Slashdot Mirror


Oregon Residents Riled Over Virtually Staff-free Data Centers Getting Tax-breaks

An anonymous reader writes: The population of Hillsboro, Oregon is becoming vocal about the state's enterprise zone program offering enormous tax concessions to companies setting up data centers in the region — even though the five-year deals on offer only require data center operators to employ one person. That's exactly as many people as one DC plant, Infomart Portland, employs full-time, yet it gets more tax relief than highly-staffed enterprise zone neighbor Solarworld. The current influx of data centers to Hillsboro have only generated seven jobs to date. More installations are coming, and all Hillsboro residents are seeing is space taken up that might have gone to businesses that give something of benefit to the community.

158 comments

  1. And so it begins ... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Finally people are waking up to the fact that the digital revolution doesn't necessarily create jobs, jobs, jobs.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    1. Re:And so it begins ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly the answer is 300,000,000 datacenters, each employing one person.

      Oh, you thought they'd employ Americans?

    2. Re:And so it begins ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I hear that it frees up people to do more creative things though. ;)

    3. Re:And so it begins ... by rogoshen1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      as a resident of Lane County OR, I'd say we have faaaaaaaaaaar too many under employed creative types.

    4. Re:And so it begins ... by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      The question is, could those 300,000,000 datacenters all employ the same person, controlling a horde of robots?

    5. Re:And so it begins ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finally people are waking up to the fact that the digital revolution doesn't necessarily create jobs, jobs, jobs.

      I wish people would wake up to the fact that apps, apps, apps doesn't necessarily create value.

      I don't see app stores shrinking no matter how worthless 99% of the content is.

    6. Re:And so it begins ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's lots and lots of money to be made in blogging!

    7. Re:And so it begins ... by Jstlook · · Score: 0

      Like pee in the reservior?

      --
      ---jstlook ---For that is the way of Elves, for they say both yes AND no, and mean every word of it. --- J.R.R.T.
    8. Re:And so it begins ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and then you'll have a bunch of out work accountants in addition to everybody else. Featherbedding is an industry in and of itself. The fight against automation has a long history. What's important is to make sure the laid off people are fully compensated by all the new tech. All current economic systems must be tossed aside. "What the market will bear" must be recognized for the savagery it engenders, vividly illustrated every Friday after Thanksgiving, and in the places where the raw materials come from.

    9. Re:And so it begins ... by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      Modern datacenters may not necessarily create a great many old-style rank 'em & stack 'em manual labor jobs. But if you know what to do said servers... Well, my year-and-a-half old resume version that's still in some databases from my last job hunt still gets me daily emails and not-infrequent phone calls trying to recruit me.

      Also, I have my doubts about that "only one employee" claim. 24/7 on-site security, for example, should count for at least a dozen staffers, probably more. Services like this are probably contracted and don't technically count as "employees". Still, it's misleading at best to make the "only one employee" claim.

      There are certianly hundreds, maybe thousands, of jobs in businesses that utilize the gear in that data center. Maybe that one small town in Oregon didn't consider that you can operate computers remotely and got themselves a bad deal. But to say categorically that (many) jobs are not being created is profoundly ignorant.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    10. Re:And so it begins ... by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There are certianly hundreds, maybe thousands, of jobs in businesses that utilize the gear in that data center.

      Which doesn't help the community unless those jobs are paying in tax revenue to Hillsboro to offset the tax breaks. You're clearly being intentionally dense if you don't understand the complaints.

    11. Re:And so it begins ... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

      Many of these data centers are run dark - no lights on. Couple that with high security hardware and software, and there's no need for an on-sight security force. And of course there's that data center that is flooded with nitrogen - no oxygen to breathe means no quick smash-and-grab.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    12. Re:And so it begins ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as people are stupid enough to give megacorporations tax breaks for nothing in return, those corporations will say thanks, suckers!

    13. Re:And so it begins ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give a person 6 months of unemployment to find a non-existent job, they'll tread water for up to a year. Show a person that they'll never get a job in the new economy, and they'll sink like a stone in the river after they jump off the bridge because there's no hope.

    14. Re:And so it begins ... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Informative

      the 67 THOUSAND page tax code needs to be scrapped and simplified.

      Except this is about Oregon state tax, and has nothing to do with the federal tax code.

    15. Re:And so it begins ... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, and then you'll have a bunch of out work accountants in addition to everybody else.

      The unemployed accountants could be paid to throw rocks at windows to generate jobs for glaziers.

    16. Re:And so it begins ... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Which doesn't help the community unless those jobs are paying in tax revenue to Hillsboro to offset the tax breaks.

      They don't, because Oregon has no state sales tax. So all the equipment comes in tax free.

    17. Re:And so it begins ... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Interesting

      As long as people are stupid enough to give megacorporations tax breaks for nothing in return ...

      It is really a prisoner's dilemma. The states would all be better off if there were no tax breaks. But if the other states defect, they win unless you defect too. So everybody loses, as it turns into a race to the bottom. The states would all be better off if they had a mutual agreement to stop the preferential subsidies.

    18. Re:And so it begins ... by ganjadude · · Score: 0

      you are correct there, Not living there I have no idea how bad their tax code, if its anything like NYs its just as bad as federal and should also be scrapped

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    19. Re:And so it begins ... by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Did this same one person build the Data Centre? Lay the concrete, build the walls, install the Air-con, the electrical, the plumbing? I'm pretty sure there's more than 40 hours a week worth of work in constructing one of these things.

    20. Re:And so it begins ... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It creates construction jobs. It also creates new jobs that previously didn't exist. Also where the digital revolution displaces people it means those people are now free to work on other things.

      The human race is expanding at an ever increasing rate. The faster we can replace meaningless service jobs, or augment construction jobs so construction can happen faster, more easily or on more fronts the better off we are.

    21. Re:And so it begins ... by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      If anything, the digital revolution obviates the need for tedious, drudgerous work. In the 1960s that was George Jetson speak! Poor George had to work an entire hour per day! But now that we've adopted far-right, archaic ideology and let the super-wealthy get all the spoils of the digital revolution, suddenly "eliminating drudgery" means "eliminating jobs".

      The digital revoluion is set to disemploy up to 50% of Americans over the next 2 decades. It's going to get lots worse before it gets better. That is, unless you are a software engineer.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    22. Re: And so it begins ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... Because they lost taxes compRed to jobs that wouldn't have existed otherwise? Because having jobs is better than not having jobs? Because business that goes elsewhere is good? Because it shows that the tax burden is pushing jobs away ... We have a winner.

    23. Re:And so it begins ... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

      Construction creates temporary jobs. The workers work for a few months on a building that can last for decades. And the digital revolution is no longer creating more jobs than it destroys.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    24. Re:And so it begins ... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

      Building like that are built in a few months, and most of the workers only do a part of the job, and then move on to the next job.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    25. Re:And so it begins ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "on-sight" as in "shoot-on-sight"?

    26. Re:And so it begins ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to say it but not all states are equal in terms of desirability. Even in some states things are not equal without the tax code being taken into account. More people want to live in Southern California for the weather, views, and many other elements then want to live in fly over country.

      Flat tax codes would only make most people move to popular places and ignore the tax code, you would still have winners and mostly empty data centers. They just would move around to the new normal.

    27. Re:And so it begins ... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

      That is, unless you are a software engineer.

      Hahahahahahahahaha ... guess you didn't follow all the links in all the articles to supplementary material. One makes a darned good argument for the elimination of writing software by having computers do it. And why not - a computer can mix and match billions of code snippets already written and brute-force the "creativity" out of creating software by testing each one. I give it 20 years.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    28. Re:And so it begins ... by robbiedo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hillsboro, Oregon is not some small town.

    29. Re:And so it begins ... by robbiedo · · Score: 1

      But is would normally have property tax.

    30. Re:And so it begins ... by hawguy · · Score: 1, Informative

      That is, unless you are a software engineer.

      Hahahahahahahahaha ... guess you didn't follow all the links in all the articles to supplementary material. One makes a darned good argument for the elimination of writing software by having computers do it. And why not - a computer can mix and match billions of code snippets already written and brute-force the "creativity" out of creating software by testing each one. I give it 20 years.

      If you have a library of 25 code snippets and need to find the magic order to combine just 10 of them to do your task, that's around 1.1 x 10^13 combinations that need to be tested. So around 10000 more than a "billion".

      if you have a library of 50 code snippets and need to find the magic order to combine 25 of them to do your task, that's around 2 x 10^39 combinations. If you can test a billion billion (1e18) every second, it would still take 60 trillion years to test them all.

      I don't think brute forcing code is going to replace anyone's job.

    31. Re: And so it begins ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know, right? I mean, look at all the young people that moved to SoCal during the glory years of the dotcom boom.http://i.imgur.com/Hwpiv6W.jpg

    32. Re:And so it begins ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do they change failed components or install/replace systems? Seems like it would be expensive to keep flushing and refilling the DC with nitrogen every time someone has to come in. Or does the tech just suit up with a SCUBA tank?

    33. Re:And so it begins ... by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      no they will just work the criminalizing street homelessness system where we all the pay the high cost of the jail / court system that costs a lot more then just putting them in homes.

    34. Re:And so it begins ... by Shalian · · Score: 2

      Hey funny you mention that, There was this article earlier that said selfish extortion is the best way to win the prisoner's dilemma. That sounds like modern corporations dealing with local governments in a nutshell1

    35. Re:And so it begins ... by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      I hear that it frees up people to do more creative things though. ;)

      Reminds me of a thing I read by an anarchist writer on how he propsed city tasks like garbage collection would happen. He said the city would ask children to do it, because children "like rubbish" so they didnt have to get paid.

      Somehow i don't think the guy had kids.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    36. Re:And so it begins ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I see what you did there... but no one has really made any convincing argument that the tax code should be scrapped. It got to 67,000 pages (if that's even a real statistic) for a reason. How many man-hours of work does that represent? It reminds me of young cowboy programmers who always want to chuck the whole thing and start over, actually believing they can single-handedly replace 1000s of man-years of work, because everyone who came before them was an idiot.

      You could make the exact same argument about the entire legal system. How many pages is the criminal code? Way too many, right? Sure there were centuries of debate and millions of man hours put into it, but it's just too complicated. It'd be faster to just rewrite it from scratch in Java than to fix all the issues with it.

    37. Re: And so it begins ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't get it, or you are intentionally being retarded. The whole point of automation was not to free people for other jobs, it was to free up people so they can enjoy life. Basically the automation to create the fruits of labour that will then be shared amongst those that became redundant. But since we live in a greedy, fuck thy peer society (of descendants of sociopaths and criminals forced to leave Europe) this is not going to happen. Instead we must think of population control. this planet can't susta more than 2.7-3 billion Homo sapiens any way.

    38. Re:And so it begins ... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2

      Security is increasingly automated. I've seen estimates that 19/20 security jobs will be replaced with robots. Humans will only handle exceptions.

      They are testing a security robot now which patrols the grounds, record everything, and call for human backup if something unusual happens. It can't do steps but that's about the only limitation.

      At the level 3 data center in houston, there are no security guards anyway. A double airlock style door which requires a card and password at each door to get in the center.

      I think people somethings think they "won" and push their advantage too hard. Bad things could happen to the data center. The police might happen to be on the other side of town dealing with a call. Then perhaps human security will be required.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    39. Re:And so it begins ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it does. Just not in this country.

    40. Re:And so it begins ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finally people are waking up to the fact that the digital revolution doesn't necessarily create jobs, jobs, jobs.

      No, they aren't, they're just gobbling up more hysterical reporting.
      Take this line for example: "More installations are coming, and all Hillsboro residents are seeing is space taken up that might have gone to businesses that give something of benefit to the community."
      Even if we ignore everything else, this is completely overlooking the fact that the land was purchased or leased from... the local economy. The electricity, water, and possibly natural gas... are produced and/or taxed by... the local economy. The people who built the actual datacenter itself... yup. locals.

      No, these datacenters aren't some huge boon to the economy, especially if the politicians are giving them away tax-free. But they also aren't some kind of parasitic organism consuming the region, despite what this article is suggesting.

    41. Re:And so it begins ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which doesn't help the community unless those jobs are paying in tax revenue to Hillsboro to offset the tax breaks.

      They don't, because Oregon has no state sales tax. So all the equipment comes in tax free.

      No, if it's purchased in-state it's tax-free. At least in terms of sales tax. Then there's business equipment taxes, and property taxes, and the equipment carries value as corporate asset which can also be taxed. And don't forget the electricity to operate it.

      But you're also overlooking facility maintenance and repairs, which add to the local economy. No, it's not creating huge piles of jobs, but if the citizens are pissed then they should go complain to the lawmakers who are handing out tax breaks, not piss and moan about "teh Evilz of tekknologee". Keep in mind these are the same clowns who think unpowered microwave towers are scrambling their Vibes, Maaaan.

    42. Re:And so it begins ... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Construction jobs are not temporary. These people don't come out of the service industry, build something, and then go back. Construction jobs are on-going with expanding infrastructure.

      Technology on a macro scale does not displace jobs. It moves them around and increases human efficiency. It now takes less people and less time to build a building compared to 50 years ago. That does not mean there are less people working now, it means there are more building projects happening at a faster pace.

    43. Re:And so it begins ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The tax breaks are not permanent. There is nothing to say that other taxes cannot be levied. For example, the county could pass an infrastructure tax on companies that employee fewer than 20 people and consume more than 20kW. After it passes, this would solve that problem. There is an expense in moving the data center, so as long as the tax is not overly onerous the companies would stay. Even if they left, the county loses one job and suddenly has a nice building available and selling for cheap for a company more in keeping with county goals.

    44. Re:And so it begins ... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      If your code snippets are all working modules (not just functions) will well-defined inputs and outputs, the brute-forcing takes on a different meaning - combining modules that have the appropriate inputs and outputs with each other. Entirely doable.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    45. Re:And so it begins ... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      The systems are standardized - they can be automatically pulled and brought to a place safe for people. However, in the case that's already deployed, they use self-contained air units, like fire fighters.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    46. Re: And so it begins ... by tlambert · · Score: 1

      I know, right? I mean, look at all the young people that moved to SoCal during the glory years of the dotcom boom.http://i.imgur.com/Hwpiv6W.jpg

      Where are the big arrows coming into California from Mexico, China, and Russia, among other countries? That map seems incomplete.

    47. Re:And so it begins ... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Ask the Chinese factory workers at Foxconn how they feel about being replaced by robots that can work longer hours for even less than they are making? It's already started and the company wants to replace all 1 million workers with 1 million robots.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    48. Re:And so it begins ... by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      It was news to me that anybody was doing this, but liquid nitrogen costs about 20 cents per liter as far as I can tell online (probably cheaper in bulk). You would need about 1.4 l per cubic meter of air you want to displace.

    49. Re:And so it begins ... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Because of the preferential rate for electricity, the rest of the citizens of the city are paying higher rates than they would otherwise. The land was leased from a corporation with 1 employee. That money doesn't stay in the local economy either. Subsidies like this have always failed to give a good return on government investment, whether it's for sports arenas or business.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    50. Re:And so it begins ... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Construction jobs are not temporary. These people don't come out of the service industry, build something, and then go back. Construction jobs are on-going with expanding infrastructure.

      Tell that to the construction workers who lost their jobs when the housing bubble burst. A lot of them went into service industries to make ends meet. Others simply couldn't find jobs.

      Also, building out infrastructure takes capital investment. Since it's not a "pay-as-you-go" proposition, it's funded by debt, which increases taxes. Much of the cost is materials, not labour, and those materials (cement, structural steel) come from other countries.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    51. Re:And so it begins ... by bruce_the_loon · · Score: 1

      Can't you keep them occupied by coming up with better ways to remove dead whales than dynamite?

      --
      Trying to become famous by taking photos. Visit my homepage please.
    52. Re:And so it begins ... by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      As a resident of the Portland Metro area, I'd say we have you beat in that department by miles, and miles, and miles... ;)

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    53. Re:And so it begins ... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      You can get nitrogen concentratorsthat are even cheaper. They're power hungry but otherwise fairly inexpensive. And if you are just trying to do fire suppression, you don't need a pure nitrogen atmosphere by any means.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    54. Re:And so it begins ... by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      They don't, because Oregon has no state sales tax. So all the equipment comes in tax free.

      I'm sure the regulatory fees and taxes the paid to PGE and NW Natural (if they use gas to heat the place) says otherwise, since they in turn have to pay rent to the city for right-of-way, permits for new construction to service the joint, etc. ;)

      Funny thing is, I used to work for SolarWorld... and there are no saints there either when it comes to jobs. While they do employ a lot of folks, it tops out at around maybe 800-900 or so employees, a majority of which are entry-level jobs contracted from Kelly Services at a starting wage of $10/hr (which is pretty crap, considering the drive distance to get there and the high local cost-of-living). They originally promised 1500 employees in total when they got the tax break, but that promise was made long before they shut down manufacturing in Vancouver, WA and Camarillo, CA... and for a long time, half the plant was shut down, meaning a lot of laid-off workers.

      To be fair, in all cases the businesses do generate a lot of local jobs that don't involve their HR department - construction and professional services (HVAC, security, facility maintenance, etc) among them... just that they'll never generate as many jobs as Intel has generated in the area (something like 16,000 jobs or so for the fabs and R&D Eng facilities - not counting the new D1X fab being built).

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    55. Re:And so it begins ... by camg188 · · Score: 1
      From the slashdot headline:

      The population of Hillsboro, Oregon is becoming vocal about the state's enterprise zone program offering enormous tax concessions

      First sentence from the fn article:

      OregonLive readers reacted quickly to a story posted Monday morning outlining how out-of-state companies are building data centers in Hillsboro, attracted by massive property tax breaks.

      What a joke. The commenters on OregonLive now represent the entire population of Hillsboro? Half of the article is just reprints of readers' comments on the original story.

    56. Re:And so it begins ... by hawguy · · Score: 1

      If your code snippets are all working modules (not just functions) will well-defined inputs and outputs, the brute-forcing takes on a different meaning - combining modules that have the appropriate inputs and outputs with each other. Entirely doable.

      That doesn't change the numbers - if you have a reasonably sized library of code modules and try to brute force an app by putting them together randomly to see what you end up with, it's going to take an obscenely long time. And it's not even clear how this code writing AI will know when it gets a useful app -- It may create a working calculator app that can only calculate the cosine of base 13 numbers... it's a valid app, but is it a useful app? How would it know? What about the billion other apps that do a similar task, like calculating the sine of base 213 numbers?

    57. Re:And so it begins ... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      This can be said of all surveys that don't include 100% of the target population. The commenters certainly represent a cross-section of opinions from Hillsboro residents.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    58. Re:And so it begins ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not living there you have no idea how good it is either. You also have no idea if it's anything like NY's.
      Basically you don't know anything about it at all.
      We will just summarize with you don't know anything.

    59. Re:And so it begins ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your argument started falling apart once you called the tax code "work". It's nothing like a program and nothing like a legal system - the complexity increases as additions are made to serve whatever special interests are in fashion at the time.

    60. Re:And so it begins ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see you have never played around with combinatorial problems before.
      Take the Knight's Tour. Very simple problem. You have a knight that can move the way a Knight moves in chess. There are only 8 possible moves. The rules are simple: You visit every square exactly once. You might call this a well defined interface.
      The small board (it's only 8x8!) makes this problem seem easy to solve at first.
      A program to solve the Knight's Tour is trivial to implement recursively... You simply try all 8 moves. If you go out of bounds, you return nothing. If you hit the same square twice, you return nothing. If you hit the final square, you return the path. Simple!
      When you go to run your program you will notice the problem. It may take a few days of not getting the result back until you realize, there are an awful lot of combinations. In fact, there are 4 x 10^51 possible move sequences. An implementation not heavily optimized running on a modern quad core with some parallelization can achieve, perhaps, a few billion "failed paths" per minute.
      Suppose you achieve a very high rate of throughput, 10 billion a minute! That will still take you around 4 x 10^41 minutes. Do you know how long that is? It's 7.61 x 10^35 years. That is order of magnitudes longer than the life of the universe.
      Of course, you can quickly solve the Knight's Tour by simply implementing Warnsdorff's rule, a heuristic that gives a solution in about 3 ms in a naive java implementation I wrote after testing just a few hundred potential sequences.

      In your theory of modules (as opposed to "functions," as you say), the more complex and sophisticated your modules are, the more you will have. There will be many ways to combine them. Brute forcing does NOT take on a "different meaning" at all, you are simply brute forcing something of a different shape. You say it is entirely doable, but you have no proof. You don't even have a decent understanding of how quickly the combinations add up.

      Furthermore, how will the computer know when it has found a working program? Will we have to specify what we mean? We have to somehow tell the computer what we want for us to find it, do we not? I doubt that natural language processing will let me say something like, "Make me a social media app even cooler than facebook!" and get a valid result. How spartan can these specifications be while still giving the computer enough information to determine what is to be built.

      In short, you say it is doable. The method you describe is not feasible based on computational complexity alone. I disagree with you that "working modules" vs "functions" changes the problem complexity much, if at all.

    61. Re: And so it begins ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that why I see so many unemployed people biding their time on facebook games? The point of automation is to save companies money and do repetitive work faster with less errors.

    62. Re:And so it begins ... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      You can optimize the "knights tour" in many ways. For example, eliminate all mirror images and all symmetrical images - this right away cuts the solution field by 8. Additionally, start the knight on one color only - eliminates half the rest right there. I'm sure given a bit of thought, I can come up with a few other optimizations, and people a lot smarter than I also can, to cut the problem down to size.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    63. Re:And so it begins ... by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      Which doesn't help the community unless those jobs are paying in tax revenue to Hillsboro to offset the tax breaks.

      They don't, because Oregon has no state sales tax. So all the equipment comes in tax free.

      But there are property taxes, business related purchase taxes and so on. You are just being deliberately obtuse for the sake of having an ideological argument.

    64. Re: And so it begins ... by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      I know, right? I mean, look at all the young people that moved to SoCal during the glory years of the dotcom boom.http://i.imgur.com/Hwpiv6W.jpg

      Where are the big arrows coming into California from Mexico, China, and Russia, among other countries? That map seems incomplete.

      And where are the arrows coming into the rest of the country from Mexico, China and Russia, among other countries? Yes, the map is incomplete.

    65. Re:And so it begins ... by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      Did this same one person build the Data Centre? Lay the concrete, build the walls, install the Air-con, the electrical, the plumbing? I'm pretty sure there's more than 40 hours a week worth of work in constructing one of these things.

      And somehow this translates to property tax exemptions how? There are other businesses that went through the same construction costs, that created more permanent jobs and that end up (or ended up) paying more taxes during the same tax period these tax breaks occurred. From a sensible, logical point of view, how to we justify that?

      Notice that I'm saying "justify", not "explain" because I can explain anything away with a barrage of cynicism. Justification, the rationale behind something, however, that is what I'm asking.

    66. Re:And so it begins ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can optimize the "knights tour" in many ways. For example, eliminate all mirror images and all symmetrical images - this right away cuts the solution field by 8. Additionally, start the knight on one color only - eliminates half the rest right there. I'm sure given a bit of thought, I can come up with a few other optimizations, and people a lot smarter than I also can, to cut the problem down to size.

      Absolutely, or you can use the obvious heuristic I mentioned in my post which solves the "knight's tour" in generally a very short period of time without any of the changes you mentioned. This was merely an example of how quickly combinatorial numbers grow.

      Your post supposes that by having the unit of program be "module" instead of "function" would somehow make this a "doable" problem. You have no proof to this however. Your response here merely suggests that you hope heuristics and optimizations would be provided to make the search space doable in a reasonable period of time, but you have no reason to suspect it will. You merely assume that technology will be developed to solve the problem. A lot of people around here like to assume that technology will definitely appear like strong AI. However, the hope that some breakthrough will be achieved is not the same as achieving it.

      Even if we set aside computational complexity of such an endeavor, you still ignore the obvious point that I and hawguy made: How does the program know if it found a "good" program, or one that meets my need? Do I have to describe my needs? Would this take the form of a specification? This specification would have to detail on a sufficiently useful level what the program should do for the automagic computer programmer to write it. Is this magical program of your supposed to write all the possible programs AND determine what is needed or useful at the same time?

      Or do you suppose you will just speak out loud, "Computer, make me a social network program targeted at cats," and get a meaningful system? That would require you to not only overcome substantial problems in the space we described, of automated programming, but also in natural language processing - an area we basically suck at.

      You can keep hoping and praying to your techno-messiah to rescue you. But the reality is there is absolutely no reason to believe that, in 20 years, we will have automated programming systems sufficient to replace programmers. Indeed, the development tools we have now are barely better than 20 years ago. 20 years ago we were promised AI, and we really are not any closer than we ever have been. We have more hardware so we can do fancier statistics over larger problem sets, but nothing like you would expect from true intelligence.

    67. Re:And so it begins ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And somehow this translates to property tax exemptions how?

      All companies have to go through construction costs, but not all companies are paying those costs to your state's construction workers and tradesmen.

      When a company from outside moves in, they bring new business to your state's construction guys, meaning more taxable income for your state. If you believe in trickle down, that increased income will spread to other businesses (places where construction guys go to spend money), and you can get more taxes from those businesses as well.

      All those taxes then could then be used to pay for tax breaks to the company moving in

      At least, that's the theory. The devil's in the details on whether your increased tax revenue is enough to cover the amount of tax breaks you give.

    68. Re:And so it begins ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can optimize the "knights tour" in many ways. For example, eliminate all mirror images and all symmetrical images - this right away cuts the solution field by 8. Additionally, start the knight on one color only - eliminates half the rest right there. I'm sure given a bit of thought, I can come up with a few other optimizations, and people a lot smarter than I also can, to cut the problem down to size.

      Well there are many well known optimizations you can read about on Wikipedia. I think you still do not appreciate the size of the numbers. The right heuristics find you a problem right quickly. Your examples of problem space reductions, however, barely reduces it by an order of magnitude. We are talking about 7 x 10^35. Even if your optimizations were to cut the problem space to one trillionth of the original (which I am sure you will agree, is far better than your off the cuff solutions which are barely a single order of magnitude) It would still take billions of years to try all possibilities at a rate of 10 billion/minute (which is a decent rate for a single machine).

      Of course as mentioned, Warnsdorff's heuristic of always choosing the next move which has the least number of possible moves will solve the entire problem in a few milliseconds. You assume such a heuristic exists for this mythic program generating program, but until a proof or demonstration of such a thing exists it is simply hope.

    69. Re:And so it begins ... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Example - you have several different database crud operation code modules to choose from.

      You also have several different database user interface to pick from.

      Additionally, you have several database schemas to choose from, including different indexing options depending on what is important to get fast, the mix of reads, deletes, writes, and rewrites, etc..

      And several data input modules - keyboard, external data feed, whatever.

      And several logging modules, each compatible with the back end.

      And several different error-reporting modules (do we put up a user alert and give a chance to edit it, do we not allow it and send a text message to a phone, whatever).

      It would be able to give a list of data we want, like Name, etc. without specifiying the data size or internal type, because that's all been standardized (last name, first name, middle name, etc).

      Given the requirements in more or less plain english, it should be possible to come up with the optimal solution pretty quickly, since each module has standard interfaces to the others.

      For example, I need a way to track a million people. The information that's mandatory is their name and address, date of birth, and gender. When the address changes, the old address should be preserved so that I can trace back if necessary.

      Optional fields are cell number, email, home and work phone numbers, and 1 or more emergency contacts. When any of these change, the old ones should be preserved so I can trace back if necessary.

      Initial input is via a record dump on a usb key stored in SDF format, with updates being done by either using the same method or by someone typing them in.

      A sequential account number should be auto-generated for those records that don't have an account number from the initial dump. The account number is 2 letters, 6 digits, then 2 random digits to help detect bad account numbers.

      I should be able to search by account number, name, or any phone number.

      Input data from the initial dump should be flagged if not valid, and input data from later should only be entered if all required fields are there.

      Auto-generating such an application should be doable now.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    70. Re:And so it begins ... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      I've already posted one solution here. And yes, I'm well aware of how quickly numbers expand (the "I'll put a dollar on the first checkerboard square, the same on the next, etc. You just have to put a penny on the first, and double the amount every day. When we finish the 64th square, you take the money I put down, and I take the money you put down" being a simple-to-comprehend example).

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    71. Re:And so it begins ... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      You're assuming there is only one solution, and that we have to search the whole problem space to find it by brute force with only a few optimizations.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    72. Re:And so it begins ... by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Example - you have several different database crud operation code modules to choose from.

      You also have several different database user interface to pick from.

      Additionally, you have several database schemas to choose from, including different indexing options depending on what is important to get fast, the mix of reads, deletes, writes, and rewrites, etc..

      And several data input modules - keyboard, external data feed, whatever.

      And several logging modules, each compatible with the back end.

      And several different error-reporting modules (do we put up a user alert and give a chance to edit it, do we not allow it and send a text message to a phone, whatever).

      It would be able to give a list of data we want, like Name, etc. without specifiying the data size or internal type, because that's all been standardized (last name, first name, middle name, etc).

      Given the requirements in more or less plain english, it should be possible to come up with the optimal solution pretty quickly, since each module has standard interfaces to the others.

      For example, I need a way to track a million people. The information that's mandatory is their name and address, date of birth, and gender. When the address changes, the old address should be preserved so that I can trace back if necessary.

      Optional fields are cell number, email, home and work phone numbers, and 1 or more emergency contacts. When any of these change, the old ones should be preserved so I can trace back if necessary.

      Initial input is via a record dump on a usb key stored in SDF format, with updates being done by either using the same method or by someone typing them in.

      A sequential account number should be auto-generated for those records that don't have an account number from the initial dump. The account number is 2 letters, 6 digits, then 2 random digits to help detect bad account numbers.

      I should be able to search by account number, name, or any phone number.

      Input data from the initial dump should be flagged if not valid, and input data from later should only be entered if all required fields are there.

      Auto-generating such an application should be doable now.

      What you are describing now is not what you were describing earlier. Earlier you suggested that a computer could "mix and match billions of code snippets already written and brute-force" a program.

      What you're suggesting now is that you want the computer to parse your natural language of a problem and turn that into a program.

      Do you not see the vast difference between the two?

    73. Re:And so it begins ... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Of course. One of the articles I found proposed to do brute force solutions, and given the terabytes of code out there, it should be possible. Even the creation of the original modules should be open to brute-forcing.

      But note I described the results I wanted - not the code to achieve them. And since I've already written code to do it that way around the turn of the decade, and I don't have the resources to brute-force code creation, I'm figuring I'll go with automated code generation from a simple wish list.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    74. Re:And so it begins ... by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Of course. One of the articles I found proposed to do brute force solutions, and given the terabytes of code out there, it should be possible. Even the creation of the original modules should be open to brute-forcing.

      Having terabytes of code to choose from does not make brute forcing any easier.

      But note I described the results I wanted - not the code to achieve them. And since I've already written code to do it that way around the turn of the decade, and I don't have the resources to brute-force code creation, I'm figuring I'll go with automated code generation from a simple wish list.

      Sure, natural language processing is becoming more refined and will continue to become more powerful. But that's not brute forcing - the natural language processor doesn't piece together random combinations of code to give you what you asked for, it already has algorithms to retrieve data from a database, perform transformations and updates, etc, so it puts together the code logically, not through blindly pasting code snippets together to see if it does what it needs.

    75. Re:And so it begins ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear that it frees up people to do more creative things though. ;)

      yes, I am forced to early retirement, low income and keeping mentally active by following a few IT courses on the wet, meeting with peers to solve the worlds problems.

    76. Re:And so it begins ... by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      So all those builders got paid though right? I mean it still a job that wasn't there before, and if the data centre building industry is growing, then there's more and more work for the people who design and build them.

    77. Re:And so it begins ... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I would gladly tell them that. I work in construction management. Our biggest problem is not getting enough people continuously. The primary problem for people who are in construction is that they chose a career which doesn't have a fixed home base. I know construction workers who exited the industry because they didn't want to move to another project. Well that is part of the job description, much like a taxi driver can't work from a home office. Frankly if there's anyone in construction out of work at the moment then they are too inflexible to have been in the industry to begin with (not just location but also in the field, the housing bubble burst but there were MANY other fields of construction. e.g. The largest industrial project in Indiana's history hit construction phase pretty much just as the housing bubble burst, and they weren't able to get enough workers to do the basic cement foundations putting the project behind).

      Building infrastructure takes capital investment, you are 100% right. Except the cost of investment is steady, and the efficiency created by technology is what allows this steady investment to open up on more fronts. Just consider how frequently we are building a new tallest building in the world, and how each consecutive one isn't actually considerably more expensive than the previous despite being larger. Buildings are getting bigger, we are getting more of them, and best of all we do all this for the same expense thanks to newer technologies, and that's in-spite of all the new costs such as safety compliance that the construction industry now faces.

    78. Re:And so it begins ... by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      Oh, there's no justification. I agree the whole process is corrupt as balls. I'm just pointing out that there was more than one job created here. However temporary, a lot more than one person got paid for this project.

    79. Re:And so it begins ... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      As I said, I don't have the resources to brute-force, so I came up with a better way. However, given enough resources (sometime before we reduce the solar system to computronium particles, I hope) others have already said it's possible.

      For now, there's still room for humans :-)

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    80. Re:And so it begins ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is simply another programming language. And it is a declarative language (similar to Prolog, or SQL) where you describe the results rather than an imperative language (most of what we use). This is hardly a novel idea. This would require a quantum leap forward in NLP.

      Still, it is good that you recognized that your original idea of simply brute forcing every program possible and picking out the good ones isn't feasible.

    81. Re:And so it begins ... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Isn't feasible for ME. Doesn't mean it isn't feasible for someone with adequate resources.

      Genetic algorithms are one form of brute forcing (as opposed to introspection/design) that can work.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    82. Re:And so it begins ... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      http://www.technologyreview.co...

      Knightscope may not outright replace many security guards soonâ"over a million of them were employed in the U.S. last year, according to an estimate from the U.S. Department of Laborâ(TM)s Bureau of Labor Statistics. But the estimated hourly wage these guards earned was more than twice the $6.25 that Knightscope says it will charge for its robots, which could tempt some companies and schools to at least try them out.

      http://robotsecuritysystems.co...
      http://metro.co.uk/2014/06/16/...
      http://www.gsnmagazine.com/art...

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  2. indirect jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think this fails to take into account the indirect job creation that this operation permits. For instance, the building maintenance and construction had to be done by locals. Any time the A/C breaks down, it has to be repaired by locals. If a server fries, there has to be someone to build that machine and swap it out. There is a lot of consumption of infrastructure resources, like power and water, that also feeds into the economy. There are a lot of DC jobs that you can't see. Granted, they aren't the same number of people as a factory might employ, but there are a lot of unseen positions that these data centres create.

    1. Re:indirect jobs by laurencetux · · Score: 5, Informative

      and i can counter with just about that many MORE indirect jobs that the place employing say 25 people would generate (added to your list).

      Food delivery folks
      Supplies delivery folks
      Clothing shops
      car dealers
      Entertainment venues
      Schools (wanna see if you can make a team of folks that DON"T have kids without doing something actionable??)
      Food shops

    2. Re:indirect jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I get entire racks prebuilt shipped in and out, it just takes one on-site person to plug it in then the shippers get back in their truck and go back whence they came.

      That said, if the company cited really does only have one employee, I'm glad not to do business with them. I'd require a bare minimum of three to at least pretend someone is on site 24x7.

    3. Re:indirect jobs by Cow007 · · Score: 1

      Indirect benefit of living near industry like this better infrastructure. My power is more reliable and I get better water than the folks down the road and I suspect living across from the big business park in Beaverton isn't completely unrelated

      --
      411 Y0UR 8453 4R3 8310NG 70 U5!! -NSA
    4. Re:indirect jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How many of those jobs are in the vicinity of the data center? Localities don't give tax breaks to help the global economy. They do it to help their local economy.

    5. Re:indirect jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's probably not what they had in mind when they were creating those tax incentives. You do get indirect benefit, but you would be able to buy those benefits with the money that you're not providing as a tax incentive if they didn't build the minimum necessary facility. In some cases, like with Boeing, they wind up taking the money and moving all of the production they were supposed to be building locally elsewhere because somebody forgot to require them to build it locally.

      There's also the reality that those tax incentives could be spent on things like education that would bring more jobs to the area on a per dollar basis. That's the real issue with subsidizing datacenters that employ basically nobody locally.

    6. Re:indirect jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The question isn't whether ANY economic benefit is brought to the community, but whether that benefit exceeds the ~750k per year of tax reduction given to the company mentioned in the article. Some people seem to think so, some not. Hard to tell who is right, but it deserves to be highlighted that communities simply paying corporations to establish isn't automatically a great deal.

    7. Re:indirect jobs by ConstantineM · · Score: 1

      The rest are probably contractors, which wouldn't be employees. So, the whole metric of the number of full-time [on-site?] employees is quite biased to underestimate the number of people involved in the operation.

    8. Re:indirect jobs by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Most of the data centers I deal with are unmanned. It doesn't matter when you go, unless you call ahead, there is nobody there to meet you. There isn't any staff that hangs around. The security is all automated. The many cameras are monitored by an off-site force.

    9. Re:indirect jobs by uncqual · · Score: 1

      In general, another factor in the equation is what tax revenue would have been generated on the land consumed by the DC if the DC hadn't been built. In an area where land is plentiful, the land might be (under)utilized for the next five years by something that would generate less net tax revenue.

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    10. Re:indirect jobs by knightghost · · Score: 1

      I think this fails to take into account the indirect job creation that this operation permits. For instance, the building maintenance and construction had to be done by locals. Any time the A/C breaks down, it has to be repaired by locals. If a server fries, there has to be someone to build that machine and swap it out. There is a lot of consumption of infrastructure resources, like power and water, that also feeds into the economy. There are a lot of DC jobs that you can't see. Granted, they aren't the same number of people as a factory might employ, but there are a lot of unseen positions that these data centres create.

      Not really. Most of the materials are imported and configuring them is very quick. Your "lots of jobs" = not local.

    11. Re:indirect jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you're happy to live in a 3rd world country called the USA?

      People used to take those for granted. Well, a long time ago, when there was still a middle class.

    12. Re:indirect jobs by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I was wondering abput this myself. Keep in mind, the tax value of the property might not have been as high before the data center was built either.

      But Oregon and the counties in it also tax business income in the state. The state is like 6.7% on the first $10 mil and some higher number after that. So lets guess that the property tax was half as much and the data center pays $5000k in income taxes a year. Is it worth it considering a likely or possible alternative of less than $400k a year without it?

      And keep in mind, i have no clue on the previous tax revenue. I'm just asking if the extra in other taxes with the business makes it worth it or not.

    13. Re:indirect jobs by RabidReindeer · · Score: 2

      and i can counter with just about that many MORE indirect jobs that the place employing say 25 people would generate (added to your list).

      Food delivery folks
      Supplies delivery folks
      Clothing shops
      car dealers
      Entertainment venues
      Schools (wanna see if you can make a team of folks that DON"T have kids without doing something actionable??)
      Food shops

      Versus how many people would be doing the above jobs if instead of a 25-person data facility, an old-time 1500-person factory was located there?

      It's like the old trickle-down fallacy. If a CEO earns 400 times what the other employees do and lays them off, is he going to buy 400 times as much toilet paper?

    14. Re:indirect jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For instance, the building maintenance and construction had to be done by locals.

      Since when?

      Any time the A/C breaks down, it has to be repaired by locals.

      Not true either.

      There is a lot of consumption of infrastructure resources, like power and water, that also feeds into the economy.

      Uh huh. I really doubt any of the citizens are seeing any benefit from these DCs consuming local resources but not returning any tax money to city.

    15. Re:indirect jobs by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Food delivery/shops -> with only 25 jobs and thousands of unemployed I can pay those 25 people subsistence wage. They won't be buying food from restaurants. They can barely feed themselves. Same goes for clothing and entertainment. As for cars, hah! They can walk. Meanwhile we're cutting funding to schools. And besides, once they have kids they're dead weight. I'll just fire 'em and hire more young single people from the local tent city.

      See, once you start racing to the bottom there's no end in sight. And all the trickle down (voodoo) economics in the world won't save you.

      --
      Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    16. Re:indirect jobs by hawguy · · Score: 1

      I get entire racks prebuilt shipped in and out, it just takes one on-site person to plug it in then the shippers get back in their truck and go back whence they came.

      That said, if the company cited really does only have one employee, I'm glad not to do business with them. I'd require a bare minimum of three to at least pretend someone is on site 24x7.

      If you have a lights-out datacenter, you don't need employees on-site 24x7 because replacing hardware is not a time-critical task, if a disk drive, server or switch fails, you can replace it during your next monthly maintenance sweep. If a power system failure takes out half the datacenter, you failover to your backup datacenter while you wait for a repair crew to arrive at the failed datacenter. Whether you have an employee on-site or not, he's not likely to be able to fix anything himself anyway.

      You don't need people on-site to monitor the datacenter, you can have everything monitored by your NOC on the other side of the country.

    17. Re:indirect jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And as long as They keep focusing on only the profit and a few simplistic numbers while ignoring the people, society will continue in a downward spiral. Then they'll be all surprised when there's mass unemployment, poverty, crime, violence, and eventually, revolution.

      Sometimes profit has to take a back seat for society to progress.

    18. Re:indirect jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But those "indirect" jobs would have been created by ANY business that was built, not just data centers, so they're a wash. The complaint is that the tax breaks were meant to increase local employment, the idea being the money paid to the new employees and pumped into the local economy would be greater than the lost taxes and have a positive impact. But with the data centers employing so few people, the tax breaks are having a negative economic impact instead.

    19. Re:indirect jobs by tlambert · · Score: 1

      There's also the reality that those tax incentives could be spent on things like education that would bring more jobs to the area on a per dollar basis. That's the real issue with subsidizing datacenters that employ basically nobody locally.

      So you can give the tax breaks, and have the data center built locally, and employ construction workers, ongoing site maintenance workers, etc., which you don't count as employees because they are contractors, yet they have jobs.

      Or you can *not* give the tax break, and have a vacant lot, as the data center is built in Kansas or wherever instead.

      Pick one.

    20. Re:indirect jobs by tlambert · · Score: 1

      Not really. Most of the materials are imported and configuring them is very quick. Your "lots of jobs" = not local.

      If only there were some way to make Oregon economically desirable to businesses...

    21. Re:indirect jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you're happy to live in a 3rd world country called the USA?

      People used to take those for granted. Well, a long time ago, when there was still a middle class.

      Sounds like someone ought to go visit an actual 3rd world country and get a taste of perspective.

  3. Amazon, anybody...? by DogDude · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I'd be interested in seeing a poll of the number of people bitching about the lack of local jobs being created who also shop online.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:Amazon, anybody...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      False equivalence - the question here is whether the data centers bring in enough tax revenue through direct or indirect means to offset their tax breaks. If not, then they are effectively picking Oregon residents' pockets by state proxy.

  4. 1 employee? Not the entire story. by tehSpork · · Score: 5, Informative

    I live in Hillsboro and have no complaints, though I have hardware in one of those datacenters so I may be biased. I think these articles are failing to account for the jobs created indirectly. I know a few folks that work for companies that have hardware in one of these local datacenters, in addition to traditional sysadmin jobs their duties include being on-call for hardware failures and the like. A at least one of these companies is fairly large and chose to come to Hillsboro and hire techs here because of the space available.

    1. Re:1 employee? Not the entire story. by swb · · Score: 1

      I would think a large datacenter would end up with a lot of ancillary jobs for electrical, HVAC, technicians to work with customer equipment, delivery guys to get the stuff there and so on. Even the best large single company data centers have all manner of stuff that needs fixing.

    2. Re:1 employee? Not the entire story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If your city has a population of 100 residents then that may be ok. If not, then yeah that's not enough to keep everyone in the black so to speak. It does not take 10+ people to replace a blade server, or a failed hard drive. Definitely not full time and definitely not year round. Maybe for that one person, maybe, but he'll have other tasks assigned to him or he won't get paid for large portions of the year.

      That's the issue here, to go with what another poster said, that indirect jobs are created, hiring one person although better than none, will not create new businesses in an area, and if the area is bad off already, then the existing businesses will take the new hire's business with the people they already have. (It's one person that's been hired, he can't go to every single restaurant / clothing store / car dealership / entertainment store in town and buy everything in the store every single day. He does not have the money for it (most likely), and even if he did, he can't be in more than one place at once. TL:DR he's not enough of an impact to the local economy to justify other taking on the expense of hiring more workers.)

      That's the problem there is not enough people in the local economy to justify further investment. Of cource this is a chicken and the egg problem too because without investment, there will not be enough people spending money in the local economy. Because they will not have the money to spend.

      The only way to break this cycle is to have the people who have money, make the investment. Will there be "freeloaders"? YES. There will be, but the money can't come from those who don't have it. The money must come from those that do. That or the local area will need to agree on a new resource distrubtion system, that does not give so much worth to the current form of currency. (Good luck with that btw.)

    3. Re:1 employee? Not the entire story. by thogard · · Score: 2

      That was true before the days of disposable servers. Today, when it breaks, drop it from the pool of working systems. The HVAC is on a lease contract which makes them far more reliable as the manufacture no longer gets s cut by selling parts that used to be used for maintenance. The same is true with power systems but the electrical wiring is massively overbuilt between the stuff under contract and the racks. I have a rack in a recently built data center and they have an electrician on site less often than some small companies I work with.

    4. Re:1 employee? Not the entire story. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 0

      That was true before the days of disposable servers. Today, when it breaks, drop it from the pool of working systems.

      The replacement servers come from somewhere.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    5. Re:1 employee? Not the entire story. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      The replacement servers come from somewhere.

      But they don't come from the local community offering the tax breaks.

    6. Re:1 employee? Not the entire story. by swb · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but what community with a datacenter actually supplies the replacement servers? Maybe Taipei and Shenzhen?

      I think the "community economic value" varies greatly by the size of the community.

      Small communities only have so much value add but this can work against the datacenter because now everything has to be brought in, especially people, and that gets expensive.

  5. First I heard of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Posting anon since I should know more about happenings in my local area, but I find it amusing, for some reason I can't put my finger on, that I live in Hillsboro and this is the first I've heard about this.

    1. Re:First I heard of this by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      It was a big story on the front page of The Oregonian this morning. That's the first time I heard about it. If those guys are worried about having enough space they ought to put their data centers in Prineville. Tons of room out there.

    2. Re:First I heard of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm posting anonymously too after using mod points, but now I'm getting 15 mod points every couple of days it doesn't seem as big a deal... Anyway, I'm a Portland resident and still haven't heard about this. Occasional watcher of KOIN news. It may well have have been on the front page of the Oregonian, but the only time I ever look at the newspaper these days is when it's sitting there free in the airport lounge and I can't be bothered to crack open my laptop....

    3. Re:First I heard of this by SgtAaron · · Score: 1

      It was a big story on the front page of The Oregonian this morning. That's the first time I heard about it. If those guys are worried about having enough space they ought to put their data centers in Prineville. Tons of room out there.

      Hah. Yeah well Prineville doesn't seem to be complaining too much about the Facebook center there, since the only other thing around is Les Schwab HQ. It's true however it's not supplying any jobs to a pretty depressed economy in that county. I think they're planning to expand, or are already. I've forgotten. DC's like it here though; low humidity allowed for an interesting cooling setup there, and the electricity is relatively cheap.

      But really our general world-connectivity in central Oregon has improved much since a DC here required more fiber. It used to be that a backhoe or other would cut our only link to Portland, and more than once all ATMs in three counties would stop working.

    4. Re:First I heard of this by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      There's an Apple DC there too, isn't there?

      They moved the Les Schwab HQ to Bend in 2008 after Les died in 2007 but they still have the big distribution center in Prineville at the bottom of the rimrocks.

  6. It could be worse... by oneiros27 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've actually lost count how many megachurches have been built on farm land in Upper Marlboro, MD. I assume the land must be cheap, as we have The First Baptist Church of Glenarden, which was built just 1.2 miles from Riverdale Baptist Church. And it's not to be confused with the First Baptist Church Upper Marlboro, which is about 8 miles away as the crow flies.

    All of these are non-profits, so there will likely never be any more tax revenue from them, and unless they also have a school (which Riverdale does), it sits nearly empty for most of the week.

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    1. Re:It could be worse... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2

      This is nothing compared to what University of Pittsburgh Medical Center is doing. It calls itself a non-profit and pays no taxes. Classified all its employees as contractors and dodged pay roll taxes too,. With such inherant cost advantages, it has driven all competition out. It also is fully vertically integrated. From general practioners to specialists to pharmacies to ambulances to parking garages to ...

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    2. Re:It could be worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've actually lost count how many megachurches have been built on farm land in Upper Marlboro, MD. I assume the land must be cheap, as we have The First Baptist Church of Glenarden, which was built just 1.2 miles from Riverdale Baptist Church. And it's not to be confused with the First Baptist Church Upper Marlboro, which is about 8 miles away as the crow flies.

      All of these are non-profits, so there will likely never be any more tax revenue from them, and unless they also have a school (which Riverdale does), it sits nearly empty for most of the week.

      What about the First Baptist Bar & Grill?

    3. Re:It could be worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Completely off topic, but...

      If two separate Baptist church bodies were to apply for the name "First Baptist Church of Glenarden", that would mean that somewhere, someone's gonna think "Crap, now we're gonna be the *Second* Baptist Church of Glenarden".

      Would this be a career killer for some priest's career in the church? How does he try to sugarcoat this info at his next performance appraisal? "You know Bob, you were going along real nicely till that whole Second Church business blew up. How the heck did we get into that position?" "Well chief, this is how it all went down ... (explanation) ... and that's why it's not my fault at all, and it's actually a good thing for us"

    4. Re:It could be worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've actually lost count how many megachurches have been built on farm land in Upper Marlboro, MD. I assume the land must be cheap, as we have The First Baptist Church of Glenarden, which was built just 1.2 miles from Riverdale Baptist Church. And it's not to be confused with the First Baptist Church Upper Marlboro, which is about 8 miles away as the crow flies.

      All of these are non-profits, so there will likely never be any more tax revenue from them, and unless they also have a school (which Riverdale does), it sits nearly empty for most of the week.

      Yes, let's keep championing the idea that religion needs a tax shelter with this kind of shit being flung in every taxpayers face.

      Remember to turn the other cheek and make those checks payable to Pay-to-Pray, a non-profit organization (soon to be worth millions) dedicated to saving you in the afterlife, all for a small weekly recurring fee of course.

      I'm certain the pastors making six figures in these churches need all the help they can get. They're barely scraping by I tell ya! Not like all those rich Pay-to-Pray customers...

    5. Re:It could be worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is nothing compared to what University of Pittsburgh Medical Center is doing. It calls itself a non-profit and pays no taxes. Classified all its employees as contractors and dodged pay roll taxes too,. With such inherant cost advantages, it has driven all competition out. It also is fully vertically integrated. From general practioners to specialists to pharmacies to ambulances to parking garages to ...

      ...so you're saying all that efficiency translates into a Wal-Mart level pricing schedule for work done there?

      Whaaaaaat? Whaddya mean it's not? No way...

    6. Re:It could be worse... by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      Built obviously on the site of the old LCG of DEC?

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  7. Free heat please by Cow007 · · Score: 2

    If they want to put a rack in my flat in Beaverton this winter I would love the free heat

    --
    411 Y0UR 8453 4R3 8310NG 70 U5!! -NSA
    1. Re:Free heat please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A "flat" in Beaverton? You should really re-evaluate your vernacular... primarily because you live in Beaverton, Oregon where the only "flat" you're gonna find is of fruit or a pickup truck.

    2. Re:Free heat please by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      Right. This is just another example of the continuing annoying trend of Americans thinking its cute to use Anglophile vernacular, such as appending the word "bloody" onto sentences.

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    3. Re:Free heat please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a snob!
      America forked their language from Britain. A huge swath of our language is English. Why are you upset if we trade some vernacular? I am sure some American vernacular has been borrowed by the British in the last few hundred years at some point.

      If you are concerned about maintaining some type of air of elitism, you can rest assured that we will probably never spell "color" or "armor" with a "u."

      If a man wants to call his house a bloody flat, I say let him.

  8. lol by drew_92123 · · Score: 0

    Reminds me of the data center shit that happened up in Quincy Washington, Sure, they created a few jobs, but it also made the land and homes so expensive that the locals couldn't afford to buy and live there any longer... Of course Washington got smart and killed a lot of the tax breaks MS, Yahoo, and others were enjoying at the time...

    1. Re:lol by moeinvt · · Score: 1

      How does a data center drive up land and home prices if there are only a few employees?

    2. Re:lol by tlambert · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the data center shit that happened up in Quincy Washington, Sure, they created a few jobs, but it also made the land and homes so expensive that the locals couldn't afford to buy and live there any longer...

      Because everyone wants to live next door to a data center because of all the jobs there, or why? Why would it be more expensive to live near a data center, than not, if there were no economic benefit to doing so?

    3. Re:lol by ScuzzMonkey · · Score: 1

      Because the supply of land (which is also required for homes) is finite; any project that removes a large chunk of it from the market is going to drive up the price of the remaining available space (and by extension, homes that might be built on it).

      --
      No relation to Happy Monkey
  9. The problem is... by fhic · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... these local governments are still of the mindset that "industrial/technology" means factories, which means jobs. But as we all know, everybody that builds a datacenter wants as little staff as possible. A datacenter full of staff is seldom a good thing. When I walk past our datacenter on my way to work, if I even see the lights on or more than one car in the parking lot, I clench up, because I know it isn't going to be a good day when I get to my office on the other side of the campus.

    1. Re:The problem is... by Moof123 · · Score: 2

      Living here I can say I am frustrated by how much the local big businesses get big tax breaks simply by occasionally threatening to leave now and then. Nike, Intel, and now these datacenters. The rest of us, and other employers foot the bill to cover their shirked responsibilities to their communities.

    2. Re:The problem is... by tlambert · · Score: 1

      Living here I can say I am frustrated by how much the local big businesses get big tax breaks simply by occasionally threatening to leave now and then. Nike, Intel, and now these datacenters. The rest of us, and other employers foot the bill to cover their shirked responsibilities to their communities.

      You mean the "shirked responsibilities" that would be being paid to the lowest bidder in Topeka or Wichita Kansas, rather than in Oregon, were it not for the tax breaks?

      The people who build data centers don't care where they are located physically; they care about taxes, land costs, and power costs. If power were more reliable in Kabul Afghanistan, and the local government a bit more stable, they'd be located there, instead.

  10. You call this a winter? by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 2

    Looks like summer around here.

    --
    Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
    1. Re:You call this a winter? by Cow007 · · Score: 1

      My favorite is the heat pollution early flowers...

      --
      411 Y0UR 8453 4R3 8310NG 70 U5!! -NSA
  11. Obviously They Thought It Was A Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Data Center of the future will employ only one man and one dog. The man is there only to feed and care for the dog. The dog is there to bite the man if he touches anything.

  12. Solarworld by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure. Give more taxpayer largesse to Solarworld.

    Oregon's Solyndra, kids. Just wait.

  13. Intel's newest fabs by jimmydevice · · Score: 1

    are located in Hillsboro Or. Also located there is a major part of their design group and process science.

    The tax breaks were given to Intel, But in an an attempt by the county and city gov. to not look biased, I presume they extended the breaks to all tech. Of course, The companies are eating the infrastructure for lunch.

    1. Re:Intel's newest fabs by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      They should have taken a leaf out of Washington States book when it comes to company specific tax breaks - the breaks they wrote in for Boeing were written generically but were so specific for the Boeing 787 program that it could not apply to any other aircraft manufacturer. Number of engines, length of fuselage, number of seats, percentage of efficiency increase over previous generation, production to start no later than X etc etc etc. Literally, it could not have been taken up by anyone other than Boeing.

    2. Re:Intel's newest fabs by tlambert · · Score: 1

      are located in Hillsboro Or. Also located there is a major part of their design group and process science.

      Almost all of the microarchitecture changes and die shrinks come out of Haifa, Israel. Not Hillsboro. The Itanium came out of Santa Clara, California. Willamette came out of Hillsboro (the Pentium 4, which was arguably a pretty big failure, with 35%-50% of the 115W power consumption lost to leakage power). There was also the well-know SMT issue, where the dispatch ordering was (effectively) random, meaning the IPC between SMT cores never really scaled very well. Prescott never really scale above about a max of 3.8GHz, when it was (in theory) designed to allow derivatives of the microarchitecture to run at speeds of up to 10GHz.

      Generally, most of the machine-building companies I've worked for (Apple, Google) tend to skip the Hillsboro designs for anything but prototypes, and they wait for the every other year die shrink out of Haifa for the actual shipping product.

  14. Fifth Third Bank by oneiros27 · · Score: 1
    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
  15. Usage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see what you did there... but no one has really made any convincing argument that the tax code should be scrapped. It got to 67,000 pages (if that's even a real statistic) for a reason. How many man-hours of work does that represent? It reminds me of young cowboy programmers who always want to chuck the whole thing and start over, actually believing they can single-handedly replace 1000s of man-years of work, because everyone who came before them was an idiot.

    You could make the exact same argument about the entire legal system. How many pages is the criminal code? Way too many, right? Sure there were centuries of debate and millions of man hours put into it, but it's just too complicated. It'd be faster to just rewrite it from scratch in Java than to fix all the issues with it.

    You don't need to use "man-years" and "man hours".

    Instead, just use "hours" and "years". Context makes your meaning clear.

    It reminds me of young cowboy programmers who always want to chuck the whole thing and start over, actually believing they can single-handedly replace 1000s of years of work, because everyone who came before them was an idiot.

    [...]

    Sure there were centuries of debate and millions of hours put into it, but it's just too complicated.

    1. Re: Usage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was worthless. Thanks for the insight!

    2. Re: Usage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, they have different meanings. Something could take a couple of hours to create while at the same time taking a man-year to create if many people work on it.

  16. Fucking Tards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're screwing up the game of bait and switch!

    The reason why Illinois is so infested with unions is that the costs of moving the means of production are outrageously high so it's easier to just pay them off than it is to have massive capital investments sitting idle/collecting dust.

    These incentives for baiting companies to make capital investments in a locality are a trap. Bring in the money, bring in the jobs(they're hiring contractors instead of salaries employees I'm sure), and eventually: it becomes a hub like "Silicon Valley" where the convenience of being located where it's cheap to commoditize employees in to interchangeable/fungible cogs which don't require investment in training.

    They can get all of the benefits of a talent hub without the costs of San Francisco(and have cheap hydroelectric power at the same time). Electricity in Oregon is cheap, and the climate trends on the cooler side of the extremes because of all the rain.

    Once the market is captive via inertia: now you raise taxes and bleed them.

    Do you even Machiavelli?

  17. Sure it can. by tlambert · · Score: 2

    Instead we must think of population control. this planet can't susta more than 2.7-3 billion Homo sapiens any way.

    Sure it can.

    It *does*, therefore it can. Proof by example.

  18. Government subsidies don't work as expected? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Say it ain't so!

  19. How many part-time jobs? by camg188 · · Score: 1

    Why no mention of part time jobs?

  20. I see the opposite side of this problem by ErichTheRed · · Score: 1

    I really wish these tax deals didn't exist. I'm on the opposite end of this problem, living in New York. Taxes are high, cost of living is high, but in my opinion quality of life is high too. Florida, North Carolina and Texas constantly go trolling for companies in high-tax states (NY, CT, MA, CA, etc.) and bribe them to move. Some of these bribes are crazy, as in, "We'll build you a headquarters, give you free utilities for 10 years, and you'll pay zero property taxes." The problem is states end up playing Prisoners' Dilemma with each other. New York does the same kind of incentives, but can't support the level of offers that no-tax states can...I think some regions of upstate NY are waiving local taxes for a certain number of years, but businesses want permanent gains. The worst thing is that the anti-tax folks whip the media up into a frenzy whenever one of these companies moves, trying to get more people onto the anti-tax side using this as an example.

    The problem is that in Florida and Texas, states with no income tax, you get what you pay for in terms of services. In NY, outside of NYC, even the crappiest school districts are adequately funded and provide OK education. The state university system is good and still a bargain if you get into one of the better schools. Public services are decent in most places. In a state where you pay no income tax and $1000 a year in property taxes, you're not going to get the same level of services. I worked for one of those relocated companies, and went on a fact finding trip when they wanted to move me to Orlando. A real estate agent (who was actively trying to sell me on the idea) actually mentioned that if our kids are used to NY public schools, I would have to put them in private school to get them the equivalent. There goes all that cost savings from the cheap house and low taxes! Plus the weather sucks -- yeah, yeah, I'm weird, I like winter.

    In this case, Oregon just hasn't figured out that data centers are not an employment source. Most run lights-out and employ one or two techs to swap out equipment and maintenance/security forces. Any images of 20-something developers in hip office spaces cranking out the latest phone apps are not applicable here -- they're still sitting somewhere else.

    1. Re:I see the opposite side of this problem by dziki · · Score: 1

      I chuckle about the school argument for either high taxes or paying more for real estate for a "better" school district: "Quality schools" is liberal code for "non-minority". NYC and DC have high taxes and high spending on schools but score lower than, say, Indiana. Growing up in a working class region in Pennsylvania, the solution for kids who felt challenged by the school's slow curriculum was simply to skip grades and graduate early and take summer classes at community college. Problem solved.

  21. As a native recovering Portlander... by Baloo+Uriza · · Score: 1

    Their first hint should have been from the last time this happened in the 1980s and 1990s, and Hillsboro got built up from being a farm town in the middle of the last arable land west of Portland to one of the 5 largest cities in the state, now making it pretty much nonstop city from Forest Grove to Wood Village. Yet the gridlock is horrible because all the tax breaks that were given to build up the tech meant that there's nothing in terms of basic infrastructure to support it. Intel's campuses sit on two lane farm roads, with the exception of Hawthorne Farm (which has it's own MAX station), despite being, literally, in the middle of a city with more than 100,000 people and no mass transit to speak of (TriMet largely doesn't serve Washington County except for the MAX, and frequent service ends miles east of the economic incentive zone in Beaverton). God help you if your house catches fire or you have a heart attack at rush hour, nothing's getting through that traffic. But that's only the tip of the socioeconomic iceburg.

    I was born and raised in Portland on Jessup and Garfield, just off of 99E, in the only part of town that has any racial diversity. I'm Cherokee, I'm bisexual, and I can't say I miss the low IT wages, unavailability of anything longer than a six month contract, employer abuse of H1B visas (we're looking at you, Intel, undermining a market with 20% U6 unemployment to basically hold wage slaves on the threat of deportation!), extremely high cost of living, and entrenched white-supremacist racism and homophobia. Or getting harassed by the Washington County Sheriff's Office, Hillsboro Police, Beaverton Police and the Portland Police Bureau on a twice-weekly basis for driving or waiting the bus while redskin (yet, good luck getting one of 'em to turn up any of the more than a dozen times my home was broken into or my vehicle stolen over the years; that only happened during a brief few months living in Salem, turns out Oregon State Police are the only professionals there). Or getting punched in the face by a total stranger for holding my boyfriend's hand on the MAX (Portland Police's answer? "Don't hold hands."). Worst yet, I didn't know this wasn't normal behavior for people until I just packed what I could into a duffelbag, spent the last of my money on a plane ticket, took the MAX one last time to Portland Airport and flew off into the sunrise, and discovered that Oregon, all of it, big cities included, is an unmitigated backwater yearning to be the hipster version of the Deep South.

    You know your hometown has a problem when moving to an indian reservation in the midwest, sight unseen, a single bag of clothes, no savings, and no game plan, when the only thing you know that's waiting for you when you get there is a safe couch to surf, and even without taking advantage of any of the tribal benefits, it improves every aspect of your life personally and professionally, being the exact opposite of Oregon in every regard, with the sole exception of relatively minor things like sales tax rate (way lower prices and WAY higher wages more than offset this, though) and access to public transportation. I have my own car now (which hasn't been stolen yet, making 3 years and counting the longest I've ever owned a car), I have my own home now (which hasn't been broken into yet, equally record-setting), and I have job security and upward mobility (both of which are things you read about other people having if you're in Oregon).

    Self sufficient income and personal safety are two things I deeply lacked in Oregon, and it's the three things I prize above everything else now (hey, you live the first 30 years of your life without those two things and the novelty won't wear off once you do). About the only way I'd ever go back there is if someone actually hired me with a high enough wage so that I don't have to deal with the locals unless I really want to, and make me well off enough inside a few months that I could go back home to Oklahoma and take the rest of the year off, or fatten

    --
    Furries make the internet go.
  22. Stop Shoehorning Your Pet-Peeve Issues by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

    you are correct there, Not living there I have no idea how bad their tax code, if its anything like NYs its just as bad as federal and should also be scrapped

    But since you do not know for sure, you might as well STFU and learn about it before trying to conjoin this issue with federal taxation issues (or more to the point, stop trying to shoehorn your pet-peeve issues into every single issue you come across unless you factually know the two are related.)