Slashdot Mirror


Will Greek Finance Minister Varoufakis Support Cryptocurrency In Greece?

giulioprisco writes New Greek Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis, former Economist-in-Residence at game developer Valve Corporation, sees something like Bitcoin — or, more likely, a state-controlled "Fedcoin" — possibly playing a role in the (necessarily creative) rescue of the Greek economy. "The technology of Bitcoin, if suitably adapted, can be employed profitably in the Eurozone," he said.

253 comments

  1. Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Does anyone care what Minister Varoufakis thinks?
    .

    1. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most of Europe does, actually, seeing as he is negotiating with the rest of the Eurozone to make a deal that will save Greece's car crash of an economy. If Greece implodes, it could take the entire Eurozone with it by causing domino defaults, because Greece owes a lot of money to other nations that are already in dire fiscal straights

      an ignorant American might not care, but President Obama has already weighed in to support Varoufakis in seeking debt relief, as he does not want a major trading partner to collapse

    2. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Teun · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Yes and no.

      The European economy is contrary to 5 or 6 years ago presently plenty strong enough to absorb the exit of Greece from the Euro.

      But for the EU it is a matter practicality and also of honour to keep the lot together, it is the difference between a continuing struggle and complete failure for the Greek economy and people.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    3. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not so confident. A few quartets of good growth from the least screwed EU members is not a recovery. The ECB proposing Dr. Evil levels of quantitative easing doesn't paint a picture of great economic health either.

    4. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure you understand the matter.

      If Greek economy implodes, it does not invalidate debts (there are no default system in loans between nations). It is possible, that other nations who borrowed the money come across, understand that interests have made situation for them unbearable, thus gives up parts of the loan (not the capital that was loaned, but showing understanding and giving up most of the accumulated interest), that would be very understandable act. I'm all for that. I wish Greeks to stay within EU. The problems there are not (mostly) do with ordinary people, it's just darn reckless management of state business what happened there. (Falsifying statistics and covering up real numbers, to keep nose above surface.) Nobody in their senses would have loaned money there if they had known how bad situation was.

      I'm from a country that has loaned them money, billions of euros, and if you think we will just let them say "sorry, we don't have money, we're not going to have money for some time and we're never going to pay anything ..." is just bullshit. They will not be able to escape the loans, no matter if they detach from euro zone and have drakmas again. It will only make their situation worse. They need to start working with the plan that was made for them to clear up the mess and other nations will help them. It's their country and nation it's their job to get it done, we can't and won't even be able to do it if they don't cope with the facts.

    5. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rubbish. If they simply refuse to pay, what can creditors do about it? Invade?

    6. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      ... continuing a bit.

      The reason the can't escape completely the loans is simply, if they dare to say that they don't pay, then who's going to loan them money after that? Right, nobody.

      How they would be able to do trade with other nations after that? Right, paying everything in front in euros or dollars, nobody else would trust them otherwise.

      So, where would they get those euros / dolallars? Now, that's the real tough guestion, and I don't have an answer for that. Nor I think has Mr. Varoufakis either, and that's the reason even as he trying to play tough guy will have to thing seriously before spewing "We don't pay our loans" or anything that could even remotely be understood like that.

    7. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      They will not be able to escape the loans...

      So what are your plans? Call in the generals and take over? Wouldn't be the first time...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    8. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If Greece implodes, it could take the entire Eurozone with it by causing domino defaults, because Greece owes a lot of money to other nations that are already in dire fiscal straights

      Two years ago maybe, when the whole euro-zone was in a depression and there weren't plans in place but now they've prepared and the Greek economy is only about 2% of the total. Germany has been very ready to play hardball and let Greece fall on their sword if they don't stick to the rescue plan. You have to remember that once you've made sure the other dominos won't fall many want to make Greece an example of what happens when you spend irresponsibly. So does their new PM really want to go "all in" and find out if they'll really get kicked out of the-euro zone? That's some real high stakes poker there if he gets called they tell him to get out.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    9. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What plans?

      I didn't loan them anything, it's the country that I live loaned. It's up to them to come up with something, but certainly it's not anything childish you propose doing with arms. No, it isn't. Grow up already, please.

      Read my other answer, if they don't pay then their living is going to be darn tough for decades to come, unfortunately not that it will be easy if they pay either.

    10. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Grow up? Do you have any idea why military coups happen? Apparently not! You appear to be some kind of idealist.

      And learn about the editorial 'you'. It might come in handy in the future.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    11. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Once the possibility of someone exiting the Euro becomes real other countries will be tempted or pushed out basically making it pointless.

      It was an economic marriage. And like in any marriage there are good times and bad times. Unfortunately some in Europe don't think of it this way.

    12. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      The Eurozone is still in a depression. Even Germany is in a situation of under-employment as a large fraction of the people they count as employed only have part-time low paying jobs.

    13. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Greece refuses to pay, then creditors will not loan them any more money. Greece needs continuing loans so that they wil have cash to purchase and import fuel for transportation, electricity, heating, etc.
      The oil markets will not accept local currencies; it has to be dollars or in some cases, euros.

    14. Re:Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So does the rest of Europe. It's the only thing keeping the peace over there.

    15. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Tempted? Are you an ill-informed euro sceptic? If it weren't for the need to bail out Greece, the euro would've been a tremendous boost for the economies of all countries that have adopted it. The absence of currency fluctuation has increased B2C trade between eurozone countries with at least an order of magnitude compared with trade prior to the adoption of it. Now the benefits only slightly outweigh the problem with Greece. Greece was admitted into the euro with a last minute lowering of the bar and despite that Greece had to cook the books. Besides, as an entry condition all new EU member states have committed themselves to adopting it once their economies fulfill the criteria.

    16. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by TyFoN · · Score: 1

      The Greeks have done nothing but cook the books and lie to get into EU, get loans to spend on handouts and now they blame everyone but themselves.
      The public in Greece voted for every single one of these crooks and are to blame.
      I think the best course of action is to toss them out, they were never fit to be in. They even hid public debt in their train company to pass EU requirements all to be able to borrow cheap with no intention of paying back.

      Sorry, I don't want to pay for the Greeks early retirements.

    17. Re:Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those greasers only live because we allow them to.

      And you americans live until your cholesterol allows you to. You have a 35% obesity rate, you should thank god, the universe or whatever you believe in if you still exist as a nation. Look at these disgusting monsters, you call them "humans" in the US, but they would be closed in a zoo anywhere else:
      http://images.sodahead.com/pro...

      Please, don't let them get outside your country and come to europe. They would scare our kids.

    18. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by cryptolemur · · Score: 1

      There are two problems with making Greece and example: they did not spend irresponsibly, they became insolvent only after Germany forced them to shrink their economy, and secondly, because once out of Euro Greece can pay back their loans with newly printed bitdrakhmas, and Germany will take the biggest hit of that being the biggest creditor.
      Ok, three problems, since even the term "punishment" makes it also obvious that EU is not a cooperative looking for the common good of it's citizens, but tool for the German financial elite to have their way regardless of things like democracy.

    19. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now to be honest we knew they cooked the books decades before the problems, but we let them continue anyway.
      There were even talks about dropping them from the eu. But I guess they weren't because the other corrupt countries would be next.

    20. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by cheesybagel · · Score: 2

      The Euro had all sorts of problems. That spurious inflation on the beginning was one. As for the increase in trade it went mainly in one direction and actually exacerbated the current problem.

      Do you know what caused the inflation? Germany printed a bunch of DMs before the Euro came into the market. In order to keep their inflation low, and fullfill the ERM convergence criteria, they kept the DMs stashed in the banks and kept them out of the market. Once the Euro came online they converted all these bogus DMs into Euros and flooded the market with them causing the inflation, and loaned them to countries like Greece. So effectively the Germans loaned bad money to countries like Greece and are asking for good money in goods and services as return now.

      Also whoever had the idea of making a monetary union with free bank transfers with a eurozone wide deposit insurance scheme was bonkers.

    21. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it weren't for the need to bail out Greece, the euro would've been a tremendous boost for the economies of all countries that have adopted it.

      WTF are you talking about? It's not only Greece. There are also Spain, Portugal, Italy, Belgium and France, all of their GDP growth data have dramatically slowed down since the introduction of the euro. That's also why eurosceptic parties are on the rise and sometimes even leading the polls in France (Front National), Spain (Podemos), UK (UKIP) and Italy (Five Star Movement and Northern League). Not to mention the rising hatred towards germans in the same countries.

      The EU is a dead project, and it should have never been born. It's just a matter of time before the first country voluntarily gets out (France maybe, when Le Pen will be president?), then it will be a chain reaction, just like in the USSR. Nations arise from people with common ethnicities, cultures and languages, not from vulgar trade agreements and single currencies.

    22. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh, idealist me? You hardly could find someone more pragmatic and realist person. You see, I'm not that young any more and I've lived and seen things that most westeners have never seen.

      I've seen quite bit of military, been there done that, long time ago serving enlisted. But that was 30 years ago. But then also I've seen some close distance bit more recently about it while working years as a contractor for a major US company at gulf region around turn of century. Over half of my colleagues were former US. marines & navy who had returned there as a contractors to work at various levels of management. Much of the company infrastructure, housing & working compounds, warehouses, labs etc. where set up and occupied by US forces while first gulf war. Much of the security and procedures were still according to SOP. I had no problems living there and making my living, I understood very well why I was at gun point many times a day while approaching gates and checkpoints, did carefully check my parked car of any odd items before driving it, randomised routes between points of visit like residence compound, offices, labs, customer sites etc. And continuing that years after years after years, and pushing projects customer was trying to avoid taking responsibility even when the products agreed to be delivered were clearly ready and operational. The would rather have us having responsibility forever. But that was not possible after all and we finally got them to take over and I could repatriate to my home country like my colleagues too. Haven't been or visited there since, but probably will after few years if not otherwise just visiting as a tourist to see how things have developed.

      I have no regrets about those years, we did good job, I did good money and I learned a trick or two while there.

    23. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by ecotax · · Score: 1

      I'm not in favour of making Greece an example; most Greece people didn't ask for the mess they are in and are hardly to blame for being ruled incompetently in the past. That said, it's complete nonsense to blame the unfortunate financial situation the country is in on Germany or the remainder of the EU. Greece has been completely incompetent in raising taxes and clientelism and corruption are widespread. I can imagine the austerity measures to be impopular, but let's not forget that the EU has been dumping hundreds of billions of euro's in the EU, in an attempt to help Greece.

      --
      "Money is a sign of poverty." - Iain Banks
    24. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another dipshit barbarian Dutch opening his yap and talking a lot of shit.

      Dutch are neanderthal morons that have no achievements other than an institution of scammery (big banks and creating big ships to ransack, rape, pillage and steal from people on remote islands).

      Dutch are trailer trash inferior weaker Germans.m

    25. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by gTsiros · · Score: 2

      ... do you have a source?

      --
      Looking for people to chat about multicopters, coding, music. skype: gtsiros
    26. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      None of that explains why military coups happen, nor why it could easily happen again in Greece. In fact you're not addressing anything I posted. The bankers will get their piece of flesh, through blood sacrifice if needed. And it does no good to bring up the US/UK imperial war in the Middle East. It does not relate to this here discussion, aside from the financial sources.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    27. Re:Umm... Lulz.... by CaptainDork · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, just like we wiped out North Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan, and just how we've just about wiped out ISIS and stuff.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    28. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you got it wrong, I'm nor Dutch, German, Belgian, French, ... sure I had plenty of them as my colleagues. Most of them were great guys, like were all guys from commonwealth countries, etc. too many nationalities to list we had workforce about 4700 consisting of people of 50 nationalities :)

    29. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hes a Dutch piece of trailertrash shit, that is why he talks so much shit.

      Dutch people are scammers and evil deceiving money tricksters.

    30. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't matter if military coup happen or not, it does not affect who governs Greece. As long as there is Greece the dept is unless it's paid up or given up by lender, which isn't going to happen that would make precedence for other nations who would also want to leave their dept unpaid.

    31. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      Absolutely, it's all Germany's fault.

      Your problem is that you don't have to convince yourself of that, but since you want Germans to pay for the mess the Greece are in, you have to convince the Germans. And knowing how they are pissed off with the Greek and have had just about enough of it, you'll have a hard time doing that.

    32. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by lgw · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Once the possibility of someone exiting the Euro becomes real other countries will be tempted or pushed out basically making it pointless.

      It was an economic marriage. And like in any marriage there are good times and bad times. Unfortunately some in Europe don't think of it this way.

      Not pointless - there's real economic benefit to a single currency for Europe.

      If it's a marriage, then Greece is the abusive, cheating spouse. They've gone from irresponsibly spending more than they could ever repay (since they can't inflate their way out of debt), through a brief attempt at surviving austerity (terms of the debt relief they got - everyone knew it would suck), to saying "screw you, we're too big to fail, we're gonna spend spend spend, what are you gonna do about it?"

      Greece was in a better economic position than most of Eastern Europe at the start of all this, with a better standard of living (even had they chosen to live within their means) than many later entrants in to Euro. But they chose to spend vastly more than they were making, running up the highest debt-to-GDP ratio in Europe, inflating that standard of living artificially until they could borrow no more.

      What the US thinks of that isn't very relevant, but those Easter European countries that made real sacrifice to join the Euro, and who have been keeping their debt down and surviving with a much lower standard of living than Greece and directly paying for Greece's first bailout in some cases aren't impressed with Greece's excuses. At this point, a "Grexit" will be less disruptive than continued bailouts.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    33. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      Like I said before, They need to do like Iceland. The 'debt' is a result of bankers fraud and is not legitimate. And yes, a lot more nations should do the same. It's time to put things in the proper order and make the banks serve and not rule. That would mean instituting a public bank, through their post office or whatever.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    34. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      There is little chance of Greece leaving the Euro. For a start it would take at least a year to set up a new currency to use. A year of limbo with Greece still using the Euro but having no interest in its future.

      Of course, setting up a new currency wouldn't even begin before months of negotiations to agree a procedure for an exit. There is currently no mechanism for a country to leave the Euro. Then there needs to be a new treaty to set it up.

      Neither side will wait that long, there will be an agreement in the ~18 months it will take to happen.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    35. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to add slave traders to the list. BTW this is what we call the V.O.C mentality.

    36. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a complete misrepresentation of what happened. Germany has absolutely no interest in shrinking the Greek economy. Quite the opposite, actually. Germany, among many other countries and institutions, helped prevent the bankruptcy of Greece in 2010. That immanent bankruptcy had one reason only: Greece wasn't ready to join the Euro in 2001, but had cooked the books to get in anyway. The rules for joining the Euro don't just exist for the benefit of the other countries, but should also ensure that a country's fiscal health does not require constant high inflation to devalue debts and commitments, an instrument which is not available in the common currency. In the following decade, instead of printing more drachmas like Greece used to do to pay out pensions etc., Greece simply borrowed. What it should have done instead is bring its commitments in line with its tax base. But we know that it didn't, which led to the financial markets wising up to the unsustainability of Greece's public debt. Interest rates went up accordingly, and had it not been for the other European countries, including Germany, Greece would have been bankrupt then and there.

      Absent a massive increase in productivity, which can not simply be bought, Greece has to lower its commitments. That's "austerity", also known as not spending 120 bucks when you only have 100. There is no point in continuously increasing the turnover when you lose money on every Euro spent, so the fiscal responsibility has to be there before you can try stimulating the economy. Continuing on the same path that Greece has been on for the past decades is not an option in the Eurozone.

      If Greece exits the Euro, it can not pay back its debt in "bitdrakhmas". These debts are denominated in Euros. Greece would have to sell "bitdrakhmas" for Euros, and use those Euros to pay back the debts. Anything else would constitute a default and cut off Greece from the financial markets. But let's not kid ourselves: If Greece isn't willing to live within its means, then a default is inevitable anyway. Greece really needs to stop blaming others for its situation, accept responsibility and get its act together, 10 years ago, but better now than never, or this will be be one very rude awakening.

    37. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Greece and the EU are currently like two poker players going all-in with their mortgage money, knowing that if the other one doesn't fold they can't pay and lose their house.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    38. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The Eurozone might be able to absorb a Greek exit in purely financial terms, but in psychological terms it would be a disaster. If Greece leaves, then that provides a precedent for countries leaving. Investments in Euros are based on the premise that the Euro is backed by a large economic base and if countries can leave that base then there's a lot less of an incentive to use the Euro. That's likely to lead to a drop in liquidity in the rest of the Eurozone, which would make leaving an even more attractive bet for some of the weaker economies.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    39. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      secondly, because once out of Euro Greece can pay back their loans with newly printed bitdrakhmas, and Germany will take the biggest hit of that being the biggest creditor

      Normally you have to pay back loans in the currency that they were given. If you only have another currency, then you have to find someone willing to exchange them. The exchange rate isn't likely to be very good for a little while. That said, it would probably be great for the Greek economy, as a very weak currency will make exports very easy for them.

      The other problem that you're not mentioning is that, if Greece leaves the Euro then Putin will be very happy to extend trade deals to them to get around sanctions and to piss off Germany and no one wants Greece to become a satellite state of the new USSR.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    40. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, it's bit more complicated than just saying "It's bankers fault, let's make them pay it". It would be easy for an average person agree that let's make that rich 1% pay it, but that sadly isn't the case.

      Once you realize that some high income bankers would lose some future income, that would happen for sure. But hardest would be hit ordinary blue collar workforce who's savings and pension money is in Greece bonds via funds and similar instruments. You may have hard time justifying them why someone who worked 35-40 years earning low or medium income should not be able to retire at 65 age even when their health isn't that great any more.

    41. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Teun · · Score: 3, Informative
      Maybe you should take your temperature?

      Nearly every EU country has a couple of conspiracy nuts claiming *.* screwed them during or before unification.

      The problem is not someone loaned bad or good money to Greece, the problem is Greece wasn't and isn't able to hold up it's own pants, all due to their own lack of courage to fix their tax and economic imbalances.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    42. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      Easter European countries that made real sacrifice to join the Euro, and who have been keeping their debt down and surviving with a much lower standard of living than Greece

      Sounds great, we should join - UK, I look forwards to a much lower standard of living.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    43. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, "VOC mentality", I do not speak Dutch. I found nl.wikipedia.org page about it and used google translate and tried to understand what it said.

      Sure there were quite strong spirit trying to get things done there. Had we not had it, we wouldn't have any kind of success that's sure.

    44. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Rei · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The fact that the Troika hasn't been willing to give one iota on the Greece issue should be enough of a reflection on how little consequence they think an exit of Greece from the eurozone would be. Germany in particular doesn't want to give any ground (I imagine all of the nazi-name calling has played no small part), but they're hardly alone, many countries are taking a very hardline stance on Greece. Most parties feel that the consequence of giving way to Greece could be significant, but the consequences of their exit - while not completely painless - would not be that dramatic.

      On the other hand, in Greece, there's only one route for exit, and that's capital controls (or a rapid conversion over the weekend) where everyone's assets are converted to some kind of new-drachma, which instantly devalues to half its value or less. Which is why everyone is taking their euros out of the banks, they're not stupid (unfortunately, thieves aren't stupid either, breakins have become an epidemic as they look for people hoarding money at home).

      I can't see a cryptocurrency helping in any way... if anything I'd guess it'd only serve to unnerve markets even more and lose even more value as a consequence. I could picture it maybe as a simultaneous and rate-locked currency to a physical New Drachma, maybe. But it sounds IMHO like an incredibly risky move even then. I mean, one presumes for example that there's a government-controlled master key to "print" more cryptocoins? Then that means that your entire economy can be crushed overnight by someone hacking, physically stealing, misusing, cracking, or whatnot your master key. Isn't that an unnecessarily big risk to take? And on an individual level it seems full of problems as well...

      Don't get me wrong, I don't think cryptocurrencies are inherently an evil or shouldn't exist. But I would have serious second thoughts about such a massive nationwide rollout on a country that's already in chaos.

      --
      We gotta go to a crappy town where I'm a hero.
    45. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Success? Please!

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    46. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Teun · · Score: 1
      You've clearly not been living in the EU.

      Or you've for the past ~15-50 years been living under a rock.

      Had you not been living under said rock and like me been travelling the world and the EU you would have had first hand experience of the vast steps forward we've made.

      Oh yes, because you live under a rock you've likely not heard the populists in France and Denmark are after the recent attacks by domestically bred terrorists keeping VERY quiet with their stale demands to close the borders to keep out trouble.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    47. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Rei · · Score: 2

      It's easy for Americans who've never had to live with a weak, low circulation currency to say "EURO BAD!". But they've never seen the consequences. How even in a good economy your money steadily becomes more and more worthless because inflation of such currencies is almost always worse than that of stronger currencies. How you pay out the nose for loans because of the higher risk of inflation or currency swings. How many companies won't even work with transfers to / from your currency.

      Big, strong currencies offer serious benefits. America has been given a *massive* economic boost due to the widespread usage of the Greenback. Their economy would be nowhere near what it is today if each state had its own currency.

      --
      We gotta go to a crappy town where I'm a hero.
    48. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      No, we must take back the money they stole and close their accounts. It can all be done with the push of a button. You do remember when the banks directly robbed account holders to pay off the Russian Mob accounts, right? Let's reverse that.

      Now, here's the thing, if the Greeks and others actually resist, there will be war. That is a guarantee. If Russia attacks first, it will be a big war.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    49. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Rei · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's also this big lie that "Greece has been saddled with debts that they could never pay". Greece's state assets are worth an order of magnitude more than their debts. They could sell off a tenth of them and have all of their debts in the clear right away.

      Obviously, they don't want to privatize everything, and I don't blame them. But the concept that this debt is impossible to service is simply a lie. They just don't want to. Heck, they could do it without excessive pain to the middle class or extensive privatization if only they'd go after their wealthy - there's a couple dozen Greek billionaires and countless more in the next eschelons. And these are the biggest tax dodgers who don't pay anywhere close to their fair share. But Greece is apparently either unable or unwilling to go after them.

      --
      We gotta go to a crappy town where I'm a hero.
    50. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Rei · · Score: 1

      If I were an investor, I'd be glad to see the Euro kick out any countries that undermine the currency.

      --
      We gotta go to a crappy town where I'm a hero.
    51. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Rei · · Score: 1

      You do realize that to import goods, you have to pay for them, right?
      You do realize that without international trade Greece would resemble Somalia, right?

      Yes, Greece can declare itself another North Korea and cut itself off from the world if it wants to give the global financial system the middle finger. But hey, good luck with that...

      --
      We gotta go to a crappy town where I'm a hero.
    52. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you don't know the project I was working. You assume but you are wrong. It wasn't Gulf war, neither of them, I wasn't involved with them. It was building _essential infrastucture_ after first one. An it's still there and it's thriving, it's been extended and enhanced many times and works great, it's been used by tens of millions people daily. I'm not going to details, as I'm not supposed to talk them openly in detail.

    53. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by ewibble · · Score: 2

      I don't think anything that bad will happen Greece defaults, sure the government may not loans, for a while, that will just force them live within there means, while removing any interest burden. Who in their right mind lending more money to Greece anyway, and simply not trying to recover as much money back as they can. Private companies will still get loans, the wouldn't have defaulted.

      If you lend people money to take on a risk (Isn't that the justification for charging interest), and if you lend too much money to people and they can't pay, well like any investment you can loose, and I don't feel sorry for the lenders. These are large banks and countries that have lent to Greece and as such should have done due diligence.

      Maybe if Greece defaults, It will teach these people, don't lend to people who can't afford to pay (even countries), and it will not allow countries like Greece to get into these situations, in the first place.

      At some point going bankrupt, is the only sane choice, probably better than having your entire economy crippled by interest repayments for the foreseeable future.
       

    54. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Kjella · · Score: 2

      There are two problems with making Greece and example: they did not spend irresponsibly, they became insolvent only after Germany forced them to shrink their economy

      LOL you must be from Greece, their debt-to-GDP ratio was poor to begin with increasing every year through budget deficits. They went insolvent because the market understood they had no chance of paying their debts and interest rates skyrocketed. It's rather hilarous to blame Germany and the EU for the terms of the loans when the market would sooner lend money to a drunken hobo than to Greece, it was either that or bankruptcy.

      You can of course argue that they're now trapped in an evil circle where the austerity measures are killing the economy and they should default sooner rather than later, but they're just where everyone deep in credit card debt are - they spend what little income they have paying interest and don't have any surplus to improve their situation. What you're blaming Germany for is doing just enough to keep the Greek economy from dying, but not enough to cure it. That's right, you rich uncle isn't going to come in and solve all your problems. From all the gratitude they're getting I'm guessing that the next time they'd rather not bail anybody out at all.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    55. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Secrets lead to excessive speculation. If there is something to hide, then something is wrong with the project, especially if it involves public funding. And besides, how does it match up with infrastructure that was destroyed by the war? Sorry, sounds like shtick to me. Even vampires don't enter a house uninvited.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    56. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm french, and the fact that the countries I mentioned stopped or slowed down their economic growth after entering the eurozone is proven by GDP data, whether you like it or not. Just check the IMF database. Furthermore, many people don't like the idea to be forced to "compete" for a job in their own country with romanians and bulgarians immigrants who are ready to work for 600 euros per month.

      Forget about your german-led fourth reich look-a-like, it's dead. People are already speaking with their own votes: in Greece, soon in Spain, France and Italy. It's called democracy, not "populism".

    57. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you'll find the Greeks have a monopoly on iotas.

    58. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember when Germany had half its debt cancelled in 1953? No one ever did business with them again.

    59. Re:Umm... Lulz.... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Greece, as my high school history teacher would put it, is a basket case. It survives only on the handouts from the EU.

      I worked on an EU funded research project, where Greeks were involved, the National Technical University of Athens (NTUA) and the Athens Technology Center (ATC). Although some of those folks had PhDs, none of them were even close to being productive as a US high school student.

      Whine, moan, bitch and complain, someone else was responsible for their failure. I couldn't even hear it any more.

      Yeah, great, a funky new currency . . . but Greece needs some more radical reform . . . and not some leftist bullshit.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    60. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Greek] people didn't ask for the mess they are in and are hardly to blame for being ruled incompetently in the past

      Nor did they ask for the current government to rule incompetently. Which is why the rest of the EU is not listening to the current government. No?

    61. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How hard IT is to understand that very large companies contracts restrict and often outright deny anyone outside corporate top management commenting company matters or ever revealing which products or projects you happen to work?

      Contracts bind afterwards too and sometimes sanctions count up to millions if broken. If it was just me I would be glad to talk about the matters openly to anyone would like to hear.

    62. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      For what? The money printing?
      https://www.richmondfed.org/pu...

      Figure 6 pg 41. Also that chart conveniently does not show the amount of DMs they printed when they absorbed Eastern Germany. They converted Eastern German currency to DMs on a 1:1 basis when black market value was 10:1!

    63. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If it's a marriage, then Greece is the abusive, cheating spouse [...]

      And you're so full of shit that it ain't funny.

      This neo-capitalist kool aid must be a really strong stuff. Pity it doesn't kill right away :-(

    64. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Greece has problems. But the talk they were the only ones that cheated their way into the Euro is just plain bunk. Basically everyone cheated their way into it. Germany set the rules and they were the first to break them when they started running up a deficit followed by France. Just because currently they are running up less of a deficit doesn't mean they won't the future. Do the German government think China is going to buy their stuff forever? Good luck.

      The Chinese high-speed rail buildup is a good example why the Germans won't get what they want. They are always running to try to find new markets in Africa and Latin America but they will bump into already installed Chinese interests when they try to get there.

    65. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Ask the Czechs and Poles why they're dragging their feet so they don't get in the Eurozone.

      Fact is anyone with an economy that matters has tried to steer well clear of the Euro for quite some time now ever since the troubles started. And if countries start being ejected it will only precipitate the destruction of the Eurozone.

    66. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most Greece people didn't ask for the mess they are in and are hardly to blame for being ruled incompetently in the past.

      Yes they did. All Greeks play the same game, bribe government and evade taxes. It is ingrained in the society.

    67. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by lgw · · Score: 1

      Perhaps. I'm of the opposite opinion - that if countries start being ejected for financial mismanagement, the skeptical might be encouraged that the Euro is a currency run by grown-ups. But we have no actual data either way - perhaps we'll see the experiment performed, and then we'll know.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    68. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The German reunification was in 1990. The final exchange rate from DM to Euro was set at the end of 1998. If that is not enough time for the financial markets to figure out a realistic value, then there's really no way to do this at all, is there?

      If you think Germany's playing hardball now, wait until it finally realizes that it can't buy friends.

    69. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you hate Germany so much, I suggest you get away from it as far as possible as quickly as possible. Nobody would think badly of Greece for leaving right about now. Take your chance and kindly fuck off.

    70. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by gTsiros · · Score: 1

      If you have the patience, can you please give me a short explanation how to read the chart? Thank you in advance.

      --
      Looking for people to chat about multicopters, coding, music. skype: gtsiros
    71. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ask yourself: whom did the Greeks "borrow" all this money from?

      If a private debtor is bankrupt, the lender - loses their money. Tough, but that's why there exist such things as credit checks and ratings.

      If a country is bankrupt, why should the lenders carry on expecting to get all their payments back on their own terms?

    72. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The EU knew Greece was a lout and a liar before they made it official, the EU just thought it could change Greece. So it's more like a dysfunctional marriage than you even let on.

    73. Re:Umm... Lulz.... by ArcadeMan · · Score: 2

      Don't forget your incredible victory against drugs!

    74. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...saying "screw you, we're too big to fail, we're gonna spend spend spend, what are you gonna do about it?"

      Where's the factually incorrect mod when you need it?

      At this point, Greece is running a primary surplus. They're taking in more revenue in taxes than they're spending - excluding payments on their debt. At this point, there's no possibility at all that Greece would be able to borrow more money from the EU to run a primary budget deficits in the future. The key question is how much of their budget surplus should be going to make payments on their debt. The Germans want 4.5% but the new Greek government wants it to be more on the order of 1.5%.

      Now, it's true that Greece has so much outstanding debt that they're never realistically going to be able to pay it all off. And there's a strong sentiment in Germany to inflict severe economic suffering on Greece for it's past borrowing excesses. But the Greek economy is in shambles after years of harsh austerity and at some point you've got to understand that too much economic suffering can lead to other bad stuff like extreme nationalism and xenophobia (a point you'd think that Germany would sympathetic to given it's own history).

      Anyway, at this point it's definitely not about whether Greece is allowed to spend and spend in the future, it's about how much the ordinary people of Greece should suffer for borrowing excesses of it's previous government in the past.

    75. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      A crypto currency would be like buying gold to hedge against the inevitable inflation or devaluation of the currency. It wouldn't be a matter of printing more, it would be a matter of will this dollar still buy a dollars worth of something if the value is cut in half. But with a crypto currency, the initial scarcity could be negated if there was a one time creation of enough currency to cover the expected load and the key would be destroyed (or useless) and unlike investing in gold to hedge the value, it wouldn't temporarily increase demand and costs initially. I'm guessing that instead of creating a new currency, they would just create an exchange with the help of other exchanges.

      So during and after the fallout, some currency could be exchanged back into whatever dollar system is in place as needed and it would be at the exchange rate in comparison to a more stable dollar (like the euro or USD) instead of holding a dollar that is worth only 25 percent of it's value 10 or even 2 years ago. OF course this will make purchasing more crypto currency units more expensive as you would need to spend 4 times as much but it would lessen the shock of whatever is to come. And on another note, if the finance minister adopted and used a specific crypto currency through their exchange, they would also have records of who can be taxed and perhaps those records would be more complete than what they have now (I hear tax avoidance in Greece is rampant).

    76. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      " it's about how much the ordinary people of Greece should suffer for borrowing excesses of it's previous government in the past."

      It's about how much the ordinary people of Greece should suffer for the lending excesses of German banks.

    77. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      I don't hate Germany. I hate near sighted politicians. And I don't know why you think I'm Greek.

    78. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      And if they did leave the Euro, wouldn't the new currency be weak and make it practically impossible to pay off a debt that is Euro based. I don't think people who want Greece to leave have considered the consequences. / I could be wrong, I'm no currency expert.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    79. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cheesybagel thinks that the rising DM money supply growth at the beginning and at the end of the 1990s (right after German reunification and right before the Euro) with no corresponding uptick in inflation indicates that Germany selfishly increased its money supply and somehow "hid" some of it from the markets, so that Germany would later have more Euros than it should have had, putting Germany in a position to lend Euros that it had gotten "for free" to poorer countries like Greece to put them into indentured servitude. That is, of course, completely bogus, but I can see how that would be a convenient excuse for not wanting to pay back a loan. Don't try that in the real world though. Creditors don't care how much you have invested in your conspiracy theory.

      The criticism of Germany's strict monetary policy hasn't started yesterday. In particular, through the periods mentioned above, Germany was heavily criticized for not increasing its money supply *more*. That article actually explains the how and why quite nicely. There's text between the pictures. It also gives a good idea why so many countries love to hate Germany, but ultimately would still rather be in the Euro than out.

    80. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Rei · · Score: 2

      Whatever they convert it into, New Drachmas or Cryptodrachmas, it's still going to devalue like crazy. Both, being backed by the same entity (the state) will have the same credibility problem. Except even moreso for the cryptocurrency because of all of the concerns that carries with for many investors.

      --
      We gotta go to a crappy town where I'm a hero.
    81. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At this point, there's no possibility at all that Greece would be able to borrow more money from the EU to run a primary budget deficits in the future.

      We'll see them try within the next 24 hours.

      And there's a strong sentiment in Germany to inflict severe economic suffering on Greece for it's past borrowing excesses.

      No there isn't, and you're not doing anyone any favors by making these baseless accusations. Germany has been nothing but helpful throughout this crisis, at very considerable cost, and is still willing to help (but losing patience by the hour now). Germany essentially only asks in return that its efforts won't be futile. If that's too much to ask, well...

      Greece still has a very distorted image of its own economic power. It still fails to realize how much of its standard of living was just propped up with money that Greece had not earned. Taking that away is neither punishment, nor a goal of austerity, but a rather unavoidable consequence of not keeping the fake economy going at a huge cost to other European countries. Whether the Greek understand this decides if they're going to be in the Eurozone or out while they're recovering, but it has no influence on whether they have to go through this or not. It is dishonest to pretend that Germany could just "not punish Greece" and all would be fine.

    82. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I don't think you understand the concept.

      If they create an exchange with a current crypto currency and conver all their money to it except what is needed from day to day, then drop out of the Eurozone and create their own dollar, each crypto dollar will be the value of the crypto currency used. If their created dollar is worth 1/10 of a Euro and each crypto dollar or coin is worth 2 Euros, it will bring in 20 Drachmars when cashed out.

      The key is a current crypto currency. It will be backed by something other than the state. the other option which is virtually identical is to convert it to a foreign currency then convert it back. Except the later is subject to manipulation and fees imposed by the banks- some of which will be butt hurt over the defaults when they leave the Eurozone.

    83. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At this point, there's no possibility at all that Greece would be able to borrow more money from the EU to run a primary budget deficits in the future.

      We'll see them try within the next 24 hours.

      Wow, you're really not understanding the current situation at all.

      A good place to start would be the concept of a primary surplus. That's the situation Greece is in now.

    84. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know what a primary surplus is, thank you very much. And I still expect them to try and set up the conditions of the credits so that they get them even if they run a primary deficit, because that's what they're going to do. They've been avoiding any sort of commitment to measurable goals up to now and they're not going to commit to a primary surplus on Monday.

    85. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If it's a marriage, then Greece is the abusive, cheating spouse"

        Greece is also married to an abused cheating spouse. Lets not pretend that we all don't notice former Yugoslavian "Macedonians" now ridiculously claiming to be founders of Hellenistic age... while EU keeps "recommending" they join the EU? (can only imagine how Cameron would react if France claimed themselvses the "real" English). EU s eventually doomed to failure if they keep screwing each other rather than protecting one another.
      :

    86. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by qpqp · · Score: 1

      They need to start working with the plan that was made for them to clear up the mess and other nations will help them.

      Wrong. I wouldn't work with a plan that forces me to cut my own legs (sell state-owned, important infrastructure to the likes of Telekom, Vattenfall, etc.) either, instead I'd look for a proper way out (grow - not shrink).

    87. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by qpqp · · Score: 1

      The oil markets will not accept local currencies; it has to be dollars or in some cases, euros.

      You're forgetting Rubles, which is a serious oversight currently.
      Also, Greeks do have their own oil, if they start drilling. They have their own electricity too. It'd be difficult, but possible.

    88. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by qpqp · · Score: 1

      They could also pivot towards the EEU and/or SCO, who'd both probably be welcoming Greece with open arms.

    89. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by qpqp · · Score: 1

      have had just about enough of it

      Who cares?
      Fortunately, these days Germans don't have an army capable of attacking anyone, unless it's with broomsticks. So they'd have to live with it.

    90. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Znarl · · Score: 1

      Germany is an export economy and so does very well out of a weak Euro. It is in Germany's best interest for countries who drag down the value of the Euro to not get kicked out as it lowers the cost of Germany's exports for the rest of the world. If only strong export based countries used the Euro then it would increase the price of those countries exports for the rest of the world.

    91. Re:Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Joke's on you, you pure-bred yoroppean, these kids are not American, but Yoroppeo-Asian, most likely from Georgia. By the looks of it that's the Mickey D on Rustaveli boulevard in Tbilisi from a decade+ ago. It says "Big Mac" in Georgian on the poster, and the funny car outside is one of them Russkie FIAT copycats.

    92. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by siddesu · · Score: 1

      Call me EU-biased, populist, fourth Reich apologist or whatever, but I don't see how the Euro has been bad for Belgium by looking at its GDP growth. It isn't spectacularly different before/after the Euro, but it seems there is a lot more economic stability after than before.

      Belgium:

      Before Euro: http://www.tradingeconomics.co...

      After Euro: http://www.tradingeconomics.co...

      As for France, the tendency of diminishing growth has been there since at least the oil shocks, nothing in the chart I see that would point to the introduction of the Euro as the culprit.

      http://www.tradingeconomics.com/charts/france-gdp-growth-annual.png?s=frgegdpy&d1=19500101&d2=20151231

    93. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      Actually I think more the opposite, Greece being pushed out would show the healthy countries that the EU is not just wealth fare system for countries that mismanage their economies while at the same time scaring some of the more troubled countries into doing something to rectify their own issues. Greece staying in the Euro and NOT fixing their economy I think is far more likely to shatter the EU than them being ejected.

    94. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the 3 charts that you linked blatantly confirm the fact that Belgium's and France's economic growth has dramatically slowed down since they entered the eurozone.

      Thanks for backing my point, however you might want to see an optometrist soon.

    95. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      If they leave the Euro they will most likely default on their Euro debts anyway. The only point of leaving is to abandon those debts.

      Actually defaulting might be a good option for them. It worked out okay for Argentina. Not brilliant but better than what they have now. The other Euro countries would obviously prefer that that didn't happen though, so I think in the long run will accommodate them.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    96. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That picture isn't even from America you dumb fuck!

    97. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Rei · · Score: 1

      If they create an exchange with a current crypto currency and conver all their money to it except what is needed from day to day, then drop out of the Eurozone and create their own dollar, each crypto dollar will be the value of the crypto currency used.

      Sorry, but unless there's hard assets behind it, it's going to float. And the float will be way down, just the same as any other Greek currency. Greece's creditors and exporters don't want New Drachmas, CryptoDrachmas, or anything of the sort: they want dollars and euros. To get dollars and euros, Greece has to make and export goods and services at a rate competitive with their rate of imports. For their government to get dollars and euros, they actually have to stamp out corruption, tax evasion, and so forth. Greece's inability to do these things is the reason they're in the bind they are today.

      --
      We gotta go to a crappy town where I'm a hero.
    98. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by siddesu · · Score: 1

      If you can read the opposite of what the charts actually say, it is pointless to talk to you. Go feel sorry about yourself somewhere else.

    99. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Tom · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But Greece is apparently either unable or unwilling to go after them.

      The old government was, because of the strong ties between the old parties and the business moguls. The new government has no such ties, and has, in fact, announced steps to do exactly what you say they should do.

      But, of course, since they're evil communistsocialistliberalevilcommitraitors, it doesn't matter what they actually do, does it?

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    100. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Tom · · Score: 1

      Germany in particular doesn't want to give any ground

      Because it's been running an internal class warfare for the past 20 years. Germany is strong right now because all of the burden has been shifted to the low and middle classes, with real wages being stagnant for over 10 years, more unemployment than at any time since the war, and massive amounts of the workforce employed in temporary or part-time jobs.

      In other words: The cost of labour has been systematically driven down. The problem for Germany is that this system is unsustainable, unless you can always shift off the cost to someone else. The austerity is not new, it's the same recipe that Merkel and her predecessor cooked Germany with. They cannot allow another country to shake off this yoke without their home country asking why the fuck they need to justify spending 12 Euros instead of 10 Euros on a sports club for the kids when the rich have doubled their income in the same time everyone else has only lost.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    101. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Tom · · Score: 2

      Germany is playing hardball exactly because it can not afford Greece to step out of the austerity program.

      If Greece does it, and survives - even if badly, it just needs to survive - then Spain, Portugal and Italy will certainly follow, with Cyprus, Ireland and others close behind.

      Merkel has presented austerity as "without alternative" in the same way she has run her own country (disclaimer: I am german). Every major decision in her entire reign was never justified by being the best option or shown to be productive, the primary argument has always been that there are no other alternatives and that's it.

      If the new Greece government can demonstrate that there is an alternative, the whole house of cards will come crashing down. Merkel will fall, because her entire political system (she's even made sure that there is no alternative to her within her own party, guaranteeing that they will not win the next election after she steps down) is based on this "without alternative" premises.

      And if you don't think that politicians are willing and able to ruin whole countries or continents over their personal ambitions and powerplays, you've slept through all of history class.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    102. Re:Umm... Lulz.... by Tom · · Score: 1

      While based on some extremely limited understanding of the world this is technically true, you do understand that a) you'd all die in nuclear hellfire as Russia and China retaliate (because if you start a nuclear war for no reason, you can't be trusted not to do it on a whim to them) and b) "you americans" can do squiddly doo. 0.0001% of you can do. I think on a metaphor your small brain will understand, compared to your body that is about the equivalent of those three hairs on your balls you don't like.

      Also, "those greasers" had democracy when America was ruled by buffaloes. They already were over with a full civilization, artists, philosophers and scientists included, when "USA" became spellable because latin letters had just been invented. They laugh on your history of 300 years, because they can add an entire order of magnitude to that. Those "greasers" invented the logic that is the foundation of the math that is the foundation of the computer science that is the foundation of the hardware and software you unwashed redneck use to spit out your mental sperm into the world.

      In many respects, Greece is the seed and core of everything that you admire in your world, but it would be stupid to ask you for some respect, because people like you don't know what that is.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    103. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see how the Euro has been bad for Belgium by looking at its GDP growth.

      LOL! You don't see what the chart that YOU posted shows?!

    104. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Germany is playing hardball exactly because it can not afford Greece to step out of the austerity program. If Greece does it, and survives

      You're delusional. There's a snowball's chance in hell for that to happen, and Greece knows it. They wouldn't even be talking to the rest of Europe if there was any chance at all they could make it on their own.

      If the new Greece government can demonstrate that there is an alternative

      The battle cry of socialists and communists world-wide: We'll do it and the world will follow. Never seems to work, does it?

      And if you don't think that politicians are willing and able to ruin whole countries or continents over their personal ambitions and powerplays, you've slept through all of history class.

      You're talking about Tsipras and Varoufakis, right? Have you never heard "beware of Greeks bearing gifts"? Was that not part of your history class? Also, how many times do you have to watch handout economies fall back versus competitive economies to LEARN THE FUCKING LESSON!

    105. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Euro had all sorts of problems. That spurious inflation on the beginning was one. As for the increase in trade it went mainly in one direction and actually exacerbated the current problem.

      Do you know what caused the inflation? Germany printed a bunch of DMs before the Euro came into the market. In order to keep their inflation low, and fullfill the ERM convergence criteria, they kept the DMs stashed in the banks and kept them out of the market. Once the Euro came online they converted all these bogus DMs into Euros and flooded the market with them causing the inflation, and loaned them to countries like Greece. So effectively the Germans loaned bad money to countries like Greece and are asking for good money in goods and services as return now.

      Also whoever had the idea of making a monetary union with free bank transfers with a eurozone wide deposit insurance scheme was bonkers.

      I cannot find a reference on the Internet that supports the assertion "Germany printed a bunch of DMs before the Euro came into the market."
      There is an urban legend to that effect, and it has to do with the fact that Germany had printed and stored a huge quantity of DM in expectation of the possibility of a counterfeiting attack, but those DM were physically different than those in circulation and destroyed after the Euro conversion, not converted. Also, other Warsaw pact countries had done the same anticipation of a counterfeiting attack, that is printing and storing of a post-counterefit currency that is different from the one in circulation.

    106. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, of course it matters what they actually do. What doesn't matter is what they say. If communists could actually do what they promise, the whole world would be communist.

    107. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Optic7 · · Score: 1

      Maybe they can't sell the stuff because no one knows who actually owns it. What chance do they have without even a proper land registry? I heard about this in a comment on The Economist, and couldn't believe it, but then found more details here: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05...

    108. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Bonzoli · · Score: 1

      Nobody is going after those who took all this money? Its not magic, it went somewhere.
      The new government officials are cozying up with the kremlin which is a kleptocracy. In may western nations puts them on par with communists. You know the ones currently driving tanks west across the Ukraine.

      Clearly stepping on the economy while hoping it will improve to pay back the loans is a bad idea. But are the people mad enough now, to go get the stolen money back? This will require a lot of people going to jail or giving it back. If they aren't then its not going to get better.

    109. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bullshit. Greece is costing Germany a fortune in loans, at the moment they are the biggest contributor to helping keeping Greece afloat, that money well and truly outweighs any benefit they get from a weaker Euro, not to mention the political poison as it is deeply unpopular to take tax payers money and give to a country of tax avoiders.

    110. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Tom · · Score: 1

      Nobody is going after those who took all this money? Its not magic, it went somewhere.

      To foreign banks, mostly. And if we've learnt anything at all during the past seven years, it is that Iceland is the only european country with enough balls and not enough corruption to actually go after those responsible for the whole clusterfuck.

      The new government officials are cozying up with the kremlin which is a kleptocracy.

      True, but since the US basically doesn't give a fuck about your country if you don't have oil, and europe is in the firm grasp of a woman who gets pleasure from re-introducing levels of poverty we've not seen since the world wars, there really aren't many places to go to for support.

      You know the ones currently driving tanks west across the Ukraine.

      That's a completely different topic, so I'll only say that the europeans actions in Ukraine will probably be in the history books of the 22nd century as examples of unbelievable stupidity and ignorance.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    111. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Tom · · Score: 1

      The battle cry of socialists and communists world-wide: We'll do it and the world will follow. Never seems to work, does it?

      Step out of the binary world for a second. There is communist dicatorship soviet style, and oppressive hypercapitalism USA style, but there are also worlds inbetween. For 50 years, Europe had a successful social-economical system called social market economy. It worked really great, and gave us the prosperity of (almost) the USA with the social security systems of (almost) socialism. The gap between rich and poor was much lower than across the atlantic, while productivity and freedom were much higher than in the east.

      The new greece government makes demands that 30 years ago wouldn't have raised an eyebrow in Europe. You want people to be able to actually survive on the wages of a full-time job? Yeah, so what? Everyone wants that. You want to spend money to help the unemployed and create jobs? Why are you even saying that, this is what we all expect from a government.

      Also, how many times do you have to watch handout economies fall back versus competitive economies to LEARN THE FUCKING LESSON!

      "fall back" in what metric? The USA looks great on paper, but your richest 0.1% are taking in 50% or 90% or whatever incredible share of all the wealth and profits.

      Do you want to live in a country with an average wage of 5000 or 10000? Sounds like a simple question. But if the average is just statistics, and most people actually collect 10% of it in the "richer" country, living in the poorer one is the better choice for most people.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    112. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Greeks can build their socialist utopia if they like, but then THEY have to BUILD it and PAY for it. All sustainable advancements towards more participation and social insurance in Europe have been made from a position of economic strength. None of the countries got there by instituting these things first and then hoping they'd find a way to pay for them, but THAT is how you ideologues always want to do it.

      If you can't even see how competitive economies are far preferable to economies which create all the "right" disincentives, you've enjoyed living in a highly competitive economy far too long without looking why you have what you have. The Greeks who have been living and working in Germany for a while understand this better than you do.

    113. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quote myself:

      We'll see them try within the next 24 hours.

      Told you so. Well, they took their time, had to create urgency after all to get this thing through the parliaments, but there you are: Not a single commitment to a quantifiable goal. The most expensive envelope of hot air ever sold. Greece being Greece.

    114. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You moron. Yes, the bailout money ended up with the banks, but that only replaced the money that the banks had lent to Greece before, which Greece was about to default on. If that had not been done, YOU would be asking the IMF for handouts now after a crash of the European banking system. The people who had SPENT that money live in Greece, and they didn't invest it but consumed it. Like getting a loan to buy an iPad instead of the bike you need to go to work, because the iPad's nicer and you can always get another loan, right?

    115. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Tom · · Score: 1

      The Greeks can build their socialist utopia if they like

      Are you retarded or what? The plans of the new greece government are as far away from "socialist utopia" as a Ford Model T from a flying car.

      All sustainable advancements towards more participation and social insurance in Europe have been made from a position of economic strength

      Not really, no. But don't let facts spoil your ranting. Especially social changes often came about in times of crisis, because it is then that the ugly truth of the current system shows itself in full splendor.

      If you can't even see how competitive economies are far preferable to economies which create all the "right" disincentives,

      If you don't understand that all extremist positions are evil, you've not paid attention in history class. Competition is good, but hypercompetitive environments are disasters to physical and mental health, society, culture and every aspect of humanity other than profit, profit, profit. On the opposite end, social security is good, but nanny-states (the real ones, not the "omg, the government actually moved a finger" hyperbole of american right-wingers) cut into innovation, progress and motivation to do anything at all.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    116. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The nice thing about discussions with communists is that one only has to wait to be proven right. The flip side is that one always ends up paying for their boneheadedness anyway, which may be the reason for their apparent learning impediment.

    117. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      lol.. Not really. It would be no different then them buying US dollars, exiting the Eurozone, creating a crap currency, then converting back into their crap currency. It needs nothing hard at all. Any paper or fiat currency will work.

      Greece will not have to export anything, all they will have to do is find someone willing to sell. That's where a bit coin operation would work. They purchase bitcoins from whoever sells, when they exchange them back out, it's the current exchange rates. Whoever sells them can purchase hard assets or take the loss or do whatever their scheme allows.

      Greece could purchase gold and do the same. Using a crypto currency only allows that to happen without having to purchase the asset themselves.

    118. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and they got their wish. The time to be proud of that primary surplus is now, because the con men in Athens will now commence "stimulating the economy" by raising the income tax allowance and pensions while also forgiving "small tax debts" and naturally failing at making rich people pay taxes. The Nazis pay, so it's OK.

    119. Re:Umm... Lulz.... by Meski · · Score: 1

      All right, but apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, the fresh-water system, and public health, what have the Greeks ever done for us?

    120. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Tom · · Score: 1

      discussions with communists

      Americans. Everyone who disagrees with them or who thinks that letting people starve on the streets might be unbecoming of a civilized nation must be a communist.

      You're not very different from ISIS. For them everyone who disagrees with them is a to-be-slaughtered satan worshipper. Different words and details, same approach. Bush Jr. summed the american mindset up very good: If you're not with us, you are against us. In the small box that is your world, there is only space for two opinions, and nothing inbetween or to the sides.

      I would pity you, but ignorance is a choice and not an accident, and I never pity people for self-inflicted misery.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    121. Re: Umm... Lulz.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the bailout money ended up with the banks

      And if you see nothing wrong with that, you should quietly shoot yourself in a corner instead of bothering us with your presence.

      You are probably also a supporter of solving the problem of drug addiction by giving the addicted more drugs.

  2. Betteridge's law of headlines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Will Greek Finance Minister Varoufakis Support Cryptocurrency In Greece?

    No

    As obvious as the question is stupid.....

  3. Will Greece borrow more and then default? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yes, they will. Good for them. I'd rather see a nation state profit from financial fraud than the usual consortium of bankers.

    Iceland seems to be doing just fine, despite not honoring their debts.

    1. Re:Will Greece borrow more and then default? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Iceland was not in debt. It was defrauded. The money was stolen and they took it back. We all need to do the same thing.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:Will Greece borrow more and then default? by cheesybagel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Iceland did the right thinag. The Government shouldn't be forced to pay the debts of failed private companies. Even if they are banks. The PIIGS are all suffering because they followed the EU command to assume private banking debts. Notice how even in Greece, which had the most government debt, supposedly they had to cave in early because other 'the ATMs wouldn't have money to dispense next week' because of a banking run. Bah.

    3. Re:Will Greece borrow more and then default? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Greece did not profit from financial fraud so much, but some of her politicians and Goldman (who arranged the schemes to borrow far and above what Greece could afford) profited. The brouhaha is happening because now the regular Greeks have to foot the bill.

    4. Re:Will Greece borrow more and then default? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Also, the issue in Greece is that if they do something the banks don't like, there will be another coup. It's 1967 all over again.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    5. Re:Will Greece borrow more and then default? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iceland did the right thinag. The Government shouldn't be forced to pay the debts of failed private companies.

      But they did pay the debts of the failed private companies, but only those owed to domestic residents.

    6. Re:Will Greece borrow more and then default? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem in Greece is not private banks, it is the rampant tax evasion by its residents, specifically the professional class. Following close behind, there is massive corruption of government officials. I don't think Americans truly understand how ingrained the corruption is in Greek society. Giving envelopes with bribes to expedite service is an accepted practice. Even the anti-corruption task forces are corrupt. It is a widely known problem and tax evasion is considered a national sport. It is estimated that 40-50% of the GDP is involves untaxed transactions. Greece is really a third world nation living as a first world nation, and the bill as come due.

      Remember the Swiss banking accounts turned over to EU and US governments? It contained many rich and well connected Greeks who had evaded taxes by putting their money in these accounts, including ministers and advisers, and their friends. This is the reason the Greek government refused to take any official action. If the people in power who advocate clamping down on tax evasion are themselves evading taxes, what hope is there for the country?

      The new government is not going to get anything done. If anything, it makes things worse because they want to spend money with no realistic way to pay off its debts while continuing to deal with the limited revenue coming into the national coffers..

    7. Re:Will Greece borrow more and then default? by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      If only the PIIGS had done that too.

    8. Re:Will Greece borrow more and then default? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iceland did the right thinag. The Government shouldn't be forced to pay the debts of failed private companies.

      But they did pay the debts of the failed private companies, but only those owed to domestic residents.

      They are belatedly repaying foreign creditors now as well. My mother received a partial payment last year.

    9. Re:Will Greece borrow more and then default? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the Greek government is more corrupt than americans can imagine, yet the problem is people don't want to pay taxes to said corrupt organization? I do not understand your angle here.

    10. Re:Will Greece borrow more and then default? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iceland did the right thinag. The Government shouldn't be forced to pay the debts of failed private companies. Even if they are banks. The PIIGS are all suffering because they followed the EU command to assume private banking debts. Notice how even in Greece, which had the most government debt, supposedly they had to cave in early because other 'the ATMs wouldn't have money to dispense next week' because of a banking run. Bah.

      The ISK became totally untradeable for months - there was literally no exchange rate available anywhere - because there was not a single un-defaulted bank that anyone could actually have carried out an FX transaction with. Of course Greece COULD have done this, but that would have meant fracturing the Eurozone into "regular Euros" and "Greek non-fungible Euro claims", which would have been effectively a de-facto Greek exit from the Eurozone. And once Greece left the other vulnerable nations would be seen as being next, probably causing a domino effect that would have collapsed the Euro... Maybe you think the Euro actually should have been completely abandoned, but otherwise there was no way to let the Greek banking system fail in isolation from the rest of the Eurozone banking system and still keep Greece in the Euro.

    11. Re:Will Greece borrow more and then default? by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Nah. All they had to do was let the Greek banks fail and handle it as any other business bankruptcy. The bank assets would be resold on the market and used to repay the creditors who would then have to write down the debt on their books. Instead they're just kicking the can down the road and letting the debt snowball.

    12. Re:Will Greece borrow more and then default? by Tom · · Score: 1

      Iceland did the right thinag.

      This.

      When the whole crisis thing happened, we should have jailed the bankers, and the politicians that let them do it (by repealing regulation laws, removing funding from compliance offices, etc.)

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  4. Why? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 3, Informative

    Greece doesn't need a currency, it needs liquidity - a crypto currency won't bring that. The entire current issue is not about which currency to go for, its how Greece keeps paying its creditors - if they can't service their current debts, their ability to borrow goes through the floor, and a crypto currency isn't going to reverse that. Greece can't back its own crypto currency with anything it has a monopoly on either because it doesn't have anything that valuable.

    1. Re:Why? by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      That's why it's time to purge the books. The banks can easily afford it. The most they might lose is a fleet of new jets and yachts, and they might have to buy cheaper hookers and drugs. The 'debts' are predatory and fraudulent.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how does that help? Greece has no money because they spend more than their economy creates. Lenders are already wary, your plan guarantees the country will be insolvent.

    3. Re:Why? by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      If you have your own currency you can print money. That gives you liquidity, at the cost of massive currency devaluation. Currency devaluation will make Greek exports cheaper and imports more expensive- and both will greatly benefit local industry and services, creating local jobs and economic growth. Switching to their own currency will fix all their problems, unless you are rich.

    4. Re:Why? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      What they want is a cryptocurrency whole Europe / world use and one which is "printed" / made in Greece so they can let inflation for everyone else cover their never ending spending beyond their means =P

    5. Re:Why? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      They can do what Iceland did. The loan sharks that run the system need to be 'pushed into the sea'.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    6. Re:Why? by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      Greece doesn't need a currency, it needs liquidity - a crypto currency won't bring that.

      Actually, what is needs is a lack of liquidity. It needs to live within it's means. If it's overextended then
      maybe bankrupcy is the right thing to do. A crytpcurrency might help if it can't be manipulated and used
      to print new money. I wouldn't say bitcoin is super stable at the moment but a stable currency backed by
      something that can't be faked would go a long ways to fixing greece and the other economies that like
      to print their own money instead of balancing their budgets.

    7. Re:Why? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2

      That worked well for Zimbabwe, hasn't it?

    8. Re:Why? by cheesybagel · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I guess you didn't hear that even Greece is now running a primary surplus. You know what that means? The Goverment spends less than it collects in taxes.

      Spain had been running a primary surplus for a long time and the banking sector fail still brought them down.

    9. Re:Why? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1
      Hmm, sounds like a variation of Smoot-Hawley in that it makes imports more expensive to the benefit of local companies.

      And we all know how well Smoot-Hawley worked, right?

      It should also be pointed out that Weimar Germany went that route once too. And that worked almost as well as Smoot-Hawley....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    10. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are these Greek "exports" that you speak of? Olive oil and repackaged Bulgarian "feta" cheese? Be serious, please, the Greeks suck because they've been on the political dole since mid-Cold war.

      The real problem is a PR one. Germany bailed them out two years ago by "haircutting" interest instead of the principal. The Greeks got to pay half of what they owed, but they still bitch that they got a 'rough' deal, because the principal is still at 310 billion euros, and nobody cares about the interest payments.

      The other real problem is that Varufakis is just a stupid fuck -- he went into the negotiations as if it were an angel investment round. Not with a plan, but with a big grin, a gouchebag fashion sense and a firm belief that EU will kneel because of his imaginary sex appeal. Too bad it isn't 2010 anymore and nobody cares if Greece defaults.

    11. Re:Why? by gclef · · Score: 2

      There's one problem it won't fix: the Greek debts to EU are not going to shift to the a currency just because Greece does. The debts to the rest of the EU will remain in Euros, and if the Greek "new Drachma" devalues massively compared to the Euro, the relative loan repayments in new Drachma will go up correspondingly.

      Greece can't print their way out of the loans. They can print their way to cheaper exports, yes....but the can't print their way out of the loans.

    12. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. A cryptocurrency misses the point enterely.

      I actually wonder why there are still any Greek depositors holding euros in their bank accounts in Greece. They have a few more weeks to move their euros out of the country. The wealthy Greeks have already done it. Why hasn't everybody else followed suit?

    13. Re:Why? by itzly · · Score: 1

      What about the stuff they don't produce locally and have to import, like such vital things as oil and gas ?

    14. Re:Why? by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      This.

      Monopoly money by another name would stink as bad.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    15. Re:Why? by fraxinus-tree · · Score: 1

      No, they cannot. They are in pretty much the opposite position. It is not the banks not having money (as in Iceland), it is the government not having money.

    16. Re:Why? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      That is the lie they want you to believe, besides not making sense. All these countries, Iceland, Greece, Spain, etc. were robbed. Iceland so far is the only one to fight back, they told the creditors to fuck off. And now they are better off for it. We all need to do that and put up public banks.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    17. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The entire current issue is not about which currency to go for, its how Greece keeps paying its creditors - if they can't service their current debts, their ability to borrow goes through the floor, and a crypto currency isn't going to reverse that

      The point of having their population using crypto currency would be to prevent greece for mortgaging their futures in the first place.

      Of course they have to default on their bad loans, but that was something well known when they were first making them.

    18. Re:Why? by fraxinus-tree · · Score: 1

      Electing a populist government over and over does not qualify for being robbed.

    19. Re:Why? by Solandri · · Score: 3, Informative

      A surplus built on the back of borrowed money is not a surplus if you decide not to pay that money back. There's a reason accountants use amortization schedules and depreciate long-term assets. If you want to artificially restrict your analysis to just what the government spends (minus debt repayments) and collects, then you also need to subtract any economic activity generated by purchases made with that money which led to the debt.

      In other words, you cannot buy a car with a car loan, get a job which requires the use of the car, then claim you shouldn't have to pay back the loan because you'd be making money if it weren't for those pesky car loan payments. Eliminating the car loan from your calculation also necessitates eliminating the car.

    20. Re:Why? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You nuts? The seas are already polluted enough. Find a different way to get rid of your trash!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    21. Re:Why? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      If part of the "deal" was that I have to starve my population but I have to buy German submarines for the money instead, I guess I'd be a tad bid pissed as well.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    22. Re:Why? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Russia might just be interested enough in having an ally inside the EU to consider striking a deal. I could well see Greece dropping any kind of embargo on the grounds that if the EU shits on me, I'm under no obligation to play along with their embargo anymore.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    23. Re:Why? by Solandri · · Score: 1

      If you have your own currency you can print money. That gives you liquidity, at the cost of massive currency devaluation.

      Oh dear. First, Greece is on the Euro - they can't print more money.

      Second, money is just a representation of value/wealth. It is not value/wealth in and of itself. The true value is productivity. Anything you do to alter the money supply changes nothing if productivity is not altered. All that happens is you just add or subtract a zero to every number used in the accounting books. If your paycheck increases by 10x, but prices also increase by 10x, then nothing has changed. The economy gains no liquidity from printing money.

      The one thing printing more currency does is shift wealth away from people who have been saving up (i.e. your savings account at the bank) to the entity printing the money. This is why investors flee to gold in bad economic times - the government cannot print more gold, so its value cannot decline due to this type of wrong-headed fiscal policy. (Note: It could actually be the proper course of action if huge amounts of the country's wealth is being held by a small group of extremely wealthy individuals. But I don't believe that's the case in Greece.)

      Same thing happens with debts (which are just a form of deferred savings). Debt repayments don't scale with currency fluctuations, so if you print enough money that your need 10x as much currency to do the same thing as before, then suddenly your debt is 1/10th what it was before in terms of real productivity.

      But that's exactly the same thing as defaulting on your debt. Except instead of defaulting on 100% of it, you've defaulted on 90% of it. And that loss of economic credibility (i.e. credit) will make it that much harder for you to convince someone to lend you money in the future, worsening your liquidity crisis.

    24. Re:Why? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      There's one problem it won't fix: the Greek debts to EU are not going to shift to the a currency just because Greece does. The debts to the rest of the EU will remain in Euros, and if the Greek "new Drachma" devalues massively compared to the Euro, the relative loan repayments in new Drachma will go up correspondingly.

      And the reason a financially independent Greece would keep paying Euro loans is...?

      Frankly, Euro was doomed from the beginning. As long as national currencies could float relative to each other deficits and surpluses balanced automatically through such adjustment. Euro scrapped this mechanism with replacing it with another, so now weakest EU nation goes bankrupt, then the next weakest, then the next, etc. Ultimately, they all serve as permanently indentured servants to the final victor (almost certainly Germany). Except of course they'll simply break away, returning their national currencies and declaring their Euro debt null and void.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    25. Re:Why? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      No they can't.

      It will cause a great depression not seen since WWII. Reason being is the way the books are counted at the banks. Imagine the game of hot potato in kindergarten? Now imagine each time you caught it counted as an asset. When you throw it it counted as another asset.

      Debt = assets. Not liabilities today??

      See the problem? So since everyone is in a web of IOUs you close one down and it impacts the others and the house of cards collapss in a domino effect hence 2008 financial crises. Difference is we got bailed out back then. Today ... there is no more cash to do so.

    26. Re:Why? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Also the same with business reliance on lines of credit to pay employees and suppliers.

      No one pays in cash and that is a common misconception today. Wall Street likes smooth lines and no bumps which lines of credit pay for daily operations. No lines of credit POOF out of business even if you have money it means suppkiers who put in 90 days pay as they too used a line of credit can't pay your employer. So the cash reserves will go with them as well.

      Lovely. In 1929 only the few big titans of industry was so dependent on lines of credit. Not true in 2015

    27. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's "starving" the population? Greece is still a rich country compared to at least 10 other EU members that maintain a much better fiscal record. The only reason the EU hears the Greek whining is the enormous sense of entitlement that Greece has developed since they began to receive EU money in 1981 and the fact that OMG they finally have to start looking for real jobs and pay taxes.

    28. Re:Why? by siddesu · · Score: 1

      I want to see how a "financially independent" Greece does, really, except it won't be pretty. If the historical record is any indication, they'll be the third-poorest Balkan nation, ahead of maybe Macedonia and Albania but behind everybody else, with a GDP per capita at a healthy 15-20% of the EU-12 average and an economic growth in the low 50 points of one percent when times are exceptionally good.

      Unless they have another coup d'etat or, maybe, get bought wholesale by Istanbul or Moscow with all the expectations of good government that such a deal implies.

    29. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is nothing wrong with using credit as long as you pay it back. Borrowing as much as a country can and then refusing to repay is a failed country.

    30. Re:Why? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      That's right. Allowing your bank to remove your deposits and devalue your currency is.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    31. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Precisely why every municipal region in the US requires its own currency. Look what happened to Detroit.

    32. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greeks are too stubborn and UNWILLING to work with creditors. France has defaulted more often than Greece over the last 150 years. The French work things out with creditors in less than a year. But the Greeks? They average 45 years per default.

    33. Re:Why? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Greeks are too stubborn and UNWILLING to work with creditors.

      Good for Greece! The 'creditors' are fraudsters. Screw them.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    34. Re:Why? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Greece needs to grow up and stop the tax holiday for the rich rort. They simply need to balance out the revenue side of the taxation so they cay pay for social services. So lock down the wealth of the rich and the tax the hell out of it, basically something like 20 odd years worth.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    35. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad Russia has no money left for more Afghanistans, they just scrapped plans for a major pipeline to Europe on the account of lack of cash.

    36. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Greece doesn't need a currency, it needs liquidity"

      Greece also needs to make its corruption less visible. A cryptocurrecny seems like the perfect tool to obfuscate the money vacuum.

    37. Re:Why? by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      >That worked well for Zimbabwe, hasn't it?

      Zimbabwe was a completely different scenario. More-over there is zero reason to suspect a similar outcome.
      The idea that government spending in a recession causes hyperinflation is bullshit, it comes from Austrian economics - the only school of economics that ignores empirical data (on purpose!) and there is literally not a single example anywhere in history of that *ever* happening.

      I know you're about to say "Zimbabwe", "Rome under Nero" or any of the other examples of hyperinflation - which all did big money printing, but they really aren't valid. All of them had other factors too. Rome under Nero had just gone through a massive drought that destroyed their farming crops, and two civil wars. Zimbabwe had a major near-revolution first.
      In fact the ONLY example of hyperinflation in all of history that was NOT preceded by a massive social upheaval of NON-economic nature is Spain in the 15th century - and that was with gold-standard money (it turns out -the gold standard gets fucked if a few citizens discover a whole lot of gold on another continent and just keep bringing more).

      A recession, by definition, is a liquidity trap. In a liquidity trap inflation is very difficult to achieve at all - in fact you're at constant risk of DEFLATION - you WANT to cause inflation to counter that effect. The whole point of a recession is that nobody is spending (or able to spend) - so nobody is making money either. If SOMEBODY doesn't start spending, you stay in a recession for ever. Usually the only possible OPTION to BE that somebody is the government.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    38. Re:Why? by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      >Note: It could actually be the proper course of action if huge amounts of the country's wealth is being held by a small group of extremely wealthy individuals. But I don't believe that's the case in Greece

      Actually - it kind of is the case in Greece.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    39. Re:Why? by Tom · · Score: 1

      Greece can't back its own crypto currency with anything it has a monopoly on either because it doesn't have anything that valuable.

      Really? And other currencies are backed by what, exactly? Promises of the government, that's what. It's been a long time a major currency was actually backed by anything valuable.

      Greece doesn't need a currency, it needs liquidity - a crypto currency won't bring that.

      A currency under the control of the government will bring that. One price that countries paid for joining the Euro zone was that they lost fiscal control. Your own currency - doesn't matter if it's called Drachme or Bitme - gives that control.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    40. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is blatantly obvious that you have no clue how crypto currencies work.

    41. Re:Why? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Currencies aren't backed by government promises, although government promises of stability do help stabilize them. They aren't backed by anything. The dollar is worth what a dollar will buy, nothing more.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  5. Taxation by Teun · · Score: 1
    The lax tax moral of the Greek was together with the huge number of public servants an important reason their economy faltered.

    The government of this game developer wants to re-employ many of the laid off people so fixing the tax system is probably the only option they have left to keep the country from again falling over.

    And such a currency can include many safeguards to ensure taxes are going to be paid.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    1. Re: Taxation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Varoufakis wasn't a game developer. He was Valve's economist; now he's in effect an economist for the Greek government.

    2. Re:Taxation by JBMcB · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My favorite story about Greece's problems:

      In the 90's a governmental committee was formed for the sole purpose to close a particular dam. After a decade, the dam was closed and demolished. That committee still exists. They don't go around closing other dams, they, I assume, just make sure the dam is still closed.

      Source: Planet Money

      --
      My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    3. Re:Taxation by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Fact: Greece has less government employees per capita than Germany.

    4. Re:Taxation by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      If you think this kind of thing doesn't happen everywhere you are deluding yourself. How many Yucca Mountain studies have been done by now?

    5. Re:Taxation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hush now!

    6. Re:Taxation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is that Germany collects its taxes. There are enough outstanding taxes in Greece to pay their state's debts.

    7. Re:Taxation by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      That was because the house majority leader at the time was from Las Vegas.

      Needless to say the locals heavily oppose it in their backyard.

    8. Re:Taxation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fact: Greece has less government employees per capita than Germany.

      Regardless both are very high levels of government, however Germany actually manage their spending and income to ensure it is sustainable. They have a healthy tax base that they actually collect taxes. Greece also has a military 3 times the size of Germany's per capita military.

    9. Re:Taxation by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      Germany also has one of the worlds highest per capita of government, but they collect taxes. Interestingly Greece actually spend significantly more on military than Germany per capita, that is the sort of shit that gets them in this mess. When you have such insanely high levels of government you have to be incredibly careful on how you run your economy and ensure you have a healthy tax base that actually pays tax.

    10. Re:Taxation by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Why did you think Merkel was kowtowing to Putin regarding Ukraine? Germany has cut their armed forces substantially since the fall of the Soviet Union. Just look at the amount of Leopard 2 tanks they sold to other countries including Greece. The Germans today have less Leopard 2 tanks in their army than the Greeks!

      That's why Putin can do whatever he damned pleases.

      That's one of the reasons the Greeks are miffed at Germany. A large fraction of the Greek government expenses were spent in German military hardware. German military companies actively corrupted Greek government officials to get those contracts. This is documented.

    11. Re:Taxation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What an idiotic statement, Germany could spend every cent they have on military and still not be a major threat to Russia. They would bankrupt themselves while putin laughed at their stupidity.

    12. Re:Taxation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously don't know how belligerent Turkey has been. (Turkey: the country that buys 1 millions dollars worth of oil EVERY DAY from ISIS.)

      Don't forget Turkey still illegally occupies northern Cyprus. And despite 41 years passing ... a whole lot of help the rest of the world has been with kicking them out.

      So it's understandable that Greece spends more than Germany (per capita) on defence: they have warmongering assholes to the east.

  6. Not gonna fly by florin · · Score: 0

    They can of course do whatever they like once they default and are forced to go off on their own to protect the rest of the Eurozone. I'm sure having a currency of their own again may sound tempting considering their current predicament.

    But current cryptocurrencies are popular only because of the promise of easy wealth to early adopters. The concept of taking control away from established capital and the concept of states is only interesting as long as such adopters have not yet become established themselves. A state backed cryptocurrency will not have that dodgy get rick quick appeal so it's hard to see who will benefit from this.

    1. Re:Not gonna fly by cheesybagel · · Score: 1, Insightful

      In other words cryptocurrencies are a Ponzi scheme. Plus Bitcoin is deflactionary like the man himself said.

    2. Re:Not gonna fly by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      This, and it's kinda obvious:

      When in danger
      When in doubt
      Run in circles
      Scream and shout

      Even if it's a useless fucking idea, it's an idea.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  7. Freedom and good and bad currencies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a long, long history of States forcing people to use bad currencies (i.e. those being used to transfer wealth from people to the State by printing money).

    This is why for example Zimbabwe uses the US dollar now, instead of its own.

    If a State run cryptocurrency turns up, either it will be sound - the State cannot print money, nor try to mandate an exchange rate - or it will not.

    If it is sound, people may use it.

    If it is not sound, people will only use it if they are forced to do so, i.e. if bitcoin (and all alternatives) are banned.

    We note of course China has banned bitcoin, and has extremely tight restrictions on the exchange of the Yuan, and its investment - all examples of States forcing people to use bad currencies (so the State can by printing money obtain their wealth).

    1. Re:Freedom and good and bad currencies by cheesybagel · · Score: 0

      Deflactionary currencies are always a bad idea. The Government (or someone) needs to be able to print money. Money is just a means of exchange for goods and services produced by people. Usually the more people you have the more goods and services you produce. Imagine everyone was using Bitcoin while the world population was increasing. What do you think would happen?

    2. Re:Freedom and good and bad currencies by Tranzistors · · Score: 1

      What do you mean? If I knew my bitcoin wallet doubled its value every year, I would spend/invest NONE of it. And since everyone else would do the same, the value would grow even further and further, until it wouldn't. Then there is incentive to spend, thus flooding the market with bitcoins, which results in inflation, which forces to spend even more, before value is lost even further. Sounds like solid economical base to me.

    3. Re:Freedom and good and bad currencies by cheesybagel · · Score: 0

      What would happen instead is a deflationary spiral like the one that helped cause the Great Depression.

    4. Re:Freedom and good and bad currencies by Tranzistors · · Score: 1

      A rose by any other name...

    5. Re:Freedom and good and bad currencies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad few gov toxic got my net for cc gain like your obligatory anal probe.

    6. Re:Freedom and good and bad currencies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would happen instead is a deflationary spiral like the one that helped cause the Great Depression.

      Deflationary spiral is an effect, not a cause of a depression.
      GREAT depressions start as normal depressions but are then enhanced by government "interventions".

    7. Re:Freedom and good and bad currencies by cynicist · · Score: 1

      More people would be using Bitcoin?

  8. Whatever they do by fustakrakich · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just hope they hold up and tell the banks and Germany to go to hell. That is what they were elected for. Now, if they do, there could very easily be another military coup ordered by those banks. Unfortunately, it looks like compromise for the benefit of financial institutions is still the only thing on the menu. This 'crypto-currency' thing looks like a diversion.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:Whatever they do by Teun · · Score: 1
      The Greek economy is still extremely weak and needs support to grow, going it alone is not realistic.

      Greece gets that support from the EU, their only alternative is this guy Putin and he has already been seen in Athens.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    2. Re:Whatever they do by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Did you read that notice about the formation of the BRICS bank? It is supposed to start operating in the middle of next year. Basically the BRICS are creating the XXIst century equivalent of COMECON as a counter to the G7 nations.

    3. Re:Whatever they do by Teun · · Score: 1
      So?

      I don't believe they'd burn their fingers on a Greece without EU support.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    4. Re:Whatever they do by Tranzistors · · Score: 1

      I wonder, under what terms will BRICS bank lend Greece anything.

    5. Re:Whatever they do by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Greece has untapped oil reserves.

    6. Re:Whatever they do by Teun · · Score: 1
      (Oilfield laugh)Hahaha(/Oilfield laugh)

      An independent that buys it's own rig is a recipe for failure, besides 100 million Bbls is peanuts and Greek oil is notoriously difficult to get up.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    7. Re:Whatever they do by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      And the US Geological Society estimates there are around 22 billion barrels of oil in the Ionian Sea, off western Greece, and another 4 billion barrels in the northern Aegean Sea.

      http://www.aljazeera.com/progr...

  9. Greek Myths by Guy+From+V · · Score: 2

    I'm pretty sure the River Styx freezing with Aphrodite and Helen of Troy ice skating naked while Dionysus hands out brews and bags of trainwreck is less mythological than the possibility that Greece's economy will start looking up with the current megasocialist nanny state political mindset going on over there. "Crypto" currency is right, like...literally.

    1. Re:Greek Myths by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 0

      More like the capitalists don't dare let them succeed. It would show the world that there was another way, and demands to go that way would escalate in other states.

      A cryptocurrency would be a bold step ; placing control of the money under the government, or the people, instead of a private bank.

      The real problem is "Klepto" currency - the fiat currency that's thought up out of nothing. Yes, it provides liquidity, but it also provides power. If concentration of weath begets more wealth, then the guy who can grind out as much as he likes can use it to steal everything from everyone else, which is what is by and large happening.

    2. Re:Greek Myths by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 2

      "Crypto" is also a terrible misnomer for cryptographically secured currencies :-)

      They aren't hidden. They are public. BitCoin only works when the entire transaction ledger is available to all it's users.

      In contrast, banks keep their ledger as private as possible. Historically this stems from the fact that you had to keep it secure - or people would just alter it. Then the secrecy became something that people relied on and almost more important than the security.

    3. Re:Greek Myths by Guy+From+V · · Score: 1

      The problem is that there aren't any truly capitalist states, nor has one ever existed. The capitalists you think are persecuting these ochlocratic countries are just a just a bit more capitalist than they are. A truly capitalist state would be vastly more harmonious and progressive than most any other kind of state, the misery and repression begin when capitalism begins to slip into fascist corporatism. At least IMHO.

    4. Re:Greek Myths by MeNeXT · · Score: 4, Insightful

      More like the capitalists don't dare let them succeed. It would show the world that there was another way, and demands to go that way would escalate in other states.

      I will assume that you are not a troll. The fault lies within the Greeks themselves. You cannot forever consume more than you produce. No matter who you are. Capitalist or socialist. Greece has borrowed to support their lifestyle since WWII, if not before. They are constantly running an operating deficit. Nobody wants to lend Greece money because Greece does not want to change their ways. They want to consume more than they produce. The Greeks would't lend themselves the money!

      Austerity is not the problem, it's a solution. Did you Notice that Greece has not proposed one solution in which they pay back the debt? They only demand they are bringing to the table is that they can't be asked to reduce their spending. It's humiliating.

      Now some will come forward and say that a recession is not the time to reduce spending. This is right when you are not always running a deficit and when the burden of your debt is manageable. Greece was forgiven 100 billion euros already. If the Greeks don't want the austerity measures let them propose a solution to the repayment of all the loans including the 100 billion which was forgiven on the condition of austerity.

      I am more of a socialist than a capitalist. I honestly believe that the state needs to help even the field in order to produce more than is consumed which translates to building wealth. Yeah I agree with you the boogieman did it. It's just that the boogieman in this case it's the Greeks who think that they are entitled to live beyond their means.

      --
      DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
    5. Re:Greek Myths by gTsiros · · Score: 1

      "They want to consume more than they produce"

      if you were familiar with what the EU *forced* us to do when we entered the euro, you wouldn't say this.

      they basically paid us to stop exporting.

      --
      Looking for people to chat about multicopters, coding, music. skype: gtsiros
    6. Re:Greek Myths by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 2

      Fascism is the natural end state of capitalism; the concentration of power eventually means that the state and the corporation merge and things are done for the benefit of the corporation.

      You can't have unregulated capitalism without it devolving into fascism. I think the UK and the US are already there - the essential dishonesty of our leaders, who publicly claim to want to do the best for us, then turn around and do the best for their corporate masters. The careful creation of a rhetoric of "them and us" to justify military action which just takes what they have and has us foot the bill (and much of it goes to private contractors). The brutal destruction of our public welfare systems to clear the way for much more profitable and expensive corporate systems.

      Without regulation, how does this go down? Really, the only difference would be that you'd be cowed by the private armies of the corporations, rather than the force deployed by government on their behalf. Rich men act to protect what is theirs. They fear being bereft of it. The only way people lack fear is if they feel in control, and when your interests are so large, that needs a lot of control.

    7. Re:Greek Myths by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Harsh, but cryptic.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    8. Re:Greek Myths by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      People got fed up paying for the mistakes of bankers and politicians. They decided to put an end to it, and look out for themselves. The government is supposed to be the will of the people, and work for their benefit. Now it is, now it does.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re: Greek Myths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What were your export? Olive oil and what else?

      Any industrial product I never heard of? Any electronic consumer products I never heard of? Any medical equipment, nivel medicine/pharma I never heard of? Any automobile brands I never heard of? Anything of tangible economical values on which an exporting economy is based on?

      I think you exported ship owners who register their ships under foreign flags. And I also think you exported myths. Many myths.

    10. Re:Greek Myths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many hours per year do they work?
      Are their pension plans bloated?
      If they have UHC, does it cover non-essential health care?
      Do their social welfare programs go above and beyond just ensuring people can survive if they are "non-employed"?
      Do they have spending issues with higher education?

    11. Re:Greek Myths by ultranova · · Score: 1

      The problem is that there aren't any truly capitalist states, nor has one ever existed.

      Then how do you know that

      A truly capitalist state would be vastly more harmonious and progressive than most any other kind of state, the misery and repression begin when capitalism begins to slip into fascist corporatism.

      ?

      If 20th century taught us anything, it's that ideologies that promise Earthly paradise in return for absolute obedience are extremely suspect.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    12. Re:Greek Myths by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Austerity is not the problem, it's a solution. Did you Notice that Greece has not proposed one solution in which they pay back the debt?

      Actually Greece is proposing to pay back all of their debt. What they are saying is that instead of crippling austerity that is ruining Greek people's lives they want to first fix their economy, recover and when times are good pay off the debt. It worked well in other countries, such as Britain after WW2. Rather than paying off debts to the US and banks the government rebuilt the country. Lots of jobs, lots of investment and stimulus. Then when things were booming again debt was paid off.

      Austerity has already failed in Greece. Eventually it might pay off the debt but people still need to live in the mean time. Massive unemployment and people not being able to afford basics like food and electricity are not a solution.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re:Greek Myths by iwbcman · · Score: 0

      Way to drink the cool-aid. Greece is in a full blown depression for going on 5 years now. And Greece wasn't exactly rolling in the dough before the crisis. 300,000 people have lost electricity because some genius tied property taxes to electrical service, get behind in property taxes and boom loose your electricity. The US has never been in as bad shape as Greece is currently, our "Great Depression" barely even scratches what's happening now in Greece. Veroufakis was correct in comparing Greece's current state to that of the Weimar Republic in the 1920's Germany, the situation which led to the rise of the Nazi's and remember the Nazi party, Golden Dawn, came in 3rd place in the last election.

      Austerity is the single dumbest economic idea in the history of neo-classical economics. Of course people have bought into it because we have been preaching "balanced budgets=good governance" for the last 40 years and it is simply beyond retarded. No state in the history of mankind has ever regularly had balanced budgets, much less budget surpluses which is mandated by the Troika loan conditions (%4.5 surplus per year). %90 of the so-called bailout for Greece went straight to creditors in Germany and France, the Greeks saw nothing of it, meanwhile with %50 unemployment, cuts in social services, no universal healthcare etc. the Greeks have been royally fucked.

      The best American comparison would be Detroit. One city manager signs a loan contract for the city, which included a really cool provision: If Detroits credit rating were to be downgraded the entire sum of interest on the $450 million dollar loan had to be paid immediately. Thus bankrupt Detroit. Contrary to popular opinion, most Detroiters who have worked hard all of their lives were not sipping champagne and eating caviar. The notion that the entire population of a city, or god forbid an entire country should be faced with spiking suicide rates (%50 rise in Greece since 2008) because some idiot gambled with Hedge Fund managers to drum up speculative money for things which were never democratically decided is simply insane. Or that they should be forced to privatize everything public and lose their pensions ....man it is hard to imagine anything more unfair.

      I lived in Germany for 15 years and they are so full of shit on this that they should be ashamed of themselves. %80 of germans bank with public banking institutions(sparkassen). Their private banking industry is tiny compared to most countries in the world and most germans have 0 credit/debt, ie. no loans, no credit cards etc. This is of course changing now as the EU forces Germany to privatize their financial sector, but Germany is only able to point it's finger at anyone else because they did not have a private financial system raping the population with cheap credit, like Greece, Spain, Italy, Ireland etc. How in the flying F is the Greek state supposed to make good on all the shit debt, when prior to the crisis the average Greek had personal private debt equivalent to -%75 savings. Austerity means cutting jobs, cutting pay, cutting pensions, cutting services and this when everyone is already drowning in debt. Quit drinking the cool aid.

    14. Re:Greek Myths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 A level-headed, rational response.

    15. Re:Greek Myths by Tom · · Score: 1

      They are constantly running an operating deficit.

      Ironically, Greece had a balanced budget in 2014. Germany did not. Yes, this is true.

      Austerity is not the problem, it's a solution.

      Austerity has resulted in the Greece GDP imploding. The amount of debt a country is allowed under EU rules is based on the GDP. Thanks to austerity, even with a balanced budget the debt ratio of Greece became worse, even as the actual debt itself was being paid back.

      Did you Notice that Greece has not proposed one solution in which they pay back the debt?

      Did you notice that the vast majority of the "debt relief" money that was given to Greece never actually arrived there? The whole thing has been another scam to bail out banks, and they took almost all the money that was allegedly "given" to Greece.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    16. Re:Greek Myths by locofungus · · Score: 1

      Ironically, Greece had a balanced budget in 2014. Germany did not. Yes, this is true if you compare apples to oranges.

      Greece had a small budget surplus if you exclude debt repayments and one off payments such as bank bailouts. Overall it's budget deficit was around 13% (which meant that Greece was no longer in last place with Slovenia something around 15%)

      18 European countries kept their deficit within the 3% threshold. Luxembourg posted a small surplus while Germany[1] was balanced.

      https://euobserver.com/news/12...

      To Greece's credit, balancing the budget excluding debt repayments and one off items was achieved around a year ahead of the agreed austerity plan.

      [1] To reconcile this with your claim I can only assume that Germany was very slightly negative. Small enough that most people call it balanced.

      --
      God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light.
    17. Re:Greek Myths by MeNeXT · · Score: 1

      Actually Greece is proposing to pay back all of their debt. What they are saying is that instead of crippling austerity that is ruining Greek people's lives they want to first fix their economy, recover and when times are good pay off the debt. It worked well in other countries, such as Britain after WW2. Rather than paying off debts to the US and banks the government rebuilt the country. Lots of jobs, lots of investment and stimulus. Then when things were booming again debt was paid off.

      Austerity has already failed in Greece. Eventually it might pay off the debt but people still need to live in the mean time. Massive unemployment and people not being able to afford basics like food and electricity are not a solution.

      It is very easy to talk but what is needed is action. The only plan of action that I heard which is to reign in Greece's spending in order for it to be able to come out of this is the European austerity package. The problem with the Greek economy is that the spending is beyond the income that Greece is capable of earning and most Greeks do not wish to contribute. I know first hand. Greece had since WWII to build wealth like Britain but in Greece it was not about building wealth but about greed. Many Greeks were forced out of Greece because of this greed and now are watching from the outside and can't believe the gaul that the Greeks in Greece have. Fix the greed. Fix the corruption. Roll up your sleeves and start working as a country and not as a few privileged individuals who are raping the rewards from the rest of the population.

      Austerity hasn't failed it has awoken the Greeks to hopefully understand that an exit from Eurozone will result in a more drastic reduction in their earnings than the austerity measures currently imposed. The Greek problem is the Greeks themselves. Stop blaming others for your failings. Nobody has forced this path on you. This path was created by your actions and you should be thanking Europe that they are there to continue lending Greece money. If you can't see that, then you will never get out of this problem .

      --
      DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
    18. Re:Greek Myths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they haven't shown a single proposal for HOW to rebuild the economy. All the Greek government is suggesting is hiring large numbers of new government employees and providing lots of free services. No mention at all if how to pay for it, much less any talk about how to actually get the Greek to start paying their taxes...

    19. Re:Greek Myths by MeNeXT · · Score: 1

      If I get behind property taxes I have more to worry than about electricity. Not only will I loose my electricity but I will also loose my home. I will loose any other asset if my home does not have enough equity to cover the taxes and the loan and I will be forced into bankruptcy. I will be out on the street.

      For 60 or more years Greeks have borrowed (plundered) Greece and now Greeks expect someone to come and give them more so they can continue. Stop looking at the last 4 years and look at the last 60. How many surpluses have have you had in the last 60? How many of the deficits exceeded the cost of living? Greeks have borrowed from their children and now the children are forced to pay. You can't fix 60 years of indulgence in 4 years it's going to take a generation before things start improving to the point where you can start building wealth. If it were not for austerity people would be starving to death and Greece would probably need the Red Cross and charity.

      Wake up! Nobody can fix this problem but the Greeks. Stop blaming others. Last I heard Greece was a democracy. The Greeks need to start getting involved. Start fixing the corruption. Start paying taxes. Nobody needs to lend Greece money and the Greeks should be grateful that someone has enough to help them. The Greeks haven't yet realized what would happen if nobody lent them any more money. They still believe that they are entitled.

      --
      DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
    20. Re:Greek Myths by MeNeXT · · Score: 1

      They are constantly running an operating deficit.

      Ironically, Greece had a balanced budget in 2014. Germany did not. Yes, this is true.

      One year in over 60?

      Austerity is not the problem, it's a solution.

      Austerity has resulted in the Greece GDP imploding. The amount of debt a country is allowed under EU rules is based on the GDP. Thanks to austerity, even with a balanced budget the debt ratio of Greece became worse, even as the actual debt itself was being paid back.

      Austerity was caused by 60 years of borrowing money that was never ever intended of being repaid. The cause of the implosion to the GDP is the 60 years of borrowing. There would be no need for austerity if there was not prior, out of control, borrowing.

      Did you Notice that Greece has not proposed one solution in which they pay back the debt?

      Did you notice that the vast majority of the "debt relief" money that was given to Greece never actually arrived there? The whole thing has been another scam to bail out banks, and they took almost all the money that was allegedly "given" to Greece.

      Everyone needs to pay their debt no matter who they are unless the debtor forgives. I don't know what your point to this last statement is. Why would the money go to Greece when it already went to Greece over the last 60 years. You want to eat your cake and have it too. Greece was forgiven 100 Billion. This money went to Greece. The rest went to pay the creditors. When I sell my house, the money that will be mine is what will be left after I pay off the bank. The bank didn't steal my money. I used theirs to purchase the house.

      --
      DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
    21. Re:Greek Myths by Tom · · Score: 1

      One year in over 60?

      The last time Germany had a balanced budget was 1969.

      Austerity was caused by 60 years of borrowing money that was never ever intended of being repaid. The cause of the implosion to the GDP is the 60 years of borrowing. There would be no need for austerity if there was not prior, out of control, borrowing.

      So who are the idiots who gave money to someone who so obviously not only couldn't, but never intended to actually pay it back? And why are we bailing them out with taxpayer money?

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    22. Re:Greek Myths by Tom · · Score: 1

      Overall it's budget deficit was around 13%

      That is the point. 13% of WHAT - of the GDP. Which had just imploded, thanks to austerity measures.

      I posted elsewhere a car analogy. This is like me borrowing you money, then when you get into trouble forcing you to sell your car to pay your debt. Ok, so far it's more or less fine (though stupid of me if you need your car to earn money to pay me back). But here's the trick: After you sold your car, I tell you that since your net worth has dropped (you no longer own a car), you now have a different credit rating, and because of that, you owe me more money, higher interest, whatever. Please sell your bike, too. Yes, that will reduce your net worth further.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  10. Cryptocurrency won't work in Greece by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    For the same reason that it wouldn't work in Argentina. Any successful cryptocurrency gets its tradable value from the perception that the money supply is strictly limited, as in the days when currencies were based on the issuing country's gold reserve. For a cryptocurrencies,money supply is limited by some publicly available and testable mathematical formula.

    For any government whose dreams exceed its revenue, this means instant and long-lasting austerity. It would be like the Euro, but even stricter.

    1. Re:Cryptocurrency won't work in Greece by Tranzistors · · Score: 0

      How is gold (or peg to it) any worse than bitcoin? Right now any entity that is afraid of volatility or deflation will avoid bitcoin, and most governments will.

    2. Re:Cryptocurrency won't work in Greece by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Gold was ancestrally popular because each country could print no money exceeding its share of the world's gold (and in early times had to actually circulate bullion coins as money), and the supply of gold increased at a modest amount each year that roughly matched the total value of fungible goods and services in each country. This meant that an ounce of gold traded for about the same quantity of goods century in and century out, with no inflation or deflation.

      Then the industrial revolution dramatically increased the rate at which a country's fungible goods and services grew each year. Gold production increased slightly too with better mining methods, but not by enough to allow money to increase at a fast enough rate to remain a neutral medium of exchange. That meant that in technology-driven societies gold keeps increasing in "value" every year compared to goods and services, causing people to hoard it out of circulation compared to any money whose supply is less limited. So central banks developed, which attempt to maintain neutral currencies by continually checking to see how goods and services are changing each year, and adjusting the money supply to match.

      Central banks vary a lot in how well they do at keeping the money supply trimmed to match its country's goods and services. Some ratings are: excellent - Switzerland; fairly good - US, poor - Greece and Argentina.

    3. Re:Cryptocurrency won't work in Greece by packrat0x · · Score: 1

      The *real* problem with gold backed currency is that a foreign country (not on a gold standard) can hoard and dump gold, and thus cause economic pain. Yes it would be expensive to do so, but then again, war is expensive too.

      --
      227-3517
  11. We all know how this will end. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Greece will base it's economy on hats.

  12. Beijing called... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And say if you continue saying crap like that they might reconsider allowing you to pile up debt...

  13. Re: Umm... Lulz.Markets will Rule by BoRegardless · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Prediction is Greece will exit the EU because of inefficient use of all forms of resources. They have been pseudo-socialist giveaway state for so long w/1 in 3 workers working for the state's institutions, they've collectively forgotten market economics is what runs countries effectively.

    Venezuela is the prime example of wasteful redistribution policies by a government which collapse a society (military takeover is next.)

    Greece will change fairly soon and it will be somewhat painful or they will deteriorate toward Venezuela's position, in which case it will impoverish Greece's working class.

  14. Too bad their currency can't buy them by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    As it will be worth less than the paper it is printed on if they default on their debt which they plan on doing.

  15. Quote at the bottom of the page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "A continuing flow of paper is sufficient to continue the flow of paper. -- Dyer"

  16. when you default on a loan by ozduo · · Score: 0

    you risk getting repossessed. Which islands is Greece prepared to loose? There are a few Greek mediterranean jewels worth owning and it would be a valuable lesson to other debtors.

    --
    I got to the chocolate box before you, that's why the hard ones have teeth marks.
  17. Can any Greek speakers help translate GPL software by HongPong · · Score: 1

    I helped cleanup & docs on a GPL project called Integral Community Exchange System (ICES) just approved as full drupal.org project module suite https://www.drupal.org/project... . It is already used by Ecoxarxes (econetworks) around Spain specifically Catalonia to provide timebanking/time credit and needs/offers listings. It feature-replaces closed source CES software used in places like South Africa and Australia.

    I think that getting basic needs connected and covered for people and enhancing trust among a web of people, without need for deflated (or low velocity /liquidity fiat currencies like Euro in depressed Spain or Greece), with either timebanking or basic services listed, already helping a lot of people. Exchanges: https://www.integralces.net/ce... developer docs https://docs.integralces.net/ Thanks for considering something practical. No fancy blockchains, but an OAuth / OpenTransaction implementation to exchange crossovers is working in dev. If anyone would like to plugin or translate please check it out...

  18. Re: Umm... Lulz.Markets will Rule by Tom · · Score: 3, Informative

    You've read too much propaganda.

    The crisis in Greece has many reasons. Inefficiency is a problem, but not a crisis cause. The fact that the country had a strongly interconnected (not to say, inbred) web of corruption between politics, administration and business is much more likely to have been a leading cause.

    The greek "giveaway state" is such a cheap myth. They don't even have social welfare the way that those who cry loudest (e.g. Germany) have.

    The real problem is that Greece was heavily in debt to foreign banks. Instead of giving them a way out, the governments of the countries of those banks pressured them into paying their debts and interests, and cutting spending. When your economy is in a crisis, every economist who's not a total idiot knows that cutting government spending will deepen the crisis. What a surprise, that's exactly what happened.
    And now comes the magic trick: The amount of debt that the EU, European Central Bank and IWF consider "acceptable" is calculated based on a countries GDP. Greece actually cut spending a lot and last year ran on a balanced budget, something that our own Mrs. Merkel didn't manage to do with our country. Greece debt has actually decreased. However, due to the magic trick, Greece debt ratio has become worse, not because of more debt, but because of less GDP.

    It's like telling you that because you're in debt, you need to sell your car to pay me. And after you've done so, telling you that because your net worth has now declined, you've now got a different credit rating and owe me more money for the higher risk.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  19. Re: Umm... Lulz.Markets will Rule by Tom · · Score: 1

    Like that happened by itself, or like the fact that banks had bought the government bonds somehow makes the situation more troublesome than if individuals had bought the bonds.

    It does, because banks are big players and can trick or coerce governments into deals that are bad for them. There's a reason many governments are buying back properties they privatized in the 80s and 90s when corrupt consultants convinced them that selling state property was a cute idea.

    There are long articles by actual economists on this topic, but the basic idea is that for any debt crisis, you need not only an irresponsible borrower, but also an irresponsible lender.

    Oh, now it's Greece's achievement that the reforms which were demanded of them actually worked?

    Are you fucking kidding me? They balanced their budget, by crashing their economy. Your definition of "worked" is far out there.

    For the getting-the-money-back part, the balanced budget is happening soon.

    One way for us to balance our budget could be to sell all those people who are so willing to give away our money to prop up other nations who hate us for it.

    You mean our banks? I'm against selling them into slavery, they belong into jails.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  20. How Hitler Defied The Bankers? by NewYork · · Score: 1

    How Hitler Defied The Bankers?
    http://open.salon.com/blog/gor...

  21. Cryptography by DrYak · · Score: 1

    For the record, a Cryptocurrency isn't called so because it's hidden (indeed it's not).

    It's called so because is relies a lot on *Cryptography*: digital signature, public keys, message authentication, etc. All these are necessary for the distributed nature of cryptocurrencies to work reliably.

    As for "state controler Fedcoin": Sorry, no. It doesn't work that way. The whole point of cryptocoins is to be distributed accross the network, so that there isn't a signle entity that has single hand control over everything else. That's *why* they rely on a transaction ledger (Blockchain) distributed accross the whole network. State control is impossible this way.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]