Slashdot Mirror


Most People Use Their Phones During Social Events, Despite Thinking It Harms Conversation

Mark Wilson points out that the Pew Research Center has released a new report on mobile etiquette in the age of smartphones. 90% of U.S. adults now have cellphones and carry them around frequently. Pew's survey looked into how this is changing social norms with regard to shifting attention away from physical-world interactions. Most people think it's fine to use a cellphone while walking the streets or waiting in line, but 62% think it's not OK at a restaurant, an 88% disapprove of using one at a family dinner. Disapproval of using a cellphone in a meeting, movie theater, or church is almost universal. 89% of people say they used their cellphone during their most recent social activity, whether it was texting, checking the web, or snapping a picture. Despite this, 82% say cellphone use generally hurts the conversation. 79% of adults say they occasionally encounter loud or annoying cellphone behavior from others in public, and more than half say they often overhear intimate details of other people's lives because of it.

137 comments

  1. So everyone is rude... by gurps_npc · · Score: 2
    Not a surprise to me, the far majority of people are and always have been rude.

    From the people standing in subway doors (do they think we are going to climb out the windows?) to the people talking on the phone, people are rude.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:So everyone is rude... by micahraleigh · · Score: 2

      ... or everyone is hypocritical.

    2. Re:So everyone is rude... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or we don't approve but don't care enough to stop it. Or, and I think this is the case, are raging hypocrits about our cell phone rage versus our cell phone use.

      As long as people are quiet an don't flash too many bright lights, I really couldn't care less what another table does during dinner. What is appropriate at my own table depends very heavily on what is going on. I can't imagine I'd drop a great conversation to check my work email. But I've never been that thoroughly entertained, and some people will go on about things I don't want to talk about (namely other people) and fuck yes, I will send all sorts of messages that I want to move on.

    3. Re:So everyone is rude... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Not a surprise to me, the far majority of people are and always have been rude.

      From the people standing in subway doors (do they think we are going to climb out the windows?) to the people talking on the phone, people are rude.

      Not everyone is rude. This study only looked at the U.S.A.

    4. Re:So everyone is rude... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Remember that democrats hate minorities. Think about why they put plan parenthoods in mostly poor black areas. They hate black and want there to be no black people.

      They hate the young too. They are the party of old (Hilary, Biden, Sanders.)

      It's time to move these people out so they can stop killing us.

    5. Re:So everyone is rude... by The-Ixian · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have relied on public transit every day for years (I don't own a car) and I am continually amazed at the lack of empathy and disregard for other people that some have.

      Even still, I wouldn't say that most people are rude.... It just seems that way sometimes because the obnoxious ones are disproportionately so.

      What really gets me annoyed with people is not mobile device use (it is oddly reverent to see a train full of people with their heads bowed looking at their phones) it is littering in public places... why do people think it is acceptable to throw cigarette butts on the ground or pee all over public toilets?

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    6. Re:So everyone is rude... by Krishnoid · · Score: 2

      why do people think it is acceptable to ... pee all over public toilets?

      Because they're (see item 10) dainty and/or fastidious.

    7. Re:So everyone is rude... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everyone. Have you noticed that it is almost always one of those Republicans that is on the phone and talking loudly. Their kind believes that the louder you talk the smarter you sound. That is why they're so loud. So loud. Just think about how many of their kind you've seen here posting in all caps. In all caps. They're so rude.

      You must be a Republican, you've never ridden a city bus.

    8. Re:So everyone is rude... by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      ... it is littering in public places... why do people think it is acceptable to throw cigarette butts on the ground or pee all over public toilets?

      My personal observation is that when it comes to littering a lot smokers are first in place and beer drinkers are a somewhat distant second.

    9. Re:So everyone is rude... by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      My personal observation is that when it comes to littering a lot smokers are first in place and beer drinkers are a somewhat distant second.

      It's difficult to tell, because beer drinkers' litter has intrinsic value; even bottle caps, if you collect enough of them.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:So everyone is rude... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also ride a bus daily, and the littering absolutely astounds me. Intentional stuff: straw wrappers tied around things, gum spit out on seat cushions, and plastic bags jammed so far into the release of a handicap seat that it probably won't come down when it's needed. I genuinely don't understand what goes through the minds of these people, but I'd gladly listen to a loud conversation about Martha's teenage neice getting an abortion rather than standing up to find my pants covered in the shells of peanuts, which I'm incredibly allergic to.

    11. Re:So everyone is rude... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between "use" and "use".

      When you ask people "is it rude for someone to use a cellphone during a meeting?", they'll think "taking calls, sending texts, generally prioritizing external interactions over those actually present in the room - yes, of course that's rude".

      But if you ask them "did you use your cellphone in your last meeting?", that "use" could have included: taking a picture, using a calculator app, browsing a signle page to resolve a question under discussion. And most people would probably be OK with that sort of "use".

    12. Re: So everyone is rude... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drinking age and public drinking laws may have something to do with beer drinker litter. Since an empty bottle for a teenager goes from "evidence of something illegal" to "innocuous street trash" when they drop it. Likewise for adults and public drinking.

    13. Re:So everyone is rude... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a surprise to me, the far majority of people are and always have been rude.

      From the people standing in subway doors (do they think we are going to climb out the windows?) to the people talking on the phone, people are rude.

      Not everyone is rude. This study only looked at the U.S.A.

      I thought an armed society was a polite society? Or are there actually not enough guns in America yet?

    14. Re:So everyone is rude... by Bugamn · · Score: 1

      Those aren't exclusive.

  2. Most people use their phone when they shouldnt by rossdee · · Score: 2

    says captain obvious

    But thats because they have so many functions these days
    I use my Galaxy Note 3 as a phone less than 1% of the time I am 'using' it

    1. Re: Most people use their phone when they shouldnt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same for me and my iPhone 6 Plus!

    2. Re: Most people use their phone when they shouldnt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, I *can't* use it as a phone (can't talk) but I use it all the time as a text to speech device.

  3. The cost of external cognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that people have become accustomed to having the smartphone handle their news, contact info and communications, they are quite literally incapable of normal conversation without involving the smartphone because it has become a part of their thought processes.

    1. Re:The cost of external cognition by ranton · · Score: 4, Interesting

      they are quite literally incapable of normal conversation without involving the smartphone because it has become a part of their thought processes.

      At some point Ray Kurzweil's vision of a connected brain will be a reality, and we will literally be able to use external computation in our regular thought patterns. Information retrieval is only the beginning; soon* these devices will help us be more creative by loaning us extra neurons when we need them.

      * By soon I mean probably within a few decades

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    2. Re: The cost of external cognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More creative? I'd think it would lead to more groupthink.
      Creativity is when someone goes off the beaten path and does something new a different.

    3. Re: The cost of external cognition by ranton · · Score: 2

      More creative? I'd think it would lead to more groupthink.
      Creativity is when someone goes off the beaten path and does something new a different.

      I'm of the belief that there are no truly original ideas, just new combinations of old ideas. The more old ideas you know the more creative you can be. This is just an opinion though.

      I also think group think is more of a problem among the uneducated. I doubt making knowledge more available will increase group think, although I agree it will certainly not get rid of it either.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    4. Re:The cost of external cognition by RobinH · · Score: 2

      I think this is true. A lot of conversations now seem to involve people telling me about their new app, or their new pulse rate measurement thing, or all the intricate details of their cell phone contract. Seriously... I don't care... tell me a funny or interesting story but if you spent 98% of your time staring at your phone, what are the chances you have anything interesting to share other than a clickbait article or a funny cat video?

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    5. Re:The cost of external cognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And by "us", you mean "really quite rich people". Don't imagine the proletariat will be able to afford many "extra neurons".

    6. Re:The cost of external cognition by ranton · · Score: 2

      And by "us", you mean "really quite rich people". Don't imagine the proletariat will be able to afford many "extra neurons".

      Yeah, I can't think of any examples of technologies that were once only affordable by rich people, but are not ubiquitous. Its not like everyone owns a car, computer, mobile phone, dishwasher, microwave, refrigerator, or any other number of items originally affordable by only the rich ...

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    7. Re:The cost of external cognition by nanoflower · · Score: 1

      Not so much a technology as a product but things like Superyachts are likely never going to be affordable for the proletariat just because too much raw material and labor goes into making them. For the technology that goes into making them and is installed within them, that can come down in price and become available at a price anyone in the middle class can afford.

    8. Re: The cost of external cognition by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      I'm of the belief that there are no truly original ideas, just new combinations of old ideas. The more old ideas you know the more creative you can be. This is just an opinion though.

      I also think group think is more of a problem among the uneducated. I doubt making knowledge more available will increase group think, although I agree it will certainly not get rid of it either.

      That's got the parts of creativity, but what is needed is parts to do something, and then restrictions. It sounds crazy, but when we have no restrictions, creativity suffers badly. This is tied to education, where you are given a project which might sound weird, like photographing hedges ( I was assigned this once) and you have to produce something worth looking at.

      The basic preise though is very interesting, because once you have a huge tool set, the creative mind can work with th restrictions. Awesome.

      Now, to the idea that technology dumbs people down, and to the point of groupthink or stupid people - it does not dumb people down at all.

      It might look like it's making people stupid - but what it really does is allow people who are already stupid, access to technology that a few years back was only accessible by smart people.

      The young lady that brags about robbing a bank - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v... - is already stupid.

      The people hwo bitch about their employers on Facebook http://www.huffingtonpost.com/... - are stupid.

      None of these are caused by the technology. They are what happens when stupid people get hold of it.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  4. Society better get used to it by ranton · · Score: 2

    Within 20 years we will probably have contact lenses or even retinal implants that allow us to interact with technology at any time and without anyone noticing. Learning to deal with people looking at their cell phones during conversation is a good way to help transition society to a time when you can't assume 100% of someone's attention just because they are standing next to you.

    Now the loud cell phone behavior is just being a jerk though.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    1. Re:Society better get used to it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Within 20 years we will probably have contact lenses or even retinal implants ....

      Yeah, really, people are going to put a lens in their eye every day to check facebook.

    2. Re:Society better get used to it by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Within 20 years we will probably have contact lenses or even retinal implants that allow us to interact with technology at any time and without anyone noticing. Learning to deal with people looking at their cell phones during conversation is a good way to help transition society to a time when you can't assume 100% of someone's attention just because they are standing next to you.

      Now the loud cell phone behavior is just being a jerk though.

      Ah, so retinal implants will pretty much guarantee that I won't even be able to tell if someone is actually paying attention or listening, even if they are staring right back at me in an apparent attempt to look engaged in physical conversation with another human being.

      Gee, sounds wonderful. I'm starting to miss the days of human distraction being fucking obvious already.

    3. Re:Society better get used to it by ranton · · Score: 2

      Ah, so retinal implants will pretty much guarantee that I won't even be able to tell if someone is actually paying attention or listening, even if they are staring right back at me in an apparent attempt to look engaged in physical conversation with another human being.

      If you are having a conversation with someone where all they have to do is nod and smile every once in a while to make you think they are listening, they are not the problem. Perhaps this technology will help stop people from wasting others' time with meaningless conversation. Small talk may cease to exist.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  5. Most people keep talking to you... by Sobakus · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...even when you are busy doing very important stuff with your phone!

    Rudeness? Tell me about it!!!!!

    1. Re:Most people keep talking to you... by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      even when you are busy doing very important stuff with your phone!

      I know, man! If I stop now, I lose all my points! Just gimme a second, okay?

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:Most people keep talking to you... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I have a friend who uses his phone during dinner at nice restaurants. He's fifty but hangs out with the young 'uns a lot and has picked up their habits. His excuse, I kid you not, is that he claims it is rude to not answer a text immediately. I explain that it's rude to use the phone at the dinner table, especially at a nice restaurant. But he will not budge. I personally think he just made up this rule as an excuse, or something that he picked up, and that no one ever told him it was rude to wait an hour before responding. Or he's just addicted, which is more likely.

      (after all, what happens if you get a text while asleep, or you don't hear the chime, or the battery is dead, or ...)

    3. Re:Most people keep talking to you... by antdude · · Score: 1

      "How wude."

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  6. I tip my bartenders extra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When they ignore the jackass on the phone who was there before me and come over to take my order.

  7. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't believe it, I'm gonna Google it. Hah, George got a parking ticket! Huh? Oh yeah, uh, hold on. There! Oh wait, that's not right. Whaddya think I should I look up to get it? No, how about ... Aww, look at this cute picture!

  8. Bah by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

    But but... I need to collect my smurfberries before the timer runs out in 5 minutes!

    C'mon! Get your priorities straight!

  9. BRB by penguinoid · · Score: 1

    BRB, I think someone is trying to talk to me.

    Posted from my iAntisocial.

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  10. It's worse in China by Aviation+Pete · · Score: 1
    It seems that most US citizens have at least some intuitive feel of what is appropriate, even if they sometimes forget their manners.

    Contrast that with China: My experience is that there it is totally normal in meetings to answer the cellphone when it rings, and if someone is tasked to contact someone else, they think nothing of dialing the other side right away. In the middle of the meeting. To appear eager seems to be more important than focussing on the meeting.

    --
    You know it's time for the next revolution when your rulers' names end with roman numerals.
    1. Re:It's worse in China by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Some of those calls aren't related to the meeting? Or are they just 'hooking up'? Not everyone can be there, you know. Just asking...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  11. China was right! by ememisya · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the whole Internet Addiction is a real concept after all. I personally know a handful of my friends are trained to check their phones when they hear the "ding" the facebook app makes when you get a notification. Most social applications are designed to be addictive, and given they are custom tailored to the user's data that's not too difficult to code nowadays. Perhaps we should prepare infomercials for public schools and T.V. showing the dangers of not having an attention span (focusing potential) for more than 5 minutes like a squirrel on chocolate coffee due to constant distractions. This is certainly something the parents will have to teach their children, but I suppose that generation doesn't really have families of their own yet, nor do they see anything negative about it. Who needs attention span? *ding* Ohh! My friend posted his lunch on Instagram!

    1. Re:China was right! by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Funny

      The really funny thing is to watch the group effect of this Pavlovian response.

      The "ding" goes off, and everybody in earshot is suddenly frisking themselves for their phone because, oh my fucking god, teh soshul netwerkz and teh emailz.

      I figure you could fuck up most gatherings of people by having a device which could emulate the "ding" sound of several different mobile devices. Just walk through crowds causing all of these people to panic and think something life-affirming is going to happen and they'll have missed it.

      I'm glad I came late to mobile technology. I'll leave mine locked in a drawer (or at home) and deal with it later.

      I have no interest in being so tightly tethered to an electronic device that it becomes ingrained ... I bet there's a measurable physiological response to that "ding" in a lot of people. It's pathetic, but I'd be curious to see what brain centers are impacted ... probably all of them, and your body now things it's a survival imperative.

      Me, I think it's pretty pathetic to watch it.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:China was right! by _UnderTow_ · · Score: 2

      I'm glad I came late to mobile technology. I'll leave mine locked in a drawer (or at home) and deal with it later.

      You sound old.

    3. Re:China was right! by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Probably.

      But thankfully, I managed to watch mobile stuff go from seldom used by anybody to used by almost everybody without being forced to be a slave to it because I never needed to.

      Which means I got lucky and can simply say "I don't care" and walk away from technology for hours or days at a time.

      All that time I spent craving tech when I was younger, and trying to explain to people why it was cool, has paved the way for me to not give a damn now -- because it's the same as it's always been, only shinier and smaller.

      It's the intertubes and email. It'll still be there later. No, I'm not gonna read my email in the middle of the night in case someone sent me the TPS reports.

      Watching someone twitch like a crack monkey when that thing goes "ding" ... it's quite pathetic.

      Now, kindly extract yourself from my lawn. ;-)

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    4. Re:China was right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not old I just never felt like I needed one of the smart phones. I had a flip phone up until a year ago and it had lasted for 8 years.

      I had been leaving it at home and not checking it obsessively but the issue is that everyone else does. That makes it so I look like I am blowing off work when they call me on off hours and I don't get back to them for several hours. Now I have to retrain myself to check the damn thing. :(

    5. Re:China was right! by _UnderTow_ · · Score: 1

      I aggressively shut off notifications for just about everything on my phone. I'm married and we have kids in their teens, so I've left notifications on for text messages and phone calls. Everything else can wait.

    6. Re:China was right! by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I often wonder why people put work e-mail on their personal phone....

      When I am in the office, I have my e-mail up. When I am at home... it is my time.

      I am with you, I am old enough to have seen the rise of the Internet and mobile computing and I am certainly not beholden to it.

      It is certainly nice to be able to route a bus trip while standing on a strange street corner or download and listen to podcasts without having to involve other devices or take a phone call wherever you are or send/receive the occasional text message. But that is about the extent to which I use my phone.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    7. Re:China was right! by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      Agree 100%. Awesome post.

    8. Re:China was right! by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I was in a packed theater, no empty seats, for some major movie (The Hobbit I think). One guy is still talking on his phone after the picture has started (really started, not ads, not previews, not opening titles). Everyone is shushing the guy and he's not really getting the hint. Then he finally when people start throwing popcorn at him he says "sorry, I gotta go, I'm watching a movie".

      I can't imagine what goes wrong in that sort of person's head.

      Similarly recent story at a Broadway theater when someone got upon stage before the play started and plugged his phone charger in. Hard to believe that someone with so much brain damage is still able to use a phone.

    9. Re:China was right! by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Why the sudden compliment?

    10. Re:China was right! by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I'm glad I came late to mobile technology. I'll leave mine locked in a drawer (or at home) and deal with it later.

      You sound old.

      And you sound stupid. But he doesn't choose to be old.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    11. Re:China was right! by pforhan · · Score: 1

      No, no, no, you misunderstand -- he's better than other people!

  12. Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Feel free to stop talking to me.

  13. Glued to their damned faces ... by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Years ago I had a manager who could not put down his Blackberry.

    He'd call a meeting for us to walk him through some stuff. Every few seconds he looked at his phone. Now and then an email would come in, and he'd be like "what, sorry, I missed that part".

    One day I walked out of the room while he was reading his email.

    He came running after telling me the meeting wasn't over.

    I told him the meeting had never really started, and since it was him who called it for his benefit, he could either put down his phone and listen, or I'd send him an email. But that I wasn't going to sit there repeating myself because he couldn't put his damned phone down.

    There is nothing more annoying than some idiot who is in the middle of a social interaction, whips out their phone, loses the plot, and then expects you to give them a recap. Sorry, but I'm standing right here ... I don't give a crap about your electronic device.

    If you want to be a selfish bastard, do it on your own time. But don't waste my fucking time because you have the attention span of a child.

    That people know it's rude and do it anyway ... that's the part that really annoys the crap out of me. Go away, and I'll send you an email if you prefer. But stop constantly checking the damned thing, because I'm just going to walk away.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Glued to their damned faces ... by garbut · · Score: 1

      I have a coworker who even interrupts himself whenever his phone makes a sound. He'll stop talking mid-sentence and forget what he was talking about after he's finished fussing with his facebox or whatever. He'll ask to be reminded what he was talking about but never gets an answer. Like we're all supposed to wait in suspense for the rest of the sentence.

      --
      Oh, should I have sugar-coated that?
    2. Re:Glued to their damned faces ... by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      I have a coworker who does this constantly.

      I am sitting there talking to him and his phone will buzz, beep and blink.. kind of hard to ignore actually. I will continue to talk and he will make sort of agreeable grunting sounds while his eyes flick between me and the screen of his device... then he will ask me what I was saying, not having paid attention to either me nor his device...

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    3. Re:Glued to their damned faces ... by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 5, Informative

      That people know it's rude and do it anyway ... that's the part that really annoys the crap out of me. Go away, and I'll send you an email if you prefer. But stop constantly checking the damned thing, because I'm just going to walk away.

      I learned an important lesson about this many years ago, long before cell phones became ubiquitous.

      I remember as an undergraduate meeting with a senior university official (a provost, actually), and the phone on her desk started ringing. We were seated at a table elsewhere in her office, but I paused, thinking she would probably need to answer it. But she just kept on talking to me, and the meeting went on normally.

      I ended up becoming a research assistant for her, and when this occurred in another meeting, I paused in what I was saying and said, "Uh... do you need to get that?" Her response was very logical and clear:

      It was a matter of respect, she told me. A scheduled personal meeting with someone should receive her full attention, since I had taken the time to be there with her. Whether I was a lowly undergraduate or the university president, a scheduled in-person meeting was more important than whatever random person might be calling on her phone. If the situation was truly urgent, there were other ways people would get messages to her.

      I never forgot that, and to this day I try to live up to her example. If you're in a meeting and you know that you may need to be interrupted, the polite thing to do is to inform the person you're meeting with at the outset that you might need to take a call or check email or whatever because you have an urgent matter to attend to. (But most of the time, you probably don't really have anything that urgent.)

      Doing otherwise is disrespectful. With the growth of ubiquitous smart phones, the temptations have grown stronger, I guess. But if someone is taking their time to meet in-person with you, the least you can do is respect that time by giving them your attention.

  14. If I'm bored, I'll phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm naturally on the wallflower side of the personality scale, which is not something I especially like about myself.

    If I'm bored in a group conversation, and\or no one is engaging me, I'll slip into my phone while the others talk. I'm often not doing much to help the conversation along anyway, and feel embarrassed that I'm not the talkative type that I want to be, which seems to come natural to others. So I may use my phone to save face; it gives myself an excuse for not being in the middle of things, and also simply gives me something to do.

    I could probably do a better job inserting myself into the conversation, but social anxiety and self doubt make that difficult. It's not easy to go against your nature, even if you don't like your nature and are trying to get better. My phone escape isn't especially helpful to resolving the problem, but it works for me in the short term.

    1. Re:If I'm bored, I'll phone by Daetrin · · Score: 2

      So in other words, when it comes to social interactions you tend to phone it in?

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    2. Re:If I'm bored, I'll phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol you got me there :)

    3. Re:If I'm bored, I'll phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just fuck off.

    4. Re:If I'm bored, I'll phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't clip my wings, sweetheart

  15. attention by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    My problem is, my phone is more interesting than most conversations during social events. I'm socially awkward at best, with esoteric interests. I can only hold a conversation on LeBron or Beyonce for about two minutes before I am bored.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    1. Re:attention by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      I can only hold a conversation on LeBron or Beyonce for about two minutes before I am bored.

      Just go out and visit with the chauffeur... The 'fresh air' will pep you right up. You'll want to talk to everybody.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:attention by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Sorry, the "chauffeur" is hung up on Kardashian clan or Bruce Jenner or something else boring.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    3. Re:attention by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      Exactly, by using your phone during a conversation you are telling the group that they are not interesting enough to hold your attention. That is very passive aggressive. The better option would be to either remove yourself or actively try to change the conversation. Another option is to display patients and just smile and nod until the conversation moves on. No one like to think they are boring.

    4. Re:attention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 'fresh air' will pep you right up. You'll want to talk to everybody.

      The skunky fresh air.

    5. Re:attention by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      My problem is, my phone is more interesting than most conversations during social events. I'm socially awkward at best, with esoteric interests. I can only hold a conversation on LeBron or Beyonce for about two minutes before I am bored.

      Depending on the event, if there are sufficient people, you will be astounded that you'll be able to find someone who is at least tangentially interested in something you're interested in.

      And the trick is to either remove yourself and insert yourself in another group, find someone standing alone and strike up conversation (there are socially awkward people who attend events too, and at least you two have one thing in common).

      You won't believe how many people don't care about LeBron or Beyoncé or Kardashian or whatever. They're more than happy to discuss the weather, or even your "esoteric" interests.

      Hell, your esoteric interests may be the most interesting conversation among the people who are also bored as hell. A lot of the time, they discuss weather or sports or something as a non-offensive, generic topic of conversation, hoping someone will be able to steer it to something more interesting.

    6. Re:attention by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      I agree but... yeah, depends on the group and circumstances. I was just at an outdoor party a couple of days ago and everything was going ok until the group I was part of launched a horribly racist/xenophobic conversation. There was no way I'd get into that argument so I just distanced myself a bit and started dicking around with my phone. Meanwhile the other group was engaged in an obnoxious drunken conversation.

      What I really have a problem though is when someone pulls out their phone while I'm mid-sentence talking to them without so much as "sorry gotta take it" or something (because of course it's stupid facebook bullshit), and just proceed to text something. What the fuck. If you don't want to talk to me then just don't.

      So yeah I'd say phones are inappropriate at social events but there are clear exceptions to the rule.

    7. Re:attention by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      My problem is, my phone is more interesting than most conversations during social events. I'm socially awkward at best, with esoteric interests. I can only hold a conversation on LeBron or Beyonce for about two minutes before I am bored.

      What or who are LeBron or Beyonce?

      I'm afraid popular culture is of little interest to me.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    8. Re:attention by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      the group I was part of launched a horribly racist/xenophobic conversation. There was no way I'd get into that argument so I just distanced myself a bit and started dicking around with my phone

      Coward.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    9. Re:attention by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Racist Xenophobic conversations would be something I would engage in, not because I was either. It is more interesting to troll the stupid idiots spewing crap, than it is listening to conversations about LeBron or Kardashians.

      I could have a shit ton of fun with that.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  16. Snapping pictures? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    You are stealing souls!

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  17. Interrupting social intercourse by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    In the words of Don Martin, One Fine Day At A Taco Hell

    "...and I agree, Hillary 2016 baby and...yes, that's a picture of Taylor Swift...what are you doing, what are you...oh gross! Stop fapping!"

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  18. First Post! Yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least it would have been if I wasn't playing with my phone during this social event.

    Trying to get first post on slashdot counts as a social event, right? Right? RIGHT?!?

  19. Your phone as a lifestyle: NO. by kheldan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's what most people seem to view the thing as -- which is wrong. It should not be a lifestyle, it is a phone. It should not take the place of actual, in-person, face-to-face social interactions, not any more than so-called 'social media' should. That's the problem: Smartphones, 'social media', the Internet in general, all claim to 'connect people' and 'bring people together', when in fact all they're doing is giving people and excuse to distance themselves from actual social interactions with other human beings. We see the effects of this more and more all the time. Words on a screen can't take the place of live interaction with another human being. We communicate on more levels than just the words we say, and text on a screen is about as sterile as you can get. There is inflection, tone of voice, body language.. you don't get any of this with just text on a screen. What's worse, most people don't even seem to read everything someone writes, so what little true meaning they could get from just text is also lost because of that. Even using your phone as a phone, you're still missing out on layers of non-verbal communication that you'd otherwise be getting the benefit of. This lack of real communication between people is leading to more and more misunderstandings.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    1. Re:Your phone as a lifestyle: NO. by plover · · Score: 2

      This lack of real communication between people is leading to more and more misunderstandings.

      Au contraire. In an email, I can carefully choose the exact words to tell you what I think of you, your ideas, and describe in precise detail where you exist on the food chain. After reading that email, you will have no doubt as to what was said. In conversation, I could slip up and say the wrong thing in the presence of the wrong person, or forget what X said about Y even though I was there and so I must have been "listening".

      Email is great. Conversation is for chumps.

      --
      John
    2. Re:Your phone as a lifestyle: NO. by myrdos2 · · Score: 1

      But now instead of standing around awkwardly and occasionally trying to look like I care about the conversation, I can read Slashdot.

      I can even hold up one finger in the middle of a long boring story, point at my phone and leave and no-one will think it's impolite. Even if it hasn't rung, and the battery is dead. Now THAT's progress.

    3. Re:Your phone as a lifestyle: NO. by kheldan · · Score: 1

      So do you have sex with your wife or girlfriend via email? Or dinner? All your conversations with her? What about your personal friends? Or do you avoid all direct personal contact with other human beings and are alone in the real world and only have 'online' friends?

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    4. Re:Your phone as a lifestyle: NO. by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      Teenagers are having less sex these days and this is postulated to be the reason.

    5. Re:Your phone as a lifestyle: NO. by kheldan · · Score: 1

      Interesting, but I am unsure whether you're stating this to support or refute what I'm saying.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    6. Re:Your phone as a lifestyle: NO. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      After reading that email, you will have no doubt as to what was said.

      You must be new. People regularly decide that you must have meant meaning number six in the dictionary for a word when you obviously meant meaning one or two... or they don't even know what a word means. There's probably already a law which states that the more time you spend choosing precisely the right wording, the more likely it is that some jerkoff will skip their meds on the day they read it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Your phone as a lifestyle: NO. by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      Au contraire. In an email, I can carefully choose the exact words to tell you what I think of you, your ideas, and describe in precise detail where you exist on the food chain. After reading that email, you will have no doubt as to what was said.

      I'm assuming you're being sarcastic here, but in case you're not...

      "Choosing the exact words" is how most flame wars get started on the internet, usually over things that no party actually meant but which other people "read into" the text. I've seen this plenty of times in email conversations with colleagues, too. I have had colleagues who seem almost willfully to misread everything I wrote and assume the weirdest possible or most complicated scenario, rather than just answering a simple question about a straightforward matter.

      Often there's a significant disconnect in email reading/writing styles. An email that is fired off quickly and barely proofread may be scrutinized in detail by a recipient with all sorts of "implications" read into it that completely warp the original intent. Or the reverse -- the subtlety of a meticulously crafted message is lost by some idiot who just glances at it and says, "Sounds great! Cheers!"

      At least conversation happens in real time, and you often can correct misunderstandings or misinterpretations before they get out of hand.

    8. Re:Your phone as a lifestyle: NO. by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that I'm trying to do either one. The world is changing due to ubiquitous smart phones. I'm sure it's neither all good nor all bad. I don't feel like online relationships are real relationships. But people younger than me seem to have a much different attitude, so maybe I'm missing something. Or maybe they are.

    9. Re:Your phone as a lifestyle: NO. by houghi · · Score: 1

      People are a social animal. Being occupied with the phone feeds into that need to be social. The same with Faceplant and what not. (and even this site.)

      The person with you is already in your herd, so no need to pay attention to it. The person on the phone is not and you want him to be, so a higher need to contact him is needed.

      Only when there is a risk of people leaving the heard (i.e. tell you that they will leave) will the urge move from not interested o interested.

      At least that is what I think why this happens and why e.g. Faceplant has such a great success, regardless of the damage they are doing.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    10. Re:Your phone as a lifestyle: NO. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Teenagers are having less sex these days and this is postulated to be the reason.

      My teenage daughter would beg to differ. Constant video access means she can effectively have sex 24 hours a day even when her SO is not physically present...

  20. Where do you work? I want to work there! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't give a crap about your electronic device.

    If you want to be a selfish bastard, do it on your own time. But don't waste my fucking time because you have the attention span of a child.

    Whoa! Your company has Fucking Time? We barely get Coffee Breaks here.

    As for your boss's behavior, I put the blame on you. Don't EVER schedule a meeting during Fucking Time! I can't believe someone actually has to tell you this.

    1. Re:Where do you work? I want to work there! by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Whoa! Your company has Fucking Time?

      Yeah, every bloody quarter where they say no profit sharing for us, while doling out record level executive bonuses ... for having so skillfully mismanaged the company there's no room for profit sharing.

      No room for raises because we didn't meet our targets. But the ass who was responsible for the targets still gets his quarterly bonus.

      Most people get fucked by their company fairly constantly. Just not in a good way.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Where do you work? I want to work there! by Anonanonaon · · Score: 1

      Sounds like quittin' time to me.

      What's keeping you there?

    3. Re:Where do you work? I want to work there! by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      LOL ... don't confuse years of apathy with any specific complaints about any specific company.

      You could make that same joke about pretty much any company without anything to back it up and the people would laugh.

      The grass on both sides of the fence has dog poop scattered around. Executives always reward themselves handsomely, and often detached from performance.

      Just look at how much a CEO of a Fortune 500 company makes for getting kicked out for being incompetent. It's pretty lucrative, apparently.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    4. Re:Where do you work? I want to work there! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe someone actually has to tell you this.

      I can't believe that you believe that your post was funny -- are you twelve?

  21. What's wrong with snapping a picture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    talking on the phone disturbs others.

    Texting or surfing means you are not really there.

    Taking photos means you are at least being involved - especially group selfies.

  22. Overwhelming Majority of Surveyed Say it's Wrong by idontgno · · Score: 1

    when someone else does it.

    When I do it, it's ok, because I have good reasons and it's really important.

    In other news, surveys have uncovered that laws only apply to the other guy.

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  23. Black and White by jklovanc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These situations are not so black and white.

    Good - Looking up contentious fact being discussed.
    Bad - Shopping online while conversation is going on.
    Good - Taking one picture to memorialize a special dinner.
    Bad - Taking a picture of every plate of food one eats.
    Good - Texting late guest to see where they are?
    Bad - Texting someone completely unrelated to the event.
    Bad - Talking loudly on one's phone while other people are having a conversation.

    The problem is not that the smartphone is being but why the smartphone is being used. If the use contributes to the event I don't see an issue.

    1. Re:Black and White by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      In other words: Use the device as the tool that it is...

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    2. Re:Black and White by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good - Looking up contentious fact being discussed.

      So you're THAT guy, huh?

    3. Re:Black and White by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      And so our my friends. We would rather have the actual information rather than assumptions and mis-remembered facts.

    4. Re:Black and White by houghi · · Score: 1

      Good - Looking up contentious fact being discussed.

      I completely and utterly disagree. 99.9% of the discussions in a social environment are NOT about the facts. They are about the interaction between the people.

      They are not debates. They are discussions. e.g. a discussion where one person says Linus says he is American and the other says he is Swedish.

      Look it up and you find the truth. Discussion over. You have time to look at your phone.

      Without the phone: you discuss, then get onto the subject of change of nationality. Next the subject of borders in general and that leads to the game and gaming and that leads to ordering another round and ...
      In the end you had a great evening with friends. You still have no idea what Nationality Linus had or if you were even talking about the same Linus, but that is irrelevant. Talking to others is what was important.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  24. It's simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's rude to use your smartphone sometimes, but I only use mine for really good reasons. So everyone except for me is rude.

  25. Bane of my existence: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My friends/family on their phones is something I can speak up about so that can be annoying but manageable. What really irritates me are all of the zombies walking around while they are looking at their phone. They are oblivious to everything around them and they get in my way. Sometimes I just want to slap the phone out of their hands.

  26. I don't do "social events" by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    I do, however, go out with my GF, and when I do, the phone is in my pocket. I might check my email when she's getting 2nds at the buffet, and she checks hers while I'm taking a leak, but when we're eating or watching a crappy movie, we don't use our phones.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    1. Re:I don't do "social events" by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      I remember an occasion back when phones were first becoming popular, when I was at a hamburger stand and there were five girls in a nearby booth. Four of them were talking on the phone, and the other was sitting looking incredibly bored. It really struck me at the time - why go out with friends and spend the time yakking on the phone?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  27. We All Have Cell Phones by ashshy · · Score: 1
    So come on, let's get real:

    https://www.youtube.com/embed/...

    --
    #o#
    O Moo.
  28. Today at the post office by shellster_dude · · Score: 1

    I was standing in a long line, and watched two people at the counter trying to simultaneously mail parcels and talk on their phone. In both cases the postal worker had to explain things multiple times, and wait for them to finish chatting for a second before paying. One even turned to the postal worker and said, "Excuse me, can you hold on a second?". People suck.

    1. Re:Today at the post office by moeinvt · · Score: 1

      SMH. The person asked postal worker to "hold on a second" as opposed to interrupting the phone conversation? With people waiting in line? WTF?
      Do these people not understand that they are being rude and obnoxious or do they just not care?

      Rude people definitely suck!

    2. Re:Today at the post office by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      I've seen several places which have signs up which say "we'll be happy to serve you when you are done with your phone".

      The funniest thing I saw around that was some guy answer his phone just as he started to place his order, and the kid at the cash basically yelled "next", and then refuse to serve that customer who answered his phone. He just pointed at the sign and served the next guy. "Sorry sir, you'll have to get back in line".

      The people who ask the guy at the counter to wait while they do whatever they are doing are self important assholes who think the world needs to stop because they got a call.

      We don't care who called you, we're all in line too. Your phone call is your problem.

      The short answer is they simply don't care.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:Today at the post office by j2.718ff · · Score: 1

      I was standing in a long line, and watched two people at the counter trying to simultaneously mail parcels and talk on their phone. In both cases the postal worker had to explain things multiple times, and wait for them to finish chatting for a second before paying.

      Fortunately, I'm not friends with any such people, but I wonder if the phone conversation can be any less distracted than the in-person one. The person on the other end must know their friend is at the post office, and hear half of the conversation with the employee. I presume this person is multi-tasking both conversations equally poorly.

      If I were on the phone with someone, and they said "Hold on a moment, I'm next in line at the post office", I would not be offended.

  29. professor answered phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a college professor answer his phone and talk for a few minutes during a lecture he was giving. I found this to be rude enough that I left.

  30. This is going to be a big female future problem by sjwest · · Score: 0

    If your in a cinema then no your coughs wont disguise your ringtone.

    Couple of years ago we had 'invited' guests over when an easter occurred. a girl spent most of her time with her friends who might have been with us physically the phone had the attention. Not my problem...

  31. It's not what, but how by ReverendLoki · · Score: 1

    My belief is that it's not that you are using your cell phone, but how. I'm OK with people using it during whatever social event as long as it is in a constructive manner. Say, to pull up movie times while discussing after dinner plans, coordinating with other people to meet up, settle an argument with some facts, etc.

    The phone makes it easier for someone to be non-social if they want to be, but it doesn't automatically turn social people non-social.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    1. Re:It's not what, but how by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      It seems like most people use their phones at social events as a measure of status more than anything...

      Ahem, let me just check my phone.... oh, what that? Why yes, this IS the new ePhone 2000 cylinder with feedback buzz touch... See? The whole thing is a screen... I can check faceweb from any angle...

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    2. Re:It's not what, but how by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      It seems like most people use their phones at social events as a measure of status more than anything...

      Ahem, let me just check my phone.... oh, what that? Why yes, this IS the new ePhone 2000 cylinder with feedback buzz touch... See? The whole thing is a screen... I can check faceweb from any angle...

      Since even most fourteen year olds seem to have the latest iPhone/Galaxy it's not that much of a status symbol.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  32. Use Common Sense by hodet · · Score: 2

    I have pretty strict rules for myself on pulling out my phone. If I am in a conversation I will not check it, period. If I am expecting a message that is urgent (how often does that happen though), I will excuse myself and step away. But if someone is in a group and there is a break in the interactivity and they check infrequently in a very low key way then that's cool by me.

    Nothing worse than socializing with someone or a group of people, over a beer or whatever, and a good flow of conversation and laughs and then they just suddenly zone out for 3 minutes on their phone(s). That's a buzz kill man, and I am more than likely going to wrap it up and find something else to do.

    Also, watched a fireworks show in Ottawa in August and the three teens sitting in front of us pretty much watched the whole thing through their phones recording it. How asinine is that?

    1. Re:Use Common Sense by j2.718ff · · Score: 1

      Also, watched a fireworks show in Ottawa in August and the three teens sitting in front of us pretty much watched the whole thing through their phones recording it. How asinine is that?

      Don't you see? They're collecting very useful data! Today, our grandparents can tell us how much better everything was when they were young, but they can't prove it. When these teenagers grow up and become grandparents, they will have video proof that the fireworks of their day were better than the ones their grandkids have.

    2. Re:Use Common Sense by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      Also, watched a fireworks show in Ottawa in August and the three teens sitting in front of us pretty much watched the whole thing through their phones recording it. How asinine is that?

      Pretty typical for tourism these days. People walking around bumping into things while taking photos and recording stuff rather than actually experiencing the world.

      Years ago, I lived in Rome for a short time. I got to observe idiots wandering around like this every day. I think I took less than a dozen photos the entire time I was there. If I want photos of all the gorgeous things around me, I can buy a book with professional photographers taking things from angles and with lighting I couldn't hope for. But the experience of walking on the exact same paving stones in the Roman Forum where Caesar and Cicero once walked thousands of years ago -- I just sat down there and contemplated where I was in awe.

      That memory is important to me. Having a video or photo of my feet and some stones would not help me remember how I felt, and I doubt I would ever look at it. And if I were just wandering around worried about focusing my camera on all the stuff I could see, I doubt I ever would have even thought about those stones beneath my feet... and yet that was one of the most powerful feelings I took away from my trip.

    3. Re:Use Common Sense by hodet · · Score: 1

      You're the type of people I can travel with. You get it. Cheers.

    4. Re:Use Common Sense by hodet · · Score: 1

      They will prove many things about themselves to future generations. :-)

  33. Rude is rude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think its fine by your self doing stuff on your phone. I even think its Ok to check messages briefly on occasion with other people. But I don't think your attention should be more focused on whatever is on your phone then actual people. I was at a college speaking event and it amazed me how many educated people did not have the manors to simply mute their phones. I kept hearing text tones throughout the event. Its no different then talking, a baby crying, or just plain noisy. People do not seem to have developed manors about respecting others. Its disrespectful and just because its a smartphone, does not mean you are smart and know how to use one.

  34. Boors will be boors by Jawnn · · Score: 1

    They just found a new way to offend those around them.

  35. Using your phone in church by edtice1559 · · Score: 2

    I'm sure people are just looking up relevant scripture during the engaging sermon.

  36. How I deal with it by citylivin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Learning to deal with people looking at their cell phones during conversation"

    I immediately stop talking and if the person notices, they will usually apologize. If they don't notice after a few seconds then i turn and walk away.

    Call me crazy but I don't have a cel phone. At home I have a computer and and work I have a computer so I don't really need one in between, or when I am out and about enjoying myself. I guess I am an extreme minority now, but I will never be one of these zombies you see everywhere. I like to be aware of what is going on around me. I believe that not connected time, simply staring at the scenery on the train for instance, helps one to think and process things. No one thinks anymore, they just look down at their phones and distract themselves.

    I can appreciate that cel phones are a useful tool, but the way people treat them is so bad I can't stomach the thought of owning one.

    Not to mention all the persistent tracking and other horrible privacy concerns. Not to mention the upfront multi hundred dollar cost and the $50+ monthly cost... I guarantee that the only phones I ever own and use will be feature phones that make and receive calls only. I don't need a little TV turning my mind to mush and tracking me all the while.

    --
    As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
    1. Re:How I deal with it by rybarczykbr · · Score: 1

      I agree. Feature phone is the way to became "normal" again. Most of time I keep it turned off inside car's glove compartment.

    2. Re:How I deal with it by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I assume you also don't own a TV, and insist on telling people the fact whenever possible.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  37. No. That's terribly wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In other words: Use the device as the tool that it is...

    No. Using a hammer as a hammer in a china shop would be inappropriate and unwelcome. Using a phone as a phone in a movie theater is explicitly forbidden.

  38. snapping a picture? by j2.718ff · · Score: 1

    people say they used their cellphone during their most recent social activity, whether it was texting, checking the web, or snapping a picture

    One of these things is not like the others. Snapping a picture is part of the in-person interaction. Snapping a picture of the people you're with is quite different from sending a text to a person who's not there.

  39. Phones on the table by jklovanc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There is a new meme going around. At the beginning of the dinner everyone puts their phone face down in the middle of the table. The first person to pick up their phone without the consent of everyone else before the end of the meal pays for everyone. This leave the option open to do things constructive to the conversation, like checking on a late party member, while still not paying.

    1. Re:Phones on the table by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      In the version I've come across, the first person to touch their phone not only had to pay, but also had to strip naked and give everyone a blow job.

      That's one rugby club night I won't forget in a hurry.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  40. Wait, what? by whh3 · · Score: 1

    Those are my clue words.

    When I hear them, I know the speaker, although physically part of a conversation, had changed their focus to their device and is attempting to re-engage.

    Their attempt to re-engage is usually precisely timed to match a) when they think the conversation has returned to being about them or b) when they want to interrupt the conversation to say something that they think is important but was JUST SAID WHILE THEY WERE NOT PAYING ATTENTION.

    So frustrating.

    Wait, what?

    --
    remove nospam. to email!
  41. It's become a hazard to me personally. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a pedestrian, I've almost been run over by a bike and ran into on foot in about the last 2 weeks by people too buried in their phones to look in front of them. Which in my book is f'ing stupid. Both times I yelled at them right before they ran into me.... so they wouldn't run into me. Oh, and I watched someone run a red light while looking down at their phone. F'ing stupid.

  42. Gee... I wonder what the BLACK figures are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Break the figures down by RACE, and I bet you'll see that the wonderful, 'Just the same as us' BLACKS use their phones more than whites do, in situations which many would consider it rude to do so. You don't say...

  43. Do as I say, not as I do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm the only one in the universe that counts.

  44. Such interesting developments. by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

    When I got into computers in the 1980s, the lucky few of us had dedicated computer desks in some remote corner. I guess my parents wanted it to be in some common area instead of my own room so they could see what I'm doing. Also, grownups with computers used it either for work or "work", but in a separate location likewise.

    These were interesting times because cell phones had a somewhat similar life cycle. In the past, you'd call a place, but with the cell phones in the mid-90s, you could actually call a person instead, and that made so much more sense. In the mid/late 90s I was studying away from home, and I felt similarly about laptops, as they were not tied to a specific location. They were the real personal computers.

    The social impact of laptops was that you could take it to a common table, instead of geeking out in a separate corner. While it obviously takes your attention, it won't block the eye contact with others in the same way desktops would. Tablets and phones are just a natural continuation of this. IMHO, this is how computers got mainstream, not so much due to computing power or networking, but by not getting in the way.

    Unfortunately, the idea of going away to do some computing still makes sense. Or maybe it's just me, I want to focus on one thing at a time and do it well, be it computers or people. It's sad seeing all these young people with their phones like they're on crack.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  45. Texting while walking by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

    I am amazed at how many people walk around head down and texting without a clue of their surroundings.
     
      1. Girl standing on a busy downtown street corner, looking down at her phone, completely oblivious. A huge flat bed truck hauling an excavator is creeping around the apex of the corner and the side of the truck frame is getting closer and closer to her as the truck cuts off the corner. I finally realize she doesn't see the truck, now only inches away and grab her shoulder and pull her back a step. She is about to yell at me when she sees the truck, the back wheels of which are now rolling over the curb where her feet were 3 seconds earlier, and realizes how narrowly she just escaped.
     
    2. Standing waiting for a light, a different girl, head down, texting, walks into me from behind. The top of her head actually hits me in the small of my back. I turn around and she looks up, looks up some more (I'm about 6'3", she's a tiny asian girl maybe 5'4" tops), finally says "You should watch where your'e going" WTF?

    --
    None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
  46. FTFY by jklovanc · · Score: 2

    99.9% of the discussions in a social environment are NOT about the facts.

    Sorry but your friends are no like mine. Mine like to talk about facts and opinions of those facts. With mine I would say the ratio is closer to 80%.

    Look it up and you find the truth. The discussion can move on.

    Other outcomes are as follows;
    You waste time supporting your conflicting opinions and the discussion gets hijacked over who is correct.
    You accept the wrong fact and the discussion becomes invalid because it is based on a false premise.

    Talking to others is what was important.

    I like to learn things along with talking.

    I always prefer to verify a fact when I can rather than assume what someones says is true. One person looking up a fact for 30 seconds does not end discussion it just moves it along. For example, last weekend I was playing board games at a pub. We wanted to play Settlers of Catan. We normally have four players and the standard rules are set up for that. Tonight we had five players. We used our smartphones to find the 5/6 players setup for Settlers. Without the smartphone we would all have been disappointing.

    BTW, I have a form of autism that causes me to have a need to verify facts. If there is a controversy my mind fixates on it and it takes me out of the discussion. Verifying facts actually allows me to stay in the conversation.