Slashdot Mirror


John Urschel: The 300 Pound Mathematician Who Hits People For a Living

HughPickens.com writes: Kate Murphy writes at NYT about mathematician John Urschel whose latest contribution to the mathematical realm was a paper for the Journal of Computational Mathematics with the impressively esoteric title, "A Cascadic Multigrid Algorithm for Computing the Fiedler Vector of Graph Laplacians." "Believe me, I am aware that terms such as multigrid, Fiedler, and vector are not words that people use in their daily lives," says Urshel.

But as an offensive guard for the Baltimore Ravens, John Urschel regularly goes head to head with the top defensive players in the NFL and does his best to keep quarterback Joe Flacco out of harm's way. "I play because I love the game. I love hitting people," Urshel writes. "There's a rush you get when you go out on the field, lay everything on the line and physically dominate the player across from you. This is a feeling I'm (for lack of a better word) addicted to, and I'm hard-pressed to find anywhere else."

Urschel acknowledges that he has faced questions from NFL officials, journalists, fans and fellow mathematicians about why he runs the risk of potential brain injury from playing football when he has "a bright career ahead of me in mathematics" but doesn't feel able to quit. "When I go too long without physical contact I'm not a pleasant person to be around. This is why, every offseason, I train in kickboxing and wrestling in addition to my lifting, running and position-specific drill work."

170 comments

  1. Keeps the brain sharp by weilawei · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I prefer cycling and climbing myself; not really into hitting things/being hit. Sitting in a chair all the time isn't healthy.

    1. Re:Keeps the brain sharp by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 1

      I prefer cycling and climbing myself; not really into hitting things/being hit.

      Both cycling and climbing are great physical exercices, plus, as any physical exercice, good for the mind and soul also, but those two even more because they are outdoors; usualy cycling and climbing is something you (can) do alone, something "hitting things/being hit" is not - the "hitting things/being hit" kind of physical exercices are great also because they are more of a "game", plus a way to socialize in a more natural way.

      Sitting in a chair all the time isn't healthy.

      You are absolutely right, thank you for reminding me to go to the gym! I am a member in a gym close to my home for more than a decade. I usualy skip my program for looong periods (not been there for more than a month...), but my advise: be a member in a gym (gyms are very convenient), even if you are like me taking looong "breaks" (i.e., even if you are fucking lazy!), since there you can do most things needed by your body - i will go today!

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
    2. Re:Keeps the brain sharp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      the "hitting things/being hit" kind of physical exercices are [...] a way to socialize in a more natural way.

      Don't socialize me, bro! Only in America...

    3. Re:Keeps the brain sharp by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 3

      the "hitting things/being hit" kind of physical exercices are [...] a way to socialize in a more natural way.

      Don't socialize me, bro! Only in America...

      Don't repulse me bro, you're gonna get hurt! By the way... i am Greek!

      The "hitting things/being hit" kind of physical exercices are a GREAT way to socialize in a more natural way (o.k., all in this "game" should better agree before starting, i forgot to mention it in my first comment!) since -not mentioning the other benefits of exercising in this way- physical contact of the non-erotic nature is very healthy for the body, mind, and soul.

      For example, as a Greek i enjoy wrestling (the real one, free/Greek-Roman) a lot (i still wrestle sometimes, even if i am too old now), and i am sorry that many people make fun of it (you know... homosexual jokes), because it is a good way to have such "hitting things/being hit" exercise without (much) danger and (many) injuries (and you can go to work without needing sun glasses indoors!) - but i am glad that in USA wrestling is popular enough to be present in some schools as an option (do you know that USA have some great wrestlers? Probably not, but they are good enough to compete against athletes from the traditional wrestling countries: Greece, Slavic, Iran, various Central Asian.).

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
    4. Re:Keeps the brain sharp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "When I go too long without physical contact I'm not a pleasant person to be around. This is why, every offseason, I train in kickboxing and wrestling in addition to my lifting, running and position-specific drill work."

      The mathematician-football player sounds like a brutish person worthy of imprisonment for the safety of society. He is a time-bomb awaiting to detonate.

    5. Re:Keeps the brain sharp by jodido · · Score: 1

      He said "not a pleasant person to be around." I'm that way too sometimes. Who isn't? Why do you call him "brutish" and "a time-bomb"? There's not a word to suggest he's ever been violent outside his job.

    6. Re:Keeps the brain sharp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer cycling and climbing myself; not really into hitting things/being hit.

      You are absolutely right, thank you for reminding me to go to the gym! I am a member in a gym close to my home for more than a decade. I usualy skip my program for looong periods (not been there for more than a month...), but my advise: be a member in a gym (gyms are very convenient), even if you are like me taking looong "breaks" (i.e., even if you are fucking lazy!), since there you can do most things needed by your body - i will go today!

      No one cares about how lazy and stupid you are.

    7. Re:Keeps the brain sharp by UncleGizmo · · Score: 1

      Some of us are aware of US Wrestling - Burroughs, Ramos, Ruth...old school brothers like the Schultzs and Banachs...

      I like how you say they're "good enough" to compete internationally. In the US, it's sometimes hard to remember that we aren't automatically the best at everything. But it's great to watch such great competitors.

      You are so right about how it helps socialize... we hear in the news about US/Iran/Cuba/Russia, etc. politics, but you wouldn't know it watching the teams wrestle. Fierce competitors on the mat, respectful off.

      I'm to old to wrestle too - but I keep sharp by coaching. It keeps you close to the energy without the pain!

      --
      Who put this thing together? Me, that's who.
    8. Re:Keeps the brain sharp by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      He said if he goes too long without physically assaulting people he becomes "not a pleasant person to be around". Most people aren't like that, and those that are don't usually admit it.

    9. Re:Keeps the brain sharp by DroolTwist · · Score: 1

      He said if he goes too long without physically assaulting people he becomes "not a pleasant person to be around". Most people aren't like that, and those that are don't usually admit it.

      I think you are reading too much into his statement. He enjoys physical sports. If he can't do what he enjoys, he's cranky. Who isn't cranky when they don't get to participate in their chosen hobby/pastime over a long stretch? Maybe there are people who have no interests outside of work and are happy to drudge away with no break; I'm certainly not one of them. I have to look away from time to time.

    10. Re:Keeps the brain sharp by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 1

      Some of us are aware of US Wrestling - Burroughs, Ramos, Ruth...old school brothers like the Schultzs and Banachs...

      I am really glad because i love wrestling (not only because i am Greek), and i like many U.S.A. wrestlers (e.g "old school brothers like the Schultzs and Banachs"!).

      I like how you say they're "good enough" to compete internationally. In the US, it's sometimes hard to remember that we aren't automatically the best at everything. But it's great to watch such great competitors.

      Well, we Greeks suck at baseball! And i mean TOTALY SUCK, not like U.S.A. does in wresting, because U.S.A. wresting has some great wrestlers - not so many as someone would expected based on its population, but i understand the lack of tradition. But think how a Greek like me feels when some Iranian (Persian) defeats some of our guys!

      You are so right about how it helps socialize... we hear in the news about US/Iran/Cuba/Russia, etc. politics, but you wouldn't know it watching the teams wrestle. Fierce competitors on the mat, respectful off.

      I am a (Christian) Greek nationalist, i strongly oppose immigration (even "legal"), and i hate Muslims (it's a long story... to make it sort: i just hate them). In the gym i use there are also some Iranian (Persian) guys, illegal immigrants - what can i say, i love those guys... YOU know it: athleticism (a Greek word, meaning so many great things... but many Slashdoters will get angry with one more Greek lesson by me!) trains you in respect - hopefully, we people, will resolve our social/politic/etc problems, so we can enjoy life as a game, with wrestling included (can you believe that the international Olympics commity wanted to exclude wrestling! FUCK YOU BARBARIANS - you must return to us Greeks the name "Olympics" before that happens!).

      I'm to old to wrestle too - but I keep sharp by coaching. It keeps you close to the energy without the pain!

      Ha... That's great! I am too lazy to coach - i never was so good to be honest, but i am old enough to pretend "i know stuff"; those Iranians, much younger and better than me in wrestling (one of them was well known in Iran) are nice enough to let me "show them my stuff". Yes, you are right: "coaching keeps you close to the energy without the pain!".

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
    11. Re:Keeps the brain sharp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, he said he likes to assault people or he gets grumpy, Jock sniff much?

    12. Re: Keeps the brain sharp by amplesand · · Score: 1

      As a Scandinavian, I wonder what claim the Greeks may have had to intellectual fame since the great Aristotle. The misfits from Nicosia? Petrus? LOL... What scientific advances did the Bysantians ever make? NO, the days of Greek glory is like the Scandinavian, British, and French. They're all gone, at large. Live with it.

    13. Re:Keeps the brain sharp by nedlohs · · Score: 0

      That's not what he said.

      When football season if over plain old football training doesn't provide enough physical violence to make him pleasant so he adds kickboxing and wrestling where you do get to physically assault people in training.

      He didn't say he "enjoys physical sports" he said he needs to be able to perform physical violence on other people in order to not be "not a pleasant person to be around".

      Sure maybe he just worded things badly - then again he's supposed to be smart in a field of logic and precision and so just as likely meant exactly what he said.

    14. Re: Keeps the brain sharp by antiperimetaparalogo · · Score: 1

      As a Scandinavian, I wonder what claim the Greeks may have had to intellectual fame since the great Aristotle. The misfits from Nicosia? Petrus? LOL... What scientific advances did the Bysantians ever make? NO, the days of Greek glory is like the Scandinavian, British, and French. They're all gone, at large. Live with it.

      As a Greek, i wonder many times if it is me who has a bad taste of humor or it is (some) barbarians who don't have any of it - can you help me?

      To answer your question: Go to any of your universities and you will find that most of the NON-Scandinavian professors there are Greeks... even more than Germans!

      --
      Antisthenes: "Wisdom begins by examining the words/names." - excuse my English, i am (slightly...) better with my Greek!
    15. Re:Keeps the brain sharp by DroolTwist · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected - I misread his statement my first pass through the article.

      However, I still didn't read more into it than necessary. I just took it as he enjoys either a) football, b) wrestling or c) kickboxing, and if he can't do any of them, he's cranky. He's competitive, and his chosen sports involve physical dominance (being an avid MMA fan and jiu jitsu student I really don't see the big deal here). As far as how he worded his statement, if you've ever worked around extremely intelligent people like him who do physics, math, etc. (I currently manage a network for these types of folks), you hear things worded in ways much differently than what you hear in a social setting with, we'll call them.. 'people with social skills'.

      I just don't understand some people's reaction to his statements.

    16. Re:Keeps the brain sharp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great idea. Let's imprison productive people who have found ways to financially capitalize on their inner demons in a socially acceptable way.

      While we're at it, let's also jail all the alcoholics who have found coping mechanisms that keep them sober. Because who knows, one day they may slip up, you know.

      We don't have enough people in prison already, right? Might as well start locking away people for theoretical future crimes.

    17. Re:Keeps the brain sharp by dargaud · · Score: 1

      Same here. I've long wondered why climbing is so chock-full of intellectuals (somewhat less so in the US than in Europe, lots of dirtbags without a job in the former). Most climbers are engineers, researchers, etc... It's certainly not because of money because once you have harness, shoes and rope you are pretty much set for the next few years. Maybe because it's one of the few sports where you can stop and think for as long as you want (or rather as long as your arms can hold).

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    18. Re:Keeps the brain sharp by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      There's no issue with his choice of sports (aside from why would you risk the brain damage - but that's an different topic). I also do bjj - the wussiest of the "combat" sports - two people rolling on the ground hugging :)

      Of course when you think about it when I train bjj I'm really trying to get another human being into a position in which they will die if I don't choose to let go - let's ignore all the other people around who will *make* me let go if I'm actually psychotic.

      I don't think there is a big deal - he just said something that when taken at his word is reasonably disturbing. Though CTE is pretty scary lurking in the background, possibly more so for someone who claims to need to be physically violent to start with.

    19. Re:Keeps the brain sharp by kylemonger · · Score: 1

      He doesn't need to be imprisoned. We as a society need to accept that the desires of the people in our societies are very diverse. Rather than labeling and imprisoning such people, we should provide outlets that permit them to remain happy without harming others.

      Urschel found his outlets. Other naturally aggressive individuals work as bouncers in clubs or brawl as ham-and-eggers in semi-pro fights. Unfortunately some of these frustrated warrior types just go out and start barfights for their kicks. Every time I look at MMA and think it should be banned as bloodsport, I think about what the idled MMA fighters would be doing instead.

    20. Re:Keeps the brain sharp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was obviously being facetious, you're just ignoring that because you want all "jocks" to be evil.

    21. Re:Keeps the brain sharp by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      no, he said he likes to assault people or he gets grumpy, Jock sniff much?

      Get back into the locker, nerd. No one said you could come out yet.

  2. Surprising to those unfamiliar with mathematicians by Crashmarik · · Score: 4, Informative

    For the rest of us no surprise at all. 40 years ago I studied graph theory with a professor that was also a competitive karate fighter.

  3. Discrimination by GigaplexNZ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Urschel acknowledges that he has faced questions from NFL officials, journalists, fans and fellow mathematicians about why he runs the risk of potential brain injury from playing football when he has "a bright career ahead of me in mathematics"

    Funny how the NFL officials only care about potential brain injury on players who are good at math. If the risk of brain injury was truly that high, nobody should be playing it.

    1. Re:Discrimination by Chrisq · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Urschel acknowledges that he has faced questions from NFL officials, journalists, fans and fellow mathematicians about why he runs the risk of potential brain injury from playing football when he has "a bright career ahead of me in mathematics"

      Funny how the NFL officials only care about potential brain injury on players who are good at math. If the risk of brain injury was truly that high, nobody should be playing it.

      In fact you could argue that Urschel is in a position where he can evaluate the probability of potential risks and impacts and make an informed decision on whether to play whereas many players can't.

    2. Re:Discrimination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They worry about him because he has something to lose in the brain department.

    3. Re:Discrimination by disposable60 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think the answer here is that an NFL career pays rather better than an Academic one. If he can retire with his faculties intact, he won't have to chase grants and prizes to be comfortable.

      --
      You're looking for quotes? See my journal.
    4. Re:Discrimination by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Let the risks be known, including the insurance companies that foot the bill for injury. But whether or not someone plays the game is none of your business, or anyone else's for that matter. In other words, they have the liberty to be self-destructive !

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    5. Re:Discrimination by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Given the NFL's more or less uniformly dishonorable record on football related traumatic brain injury (roughly the same honesty, and similar stalling tactics, as tobacco producers); it wouldn't entirely surprise me if they are worried about this guy because he's a football player with an easily demonstrable history of high intellectual capability.

      If he ends up a pitiful sad-sack, markedly damaged, the story pretty much writes itself: "From published mathematician with lots of papers you don't even understand the title of, to broken man, thanks to football!". In players without any baseline, or where the baseline is roughly 'normal to sub-normal intelligence, no non-football skills of significant note', there may still end up being a sad story of cognitive effects(it doesn't just knock off IQ points, depression, emotional disregulation, and other quality-of-life ruiners are pretty typical); but the story won't be nice and clear cut in the same way.

    6. Re:Discrimination by PPalmgren · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, hes playing the right position if he wants the least head trauma possible. Of all the positions, lineman have to deal with the smallest velocity vectors of any (well, besides kickers). Concussions are far more common among 'skill positions' where players are frequently moving at high speeds and a target/are targeting for tackling. Offensive Lineman just push players or prevent players from advancing...kinda like a Sumo wrestler.

    7. Re:Discrimination by JimSadler · · Score: 1

      Really nobody should be playing football. Brain injuries are just one of the numerous medical problems caused by football. One might consider why one has hostile moods in the first place rather than trying to control that demon by feeding it.

    8. Re:Discrimination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Almost, but not in this society, as long as there is medicare, disability, and other forced nanny state programs.

    9. Re:Discrimination by swillden · · Score: 2

      I think the answer here is that an NFL career pays rather better than an Academic one. If he can retire with his faculties intact, he won't have to chase grants and prizes to be comfortable.

      This. Given that he's a lineman he's actually got a pretty good chance of avoiding CTE. Linemen collide on every play, but they do it at relatively low speed, since they only have about two feet in which to accelerate. If he's cautious with his head, careful with his money, and keeps his career short, Urschel has a good chance of walking away intact and independently wealthy after four or five years.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    10. Re:Discrimination by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, hes playing the right position if he wants the least head trauma possible. Of all the positions, lineman have to deal with the smallest velocity vectors of any (well, besides kickers). Concussions are far more common among 'skill positions' where players are frequently moving at high speeds and a target/are targeting for tackling. Offensive Lineman just push players or prevent players from advancing...kinda like a Sumo wrestler.

      Then there is that mass thing. A quarterback at 240 pounds being nailed by a steroid fueled tackle who is nearing 400 pounds.

      Math and physics, all rolled into one game.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    11. Re:Discrimination by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      Funny how the NFL officials only care about potential brain injury on players who are good at math. If the risk of brain injury was truly that high, nobody should be playing it.

      I don't think that is their intent. Most of the players in the NFL do not have a second career to fall back on once their playing days are done, let alone one that should pay them a decent salary. The players themselves know the risks now but the alure of making millions of dollars for a few years of harsh physical punishment is seen as a worthy risk.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    12. Re:Discrimination by operagost · · Score: 1

      Mike Webster is a well-known case of a CTE sufferer, but considering the far higher incidence among skill players and defense, I'd say it's merely the exception that proves the rule.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    13. Re:Discrimination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, we should advocate removing the freedom of individuals to live their life as they see fit. Because you're my little bia*tch and I know what's best for you. Control is a mental disorder.

    14. Re:Discrimination by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      In fact you could argue that Urschel is in a position where he can evaluate the probability of potential risks and impacts and make an informed decision on whether to play whereas many players can't.

      Since he has no medical training - why would you even think he's in a better position to do so? Being able to evaluate the mathematical probability of injury != being able to evaluate the medical risks. Two entirely different problem domains.

      And that's setting aside the issue that we don't really have the data to properly evaluate the medical risks in the first place. We know there's a risk of brain damage (there's existence proof of it happening), but it currently can't be well quantified because the underlying data is noisy, incomplete, and of questionable precision and accuracy. We can't say "player X you should stop playing now because of accumulated damage", because we don't have an accurate gauge of the severity or effects of individual events, let alone their cumulative impacts.

    15. Re:Discrimination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well unless hes the son of immigrants them the bar for good at maths isnt very high for white 'native' Americans.

    16. Re:Discrimination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The typical NFL player is only really worth keeping around for genetic research such that the rest of the species might have useful genes spliced in from them at a later time - they're brains aren't exactly required. It is odd to see someone that would actually pass as a person risking their brain that way though.

    17. Re:Discrimination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but his knees and back will be shot.

  4. Re:Sociopath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure which is worse: That someone might read this and think this you're smart or insightful for saying it, or that you might think yourself smart or insightful for saying it.

  5. Co-authors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Kinda lame not mentioning the three co-authors that worked with him on that paper.

    1. Re:Co-authors by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 1

      The whole story is lame, because it's not about the paper or his research but about his leisure time activities.

      Who cares? How about a story about Joe the Plumber's sports at the local bowling center instead?

    2. Re:Co-authors by pscottdv · · Score: 1

      You have it backwards. The NFL is his job. Mathematics is his leisure-time activity. Personally, I think that unusual enough to warrant an article.

      --

      this signature has been removed due to a DMCA takedown notice

    3. Re:Co-authors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? So what do you know about the leisure-time of other NFL members?

  6. Re:Sociopath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Plenty of people have an aggressive streak to match their drive. It's better to get it out through exercise (e.g., contact sports, competitive racing) than taking it out on your colleagues/friends/family. Endorphins are great. You should try some.

  7. Re:Why doesn't he want to live in Africa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's funnier to beat up white people. They make this squishy sounds when you bash them in and they end up anatomically reversed.

  8. Muscles and brains are not mutually exclusive by Viol8 · · Score: 2

    So I don't understand why this seems to come as a surprise to a lot of people. We're physical *and* mental beings, you need to exercise both aspects to be truly healthy IMO. However there do seem to be far to many people who focus on one to the exclusion of the other (and even more who don't focus on either but thats for another argument).

    1. Re:Muscles and brains are not mutually exclusive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's because most people who have the intellectual skills to do research and write papers like that tend to be involved in intellectual work as their primary paying job, not as a sideline hobby, and they tend to do physical exercise as a sideline hobby, not as their primary paying job - much less for a professional sports team.

    2. Re:Muscles and brains are not mutually exclusive by pscottdv · · Score: 0

      It is quite rare for someone to be capable of working at a professional level in sports and academics at the same time.

      --

      this signature has been removed due to a DMCA takedown notice

    3. Re:Muscles and brains are not mutually exclusive by LaurenCates · · Score: 1

      Maybe because one is more satisfying than the other.

      --
      Some people don't believe in fairies. I don't believe in The Patriarchy.
    4. Re:Muscles and brains are not mutually exclusive by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 2

      So I don't understand why this seems to come as a surprise to a lot of people.

      It goes against the dumb jock/wimpy nerd stereotypes most people have.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
  9. You can be both types of people... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Scholarly & Athletic: I was a lettering NCAA athlete in Lacrosse (violent enough) for LeMoyne College (an often division or national champ @ division II level) + good enough to get room + board partial combined academic/athletic scholarship for it.

    (I was pretty much "straight A's" elementary school to highschool - senior year I didn't give a hoot since I had my credits done by junior year & I went to work after going for 1 class most of senior year only in the a.m. then off to work during the rest of the day, & I even played football as a cornerback defensemen, 1st string for an often state championship winning team in highschool - I didn't play my junior & senior year since my Dad cut off monies he gave me & asked me "how old are you now?" & I said then "16" & he said "you can go work for money now" so, I did... He also pointed out that I should pick one sport over the other, & that football was FAR more dangerous + had more competition for scholarship (nevermind the pros), so, Lacrosse it was instead, since better chance for scholarships etc. that way since I learned & played it in the BEST city in the nation for decades in it, in Syracuse N.Y. ...).

    You can be *ANYTHING* you want in this life, both the mind & body are "plastic" responding to the needs you have you place on them...

    *There are, no limits: Only the limits you put on yourself...

    APK

    P.S.=> I think it's great there's people like the man in this article setting that example - it's close to the 'greek ideal' of "sound mind, & sound body"... apk

    1. Re:You can be both types of people... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, I'm not APK, and I don't generally get all hyped up about his posts, but who the fuck downmodded this one? It's on-topic and moderately interesting.

      Mod by content, not by author.

    2. Re:You can be both types of people... apk by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      You can be *ANYTHING* you want in this life, both the mind & body are "plastic" responding to the needs you have you place on them...

      *There are, no limits: Only the limits you put on yourself...

      Right, so Stephen Hawking could have out-run Usain bolt if he'd just applied himself properly?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    3. Re:You can be both types of people... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can be *ANYTHING* you want in this life, both the mind & body are "plastic" responding to the needs you have you place on them...

      *There are, no limits: Only the limits you put on yourself...

      Right, so Stephen Hawking could have out-run Usain bolt if he'd just applied himself properly?

      Stephen Hawking is famous for the same reason Kim Kardashian is famous. The cult of celebrity. If Hawking was truly brilliant he would have discovered a cure for his ailment. Or at least created a better voice synthesizer that was operated by his mind not his skull.

    4. Re:You can be both types of people... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see any indication it was modded down. He posted as AC (he always does), so the post starts at zero.

    5. Re:You can be both types of people... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The post was at -1, Overrated. You should try clicking Score sometime, because it'll show you a breakdown of the mods. In fact, you can still see that it was downmodded.

      You must be new here. HTH. HAND.

  10. Re:Why doesn't he want to live in Africa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see you couldn't address my simple question.
    Why doesn't he want to live in Africa, among his own race, and ONLY his own race? Could it possibly be because he is a 'white supremacist', and believes that white people make better societies than blacks do?

  11. Tennis and Computing by lkcl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    two years ago i took up tennis at the recommendation of a friend. before that i'd done tai ji, full-contact karate (shin kyu-kshin), long-distance skating (86 miles athens-to-atlanta 1999, 65 miles new york park 1999, 26 miles rotterdam 2006) and yoga (ashtanga and T.M Asanas). it's a big list of different physical activities, which have the following things in common:

    * complex coordinated movement
    * requiring or recommending very deep breathing (skating especially)
    * very long and regular practice

    the reason why i specifically love tennis is that in addition to these things it is necessary to not only be extremely physically fit but also, if you would like to win, you require strategy and planning both on and off the court. tennis is particularly harsh on the body in that it is a series of very short explosive sprints, standing still, *then* hitting the ball, and then doing it all over again.

    also the types of movement required are *unbelievably* complex! serving involves *six* degrees of freedom of movement (x-y-z, rotation in x-y-z) in order to impart the maximum amount of inspired deviousness into a small yellow round object.

    to fully understand why it was that, aged 44, i started this sport and now practice over an hour a day, you have to understand that prior to that i was sitting 12 hours a day in front of a computer screen: average distance approx 1 metre. for the prior 4 years that was a 24in imac, so the panorama i *initially* thought was great.... turned out to have caused extreme alterations in my eyes.

    just over two years ago i discovered that my eyes had gone "prism". this is a new development: i've always had -0.75 astigmatism, but prism basically means that i can focus easily on an object that's 1 metre away, but if i look at something 3 metres or greater away i see *DOUBLE*. in the dark, i can't bring the two together.

    the implications of that are that not only has there been physical damage caused by long-term computer usage but that there has also been *NEURAL* damage caused by long-term computer usage.

    the bottom line of this story is, in this context, that this football player is being extremely sensible. if a few neurons get knocked out of place by a concussion, so damn what: his pursuit of mathematics will, by virtue of it being so incredibly challenging, allow him to grow new pathways and literally grow new neurons. the reason why his peers get brain damage is because they *don't* have anything other than football to challenge them.

    each of his pursuits therefore supports the others. the physical exertion keeps his body - and his heart - fit. that in turn allows him more oxygen with which to feed his brain and thus sustain the pursuit of mathematics. the increased mental alertness allows him to play with tactics and strategy that the average player would not be able to consider. his specialty in mathematics would allow him to apply physics (moments of inertia) in a *really* practical way that would keep both him and the people he smacks down safer than would otherwise be done by someone without his knowledge.

    but the best part of all this is that if he has a successful long-term career, i predict that he will end up inspiring thousands of young football players to pay a bit closer attention to their other studies, and that coaches will have an example - a specific person - that they can quote as to why, when they go recruiting, they are looking for someone who has not only the physique but also the high academic aptitude as well. ... wouldn't it be great to have an entire team of football players who not only kick ass (literally) but who have degrees and even PhDs? that would change how people think of football, forever.

    1. Re:Tennis and Computing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An offensive football player has an immensely higher risk of traumatic brain injury than the average tennis player.

      captcha: FRIGHT

    2. Re:Tennis and Computing by dargaud · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you need to try rock climbing. The one on lead trad (placing protection yourself), not the kind on plastic you can do at the gym.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
  12. Re:Sociopath by smallfries · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This just shows that you don't know what the word means. I've know a couple of real sociopaths over a lifetime, and they were mean, manipulative, vindictive arseholes. One thing that they were not, was violent. They preferred to destroy people in more lasting and important ways than a few bruises. The closest everyday concept that mcuttatches the condition is evil.

    Most blokes like burning off steam though. Not all of them, some are more shy retiring delicate types such as yourself. But for most men, regardless of whether they end up in the ivory towers of academia or cutting blocks in a yard, physical contact is normal. Success tends to correlate with the ability to control it and project it on demand. That's why we see sports as being a good outlet for it. I've known surprising number of martial artists in academia, they were all very straight forward about why they did it: they like punching things.

    --
    Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
  13. 300 Pound Nerd? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ha, that's nothing!

  14. I'm with him by T.E.D. · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "There's a rush you get when you go out on the field, lay everything on the line and physically dominate the player across from you. This is a feeling I'm (for lack of a better word) addicted to, and I'm hard-pressed to find anywhere else."

    This is your indication that you are talking with an adrenaline/endorphin junkie.

    I play futbol (soccer) defense, and can completely understand this. Its an otherwise thankless position. If you do it well pretty much nobody but your goalie notices, and if you mess up everyone hates on you. So why do it? Honestly, I believe I got addicted to the adrenaline/endorphin hit. I don't even feel right until I've had my first hard tackle. It is next to impossible to get that fix in real life, but a good physical confrontation will bring it right up. I once hadn't got there yet, and then a (clearly juicing) big forward knocked me to the ground while the ref wasn't looking. I got up laughing and thanking him. Not quite the reaction he was expecting.

    I don't know how many here have seen Clint Eastwood's Every Which Way but Loose, but the main character Philo clearly had this as well. It was a major plot point that he had to fight, and had an unusual thing where he got better the more he was hit. Classic Endorphin/Adrenaline junkie.

    I think it ought to go without saying that as a mathematician Urschel isn't going to get his body chemical "hit" in his daily life. I've certainly found that to be the case as a software engineer.

    1. Re:I'm with him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adrenaline and endorphins are of course good and very important in themselves, for our development as individuals and as a species/society. They are however quite basic, as hormones and neurotransmitters, and can easily be secreted with no human-level rationality.

      Their overall evolutionary roles are helping "defensive fight, flight, or prostration" responses ("defensive fighting" does include "fighting for food, territory and partners", but its evolutionary role involves mostly tension contexts, that is "even if you don't kill or hurt him enough, he probably won't survive, or he will be affected enough to significantly lower his chances at reproduction"... and even in this role, we, as developed human beings, can find many, much better ways to manage the tension), helping to manage physical and mental pain, and rewarding "good individual and social behavior", and they are generally very good to us in these roles.

      What you are describing (and which is for sure common to almost every human being on this planet today, in one form or another) is using them to "help you fight for fighting" (the "money, territory and sex" aspects end up very secondary here at the extremes, with common images of "tough guys who really only care about the fighting in the end"), "helping to endure more and more pain to seek more and more pain", and "rewarding the most stupid shit that get you nowhere, useless, and dead", all this in a very artificial stressful, frustrating, and oppressing environment, with almost zero rationality at any level whatsoever, leading to the increase in number, intensity, difficulty, and complexity of all our problems today, and deeply anchoring their indefinite perpetuation. It is a very pitiful situation.

      Our development is leading us to make 'use' of adrenaline and endorphins with the most irrational motives, because of the weight of accumulated problems, and our sensitivity to it.

      Because of our development, however, we are able to seek and reach reason in absolutely everything, to liberty and individual, relational, social, and global, complete contentment and even fulfillment, for the very long term.

      Adrenaline and endorphins can help us greatly in this. They are much, much more powerful, when combined with reason. They are a very fundamental part of the sensation of true, developed pleasure and satisfaction, thus contributing very significantly to their sentiments and emotions, to the exaltation of fulfillment, as the culmination of our existence, of our true nature as sentient and developed individuals.

      Thinking of making use of them for more and more insanity is very reducing, and the illusion of intensity is actually very superficial. One cannot be happy with adrenaline and endorphins alone. The pleasure is very much restricted by our many problems, which are always here, outside, and inside too. If the cause for the secretion is a problem in itself, it is even worse. The idea of "guilty pleasure" is utterly wrong (including because it is also 'used' for non-problematic things because of taboos and prejudices, and 'guilt' is a very stupid idea in itself, but that's not the point here). It simply cannot even begin to compare with pleasure in good, reason, logic, truth. There is no "supreme pleasure in the image of a lustful hell" (which would thus be in no way a "temptation" of anything, and only be a very basic manipulation). There is no reality to the idea of "ultimate delight in hurting, torturing, raping, mutilating and killing".

      A basic physiological sensation very superficially associated to some amount of excitement, however a privilege it may seem to us as a delusion in our profound suffering, is really only that. We are very much literally crumbling under the weight of the psychological complexes causing these associations.

      That being said, adrenaline and endorphins do have however the use of "making us an integral part of this insanity, so we hopefully don't kill ourselves too fast because of the terror of our current misery". They're useful in this too. They prolong our lives, so we can hopefully do better one day, so we can try one more time to overcome.

  15. Dishonest headlines as usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Ravens are a professional football team. The majority of his income almost certainly comes from football, not math.
    He is therefore a footballier first and a mathmaticiary second, not the other way around.

    1. Re:Dishonest headlines as usual by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      Perhaps. The league minimum is about half a mil a year. Good money by any standard. However, that's only about 4x what an average math PhD can pull down in a year. Compare that with the fact that an NFL linesman career is going to be over in 10 years if you are really lucky, while a mathematician can work until either they drop or age-related dementia sets in, and it really isn't so cut-and-dried. At the absolute least, he's smart to be trying to do both so he isn't starting from base salary(/reputation) on the math thing when forced to retire from football.

    2. Re:Dishonest headlines as usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10 years at 4x the money (using your numbers here) means he would have to work 40 years in mathematics to make that kind of money. Instead, he can make 40 years worth of money in 10 years and spend the next 30 doing whatever he likes.

      He was born in '91, so he's ~24 years old, and we're positing that he could play 10 years. He started in 2014, so that's 1 year already. meaning he'll theoretically play until he's 33. 33 years old and with all the money of someone who is (23 years + 40 years career) 63 years old. That's early retirement right there, leaving the next 30 years open to do anything he can possibly imagine.

      As for brain damage, assume a spherical cow.

    3. Re:Dishonest headlines as usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he's smart, which he apparently is, I'm sure he could play football for 3-5 years and then spend the rest of his life living off investment income and whatever he decides to pull in from mathematics work.

    4. Re:Dishonest headlines as usual by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      You are missing (or conveniently ignoring) the part where I said he'd be lucky to keep at it that long. In point of fact, the *average* NFL career is a smidge over 3 years. A bit more for players who are good enough to make active rosters, less for players who aren't kickers or QB's. There are a lot of variables. As there are with salary.

      The point here is that NFL careers aren't that long, and the pay for people who aren't superstars only makes up for that if the alternative is something like a service/menial job. If the alternative is getting a jump of that many years on the ground floor of a high-paying career, in many situations it would be way smarter to take the longer career. Particularly if it is something you love doing (which seems the case here). If he's going to try to be a mathematician after sports "retirement" anyway, the sensible thing is to keep that career as serious as possible in the meantime.

    5. Re:Dishonest headlines as usual by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      Probably the case. But as I told another poster, it would be even smarter to keep the math career as active as possible in the meantime, as that gets the first few years of lowest pay and prestige out of the way, and gives him that extra 3-5 years at the high-paying end of the career as gravy.

    6. Re:Dishonest headlines as usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10 years at 4x the money (using your numbers here) means he would have to work 40 years in mathematics to make that kind of money. Instead, he can make 40 years worth of money in 10 years and spend the next 30 doing whatever he likes.

      He was born in '91, so he's ~24 years old, and we're positing that he could play 10 years. He started in 2014, so that's 1 year already. meaning he'll theoretically play until he's 33. 33 years old and with all the money of someone who is (23 years + 40 years career) 63 years old. That's early retirement right there, leaving the next 30 years open to do anything he can possibly imagine.

      As for brain damage, assume a spherical cow.

      Not to mention there is a NFL pension and 401k plan. And the fact that he can be heavy on investments early on and have tons of time for compound interest.

    7. Re:Dishonest headlines as usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Not even close. He's got a master's in maths. Even if he's a genius, for the next four years he'd be doing a PhD, earning about 25k (ask me how I know...). So he'd come out of Grad school at /best/ 1.9 million down. Then he'd be lucky to get a postdoc for 3 years at 45k (ask me how I know...). Then as an absolute wunderkind he might get a tenure track job, on 75k, for about 6 years, moving up to an immense 120k.

      So 4 years of football = 2 million, or:

      4 years of grad school 3, of postdoc, 6 of tenure track, and 11 years as faculty to make up the same amount.

      You do the math. He has. Even if he quits after the PhD and goes to a good industry job, he's down 1.9 million after the 4 years.

    8. Re:Dishonest headlines as usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's more than a bit of a stretch to argue that he's doing math for long term financial security. For Urschel to get to the point where he's making over $100k as a mathematician requires putting in time of about 4-15 years in lower salaried positions beyond the 4 years he spent in college (where he also was trained in football).

      The average math PhD (which Urschel does not yet have) in the age range of an NFL player makes between $50-$100k. But, it's silly to compare the minimum NFL salary with the average PhD salary. The average NFL linesman salary in that age range is about $1.2M a year. That's a very significant difference.

      When he's done with the NFL he will have made much more than an average mathematician's career earnings, but he will have the money faster, which has additional value.

      Even looking at a single year in the NFL at the minimum salary ($310k), he's going to be making more than the equivalent to a mathematician's entire "training period" of graduate school and postdoc. 50% of graduate students in science and mathematics leave PhD programs early. The #1 reason for leaving is financial challenges. No one is leaving the NFL because they can't afford to pay for daycare at the salaries offered.

  16. So... It finally happened... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are no more real news to read...

  17. Re:Sociopath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coward.

  18. Re:Sociopath by Notegg+Nornoggin · · Score: 0

    Rascist!

  19. Chess boxing by Mal-2 · · Score: 2

    I bet this guy will kick ass at chess boxing when his NFL days are over.

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  20. Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu (BJJ) would be a lot less risk by Monoman · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... and it would pay less. I highly suggest it for everyone though.

    I started learning Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu (BJJ) about 6 years ago. One of the first things I noticed was that there seemed to be a higher percentage of technical/professional than I found in other athletic activities I had done in the past. Yes the UFC has made BJJ a bit trendy but it is more than that. BJJ is great for a smaller and weaker person because it effectively demonstrates technique over strength from day one.

    --
    Keep the Classic Slashdot.
  21. So what does it mean? by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 0

    Does it mean that even clever people may need some virile exercise, or does it mean, as TFA suggests, that NFL players are all retarded?

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  22. Re:It's WHY I've asked this:... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because, in your world, "confront" means "crapflood".

    Until someone you've harrassed in this fashion over several months tracks you down, sends you a postcard, and it occurs to you that they could just as easily have shown up on your doorstep with a baseball bat instead.

  23. Re:Surprising to those unfamiliar with mathematici by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think that the 'surprise' here is related to the (quite numerous, now that the NFL has pretty much lost the battle to keep CTE under wraps) stories about how the head trauma you experience in football has a nasty habit of wrecking your brain in a variety of unpleasant ways.

    The fact that not all math professors are wholly sedentary, feeble, and bookish isn't a huge surprise; but seeing one doing something well known to have a high risk of chewing up his brain and spitting it out, that is somewhat curious. I would have expected him to choose something with more below-the-neck contact. Soft tissue damage and broken bones are something that humans cope with fairly well, and Team Medicine knows a lot about dealing with, if natural recuperation isn't cutting it; but brains are touchier; and there is a lot less we can do for you if yours isn't working so well.

  24. Re:Sociopath by thegarbz · · Score: 2

    This just shows that you don't know what the word means.

    It's a personality disorder depicted by extreme anti-social behaviour. It's actually a quite broad word which describes a very broad range of personality traits.

    Somehow being an unpleasant person when you're NOT smashing someone about fits that definition quite nicely regardless of what you *think* it means.

  25. Re:Sociopath by LaurenCates · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm a neurotic workout fiend. I have been since I was in my late 20s.

    Bear in mind, I wasn't an athletic kid. Not because I had no inclinations, I just lacked confidence and being an introvert didn't help matters much.

    So I took up martial arts - any kind anyone would teach me - and my husband would tell me the difference was unbelievable. Much better than just trying to run alone or work out in my basement. Apparently, it wasn't just being in shape that was affecting me: it was also the fact that I would interact with people, and once I knew what I was doing, I'd be able to teach newcomers as well. I also slept better at night and lost weight. It's physical AND mental.

    I'm not saying all introverts have to do this, but I become intolerable if I spend too long coming home at night just to sit and watch TV until bedtime. Hubby's come to accept that I have to work out at least five days a week, at least two hours a night, in order to maintain this. And that's fine with both of us, but for anyone to assert that I might be a special case hasn't ever taken part in an athletic activity which promotes interaction with other people.

    You'd find that people who aren't training to be pros, but work out that much, are probably more common than you think.

    --
    Some people don't believe in fairies. I don't believe in The Patriarchy.
  26. Re:Sociopath by thegarbz · · Score: 0

    If you don't understand the difference between enjoying sports and racing to release endorphins and:

    I love hitting people

    then there's really no helping you.

  27. Re:It's WHY I've asked this:... apk by LaurenCates · · Score: 1

    Eh, if you're on an internet forum and you're really that concerned about people who downmod you, maybe you should take up martial arts yourself.

    --
    Some people don't believe in fairies. I don't believe in The Patriarchy.
  28. Re:Sociopath by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    There are sociopaths that do overt violence; but most of them don't last so long in the wild. Either somebody kills them, or they kill somebody stupidly and impulsively and the criminal justice system gets them. (Though much of our more rigorous research on sociopathy is built on them; because people doing very long sentences in high security prisons are comparatively easy to sign up for studies, it breaks the tedium if nothing else, while getting high-functioning sociopaths with busy schedules who aren't in prison to cooperate can be tricky).

    That aside, mistaking voluntary physical aggression for mutual entertainment for 'violence', because the mechanics look fairly similar, seems to be a mistake similar to mistaking consensual sexual behavior for 'rape', because the mechanics look fairly similar. It is pretty weird what our more atavistic tendencies have led us to think is fun; but so long as everyone involved is an informed and willing participant, so what?

  29. Re:Why doesn't he want to live in Africa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Projection.

  30. "Bright career in mathematics" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a sin to say that to a student if he isn't Terry Tao. No doubt Urschel is gifted, but in academia you'll need more than a gift and hard work to have a real career, let alone a bright one..

  31. great article by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    First, a guard is possibly the least likely player on the field to get a concussion. Sure they hit hard every play, but it's almost more like wrestling than anything, and almost never the high speed impacts that result in concussion.

    Second, I think it's great for young men to hear this. We've spent pretty nearly the last 20 years identifying "male" behaviors as pathologies that need to be circumscribed, if not outright "corrected", and wonder why young men are checking out. There is a joy to physical head to head competition and no reason one can't be intelligent AND enjoy such activity immensely.

    --
    -Styopa
  32. Re:Why doesn't he want to live in Africa? by MBGMorden · · Score: 2

    I see you couldn't address my simple question.
    Why doesn't he want to live in Africa, among his own race, and ONLY his own race? Could it possibly be because he is a 'white supremacist', and believes that white people make better societies than blacks do?

    Perhaps because most people don't take race into account at all for such positions and economically people tend to be much better off in the US? Afterall if his goal was to live among white people as you suggest then several countries in Europe would be a far more sensible choice.

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  33. What a pretentious jock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Making fun of people who use vector in their daily lives even though he's a professional mathematician??

    Jocks never change.

  34. Doesn't surprise me by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I know it's just an anecdote, but in my personal experience, at the higher levels of football (college and up: I played in college and have known several people that have moved on to the NFL) it takes a certain amount of intelligence to succeed, simply because the plays and the calls get more complicated. And while the stereotype of offensive linemen is that they are big and dumb, from what I have seen is that they actually tend to be smarter than other players. On my college team at least 2-3 out of our teams academic top 10 every year were offensive linemen, and a surprising number of our offensive linemen went on to graduate school, whether at our school or others. Of course, I may be slightly biased as I was an offensive lineman, I was one of those that went to grad school, and I was on my team's academic top 10 all 4 years.

    Another interesting observation I have made is that certain personalities or characteristics seem to congregate to certain positions. For example, if you were to walk through a college or NFL locker room, more often than not you can tell if a player is offense or defense based solely on the state of their locker: offensive players tend to have cleaner, more organized lockers while defensive players tend to have messier, jumbled lockers.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    1. Re:Doesn't surprise me by shoor · · Score: 1

      I remember reading years and years ago about this. The San Diego Chargers were a football team way down in the cellar of the rankings, so they hired a psychologist to try and figure out what was wrong with the team. He noticed that the defensive players had messier lockers. He ended up giving a personality description of the typical players in each position. The only one I remember is that he described the safeties as 'assassins'. I remember that because I always kind of felt that if I had become a professional football player (not that that was ever going to happen), the position I'd probably have wanted was safety, partly because they seemed to be the most 'individualistic' players on the field, opportunists, reading the situation and reacting rather than following a set script. (Yeah, I know, the coach or captain may call for something like a safety blitz, but relatively speaking, they seemed to be the most independent players on the field.)

      --
      In theory, theory and practice are the same; in practice they're different. (Yogi Berra & A. Einstein)
  35. Not surprised by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 2

    In my first year of college I had one math professor who was a former pro football player and another who was a former pro hockey player. Both were excellent professors.

  36. There is a term for this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In superhero and roleplaying game terms we have a name for this: Genius Bruiser.

  37. Re:Sociopath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You do realize that most if you go down lists of people who are either confirmed sociopaths or suspected sociopaths, you get a list of serial killers, most CEOs of major corporations, most world leaders, etc. People who like to hit other people aren't typically considered sociopaths. Sociopaths destroy the people around them and society in general as they don't feel the need to conform to social norms and are completely willing to bend those norms and manipulate people to their gain. That's why they tend to end up in positions of power. One of the classical signs of being a sociopath is to have a complete lack of empathy. To know what you are doing is wrong and will hurt others, but to not care about it.

    For him to show signs of sociopath tendencies, he'd have to go around hitting people any time he felt he could get away with it, whether or not they're consenting. The fact that he limits it to consensual situations explicitly defines him as to not be a sociopath.

  38. Learn what the word sociopath actually means by sjbe · · Score: 2

    The mind of the true sociopath.

    Apparently you don't know what the word sociopath means. Enjoying playing rough contact sports does not make you a sociopath. In fact off the competitive field most athletes who are good at contact sports like football, MMA, wrestling, etc are about as far from being sociopaths as you can get. I've been a wrestler and a wrestling coach for about 35 years so I speak from long first hand experience. Had you bothered to speak with anyone actually involved at those sports you'll find that most of them are very calm, caring, decent people.

    When I go too long without physical contact I'm not a pleasant person to be around

    Funny I would have thought the opposite.

    That's because you made some ill founded assumptions about something you plainly know nothing about.

  39. Re:It's WHY I've asked this:... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're crapflooding off topic hypocrite. You have failed again.

  40. Playing contact sports != mental illness by sjbe · · Score: 2

    Thanks for your anecdote, which comprehensively contradicts all other research into abnormal psychology.

    You could bother to look up the definition for yourself in any clinical textbook and you'd find that he was largely correct although the term sociopath isn't really used by professionals. Furthermore in both cases the definition has to do with an inability to form emotional attachments or feel empathy towards others. That has NOTHING to do with enjoying rough contact sports. The mere fact that someone enjoys a rough contact sport does not and never did mean that a person has an inability to form emotional attachments, feel empathy or that they are manipulative.

    Oh, and if you like hitting people, you're violent. It's sort of the definition of the word. And hitting people is not the same thing as enjoying physical activity or contact.

    You will find that most of the male population enjoys rough contact sports to some degree. If you don't personally, that is fine but you ARE an exception. Sports like (american) football, MMA, boxing, rugby, hockey etc are popular in significant part precisely because of their rough nature. Does that make the participant's violent? I suppose to a degree but sports are an appropriate outlet. And you are wrong that it isn't the same thing as enjoying physical activity and contact - it is a subset of those things. What you need to worry about is people who hit others at inappropriate times. If you step on a football field, you know what you are getting into and accept the risks involved which may include you getting hit rather hard. This does not make the person doing the hitting psychotic, sociopathic or otherwise mentally ill.

  41. Amused is it here: Why? Ok... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They can downmod me as I don't have limits on my posts counts like most "AC" posters - no stopping me, IF I wish... I do have the option to post again, as much as I like, anytime.

    Thus, making them blow their modpoints, which they DO "run dry" of... lol!

    * :)

    (If the "best they've got" in my 'courageous detractors' is mere 'downmods' on an easily cheated so-called "moderation system"? They don't have squat... & they KNOW it!).

    Martial Arts? I don't know *WHERE* you got that from, as I didn't mention it, but, I did that ages ago (8th-10th grade, gratis, learning from a friend down my block who was a 5th Dan blackbelt in MuTai (sp?) & go-ju ryu (that's what he called them @ least - I was his 'punching bag' for the 1st yr. but I'll never forget him for it, I learned a lot...)).

    APK

    P.S.=> See subject - it makes me laugh that they do it, knowing they're wasting their time & "ne'er-do-well" lives doing it, but yet NEVER ever disproving points I make here validly & on-topic... apk

  42. Re:Sociopath by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you don't understand the difference between enjoying sports and racing to release endorphins and:

    I love hitting people

    then there's really no helping you.

    Nonsense. I've played Ice Hockey for years as a way of getting excercise, stress release, and agression control.

    And that works a trick. I was always considered the face of calm rationality at work, the guy that doesn't bother to panic. Assertive but never aggressive. On the ice however, a bit different of a story. I modelled my play after Esa Tikkanen, and Darius Kasparitus, Clowns on the ice that you mess with at you own risk. so I gave and took my fair share of hits.

    A hockey player that abuses his wife is pretty rare. We tend to have no agression left after the games. A lot of successful people play that sport, and yes, it is pretty violent. Just like we love it. And yes, we love hitting people within the context of the game. We don't need your help.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  43. That's nitpicking... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: He'd be faster if he did what you said, that's certain (of course, he's crippled, but put a guy with a mind like his to work, properly motivated? He might surprise us all...).

    You're being rather "obtuse", don't you think? For instance, I don't even imagine I could play in the same league with say, Michael Jordan, in basketball - he's got FAR more experience & saavy, which I *might* be able to accrue over the same timeframe as he did... however, God didn't genetically gift me with his physique/height, so there you go.

    APK

    P.S.=> You guys here are amazing - I was merely making a point that IF/WHEN you apply yourself, you can do amazing things, & even surprise yourself...

    HOWEVER, in fairness:

    Perhaps I ought to have added "within reason + considering 'design-constraints'"...

    Just so you couldn't nitpick!

    Then again, I make a post a bit longer than most? Trolls would pull their WEAK "TL:DR" b.s., since it'd be all they'd have (along with bogus downmods via sockpuppets to cheat the moderation system here)... apk

  44. Therapy through sports by sjbe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Really nobody should be playing football.

    Curiously this is almost always said by people who never played themselves. Tell me, what exactly is the problem with consenting adults playing a potentially violent game where there is some chance of getting hurt? How is it worse that an X-Games skateboarder who knows he's going to injure himself at some point? Or a sailor who knows they might drown?

    Brain injuries are just one of the numerous medical problems caused by football

    The only real problem I see with that is that children aren't adequately protected by the rules of the game when they play it. If an adult wants to take the risk of injury then that's their problem. They can reasonably be expected to understand the potential consequences of their participation. Children, not so much and incidence of concussions and certain other injuries in american football are far higher than for most other sports played by youths.

    One might consider why one has hostile moods in the first place rather than trying to control that demon by feeding it.

    One of the demonstrated best ways to deal with hostile or other moods is through exercise and sports. I cannot think of a more appropriate outlet or better treatment for such issues. I would much rather someone work out their issues on the playing field than in some less appropriate venue.

    1. Re:Therapy through sports by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      Really nobody should be playing football.

      Curiously this is almost always said by people who never played themselves. Tell me, what exactly is the problem with consenting adults playing a potentially violent game where there is some chance of getting hurt? How is it worse that an X-Games skateboarder who knows he's going to injure himself at some point? Or a sailor who knows they might drown?

      You make very good points, though I read the GP as pointing out the apparent irrationality (to some) of playing football, rather than trying to outlaw it or something. It's one thing to make an argument that "no one should do X because X is bad, and thus X doesn't make sense"; it's slightly different to argue that "no one should ever be allowed to do X."

      In any case, whatever the GP meant, I certainly don't have a problem with consenting adults doing whatever -- particularly if they are informed about the consequences of their actions.

      Brain injuries are just one of the numerous medical problems caused by football

      The only real problem I see with that is that children aren't adequately protected by the rules of the game when they play it.

      Here's where your comment begins to seem a little disconnected from the current debate. You later go on to discuss "incidence of concussions and certain other injuries" for children and such. It's true that "concussions" and various other acute injuries are a significant problem, and perhaps modifications to rules to encourage more "sportsmanlike" play or whatever could help with some of those. But rule changes simply aren't going to change the fact that slamming your brain into your skull at high speed repeatedly for years on end now seems like it may have serious potential for chronic brain damage.

      Perhaps even more distressing are recent studies that suggest the possibility of significant effects on the brain even without concussions. If this latter research is confirmed and shown to have long-term consequences, it suggests that the problem can't be fixed just by tweaking the rules or discouraging serious injuries -- the potential for chronic brain damage may simply be part of a game where people slam heads together on a regular basis.

      I don't think there's enough evidence to make this latter claim yet, but if it proves to be true, there is in fact at least a valid argument to support GP's contention that "no one should be playing football," assuming they care about brain function. The use of padding, helmets, and various other equipment may have had a positive effect of preventing serious acute injuries, but it may also have the unintentional effect of allowing players to play longer and harder in other ways and thereby sustain serious chronic injuries without realizing it.

    2. Re:Therapy through sports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Going by his words in the article, I think he's effectively addicted (in the medical sense) to the game (or some aspect of it, most likely the adrenaline kick he cannot find elsewhere) and at this point cannot really give his consent any more.

      Now, I'm not sure about his particular case, but most football players get hooked when they're too young to make such decisions and when they're recruited nobody takes care that this happens when they're 21 and fully informed of the risks. The NFL isn't much better than the tobacco lobby.

    3. Re:Therapy through sports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yea all that exercise worked out so well for Andreas Lubitz

    4. Re:Therapy through sports by John+Bokma · · Score: 1
      However:

      For reducing anger and aggression, the worst possible advice to give people is to tell them to imagine their provocateur’s face on a pillow or punching bag as they wallop it, yet this is precisely what many pop psychologists advise people to do. If followed, such advice will only make people angrier and more aggressive.

      Source: http://www-personal.umich.edu/...

    5. Re:Therapy through sports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes! Thank you for pointing out the positive cathartic use of sports.

      "...consider why one has hostile moods"....this guy is a hypocrite. All men are born with hostile moods, it's called testosterone. Even the most passive, sensitive, and intelligent of us. In fact, if you are "sensitive" (speaking from experience) then you are also likely highly emotional, and therefore occasionally volatile when those emotions overflow.

      I've known a few quiet nerdy types who look down at "sports" and "violence". Then after bottling it all up for years, it comes out in some self-destructive violent outburst or knee-jerk reaction to something trivial. In other words, they eventually "crack".

      I prefer to vent these perfectly natural emotions using a variety of methods including intense sports.

  45. Re:Sociopath by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Thanks for your anecdote, which comprehensively contradicts all other research into abnormal psychology. A sociopath is just a slightly better adjusted psychopath, and psychopaths are frequently extremely violent.

    Why the correlation of someone that plays sports, with psychopaths who kill people?

    That certainly escalated fast.

    Oh, and if you like hitting people, you're violent. It's sort of the definition of the word. And hitting people is not the same thing as enjoying physical activity or contact.

    Such a digital world you live in. But you are wrong. And here's some examples of why. Many women enjoy giving a guy a smack now and then. No malice, no intent to hurt, just sort of I guess you would call it a "love tap". And some times it can sting. They only do this to men they like and know well. My wife does this all the time, usually accompanied with a "smartass" toward me. This is not violence, it's one of the sillier forms of affection.

    Now on to the players who hit each other. We're playing a game, we hit each other. But we're not trying to hurt each other - and the exceptions tend to get tossed from the game. Intent is important.

    And for people who cannot deal with it, there is always spinning classes.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  46. Not really that rare by sjbe · · Score: 1

    It is quite rare for someone to be capable of working at a professional level in sports and academics at the same time.

    Not as rare as you might think. I've been in the sport of wrestling for 35 years and D1 college wrestling has world class talent in the sport. Right now the toughest wrestling conference in the country is the Big10. The second toughest conference is the Eastern Intercollegiate Wrestling Association (EIWA) which consists primarily of the Ivy League and Patriot League schools - schools like Lehigh, Cornell, Princeton, Harvard, American, Army, Navy, Columbia and the EIWA routinely has several of the top ten teams in the country. Brains and athletic talent go together far more often than many realize. Schools with high academic standards may not have as deep a bench as schools without high standards but they certainly can compete.

    While the number of people who are gifted in both academics and sports is necessarily smaller than the number who are gifted in just one or the other, you'll find that it isn't particularly unusual for someone to excel in both. I myself competed in D1 college wrestling at an EIWA school while getting an engineering degree and I now have two master's degrees, one in business and one in engineering. And I wasn't the most academically gifted athlete on my team. There were guys who were All Americans on my team who got better grades than I did. People who think smarts and athletics rarely go together hasn't met a lot of real athletes.

    1. Re:Not really that rare by Pulzar · · Score: 1

      I myself competed in D1 college wrestling at an EIWA school while getting an engineering degree and I now have two master's degrees, one in business and one in engineering.

      Not to take anything away from your achievements (I certainly couldn't compete in any sport at that level), but college wrestling isn't exactly "professional-level sports". Your athletic activity was still a part-time one while focusing on your education... The professional athletes, whose full-time job is to play sports, are exceedingly rarely accomplished academics at the same time.

      --
      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 filled with CD-ROMs.
  47. Re:Surprising to those unfamiliar with mathematici by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was his first name Khalid? Does he play classical guitar? If so, we may have studied under the same professor.

  48. So Basically... by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

    ...he's the Incredible Hulk?

    When I go too long without physical contact I'm not a pleasant person to be around.

    We're making him angry. We wouldn't like him when he's angry.

  49. OOOooo, "subtle threats", lol... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Show up @ my door w/ that bat & *try* use it: I've had to do that in this neighborhood before sadly, I've got NO problems with it - & I've always come out "on top"...

    * Plus I severely DOUBT you'd even make it to my doorstep alive (w/out being eaten alive by "the natives" around here)...

    Your "unidentifiable ac post" now? Speaks WORLDS about you - you're too much of a chicken-shit to stand behind your words... fact.

    APK

    P.S.=> Funniest part is, I know WHO you are now - clue: Get over it - you're sick in the head buddy!

    See, oddly & IRONICALLY enough, I stumbled across that postcard you sent me yesterday from SWEDEN ("Spring Cleaning" here is why)!

    Face facts - You started up w/ me, & had to "eat your words" for it, lol... I simply used the ammo YOU stupidly provided, & you're still "stinging" from it? Grow up, lol... apk

    1. Re:OOOooo, "subtle threats", lol... apk by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      That wasn't me, but it is nice to see you finally admitting that you got the card--it only took you a year or so.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    2. Re:OOOooo, "subtle threats", lol... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zontar the weak minded is a better name for you http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    3. Re:OOOooo, "subtle threats", lol... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had to do that in this neighborhood before sadly, I've got NO problems with it - & I've always come out "on top"...

      No you haven't, and everyone can tell.

  50. Re:Surprising to those unfamiliar with mathematici by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    Not everyone can run the probabilities in their head...oh wait...

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  51. Re:Surprising to those unfamiliar with mathematici by alvinrod · · Score: 1

    I don't follow football a lot, but my understanding is that players on the offensive line are a lot less susceptible to this problem. They don't tend to tack other players or collide at high speeds. They're almost right next to the opposing player who needs to be stopped and usually just end up grappling with this person. Contrast this with other positions where the player needs to tackle someone or ends up getting tackled a lot.

    Players on the line are more likely to have their knees worn out. Carrying that much weight around is going to be hard on the knees already and the constant up/down motion doesn't help matters at all.

  52. Re:Sociopath by Zalbik · · Score: 1

    If you don't understand the difference between a pithy remark and an actual desire to do someone harm, then there's no helping you.

    Or are you making the "insightful" claim that all football players are sociopaths?

  53. You meant to say "karateka" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Fighters" are either soldiers or people who do full-contact armed sport combat. People who spar competitively in the Asian martial arts are called "karateka". It's a meaningful distinction, art .vs. sport.

  54. Re:Surprising to those unfamiliar with mathematici by DroolTwist · · Score: 2

    I doubt they are less susceptible. They may even be more susceptible, as they are butting heads on every snap, not just when they tackle or are tackled. Christ, just take a look at their helmets after the first quarter. I was a pulling guard in high school, and trust me; you'd be amazed at some of the impacts you experience on the line. And that was 20 years ago. These guys today are 6'7, 300+ lbs, and some run a 4.6-4.7 40 yard dash. The amount of power they generate off the line is incredible.

  55. Re:Surprising to those unfamiliar with mathematici by Immerman · · Score: 2

    Not anymore they can't...

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  56. It was downmodded... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: For no good reason as stated. Someone upmodded is all.

    You're correct: I always DO post ac... why?

    Well - Would you like to see some of the 'threats' I've gotten in regards to telling me to get a "registered 'luser'" account here & how said AC troll (+ registered lusers) said they would "modbomb me to hell" etc. & even using TOR to do it (webmistressrachel for example)...

    I've got many of those bookmarked (as I was instructed to do in fact).

    You can see how one loon sent me a postcard above, ac post of course, & said things about "bringing a baseball bat to my door" etc. (which since he posted ac isn't impressing me @ all whatsoever on that note - it shows he's TRULY, a cowardly little worm, nothing more... utterly reprehensible & disgusting, imo @ least).

    No... I don't INTEND to *ever* be an "easily tracked sheep", since once you make an 'enemy' online, especially nerd weasels, they stoop to such "LOWS" as that, every single time (makes me laugh & proves my points here in fact). I do JUST FINE, minus 'modpoints', & that's really all I "lose out on" not having such an account here... if I have to tell something to someone? I do it directly (ala "Good Job/Good Post" etc.) is all.

    APK

    P.S.=> Anyhow/anyways: Nice to see someone upmodded my post now (to offset that initial downmod on it made for no good reason), but it's time to continue my "Spring Cleaning", so gotta "jet" & wash the car... apk

    1. Re:It was downmodded... apk by EmeraldBot · · Score: 1

      Dude, you have no anonymity. With less than five minutes of my spare time, I know your entire name: Alexander Peter Kawalski, hence your nickname of APK. You are a Verizon customer, and you currently live in Syracuse, New York. You can be found at 903 East Division Street, Apartment #1, bottom floor. The house is a bit of a dingy gray/blue color, you have a few wooden chairs out back in your poor excuse for a yard, and there's a wooden power pole directly by your house.

      Post AC all you want, but it's not going to stop anyone from finding out who you are.

      --
      "Set a man a fire, he'll be warm for the rest of the night. Set a man afire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
  57. Re:Sociopath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pretty much this, been playing hockey (Left D) since I was 5 ish. There's nothing like somebody stepping up to you and then putting them on their ass. Off the ice, I'm easy-going and mild mannered.

  58. Re:Sociopath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also, I'd also like to add to all those people saying that "hitting" in any context is bad, fuck off you a-sexual eunuchs. I have hair on my balls, testosterone in my blood, and aggression that needs a healthy outlet. In short, I'm a man.

  59. Re:Sociopath by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Pretty much this, been playing hockey (Left D) since I was 5 ish. There's nothing like somebody stepping up to you and then putting them on their ass. Off the ice, I'm easy-going and mild mannered.

    Stress relief 101! Nothing takes the edge off a hard day at the office like Hockey. And not like I didn't take my share of bumps.

    And the part that some can't understand, except in the case of personality conflict, we'll go out and have a brew or two with the folks after the game. The rough stuff stays on the ice.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  60. Re:Sociopath by chihowa · · Score: 1

    Now on to the players who hit each other. We're playing a game, we hit each other. But we're not trying to hurt each other - and the exceptions tend to get tossed from the game. Intent is important.

    I think that this is an important distinction to draw attention to. The overwhelming majority of contact sports do not condone the intentional injury of other players. There's a general acceptance that incidental injuries are inevitable, but the same is true for non-contact sports and even solo athletic activities. Even when hitting other people is a part of the sport, doing so recklessly or maliciously is not cool and will end with you being excluded from the game or entire sport.

    --
    If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  61. Re:Sociopath by IMightB · · Score: 2

    100% correct, actually most of the time, the beer effect is applicable to off-the-ice fist fights as well.

    I've never understood this whole fighting is 100% bad mentality. We are animals, the product of evolution. We have plenty of traits still with us that meant the difference between life and death on the Savannah's. For some reason, some people think that these traits (such as aggression) are legacy things that are not needed any more. I'd argue that many of these traits are not only needed, but just as important as ever.

    I also, think in these days of "think of the children, can't we just hug our problems away, lets form a circle and sing Kumbaya" we simply do not get a chance to properly (practice/hone) these skills/traits and sports creates an artifical environment where we can exercise these traits.

    I'm not saying that there are cases where people have REAL issues with aggression, but I'm definitely NOT on the contact sports are evil camp.

    You don't like contact sports? Don't play them, but also don't try to force your opinion down everyone's throats. There's all sorts of activities/choices that are proven to cause harm to the body and mind, sitting on your ass in your mom's basement all day, with the only social face-to-face contact you've had with a living human, other than your mom, was six months ago, is probably the worst of them.

  62. Re:Sociopath by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Even when hitting other people is a part of the sport, doing so recklessly or maliciously is not cool and will end with you being excluded from the game or entire sport.

    Definitely. I was involved in one of those rare cases. A fellow was pissed at me for one reason or another, and took a full downward baseball swing at my lower back with his stick., designed to make it under my padding. Hurt prety good.

    That was the involuntary end of his participation in the league.

    On the other side, where most players are, I was skating with the puck behind the goal, when another player was messing with me with his stick, like usual, we'll just try to slow the other guy down.

    Something got messed up, and the blade of his stick managed to do down the front of my hockey pants, and lift my cup away from my body. We both figured out at the same time, all I could think to do was collapse, he dropped the stick, and the ref stopped the game. I wasn't hurt at all, but the poor guy was fearful he'd get a visit form my wife.

    The funny part was the ref (a friend) decided to have some fun by having a conference with the other refs to decide if the stick was allowable to be used again, or had to be discarded as a hygiene issue.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  63. Don't put words in my mouth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That I never stated: Did I SAY I had "anonymity"? No. Wrong on part of that information (it's stale)... See subject!

    * Do you actually THINK I care if someone knows who I am? Heck - I actually want others to know who I am (especially in the field of computing) &/or things I've accomplished of decent note in it (& yes, there are PLENTY of those)...

    APK

    P.S.=> Anonymity? It's for people with NO honor, or integrity (period) imo @ least - which is WHY I post using my initials to identify myself @ least, with my REAL initials... apk

    1. Re:Don't put words in my mouth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I forgot to add that it REALLY makes it EASY for people to **impersonate me** and "attribute" statements to ME such as "I voted for Hitler" and "I like to diddle sheep".

      While I'm too BUSY to NOTICE because I'm posting ***100+ times*** in response to another post that points out what a CLUELESS, "batshit-crazy" *moron* I am, that is.

      APK

      P.S. => Yes, I really do ENJOY being a "LAUGHINGSTOCK" and merely ADD to the FUN by IDENTOFYING myself with my REAL initials... apk

  64. Re:Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu (BJJ) would be a lot less r by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

    ... and it would pay less. I highly suggest it for everyone though.

    I started learning Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu (BJJ) about 6 years ago. One of the first things I noticed was that there seemed to be a higher percentage of technical/professional than I found in other athletic activities I had done in the past. Yes the UFC has made BJJ a bit trendy but it is more than that. BJJ is great for a smaller and weaker person because it effectively demonstrates technique over strength from day one.

    ^^^ this. Pretty much almost every person I've seen in BJJ (or Judo) has a technical/professional job. Training is not cheap, and it requires a certain type of income to keep it up. It is also worth noting a significant number of UFC fighters wrestle in college.

  65. Re:Sociopath by ohnocitizen · · Score: 1

    A hockey player that abuses his wife is pretty rare.

    That's nonsense. You can have a violent sport like boxing and still have the players be abusers. Plus read this.

    Even bigger problem though is that is a misunderstanding of domestic violence and why it happens. It isn't "men have aggression and need to get it out". More like a mix of cultural (shitty views of women as "less than" men, toxic attitudes towards relationships especially marriage, etc) and individual factors. Why not read up on it a bit?

  66. Re:Surprising to those unfamiliar with mathematici by r_jensen11 · · Score: 1

    I don't follow football a lot, but my understanding is that players on the offensive line are a lot less susceptible to this problem. They don't tend to tack other players or collide at high speeds. They're almost right next to the opposing player who needs to be stopped and usually just end up grappling with this person. Contrast this with other positions where the player needs to tackle someone or ends up getting tackled a lot.

    Players on the front lines have incredibly high rates of TBI because one of the common methods used by both the O and D lines is to whack the opposing player in the head to disorient them. TBI is greatly influenced by the frequent whacks to the head as well as using one's own head as a weapon - one doesn't need to be knocked out to have a concussion or subject to TBI.

  67. That can't be right by paiute · · Score: 1

    The Big Bang Theory taught me that all smart people were pencil-necked geeks or had some obvious visual clue that they were intelligent. It is just not possible for someone to be athletic and intelligent.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  68. Re:Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu (BJJ) would be a lot less r by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

    Judo is pretty cheap. One can frequently find classes at the local YMCA for $10-20/month. BJJ, on the other hand, is very proud of what they offer. If you can find lessons for $100/month or less, good luck!

    --
    If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
  69. It's WHY I've asked this... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why aren't we allowed to see who downmods us (or for that matter, upmods us also)? You can't confront detractors, plain & simple (which is EXACTLY how sneaks & whimps behave in life, which is WHY jocks hated them (I was both, I know & it's NOT unjustified - backstabbing's the province of weasels)).

    * In response from "the powers that be" here? LMAO - I heard "We'd have 'flamewars'" - WELL, YOU HAVE THEM ANYWAYS, so that b.s. DOES NOT "WASH"... it's crap.

    The structure of the so-called "moderation" system is here bullshit - it's EASILY CHEATED via the creation of multiple registered 'luser' accounts for 1 thing, & those are used to downmod those you don't like (for no reason), & to upmod the sockpuppeteer's REAL primary account.

    Funniest part is, most of us KNOW that's how it really is around here... the 'moderation system' (aka sockpuppet to cheat the system system) blows, mainly for the reasons above.

    It's a system for weasels, BUILT by weasels that allow it (& to create the means to confront such whimps is EASY - I know this since soylent news runs the /. code, & one of their MAIN devs told me he could make a system where you can confront such detractors, in MINUTES time (& conversely, so you can thank those that upmod you also)).

    As to WHO downmodded me & why? Hey - It's some fool who I've gotten the best of & his "geek angst" is showing. Nothing more (it's pretty obvious): He's "butthurt".

    (Lastly/Added: Last time this post was downmodded http://science.slashdot.org/co... is effete & ineffectual - I'll just post it again, as I said I could ("no limits" posting AC here...)).

    APK

    P.S.=> Personally, since your "ghost really IS in the machine" when you write code, I think it shows the character of those who created the site here in making it that way (backstabbing deceitful weasels, nothing more)... apk

  70. Answer this question bigshot... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The house is a bit of a dingy gray/blue color, you have a few wooden chairs out back in your poor excuse for a yard, and there's a wooden power pole directly by your house." - by EmeraldBot (3513925) on Thursday May 14, 2015 @11:53AM (#49689803)

    Do you own a home? Doubt it. Prove otherwise... & IF you do, which I doubt you'll produce evidence of??

    Hey - I can take "potshots" @ you too (& that photo you're looking at must be VERY old, since my yard's pretty nice + has radically improved since I initially got the place (that's "how I roll/what I do")).

    * :)

    (In fact, I've set myself up fairly well - well enough to no longer have to be a "wageslave" anymore, my bills + taxes are ALWAYS paid in full, like a good citizen does, & I can actually ENJOY the remaining years of my life - running my OWN business, that's proven successful for nearly a decade now in fact so... can YOU say the same? Again - prove it...)

    APK

    P.S.=> You know, I just LOVE fools like you - I can turn your b.s. around with ease... apk

  71. Yes they are pro level athletes by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Not to take anything away from your achievements (I certainly couldn't compete in any sport at that level), but college wrestling isn't exactly "professional-level sports". Your athletic activity was still a part-time one while focusing on your education...

    You are quite wrong. Collegiate wrestling very much IS pro level athletics. I've been there and done it and know first hand. It is a full time job on top of your academic load. We're talking 40+ hours a week when in-season. And at a school like Cornell or Lehigh or Northwestern or Stanford they don't cut you any slack in the classroom. While the pay isn't as much as say someone in pro basketball (not even close), the amount of work it requires is very much the same to be at the top of the sport. Furthermore the quality of the competitors in collegiate wrestling is world class in the top programs. There are guys wrestling in college right now who are among the best in the world. Logan Steiber is just now graduating from Ohio State and he has beaten world champions wrestling in the middle of Times Square. Jordan Burroughs won his first of three world and Olympic titles just months after winning his second NCAA title. I assure you that these guys are pro athletes in every sense of the word even if they don't get paid a whole lot.

    The professional athletes, whose full-time job is to play sports, are exceedingly rarely accomplished academics at the same time.

    Rare but not unheard of. And certainly not as rare as you probably think. There are quite a few coaches in college getting advanced degrees while training for world and Olympic competition. I can show you guys who became national champions while doing medical residencies. I can show you Olympians who were practicing doctors.

  72. "EmeraldBot" impersonating me now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject, & answer the question here http://science.slashdot.org/co... "Emerald Bot"

    * Let's see how a 'bigshot' critic like you handles that... lol, "Run, Forrest: RUN!!!" will be the result on YOUR end I'd strongly wager.

    APK

    P.S.=> I seriously wonder HOW scum like you can live with themselves... apk

  73. Re:Surprising to those unfamiliar with mathematici by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing like hitting/getting hit to clear the mind.

    I loved training, it was a great way to get rid of excess stress energy. The "scream", or Kiai allowed for clearing of the lower chakras and the throat chakra, wonderful release of anger. Serene state of mind resulted from an intense session, yielded deeper meditative states and connecting deeper with intuition facilitating easier problem solving.

    Then age catches up...Sigh.

    On to tai chi.

    A.C.

  74. Eve Online by evanh · · Score: 1

    Play Eve and he'll be all sorted

  75. Re:Sociopath by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    A hockey player that abuses his wife is pretty rare.

    That's nonsense. You can have a violent sport like boxing and still have the players be abusers.

    DIdn't say you couldn't. Can you give me the quote where I sad that spousal abuse is nonexistent in Ice hockey players? And why are you so sexist, not including women, as referenced below. That's misogynistic, you know.Women do play Ice hockey, and women do get into fights and body checking.

    Even bigger problem though is that is a misunderstanding of domestic violence and why it happens. It isn't "men have aggression and need to get it out". More like a mix of cultural (shitty views of women as "less than" men, toxic attitudes towards relationships especially marriage, etc) and individual factors. Why not read up on it a bit?

    Since you have taken this down the men are pigs route, which by the way is a very small part of what I was saying. I knew no guy on any tram I played on or any league I platyed in who was not really mellow off the ice. Feel free to call me a liar. Even in my case, even though I have never been involved an any fracas with my wife, she says she prefers me having played several games a week. Even when we lose.

    But now, men, being the bastard misogynists that they are, here is something to read: http://www.oregoncounseling.or...

    Oregon, that liberal bastion reports....

    I'll make a quick quote from the page

    "Very little in known about the actual number of men who are in a domestic relationship in which they are abused or treated violently by women. In 100 domestic violence situations approximately 40 cases involve violence by women against men. An estimated 400,000 women per year are abused or treated violently in the United States by their spouse or intimate partner. This means that roughly 300,000 to 400,000 men are treated violently by their wife or girl friend.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  76. Re:Sociopath by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    and agression control.

    Do you go out on the field specifically to try and hit someone, or do you take your aggression out on the game.

    There's one thing about smacking a puck and racing around, it's quite another to feel the need to smash someone just to act like a person.

    That is what defines sociopaths.

  77. Re:Sociopath by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Or are you making the "insightful" claim that all football players are sociopaths?

    Depends. Are you playing football to play football? Or are you playing football to go out and smash someone into the ground because if you don't get your weekly dose of hulk smash you become depressed?

    There is a big difference between playing contact sports to play sports, release tension, get exercise etc, and playing contact sports because it gives you a chance to smash a fellow man into the ground.

  78. Re:Sociopath by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    and agression control.

    Do you go out on the field specifically to try and hit someone, or do you take your aggression out on the game.

    There's one thing about smacking a puck and racing around, it's quite another to feel the need to smash someone just to act like a person.

    That is what defines sociopaths.

    I never think about it, so I suppose I don't play specifically to hit people. I play because its one metric ton of fun. The game is really fast - insanely fast at the NHL level - and collisions are simply going to happen, even in the "non-checking" leagues.

    The last thing I want to do is injure someone. But yeah, knocking someone on their butt is fun. And yeah, it does tend to take the edge off a hard day. Just the intense activity relaxes you, (I tend to sweat off ten pounds every game) but the hitting does even more. I simply feel more relaxed and mellow after a game. It is acceptance of being a guy. We do this kind of stuff, because it is inherent nature - and its a sort of ritualized quasi-warfare that substitutes for the more nasty killing people type real warfare. It isn't even remotely sociopathic. Sociopaths simply get kicked out after a few games. We don't want them there.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  79. Re:Sociopath by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    I fully agree. There's nothing sociopathic about playing contact sports. I was just originally calling out the player on his first comments, that he's not a nice person to be around when he's not hitting people.

    Whoever marked that troll didn't actually think about what I wrote, or look up the term in the dictionary. For the record I'm not a nice person to be around either when I don't have my weekly dose of endorphin releasing activity (football)

    Maybe it was a poor choice of his words, maybe he's actually a sociopath.

  80. Hey... by DenaliPrime · · Score: 1

    When are we going to get him on here for an interview?

    --
    I! Tego Arcana Dei.
  81. 1 thing's certain... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're truly an unidentifiable "anonymous" COWARD with no balls, lol!

    So- Wanna find out?

    * Come to my door with that baseball bat you spoke of, you little fucking weasel... we'll see.

    APK

    P.S.=> It'd be the LAST thing you'd ever do, I shit you not... apk

  82. You gotta respect... by Stubbyfingers · · Score: 1

    a guy who knows what he likes to do. Especially when what he likes to do is pound people into the pavement.

  83. Re:Sociopath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, you took OP's comment and went off the fucking rails MRA style. Also, why the fuck would some stranger on the internet look shit up for you? Find your own damn quotes you lazy idiot.

  84. Re:Sociopath by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Wow, you took OP's comment and went off the fucking rails MRA style. Also, why the fuck would some stranger on the internet look shit up for you? Find your own damn quotes you lazy idiot.

    So what you are saying is that you can make any old thing up, and I have to prove I didn't say it? If someone wants to say I said something I didn't - it's up to them to prove it - not me to prove I didn't say it. Derpy. No wonder you are an anonymous coward. Because logic like that is so stupid, you should be embarased to admit you think that way. That at least was a smart move.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  85. Field Medal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He is trying to get the Field Medal or the Fields Medal. Either way he can't lose.

  86. Re:Sociopath by lkcl · · Score: 1

    You'd find that people who aren't training to be pros, but work out that much, are probably more common than you think.

    yep - count me in. i'm currently up to about the same level of exercise as you - about 2 hours a day: tennis or street-skating. tennis is for my eyes - and the social interaction. street-skating is because i find the explosive (sprinting) nature of tennis is causing huge knots in my arm and leg muscles. without this, i am... yeah, not a nice person either :)

  87. Re:Sociopath by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

    I doubt he's really AC more like ohnocitizen in disguise

    --
    The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
  88. Re:Sociopath by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    I doubt he's really AC more like ohnocitizen in disguise

    I'm suspecting the same. And yes, I think he can make any old thing up and expect people to take it as gospel truth.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  89. Re:Sociopath by ohnocitizen · · Score: 1

    Domestic violence is under reported in general, but indeed it is more so for men. I didn't mean to imply they are not also victims of abuse. Simply that your statement that men who engage in an aggressive sport are less likely to commit domestic violence. That is bullshit. All you are offering is anecdotal evidence

    You're putting words in my mouth, I did not say men are pigs. I also didn't say you said it is nonexistent. You did however HEAVILY imply it is rare BECAUSE of how aggressive ice hockey is. Which is silliness.

  90. Re:Sociopath by ohnocitizen · · Score: 1

    What did the AC make up, specifically? Can you point anything out? As for "looking up the quote", it's a total straw man argument. But I guess have fun arguing with each other over that :)

  91. Re:Sociopath by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Hehe, tricked into coming out of hiding eh?

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  92. Re:Sociopath by ohnocitizen · · Score: 1

    Oh great internet warrior who doesn't know how to reply directly to a comment: Well done! Yes I and the AC are the same person! Your brilliance tricked me into replying to a comment thread and thus revealing my identity! Your valid arguments have further convinced me everything I have said simply must be mistaken. Retire your keyboard oh great one you can do no better than this glorious victory.