Slashdot Mirror


Watching a "Swatting" Slowly Unfold

netbuzz writes That online gamers have been victimized has unfortunately allowed us to see what "swatting" looks like from the perspective of the target: terrifying and potentially deadly. A similar type of criminally unnecessary SWAT scene played out Saturday night when a caller to police in Hopkinton, Mass., claimed to be holed up in the town's closed public library with two hostages and a bomb. The library stands within eyesight of the starting line for the Boston Marathon. An editor for Network World, there by happenstance, watched for two hours, and, while it was a hoax and no one was hurt, his account highlights the disruption and wastefulness these crimes inflict.

45 of 246 comments (clear)

  1. call the library ? by itzly · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wouldn't it be smarter for the police to call back the library, and ask if there's anything going on ?

    1. Re:call the library ? by Galaga88 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If there's a real incident in progress, this wouldn't work. They'd either not answer, or be compelled by the people with guns to tell the cops that everything is a-okay.

    2. Re:call the library ? by ooshna · · Score: 2

      I see that working out well. Unless of course it isn't a hokes and the crazy guy with the hostages answers the phone with the police on the other line asking if things are ok because they just received a call. Which will end with a "I'm sorry someone wasted your time but everything is fine here." Or even worse "What the police?! Alright assholes which one of you called the pigs *gunshot* *gunshot* *screams* *heavy breathing* no no everything is fine."

    3. Re:call the library ? by itzly · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why would the hostage taker first call 911 to say there's a hostage situation, and then deny it when they call him back ?

    4. Re:call the library ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wouldn't it be smarter for the police to call back the library, and ask if there's anything going on ?

      In the rest of the civilized world the police has methods to approach situations like these in a more controlled manner, yes. But in the US, there is an incredible strong fear-based "what if?" premise to the narrative. Which leads to police methods working fine in other countries being ridiculed.

    5. Re: call the library ? by tomkost · · Score: 3, Interesting

      While I agree they can't take chances with calling, you are unfortunately wrong about them being sued. Well, they could be sued, but there is not much chance of success. The SCOTUS has already ruled that the police have no obligation to protect you as an individual, merely "society at large"... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W...

    6. Re:call the library ? by itzly · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not in this case, which is what I was talking about. Naturally, you can't always call back, but it doesn't hurt to explore options like these before bringing in the big guns.

    7. Re:call the library ? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Funny

      Han Solo: [sounding official] Uh, everything's under control. Situation normal.
      Police Officer Calling: What happened?
      Han Solo: [getting nervous] Uh, we had a slight weapons malfunction, but uh... everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here now, thank you. How are you?
      Officer: We're sending a squad up.
      Han Solo: Uh, uh... negative, negative. We had a reactor leak here now. Give us a few minutes to lock it down. Large leak, very dangerous.
      Officer: Who is this? What's your operating number?
      Han Solo: Uh...
      [Han shoots the phone]
      Han Solo: [muttering] Boring conversation anyway. LUKE, WE'RE GONNA HAVE COMPANY!

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    8. Re:call the library ? by PRMan · · Score: 2

      "OK, great, we'll send in some SWAT officers to check it out. Have everyone stand by the wall with their hands on the wall above their heads. We'll just be 5 minutes."

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    9. Re: call the library ? by itzly · · Score: 3, Insightful

      the police could be sued if they wasted any time at all. That would include calling the closed library

      Responding to a prank call also wastes time. Somebody could be planning to rob a bank, and make a prank hostage call at a business at the other side of town to distract the police.

    10. Re:call the library ? by Ecuador · · Score: 2

      Or just check where the call originated from? AFAIK all legitimate 911 calls have a location that is provided by the cell phone network to the 911 center. If the call is some sort of anonymous VOIP call that you can't verify where it originated from, DO NOT send the SWAT without figuring out what's going on...

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    11. Re:call the library ? by The+Snowman · · Score: 3, Informative

      If there's a real incident in progress, this wouldn't work. They'd either not answer, or be compelled by the people with guns to tell the cops that everything is a-okay.

      I agree, nobody would answer. From the summary, nobody even has to read the article for this one:

      ...claimed to be holed up in the town's closed public library with two hostages and a bomb.

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    12. Re: call the library ? by TWX · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But they can respond with appropriate force levels, and with intelligence behind their response. Like contacting the security company to find out if the alarm is set or if there's any security cameras to get feeds from, or contacting the municipal director of the library services department to find out what the regular status of the building should be at that time to know if it should be open or closed or staffed or what.

      There are a lot of checks that they can at least attempt to perform before storming the building in body armor.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    13. Re: call the library ? by TWX · · Score: 3, Informative

      Or they can claim to have put bombs one school in the city, after they crash a subway train into a station, then use excavation equipment to rob a gold repository, to make it look like they planted the gold on a ship that they blow up in the middle of the harbor...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    14. Re:call the library ? by Immerman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If the incident was called in by the perpetrator, wouldn't you expect him to want the staff to confirm his story? Why would he lie?

      In fact, in most any hostage scenario I'd expect the perpetrators to want the staff to confirm their story - the whole point is to extract concessions, is it not? Ditto for a "suicide by cop" scenario. I'm having a hard time coming up with any scenario where the perpetrators would hole up in a public building and NOT want police and media attention.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    15. Re:call the library ? by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Funny

      The first armed man put down the telephone. His accomplace briefly averted his eyes from us to glance at him, asking "Did they buy it?"

      "Sure thing. The police think it's just another night at the library, that the call they got was a hoax. Totally bought the line I was the night watchman. They have no idea about the hostages."

      "Good", said the first. "What now?"

      "Now", the first armed man replied, "We dial 911, and tell them we have hostages and list our demands..."

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    16. Re: call the library ? by Shakrai · · Score: 2

      A smart bank robber would do it 3 or 4 times.

      No such thing. A smart person is not going to gamble losing a few decades of their life over a four digit sum of money. That's assuming the teller(s) don't just dye pack the money, in which case you end up with nothing, even if you manage to elude the law enforcement response. In the United States you've also got a non-zero chance of running into an armed security guard, civilian, or off duty law enforcement officer.

      The lottery has a higher return on investment than bank robbery, with zero chance of one ending up behind bars or dead.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    17. Re: call the library ? by Minwee · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A smart bank robber...

      ...already did it. Without leaving his desk. And not only did you never notice, the police will never even hear that it happened.

    18. Re: call the library ? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 2

      The lottery has a higher return on investment than bank robbery, with zero chance of one ending up behind bars or dead.

      Not true... stores that sell lottery tickets get held up all the time. If you happen to be buying your ticket while this is happening, you could end up dead.

  2. Related to the Boston Marathon how? by hatemonger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Moderately interesting article. Too bad they decided to add the clickbait boston marathon reference. Makes me feel a little dirty for giving them a click.

    1. Re:Related to the Boston Marathon how? by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      Clickbait? Really?

      Given that there was actually a bombing at the Boston Marathon, how is this clickbait?

      The proximity to a place which has already had one terrorism incident pretty much means "what the hell else would you expect the police to do but treat it seriously?"

      You think a police department which has already lived through his kind of thing is simply going to say "nahh, we don't believe it"?

      I don't think you understand what clickbait actually means. The author isn't just dropping the name of that to get more ads ... he's explicitly saying that's one of the reasons why there was no choice but for the police to take this seriously.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Related to the Boston Marathon how? by hatemonger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So you think police don't need to take threats seriously in places where they haven't already had terrorist attacks?

      He most certainly is dropping the "Boston Marathon" name to get more clicks. If it was actually relevant enough to base the article title on, then the implications, history, and potentially different police response would all get talked about in the article. As it stands, it's only mentioned once in an otherwise unnecessary last paragraph. Because it's clickbait.

    3. Re:Related to the Boston Marathon how? by MobyDisk · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Boston Marathon is on April 20th. So a hostage situation on April 5th would be unrelated. It would be like saying "Armed robbery at Pizza parlor within sight of the Statue of Liberty" knowing that the Statue of Liberty can be seen for miles away. Or maybe "Armed robbery at Pizza parlor visited by Barack Obama" when Barack Obama was there last year.

  3. Domestic Terrorism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Would it be overkill to consider swatting a form of domestic terrorism?

    It places people in imminent threat of bodily harm, definitely spreads fear - and the one that seems to tip the scales for me is that it intentionally disrupts the police's ability to respond to real threats and is basically derailing society's ability to defend itself.

    Okay, labeling it terrorism would probably be too much, but things like swatting strike me as attacks on society itself - which to me falls under my own definition of terrorism.

    1. Re:Domestic Terrorism? by rahvin112 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Let me put this clearly. We don't need a damn new enforcement of terrorism laws that they then can use to throw at the books of everyone and their grandma. There are laws already on the books for dealing with this from filing a false police report on up.

      What they need to do to put a stop to this is start putting people in jail for it and make people realize they cannot fake a call to 911 anonymously. Once the story makes the rounds that if you do it you will go to jail people will stop doing it. That's all you need to do, start putting the pranksters in prison for a year or so and giving them a felony record in the process and this will stop. But you have to prove to the public that if you make one of these calls you will be caught.

      But as long as the police departments treat it as a non-crime by not investigating it's only going to get worse. The for profit policing that the war on drugs had created discourages the police from pursuing real crime that's not tied to drugs.

    2. Re:Domestic Terrorism? by Kohath · · Score: 3

      Maybe. But there would be less risk of imminent harm if the police were less trigger-happy, better trained, more respectful of non-police, and more accountable for their actions.

    3. Re:Domestic Terrorism? by sycodon · · Score: 2

      And if anyone is injured or killed, then accessory to attempted murder or murder.

      If any property is damaged, full liability right up to taking your pension, property and garnishing of wages.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    4. Re:Domestic Terrorism? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      90% of what SWAT is "legitimately" used for is domestic terrorism if you use the same standard. When Maryland adopted a law that forced police departments to keep track of where and why they deploy SWAT and publish it (this happened after they mistakenly raided a house of a mayor in one of the small towns), the stats for the first year have immediately shown that people complaining about needless escalation were right all along - over 90% of the time SWAT is used to serve search (not arrest!) warrants, half of them for non-violent crimes. When dealing with those non-violent crime cases, SWAT teams have used forcible entry (i.e. breaking down doors, throwing flashbangs and otherwise having fun) 66% of the time.

      Oh, and as you'd expect, every single PD in Maryland fought that law tooth and nail, too.

      It's a setup that's ripe for abuse. Of course it gets abused!

  4. Re:Privacy battle by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No actual guns blazed in this scenario. Lots of people milled about, but not a single shot was fired.

    Did you have some kind of point to make?

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  5. The only reason this SWATTING nonsense works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is because of the predictably over-the-top military reaction by the police.

    Why kick someone in the balls when you can shine a laser pointer at his crotch, and have his dog bite him there?

    De-escalate police reactions and you'll see this go away.

    1. Re:The only reason this SWATTING nonsense works by zlives · · Score: 2

      you clearly did not watch the docudrama "Die Hard".

  6. NW's Bad Precedent Encourages More Swatters by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 2

    >> An editor for Network World....his account highlights the disruption and wastefulness these crimes inflict.

    Or encourages other people to aim their hoaxes at other cities with high per-capita media, such as New York, LA, DC...in the hopes they get national attention too.

  7. "Swatting" doesn't capture the crime. by hey! · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Better to call it "terrorism by proxy".

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:"Swatting" doesn't capture the crime. by sudon't · · Score: 2

      Better to call it "terrorism by proxy".

      Would it be overkill to consider swatting a form of domestic terrorism?

      Sure, why not? The word's been rendered meaningless already.

      --
      -- sudon't

      Air-ride Equipped

  8. for those outside the states... by nimbius · · Score: 5, Informative

    Swatting is our warm colloquialism for the unintended consequences of the slow but progressive militarization of our local and regional police forces. forty years ago, the war on drugs and whats known in our nation as 'tough on crime' policies began to take the form of whatever our politicians fever-dreamed the nature of crime to be. California came out with 3 strike laws that relegated everything from bounced checks to jaywalking third offences to a minimum life sentence in prison, and the idea of civil forfeiture became a smart way to enact real-world consequences for movie-screen criminal caricatures. In america as it stands, thanks to the policies of carter, reagan, nixon, bush, and johnson, police officers can now purchase surplus military equipment for free, less shipping. And since america's chief export is war these days, we have a lot of surplus military equipment waiting to be used. This program ramped up after 9/11 and before we knew it, sleepy towns like Dothan Alabama owned tanks, mine resistent personnel vehicles, and millions of dollars in tactical military hardware such as night vision and machine guns with no realistic opportunity or purpose to utilize them.

    So without real use, these systems degrade and deteriorate and the cost to maintain them is, well, very expensive. as a result, police departments found themselves shoehorning equipment requesitioned from hand-me-down government transfer projects and knee-jerk terrorism overfunding into everything. Warrant service for taxes? SWAT and a 40 ton tank can handle that. peaceful parade against planned parenthood? sounds like a job for machineguns and nightvision. And finally, the SWATting. Its an innocuous situation where some crank-yanker calls in an odious situation that requires immediate action. Hostage situations and school shootings arent oustide the american experience, but our response is nothing short of lethal interception no matter how far fetched it seems that a hostage situation in the Dugal county truck stop mens room is taking place.

    Cops are baked in it. Theyve spend 30 years growing into this nonsense, that everything that isnt pulling over minorities in classic cars should be handled like a van damme movie. Their defense is often pretty good, noting that america is relatively unique in that citizenry can openly and easily procure weapons capable of quickly defeating both their body armor and their general defensive capability. But municipalities have no excuse for continuing to perpetuate this police-state response other than the obvious: theyre run by boomers and the elderly. People who have direct influence over the tactics and policy used by our police are obviously easily frightened. 24 hour news and internet forwards from grandma have reduced what should be a responsible, level-headed committee to a clamouring rats nest of assholes hovering somewhere between religious nationalism and dictatorial rule of law. the bottom line: cops arent soldiers, but we liketo pretend they are to make sure theyre ready to fight our boogeymen.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  9. Re:Privacy battle by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    Longer sentences tend not to work on crazy people. If they had long-term thinking ability and discipline, they probably would not do stupid things to begin with.

    Longer sentences look good on paper and politically, but often just cost tax payers more than the crime damage potential because locking people up is expensive. It might be a better deal to have more cops than more jails, for quicker response.

  10. Re:It's mostly not the cops' fault by itzly · · Score: 2

    the use of deadly force is authorized

    An anonymous phone call should not be the basis of authorization of deadly force.

  11. Re:Privacy battle by sycodon · · Score: 2

    Wasn't that last guy convicted guilty of some 19 "swattings"?

    Plus, I don't discount the Deterrence effect.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  12. How to encourage swatting. by MrL0G1C · · Score: 2

    To encourage more swatting simply:

    1. Post videos of swatting online.
    2. Post interviews of swatted people onlne.

    Also works for mass-shootings.

    --
    Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    1. Re:How to encourage swatting. by MrL0G1C · · Score: 2

      BS, copycat crimes are a proven thing, google it.

      What YOU SAID is not logical at all. Deterrents rarely work, how's that 3 million people prison system thing going? Cost much?

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
  13. Re:Completely and utterly false explanation... by HBI · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He's not wrong. Sorry, i'm not a leftist ideological hack, probably just the opposite, and I agree with, in essence, everything said by the GP poster. We did militarize our police forces for bad reasons. We do overreact to crimes. We should strip out all of the military hardware from "first responders" aka law enforcement. There's no need for it and it makes our existence more coarse.

    Getting rid of some stupid drug laws and over the top criminal enforcement would also help.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  14. I think the solution is obvious by davydagger · · Score: 5, Informative
    As long as the cops in the USA have the "shoot first, ask questions later" mentality, swatting will always be a problem. SWATing exploits the fact that cops are fucking stupid, scared animals, who are prone to alarmism, and itch for an excuse to use excessive force. They see no problem in roughing up many innocents to get a small handful of small time criminals. They are easy to trick, slow to think, quick to act.

    The solution is to re-examine SWAT team usage nation wide, and how they are used and for what. Until we do, SWATing will always be a threat. The solution is to fix the vulernbility by replacing a dangerous and broken system with one that works better.

  15. Re:Completely and utterly false explanation... by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 4, Interesting

    and it makes our existence more coarse.

    We are living in the fall of The Republic and the beginning of The Empire.
    This is similar to how for hundreds of years it was forbidden for Roman Troops to enter the city. Then they did.
    It was forbidden to go armed into The Forum. Then they did.
    It was forbidden to go armed into The Senate. Then they did.

    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
  16. this will get fixed... by doug141 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    when it affects someone in power.

  17. BlowBack (Re:Privacy battle) by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    Yes, before he was caught. A sentence of a billion years probably wouldn't have prevented those 19.

    Plus, I don't discount the Deterrence effect.

    I do. A cost/benefit analysis suggests we often over-detain for "feel good" political reasons.

    In some cases it makes the problem WORSE because the thought of long sentences makes the chasee take bigger risks. One rapist told investigators he killed his under-age victim because the penalty for murder was only slightly more than the rape sentence. The "jail math" thus lead him to remove the "witness".