Slashdot Mirror


Apple TV To Be Revamped

An anonymous reader writes: This Wednesday, Apple is hosting an event in San Francisco to announce updated versions of some of its products. One device getting a lot of the attention will be the Apple TV, which has languished for several years without significant changes. Apple is making a renewed push for the living room. The company has expanded its partnerships with TV studios over the past few years, launched its own streaming music service, and also made inroads on gaming. The new Apple TV will try to do all these things, including support for apps. It will also reportedly feature universal search: "Essentially, you'll be able to search for a show or movie once, and see results from all sorts of different sources." A side effect of this ambitious goal is that the device will more than double in cost, going from $70 to $150.

132 comments

  1. rumours are accepted as fact? by goranb · · Score: 0

    really? rumours are accepted as facts here?

    1. Re:rumours are accepted as fact? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Apple rumors are more PR releases than made up fantasies these days.

    2. Re:rumours are accepted as fact? by goranb · · Score: 1

      citation needed...

    3. Re:rumours are accepted as fact? by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      well, go back to ars and slashdot articles posted within the month leading up to an apple event and see how accurate said rumors have been

      I can tell they have havent shocked me at an event in ages with something that didnt "leak"

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    4. Re:rumours are accepted as fact? by goranb · · Score: 1

      broad "predictions" that were nothing more than probable steps Apple might take... rumours ;)

  2. Apple TV by 56ker · · Score: 0, Troll

    The linked New York Times article mentions that it will need an internet connection. So the Apple TV will be competing with non-internet TVs and people watching TV on laptops, desktops and tablets. Quite why somebody would buy another device to do what their other devices already do (other than it being Apple) I'm not quite sure?

    1. Re:Apple TV by Kohath · · Score: 2

      Why would anyone who already has a laptop want to own a TV at all? If you can answer this, you can answer why a laptop owner might want to watch content on a TV instead of a laptop.

    2. Re:Apple TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they already sell movies via iTunes, so the Apple TV should work with that. I suppose they might add local streaming as well (phone/Mac to Apple TV which already may exist in some form).

      And who knows? Maybe it'll have Apple Watch integration.

    3. Re:Apple TV by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      The linked New York Times article mentions that it will need an internet connection.

      You know, I heard the Amazon Fire TV devices, Roku, and Chromecast also list an Internet connection as a requirement. I wonder why...

    4. Re:Apple TV by frnic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Seriously, you can't see why anyone would, then Apple must be wrong, I mean they were wrong about their smartphone, it barely sold any at all before they quit making it.

      We have a Apple TV and are extremely happy with it, like most Apple products is it not very customizable, so instead of customizing it, we watch TV on it. My wife and I are retired, and we enjoy things that just work and don't require fiddling with. We have also tried Plex, and FireTV and find the Apple to be more to our liking. It may also have to do with being able to watch our 300+ movie library stored on my MacOSX and served up via iTune family sharing.

      The new TV (assuming there even is one) providing App support could be cool, and iPhones and iPads are already used for more gaming by casual gamers (only a couple hundred million - barely any market at all). So, if the TV could play those same iPad games from the App store, we will certain play a few - also, since games bought on the App Store are mostly family sharing enabled, I expect we will be able to play all those games we already have on the new TV - yup, I expect you are right though, Apple has blown it again.

    5. Re:Apple TV by reboot246 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have a laptop and a TV. I watch content on the TV because it's BIGGER and has better sound. I read slashdot on the laptop because the TV doesn't have a keyboard or browser. Sure, I could use the TV as a monitor, but then I wouldn't be able to watch TV!

      Right now I'm watching a college football game. Who in their right mind would choose to watch something like that on a tiny laptop screen when there's a huge TV right here in the living room?

      They are two separate tools. Each can do something the other one can't do.

    6. Re:Apple TV by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      "The linked New York Times article mentions that it will need an internet connection. "

      It already does.

    7. Re:Apple TV by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 2

      Why would anyone who already has a laptop want to own a TV at all?

      Because for watching TV, a TV is generally the best device for that...

      Nothing like sitting on the couch, chilling out, watching a 70" TV with your family together. Everyone sitting huddled around a laptop? That doesn't sound very social.

    8. Re:Apple TV by MBGMorden · · Score: 2

      I think the bigger issue is that those devices are coming down in price - AppleTV is going up. All have versions available in the ~$40 range, and all work pretty well. I can't imagine an AppleTV doing anything that my FireTV doesn't already do for cheaper.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    9. Re: Apple TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I can... it'll make more profit for AAPL.

    10. Re:Apple TV by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It's the same as Roku. Why spend an extra $200 to get as smart TV when you can spend $100 for the Roku? Apple TV is the same, except they're being a bit goofy for going after TV deals directly instead of just allowing plugins of any sort.

    11. Re:Apple TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This post brought to you by Apple?

    12. Re:Apple TV by ganjadude · · Score: 2

      thats the exact thought process i went through a few months back when i bought my new TV> fir the same display panel, in the same exterior case, with the same remote - 180 bucks more for the smart tv vs the display only version. a 50$ roku stick was the final piece.

      in the end i now can turn any hdmi capable display into a smart device, and i saved a good amount of money

      I realize im raving about the roku on this thread, just a happy customer, nothing more

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    13. Re:Apple TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The day we call TV a social activity.

      Where did it all go wrong?

    14. Re:Apple TV by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      I can't imagine an AppleTV doing anything that my FireTV doesn't already do for cheaper.

      Well that's just a sign of a limited imagination.

    15. Re:Apple TV by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      I realize im raving about the roku on this thread, just a happy customer, nothing more

      I wouldn't really call it a "Roku Rave" since you can replace the name of the device with any number of other devices just as easily. It could a happy Amazon FireTV, Apple TV, or even smart Blu-Ray player owner. The best part being you can replace from malfunction, upgrade, or change the "smarts" down the line without throwing out what might be a perfectly fine HD screen in the process. Or position the device someplace were it can get better network connectivity compared to where your HDTV screen need to be tilted. With radio/bluetooth remotes on some devices there no reason it has to be right there under/beside the screen.

    16. Re:Apple TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, this new Apple TV is for people with more imagination! So it will be more like a kindle, where you imagine the pictures as you read the text? Or did you mean it's just for people willing to spend more money to get something that says 'Apple' on it?

      That's a problem, you know, because you have to invite people into your home who you want to impress with this one, it isn't something with a cutout in the case (a case, because it was designed to be too thin, and vulnerable to damage) to show the Apple logo.

    17. Re:Apple TV by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      agreed. it goes back to the "leanback experience" that people have talked about.

    18. Re:Apple TV by tepples · · Score: 1

      Sure, I could use the TV as a monitor, but then I wouldn't be able to watch TV!

      That's why your TV has more than one input. Plug an RPi, NUC, or other small computer into one video input, and plug your other TV sources into another video input. It's the same way people can play Double Dragon Warrior or Body Harvest Moon on a PlayBox, press a couple buttons, and be watching Monday Night Sportsball on ESPN.* On the other hand:

      Right now I'm watching a college football game. Who in their right mind would choose to watch something like that on a tiny laptop screen when there's a huge TV right here in the living room?

      Because someone else in the household wants to watch another show broadcast at the same time.

      * "Extremely Stupid People's Network", according to Mad

    19. Re:Apple TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You prolly can't even change the battery yourself. Plus walled garden something something.

    20. Re:Apple TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He didn't say the Apple TV is for people with more imagination.

      He said YOU show signs of a limited imagination.
      Perhaps limited reading comprehension too.

    21. Re:Apple TV by bkmoore · · Score: 1

      Why would anyone who already has a laptop want to own a TV at all?....

      Because there is more than one person living in my household. I guess I could just give every family member a laptop for movie night. But then we might as well be asking, why would anyone who has instant-messanging want to have a face to face conversation at all?

    22. Re:Apple TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sargasm much? :)

  3. Unversal search by whoever57 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The new Apple TV will try to do all these things, including support for apps ...."Essentially, you'll be able to search for a show or movie once, and see results from all sorts of different sources."

    You mean like owners of Roku and Tivo boxes have been able to do months/years?

    A side effect of this ambitious goal is that the device will more than double in cost, going from $70 to $150.

    Apple is trying to reproduce its success from the cellphone market in the set top box. Bring out features that were already available on competing platforms and charge a premium for them. Obviously, the reason for Apple TV's lack of success is that its price was too low.
    <Just waiting for the Apple fanboys to mod me down!>

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    1. Re:Unversal search by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      why would i pay 150 for something when i can get a roku which has been at it longer for only 50 bucks (roku stick)

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    2. Re:Unversal search by MouseR · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hum. Apple TV has existed for years. They just never marketed it.

      This new one is just a a 3rd gen.

      It's always been an internet device. And it can access content off your networked Macs. I use RipIt to rip my DVDs into iTunes for access off all my devices (iOS, Apple TV & other Macs).

      The Apple TV is simply a purpose- specialized screen-less iPhone, essentially.

    3. Re:Unversal search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's a matter of priorities. Some of us just don't care if it's 50 or 150 as the main point. That being said, I won't buy one. The Apple TV has one main weakness and it's the lack of a media server (painfully obvious with iTunes too). Sharing media between your computers, TV, tablets and phones (plays everywhere on everything) is a basic feature. That's why I'll keep using Plex for movies and TV series, at even higher cost than the Apple solution.

    4. Re:Unversal search by thechink · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why? Because it's all about integration with the Apple eco-system. The current Apple TV is a useful companion device to the iPhone, iPad and Mac and the new one will add to that. If you're not invested in their eco-system then buying would not be useful to you.

    5. Re:Unversal search by ernest.cunningham · · Score: 1

      I use Airplay to stream to the AppleTV any locally stored content like this.

      AirVideoHD Server and client app makes things easy for watching media on your iOS devices and AirPlay to your Apple TV.
      Alternatively, you can mirror your Mac screen to your TV with AirPlay.

      Plenty of options here.

    6. Re:Unversal search by frnic · · Score: 0

      Why would we mod you down? Of course Apple waits a few years and lets other companies invent the wheel. Then they take it and make money with it by making it easy to use and BORING. So far it seem stop work for them, I realize that you are only interested in really cool products that you can tweet and that the company making it has no interest in profits. Personally, I will take the Apple product which will work, be supported and be improved over time... They may be late to the game, but if winning means making money, well, they seem to have figured that part out.

    7. Re:Unversal search by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      If it simplifies the TV-to-TV peripheral interface, I'm in, regardless of what new streamed content we may get.

    8. Re:Unversal search by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Why? Because it's all about integration with the Apple eco-system.

      As a matter of principle, I do my best to avoid any products that are said to be part of some corporate "ecosystem".

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    9. Re:Unversal search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4th gen, actually. 1st was a big silver box with a hard drive in it that ran MacOS. 2nd was the little black iOS device that only did 720p. 3rd is the current little black one that does 1080p.

    10. Re: Unversal search by unami · · Score: 1

      it's a stupid summary. you won't pay more just because of the universal search function. still, apple, will sell it as a major feature, although it's "just" software. but they will charge double the price because of the new motion/voice controller, better cpu, and added storage - so you can play and download games with it. i'd guess, universal "text" search, and a new, revamped "tv" service (where i could imagine one could get either single channels or packages for a reduced price) will come to the old 70$ apple tv, which the'll probably still sell for $50 from then on, as well. but you'll have to pay extra for the new hardware features and the ability to play games with it and use it as a homekit comtroller.

    11. Re: Unversal search by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      universal search? On my ROKU if i go to the main search it will show me from which channels i have installed the program is on, and if there is a free option or only paid.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    12. Re:Unversal search by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Mostly it's just extra support for iTunes. What other integration is there with phones/pads/computers? You mean chromecast and making your phone videos go to tv? That works with other devices. So what happens if Roku or Amazon or Google get iTunes support, then where's the Apple TV advantage?

      Apple TV in the past has languished with little support from high levels at Apple, it's not the cool fad of the day so gets overlooked. So I suspect it'll get overlooked in the future as well.

    13. Re:Unversal search by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      why would i pay 150 for something

      That's a pretty stupid question to posit before you know anything about what the $150 model does.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    14. Re:Unversal search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just Mirror, but extend your desktop too.

      Dual monitor with no cable.

      Nice for flash video sites with no app that you want on a big screen while you work.

    15. Re:Unversal search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good for you, Jack.

      But that doesn't make you smarter, better-off or superior to anyone who does.

      A "matter of principle"? pfft w/e.

    16. Re: Unversal search by __aajwxe560 · · Score: 1

      You know, I just don't understand why so many of these vendors make this so difficult. Roku hugs the peripheries of the future IMHO with internet channels, etc all merged together under an early version cohesive search engine on the TV. WD Live offers awesome local media streaming and supports just about any codec I throw at it. Yet neither of these vendors, nor countless others, seems to be able to simply take these two approaches that exist TODAY and present a single cohesive media player. If I wanted my PC to take on the overhead of decoding video for my Roku, I'd just watch through my homemade media server and burn 150watts at any given time. My WD Live does the same running at 5 watts thank you. Likewise, why does WD not see the opp in front of them to extend their player the way of Roku with plugins and add-on channels? And don't get me started on all the latest Chinese vendors trying to do this with Android on small ARM-based devices ....

    17. Re:Unversal search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a stupid troll.

    18. Re:Unversal search by fermion · · Score: 1
      Tivo requires a monthly subscription. I think they are trying to be more like Amazon Fire TV, which seems to be not available anymore, but was only $100. It was used to promote Amazon videos, just like the Apple TV sole purpose was to promote Apple videos.

      The saving grace of Amazon was that Amazon had a lot free content if you were a Prime Subscriber. It also had a Plex Client. I guess if Apple has Apps now, and one of those is a Plex client, then that would be good.

      At the end of the day, though, I don't see any reason to buy any of these because the video format for each service is different, so once you buy a video you are locked into something that may or may not exist in a few months.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    19. Re:Unversal search by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      You probably wouldn't because hating Apple is a major part of who you are as a person.

      However, for normal people, I suspect the clincher will be that the Apple TV will have an App Store. Obviously that makes it a cheap console with cheap apps. Plus all the many more things that the third party app developers will come up with.

      You don't get that with a Roku.

    20. Re: Unversal search by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      The "main" search? You mean there are multiple searches?

      Can you just speak to search for something and play it on a Roku, without so much as picking up a remote? Pretty sure you will be able to on the new Apple TV. It's trivial if they put Siri on it.

      "Siri! Play me last weeks American Odessey."
      "OK"

    21. Re:Unversal search by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Why will it fail abysmally because the AppleTV is not a bloody TV. This now having to compete with actual big screen Android TVs http://www.trustedreviews.com/... rather than bullshit pretending a box with no screen is a TV. So this time Apple way off the mark and behind the times and just making a token adjustment to try to catch up. All in one computers are rapidly growing in size, dozy M$ also doesn't seem to have woken up to this.

      People do not want a box to hook up to their idiot box, they want an idiot box that will do all of it for them and just smarter controllers. Brings up another point, smarter TVs mean the game console is also dying, they just don't know it, yet.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    22. Re:Unversal search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would we mod you down?

      Because it is happening? The post is being down-modded.

    23. Re: Unversal search by omkhar · · Score: 1

      So.... Exactly like Amazon Fire TV?

    24. Re:Unversal search by KGIII · · Score: 1

      People will buy this and vigorously defend their decision because it is an Apple product. You know this, right?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    25. Re:Unversal search by thechink · · Score: 1

      Off the top os my head I can think of iCloud photos & videos, AirPlay, Siri, iPhone/iPads as controllers, etc. Lots more to it than just iTunes.

      In the past Apple has called the Apple TV a hobby. They maybe ready to take it more seriously now.

    26. Re:Unversal search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Apple TV is a multi year failure, calling it a "hobby" is double speak. Third try (gen) is charm, eh?

    27. Re: Unversal search by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      a) No. With Amazon Fire you need to pick the remote up and press a button to speak to it. Experience of Siri is that for a plugged in device, simply saying "Hey Siri" is enough.

      b) No. Their speech search only works with Amazon's own content. It's not universal search. Experience of Siri (and Apple generally) is that it will be universal search.

      c) You're attempting to play that game where Apple's device has to beat not only the feature list of the device that everyone is arguing about, but every single other device on the market too. And failing.

    28. Re:Unversal search by tsa · · Score: 1

      There's Beamer. It streams every movie I throw at it to the Apple TV with no problems.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    29. Re: Unversal search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It exists. It's called home sharing under iTunes or in the Apple TV settings. We ripped our dvd / bluray collection a couple years ago and put them on an external drive. All the apple tvs, tablets, computers and phones play those movies just fine.

    30. Re: Unversal search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Brings up another point, smarter TVs mean the game console is also dying, they just don't know it, yet"

      LOL what!? You been hitting the crack pipe today?

    31. Re: Unversal search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure Apple, Google and Amazon will be around more than a few months. Go ahead and buy a movie or two, it's probably fine.

    32. Re:Unversal search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a good principle in general, but there is a genuine benefit offsetting the tradeoffs of the Apple ecosystem. That benefit is that it is very easy for home users to connect their apple devices together.

      Power users like slashdotters might scoff at that, as even without a dedicated "ecosystem" it's still pretty easy to connect devices together, but non-power-users can certainly enjoy the easy of setup and discoverability (apple advertises and highlights the interesting features that you can get with other products if you know to look for them)

    33. Re:Unversal search by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      but there is a genuine benefit offsetting the tradeoffs of the Apple ecosystem

      As you say, it's a tradeoff. And it's one I'm just not willing to make.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    34. Re:Unversal search by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      not true. Id love a new ipod classic

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  4. Sounds Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    It's APPLE. Everything APPLE sounds good. sw-Bling!

  5. Getting with the times. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    "It wasn't reporting a steady stream of passwords, search terms, and just generally overheard words while listening for "Siri" back to Apple for passing through their corporate analysis and sales partitioning algorithms, and NSA's computers in those mysterious buildings whose costs rival the Apollo program and Manhattan project.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  6. app store by Kohath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The App Store on the Apple TV should be just as revolutionary as it was on the iPhone 3 when it came out. Instead of making a deal with Apple or Comcast or Roku to get your content on TV, you'll just write an app. This should open up TV to a whole new universe of niche providers and accelerate the trend of shrinking audiences for cable and broadcast shows.

    I'm looking forward to all the new choices.

    1. Re:app store by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

      People on Slashdot seem dismissive (as usual) but I also am pretty excited about what third party apps mean for the TV space. I think it could be really exciting, and it's pretty easy for anyone to have a go at it if they like.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    2. Re: app store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have to make a deal with Roku to be in their platform, just write an app.

    3. Re: app store by Kohath · · Score: 2

      Hmm. I didn't know that. Apple's entry into the market should still lead to a lot more content choices.

    4. Re:app store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Third party apps for Apple TV in the App Store?

      When they are not even making the App Store work properly?

      Since they brought and integrated Testflight into it, the App Store is a pile of crap, crashing, giving error messages and blocking developers from submitting apps for no reason.

    5. Re:app store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have not had any of these problems. You should maybe give Apple support a call?

    6. Re: app store by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 1

      Any there any large services NOT on Roku? Because of their open SDK, pretty much everyone has made a Roku channel. Apple will still lead to more exposure, but Roku's been the leader in the content game for a LONG time.

    7. Re: app store by robmv · · Score: 1

      Same for Android TV, there is nothing revolutionary on a store for TV set top box applications

    8. Re: app store by unami · · Score: 1

      yup, but there's a good chance that you'll have to emphasize "has been" pretty soon after apple has entered the market.

    9. Re: app store by Kohath · · Score: 1

      I just did some searching and, yeah, most of what I was hoping to see is already on Roku. Now I'm thinking of buying one.

      But maybe with the new Apple/Cisco deal, the Apple TV will have WebEx support. That's one thing I don't see on Roku.

    10. Re:app store by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      When they are not even making the App Store work properly?

      The app store works great - discoverability is just poor, which means you must result to (*gasp*) actually marketing instead of having customers fall upon you.

      Since they brought and integrated Testflight into it, the App Store is a pile of crap

      That may be the stupidest complaint I've ever heard about the App Store, since TestFlight has zilch to do with the App Store at all (Test Flight for those unaware is a means to get beta versions out to people for testing, and the integration has actually been pretty helpful for most uses).

      On a side note, I've done dozens of app submissions in the past few months, and have not encountered a single error... and app reviews have seemingly been much faster for some reason.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    11. Re: app store by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Apple entered the market 8 years ago. Roku has been doing fine.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    12. Re:app store by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      That's how Roku works. Roku does not make deals to get content, instead it has lots and lots of apps .Apple sounds like it is playing catch up.

    13. Re:app store by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      There's nothing new here. Other devices already have apps, and those apps are the ones that get the content. It's how Roku, Google TV, Chromecast, FireTV, and smart televisions work. Though with greater or lesser amount of ability to add new apps. They may be called "channels" but they're really the same as apps.

      The only thing in the announcement that sounds new is the move to talk to TV content providers directly. That sounds a bit bad actually, as it may mean that content partners with Apple may get higher precedence over third party content providers; perhaps they'll push their best friend and downplay Netflix and let politics get involved.

    14. Re: app store by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Doubt it. Apple has been in the market for a very long time already, and is falling far behind except with iTunes fans who already have lots of content there. They are playing catch up. The only thing happening here is a reminder, even to Apple fans, that Apple TV exists.

      I prefer a device that is completely agnostic, no preference to one channel or the other, whereas I think Apple will play favorites.

    15. Re:app store by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Other devices already have apps, and those apps are the ones that get the content.

      If "content" is all you think AppleTV apps will do, the Force is not the only thing facing an awakening in a few months...

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    16. Re:app store by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm only going off what the news article said.

    17. Re:app store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The App Store on the Apple TV should be just as revolutionary as it was on the iPhone 3 when it came out. Instead of making a deal with Apple or Comcast or Roku to get your content on TV, you'll just write an app. This should open up TV to a whole new universe of niche providers and accelerate the trend of shrinking audiences for cable and broadcast shows.

      I'm looking forward to all the new choices.

      There's also the fact that "smart TV" makers seem to have a bad track record privacy:

      * http://www.cnet.com/news/samsung-changes-smarttv-privacy-policy-in-wake-of-spying-fears/

      Whereas Apple, for all its other faults, has been pretty good at trying to protect people's privacy on their devices.

    18. Re:app store by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I will be dismissive for a different reason: content of the app store.

      If you look at platforms like Kodi you'll find a very feature rich plugin section. A large number of these plugins feature things that facilitate piracy, make that piracy automatic, allow easy content searching for piracy, and improve cataloging of the pirated content. Then when you're not pirating things you're downloading aftermarket program guides from non approved sources, accessing streaming services not typically available on the device, or interfacing with other devices that were incompatible out of the box.

      The vast majority of plugins I see installed on a typical Kodi box would likely never make it through the App Store's terms of use and if they did they are held at the whim of a single complaint from a content provider.

    19. Re:app store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      like all the private channels you can already install on roku? also, you'll definitely have to make a deal with apple vis-a-vis the the current app store.

    20. Re: app store by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Apple entered the market 8 years ago. Roku has been doing fine.

      And Netscape was around before Microsoft got into web browsing, and Blackberry dominated the smartphone market before Apple came along. Roku best not be complacent.

  7. First in line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    I'm first in line if they come out with some new version. I love my current one, but will buy the latest and greatest apple product anytime!

  8. Cost is not an issue by goombah99 · · Score: 2

    If someone is decideing between a Roku or an Apple TV based on a $80 price differential then they probably can't affort to buy shows anyhow. What matters is what's the easiest thing to use , gives you great results, and doesn't become an on-line attack vector in your home because you left it unpatched. For example, I bought my Amazon firestick because it delivered the content I wanted in the most simple way and it keeps it self updated and patched. It's not over complicated. I don't want something that can do everything like a chromeStick or an XBMC home sever. I want something that does just what I want extremely well.

    What's the one thing I'd like for my Amazon fire stick that it doens't have is to be able to access the apple iTunes movie store. When you can plan in advance, downloading the movie rather that real time streaming is likely to achieve much better outcomes when my connection is overloaded. Paying a $1 extra for that is usually worth it to me.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Cost is not an issue by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Netflix is $8 a month, so they can afford the shows but still feel that Apple TV is overpriced.

    2. Re:Cost is not an issue by ganjadude · · Score: 2

      the roku has got to be one of the easiest things to use. i plugged it in, most channels i would want are pre loaded. all i had to do was connect to my network and enter my credentials.

      cant speak for fireTV or others but the roku is a fine device

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    3. Re:Cost is not an issue by goombah99 · · Score: 1

      Netflix is $8 a month, so they can afford the shows but still feel that Apple TV is overpriced.

      If all you are watching is Netflix then yes you don't need apple.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  9. Rumoured to be no 4k support by mccalli · · Score: 1

    Bit of an omission at this point in the game I think.

    1. Re:Rumoured to be no 4k support by UnknowingFool · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And at what point is that? You mean at a point where most people don't have 4k TVs and most content is barely 1080p and most people don't have connections that support 4k streaming?

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    2. Re:Rumoured to be no 4k support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or eyes/viewing distances that make 4k even useful?

    3. Re:Rumoured to be no 4k support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say you blow a kilobuck on a 4K TV with all sorts of Smart, incompatible, and already obsolete features.
      How much better would it be if you just spent $150 on a Box, the rest on a 4K Monitor, and just replaced the Box with new Smart, incompatible, and already obsolete features every 18 months or so. The Screen itself won't be obsolete for a long time.
      It isn't for me though. I went through the whole Home Theatre thing when it started, including a very expensive NEC DLP Projector.
      I'm back to simplicity- a cheap LED TV with absolutely no Boxen. Once the Cable Ghouls require a Box for even the most Basic Cable, because all channels have been scrambled, I'll just OTA what I can.
      It's just TV after all.
      It's not that important.

    4. Re:Rumoured to be no 4k support by Kjella · · Score: 1

      And at what point is that? You mean at a point where most people don't have 4k TVs and most content is barely 1080p and most people don't have connections that support 4k streaming?

      Well, Apple likes to target the people with money which significantly increases the odds. I really don't understand why TV can't take a few pages from Spotify and Steam though like offline mode (download now, view later) and automatic pre-release caching of content, it's not like the next episode of Game of Thrones is broadcast live. No stuttering, no degradation, no broken connections and even if they don't want to do full offline mode even a shitty cell phone connection should be enough to authenticate and play. Of course it won't work for sports or news or anything else broadcast live, but it'd work for some things. They could even schedule it for the service's non-peak hours, so 3 AM in the morning you're downloading tonight's episode. That would make it accessible to a lot more people.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    5. Re:Rumoured to be no 4k support by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Well, Apple likes to target the people with money which significantly increases the odds.

      And how will targeting richer people help with the fact that there isn't a lot of content at 4k? There's no excuse not to have 1080p right now but 4k is years away maybe even a decade. At that point, if rich people want to replace their $150 1080p Apple TV with a 4K version, it's not a huge cost

      I really don't understand why TV can't take a few pages from Spotify and Steam though like offline mode (download now, view later) and automatic pre-release caching of content, it's not like the next episode of Game of Thrones is broadcast live

      Because most people who want to see a show or a movie want it instantly. And the decision to watch that video is more or less spontaneous and not planned.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    6. Re:Rumoured to be no 4k support by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Well, Apple likes to target the people with money which significantly increases the odds.

      No apple targets zealots who like to buy the latest Apple product. Yes they have money, but having money does not mean people will instantly go out and just upgrade everything on a whim. If they did they likely would not have money. I know of lots of people who disposed of perfectly fine iPhone 5 to get the iPhone 6, but not a single one of them would throw out a functional 1080p TV for an equivalent 4K model. I'd wager that when content is available in 4K people still wouldn't do it. TVs in general are treated like household appliance. They are typically replaced, not upgraded.

  10. Re:Is this one of those new advertisements? by tomhath · · Score: 0

    Agreed. Times have changed from the old days when Steve Jobs would tell the fanbois what to buy and they would trip over themselves to obey..

  11. Typical... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see "It will also reportedly feature universal search: 'Essentially, you'll be able to search for a show or movie once, and see results from all sorts of different sources.'" and I think "No surprise, Apple taking something that's existed elsewhere (this has been an ability for the Roku for some time now) and it'll be hailed as revolutionary."

  12. Not nearly as "appish" by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    You don't have to make a deal with Roku to be in their platform, just write an app.

    First of all, do you know Brightscript? I don't know many people that do...

    Now compare that with the number of people who know the iOS SDK.

    Also on Roku you are just making a "Channel", not an app. You don't have much in the way of a controller. You don't have any integration with media (iOS apps can be built to read and do things with all iTunes media). The Roku SDK is very content-presentation centric, instead of being an app with the full breadth of capability we've come to expect from mobile apps.

    I like the Roku box but to say it has "apps" in the same sense as HOPEFULLY the AppleTV does (we still do not know for sure if the AppleTV has apps this time, it's been expected for years now) is to ignore all practical factors at work. I had looked before at platforms to build apps for TV but all of them were really limited compared to mobile app SDK's.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Not nearly as "appish" by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      You can play Angry Birds on Roku. How much more control do you want? Touch screen is out. Now I can imagine hooking up a computer so you have mouse and keyboard, but what' the point. It's a *TV*.

      It really sounds like the Apple fans who utterly ignored Apple TV for seven years are just now realizing it exists and trying to drum up the support. The reality distortion field has broken down and it will take a lot more than a press release to get it up at full strength again.

    2. Re:Not nearly as "appish" by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Touch screen is out.

      Why?

      You lack imagination as to what a new control scheme could do, or even an iPhone/iPad pairing (which you can't do with the Roku SDK as far as I can tell).

      It really sounds like the Apple fans who utterly ignored Apple TV for seven years are just now realizing it exists and trying to drum up the support.

      I never had one as to me it was less functional than most other players (though I did get one for my parents since it was easier to use). The new AppleTV though should be quite a lot more functional... it was a great surprise to me that no other company has even come close to what Apple is about to do (assuming they really ship an Apple TV that supports third party apps, still not a sure thing).

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re:Not nearly as "appish" by Kohath · · Score: 1

      It really sounds like the Apple fans who utterly ignored Apple TV for seven years are just now realizing it exists and trying to drum up the support.

      iPhone 2G was a curiosity before the App Store. It was a slow phone/iPod hybrid with an interesting GUI.

      For 7 years, the Apple TV without the App Store has been second rate. The App Store changes things.

    4. Re:Not nearly as "appish" by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Ya, but if it's apple it's going to be a walled garden.

    5. Re:Not nearly as "appish" by Kohath · · Score: 1

      That will be sad for ideologues who dislike such arrangements, but at least they'll have something new to moralize about.

    6. Re:Not nearly as "appish" by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      or even an iPhone/iPad pairing

      This has existed for quite a while now, with the 'Remote' app.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    7. Re:Not nearly as "appish" by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Ya, but if it's apple it's going to be a walled garden.

      Only because it's Apple. No one complains that they can't replace the GPS software on a new car with Waze, before they go home to play some GTAV on their Playstation 4.

    8. Re:Not nearly as "appish" by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Naw, Windows doesn't mandate a walled garden, Linux doesn't mandate a walled garden, even Apple's computers don't mandate a walled garden, if they did then everyone would be complaining loudly. Is it too much to ask to allow open applications in the smart TV market, especially with a company that's playing catch up?

    9. Re:Not nearly as "appish" by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      That's not a real response, maybe because there isn't a real response that can be made.

      No one is going to complain about "walled gardens" on car software - well, maybe they will now that Apple is getting into the car software business, because Apple. No one complains about "walled gardens" on their Bluray players, or the "walled gardens" on their game consoles.

      walled garden = ad hoc argument masquerading as principle.

  13. So we all agree now Apple invented tv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    along with gui software , mp3 players , personal computers , digital watches.

  14. Re:Is this one of those new advertisements? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You are just a stupid troll.

  15. Re:Is this one of those new advertisements? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    And yet Apple sells a lot more now than when Jobs was alive. Go figure.

  16. Not so Universal search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Essentially, you'll be able to search for a show or movie once, and see results from all sorts of different sources."

    And I'll bet that if you search for free content, say the public domain "It's a Wonderful Life", this universal search will only show sources where you will have a pay-per-view fee in addition to your monthly subscription charges.

  17. Only one thing matters to me... by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

    Can i host my own content on my own server with having to use iTunes?

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
  18. Price "doubled" by sehryan · · Score: 1

    It is a bit misleading to say that the price has doubled. While the ATV is currently at $69, it has traditionally sold at $99. The $30 drop was in anticipation of its originally scheduled debut in late Spring, which got delayed.

    So it is more like a 50% increase than a 100%+ increase.

    --
    The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe.
    1. Re:Price "doubled" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's actually more than a 50% DECREASE from the average cost of the two debut models, originally priced at $299 and $399..

  19. Throw out your display when the STB breaks? by tepples · · Score: 1

    People do not want a box to hook up to their idiot box, they want an idiot box that will do all of it for them

    SeaFox makes a good point that if you have a nice display, you might not want to throw it out when your receiver breaks or becomes obsolete, and it's easier to orient an external receiver for good Wi-Fi reception than to do so with a display.

    smarter TVs mean the game console is also dying

    How well do "smarter TVs" work with two to four remote controls? How responsive are they to player actions on said remote controls? And how does one load a game onto them while living in an area with harshly capped Internet? For those who live too far from the DSLAM, cellular and satellite Internet are often the only options, and they tend to cap home users on the order of 10 GB per month. The major consoles, on the other hand, support loading games through discs.

    1. Re:Throw out your display when the STB breaks? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      I did specifically note the rapid growth in size of all in one computers. Then the is question of how many years are left in optical disk drives before they are replaced by far more portable flash ram or it's equivalent. Things change and now Apple is starting to 'lag' much like M$ does.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    2. Re:Throw out your display when the STB breaks? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Then the is question of how many years are left in optical disk drives before they are replaced by far more portable flash ram or it's equivalent.

      It'll probably be a long time before 32-64 GB of removable flash memory is cheaper than stamping out one BD-ROM.

    3. Re:Throw out your display when the STB breaks? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Beware the cost demons of packaging, shipping, transport, retail and delivery. Small is cheap to get from the producer to the end user. Small consumes far less resources all along the way, so the last remaining cost difference is not production costs but the completely artificial impost of patent costs. So basically governments of the world are conspiring to burn it to the ground in order to pump up patent profits. No second thought about, hey wait dudes, it is really, really fucking stupid to serve patent profit greed at the expense of excess resource use and pollution generation but hey, psychopathic capitalism is psychopathic because that it the nature of capitalism.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  20. Re:Please, The Grassy Knoll Shooter, Kill Tim Cook by KGIII · · Score: 1

    Umm... Do you mean assassinations?

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  21. Roku apps are called channels by tepples · · Score: 1

    the Apple TV will have an App Store. [...] You don't get that with a Roku.

    Roku apps are called channels. There are plenty of them, some unlisted (so that they don't show up in the channel store if they don't have to), and there's no $99 per year fee to develop your own channel.

  22. Mods, get a grip!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parent posts false information and get up-modded? Wow, the Apple fanbois are in full swing today!

  23. I want snotTV by Snotnose · · Score: 1

    Give me a doohickey that I can plug into my TV's HDMI/USB/Firewire/whatever port. This doohickey lets me stream whatever from my PC to my TV. Wanna watch a show? Fine. Wanna listen to music? Fine. Wanna put a DVD into the PC DVD drive and watch on my 60" TV? Fine. Wanna play a game? Urm, I can see how that could be a problem.

  24. Re:Is this one of those new advertisements? by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    Not really. The article was far too-well written compared to the typical /. submission. That should be your first clue that it might be written by a PR person as an advertisement.

  25. Yawn. by Brannon · · Score: 1

    nt

  26. wooooo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, upgrades that do stuff that Roku's been doing for a while at 50%+ more cost.