Slashdot Mirror


Sorority Files Lawsuit After Sacred Secrets Posted On Penny Arcade Forums

Limekiller42 writes: Lawyers for the Phi Sigma Sigma sorority have filed suit in Seattle's King County Superior Court against an unidentified person for "publicizing the sorority's secret handshake, robe colors and other practices." The well-written article is by Levi Pulkkinen of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer and states that the sorority is seeking a restraining order and financial compensation for damages.

257 comments

  1. Those are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Those are not the secrets I would be interested in.

    1. Re:Those are... by monkeyzoo · · Score: 2

      Oh no! The secret handshake has been revealed?! Now how will they know who isn't really a member?

    2. Re:Those are... by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      Those are not the secrets I would be interested in.

      "Handshake" is a euphemism.

    3. Re:Those are... by Dog-Cow · · Score: 5, Funny

      The presence of a penis would probably be the first clue.

    4. Re:Those are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yes, but, you don't understand how afraid feminists are of post-op trans women.

      See the Michigan Womyn's Music Festival.

      captcha: switch

    5. Re:Those are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just because a dude chops off his dick doesn't make him a woman.

    6. Re:Those are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But he's not a man anymore

    7. Re:Those are... by TWX · · Score: 3, Funny

      Thank you mistress, may I have another?

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    8. Re:Those are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, perhaps not. Depends on your definition.
      But what he is, by definition, is a eunuch.

    9. Re: Those are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes. But he is still a man as well. A man with no penis. A rebel without a cock.

    10. Re:Those are... by Talderas · · Score: 0

      Can a dickless man with testicles be considered eunuch?

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    11. Re:Those are... by Cederic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Similarly, just because a woman has a cock doesn't make her a man.

      Luckily women born with cocks can now have surgery to bring their physical appearance into line with their gender. Isn't medicine marvellous.

    12. Re: Those are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      You failed biology in high school, didn't you? Hell, probably further back than that, this is basic stuff parents teach children at like 5.

      Penis = man
      Vagina = woman

      Not hard.

      You can't start calling four-sided figures "triangles" just because "that's what they identify as."

    13. Re:Those are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Let me just crack open the good ol' dictionary here.

      Oh, look, they both mean "the state of being male or female". Sex also has some additional meanings when used as a verb or as a noun to refer to said verb. But other than that, they're identical words.

    14. Re: Those are... by DedTV · · Score: 2

      Thankfully, I nor my parents went to school in Texas. So, in my Biology class we learned that genitalia and identity are both irrelevant and in humans:
      XY Chomosomes = Male
      XX Chomosomes = Female

    15. Re: Those are... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Oh, to live perpetually in a five year old's simplistic world.

      Meanwhile, back on planet earth, gender isn't binary and genitalia are only mostly indicative of gender.

      Failed biology in high school? Looks like you didn't even take it.

    16. Re: Those are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what planet you live on, but it certainly isn't Earth.

      I'm aware that there are weird edge cases where people have indistinct genitalia. That's medically interesting but not really worth discussing in the broader case of "people with distinct genitalia."

      You have a penis, you are a man. You have a vagina, you are a woman. That's "by axiom" if you will, the definition of the words. No matter how much you want to change it, you can't.

      Anyone else notice this "identify as" bullshit only started coming up after SJWs started heavily promoting the "men are evil" meme? It's almost like they're screwing with men's heads to the point where some men end up deciding that because they aren't evil incarnate they must "really" be a woman. Strangely you'll never see a women decide she's "really a man." Wonder why that might be?

    17. Re: Those are... by DedTV · · Score: 1

      XX/XY absolutely determines gender in normally developed humans. That genetic defects/mutations/abnormalities such as 46,XY can occur doesn't refute that.

      And "identity" isn't meaningless. It's merely subjective whereas chromosome identification is objective. As for which determines what someone IS, that too is subjective.

  2. Will they be suing by silentcoder · · Score: 4, Funny

    Pornhub for "secret practises" published there too ?

    --
    Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
  3. What the fuck is this shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously, who cares about a bunch of rich cunts and their little childish college games.

    Bunch of wankers, the lot of them. Immature, strutting nobends.

    1. Re:What the fuck is this shit? by Viol8 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes , but they're also the next generation of politicians and business "leaders".

    2. Re: What the fuck is this shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Tread softly, you might regret your snide comments when you or your kids are looking for work. An immature bitch with power is still worth more than a billion peons.

    3. Re:What the fuck is this shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I Came here to call them rich, vapid cunts, but you basically beat me to it.

    4. Re:What the fuck is this shit? by u38cg · · Score: 3, Funny

      Somebody's still bitter about not getting in, huh?

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    5. Re:What the fuck is this shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somebody's still bitter about not getting in, huh?

      If I wanted to suck another guy's dick I'd just go and do it, I don't particularly care about your homoerotic little power trips when it comes to initiating. Get a grip.

    6. Re:What the fuck is this shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rich *stupid* vapid cunts.

      Their sorority was founded in 1913.

      If I'm not mistaken, every piece of original Phi Sigma Sigma 'content' is now in the public domain.

      Oops.

    7. Re:What the fuck is this shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It happened on the forums for a very popular nerd-focused webcomic, so I would say it's at least relevant to many readers' interests.

    8. Re:What the fuck is this shit? by kamapuaa · · Score: 4, Funny

      Seriously. And none of them would even date a socially awkward Computer Science student. Vapid cunts. Well, they're all fat and ugly now, while I post on Slashdot and have a sweet Fedora collection.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    9. Re:What the fuck is this shit? by funwithBSD · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hats or DVDs?

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    10. Re:What the fuck is this shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hats or DVDs?

      Does it matter?

    11. Re:What the fuck is this shit? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Frankly, if I was king for a day, I would ban all sororities for campuses.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    12. Re:What the fuck is this shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Frankly, if I was king for a day, I would ban all sororities for campuses.

      Indeed. Move them where they belong--my basement.

    13. Re:What the fuck is this shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, AC, you must have been a master of "negging."

    14. Re: What the fuck is this shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless such content has never been published before. So yes, you are mistaken.

      PS: yeah, stupid cunts and all, agreed.

    15. Re:What the fuck is this shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pardon me old chap, but, might you be British?

      Pleasant weather today, isn't it? Just caught the sun for a moment!

    16. Re:What the fuck is this shit? by u38cg · · Score: 1

      Wrong country, but never mind. You seem awfully bent out of shape about it though.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    17. Re: What the fuck is this shit? by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      While the scope of publishing is to a small audience, distribution to their members may be considered publishing.

    18. Re: What the fuck is this shit? by Opportunist · · Score: 0

      Yet a simple little piece of metal, sufficiently accelerated, can cure that.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    19. Re:What the fuck is this shit? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Well, if that's the case, I don't see a reason not to take it down. It really doesn't add much to a conversation, and clearly causes a lot of pain. There's no good reason, other than being a dick, to leave it up.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    20. Re:What the fuck is this shit? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      nobends

      Is this a misspelling of knob-ends? If so, it's a singularly stupid term to use of a group of women, but then again you're obviously a misogynistic retard anyway.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    21. Re:What the fuck is this shit? by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

      Frankly, if I was king for a day, I would ban all sororities for campuses.

      They would just move off campus.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    22. Re:What the fuck is this shit? by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

      Because?

      --
      There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
  4. Sororities by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why do sororities even exist?
    They seem like an utterly retarded idea.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    1. Re:Sororities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      >This also explains why some people vote.
      Fixed that for ya.

    2. Re:Sororities by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 5, Informative

      They exist because most people need that feeling of belonging. Belonging to mankind doesn't seem to be enough. Belonging to a group is what people want.
      Now why there are silly things like handshakes and mandatory dress colors is beyond me.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    3. Re:Sororities by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why do sororities even exist?

      The tribal instinct remains strong. Human beings tend to feel more secure when they can form themselves into groups with whom they identify and that exclude those with whom they do not identify. The "secret rituals" are one of the key ways of reinforcing this feeling of being in a cohesive tribe, protected against intrusion from outside.

      Some fairly modern tribes, such as country clubs and gentlemen's clubs, are now legally constrained in their ability to exclude members they feel uncomfortable with. Criminal tribes, like the mafia and yakuza are typically particularly careful about the members they recruit, and have many rituals designed to inspire loyalty and the feeling of exclusivity.

      Regardless of type, the instinct we have to form ourselves into tribes remains, long after it outlasted its useful protective purpose in primitive societies.

    4. Re:Sororities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You mean it's where cowards herd together to make themselves feel better?

    5. Re:Sororities by LaurenCates · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'd argue that having a tribe is not necessarily a bad thing.

      I know that a good number of /. posters would disagree with this, but this is why I don't think religion is a terrible thing. If you have a group with which you identify, with which you share a common history and traditions and common points of view, it may not be useful anymore as a "protective" thing, but rather meets the simple need to be a part of something larger than oneself.

      I know this is purely anecdotal, but I don't have much of a family to speak of. Consequently, finding a church to belong to is somewhat comforting to me because I don't have that "tribal" feeling that comes from having a family. I imagine that it might be helpful to people in similar situations.

      This is ultimately why people, even with families, seek out "tribes" outside of their family, because of the need to "belong", not just show up and exist.

      --
      Some people don't believe in fairies. I don't believe in The Patriarchy.
    6. Re:Sororities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's the U.S and the us-and-them attitude and group-mentality is strong there, in a culture and society that has yet to grow up.

    7. Re:Sororities by rudy_wayne · · Score: 1, Troll

      I'd argue that having a tribe is not necessarily a bad thing.

      I know that a good number of /. posters would disagree with this, but this is why I don't think religion is a terrible thing. If you have a group with which you identify, with which you share a common history and traditions and common points of view, it may not be useful anymore as a "protective" thing, but rather meets the simple need to be a part of something larger than oneself.

      And then eventually your tribe starts demanding that all the other tribes adhere to your tribe's "beliefs". Immediately followed by attacking and killing all the members of those tribes if they don't accept your tribe's beliefs as being THE ONE TRUE BELIEF®.

      In the history of mankind, there has never been a "tribe" or religion which HASN'T done this. Which is why all religion is evil (in addition to promoting fear, ignorance and general stupidity).

    8. Re: Sororities by mattwarden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Basing your voting pattern by convincing yourself that everyone on the other side is stupid/bigoted/uneducated/crazy is as intellectually weak as you can be.

    9. Re:Sororities by argStyopa · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "...Some fairly modern tribes, such as country clubs and gentlemen's clubs, are now legally constrained in their ability to exclude members they feel uncomfortable with. ..."
      Unless, of course, they are formed by/for 'protected' classes of individuals - then discrimination is perfectly acceptable.

      "...long after it outlasted its useful protective purpose ..."
      Nah, I'd still say that there is a distinct value to tribalism, it's just that value is perceived to be less by the modern cultural imperative toward almost compulsive extroversion.

      --
      -Styopa
    10. Re:Sororities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They exist because most people need that feeling of belonging. Belonging to mankind doesn't seem to be enough. Belonging to a group that's better than the rest is what people want.
      Now why there are silly things like handshakes and mandatory dress colors is beyond me.

      ftfy. Everyone belongs to several groups by the time they finish high school and enter college. When they pick a sorority they get a chance to be better than everyone else (in their own heads) and rituals/secrets/hazing/infighting/etc are what put it over the top.

    11. Re:Sororities by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Why do sororities even exist?

      It's called the rent-a-friend program. Ditto frats.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:Sororities by gweihir · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What I do not get is how they keep dress colors secret. I mean you wear it and peoples can see the color. Maybe these are not "real" secrets, but just thing people pretend are secret?

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    13. Re:Sororities by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Good thing you dont see "us-and-them" tensions in places like China (Han vs minorities), Ukraine / Crimea, Sweden, the Middle East, or really anywhere else in the world.

      Oh wait, you do.

    14. Re:Sororities by gweihir · · Score: 0

      Excellent explanation!

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    15. Re:Sororities by mysidia · · Score: 5, Informative

      Now why there are silly things like handshakes and mandatory dress colors is beyond me.

      Sororities also attract people who want to create an air of an elitism a "clique", And people who want to create bureaucracy and control other people -- so they tend to form internal committees and have member ranks and have a bunch of jobs for "important people", make a bunch of arbitrary rules, and establish big fines for members who break rules or miss meetings.

      This also explains 'hazing' and elaborate initiation procedures.

    16. Re: Sororities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it was right the second time

    17. Re:Sororities by Hartree · · Score: 5, Funny

      "handshakes and mandatory dress colors "

      I know other groups that have hand signs and colors. They're called the Bloods and the Crips, among other names.

    18. Re:Sororities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's where people tribe together to make themselves feel better. It's not a sense of security, but a sense of being part of a group. For many people THE group is their family, for many it's their amateur sports team, for many it's their sports teams fan club, or other organization, formal of unformal, like a circle of friends. People are social animals with long tribal traditions. That has helped us survive. I'm sure there are other successfull survival strategies, and all the time mutations that don't have the tribe mentalism are born. Maybe they will outbreed the tribe people in modern society and world, maybe not. Seems like sorority girls have connections to make enough money to protect and take care of their offspring. That's evolution.

    19. Re:Sororities by Hartree · · Score: 2

      "You mean it's where cowards herd together to make themselves feel better?"

      So, you're saying Anonymous Cowards are members of sororities?

      There are so many levels of Freudian in that.

    20. Re:Sororities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sororities exist to inspire sorority hazing porn.

    21. Re:Sororities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tensions exists everywhere, but in some of the places you mentioned it isn't part of the culture to make the discussion as polarized as possible.

    22. Re:Sororities by LaurenCates · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, you're talking about the extremists, who get the most attention because they're the loudest.

      Look a little closer into most any given group (there are certainly notable exceptions) and you'll find a bunch of normal people with perfectly normal human wants and needs that assumes the group in general is good, and will do good, or at least not actively bad, things if given the freedom to do so.

      The same group of normal people, however, really only understand the concept of "normal", so when you present them with something like extremism, they tend to keep their heads down because they neither understand how to fight the irrationality of the extremism in the first place, nor the irrationality coming from the outside that tends to condemn the entire group and want to avoid getting stigmatized for the actions of a few bad actors, nor even endure the eye-rolling or different levels of shaming (up to and including abuse) that others do when they try to straighten out the matter and try to express their viewpoint on the situation, which may be perfectly rational and reasonable, but a lot of people will reject outright simply because of those same bad actors in the first place.

      Another anecdote: I'm also a vegetarian. I don't advocate for it. I don't tell people they should. In fact, I actively tell people not to if they don't really "want" to, but think they "have" to (that's the right way to give yourself an eating disorder).

      Still, I've had to endure a lot of defensiveness from people who think that once that detail comes out, I'm going to start spouting whatever propaganda that the loudest and most obnoxious vegetarians/vegans feel compelled to spout.

      Do those people make vegetarianism bad? Of fucking course not. Are those people the majority of vegetarians? Absolutely fucking not. Most of us will leave you alone, even when you turn up your nose at us. We wish you wouldn't assume the worst of us, but we know it's coming.

      This is why broad-brush generalizations suck. And yes, that includes religions.

      --
      Some people don't believe in fairies. I don't believe in The Patriarchy.
    23. Re:Sororities by HnT · · Score: 1

      Because girls have a right to be just as obnoxious, retarded, inebriated and dependent on peer pressure as "bros"...

      --
      "Only one thing is impossible for God: To find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." - Mark Twain
    24. Re: Sororities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even funnier from across the pond, "lawyers for a sorority".

    25. Re:Sororities by sycodon · · Score: 0, Troll

      The Greek System is for people who essentially have no self esteem and have to seek their self worth from a group of like minded losers.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    26. Re: Sororities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad somebody said it. There's a lot of that on here.

    27. Re:Sororities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that must be why all the best looking and most successful people are in frats and sororities--because they lack self-esteem.

    28. Re:Sororities by NotDrWho · · Score: 0

      No, it's called the "Having a place to go to party and meet hot women, hang out with a bunch of buddies who will back me up and help me out" program, as opposed to the cheaper but somewhat less fulfilling "Sit in my dorm room and jack off to Porntube all day" program.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    29. Re:Sororities by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      No, it's called the "Having a place to go to party and meet hot women, hang out with a bunch of buddies who will back me up and help me out" program,

      I think you mistyped jerk me around and jack me off, there.

      Only people who haven't had real adversity in their lives are brought together by bullshit frat initiation adversity.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    30. Re:Sororities by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

      Only people who haven't had real adversity in their lives

      So, pretty much every college kid in American then?

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    31. Re:Sororities by cHALiTO · · Score: 2

      No, it's called the "Having a place to go to party and meet hot women, hang out with a bunch of buddies who will back me up and help me out" program

      That's just having friends. You don't need secret handshakes, rules and especially don't need lawyers for that.

      --
      "Luck is my middle name," said Rincewind, indistinctly. "Mind you, my first name is Bad." -- Terry Pratchett
    32. Re:Sororities by edtice1559 · · Score: 2

      One of the reasons we feel so attached to these organizations is the hazing rituals. Once you've gone through that, you love something. Our parents generation went through quite a bit of abuse getting into various "tribes". Therefore, they have fond memories and pass on their enthusiasm somewhat to the next generation. Now that we've eliminated hazing, I imagine that participation will decline in a few generations.

    33. Re:Sororities by sycodon · · Score: 2

      I forgot to mention its members are also self deluded.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    34. Re: Sororities by cHALiTO · · Score: 1

      Being from the backyard, I only know these things from movies. I still don't get them. It looks like people that can't outgrow tree-house clubs or something.

      --
      "Luck is my middle name," said Rincewind, indistinctly. "Mind you, my first name is Bad." -- Terry Pratchett
    35. Re:Sororities by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      So, pretty much every college kid in American then?

      Only a minuscule minority of the kids who actually get to go to a university have seen adversity, so sure, I guess that's true. But "college kid" is misleading.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    36. Re:Sororities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a college student, the "sit in my dorm room" option is generally a good one. Most of the time I'm too busy to date because I am, theoretically, learning things.

    37. Re: Sororities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because like-minded people tend to band together, to interact with other people sharing the same traits. Beautiful, engaging people join fraternities and sororities, sports clubs and so on. It's a voluntary choice. Unattractive, annoying people join the local nerds' group of outcasts. For them (you) it's forced. You have no choice. You are shunned and rejected by everybody who is - or even looks up to being - socially adept. Fraternities and sororities are exclusive: they attract the top of the top. The nerdy bunch is the toilet, all the shit goes there.

    38. Re:Sororities by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      the crusades were fought because Muslim cultures had pushed Christians west out of areas they consider holy. Christians were just trying to get it back (plus they were there first by about 600 years). So, let's see what kind of shit you have to bring up about Christians now.

      In fairness, you prove the point. If I consider a 1972 Denver mint Quarter holy, it doesn't give me the right to attack anyone who doesn't kneel before it and chant "boola, boola, boola."

      It's land. Just land. Land over which insane people have been fighting for just about ever. You'll never stop either. Because for every injustice you claim your enemy can claim another. Then it becomes Turtles all the way down.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    39. Re:Sororities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      the crusades were fought because Muslim cultures had pushed Christians west out of areas they consider holy. Christians were just trying to get it back (plus they were there first by about 600 years). So, let's see what kind of shit you have to bring up about Christians now.

      In fairness, you prove the point. If I consider a 1972 Denver mint Quarter holy, it doesn't give me the right to attack anyone who doesn't kneel before it and chant "boola, boola, boola."

      It's land. Just land. Land over which insane people have been fighting for just about ever. You'll never stop either. Because for every injustice you claim your enemy can claim another. Then it becomes Turtles all the way down.

      Your own level of extremist rant regarding the allegedly small difference between forcing someone to worship a tiny circle of metal, and reclaiming land that was seized through force (which was an effort equal parts political, nationalist, and religious) proves why we can't have nice things. Any of us, especially the smug anti-religion assholes.

    40. Re:Sororities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to say "because it's fun" but the armchair sociologists, psychologists, and political scientists in this thread seem to have a better understanding of it all.

      .

    41. Re:Sororities by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your own level of extremist rant regarding the allegedly small difference between forcing someone to worship a tiny circle of metal, and reclaiming land that was seized through force (which was an effort equal parts political, nationalist, and religious) proves why we can't have nice things. Any of us, especially the smug anti-religion assholes.

      You still prove my point. I don't give a damn about the crusades, they were a long time ago. You still have a raging hard-on about them. You're just part of the never ending middle east conflict, on or the many who use the conflict as their identity, and take gleeful joy in continuing it forever and ever, world without end, amen.

      Now go forth, and smite those who would oppose your god, for he is omnipotent, and could do it himself, but he kind of gets a kick out of watching his greates creations kill and torture each other.

      Science flies us to the moon.

      Religion flies us into buildings.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    42. Re:Sororities by neurovish · · Score: 1

      Why do sororities even exist?
      They seem like an utterly retarded idea.

      Think of it like LARP for "normal" people.

    43. Re:Sororities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These tendencies are much stronger and prevalent in the U.S than other western countries, despite that your country on the whole is affluent and people there live in excess, again indicating that your culture and society are "behind."

    44. Re: Sororities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basing your voting pattern by convincing yourself that everyone on the other side is stupid/bigoted/uneducated/crazy is as intellectually weak as you can be.

      But everyone on the otherside* is stupid, bigoted, uneducated, and/or crazy.

      *Where the two sides are "politicians" and "not politicians".

    45. Re:Sororities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure if you've never heard of cloaks, ponchos, trenchcoats, and other such articles of clothing, or are just trying to be funny.

    46. Re: Sororities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sororities and frats are nothing alike. I teach. We work with the Greek councils (the general one and the black one) to correlate their membership with our grades, and we compare the frats and sororities to find out which are trouble, and we compare them to the general population.

      The result? Sorority girls have higher GPAs than average, with few exceptions. Frat members have below average GPA.

      Sororities are highly structured support groups and in some ways are closer to a military unit in how they regulate members' time. There is mandatory study hall (yes, we know about your file cabinets where you keep copies of our old tests) and there are both mandatory academic performance requirements and a strong social push to excel. Frats, on the other hand, seem to have little more than beer and excessive free time.

      Having taught for a while and read the reports, I would put my daughter in a sorority, but I would never let my son join a fraternity.

    47. Re:Sororities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. That's pretty impressive since it goes precisely against the robust data in the archeological record. Where the fuck do people like you get these weird ideas? From cereal boxes? Glen Beck?

    48. Re:Sororities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's an unfair comparison the upstanding retarded community.

    49. Re: Sororities by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

      The problem is in most cases, they are right. It doesn't matter which side they are on ;)

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    50. Re:Sororities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Replace the word sorority with cult and you will understand.

    51. Re:Sororities by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

      Belonging to a group is easier simply because individual liberty is too hard. Group Politics is much easier.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    52. Re:Sororities by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Ah, Stockholm syndrome.

    53. Re:Sororities by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      The Crusades were fought so that Western European princes could get their hands on the most important trade hub on the planet.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    54. Re:Sororities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know that a good number of /. posters would disagree with this, but this is why I don't think religion is a terrible thing.

      You know who else blamed religious tribalism for social problems? Hitler.

    55. Re: Sororities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've convinced myself that everyone on both sides are stupid/bigoted/uneducated/crazy. Now I base my voting pattern on a dice roll.

    56. Re: Sororities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here are the GPA numbers from the University of Florida: https://www.studentinvolvement.ufl.edu/Portals/1/Sorority%20and%20Fraternity%20Affairs/Grade%20Reports/Fall%202013%20Academic%20Report%20by%20Council%20PUBLIC%20VERSION.pdf

      The fun numbers are at the end:

      Women: 3.36
      Sorority: 3.41

      Men: 3.20
      Fraternity: 3.18

      University average: 3.29

      By being male, you lose 0.9 GPA, and by joining a frat, another 0.2, for a total of 0.11 loss.
      By being female, you gain 0.7 GPA, and by joining a sorority, you gain 0.5 more, for a 0.12 gain overall.
      Note that the effect of joining a sorority is greater than that of joining a fraternity.

      Interestingly, the fraternity with the highest GPA just got suspended for spitting on wounded veterans and trying to urinate on the flag at the beach. Interpret that as you will.

    57. Re:Sororities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like this article about how most racism is actually more tribalism. Interesting idea. https://bradrtorgersen.wordpress.com/2015/04/14/tribalism-is-as-tribalism-does/

    58. Re:Sororities by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      More related to Cognitive Dissonance Theory ( http://www.psychwiki.com/wiki/... )

    59. Re:Sororities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but it's not just extremists. Well, the killing part I'll give you, but not pushing their beliefs on others. What you're describing isn't religion. "Trying to be good" isn't a religion. Core tenets of practically every religion are that it's the only correct one, everything in it is true and immutable and it is your duty to spread that religion to everyone, even if they don't want to hear it. Period. If you don't believe or do this then you are not following that religion.

      Now, what you're really getting at is that most people (seems like yourself included) that belong to a specific religion don't TRULY believe in it. They pretend to and my even convince themselves they do by leaving out and ignoring all the parts they don't like or want, but that's not how religions work. Like you said before, they just want to belong to a social club and religions are by far the most abundant. I don't necessarily have a problem with their need to belong, I just wish people would realize they don't need to use myths as an excuse to get together.

    60. Re: Sororities by silentcoder · · Score: 2

      Reading "some people" and responding as if I had said "everybody" is a flagrant strawman. I'm sure there are some people with sensible reasons for voting republican. David Koch for example votes republican for the perfectly sensible reason that it saves him personally from paying taxes.
      Using a flagrant and blatantly obvious strawman because you can't take a mild tease about a group you identify with... now THAT is truly intellectually weak.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    61. Re:Sororities by Cederic · · Score: 1

      You're doing it entirely completely and utterly wrong.

      I've posted this on here before: Lectures are where you go to catch up on sleep. If you go at all.

      Go to university for an education, not to be taught.

    62. Re:Sororities by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I once got shit from my (American) manager for criticising Kevin Costner's performance in a film. Apparently they'd both been in the same greek frat.

      As you say, losers.

    63. Re:Sororities by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Because simple human minds love being part of a group. And especially having others who they can exclude from it, so they can feel superior. Even if their accomplishment for belonging to this group is close to or identical to zero.

      For reference, see any xenophobic rhetoric.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    64. Re:Sororities by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Arguing whether or not tribes are a good thing is like arguing whether or not aerobic respiration is a good thing. Good or bad, humans have a biological imperative to form exclusive social networks and are going to do so.

    65. Re:Sororities by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

      In fairness, the crusades were fought because Muslim cultures had pushed Christians west out of areas they consider holy.

      There was 400 years between Islam taking over the eastern roman emprie and the start of the crusades. To suggest a causal relationship would be live France deciding to nuke the UK tomorrow and claiming it was justified retaliation for the Hundred Years War.

    66. Re:Sororities by Immerman · · Score: 2

      I don't know - especially in the bigger-name schools a lot of those club members are probably on the way to becoming wealthy, well-connected individuals. Networking with (and among) those sorts tends to be... profitable.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    67. Re:Sororities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, hazing and initiation can serve a useful purpose in terms of group cohesion; for instance, they can generate a stronger sense of loyalty due to certain well documented psychological effects.

      The gist of it is that people subconsciously assume that something must be worth more if they had to go through more pain to get it. So making people jump through hoops not only helps demonstrate their loyalty to the group, but also increases the amount of loyalty they actually feel.

      Not that any of that justifies hazing, of course, but it does go a long way to explaining why it's such a seemingly inevitable attribute of many types of self-selecting groups, with or without controlling busybodies at the top.

    68. Re: Sororities by Cutting_Crew · · Score: 1

      Yeah but you don't have to form Frats or Sororities to interact and bond with people sharing the same traits. You can do that using other means without taking up University space to build the big and lavish frat/sorority houses to accommodate only those types of people.

    69. Re:Sororities by LaurenCates · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I'd call it a biological imperative. Only because I'm not sure what you mean by "biological", or for that matter "imperative".

      "Compulsion" work better here.

      --
      Some people don't believe in fairies. I don't believe in The Patriarchy.
    70. Re:Sororities by cusco · · Score: 1

      Alexandria? Or Constantinople? Jerusalem was a tourist destination, Silk Road trade passed through Constantinople, spice trade through Alexandria. Of course that's only important if you consider Europe anything more than the backwards barely-civilized backwater that it was at the time. Europe was so unimportant that it didn't even hear about the opening of the Forbidden City for 21 years, while ambassadors were sent from kingdoms all over Africa and Asia bringing gold, jewels, elephants and giraffes as gifts.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    71. Re:Sororities by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      It's land. Just land. Land over which insane people have been fighting for just about ever.

      So if all the people who have ever owned the land under your house came back and demanded it from you, or they'd kill you, would it make you insane to say "but it's mine now"? Would it make them insane? What about if the people with claims have claims dating back before the country who grants you exclusive use of the land existed?

    72. Re:Sororities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Belonging to a group is one thing.

      Having that group then tell its members that the wine and cracker they are receiving is actually the blood and body of their savior is on another level.

      Having another group tell its members that their prophet can't be drawn on pain of death is on a completely different (and much worse) level.

      Just because it's a group, and you want to belong, doesn't mean you get to act like complete shits to people who don't belong to your group, and doesn't give the group the right to tell it's membership patently false things. Lying is always wrong, regardless.

      Personally, I'll stick to groups that are safe and harmless. My minecraft server is doing nicely, although I'm sure the creeper union is bitterly upset at all the rampant killing of its membership. But then again, they are just creepers.

    73. Re:Sororities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      30% of muslims who believe chopping off the hand of a thief is a just punishment does not represent a 1% extremist view.

    74. Re:Sororities by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Compulsion like people have a compulsion to breathe.

    75. Re:Sororities by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      The robes, which are probably only used within the sorority house during rituals.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    76. Re:Sororities by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      So if all the people who have ever owned the land under your house came back and demanded it from you, or they'd kill you, would it make you insane to say "but it's mine now"? Would it make them insane? What about if the people with claims have claims dating back before the country who grants you exclusive use of the land existed?

      What are you arguing about? The people in the middle east claim ownership of land they havent actually owned fo ra long time. That's part of why they are insane.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    77. Re: Sororities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or it could just be that sororities only let in the smart people so their average is higher, while frats will let in anyone so it drops it.

    78. Re:Sororities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are sorority functions where only members are allowed in. An initiation, for example, will show the new girls the secret handshake, hand signs, secret knocks, secret passwords, and other lame shit. The current members may also be wearing robes in certain colors. You're not supposed to tell people all the secret stuff because its secret. Why? I don't know. I doubt someone would be able to sneak into any meetings as everyone knows everyone. People like belonging to exclusive societies. Frats/sororities/secret societies all cover this genre. It can be fun and you get to become part of a group of people that pick you to join them among a rushing class because they like you. It's an easy way to network while at college other than talking to people in your classes. Some could argue that you are paying for friends but the dues really just go to the activities that the frats/sororities plan and to pay for the house. It really shouldn't be taken too serious and these people at phi sigma sigma are taking it serious.

      Source: both my sisters are in a sorority.

    79. Re:Sororities by Nethead · · Score: 1

      That's why I lease my land directly from the Native Americans. In 15 years they'll get it back.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    80. Re:Sororities by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      They owned it until they were invaded. And it changed hands many times before that, and the current owners claim ownership because of claims even older than the current objectors.

      It seems to be equally insane to pick fights with insane people.

    81. Re:Sororities by mysidia · · Score: 1

      for instance, they can generate a stronger sense of loyalty due to certain well documented psychological effects.

      Nice job coming up with a seemingly rational reasoning for initiation rites, which I have no doubt has little to do with why many groups actually do it.

      Because it's "fun" for existing members and becomes a "game"; makes them feel more important, and helps establish dominance over junior members.

      Also, if they stay within reasonable restraints and keep their antics civil and not involving risky daredevil stunts or public humiliation, it can be relatively harmless.

      That's all fine and dandy..... but the courts should not take these groups seriously, or allow them to sue someone for "violating the sanctity" of their group's secrets

    82. Re: Sororities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WOW!! It is amazing how poor your math skills are!

      0.9 + 0.2 = 0.11 ????!!
      0.7 + 0.5 = 0.12 ????!!

      Let me guess. You joined a fraternity.

      .

    83. Re:Sororities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh, the crusades happened partly because french monks wanted to both stop the nobles from beating each other up and ruining everyone's Good Time (had been going on for a couple hundred years at that point and they were tired of it), and so they could get some land and power for themselves.

      Damn Frenchies.

    84. Re:Sororities by Dripdry · · Score: 1

      I once saw a bumper sticker that said,"Nuke the Middle East and bring the boy home!"

      That was in ~1994

      --
      -
    85. Re:Sororities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They exist because most people need that feeling of belonging. Belonging to mankind doesn't seem to be enough. Belonging to a group is what people want.

      But why would I want to belong to a group of assholes?

    86. Re: Sororities by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      You got pretty defensive there. Perhaps you realized I had a good point. Do yourself a favor and read some of the many great conservative and libertarian authors and philosophers. You will either realize your error or have a much more sound understanding of why you disagree with them.

    87. Re: Sororities by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      I didn't get defensive at all. I pointed out your fallacy. I don't feel the need to defend things I didn't say.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
  5. I hope the case is laughed out of court by DrXym · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is no "damage" here aside from learning that this secret society is as ludicrous as all the rest. A fact that most people would know already.

    1. Re:I hope the case is laughed out of court by gweihir · · Score: 1

      True. But most state secrets and most military secrets are secrets because they are so stupid that it would be terribly embarrassing if they became public knowledge. (We screwed up badly? Classify it!) The same principle seems to apply here.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  6. Not sure there's a case by Overzeetop · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wouldn't these be considered trade secrets and under the responsibility of the sorority to guard against disclosure? If the physical pieces are not trademarked, nor the written contents or acts copyrighted as a performance. Note that a quick Google shows they were founded in 1913, which would make all of their original text public domain.

    (Oh, and Streisand Effect, of course)

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Not sure there's a case by PAjamian · · Score: 1

      I think there would only be a case if someone signed a legally binding non-disclosure agreement prior to sharing the secrets that got published and then only against the person who signed the agreement (whether that be the publisher or someone else who leaked them). If no such agreement was signed then I don't think there's any recourse possible. Of course IANAL and this is just speculation.

      --
      Windows is a bonfire, Linux is the sun. Linux only looks smaller if you lack perspective.
    2. Re:Not sure there's a case by PAjamian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Note that according to TFA this seems to be exactly what they are claiming, that some "unidentified former member" "broke a contract". The referenced contract would likely be a NDA. The person being sued is this "unidentified former member".

      --
      Windows is a bonfire, Linux is the sun. Linux only looks smaller if you lack perspective.
    3. Re:Not sure there's a case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't these be considered trade secrets and under the responsibility of the sorority to guard against disclosure?

      Not every secret is a trade secret. In order for a secret to be considered a trade secret, it must pertain to method or device involved in trade. The only things these girls are trading are STDs.

    4. Re:Not sure there's a case by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, but is this a legally binding NDA ... or is it some sorority mumbo-jumbo which amounts to "I swear on the holy training bra, as a testament to the paddling of the swollen ass, that I am beholden to the sorority, ack ack a-dack".

      Maybe, just maybe, the oaths and rituals which take place in sororities and fraternities doesn't meed the legal threshold of a binding NDA?

      I'm sorry, but people are talking about trademarking secret handshakes, which sounds idiotic to someone who only ever saw the fraternity system in bad movies.

      So, just keep hearing Patrick Stewart saying "And now, the paddling of the swollen ass", and ask yourself ... does this crap merit legal protection?

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    5. Re:Not sure there's a case by gnasher719 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Wouldn't these be considered trade secrets and under the responsibility of the sorority to guard against disclosure?

      They are not trade secrets, because they are not involved in trade. It is a trade secret if you keep it secret, and the fact that you know it and others don't gives you an advantage in trade. For example, if you knew how to make nice burgers for 10 cent less than your competitor, that would give you an advantage as long as your competitor doesn't know about. it.

      But otherwise, just because you want to keep it secret doesn't mean it has legal protection.

    6. Re:Not sure there's a case by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      Given the sorority was founded in 1913, it is perfectly possible that a member wrote this information down decades ago and this has then passed down to someone who is not bound by any NDA and person who wrote it down is now dead. Good luck suing a dead person.

      It would also be tricky a member wrote this information down and then had it stolen from them, and the thief then published the information.

    7. Re:Not sure there's a case by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't these be considered trade secrets and under the responsibility of the sorority to guard against disclosure?

      It's only a trade secret if used to conduct a business. To have a case for an infringement of a trade secret, the plaintiff needs to be able to show damage with financial impact was done by the disclosure.

      Seems like there's a good chance the sorority lacks standing to sue on disclosure of such trivialities which are probably only secret for sentimental reasons.

    8. Re:Not sure there's a case by Andy_R · · Score: 1

      The letter to PA was sent on behalf of "Phi Sigma Sigma, Inc.", and there has to be some mechanism in place to pay for all those blue and gold* robes so they probably do count as a business.

      * Just a wild guess based on those being their official colours according to Wikipedia, the colours of their logo, and the colours of practically everything on their website... wouldn't it be funny if those really were the colours they claim are "secret"!

      --
      A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
    9. Re:Not sure there's a case by cHALiTO · · Score: 4, Funny

      Gee, I really hope these girls are not law students :P

      --
      "Luck is my middle name," said Rincewind, indistinctly. "Mind you, my first name is Bad." -- Terry Pratchett
    10. Re:Not sure there's a case by nietsch · · Score: 1

      Are you suggesting that apart from being sexually promiscuous and practicing unsafe sax, they also engage in homo/bisexual relations? If not and certain boys are the/a tool of their trade, then some of their secrets might be eligible for trade secret protection.

      --
      This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
    11. Re:Not sure there's a case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and pretty much every photo in google images, along with the pyramid shape.

    12. Re:Not sure there's a case by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The only things these girls are trading are STDs.

      Not with you though, eh?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  7. No copyright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The information was never put into a tangible form so there is no copyright, so I don't buy the intellectual property infringement. I guess it could be a trade secret, but it's up to organization to protect that information. However, it's not much of a secret if a few thousands of people know it. No theft here. The only case they might have is breach of contract.

  8. You can sue for anything by Crashmarik · · Score: 1, Informative

    Getting a judgment is another matter entirely.

    Of course with the right lawyer and the right jury

    http://articles.latimes.com/19...

    You can get a million dollar award for a MRI destroying your psychic abilities.

    1. Re:You can sue for anything by kenai_alpenglow · · Score: 1

      In the judge's defense, he did tell the jury to ignore the psychic claims and consider the allergic reaction to the dye. Then again, $1M is a little much for some nausea...

    2. Re:You can sue for anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Getting a judgment is another matter entirely.

      Of course with the right lawyer and the right jury

      http://articles.latimes.com/19...

      You can get a million dollar award for a MRI destroying your psychic abilities.

      "Haimes, 42, contended an allergic reaction to a dye injected during the exam gave her severe, recurring headaches that forced her to give up her practice in New Castle, Del., two months later."

      You are disingenuous.

    3. Re:You can sue for anything by PAjamian · · Score: 1

      Note that according to TFA this seems to be exactly what they are claiming, that some "unidentified former member" "broke a contract". The referenced contract would likely be a NDA. The person being sued is this "unidentified former member".

      --
      Windows is a bonfire, Linux is the sun. Linux only looks smaller if you lack perspective.
    4. Re:You can sue for anything by PAjamian · · Score: 1

      oops, posted to the wrong thread.

      --
      Windows is a bonfire, Linux is the sun. Linux only looks smaller if you lack perspective.
    5. Re:You can sue for anything by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      Getting a judgment is another matter entirely.

      Of course with the right lawyer and the right jury

      http://articles.latimes.com/19...

      You can get a million dollar award for a MRI destroying your psychic abilities.

      "Haimes, 42, contended an allergic reaction to a dye injected during the exam gave her severe, recurring headaches that forced her to give up her practice in New Castle, Del., two months later."

      You are disingenuous.

      Not so much

      http://articles.latimes.com/19...

      Or at least the appeals court agreed with me.

    6. Re:You can sue for anything by stephanruby · · Score: 2, Informative

      Getting a judgment is another matter entirely.
      Of course with the right lawyer and the right jury
        http://articles.latimes.com/19...
      You can get a million dollar award for a MRI destroying your psychic abilities.

      Come on. This misinformation is 30 years old already. Why can't we let it die already?

      Contrary to popular belief, Haimes never claimed that a CAT scan had caused her to lose her psychic powers. In fact, the often alluded-to CAT scan never took place. Haimes only claimed that the headaches resulting from her allergic reaction prevented her from earning a living as a psychic.

      Citation: Galanter, Marc (1998). An Oil Strike in Hell: Contemporary Legends About the Civil Justice System. Arizona Law Review, (40 Ariz. L. Rev. 717).

    7. Re:You can sue for anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If she was psychic why didn't she just predict that having the scan would cause her headaches and not have it.

    8. Re:You can sue for anything by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      Well then she needs to sue the La Times for libel

      http://articles.latimes.com/19...

      http://articles.latimes.com/19...

      http://articles.latimes.com/19...

      Seeing as they reported that as the case in the initial filing, the initial verdict, and the appeal.

      "Katz (the appeals judge) found that the jury, which made the award after less than an hour of deliberation, had disregarded his instructions on the law".

      Or it could be you are wrong ?

    9. Re:You can sue for anything by Crashmarik · · Score: 3, Funny

      If she was psychic why didn't she just predict that having the scan would cause her headaches and not have it.

      What am I ? A mind reader ?

    10. Re:You can sue for anything by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      Getting a judgment is another matter entirely.

      Of course with the right lawyer and the right jury

      http://articles.latimes.com/19...

      You can get a million dollar award for a MRI destroying your psychic abilities.

      "Haimes, 42, contended an allergic reaction to a dye injected during the exam gave her severe, recurring headaches that forced her to give up her practice in New Castle, Del., two months later."

      You are disingenuous.

      And you're an idiot - from her statement:

      "She contended that a diagnostic CAT scan she had undergone 10 years ago left her with chronic and disabling headaches when she sought to look into either the past or the future, preventing her from continuing practice as a psychic..."

      That's pretty much in keeping with "destroyed her psychic powers"; if she cannot do it anymore[1] it's gone, hence destroyed. "sought to look" doesn't mean that she succeeded in spite of the headache, it just means she attempted. She does not say if she was successful.

      [1] Not that she ever could.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    11. Re:You can sue for anything by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Well, I know I'd believe a highly reputable source like the LA Times over schlock like the Arizona Law Review any day.

    12. Re:You can sue for anything by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Thank you. You've just helped further prove my point. That extremely large monetary awards given by juries often get overridden on appeal, or never even get paid in the first place, which makes many of the myths we hear about extremely large judgements very misleading.

      Well then she needs to sue the La Times for libel

      Who cares? She didn't even work in LA or California. Plus, her income was already gone (or so she claimed). So it's not like she could prove any further losses as a result of the particular spin of the story.

      "Katz (the appeals judge) found that the jury, which made the award after less than an hour of deliberation, had disregarded his instructions on the law".

      And yes, that part is probably right anyway. Whether they believed she was a psychic, or not, is besides the point. The emotions of the jury probably got the better of them. If you ever had a severe allergic reaction yourself, or if you ever witnessed one in someone else, you should know how serious and painful such a reaction can be.

    13. Re:You can sue for anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She predicted the million-dollar jury award.

    14. Re:You can sue for anything by Holi · · Score: 1

      I am sure this had more to do with the settlement then any psychic powers.

      "an allergic reaction to a dye injected during the exam gave her severe, recurring headaches"

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    15. Re:You can sue for anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same reason why mathematicians still use calculators.

    16. Re:You can sue for anything by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      Thank you. You've just helped further prove my point. That extremely large monetary awards given by juries often get overridden on appeal, or never even get paid in the first place, which makes many of the myths we hear about extremely large judgements very misleading.

      Myths ? The defendants have to defend against these ridiculous torts, The awards are enough that there is no discouragement to the lawyers that view them as lottery tickets. The overall expense and damage to the economy is greatly magnified as avoiding law suits becomes a priority.

    17. Re:You can sue for anything by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Because they're fucking hacks?

    18. Re:You can sue for anything by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I can seek to look into the past or future myself. I don't even get headaches from it. Of course, my visions aren't real accurate, but I doubt hers were either.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  9. The real reason they're bringing suit is... by TrentTheThief · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... they're ashamed and angered by everyone knowing that they made up a secret club and have secret meetings that any pack of 4th graders would be proud of. Seriously, ladies, now that the world knows, don't you feel kind of childish? Greeks: Providing a safety cuddle blanket for insecure high school grads for over two centuries

    1. Re:The real reason they're bringing suit is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't sue when The Simpsons revealed the secret of my No Homers club.

    2. Re:The real reason they're bringing suit is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if they are made to look like they're taking silly stuff seriously, won't that cause people not to join and so result in financial loss for the organization?
      This demonstrates why the doctrine of corporate personhood is as silly as that sorority.

    3. Re:The real reason they're bringing suit is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was in a local fraternity in my university days. It was basically an organized drinking group that pooled money to throw fun parties, get drunk, go camping, go to the beach, etc. The only national organizations allowed at my school were academic.

      Not all Greek organizations are alike, just as not all Slashdot commentators are neckbearded basement dwellers.

  10. Americans love by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    taking themselves way too serious like this. And college kids are the worst.

  11. Already reveled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought this was already reveled in the movie "Where the boys aren"t 3"

    1. Re:Already reveled by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I thought this was already reveled in the movie "Where the boys aren"t 3"

      I've always thought that series went downhill after number 17, although 28 was pretty good..

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  12. Guesses by will_die · · Score: 1

    I'll guess that their colors are pink and black.
    Also isn't it a sexist to claim that some female released the information that was posted?

    1. Re:Guesses by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Also isn't it a sexist to claim that some female released the information that was posted? Reply to This

      It's a Sorority, so they would not have any male members allowed to know the information. Such is the way with these organizations.

    2. Re:Guesses by will_die · · Score: 0

      Tell that to bruce jenner and the sorority he lives in.

    3. Re:Guesses by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Tell that to bruce jenner and the sorority he lives in.

      The existence of a few possible theoretical exceptions do not warrant changing the default assumptions.

      We also assumed that the sorority members would be humans and not robots, or invaders from the planet Omicron Persei 8.

  13. I'll save you 30 seconds of Googling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Phi Sigma Sigma secrets are:

    Phi Sigma Sigma (PSS) secretly stands for Philanthropic Social Society. However, this is never written down or recorded (until now) because it is so "sacred". The Handshake consists of a series of motions. Member A first begins with the pointer finger and the thumb surrounding Member B's pointer finger and thumb. This is the "Phi". Then Member A wraps the remaining fingers, middle, ring and pinky around the hand as a symbol of the "Sigma". Depending on who is the senior member, the pinky finger is wrapped around the older member's hand. Next is the hand knock. It goes Knock. Pause. Knock. Pause. Knock, knock, knock. The meetings are set up usually with the President, VP and other officers sitting at the front. The President wears a yellow or gold robe and the officers wear royal blue robes. The remaining members sit across from the officers in a pyramid formation with the base closest to the officers and the apex farthest from the officers. Members are seated by class order, then by alphabetical order. The table at which the President and Vice President are seated consists of candles on each side. Two gold candles and one blue at each corner of the table. Members usually recite an oath, "We, the members of Phi Sigma Sigma, promise to keep secret and sacred all of our proceedings." The way to enter the pyramid is by using the hand knock to notify the members you are wanting to enter the room. The President will respond back with her gavel by repeating the knock. The person will enter then travel to the apex of the pyramid formation. The President will say the secret and sacred words "Remove the Veil" and then the member will respond back with the Chapter's name, example, "Zeta Eta." The Gold and King Blue symbolize "Perpetuity" and "Sincerity". At initiation, blue "veils" (tulle from the local fabric store) are placed on the heads of the potential new members and are later removed to symbolize some sort of occult transformation and that they are full-fledged members.

    1. Re:I'll save you 30 seconds of Googling by j-beda · · Score: 2

      Phi Sigma Sigma secrets are:

      Phi Sigma Sigma (PSS) secretly stands for Philanthropic Social Society. However, this is never written down or recorded (until now) because it is so "sacred". The Handshake consists of a series of motions. Member A first begins ....

      Assuming that you can find the poster, and that the poster is in fact a PSS member who might possibly have some sort of obligation to keep the secrets, how would the complainants ever hope to establish that these were the actual secrets if they have never been documented? Wouldn't they need to have testomony from the people who shared the rituals with "Jane Doe", and wouldn't that testomony have to go into the public record during the trial?

      I suppose the judge might order the trail records sealed like is sometimes done when a vunerable minor dis involved with the courts, but it doesn't seem likely the courts would care much about such things in this type of case. Is there a "Greek Friendly" court in Washington somewhere like the "patent friendly" on in Texas?

      John Oliver bit on patents: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    2. Re:I'll save you 30 seconds of Googling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit. It's as lame as the stupid Masonic (for men) or Order of the Eastern Star (for women) rituals. As soon as they mentioned 'pyramids' I knew the rest would be as bad as the first. It's 2015. Can't they issue ID badges?

    3. Re:I'll save you 30 seconds of Googling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what we need. A high tech fraternity with biometrics, and hacking, and uh, linux.

    4. Re:I'll save you 30 seconds of Googling by Alsee · · Score: 0

      The parent post is a hoax.

      Their secret handshake is actually "the shocker", and their robe colors are "saran wrap".

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    5. Re:I'll save you 30 seconds of Googling by mr.dreadful · · Score: 2

      Now if we can just add in some "going clear" and alien-worship, we're all set!

    6. Re:I'll save you 30 seconds of Googling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      **eyeroll**

    7. Re:I'll save you 30 seconds of Googling by nietsch · · Score: 1

      I think you meant sorority?

      --
      This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
    8. Re:I'll save you 30 seconds of Googling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how would the complainants ever hope to establish that these were the actual secrets if they have never been documented?

      While I cannot speak for PSS, my own fraternity does have a single book with our secrets written down, hidden and behind lock and key at or near our headquarters.

      I don't know that this would be enough to prove that they are the intended secrets in a court of law, but they are documented. There's also collective oral tradition (which is how they are shared, since they can't be written), and if a member of every chapter (with confirmation that they're an active member) would sign something saying that these are the secrets, that might be enough.

  14. PA Not Even in Suit by neorush · · Score: 0

    I RTFA and PA is not even being sued here. The sorority is suing "Jane Doe", since they don't even know who posted the comments....for craps sake, I might take Slashdot out of my feed soon.

    --
    neorush
    1. Re:PA Not Even in Suit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly you're not a member of the Sigma Sigma Chi (Secret Slashdot Club) since we are required by sacred oath never to remove Slashdot from our news feed. You also don't seem to understand the sacred importance of Not Reading the F'ing Article.

    2. Re:PA Not Even in Suit by AntronArgaiv · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If they had been smart, they would have revealed slightly different secrets to each new member. Then, when the inevitable disclosure occurs, they can check their records and trace the leaker.

      But I've already said too much...

    3. Re:PA Not Even in Suit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That goatse redirect didn't fool me. I had to pretend to be fooled into clicking that link as part of the initiation. Yeah, that's it!

    4. Re:PA Not Even in Suit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Penny Arcade is in the suit for sure. They aren't a defendant but they are going to get dragged into this, because only they know the few things that might identify Jane Doe.

    5. Re:PA Not Even in Suit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the sight of confused college chicks banging their fingers together in the hallway wouldn't ever attract attention.....

  15. dmca by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pretty hard to show damage, and I fail to see what exactly is the copyright able item.

  16. Look at the bright side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least these dimwits didn't invoke the DMCA.

    My god if I had a penny for every time the DMCA has been used to bully someone in a lawsuit and been pulled out of context, I would have my own space program being run out of my back yard.

    seriously who is with me on this? If I were a judge and some business didn't upgrade their security and got hacked and then tried to use the DMCA to paint someone as being a "Terrorist" with the DMCA, I would tell them this. " That is not the purpose of the law, that is not what the law was invented to do, and the loop hole you are looking for does not exist in the legal system. If you don't like it, I suggest you speak with your legislature to pass the law that actually applies to what you are trying to use the DMCA to do, otherwise you are wasting the courts time to cover up for you not doing your own due diligence to protect your business and your business model and that is not the responsibility of the courts. Come back when a law applies to your situation. Bye!

    1. Re:Look at the bright side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They did back in 2012 when they tried to have Penny Arcade take down the posting: http://www.penny-arcade.com/news/post/2012/11/19/phi-sigma-sigma

    2. Re:Look at the bright side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My god if I had a penny for every time the DMCA has been used to bully someone in a lawsuit and been pulled out of context, I would have my own space program being run out of my back yard.

      And then have to fight the HOA over it.

    3. Re:Look at the bright side by PincushionMan · · Score: 2

      Actually, they did invoke the DCMA and serve PA with a takedown notice, since they claim it deals with 'trade secrets'.

    4. Re:Look at the bright side by Holi · · Score: 1

      They would be hard pressed to show financial harm, which is a requirement for them to invoke trade secrets. Since neither the secret handshake nor the robe colors provide any financial benefit from them being unknown I can't see this suit actually making it to a court room.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    5. Re:Look at the bright side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A DMCA takedown notice can only be applied to copyright, not trade secrets.

  17. That's lame... by demon+driver · · Score: 1

    Some other secret societies wouldn't have _sued_ such a person... Then again, a more decisive action would have probably not gone too well with 'philantropic' and 'social'...

  18. Theaters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Groups of people coming together to perform a play form a particularly close "tribe" - it's like having a group of people who are even closer than family, for a few weeks at a time. But they don't go around attacking and killing other actors, or even non-actors. It's much more likely that the non-actors will withdraw from the actors than that the actors will go on a killing spree against the people in the rival theater company...

    1. Re: Theaters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe that's because there are not many Muslim theatre troupes?

  19. How would you pronounce Phi Sigma Sigma? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Piss?

  20. DMCA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How in the world can they claim violation of the DMCA? Did he rip a DVD of the secret handshake?
    The judge should throw these lawyers out of his courtroom and disbar them.

  21. DMCA? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the complaint they say it is a violation of the DMCA. Disbar these lawyers

  22. But it might actually cripple a magnetic sense. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Come on. This misinformation is 30 years old already. Why can't we let it die already?

    Contrary to popular belief, Haimes never claimed that a CAT scan had caused her to lose her psychic powers. In fact, the often alluded-to CAT scan never took place. Haimes only claimed that the headaches resulting from her allergic reaction prevented her from earning a living as a psychic.

    On the other hand, I could see an MRI actually destroying a hypothetical human magnetic navigation sense.

      - A number of animals, including birds, are documented to have a magnetic sense they use in navigation.
      - Bacteria are known to migrate vertically using the earth's field to align them as "dipping needles" so their cilia drive them downward to lower-oxygen water.
      - The bacteria obtain their magnetic alignment by depositing crystals of magnetitie of a size that will hold no more than a single magnetic domain, and thus be automatically magetized. New crystals are deposited next to old, making them align in the same direction. The row of crystals is a strong enough magnet to align the bug like a compass needle. The row is normally split when the bug reproduces, so the two new bugs are both magnetized the same way, rather than one getting a 50/50 chance of swimming the wrong way. (No doubt the occasional offspring gets none and has to take the chance - which let the species survive magnetic reversal events.)
      -Some nerve cells in a number of animals contain such magnetite particles, leading to the speculation that these may be the basis for a magnetic sense.
      - Among such nerve types is on in the human nose, leading to the speculation that some humans may be able to "smell" magnetic fields (or have some magnetic sense in some OTHER group of neurons that ALSO produces the particles and that those in the nose are vestigial mis-triggering of the mechanism, or that an organism in their ancestry may once have had a magnetic sense, of which this is a vestigial remanent.)
      - (I have a small number of personal, anaecdotal, experiences that lead me to believe that I once had a magnetic sense that was input to my brain's location processing, but at a priority far below visual observation. These all occurred before I ever had an MRI.)
      - If some nerves do detect ambient magnetism by monitoring mechanical forces originating in magnetitie particles, the strong magnetic field of an MRI machine might be expected to disrupt this by modifying the magnetization of the particles, or by yanking on then so strongly they disrupt, or even kill, the nerves in question.

    So if humans DO have a magnetic sense of this form, it might actually be destroyed by exposure to, and especially testing in, an MRI machine.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:But it might actually cripple a magnetic sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That post was truly magnetic in its impact!

    2. Re:But it might actually cripple a magnetic sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Humans definitely have a built-in compass. Some of us turn it off, but it can be trained to work. For example:

      http://www.dudeiwantthat.com/gear/gadgets/north-paw-human-compass-trainer.asp

      Basically you just need a belt that "buzzes" in the direction of north every minute or so. Soon, the iron in your eyes, nose and blood are sufficient to tell you which way is North.

    3. Re:But it might actually cripple a magnetic sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Except studies of the effectiviness of such devices show that the knowledge comes from the device when wearing it, and from situational awareness afterward (i.e. a better sense of orientation of which way places you frequent). If you remove the belt and the visual clues, e.g. put in a rotatable enclosure, there is no remaining sense.

      blood are sufficient to tell you which way is North.

      The iron in your blood doesn't affect its magnetism on any sizable scale, because it is chemically bound. Blood as a whole is very slightly diamagnetic, as are a lot of materials, with or without iron.

  23. This being Slashdot ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... I'm not surprised to find that most of the comments range from confusion to outright derision over the fact that people still get together and socialize.

    I am, however, surprised to find that people assume that because this is a sorority they must be "immature", "wankers", and "rich cunts". In the very next post, they'll be wondering why people assume that Linux users are antisocial, inflexible, and terrible employees.

    1. Re:This being Slashdot ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... I'm not surprised to find that most of the comments range from confusion to outright derision over the fact that people still get together and socialize.

      I am, however, surprised to find that people assume that because this is a sorority they must be "immature", "wankers", and "rich cunts". In the very next post, they'll be wondering why people assume that Linux users are antisocial, inflexible, and terrible employees.

      We're not Linux users. All we have is an Xbox and and old copy of Windows 98.

  24. Nerds! by khr · · Score: 1

    It must've been from a video tape from some of those Lambda Lambda Lambda nerds!

    1. Re:Nerds! by cusco · · Score: 1

      Used to know some guys that rented in a big rundown house full of stoners on Frat Row, all chopped up into about a dozen bedrooms, that everyone referred to as 'Entropy House'. It would have been about a block from these dingbats. One year in the late '70s during Rush Week they put up the Greek letters Lambda Sigma Delta on the house and handed out electric beer to all the prospective pledges that weren't bright enough to figure out what the letters spelled. It apparently was an interesting night.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  25. Penny arcade sorrority lawyer response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    http://penny-arcade.com/comic/...

    http://www.penny-arcade.com/news/post/2012/11/19/phi-sigma-sigma

    Posted anno to avoid karma whoring.

  26. They are afraid of copyright suit by Vapula · · Score: 1

    Their secret knock (knock pause knock pause knock knock knock) is very likely to be the main rythme of some song...

    As such, it can be seen as a copyright violation of that song... And phi sigma sigma could be liable for damage to that song author...

    So, they try to get that hidden as fast as possible before some musician recognize his own property.

  27. Sacred.... Hilarious by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    There is NOTHING "sacred" for any of that greek bullshit. It's all stupidity for the sake of stupidity.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  28. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  29. Here are the secrets for the curious by HnT · · Score: 2

    "
    Phi Sigma Sigma secrets are:
    Phi Sigma Sigma (PSS) secretly stands for Philanthropic Social Society. However, this is never written down or recorded (until now) because it is so "sacred". The Handshake consists of a series of motions. Member A first begins with the pointer finger and the thumb surrounding Member B's pointer finger and thumb. This is the "Phi". Then Member A wraps the remaining fingers, middle, ring and pinky around the hand as a symbol of the "Sigma". Depending on who is the senior member, the pinky finger is wrapped around the older member's hand. Next is the hand knock. It goes Knock. Pause. Knock. Pause. Knock, knock, knock. The meetings are set up usually with the President, VP and other officers sitting at the front. The President wears a yellow or gold robe and the officers wear royal blue robes. The remaining members sit across from the officers in a pyramid formation with the base closest to the officers and the apex farthest from the officers. Members are seated by class order, then by alphabetical order. The table at which the President and Vice President are seated consists of candles on each side. Two gold candles and one blue at each corner of the table. Members usually recite an oath, "We, the members of Phi Sigma Sigma, promise to keep secret and sacred all of our proceedings." The way to enter the pyramid is by using the hand knock to notify the members you are wanting to enter the room. The President will respond back with her gavel by repeating the knock. The person will enter then travel to the apex of the pyramid formation. The President will say the secret and sacred words "Remove the Veil" and then the member will respond back with the Chapter's name, example, "Zeta Eta." The Gold and King Blue symbolize "Perpetuity" and "Sincerity". At initiation, blue "veils" (tulle from the local fabric store) are placed on the heads of the potential new members and are later removed to symbolize some sort of occult transformation and that they are full-fledged members.
    "

    --
    "Only one thing is impossible for God: To find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Here are the secrets for the curious by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hmph. The Freemasons should sue them for creating a derivative work. The case would be called Idiot v Idiot.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    2. Re:Here are the secrets for the curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like an opinion of all Freemasons based on a Southpark episode.

  30. Re: But it might actually cripple a magnetic sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that why Haimes stopped flying south for the winter after the scan?

  31. Fraternity member here, AMA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There seems to be a good amount of confusion and a (teensy) bit of hate in the comments that I'd love to help clear up.
    Background: two years in an engineering fraternity.

    As for my view on the article: they have no legal basis here to do anything. Honestly the only reason that this is on here is because Penny Arcade is involved. They even made it a more public ordeal by being so aggressive about it.

  32. Fine by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

    then I would like to open a class action lawsuit against all Greek groups and their members for all their bullshit. I will be seeking eleventy trillion dollars in damages for general douchbaggery, massive nepotism, and because fuck them.

    1. Re:Fine by cusco · · Score: 1

      You can join the Nebraska woman who filed a lawsuit yesterday against all the homosexuals on the planet, claiming to represent god.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  33. No wonder freemasonry is so accepted in the US... by rippeltippel · · Score: 1

    ...given its mindset begins that early.

  34. I think we're all missing something important... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When worn over the chest, Phi Sigma Sigma looks like "PEE"

  35. Schedule of events by Stewie241 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    November 2011: Somebody posts anonymously on PennyArcade about Phi Sigma Sigma rituals
    Late 2012: Phi Sigma Sigma discovers the post about rituals
    2013: Nothing happened
    2014: Nothing happened
    2015: Phi Sigma Sigma attempts to file lawsuit

    So now, we have somebody who made a post to an online forum almost four years ago, under an account that has exactly one post, and has not been active since November 2011, faced with a potential lawsuit. That's assuming that there is enough data to actually identify who the member is. And assuming that the user who posted is actually a former member and not somebody else who learned about the 'sacred secrets' some other way.

    Considering it is a breach of contract suit, I'd be interested to see what the actual contract looks like.

    1. Re:Schedule of events by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 3, Funny

      Considering it is a breach of contract suit, I'd be interested to see what the actual contract looks like.

      Dude, the contract is a sacred secret that's never written down and you can't know it.

  36. Scientology much? by tibit · · Score: 1

    So, they are going through scientology playbook, then? /shakes head

    --
    A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  37. Dear Phi Sigma Alpha by axl917 · · Score: 1

    Please sue me too.

    Phi Sigma Sigma (PSS) secretly stands for Philanthropic Social Society. However, this is never written down or recorded (until now) because it is so "sacred". The Handshake consists of a series of motions. Member A first begins with the pointer finger and the thumb surrounding Member B's pointer finger and thumb. This is the "Phi". Then Member A wraps the remaining fingers, middle, ring and pinky around the hand as a symbol of the "Sigma". Depending on who is the senior member, the pinky finger is wrapped around the older member's hand. Next is the hand knock. It goes Knock. Pause. Knock. Pause. Knock, knock, knock. The meetings are set up usually with the President, VP and other officers sitting at the front. The President wears a yellow or gold robe and the officers wear royal blue robes. The remaining members sit across from the officers in a pyramid formation with the base closest to the officers and the apex farthest from the officers. Members are seated by class order, then by alphabetical order. The table at which the President and Vice President are seated consists of candles on each side. Two gold candles and one blue at each corner of the table. Members usually recite an oath, "We, the members of Phi Sigma Sigma, promise to keep secret and sacred all of our proceedings." The way to enter the pyramid is by using the hand knock to notify the members you are wanting to enter the room. The President will respond back with her gavel by repeating the knock. The person will enter then travel to the apex of the pyramid formation. The President will say the secret and sacred words "Remove the Veil" and then the member will respond back with the Chapter's name, example, "Zeta Eta." The Gold and King Blue symbolize "Perpetuity" and "Sincerity". At initiation, blue "veils" (tulle from the local fabric store) are placed on the heads of the potential new members and are later removed to symbolize some sort of occult transformation and that they are full-fledged members.

    1. Re:Dear Phi Sigma Alpha by axl917 · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, Phi Sigma SIGMA. Whatever.

    2. Re:Dear Phi Sigma Alpha by Crookdotter · · Score: 1

      What a load of childish rubbish. I'm not american so don't know, how old are these pillocks that do this?

    3. Re:Dear Phi Sigma Alpha by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      You know, it's funny. A few years back, I googled my fraternity to see if our secrets were published online. Results: I found some stuff. Some was correct; some was not. Oh well.

      So what did I do about it? Absolutely nothing. Why? Two reasons: 1. Streisand Effect, and 2. nobody outside of our fraternity gives a shit.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    4. Re:Dear Phi Sigma Alpha by cusco · · Score: 1

      College age, so 18-26 or so.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  38. Definately not anything close to Marvin Gaye... by Imazalil · · Score: 1

    No sir, certainly not. Better not let the family know.

  39. Just so PSS has to now sue Slashdot: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has to be about the stupidest "secret" I've ever heard of. No wonder nobody ever tells it.

    Phi Sigma Sigma secrets are:

    Phi Sigma Sigma (PSS) secretly stands for Philanthropic Social Society. However, this is never written down or recorded (until now) because it is so "sacred". The Handshake consists of a series of motions. Member A first begins with the pointer finger and the thumb surrounding Member B's pointer finger and thumb. This is the "Phi". Then Member A wraps the remaining fingers, middle, ring and pinky around the hand as a symbol of the "Sigma". Depending on who is the senior member, the pinky finger is wrapped around the older member's hand. Next is the hand knock. It goes Knock. Pause. Knock. Pause. Knock, knock, knock. The meetings are set up usually with the President, VP and other officers sitting at the front. The President wears a yellow or gold robe and the officers wear royal blue robes. The remaining members sit across from the officers in a pyramid formation with the base closest to the officers and the apex farthest from the officers. Members are seated by class order, then by alphabetical order. The table at which the President and Vice President are seated consists of candles on each side. Two gold candles and one blue at each corner of the table. Members usually recite an oath, "We, the members of Phi Sigma Sigma, promise to keep secret and sacred all of our proceedings." The way to enter the pyramid is by using the hand knock to notify the members you are wanting to enter the room. The President will respond back with her gavel by repeating the knock. The person will enter then travel to the apex of the pyramid formation. The President will say the secret and sacred words "Remove the Veil" and then the member will respond back with the Chapter's name, example, "Zeta Eta." The Gold and King Blue symbolize "Perpetuity" and "Sincerity". At initiation, blue "veils" (tulle from the local fabric store) are placed on the heads of the potential new members and are later removed to symbolize some sort of occult transformation and that they are full-fledged members.

    1. Re:Just so PSS has to now sue Slashdot: by Stewie241 · · Score: 1

      Well, except that Penny Arcade isn't being sued. The poster is being sued. It is possible that the poster actually can be sued because if the poster was a member and had signed a contract saying that the information would not be shared, then the member violated the agreement.

      Given that Slashdot presumably has no such agreement and you also have no such agreement, no lawsuit for you!

      Not to say the whole thing isn't ridiculous. *I* certainly wouldn't want to be the lawyer who has to serve up a lawsuit over somebody outing the secret handshake and have to do it with a straight face.

  40. That Splains it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The secret is the alphabetical order. Not every Greek secret society can master it, ergo, it is considered a trade secret.

  41. I think people are by responsibleusername · · Score: 1

    confusing sororities with fraternities to some extent. Not that there aren't bad examples of both, but I've known a number of women (some in science, some not) that had good experiences with sororities that were based around sisterhood and providing support and outreach and stuff. I'm sure there are some examples of that with fraternities as well, maybe just less of them (I maintain any men-only secret society will eventually become fucked up no matter what). Still not sure why this is news though, only the vitriol about sororities is interesting here.

  42. Wrong colors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you mean white and black.

  43. Secret colors my ass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Without having read the article a simple google image search makes the group's colors pretty fucking obvious:
    https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&site=&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1920&bih=977&q=phi+sigma+sigma&oq=phi+sigma+sigma

    You don't need to have inside knowledge to figure that shit out.

  44. Even more secret club book has been revealed. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    Why are these girls complaining? The club book of their arch enemy, whose club's express purpose is to exclude these girls, has been revealed.. And neither Club Dictator-for-life nor the Club President and the First Tiger complained about it.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  45. Handshakes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The same handshake that an Outlaw MC member taught me in '72 was the same handshake a coke dealer taught me in '79, and the same handshake I learned a few years ago from one of my nephews' friends for their "clique".

    It's also a Masonic handshake, I was amazed to learn; those go way back, fwih.

    1. Re:Handshakes... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The same handshake that an Outlaw MC member taught me in '72 was the same handshake a coke dealer taught me in '79, and the same handshake I learned a few years ago from one of my nephews' friends for their "clique".

      It's also a Masonic handshake, I was amazed to learn; those go way back, fwih.

      There really aren't that many possible variations on a handshake, without getting into ridiculously elaborate "high five, low five, round the side, in your eye, rabbit pie" type that my kids love.

      If you just want it to look like two normal people shaking hands, there are only some minor variations you can do, like the Masonic pressing with the thumb thing.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  46. Sororities/Fraternities are just stupid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's more important shit to worry about going on in the world and this is what they're suing for...
    Just a waste of time and money.

    Phi Sigma Sigma secrets are:

    Phi Sigma Sigma (PSS) secretly stands for Philanthropic Social Society. However, this is never written down or recorded (until now) because it is so "sacred". The Handshake consists of a series of motions. Member A first begins with the pointer finger and the thumb surrounding Member B's pointer finger and thumb. This is the "Phi". Then Member A wraps the remaining fingers, middle, ring and pinky around the hand as a symbol of the "Sigma". Depending on who is the senior member, the pinky finger is wrapped around the older member's hand. Next is the hand knock. It goes Knock. Pause. Knock. Pause. Knock, knock, knock. The meetings are set up usually with the President, VP and other officers sitting at the front. The President wears a yellow or gold robe and the officers wear royal blue robes. The remaining members sit across from the officers in a pyramid formation with the base closest to the officers and the apex farthest from the officers. Members are seated by class order, then by alphabetical order. The table at which the President and Vice President are seated consists of candles on each side. Two gold candles and one blue at each corner of the table. Members usually recite an oath, "We, the members of Phi Sigma Sigma, promise to keep secret and sacred all of our proceedings." The way to enter the pyramid is by using the hand knock to notify the members you are wanting to enter the room. The President will respond back with her gavel by repeating the knock. The person will enter then travel to the apex of the pyramid formation. The President will say the secret and sacred words "Remove the Veil" and then the member will respond back with the Chapter's name, example, "Zeta Eta." The Gold and King Blue symbolize "Perpetuity" and "Sincerity". At initiation, blue "veils" (tulle from the local fabric store) are placed on the heads of the potential new members and are later removed to symbolize some sort of occult transformation and that they are full-fledged members.

  47. Why does anybody care? by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

    This is the question I asked myself when reading this story. I couldn't imagine why anybody would care so much about these sorts of completely inconsequential secrets. The fact that they are involving lawyers and and threatening litigation, however, makes me feel like this sorority should have it's names changed to something like "Pile of Shit Society" or something, and I'm glad these piles of shit are having their secrets revealed. Maybe the fact that the handshakes are revealed will be a plausible excuse for why you might know the handshake. I sure wouldn't want people to know I was a legacy pile of shit.

  48. The good thing about sororities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sororities bring all sorts of people from different races, nationalities, interests, politics, and even income levels together.

    Everyone who is not, has never been in, and never wants to be in a sorority comes together united in the same opinion:

    We all hate sororities.

  49. Online Revenge on Ex, Get Exlover Back Online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "With your revenge spell, my foreman was fired the next day! This is the same #%$!@ that canned me. Serves him right. Ricco, (my foreman) was practically in tears when he left the bosses office. The only thing I regret is not having my camera. I want to order a custom spell now!" quickrevengespell@yahoo.com, Anthony Y, Florida

  50. Phi-Sig-Pigs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well when I went to college at the glorious SUNY Brockport, Phi Sigma Sigma was the fat/ugly girl sorority... better known as the Phi Sig Pigs. I wouldn't even fuck any of them.