Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Panic Button a Very Young Child Can Use

First time accepted submitter Zotonian writes My wife is epileptic. Her seizures have been well controlled by medication until recently. My concern is that we have a toddler and infant at home. I've set up cameras so I can monitor the house, but I'm looking for a solution that my 2 year old daughter can hit a button to tell me to look at them if necessary. Most of the options I'm finding off the shelf notify first responders and I'm concerned of the number of false positives a toddler might initiate. Other solutions like cellphones or wearables for kids are too overloaded with unnecessary options like GPS, phone, games, etc. I'd rather have a simple 'push button' solution I can wire into my router that would send me a text or chat message that alerts me to check the cameras. Then if there is an actually emergency I can take the steps from there. I'm looking for cheap and simple. Any suggestions from the Slashdot community?

218 of 327 comments (clear)

  1. wearable for the wife? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How about a smartwatch for the wife. Make a little app the detects erratic arm movements and sends you a text message from her phone when that happens. Then you check in on the camera .

    1. Re:wearable for the wife? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Informative

      Go to eBay and type "wireless panic button". There are plenty of options for under $100. Here is a panic button + watch that sends an SMS message to up to 5 numbers.

    2. Re:wearable for the wife? by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 2

      That won't work, as approaching a seizing epileptic is a good way to get a very sore slap, even for an adult. A two year old who gets hit by a fitting adult could be very seriously injured.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    3. Re:wearable for the wife? by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

      COOL!! I love that idea! Too bad you posted as AC, I'd be PMing you to ask where I can send a pizza to for that one!

    4. Re:wearable for the wife? by RevWaldo · · Score: 1

      A quick search and...

      http://www.epdetect.com/

      Could be good, could be lousy.

      .

    5. Re:wearable for the wife? by Taed · · Score: 1

      Or a smart phone that she carries on her person (e.g. shirt pocket or on an arm band) that alerts when it is no longer vertical, such as if she's on the ground or slumped over?

    6. Re:wearable for the wife? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Make a little app the detects erratic arm movements

      It seems that your mental map of "epileptic" requires a symptom of "movement", possibly even of "erratic movement", or even "flailing about thrashing the landscape and foaming at the mouth".

      The OP didn't describe the symptoms of his wife's epilepsy, or even if the symptoms are the same from fit to fit. Many people with epilepsy do not have any noticeable "erratic" movements, twitching, tremor (that's possibly Parkinson's you're thinking about - a different neurological condition) or other physical symptoms. If they happen to be sitting down at the time of taking a fit, then it's quite hard to tell the difference between them having fallen asleep (or drifted off into some inner world of attention) and them having a fit. Even taking 5 minutes to slump to the desk in mid-meeting is hard to distinguish between someone bored to unconsciousness by the Boss and having a fit because their medication is too strong for their particular chemistry that day.

      Epilepsy is a multi-symptom disease. Your measurement criterion would only work for one of the less-common cases.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. Dog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Get a trained dog instead

    1. Re:Dog by plover · · Score: 1

      Get a trained dog instead

      My dog doesn't have a service interface that can trigger a camera or send an SMS. Of course, she's not terribly well trained, either, but I am not sure what kind of WiFi signal strength she'd have even after training.

      --
      John
    2. Re:Dog by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 4, Informative

      An epilepsy service dog can be trained to activate an alarm, such as LifeLine. It will also position itself between her and the toddler so the toddler doesn't get hurt. Just the knowledge that the dog CAN do this for her will lower everyone's stress levels.

      A lot more dependable than some cobbled-together system that relies on a toddler, and that could lead to ugly questions about negligence. While the dogs are expensive, there are organizations that pay for the training.

      Next time, why not ask her doctor or the doctor's secretary?

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    3. Re:Dog by s.petry · · Score: 1, Funny

      The dog may not be enough to prevent negligence charges if something happens to the child given the known condition of his wife and state of her medications. IANAL, but even if I was a Lawyer I would advise adult supervision until she was back to stabilized with medication.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    4. Re:Dog by Buchenskjoll · · Score: 2

      And in my neighbourhood you are not allowed to have wireless dogs running around.

      --
      -- Make America hate again!
    5. Re:Dog by ExecutorElassus · · Score: 1

      I really wish you could give more than five points for good commentary. This guy's trying to build a gadget for a toddler, when a trained dog will be much more effective.

      Come to think of it, everybody should have dogs instead of gadgets and toddlers. They make us better people (usually, unless we really really suck at being people to begin with).

    6. Re:Dog by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Next time, why not ask her doctor or the doctor's secretary?

      And failing that, the doctor's secretary's husband's tennis partner.

      You obviously have no idea what the job of a medical secretary entails.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    7. Re:Dog by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Thanks. Just ask anyone who's seriously vision-impaired or has a therapy dog how effective they are. Plus the toddler will get a real kick out of the dog.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    8. Re: Dog by tbuddy · · Score: 1

      Kids are more expensive than dogs. You can write off service dogs as medical expense including purchase, training, feeding, and vet bills in the US. A friend had the community give over $5,000 of the $10,000 to buy his daughter's diabetic service dog. People are generally more compassionate at least in this area about helping foot the costs of a service animal than an insulin pump or monitor. Old Yeller tugs at the heart strings more than Johnny 5.

    9. Re:Dog by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I wasn't trying to get karma (I'm pretty much always at the cap :-) It's just that we always try to find technical solutions to problems in the same sense that when all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.

      Going the technical route is going to result in a "solution" with more and more points of failure as we try to build in more safeguards for false alarms, or no alarm (for example, who's going to push the button when the toddler is taking a nap? Install cameras everywhere and have someone monitor it? There's not always going to be a monitor available, so write up some software that can send an alarm if the cameras see a problem. Power failure? UPS. Internet down? Fallback to cellular network.) A dog is so much simpler and better, and as you point out, gives her a level of autonomy that isn't possible with a button in the home that a toddler has to push.

      Dogs are life savers. It's like I told my therapist (for PTSD), I'd be dead by now if it weren't for mine. It's an unpleasant truth (to be even partially dependent on a dog), but it's also a wonderful truth (that it's even possible). Just depends on how you look at it. Nothing to be ashamed of.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    10. Re:Dog by Lemmeoutada+Collecti · · Score: 1

      And we don't want to forget the other benefits a well trained service dog provides:

      They don't require wifi, internet, or electricity. By law (in the US) it can go anywhere she can go, and can do so on its own.
      They are self recharging - they typically sleep on their handler's schedule. They will still wake up if something happens when they are asleep, and can still respond.
      It can be trained to alert medical responders, guard her from others if she collapses in public, and protect the public from accidental injury.
      Seizure dogs can often detect a seizure well before the person goes into a full grand mal state, and move the person against a wall so that they do not fall and hurt themselves.
      They can also help the person remain calm (by being dogs) which may help reduce the chances of an episode.

      And when they are at home, they are still dogs, so can play, cuddle, and love your family like any dog.

      --

      You can have it fast, accurate, or pretty. Pick any 2.
    11. Re:Dog by meustrus · · Score: 1

      What's with all the disrespect for secretaries? Have you never been in an office with one, or do you just assume that an office of a dozen plus people just magically holds itself together? A secretary answers the phones, keeps things organized, keeps the copiers stocked, and above all knows enough about their coworkers' business as to tell the difference between a question that can be simply answered and one that needs the coworker's attention. A doctor's expertise is quite a bit more advanced than fielding the same question coming from dozens of people, and that doctor's time is more valuable being spent on things that actually require a judgment call. And while secretaries won't know why patient X needs X medication (at least not until spending years on the job and learning by osmosis), you can be sure that secretaries know every single prescription made because the doctor will have tasked them with sending them all to the pharmacy.

      Secretaries spend their entire workday making everyone else around them more productive. It is not something a monkey could do. It is not something every person could do either. And they know an awful lot more about the work their coworkers do then you think. These people silently keep the world running smoothly. The least you could do is say "thank you" instead of running around like a snarky asshole acting like what they do amounts to nothing.

      --
      I sometimes ask revealing, often ignorant-seeming questions. Maybe they're harder to answer than you think.
    12. Re: Dog by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Service dogs cost a lot of money, which is why volunteer associations and service dog organizations do fund-raising - so that they can provide a trained dog for free. You would have known that if you had followed the link I posted when I made the suggestion.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    13. Re:Dog by deadweight · · Score: 1

      YES! +1000 The dog will give the wife enough warning to push the button herself usually. My friends son started having seizures and the first time the dog went for help even without being trained to do so.

  3. SmartThings has a panic button by mveloso · · Score: 1

    It's a bit heavyweight, but SmartThings has a panic button and via an IFTT integration can SMS you when it's pushed.

  4. The bttn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    This product may be what you are looking for

    http://bt.tn/

    A big red button connected to the net that can do whatever you want

    1. Re:The bttn by fhage · · Score: 2

      This product may be what you are looking for

      http://bt.tn/

      A big red button connected to the net that can do whatever you want

      This. I was thinking a Raspberry Pi stuffed inside a Staples "Easy Button".

    2. Re:The bttn by brokenin2 · · Score: 2

      Yeah.. I'm thinking use the GPIO on the Pi to kick off a script that takes a picture (either from one of the existing cameras, or the camera module on the PI) and sends you an image of the button getting pressed... and maybe some others as well..

      There's a lot of info on programming the Pi with GPIO, and a handy little python library waiting to go..

    3. Re:The bttn by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      you know what's funny? raspberry pi is cheaper...

      bt.tn is a nice plastic design if you like '80s design and colors though. but for being a connected button it really is expensive.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:The bttn by POPE+Mad+Mitch · · Score: 1

      Cheaper again, ESP8266 wifi board, the NodeMCU firmware is very easy to program with, write a script that on wakeup it connects to wifi and makes a http request to your alerting system, or sends an email, or whatever, then shuts it down to 'deep sleep until reset' wire the big button to the reset line. costs just a few quid, its being hardware reset to wake it up so less chance of it failing, and should run off batteries for months if not years.

  5. Arduino Panic Button by netelder · · Score: 5, Interesting

    http://www.instructables.com/id/Desk-Panic-Button/?ALLSTEPS

    1. Re:Arduino Panic Button by Thantik · · Score: 2

      So, I take it this reply is you volunteering to go to work for their family and pay their bills? Removing him of all obligation so he can "you know ... BE A FUCKING PARENT"? Fact of the matter is, someone has to work. Someone has to pay bills.

    2. Re:Arduino Panic Button by hondo77 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or, he could, you know ... BE A FUCKING PARENT.

      I'm thinking dad is working (so he can earn, you know, a fucking paycheck to buy fucking food and keep a fucking roof over their fucking heads) while mom is at home being a parent (unless she can't because she's having a fucking seizure).

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    3. Re:Arduino Panic Button by dave562 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I was not going to be the first one to say it, but the exact same thought passed through my head.

      This guy has a wife with a serious illness AND a two year old child. His solution is to make it possible for his two year old to keep an eye on his wife.

      What kind of long term trauma is that going to cause? "Now Sally, keep a close eye on your mom because it is on you to make sure that when she starts convulsing that you make sure daddy is aware of it." What kind of sick person puts that responsibility on a toddler?

    4. Re:Arduino Panic Button by NicBenjamin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Calm down.

      His wife's eyes are on the kid. But Mom has epilepsy, so it's statistically likely that eventually she'll have a seizure while she's the only grown-up at home. The solution back when I was growing up would have been something along the lines of "go to the neighbor lady down the street, and she'll decide whether to call the police" but nowadays it could easily be "ping dad with a technological doohickey and he'll decide."

    5. Re:Arduino Panic Button by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What kind of sick person puts that responsibility on a toddler?

      You know nothing about him, his wife, or his situation. Some people have severe epilepsy attacks, but others have milder attacks that they quickly recover from. Just because he is trying to make a situation safer, doesn't imply that the original situation was dangerous.

      What if instead of an epileptic, he was worried about his elderly mother falling or having a heart attack? Do you think it would be negligent for him to install a panic button, and teach his daughter how to use it, just in case grandma has an accident?

    6. Re:Arduino Panic Button by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      The mother is watching the kid, and the kid is watching the parent. The issue is that sometimes the mother can't be a panic button, and so the 2 year old can help.

      There's nothing in this that screams "horrible parent."

    7. Re:Arduino Panic Button by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      What kind of long term trauma is that going to cause?

      None.

      Which sort of makes the rest of your point moot.

      First, reread the summary:

      I've set up cameras so I can monitor the house [...]

      Thus, he is monitoring the house and his wife. This button is the equivalent of a "Daddy!" yell. So if the child sees that Mom is convulsing, she can hit the "Daddy!" button and Daddy will look in to see what's going on, just in case he was away from his computer or was looking at something else (eg, code).

      Frankly, this is a reality in their household and it's best that the child knows what to do. Giving kids responsibility isn't a bad thing. Depending on a two year old to be responsible isn't necessary the smartest move, I would agree. But that's what the cameras are for.

      Actually, I'd also go for the arm-band with an accelerometer or something. So if she's having a seizure, it can signal him to look at the camera as well. Don't know how many false positives it can generate--is the wife Italian?

    8. Re:Arduino Panic Button by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      "Ill" = "bad parent", does it? Should ill parents all have their children taken into care immediately? What other illnesses count? Do we protect children of diabetics from the trauma of seeing mummy inject herself every day? Are deaf people only allowed to look after their own kids if there's someone in the room to hear the child shout "HELP!"? Mild heart murmurs? We can't be sure that that won't trigger a heart attack with no warning....

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    9. Re:Arduino Panic Button by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      BE A FUCKING PARENT.

      How would having younger siblings help?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re:Arduino Panic Button by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      A panic button could be rather comforting for a young child. They pick up the emotions of adults, and if not already will soon become away that their mother has a potentially serious health issue.

      "Don't worry Sally, if you are ever scared or worried about mummy just press this button, and daddy will look in on you, okay?"

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:Arduino Panic Button by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      I was not going to be the first one to say it, but the exact same thought passed through my head.

      This guy has a wife with a serious illness AND a two year old child. His solution is to make it possible for his two year old to keep an eye on his wife.

      What kind of long term trauma is that going to cause? "Now Sally, keep a close eye on your mom because it is on you to make sure that when she starts convulsing that you make sure daddy is aware of it." What kind of sick person puts that responsibility on a toddler?

      Someone who is doing the best he can with what he and his family have to work with.

      You of course, having similar challenges in your life, have achieved perfection and thus have the right to criticize someone else.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    12. Re:Arduino Panic Button by Zeromous · · Score: 3, Interesting

      When my kid was 2, she was at grandmas when she had an aneurysm. Luckily grandpa was home. Far from scarring, my kid actually had a fascinating life experience, and opened a dialogue about emergencies, first responders, what to do if something bad happens and they are alone. My kid still recalls it today as a positive, but very unfortunate circumstance.

      Kids are far more resilient than your average parent gives them credit for. I'm proud of the way my kid handled it.

      --
      ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
    13. Re:Arduino Panic Button by werepants · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You seem to suggest that putting responsibility on a person is a psychologically damaging thing. I disagree, and I think simple responsibilities are great and healthy at any age. This is a difficult situation, but these seizures might happen at most once or twice a year - are you really saying that the child can never be alone with her mother, ever, on the off chance that a seizure hits? Seizures would be potentially traumatic and scary, but there would be no way of sheltering her from them without taking such dramatic measures.

      I've got a 2-year-old at home, and she would be perfectly capable of understanding "if Mommy falls down or gets hurt, push this button and Daddy will come help". This is certainly much better than crossing your fingers and hoping it won't happen again.

  6. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nobody on these forums can offer you legal advice but what you're asking sounds like a good way to get your kid taken away.

    1. Re:No by sumdumass · · Score: 3, Insightful

      An infant and 2 year old aren't exactly capable of taking care of themselves. If the person supervising them is in a position where due to medical reasons, they might not be able to supervise them, some busybody can complain they are in harms way which will get CPS involved and they like taking kids until you jump through hoops of fire backwards with your eyes closed while reciting some latin poem.

      No, seriously. You would not believe how much trouble CPS or your local equivilant can be. Hell, there have been stories of CPS getting involved because 4 and 5 year old were playing in a fenced in bavk yard and the parent was watching them through a window from inside the house. Called it neglect.

    2. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Leaving your children in a home where the "responsible adult" really needs a live-in nurse. Kids get taken away because mothers take a nap and the kids walk down the street alone. A seizure sounds worse than a nap.

    3. Re:No by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Better to put them into daycare, or find someone else with similar-age kids and both people baby-sit all the kids at the same time. Also, you really don't want to put that sort of responsibility on a two-year-old. Better to get a service dog that can alert others by doing exactly what you want.

      Service Dogs

      They make great pets and loyal companions, but did you know dogs can also be trained to help people with epilepsy? While service dogs are often associated with people who have visual impairments, seizure alert dogs are becoming more and more popular around the world. Their calm demeanour and safety training gives people the confidence to live independently.

      Some common tasks that trainers can teach the dog include:

      staying close to the person with epilepsy to prevent injury
      fetching medication or a telephone
      alerting a caretaker
      activating an emergency call system (e.g. pushing a Lifeline button)
      “blocking” a wandering person (usually during absence seizures and complex partial seizures) from walking into dangerous areas (Keep in mind that dogs cannot tell whether an action, like walking onto a street or down the stairs, is intentional or not.)

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    4. Re:No by AK+Marc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I know lots of epileptics. I've never known a single one with a live-in nurse. Even the blind one I know lives alone.

    5. Re:No by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Nobody said to use the infant for the caretaker for a sick parent. Why do so many people blantently lie to make someone who's trying to improve a situation seem bad?

    6. Re:No by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The father is watching them through web cams. But he's nervous about missing something, so he's looking for another backup plan. Apparently looking into a second (or third or fourth) backup plan is the same as not having a plan at all. At least to the lying A/Cs.

    7. Re:No by s.petry · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Nobody is asking for the nurse for the adult with epilepsy. People are asking for an adult because of the sole 2 year old at home with an epileptic currently having difficulties with their medication and suffering seizures.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    8. Re:No by s.petry · · Score: 1

      What is _his_ drive time from work to home? Mom has a seizure and there is a 2 year old with no capable/coherent adult present for that duration. I'm not confident you know much about, or have researched the potential severity of an epileptic seizure. It's not like mom having to throw up and leaving the kid for a minute to do so.. seizures have a long recovery time and frequently require hospitalization. Seizures are not just emotionally traumatic, the victim can flail violently enough to throw furniture, break their own bones, and cause severe physical injury to anyone close to them.

      The only person lying is you, though perhaps due to ignorance and not considering the complete situation. He is not improving a bad situation, he is putting a 2 year old in danger with his current arrangement and a panic button won't change that fact.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    9. Re:No by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Actually I need to correct myself too, because it's no just the 2 year old at home alone with a person that puts them in jeopardy. There is an infant in the equation as well, so this is much worse.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    10. Re:No by sjames · · Score: 2

      The fact is that any person can unexpectedly drop at any time. Thankfully, it's uncommon but if we're being honest nobody can preclude the possibility. At least his house will have a ready made "Daddy! button".

      As for CPS, they are essentially an unpredictable predatory force. Nobody can guess what might set them off or when they will ignore an obviously harmful situation.

    11. Re:No by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      Or he could be like me. Working from a home office but with sound proofing so that the general noises of your young family don't get heard by clients on the phone. He has webcams setup to realtime monitor but he also has to work. So having the ability of the two year old to hit a panic button that brings you running sounds like a great idea.

      Every now and again I hear my youngest scream like she has been dropped in a vat of boiling acid. I don't go running for two reasons, first is I know she is with mum. Second is 99% of the time it is because her big sister wouldn't give her the toy, sticker, food, cup, imaginary friend. A panic button however would cause me to drop everything and run.

    12. Re:No by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The video will let him watch the cameras to keep an eye on the children. He can then summon assistance if a situation requires it. Why is trying to keep your family safe a bad thing?

    13. Re:No by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      Nobody is asking for the nurse for the adult with epilepsy.

      What, you can't be bothered to read the post I'm replying to?

      "Leaving your children in a home where the "responsible adult" really needs a live-in nurse. "

      It's not like everyone on the planet can't just scroll up and see that you are 100% provably wrong.

      People are asking for an adult because of the sole 2 year old at home with an epileptic currently having difficulties with their medication and suffering seizures.

      So an adult isn't an adult if they have epilepsy. Would you prefer he quit his job so he can stay home and go on welfare? Or should they hire adults to be there at all times, bankrupting them? Really, which works best? Forced sterilization of everyone with epilepsy would fix this problem. Would that work for you?

    14. Re:No by s.petry · · Score: 1

      If that was the case I believe he would have called it out.. he would probably not have to ask for a technical solution to what he could do with a baby monitor and no rigging too.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    15. Re:No by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I'm claiming that you are being an idiot if you claim adult supervision is "unsupervised" because you can conceive of some scenario where something bad could happen.

    16. Re:No by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      As for CPS, they are essentially an unpredictable predatory force. Nobody can guess what might set them off or when they will ignore an obviously harmful situation.

      And that sort of (completely understandable) hostility is taken by a lot of child protection officers as evidence that you've got something to hide....

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    17. Re:No by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I had a service cat once, but the service was rubbish... Unless maybe I was the service human. Yeah, that makes more sense.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    18. Re:No by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      The fact is that any person can unexpectedly drop at any time.

      Yes. But in this case, the person is, in fact, *expected* to drop and become insensate. Huge difference.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    19. Re:No by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      So you think a person having some variety of epileptic seizure is capable of providing supervision to an infant and a two-year-old?

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    20. Re:No by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      So when the two year old starts sticking a toy into an electrical socket, or decides to make dinner 'just like mommy/daddy' while Mommy is having a seizure, or whatever, what's daddy going to do?

      You've never raised children, have you?

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    21. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...If the person supervising them is in a position where due to medical reasons, they might not be able to supervise them...

      Isn't that just about anyone, except maybe Superman? I mean, I have a common medical condition called sleepiness-big-feet-and-necessary-darkness-so-the-kids-go-to-sleep (diagnosed around about the time we had kids). It means that I might fall down the stairs while I'm the only adult in the house with the kids. If such a thing were to happen, the kids would essentially have to fend for themselves until another adult arrives, which could be the next morning, or possibly the one after that. If they happened to be sleeping at the time, that would probably mean they'd have to sit in their cots, with the lights off for the whole time, as they can't yet climb out, and certainly can't operate lightswitches without being lifted up to reach them.

    22. Re:No by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      There are organizations that pay for the service dog and its' training (and training the owner), and, unlike a cobbled-together alarm, the batteries don't run out.

      Day care not so much, because then we're treating the mother as if she's disabled, rather than helping her overcome the problem and lead a normal life. If there's one thing that people with disabilities hate, it's not being permitted to live a normal life.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    23. Re:No by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Well, cats are like dogs in many ways. For example, just like dogs, if you want them to come running just run the an opener for a couple of seconds. Or if you want them to rub up against you just get dressed for an important meeting and they'll quickly make sure you're covered in fur. And they'll hork up a furball at 3am to get you out of bed. About the only diff is that dogs don't occasionally sleep on your head at night.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    24. Re:No by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      And i assume that you could gate the stairs or even sleep downstairs if it wasn't possible for anoyher adult to be around. Either way, you can take strps to mitigate the dangers where an epileptic having a siezure- not so much.

      But here is the question. Would you leave a todler and infant in the care of a bed ridden 95 year old double leg amputee who is sedated most of the time? How about a non functional alcohiolic who has just finished a pint of wild turkey and chased it with a 12 pack of malt liquor? I would hope not. So if it is likely or even possible enough that you are trying to figure out how a 2 year old can alert you when their caregiver becomes the motive or functional equivilant, you got some problems that require a little more thought than placing the life of a person jn the hands of a todler (even if it is a smart todler).

      Something as trivial as monitoring the caregiver directly is a much better option. But having a neighbor check in every so often or the caregiver text a number every 30 min or something would be better than relying on a young child. But i can almost guarentee you that no matter how well we justify it, no matter what aafeguards are in place, some busybody will not think it is enough and CPS will assume the worst causing a hassle that would make you wish you were charged with a felony instead.

    25. Re:No by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      And if there's one thing that everyone else hates, it's paying to help disabled people.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    26. Re:No by sjames · · Score: 1

      That's not in evidence. Perhaps the wife had a single seizure break through followed by an increase in medication and the doctor has said he expects no more but can't guarantee it 100%.

      We don't even know what type of seizures she has.

    27. Re:No by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Well, the original story says 'Her seizures have been well controlled by medication until recently.' Therefore, they are actively expecting more, and they're bad enough that he feels the need to have remote surveillance.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    28. Re:No by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Your plan is unworkable because nobody meets the definition of being able to supervise their kids 100% of the time. Your position would indicate that when a parent is having gastroenteritis and is stuck in the bathroom for 5 minutes several times a day with explosive diarrhea and the heaves that she is unduly endangering the kids and another adult should be present.

      Or that someone who is taking insulin can't perform as a parent because they may pass out for up to an hour from hypoglycemia. It happens, people deal with it. A properly-trained service dog can provide early detection to help the person avoid fainting, as well as push an alarm button if necessary.

      Contrast those scenarios with the current one: most seizures last a minute or a minute and a half. A seizure dog can keep the kids away from her during this time period so that they don't get hurt.

      Life cannot be made 100% safe, and we have to deal with it however we can. In the meantime, since her medication isn't doing the complete job, I'm sure she'll see her specialist to see what can be don.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    29. Re:No by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      There is no blatent lie. Who is looking after the two year old and infant if the mother is having a seizure? Clearly the seizures are enough of a problem that he wants to put a panic button in the house for a 2 year old child to operate! It's a shitty situation to be in for sure, but there simply needs to be another adult in the house.

      Gee whiz - so the next time you're stuck on the toilet with gastro several times a day you can't supervise your kids, and you need to have another adult in the house. Totally absurd when you consider most seizures last less then a minute and a half.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    30. Re:No by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1
      That's ignorant. Most seizures are under a minute to a minute and a half. Parents with insulin-dependent diabetes can pass out for a LOT longer than that due to hypoglycemia, but nobody's saying "OMG Here's what can happen. Bad parent!"

      And most parents are smart enough to have made the wall sockets child-resistant.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    31. Re:No by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      So you think that a person who might pass out from hypoglycemia due to an insulin miscalculation isn't capable of providing supervision for an infant and a two-year-old? News flash - diabetics do it all the time.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    32. Re:No by sjames · · Score: 1

      Not in evidence.

      It could as easily mean she had one seizure after 10 years without and in an abundance of caution they want to add monitors.

      What is it these days with making assumptions that would explode William of Occam's head and then condemning people for it as if it was verified fact?

    33. Re:No by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      The key word in your argument is "potential." There are many different types of seizures, and most don't require hospitalization - the person will have come out of it well before an ambulance can get there and fully recover in between 10 minutes to a half hour. It's most likely that the next seizure (if it happens) will be like the previous ones, so they know what to expect.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    34. Re:No by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I've got two children and have been in a situation similar to the one in question here. You are an idiot.

      You think that the kids seeing mommy have a seizure will sprint to the kitchen to burn the house down? In practice, they will act more like dogs, hanging around their master and licking his face if they perceive a problem.

      And daddy with the webcams has the numbers for the police and a helpful stay-at-home neighbor on speeddial. Someone can be there helping out at a moment's notice. He's just looking for help identifying the moments that's necessary.

      You've never had a life have you? Never been in the situation where the parents must either quit their job, or leave the children alone for 2 hours? Or are you a stay at home mom who hates anyone who can't make the 100% dedication to their kids that you did and you regret now, having lost a chunk of life to the kids, you'll never have a real job?

      My kids have *never* stuck a toy in an electrical socket. And the 8 year old can make dinner like mommy and daddy now, but never tried without supervision until he was old enough to do it. That you raise your children so poorly also says plenty about you. Perhaps you aren't the best person to take advice from.

    35. Re:No by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      No. I don't believe that, nor did I ever say that.

    36. Re:No by s.petry · · Score: 1

      To your first point: He does not need someone else in the house 100% of the time, he needs someone during the time he is at work or away for extended periods of time. No, an epileptic seizure in the severe tonic-clonic category is absolutely nothing like having to take an emergency bowel movement. I'm really trying to think of something medically that compares, and can't. Diabetic people (your next example) can be auto-monitored and auto-medicated. The most frightening thing about epilepsy is that it's completely unpredictable and seizures do not require warnings.

      To your next point, I very much doubt any medical professional would green light his solution. In fact I would like to see a Doctors answer to his question. Will any doctor guarantee that her next seizure will not be a severe grand mal? What if her history is that she only has tonic-clonic seizures, he never specified what type or duration.. he only said "he felt horrible because he was not there" and "she had a seizure". You are assuming the best possible scenario, which in a way I appreciate. I don't agree with you, but I do appreciate your point of view.

      To your last point: I fully agree that life can't be made 100% safe, life is all about risk vs. result decisions. In this case, while the risk may it is real. Further even with the risk low, the result of a worse case scenario is absolutely catastrophic. The biggest victims in that result are two small children who can not understand nor accept risks for themselves. In fact, it seems like the two year old is being pushed into a huge responsibility.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    37. Re:No by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Not in evidence.

      True, true, but not a completely unreasonable inference.

      It could as easily mean she had one seizure after 10 years without and in an abundance of caution they want to add monitors. What is it these days with making assumptions that would explode William of Occam's head and then condemning people for it as if it was verified fact?

      Erring on the side of caution. Though, to be fair, your 'once in ten years' statement is about as hyperbolic as 'OMG two hour seizures and the kids are instantly smoking crack!'

      Honestly, the guy should have left all of the details out, and just asked about something that can detect a circuit closing and do something about it. Enclosure contacts are a cheap and bog-standard thing. But, without the salacious details to rile everybody up, would the question of landed on the front page?

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    38. Re:No by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Again, you are looking at worst-case scenarios when there is no indication that such is the case. To the contrary, there is no tone of urgency or immanent danger, and she has been well controlled for quite a time. So are the kids in danger now? Not really.

      Diabetic people (your next example) can be auto-monitored and auto-medicated. The most frightening thing about epilepsy is that it's completely unpredictable and seizures do not require warnings.

      Not all the time - mistakes happen. I've passed out a few times, and the last time I tried to stand up in the kitchen, and BANG. No warning whatsoever, due to interference with another medication. Must have tried to get up again, because both sides of my body had bruises. Also, the kitchen floor is tile, so I had a nice concussion for a few weeks. And I hit the chair seat with my head on the way down, so a really, really sore sore neck. I was out for a bit more than an hour, and when I woke up I went to bed to sleep it all off. That's not the only time I've ended up with a concussion - so I guess it's a good thing I've got something of a hard head :-)

      Like most ask slashdots, the user didn't post enough info, and isn't posting responses to provide that info, possibly because of all the crazies saying they are unfit parents. They aren't. If anything, cameras all over the place is overkill. A seizure alert dog can signal for help in less time than it takes for him to get the alarm, log into his video server, check the web cams, and then call for help. Also the seizure alert dog will prevent the kids from getting too close and maybe getting a good whack. No electronic solution can do that, and doesn't require action from the kids, who will probably be freaking out.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    39. Re:No by sjames · · Score: 1

      Really? You want to blame the author for the shitfest?

      Abundance of caution used to mean not shitting on people until you were reasonably certain they needed shitting on. You know, not being an asshole.

      It takes a lot of effort to turn TFA into anything resembling salacious.

    40. Re:No by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Again, you are looking at worst-case scenarios when there is no indication that such is the case. To the contrary, there is no tone of urgency or immanent danger, and she has been well controlled for quite a time. So are the kids in danger now? Not really.

      Serious question. Are you a Medical Doctor specializing in Epilepsy and approving of the person's proposed solution? I did talk to a couple MD's today who don't use Slashdot (nor would they post an opinion here) who said this guy was nuts. I'm wondering if you have expertise that they lack. They were not neurologists, let alone specialists in epilepsy. Just a couple of general practice doctors. Hell, if you are a Neurologist point me to an article.

      Assuming you are not a neurologist or MD, even if his wife was under control, the nature of the disorder is such that medication can stop working without warning. The only way a person would know their medication stopped working is to have a seizure. At this point she should be under surveillance, and his solution does provide surveillance for her. He has solved the lowest risk portion of the problem.

      Not all the time - mistakes happen. I've passed out a few times, and the last time I tried to stand up in the kitchen, and BANG. No warning whatsoever, due to interference with another medication. Must have tried to get up again, because both sides of my body had bruises.

      That really sucks, and I'm sincerely sorry to hear about something like that happening. On the other hand, I believe this provides the foundation for an example of similar conditions which I previously lacked.

      Imagine that you could not stop taking the medications for a year or two. It's the only medication you can get and your life depends on taking them. Given that scenario every time you moved quickly you were at risk of passing out and hitting your head. Would you trust yourself as the sole care for an infant for 9-10 hours a day with a two year old under your care as well?

      I think more importantly, would a doctor tell you to get some help until either A) the kids were in school so the risk duration was shorter, or B) everything was under control and you were not risk of passing out any longer? Or would they say "ahh, it's fine."

      I'm pretty sure we both know the answer to these questions. No, nobody wants bad things to happen and yes, you are going to try and be careful. That does not matter, because it only takes one lapse in thought for you to kill an infant. One emergency situation where you have to jump and you could fall on top of a baby. Intent does not matter at that point, you had a huge amount of known risk that you did not mitigate properly. No MD in the world would approve that situation, and I don't honestly know any parents that would either.

      I do like your epilepsy dog, I think it's an awesome thought when the kids are older. It does not reduce the biggest physical risk however, which is the infant. There is no way to guarantee that if mom has a seizure she will have enough time to set the infant down, let alone not fall and land on top of the infant. A dog can not intervene at the highest risk moment.

      My biggest concern for the two year old is not physical harm, though that is also a risk. Children mimic what they see, and parents hug and cradle kids to make them feel better. A mom having seizures and a two year old next to them is a frightening proposition. Even if you tell them "don't go near mom when X" they are not developed enough to make those types of distinctions.

      My real concern is that the two year old will feel massive guilt if something bad happens, even if they hit his proposed panic button. No, I didn't run into any Psychologists today. If I had, I would guarantee that they would have been as appalled as the MD's with what this guy is asking for help with. That much trauma would be hard enough on a teenager, it would be devastating for a two year old.

      Yup, the guy could hav

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    41. Re:No by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Unless the MDs specialized in this area, their opinion is as qualified, or unqualified, as mine. One of my sisters got into it with me over the way my endocrinologist and various other specialists were handling my case, going to the point of talking about it to several doctors who stopped by the pharmacy she works at. They said my doctors were wrong. I asked her if they were specialists, and how they can give an accurate opinion (which contradicts the unanimous opinion of half a dozen specialists) without actually seeing me.

      The fact is that the two doctors you talked to today were absolutely not able to give a qualified opinion because they have neither seen the patient nor her file.

      Life doesn't come with 100% guarantees. There's no guarantee that anybody won't have a seizure or stroke or heart attack or faint form one or another causes; it's about risk management.

      You need to let this go, or at least try to be constructive and / or supportive. There is nothing in any post to indicate that she's having grand mal seizures (or even more than one seizure recently after 9 years being seizure-free), and it's also irrelevant how far away he is.

      Why? Because, as I pointed out before, most seizures pass after a minute or two, and then the worst side effects are gone within half an hour. And in the worse case scenario, he can call 9-1-1.

      People aren't banned from higher-risk activities such as driving because of something that "might happen." We don't ban insulin-dependent diabetics who are well controlled from driving, even though we are at higher risk of hypoglycemic events which can cause confusion, changes in vision, temporary loss of vision, passing out, etc.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    42. Re:No by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Do you honestly think 'Hey, I'm looking for a way to wire up a button to trigger an SMS or email' would have gotten posted?

      I don't. That's a google search. That's a solved issue.

      But: "Hey, my epileptic wife who's medication doesn't work so well any more stays home all day with my baby and two-year-old, and I need the two-year-old to be able to push a PANIC button in case mommy has a bad seizure! How can I roll my own?" Now that, my friend, that brings in the page views.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    43. Re:No by s.petry · · Score: 1

      I respect your opinion, and appreciate the perspective and courteous dialogue. We have to agree to disagree on this one. More details from him, and I might agree with you completely. I sincerely hope the guy at least takes your advice and at least gets a trained dog into the house, again I think that would alleviate half of the high risk concerns. That was a great call!

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    44. Re:No by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Thanks. No problemo :-)

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  7. Spot Messenger by zippity8 · · Score: 1

    A spot messenger is fairly simple and enables you to locate them wherever they may be.

    http://www.findmespot.com/en/i...

    1. Re:Spot Messenger by plover · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the Spot has more than just the one button. There is a button that sends the equivalent of "OMG MY PLANE HAS CRASHED INTO AN AVALANCHE ON A VOLCANO AND O GOD SEND THE RESCUE SQUADS NOW!!!" to whatever emergency agency is available. Not the kind of thing you ought to place in your two-year-old child's hands.

      --
      John
  8. iSocket by rmdingler · · Score: 1
    They make an plugin alarm that notifies you via cellphone when a power interruption occurs (and when it is restored).

    Wire it through a light switch (to an outlet) at a height your toddler can comfortably reach. Your home may already have a switchleg-activated plug for table lighting.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  9. Smartthings by FF-Loucks · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Get a hub and a door/window sensor or the starter kit. Put the door / window sensor on a cabinet door and tell your daughter to open that door if mommy has a problem (you could put a teddy bear or something in there that she should take to mommy ONLY if mommy is having issues). Then, using the smart app, you can have that alert you anytime the cabinet is opened. Should be less than $150 or so and now you have the start of home automation as well.

    1. Re:Smartthings by hodet · · Score: 1

      This is brilliant.

    2. Re:Smartthings by Harlequin80 · · Score: 2

      Damn it if I hadn't already posted I would mod this up. Works to a child's psychology as well.

    3. Re:Smartthings by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      I suspect you'd get false positive every day, as kids love to open and close cabinets, especially if you're going to put a teddy bear inside.

      But yeah, great idea.

    4. Re:Smartthings by mtrachtenberg · · Score: 1

      The "open this door" is a great idea. Another approach might be a sound sensor and/or vibration sensor that will send out the message. That way, if your two year old starts crying hysterically or your wife screams or (possibly) your wife falls hard, you'll get a notification.

  10. A couple of ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Two year olds are going to take naps and such. You cannot count on the two year old. You won't be very effective away at work if you are always worrying and checking in on the home situation.

    You could get a seizure dog that could alert the wife that a seizure is imminent and/or the dog could alert the two year old to contact you. What happens when the wife has a seizure, does she fall down? Perhaps you could use a smart phone app with the wife, when the app is active it monitors the orientation of the phone, if your wife changes from vertical to horizontal then the app could message you. I don't know how much I would trust that but it might work. Finally, you could have another responsible individual at home, a friend, mother in law, etc. Good luck.

  11. If you don't want to roll your own... by Mantle · · Score: 1
    http://supermechanical.com/twi...

    Comes with a 0-4G vibration sensor, can be extended with other sensors in the future if you want to repurpose it later.

  12. The button isn't the problem by Shoten · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You're asking for a kind of button that will make it possible to rely upon a 2-year-old child as a caretaker. This is not a technology problem, and unless someone finds a way to accelerate human development of children to an alarming rate, it's not a solvable one either. And I have to say, what you're proposing seems like an inherently risky situation...to your wife and child both. Your wife runs the risk of your not being alerted, and I can't even guess what it would do to a child to have that kind of responsibility, especially if she doesn't hit the button for whatever reason, and ends up haunted by that for the rest of your life.

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    1. Re:The button isn't the problem by King_TJ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, except all he's *really* asking for here is an additional way to get notified if something's wrong, so he could take a look for himself via an internet connected camera.

      This wouldn't (shouldn't) be about trying to use a 2 year old as a caretaker. The way I'm reading this, he just wants an extra fail-safe in place. (I think even a 2 year old is mentally functional enough to realize something's wrong with mom if she suddenly falls to the floor, flails around and acts generally unresponsive. It would probably make the kid feel better, not worse, if he or she knew simply pressing a button would be a way to communicate "help!".)

      One of our kids used to have seizures (he's been free of them for a couple of years now while taking medication), and his younger sister, around age 2-3, was able to come tell us when it happened to him, if he was up in his room and we didn't notice it immediately.

    2. Re:The button isn't the problem by DRJlaw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're asking for a kind of button that will make it possible to rely upon a 2-year-old child as a caretaker.

      That's funny. I thought he was asking for a kind of button that would make it possible for his child to communicate with him as a backup measure, given the video surveillance and all.

      Of course you're free to argue that epileptics cannot be left unsupervised. Good luck with that.

      You're also free to argue that epileptic parents should not be allowed to be alone with their children since their children might be required to be "caretakers," whether via a button, a telephone capable of 911, or merely living within distance to run to a neighbor. Because we'd all support that.

      After all, this isn't an attempt to marginally improve a circumstance. This is an attempt to shift all responsibility for the parent's care onto the child. Not.

    3. Re:The button isn't the problem by NicBenjamin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Epilepsy isn't some debilitating condition that requires 24/7 care. Epileptics are fine most of the time, particularly if they control their seizures with medication. Most of them actually have productive lives, with stressful jobs, and manage to hold shit down. As a stay-at-home mom of very small children this guy's wife can control her risk factors (particularly her amount of sleep, when she takes medication, etc.) much better then somebody whose work-schedule changes every week, has lots of deadlines, etc.

      But if she does have a seizure it would be really bad because a) she'd be alone with nobody to call for help, and b) the kids would be alone.

      A two-year-old can easily understand when something's wrong with Mommy. Most two-year-olds will know something is wrong with Mommy before Mommy knows something is wrong with Mommy, particularly if she's a home-maker. If you're two, and you've got a stay-at-home-mom, she is your entire world. A two-year-old can understand "press this button." If the kid decides pressing the button is a good game there's no harm because the police haven't been called.

    4. Re:The button isn't the problem by DerekLyons · · Score: 2

      You're asking for a kind of button that will make it possible to rely upon a 2-year-old child as a caretaker.

      That's funny. I thought he was asking for a kind of button that would make it possible for his child to communicate with him as a backup measure, given the video surveillance and all.

      Well, you thought wrong - because he plainly states the purpose is to have the two year old alert him that he needs to check the video cameras and there is no indication of either the existence of a primary alert system or that he is monitoring the cameras with sufficient regularity to serve as the primary alert system.
       

      You're also free to argue that epileptic parents should not be allowed to be alone with their children since their children might be required to be "caretakers," whether via a button, a telephone capable of 911, or merely living within distance to run to a neighbor. Because we'd all support that.

      "Child", not "children" - and really, a toddler, not even a child. (The infant can safely be left out of the "caretaker" equation.)
       

      This is an attempt to shift all responsibility for the parent's care onto the child.

      It's an attempt to shift a significant portion of the care onto the toddler. Anyone with sense would question that.

    5. Re:The button isn't the problem by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Yeah, except all he's *really* asking for here is an additional way to get notified if something's wrong, so he could take a look for himself via an internet connected camera.

      The way I'm reading this, he just wants an extra fail-safe in place.

      Since he didn't specify the existence of a primary method of notification... it's an assumption that he's looking for an additional or extra method of notification.

    6. Re:The button isn't the problem by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      ... it's an assumption that he's looking for an additional or extra method of notification.

      But not an unreasonable one, if he's conscientious enough to reach the point where he's looking for something like this.

    7. Re:The button isn't the problem by s.petry · · Score: 2

      It's a 2 year old! Good grief, you have never been around a 2 year old before? A 2 year old is supposed to play and learn, not be responsible for the goddamn panic button if mom starts to die. (Yes, to a 2 year old no matter how severe the seizure it will be traumatic and appear to be mom dying).

      His "extra" fail safe" is a panic button on top of web cams. Where is the adult to make sure the 2 year old does not try to hug mommy when she is having convulsions. Which of course has the added bonus of possibly killing both the mom and the kid, causing permanent injury to one or both.. and who is all that guilt going to sit on if something goes wrong? Oh gee, if the 2 year old lives they get to feel all the guilt because dad could not think of a better solution than to leave a 2 year old alone with an epileptic... Do you not know anything at all about epilepsy and are posting from pure ignorance?

      While we are at it, is the 2 year old also responsible to ensure that the room is clear of obstacles that may harm the mom/child when seizures start? Rolling mom onto her side while mom is flailing?

      One of your kids having seizures near adults (parent) is not even close to the same thing as an adult having seizures next to a sole small child. Your persnoal anecdote is useless.

      Wholly fuck! I believe this is the the sickest thread I have ever read on Slashdot! (TFA and responses)

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    8. Re:The button isn't the problem by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Epilepsy isn't some debilitating condition that requires 24/7 care.

      A TWO YEAR OLD DOES REQUIRE 24/7 CARE!!

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    9. Re:The button isn't the problem by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Since he didn't specify the existence of a primary method of notification [...]

      Which is why it's always a good idea to read the summary:

      I've set up cameras so I can monitor the house [...]

      Camera is primary system of notification. If he notices the wife flailing about, he can call appropriate people. If he doesn't notice because he's otherwise occupied, the child is a back-up.

      Reading: It's FUNdamental.

      As someone else said, before we got all this high-fallutin' technology, the solution would be to make an arrange with the nice lady next door so that if Mom is being unresponsive, the kid can go over there and get help.

    10. Re:The button isn't the problem by sjames · · Score: 1

      It's really a lot more for the child than the parent, I would think. A way for the child to quickly contact her other parent.

    11. Re:The button isn't the problem by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      I've read a couple of your posts on this topic now. It has become obvious that you don't have kids. 2 year olds don't require 24/7 care. They need risk mitigation strategies so that they can't easily fall down stairs, get access to sharp pointy objects or leave the building. Once you have those things the demands they have are generally desire related rather than critical need.

      Pretty much every parent has used the disney channel or equivalent to baby sit their kids while they go off and do something else. Be it cook dinner, go for a crap or hang out the washing. If the house is set up well, and given he has wired it with cameras it probably is, then the 2 year old is likely to be perfectly safe should the mother have a seizure.

      If the time the 2 year old is left alone starts to get too long the worst case scenario is they are going to be melting down and trying to break the baby gate.

      Epileptic seizures are often preceded by known symptoms. Symptoms the sufferer can recognise. If this is the case you have that as first line defence, second is cameras, third is panic button. There may even be others in there that we don't know about.

    12. Re:The button isn't the problem by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      So you have a 2 year old and go to work for a few hours leaving them alone?

      Just make sure there aren't any matches around. Especially if there's a huge strawman nearby.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    13. Re:The button isn't the problem by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      How is that a straw man?

      " 2 year olds don't require 24/7 care" - if you can't go to work for a few hours leaving them alone then clearly that isn't true.

    14. Re:The button isn't the problem by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      It's not a good argument because it depends on a wonky definition of 'care.' I wouldn't consider spending three hours on Slashdot in the living room while the kid is playing in his room alone 'care.'

      What makes it even more strawmanish is it's irrelevant to any point at hand. The OP isn't saying his kid shouldn't have adult supervision 24/7, he's saying that if that adult supervision in interrupted due a medical emergency he needs to know, partly so he can arrange for adult supervision until the seizure ends. If s.petry had used literally any reading comprehension skills at all he would know he was actually agreeing with the OP.

  13. Think smarter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Make it a device your wife can wear instead. Accelerometer, gyroscope, etc, built in and made to alert you if she has an episode. If these are even applicable, I know not all seizures are the kind where you collapse and shake. But if they are, then you can deal with some false positives from normal activity and try to fine tune it. then maybe even market your own version of such a device to others.

    Been wondering lately why these devices are still push-button user-triggered things. Detecting a fall, activating a microphone and connecting to a base station to contact emergency assistance is definitely in the realm of current technology.

    Maybe you can be the guy who gets that idea out of the 80's and into the modern age.

  14. Re:Not sure why this is on Slashdot by OrangeTide · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I assumed he is a good man but a shitty engineer, so he asked here for help from people who are good engineers but shitty human beings.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  15. Automatic Activation by rtb61 · · Score: 1

    It really depends upon the nature of the seizures. Rigidly locked in space or extreme spasms. So a motion detector that your wife can wear that can detect say laying on the ground rather than being vertical or detect rapid motions indicative of an attack. Greater care needs to be taken when holding the child or say cooking and how that is treated. These is also devices for detecting changes in blood pressure, breathing and pulse rate, so a more automated response is likely to be preferable, with a signal sent to you so that you can attempt contact to confirm conditions. Wiring up every room in your home with internet enable cameras might not be the safest choice in terms of security. If you really want the internet enabled video, an internet enabled bot would likely be the safest choice, aside from of course closed doors and internal versus yard access.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    1. Re:Automatic Activation by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      It sounds like the OP here *already* has video monitoring set up, he's just looking for some way to getting an alert that he should look at it.

  16. Re:Yeah, I have an idea. by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 1

    What's the problem? I often have my 2 year old toddler housesit when my 98 year old grandfather would otherwise be home alone. It works well. If anyone asks I just tell 'em the big one is watching the little one.

    --
    Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
  17. Doable by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    I designed one that was activated by a tank filling with fluid to a certain height. It then texted the delivery guy to come take the fluid. I can't give you my solution, it was very low level and simple based on local tech, and it wasn't a neat portable thing for your toddler to carry although it could be a panic button in the middle of the house. However, any competent hacker, er, I mean local technician, should be able to rig something together like this for you. A two year old can learn a lot and be quite responsive.

  18. Z-Wave by heezer7 · · Score: 1

    How about a z-wave controller like a Vera and one of the many z-wave remote controls out there. Out the the box the vera can email and text.

    1. Re:Z-Wave by plover · · Score: 2

      There are many home automation systems out there that could serve this up with a wireless switch or a panic button. I have a Vera as well as the parent poster, and it would work perfectly for this task. In addition to text and email, you can also hook up a Prowl notification to be delivered as an alert to your phone.

      A well-connected home would give you another option. Instead of relying strictly on the panic button or your toddler's response, you could ask your wife to use the home automation system at least once an hour (or so.) You could then configure it to trigger a notification if no light switches or TV remote buttons are activated, or if no doors are opened or closed during that time. Give her a way to disable it when she sets the alarm clock for a nap, or leaves home for a walk in the park, or whatever. Perhaps after 55 minutes elapse, you could turn on the lights or ring a doorbell to remind her to check in. The idea is similar to the dead man's switch railroad engine cabs have, where the engineer has to press a button or adjust a control every minute to prove he's still awake.

      Of course, this might be too intrusive an approach and she may not be interested in this kind of monitoring, or you might think that a tolerable response time for your wife is too long for you to react, but it also might be a backup option that suits both of you.

      --
      John
  19. Re:Chill out by xlsior · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah, I have a suggestion. Chill the fuck out. Watch your 2 year old, and when he/she's asleep, don't worry about it.

    While you can probably delay the situations with the highest risk factors (e.g. baby's bath time) until both parents are home, there's a lot of things that potentially could go wrong while unattended. For example, A sudden onset seizure could cause the wife to drop the baby, or hit her own head on the coffee table, or who knows what else. Having a way for the 2 year old to call for help on her own in such situations could make a tremendous difference

    This was a reasonable question looking for help mitigating very real risks -- don't be a dick about it.

    That said: perhaps the easiest way would be to have a very basic speaker phone set up somewhere with a one-push button to actually CALL dad in case of emergency. A benefit of that over a silent email/sms/whatever setup is that it could give the 2-year old instant feedback that help is coming if there really is a problem, and depending on the verbal skills of the kid dad can save precious time as well: "mom fell and isn't moving!" vs. wasting time to try to remotely view your cameras first and see what happened.
    (Although a possible downside is that she may just start hitting it anytime she wants to talk to dad during office hours)

  20. Sandman.com by KenStieers · · Score: 1

    Sandman has some one button dialers, as "call out on off-hook" phones. Program it with the number you want it to call, and it dials when you pick it up...

  21. How about.. by wbr1 · · Score: 1

    Instead of relying on a two year old that may not be capable (or even napping) of understanding the implications, you do this:
    Rig a system, perhaps a fairly short lanyard on your wifes non-dominant wrist that pulls a pin switch that is nearly certain to get pulled during a seizing event. Sure it is annoying, and prone to false positives, but she can cancel the false positives if she is okay.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  22. Give your wife a cheap android phone to carry by complete+loony · · Score: 1

    Then write an app to monitor the accelerometer. Make some noise, connect to your wifi and send a chat message of some kind. False alarm? Take the opportunity to have a conversation with your wife ;).

    --
    09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
  23. Re:Not sure why this is on Slashdot by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    I wrote a big post but slashdot is buggy and ate it. I didn't feel like writing it again. It was essentially keyfob + receiver + Rasp Pi or whatever. Should get range typical of a garage door opener.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  24. Can't help you much with the hardware, but by m.dillon · · Score: 1

    But I can suggest that the best technology for this sort of thing is a stand-alone cellular modem, preferentially one that is on the same network as your cell phone. Wire the button into that and have it send a text message to your phone and to your gmail address.

    There are certainly cellular modems that work over a serial link and I assume there are devices you can buy off the shelf that will integrate the whole thing into a panic button type of interface. But I haven't researched all-in-one solutions so I can't point you at one. We use cellular modem / texting for alarms and alerts for telemetry systems (replacing satellite paging systems which died out many years ago).

    The message will flow through the fewest number of networks possible to reach its destination (typically just the telco's own network) and texting protocols are quite robust on the telco side. It's the most reliable solution possible. If you run the message through your home router it is likely traversing four or five completely different networks to reach its destination and that just isn't as reliable.

    But frankly, still not at the level of quality needed for a serious medical condition.

    -Matt

  25. Flic, button project might work by klek · · Score: 1

    I dropped some money towards the Flic indigogo awhile back, which is a simple "one click" remote button that is tethered to a smartphone, and you program it to do anything you want... send an email, call a friend, take a photo, etc. etc. Flic.io

    The single function and customizability may be what you are looking for.

  26. Wrong solution by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You're looking for the wrong thing. You want your two-year-old and a toddler to be responsible for telling you when there's an emergency?! Are you fucking nuts? The solution here is not some unreliable piece of tech based on a homebrew solution susceptible to all the failures of internet service, IP cameras, and routing equipment. The solution here is nursing care or other medical devices. You need to talk to your doctor, but a bunch of IT nerds on the internet.

    --
    -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    1. Re:Wrong solution by s.petry · · Score: 1

      At least I'm not the only one outraged by this guys post (and a whole lot of people defending him in responses).

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    2. Re:Wrong solution by Crookdotter · · Score: 1

      I agree it's not a perfect solution, but we don't live in a perfect world. Nursing care costs money, which he clearly doesn't have available. I'd like a panic button for my home, just in case I'm home alone with my daughter (or gramdma is) and fall down the stairs. It's unlikely, but it could happen. What's wrong with a device, simple to push, for those cases when 'Daddy fell down'? With the cameras, a push button and perhaps some kind of wearable tech, I'd say the guy is trying different vectors to keep his family safe within the limitations of him having to work, his wife having periodic seizures and having to look after a child. A 2 year old is young, but they aren't completely stupid. They would help, and just need the tools to call out for it. It's not lumping them with responsibility, it's asking if they are ok to help.

    3. Re:Wrong solution by Venerable+Vegetable · · Score: 1

      Huh, you think he didn't talk to a doctor? In the real world a doctor will tell you his: You have a condition like millions of other people, here is some medication and live with it.

      Most people simply cannot afford nursing. If you have frequent and severe attacks and live in a first world country you will get an alert dog. But most people who might get an epileptic seizure hardly take any precautions at all, because it is a calculated risk like everything else in life.

      This guy wants to go the extra mile and gets blasted for it? You are the one who is nuts. You have seen one worst case example of epilepsy and think this aplies to all cases. Did you know that in by far the most cases people have only a few attacks in their life? That often they don't even realize it? In most other cases it goes away with the right medication. If you take medication, usually you can stop taking it after a few year, without the epilepsy ever returning. You don't need medical attention during or after an attack, unless you hurt yourself during the seizure.

      Usually epilepsy isn't what you seem to think it is.

  27. Leave the child out of it! by Opportunist · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There are technical solutions that your wife could press (if she is capable of some kind of "last action" when she feels the onset) or something that could even sensibly and automatically react to certain stimuli (like not being upright, i.e. lying on the floor, irregular heartbeat, motion sensors that can identify seizures, etc), but whatever you do, DO NOT put this burden on your kid.

    You are essentially asking for something that would allow you to make your kid the caretaker of your wife. That's something you might want to consider in, say, 40 years, but most certainly NOT when the child is actually still a child! What this could lead to is what's generally known as parentification. Read the link if you want to know why that's a BAD idea.

    And that's even ignoring the worst possible case: Your wife getting seriously injured and your child feeling responsible for this. I think I don't have to dig up a link for you to know why that would be damaging to your child.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Leave the child out of it! by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 2

      You are essentially asking for something that would allow you to make your kid the caretaker of your wife.

      I'm seeing lots of people saying this, but I don't see it.

      I would think this would be a good thing for the child to know and have something to do if this happens. I'd imagine a two year-old watching Mommy convulsing on the floor and having no idea what to do would be far more traumatizing than knowing that she should immediately go press the big purple button and then wait by the phone for Daddy to call her (which he will do as soon as he's called 911).

      By the way, most of the issues with "parentification" are when the child is the sole caregiver. Obviously, she isn't--her father is also involved. Also, Mommy isn't an invalid--she's probably still making lunches and doing other things. So this is more for the possible case where Mommy collapses.

      As for the concern about your child feeling responsible, that's mostly going to be based on how it's presented to the child. Personally, I wouldn't rely on the child being the only alarm. That much, I do agree with. Not so much that a child is somehow unable to give the alarm but that the child may be absorbed in something else and miss things as well.

      I'd also add a wrist-mounted accelerometer or something like that which would send the same signal as the big purple button if his wife were to start flailing her arms around.

    2. Re:Leave the child out of it! by Harlequin80 · · Score: 2

      I'm really really concerned that the people on here don't give their kids any kind of emergency training.

      By giving your child a small amount of responsibility you are NOT turning them into primary care givers or causing parentification.

      My 4 year old knows how to call the police, ambulance and fire service. She knows which one to call and when. She knows how to unlock my wife's and my mobile and how to dial 000. She knows that it might happen that we are hurt and we can't do it and she knows she will never ever get in trouble if she calls when it wasn't needed. What's more is we have practised it.

      For a 2 year old something as complex as explaining a situation to dispatch would probably be too much. But knowing to hit the big red button if mum collapses is not.

  28. Cellphone for kids... by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am guessing that he did not look very hard...

    http://www.amazon.com/LG-Veriz...

    first hit after googleing "Cellphone for a small child"

    a child can easily learn that press 1 for daddy, 2 for mommy, 3 for grandma and if mommy needs help press the big red hand and tell the lady on the line our address.

    Otherwise for his wife there are a TON of systems that are panic buttons designed for people who have siezures.

    So, what does the question asker have against all the existing options?

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Cellphone for kids... by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      That was my first thought as well, and I am shocked I had to scroll this far down before I saw someone else had posted it.

      He can just get a phone intended for young children, program all of the speed dial buttons to go directly to his line (the one you linked even allows the user to program the emergency button too), and enjoy the fact that he doesn't have to spend exorbitant amounts of time or money on a custom-built solution that may not have issues he's aware of until the time comes to actually use it. Plus, he doesn't have to worry about false positives going to emergency responders, since the phone would be incapable of calling them in the first place.

      Simple, cheap, easy to set up, available off the shelf, uses proven technology, and serves a need that isn't going away anytime soon, so there are plenty of options on the market.

    2. Re:Cellphone for kids... by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

      I am guessing that he did not look very hard...

      Or the thought simply never occurred to him that somebody might make a simplistic cellphone like this. It sure didn't ever occur to me. With all the movement towards phones that are getting bigger all the time and more complex, I had no idea that such phones existed. Your post is the first I've ever heard of this phone. I've never seen one advertised. Your post was helpful, but the whole "You should have thought of this" attitude really wasn't.

    3. Re:Cellphone for kids... by RyoShin · · Score: 1

      Because children never lose objects, even medium-sized ones. If Mommy is sick, the last thing the child will be thinking is "where did I put my green fun phone?"

      The option of a panic button that is firmly attached somewhere (or, better yet, a panic button in every room, firmly attached) won't get lost, and the kid can be taught easily enough to hunt down the nearest one and smack it repeatedly.

      I suppose you could strap the phone to the kid somehow, but it has to come off at some point so it's still not as reliable. You could combine the two ideas, and have the phone attached to a fixed object and easy to get to.

  29. Already done. by Obfuscant · · Score: 1
    Get your wife an "I've fallen and I can't get up button" that she wears. Your wife is unlikely to false-trigger it, and if she's wearing it then your daughter is unlikely to, either. Tell your daughter to push it when there's trouble, and teach your wife to stop her from pushing it if she can. If she cannot, then there's something wrong. In fact, your wife can probably activate it herself when she feels a problem coming on.

    This means you don't have to snoop on your family using remote cameras. Certainly you must have cameras in the bathroom just in case she seizes while taking a leak, right? And the bedroom, too (sleeping or changing clothes, not taking a leak, d'oh).

    That one button will be so much better at teaching your kids about the concept of "privacy" than 24 hour video surveillance of their, and their mother's, every movement (B or otherwise).

  30. bite the bullet by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's very difficult having a spouse with a chronic illness. (I know.) Even harder when you have children.

    As much as it sucks, have her in child care as much as possible. Yes, it's horrifically expensive, it's not ideal, it's not what you envisioned (I assume, as much as you want to let her stay home with mom). But it makes sense.

    If it's your wife that you are primarily worried about, then you need to figure out what can help her. Can a neighbor check on her fairly frequently? Another family member? Also, I've seen devices advertised (primarily to elderly) which claim to be able to detect falls.

    For both - child and wife - check with local social workers about what is available. You may be eligible for subsidized child care due to the situation. Your wife may be eligible for some kinds of help.

    Hang in there, and don't be ashamed to reach out for help.

  31. K.I.S.S. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    You can do this on a Mac easily enough, even easier on Windows. Let's presume Windows:

    Buy a USB "big red button" on Ebay for a few bucks. Not the "easy" kind, just the plain button. Plug it in to your computer, install the software that lets you script what the button does.

    Subscribe to one of those services that will send an SMS from your PC.

    Do a few minutes of scripting to get the button to send an SMS to your phone.

    Program your phone -- also pretty easy -- to blast an alarm when it gets that particular SMS.

    Job done. Cost: maybe $5.

    1. Re:K.I.S.S. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Search eBay for "bluetooth remote". Buy it now and sort by price. You'll find a cheapo little $1.82 (SHIPPED!) "selfie remote". This is easy integrated into any number of things that can listen for a bluetooth signal. Done and done. $5, geez, what are you, rich? :-P

      You still have to get the remote to interface with your computer. A bluetooth remote won't send you an SMS when you're away from home.

      I might have misunderstood, but it was my understanding that this guy is away from the house for significant periods.

      Still, you make a good point. If you can find a good way to interface it, it would work fine.

      By the way: I just went on Ebay to find the big red USB switch that I have myself. The price has gone up to $38. That seems pretty outrageous for what it is. They still have USB foot-switches for about $10 though.

  32. Re:wait, what the hell? by hawguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Your epileptic wife is having attacks, and you want a TWO year old to be not only alone in that situation, but responsible for a panic button? Dude, you are sick and need to get a frickin clue. Fast! Someone should seriously turn you in for child endangerment bordering on abuse!

    Yeah, I honestly had to consider whether or not this was an early April fools gag...

    You seem to have misread his situation, it's not that he *wants* that situation, it's a situation he wants to avoid. Yet, he also wants to prepare for it.

  33. One-button cell phone by steveha · · Score: 1

    How about a one-button waterproof cell phone?

    I've read about phones where you program which number the phone calls, but I can't find any now. Maybe they are no longer sold.

    But here's a phone that calls some sort of operator, who can then decide how to handle the situation. You need to pay a monthly fee for the operator but I think that's better for a 2-year-old than a phone that just dials 911.

    http://www.greatcall.com/products/greatcall-splash

    If you could find a 1-button programmable phone, and program it to call you, that might be ideal.

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    1. Re:One-button cell phone by ChTom · · Score: 1

      http://medicalalarmsystems.com/automatic-fall-detectors-sensors.html

  34. Re:Not sure why this is on Slashdot by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    I kept it for a while, because it seemed like /. happily accepted it. First time that has happened to me in a decade on slashdot. It makes me sad.

    And thanks, but let's not assume my posts are really worth saving :)

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  35. Re:wait, what the hell? by Robert+Bowles · · Score: 2

    Clearly OP has a less than ideal situation, but additional data vectors (child or not) are always good. 24x7 at home nursing care is prohibitively expensive to all but the five richest kings on earth. Do you have a constructive solution?

    Mod parent troll or flame bait.

    --
    /* MAGIC THEATRE
    ENTRANCE NOT FOR EVERYBODY
    MADMEN ONLY */
  36. Dead Man Switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Set up an application/device that requires your wife to confirm that she's okay every n minutes. If she fails to confirm, it alerts you.

  37. did you google for a usb button? by verin · · Score: 1

    http://www.usbbutton.com/

  38. In all honesty by s.petry · · Score: 2

    Sounds like you always assume the best in people and can't see the whole equation played out. Optimism is good, but in this case there is a 2 year old in the equation that seems to be constantly overlooked in this thread. Web cams don't make good baby sitters, in fact I'd be curious to know if he would be guilty of a crime if something was to happen to his wife given he knew the current medial needs of her.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:In all honesty by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 3, Informative

      If we start down that track, we're effectively saying "people with health problems can't be mothers". Next you'll be calling social services because you saw your blind neighbour carrying her own baby. Honestly, it would be nice if we were all perfectly healthy, but some of us aren't, and that doesn't make us any less human.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    2. Re:In all honesty by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      there is a 2 year old in the equation that seems to be constantly overlooked in this thread

      To be fair, 2 year olds are not very tall and are easy to overlook.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  39. They need more care than you can give them. by westlake · · Score: 1

    My wife is epileptic. Her seizures have been well controlled by medication until recently

    An infant, a toddler, and mother whose seizures are no longer under control.

    There are no technical solutions for a problem like this.
    You can not and must not ask a two year old to be caretaker for her mom. She is not there as a backup for your webcams or to care for your baby. This is a huge red flag for child protection services.

    What you need is are licensed home care aides or nurses, with full time coverage when you absent from the home. If you want to avoid institutionalization for your wife and kids this is your only option.

    1. Re:They need more care than you can give them. by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Then they should have some family around to help. Or fake a relgious conversion and get some local church to help out. Or find some other local charitable organization that helps with such things.

  40. But her seizures aren't under control. by westlake · · Score: 1

    Epileptics are fine most of the time, particularly if they control their seizures with medication.

    But her seizures aren't under control. It's there in the first line of his post.

    1. Re:But her seizures aren't under control. by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      Epileptics are fine most of the time, particularly if they control their seizures with medication.

      But her seizures aren't under control. It's there in the first line of his post.

      To be precise "well controlled until recently."

      What precisely do you suggest he do? Divorce his wife because a medical condition he knew she had got worse? Quit the job that's probably so he can be a stay-at-home dad? If her seizures are so bad she can't care for a two-year-old there are literally no jobs that she can do anywhere so that probably means poverty for the entire family.

      Moreover he doesn't say what he means by well-controlled. To a non-epileptic any seizure is terrifying. The idea of having one every six months or year is even worse. Epileptics are a bit more sanguine. They have a seizure, and it's over. They might have to take a personal day from work. Most people get a couple of those a month. If they're lucky nobody calls 911, because 911 means the ER, which means medical bills,, and they don't need the ER to tell them they have epilepsy.

  41. Get an ADA Siezure Detection Dog by JumperCable · · Score: 1

    The dog will warn your wife when the symptoms of a seizure are about to come on. This will give her enough time to act to ensure her safety & even call for help. Yes, ADA dogs are pricey, but since you post here, I am going to guess you can afford one to keep your wife safe. Plus it will make a good playmate for your 2 year old.

    Sometimes the old solution that just works, is the best solution.

  42. Re:FU! by sjames · · Score: 1

    Name one!

  43. Re:Yeah, I have an idea. by s.petry · · Score: 1

    And your infant is there too, while your 98 year old grandfather is prone to forgetting what his name is and his medication is not working any more? Come on now, you have to try and make it apples to apples.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  44. Re:wait, what the hell? by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

    I think it is you that have misread the summary. I think the "until recently" is the real deal
    breaker for me. If his wife was epileptic but had things under control then having a panic button
    for the kid and/or a sensor for the wife makes sense but only in the same way it makes sense to
    teach a kid to dial 911 in a fire. If she is having frequent episodes then there probably needs to be
    someone else present in the house.

  45. Re:Clarification from OP by s.petry · · Score: 1

    Since I am one of the biggest mouth pieces against what you are doing, I'll chime in and attempt to clarify a few points. Your follow up is not going to change my opinion very much, but since you took a great amount of time attempting to clarify I will try and return in kind.

    when my wife unexpectedly had her first seizure in more than NINE YEARS.

    If you married an epileptic person you are already brave, so hang in there. One of the many things that you should already know is that it's a very unpredictable condition. That she was seizure free for 9 years is great, but it's not relevant to my concerns. What is a concern is that you have an infant and 2 year old, and your wife seems to be in a flux with control medication.

    Teaching your children what to do in case of a fire doesn't mean you are making them responsible for fire fighting.

    No, but we are not talking about teaching your kid to dial 911. We are teaching your kid to dial _you_ and then you having to dial 911.. or you are trying to teach the kid both. Further, this is not a fire. This is "mommy" and the 2 year old _WILL_ panic if mom has a seizure. If you were there for her last one, you would have already seen it. At 2 years old a kid probably would not be able to dial 911 either. The expected capacity for something like this is maybe 4 years old, and that is really pushing the border.

    Second, the cameras I installed have motion and noise threshold alerts, so I get automatic notification from them...[snipped because it does not matter]

    What is your drive time from work to home? I'm assuming that is what is going on, you are at the office and mom is at home. Mom is holding the infant for feeding and has a seizure, how long does it take for you to get home and pull the infant to safety? Toddler goes to hug mommy and make her feel better, how long for you to be there to prevent harm to the 2 year old when that happens? If it's not a 2 minute drive, you are too late and may have two dead kids. Reality sucks, but that is reality.

    Third, this is not the only solution in place. We have neighbors, friends and family who check in regularly and I expect that will greatly increase since this episode. But that doesn't guarantee that someone is going to be there when an episode occurs, or even that they would arrive in a short period of time. Again, I'm trying to prepare for worst case scenarios.

    Knowing her current situation, that is called negligence. Sorry, but this is not about how fast someone can get your wife to the hospital. It's how fast can your infant and toddler be pulled out of harms way. You know the current situation, and you have two very small children at risk.

    Day care or private nursing is not an option unless someone else is footing the bill. Day care is not even a money problem, it's more a problem of "the devil you know is better than the devil you don't."

    I provided a few solutions above, but will repeat. 1) Exchange Student/AuPair. 2) Call a Government Social Welfare person and see if there are any programs to assist you. 3) Plenty of foundations for Epilepsy, call and see if you can get a grant 4) Find a Church and see if there are volunteers (less worry about devils this way *I'll save offending certain religions, but most are actually good*)

    Back to what I said above, the "devil" you currently have is a wife with a medical condition that puts two very small children at risk. Make friends and have her make friends, bring in other parents with kids about the same age. In person company is much better than Facebook and WebCams, and playmates for your kids is extremely beneficial.

    Once your wife is back to stable, not much _should_ really change. The randomness of epilepsy is probably the worst thing about it (I don't intend that as cold, none of it is good). If you are not there, it is always going to be safer t

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  46. Can you solder? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    If you've got some simple electronics knowledge, you could use one of these wifi modules: http://rayshobby.net/first-imp...

    $3, wire up a switch, and write some software to monitor it. You could use one to make an accelerometer monitor for your wife too.

  47. Re:FU! by s.petry · · Score: 1

    "The Epilepsy Foundation", and of course they have branches in every State and many geographical regions within States (LA has a branch, Eastern Pennsylvania, Michigan, Northern Cal, Idaho, etc..). Need me to Google that for you or can you do that all by yourself?

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  48. I'm teh Gubment? by s.petry · · Score: 1

    I am not the US Department of Social Services, and if GP has time to make a few Slashdot posts he sure as hell can call them.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re: I'm teh Gubment? by s.petry · · Score: 1

      And you are different how exactly? Oh, I get it! On your soap box you don't mind if the parent has an infant and two year old in a potentially deadly situation. Got it! I'll stay on my soap box with a moral conscience thank you very much.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  49. Re:Clarification from OP by j-beda · · Score: 1

    Day care or private nursing is not an option unless someone else is footing the bill. Day care is not even a money problem, it's more a problem of "the devil you know is better than the devil you don't." A seizure is something you can plan for and come up with options. Day care has a hell of a lot more unsavory potential variables. Read the news sometime.

    Maybe all those people with kids in daycare are delusional, compeltely out of touch with the dangers they are placing their children in. Or mabye you are. Which is more likely?

    Yes there are problems and challenges with daycare, and infant daycare spaces may in fact be unobtainable in your area due to high demand, but to think that "a seizure is something you can plan for", there seems to be something wrong with your world view. If your wife's seizures are unpredictable enough that you need some sort of monitoring, and you are able to afford care for your children to take that burden away from her, then not doing so seems strange.

    Epilepsy is generally not associated with any other mental issues is it? What is your wife's position on all of this? Does she want to remain primary care giver in this situation? Does she think that this planned monitoring system would be safe enough? How is she coping with this sudden change in her previously well controlled affliction? This type of relaps can lead to major phychological distress - how is she coping with that? Being the primary caregiver of little kids is tough enough for anyone - can she handle the extra burden now that she's no longer confident of having seizures under control? How about you? Is your stress level such that you are maybe in need of some additional support? Are both of you getting enough sleep?

    Are there perhaps five friends or family members who could take one day each week to spend the day with your family? Members of the local mom's group? People in your birthing classes? Church members? If the expected frequency of seizures is so high that it feels wrong to burden friends or family with the issue (perhaps monthly, weekly or daily?) then it is clearly too high to rely on tech solutions and panic buttons - your wife needs more help than that. If the expected frequency os seizures is low enough (I don't know how low this would be - maybe once a year seizures?) then maybe it would not be so difficult to provide good social coverage durring work hours, and rely more on the kids when they got older, but unless you work within a hundred meters of your home, I cannot imagine how you can think that any sort of remote monitoring would provide the type of help that you are going to need.

    If mom has a seizure and you get alerted to it, what are you going to do about it? How long is your response time to get home? Are you really comfortable that the toddler and the infant will be able to handle things until you arrive? And that you can get home in time to assist your wife with her seizure issues? Are you expecting to call the ambulance to get there before you? What do you expect them to do with the kids? I imagine that the systems in place to care for families in the community might view such a situation as an unfortunate rare accident, but if this type of seizure happens again, do you think social services will be happy with leaving the children under the care of you and your wife? While there are news stories of children being left in awful situations with terrible parents, there are also cases where children are separated from parents who maybe don't seem so bad - would this type of situation fit into that characterization?

  50. Some ideas to be helpful by Zitchas · · Score: 2

    True. And a few other things.

    People keep mentioning. "Why don't you have the kid run next door to the neighbor and get them to get help?" Last time I checked, if they're smart (and independent) enough to go next door for help, they're more than capable of hitting a panic button. Secondly, hitting a panic button, dad checking the cameras, and dad reacting, is all probably going to happen a lot faster than kid running next door, kid ringing door bell, talking to neighbor, neighbor coming over, neighbor deciding what to do.

    On the same token, the panic button ->dad ->calls neighbour chain would likely get the nearest adult to the scene a lot faster than having the kid heading outside. Safer, too. Much better to have the kid inside with an epileptic than outside running around in a panic. What if the nearest "friendly" house is their friend's house across the street? In a panic the kid's not going to be looking both ways.

    From the sounds of things, his wife is perfectly capable of taking care of things 95% of the time. If she was having daily seizures, he probably wouldn't be leaving the house. You don't need live-in care for something that may well only happen once a week or less. Instead of viewing this as an attempt at delegating all caretaking responsibility to the kid, think of it as establishing multiple fail-safes.

    We know he's got bunch of cameras that he watches on a regular basis (but not continuous). Given that he's technically inclined, and that, from what I gather, many people with epileptic seizures can recognize onset symptoms, (not all sufferers, definitely not all the time, but at least sometimes) there's probably decent chances that they've rigged up something that the mother could use herself. Maybe just a speed dial, but possibly other things. If not, then the various ideas of using exercise bands and accelerometers might make a very good layer of redundancy there, too.

    Personally, the idea of having a sensor-rigged cupboard with a big stuffed animal in it, and telling the kid to take mom the stuffed animal when she's in trouble sounds like a great idea too. Great padding to have between an epileptic and any potentially hard surfaces, although unlikely a kid would be placing it optimally.

    Frankly, giving one's kid a panic button that sends a message to Dad seems like a really good thing to have, no matter what the situation at home is. Honestly, it isn't exactly that rare of an occurrence for the sole responsible adult at home to have some kind of accident where it would be *very* useful for the kid to have some way of summoning a responsible 3rd party, whether it be a neighbour or relative or whatever.

    Lastly, just because he hasn't laid out every last precaution and detail of his family's life is no reason to assume that they're being negligent, that she's having daily severe seizures, or that they're pinning all their hopes of safety on the kid. We don't need to know all that. He simply asked for advice on a single, specific solution to a specific element of his situation. Let's help him out on that, shall we?

    Some quick links that a google search turned up:

    First one is an instructables video, the last two are commercial options, one for phone software, the second for an actual device.

    http://www.instructables.com/id/Desk-Panic-Button/

    http://www.blacklinesafety.com/solutions/loner-mobile/

    https://www.alarmgrid.com/products/honeywell-5802wxt

    --
    Z
    1. Re:Some ideas to be helpful by s.petry · · Score: 1

      The oldest kid is 2 years old. Sorry, but a 2 year old running next door for help by themselves is extremely unlikely. The younger is an infant, so that's not in the equation.

      Kids dialing 911, even though we teach it early is miraculous at 4-5 years old. It is so rare that it makes National News when it happens. A two year old does not have the intellectual capacity for this type of responsibility. The motor skills and memory required to run to a phone/button and take a specific action under duress far exceed that age. Stress for a 2 year old results in hide/freeze response, not "run take action" response. They are still getting a knack for motor skills and language, complex tasks are further off.

      Last part, to your 95% of the time.. I fully agree. The problem I see is twofold.

      1) Epilepsy is unpredictable. While people are known to go for very long times without seizures, the onset of seizures is not predictable in any way. There are no limits or restrictions to seizures. Generally speaking one a day is a lot. I'll go further and say with working medication once a year is a lot. Without working medication (as may be the case with his wife), several a day is certainly well documented. Some people have warning signs, some occasionally have warning signs, some have no warnings, and the warning signs can be so short that they are not usable as warnings.

      2) Depending on the type of seizure, an adult can be incapacitated for hours. Not just immobile, but completely incoherent and disoriented. Seizures can be extremely violent. With an infant and toddler this is a huge risk. Mom will probably survive the seizure even if he has an hour drive home from work. Mom may not have any warning and go into a seizure while feeding the infant, bathing the toddler, etc.. etc.. Is his commute time enough to mitigate that risk?

      I would further agree that the actual chances of something bad happening are pretty small. If this was you, would you take that risk even if it was small? Having full knowledge of his wife's condition, would law enforcement be okay with his solution?

      We don't know some key information here. Like how far is his commute? What type of seizure is his wife more prone to? How far does he live from ERT? Since we don't know, I see nothing in his post to assume the best of everything. My assumption is 30 minute drive from work to home, average response time of 10-15 minutes for ERT, and Tonic-Clonic seizures (which seem to be the most common in adults).

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  51. Re:Chill out by westlake · · Score: 1

    Having a way for the 2 year old to call for help on her own in such situations could make a tremendous difference

    Unless of course it is the two year who gets hurt when Mom has a seizure.

    Her seizures aren't under control. That is in the first line of the post. Once you admit that, you need to go with a care plan approved by her doctor, and the pediatrician who cares for your kids.

    There can be nothing harder in the world.

  52. Re:FU! by s.petry · · Score: 2

    If you worked a bit harder than a cursory glance you would find things like this: The Epilepsy Foundation of Northern California is a 501(c)(3) charitable organization leading the fight to stop seizures, find a cure and overcome the challenges created by epilepsy.
    We direct information, resources and support toward the over 140,000 Northern Californians living with epilepsy.

    infant and 2 year old != "small children" by any rational definition.

    Do they provide in home assistance? I don't know, GP asked me to find "one" site for support. I found that in a quick Google Search. I don't have epilepsy so have never had to search for their services. If you really care about TFA and are not just trolling, why not call them and see? Oh, I know.. you can't even read the information box in a web site so I'd be expecting miracles. It's much easier to troll and claim impossible

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  53. Flic by SLOviper · · Score: 1

    To answer your technical question minus the classic /. judgement I second @klek in suggesting Flic.io.
    It sounds like it will do exactly what you're looking for.
    Unfortunately they're still in development but it sounds like exactly what you're looking for.

    --
    In theory, theory always works in practice. In practice, theory rarely works. <><
  54. A better option you might not have considered by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

    Perhaps your wife could wear some sort of device (bracelet, etc) that itself would be capable of detecting that she was having a seizure, that could be setup to trigger whatever notifications were desired. Here are a few things I found alone these lines:

    http://www.epdetect.com/
    http://www.healthline.com/heal...
    http://www.gizmag.com/embrace-...

    1. Re:A better option you might not have considered by moeinvt · · Score: 1

      FYI, It's a common misconception that 'seizure' means that a person falls to the ground and starts twitching and frothing at the mouth.
      There are dozens of different types of seizures, the "tonic clonic" seizures (formerly called 'grand mal') which involve these symptoms are merely the worst. The mildest seizures are probably 'absence seizures' which would be hard to distinguish from daydreaming. Other seizures alter consciousness but don't necessarily impair motor function. Some seizures have physical symptoms which aren't readily apparent. e.g. making a tight fist or gripping an object, lip licking or pronounced swallowing.
      The description wasn't specific, but I suppose if he needs a panic button, the wife's symptoms must be rather harsh.

  55. As far as a button by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

    I'd get a raspberry pi, and write some code to use one of its GPIO pins as an input. (which would then send your chat/text/email message, etc)

      Then you can connect whatever kind of button or switch to it that you find most appropriate for your toddler to puch.

  56. no "cheap and simple"! by m.alessandrini · · Score: 1

    It's your wife and children you're talking about, look for the best solution, even if expensive and complex. It will not be worse than all the cameras you already set up.

  57. Hydracontrolfreak by onceuponatime · · Score: 1

    A hydracontrolfreak box with a Phidget and a big panic button. The HCF can read the video in a loop and mail you a link to the video except at the time the button was pressed. It can also trigger prowl, boxcar whatever other alerts you want, but if you use a hotmail account you will get a push notification anyway.

  58. Re:wait, what the hell? by mysidia · · Score: 2

    I read that as: there was probably a recent event that now causes him to doubt or worry that the condition might not be fully under control.

    So it could be a useful thing to have a panic button available to the child, but surely there should be a panic button available to the wife as well.

    Also, my greatest concern would be that the panic button fail, so it should be quite reliable and not solely dependent on an internet connection.

    I'm not sure why the author thinks it should not contact first responders.

    I say rubbish.... the buttons should set off an alarm, and a monitoring company should attempt to make immediate contact with the wife; if no response, then start making a phone call to all the emergency contacts.

  59. Re:Not sure why this is on Slashdot by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

    >Pro-tip: When posting to Slashdot, or any other website, write your post in an off-line text editor, then cut-and-paste it into the textarea. That way if their buggy JavaScript, or you fat fingers, delete it, you can just re-paste.

    OR you could just install Lazarus and let technology handle the grunt work for you.

    http://getlazarus.com/

  60. A real answer by blinkenlights1 · · Score: 1

    Purchase a security system (ie Burglar alarm) which has GSM dialout and 24 hour panic button facility. Make sure the system has a standard input for the panic - you don't want one of those silly systems which puts "panic button facility" on the label, and then expects you to push two keys on a keypad. Wire up a simple pushbutton which you can buy at radio shack if you are extremely quick. You may have to put an End-Of-Line resistor across the switch - consult someone who knows if that is the case. The rest is pretty straightforward. (GSM dialout means it calls your mobile/cell, 24 hour panic means a button which will send a signal even when the alarm is disarmed)

  61. Don't automatically call 911 on epileptics by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 5, Informative

    I had epilepsy for 30 years, about one seizure every two weeks, before finally getting brain surgery last year. The seizures were deeply hallucinogenic, physically severe, often lasted 10-20 minutes, and they left me with a huge hangover; afterwards I had to sleep about 12-18 hours in one go, maybe wake up for maybe four hours, then go back to sleep for another 12-18 hour stretch. I was like my brain was rebooting like Windows after a blue screen. If I wasn't able to sleep, I would become really sick, get intense migraines, and start throwing up, and recovery took several days longer.

    A big problem was people instantly making 911 calls. I was routinely being dragged off to an ER all the time, waking up in one at least once a month. They all knew me there, and realized after a while what the deal was, so I would be wheeled into a corner and left behind a curtain while they tended to more serious cases. I had to wait there for hours staring up at fluorescent lights and struggling to keep from vomiting and choking to death (since they liked to strap me on the bed face up). It usually took six to ten hours to get out of there- I had to wait for the lab to finish their ritual of drug assays for PCP, LSD, THC, cocaine, methamphetamine, and all kinds of other shit that they knew were going to come back negative. And this was before the ACA, so with a huge preexisting condition I couldn't get insurance from anybody, and had to pay out of pocket costs for meds which I couldn't afford half the time because this shit made it hard to get a job in the first place. When seizures came, I had about ten second warning from a visual aura. If I was outside I would quickly jump underneath nearby bushes or hide behind parked cars just so no one would see me and call the ER. I would wake up and stagger home bleeding, getting lost, and trying to stay out of sight. I did have a bracelet that said DO NOT CALL 911, along with my wife's number, but no one ever took it seriously. I wanted her to know so she could come pick me up, but I always wound up in the jaws of an ER instead.

    Don't assume this guy and his wife want a 2 year old calling 911. That may be the last thing they need. I can see why he would want to know, right away. He's lived with her and is going to be better equipped to handle her than the paramedics will. if they can't get any clues from a toddler, the emergency responders have to figure out what's going on themselves, and that makes it a painful mess. There isn't a lot that an ER can do with a seizure anyway except strap the person down so they don't thrash around and get bruises. There's always the possibility of status epilepticus (which I've had many times) but you should wait until a seizure lasts for more than five minutes. They look scary, maybe like the person is dying, and of course there's the danger of thrashing around and hitting things. But in general a seizure doesn't do any lasting damage to the brain.

    1. Re:Don't automatically call 911 on epileptics by chaotixx · · Score: 1

      Fascinating first hand account. The surgery helped, then?

    2. Re:Don't automatically call 911 on epileptics by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      It mostly worked, although now I have trouble remembering people's names when I see their faces. I lost my job as an engineer because I was ditzy and forgetful for a few months after they removed a chunk of my brain out, but it was worth it. They used me as a subject in a study on recognizing numbers (since part of my skull was in a refrigerator somewhere). They also sent pulses onto cortical surface electrodes to see where the seizure focus was, and those produced visual hallucinations on the left side of my field of vision. Things in the left side of the room would look fuzzy, or colorful, or repulsive, or beautiful, etc. depending on which electrodes they zapped.

  62. Check the mirror mate. by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

    Which is why it's always a good idea to read the summary

    The problem isn't that I failed to read the summary, it's that you failed to comprehend the summary.
     

    Camera is primary system of notification. If he notices the wife flailing about, he can call appropriate people. If he doesn't notice because he's otherwise occupied, the child is a back-up.

    A camera is a method of monitoring - it is not a system for providing notification. These are two very different functions. (Something I would have thought Slashdot would grasp intuitively.)
     

    Reading: It's FUNdamental.

    It is, you should try it sometime.

  63. Re:FU! by sjames · · Score: 1

    No. I asked for an agency that could help with the suggested home care and or quit working situation. You now admit that you have no idea if the one you named will or will not do so and in the process had to brush aside that they suggest exactly the measure you claim to be irresponsible.

    You then rant about the poster not doing what you obviously didn't do.

    Not a great showing there.

    It turns out they are a fine organization that provides a good bit of support including education, funding research, doctor referrals, and help getting compassionate discounts on the prescription drugs, but it doesn't happen to include help in this situation.

    TL;DR version: BZZZT!

  64. Ask Slashdot: Panic Button a Very Young Child Can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Take the child out of the equation. Get your wife to wear a compact mobile phone that is dialled-activated by a mercury switch-so that when she falls over/goes horizontal you are called instantly-maybe on loudspeaker or camera on mode.

  65. Re:wait, what the hell? by neo256 · · Score: 4, Informative

    You... do know that epileptic seizures are in most cases non fatal. As in the initial position is most important. It happens suddenly, when you hit a chair, table, whatever, you could get (seriously) injured. Everything after that depends very much on the length of the seizure and how quickly one regains consciousness. You simply can not call the hospital every time it happens. I am an emergency response officer (damn that sounds cocky in English) and first rule during an epileptic seizure is when you recognize it (the person should make it known they are epileptic) and help them to the ground. If you have the time push away anything that might hurt them (sharp objects, furniture). Ideally you drag them to a 3 meter radius free spot. Remember though. You will probably will be to late in most cases. And just FORGET anything about trying to stop the shaking or help someone in anyway (NO you do not force ANYTHING in to their mouths. The force of the bite is so great they can shatter teeth or the object you embed adding shrapnel of debris to the whole mix). This is a neurological condition that either stops by itself or can be negated with special medicine only a doctor can prescribe (dependent on the type of epilepsy) and carried by the person so they can instruct people to help them out with this. The most important is the aftermath. - If it is the first time and it is an unknown condition to this person: ambulance or at least off to the hospital with them. - If shaking takes more then 10 minutes or the person does not regain conscious within that time period. Call the ambulance (just in case). - Check if the person is breathing. Which I hopefully don't need to explain why and what you need to do. Everyone even a toddler can just raise the 'I think something is wrong' alarm. The point is; not a whole lot of things can accurately trigger on a seizure. As far as I know you heart rhythm doesn't even have to be affected. And the 'flailing' can't easily be found by the watch. If you are laying on your arm while having the seizure that's the only limb that will not move. While under normal circumstances you might flick your wrist and set off an alarm. People in your neighborhood are your best friend. Always, period. When you wake up you feel like you walked the marathon. Everything hurts, you feel disoriented (in most cases) and are prone to feel 'alien' as you have been 'gone' for X minutes. Yes I think a button is the right choice for given use case.

  66. Re:Call Social Services! by gnupun · · Score: 1

    Good grief man, if your wife is having episodes get another ADULT into the house!

    I think, that's the problem. He doesn't have any adult relatives to take care of this problem, and a private nurse would cost a lot. It seems a common problem with nuclear families.

  67. I also think you have your head up your butt by business_kid · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I have epilepsy. Sorry to be hard, but if you apply the "Worst case analysis" that engineers use, all your wearables / toddlers / gimmicks are trash. Is your toddler going to pull your patient wife off the cooker that's setting her on fire? Stop her bleeding? Decide when to ring for medical help?
    Most epileptics know when they have issues coming. If your wife does, have an effective strategy to deal with that. If not, rethink your career. Can you take less money and work from home? Cut some deal with your boss? Take less money and work nearer home?
    There is also a little known perscription drug called Epistatus. It never seems to get approval, but is available on perscription. It is absorbed through the cheek, and can be administered while unconscious. There's a youtube video.

    I hear a lot of YOUR opinions, but nothing of your wife's opinions. What does she want you to do?

  68. Re:You don't need to! by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 2

    So what are you saying -- epileptic people are broken subhumans and it's irresponsible for them to try to live independently? It's one thing to ban them from driving or operating heavy machinery, it's another to suggest that they can't bring up their own children.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  69. Re:Fuck beta? by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 2
    Newlines have never done anything on slashdot. It's not a beta thing. You have to enclose your paragaphs in

    tags or use
    tags for new lines.
    --
    (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
  70. Re:Fuck beta? by neo256 · · Score: 1

    Ah I see, thank you. I didn't expect the thing to need HTML tags to function. However, I will keep that in mind.

  71. Re:Fuck beta? by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 1

    yeah, it is a bit backwards

    --
    (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
  72. Why a button, try a dog! by jtollefson · · Score: 1

    You may want to look into getting a dog. They're more reliable than a 2 year old with a panic button. I get what you're thinking and it's good that you want to watch out for your family, but, I think a proactive approach may be wiser here.

    I read about these guys, it may be something you want to look into. These dogs have the ability to detect a seizure is coming before it happens.

    http://www.epilepsy.com/get-he...

  73. Im not terribly familiar with epilepsy ... by ai4px · · Score: 1

    When your wife has a seizure, does she fall to a horizontal position? if so you may be able to use a man down type tilt sensor on her waistband or upper arm. It would seem a simple tilt switch oriented properly could sense when a person has fallen. Man, I'd hate to make a 2 year old responsible for mommy.... if something went wrong (ie *really* wrong), it could do emotional harm to the child.... the guilt of knowing you didn't do what you were supposed to to save mommy for example. Tough spot.... de ai4px

  74. French solution by e70838 · · Score: 1

    Hello, I am living in france and my mobile phone provider is "Free" (the brand www.free.fr). Among the included services, I have the possibility to send myself SMS from any computer for free (no charge). The api is very simple: curl -k "https://smsapi.free-mobile.fr/sendmsg?user=108xxxx&pass=J2xxxxx&msg=Je%20Rentre%20!"

  75. Why ask Slashdot? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    Your wife is surely not the only parent who has siezures.

    Surely there's more comprehensive advice available from organisation that actually know the first thing about this than Slashdot.

  76. Self-install Alarm by originalhack · · Score: 1

    Look on-line for places that sell the same kind of fire/burgler alarms that are usually installed by alarm companies to homeowners. Personally, I bought an "ELK M1" along with a receiver that picks up signals from the Honeywell/Ademco alarm sensors and panic buttons. The programming model for these is a bit arcane, but they are rugged and reliable.

    You can set up a smoke detector to automatically call a monitoring center (less than $10/month) and have them send the fire department and you can similarly use all of the standard burgler or adult-panic-button features to call police and medical help. This is all very configurable.

    For your child, you can program the child's "look at me" button as a "Non Alarm Zone" so that it doesn't trigger the alarm immediately but causes the system to call you (or text you or email you) or take whatever additional action you want. (In my case, I also added a Universal Devices controller that does even more automation stuff).

    You also may consider having the child's button trigger an actual panic alarm after buzzing for a while in the house. So, if the child hits the button and neither you nor your wife cancel it, professional help would be called.

    Many of these systems are very configurable and a good monitoring center can have special instructions for different alarms (call house, then call you, then call help). They are a pain to program (designed for non-programmers) but surprisingly flexible.

  77. Plush toy walkie talkie by k2r · · Score: 1

    Maybe a Panic Button is too abstract, but a year ago I saw somewhere a WiFi enabled Plush Toy that a kid could press to send (and receive) a message to an absent parent anywhere on the net.
    I guess that a device like this could be used even before a kid can clearly speak and the kid would be used to it being a means of contacting daddy.

  78. Re:Clarification from OP by moeinvt · · Score: 1

    Having a bad day or are you just an asshole in general? Do you need emotional support, more sleep or professional help to prevent you from making obnoxious comments to people in a tragic situation?
    How dare you judge someone to be a terrible parent based on the mere fact that they don't want their kids in daycare or perhaps can't afford it? You want to sic social services on them and raise the possibility of having the kids taken away just because the wife has a medical condition? You're asking personal questions about their psychological well being? WTF?
    The guy is in a tough spot and he's asking for a technical solution to a given problem from the computer geeks on Slashdot. He doesn't need a fucking lecture from you on how to best manage his family situation and his wife's medical condition. Nor does he need you to run down a list of worst case scenarios for him and raise the specter of Big Brother taking his children away. I'm sure that he and his wife have gone through the "what ifs" 1000 times already.
    The fact that seizures are "unpredictable" does not mean they happen on a regular basis and it doesn't mean they will always be so severe as to constitute an emergency situation. Suppose the frequency is 1-3 times per year? You demand that they pay for daycare and insist that the wife sit around doing nothing because there's a 0.3% chance she might have a seizure on a given day? And that not doing so makes them terrible people?
    Perhaps the OP is too polite, so I'll be the first to tell you to stick your judgements, personal questions, opinions and implied threats up your ass.

  79. Old fashioned but works... PHONE by ossuary · · Score: 1

    I see no mention of whether the person has or does not have a landline or VOIP phone, but here is a possible solution: http://www.vtechphones.com/pro... It is a phone that can be programmed to have hotbuttons. Some of the buttons can even have pictures inserted behind the button so an ailing parent or small child can simply push a button and the phone then dials the corresponding number. That number can be 911, a parent, etc... It also has a panic button dongle that can be worn and used in case of emergency. Good luck. That is a tough situation.

  80. Re:wait, what the hell? by Pope · · Score: 1

    Nope.

    Regular old new lines work just fine.

    Dunno what happened to your post.

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  81. Re:Clarification from OP by j-beda · · Score: 1

    Perhaps I am an asshole. Likely I am suffering from lack of sleep, a poor family life, and lack of fulfilment in my daily existance. Perhaps my raising potential difficulties in the manner I did makes them difficult to understand or even hear. That does not change the validity (or lack thereof) of those issues.

    Raising kids is hard. Taking care of infants and toddlers can be extremely difficult. Dealing with a colicky baby at 3am with a toddler who cannot sleep due to a fever and whatever crap has happened in your life that day and the fact you haven't had a decent night's sleep in three weeks can be almost impossible. Having the additional stresses of your own illness or that of your spouse does not make it any easier.

    Of course, we are all the products of unbroken lines of parents who "successfully" raised kids to breeding ages, so it clearly is not impossible, and there are uncountable number of people who have made it through much more difficult situations, but there are also huge numbers of people who have been in less difficult situations and have failed miserably. Giving some thought while not in the middle of a desperate situation on how to handle that situation can be very useful. Knowing the phone number of the local crisis hotline, the on-call "tele-nurse", or other available resources can be very useful. Taking seriously friends' offers to "call at any time" is also important. Realizing that the stresses we are talking about can and do have serious mental health effects, which can have very real long term effects even if everyone comes out completely physically fine. "Nobody died, but the divorce wasn't pretty" is not the optimal outcome.

    You are right that the spectre of child services swooping in is probably not a useful addition to the discussion. If we assume that the original poster is focussing on family safety to the extent that they think they are mitigating the risk of outcomes that would we catastrophic, then involvement of child services is a non-issue. However the way things have been presented were not along the lines of "I think there is a million-to-one chance that we may have a problem, and I want to provide some extra protection to increase my peace of mind". This felt more like a "There is a 1% chance that we are going to have a problem", and in my opinion those sorts of dangers cannot be reliably addressed by the types of technical measures being considered.

  82. Beaglebone + Arcade Button by Cruciform · · Score: 1

    The day I got my Beaglebone Black I connected an arcade button to it to test the GPIO with the onboard LEDs. Took only a moment to set up and when the button is pressed the LED lights up. Scripting an event to contact you when the button is pressed would be trivial, and it can also host an additional on-board cam for you, among other things.

    1. Re:Beaglebone + Arcade Button by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      Those huge red "EASY" buttons from one of the office supply stores would be perfect for cannibalizing too. I was thinking of using one of those to train the dogs to use as a doorbell.

  83. Re:wait, what the hell? by NotDrWho · · Score: 2

    I'm sure a local church would have people that may volunteer,

    No there aren't. Most churches are stretched thin as it is. Very few could provide in home personnel for 40+ hours a week to someone who's dying. Even fewer even offer daycare facilities, much less in-home daycare.

    I'm sure there are foundations he could apply for assistance with

    Even the poor and seriously ill have trouble finding anyone to provide them care in this country. The few non-profits that offer this kind of assistance are already overwhelmed. They can't provide enough care for the seriously ill poor, much less for a middle-class guy whose wife has occasional epileptic attacks.

    how about a Ou pair or exchange student?

    Even at minimum wage for 40 hours week--that's about $1,200 a month. Pretty major cost for someone whose spouse already isn't working. Even I couldn't afford that easily, and I make significantly more than most.

    Going on Government aid

    WTF government aid are you TALKING about? You think the government provides free full-time nanny service for epileptics? Hell, they don't even provide free drugs for them.

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  84. I thought he asked for help, not trolling? by WinterBeard · · Score: 1

    Some of you guys and gals are being way to rough on this man. He obviously cares about his wife and kid enough to risk asking his question here, but damn, give this guy a break. While the panic button may not be a great idea at least he is thinking about solutions for what is a tough situation. I appreciate those of you who have offered suggestions of a wearable for his wife, a service dog and additionally a panic button for his child.

  85. Re:Fuck beta? by Qzukk · · Score: 1

    I don't know on beta, but on non beta, you go to your preferences (the gear next to the post anonymously checkbox) and choose "Plain Old Text" for your "Comment Post Mode". This gives you the bastard child that is forum style posting, where you can write HTML if you feel like it or you can write whatever and as long as it doesn't look like HTML it will just work but as soon as you want to write < you better break out your html entities guide.

    Also remember, two enters is a paragraph.

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  86. Re:Fuck beta? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1
    You don't need the closing

    tag.
    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  87. Put the kid in day care by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    Problem solved.

  88. Re:You don't need to! by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    Not really. It all falls under the category of "things you need to avoid because of a handicap." It's not an insult to people with epilepsy; it's just facing reality. There's no shame in admitting something is beyond our reasonable capabilities. In fact, it takes more strength to admit it, in many cases. What if she's carrying the toddler down stairs when a seizure occurs? Suddenly it's on par with being behind the wheel with the kid wearing no seatbelt.

    Being responsible for one's own life is one's own responsibility, and if someone wants to do that, and can do that, then more power to them. But being responsible for someone else's life -- especially one's own child -- is something else altogether.

  89. Elderly Care Solution Maybe by Squatting_Dog · · Score: 1

    I remember reading about a smartphone app. for people to monitor their elderly parents that would monitor an individual for being inactive for x amount of time and then sending a text to someone to check on them if x time elapsed. I'm sorry I don't remember the name of the app.(I'm sure you can Google it) but it sounds like it might be a possible solution for you.

    Good luck.

     

  90. Re:You don't need to! by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    So what are you saying -- epileptic people are broken subhumans and it's irresponsible for them to try to live independently? It's one thing to ban them from driving or operating heavy machinery, it's another to suggest that they can't bring up their own children.

    What do you expect from a bunch of people who have a distorted view of the real world because they spend so much time away from it that every problem needs to absolutely have a 100% perfect technical solution? According to their world view, the mother is a bug. Bugs must be eliminated. Ergo ...

    All I can say is it must be nice in that world, where every people problem has a 100% solution rate and nobody is competent if they have a physical or mental illness ... of course, their black or white distorted thinking would also disqualify them as they probably have borderline personality disorder, since they can't recognize that life has at least 50 shades of grey.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  91. esp8266+Arduino by jjdacl · · Score: 1

    I would get an esp8266 (banggood.com $5) and an arduino nano. You can build a little sealed box with just a single switch and a LED on the outside. Kid flicks the switch, the light comes on and they know Daddy will look at the webcams. I'm happy to help you with the arduino code if you choose to do this.

  92. Fair point by s.petry · · Score: 1

    Given the wording from the submitter and his follow up (anonymous) post, I am assuming the worst. With the information at hand, I believe my assumption is fair.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  93. Easy by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    Go to RatShack buy a large button, wire it into an autodialer that uses your landline to dial you and possibly someone else. This way you could say have a neighbor, friend or family member notified as well.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  94. Re:Clarification from OP by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry for you and your wife's situation, as well as the hostile, non-constructive way that many posters have replied. Then again, this is slashdot ... You might want to check more than one place that provides service dogs, because it's not like they only start training them when someone needs one - there are always dogs in the pipeline, partially because some dogs turn out not to be suitable, but more because people who need a service dog of any sort simply can't wait a year or two to get one. You might even want to look at nearby states or provinces.

    In the meantime you might want to try borrowing an ordinary dog during the day from a neighbor is isn't home during the day. Any dog can bark a LOT when something is wrong. You'll hear it if you're monitoring pretty much any room in the house, and your neighbor will appreciate having the dog not being left alone all day. Then when you get the service dog, you don't have to "abandon" the other dog - just give it back to the owners. Or keep having it over for daytimes, even if it's just once in a while. Probably not all that practical, but you never know.

    Good luck to the 4 of you, and maybe you can find some way to keep us up to date :-)

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  95. Re:Clarification from OP by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    You know, a lot of the posts have been cruel and maybe a bit trollish, but I think that so far, you take the cake.

    Are you genetically, physically, and mentally so perfect? I doubt it - at the least you seem to be in need of an empathy transplant.

    She hasn't had a seizure in 9 years and her doctors were even thinking of weaning her off the medication. Do you ban everyone who "might" produce a child who has a chronic disease? And who decides? Before the discovery of insulin, type one diabetes was a death sentence. In 50 years, we'll probably have a permanent cure. 20 years ago there was one type of cancer that had a 100% fatality rate in children. Now - 5%. In the future - who knows?

    You might want to consider your own future - because you are at risk.

    The incidence of epilepsy increases dramatically beginning at age 60 years and the elderly are the fastest growing segment of the general population in developed countries.

    Based upon the LR (lifetime risk) calculations in this population-based study, 1 in 26 people will develop epilepsy during their lifetime. Men have a higher risk of developing epilepsy (1 of every 21 males) than women (1 of every 28 females). This approach is more accurate than cumulative incidence, and it is better comprehended by most people who are accustomed to similar statistics provided for cancer.

    Now throw in mental illnesses:

    The projected lifetime risk estimates suggest that approximately half the population (47-55%) will eventually have a mental disorder in six countries (Colombia, France, New Zealand, South Africa, Ukraine, United States)

    And lets not forget chronic physical diseases - heart, kidneys, diabetes, eyes, cancer, bladder, colon, etc.

    If you look at the stats, it's pretty much impossible that anyone on the whole planet is "perfect" and will never develop problems.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  96. Re:You don't need to! by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

    Everyone is at risk of sudden death, an unexpected fit or whatever. Some people are slightly more prone to it than others, some are extremely prone. Where do we draw the line?

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  97. Device for seniors by Reziac · · Score: 1

    How about one of those devices designed for seniors ("fell and can't get up" call device) -- I gather some connect directly to 911, others to a preset phone number. They're designed for a person possibly incapacitated who only has enough remaining steam to push a button. Basically they're single-function cell phones.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?