Slashdot Mirror


Allegation: Philly Cops Leaned Suspect Over Balcony To Obtain Password

An anonymous reader writes with this news from Ars Technica: If you want access to encrypted data on a drug dealer's digital device, you might try to break the crypto—or you might just try to break the man.

According to testimony from a police corruption trial currently roiling the city of Philadelphia, officers from an undercover drug squad took the latter route back in November 2007. After arresting their suspect, Michael Cascioli, in the hallway outside his 18th floor apartment, the officers took Cascioli back inside. Although they lacked a search warrant, the cops searched Cascioli's rooms anyway. According to a federal indictment (PDF), the officers 'repeatedly assaulted and threatened [Cascioli] during the search to obtain information about the location of money, drugs, and drug suppliers.'
That included, according to Cascioli, lifting him over the edge of his balcony to try to frighten out of him the password to his Palm Pilot. That sounds like a good time for a duress password.

225 comments

  1. Done in movies... by mi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I remember it being done in a few movies — by the good guys — without anybody in the audience cringing. Nor do I remember any calls to boycott a movie over such things.

    So, if popular culture approves of and encourages it, can't blame the cops too much for doing it despite it being merely illegal...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a "few" movies?... way more than just a few movies. television, too; and it's not a new concept, in either of those... at least there you can claim literary license and the fact that it's, um.... FICTION...

    2. Re:Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and on Hawaii five-O

    3. Re:Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So what you are saying is that it's up to Hollywood to dictate what is acceptable in society?
      They clearly don't have an agenda, right?

    4. Re:Done in movies... by jklovanc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Some of of can tell the difference between fiction and reality. They get away with lots of things in movies that are not acceptable in real life.

    5. Re:Done in movies... by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You think Hollywood invented it? Are you horribly naive?

    6. Re:Done in movies... by mi · · Score: 1

      They get away with lots of things in movies that are not acceptable in real life.

      Sorry, I fail to see, how mere racism or sexism can lead to a boycott, while abuse of a suspect gets a pass. And not just once either!

      Likewise, if Captain Steven Hiller — Will Smith's character in Independence Day — can be a hero despite beating and otherwise abusing a prisoner, the morons of Abu Ghraib have their excuse...

      The real life vs. fiction may explain the legal responsibility, but the moral condemnation of such actions should not be any different between the real and imaginary worlds.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    7. Re:Done in movies... by houstonbofh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We have been well trained that it is OK for the good guys to bend the rules to stop the bad guys. Of course how can you be you are the good guys? https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    8. Re:Done in movies... by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      Some of of can tell the difference between fiction and reality. They get away with lots of things in movies that are not acceptable in real life.

      And you can rest assured, the shit they get away with in movies they wouldn't in real life ... have happened in real life. Many many many times. In many many different places.

      Police have been muscling up suspects as long as there have been police.

      That "fiction" you're talking about is straight out of real life. If anything, the "fiction" is probably tamer than some of the shit which has been done in real life.

      If you think this is the first time cops have threatened a suspect (or possibly even done so), you are hopelessly naive.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    9. Re:Done in movies... by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You seem to be under the illusion that people in general act on a moral, principled basis in all (or even most) aspects of life.

      You are sadly mistaken and delusional if you think that.

      You haven't spent nearly enough time around people if you are expecting moral condemnation from most movie goers.

      People are, not nearly as deep down as we'd like to think, complete fucking barbarians. And don't ever forget it.

      Most people don't commit crimes for fear of punishment, not because they morally object. On balance, the human race is far more amoral than people like to believe.

      And anything which relies on the inherent goodness of humans is probably useless. Because humans aren't inherently good.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    10. Re:Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what we can except from the "life imitates art" crowd.

    11. Re:Done in movies... by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      ...but the moral condemnation of such actions should not be any different between the real and imaginary worlds.

      We must burn all the Three Stooges reels! And Tom and Jerry? My god!

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    12. Re:Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So, if popular culture approves of and encourages it, can't blame the cops too much for doing it despite it being merely illegal...

      Yes, we can. Police shouldn't receive their training from works of entertainment any more than doctors or lawyers should.

      When you watch ER, House, the Practice, Better Call Saul, you'd never take it seriously if you were a member of those professions.

      Might as well take Japanese anime as lessons in history.

    13. Re:Done in movies... by yndrd1984 · · Score: 2

      People usually only freak out about behavior in movies that they think other people will emulate, especially things that seem realistic. My parents like to watch lots of British murder mysteries, but they'll be put off by 'bad' language, nudity, or people being rude in the same show.

      The people who boycott for the reasons you gave believe that our entire culture is heavily racist and sexist, and movies are part of the problem. But most people aren't corrupt cops.

    14. Re:Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are loved and help is available.

    15. Re:Done in movies... by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You are loved and help is available.

      LOL, aww, that's sweet.

      Honestly, it's not a cry for help or expression of despair.

      People can be, and frequently are, good people. But in the aggregate, I don't ascribe "goodness" to humans -- especially when nobody is looking.

      As a species we're capable of a lot of good. But we're also capable of a lot of other stuff.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    16. Re:Done in movies... by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      So what you are saying is that it's up to Hollywood to dictate what is acceptable in society?
      They clearly don't have an agenda, right?

      You think they haven't been ?

    17. Re:Done in movies... by rtb61 · · Score: 0

      The most noticeable thing about abusive law enforcement actions in the US, only the law enforcement (let's be clear the US does not have police it has law en-FORCE-ment). Not really US law enforcements fault, not really. Some one else is selecting the people to become law enforcers, somebody is training to poor selections to be law enforcers, somebody is setting policy for those poorly selected and badly trained law enforcers, to ensure they act as revenue generating law enforcers. Take a long hard look at the difference between law enforcers in Conservative Government zones and police in Progressive zones. Not just locally but globally, yep, the people you select to run government are smooth talking, self serving, idiotic fuck ups, who are only capable of knee jerk simplistic thinking and voila you get the results you would expect.

      The American reaction is like blaming all dogs for some dogs being bad. There is a huge difference in selection and training for a guide dog for the blind and a junk yard guard dog. Conservative American politicians in their ignorance and stupidity are putting junk yard dogs out on the street and getting the results you would expect.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    18. Re:Done in movies... by Adriax · · Score: 1

      Pretty much every cop show/movie will pull this at some point.
      Whether it's the Loose Cannon being tough on crime to get results, or the 100% By The Book Boyscout (who doesn't even jay walk when chasing a fleeing suspect) doing it after the badguys do something so evil it's the only alternative (or they made him snap and he goes into Badass Loose Cannon mode for the rest of the film).

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    19. Re: Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Solly this is my weak arm TALK!!!

    20. Re:Done in movies... by Rakarra · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sorry, I fail to see, how mere racism [forward.com] or sexism [femitup.com] can lead to a boycott, while abuse of a suspect gets a pass. And not just once either!

      Because, in the US, many Americans are fine with the idea that doing bad things to bad people in pursuit of a good goal is a-ok.

      Jack Bauer could get away with torturing a guy because Jack Bauer was right, he was not corrupt, he fighting for the good guys, and the guy he was torturing was trying to hide details on some terrorist attack. That's easy to screenwrite for. The problem is that in real life, often the people who think they are right and good actually aren't, they torture the wrong person, and there are unintended consequences.

    21. Re:Done in movies... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      ...but the moral condemnation of such actions should not be any different between the real and imaginary worlds.

      We must burn all the Three Stooges reels! And Tom and Jerry? My god!

      Actually, Genesis would be a good start.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    22. Re:Done in movies... by kbsoftware · · Score: 2

      It's important that you separate the fantasy that happens in movies and what happens in real life. As for your comment I think Ron White says it best "You can't fix stupid".

    23. Re: Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are loved and help is available.

    24. Re:Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I would say that the primary vice that afflicts humanity is thoughtlessness. A lot of the sort of commonplace, everyday evil that people commit is a result of their failure to reflect on the implications of what they are doing. In many cases, if someone helps them think it through, they will agree that it is evil and reject it. But they will turn around and do the same thing the next day, when nobody is helping them think it through.

      People like to see cops be tough on crime. This is because they dislike evil. In hollywood scenarios where this happens, it is known by the audience in advance that the criminal is, for sure, guilty, and in their minds that makes a measure of abuse acceptable. But, if made to think it through, most people will agree that this kind of treatment is not appropriate if the person might be innocent. Some may even go so far as to agree that even criminals should not be treated that way....and in most cases when trying to earn agreement, your barrier is much more their ability to think abstractly and objectively, rather than their sense of fairness.

      Of course, these same people will turn around and do something evil if they think that the harm isn't too severe. They will flagrantly violate the golden rule...usually not out of conscious malice but out of an unwillingness (in inability) to reflect on the fact that they are doing this. If they think they can get away with it, they will have an apology prepared before they even act...but this is precisely because they think the harm they are doing is minor (and, if they are wrong, it is usually because they are stupid, not because they are evil).

      I still agree with you....there is a lot of raw evil in common human behavior. But I maintain that most (perhaps not all, but I will posit that it is the majority) people do have a sense of fairness and to act on it....but their thoughtlessness makes them fail at it pretty badly.

    25. Re:Done in movies... by mi · · Score: 0

      We must burn all the Three Stooges reels!

      Three Stooges are not offered as role-models. Viewer is invited to laugh at them, not be inspired by them.

      And Tom and Jerry? My god!

      Actually, my collection of Looney Tunes came with a video-clip by Woopy Goldberg apologizing on behalf of Warner Brothers for the "racism" and "stereotypes", which, according to her, "were wrong then and are wrong now", but, nevertheless, "are part of Americana"...

      Funny, how Django had no such disclaimers and apologies over portraying the two good guys as head-hunters sniping from afar at innocent people for money. (Kinda vindicates our Dear Leader's policies, but I digress...)

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    26. Re:Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shut up about the stupid movies. this is real life.
      cops are NOT your friends. cops LIE CHEAT and STEAL.
      cops physically ASSAULT you for FUN.
      cops and prosecutors CONSPIRE to seal their bogus cases against INNOCENTS and less than doers.
      judges and politicians are lifers who don't give a shit.

      FUCK THEM ALL.
      that's the only legit response you should have.
      FUCK THEM, VOTE THEM OUT, DEFUND THEM, PROTEST AND CALL THEIR GAME, AND SHUT THEM ALL DOWN.

    27. Re:Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What was illegal about it? There was no permanent injury, nor excessive pain or suffering, right?

    28. Re:Done in movies... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      So, if popular culture approves of and encourages it, can't blame the cops too much for doing it despite it being merely illegal...

      Popular culture also approves and encourages Justin Bieber, but don't nobody want to see cops imitating that mess.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    29. Re:Done in movies... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      Some of of can tell the difference between fiction and reality.

      And one would hope that law enforcement officers are near the top of the list of people who can tell the difference between fantasy and reality.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    30. Re:Done in movies... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Actually, Genesis would be a good start.

      That's for sure. THAT sumbitch told Abraham to kill his kid and then at the last second went, "PSYCH!"

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    31. Re:Done in movies... by mark-t · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hanging a person over a balcony with an implied threat to let them fall is quite definitely qualifies as a threat against a person's life, and that *IS* illegal. Even if no "permanent" harm was done, their actions fail on points 5, 6, 7, and 9 in The Ethics Scoreboard list of ethics fallacies.

    32. Re:Done in movies... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      Now, do you have statistics to back up your implication, that in real life police are more often wrong than right?

      No, but the consequences of real life police being wrong are pretty fucking serious. And they're wrong a lot more often than people care to admit.

      http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.or...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    33. Re:Done in movies... by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You think Hollywood invented it? Are you horribly naive?

      Maybe they didn't invent it, but the sure as heck made it socially acceptable in the minds of the masses.

    34. Re:Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is because the people who cry racism and sexism on every little thing are wacko fringe people who should never be listened to.

    35. Re:Done in movies... by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 1

      We must burn all the Three Stooges reels! And Tom and Jerry? My god!

      Not burn. But definitely see a lack of the violent type of cartoons that were much more prevalent in the 60's and 70's now. I think someone figured out exposing our children to such blatant acts of violence teaches children that violence is ok. And now you don't see all those old Looney Tunes and Tom and Jerry cartoons in easy to find places for children. I mean really, what did you expect to come out of showing children senseless acts of violence, even by animated characters on each other? As an adult, I find this stuff still rather hilarious, but I'm an adult now and can easily discern it's just for fun. A child? Influential. They don't know better yet.

    36. Re:Done in movies... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Actually, Genesis would be a good start.

      That's for sure. THAT sumbitch told Abraham to kill his kid and then at the last second went, "PSYCH!"

      And that Lot! Gets it on with his daughters, has some kids with them, and his wife was conveniently nuked beforehand to enable him to bump uglies wit 'em. What a character!

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    37. Re:Done in movies... by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Nor do I remember any calls to boycott a movie over such things. So, if popular culture approves of and encourages it, can't blame the cops too much for doing it despite it being merely illegal...

      Finally, a like-minded individual. What movie/book should we boycott next?

      I tried boycotting a Harry Potter matinee once, but those little 8 year old kids can be incredibly violent and cruel.

    38. Re: Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't Hollywood dictate how we should dress, treat each other and how we should conduct corporal punishment?

    39. Re:Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >Most people don't commit crimes for fear of punishment, not because they morally object.

      I agree. But that's because most crimes are completely disconnected from anything that resembles morals. Some examples:

        - Making moonshine for yourself
        - Having a beer while fixing your car, or, for that matter, having a beer in the backseat while someone drives
        - Having consensual sex at 17 with another 17 year old
        - Shopping/opening on Holy Days (spelling intentional) (Outside the USA this is often illegal)
        - Swearing in public
        - Selling booze (in places where only the state may sell it)
        - Smoking a joint at home
        - Giving a cigarette to a 20 year old
        - Giving a beer to a 20 year old
        - Refusing to pay child support to a 24 year old (Outside the USA 25 years is the cutoff if the "child" chooses to attend university)
        - Choosing to receive compensation for sexual activity as an independent occupation
        - Drinking unpasteurized milk

      I could go on... I'm an atheist, and I can assure you, there are things that *aren't* crimes that I would not do because I believe they're immoral but not illegal. And, occasionally, the law actually does align with my moral beliefs (for example, murder, assault, and rape).

      >Because humans aren't inherently good.

      I believe they are, the issue is that we expect humans to be "good" in impossible situations, such as when "good" has no moral reasoning behind it (see the list above), or when "good" causes more danger (eg: Attempting the speed limit on a road that regularly sees nobody going at the limit or less than it--Stretches of the busiest highway in North America are actually like this).

    40. Re:Done in movies... by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Well, we're more accepting of it in fiction mostly because we know who the bad guys are. We know who they are because we've seen them do bad things.

      In the real world, it isn't so clear cut.

    41. Re:Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cop shows and movies are nothing but propaganda for the feds to get the masses to believe the crazy illegal investigative tactics used in them are legal and allowed.

    42. Re:Done in movies... by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      We have been well trained that it is OK for the good guys to bend the rules to stop the bad guys.

      In fairness, there ARE times when that is the case...

      A good example is during the movie "The Peacemaker" with George Clooney.

      A terrorist has a nuclear weapon in his backpack and is 10 blocks away from where he plans to set it off. He also plans to die, so if you confront him, he'll just set it off anyway.

      The sniper who is supposed to shoot the bad guy has his shot blocked by a girl on her daddy's shoulders. He doesn't have a clear shot.

      Do you shoot through the girl to hit the bad guy in that case?

      Is the cop bad if he does? Is he good? Is that against the rules?

    43. Re:Done in movies... by ultranova · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So what you are saying is that it's up to Hollywood to dictate what is acceptable in society?

      How do you learn what is acceptable in a society? By watching people do stuff and get praised or reviled for it. What does Hollywood do? Show people doing stuff and get labeled heroes or villains. They're an efficient propaganda machine, for good or ill.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    44. Re:Done in movies... by Mr.+Shotgun · · Score: 1

      You are loved and help is available

      Awe, that's cute. What will you do about those who do not seek help? Those who consider themselves just fine?

      --
      Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the (supposed) good of its victims may be the most oppressive
    45. Re:Done in movies... by lorinc · · Score: 1

      Most people don't commit crimes for fear of punishment, not because they morally object.

      Most people don't commit crime because it is usually useless.

    46. Re:Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... Is the cop bad if he does? Is he good? ...

      A similar question was posed in 'Swordfish': When does the greater good stop being good? Cop shows, tend to show cops being a bad guy, usually to catch the bad guy, thus re-inforcing the story of justifiable misconduct. 'NCIS' while often heavy-handed usually describes the government as just another bad guy; but one they don't catch or punish.

      Tv. fiction like 'CSI' has the benefit of always having evidence: It's a matter of collecting it and interpreting it. Alas, the real world is far less tidy. It's also populated by officials who have a 'us versus them' attitude to the population they're meant to protect. Or from their point of view, everyone (else) is guilty, so more misconduct to catch them is really the greater good. We see such a slippery slope being a common argument in the war on drugs/terror. It's resulting in those officials demanding suspects prove their innocence and denying suspects due process or judicial rights.

      TL;DR: The problem isn't one person versus the greater good; there will always be exceptions to protecting individual rights. It's choosing institutionalized abuse as the greater good. (See security theatre.)

    47. Re:Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > But not in the case described in TFA — the threatened man really was a drug-dealer, and they did get the necessary info out of him. And using that info in a trial could be impossible since it was obtained illegally, and guilty people will go free. Yay, way to go officers.

    48. Re:Done in movies... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      It's good drama. A direct physical conflict between opposing characters, and one that allows the story to advance rapidly. It's a lot more exciting then having to put the case on hold for a day while the investigators file paperwork requesting a search warrant.

      I also notice that in any crime series, if the suspect calls for their lawyer at any point they are *always* guilty of something - but innocent people never have their lawyer present. It seems that only the guilty have any reason to exercise their legal rights in TV-land. The innocent have nothing to fear from the police.

    49. Re:Done in movies... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      That's quite in-character for the OT God. He demands absoute loyalty and obedience, and a number of stories in the old testament are about him either requiring this loyalty be proven or showing what happens when it isn't. There are a number of occasions where he gives what seem like trivial, unimportant instructions (Do not eat the fruit, do not look at the burning city, do not touch the ark) then executes someone on the spot for some tiny violation. The entire story of Job is supposed to demonstrate the virtue of unquestioning obedience: God (Via his assistant) unleashes all manner of misery and suffering upon Job, killing his family, ruining him financially and inflicting him with horrible diseases entirely to show that Job, as a loyal Jew, will remain obedient and loyal no matter what circumstances throw at him - and sure enough, at the end, God restores his health and wealth. Though not the dead family.

    50. Re:Done in movies... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      He did not say "more often". Learn to read. But be quick about it, there's some cops wanting their boots licked.

      What would you consider to be an acceptable error rate in this situation?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    51. Re:Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just wish TV-land would have a few series in which things happen exactly they do right now, but in the end it turns out the guy was innocent after all and the "confession" made under duress was just him being frightened to death and lying because of it.
      And then the whole thing gets swept under the rug, the guy gets convicted anyway and the audience would finally know how police work really is done.

    52. Re:Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I beg to differ. The worst criminals do not fear punishment at all. Unless the consequence is staring right in their face even a five minute delay in punishment makes it irrelevant to many bad guys. There is a real disconnect between now and even a few minutes from now. You see this psychology in needle sharing drug addicts. They know full well that a dirty needle can and will kill them but it rarely causes them not to stab themselves with that needle. Disease might take ten years or more to kill them and in their mind that amounts to no consequences at all.

    53. Re:Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that Lot! Gets it on with his daughters, has some kids with them, and his wife was conveniently nuked beforehand to enable him to bump uglies wit 'em. What a character!

      Read it again. His daughters drug and rape him, ostensibly because they believe they are the last people alive on Earth, and need to repopulate.

    54. Re:Done in movies... by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      So, if popular culture approves of and encourages it, can't blame the cops too much for doing it despite it being merely illegal...

      Yes, we can.

      Indeed, we can, but unfortunately "we" don't. And that's the problem.

      The "we" here is not the Slashdot readers (or other people well-informed about civil rights), but the population at large. And this population doesn't get any special training about their rights, but picks it up from movies and similarly unreliable sources.

      So, even though police's training tells them that they shouldn't behave in such a way, they are confident that there will be very little backlash against such behavior (except from the "weirdos", which are a tiny tiny minority), and so they'll do it despite their training.

      In summary: yes, we can blame police for this behavior. But we (the better informed people) should blame the movies as well.

    55. Re:Done in movies... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      As an adult, I find this stuff still rather hilarious, but I'm an adult now and can easily discern it's just for fun. A child? Influential. They don't know better yet.

      Watched all that stuff as a kid. Don't recall ever thinking "Hey, it would be pretty cool to drop a safe on someone - not like it really hurts them past the commercial break, after all!"

      No, kids aren't so stupid that they see talking mice running at near sonic speed (or small dinosaurs doing same) and think "oh, how realistic! Wow, the world is pretty cool, isn't it?"

      Hell, most of us (speaking of the kids of my day, and get off my lawn!) never even believed that animals could talk, much less order shit from Acme....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    56. Re:Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The entire story of Job is supposed to demonstrate the virtue of unquestioning obedience: God (Via his assistant) unleashes all manner of misery and suffering upon Job, killing his family, ruining him financially and inflicting him with horrible diseases entirely to show that Job, as a loyal Jew, will remain obedient and loyal no matter what circumstances throw at him

      His Assistant? Satan? In the story of Job, Satan declares that Job only loves God because God gives Job what Job wants. God disagrees, and Satan requests permission to plague Job to prove Satan's point. God allows Satan to do certain things to Job, and excludes other actions. If you subscribe to the idea of "what God allows, God approves" school of thought (making God a horror to mankind), then Satan could be viewed as God's agent in this story (of course with that school of thought, every action is God's action because everyone is God's agent). If you subscribe to the "God allows things to happen, but other beings are allowed to independently initiate action" school of thought, then Satan in the story of Job is an antagonist.

    57. Re: Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I saw it in a movie so it must be right" won't work with your wife, so should they really be that dumb?

    58. Re:Done in movies... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      God (Via his assistant) unleashes all manner of misery and suffering upon Job, killing his family, ruining him financially and inflicting him with horrible diseases entirely to show that Job, as a loyal Jew, will remain obedient and loyal no matter what circumstances throw at him - and sure enough, at the end, God restores his health and wealth. Though not the dead family.

      Not only that, but he did it basically on a dare.

      God: "Job will do anything for me, no matter what"
      Satan: "no way"
      God: "yes way"
      Satan: "prove it or GTFO"
      God: "watch this..."

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    59. Re:Done in movies... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If murder were legalised most people would not start murdering. Most people don't commit serious crimes because of morality. Minor crimes, especially victimless ones, are another matter because there are fewer moral qualms.

      Fear of being caught tends to come far down the list. A long time ago in England almost all crimes carried the death sentence. 10 year old children were hung for stealing. It didn't really reduce the crime rate. If anything it just made people driven to crime by poverty more likely to murder the police trying to catch them, since death was certain anyway.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    60. Re:Done in movies... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Capable isn't the same as well screw everyone else over at the first opportunity.

      I once left two bags if expressive shopping items on a train in Japan. Next day I collected them as a cleaner had handed them in. Could easily have taken some stuff and never been caught, but didn't. Once a friend left 50,000 yen in a restaurant. That's about â300 or $400. Went back the next day, it was all waiting for her, found by the staff and kept safe.

      In some cultures people are basically nice. It's actually quite shocking for British people when they go to Japan and people just trust them by default. In the UK that will get you screwed over fast.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    61. Re:Done in movies... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Most people don't commit crimes for fear of punishment, not because they morally object.

      Every person I've ever heard say that also said that they'd not commit murder if it were legal.

      So I assume everyone who says that is a hyporite. How about you? Are you a murderer, restrained solely by fear of punishment?

    62. Re:Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Leaned over balcony" That is so mild.... title should read "Philly cops attempt murder to obtain suspect's password".

    63. Re:Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I fail to see, how mere racism or sexism can lead to a boycott, while abuse of a suspect gets a pass. And not just once either!

      Regarding Exodus, you can't see the difference between a director/writer saying "I did it because ACTION (aka, the Micheal Bay reason)" and "I did it because fuck your race/gender/sexual orientation"?

      Regarding Frozen, feminazis* don't work on logic to begin with.
      *Who are merely a minority among feminists, though a very vocal one. And it kinda sickens me that I felt the need to explain that I am not saying that all feminists are feminazis.

    64. Re:Done in movies... by Sarten-X · · Score: 2

      Let's not forget that this is a typical Slashdot hivemind-feeding story... Everything in TFS apparently comes from testimony (which may or may not be accurate, and may or may not be accepted as a fact by the court), and let's also not forget that even lacking a search warrant, officers are allowed to do a sweep of the area to ensure their safety.

      Even if we accept that the accused officers did violate their suspect's rights, and they did search excessively without a warrant, and they did threaten him, they've been indicted for it. They got caught being bad cops, by other cops, and now they get to go through the whole justice process from the other side. The system isn't perfect, but it's not beyond hope.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    65. Re:Done in movies... by mi · · Score: 1

      He did not say "more often".

      In the below context, the qualifier "more" is implied and does not need to be explicitly mentioned to convey the implication:

      The problem is that in real life, often the people who think they are right and good actually aren't,

      Because people make all sorts of mistakes "often" — and that is not worth mentioning. So, if you mention it, you are implying, that a particular mistake happens more often than others.

      some cops wanting their boots licked.

      Neah, they are all busy chasing you over your truancy.

      What would you consider to be an acceptable error rate in this situation?

      I did not express any opinion of my own on the "acceptable" rates or actions in this thread. I'm just pointing out the discrepancy between our condemnation of fictitious vs. real police (and military).

      A discrepancy, that, strangely enough, does not exist (or is not as big) in our disapproval of other things — like on-screen sexism or racism.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    66. Re:Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's to do? Which those? Who cares? You and they also are loved, and help, drugs, risky behaviour, and prostitutes are available. Take or leave, nothing for me to do about.

    67. Re:Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in their mind that amounts to no consequences at all.

      I don't know about that. I smoke cigarettes--one of the nastiest addictions you can visit on your body. My grandmother died of emphysema after a tracheotomy and morphine drip in her house. I'm well aware that there are consequences and I'll most likely suffer them in full measure

      Being a human means being able to make your own damn decisions and suffer your own damn consequences. You don't have to agree with me, you can think it's stupid, but it doesn't hurt someone else (don't smoke around non-smokers or children) and it's none of your damn business how I use my life or what I do to my own body.

    68. Re:Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Murder: verb: kill (someone) unlawfully and with premeditation. You can't murder someone if it's lawful. /pedantry

    69. Re:Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even as kids, we knew the references to Speedo Pep Pills were referring to real drugs. I mean... DARE...

      We just didn't know anyone to buy them from.

    70. Re:Done in movies... by Jawnn · · Score: 1

      I remember it being done in a few movies — by the good guys — without anybody in the audience cringing. Nor do I remember any calls to boycott a movie over such things.

      So, if popular culture approves of and encourages it, can't blame the cops too much for doing it despite it being merely illegal...

      So what a group of people watching a fictional movie "approves of and encourages" should somehow translate to and justify actions in the real world? WTF? Man, that is some seriously busted logic, pal.

    71. Re:Done in movies... by daremonai · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Everything in TFS apparently comes from testimony (which may or may not be accurate, and may or may not be accepted as a fact by the court),

      One of the two police officers who dangled him over the balcony confessed to it in court, so as far as mere testimony goes, that's pretty good.

    72. Re:Done in movies... by ckatko · · Score: 2

      What the fuck are you talking about? We see all kinds of sick, crazy shit in movies because it's fantasy.

      Should we be okay with killing people because it Arnold blows people away?
      Should we be okay with incest because Game of Thrones is popular?
      Should we be okay with torture because they use it in the movies?
      Should we be okay with hitting women because Shawn Connery did in in films?

      I mean what the fuck kind of argument are you trying to put forth, and how the hell have you convinced people to mod up some a moronic idea?

    73. Re:Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just an expression of the just-world fallacy. If you have ever actually tried to get "help" you find out what that actually means. They clip your wings in exchange for some pills. Isn't that generous of them? They wait until you're desperate enough to give up your freedom because it is the only way to ration their limited resources.

      I went to the ER looking for a meeting with a psychiatrist to have my antidepressants modified. The bean counters spent 6 hours of my life putting me in a holding room with a tv and several other crazies. All they wanted from me was to say I wasn't a threat to myself or anyone else, took away my clothes, a piss test, and a willingness to be admitted for observation. They weren't there to help. They were looking to CYA. They promise drugs as a transparent attempt to put a carrot on a stick while they bait and switch with multiple rounds of hoops you have to jump through so they can prevent themselves from getting sued. Then they sit you down with a glorified accountant/CFO wannabe who tells you if you aren't willing to be admitted they can't do anything for you.

      Fuck that. I'd rather wait 3 months to see a shrink than have "admitted for mental health" on my DHS records.

      For the smart alecks in the audience: I went to County Mental Health Services before I went to the ER. This was a desperate attempt to get care after calling several dozen psychiatrists over a 2 week period. It's the same shit everywhere: 3 month wait list thanks to Obamacare. Suddenly demand outstrips supply by a long shot. Impulse response shit. Don't expect new practices to fill the need either, thanks to "price controls".

      It was the County Mental Health Services supervisor who sent me to the ER because their mandate prevented them from helping anyone with Health Insurance... I shit you not.

      After getting "help" from Private Sector, County Government, and finally the Emergency Room: I eventually had to get on the 3 month wait list. I've needed to modify my antidepressants prescription since 8/14 and here it is 8 months later and I will FINALLY be seeing a psychiatrist next week. I eventually signed up for the waitlist out of frustration.

      Salt on the wound: I saw a General Care Physician ~9/14 who passed the buck and refused to cut me a prescription because there was some concern I might be Bipolar II and once again, she wanted to cover her ass. IE Since she wasn't a specialist, she refused to touch me with a 10 ft pole and told me to go see a psychiatrist. LMFAO...

      Wild fucking ride right? Some fucking "help". Let me tell you: I did some "self-medicating" between August and today. Fuck anyone who wants to give me shit for that. I tried to go legit. Sometimes people are cynical for GOOD reason. It's called experience.

    74. Re:Done in movies... by mi · · Score: 1

      we know who the bad guys are

      Well, we know, the victim really was a drug-dealer too now.

      because we know who the bad guys are

      We — the readers and viewers — know (sort of). The policeman doing the illegal deed in fiction knows just as much as the real cops in TFA knew.

      There should be no difference in our condemnation (or lack of it) of their actions. And yet, the difference is vast, proving most of the society as either hypocrites or tools of the manipulators ready to whip-up public outrage for their own purposes.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    75. Re:Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The solution to that scenario is not to medle in other countries and get people so pissed off at you that they are willing to die to get back at you

    76. Re:Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Morality plays very little part in it for most people. Only a minority are evil. Only a minority are good and moral. The rest just go with the flow and follow what the rest of their "tribe" does.

      Most people may _want_ to be perceived as good but they aren't. Most people don't commit serious crimes because most other people aren't doing it. Or the perceived risk-loss-benefit isn't good enough.

      Put those same people in a situation where someone in authority orders them to do it and they will do serious crimes.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      The legal murder example is ridiculous - since in such an environment if you try to kill someone, they or their friends and families may try to kill you back. For examples go look at other countries where the government does not have a strong monopoly over violence. It's not about morality.

      If instead you made it legal and acceptable for "A" to kill anyone they like, but nobody else could kill them, most would kill - just ask any drone pilot. Morality has little effect on their actions. Some may not like it, but most would still kill even if they think it's wrong (children, civilians etc ).

      Or look at the US police - how many arrest their fellow cops when they see them doing illegal AND immoral things? They won't go against their tribe. It's been bred into humans after many generations of killing/exiling of those who go against their tribe.

      Morality is still useful - it's what you use to decide those norms. But don't spout bullshit about morality in the real world being an important factor for most people. You want to improve things, you make sure that the accepted norms, customs, rules for various tribes are good.

    77. Re:Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of the crimes you list are either examples of vice laws or strict liability laws, which are both an abomination of justice and make a mockery of morality.

      It's no surprise that people have no qualms about committing victimless 'crimes'.

    78. Re:Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, this is just something someone said. Whether there is anything to substantiate their claims has not yet been shown and might never be shown.

      Anybody can claim anything they want. Whether they can prove it actually happened is another matter.

    79. Re:Done in movies... by William+Baric · · Score: 1

      Trying to avoid punishment is an example of a "moral, principled basis".

    80. Re:Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When people are pissed off and willing to kill because you refuse to "respect" their imaginary god and the pedophile they call a "prophet", I'd say we should meddle in their country even more.

    81. Re:Done in movies... by linuxrocks123 · · Score: 1

      Re the Milgram experiment:

      Through their participation in the experiment, many subjects realized that they were capable of committing acts of extreme violence on other human beings. After having this realization, many subjects experienced prolonged symptoms of anxiety. (However, 84 percent of former participants surveyed later said they were "glad" or "very glad" to have participated.)

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      I agree with other posters in this thread -- most people aren't amoral so much as habitually thoughtless.

      --
      vi ~/.emacs # I'm probably going to Hell for this.
    82. Re:Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, all he was doing was selling drugs, whereas they committed a violent crime.

      The prima facie evidence here is that the cops are worse criminals than the drug dealer.

    83. Re:Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usually when the good guy does that there are exigent circumstances. If there was good reason to believe there would be a murder if someone didn't talk, I don't care so much if they were leaned over the edge of a balcony a bit to get it. If it is a normal police investigation and that information will be used as evidence, that's a pretty different matter.

      Other times, the good guys do that, but are also.....heros who are not such good guys.

    84. Re:Done in movies... by Threni · · Score: 1

      Somewhere there's a terrorist reading your post and saying "that's what I'm talking about!".

    85. Re:Done in movies... by KingTank · · Score: 1

      Not a lawyer, but I believe a court would consider that "self defense". The principle is sometimes extended to include defending others. Although I'm sure it would be very unusual to have a situation where self defense required killing an innocent. Pretty sure it would apply to torturing the terrorist though. IMO that's why legalizing torture isn't necessary. There's already implicit exceptions to the law that apply in various "Jack Bauer" scenarios. There's also something the courts call "criminal intent". You can't accidentally commit a crime. Don't believe you can be coerced into committing a crime either.

    86. Re:Done in movies... by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      We — the readers and viewers — know (sort of). The policeman doing the illegal deed in fiction knows just as much as the real cops in TFA knew.

      It's that "sort of" that makes the difference, however.

      Again, movies tend to make it simple. Take something like torture in "24." We're generally forgiving because, hey, we know the bad thing is going to happen. We know that whoever Jack Bauer is torturing is the right person because for the last 3 episodes we saw him scheming with the other bad guys. And, finally, we want to get on with the story and to do that, our hero needs to know this stuff (that we, the audience, already know). Since it's fiction--and we know it's fiction--we know that nobody is really getting hurt so it's no big deal.

      Again, real life tends to be more complicated. Yes, the Cops knew that this guy was a drug dealer, but was he really? Depends on how much you trust the police.

      Don't get me wrong--there are idiots out there who can't really separate fact from fiction or imagine a real-world scenario based on the movies. I remember when the US Government was talking about torture and a scenario that sounded right out of 24 with the old, "Wouldn't torture be okay then?"

      proving most of the society as [...] tools of the manipulators [...]

      Well, movies are supposed to manipulate your emotions. That's why they have soundtracks and the like. Fiction does that.

    87. Re:Done in movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You actually seem to be agreeing with the GP in full. You're an addict, you know what the long-term consequences will be, but you don't care about then, you care about now. Consequences far in the future are immaterial to you.

    88. Re:Done in movies... by edittard · · Score: 1

      video-clip by Woopy Goldberg

      Never heard of him.

      --
      At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
    89. Re:Done in movies... by ultranova · · Score: 1

      A terrorist has a nuclear weapon in his backpack and is 10 blocks away from where he plans to set it off. He also plans to die, so if you confront him, he'll just set it off anyway.

      The sniper who is supposed to shoot the bad guy has his shot blocked by a girl on her daddy's shoulders. He doesn't have a clear shot.

      Do you shoot through the girl to hit the bad guy in that case?

      Well, the girl is less likely to die from a bullet wound than a nuclear bomb going off right next to her, so it's not really an ethical dilemma, any more than performing a risky medical operation to save that girl's life afterwards would be.

      The problem is, this entire ridiculous scenario is an example of an idea - that ethics can be set aside if needed - fighting for existence. Ideas aren't passive things; they're encoded by living neural cells in human brains, and neurons have a basic drive to be used. So once you accept the idea of ethical exceptions in principle, that idea will always whisper in your ear in every situation, even ones that don't involve any immediate danger.

      So the question is: given two imperfect options - absolute ethical commandment and a slippery slope - which one is likely to cause less destruction?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    90. Re:Done in movies... by Jimbob+The+Mighty · · Score: 1

      What? I can't even... Look, troll, murders are commited in quite a lot of movies, often to drive some sort of narrative. This does not mean popular culture approves of murder, and neither should anybody else. And don't get me started on the other thing.

    91. Re:Done in movies... by mi · · Score: 1

      Well, movies are supposed to manipulate your emotions.

      Movies are. But not the news-reports. And yet, Abu Ghraib scandal — in addition to legal prosecution of the culprits — brought down moral condemnation of not only them, but the entire chain of command all the way up to the then-President.

      That nobody said a word to likewise condemn the fictitious Marine Captain Steven Hiller — the dashing hero of the "Independence Day" — suggests, our emotions against the real miscreants were deliberately whipped-up.

      Given the harm the manipulation did to the American cause, one can be forgiven for suspecting, it was orchestrated — at least in part — by a hostile party... Would not have been the first time...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    92. Re:Done in movies... by Agripa · · Score: 1

      Some of the testimony before Congress about FBI abuses a couple years ago justified these types of actions during interrogation by saying they saw Jack Bauer doing it on 24 so they figured that is how it is done.

    93. Re:Done in movies... by Agripa · · Score: 1

      Even if we accept that the accused officers did violate their suspect's rights, and they did search excessively without a warrant, and they did threaten him, they've been indicted for it.

      It is noteworthy in this case because it is the exception and not the rule. It will be an even larger exception if it goes to trial or they plead guilty.

    94. Re:Done in movies... by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      The difference is that in the movies, the audience generally has perfect knowledge of the situation. Of the intentions and criminality of the bad guy and the honesty and righteousness of the good guy.

      And this is why IRL we must have due process of law, in which the good guys must prove beyond reasonable doubt that the bad guy deserves what's coming to him, and that the good guys acted like good guys.

      Doesn't make for good TV, though. 99.9% of real court cases are boring as shit.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    95. Re:Done in movies... by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Seeing as that's not what's happened, I have no idea what you are on about. I suspect you don't either.

    96. Re:Done in movies... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Exactly this! I like watching Jack Bauer "question" the bad guy as much as anyone, but what it comes down to is, it's not real! Nobody is really getting hurt, not even a criminal/terrorist. A real cop shouldn't do a fraction of the stuff we in the movies, and if they do, there should be heavy RL consequences.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    97. Re:Done in movies... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      In which case, they should be fired for stupidity before getting criminally charged.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  2. xkcd by cdxta · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:xkcd by turp182 · · Score: 1

      Damn you! (your post wasn't there when I typed a longer version of yours...)

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
    2. Re:xkcd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Came for the obligatory xkcd. Was not disappointed. 10/10 would read comment again.

    3. Re:xkcd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still don't know what the drug is supposed to add to the punchline. It would have been tighter to just say "Hit him with this $5 wrench until he tells us the password."

    4. Re: xkcd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saved me from looking up the URL. :-)

  3. Obligatory XKCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://xkcd.com/538/

  4. Oh Yeah!!! Oblig XKCD by turp182 · · Score: 5, Funny

    https://xkcd.com/538/

    Bam! My first obligatory post on Slashdot.

    Someone has probably posted it while I typed this though...

    --
    BlameBillCosby.com
    1. Re:Oh Yeah!!! Oblig XKCD by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Actually, you are number 3 ;-)

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re:Oh Yeah!!! Oblig XKCD by turp182 · · Score: 1

      Damnit. I tried. I've never tried first post, thought I could pull of an XKCD reference.

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
    3. Re:Oh Yeah!!! Oblig XKCD by gweihir · · Score: 1

      As the XKCD reference cannot be repeated to often, no harm done.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    4. Re:Oh Yeah!!! Oblig XKCD by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Someone has probably posted it while I typed this though..."

      That is because it was so obvious that it would have been best if nobody linked to it. Before I even clicked on the link to the article I knew some asshat was going to link to that xkcd comic.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    5. Re:Oh Yeah!!! Oblig XKCD by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2

      Who the fsck is often, and why don't they capitalize their name? ... and how do you know it won't get repeated to them?

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    6. Re:Oh Yeah!!! Oblig XKCD by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      As the XKCD reference cannot be repeated to often, no harm done.

      I feel sorry for the second person who posted the xkcd comic. His score is still at 0, while the first and third posters were modded up to five. Some people have no luck!

    7. Re:Oh Yeah!!! Oblig XKCD by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      I didn't want to take the time to search for it. But now I have this handy link! Thanks, xkcd posters!

    8. Re:Oh Yeah!!! Oblig XKCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not take the time? Search terms like xkcd wrench or xkcd encryption is enough to get it on the first result. Or you could just think of it as just another numbered library of knowledge. This one is so common that it is worth remembering: 538.

    9. Re:Oh Yeah!!! Oblig XKCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nicely done. ;)

    10. Re:Oh Yeah!!! Oblig XKCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even once is too often. We have enough Randall Munroe taint lickers around here.

    11. Re: Oh Yeah!!! Oblig XKCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mad because you didn't think of it first? It's ok, mommy and daddy still love you.

      I bet you typed that comment on a Windows XP machine, patched I'm sure ;)

    12. Re:Oh Yeah!!! Oblig XKCD by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Obligatory XKCD for over-referencing humor: https://xkcd.com/16/

  5. Always felt silly for doing that by HangingChad · · Score: 1

    That sounds like a good time for a duress password.

    I always took the time to make two containers with one accessed through a duress password. I felt silly for doing it...less so now. It was something I did because I used to travel a lot internationally. That was before Customs started cloning people's device drives.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:Always felt silly for doing that by gweihir · · Score: 1

      If they are professionally, they will clone, perhaps in a way that you cannot see and do something stupid. Bang! The first 10 years prison for "destruction of evidence" already in the bag. If they have no clue how to do this right, then you duress password may work, but they may also be unprofessional enough to just kill you on the spot "by accident". If they do not, see above under "destruction of evidence".

      The only sane thing is to not ever carry sensitive data when crossing borders or in similar situations.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re:Always felt silly for doing that by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      If they are professionally, they will clone, perhaps in a way that you cannot see and do something stupid.

      Actually, there's many ways duress passwords can work. When I had one, it granted access as usual, but notified the security people that something was up.

      For a storage system, there's two options:
      1. The duress password directs you to a DIFFERENT image stored within the encrypted blob than the 'real' password. Though at this point it 'works best' if it's less a 'duress' password than a second password used for different stuff. For example, you put all your legitimate* stuff in using password 1. Then you use password 2 for your illegal stuff. If they place you under duress, you give them password 1, and a heavily used image is a lot more realistic than a blank one. That's one thing to remember about a hidden partition - you really want it to look used for realism.
      2. There are chips on the market today that will hold the keys securely and only 'unlock' with the proper code. They aren't subject to cloning under normal circumstances, and are designed to dump their codes if tampering-like behavior occurs. Such as freezing them will result in a code dump, not data retention. Anyways, most have the ability to take a 'duress code' that will cause them to dump the keys, at which point the easily duplicated hard drive effectively contains nothing but garbage unless you can come up with the proper key that just got wiped.

      *Including some embarrassing but not really illegal stuff if you're smart.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    3. Re:Always felt silly for doing that by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Alerting security is something that an work, but it requires that you actually have the upper hand, but that not all your forces are there at the time. That is usually called a "panic button" though. As to hidden partitions, that is all fantasy BS. Really. As to your magic chips, ever wondered why a proper HSM does _not_ have a duress password? Right, because the manufacturer does _not_ want to be responsible for getting you shot.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    4. Re:Always felt silly for doing that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they are professionally, they will clone, perhaps in a way that you cannot see and do something stupid.

      Actually, there's many ways duress passwords can work. When I had one, it granted access as usual, but notified the security people that something was up.

      For a storage system, there's two options:
      1. The duress password directs you to a DIFFERENT image stored within the encrypted blob than the 'real' password. Though at this point it 'works best' if it's less a 'duress' password than a second password used for different stuff. For example, you put all your legitimate* stuff in using password 1. Then you use password 2 for your illegal stuff. If they place you under duress, you give them password 1, and a heavily used image is a lot more realistic than a blank one. That's one thing to remember about a hidden partition - you really want it to look used for realism.
      2. There are chips on the market today that will hold the keys securely and only 'unlock' with the proper code. They aren't subject to cloning under normal circumstances, and are designed to dump their codes if tampering-like behavior occurs. Such as freezing them will result in a code dump, not data retention. Anyways, most have the ability to take a 'duress code' that will cause them to dump the keys, at which point the easily duplicated hard drive effectively contains nothing but garbage unless you can come up with the proper key that just got wiped.

      *Including some embarrassing but not really illegal stuff if you're smart.

      You do understand that the reaction of a bad guy that is hell-bent on getting your data to finding one of these cryptosystems or gadgets would be to, ahem, apply duress until you had been definitively and permanently broken before attempting any of the passwords you've given? You probably won't be of much use to anyone afterwards.

      Moreover, you do also understand that if they don't find what they're expecting, they will believe that you've given them the duress password, even if you've given them the real one, and will then make a possibly lingering and most definitely unpleasant example of you?

      Mod parent -1, courting a particularly nasty Darwin Award.

    5. Re:Always felt silly for doing that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > they will clone,

      Dude, use tamper resistance. A nice pyrotechnic charge on opening the device should do it.

    6. Re:Always felt silly for doing that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > they will clone,

      Dude, use tamper resistance. A nice pyrotechnic charge on opening the device should do it.

      Thank you comrade, we can now add bomb making to the charges.

    7. Re:Always felt silly for doing that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget the boobytraps; you're going to wind yourself up in a world of hurt. Something as simple as a case alarm to wipe the encryption header for your drive and a panic button for it. You could also set it to trip on the house/business alarm after 30 seconds. You DO have redundant encrypted offsite backups, right?

    8. Re:Always felt silly for doing that by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      They won't let you touch the device, so if you gave a duress password, it would be the police, not you, that would be destroying evidence. And if there was evidence they were so sure was there, they can subpoena the evidence against you that you hold. They don't have to open the safe if they can compel you to provide the contents.

    9. Re:Always felt silly for doing that by gweihir · · Score: 1

      That is exactly the problem. Sure, if you do not expect to walk away, a duress password has some use, but a cyanide tooth would be far better. (If those actually exist, I somehow doubt it.)

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    10. Re:Always felt silly for doing that by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Excellent, you just have added terrorism charges against yourself.

      And ever wondered why it is called "tamper resistant" and not "tamper proof"? Simple: It _was_ called tamper proof, but nobody managed to pull it off, so anybody with a clue stepped down to "tamper resistance". Against experts with time, it has no real value.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    11. Re:Always felt silly for doing that by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Ah an attempt at legal sophistry! Nice. That has universally failed in history. Know why? In any state that actually has laws with the name, you can refuse to hand over the password in the first place. The others are just police states and they are in effect not bound by laws when they decide what to do to you.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    12. Re:Always felt silly for doing that by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      All "legal" is sophistry. Pretty much by definition. And it works in places that are police states that pretend to not be (the USA, for one). They will pretend to give you an option, durring the torture designed to elicit a confession, regardless of guilt. And when you make a choice, they'll hold it against you. Either way. Professing innocence is proof of guilt. That's what Martha Stewart went to jail for, not confessing (called Obstruction). When your choices are to admit guilt or go to jail for failure to confess, then you live in a police state.

    13. Re:Always felt silly for doing that by gweihir · · Score: 1

      I completely agree.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    14. Re:Always felt silly for doing that by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      That is usually called a "panic button" though.

      Nope, the thing that's usually called a "panic button" is, in fact, a button.

      The trouble with an actual button is that someone could see you pushing it (or trying to). With a duress password, you give the appearance of complying which at least buys you some time.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  6. This is called "rubber hose cryptoanalysis" by gweihir · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The idea is that if you beat somebody with a rubber hose, that does not leave any mark.

    Also, stop the nonsense about duress-passwords. They do not work. Really not and no, your smart idea for any movie-like device that makes them work is just that: Movie-like but not real. On the other hand, trying to be smart with a duress password procedure can easily get you killed or worse.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:This is called "rubber hose cryptoanalysis" by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      The idea is that if you beat somebody with a rubber hose, that does not leave any mark.

      Also, stop the nonsense about duress-passwords. They do not work. Really not and no, your smart idea for any movie-like device that makes them work is just that: Movie-like but not real. On the other hand, trying to be smart with a duress password procedure can easily get you killed or worse.

      That really depends on the circumstances. For someone with a PDA (remember them) or computer they are unlikely to be useful, especially if the person "persuading" you is convinced the device contains the information they want. OTOH, they can be useful in specific circumstances. We had a duress codeword to indicate forceable entry was being attempted. When the door was opened the bad guys would be treated by a bunch of pissed off guys with automatic weapons.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    2. Re:This is called "rubber hose cryptoanalysis" by gweihir · · Score: 2

      What you describe is not a duress password, it is a safety-destruct and the critical difference is that it is used before the bad guys have you in their power. Still a risk to your health, but less so as you did not disobey a direct order.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    3. Re:This is called "rubber hose cryptoanalysis" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aside from the fact that you're a random jackoff on the 'net, read the wiki article on duress passwords and codes. The precursor of the CIA would like to have a word with your uniformed faggot ass.

    4. Re:This is called "rubber hose cryptoanalysis" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Also, stop the nonsense about duress-passwords. They do not work. Really not and no, your smart idea for any movie-like device that makes them work is just that: Movie-like but not real. On the other hand, trying to be smart with a duress password procedure can easily get you killed or worse.

      Depends on the threat model.

      I always wondered why ATMs didn't have duress passwords. You get mugged, you tell the mugger the password is 1234 instead of 5678, and the ATM happily dispenses money and calls the police for you.

      I also don't see any reason why phones can't have duress passwords. You get pulled over by the cops, they try to illegally search your device incident to a traffic stop, you key in 1234 instead of 5678, and the phone starts silently recording and/or streaming live audio/video to the cloud.

      The duress password doesn't defend against charges of destruction of evidence. It can be quite useful for defense against power-tripping bullies, whether they're the sort without a badge at the ATM, or the sort with a badge at the side of the road. It only has to last the 5-10 minutes it takes to give the thug what he thinks he wants, and then the thug will let you go.

      Duress codes are to mobile devices what exploding dye packs are to banks. The goal is to let the thug get away with the money, but not get away with the crime.

    5. Re:This is called "rubber hose cryptoanalysis" by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      What you describe is not a duress password, it is a safety-destruct and the critical difference is that it is used before the bad guys have you in their power. Still a risk to your health, but less so as you did not disobey a direct order.

      well, if someone is holding a gun to your head and telling you to gain access to a location I'd say they have you in their power and the password you give is under duress; since you would not use it in any other situation.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    6. Re:This is called "rubber hose cryptoanalysis" by westlake · · Score: 1

      Also, stop the nonsense about duress-passwords. They do not work.

      There is a reason why they call the drug courier a mule and it isn't because he is the brains of the outfit.

      The right question to ask --- the first question to ask ---- is not where and how to hide the insanely dangerous files you are carrying about on your person but why you are doing anything so stupid in the first place?

    7. Re:This is called "rubber hose cryptoanalysis" by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "Also, stop the nonsense about duress-passwords. They do not work."

      I was trying to figure out what you are talking about, then it occurred to me that you have no idea know what you are talking about.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    8. Re: This is called "rubber hose cryptoanalysis" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rubber hoses definitely leave marks. They fade more quickly.

    9. Re:This is called "rubber hose cryptoanalysis" by mark-t · · Score: 1

      ....then the thug will let you go.

      Why should I believe that? If a person is morally bankrupt enough that they are willing to threaten somebody's life, why on earth should I think they are not at least equally capable of lying?

    10. Re:This is called "rubber hose cryptoanalysis" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Money.

      D'uh.

      Salary for combat couriers these days is quite good.
      That said, I'm thinking of shipping out to Fiddler's Green.

    11. Re:This is called "rubber hose cryptoanalysis" by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes. I misread your description. Sorry. This is the one situation where a duress password actually works, namely when you have superior force, you just need to alert it.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    12. Re:This is called "rubber hose cryptoanalysis" by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Duress passwords work under one condition: You actually have superior force, you just need to alert it. That includes silent alerts in banks and the like. Your ATM example is a valid one. (It fails because most people are already challenged handling one 4 digit pin, after the first few times the police was called by accident, the duress-PIN would get disabled pretty fast...) The usual scenario is however that you do _not_ have superior force (border crossing, the story here, etc.) and then they do not work or rather do more harm than good.

      As a border condition, if you are willing to die that can count as having "superior force" of sorts. Still, even then a duress password is unreliable enough to not be a good solution and you should do something else if at all possible.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    13. Re:This is called "rubber hose cryptoanalysis" by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Even worse: Criminals into this sort of thing are people with poor impulse control and limited rationality! (Criminals with good impulse control and good rationality become bankers, politicians and CEOs...) Hence there is a very high risk you you getting killed or seriously injured just because you did resist by using the duress password.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    14. Re:This is called "rubber hose cryptoanalysis" by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Excellent point! In the case of data, there are almost always ways to access it remotely after the danger has passed. As to the original story: Yes, I get it, it is convenient to store your customer records electronically on a device you do not hide, but it is also really dumb.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    15. Re:This is called "rubber hose cryptoanalysis" by gweihir · · Score: 1

      When you have shot yourself in the foot with a duress password, remember me. That is all I ask.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    16. Re: This is called "rubber hose cryptoanalysis" by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Quite possibly. I do not know where the name came from and certainly there are torture methods that leave less or no physical evidence, for example water-boarding. Still, this is the established term in the crypto-community and the idea is to torture you. The idea to not leave marks is just a bonus.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    17. Re:This is called "rubber hose cryptoanalysis" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh, duress passwords just need to be a bit more sophisticated in operation. I only know truecrypt. If your main volume is opened it should also open your duress volume and procedurally update timestamps on some files. that way it looks used if ever needed.

    18. Re:This is called "rubber hose cryptoanalysis" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THIS..... is may actually be a good use of My Butt.. i mean The Cloud.

      I also like your ATM ideas. why isnt this stuff a thing already?

    19. Re:This is called "rubber hose cryptoanalysis" by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      If the criminal has ANY way of knowing that you used the duress code, it's not a duress code, it's a giant red alarm button.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    20. Re:This is called "rubber hose cryptoanalysis" by RyoShin · · Score: 1

      You get mugged, you tell the mugger the password is 1234 instead of 5678, and the ATM happily dispenses money and calls the police for you.

      There are a few problems with this, such as:
      1) The person now has to remember two PINs instead of one; if they forget the duress PIN, which is likely since they never use it personally, they have to hand over the proper PIN anyway to avoid getting hurt. (A counter to this has been "make it the same PIN, but backwards"; then you have to figure out how to work with PINs like 4224.)
      2) If the duress PIN has anything in common with the normal PIN, it's likely the person will mis-enter at some point and accidentally trigger the duress signal
      3) If it's a shared bank account, but the account holders can have separate PINs for their cards (dunno if this is a current possibility or not), there is a potential for PINs and duress PINs clashing

      I imagine that banks have already considered such an idea and found it wanting, or that the cost of implementation and dealing with false-duress situations to be considered too much.

      Doing the same thing for a phone would be much easier, because people can install an app to do such as necessary. In fact, I would be surprised if there wasn't such an app already.

  7. Palm Pilot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't know that Palm Pilots still exist.

  8. Beating is for wussies by mi · · Score: 1

    Drug him and beat him with a $5 wrench until he tells us the password

    XKCD did not invent it — the method is known as rubberhose cryptoanalis for ages — unlike wrench, a hose is less likely to leave visible marks.

    But beating is for wussies — and drugging is completely gratuitous. The real men of the wonderful entity lovingly referred to as "Russkiy Mir" (Pax Russiana) use the swifter variation known as thermorectal cryptanalysis.

    It does not have to involve any beating and requires a $5 soldering iron. I'll leave the details to your imagination...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Beating is for wussies by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      thermorectal cryptanalysis

      God dammit so much now I'm going to have to use that somewhere wildly inappropriate and see who figures it out...

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
  9. The best encryption: No encryption by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    At least none that can be seen. You cannot demand keys for something you don't know of. If there's a container with a "please enter pass phrase" lock on top of it, it begs for a key.

    Unused space on your hard drive that looks like it contains old data from before you last partitioned, though...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:The best encryption: No encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > that looks like it contains old data from before you last partitioned, though...

      You mean that partition with randomness on it, along with your copy of trucrypt installed on the main partition? Yeah, no one will be able to figure that out.

    2. Re:The best encryption: No encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no the unmounted partition with randomness on it and the copy of truecrypt portable on a random directory buried under tons of crappy freeware on your usb stick.

    3. Re:The best encryption: No encryption by joe_frisch · · Score: 1

      It is quite possible to demand keys that someone *thinks* might be there. More is the pity if there never was any encrypted data on the device to begin with.

      A lot of misbehavior from law enforcement seems to stem from them being "sure" of what is going on, despite a lack of evidence to support the surety.

    4. Re:The best encryption: No encryption by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Truecrypt? I don't have truecrypt installed. I tried it a while ago, after all, I'm in security research, I think I still got a version on a stick somewhere, but don't ask me just where in my mess that stick is ... but you have a warrant, and you're the expert. Good luck.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:The best encryption: No encryption by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      They can demand all they want, I can only hand over what I have. I can't give you what doesn't exist. Which, of course, doesn't guarantee that it will end well for me. Just look at Saddam and him being asked to hand over his nonexistent WMDs.

      But it still increases my chances.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:The best encryption: No encryption by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      TrueCrypt hidden containers get around that problem by hiding the real secret data inside a dummy encrypted container that you can hand over the password to. Any unused space will be filled with random bytes, as is the norm for a TrueCrypt container, so isn't suspicious.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:The best encryption: No encryption by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      I tried it a while ago

      You just admitted to using TrueCrypt.

      I think I still got a version on a stick somewhere

      You just gave them enough for a search warrant.

      don't ask me just where in my mess that stick is ... but you have a warrant

      Now you've admitted to concealing evidence, and you've acknowledged the warrant.

      Granted, these are all slight stretches and distortions of what you actually intended to say, but they're all things to be argued in court. I'm usually one to give the police the benefit of the doubt, but if you're involved in anything where they're looking for passwords (or any other situation where you're not free to walk away at any moment), you need a lawyer and a closed mouth.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    8. Re:The best encryption: No encryption by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Using any sort of privacy device is not probable cause for a warrant in the US, and it's perfectly legal for the suspect to conceal evidence. That's what search warrants are for: the law recognizes that a suspect will not bring forth evidence, and has no legal duty to.

      AFAIK, the only cases where US courts have held that the suspects must divulge passwords are when the authorities have seen incriminating material (one cases where a customs official saw child pornography on a laptop, for example).

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  10. They should have thrown him over the ledge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    after force feeding him the drugs he was selling.

  11. Has anybody mentioned by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 2

    something about a $5 wrench?

    1. Re:Has anybody mentioned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey, they saved five dollars.. don't need a wrench when gravity and a ~180 foot drop is available.... for FREE... it's all about location, location, location

    2. Re:Has anybody mentioned by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dude, it's the Government. That $5 wrench cost at least $25,000.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    3. Re:Has anybody mentioned by Biff+Stu · · Score: 1, Informative

      Since you asked,

      https://xkcd.com/538/

  12. Welcome to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bangladephia. It's a Third World City with a football team.

  13. Threats by PPH · · Score: 1

    I'd cave in after a while.

    "The drugs are right there, officer. In the cabinet underneath the video camera streaming this whole scene out to YouTube."

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Threats by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      So basically you'd be streaming your criminal activity on YouTube all the time? Because that would be stupid.

      Or you'd bust our your super ninja skills and enable the streaming as the police were knocking on your door with a carefully placed deadman switch? Why not just go all Bruce Lee on them and beat them up and take their guns?

      Because, honestly, when I hear Slashdot people saying all of the tough shit they'd be doing in that situation I just really have to laugh -- seriously, stop fronting ... nobody believes you're a thug or a criminal mastermind. It's lame.

      A bunch of pasty nerds talking tough on the internet who would really just pee their pants and cry like little girls.

      And, yes, I'm not claiming to be any different.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Threats by dbIII · · Score: 2

      So basically you'd be streaming your criminal activity on YouTube all the time? Because that would be stupid.

      Sometimes deliberate jokes are deliberately stupid.

    3. Re:Threats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A bunch of pasty nerds talking tough on the internet who would really just pee their pants and cry like little girls.

      And, yes, I'm not claiming to be any different.

      Why do you think we're all like you?

      I myself have active duty intel experience (albeit dated) and many of us have both cyber chops and military skills. Hell, rumor has it other smart folks like attorneys and doctors frequent this place. The fact that you are incapable of many things doesn't mean that the rest of us are. I encrypt the hell out of everything, and at one point during a divorce had employed deadman switches on various pieces of technology.

      No Bruce Lee here, just a man who has handled himself in various situations both CONUS and overseas. If your life is that sad, why don't you do something with it.

    4. Re:Threats by gstoddart · · Score: 0

      So is the bravado of internet nerds.

      And differentiating between the humor and the actual fool who says "yo dawg, if that was me I'd be all gangster and shit and and be up in his grill and ... aw. mom, I'll take out the garbage later" ... well, not my job.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    5. Re:Threats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you think we're all like you?

      I myself have active duty intel experience (albeit dated) and many of us have both cyber chops and military skills. Hell, rumor has it other smart folks like attorneys and doctors frequent this place. The fact that you are incapable of many things doesn't mean that the rest of us are. I encrypt the hell out of everything, and at one point during a divorce had employed deadman switches on various pieces of technology.

      No Bruce Lee here, just a man who has handled himself in various situations both CONUS and overseas. If your life is that sad, why don't you do something with it.

      *rolls eyes* Yeah, right, Mr. Bond. We believe you.

    6. Re:Threats by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      No Bruce Lee here, just a man who has handled himself in various situations both CONUS and overseas. If your life is that sad, why don't you do something with it.

      Look, if you want to flap your gums and wave around your penis, do it elsewhere.

      Maybe on a chat room with your buddies while you're playing Xbox.

      Mostly you sound like a total wanker.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    7. Re:Threats by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Just have to ask.. do you think folks with military and intelligence experience don't read slashdot like any other nerd does?

      Ok, granted, maybe they've moved on to Reddit or tech-site-of-the-day like others. But maybe they just enjoy reading the site because they have for 15 years.

    8. Re:Threats by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, but applying a reasonable degree of reading comprehension instead of just skimming key words before replying is normally assumed.

    9. Re:Threats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little bitch? I'll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I've been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I'm the top sniper in the entire US armed forces. You are nothing to me but just another target. I will wipe you the fuck out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my fucking words. You think you can get away with saying that shit to me over the Internet? Think again, fucker. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of spies across the USA and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your life. You're fucking dead, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can kill you in over seven hundred ways, and that's just with my bare hands. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed combat, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the United States Marine Corps and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable ass off the face of the continent, you little shit. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little "clever" comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking tongue. But you couldn't, you didn't, and now you're paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will shit fury all over you and you will drown in it. You're fucking dead, kiddo.

    10. Re: Threats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every post you made damn near is insulting someone. Do you have low self esteem or something? I have a sneaky suspicion that you were a bully growing up. Then one day you got your shit pushed back, now you try to bully the Internet.

      You are a case of human breeding gone wrong. Your mom and dad never showed you any attention and you have no real life experiences. You just spout off random nonsense that you know is false, but do it anyway because it gets your little dick hard.

    11. Re:Threats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being an IT guy for military or government intelligence doesn't make you any less of a fat pussy.

  14. Roiling Philadelphia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live here, and this is the first time I've heard there's some sort of corruption trial.

  15. So, rob a casino and blame Ocean's 11? by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    So, if popular culture approves of and encourages it, can't blame the cops too much for doing it despite it being merely illegal...

    Let us know how well that "can't blame me, I saw it in a movie" defense works out for you.

  16. What happened to Sully? by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

    I let him go. - John Matrix

    --
    Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
  17. Poker Night with Pinocchio. by westlake · · Score: 0

    You cannot demand keys for something you don't know of.

    The cop or the border guard spends his entire working life learning how to read faces, body language, as if his life depended on it, which, of course, it often does.

    It is not the machine that betrays you. It's you.

    1. Re:Poker Night with Pinocchio. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trained to be a bully and aggressor crossed with militarization with a side of overzealous behavior targeting everyone as "the bad guy" is what betrays us all.

    2. Re:Poker Night with Pinocchio. by dcollins · · Score: 4, Informative

      "After investing $1 billion in behavior detection techniques and training since 2007, the Transportation Security Administration has little to show for its efforts, the New York Times stated in a new report. According to the newspaper, critics of the TSA’s attempt to read body language claim there’s no evidence to suggest the agency has been able to link chosen passengers to anything beyond carrying drugs or holding undeclared currency, much less a terrorist attack. In fact, a review of numerous studies seems to suggest that even those trained to look for various tics are no more capable of identifying liars than normal individuals. 'The common-sense notion that liars betray themselves through body language appears to be little more than a cultural fiction,' Maria Hartwig, a psychologist at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York City, told the Times."

      http://rt.com/usa/tsa-spent-billion-body-language-937/

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    3. Re:Poker Night with Pinocchio. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      They are supposed to be discouraged from this though, because in practice 'reading body language' very often turns into 'everyone who isn't white is acting shifty.'

    4. Re:Poker Night with Pinocchio. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      In this case I should consider myself lucky that my body language is FUBAR...

      Hey, it's about damn time that condition has some up sides, too.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Poker Night with Pinocchio. by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      It may have more to do with the people they are trying to train...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  18. The future? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Infiltration worked so well. Cooperation, leniency for working with the gov. Years of free charming, charismatic chatroom leaders and their accomplishments, forums and gov funded onion networks.
    Once a person and all their data is lost the only hope is a "security check" word, phrase. Something that can be added or left out that shows duress or coercion.
    That was the past.
    Now with OS, hardware and telco collaboration expect every consumer device to have a backdoor or trap door as sold.
    The backdoor or trap door would have been expected for the security services at a national level.
    Now that same level of expert contractor is ready for state, city and local law enforcement use on any device recovered.
    The same offer of cooperation, leniency, working with the gov will be made and a 'show' about needing the passwords over hours and much longer.
    The device, network is open in seconds and the isolated holding time is been put to use.
    The new trend is movement around a city with no access to any lawyer for many hours..
    Just before some legal time limit for court documentation a person is released or the lawyer is finally allowed access for the first formal recorded interview.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  19. Eh? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

    Was the undercover cop Suge Knight?

    1. Re:Eh? by the_fat_kid · · Score: 1

      Let us not forget that it was Vanilla Ice that got the visit from Mr. Knight.
      It makes me feel good, still.

      --
      -- Sig under construction...
    2. Re:Eh? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Not a fan of the Ice Ice Baby (with the baseline he stole himself from Queen), but I'd probably back him over Knight. Of course, a good outcome would be the balcony collapsing, sending them both tumbling.

  20. Small part of a bigger story by Razed+By+TV · · Score: 3, Informative

    I think the more interesting story is undercover drug unit goes and terrorizes numerous drug dealers for illegal profit. But I guess that story is already months old. http://articles.philly.com/201...

  21. End all/most drug laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    More lives have been harmed by drug law enforcement than by drugs themselves. Make it legal to destroy yourself with drugs. That is what liberty means. To be at liberty to make bad choices. Get the state out of the business of saving those who make the choice to destroy themselves with drugs. The role of the state is cleanup. Let the private sector focus on redemption. With the tax money saved, let all those "concerned" liberals, step up their giving to charity.

  22. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what the douche gets for having a palm pilot in 2007.

  23. Palm Pilot by TheDarkener · · Score: 2

    Funny, the most interesting part of this story was the mention of his Palm Pilot. /me wonders what model it was.

    And to answer your question, yes I still use a Palm Pilot.

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    1. Re:Palm Pilot by fygment · · Score: 1

      Yeah ... especially after watching a friend using his stylus on his Galaxy phone and thinking 'plus ca change' ...

      --
      "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
  24. Cops like this should get a medal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After all there is a war on drugs. The drug dealers won't hesitate a second to get your sons and daughters addicted and then pimp them out at a truck stop. When some cops actually try to combat the problem you criticize them. Fight fire with fire. I wish they had thrown the dealer off the balcony. This is how cops should act. Unfortunately, the vast majority of the time Law Enforcement ignores people like this and instead goes after the strung out looser driving away in the busted jalopies. Drug dealers and law enforcement are anal sex buddies working hand in hand to ensure the prisons are full (of drug addicts e.g. your children) and that the drug dealers make tons and tons of profit off the ruins of Americas youth, while the cops get good pensions and salaries ignoring the central problem. The USA needs a good dose of vigilantism and street justice. The legal justice system has been totally corrupted by money and power. (Drug dealers, both the legal and 'illegal' kind)

  25. Duress passworks work fine for unknown-unknowns by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 2

    Duress passwords are fine for stuff that the adversary doesn't know about. If three letter agents bust in on you and they have network logs or other surveillance showing what you've been up to then no, the duress password is not going to get you anywhere.

    On the other hand, if you had a laptop with some Tienanmen square videos on it that you wanted to bring to China, I think it's perfectly viable approach to simply load up the dummy container with videos of yourself doing a little soft S&M or something, just in case. Really, I would like to hear your explain why you think showing some slightly annoyed (but not suspicious of anything in particular) Chinese officers videos of tanks rolling around in Tienanmen would be safer and preferable to showing them your wife tying you to a bedpost. I would say that the latter approach is at least worth a shot.

    Of course, it's usually better to go the extra mile and use headerless solutions in such a way that it would take someone with a fair bit of expertise to notice even the possibility of encrypted material, with no way to conclusively prove whether it's there or not. I mean, if the phrase "please enter your password" appears at any point, you have already done something extremely stupid and lazy. The criminal or cop who has just busted in and is holding the gun to your head almost certainly does not have the knowledge or tools necessary to realize that the device might not be fully decrypted.

    If you're worried about getting "killed or worse" by an adversary who is going to first detain you for days while the device is subject to extensive forensic analysis then you're a terrorist and/or you plan on visiting some rather unpleasant countries and doing some fantastically stupid things.

    1. Re:Duress passworks work fine for unknown-unknowns by gweihir · · Score: 1

      You nicely demonstrate a huge problem with duress passwords even in the relatively benign circumstances you are talking about: They are very difficult to get right.

      In you case, the "mild BDSM" cover may be worse than what it hides. From Wikipedia about pornography in China: "Possession of pornography is punishable by up to 3 years in prison, a fine of CN¥20,000, or up to life imprisonment for large underground distributors."

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  26. Safeword? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LAWYER!

    Better call Saul!

    1. Re: Safeword? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't call a lawyer, much less talk to one, with your teeth broken by a baton and your mouth full of human excrements, can you?

  27. There is a simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go the UK way: you either surrender your passwords, automatic 25 years sentence. You say you forgot them? Too bad, automatic 25 years sentence. You give a password to a bogus volume? As soon as we detect your puny ruse - and we will - you get an automatic 40 years sentence. There, all your stupid tricks are now useless, no amount of technology can save you. The use of encryption by ordinary citizens should automatically be treated as admission of guilt. If you're trying to hide from the State, you're a criminal. End of discussion.

  28. Too Many Bad cops by JimSadler · · Score: 1

    We are seeing the effect of electronics on the exposure of bad cops. It certainly looks like a sizable chunk of our cops belong in prisons. I wonder if society will try to bury the ability to detect bad cops.

    1. Re:Too Many Bad cops by JRV31 · · Score: 1

      How many times we you have to hear about abuse of power by pigs? These gangs of armed thugs must be brought under brought under control and made to pay for their crimes.

  29. Never mind "the masses" by mariox19 · · Score: 2

    I wish Hollywood's influence was limited to the simple-minded "masses." When you get a chance, go ask Justice Scalia about his hero, Jack Bauer.

    --

    quiquid id est, timeo puellas et oscula dantes.

    1. Re:Never mind "the masses" by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 1

      I wish Hollywood's influence was limited to the simple-minded "masses." When you get a chance, go ask Justice Scalia about his hero, Jack Bauer.

      Last I checked, being a simple-minded idiot doesn't disqualify you from serving on the Supreme Court. You just have to convince congress critters you aren't. Which probably isn't too difficult considering the simple-mindedness idiocy we have serving as congress critters.

      Politicians that're smart intelligent people is long gone, it's just a big popularity contest now, and unfortunately, being popular isn't a very good qualification for serving in congress, but most people seem to think it is.

      All boils down to: Beware of stupid people in large groups.

  30. drug dealer...nuff said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    should have dropped him

  31. Well... XKCD prooved this som years ago... by Hymer · · Score: 1
  32. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  33. American Crime. Regular TV. Blows your memes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    American Crime. Regular TV. Blows your memes.

  34. What is it about LAW enforcement... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... that makes it so hard for them to follow the law?

    I am so much more worried about corrupt cops and corrupt politicians than anything some clown in the middle easy could ever do to me.

  35. hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    duress password? lotta effort.

    just use truecrypt (7.1a or earlier), and make sure you have a hidden partition and a dummy partition, with just enough files in the dummy partition to look legitimate. bam, problem solved, with a lot less effort/cost

  36. No different than beating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A confession out of a suspect.

    I don't really care what the bastard did now. He walks because cops don't get to do this shit.

    If we allow this, then they'll beat whoever they want until they admit to whatever crime the cops want to clear off their books.

  37. Obligatory by AlCapwn · · Score: 1

    Ctrl+F "xkcd"

    Suspicions confirmed.

  38. xkcd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  39. Hanging some skell over a railing by sabbede · · Score: 1

    may be an "old school" policing tactic, but Palm Pilots are a pretty "old school" device.