Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Announces Windows Holographic Platform

An anonymous reader writes: At its Build 2015 developer conference [Wednesday], Microsoft announced the Windows Holographic Platform. In short, the company will let developers turn Windows 10 apps into holograms for HoloLens. On stage, Microsoft showed a Windows video app that you can simply control with your voice: Just say "follow me" and the video app moves along as you walk around a room. "Every single universal Windows app has these capabilities," said Alex Kipman, technical fellow for the operating system group at Microsoft. Apps can look like little windows, or they can be more than that. The demo included a photos app, a browser, Skype, a holographic Start Menu, and even a dog on the floor.

22 of 99 comments (clear)

  1. Another day, another gimmick by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

    When you're done playing, kindly place it next to the Kinect, will ya?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Another day, another gimmick by SpectreBlofeld · · Score: 2

      Kinect technology is incorporated into this platform. It's what guides the orientation of the visual overlay faster and more accurately than accelerometers and orientation sensors.

    2. Re:Another day, another gimmick by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 2

      When you're done playing, kindly place it next to the Kinect, will ya?

      HoloLense has a killer app that will draw many to it, if you think about it for a minute--it's a 4 letter word. Not sure if it would compete with VR, but it would be slightly less conspicuous.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    3. Re:Another day, another gimmick by kernelistic · · Score: 4, Funny

      Golf! What a great idea!

  2. Not Holograms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wish the press and Microsoft would stop using the word "Hologram" when describing this. It's Virtual Reality. There are no holograms involved whatsoever.

    1. Re:Not Holograms by RevWaldo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Indeed:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H...

      Wake me when they make real advances in holography, like holographic video.

      .

    2. Re:Not Holograms by Arkh89 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Exactly, I am wondering if this qualifies as false advertising : using the name of an advanced technology that would be enabling primary functions of the product but is not actually present.

    3. Re:Not Holograms by trout007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think it is technically augmented reality.

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    4. Re:Not Holograms by oodaloop · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, it's definitely a hologram. But then, so is the whole universe.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    5. Re:Not Holograms by flarb936 · · Score: 2

      I think Microsoft may be able to get away with this on a technicality because the waveguide used in the glasses may be a holographic material. Kind of like this http://physicsworld.com/cws/ar...

      --
      ralphbarbagallo.com
    6. Re:Not Holograms by mark-t · · Score: 2

      They use the word hologram to describe this because that's the word that pop culture identifies with... even though it is wrong.

      You are right, however... this no more makes holograms than a View-Master toy invented in the 60's... it just has a lot more tech behind it.

  3. Doesn't replace the real thing. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

    and even a dog on the floor

    "Happiness is a warm puppy." Even Charlie Brown and Lucy knew this. An image of a dog is far from the real thing. Hopefully, virtual "reality" will never replace the real thing - though with the number of people living their lives on facebook and twitter, maybe it will help drop the birthrate well below zero when the only sex most people get is cyber.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    1. Re:Doesn't replace the real thing. by pitchpipe · · Score: 4, Funny
      For some reason I read that as "Happiness is a warm pussy," and found myself nodding enthusiastically in agreement.

      Maybe the cyber ones will have heaters.

      --
      Look where all this talking got us, baby.
  4. Its for sharing perspective. by MitchellThompson · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wired magazine covered it a month ago. Yep, Microsoft's new CEO is trying new things and attempting to restructure the company to be more accepting to these far-out-there ideas. Kudos. The old mantra was to only focus on core enterprise software and the Windows OS. I think the holograph idea is interesting, no doubt, but media is spinning it into "Look Microsoft bought Minecraft and they are working on a holograph system. ITS FOR GAMING!!11". No, the article I read spun it into a more mundane but useful application. Remote training / services etc. Examples were a plumber who can see your pipes and can show you in 3d what goes where... Or call up your buddy and he can help you fix your engine because he can see in 3d what you are seeing, and vice versa. This isn't VR. Its not exploring mars from the rover's perspective. Its sharing a perspective. That- is interesting.

  5. Finally by ArcadeMan · · Score: 5, Funny

    Virtual anime girlfriends* are finally here!

    * Don't worry, I'll store them in separate folders so they don't know about each other.

    1. Re:Finally by oodaloop · · Score: 5, Funny

      * Don't worry, I'll store them in separate folders so they don't know about each other.

      If it's OK with you, I'm going to pretend they're all in the same folder.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    2. Re:Finally by TheDarkener · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't worry, I'll store them in separate folders so they don't know about each other.

      Don't forget to remove the "Everyone" group permissions.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    3. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      And don't forget to enable the grope permissions!

  6. demo video online by eples · · Score: 3, Informative

    The demo starts at 2:31:00 into the keynote video:
    https://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Build/2015/KEY01

    --
    I'm a 2000 man.
  7. Thanks for the nightmares by Atrox666 · · Score: 3, Funny

    All I can think of is an irritating holographic paperclip..stalking me.

  8. Re: Capitalism is doomed by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Even Marx himself predicted that a necessary period of transition from Capitalism to Communism would be the "Dictatorship of the Proletariat". We can all debate the niceties of Marxism, but the fact was that its formulator and primary theorist believed that the people would need to be "shepherded" to the Utopian Marxist society.

    The real problem for Communism is that the industrialized countries never bit. There were a few abortive revolutions in the mid-19th century, but the leadership of these countries were smart enough to recognize that political liberalization was the antidote to a restive working class. Most countries saw enfranchisement of larger numbers of people, increasing influence of legislative assemblies, and a more populist approach to government.

    That's why the only countries that actually grasped on to Communism were primarily agrarian states like Russia, China and Cuba. In pure Marxist theory, agrarian states have not developed to the point where they are ready for the Communist revolution. That's why you have offshoots like Marxist-Leninism, Maoism, Trotskyism, Stalinism and the like, all offshoots required to explain why economies dominated by agrarian workers should skip the whole mercantilism/capitalism stage and go straight to Communism.

    My personal feeling is that Communism, like other Utopian socio-political and economic ideologies like the various strains of Anarchism and Libertarianism, are impossible to implement. Anyone attempting to will have to make so many compromises that the ideology itself becomes compromised.

    That's not to say Marxism doesn't have its uses. Certainly Marx's insistence on history being seen through the lens of economics was critical to the transition of that entire branch of academia from political narratives to a more comprehensive view of the functioning and interactions of historical societies and events. But as a socio-economic and political model, it's a flop. It can't be implemented without dictatorship, and as we've seen so many times, once the dictators gain the power to effect the Communist transformation, they are so corrupted by that power that they actively kill the revolution themselves.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  9. Re:Capitalism is doomed by phyruxus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's the other way around.

    --
    "A witty saying proves nothing." ~Voltaire
    "d'Oh!" ~Homer