Slashdot Mirror
Tag Heuer Partners With Google and Intel To Create Luxury Apple Watch Rival
An anonymous reader writes Luxury Swiss watchmaker Tag Heuer has announced it will be designing a smartwatch in partnership with U.S. tech giants Google and Intel. The watch is to rival similar devices in the consumer wearables market, specifically the much-anticipated Apple Watch. Tag is the first watchmaker to join with Google, however it is thought the deal will also welcome collaborations with other high-quality LVMH brands, such as Hublot and Zenith. The watch will be available toward the end of the year, with price structures and functionality details announced shortly before its release.
Google and Intel bring the tech know-how, and Tag Heuer brings the idiots willing to pay ridiculous money for a watch.
with price structures and functionality details announced shortly before its release
Anything with "price structures" is going to be too expensive.
This is what desperation looks like. Paraphrasing Vic Gundotra (of Google+ "fame"): three turkeys don't make an eagle.
A watch is a mechanical timepiece you wear on your wrist. The Apple product mentioned is a small computer you wear on your wrist.
Expensive watches are mainly expensive because of the internals, not because of the case. Sure, gold/silver/etc will drive up the price - but a good mechanical watch in a stanless steel case can still cost $10,000 - because of the intricate, hand-assembled internals. Replace those internals with $10 worth of silicon circuitry and a display, and it won't be worth $10K any more, even though there's the same name on the face.
Assuming that all things you wear on your wrist are interchangeable is like assuming all automobiles are interchangeable. Taking an Aston Martin and replacing the engine/transmission/driveline with one from a Ford Focus isn't going to create a desirable vehicle, and it won't be worth $140,000.
I believe with the above details. Because it is main needs of the blog. It will increase viewers of our blog.
matrixlabs
People looking to spend 10 grand on a watch want a Rolex or some other quality brand that will last a lifetime and that they can pass on in their will, not some junk fad that will be obsolete in 24 months. Google and Intel will pay dearly for this mistake.
This will not be Intel's first time to fail in the watch business, but their last failure was not nearly as spectacular as this will be.
I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
It's *extremely* telling that Google is running after luxury brands.
Why?
Because everyone at Apple and Google know the truth. And the truth is: This is not a product anyone needs.
How do you sell something nobody actually needs? Well... Nobody knows the answer to that question better than watch manufacturers.
The immediate flight to "luxury" speaks volumes about the actual utility value of these silly gadgets.
------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
So this watch starts at $8k. Butt that's OK right, because not Apple?
Seeing as how it is also partly digital, doesn't it in theory have the same complaints others were leveling against the Apple Watch - that it would be obsolete in a few years, instead of lasting multiple generations?
To me this is watch makers going the wrong direction. Instead of watch makers marching over to Apple Hill and fighting on the turf of Watch Computer, it seems like watch makers should make ever more amazing mechanical gadgets that are totally distinct from the Apple Watch.
It will be interesting to see what they deliver, but by the time it comes out we'll have seen at least one major software rev of the watch and quite a few applications delivered.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Personally, I like Tag Heur watches. But I would not buy a Tag smart watch. The reason is that in spending a decent sum of money on a watch you are hoping to get a time piece that will last. Tags just about fall into that category, certainly going by resale prices. Why would you spend money on a watch whose insides will become defunct in a few years? It makes zero sense. I would much rather buy a cheap watch that I am comfortable throwing out in a few years, if at all.
I own a Rolex DateJust in Gold and Stainless Steel, and someday I'd like to own a Jaeger-LeCoultre Master Ultra Thin Moon 39 in Stainless Steel, as well as a Breitling Navitimer 01. For my father's 70th birthday we bought him a Navitimer 01, which he just loves. (My father and I are both private pilots.)
Here's the thing about luxury watches: for women, you can wear necklaces, wrist bands, rings and earrings. But for men, the only pieces of jewelry that a man can wear (and get away with it) is cufflinks, a tie clip and a luxury watch. And if you're not wearing a shirt with french cuffs, or wearing a tie, then all that is left is the watch.
So basically a luxury watch is jewelry. Functional jewelry, but jewelry all the same. And like all jewelry, if its taken care of you can inherit it from your grandparents (as my wife inherited some pieces), you can receive it when you are young and still wear it when you're old, and you can pass it down to your grandchildren.
When you start looking at luxury watches, you find there are two types: those which use an in-house built movement built by craftsmen who sweat the details and who create all sorts of intricate complications which do interesting things (like keep accurate time, provide a stopwatch function, show the phase of the moon, the day of the month, the month of the year), and those who buy an off-the-shelf movement and wrap it in gaudy jewelry.
From what I've read (I'm not a collector but I'd like to be one someday if I ever really strike it extremely rich, because mechanical wrist watches fascinate me no end), watches from watchmakers who build their own movements are highly respected. Watches from watchmakers who buy their movements from third parties, however, are not very well respected. And the worst are those who use quartz movements: essentially an electric powered watch movement regulated by a small oscillator crystal. Like about 1/3rd of Tag Heuer's product line, many running up into the 10's of thousands, which horticulturally have more in common with a cheap Casio than with an A. Lang & Sohne.
This is why I think luxury smart watches will be an unmitigated disaster. Sure, some people will buy them--because some people have more money than God, and to be able to show off a $10,000 smart watch that you're just going to toss away in a couple of years when the electronics are out of date would be the height of "one upping the Joneses." But I cannot see them being any more interesting to someone fascinated by mechanical watches than a quartz Tag Heuer--it's the sort of watch someone with no sense of connection to the past or any sense of connection to the tradition of hand-crafted watches would shove in your face to exclaim how much better they are than you.
You know: crass assholes.
Instant loser right out of the gate. Intel cannot touch ARM for power efficiency. They have to pay US$ billions to get anybody to use their processors in tablets; almost nobody uses them in phones; using them in a watch is insanity.
Oh, wait, I forgot: TAG tends to make watches that are fucking HUGE. Never mind, TAG + Intel in a watch is actually a perfect match ;-)
Watches? The last thing I want is a thing on my wrist. As soon as I got a cell phone - what? 13 years ago - watchless. Stupid unnecessary things. Rings, tattoos, ear rings - fuck all of that stupid shit. Cue boring fuckwads with stories of their grandfathers watches handed down, blah, blah...pathetic.
http://www.acetonestudio.com
#heuer -- jeden Tag ein Hash-Tag _\|/_
Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
These smart watches are going to build tougher competition among giants but it will be confusing for average buyer to choose which big brand to buy ,, anyways, lets see what comes up ...
I bought a Seiko, because it was thin, light-weight, and had an approximate 7 year battery life. After 7 years, I bought a new battery, installed for $10.00
So, I have to change the date 6 times a year, and adjust for leapyear twice a year. Big-deal. But my watch can be immersed in water, and still keep on functioning. Newer electronic watches from the consumer market now are perpetual. Date, self adjusts, and the solar panel in the watch keeps the internal battery charged. Why would I need more. Do I need to text to my watch during meal times?
Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada