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You are the greatest, did you know than man. I mean I really Reealy love you. Now what was this article about. Oh. To your heath! cheers.
    Seriously, alchohol can creat fun opportunities to socialize and that's well known to be one of the singlemost important aspects of a healthy life. Or any life at all.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:I love you man by goombah99 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It makes you wonder about this study. One would think that socializing, as promoted by moderate alcohol consumption would have a massive improvement on health and lifespan. If this study is not seeing that then either the assumption that happiness among freinds is a boon is wrong or that alcohol entirely offsets that. The third possibility, that they controlled for this, I'll dismiss. Finding people who socialized without alcohol would put this control group in rare company; they would biased comparables. I'm not saying one needs to drink so socialize. I know many people that don't and do. I just think the groups would not be comparable.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    2. Re:I love you man by pr100 · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure what you're saying.

      I'm not drinking alcohol at all this year (just as an experiment - I'm not a recovering alcoholic or anything like that). I don't think that this has made any difference to my socialising.

    3. Re:I love you man by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure what you're saying.

      I'm not drinking alcohol at all this year (just as an experiment - I'm not a recovering alcoholic or anything like that). I don't think that this has made any difference to my socialising.

      "Getting drunk never helped me get laid, so maybe staying sober will".

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    4. Re:I love you man by cohomology · · Score: 3, Funny

      After a major health crisis, one doctor told me: "We don't cure people so they can live miserable lives without wine."

      --
      Don't mess with The Phone Company. Piss them off and you'll be using two tin cans and a piece of string.
    5. Re:I love you man by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 2

      No one is saying don't drink alcohol. They're saying don't drink alcohol to improve your health. Drink it in spite of what it may be doing to your health ;)

    6. Re:I love you man by sycodon · · Score: 2

      It makes you wounder why we pay attention to any study. Seems like most studies usually have contradictory results and then are summarily reversed years later.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    7. Re:I love you man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Spoken like a true alcoholic.

      That's ridiculous and irresponsible. Alcohol had positive health benefits in the past that are no longer relevant in much of the world. For example, the beer that the Egyptians were drinking had a lot more nutritional content in it than modern brews do. There were antibiotics and a lot more yeast. In the UK they drank beer because the alcohol helped to sterilize it.

      These days most people have access to safe sources of water so that latter bit isn't relevant. And the former isn't relevant because we're not brewing it the same way that it was in the past.

      Alcohol is poision, there's really no argument about that, the questions are how much can you consume, what are the trade offs and is there any other aspect of it that improves ones health enough to make up for the fact that it's a toxic substance.

    8. Re:I love you man by cayenne8 · · Score: 2

      Alcohol == Conversation Lubrication!!!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    9. Re:I love you man by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      This type of thing sounds VERY similar to the folks that still posit that marijuana still has no health benefits.

      Folks, face it...pretty much ALL medicine or things with medicinal qualities are in some way poisonous to the system, depending on how you frame things.

      It seems the teetotalers and anti-any drug other than pure O2 from God's own air system, will say about anything to defend their position that anything that can intoxicate is BAD, and cannot possibly have a single good or beneficial 'side effect'.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    10. Re:I love you man by king+neckbeard · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, men don't need their inhibitions lowered to consent to sex. But they may need their inhibitions lowered to approach and confidently speak with women to get a chance to have said sex in the first place, or to prevent them from overthinking and ruining things.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    11. Re:I love you man by sycodon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Everything in moderation...including moderation.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    12. Re:I love you man by Kevin+Fishburne · · Score: 2

      No, there's a new paper and THAT'S THE LAST WORD. Everyone update their recommendations and reprint their pamphlets, immediately! I think this is what Scott Adams was ranting about a few weeks ago. You're right, though, and one other thing that alcohol does even if drinking alone is to relax you, lift your spirits and get your mind off whatever stressful events actually are draining your life force. I appreciate people doing all this research, but they need to show a little humility. Hard work doesn't mean you're right.

      --
      Buy your next Linux PC at eightvirtues.com
    13. Re:I love you man by ewibble · · Score: 2

      While the study normalized for socialization, which may favor saying alcohol is bad, studies that say people who drink a moderate amount is good for you have removed people who drink excessively. Having a society that encourages moderate drinking will probably increase the amount of heavy drinkers.

      Also maybe people who don't drink don't like to socialize as much because they don't like hanging out with a bunch of drunks. Most social gatherings are based on alcohol consumption. If we had more events that where more than just drinking and talking shit, perhaps non-drinkers may socialize more.

    14. Re:I love you man by Vintermann · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Something rather important is that all or virtually all of that effect is in your socialization and expectations around alcohol, not the alcohol itself. There are plenty of classic studies showing that people who believe they consume alcohol, behave as if they really did - and conversely, that alcohol does very little to your inhibitions unless you figure out that's what they're feeding you.

      So no, it doesn't really make you do things you normally wouldn't do. It just gives you an excuse - one your surroundings believe in, and one you probably believe in yourself.

      If we didn't have alcohol, I bet that either we would find something else and ascribe inhibition-reducing properties to it, or we would act slightly less inhibited all week instead of just concentrated to friday night.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    15. Re:I love you man by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      The big 30-year study on medical doctors that showed the reduced rate of death for some levels of alcohol consumption didn't show an improvement at "1-2/day" which is actually a substantial quantity. What it showed was a reduced death rate at 4/week, compared to 0. And at 7/week the death rate was equal to 0. And at 14/week (2/day!) the death rate had already gone up substantially.

      One thing I've noticed is that people who want to believe the early study often also want the results to be different than they are; they want to remember that "moderate drinking" is good, and then use the most permissive definition of "moderate" that they can, and then their brain will forget that the study basically said daily drinking is unhealthy.

      The fact is the level of drinking that was shown to be healthy is not enough to be socially or recreationally useful. And it doesn't support the "daily large beer that is actually 2 `servings'" either, or even the "glass (or two) of wine with dinner" model.

      As to this study, I'll have to wait to find out if it is even worth reading. The linked article gave no facts at all that are useful, and gives the strong impression that the study is designed to refute the media-presented "moderate is good, daily use is moderation" myth. But they don't do any better, and define "moderate" for the reader.

    16. Re:I love you man by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

      So no, it doesn't really make you do things you normally wouldn't do. It just gives you an excuse - one your surroundings believe in, and one you probably believe in yourself.

      Overstated.

      It can indeed make you do things you would not normally do, by effecting your judgement. In turn by depressing parts of the brain that control higher-order function.

      Whether it helps socialization may be disputed, but lapses of judgment during overuse is a pretty solidly established, objective fact.

    17. Re:I love you man by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 3, Insightful

      +1 And some hate that all the conversations are lost due to alcohool and therefore don't like to socialize with drunken idiots.

      Not everybody who is drunk is an idiot.

      Would you call Winston Churchill an idiot? Or Isaac Asimov, or Richard Feynman? They were all notorious drinkers. (In fact Churchill was said to finish at least a fifth of whiskey a day.)

    18. Re:I love you man by Rakarra · · Score: 4, Insightful

      FACT: Alcohol is a poison to the human body. One can fatally overdose from consumption, and it has killed millions in human history.

      You know, you can make the same claim about water. You can easily overdose, it's killed millions, etcetc.

      Your body is a balancing act. The ingestion of any substance beyond your body's ability to process it will cause long-term harm, etcetcetc.

    19. Re:I love you man by king+neckbeard · · Score: 2

      A more accurate description might be that you are more likely to get laid if you are within a standard deviation of intelligence from your target audience.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  2. Brittish Medical Journal, HA! by unixcorn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Consuming alcohol certainly does improve life expectancy. Drinking is the only thing keeping me from killing someone almost every day!

    1. Re:Brittish Medical Journal, HA! by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 2

      Here in Texas that would count double, given the death penalty and all. I wonder if they made a "strong adjustment for psychological remediation" or even "capital punishment prevention", seems like they missed a few confounders in there.

    2. Re:Brittish Medical Journal, HA! by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      "Drinking is the only thing keeping me from killing someone almost every day!"

      For proof, look at the death rate in that one part of the world where for religious reasons nobody drinks and where they can't substitute sex, as in Utah.

  3. Don't believe anything by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The real take home lesson for this is not to put much faith in any observational study. Such studies typically inflate the magnitude of the putative effect (both for 'good' and 'bad'), typically use inappropriate statistical methodology and suffer from various well known sources of bias (as noted in TFA).

    Unfortunately, it makes progress in the medical field very slow and inconsistent since good studies are difficult to impossible to do. Basically, you're gonna die at some point. Within some broad levels of moderation, do what makes you happy. Imbibe what ever makes you feel good.

    Don't sweat the details. Even though we live in a world with horrible chemicals, air pollution, endocrine disrupters, radiation, GMOs and PETA most of the Western world is living longer and healthier than ever. Not that there aren't problems with the world - presumably we can do better, but the constant drumbeat of falling skies can safely be ignored.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    1. Re:Don't believe anything by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The real take home lesson for this is not to put much faith in any observational study.

      Right - there was a study out just a month or two ago that demonstrated that a few specific genotypes process alcohol differently than others and do have a real benefit. No doubt _this_ study was in publication before that one came out.

      Most of these broad pronouncements for a population are worthless - humans aren't so homogenous.

      Still, unless you know you have that genotype, you may be doing yourself harm, especially in regards to cancer, so take it easy on the hootch.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  4. The Pendulum by ScooterComputer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, the pendulum has finally swung back to center, where anyone with an ounce of intellect could have figured it belonged all along. Alcohol isn't "good for you", moderate consumption is neither good nor particularly bad, and overconsumption (as with most things) has consequences. Hysteria on both sides--prohibitionists and snake-oil peddlers--discredited.

    Not surprised.

    --
    Scott
    "Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid."
    1. Re:The Pendulum by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 2

      So, the pendulum has finally swung back to center, where anyone with an ounce of intellect could have figured it belonged all along.

      Until the next study comes along...

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
  5. It changes every week by ZorinLynx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Eggs are bad for you! Eggs are good for you! Meat is bad for you! Meat is good for you! Alcohol is good for you! Alcohol isn't good for you!

    I swear, if you listen to and heed all this advice you will go crazy. I think the best thing to do is ignore all this crap, eat *reasonably* (not too much of any one thing, have a balanced diet) and just ENJOY the things you like, regardless of people saying they're good or bad for you, because life is short anyway and we might as well enjoy it while we have it.

    I see so many eating bland vegan diets, thinking it's so good for them; I doubt any of them will live longer than typical omnivores.

    1. Re:It changes every week by QuietLagoon · · Score: 2

      Eggs are bad for you! Eggs are good for you! Meat is bad for you! Meat is good for you! Alcohol is good for you! Alcohol isn't good for you!...

      Yeah, it's enough to drive one to drinking....

      Maybe there should be a survey done about the effects on longevity based upon whether or not one reads all these "studies".

    2. Re:It changes every week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I see so many eating bland vegan diets, thinking it's so good for them; I doubt any of them will live longer than typical omnivores.

      And now studies are showing that while vegetarians do have a "healthier" weight on average they are overall less healthy and live shorter lives than omnivores.

    3. Re:It changes every week by king+neckbeard · · Score: 2

      Oxygen is literally a poison. It can kill you from acute toxicity and from long term damage. The fact that people like the way it affects their mental state gets many people to ignore the fact that it is poison.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  6. other shocking revelations about alcohol. by nimbius · · Score: 4, Informative

    1. That giant frozen bullet train traveling at six times the speed of sound through crowded metropolitan areas is not only fake, but scientifically impossible.
    2. Budweiser is found with friends and during good times, but is also accompanied by its lesser known entourage blurred vision, karaoke, screaming, and in high levels nudity and parking lot fits of vomiting.
    3. The anthropomorphic frogs could never enunciate a trademarked brand name, and the black screaming "whats up" men were no more than modern day black minstrel charicatures. your black friends cannot be counted on to make this noise as consistently as claimed.
    4. patron, fireball, hennessey, hypnotiq, and hundreds of other brands arent directly marketed to youth. Unless you count about a hundred different songs or more that directly associate them with happiness, friendship, and success.
    5. 7 martinis and a suit makes you a vomiting insurance liability, not james bond.
    6. Dogs and clydesdales do not drink or transport alcohol anymore. Alcohol is transported through a sophisticated network of trucking and trans national freight.
    7. Your government lies to you about alcohol because it enjoys a sizeable degree of revenue from its sale through artificially imposed monopoly, driving checkpoints, fines, and incarceration.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  7. Did they take suicide into account? by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm just saying after a year in the control group I'd have been ready to end it all :)

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  8. Not a study by Tx · · Score: 5, Informative

    Very misleading summary (yeah, duh). This is not a study, it is an editorial. Someone's opinion. It says so right at the top. Note at the bottom of the article; "Provenance and peer review: Commissioned; not externally peer reviewed."

    It's incredibly misleading to cite this article as a "study", all it is is an opinion piece article, nothing more.

    --
    Oh no... it's the future.
    1. Re:Not a study by Tx · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ok, now I've seen the link to the study, I take back what I said above. Sorry, I've been drinking.

      --
      Oh no... it's the future.
  9. Correlation is not Causation (Cliche) by gurps_npc · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Yes, it is a cliche, but an accurate one. It became a cliche because of how often people make the mistake.

    The quiet truth is that if you are sick or have any real health issues, you stop drinking alcohol. Alcohol is a powerful drug that affects your body in many ways. If you are not healthy, you often can not drink it.

    Moreover, most healthy people in the US drink alcohol. It is one of the primary social activities that people engage in. Look at dating events, they almost always alcohol.

    As such, people that do not drink alcohol fall into three general categories. Religious, Sickly, and Ex-Alcoholics.

    So cause and effect were reversed. Being healthy lets you drink alcohol, rather than drinking alcohol making you healthy.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  10. Winston Churchill by goombah99 · · Score: 2, Informative

    +1 And some hate that all the conversations are lost due to alcohool and therefore don't like to socialize with drunken idiots.

    But in the morning I'll be sober and happy, but you will still be bitter.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Winston Churchill by rogoshen1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you're sober and *happy* the morning after drinking; you drank in moderation.
      (Or you're Irish.)

  11. Article debunked here... by shabble · · Score: 5, Interesting

    http://velvetgloveironfist.blo...

    The [lack of health benefits] claim is based on the fact that most of the risk reductions in the latter two tables are not statistically significant, except for women aged 65 and over. But there is a simple reason for this which some cynical people would call a trick. A relatively small sample has been taken and then split into different age groups, sexes and consumption levels to create dozens of even smaller samples. This, combined with the fact that there are relatively few never-drinkers to use as a reference, makes it very difficult to generate statistically significant results from any individual group.

    If you combined the age groups, the reduction in mortality would reach significance. If you combined the genders, it would reach significance. If you combined the various different drinking levels and simply compared those who drank moderately with those who never drank, it would reach significance.

  12. This brought to you by the same people who studied by ihtoit · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Aspartame. Oh wait, no they didn't. They just took the paid-for conclusion by the FDA that ant killer makes a safe substitute for refined sugar.
    Thalidomide. Oh wait, no, they completely ignore the MASSES of evidence of the harmful effects of thalidomide (missing limbs, protruding spinal clusters, etc) and give the go ahead to reintroduce it as a fucking antidepressant!
    Dietery fat and its connection to heart disease. Oh, wait, nope again. Not one single peer reviewed study into the connection at all, ever, anywhere by anybody yet the BMJ continues to publish unfounded claims that fat=bad.
    The resurgence of poliomyelitis and the concurrent (some might say contemporaneous) emergence of a previously little-known condition variously called Lou Gehrig's Disease, ALS, Motor Neurone Disease, Post Polio Residual Paralysis... all sharing the same root cause and displaying shockingly similar symptomology yet the BMJ being an industrial journal pursues the industry line that it's most certainly definitely NOT actually caused by the live polio vaccine in spite of ample evidence that puts it beyond the Black Swan level of anomaly and firmly into the "merits further study" box.

    When somebody says something is impossible, and someone else proves them wrong by a SINGLE proof sample, that's not an anomaly, that's SCIENCE.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  13. Who cares about length of life..... by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Good Bourbon and Whiskey increase the QUALITY of life dramatically.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  14. Re: The health benefit of alcohol by rogoshen1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So if she drives a car, and is pulled over -- what then? Is she similarly not responsible for her actions? Or does alcohol's ability to invalidate someone's decision making ability only apply to sex?

  15. Re:The myth is not its basis by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 2

    I would have thought it was all the walking. Seriously they walk or take public transportation everywhere. Also even though their food is very rich it isn't the laoded with fillers stuff you find in the US but instead it is made with real components of food.

    --
    Time to offend someone
  16. Living with Skeptical Cynicism by fyngyrz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    One thing to keep in mind is this observation: There are three kinds of lies: Lies, damn lies, and statistics.

    Another is that we really don't know how the body works yet, as evidenced by the (still) constantly shifting winds around cholesterol, fats, vitamins, carbohydrates, breast milk, and so on.

    It's also worth keeping in mind that a lot of "official information" (such as the food pyramid, almost anything at all related to the "drug war" and more) is utter nonsense cobbled up for reasons entirely unrelated to your well-being, or lack thereof, and that places ranging from GNC to Walmart have been caught red-handed selling what amounts to sawdust in bottles labeled as various herbs.

    It seems to me that the appropriate behavior WRT one's health at this time is moderation in all consumables of interest, avoidance of things your taste or immune system makes clear to you aren't positive experiences for you, while only really staying clear of things that science has actually nailed to the wall as seriously harmful, such as cocaine, tobacco, meth, any addictive substances (there really aren't all that many of these, it isn't much of an inconvenience to avoid them even if you're into drugs as entertainment.) Pay attention to your body's response to things you ingest. It's a simple enough idea, but one a lot of people simply don't take seriously. Drinking enough to ruin your next morning? Might be an important message in that for you...

    Get regular exercise -- I'm talking every day -- and don't sit at a desk (or anywhere else) for too long at any one time.

    Couple all that with carefully avoiding the legal system (inasmuch as the government spends a great deal of effort trying to turn your personal choices into excuses for jailing you) and you might survive long enough to see science figure out how we actually work -- and I suspect that will arrive at nearly the same time as solutions for the various downsides of this and that.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  17. Re:The myth is not its basis by Quirkz · · Score: 2

    I think you forgot the line about the cosmonauts.

  18. Alcohol is the single biggest problem we face.... by erp_consultant · · Score: 2

    And I say this knowing that most people use alcohol in moderation (1-2 drinks per day). But I also know that alcohol is a massive problem in society. Have a read at this --> http://ncadd.org/index.php/in-...

    If you include deaths from drunk driving then alcohol is the single biggest killer in the United States - ahead of tobacco and all other illicit drugs (cocaine, heroin, etc.) combined. Not to mention assaults, etc. that are often fueled at least in part by alcohol.

    The notion that alcohol has health benefits is complete bunk. Red wine is probably the only one that can even make a case for it, although the amount of anti oxidants present in wine are minuscule at best. Certainly nowhere near that amounts that you would find in dark berry fruits such as cranberries and blueberries.

    So what of the negative effects? Have a read --> http://www.webmd.com/mental-he...

    Alcohol is toxic to human liver cells. If you have 1-2 drinks a day then the amount of toxins are negligible. More than that and there is a good chance that eventually you will develop cirrhosis of the liver. Or cardiovascular disease. Or certain types of cancer.

    I'm not saying that we should ban alcohol or that everyone should stop drinking. It's your body - do with it as you will. But I simply cannot accept the premise that alcohol is "healthy" in any way.

  19. Re: The health benefit of alcohol by rogoshen1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So now men are expected to be mind readers, sussing out a woman's mental state? Are you serious. We're notoriously bad at figuring this out.

    The real problem that YOU'RE tuning out is that women should be treated equally under the law. If a man were to be 'coerced' into drinking, he'd be responsible for his actions (up to, and including calling a fucking cab.) Women should not be excused for poor decision making simply because of consuming a few too many free drinks from the shady dude at the end of the bar.

    Since Slashdot is full of pedantic twats, the situation I am NOT describing is a guy having sex with a girl who's passed out. That's rape, and that's wrong. but a girl who's had a few too many drinks is just as responsible for her body and her actions as a guy in the same situation. Either women are equal to men in terms of agency and responsibility, or they're not. The SJW machine does not get to pick and choose elements of equality to go by.