Slashdot Mirror
Microsoft Uses US Women's Soccer Team To Explain Why It Doesn't Hire More Women
theodp writes: "It is not surprising that the U.S. women have been dominant in the sport [of soccer] in recent years. The explanation for that success lies in the talent pipeline," writes General Manager of Citizenship & Public Affairs Lori Forte Harnick on The Official Microsoft Blog. "Said another way, many girls in the U.S. have the opportunity to learn how to play soccer and, as a result, they benefit from the teamwork, skill development and fun involved. That's the kind of opportunity I would like to see develop for the technology sector, which presents a different, yet perhaps even more significant, set of opportunities for girls and young women. Unfortunately, the strength in the talent pipeline that we see in female soccer today is not the reality for technology. The U.S. is facing a shortage of Computer Science (CS) graduates. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, every year there are close to 140,000 jobs requiring a CS degree, but only 40,000 U.S. college graduates major in CS, which means that 100,000 positions go unfilled by domestic talent." Going with the soccer analogy, one thing FIFA realized that Microsoft didn't is that if you want girls to play your sport, you don't take away their ball!
There are more women working at MS that women contributing to the Linux community.
It's time to realise that Abble's products are the biggest abomination these days. Just say NO to the dumb iAbble way!!
Some engineering degrees (Computer, Electrical), math degrees, etc. can be used in lieu of a CS degree provided you can prove you can code.
This is all pandering to the need that companies HAVE to go get H1-B's, when the reality is no, there is PLENTY of local talent that can do these jobs.
When I studied CS there were 5 women and 200 guys in my class. With that in mind, complaining about an IT company not hiring many woman is nonsense.
The important part of the article that was left out of the summary is that Microsoft is trying to address the problem by funding programs that encourage girls to get into the talent pipeline at a young age and stick with it.
Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
As a tech marketing lady I met observed, the men make the stuff and the women sell it in our industry. She added "maybe that's because we're smarter about getting paid!"
Might help if Microsoft, among others, stopped supporting increased tech H1-B quotas. They tend to depress wages and working conditions, making the "pipeline" we're trying to promote less attractive than, say, marketing. Or doctoring or lawyering. There are only so many really smart people to go around, so one profession's gain is another profession's loss. Design engineers seem to have plateaued around very roughly $100K. That's an OK living, but not exactly what I'd call professional earnings.
So the argument is that because more women don't take Computer Science degrees that results in less women being hired, so don't take Computer Science away from them?
Very few women actually enroll in Computer Science / Engineering Programs, as a result this means that the talent pool from which to hire from contains less females vs males. This doesn't mean that big commons don't want to hire women, it just means that there aren't a lot of qualified women pick from.
Why don't you try offering them MORE MONEY, and watch the problem resolve itself! It might not be cool, but classic labor Economics still works in the 21st century.
Of course, Microsoft (or any other big tech company) doesn't really have a reason to do that as long as they can get a bunch of cheap H1-B workers to fill the positions instead.
There's something to be said for the simplicity of old school procedural languages. In some places, such languages are even still relevant. It's not always all about the new shiny shiny.
A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
Is this statistic really true? Are those 140,000 net new jobs, or just job openings that exist for some period of time during the year?
The article cites but does not link to a source for this statistic.
Also, a CS degree is a long, tough slog through dull material that has dubious relevance to most jobs that require a CS degree.
that's what FIFA is good at.
The story submitter and/or editors clearly had some agenda here in using a misleadingly suggestive title.
Fortunately, in technology as in soccer, nobody has taken away the ball, and the women that are interested in the field have just as much if not more opportunity than males to learn, study and pursue a career in Computer Science, and the whole article is bullcrap.
If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
Enough of the gender/race baiting nonsense.
I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
This is an incredibly dishonest way to frame this guy's remarks. Slashdot and Dice should be ashamed.
This is a common tactic used to keep the H1B-type labor programs going in Congress. You get a bonus with H1B labor programs keeping domestic labor costs down and therefore depressing the number of entrants in the field.
http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
And, with the incredible amount of wasteful digital projects that consume human labor, I question whether we really NEED 140,000 new computer people each year. I'd say about half of the projects I have worked on within the last decade have been canceled before completion. Mine can't be the only company engaged in such misdirected waste. Do we really need so many Linux distributions? Does MS really need to shuffle the features around in its latest operating system? Why do the newer web browsers seem to work worse than their predecessors? How does craigslist.com work so well using, zOMG!, HTML with plain fonts? Do touchscreens need to be everywhere? Do automobiles need so many microprocessors and networks(?!) to where they are now at the point of dubious stability? Does anyone really think that the "Internet of things" is going to live up to its hype when anyone over the age of 40 remembers how we were already promised a Jetsons-like paradise in the late 1990s, when the Java virtual machine was going to connect our dishwasher to our toaster? VRML anyone? Virtual Boy (now called "Oculus Rift")?
It's like a thousand-pound man is asking for his second bag of potato chips when really he needs a diet.
Whew, I thought his analogy would be a more foot-in-the-mouth comment along the lines of: despite the pipeline for girl soccer development, they still couldn't compete within men's leagues.
That's because Slashdot and Dice framed his remarks dishonestly to make them sound bad. Slashdot ought to be ashamed. (I correctly expected the thesis of his article to be "Here's what Microsoft is doing to improve the training pipeline," but that's because I assume Slashdot screwed this up.)
With regard to whether women's soccer can compete with men's soccer in terms of competing for American entertainment dollars is an interesting question. I don't watch either sport, but a fairly common opinion on Twitter is that women's soccer is MORE exciting than men's soccer because only the men's game has diving/embellishment, flopping, or "possum-ing." (I gave all three names because the act is ACTUALLY ILLEGAL in hockey, basketball, and gridiron football, respectively.)
Is this actually common, or is this a pretend opinion held by people whose real opinion is "I like international sports, but only when my team wins?"
The reason women succeed at soccer is that there are no men in that field in the US.
That's Blue Ocean strategic thinking: if you want to succeed, go to uncontested markets.
"every year there are close to 140,000 jobs requiring a CS degree, but only 40,000 U.S. college graduates major in CS, which means that 100,000 positions go unfilled by domestic talent."
And this would be a logical inference if the only people looking for jobs were that year's college graduates.
But, actually, very few job openings are filled by fresh-outs.
Conclusion: mIsleading and false.
http://www.geoffreylandis.com
We can strive to ensure that everyone has the same opportunities.
That we can. What we can't do (without things like quotas) is ensure equality of outcome, which is what this article is really about. No matter how neutral and objective Microsoft's hiring practices are, they can't hire women who don't apply there and won't hire women who aren't qualified. There's also, of course, the problem that HR is again confusing credentials for ability, but that's an ongoing issue that's as much of a problem for men with great computer skills but no degree as it is for women.
Good, inexpensive web hosting
Why would anybody, in their right mind, get a CS or IT degree if they knew how shitty the environment was?
Microsoft and every other tech company: We want talent, but we don't want to pay for it. Give us more H1-B workers to cut the average salary, please.
Game corps: We slave-drive our workers, because it's better to take young talent and burn them out so they leave before they get too expensive. Which is why we're always re-inventing wheels.
IT: Dealing with really ungrateful idiots every day, all week, all year. The higher-up the chain, the stupider (with tech) they are.
Why would anyone, male or female, bother to get into this?
Fuck it. Play soccer.
--
BMO
#1 the companies want a glut of workers so they can pay them nothing and use them as tools discarding when completed.
#2 Women being slightly smarter than men don't WANT to go into an industry built on virtual slavery and worker abuse. In general they aren't as flexible or willing to commit as much to a career given the option of a family, there are of course exceptions everywhere, but as long as the IT industry is run like a feudal system that thrives on worker sacrifice it is unlikely to achieve a balance of genders. You can't hire those who don't apply, and you can't force women into a educational course they don't want to pursue.
errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?