Slashdot Mirror


Two-Pounder From Lenovo Might Be Too Light For Comfort

MojoKid writes: With the advent of solid state storage and faster, lower-powered processors that require less complex cooling solutions, the average mainstream notebook is rather svelte. Recently, however, Lenovo announced their LaVie Z and LaVie Z 360 ultrabooks and at 1.87 and 2.04 pounds respectively, they're almost ridiculously light. Further, with Core i7 mobile processors and fast SSDs on board, these machines perform impressively well in the benchmarks and real world usage. If you actually pick one up though, both models are so light they feel almost empty, like there's nothing inside. Lenovo achieved this in part by utilizing a magnesium--lithium composite material for the casing of the machines. Though they're incredibly light, the feeling is almost too light, such that they tend to feel a little cheap or flimsy. With a tablet, you come to expect a super thin and light experience and when holding them in one hand, the light weight is an advantage. However, banging on a full-up notebook keyboard deck is a different ball of wax.

134 comments

  1. Give me battery or give me death by Sowelu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you can cut something from 3lb to 2lb, that just means you have room for 1lb more battery.

    Same thing applies with phones. Stop making them thinner, and use the saved space for more battery!

    1. Re:Give me battery or give me death by afidel · · Score: 2

      Agreed on the phones, 2mm thinner does nothing for me, but 2x more battery would change the way I use the phone. However since I started carrying a tablet as my primary remote work machine I have to disagree on that, saving a pound means I'm that much more likely to actually carry it with me.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:Give me battery or give me death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Run an OS that doesn't need 3 lbs of batteries...

    3. Re:Give me battery or give me death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wasn't aware that there was an OS that provided infinite battery life, thanks!

    4. Re:Give me battery or give me death by nine-times · · Score: 4, Informative

      I tend to agree with you less when it comes to laptops, and more in terms of phones. Often enough, when I use my laptop, I'm seated someplace close enough to a power outlet. My laptop has something like an 11 hour battery life, so effectively I pretty much never run out of battery life unless I've just been totally careless. I'd generally rather have lighter weight so I can save my back from some pain. My phone, however, is always in operation and usually in my pocket. Charging isn't terribly convenient, and if I don't charge it every night, I'll probably end up stuck someplace without a working phone.

      However, in the case of this laptop, I completely agree. The reviewer says that the battery lasted around 5 hours with light web browsing, which is too short in my opinion.

    5. Re:Give me battery or give me death by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Part of the problem with a light laptop is that if you've got it on your lap or some other soft or uneven surface, when you start typing, the laptop starts swaying. I don't know the exact weight where it gets to the point of being unusable, but even small fluctuations will subtly frustrate people.

      There may be other problems, but until they can solve this via engineering or design (without increasing weight), there will continue to be such a thing as "too light."

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    6. Re:Give me battery or give me death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you have against Android?

    7. Re:Give me battery or give me death by EvilSS · · Score: 2

      Or? Why limit yourself? They can give you a big, faulty battery and you can have both!

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    8. Re:Give me battery or give me death by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      http://news.cnet.com/HP-releas...

      HP did the sub-3 lb laptop almost 20 years ago. It didn't sell. It even had an integrated optional external battery for those who would rather carry more weight/thickenss for the battery life. It didn't sell. The laptop in general didn't sell because it was $6000, but the battery slice wasn't a popular feature.

      I hear you. I understand you. But you aren't who they are trying to sell this to, so your opinion doesn't matter.

    9. Re:Give me battery or give me death by sjames · · Score: 1

      I suspect the big pricetag was the problem. Nobody is going to cough up 6 grand for a thin laptop and then make it a thick laptop. OTOH, if it's a moderate price, someone might.

    10. Re:Give me battery or give me death by sjames · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I already have a knife for chopping onions.

    11. Re:Give me battery or give me death by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      I own a LaVie Z (it's actually made by NEC who have been selling it for years, but only in Japan) and the battery life is pretty good. Overall it's a very nice machine. Fast, good keyboard, good touch pad, two USB ports and a separate charging port, nice screen... About the only thing that isn't good is the sound from the speakers, but that's always going to be the case in such a small device.

      I got it fit travelling, because I suffer from arthritis so carrying a bulky laptop isn't something I want to do. In the end I decided I wanted a larger screen and upgraded to the 15" X model. Both models are upgradable too. Mine was an early model that I upgraded to 802.11ac and a larger SSD with OPALv2 support.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re:Give me battery or give me death by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      "Might", Reality proves that those who would pay $6k for a laptop wouldn't. So the only actual data is consumers don't cough up for a battery that makes it thicker and heavier. The few who would can be served with other options. So many laptops still have dock ports, so make a snap-on battery for them. I've seen a few around, and nobody buys them, and they don't make many because people don't want them.

      If they were high-demand, people would make 3rd party battery packs, a sliver on the bottom the laptop clips into that plugs into the regular power cord.

    13. Re:Give me battery or give me death by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Dell have been selling dual, and oversized battery options on many models for the past 15 years. The did and continue to sell well.

    14. Re:Give me battery or give me death by edtice1559 · · Score: 0

      Phones draw more power than laptops, too. At least for the interesting things. Try turning on the GPS receiver and placing a voice call at the same time. The batteries will still drain even if you have a 500mA charger connected. Laptop? Not much happening most of the time. Just the screen and WiFi radio.

    15. Re:Give me battery or give me death by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      Most laptops offer a larger battery option. There are after-market cases for most phones that include a secondary battery. The Lenovo X240 has one removable battery and one permanently attached. You can carry an extra removable battery and hot swap. Really making the device lighter and thinner makes sense for phones as it's easy to combine the phone with an auxiliary battery. Harder with laptops as they are always proprietary and you have to buy them from the vendor, but still something that is generally available.

    16. Re:Give me battery or give me death by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      If you can cut something from 3lb to 2lb, that just means you have room for 1lb more battery.

      Same thing applies with phones. Stop making them thinner, and use the saved space for more battery!

      On my phone yes, much rather more battery. on my tablet/portable laptop NO, I want it as light as possible with just enough battery life to be practical. weight is everything when you have to lug it around with you everywhere and require mobility. I currently use a Lenovo and an ASUS both were chosen first and foremost on weight, battery life was second, power/look 3rd.

    17. Re:Give me battery or give me death by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      Dell did the C- and L-400 series (clamshell (3.6lb) and superflat (3.5lb)) subnotes, they did extremely well. I'm looking to buy a new keyboard for my C400 since the battery still lasts five hours per charge, and for the L400 a new battery because everything else still works. I'm not abandoning my Asus netbook though, the Dells are actually better for live audio capture.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    18. Re:Give me battery or give me death by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Hot lithium-ion and magnesium. Brilliant!

    19. Re:Give me battery or give me death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was talking about iOS, but yeah, Android is pretty bad too.

    20. Re:Give me battery or give me death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha, meanwhile the laptop idles at 8-10W which would cause the phone to burst into flames.

    21. Re:Give me battery or give me death by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      So has nearly everyone else. The big batteries that go in the same slot, but stick out. The 9-cell upgrade for the 6-cell basic. They are designed to mainly increase weight, and aren't a thickness-adder for a thin laptop.

    22. Re:Give me battery or give me death by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      My current laptop, a Dell Precision M3800 has it all: light weight, powerful, reasonable (if not fantastic) battery life, 4K screen, and native support for Linux, out of the box but it's hard to figure out what something the same size would be like at 1/4 the weight.

      But I'm agreeing with other comments: I'd rather have this exact weight laptop with 3 days of battery life.

      A few years back, I bought the phone with the very best battery life and I don't regret it one minute. Now on its third year, the phone still easily powers through a day with 50% or so battery life, and never leaves me high and dry when flying commercially which is when battery life is most important.

      My next phone will be the phone with the best battery life Now that I finally have a powerful laptop that isn't also dreadfully heavy, battery life will once again be #1 for my next purchase.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  2. everything you always wanted in a laptop. by turkeydance · · Score: 0

    and less.

  3. Toshiba also does this by slashmydots · · Score: 0

    The new R30 and Z30 models from Toshiba are a magnesium honeycomb design that's supposed to be really tough. I don't believe them. Their modern satellite series is pathetic. They're around 4 pounds but still have 15.6" screens. They're the same old composite material that laptops have been made with for years so naturally it cracks and fractures and bends and really doesn't impress the person holding it. They're so stupidly fragile! I've had 6 HP sleekbooks come in with shattered screens too, which makes sense since the lids are about a half centimeter thick. This stupidity needs to stop.

    1. Re:Toshiba also does this by TWX · · Score: 1

      Their old Satellite lines weren't much to write home about either. I ended up with several Satellite 1700 series in the past because numerous broken ones came my way, was ultimately able to make one good one with all of the cannibalized machines but the ports were way, WAY too fragile and the hinges tended to stick and break the adjacent metal parts.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  4. Weight has always been a "quality" factor by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Weight plays a lot into our perception for how solid and well built things are, even when they're not. Lightweight is great, but go too far and things feel like a fragile toy.

    This is almost too good a problem to have with a laptop -- too lightweight? Put more battery in it.

    1. Re:Weight has always been a "quality" factor by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      Is it really the weight or the structural feel of the body? If it feels light and flimsy, then I would be worried, but not with light and sturdy.

      The choice of materials and the way it feels in the hand when you try to flex is really what is important, IMHO.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    2. Re:Weight has always been a "quality" factor by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      That's how I felt about the iPhone 5 vs 4. The 4 with glass was heavy enough it felt like a solid block. The 5, when tapped firmly on the back, had this vibration that I think is the camera element. Maybe the extra weight damped the vibrations? It made it feel cheaper. I tested a friend's 5 and it had the same vibration when tapped on the back. It affects nothing functionally, but it has a non-premium feeling.

    3. Re:Weight has always been a "quality" factor by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      There is no such thing as "feeling cheap" though. It used to be that plastics were inferior to metal so when we felt them we thought of poorly made things designed to not last very long. High tech composites may be better materials than metal so the statement "feels cheap" doesn't seem to apply. If it's too light, you could just add a lead weight. Or as an earlier poster suggested, more battery. Most laptops by the way do offer an upgraded battery that weighs an extra half pound or so if you really want it to feel heavier.

    4. Re:Weight has always been a "quality" factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There is no such thing as "feeling cheap" though"

      I see you've never been in a Subaru. My friend has a 2014 WRX, the interior feels very cheap. Cheap like my first car, a 1989 Mercury Tracer Wagon. If you don't think things can feel cheap, you need to get the sliver spoon out of your mouth, get off your plinth, and join all of us low wage scum of the world, because things most certainly can feel cheap, and those of us who don't have infinite incomes have most certainly experienced it.

  5. I doubt it feels cheaper.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. than this POS Dell Latitude E7240.. Worst machine I've had and it's ~2kg. The Lenovo x201 which I had before was so much better..

    I travel and work a lot with my laptop in one hand so a 1kg laptop would be extremely nice. Oh and this Dell have the excellent screen resolution of 1366x768.. F-ing worthless and makes it feel even cheaper, ignoring the whole keyboard flexing when pushing buttons etc...

    1. Re:I doubt it feels cheaper.. by I4ko · · Score: 1

      I've been using a E7240 for the past year and half and it is a wonderful machine, I have zero keyboard flexing. I travel with it all the time, in a small vertical messenger bag. I agree on the screen res, but that is because the company didn't spring a measly $60 wholesale for the full 1920x1080 screen which is available. I've good a good I5 in it though. My only other gripe is it does not have a trackpoint and I hate trackpads.

  6. Minthly Lenovo - Advertorial, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    courtesy of MojoKid. this time with a hint of critique - as we wouldn't notice.

  7. Latest Macbook compromises too much by presidenteloco · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Light is great, for travelling, as long as strong enough.

    But the latest Macbook (around 2 pounds) has two key problems that would prevent me buying it.

    1) The keyboard feel really sucks compared to the Macbook Air. Not enough travel. And just feels shaky and iffy.

    2) Having only one port (a USB C doubling as the power connector and for any peripheral) is going one step too far.
    Firstly, it doesn't have the amazing magsafe connector's safety, which is a showstopper for me.
    Secondly, it is not a rare use case to want plug power AND at least one peripheral (e.g. extra screen, usb memory stick, tethered smartphone.)

    So this one lost Apple's famous design edge and QA excellence. Are they slipping?

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    1. Re:Latest Macbook compromises too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I shouldn't have to ask, but this is slashdot: you are aware this article isn't about the macbook, aren't you?

    2. Re:Latest Macbook compromises too much by presidenteloco · · Score: 1

      Oh give me an f**ing break. A comment about a similar laptop in the same weight class is pretty much on topic and discusses relevant design points that come up when computer makers make usability compromises to get the weight and size down to these levels.

      Use your friggin' imagination before sniping stupidly.

      --

      Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    3. Re:Latest Macbook compromises too much by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      It's not similar at all. This one has a fucking core i7. Macbook does not compare at all.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
  8. But still no active digitizer by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

    It looks chunky enough it should have had room for at least an optional extra battery to last more than 3-4 hours under real use. And, seriously, how can you make a tablet without a real digitizer these days? Why must I use a crayon or my finger to draw figures or edit photos in tablet mode? (Don't even get me started with that Adonis bullshit - been there, done that, not worth a penny much less $100).

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  9. Too light? by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't worry, it will soon be weighed down with the burden of crippling malware.

    1. Re:Too light? by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      If you are complaining the Osbourne was too light, you need to stop taking steroids - NOW! (it might improve your temper too).

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    2. Re:Too light? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those toolbars can be some heavy stuff.
      The more added, the slower things become as well.
      So I am pretty sure toolbars are made out of pure blackholonium.

      I'll be right back, patenting Windows XP fuelled power stations.

    3. Re: Too light? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are your comprehensions skills failing you again, pedoboy? Did you crap into your own skull to impress some girl in kindergarden?

    4. Re:Too light? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      No, it comes that way already: it has Windows.

  10. Dump user interface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This looks to be a great laptop . . . other than Lenovo totally screwed-up the keyboard. Why is it that Lenovo (and other manufacturers) feel the need to move keys to strange locations, make some keys duplicates and eliminate others? Lenovo has produced laptops with sane keyboard layouts before. Do they have customers that insist on buying laptops that have stupid input interfaces?

    Oh, yeah . . . it's also missing the mandatory TrackPoint (pointing stick) and accompanying pointer buttons.

  11. What we want, what we really, really want. by blueshift_1 · · Score: 1

    We want everything with bigger screens - but not that much bigger. We want everything lighter - but not that much lighter. Sometimes companies tend to focus on what the consumer says they want - instead of trying to figure out what they really want. Let's face it, we are generally terrible at knowing what we want.

    1. Re:What we want, what we really, really want. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      What happens is that segmentation is lost. They make one for everyone, rather than 10 for 10 different types of people. To some, there is no such thing as "too light" but for many there is. There is no such thing as "too big" for me. I had an 18.3 inch screen laptop for years, loved the size, but the rest of the laptop was shit. I'd have gone with a 23" laptop, if someone made it. But I'm back to 15.6, as the big screen laptops are either 3x the cost of one a few inches smaller, or weak-hinged and under-powered. Though, I have my eye on the 17.3" size that's getting more popular, when the right one comes to my area (I'm not in the US, and the one I want is in the US, but I'll buy local if I can, for the warranty), I'll get it.

      But I realize I'm not the normal demographic. Some people care about some specs over others. Some will do work themselves (I almost always buy a laptop with 4G of ram, pull out the chip and throw it away and put in 2x8G, as that's almost always cheaper than buying the 16G version), and some just want it to work (which is a pretty low bar, but one that the makers still manage to miss).

    2. Re:What we want, what we really, really want. by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      I swear I saw a Sony 23" laptop in John Lewis not many years ago... the screen was OK resolution (1680x1200 or some weirdness I think), but the rest of it was complete shit. 1st Gen Core Duo, 2GB RAM, 250GB HD, DVD burner. Did not impress me for six grand.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    3. Re:What we want, what we really, really want. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the Toshiba 18.3 I had was mediocre in spec, and shoddy in build quality. Though my next laptop may be a http://shop.lenovo.com/us/en/l... As 17.3 is much better than 15.3, and 10-point touch. I liked the Acer R7, but they mostly abandoned the line, and never ramped up the screen size.

      I want a big touch screen on my laptop, but not with sub-standard specs to go with it. The Y70 specs are good ($1300 for an i7, 16G RAM, 960M, and 1TB HD), and it's touch and a big screen.

    4. Re:What we want, what we really, really want. by ihtoit · · Score: 1

      I had instant buyer's remorse when I bought my Toshiba. It has a 15.6" panel at 1366x768 and came with 6GB RAM, I could've gone with the one next to it which (OK it was an HP and I'm still not keen on HP having been inside MANY of them fixing mechanical failures) had a 19" screen, a Core i5 dual core and 3GB RAM, but for some strange reason I went for smaller screen, slower processor, more RAM and larger hard drive off the shelf...

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  12. Too light? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just tweak the "weight" slider when you 3D print it at home. In your 3D printed home.

  13. Re:Nice by suutar · · Score: 1

    Can he get a refund for the unused copy of windows, then?

  14. /dev/null by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you checked out /dev/null ?

    Unlimited battery life.

    Unlimited memory.

    Unlimited persistent storage.

    100% secure!

    The only problem is that it's write only with no user output.

    1. Re:/dev/null by Sowelu · · Score: 1

      Man, now I really really want an exploit that hijacks /dev/null and logs it (with reasonable limits to prevent overloading it by piping in gigabytes of random). I'm sure you learn some pretty neat stuff from whatever output normally gets sent there.

  15. Re:Also by meadow · · Score: 2

    Without a trackpoint I don't even want to look at it. Wtf is up with Lenovo not putting trackpoints on a lot of their laptops?

  16. So it's come to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Remember when cell phones kept getting smaller and lighter? Remember when netbooks were going to revolutionize the portable computer? Remember when phablets were the next big thing? Pepperidge Farms remembers.

    1. Re:So it's come to this by tepples · · Score: 1

      Remember when netbooks were going to revolutionize the portable computer? [...] Pepperidge Farms remembers.

      I'm typing this comment on a 10" Dell laptop. So do I get a box of Goldfish crackers?

  17. Re:Also by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    Lenovo, unfortunately, has their own non-Thinkpad laptop lines. These are where the bad ideas that have occasionally spilled over and corrupted the Thinkpads are given full freedom to breed and mutate into ever weirder and less likeable consumer crap.

  18. MOJOKID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1 comment, 1000 submissions. He's a hot hardware boner.

  19. Scenario 47 by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    "As you can see in my PowerPoint slide, the...ah, ah, Aaachoooo!... Hey, where's my laptop?"

  20. Re:Nice by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 0

    No. That would be like demanding that a car dealer refund you the money that the tires cost because you put different tires on the day after you bought it. And that's just stupid, and a stupid thing to suggest. M$ is not oppressing you.

  21. Re:Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A refund for what? It's not like he's paid for the copy of Windows that comes with it.

  22. Re:Nice by Sowelu · · Score: 1

    Ehh, that's not entirely reasonable. I mean, kind of, but it's like the "pirating vs stealing" thing. You're not strictly depriving the dealership of being able to sell that copy of the software again. (Unless it has unique keys even for oems, but that's still silly.)

    Really just arguing against the analogy here.

  23. Too light?? Impossible! by jerel · · Score: 1

    As long as you can use it without it flying off your lap, (we are talking about a laptop, right?) or desk, and the rest of the specs are what you're looking for, why wouldn't you want it to be as light as possible? As long as the "bottom" where the keyboard is weighs enough so the screen doesn't tip it over backwards, I say the lighter the better! Why would you intentionally want something to be heavy? Screw all the conversations around it being preceived as being cheap because it's light. The only people that would think that are people who know NOTHING about what it takes to MAKE things light in the first place! If it weren't for durability factors and little things like flashpoints, I would say make everything out of magnesium honeycomb! Or whatever is next, of course. (Spiderweb anyone?)

    --
    Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.
  24. Re:Nice by tepples · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A refund for what? It's not like he's paid for the copy of Windows that comes with it.

    Then who did pay for it? I was under the impression that PC makers paid about $60 per copy for a lawful Windows install. Or are you claiming that publishers of Windows-only trialware completely subsidize the Windows license?

  25. Re:Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, you can request a refund before you click the license agreement for Windows.
    Actually, people have done this and documented the request & refund and the documents are online.
    So, to keep your [very poor] car analogy, you could request a refund if the dealer for your preferred tire came and installed the new tires before you took possession of it.
    This really is old news.

    Rules for computing:
    Rule #1, M$ is oppressing everyone.
    Rule #2, When M$ isn't oppressing everyone, Bill Gates, through his "charitable" foundation, is oppressing everyone.
    Rule #3, If you don't know what is going on, refer to Rules !1 & !2.

  26. doubt the lightweight laptop will feel too light by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    doubt the lightweight laptop will feel too light once it's in my bag

  27. Re:Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, so you are one of those weirdos that uses those nipple thingies. The rest of the world uses trackpads, sorry.

  28. Macbook Airs have sold millions by adisakp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... and they are in the similar 2 lb weight category.

    1. Re:Macbook Airs have sold millions by adisakp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As long as there isn't flexing (decent stiffness) and there is a good balance (the screen doesn't want to topple over a too-light base), a light laptop is better than a heavy one. Especially if you want to carry it around with you.

  29. Re:Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nipple things are far superior to trackpads

    just like

    tactile real keyboards are far superior to touch screen

  30. Re:Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The TrackPoint (nipple thing) lets you move the mouse without taking your fingers off the home row of the keyboard. Very nice if you have to do any amount of typing.

    How can that be anything but a positive?

  31. My Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Carbon by rssrss · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I bought a new Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Carbon. It weighs 2 lbs 12 oz 1270 g. A bit more than the LaCie. OTOH it is built to Thinkpad standards so it is quite rugged. The keyboard is excellent. The machine came with Win 7 professional and no bloatware. It has a 500 GB SSD. It is fast and easy to use. I love it, and think the money was well spent. The battery life is excellent, it will run all day in ordinary usage. (i.e. not playing streaming HD video).

    --
    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
    1. Re:My Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Carbon by grumpy_old_grandpa · · Score: 1

      But does it run Linux? Last year, when I tried a basic Ubuntu install on the X1 Carbon, it didn't survive the first suspend / hibernate. Maybe things have improved since then.

    2. Re:My Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Carbon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's Ubuntu's problem, not Lenovo's.

    3. Re:My Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Carbon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's Ubuntu's problem, not Lenovo's.

      It's the user's problem, not Unbuntu's.

    4. Re:My Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Carbon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Lenovos problem if they want to sell these laptops to people that want to use Linux.

      Ubuntu don't care, the buyer has plenty other options. Lenovo loses the sale, it's their loss.

    5. Re:My Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Carbon by grumpy_old_grandpa · · Score: 1

      Thanks. At least somebody understands basic business models.

      It's a shame Lenovo cares so little about Linux, despite their laptops being very popular with that customer group.

    6. Re:My Lenovo Thinkpad X1 Carbon by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Lenovo shall surely miss those four sales.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  32. Re:Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tactile real keyboards are far superior to touch screen

    Except when said keyboard butchers the right-shift key. I find it amazing that a company which can produce all manner of complex hinge configurations is unable to create a keyboard with a non-rectangular outline (having a cutout for the arrow keys).

    I immediately write off any laptop that mangles the standard layout - to include chopping down the right-shift key, reversing the Fn and Ctrl keys (FU Thinkpads), reshaping the Enter, or getting creative with the F1-F12 or Esc keys (among other things - Eg. New work laptop (Dell E7450) has a backlit keyboard that turns itself off after 10 seconds - W. T. F. ) On a recent purchase I eliminated all consumer Lenovo notebooks from consideration for this reason. Dollars flow away from idiotic design.

  33. Re:Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Or are you claiming that publishers of Windows-only trialware completely subsidize the Windows license?

    Um, hello, McFly? This has been known for many years already.

    According to Dell's CEO and founder Michael Dell, pre-installed crapware brings the vendor about $60 extra revenue per unit.

    http://news.softpedia.com/news/Sony-039-s-50-Crapware-Fee-Killed-Overnight-81420.shtml

    So, yeah, he's more than welcome to a -$60 dollar refund (i.e. paying 60 extra bucks) to return his unused Windows license. I'm sure the OEM will be happy to take the money.

  34. Here's what's wrong by ITRambo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Lenovo still uses TFT displays in high priced hardware. In this product line you pay an extra $200 to get an IPS display in the Z 360. Our business is a Lenovo authorized reseller. I do not understand why they do not put an IPS display in all their higher end gear. There shouldn't even be a TFT option at $1499. The $1699 model should be the only one available. Reduce the SKU's and hence you have less capital tied up. Sell better products, Lenovo. Your image is tarnishing more all the time. I expect more from the world's #1 PC maker than TFT junk.

    1. Re:Here's what's wrong by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      There's a flip side to this. 2 of the 3 companies I've worked for and one of the government organisations have explicitly specified TFT displays for laptops. Their justification is (and I kid you not) security.

      In these companies all employees were issued with docking stations and laptops. The docking stations had nice IPS displays which kept people happy in their primary place of work but as the theory went the laptops got mostly used on trains, buses, and planes where the TFT panel's shithouse viewing angle actually "improved security."

      It was a weak excuse especially since the government department then jumped on the Surface Pro 3 bandwagon after I left, but I imagine there are actually people out there who come up with these ideas. IPS displays are not at all expensive, yet I still see the vast majority of laptops in work places are borderline crippled in the display department, even the high-end ones.

    2. Re:Here's what's wrong by mczak · · Score: 1

      I'm nearly 100% certain both displays are IPS. One is just anti-glare while the other is glare + touch. The linked review certainly would have noticed that otherwise, but instead just essentially saying the more expensive one is rubbish...
      (FWIW it's TN vs. IPS - both of these are actually TFT.)

  35. Lenovo = Superfish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's all that needs to be said when talking about Lenovo.

    Superfish

    Wankers

  36. Too light? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As someone who has worked with an Osbourne "portable", IF you think it's too light THEN kindly fuck yourself in the ass while sick with dysentery.

  37. Re:Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's great when you have both. If you have a high quality trackpad, I find it's generally faster to use that though. Seems to take less time to slide your finger around on a high resolution pad, than it is to try and make a precise movement with a microscopic joystick.

    The only negative to it when I had a laptop with one is that it can temporarily get out of calibration if you rest on it slightly, causing the pointer to creep.

  38. Re:Also by meadow · · Score: 1

    LOL. I love you. But seriously I really think a lot of the more experimental Lenovo line designs would be fun to try if only - if only - they had trackpoints. I always see a lot of Japanese dramas where there are Lenovo's and I get excited until there's a shot which shows the keyboard and the lack of trackpoint.

  39. Ghetto Blaster Solution by PPH · · Score: 1

    Just like all those annoying radio/cassette players that kids used to haul around on their shoulder: Basically a nearly empty plastic box with tiny little speakers. And some big iron weights glued inside.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Ghetto Blaster Solution by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      Those kids at least were nice enough to play the music for everybody and share. Now people are selfish and carry around little tiny earbuds (that probably have worse audio fidelity than the old boom boxes) but only they can hear the music.

    2. Re:Ghetto Blaster Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey, a ghetto blaster is for toughguys only, you need the weights to sepperate out the wannabees

  40. Re: Nice by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    That has to be one of the most erroneous car analogies ever seen on Slashdot. I have to assume it is a troll as nobody could possibly be that stupid.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  41. Re: Nice by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has to refund to the manufacturer after the manufacturer refund to the customer, because again the license it's unused

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  42. Re:Nice by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

    A refund for what? It's not like he's paid for the copy of Windows that comes with it.

    Then who did pay for it? I was under the impression that PC makers paid about $60 per copy for a lawful Windows install. Or are you claiming that publishers of Windows-only trialware completely subsidize the Windows license?

    no, generally the crapware they ship with it pays for it, actually it usually more than pays for it to the point where coming without windows actually is more expensive for most PC Makers.

  43. Re:Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not a nipple thingy. Everybody knows the proper term is "keyboard clit".

  44. Re:Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally, they sell one without an eraser head.

    But in recent buttonless trackpad models, the trackpad was unusable. A click caused the cursor to wildly move around the screen before selecting something at random.

    Hopefully, they fixed that.

  45. Re:Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know, I think it's a pretty apt analogy. If you request different tires, they aren't going to give you a discount for the old ones, this is well known to anyone who'd ever bought dealer installed upgrades, they charge for the installation on top of the part. And oddly enough, they don't give you a refund for a part if the new part is replacing a standard part. When I got my car, I could get locking hubcap bolts for something like $300 bucks. They'd install them for me for standard shop rates, minimum 1 hour, and there was no discount for the old ones, though they would dispose of them for me for free.

  46. Nonsense by SQL+Error · · Score: 1

    I have a 2lb LG notebook. It's great. It doesn't feel "too light", or flimsy, or cheaply made.

    If these Lenovo models do, it's not the weight, it's the specific materials used, or the construction, or the design.

  47. Re:Also by martiniturbide · · Score: 1

    Damn Lenovo, put 8 trackpoints if necessary, I don't care if they weight an extra kg.

  48. Re:Also by martiniturbide · · Score: 1

    The finger position is not the right one when you use a trackpad. When you use a trackpoint you do not move your hands out of the keyboard area. It is more efficient to use a trackpoint. Also, the trackpad is not as precise of a trackpoint. Sorry but the people that didn't used a trackpoint much do not understands it.

  49. Magnesium-lithium case by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    A magnesium-lithium case: aren't that two metals highly inflammable?

    1. Re:Magnesium-lithium case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is safe. magnesium-lithium alloy has lower flammability than lithium. It is hard to ignite thick sheets of magnesium without a big torch, since MgO has higher volume than the original Mg, it is densely packed on surface of the metal, blocking the rest of metal from reacting with O2. The chain reaction will only continue when the temperature is high enough for MgO to deform and fell off the metal. Your middle school chemistry teacher burned very thin magnesium sheets or wires in front of class, not magnesium brickets like the laptop.

  50. Holding with one hand by Shados · · Score: 1

    With a tablet, you come to expect a super thin and light experience and when holding them in one hand, the light weight is an advantage

    These people must have never worked at a company that uses macbook pros across the board, or a startup using thin lap-tops.

    Everyone holds their lap-tops with 1 hand like if it was a tablet, running around holding them by the lid, and all around handling them like they would their ipads.

    Light lap-tops that you can carry with one hand without effort is a definite advantage for convenience.

  51. Linux crapware by tepples · · Score: 1

    Then why don't they sell Linux machines with Linux crapware, either native or in Wine? They could make a few extra bucks that way by not having to pay the Microsoft tax.

    1. Re:Linux crapware by bmo · · Score: 1

      Because:

      1. Linux users - you know, the people who would actually buy a computer with Linux pre-installed - would stay away in droves.

      2. There are plenty of other specialty shops that will pre-install Linux that won't install the crapware.

      3. EVEN IF some Linux users would buy these machines, the first thing to happen would be a nuke-and-pave (like with Windows machines), or at the very least, degooberification of the machine via a script passed around by a pissed off owner.

      4. Knowing this, crapware "publishers" wouldn't pay a company to bundle their shite because it would be a lost-cause.

      --
      BMO

    2. Re:Linux crapware by tepples · · Score: 1

      2. There are plenty of other specialty shops that will pre-install Linux that won't install the crapware.

      Only on desktops, or also on laptops?

    3. Re:Linux crapware by bmo · · Score: 1

      >or also on laptops?

      Dell will do it, also Acer.

      System76 has been doing it for 10 years.

      Your local independent dealer will nuke-and-pave a Windows machine to sell a system (well, the good ones anyway).

      --
      BMO

    4. Re:Linux crapware by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      because the audience that buys Linux machines is very VERY different to the ones that buy a commodity windows laptop. The crapware vendors rely on making their money back from users too technically lacking to have the skills or knowledge to nuke the installed image from space. While under windows that audience is a large percentage, under Linux it is a fraction of a percent of a much smaller target audience, i.e. it aint worth their time and money.

  52. Re:Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been using Lenovo for years. I get a new one every 2 years from work. Typing this on an X1 Carbon. First thing I do on any new one is disable the trackpad and I only use the trackpoint nipple. I also carry around a wireless mouse. Ideally I'd spend some time and try the trackpad and maybe forget the wireless mouse but the many times I;ve tried, I just can't stand using a trackpad.

  53. Re:Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And people who don't know how to use their thumb on a trackpad think they need a trackpoint (or have really small hands). seriously, my fingers never leave the home row and my left thumb does almost all the mousing where necessary.

  54. What??? by jetkust · · Score: 1

    What in the hell are you talking about???? Light weight is a bad thing? I've been looking for light laptops for years. Now the same morons who think a kickstand is cool for Microsoft surface want heavy laptops to validate their stupidity? C'MON MAN. (and have fun downmodding this post to anyone who actually reads it)

  55. Re:Also by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    Also, the trackpad is not as precise of a trackpoint.

    Sure, and using a joystick is more accurate than using a mouse, right?

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  56. Re:Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you use your thumbs for the trackpad, you can leave all 8 fingers on the home row without even moving them to the nipple.

  57. Re: Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's actually one of the best. You just don't like it because, like most Linux zealots, you live in a constant state of butthurt where every little bit of truth stings like hell.

  58. Re:Also by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    nipple things are far superior to trackpads

    I've heard this asserted, yet I've never seen a study that showed it (I've seen a couple that showed the reverse, but they didn't control for all factors so aren't definitive). I've also never seen any gamers begging for them because they give an advantage in aiming (which is usually a good hint that something is a good pointing device). A modern, high-resolution, large, multitouch trackpad provides better fine manipulation (try using a trackpoint to select an individual pixel on a ThinkPad) and faster large movements (the acceleration in the trackpoint means that the Fitts' Law curve is a different shape because you need to decelerate more to stop).

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  59. Slashvertisement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is hardly news - Apple has been selling lighter MacBooks for a long time.
    Reads more like advertising for Lenovo.

  60. Crap keyboard, crap clickpad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keyboard is crap, trackpad is crap[1]. So, when you need to connect a real keyboard and a real mouse, who cares about the weight?

    [1] missing trackpad buttons, making it impossible to click without dragging at the same time. Yes, I have an L540 at work, which I use as a desktop, unlike my previous HP laptop.

  61. Re: Also by mooterSkooter · · Score: 1

    hahah, clit-mouse - I love it!

  62. Re:Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Says you and nobody else in the world

  63. Can a notebook be too light? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can relate to something being too light. I have owned a couple Macbook Air's and while most times I find the lightness a virtue I do find using a light notebook on a lap or precarious service a bit more problematic. I would almost rather have a bit more bulk then lose even more weight. Eventually the lack of weight makes pulling a notebook on the floor when you trip on the power cord or something more susceptible. Its why i would not buy a new Macbook because the lack of a MagSafe power connector and using the USB C connector is just a accident waiting to happen. I'm sure the Lenovo has just as bad of a power connector and any sudden pull and that notebook would be on the floor.

  64. Re:Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a gamer will use a mouse, but trackpoints and trackpads are unsutable for major gaming

    You say "A modern, high-resolution, large, multitouch trackpad provides better fine manipulation"
    And the mind just boggles, that certainly isn't the case in my experience, not even close

  65. Re:Also by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    Maybe you're using crappy trackpads, but it's very easy with the one on this laptop (MacBook Pro, retina display) for me to move the cursor by one pixel in any direction. With my old ThinkPad (R31, with a under quarter of the pixel density) I could just about move it 1-3 pixels, but had little control within that range.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  66. Not quite... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My reasons for thinking Lenovo builds are now cheap and flimsy have nothing whatsoever to do with their weight.

  67. Ball of wax? by thisisauniqueid · · Score: 1

    Weird metaphor.

  68. Re:Also by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    I disable the trackpads on my Thinkpads. Way too easy to brush it with the palm of my hand, select an entire section of text and type over it. Happens to me over and over again.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  69. Re: Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't get finer control with a finger, than an arm at rest.

  70. Re: Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use an Atari 2600 Joy Stick, for optimal control, and comfort.

  71. Re: Also by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure what you're trying to say. With a trackpad, rolling my finger a little bit moves the cursor a tiny amount. With a trackpoint, there's an acceleration and deceleration component - you have to move the trackpoint to start the cursor moving and then move it back to stop the movement. This involves having to do two fine motor movements in quick succession for a fine cursor adjustment, whereas the trackpad requires only one.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  72. Re:Also by nobodie · · Score: 1

    It's not a nipple thingy, it is clearly a clitoris thingy. It even has the lips to each side and your can.... well lets not go into this too deeply, it is clearly, however, not a nipple.

    --
    Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.