Slashdot Mirror


Boston Tracks Vehicles, Lies About It, Leaves Data Exposed

An anonymous reader writes: License plate readers have been in the news a lot lately for the invasion of privacy they represent. Boston is the latest city to make mistakes with the technology. Two weeks ago, a reporter realized that the City of Boston had accidentally exposed records for their automated license plate reader system online. Anyone could have downloaded "dozens of sensitive files, including hundreds of thousands of motor vehicle records dating back to 2012." What's worse is that the Boston Police Department claimed in 2013 that it had stopped using license plate readers. A look through the accidentally-public database shows "hundreds of emails" dating from 2013 to the present, indicating that the police were still getting that data with help from the Transportation Department.

88 comments

  1. the Patriots should come out and support by turkeydance · · Score: 4, Funny

    their brothers-in-cheating

    1. Re: the Patriots should come out and support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, I'm sure that just like Brady, if this ever goes to court, the police will get away with it because they weren't aware they could be punished for cheating. Or whatever bullshit excuse a federal judge used for throwing out any punishment while saying that Brady cheated.

    2. Re: the Patriots should come out and support by grub · · Score: 1


      Takes one to know one

      I think a "I know you are but what am I?" would have been much more direct and hurtful.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    3. Re: the Patriots should come out and support by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Its just like those new justice department rules on warrants, as long as its us saying it, and not the legislature mandating it....we can publically state the policy today, then secretly change it tomorow; no harm; no foul.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    4. Re: the Patriots should come out and support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have any glue.

  2. The city LIED about it? by sconeu · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm shocked, SHOCKED!!!!

    Oh wait... How can you tell when a politician is lying? His lips move.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:The city LIED about it? by Intron · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Don't worry, the government will investigate and punish the guilty. In this case it will be the reporter.

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    2. Re: The city LIED about it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Bostonians behavior runs true to form, they'll punish the people in power by re-electing them like nothing happened.

    3. Re:The city LIED about it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can you tell when a politician is lying? you havent cutoff his head , put a stake through his heart and salted the grave?

    4. Re:The city LIED about it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously? Reading your license plate is justification for use of deadly force?

    5. Re:The city LIED about it? by Greystripe · · Score: 1

      The best politicians are like ventriloquists, they can lie without moving their lips. The best way to determine if a politician is lying is to see if they are breathing.

    6. Re:The city LIED about it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you think all those press releases are in writing?

    7. Re:The city LIED about it? by Agripa · · Score: 1

      It sure was recently when that license plate reader made a mistake and the cops detained the driver at gun point.

  3. The old Lie by Omission by BrookHarty · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Most counties do this, lie by omission. "We don’t spy on our citizens!" Correct, we allow other countries, then we swap data.
    Police, "We don’t track license plates!", We let the DOT do it for us.

    So many lies in government agencies.

    1. Re:The old Lie by Omission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's more simply semantics. They are spying and tracking, just not directly.

    2. Re:The old Lie by Omission by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Well you see it depends on what the definition of "do" is. Does "do" mean to perform an an action presently, or does it mean to have ever performed an action, or even to cause it to happen by a third party.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  4. "it stopped using..." by Frobnicator · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Taking them at their word, let's assume the police department stopped using license plate scanners. They no longer own them, they sold them off, whatever.

    That doesn't mean that a third party doesn't run the licence plate scanners and the police have a very cozy relationship for getting all the data whenever they need it.

    It's much like the recent changes to the NSA's spying playbook. They say they will no longer collect and store that metadata themselves .... but they will use a third party to do it. In particular, that third party is not subject to the government's data retention policy limiting position of the metadata.

    In both cases, it means the agency itself is no longer doing it. That doesn't mean it still isn't happening, just that the agency is not the one actively doing it.

    --
    //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    1. Re:"it stopped using..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And this is where we all stop acknowledging the law anymore - it's pretty much useless at this point. The law is a big game where everyone tries to use sneaky underhanded games to redefine words, or redefine the scope of words. Basically we write a law and then tweak the language so we can ignore the law. We might as well not write laws in the first place and save the hassle. The mess that came out of Obamacare: Point at the word "Federal" (an implementation detail) and use that to derail the whole operation. Point at some hazy definition of what "Federal" can and can't do. Use that as a justification for denying healthcare. Whatever. At the same time send out American Community Surveys that are a complete violation of the constitution. Quote penal codes on the survey to make it sound extra scary. Even use the wrong penal codes or totally unrelated penal codes. There's no penalty when a government office lies, cheats or steals. See Civil Asset Forfeiture if you want to see some hot police stealing in action. Testimony obtained under duress? Plea bargaining? Nope...no penalty for bent police dealings and under-the-table sentencing.

      That said, if I'm ever hauled in front of a judge for trying to be sneaky you're damn straight a judge is going to pound me into the ground for not following the "spirit" of the law. You see, politicians only have to follow the base language. Citizens have to follow the "spirit laws" as well. That means we have to guess what we're doing is somehow wrong by some random brain-fart interpretation and "not do that". If you think someone might take offense then just don't do it. Self censorship rules.

      That said, if you're white, modestly well funded, and make at least a passing attempt at following the laws you can skip most of this. You can't follow all of the laws since some of them contradict and some of them are broad as all hell. The trick is to blag your way around it and never get arrested, never say anything in front of a cop, always nod and just go about your business. If you attract the ire of a cop then you're basically 100% fucked with no recourse. This is the system we've created now. That's why the headline here is to be expected. It's not unusual at all. Nothing will come of it and nothing will be done about it. Maybe some sap due for retirement will be retired a little earlier to placate the PR gods but that's about as much as we can expect.

    2. Re:"it stopped using..." by tomhath · · Score: 4, Informative

      If anyone bothered to read the linked article they would see that this is exactly what it happening. Strictly speaking, the police stopped using scanners. But the Boston Transportation Department is still using them and (apparently) contracted with Xerox to manage a database, which the police seem to have access to. I suppose one could argue that use of data collected by scanners still constitutes use of the scanner.

    3. Re:"it stopped using..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Intentionally misleading is still considered lying.

    4. Re:"it stopped using..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose one could argue that use of data collected by scanners still constitutes use of the scanner.

      You could indeed, as if it were invasion of privacy by one organization, it would still constitute an invasion of privacy by another organization, and an even bigger invasion of privacy for the second to share back to the first.

      However, let's be clear. Scanning license plates is NOT an invasion of privacy. Your license plate is sitting out in the open in full public view. I, myself, could walk down the street with clipboard in hand and write down every single license plate I find. I could do this every day and there is not a single thing wrong with it beyond how suspicious it looks (maybe I might get charged with prowling...maybe). If I replaced the clipboard with a camera, it's still the same situation. If I replace myself with the police it's still the same situation.

      The only thing that makes it "bad" for the police to do it is because they have access to a database of said license plates and can look up owner information on any or all of them. Now, looking up the owner of a license plate when they've done no wrong and nothing to indicate that they may possibly do anything wrong may violate the 4th Amendment, but nothing I've found confirms that (I even found once case where they outright ignore the situation of a cop looking up a random license plate), so as far as I can find it's not illegal for police or anyone else to be scanning license plates. That's regardless of any privacy concerns that a given organization may have.

    5. Re:"it stopped using..." by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      Anyone can look up License Plates Online

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    6. Re:"it stopped using..." by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      (apparently) contracted with Xerox to manage a database

      Fascinating. I didn't realize Xerox did that kind of contracting.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    7. Re:"it stopped using..." by sjames · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, it is stalking. Seeing someone in a public place is fine. Seeing them occasionally is OK. Making sure you see them every time in many places without their consent is stalking.

    8. Re:"it stopped using..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's only stalking if there's a particular target. Writing down license plates of vehicles in a particular area that may change daily is not stalking.

    9. Re:"it stopped using..." by sjames · · Score: 2

      It rises to it if it's a concerted effort to write down license plates everywhere and correlate the data such that any vehicle can be retroactively tracked.

      Try that with police cars or government limos and see if trouble doesn't find you.

    10. Re:"it stopped using..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ^you made good points.

      I was like mmhmm finally got a +1 for facts. Saw this, and did. Come back in a couple hours and -1. Hidden from the sheep too lazy to move default sliders.
      http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=7977123&cid=50483697

      fuck whoever mods every fact on slashdot to hidden. over and over its persistent.

    11. Re:"it stopped using..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      License plate scanning results in getting the license plate number and location of the vehicle. This would be akin privacy-wise to setting up a device to track cell phones.

    12. Re:"it stopped using..." by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      [x] A whole religion of Judaism (Jews are anti-Christian) ...
      [x] Dinosaur mass media completely owned by Jews..

      Mel Gibson, is that you?

    13. Re:"it stopped using..." by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Fascinating. I didn't realize Xerox did that kind of contracting.

      They've just been jealous of IBM's third reich contracts all this time, and they're doing what they can to catch up. (Hey, it's a tough market.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:"it stopped using..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bingo. That is why the hoopla. When everybody sees what everybody is doing, that is bad. When a small privileged group sees what all others are doing, that is ok.

    15. Re:"it stopped using..." by Coren22 · · Score: 0

      I have known quite a few Jews, and have had very interesting conversations on why Jesus wasn't the promised savior, but I have never known a Jew to not like Christians at all. At heart, Jews, Christians and followers of Islam (what is the term for that?) are all essentially the same religion, they all worship the same god. In fact, the Koran specifically states that Jews and Christians should not be persecuted as they are brothers in faith. Unfortunately, not many Islamics (?) actually read and understand the Koran, just as many Christians don't read and understand the bible.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    16. Re:"it stopped using..." by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I looked up Maryland, and it costs $48/plate, that is a little insane.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    17. Re:"it stopped using..." by ai4px · · Score: 1

      Even Dr Evil's organization had to diversify. From what I hear, his talent agents are undercutting other hollywood agencies and they have DiCaprio.

    18. Re:"it stopped using..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "if you're white, modestly well funded..."

      Um, if you're black and modestly well funded you're also going to be fine. Check the NFL police blotter once in a while and see what the ultimate punishment is. Hell, Ray Rice got counseling.

    19. Re:"it stopped using..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jG6kJm-50k
      http://www.ifamericansknew.org/history/rel-christians.html

      You can literally look this up yourself. Just two first hits above. You can actually say the most ignorant shit on slashdot... and get modded up to be seen. How did you even get a mod +1? When you state facts it is going to -1 faster than you can butter your bagel. If you don't believe me, I will show you. Just ask.

      The Jews think animal sacrifices, and the law, and sucking baby's penises somehow makes them holy enough to be accepted by God. God knowing exactly how they think... put Jesus in the midst of the Jews with God's own Spirit in Him. They wanted to kill him. They are still mad. They are also culturally upset that God would allow 6 million of them to be baked like cookies in a Betty Crocker oven. When you reject Jesus it gets all bad.

      Jews are as anti-Christian as it gets.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brit_milah
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rLcXvgv4FYI
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dzs-09Of99I
      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2304793/Two-babies-stricken-HERPES-ritual-oral-blood-sucking-circumcision-New-York-City.html

      Rambam - Maimonides in his "book of laws" Laws of Milah Chapter 2, paragraph 2: "...and afterwards he sucks the circumcision until blood comes out from far places, in order not to come to danger, and anyone who does not suck, we remove him from practice."

      So literally they are baby cock suckers. Yes, they are anti-Christian. You just don't hear the truth on Fox news or any other Jewish-owned media. They happen to own basically all possible propaganda conduits. "own" meaning while they are still alive. Denying Jesus doesn't end well. It gets very hot. Gnashing of teeth.

      Surely these are not the interesting loving conversations you had with your "known Jews".

      And to the +2 mod points numb-nuts above who thinks only Mel Gibson understands: The method of ridiculing/mocking 1 person (like Mel, or like Jesus, or any other individual) then taking that pre-existing mock... and applying it to anybody who agrees later.... will disappear and leave you wondering why the fuck it isn't working any more. You will look stupid. Neither mocking nor demonizing make you right. Facts rest on their own merits.

    20. Re:"it stopped using..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Id's habbening! xDD

  5. So the real question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is anyone going to be charged, arrested, jailed, or even fired or fined for this act of blatant spying and the attempted coverup? My answer is, only if these leaked records embarrass a high-ranking policeman or government official (eg, their wife thinks they go bowling every Friday night, but the records show them actually going to a gay bar).

    1. Re:So the real question is... by Dereck1701 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There already was a pretty embarrassing episode in this very city, which is the reason why the Boston police had to "shut down" the program. That incident, if I recall correctly, involved public release of a very limited database in an attempt to allay to privacy concerns. Even with this extremely hobbled database researchers were able to find multiple embarrassing events, firstly that the area with the highest recorded density of vehicles with outstanding parking tickets was the police parking lot. Secondly that at least one stolen vehicle had went past the same intersection time and time again at a predictable time and day and no one ever thought post a cruiser to retrieve it and arrest the thief.

    2. Re:So the real question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not illegal, so no.

    3. Re:So the real question is... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      firstly that the area with the highest recorded density of vehicles with outstanding parking tickets was the police parking lot.

      I understand the need for police. There is a certain percentage of society who will steal, kill, and assault other people if an enforcing agent isn't around.

      However, in it's current incarnation, police have caused me more problems than they've solved. I've been pulled over, while walking and while driving. Not long ago my car was broken into, its window smashed. Did the police do anything? No, I got a parking ticket.

      If someone breaks into your house, then the police might write a report, but nothing more will come of it. Even if there are fingerprints, they won't try to catch the thief.

      I don't know what the solution to this is, but in its current form, our police forces are really lousy. Maybe in some cities they work better than in mine. (And honestly, the individual police officers in my town don't seem to be the problem).

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:So the real question is... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      (And honestly, the individual police officers in my town don't seem to be the problem).

      In my town, both the leadership and the individual officers seem to be part of the problem. But the whole county is run by an old boys' network (shock amazement) and I don't think you can have endemic police corruption without endemic government corruption.

      If I just go to the next county, things are working there, the place is clean, and the cops are friendly and polite. Thanks, Ukiah, for being you. That's why I spend so much money there. I just wish you'd let them build that Costco, you could have even more of it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:So the real question is... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      In my town, both the leadership and the individual officers seem to be part of the problem. But the whole county is run by an old boys' network (shock amazement) and I don't think you can have endemic police corruption without endemic government corruption.

      If that's the case, and everyone knows about it, then the citizens are probably part of the problem, too.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  6. All data becomes noise @ some collection threshold by rmdingler · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One motorcycle that had been reported stolen triggered scanner alerts 59 times over six months, while another plate with lapsed insurance was scanned a total of 97 times in the same span.

    We are going to be partially rescued from the data collection efforts; not from conscience or court ruling,

    but for the sheer, greedy mass of collections.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  7. Re:Boston is for cows by reboot246 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cows don't have license plates, but if they did, I'm sure Boston would track them and lie about it.

  8. Re:All data becomes noise @ some collection thresh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you believe this, you're a moron. The whole point is that they can selectively go back and pin things on you while they're on a which hunt / fishing expedition.

  9. To be expected. by rickb928 · · Score: 2

    No agency, governmental or otherwise, willingly gives up surveillance or information. We must ignore their claims to do so, and;

    Require watchdogs, monitors, and direct supervision.

    Constant investigation of databases, storage, and records, as of this of a continuous FOIA request.

    Assume that they are still collecting the data and institute legislation to render enforcement actions, either predicated on this data or potentially made possible by it, to be illegal and unenforceable.

    And more.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    1. Re:To be expected. by NoKaOi · · Score: 1

      Constant investigation of databases, storage, and records, as of this of a continuous FOIA request.

      This is meaningless without a real consequence. If the consequence is merely that evidence gathered using it is inadmissible, so what? If they stop doing it, there is nothing anyway so there is no incentive to stop. How about prison time for those that knowingly violate the constitution?

    2. Re:To be expected. by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      No agency, governmental or otherwise, willingly gives up surveillance or information. We must ignore their claims to do so, and;

      Require watchdogs, monitors, and direct supervision.

      >

      But who can watch the watchmen?
        - Juvenal, Satires

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
  10. Oh look by Tailhook · · Score: 0

    Yet another Democrat run city plumbing the depths of power abuse. Slashdot is unwittingly chronicling the erosion of civil liberties by libtard governed hell-holes.

    San Jose May Put License Plate Scanners On Garbage Trucks
    In Baltimore and Elsewhere, Police Use Stingrays For Petty Crimes

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    1. Re:Oh look by spacepimp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wish people would stop with the nickelodeon party line bullshit: That other political party is bad, they are eroding your civil liberties!!!.
      Republicans and Democrats are both complicit. The depressingly small number of privacy protecting politicians defies party lines... People need to stop pretending their party is looking out for civil liberties. They aren't and you're still buying their lies, and pointing fingers. Until all sides are accountable they will play this finger wag game, because people like you fall for it.

    2. Re:Oh look by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

      I wish people would stop with the nickelodeon party line bullshit: That other political party is bad, they are eroding your civil liberties!!!.
      Republicans and Democrats are both complicit. The depressingly small number of privacy protecting politicians defies party lines...

      Yep. Both parties are bought and paid for, and ethically (if not morally) bankrupt.

    3. Re:Oh look by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There needs to be a name for this rule, because this happens all the time on Slashdot. Whenever an (R) does something despicable, it is proof positive that their party is horrible and needs to be disbanded for the good of the world. Whenever a (D) does something despicable, we all need to look past party lines and realize that both parties are bad. Conclusion: we can't criticize (D) but it is A-OK to criticize (R). I have seen this comment appear so many times, and it never appears on stories that feature (R).

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:Oh look by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

      If that is the case, nothing is stopping you from posting the same thing when a Republican is being bashed.

      Power corrupts, and the massive amount of money (and therefore power) that high-level politicians control is staggering. The partisan games are just a sideshow to distract you from the main corrupt attraction but even when this fact is pointed out you still feel the need to whinge about perceived partisanship.

      --

      Enigma

    5. Re:Oh look by NoKaOi · · Score: 1, Troll

      That's because in reality, most of the time when D's are doing something bad, R's are doing that bad thing too, but not necessarily the other way around.

      Both parties are horrible assholes, but R's are much more horrible.

    6. Re: Oh look by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No the d's are much worse. All you need to do is look at cities like Detroit to see how messed up in head d's are. They find new ways to stupidly spend even more tax payer money. Just look at how bad we ate in debt thanks to Obama's vision.

    7. Re: Oh look by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      D's are enthusiastic children who try things which seem like they should be good ideas, but turns aren't out, and maybe they could have figured that out if they thought about it more.

      R's, on the other hand, are malicious and evil. Have you ever heard of a Democratic candidate painting his war-hero opponent as having been a sniveling coward, who didn't adopt a child of color, but instead fathered said child upon a woman outside of wedlock?

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    8. Re: Oh look by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that I agree with your characterization, but if I did, I'd rather have Rs than Ds in charge. Predictability counts for a lot. Better lawful evil than chaotic neutral.

  11. Re:All data becomes noise @ some collection thresh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm undoing all my moderation to post this, but to anyone who thinks "what a conspiratard!" they should be asking themselves what the point of all this collection was if they weren't using this to find stolen vehicles or uninsured motorists.

  12. Too late - the politicians have been compromised by Bruce66423 · · Score: 1

    It is highly likely that the politicians who might vote for this sort of bill will have long since been nobbled; tracking their indiscretions by this means will have been... helpful.

  13. Re:All data becomes noise @ some collection thresh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm undoing all my moderation to post this, but to anyone who thinks "what a conspiratard!" they should be asking themselves what the point of all this collection was if they weren't using this to find stolen vehicles or uninsured motorists.

    To measure which streets are the most congested? To detect unusually slow traffic on major bridges or tunnels in and out of Boston as an accident indicator?

    Those are reasons that Europeans do it and would probably be pretty good reasons for the Boston Traffic Department to do so too.

  14. Good luck with that. by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    And law enforcement wants us to respect them. Good fucking luck with that.

    1. Re:Good luck with that. by Socguy · · Score: 2

      No kidding. Imagine if the public behaved towards the police the way the police seem to be behaving towards the public. We'd all be in jail for obstruction of justice/perjury etc.

    2. Re:Good luck with that. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      No kidding. Imagine if the public behaved towards the police the way the police seem to be behaving towards the public. We'd all be in jail for obstruction of justice/perjury etc.

      You and I must be reading different news outlets. If we treated the cops like the cops treat us, there wouldn't be any cops left.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  15. #LivesMatter by nicoleb_x · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And you wonder why certain groups have basically given up trying to work with the police. I don't condone the violence, in fact I condemn it, but what do you expect when, seemingly, the police (and complicit city councils) don't respect you and repeatedly trample your rights? I would recommend that these groups give up the violence and focus on city hall and all the bastards that we keep electing. Insist on new management and ditch the entrenched LEO leadership, union or actual. Policing is big money and changing that is going to be really hard!

  16. Re:All data becomes noise @ some collection thresh by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Insightful

    To measure which streets are the most congested?

    They have traffic counting hoses for that. No need to have a complex system to measure traffic congestion.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  17. Pfffpht by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its not like they are going to go and stop and interrogate every single black person they can find with this data, Over a false rape allegation or anything...

  18. BPD did not LIE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They said they stopped - true. BPD did not promise they will never use it again.

  19. Re: Too late - the politicians have been compromis by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    That is where we must start. Replacing the current politicians, starting at the local level.

    I'm not hopeful.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  20. Re:Boston is for cows by davester666 · · Score: 1

    They've got easily tracked RFID chips. They've bionic cows. Robotic? Despotic? Animatronic? something-ic!

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  21. Re:All data becomes noise @ some collection thresh by guruevi · · Score: 1

    a) The police typically has better things to do in a big city

    b) These things are built for the sheer necessity to build them. They are required by some law or agency in pursuit of terrorism or tech jobs, then promptly underfunded and mismanaged resulting in becoming useless as a tool to the people who would be able to use them. The collection part works but then we have things like a few weeks ago where the police just can't manage to upgrade the 40GB hard drive that has the data.

    c) These things are built and often forgotten due to (b) unusable interfaces and/or given to untrained units and/or given to units where a union prevents them from being used because they didn't cater to the blind cop behind the desk.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  22. Re:All data becomes noise @ some collection thresh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrong.
    What happens is that - as usual - victims of various crimes will be ignored, while all of that data and information gets put to 'good' use against anyone that speaks out or they (whether as an organization or on an individual per-cop basis) don't like.

    It will be used for blackmail, for planting evidence, for parallel construction, and for any other number of nefarious uses. That's what it exists for, why they pay for it, why it is planned and designed.

    It just so happens that such a system, by sheer coincidence, actually, also collects information which could technically be used to solve rather than enable crimes.

  23. No automated plate scanners in the Free State by denis.goddard · · Score: 1

    Here in New Hampshire, the State is forbidden by law from using ANY automated license plate scanner technology. We are the only state to have passed such legislation. Not by coincidence; we have some two dozen hardcore libertarians in the State Legislature and thousands of liberty activists, with more moving in all the time. And you can join us http://freestateproject.org/

    1. Re:No automated plate scanners in the Free State by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      new hampshire residents also prefer sitting in traffic for hours to public transportation

      new hampshire residents think that a few hicks in their northernmost town are the most qualified people to choose the president

      new hampshire residents like their booze socialist style, sold exclusively by the state

    2. Re:No automated plate scanners in the Free State by BranMan · · Score: 1

      New Hampshire has no income tax or sales tax - all our taxes are in property taxes - in one place where you can keep an eye on them. I like that.

      New Hampshire allows us to play Texas Hold-em poker - while Texas itself does not! (Oh, the irony)

      New Hampshire does not penalize you for not wearing a seat-belt or a helmet (as long as you are an adult).

      Oh, and good luck devising an effective public transportation system given New Hampshire terrain and population density.

      So there.

  24. Re:What a surprise by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

    Is there anyone in Boston that is not a cheater, liar, or supporter of either?

    In Boston the crooks and thieves and conspirators are exposed, in other places they continue to run amok.

  25. Re:All data becomes noise @ some collection thresh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly this. There are plenty of relatively low-tech ways to count traffic or check traffic flow rate (paired sensor coils in the roadbed, as is done around here, for example). Tracking license plates is actually a much harder, more expensive way to do it (so I don't believe that's why Europeans do it, although that might be one of their cover stories).

    There's certainly no need to store a couple of years' worth of license plate data if measuring flow is all you're doing. (I can think of a couple of rare scenarios where you're actually trying to analyze traffic flow over a large area (who is going from A to B, who is going from C to D, and who is going from A to D for example) where you might want to track specific vehicles -- in which case the data really ought to be anonymized by eg storing a hash of the license number rather than the actual number.) But cops, FBI, etc are compulsive hoarders.

  26. Gee by NetNed · · Score: 1

    Is anyone shocked at this from a state that criminalized everyone by barging in to houses to try and find the Boston bombers? But yeahhhh, think of the children.

  27. We need obliterate licenses and license plates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With advances in technology (ie we have phones, radios, cameras, and similar) we need to consider that law enforcement has become too invasive and there employment needs to be thinned, technology restricted (ie no more wire taps, no more license plate scanners, no more facial recognition software, no more recording devices of any kind), and equipment handicapped (ie get rid of the military equipment). This way cops will need to actually investigate crime rather then sweep us all up into there investigations to catch a few perps. Much of the violence can be eliminated simply culling the police, FBI, military, and technology they can use along with disabling there means of tracking us (ie get rid of social security, get rid of drivers licenses, get rid of license plates, etc).

    We don't need these things and have been fud'ed into believe they are critical for our well being and safety. Regardless of any truth to these things the cost to our freedoms is too high a price to pay.