Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Compiling "Facebook" of US Government Employees

schwit1 writes: According to private security firm CrowdStrike's founder, Dmitri Alperovitch, the Chinese are compiling a massive 'Facebook' like database on American federal government employees for use in espionage and blackmail. The data was stolen from high profile attacks against the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, as well as intrusions into the Anthem and CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield health insurance networks. "That can now be used to embarrass you publicly and force you to work for the Chinese government," Alperovitch says. "It's, in effect, a private version of Facebook with much more detail about your life than even Facebook has that the Chinese now have access to."

69 of 113 comments (clear)

  1. Facebook database by JazzXP · · Score: 4, Funny

    As opposed to a regular database...

    1. Re:Facebook database by cfalcon · · Score: 2

      Facedabase?

    2. Re:Facebook database by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 2

      Yes, because if you have nothing to hide ... nevermind

    3. Re:Facebook database by subreality · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As opposed to a regular database...

      Yes, a Facebook database: a database of your personal information, created without your informed consent, collected from sources you didn't realize would share it, and which gives you no control over how it may be used against you in the future.

    4. Re:Facebook database by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      database, dossier, file, list... anything would have been more accurate than "facebook". Hell, even if they compared it to Wikipedia, it would have been more accurate.

      Facebook is full of user supplied information. The others are collections of information by 3rd parties. Maybe they were hoping for the keyword "facebook" to get their story more traffic. It got them here, so that should be good for at least a couple dozen clicks. That's the number of daily Slashdot users now, right?

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    5. Re:Facebook database by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Brought to you by schwit1 & samzenpus. Were you expecting anything better?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re:Facebook database by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      Sadly, no...

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    7. Re:Facebook database by Rayting · · Score: 1

      So... Can I play FarmVille on it?

  2. those Crazy Chinese by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    Facebook proves embarrassment will fail.

  3. NIH syndrome by Curate · · Score: 2

    Why don't they just use actual Facebook for this? Lots of people have been publicly shamed through Facebook, to the point of losing their careers, their marriages, or even committing suicide.

    1. Re: NIH syndrome by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      The key word is "publicly."

    2. Re:NIH syndrome by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Why don't they just use actual Facebook for this?

      Because the US gov't might get a little upset about Zuckerface selling them that level of access to the failbook database.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:NIH syndrome by flink · · Score: 1

      Because if you publish everything peremptorily, you lose the opportunity to use the threat of revealing it as leverage against your target.

  4. facebook, not Facebook by Flaggday · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They're using the pre-2004, non-proper-noun sense of "facebook".

  5. Jokes on them. by trout007 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm already embarrassed working for the US government.

    --
    I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    1. Re:Jokes on them. by LessThanObvious · · Score: 1

      So, they mean to blackmail people using information their employer already knows? Good luck Chinese. The government officials that aren't already getting busted for smoking crack, taking bribes, sending dick pics or banging tranny-hookers just don't have much to hide. On the upside maybe the government will finally understand why privacy matters.

      The real risk I see with the amount of info known about Americans and government employees is that any real adversary can not only attempt blackmail, but kidnap or assassinate soft targets with regrettable ease end effect.

  6. Business As Usual by EEPROMS · · Score: 3

    I'm surprised how this is actually news, every government keeps dossiers on foreign government officials in a database. There have been reports of nefarious web crawling data collecting networks for years, many tracked back to government owned networks. Do you think the personal data the FBI gets from prosecuting hackers is actually thrown away, no they add it to their database.

    1. Re:Business As Usual by bob_super · · Score: 1

      News! Breaking News! The Chinese PLA has plans drawn up describing how to nuke major US cities!

    2. Re:Business As Usual by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      and the chinese SLA are still out looking for whatever happened to this mystery person known as Tania...

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    3. Re:Business As Usual by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised how this is actually news, every government keeps dossiers on foreign government officials in a database.

      It's a little different when the foreign government steals the adverse data from your government so they (foreign government) can use it against you.

      It is also a little different when the data stolen covers millions of employees over decades and involves some of the most intimate personal data.

      And this is before anyone uses that treasure trove of data to perpetrate massive financial fraud and theft.

      Remember when people used to post how they wanted to see their own government crippled and impotent, and that they didn't give a damn what China did, what it stole because China couldn't do anything? (Oh, and now it turns out Chinese agents take people against their will (dissidents, others) out of many countries.) Good times, good times.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    4. Re:Business As Usual by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      (Oh, and now it turns out Chinese agents take people against their will (dissidents, others) out of many countries.)

      no worries. they bring them back an hour later.

      btw, I've had chinese take-out many times. ain't no big thing. just watch out for the fried stuff. and make sure that the lo mein is in there; they shorted us on lo mein, last time.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    5. Re:Business As Usual by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      The news is this is a 'Facebook', which means the original author had some axe to grind with Facebook so made a meaningless comparison. Probably didn't hurt that it would attract clicks. Who knows, maybe the first draft just said database and some clever editor told him to go back and call it a Facebook.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  7. Re:Huh? by Tirian · · Score: 2

    Just because the government knows you cheated on your wife (because it came up in your background clearance check) does not mean that your wife knows. This is leverage.

  8. Stupid summary by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

    There is nothing in what the Chinese have stolen that isn't already known by the government and hence has no blackmail value. The first time they try to blackmail someone with that information the person attempting to do it will be arrested on the second contact.

    Christ, they could get more detailed personal information from the actual facebook than what they stole. It's hidden stuff like Ashley Madison that could cause someone to be susceptible to blackmail, not publicly known information from a government database. Even confidential medical records aren't going to be a thing you could get reliable actionable intelligence or blackmail material from.

    The article summary is fucking stupid.

    1. Re:Stupid summary by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      I think it's very plausible that you might tell your doctor that you have not been monogamous or that you have hired prostitutes or used illegal drugs, etc. These are all things you can be blackmailed with.

  9. Granularity by Trachman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Truth is that up-to-date, accurate and detailed, organizational structure of army or other organization that participates in national defense is a prized reference tool useful both in peace and in a war time. Many of the organizations take extra precautions to distort, obfuscate real org chart and to hide key areas, such as communications/network, nuclear etc.

    If enough time and efforts are invested all the org charts can be recreated, however in reality, due to the resource limitations only generals and top-lieutenants are in a typical org tree. Chinese made their own life easier since they have now a significant details and granularity of the information. Be sure that selected individuals will be targeted for intelligence and recruitment operations.

  10. Time to pay attention by ncmathsadist · · Score: 1

    America has tolerated too many belligerent cyberattacks from China and Russia. It is time to draw on the computing talent in this country to create a counterinsurgency against these agents and to deal with them straight-on. Enough.

    1. Re:Time to pay attention by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      The secret of our success is that it's secret. Showing our 'failures' is the better distraction.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re: Time to pay attention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We are all too busy making it look like our attacks originate from Russia or China.

  11. "Top secret security clearance" by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Its not "staggering" given the access demands needed to find and upgrade contractors and skill sets needed for US global mil operations.
    "Top secret " details placed in a simple, readable, network facing database in plain text.... ?
    Great for finding needed no bid contractors via a cloud..
    Any other US mil or gov sector would have kept its own data secure, encrypted and not on the public facing 'net'
    Why was this done, when was it done and what was allowed to drift out in plain text?
    Plain text letters of commendation listing secure project names in English on an open network?
    What has the US really lost? Lists from staff from what wars and over what decade of contractors?
    The US has entire new services with total domestic support to stop foreign intelligence operations and espionage.
    Too many new services that got created over the past decade to totally replace the decades of experts that had kept all this data totally secure in the past?

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  12. Bingo book by hackwrench · · Score: 2

    In Naruto, they call it a Bingo Book.

    1. Re:Bingo book by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      In Naruto, they call it a Bingo Book.

      In the real world, they call it a dossier file. Calling it a facebook is idiotic. It's a dossier file database. Guess those words are too big for the general public. Guess what DICE considers us? Besides [dairy-like] cattle, here to be milked?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Bingo book by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Besides [dairy-like] cattle, here to be milked?

      Oh, so you're the AC who keeps posting about that!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    3. Re:Bingo book by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Oh, so you're the AC who keeps posting about that!

      If I thought you were a bunch of cows, I'd say so without all the mooing.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  13. Do you seriously expect us to believe this BS .. by nickweller · · Score: 1

    "According to private security firm CrowdStrike's founder, Dmitri Alperovitch, the Chinese are compiling a massive 'Facebook' like database on American federal government employees"

  14. Re:Huh? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Just because the government knows you cheated on your wife (because it came up in your background clearance check) does not mean that your wife knows. This is leverage.

    Considering the divorce rate, not very good leverage

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  15. Re: CLEARLY! by Type44Q · · Score: 1
    Shill, in your inept, unsuccessful attempt at being sarcastic, you've inadvertently done a not terrible job of advocating for privacy.

    Thus it would seem that you now owe your fascist masters an apology... and their pocket change back.

    Imbecile.

  16. Re: Huh? by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    That would depend entirely on the effectiveness of the prenup...

  17. Re:Huh? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Re "embarrassing personal information is already known by the government, because you already told them."
    Its not the classic negative human traits that all skilled foreign intelligence operations and espionage hope to uncover.
    The US and UK now offer their staff better wages and living conditions to stop just that kind of easy temptation by all foreign intelligence operations.
    The negative worked well in the 1920-60's when US/UK mil/gov wages where low and any extra cash would help a lot on average as a gift.
    With digital networks any extra spending by US gov staff or 5 eye helpers is tracked, all new lifestyle changes reported and looked into. That new car, holiday, spending does not go undetected.
    Foreign intelligence services never want the "embarrassing" side of staff who are just staying in gov or the mil and at a set wage or position thanks to past security work or their private sector brand as part of a larger project. People like that are stuck doing work given to them for decades. The entire project might be busy work. Not much use to any skilled foreign operation deep within the USA of they never advance and can not be trusted. The real magic is getting deep into policy formation over decades. That needs access to the best of the best from entry, up the ranks to the top. Russia has that method perfected and the US has no understanding of who to trust based on testing or long term productivity. Passive collection over decades is very hard to detect as Russia does no act classically on the information collected as it did in the past.
    China just floods the West with university students and learns next to the US and UK's best university students. What they learn China understands for the low price of years of collage tuition. As smart as any western crypto, math, computer, engineer entering the US or UK mil or gov service with the same skills.
    Other nations spies have moved way beyond even caring about "embarrassing personal information" from gov or mil staff who may or may not have anything useful to sell or just be bait and traps.
    An easy to find US database thats in plain text, on the net... or ... a complex NSB honey pot just waiting for any domestic approaches as all the names are bait?

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  18. In Soviet America... by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...Facebook compiles you!

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!

  19. Ok, so... by multimediavt · · Score: 1

    Ok, so they've got this super secret info from a government employee database and some medical records, maybe? And? How is this supposed to be something to worry about as far as national security threats go? The info was in an HR database, so the government already knows about that info, and with the possible exception of STDs and maybe psychiatrists what on earth could be used in the medical records to blackmail anyone? On top of that, it's only federal government employees, and only a subset of those. So how does that affect the 100 million or so other non-federal employees that could take the place of anyone in the federal government position that's been compromised? The whole thing is simply FUD for PR purposes and the idiots that wrote the article and approved the summary are the only ones being duped into doing something they shouldn't.

    1. Re:Ok, so... by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      People don't get STDs in monogamous relationships. Part of dealing with an STD is figuring out how you got it, who you got it from and who you maybe gave it to, and that is all stuff you may have told your doctor if you want good healthcare. The reason medical record are confidential is because honesty is crucial to good healthcare. Have you not seen House?

    2. Re:Ok, so... by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      Well, the HR info would let them buy credit history and other such information so you would know who was having financial difficulties and might be able to be bought.

      Medical records might contain information concerning addictions which could be used against them. Either with the addiction itself (giving them drugs or sending them on gambling vacations) or financially. If someone was having, or recently had, a major medical condition such as cancer then they might be having financial problems. There are plenty of ways to coerce someone. The more information that you have the more likely you will find that method.

    3. Re:Ok, so... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      Have you not seen House?

      is that the one that the Romani went to?

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    4. Re:Ok, so... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re: "Ok, so they've got this super secret info from a government employee database and some medical records, maybe? And?"
      Any contact attempt will be well tracked by domestic efforts like the NSB ie all fake SS numbers, work, projects, letters all set, waiting for contact.
      What was really readable on open, unencrypted, networked computers by the US gov as plain text lists to be found in the wild?
      So the super secret part is really in doubt or is a created mix to test networks.
      How much would the OICI nuclear and energy sector labs, ODNI, NRO, Treasury really allow to float around different unencrypted databases outside their very own internal secure databases?
      The data seems more like a honey pot, domestic bait and a great talking point about selling/renting more 'security' products back to the US mil and gov.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    5. Re:Ok, so... by multimediavt · · Score: 1

      You can get herpes from a drinking glass. You can get AIDS from infected blood. The chances are small, but STDs can infect healthy monogamous people. Watch less TV and read more!

    6. Re:Ok, so... by multimediavt · · Score: 1

      Well, the HR info would let them buy credit history and other such information so you would know who was having financial difficulties and might be able to be bought.

      Medical records might contain information concerning addictions which could be used against them. Either with the addiction itself (giving them drugs or sending them on gambling vacations) or financially. If someone was having, or recently had, a major medical condition such as cancer then they might be having financial problems. There are plenty of ways to coerce someone. The more information that you have the more likely you will find that method.

      Anyone with a security clearance (even low level clearances) have to have clean credit histories and have annual drug tests to maintain them. Your examples work for extorting money from individuals in non-classified positions in the government, not compromising national security. You also watch too much TV if you believe otherwise. The data stolen from OPM was for non-classified government employees. I can assure you that any post breach investigation would have found any possible soft targets and the problems would have been taken care of.

    7. Re:Ok, so... by multimediavt · · Score: 1

      As you mentioned any follow up investigation of the people that had their data stolen would identify any possible soft target and it would have been taken care of within a few weeks, i.e., the person would be moved out of their current position or would have been made to clean up whatever actionable info was on their record or be dismissed. As for the "super secret" remark, I was being sarcastic as the data that was stolen from OPM was of non-classified employees to begin with. I know many people that hold security clearances for their jobs, and they are the squeakiestly clean people I know when it comes to financial and addiction related behavior (alcoholism, gambling and the like). They have to be as they are reviewed every few years to maintain their clearances. They can't even bounce a check without red flags going up all over the place. I think the official review period is every five years, but with all the international turmoil I can guarantee you that DHS is keeping much closer tabs on people with clearances. The days of the 1980s bought out mole are all but over, especially since the Patriot Act.

    8. Re:Ok, so... by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      Not every breach is for national security. A lot of espionage is for business reasons and you don't need to go after the people with very high security clearance for that.

      And I don't know how the US does their security clearance. I've had two levels of clearance in Canada (the highest being Secret which can take up to six months for them to investigate) and I know that my credit history would have been part of that examination. However at no time did I have to have a drug test. Now that was a while ago so it may have changed.

      But even if they check everything and do an annual drug test the situation for a person can change a lot in between the times the re-verify a security clearance. It's five years for Secret in Canada.

    9. Re:Ok, so... by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      You can get herpes from a drinking glass

      You can get HIV from hunting primates in Africa. I am not talking about what can and can't be reasonably be inferred from knowing someone has an STD. I am saying that the actual reasons for why they have those STDs are likely to be in their medical records, and lots of that information can be used to blackmail those people.

      Watch less TV and read more!

      I actually don't watch TV at all. It was a joke. Furthermore, what you read matters. This idea that reading text is inherently better than listening to speech, is nonsense. Watching a good movie or documentary that causes you to grow as a person is going to be better than reading some trashy novel like 50 shades of gray. Not to mention the fact that knowing how to decode Latin symbols into the English language does not necessarily imply comprehension.

  20. The best ad in that webpage was for Facebook by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

    After scrolling past ads for Chinese testosterone, Chinese intelligence booster pills and a database of sex offenders living in by basement, I finally made it to the "meat" of the advertisements, errrr, story - An ad suggesting that I join Facebook.

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  21. Re:Huh? by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

    Well given that about 70% of Americans (men and women) have cheated on their partners, and the number of people that have actually committed treason against the United States is a much smaller percentage (far less than 1%), I'd say that your claim that cheating on your partner implies a willingness to be disloyal to your country is about as false as any claim can be.

    That's like saying being a non-virgin implies that you are willing to be a rapist. The facts simply do not support these claims.

  22. Re:Huh? by Pluribus · · Score: 1

    Just because the government knows you cheated on your wife (because it came up in your background clearance check) does not mean that your wife knows. This is leverage.

    I used work at such a place. If it came up during a background check that you were having an affair, they would call both you and your wife into the security office and tell the person with the clearance, "you tell them or we will". They cared less about what you did and more for if you could be blackmailed for it.

  23. Re:Xenophobic much? by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

    How about how many votes the xenophobic US presidential candidates get?

  24. Re: Huh? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

    That would depend entirely on the effectiveness of the prenup...

    If you are working as a GS-9 in some government bureaucracy, you don't have enough assets to bother with a prenup.

  25. Re: Do you seriously expect us to believe this BS by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

    I think that the only dubious part of the claim is calling Facebook like. States have been collecting information about the people involved with other states for as long as there have been states. It's only recently that they've been able to greatly expand the number of people included and the amount of information contained.

  26. Re:Huh? by meadow · · Score: 1

    In San Francisco it doesn't matter. They've already sold out.

  27. Where's beef? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    TFA claims that Chinese is compiling a facebook of US government employees

    TFA links to an article on Washington Times http://www.washingtontimes.com... , which said that according to Fox News, a guy, with the name of Dmitri Alperovitch, claims that China is compiling a MASSIVE facebook-like database of US government employees

    Fox News article ( http://www.foxnews.com/politic... ) carries a similar claim

    Where's the beef?

    Neither of the three articles (Slashdot, Washington Times and Fox News) bother to provide any proof to back up Mr. Alperovitch's allegation

    To the editors of Slashdot -

    Are you trying to push Slashdot down to the miscreant level of Fox News??

  28. URL ? by randalware · · Score: 1

    I need access to update my status.

    And I want to look around it for the best places to work.

    fewest psychopath in management.
    quiet working environment.
    best area to live in.
    not using Windows.
    relaxed dress code.

    thanks for your interest,
    please "like" my page

    --
    This is my opinion based on what little I know and understand of the rumors and lies Thanks, Randal
  29. And that was a bad picture of me by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    Didn't care for it on my badge as it was.

  30. hahaha good one by einar.petersen · · Score: 1

    I really like the phrase using information to force people to work for the Chinese government. And the collecting government i.e. not the Chinese but the American government was going to use said "embarrasing" information for what ? Why would they be collecting "embarrasing" information in the first place. Everyone really should get over themselves thinking their particular government are the good guys. Politics is and has always been nothing but a dirty game of chess to retain or attain power. Loosing your toys in the playground (i.e. your embarrasing information) is not something you should cry about in public -That in my humble opinion is embarrasing

    --
    MS, ALS, Aphasia ? http://globability.org - Me http://einarpetersen.com
  31. Re: Huh? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    AC re "As if money isn't an incentive. Even relatively small amounts can buy information."
    If a person is going to sell information, they will want or need to spend that extra cash is strange ways.
    That character or lifestyle change is one of the most easy traits for the US gov to track in todays digital world.
    Facial recognition via public-private partnerships, collecting all internet use, averaging out payments and cash flow over all gov/mil staff watching for slight extra spending changes.
    Colleagues out of spite, jealousy, past issues take note of the changes and start to gossip. What worked "years ago" is now just a trap. Even the classic approach by "foreigners" with accents is usually a trap based on personality profiling by domestic security teams. If not reported fully the trap worked.
    Thats why most nations working with humans go for staff they can place at a low level and have work their way up for ideological or patriotic reasons. No sloppy cash trail and the level of trust is perfect over many decades. Too many good networks where lost when cash was spent in the 1950-80's.
    Thats why a big long gov/mil list in plain text left to be "found" on the internet is not really much use. Too much could be bait, junk, double and triple profiles all been watched for any contact. But its great for the press and a fun read.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  32. What's the difference? by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

    So how is this different from the "facebook-like" database US agencies are creating on the Chinese government employees? (Assuming they're doing their job right)

    Or is someone really surprised that Chinese intelligence is doing their job?

    And why not enrich this data by actual facebook data? If someone you know works for the gouvernment "friends" his colleagues on facebook, they don't need to give their employer there explicitly.

    --
    bickerdyke
  33. We're doing it too, right? by sabbede · · Score: 1
    I mean, I sure hope we are. It's a damn good idea.

    We should also probably steal theirs so we have an idea who China might be going after.

  34. I've wanted this for a while. by moeinvt · · Score: 1

    It will be awesome if they make it readable to the whole world. Would also be nice if they added wiki features so that we could do our best to help keep it up-to-date.
    These federal aholes know every last detail about us. It would be poetic justice if their detailed personal information was available for our perusal. Perhaps the Chinese managed to acquire that data which was copied from the federal office of personnel management? I want to see names, addresses, photos, work responsibilities, (outrageous) salaries, etc. etc. Especially people in the NSA, ATF, IRS and other criminal organizations, as well as the corrupt and incompetent employees of the FDIC, SEC, OTS and OCC. Everyone that deserve to be fired and/or imprisoned.

  35. Re:Do you seriously expect us to believe this BS . by coofercat · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I believe it. In fact, as a Top Security Consultant myself*, I'll give you a quote:

    "$country Compiling "Facebook" of $other_country Government Employees"

    Where $country may possibly even be equal to $other_country, and both can be picked from this list: http://www.listofcountriesofth...

    * that statement is probably no more true than any of CrowdStrike's credentials, but I've got products and services for sale ;-)

  36. Lucky For Us! by BECoole · · Score: 1

    Most people in government are democrats. Things you could blackmail a conservative over are points of pride for democrats. :/

  37. Washington Times... What a joke by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1
    Other things "You Might Also Like" on the WT page about the Chinese compiling Facbook on US Govt employees:
    • Best pocket pistols for self-defense
    • Republican debate winners and losers
    • 21 best guns for home protection
    • Child stars: Then and now
    • Quiz: The ultimate NFL trivia challenge - how well do you know your football?
    • Best states for concealed carry — ranked worst to first
    • Startling Video Could Cause Democrats to Lose White House
    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
  38. It used to be known as HUMINT by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    ... for HUMan INTelligence - the act of collecting information about your opponents, their staff, supporters and minions, that could possibly be of future use to suborn, undermine, influence, control or discourage those people.

    Nothing new here - not even storing such information on a database. The Roman Emperors did the same without calling it a database, just calling it "politics".

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"