Slashdot Mirror


Volkswagen Diesel Scandal Spreads To Porsche and Audi

New submitter sumanareddyraval writes: The fallout from the Volkswagen diesel scandal is spreading fast to the company's other famous brands, including Porsche and Audi, and across the Atlantic to the U.S. The scandal reached down into the company's engineering corps as the CEO of Volkswagen's US business, the research and development chief from Audi and the engine chief from Porsche, which are part of the Volkswagen Group, are said to be following Volkswagen's CEO out the door of the company, according to multiple reports Thursday. The impending departures are a sign that the Volkswagen scandal is ready to grow to much larger proportions.

494 comments

  1. Pulling that off was a major conspiracy by jfdavis668 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hiding car emissions was not done by a couple of people. A large number in the people inside these companies were involved in pulling it off.

    1. Re:Pulling that off was a major conspiracy by MozeeToby · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That depends if the low emission mode was already coded and used in some other circumstances. If for example the engine enters that mode after idling for 30s. It could be relatively simple for one or two programmers to include a simple check that detected the dynamo scenario and put the engine into that mode, it would almost certainly be possible to obfuscate what's going on so a casual review wouldn't detect it.

      Do I think that's what happened? No. Lone coders don't go off the rails that far without direction from above. If nothing else, it's doubtful the software engineers were directly aware of the emissions problem without anyone else being in the loop. But it is at least theoretically possible.

    2. Re:Pulling that off was a major conspiracy by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1, Informative

      No it can't. Read the reports would you. People would need to know for this to happen. This was not the work of one lone rogue employee.

    3. Re:Pulling that off was a major conspiracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Try reading his whole post; that's pretty much precisely what he said he believes. He is just pointing out what is possible.

    4. Re:Pulling that off was a major conspiracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no reason for a lone coder, or rogue group of coders to do anything like this. What do they gain? This comes from management in an attempt to make VW diesels appear more fuel efficient, more durable, and more powerful than the competition through cheating.

    5. Re:Pulling that off was a major conspiracy by Dan+East · · Score: 1

      Hiding car emissions was not done by a couple of people. A large number in the people inside these companies were involved in pulling it off.

      I've had the same thoughts all along, and it's now really looking that way:

      The criteria, outcomes and engineering of cars that missed emissions targets were overseen by managers at Volkswagen’s base in Wolfsburg, according to the people who asked not to be identified because they weren’t authorized to speak publicly.
      Their accounts show the chain of command and those involved in the deception stretched to Volkswagen headquarters.

      And the smoking gun - or, errr, engine:

      If any vehicle failed to meet emissions targets, a team of engineers from Volkswagen headquarters or luxury brand Audi’s base in Ingolstadt was flown in, the person said. After the group had tinkered with the vehicle for about a week, the car would then pass the test. VW had no engineers in the U.S. able to create the mechanism that cheated on the test or who could fix emissions problems, according to two other people.

      This allowed the engineers to view the diagnostic information from the vehicle that was just tested to find ways of identifying when a test is taking place (oh, they didn't move the steering wheel at all while it was operated at 55 MPH), and also exactly how the vehicle was tested (what speeds it was operated at, etc) and thus they could optimally tweak the cheat to pass the test. It sounds like a pretty stupid method of testing to me.

      One of the interesting things in doing it that way is even though those engineers might be breaking US law, since they aren't US citizens and got their butts back to Germany afterwards, it would make it extremely difficult to prosecute or even investigate and interview them.

      Source: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/...

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    6. Re:Pulling that off was a major conspiracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Conspiracy theorist!

    7. Re:Pulling that off was a major conspiracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to be credible, don't use the word "conspiracy".

    8. Re:Pulling that off was a major conspiracy by hucker75 · · Score: 1

      The emissions tests are shit if they can be detected by a car's computer.

    9. Re:Pulling that off was a major conspiracy by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      No it can't. Read the reports would you. People would need to know for this to happen. This was not the work of one lone rogue employee.

      Nah - some maintenance guy, or someone in the mailroom is going to pay dearly for their crime. The folks at the top will get a big bonus.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    10. Re:Pulling that off was a major conspiracy by niftymitch · · Score: 1

      That depends if the low emission mode was already coded and used in some other circumstances. If for example the engine enters that mode after idling for 30s. ..... But it is at least theoretically possible.

      It can be astoundingly important to look at incentives, rewards and bonuses.

      Management may set a goal and never check to see how it was achieved.
      The more aggressive and inflexible the goal the more incentive there is to cheat.

      My expectation is that some corner of the process was tasked with software
      driven optimizations in a set of unlabeled operating profiles gathered by others.

      There are many optimization processes driven by modern statistics that
      can generate results and answers based on test data inputs alone.

      I was astounded in my first interactions with Bayesian statistics to learn that none
      of the inputs needed to be labeled yet an optimized result was still generated
      and easy to test. There are limits but anonymous data can drive results better
      than intent and purpose driven analysis based on specific knowledge. Consider
      spam filters... all the feedback is binary: spam/ not-spam. There is no specific
      input for viagra, no input or dear sirs my Nigerian... , no input for funky language
      constructs.

      My guess is less forgiving. A single individual could have framed and gamed this
      and once a performance test result was established it would never have been
      looked at. Perhaps it was as simple as "scenario 567a" failed testing re-optimize it.
      At no time would "scenario 567a" have been labeled scam the EPA test program.
      The profile for "scenario 567a" would have been gathered no different than
      stopped at light, climbing long hill, descending short hill... Once the profile
      was gathered and a simple "go, no-go" result tagged to testing it the game
      of hyper optimizing begins.

      This will cost VW.
      It is a lesson to look beyond simple metrics and simple test goals.

      --
      Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't. Mark Twain.
    11. Re:Pulling that off was a major conspiracy by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is that people constantly deny that conspiracies like this could possibly exist. Always saying that someone would talk, and that many people can't keep a secret.

      This is proof for the fools that it can and does happen. They only got caught because a group of kids at the University I went to was trying to do a demonstration to show off how great a job VW did with the emissions. Now translate that to an agency like the CIA where you can be fired, thrown in jail, or murdered for discussing even the normal daily office crap. How well do you think those bastards can keep a secret?

  2. BMW also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    BMW engines were emitting nitrogen oxide levels that were 11 times more than the current limit set by the European Union. However, it later reported that there was no indication of tampering with the vehicles. Citing road tests by the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT), it said that a model of the BMW X3 was emitting more poisonous gases than the Volkswagen car that is currently at the center of the emissions scandal. http://www.cnbc.com/2015/09/24...

    1. Re:BMW also... by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      BMW engines were emitting nitrogen oxide levels that were 11 times more than the current limit set by the European Union. However, it later reported that there was no indication of tampering with the vehicles.

      All that means is that they can't prove BMW was cheating the tests while treating the PCM like a 'black box'. VW just cheated so bad, there was no hiding it. The "revelation" is going to be that all manufacturers detect the test regime and do their best to meet emissions standards during it, while at other times they play a little loose, usually to improve mileage.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:BMW also... by TWX · · Score: 3

      If cheating is as widespread as you allege I have a sneaking suspicion that European diesel cars are going to fall out of favor as performance drops dramatically. It's a damn shame that they did this, for a long time I was disappointed that so many of the diesel options in Europe weren't available in the US, but if they were breaking the law to put them on the road then I won't feel so bad about it anymore.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    3. Re:BMW also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That or it's a sign that the emissions standards are so ridiculously high that you can't actually meet them in a real world.

    4. Re:BMW also... by rch7 · · Score: 1

      It contradicts original road test report, that was about testing 2 VW cars and BMW X3. I think it was reported that BMW X3 didn't exceeded norms unlike VW cars. As X3 has urea tank and actually uses urea according to owners, I see no reason why it should not pass Euro tests overall, at least not to exceed them something like 11 times, which would indicate urea is not used or something is totally off. Sure if you take it to max acceleration or some other special condition, it may exceed NO emission 11 times for short moment. But not for regular driving.

    5. Re:BMW also... by afidel · · Score: 1

      That's odd since the BMW X5 35D in the UWV report that kicked off the probe of VW was well below the EPA levels in the combined testing, there were individual circuits where the X5 exceeded the fleet average limit by some multiple (it was the urban cycle in San Fran from what I remember of reading the report last week) but the overall level was well below the limit.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    6. Re:BMW also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's it! Just like how those ridiculous arsenic regulations make me have to lie about the arsenic content in my arsenic cookies!

      If you can't do with without poisoning people, maybe it shouldn't be done.

    7. Re:BMW also... by director_mr · · Score: 0

      It may end up that the environmental rules were simply unacheivable by affordable modern day technology. Simply because a government agency sets up a goal, doesn't mean it is able to be met. Watch for what happens when 50mpg average mileage for cars becomes a standard.

    8. Re:BMW also... by TWX · · Score: 1

      If I understand it, that's average across all brand's sales.

      Start selling electrics to offset the lesser-performing vehicles.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    9. Re:BMW also... by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Technology that's been buried by the industry for decades will resurface -- gas turbine, diesel-electric. It's not impossible to make a 50mpg car (gas or diesel.) The real work is meeting all the idiotic "safety" standards -- 55 air bags adds a significant mass and volume, light crash structures are complicated. Then there's the driver expectation of driving a f'ing rocket. A small, light, low power, highly efficient car IS possible. Hell, my 2ton Lexus ES can do 40mpg -- 50 isn't impossible. (the HS I had previously, once, managed over 60mpg (highway) on a 14gal tank, but that's not an enjoyable way to drive it.)

    10. Re:BMW also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would be really surprised if the engine and overall car design differed at all between the cars available in Europe and those available in the US. Especially when it comes to the Asian brands.
      The cheating makes sure that it is only a firmware change for different markets.

    11. Re:BMW also... by hucker75 · · Score: 1

      Why would customers care? I buy a car that performs well and is reliable, and that will always be VW.

    12. Re:BMW also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nitrogen Oxide isn't that dangerous... I laugh at Nitrogen Oxide.

  3. Why are the rats fleeing? by ananamouse · · Score: 1

    They must have crappy lawyers or something.

    1. Re:Why are the rats fleeing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like all parachutes, the golden ones are worthless until used.

    2. Re:Why are the rats fleeing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Billion dollar tier penalties tend to hit the stock price like a nuke.

    3. Re:Why are the rats fleeing? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I'm still waiting for the day when an exec tries to open the golden parachute only to find that it's jammed. "Open damn you! Aarrgh..."

  4. How long will the company stay up? by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    The penalties and lawsuits will quickly exceed VW's $126bn valuation.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds unlikely. GM effectively killed 143 people and got away with less than $1 billion in fines.

    2. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh hello, what planet are you from? Here on Earth, our Corporate overlords get slaps on the wrists and pay fines large enough to look like they're being punished but small enough to not make any difference in their balance sheets.

      General Motors killed over 120 people and walked away with a $900 million fine, or basically one month of VW's profits in 2014.

    3. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obvious move in the economical war fought by U.S. lobbyists to protect local automakers that have nothing in their portfolio to compete with such modern diesel engines as the ones in question.

      When the penalties become too high to be bearable, VW and associated companies will simply drag out of the U.S. market. It's not like that would be the most favorable market for them anyway. China is much more attractive and exanding rapidly anyways.

    4. Re:How long will the company stay up? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The really sad thing is that I have seen a lot of people, in a lot of places, suggest punishments in the extreme.

      "Ban them from selling cars here for 5 years"

      "Require them to buy back every car at the full sales price"

      And so on. At some point you just bankrupt the company, which is stupid, it'll put millions of people out of work, destroy a lot of wealth, and then when it files for bankruptcy, it won't be able to fix the cars in the first place.

      Do you want vengeance (against millions of people who didn't do anything), or do you want solutions?

    5. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We may be past the point of seeing if and how it will survive. I'm wondering how it will be carved up and who might get the largest slices.

    6. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Maritz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not an American company, so of course they want it destroyed. VW make better cars than American companies. NSA really needs to step up its efforts on that front.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    7. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      so why should companies bother following the law again?

    8. Re:How long will the company stay up? by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      was it intentional, like VW cheating?

    9. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes. GM new about the risks of the part before it went into production and decided not to improve the design even though a cheap solution was available.

    10. Re:How long will the company stay up? by flink · · Score: 4, Insightful

      At some point you just bankrupt the company, which is stupid, it'll put millions of people out of work, destroy a lot of wealth, and then when it files for bankruptcy, it won't be able to fix the cars in the first place.

      Do you want vengeance (against millions of people who didn't do anything), or do you want solutions?

      The fines need to cost the company more than they made/saved by implementing this scam OR the people who perpetrated this scam need to be held personally responsible, especially the executives overseeing the operation. Nothing else will deter companies from repeating this kind of behavior. Otherwise they will just make some lowly engineer the scapegoat and write off whatever symbolic fine that gets handed down as the cost of doing business.

      Since the higher ups are usually able to use the corporate veil to protect themselves from the latter option, we're left with he former: punitive fines that force shareholders/boards to police themselves.

    11. Re: How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GM engineers knew about the issue for a decade, reported it to management where it became a non-issue. So yes... Much worse.

    12. Re:How long will the company stay up? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Are you suggesting we allow corporations to exhibit epic levels of malfeasance and NOT have any punishment?

      Yeah, that sounds brilliant ... lay it out plainly to every would-be shady-asshole that the penalty for fraud on a global scale is acceptable.

      And then stand back and watch every damned corporation realize they can pretty much do anything and get away with it.

      Good luck with that.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    13. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If fines need to be higher than what is expected that the company saved, then the fines will be incredibly minor. If the BBCs estimates are correct, they probably saved about $200 million of the course of the 6 years. That comes from an estimated effected number of vehicles of 500,000 times an estimated $400 system for each car.

      And for people who want to start screaming about 11 million, remember, that was the number of vehicles world wide, and there's belief that they cheated in europe as well, but even with the cheats, they may have still been in compliance, and technically done no wrong.

    14. Re:How long will the company stay up? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 2

      Are you suggesting we allow corporations to exhibit epic levels of malfeasance and NOT have any punishment?

      No, and I didn't say that either...

      But you also shouldn't destroy a company that employs millions of people because 20 of them were stupid/evil/criminals...

      There has to be a middle ground...

    15. Re:How long will the company stay up? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The fines need to cost the company more than they made/saved by implementing this scam OR the people who perpetrated this scam need to be held personally responsible, especially the executives overseeing the operation. Nothing else will deter companies from repeating this kind of behavior. Otherwise they will just make some lowly engineer the scapegoat and write off whatever symbolic fine that gets handed down as the cost of doing business.

      I'm not at all convinced that even the above will deter companies from doing this.

      Why? Because the people who profited from this don't care if the company is fined into nothing in 5 years, they got theirs today.

      The CEO is leaving, he has his money from the past X years. What difference does it make to him what happens in the next X years?

      You need to find the people who actually did this, and punish them, not the millions of employees of a huge corporation who had no idea it was going on.

    16. Re:How long will the company stay up? by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Ban them from selling cars here for 5 years"
      "Require them to buy back every car at the full sales price"

      Don't equivocate these two. Banning them from selling cars here for 5 years would harm the public, auto dealers create a lot of jobs. Requiring them to buy back every car at the full sales price if the customer isn't satisfied with a reflash is only reasonable. Anyone should have to do this if they defraud the customer. Anyone. A person, a corporation, a co-op, anyone.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:How long will the company stay up? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 2

      Since the higher ups are usually able to use the corporate veil to protect themselves from the latter option, we're left with he former: punitive fines that force shareholders/boards to police themselves.

      ^ That is the part that needs to stop, actual specific people who profit from/make decisions to profit from such things, need to go to prison.

      Punishing the employees and shareholders does nothing, the vast majority of them had no idea this was happening.

      Never punish the innocent, it is worse than letting guilty people go free.

    18. Re:How long will the company stay up? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 4, Informative

      Do they? Frankly I have found the quality of Ford vehicles to have jumped leaps and bounds over 10 years ago. Their decision to start bringing in their European designs shows.

      GM isn't there yet, but they are making progress. The stuff they build today is also better than it used to be.

      The irony is the real fall off in quality is Japan. Toyota and Honda aren't what they used to be.

    19. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 1

      In some cases, where the conduct of a corporation is so extremely egregious and sociopathic, I do think that something needs to be done to punish those ultimately responsible. That said, as much as this stuff bothers me, it bothers me far less than what GM did. Cheating on emissions tests is bad, but deliberately ignoring and covering up safety issues that you know will get people killed, and then having lots of people get killed, is worse. Of course, GM only suffered a 900 million USD fine for that, and there are reasons why - just not good reasons: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/... Overall, we need more accountability for the executives, and management, that either allows this sort of stuff, or sets up the corporate culture where it's tolerated or even expected. How much money is the Volkswagen CEO going to walk away with? How much money did GM's executives make off with? Do we really expect to discourage this sort of stuff if it just comes down to cost benefit analysis?

    20. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      At some point you just bankrupt the company, which is stupid

      No, that's okay. Other companies will buy their factories. Wealth won't be destroyed. The investors in VW will take a bath, but that's okay: other investors will have more incentive to make sure they're not investing in a criminal enterprise.

    21. Re:How long will the company stay up? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Don't equivocate these two. Banning them from selling cars here for 5 years would harm the public, auto dealers create a lot of jobs. Requiring them to buy back every car at the full sales price if the customer isn't satisfied with a reflash is only reasonable. Anyone should have to do this if they defraud the customer. Anyone. A person, a corporation, a co-op, anyone.

      The problem is that requiring them to buy back every car at full sales price may well bankrupt them.

      Which defeats the point.

      Ford faced a similar problem in the 90s with the Explorer. Those who remember and were paying attention will tell you that the tires were only part of it, the vehicle had a design flaw that was not really fixable. Ford should have bought them all back, but that would have simply bankrupted them, so Firestone was made the bad guys.

      VW probably will end up paying out several thousand dollars to each affected VW owner, but of course that hurts the VW employees and shareholders, it does not actually hurt the people who did this.

      That is the key problem with all this clamoring, it want to punish the innocent and let the guilty go free.

    22. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      If fines need to be higher than what is expected that the company saved, then the fines will be incredibly minor.

      No, the fines need to be higher than the extra money they made times the perceived likelihood they will get caught.

      Savings are part of that, but so are the extra sales because people liked the pep. So is the fact that it took six years to locate.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    23. Re:How long will the company stay up? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 2

      How much money is the Volkswagen CEO going to walk away with? How much money did GM's executives make off with? Do we really expect to discourage this sort of stuff if it just comes down to cost benefit analysis?

      Exactly...

      Fining VW a billion, 10 billion, or even everything they've got, does nothing.

      The CEO got his money, what difference does it make to him what happens to VW in the future?

      That is why punishing VW to the point of bankruptcy is pointless. Find and punish those people who made this decision, find a reasonable compromise for VW to provide solutions that are affordable, and move on.

      Hurting a million employees who did nothing wrong, hurting shareholders who did nothing wrong, doesn't help anyone.

    24. Re:How long will the company stay up? by khr · · Score: 1

      Do you want vengeance (against millions of people who didn't do anything), or do you want solutions?/quote?

      So what should we do? Curse them so those involved are always stuck in traffic behind someone rolling coal?

    25. Re:How long will the company stay up? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The problem is that requiring them to buy back every car at full sales price may well bankrupt them.

      It won't. The VW group has plenty of money, and they can re-sell those cars in other markets.

      Ford faced a similar problem in the 90s with the Explorer. Those who remember and were paying attention will tell you that the tires were only part of it, the vehicle had a design flaw that was not really fixable.

      "Most other sport utility vehicles are also built on pickup truck underbodies. Indeed, many have rollover death rates considerably higher than the Explorer's. I'm no Ford-lover, but it wasn't just Ford. It was everyone. All early SUVs were tip-prone if driven by morons who refuse to acknowledge that they are driving something which is not a car. So they remade SUVs to be more like cars, making them worse at being off-road vehicles in the process, instead of making a better driver, which we now know to be impossible.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    26. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also don't see anything wrong with having them take back the car at full price. Perhaps it would be OK to lower that price by a small rental fee or something but I don't really see why. When some company out and out lies and sells you something that is not actually what they told you that you were buying generally the rules do say that they must return your money (when the government actually agrees that they lied - happens only sometimes in the homeopathic "cures" department). Why wouldn't we hold a car company to the same standard? Just give the money back. Sorry that they might go bankrupt. Maybe the next company won't cheat.

    27. Re:How long will the company stay up? by segedunum · · Score: 1

      US car companies were kept afloat after 2008 with large amounts of government cash gifts. Maybe Europe will do the same here?

    28. Re:How long will the company stay up? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      There is a middle ground between the two options...

      VW probably needs to come up with a solution to provide the owners a legal way to drive the cars, it will probably involve the loss of power and fuel economy, and probably involve the payment of a few thousand to each owner.

      Full price buybacks of 5 year old cars is just not reasonable.

    29. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it clear they don't? Their 2.5 I5 was a joke, their previous turbo models were shop floor queens. These turbo diesels are clean-diesel how-did-they-do-that illusions. I want a 4 door hatch VW bad, but not bad enough to believe these VW models are as reliable as a Ford.

    30. Re:How long will the company stay up? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 2

      It won't. The VW group has plenty of money, and they can re-sell those cars in other markets.

      You think this is limited only to the US?

      VW made 11 million vehicles with this defeat system in it.

      The US cars are US vin'ed, they can't just be exported to other nations and they may well not be able to get permission to do it, even if they wanted to.

      Finally, it isn't just the cost of buy backs, it is fines, legal costs, state lawsuits, etc.

      This may well end up needing a political solution, rather than a legal one. Given the size of VW, the number of people employed around the world by VW and their child companies (and dealers and parts suppliers, etc.), this quickly becomes a jobs/economy issue as much as a legal one.

      Yes, VW did something stupid, but there are limits to what you can do before you start hurting people who did nothing wrong.

    31. Re:How long will the company stay up? by b0bby · · Score: 2

      VW make better cars than American companies.

      Umm, JD Powers disagrees:
      http://www.jdpower.com/press-r...

      Anecdotally, everyone I know with VWs have had plenty of annoying problems. Ford & GM, not so many. I am surprised that VW comes in even worse than Chrysler, though.

      My theory is that a lot of European manufacturers just don't fully understand just how much Americans drive. In addition to having almost twice as many vehicles per capita than the EU (any statistics that say otherwise are probably excluding light trucks in the US numbers), each of those vehicles gets driven almost twice as many miles in a year. Basically, American drive 3-4 times as much as Europeans.

      My other theory is that the fact that their home markets are protected from the Japanese manufacturers has allowed them to rest on their laurels a bit. US manufacturers suffered vs the quality of the Japanese cars for years, but they eventually upped their game.

    32. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The cars only differed from specifications in a very minor way that is not at all relevant to most customers. That is very common and has never led to a manufacturer offering full refunds. A full refund is completely disproportional. VW should just solve the issue at its own expense and pay the owner a reasonable amount for the inconvenience. If the technical solution includes retrofitting urea injection, they should also supply free AdBlue for the lifetime of the car.

    33. Re:How long will the company stay up? by ftobin · · Score: 1

      Transfer shares of ownership to the victims. Jobs are saved, and the company does not go bankrupt.

      Criminal penalties against individuals are still appropriate though.

    34. Re:How long will the company stay up? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      "Most other sport utility vehicles are also built on pickup truck underbodies. Indeed, many have rollover death rates considerably higher than the Explorer's. I'm no Ford-lover, but it wasn't just Ford. It was everyone. All early SUVs were tip-prone if driven by morons who refuse to acknowledge that they are driving something which is not a car. So they remade SUVs to be more like cars, making them worse at being off-road vehicles in the process, instead of making a better driver, which we now know to be impossible.

      I've seen people post that before, but the truth is a bit different.

      The front suspension was redesigned from the 90-94 model year for the 95 model year. It is the 95 model year and beyond (until the full redesign in 2002) that is the problem.

      It is the combination of the new front suspension and the old rear suspension that was the issue, neither by themselves was a problem. It was a poor choice and shouldn't have been approved for production. I owned one back then, followed it closely. That info came out, then quickly vanished from the news, replaced by "Firestone evil" news.

      The Ford Explorer didn't become a "unibody car design" until 2011, when it became a tall Ford Taurus station wagon (that is really what it is today). The 2002-2010 models were body on frame just like the 95-01 models.

    35. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They sold something to consumers with a given set of specs, knowing it did not meet those specs, of course they should be forced to take it back for a full refund. This was not a mistake it was a deliberate fraud. If laws are not enforced then nobody will follow them and everybody looses.

    36. Re:How long will the company stay up? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 2

      VW makes hundreds of thousands of cars right here in the US. VW dealerships employ a lot of people and are owned by some wealthy people.

      Give it some time for the headlines to pass, then the lobbying to limit the damage will start.

      VW is not just a German company, they have a lot of roots in the US as well, you'll hurt American workers if you kick them too hard.

      The issues in 2008 were not of the car companies making, thus the help. Same reason, you can't let GM go bankrupt, you just can't.

      Of course, that also means they have become "too big to fail", but that is another topic that hasn't been addressed either.

    37. Re:How long will the company stay up? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Transfer shares of ownership to the victims.

      From whom?

      I own shares of VW (via index funds). Are you suggesting that you simply take them away from me for... reasons?

      You really don't want to go down THAT path...

    38. Re:How long will the company stay up? by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      "Destroying" the company doesn't magically make all the assets disappear. Someone else buys all those factories. People are still going to be buying the same number of cars with or without that company existing and thus those cars will still be built. Those factories and workers will be needed by whomever takes up the slack.

    39. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's a dilemma, but Winterkorn is currently laughing his way to the bank, his golden parachute is no less than 60 million euro. Maybe a sentence for those responsible would be a good idea, from CEO over the middle management to the engineers?

      There are many lung diseases in our society, and smokers are blamed for those diseases. People who never smoked get lung diseases because they of course inhaled the second hand smoke of smokers. So there is an inquisition against smokers, but nobody says anything about those polluting diesel engines that would be causing lung diseases even when they met the regulations. Now it comes out that they were cheating the tests, for how many diseases and even deaths can they be held responsible?

      I, for example, had to quit commuting by bike. I loved commuting by bike. I was able to prevent a lot of stress (no more traffic jams) and have my daily exercise (58 km in total). I thought I was living healthy. I was well trained, didn't eat sugars, was in good shape, but also was suffering from chronic bronchitis. What did the doctors say? I had the lungs of someone who was a heavy smoker for more than 20 years, only because I was breathing by diesel engines polluted air, 2 hours a day.
       
      Well thanks auto industry for taking away my hobby, my way to release stress and my own contribution to a better environment. I even had to invest into a car and reward those bastards for taking away all those things from me.

      I don't have any compassion with these bastard who think they are better than the average person. Just take away what they earned while they cheated and put them in jail. This would be an example to not cheat on the people.

      Many people are now blaming the government for the regulations. Without regulations they wouldn't have been cheating ... That's also what bankrupt bankers said ... it was not them, it where the regulations!

    40. Re:How long will the company stay up? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The Ford Explorer didn't become a "unibody car design" until 2011, when it became a tall Ford Taurus station wagon (that is really what it is today). The 2002-2010 models were body on frame just like the 95-01 models.

      IME the real difference isn't unibody anyway. That's a red herring. The real difference is the IRS on the 2002+ models.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    41. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If history has taught us anything, it's that sanctions imposed on a VW will only weaken with time and they won't go under.

    42. Re:How long will the company stay up? by ftobin · · Score: 1

      Of course share should be transferred from owners-- you're an owner of VW, and hence responsible (albeit indirectly) for the company's actions.

      Shareholders appoint board members, who oversee the company. Shareholders must the ones ultimately left holding the bag for civil violations, since they're the ones who own the value associated with the company.

    43. Re: How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ford took no government money.

    44. Re:How long will the company stay up? by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      Having to buy back all of the affected cars at full retail isn't a vengeful punishment. The buyers weren't complicit in this fraud. They now have a car that isn't legal to drive. If you don't make them buy back the cars at full retail, the deceived purchasers won't be whole. If I steal $1M from you, should I only have to pay back less than that? If so, I might as well steal and get caught. Punitive or vengeful would be making them pay damages on top of that, but repurchase at full retail seems to be the equivalent of paying back the amount you stole.

    45. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      Are you suggesting that you simply take them away from me for... reasons?

      Because the shareholders obviously didn't hire the right people to run the company for them.

      However, you can sue the people that did in fact run the company for the losses you incurred due to their illegal acts.

    46. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet VW scores very well in Europe on reliablity and durability, better than American-owned brands and far better than American imports. I think the main issue is that the VW cars sold in the US are simply of a lower quality. They're assembled in the US and Mexico using many local components, while the European-market cars are made in Europe using mostly European components. Similar trans-Atlantic differences exist in Mercedes-Benz and BMW vehicles. The US market expects lower prices and is satisfied with shorter lifespans and a lower build quality. Americans simply buy new vehicles more often and the market has adjusted to that fact.

      My other theory is that the fact that their home markets are protected from the Japanese manufacturers has allowed them to rest on their laurels a bit. US manufacturers suffered vs the quality of the Japanese cars for years, but they eventually upped their game.

      No-one is stopping the Japanese manufacturers from selling competitive cars in Europe. The fact is that they are simply not very popular anymore, except in a few niche markts (hybrids, off-road-cars). Korean brands have been more succesful in recent years and they seem ever more competetive with established brands on quality, but the price has also increased.

    47. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell them to go fuck themselves and their double standards.
      Where were they when many other companies directly killed people with faulty designs and cheap components? Oh, wait, the "survivors" got hefty compensation cheques and that made it all OK ...

    48. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      equate, not "equivocate"

    49. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Britz · · Score: 1

      To me it looks like the scapegoat and business as usual thing is currently what we do. What happened after 2007? Did the top management from Lehman Brothers get touched? Or any other bank? They didn't even have a scapegoat. And it doesn't end with private industry. There is clear and conclusive evidence that the Abu Ghraib abuses were directed by knowledgeable people that had at least the rank of generals:

      http://www.newsweek.com/roots-...

      But they found scapegoats. And everything went on business as usual.

    50. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The cars only differed from specifications in a very minor way that is not at all relevant to most customers

      This is not true, given the 40x multiple on the NOx emissions and the performance deltas exacted by turning on the emissions regime.
      This is likely to be very relevant for many consumers - they were sold a bill of goods that promised sprightly performance and very low emissions.

      Extremely stiff fines, a forced buyback, mandatory reflashing and retesting of cars, and (probably) a consent decree, let alone civil litigation or class actions filed by owners, will disincentivize other potential bad actors in the automotive space to rethink gaming the system.

    51. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ^ this, many times. The key idea is to disincentivize corporate malfeasance.

    52. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never punish the innocent, it is worse than letting guilty people go free.

      That doesn't sound very American. I thought the current "shock and awe" principle was: "If it moves, shoot it, if it doesn't, shoot it anyway, it might be faking."

    53. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anecdote, I know, but I have a VW with 100k miles and have done nothing but oil, tire and brake changes. I have even neglected all the other fluids changes and any other recommended maintenance. I do all maintenance myself though so maybe it is just that the dealer hasn't screwed it up. Runs perfect and have had no issues.

    54. Re:How long will the company stay up? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      That sounds great in theory, but the reality doesn't work that way...

      Those people will get laid off, Ford and Toyota might build more cars to take up the slack, but they'll do it at their own factories, not the former VW ones...

      The VW dealerships won't all get bought out, many would close, they are located too close to other dealerships to become something else...

      You make comments without understanding the reality behind them, but you're not unique there, plenty of people do that.

    55. Re: How long will the company stay up? by pastafazou · · Score: 1
    56. Re:How long will the company stay up? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      It helps a lot however...

      The IRS fixed the problems of the old leaf springs working with the 95-01 front suspension.

      The 90-94 front suspension was completely different and that line didn't have nearly the roll over problems of the 95-01 line, even through it was largely the same vehicle.

      Part of the reason for the change in 95 was it allowed the 5.0L V8 to be installed. It wouldn't fit in the 90-94 line due to the design of the front suspension.

      I owned a 98 5.0L V8 version, I know all too well about this. The vehicle had a design flaw that wasn't fixable within reason, Ford couldn't afford to buy back millions of Explorers, so Firestone was made the bad guy.

      Except the exact same Firestone tires didn't have the same rollover problems on other vehicles. :)

    57. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's my anecdote. I've had my VW Golf for 4 years now. Bought new. Maintained regularly. Absolutely no trouble at all. Almost 90k on it, and runs perfectly. I've never had a car as reliable as this one before, and I've had everything from Volvo and Benz to Mazda and Toyota. Rust is minimal to non-existent and I live in a snow belt.

      Now, from what I understand, reliability varies a lot. My car was built it Wolfsburg. However, I hear cars built in Mexico and the US don't have quite the same track record.

    58. Re:How long will the company stay up? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      They now have a car that isn't legal to drive.

      That is not true, and you saying it largely invalidates the rest of your statements.

    59. Re:How long will the company stay up? by pastafazou · · Score: 1

      My 2003 Jetta is closing in on 400,000KM, or 250K miles. VW Diesel engines are far more reliable than anything Ford has made in the last 25 years.

    60. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither, for once, we want accountability.

    61. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same reason, you can't let GM go bankrupt, you just can't.

      Sure you can. Somebody else will pick up the assets at the bankruptcy sale and life will go on. Maybe the new folks will do a better job.

      The 2008 issues may not have been of the car companies' making, but GM "needed" the bailout where Ford didn't, which suggests that GM was at some fault for their own problems.

    62. Re:How long will the company stay up? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Because the shareholders obviously didn't hire the right people to run the company for them.

      About half of all Americans own stocks now, very few have any say in who runs any of those companies.

      Your ideas assume that only some rich, fancy pants fat cats will be hurt, but you'd be wrong.

    63. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If VW reliability ever drops to Ford levels they have problems far, far worse than the current emissions test scandal.

    64. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Tailhook · · Score: 0

      The big difference is that GM's issue was purely safety related; their crimes didn't offend the Green Police. I'm certain the bulk of EPA staff figure GM's victims deserved what they got for commuting in a car instead of a bicycle. In any case you can certain the penalties will be far, far greater for VW et al. So I have to agree with the GP; VW is in jeopardy, at least in the US.

      By the way, if you're one of the many, many VW TDI braggarts that have plagued every automotive discussion on Slashdot since forever; please dispose of your atmosphere wrecking pollution machine. Thanks so much!

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    65. Re:How long will the company stay up? by fnj · · Score: 1

      Don't equivocate these two.

      You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. Seriously, "equate" and "equivocate" have entirely different meanings.

    66. Re:How long will the company stay up? by pastafazou · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that not all VW models are made by VW. The Routan, for example, is a Dodge Caravan rebranded. On top of that, the European market is more diesel than gas, and the diesel engines are far superior to the gas engines.

    67. Re:How long will the company stay up? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Well then I'm glad you're not in charge, because that is a really stupid idea...

    68. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      e-quiv-o-cate
      verb
      verb: equivocate; 3rd person present: equivocates; past tense: equivocated; past participle: equivocated; gerund or present participle: equivocating

              use ambiguous language so as to conceal the truth or avoid committing oneself.

      Please stop using words you don't actually know.

    69. Re:How long will the company stay up? by DarkOx · · Score: 2

      If you don't you create a moral hazard though. Its just another from of To Big To Fail. Its not worth breaking to entire economy to protect a few unfortunate victims. If anything they should be made to qualify for unemployment insurance or something like in the case of a traditional layoff.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    70. Re:How long will the company stay up? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      destroy a lot of wealth?

      sounds good! anyone WITH 'wealth' these days likely got it by being a sociopath.

      people with 'savings' are normal people. people with 'weatlh' are lying cheating bastards and that's the only way, now, to get 'wealth'.

      I'm half serious. that's what's sad; this is not a joke. the redist of weath is one of the biggest crimes of this century. resetting that could only be a good thing.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    71. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US car companies were kept afloat after 2008 with large amounts of government cash gifts. Maybe Europe will do the same here?

      Ford did not take a bailout.

    72. Re:How long will the company stay up? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yes, you are right. Thanks. I learn most of my vocabulary by watching other people use it. Or in this case, apparently, misuse it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    73. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We want other companies to be very afraid of trying anything like that. Whether the penalties will sink the company should not even be a consideration. The people who made the decision are the ones responsible for destroying the company, not the people enforcing the law. Come on, where's your sense of personal responsibility? Would you argue against putting a murderer in jail if it meant his employees would become unemployed? I hope not.

    74. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Tailhook · · Score: 1

      This. Either regulations mean something or it's just a bunch of lawyers masturbating.

      Every sale prevented by the destruction of VW will go to manufacturers that didn't willfully scam their customers, dealers and compromise public health. There are a plethora of car companies and brands that will be happy to grab up VWs market share.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    75. Re:How long will the company stay up? by ftobin · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, if the company goes bankrupt you'll lose the value in your shares anyways (beyond the 30% it's already dropped). Transferring ownership at least keeps them in business.

    76. Re:How long will the company stay up? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 2

      Right, so the moral hazard should be finding those who ACTUALLY did this and putting them in prison.

      Punishing everyone else and letting the people who ACTUALLY did it go free is the real moral hazard.

      ---

      Right now, if I was a CEO of a huge company, I'd be thinking, "gosh, I can do something illegal, make millions personally, then resign and retire scott free while the world cuts up the company I don't really care about anyway".

      THAT is the moral hazard.

    77. Re:How long will the company stay up? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Well, if a company is a legal entity with free speech and the ability to buy politicians ... then when a company does something bad, they need to be punished. If I commit a crime nobody gives a damn about destroying me financially or incarcerating me.

      If you send the message companies are free to do all sorts of illegal things and will have no consequences of any substance, then the companies will just do anything, and the knowledge that people don't wish to harm the company will keep them safe.

      You can't coddle them and validate that they can do shit like this without any significant penalty. Otherwise as soon as they can say that they stand to gain more money than they would pay in penalties, they'll all just do it.

      You can't just say "well, gee there evil corporations, try to be less evil next time". Because then what you have is every corporation will take that as license to do anything they want to without penalty.

      So, from the people who paid a premium for these cars, or now have lower resale value, or the simple fact that a lot more pollution was generated than claimed ... this crap needs some punishments of significance.

      If your "middle ground" is pathetic and useless penalties, that's not a damned middle ground. It should hurt like hell, and leave a lasting institutional memory that you can never do shit like that, and it should make everyone else watching know damned well there are consequences.

      Anything less isn't a "middle ground", it's letting corporations get away with anything under the guise of how it could harm the company and its employees. They didn't give a shit about the law or their customers, so why exactly do we owe them a duty of hardly doing anything in response?

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    78. Re:How long will the company stay up? by ftobin · · Score: 1

      Punishing the employees and shareholders does nothing, the vast majority of them had no idea this was happening.

      Shareholders hold the value of the company, and so that is where any value extraction must take place from. Additionally, shareholders are ultimately responsible, since they own VW. They appoint the board, who oversee the company.

    79. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My theory is that a lot of European manufacturers just don't fully understand just how much Americans drive. In addition to having almost twice as many vehicles per capita than the EU (any statistics that say otherwise are probably excluding light trucks in the US numbers), each of those vehicles gets driven almost twice as many miles in a year. Basically, American drive 3-4 times as much as Europeans.

      That and the typical European tends to forget that most of our states are bigger than their entire countries and that outside of major cities there is little alternative to driving.

    80. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Whatsmynickname · · Score: 1

      So to summarize:
      1. Ford/GM/Chrysler continues to build huge diesel trucks which are driven as commuter cars and spew 10x the pollutants (which I have to breath while sitting at a stop light on my bicycle), no problem
      2. GM knowingly kills 143, eh
      3. VW cheats on smog test, OH MY GOD THE HUMANITY!

      What is wrong with this picture?

    81. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Leomania · · Score: 1

      The irony is the real fall off in quality is Japan. Toyota and Honda aren't what they used to be.

      What leads you to believe that? My empirical observations from owning two Toyota vehicles ('05 Prius, '06 Highlander hybrid) is that even with the complex systems on these vehicles, they have required nothing but regular maintenance. Seriously, I had to replace the water pump on my Prius at 175K miles due to seepage at the seal, and that's it. Both vehicles have been trouble-free. My brother's Avalon is pushing 200K, and he abuses vehicles. So I'm honestly curious whether your experience has differed from mine.

      --
      You don't use science to show that you're right, you use science to become right.
    82. Re:How long will the company stay up? by dwpro · · Score: 1

      "ban them from selling cars here for 5 years"

      Extreme? No, that's a long way from extreme to me. Extreme would be seizing their assets and executing the wrongdoers china style.

      it'll put millions of people out of work, destroy a lot of wealth, and then when it files for bankruptcy, it won't be able to fix the cars in the first place.

      That sounds a lot like too big to fail. Which most of the big automotive companies appear to be. How do we fix this problem?

      --
      Millions long for immortality who do not know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon. -- Susan Ertz
    83. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      From my experience with VWs it seems like the ones made in the 90s and early 2000s that were built in Mexico are the shit ones and have all sorts of random dumb problems. The ones built in Germany from that time period don't seem to suck.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    84. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My theory is that a lot of European manufacturers just don't fully understand just how much Americans drive.

      It's more than just how much we drive, its also American culture and lifestyle, they miss little things like cupholders. I need at least 3 cupholders (2 for each passenger and 1 for yesterday's coke I haven't thrown away yet) up front and they have to be big enough for a 32 ounce drink.

    85. Re:How long will the company stay up? by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      In which case it's a misuse of scarce economic resources to start with, and society will be better off with a more efficient allocation.

    86. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These articles haven't been talking about VW diesel engine reliability, are you dense? This would be a horrible side discussion. Besides reliability is about more than just a motor. Singling out your 250k Jetta is as stupid as singling out a 500k F350 7.3 - you should realize 250k is nothing. Their so-called quality has allowed a fraudulent clean diesel to slip out the door for 6 years!

      VW make better cars than American companies.

      This is completely not true. The greatest of ironies is that some podunk West Virginia lab has called them to bear truth to their lies.

    87. Re:How long will the company stay up? by MouseR · · Score: 2

      The bike part.

    88. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My 2003 Jetta is closing in on 400,000KM, or 250K miles. VW Diesel engines are far more reliable than anything Ford has made in the last 25 years.

      And my GM truck is just shy of 300K miles and still running fine, what's your point? A single anecdotal account doesn't prove anything about a fleet of millions of vehicles, other than that at least one can survive that long, any more so than a person suffering a failure immediately after purchase (which I am sure has also happened with VWs) would prove they are unreliable.

    89. Re:How long will the company stay up? by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      Right, but VW might have miss-sold 11 million cars. It looks very much like they have no way to fix those cars in such a way that they meet the advertised specs. With that in mind, it's likely they'll have to offer to buy them all back, which is likely to amount to something in the region of $330bn, before even considering any fine.

    90. Re: How long will the company stay up? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Technically, you're correct, since Ford did take government money, but given that this thread was regarding "government cash gifts", a statement that Ford took no government money could be understood within that context to mean that they didn't receive a gift from the government, which is true. They merely received a loan, which they've been paying back in full, with interest.

    91. Re:How long will the company stay up? by sconeu · · Score: 1

      IIRC, Ford did not take the government bailout.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    92. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's hope so. I am not at all confident the US won't abuse this on a massive scale to extract as much money from VW as possible.

    93. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gm and Chrysler were, anyway. Ford, on the other hand, mortgaged their assets and took a gamble they could reinvigorate their product line and turn things around before the pile of cash ran out. Total respect for Ford.

    94. Re:How long will the company stay up? by beanpoppa · · Score: 1

      Full retail value on a 5 year old car? On what basis? How was the owner harmed in any way for the last 5 years and 80k miles? They received everything that they paid for. More, in fact, since the affected cars actually enjoyed 20% higher fuel economy than the EPA ratings. The harm only comes now in degraded performance, higher maintenance costs, and reduced resale value due to any pending 'fix'. If a 2009 Jetta TDI had a resale value of $12k 2 weeks ago, and now it's worth $7k then the total remediation from VW to the buyer should be $5k.

    95. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Gryle · · Score: 1

      Of course it is. It's nothing more than a special case of the so-called lemon laws. If I buy a car off the lot, it loses half its value. However, if that car is later found to be defective, I'm entitled to full reimbursement of the original purchase price or a trade-in of equivalent value to the original purchase price from either the dealer or the manufacturer*. VW knowingly sold defective vehicles to their customers. There are consequences for one's actions.

      *Lemon laws vary from state-to-state in the US, but this seems to be fairly standard for what I've read.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    96. Re: How long will the company stay up? by rch7 · · Score: 1

      Automaker companies have some legal immunity related to accident liability. Not full immunity, but it is not easy to prove criminal case. There are thousands of different issues reported in big company, and you can always work on improving something.
      Cheating on EPA test is completely different story just from legal point of view. As from moral point of view, diesel exhaust and photochemical smog cause cancer, and many people die too, slow and painful way, even if you can't count deaths precisely.

    97. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't speak to GM's build quality, but as a company, their organizational skills are terrible. I have to endure their stupidity at a logistical level, and it has driven me to speak ill of them often.

      GM can't pay me enough to take one of their cars.

      I'd buy a Ford, no problem. (I've dealt with Ford logistics too, and they have their shit together, so to speak.) The plug-in hybrid Energi models look really good to me. The Focus Energi is basically the same as the Volt, but built by Ford (read: a company that isn't hideously dysfunctional), and about $10k cheaper.

      Personally, I drive a Honda. I just got bit with a big repair bill from a longstanding design issue where the J35 engine eventually ejects spark plug #5. In my case, it damaged the radiator, making the repair approximately 50% more than it otherwise would have been. Honda reliability is so legendary, you can even count on the failures to happen consistently. (I'm only half joking.) That said, I'd still buy another Honda if they'd just stop beating their designs with ugly sticks. (2009 Acura TL and 2016 Pilot redesigns are excellent examples of their ugly-stickification.)

    98. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Gryle · · Score: 1

      Um, yes, yes it is true, if the owner of the vehicle happens to live in a jurisdiction where emissions testing is a requirement for passing the state inspection. Either the owner has to move to somewhere that doesn't require an emissions test or sell the car at its depreciated value.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    99. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not so much in the UK http://www.jdpower.com/press-releases/2014-uk-vehicle-ownership-satisfaction-study-voss Also better than the initial quality study actual 3 years of ownership. Ford and GM are fine here, inexpensive and generally cheap to maintain. I don't know why people choose the German brands, they tend to be more expensive to run and fix.

    100. Re:How long will the company stay up? by rch7 · · Score: 1

      Sure, China just waits for more toxic smog to be generated by your "wonders of superior German engineering" ;) If you never went to China, just look at the pictures of their big cities. You can't see anything through smog, upper class professionals just move out because of that. And they are starting to realize that it is a big problem and starting to deal with it. And you will not be fighting in courts and negotiating fines in a country ruled by Communist party dictatorship, party boss will tell you what to do and you will do it.

    101. Re:How long will the company stay up? by rch7 · · Score: 1

      VW stopped making best cars maybe decades ago. They stagnated and can't compete in mass market worldwide anymore, Asian automakers left them in dust, while US automakers catching up somewhat. And this cheat is yet another proof of it, when you can't compete, you are getting desperate and start cheating as you don't want to go out of business. You are trying to sell German patriotism in America. It sells well in Germany, but not in the rest of the world.
      BMW and MB are still making decent cars in luxury part of the market, but it is small part of the market. Diesel cars are dead end, they become popular in Europe mostly because of more favorite taxation, but it is reversing.

    102. Re: How long will the company stay up? by rch7 · · Score: 1

      It is not bailout, it is loan to retool factories to make more fuel efficient vehicles. Maybe it helped to some extent, but I don't think it was possible for them use all that money just to pay their other loans or cover losses.

    103. Re:How long will the company stay up? by afidel · · Score: 1

      VW has ONE plant in the US, the Chattanooga Assembly Plant which employs ~3,000 US workers. VW claims more than 9,500 indirect supplier employees. That's nothing like the huge supply chains here to supply Ford, GM, Chrysler, Toyota, and Honda. Heck, tiny little Nissan employs almost that many directly with just their Smyrna plant.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    104. Re: How long will the company stay up? by afidel · · Score: 1

      Ford's been repaying that loan at ~$465M per quarter and will have it payed off in 2022. They are paying US Treasury interest rates which are just below current market rates for large credit worthy companies. There's little doubt that it was a good deal at the time the loan was made but it's hardly the same as the bailouts of GM and Chrysler.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    105. Re:How long will the company stay up? by afidel · · Score: 1

      How is 250k miles remarkable? I drove 3 Taurus/Sables to 225-250k miles, all were equipped with the 24v 3.0 V6 which is a highly reliable engine. In fact my old Mazda MPV with the same engine is still on the road with that engine and just went over 220k miles despite hauling a heavier load than the Taurus it was designed for.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    106. Re:How long will the company stay up? by tavita · · Score: 1

      Depends on whether you're looking at the short-run or the long-run. Agree with parent that, in the short run, extreme punishment destroys value. But any punishment has a deterrent effect in the future: when John Q CEO evaluates the gains from cheating against the expected punishment, the larger that punishment, the lower the likelihood that cheating occurs. How you evaluate the long- vs. short-run implications of punishment is tricky, but if one cares at all about the long-run, one would probably want to increase the punishment over what constitutes reasonable reparations.

    107. Re:How long will the company stay up? by rch7 · · Score: 1

      It is true if your registration expires and you can't renew, or need to pass emission test, or need to sell the car, as I believe is the case at least in California. You just have junk on your hands which value is much less that it was before this scandal. Loss of value is minimum what needs to be repaid, plus much more.

    108. Re:How long will the company stay up? by towermac · · Score: 1

      Dang, I already commented. Too funny.

      Totally agree with the huge truck vs cars that sip diesel hypocrisy.

    109. Re:How long will the company stay up? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Except the cars DO pass emissions tests... That is the whole point of this...

      Even the EPA said "they are legal to drive".

    110. Re:How long will the company stay up? by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      http://www.dmv.org/nj-new-jers... Some states, NJ and CA that I know of, do annual inspections. In others, the police can stop you and test your emissions under certain circumstances. In either of these cases, you would fail the inspection. These cars can't be repaired to pass the tests. Therefore, you will not be able to operate them. These were sold as cars legal to drive in the US but are not. Therefore, a full refund is the only appropriate course of action.

    111. Re:How long will the company stay up? by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      Even if not subject to annual emissions checks, most states allow police, under certain circumstances, to inspect vehicles to ensure that they meet safety and emissions requirements. Even if this doesn't happen often (or at all), the fact that you won't get caught doesn't mean that the act is legal. The only thing you can do with these cars is display them as art. They aren't fit for purpose and should be fully refunded.

    112. Re:How long will the company stay up? by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      The inspection / registration requirement is an enforcement mechanism. Even when this testing is done on a regular basis (so you won't get caught) it's illegal to operate these vehicles. In many states police can do inspections for cause. And since none of these vehicles are legal to operate, having on on the road seems like sufficient reason to stop you and perform an emissions inspection. So really the owners have to stop driving them immediately. I realize that most owners won't comply, the but law doesn't say you can violate emissions until you get caught. You can't do it.

    113. Re:How long will the company stay up? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Depends on whether you're looking at the short-run or the long-run. Agree with parent that, in the short run, extreme punishment destroys value. But any punishment has a deterrent effect in the future: when John Q CEO evaluates the gains from cheating against the expected punishment, the larger that punishment, the lower the likelihood that cheating occurs. How you evaluate the long- vs. short-run implications of punishment is tricky, but if one cares at all about the long-run, one would probably want to increase the punishment over what constitutes reasonable reparations.

      That sounds very logical, but the real world doesn't appear to work that way.

      Enron's CEO was going to prison, was he not? Yet less than 10 years later, we had Goldman Saks doing the same thing, give or take.

      John Q CEO doesn't care if VW gets a huge fine in 5 years, or even goes bankrupt, if he gets $100 million today and gets to keep it.

      The other issue is that making the punishment larger only does one thing, makes the punishment larger. Certainty of getting caught is the bigger issue. You can make the penalty as large as you want, but if people don't think they will be caught, then it doesn't matter.

      https://youtu.be/pDVmldTurqk

      I'd like to share that YouTube video with you, about Mandatory Minimums. The TL;DR version is, our prisons are filled with people serving decades long sentences who didn't think they would get caught.

      To quote one line in the video, you could make jaywalking carry the death penalty, it isn't going to stop it if people don't think they'll be caught for it.

    114. Re:How long will the company stay up? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      VW had an army of marketing stating how clean their cars are. This is the reason why people bought the cars. GM car wasn't touted for its safety, that model was more for a push towards affordability. Also this was more of a failure to report a problem, vs. and intent to lie about it.

      Also Huge Diesel trucks arn't the issue, they don't pretend to be green. However if used properly, you get a decent mileage per pound, that can beat hybrid cars.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    115. Re:How long will the company stay up? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      My Mother has now owned three RX SUVs from Lexus, each one has been less reliable than the last. Her new one purchased January of this year (a 2015 model) has been back to the dealership twice for minor issues.

      I've owned Ford and GM cars and trucks for the past 20 years and have seen massive improvements to quality in that time.

      Just anecdotal information of course, not data, but it is what I've seen.

      From looking at reliability surveys, it appears that the gaps have largely closed. Even brands that used to be made fun of, like Hyundai are now well built, all things considered.

      Would I buy a Toyota tomorrow? Yes I would, if they sold what I wanted to buy. But I'd also buy a Ford, or a GM, or a Honda.

    116. Re:How long will the company stay up? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Lord, have you even bothered to learn anything about what this whole thing is about?

      The cars are rigged to PASS inspections... that is the whole point of this!

      You also claim these cars can't be repaired to pass the tests. That is also not true, their ECU can simply be flashed to run in "pass" mode all the time.

      It'll hurt fuel economy and reduce power, but then they'll pass all the time.

    117. Re:How long will the company stay up? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Well, if a company is a legal entity with free speech and the ability to buy politicians ...

      Well there is the first problem, that should not be the case.

      If I commit a crime nobody gives a damn about destroying me financially or incarcerating me.

      I do... the "war on crime" has been horrible to a lot of people. Putting people into prison for 20 years, then expecting them to be useful to society when let out is, frankly, a crime against humanity.

      It is evil and I don't support that either. Any punishment that "destroys you financially or incarcerates you for enough time to destroy you", is immoral.

      In my opinion.

      So, from the people who paid a premium for these cars, or now have lower resale value, or the simple fact that a lot more pollution was generated than claimed ... this crap needs some punishments of significance.

      Sure, but against whom? I would suggest it should be against the specific people who actually committed the crime. A corporation is just a piece of paper, you can tear it up and make a new one, it is meaningless.

      I don't think anyone would argue that VW shouldn't pay anything, but destroying the company out of some sense of "justice" is just stupid. It is cutting off your nose to spite your face.

    118. Re:How long will the company stay up? by BlackPignouf · · Score: 1

      Given that peak oil and climate change are big f**in problems we're not really adressing, bankrupting car manufacturers isn't necessarily a bad thing to do.
      Those people will have to find another job some day anyway.

    119. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bicyclists in my city don't sit at stop lights, they run red lights instead. Now, maybe, I know why.

    120. Re: How long will the company stay up? by praxis · · Score: 1

      Well, they are getting a better deal than they would have gotten from a private lender. That deal is funded by taxpayers. That sure seems like a bailout to me, albeit a pretty minor one.

    121. Re:How long will the company stay up? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Cars do not lose half their value when you buy them. They generally don't even lose half their value after 3 years anymore.

      Some of these cars are 5 years old, there comes a point where your idea is just not reasonable.

      Should VW pay anything? Yes. Full purchase price for a 5 year old car? No.

    122. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There were many U.S. car companies that refused government cash, and Ford was one of them.

    123. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As reliable as a Ford? Surely you're trolling. Um. Seriously, you gotta see how Fords age. I've seen plenty and it's not pretty. Yea they can keep sort-of going A to B with four wheels, if that's your cup of tea, but it ain't cheap and you when they do die - and it's sooner than later, let me tell you - it's a collapse and a complete write off. There's no option to fix and keep running. Body, frame, suspension, transmission, steering, linkage, electrical, the whole thing goes down in one clattering avalanche. Nobody with anything close to common sense should want "as reliable as a Ford".

      VW? Well it depends on where it was built. In the US or Mexico? No thanks. In Germany? Yes please. Those things run forever.

      Go get a VW hatch. Just make sure you know where it was built and you'll never regret it.

    124. Re:How long will the company stay up? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but "transferring ownership" in the way you describe is a moral hazard in its own right.

      Don't make the cure as bad as the disease, that is never a good path to go down.

    125. Re:How long will the company stay up? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You think this is limited only to the US?

      No, although it's irrelevant.

      The US cars are US vin'ed, they can't just be exported to other nations

      Not just any other nation. They'd have to find someone willing to work for them in exchange for a whole bunch of cars. Bet they could.

      Finally, it isn't just the cost of buy backs, it is fines, legal costs, state lawsuits, etc.

      We're just talking about the remedy to the consumer here.

      Yes, VW did something stupid, but there are limits to what you can do before you start hurting people who did nothing wrong.

      And there are limits to what you can let go before you encourage corporate malfeasance.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    126. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't pass emissions tests WITHOUT THE AID OF A CHEAT DEVICE. Are you stupid or just a shill?

    127. Re:How long will the company stay up? by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      You do understand

      that sentences

      do

      not require newlines between

      them, right?

    128. Re:How long will the company stay up? by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      Why? Because the people who profited from this don't care if the company is fined into nothing in 5 years, they got theirs today.

      of course they care. the people that profited are shareholders / investors that unless participating in insider trading still owned their stock when it plunged. at this point tough decision as to whether to hold on and hope for a comeback or just dump it. either way, not good for them.

    129. Re:How long will the company stay up? by ftobin · · Score: 1

      Transferring ownership is the same what happens when a company goes into bankruptcy Chapter 7: creditors get the proceeds from the sold off components of the company, and shareholders are left dry. Even in Chapter 11 bankruptcy, owners' shares normally go to 0 and new stock is issued.

      Ideally in the VW case, if the penalties are high enough that could not be worked through with the German equivalent of Chapter 11 bankruptcy, there's a way of transferring value to the creditors from the shareholders. This can be done by issuing new stock to creditors, while various mechanisms can remove effectively value from the current class of shares.

    130. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that requiring them to buy back every car at full sales price may well bankrupt them.

      Which defeats the point.

      Not if the point is to keep the other companies in line.
      If you show that you don't just get away with a slap on the wrist when you break the rules then the other companies will pay attention.

      In a similar fashion Sonys assets should have been seized and their board put in prison when they were caught spreading malware the second time.

    131. Re:How long will the company stay up? by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      400 000 km is a lot. Most cars don't get that far. Because most cars are too old way before that. I drive 10 000 km/year. No way my car is going to survive 40 years. Especially not with snow and salt on the road half of the year.

    132. Re:How long will the company stay up? by farble1670 · · Score: 2

      really, WTF are you saying? corporations should be able to cheat the system for as long as they can hide it, and when found out, their only punishment is that they need to find a new way to cheat?

      everyone gets what you are saying about the economic ramifications, but simply letting them get away with it isn't something that society should let happen. there's a greater good to be had beyond the immediate hardships to VW stockholders and employees. you nip this on the bud, and show to VW and the greater industry that cheating doesn't pay. and yes, corporations do respond to fines. they exist to maximize profits and they simply won't participate in cheating if it doesn't maximize their profits.

    133. Re:How long will the company stay up? by afidel · · Score: 1

      Well, the average working age American drives 15,300 miles per year and the average vehicle in the US fleet is 11.5 years old so the average car right now has ~175,000 miles on it, going 40% longer than the average hardly seems remarkable. If it was still the 1970's or early 80's where anything over 100k miles would most likely require a rebuild then sure 250k miles would be remarkable but with modern engines it's just not.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    134. Re:How long will the company stay up? by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      US-Americans drive a lot, much more than the developed world average. Also, a big part of the USA is not covered by snow and salt and cars last longer because of that. I also believe your math is wrong. You won't find old cars as much on the road as people don't drive as much with them (if you have two cars, you'll use the new one first). Therefore, just because cars are 11.5 years old on average, it doesn't mean that the average is 175 000 miles.

      It's from 2008 but I don't think i changed that much:

      With improvements in the quality of automobiles over the years, a well-maintained car should remain reliable for at least 10 years and 100,000 miles. The U.S. Department of Transportation reports the average life span of a vehicle is 12 years or 128,500 miles. Surveys have shown that, on the average, a person trades in or sells a car when it is only 4 1/2 years old with just 41,000 miles on it.

      http://www.flhsmv.gov/dmv/used...

      I know that In Canada, a 11.5 years old car is an old car, and I doubt that the average car goes past 250 000 km.

    135. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which is stupid

      And so is conflating auto emissions to the import that it has. We have a lot of people and a lot of money going into making sure new cars sold meet certain standards, and a lot of regulation in states making sure cars on the road meet standards as well. Its a lot of bullshit. Apparently, the emissions from all the cars in the world for a year equals roughly what 15 supertankers pump into the atmosphere in a day. This is fucking crazy bullshit. Shame on you VW. But I understand the problem is not your cars, but the unpractical emissions standards set for diesel cars and trucks. Now I'm not saying we need dirtier cars, but all this focus on a tiny percentage of the source of air pollution is not in any way shape or form fixing the big problem of making our air any cleaner.

    136. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And after enough companies go out of business and maybe even sink a few economies, people will realize they're not going to get away with it and the world will be better off. You can't make an omelette...

      Although I would also be fine with just jailing everyone in management above a certain level who had any knowledge of this.

    137. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Freultwah · · Score: 1

      Your other theory is very nice, only that it is untrue and shows that you haven’t really been to Europe. Where did you get that ‘protected from the Japanese manufacturers’ part? Japanese cars are very common in Europe, dealerships abound.

    138. Re:How long will the company stay up? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      You want to destroy much of the value of VW, break it up, and give the left overs to various creditors.

      If you honestly think that is a better deal than working something out with the existing company, then... well, I can't help you...

      Creditors often get pennies on the dollar, I think you have delusions of what this would net the average VW owner.

    139. Re:How long will the company stay up? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      everyone gets what you are saying about the economic ramifications, but simply letting them get away with it isn't something that society should let happen. there's a greater good to be had beyond the immediate hardships to VW stockholders and employees. you nip this on the bud, and show to VW and the greater industry that cheating doesn't pay. and yes, corporations do respond to fines. they exist to maximize profits and they simply won't participate in cheating if it doesn't maximize their profits.

      The same argument was made regarding the harsh punishments given to Germany after WWI. The very same "we have to set an example and punish them" nonsense.

      Cheating does pay, and it always will so long as enforcement and checking remains lax.

      This is just human nature at work. Your ideas of "nipping this in the bud" are just delusions of grandeur... If that worked, then Enron's destruction would have made a difference and in that case, executives DID go to prison. But it doesn't matter...

      If monitoring and enforcement is not in place before the cheating happens, then it always will.

    140. Re:How long will the company stay up? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      http://www.wsj.com/articles/fo...

      The CEO may get $66 million dollars for leaving...

      I think you might have missed the point... :)

    141. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You presume that destructing VW for ridiculous reasons would somehow create some magic company that would never do anything wrong. However you don't provide any evidence for this unlikely assumption.

      VW did something wrong and they should make amends, but let's not make things any worse than they are. They started investigations the moment they found out, they have apologised publicly and promised to solve all issues, they are fully cooperating with various government agencies around the globe, they will fire everyone responsible and the CEO has stepped down. What more could you want? Anything beyond this point is useless damage to a company that makes some of the best products in the industry and provides jobs to hundreds of thousands of people.

      Other companies have got away with far, far worse things, such as General Motors knowingly sell cars with components that were known to be dangerous, even though a cheap solution was available, leading to the death of more than 140 people. Not a single GM executive stepped down and no criminal charges were filed.. It would be completely unreasonable if VW suffered more damage from this incident than they already have.

    142. Re:How long will the company stay up? by ftobin · · Score: 1

      I think you misunderstood me. My suggestion was that instead of fines that could bankrupt the company and cause a destructive loss of value, transfer value from the existing shareholders via some mechanism, allowing the company to continue to operate. In effect, perform something similar to US Chapter 11 bankruptcy (like GM's/American Airlines), but trying ensuring there is a payoff to creditors.

    143. Re:How long will the company stay up? by jafac · · Score: 2

      Much of the stuff that breaks on VW's breaks independent of mileage. For example: a Dual Mass Flywheel should NOT break after 30000 (mostly highway) miles. (compare that to a single-mass flywheel; which will basically last forever, because it's a solid hunk of steel or aluminum; there are clutch breakdown scenarios that will DAMAGE a flywheel to the point where it has to be resurfaced like a brake rotor, but single mass flywheels never had these sorts of problems - VW added moving parts to a component that didn't need to have moving parts, for what many car enthusiasts would consider to be no damn good reason).

      A lot of the vacuum tubes, electrical relays, harness cables, and etc, break from age, and in VW's case, we're talking about 2-3 years.

      IMO: the worst "reliability problem" VW's have, in the US, is their dealer network. They refuse to stand by their warranties, and they refuse to stand by their product. They charge outrageous rates. They inflate the prices of their parts. They void the warranty if you do your own oil change, because of "oil grade" issues: but their own service department sells oil NOT of the required 505.01 grade; and then the clerk would tell me "that's what we use in the shop" (to do dealer-service oil changes). In some diesel models, if you're not using the correct oil grade (or even if you are), your cams will wear in as little as 30,000 miles. That's not a cheap repair. I've read countless stories online of people with TDI VW's where they may still have $10k left on their car loan, then something breaks like the injection pump ($2000), or in particular, the particulate filter, where it grenades, and sends contamination up into the fuel system (because they burnout the filter by periodically injecting fuel), and this contamination will cause ongoing problems with operation of the engine until the ENTIRE fuel system is replaced, at an average cost of about $7000. They don't cover this repair under their shitty warranty. Then there's issues with ice buildup in the intercooler, which sends chunks through the inlet blades of the turbocharger. If you're lucky, those don't find their way into the cylinders and snap valves. But that's usually what happens. I've heard this happening to BRAND NEW cars, and at least those poor folks get warranty coverage.

      This emissions fakery just seals the deal.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    144. Re:How long will the company stay up? by nytes · · Score: 1

      The CEO is leaving, he has his money from the past X years.

      More than that. I believe I read that his exit package will be on the order of about $67M.

      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
    145. Re:How long will the company stay up? by radish · · Score: 1

      You're making the assumption that the CEO was personally involved. He may have been, he also may not have been. His resignation was a given regardless due to the size of the problem, he is 100% responsible for the actions of his employees. Doesn't mean he was aware or actually approved of what went down. Yes he resigned and got his package but a decent amount of that (and his current wealth) is likely tied up in VW stock for quite a while, and may also be subject to clawbacks if it is determined he acted against the best interest of the company.

      When it comes down to it an engineer wrote the code, knowing full well (we have to assume) that it wasn't legit. I'm sure he didn't do it on his own, and all those responsible up the chain should be identified. But I'd actually be kinda surprised if it went as high as the C-suite.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    146. Re:How long will the company stay up? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Ok, I see what you're saying...

      Of course, there is no system in place to do what you're suggesting, and you can't put it into place after the fact (ex post facto).

      But if your suggestion is that it should be done for future cases... I'll toss one thought your way...

      http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09...

      "Yet, Volkswagen is relatively immune to stock market pressure because only 12 percent of its voting shares are traded. Porsche Automobil Holding, controlled by members of the Porsche family, holds a slight majority. The German state of Lower Saxony owns 20 percent, and the sovereign wealth fund of Qatar owns 17 percent."

      Consider for a min that they aren't likely to just hand over their shares, and if you fine and sue them into oblivion, they'll spend every last cent the company has fighting you, so that when they finally go bankrupt, there is nothing left to take.

      If you make reasonable offers and ask for something less than everything, the shareholders might give it to you. If you demand everything, they may simply spend it before you can get it.

      ---

      Finally, I'm not sure that shares in VW would really make a lot of the owners happy, or whole. To get cash they'd have to sell them running the price into the ground. If you doubled the number of shares, cutting the current owners to 50% of the company (probably the least they would be willing to live with), then you cut the price in half, handing over paper to the owners of cars who would rather have cash.

      It is a nice idea, but not a very practical one IMHO...

    147. Re:How long will the company stay up? by afidel · · Score: 1

      A LOT has changed since 2008, especially in regards to average fleet age (and a 2008 report would probably be using 2007 or older data, aka pre-recession)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    148. Re:How long will the company stay up? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Does VW not have a compliance dept separate from all other dept that report directly to the CEO/Board of Directors?

      If not, they should. How else is the boss supposed to know if he is being lied to?

      Of course, I'm silly that way, if I were CEO of Ford tomorrow, I would consider it my personal responsibility to actually know what was going on, and given the size of Ford, you can only do that with a separate compliance dept that does nothing but check this stuff.

      I've never been in charge of that much, but I have had 20 employees at one time, and I can tell you they lie to the boss all the time. Not always meaning harm, more "tell the boss what he wants to hear so we can get back to work without hassles".

      That is fine, until it is legal or safety related, then the boss really needs to know.

    149. Re:How long will the company stay up? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Yep, you're right, I read that too.. $66 million was the figure I read, or 60 million Euro, something like that...

    150. Re:How long will the company stay up? by ftobin · · Score: 1

      That is the part that needs to stop, actual specific people who profit from/make decisions to profit from such things, need to go to prison.

      Shareholders do profit from such decisions. If the decision was not made, company profit margins would have been less. Shareholders, being owners, are who corporate profits flow to.

    151. Re:How long will the company stay up? by johncandale · · Score: 1

      THe reason they do these things is because the CEOs still get their 7 figure stock options and retire rich and happy. Thye only way to stop people like wall street bank firms and others from laughing all the way to the bank is to impose real consequences. They need to start jailing people that cheat regulators, only hope reallh

    152. Re:How long will the company stay up? by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      I don't think the lifespan of cars doubled since 2008.

    153. Re:How long will the company stay up? by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1

      That company will have already killed several thousand people worldwide, and injured many thousands more. What kind of punishment would be suitable???

      Serious question.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    154. Re:How long will the company stay up? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      How do you figure they have killed thousands of people?

      If that is so, then perhaps you should call CNN right now, that would be big news.

      Serious response.

      All pollution is harmful, some more than others. The amounts here are "bad", but there are worse sources that we continue to allow, so you can't blame it all on these cars.

      As I drive down the road, I see plenty of cars and trucks spewing crap out of their tailpipes probably a thousand times worse than what these VW cars put out, but no one says a thing.

      If you're going to have emissions controls, perhaps they should apply to all cars and trucks, regardless of age.

    155. Re:How long will the company stay up? by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1

      No, not big news, CNN knows this stuff already.

      Those are actually the estimates I've seen based on the proportion of NOx that can be ascribed to these particular diesels as a fraction of the total deaths due to NOx.

      I mean, make no mistake, this is ultimately WHY this is such a big story. It's not just that they've lied to the EPA, no one really gives much of a fuck about that, it's that the EPA actually set these numbers to try to reduce (somewhat) the loss of life due to air pollution (mainly in LA); and that's why the EPA have the ability to levy such massive fines.

      Most people don't realise that, for example, in the UK, ~30,000 people die from air pollution every year. Mostly asthma, heart disease, that kind of thing.

      There used to be the visible smogs in London, when thousands died in just a few weeks, but while the visible smogs are gone... plenty of pollution is still there, you just can't see it. People don't die over a few weeks, somewhat less people die, but over the whole year.

      And in case you're wondering, this isn't some weird conspiracy, this is just what the air quality researchers at bona fide universities and doctors say.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    156. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      But that was only in the US. The justice department here is pretty lax on punishing large corporations. Let's see what happens when EU, Japan, Australia, etc, start litigating.

    157. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      What's wrong is that the standard for trucks is more lax than for autos, even though both are used by commuters and urban cowboy commuters.

      Though I agree the US will go light on VW, except on procedural fines perhaps, because the US always goes light on big corporations. In other countries they're probably going to be a lot less forgiving of VW.

    158. Re:How long will the company stay up? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Right, but that wasn't the point...

      The issue is that the pollution from these VW cars isn't that bad, it is perhaps better than the cars they replaced.

      What concerns me more are the 10-20 year old clunkers on the road that pollute like crazy. Get 1 of those off the road and it may well cut pollution by more than a dozen VW cars would.

    159. Re:How long will the company stay up? by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1

      > The issue is that the pollution from these VW cars isn't that bad, it is perhaps better than the cars they replaced.

      VW just manufactured 11 million of these fuckers. The cars they replaced would very probably have got taken off the road anyway, and they're not going to be better than the cars that would have been bought if VW hadn't fucking lied, the owners would have bought something else, something better.

      That's 11 million cars that got manufactured, that should NEVER have been made.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    160. Re:How long will the company stay up? by afidel · · Score: 1

      2013 data says average vehicle lifetime is 16.9 year, multiply that by the overall average of 11,500 miles per year and you come out close to 200k miles at scrapping.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    161. Re:How long will the company stay up? by dwpro · · Score: 1

      the German built ones seem way better than the Mexico built ones. The engines seem solid but the electrical and interior go to shit in a hurry.

      --
      Millions long for immortality who do not know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon. -- Susan Ertz
    162. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You presume" -- here you try to build a strawman. I presume no such thing.

      "don't provide any evidence" -- here I'm supposed defend the strawman you built.

      Sorry. Not playing.

      "Not a single GM executive stepped down and no criminal charges were filed" Your point? The fact that nobody got locked up for that is a god damn crime itself. There is plenty of room in US prisons for corporate criminals, as far as I'm concerned. But GM had it's cohort of apologists and equivocators to fend off the wolves, and VW has your kind, so little is likely to happen in this case either.

      Great work!

      (AC on untrusted host)

    163. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You presume" -- here you try to build a strawman. I presume no such thing.

      "don't provide any evidence" -- here I'm supposed defend the strawman you built.

      Maybe you should lookup what a strawman is before you embarrass yourself in the future. You explicitly state that if VW were to be destructed, sales would go to a car manufacturer "that didn't willfully scam their customers, dealers and compromise public health". No such manufacturer currently exist. Hence, you seem to assume that it would somehow magically pop up out of nothing.

      "Not a single GM executive stepped down and no criminal charges were filed" Your point? The fact that nobody got locked up for that is a god damn crime itself. There is plenty of room in US prisons for corporate criminals, as far as I'm concerned. But GM had it's cohort of apologists and equivocators to fend off the wolves, and VW has your kind, so little is likely to happen in this case either.

      Let's hope so. In the GM case, I think it would be reasonable if at least the people directly responsible for the decision not to improve the part were prosecuted, but it that is a U.S. company and they have paid U.S. politicians enough, they were treated very mildly. VW is a scary foreign company and it has not bought politicians, so they get the full Toyota treatment: a relatively small issue that they're willing to solve get blown up out of proportion to damage their reputation as much as possible and to extract as much money as possible.

    164. Re:How long will the company stay up? by silverdirk · · Score: 1

      When DeLorean went bankrupt they sold the stainles steel panel molds to fishermen, who dumped them in the ocean to anchor fishing nets. I expect lots of wealth will be destroyed even if the factories get used by someone else.

      The flip side is that probably a lot of inefficiency will get destroyed too. Large corporations tend to have that in abundance, carried along by the successful side of the business.

      --
      Mark of the Coder fades from you. You perform Opening on World of Warcraft. Warcraft crits GPA for 4. GPA dies.
    165. Re: How long will the company stay up? by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      The rate that Ford would have had to pay a private lender was abnormally high at the time. The double whammy of the struggles of the auto industry at the time and the concurrent financial industry crisis saw to that. Ford was a basically healthy company but would have had to borrow at junk bond rates if it could have found financing at all. Borrowing at that rate while their competitors were receiving government bailouts would have broken the company.

    166. Re: How long will the company stay up? by msauve · · Score: 1

      "The rate that Ford would have had to pay a private lender was abnormally high at the time."

      Well, no. In fact, the rate was the very definition of "normal" for the time. Rates are set by the market based on supply, demand, and risk. It's the government which provided an abnormally low rate, effectively subsidizing the loan and putting taxpayer's money at risk.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    167. Re:How long will the company stay up? by wavedeform · · Score: 1

      You need to find the people who actually did this, and punish them, not the millions of employees of a huge corporation who had no idea it was going on.

      Given that the current "thinking" is that corporations are people, then the employees and shareholders are nothing more than some sort of symbiote that live off of the corporate host. The host needs to feel pain, or it will do it again.

      Lots of car companies have had coverups about design flaws, but I can't remember another auto industry case of outright fraud like this one.

      I expect there to be a variety of class action suits. I expect the US government to at least try and recoup the amount given out in tax credits, based on VW's supposed "green" status with their TDI engine. I imagine this will play out in every country that has any sort of emission laws.

    168. Re:How long will the company stay up? by wavedeform · · Score: 1

      VW probably will end up paying out several thousand dollars to each affected VW owner, but of course that hurts the VW employees and shareholders, it does not actually hurt the people who did this.

      That is the key problem with all this clamoring, it want to punish the innocent and let the guilty go free.

      You seem to see this a some sort of rogue element within VW. While that may be true, I think it's more likely that it is just a refection of the way the company operates, and their desperation to gain a fresh foothold in the US market.

    169. Re:How long will the company stay up? by Gryle · · Score: 1

      I looked up your claim, since you couldn't be bothered to cite a source for your quotation. Sure enough, the EPA has stated "the cars remain legal to drive and resell. Owners of cars of these models and years do not need to take any action at this time."

      However, according to this letter from the EPA, emissios-control defeat devices are in violation of EPA regulations and VW further violated regulations by selling these vehicles. So yes, VW knowingly sold their customers defective vehicles that are illegal by EPA regulations. It's absolutely reasonable for consumers to get their full purchase price back, as making the VW emissions "switch" an always-on option significantly reduces the performance and fuel mileage of the vehicles, which was part of their selling point.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    170. Re:How long will the company stay up? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that not all VW models are made by VW. The Routan, for example, is a Dodge Caravan rebranded. On top of that, the European market is more diesel than gas, and the diesel engines are far superior to the gas engines.

      The diesel engines aren't superior.

      The reason there are so many diesels in Europe is because up until very recently diesel fuel had less tax on it, creating a false economy.

      Diesel engines are inferior to petrol engines that can produce the same amount of power and performance with a smaller displacement and without a turbocharger. A 2L NA petrol can easily beat a 2L turbo diesel. Add a turbo to the petrol and the deficiencies of the diesel are so obvious it's funny.

      Australia and the United States have never discounted diesel, so petrol cars are in the majority. In the long run, even though they use slightly more fuel it's cheaper to run a petrol.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    171. Re:How long will the company stay up? by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      Right now the cars are *not* legal to drive. You point out a way that they *could* be made legal to drive (although they may not be able to get up a hill or maintain the 45mph minimum speed on some freeways in that mode), but they aren't legal right now. So you basically have problem my point. They aren't legal today but they could be made legal by changing the ECU. Or by equipping them with pedals and turning them into oversize bicycles or any number of ways. Even if the change were completely trivial it doesn't matter; they're not legal right now.

    172. Re:How long will the company stay up? by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      The cars are not rigged to PASS inspections; they're rigged to pass a *particular* inspection. States are free to conduct their inspections in other ways, so the cars do not PASS inspections plural they game a particular inspection and aren't legal for use on roadways. Because even if they pass the inspection, their normal use is not complaint with the law.

    173. Re:How long will the company stay up? by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      Nah man, Ford's best vehicle was the F-150 from the early 90's. That truck just wouldn't die. My dad had one of them he got in 1992 and eventually sold, in good working order, in 2001 or 2002. It had almost 300,000 miles on it and the only things he had to repair on it were the alternator and the power steering.

    174. Re:How long will the company stay up? by pastafazou · · Score: 1

      Nice opinion. Too bad you're wrong: http://www.popularmechanics.co...

    175. Re:How long will the company stay up? by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      dude, no one knows what the hell you are saying. you are right, it's definitely unclear how much of a deterrent punishment provides, but i can say one thing for sure, having ZERO punishment provides ZERO deterrent.

      i could couldn't care less anyway. if someone does a crime, they should do the time. whether the motivation is deterrence, "justice", revenge, monetary compensation, or whatever. it's called being accountable for your actions. it's something we teach our kids, and it's a pretty good standard.

    176. Re:How long will the company stay up? by CylanR77 · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile my VW is only at 63k miles, bought new, and has had to have the intake plenum essentially replaced twice due to excessive carbon buildup, has had the gas cap "door" get stuck shut twice requiring a replacement of the spring loaded part that pops it open both times (this is especially annoying because by the time you notice it, guess what - your gas tank is nearly empty), and had the water pump fail just last week.

      Not to mention other annoyances like being unable to replace the rear brake pads on your own without the $300 VW computer tool or without bringing it into a garage or - worse - the dealership.

      My Fiat has been trouble-free by comparison, and that is particularly embarrassing when the Italians managed to build a more reliable car than the Germans.

      --
      http://cylan.deviantart.com/gallery/
    177. Re:How long will the company stay up? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Do not confuse anecdote with data.

      That being said, US trucks have long been better than US cars. The cars have been rapidly catching up the past few years.

      The new F-150 looks to be one of the best yet, given all the high-strength steel in the frame.

    178. Re:How long will the company stay up? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      So how has that war on drugs been working out for you?

      The US has a higher percentage of its population in prison than just about any country on Earth. We imprison people for all kinds of crap, often for long periods of time.

      It doesn't accomplish anything other than to spend a lot of money and ruin a lot of lives.

    179. Re:How long will the company stay up? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Right now the cars are *not* legal to drive.

      The EPA would like to have a word with you...

      You are not correct.

    180. Re:How long will the company stay up? by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      Citation, please. The EPA seems to be saying that they aren't going to take action against owners. But you fail to understand how emissions are regulated in the US. The EPA sets one set of standards. California is free to set a stricter standard. Each of the rest of the states chooses which standard to enforce. But enforcement is up to the states. The EPA doesn't do enforcement of individual vehicles, that's up to the states. Since the owners of the vehicles are victims, it seems that the states are refraining from prosecution for operating those vehicles, but there's nothing that would stop a local police department in need of revenue from stopping and impounding every VW diesel that passes through their jurisdiction.

  5. "...across the Atlantic to the U.S." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Umm, the scandal isn't spreading to the U.S.; it started in the U.S. While the defeat device has been reportedly fitted to cars worldwide, there is as yet no confirmation that any laws were broken anywhere outside the U.S. Few places have NOx limits as tight as those that were being circumvented in the USA.

  6. Re:The real guilty party by BVis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Fuck you.

    --
    Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
  7. Oh no, not Porshe! by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

    Where else can I get quick treatment for my mid-life crisis???

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    1. Re:Oh no, not Porshe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      From a car maker that's easier to spell?

    2. Re:Oh no, not Porshe! by SomeoneFromBelgium · · Score: 4, Funny

      Buy a Harley! Their emissions are terrible too. But nobody cares enough to lie about it

    3. Re:Oh no, not Porshe! by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      From a car maker that's easier to spell?

      I guess that rules out a SsangYong then!

    4. Re:Oh no, not Porshe! by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Hookers?

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    5. Re:Oh no, not Porshe! by crow · · Score: 1

      Tesla makes a wonderful mid-life crisis car.

    6. Re:Oh no, not Porshe! by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Kia?!

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    7. Re:Oh no, not Porshe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla Model S is better anyways.

    8. Re:Oh no, not Porshe! by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Were you really looking at a diesel SUV as a mid-life crisis car?

  8. This is what happens.. by BVis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    when the suits don't listen to the nerds, I'll bet. I'm sure at some point someone in engineering said that this was wrong, that they shouldn't cheat like this. I'm sure he/she was quickly told to drop it or start looking for a new job.

    --
    Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    1. Re:This is what happens.. by nycsubway · · Score: 1

      Could be the case. It could also be the case that an engineer thought it up and said it could be implemented and no one would notice, and the management agreed. Either way, it only seems plausible that management and the engineers must have both known about it. Maybe not the CEO. But, we'll probably never find out who really knew what.

    2. Re:This is what happens.. by starless · · Score: 1

      when the suits don't listen to the nerds, I'll bet. I'm sure at some point someone in engineering said that this was wrong, that they shouldn't cheat like this. I'm sure he/she was quickly told to drop it or start looking for a new job.

      Or could it have been the other way round?
      The nerd(s) had a quick cool hack to satisfy the emissions tests while providing better performance, and didn't want to listen
      to the boring lawyers in suits...?

    3. Re:This is what happens.. by Razed+By+TV · · Score: 1

      Lessons to be learned:
      Government: Dire need of whistleblower protections and incentives to use them.
      Engineers: You do what you have to do to pay the bills.
      Executives: You made your windfall while polluting the world. Keep up the good work.
      The rest of the public: Demand whistle blower protections.

    4. Re:This is what happens.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could be the case. It could also be the case that an engineer thought it up and said it could be implemented and no one would notice, and the management agreed. Either way, it only seems plausible that management and the engineers must have both known about it. Maybe not the CEO. But, we'll probably never find out who really knew what.

      More than likely a deadline was looming and everyone was worried. An engineer probably suggested that they use this as a "work-around." The problem is that it worked and something else got prioritized. And that's why you don't use work-arounds.

    5. Re:This is what happens.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      when the suits don't listen to the nerds, I'll bet. I'm sure at some point someone in engineering said that this was wrong, that they shouldn't cheat like this. I'm sure he/she was quickly told to drop it or start looking for a new job.

      I can very easily also imagine it being the other way around, that a clever engineer came up with this hack. Also, this is Germany, firing someone arbitrarily is far more difficult than in the US, you would have protection from suits behaving like this both from the law and from the unions.

    6. Re:This is what happens.. by Sique · · Score: 2

      Problem is: The (now ex) CEO Martin Winterkorn is at the same time the head of the Volkswagen R&D. So while the CEO Martin Winterkorn might not have known, the R&D boss Martin Winterkorn probably has.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    7. Re:This is what happens.. by twdorris · · Score: 1

      I'm sure at some point someone in engineering said that this was wrong, that they shouldn't cheat like this.

      Perhaps, but I suspect it's more likely that someone in engineering said, "Hey, ugh, you know you can't really hide this little forever, right? It's going to get discovered at some point either by EPA statistics analysis showing vast differences in results depending on testing methodology or by the aftermarket guys disassembling our ECU code and talking on the forums."

      Engineering *had* to know this was going to get discovered at some point. That's what really amazes me here. Why on earth would you be so stupid as to proceed down a path you knew full well was going to exploded in your face? Someone ignored that warning.

    8. Re:This is what happens.. by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      So engineers are somehow inherently more moral than anyone else? That's ridiculous.

      It's *just* as likely that some amoral engineer said to an amoral suit "hey, you know, we could detect when these tests are running, and kick in the pollution controls only when they're being tested" and the suit said "ok cool, do it".

      --
      -Styopa
    9. Re:This is what happens.. by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

      This has always been a question that I always posed to other Engineers.
      Me: Why would you do that?
      Engineer: Because I can.
      Me: WHAT!!!!
      This is to show you how some Engineers think.
      Myself being one, I always approach the same question with a little added step. Ask yourself "Okay, this is possible but SHOULD I ?". Most folks know this as using common sense (which I have met quite a few excellent Engineers who have none of this trait).
      Just because you can do something does not necessarily that you should do something.

    10. Re:This is what happens.. by BVis · · Score: 1

      Engineering *had* to know this was going to get discovered at some point. That's what really amazes me here. Why on earth would you be so stupid as to proceed down a path you knew full well was going to exploded in your face? Someone ignored that warning.

      There's a fine line between "not being stupid" and "losing your job". You can be correct, provably, technically correct, but it doesn't matter if the people who are in charge (and who sign your paycheck) find your correctness annoying. Someone in Engineering had to have had a conscience about this, and I find it highly likely that that someone no longer works for VW, and is bound by an NDA from disclosing what he knew.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    11. Re:This is what happens.. by BVis · · Score: 1

      Then that engineer is what is technically known as "a shitty engineer". Engineers take specs and data and turn them into things. Efficient engineers build precisely to spec, no more, no less. Smart engineers have made the likely mistakes they'll make along the way already and will incorporate what they learned from them into the new design.

      If this cheat wasn't in some spec somewhere, and the engineer added it on his/her own initiative, that engineer needs to lose his/her job and/or their freedom.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    12. Re:This is what happens.. by BVis · · Score: 1

      I wasn't making any moral judgements. What I expect engineers to see is 1) There are rules about emissions, with clear specifications, 2) Their product is currently not meeting those specifications, and 3) They must modify the product so it produces emissions that meet or exceed the requirements.

      Now the way to get to 3) is to fix your shit. I expect engineers to know that as well. I also expect them to know that cheating the test like this is against specifications, which state (if not explicitly, then implicitly) that the design must work within the regulations described. Cheating like this is outside the regulations, so I expect an engineer to see the problem and try to fix it. Where this went off the rails is that some idiot in a suit told the engineer to not change it, and if they made a fuss, they can expect to be out of a job.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    13. Re:This is what happens.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and the fucking nerd still didn't have the common sense to blow a god damned whistle.

    14. Re:This is what happens.. by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      I worry that it's possible a number of engineers already did resign or lose their job over this, and their replacements actually did all the work.

    15. Re:This is what happens.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A professional engineer is not automatically more moral than another human being, yet he has stated a professional commitment for a given standard of service.

      And yes, the professional license can be revoked as easily as it gets granted and, therefor, there are great incentives in place to do what society expects & dictates.
      Society does the right thing, while regulating professions which impact life or property (and now, the environment), by providing a conditional professional license.

      (just to be clear: registered engineer here)

  9. Guess: Engineering told to do the Impossible by crow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My guess is that what happened is that Engineering was told to do something that turned out to be impossible. They built a diesel engine and determined what was the maximum performance and efficiency they could achieve. Then management told them they needed to hit those numbers while still passing emissions requirements. Eventually they realized that the only solution to meet the requirements was to game the tests.

    1. Re:Guess: Engineering told to do the Impossible by freddieb · · Score: 2

      I agree. Sounds like what happened to me. They were ordered to get this product out the door or else.

    2. Re:Guess: Engineering told to do the Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Kobayashi Maru.

      Captain Kirk would be proud.

    3. Re:Guess: Engineering told to do the Impossible by AirFrame · · Score: 1

      So, really no different than in many other fields.

      Cycling - doping scandals that run one step ahead of the ability to test for the latest performance enhancements
      Battery Life in laptops/tablets - 12 hours battery life!* (* unless you turn it on)
      etc.
      etc.

      Regulatory testing has always been a game of showing the regulators the least offensive mode of your product, and once certified claiming it's valid for all modes. Some days, all Engineering can do is make sure their objections are noted in writing. Yes, I speak from personal experience.

    4. Re:Guess: Engineering told to do the Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not even sure of the "or else"... probably just "implied" that whoever could give the right performance would get that promotion, or survive the next round of layoffs, or....

    5. Re:Guess: Engineering told to do the Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think about it, they were able to get the cars to meet standards, but when the cars operate that way they didnt perform how the sales folks wanted them to (I cant sell this, its too sluggish, no torque, etc). This is where the impossible task was born. Using only software, get the cars to do two separate, diametrically opposed things. I imagine given the proper resources this is eventually possible, I doubt they had that. Not that that is an excuse. Sometimes the hardest part of the job is saying no.

    6. Re:Guess: Engineering told to do the Impossible by crow · · Score: 1

      One difference here is that the technique they used was specifically illegal, which is not the case in some of the other examples (cycling excluded).

    7. Re:Guess: Engineering told to do the Impossible by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Like Apple's PowerPC G3 benchmarks : Twice as fast as a Pentium II * (* except when running software)

    8. Re:Guess: Engineering told to do the Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does this tell us about the regulations though?

    9. Re:Guess: Engineering told to do the Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same thing happened with the space shuttle disaster. They launched despite cold weather outside the required limits to make a deadline. Most people including engineers don't have the moral courage to make a stand.

    10. Re:Guess: Engineering told to do the Impossible by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Same thing happened with the space shuttle disaster. They launched despite cold weather outside the required limits to make a deadline. Most people including engineers don't have the moral courage to make a stand.

      Bad example. The Thiokol engineers were yelling at NASA to delay the flight for exactly the reason the Shuttle exploded. They just did not have the authority to cancel the flight.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    11. Re:Guess: Engineering told to do the Impossible by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      Kahn!!!

    12. Re:Guess: Engineering told to do the Impossible by jafac · · Score: 1

      The PowerPC was twice as fast as the Pentium II. On some ops. On some ops, it was 20 times as fast. The problem was use-cases. Most software was never optimized for the vector units. And even when some was; these were particular use cases that were not common. Most UI responsiveness is based on integer math. Where the PowerPC really screamed was in multimedia, particularly ripping CD's (encoding MP3's). Before I decomissioned my G5 last year, the machine was 15 years old, and it was unbearable to use for most tasks (mainly because Apple abandoned OS updates for it; but also, the IO bus was shitty). But I could still rip a CD way faster than my brand new 8-core i7 desktop.

      So; VW do have a great piece of engineering here. Just for the limited use-case of passing an EPA emissions test.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  10. Won't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are going to do a recall. Folks will get their car's software updated and their mileage will go down a bit. It would be interesting to see how much the cheat improved mileage on the diesels.

    Lawsuits? Maybe a class action one where if they win, every VW owner gets $0.53 and the law firm gets ten of millions.

    Fines? Pfft! Chump change to VW.

    In the meantime, for all of you who are shopping for a new car, now is the time to get a VW. As far as Audi and Porsche, since when did they make diesels? The cheat was only for the diesel cars.

    1. Re:Won't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Porsche and Audi make diesel, at least in Europe.
      For Porsche the disease only spread to Cayenne and Panamera, and that smaller SUV.
      For Audi, it's available in all the range, even in racing (Le Mans ?)

      In Europe, diesel is king because of lower taxes in most countries. So even when you buy 150k worth of car, you want a good mileage...

    2. Re:Won't happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are going to do a recall. Folks will get their car's software updated and their mileage will go down a bit. It would be interesting to see how much the cheat improved mileage on the diesels.

      That is the interesting question. How far will the mileage drop? At the moment, I'm getting 35 mpg in town and 45 on the road in a 2012 Passat TDI, which is EPA rated at 30/40, Compariably.. the smaller BMW 325d is rated the same.. so the question becomes is or isn't BMW cheating?

      Personally, as long as my actually mpg stays at or above the rated mpg .. I'll be happy.. if it drops below rated.. that's a completely different story.

    3. Re: Won't happen. by Frankzy · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that sweet sweet torque

    4. Re: Won't happen. by TWX · · Score: 1

      I think that with the retrofits that will be required, you actually should forget that sweet, sweet torque.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    5. Re:Won't happen. by TWX · · Score: 1

      If the fuel economy drops then the cars will be in violation of other rules. Performance is what will drop, because that's the only thing not mandated. That in-turn will yield a class-action lawsuit from car owners.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  11. Re:The U.S and its heaven of protectionism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    VW is simply invoking its right to be forgotten - by getting fined into oblivion.

  12. Simply a case of poorly worded requirements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They should have said the requirement was for the car to pass emissions standards. What they actually said was that cars should pass emissions tests.

    Be careful what you require.

  13. So, does this news item essentially boil down to: by Maritz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Volkswagen own Audi and Porsche? Do we get another article tomorrow telling us that Seat and Skoda have been dragged into it? Any other crazy Volkswagen 'news' from the last 15 years? ;)

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  14. This should cause a sea change in testing by satch89450 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There is a reason Consumer Reports does most of its car tests on the road and the track -- it's more realistic. So I expect that the rules will change to de-emphasize lab testing on dynomometers and emphasize road testing using several different modes (in-town, highway, and off-road where applicable).

    1. Re:This should cause a sea change in testing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consumer reports are great but its also nice having a baseline (or the companies whizz bang list) to compare the two against. To me I think both are relevant, real world conditions vs "perfect" (lab) conditions. Not that this has anything to do with this, they could have just as easily turned the software on during the "real world" tests (or some other form of software obfuscation).

    2. Re:This should cause a sea change in testing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they could have just as easily turned the software on during the "real world" tests (or some other form of software obfuscation).

      From the morass of the last article about this story, the 'testing check' looked at results from five different environmental sensors to determine if it was in a lab. If the 'clean mode' automatically activates under 'real world' environments, then that would actually do what the EU wanted, and there would be a much smaller investigation into the conditions when it turns off.

      This wasn't about the engine software reporting the wrong values on things that can be tested in a lab, it was about the engine running at a different efficiency level during lab tests.

    3. Re:This should cause a sea change in testing by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yes, the only way to be sure that a vehicle is not producing excessive emissions is to probe the tailpipe during an actual drive cycle — preferably without connecting to the computer at all, so that the car has no way to know that it is being monitored.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:This should cause a sea change in testing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consumer Reports didn't catch this in their testing. What good is your vaunted road testing if it doesn't work? Did they not bother to validate the NOx figures?

    5. Re:This should cause a sea change in testing by director_mr · · Score: 1

      I'm sure this testing procedure will be cheap, easy to accomplish and not inconvenient to the myriad of drivers. I know I would love to have my car driven by the test people at the emissions centers.

    6. Re:This should cause a sea change in testing by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'm sure this testing procedure will be cheap, easy to accomplish and not inconvenient to the myriad of drivers. I know I would love to have my car driven by the test people at the emissions centers.

      Actually, it would be cheaper than what they are actually doing, which is moving to dyno testing of all vehicles. It's already here in many counties in California. That requires that you buy and maintain a dyno, and every time you tie a car down onto it, it's an opportunity for an exciting and expensive failure.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:This should cause a sea change in testing by director_mr · · Score: 1

      Standardizing a road test is very hard to do. You have to have identical inputs and loads, which is impossible for a person to perform.

    8. Re:This should cause a sea change in testing by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Standardizing a road test is very hard to do. You have to have identical inputs and loads, which is impossible for a person to perform.

      Yes, that's true. What you do instead is devise a test which states that under conditions within a-b range, vehicle has to produce results of x-y. Then you come up with test equipment that can be mounted on board the vehicle, preferably a package which can be placed with a trunk or frunk, attached to the trunk, roof or hood with suction cups and straps with soft clips, etc. The device can be used ahead of time to identify an appropriate drive cycle route.

      Ideally we'd just move to zero-emissions vehicle technologies and then we wouldn't need any of this jazz. The alternative is to have a black box on the vehicle reporting on your emissions all the time, which I presume will be part of some upcoming emissions standard anyway. You won't be allowed to diddle with that system, which will probably be connected directly to the O2 sensors alongside the PCM, and dick things up when it fails.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  15. Diesel technology... by puddingebola · · Score: 1

    is cleaner than it was, but not THAT much cleaner.

  16. Re:The real guilty party by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow. good comeback

  17. Re:Slap on the wrist by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Give them a slap on the wrist. Do we really stand to gain more by dragging these guys over the coals.

    I suppose it depends on how you feel about car emissions. If VW gets little more than a slap on the wrist, then why wouldn't every other automotive company do the exact same thing? AFAIK, this is just for their diesel engines, what Toyota decided to do this with their gasoline engines? That would be a hell of a lot of cars. I would guess that would start a domino effect, and all manufacturers would do the same.

  18. Re:Slap on the wrist by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 2

    Martin Winterkorn is that you...

  19. 1 millions extra tons of pollution each year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As technology got better, we ignorantly placed all the blame on china and other emerging industrialized nations when the main problem is still how unclean automobiles are. Those VWs put out roughly the same as the UK’s combined emissions for all power stations, vehicles, industry and agriculture. http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/sep/22/vw-scandal-caused-nearly-1m-tonnes-of-extra-pollution-analysis-shows

    Clime change nuts are chomping at the bit to get the torches and pitchforks ready. A few dead people thanks to General Motors is a drop in the bucket compared to this scandal of epic proportions.

    1. Re:1 millions extra tons of pollution each year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Analysis" == worst case scenario from back of the envelope estimate. Even the Grauniad should know better than this.

      The cars in question may pollute more than the standard allows, but there is no indication they pollute any more than most other cars on the road in Europe. It is very common that cars emit far more NOx in real-world conditions than in emission tests even without cheating.

  20. It didn't spread to Audi by Lucas123 · · Score: 2

    Audi is owned by Volkswagen and was part of the original compliant against Volkswagen from the EPA.

  21. Maybe it's sabotage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe a competitor managed to change the software used by VW, making all the engineers believe their designs were more efficient :D

  22. Re: Slap on the wrist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Besides higher vehicle prices for consumers? No.

  23. MANY people knew about it by Comboman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Theoretically possible perhaps, but what incentive would "lone wolf" coders have for making the mechanical engineers look good? Even if the mechanical engineers who designed the engine and pollution control systems didn't know about the code changes, they should have had a good idea of what the approximate test results should have been, and if they were way better than expected it should have raised major red flags. Same goes for QA. Even if the change wasn't caught in a code review, the too-good-to-be-true results alone should have raised questions. I bet lots of people knew about this and either didn't want to risk their jobs by asking about it or were told "don't worry about it, it's a decision made above your pay grade". Unfortunately, we live in a world that demonizes whistle-blowers.

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
    1. Re:MANY people knew about it by MozeeToby · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I work in production test. It is a constant battle with people who should know better trying to ship things that shouldn't be shipped.

      I could absolutely imagine a scenario where someone comes up to an engineer says "we pass emissions in this scenario, but not these others" and then pushing, cajoling, even threatening that guy into "bending the rules" and "making things work" so they can start shipping. How much does the average car factory lose for each hour of downtime? Even more likely if the issue is a fundamental flaw that will cost millions to fix. All it takes a couple guys trying to be heroes or save their jobs.

      Again, I'm not saying that's what I think happened, especially in light of how widespread the issue appears to be and how fast executives are jumping out with their golden chutes. But I do work in a similar industry in a similar capacity, depending on how the internal culture it would be easy for one or two people to make this happen.

    2. Re:MANY people knew about it by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      Other clean diesel cars use urea tanks to clear NO emissions. There is no way a programmer made this change, and a bunch of engineers suddenly said " Hey look, we don't need to include the extra tank!" and "Hey, look, no loss of power!" No way someone wouldn't notice that.

    3. Re:MANY people knew about it by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1

      This would have been back in 2009, it's quite plausible that the people involved thought they were saving VW; and they may even have done, at the time, plenty of car manufacturers were going bankrupt and being bailed out back then.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
  24. Re:So, does this news item essentially boil down t by AirFrame · · Score: 2

    I think it would be a lot easier to keep a list of companies *not* doing this. It'll be a very short list.

  25. Porsche and Audi DIESEL by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    Between the two badges, that might be all of a few dozen cars sold in this country since 2008. Few Americans have ever even seen an Audi with a Diesel that was made since the 90s, and even fewer ever knew that Porsche has had Diesel options.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Porsche and Audi DIESEL by mccalli · · Score: 1

      'this country'. I'm UK-based, and this will be a large number of vehicles indeed. Porsche Cayennes are often diesel, and there's the new Panamara thingy too.

    2. Re:Porsche and Audi DIESEL by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

      Before the recently released models subject to this investigation, Audi hadn't sold a diesel in the US market since 1983. Whats funny is the last Audi diesel I came across (a MY81 Audi 4000 5 speed with a MY83 1.6L turbo diesel engine) was apparently an EPA test car for VWoA that they later resold locally.

    3. Re:Porsche and Audi DIESEL by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      'this country'. I'm UK-based

      Slashdot is hosted and based in the US. The most represented country on slashdot - in terms of which country most readers are from - is the US as well. It is understood that on slashdot a reference to "this country" is referring to the US unless there is context to imply otherwise.

      I am well aware that the engine distribution is vastly different for some brands - particularly European-based brands - in other countries but here in the US the Diesel is almost extinct. VW is the top seller of Diesel-powered vehicles in this country and for them it is still a minority of their vehicles by sales volume. I know there are vehicles (say, the Smart ForTwo, along with vans and small pickups) that are sold with Diesel options in other countries but cannot be purchased as Diesels here. For that matter, Jaguar and BMW are two brands that sell Diesel fairly regularly in Europe but not at all in this country. You cannot get a Diesel Jaguar or BMW sedan in the US through a dealer for any amount of money.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    4. Re:Porsche and Audi DIESEL by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      However, the bogus software and lawsuits extend beyond the US. Canada and Australia, for instance. http://www.dw.com/en/lawsuit-t...

    5. Re:Porsche and Audi DIESEL by fnj · · Score: 1

      Slashdot is hosted and based in the US. The most represented country on slashdot - in terms of which country most readers are from - is the US as well. It is understood that on slashdot a reference to "this country" is referring to the US unless there is context to imply otherwise.

      Bullshit to the last point. On the internet you can't get away with those kind of bullshit assumptions any more. The audience here is the world, baby. Yeah, Slashdot is run by an American company. Very likely the most represented country in the readership is the US. It may (or may not) even exceed the total of all other readership distributed in all other countries. But that doesn't mean squat. It is accessable and accessed by people everywhere. Get used to thinking in terms outside the conditions of the 19th century, when travel to other countries was a big deal and a slow deal, and even communications with people in other countries was extremely limited in volume.

      Jaguar and BMW are two brands that sell Diesel fairly regularly in Europe but not at all in this country.

      Oopsie. BMW MY 2016 X3 and 5 Series diesels are sold in the US. If it matters, MY 2016 Range Rover, MY 2016 Mercedes E Class, MY 2016 Porsche Cayenne, MY 2016 Audi A6, A8, and Q5, all diesels, are also sold in the US.

  26. Re:The real guilty party by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

    Do you also react that way to things like "2 + 2 = 4" and other basic stuff?

    2 + 2 = 5, for very large values of 2.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  27. Re:So, does this news item essentially boil down t by Chrisq · · Score: 0

    Volkswagen own Audi and Porsche?

    Oh my!

  28. One guy is plenty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nah,

    1. A guy sits in the car with a computer and twiddles the settings to make the car drive well.
    2. Then they stick it on a test ramp, plug in the air sampling computer and he twiddles the settings to make it pass emissions test,
    3. Repeat steps 1 and 2 over and over again till everyone is happy.

    That's all that's needed to achieve this.

    I know they say VW cars detected complex heuristics to determine if they're on the rolling bed.... thats seems unlikely, the risk would be too high. Being Germans, they will have been too smart, using optimization software techniques to maximize fuel efficency on the road, and emissions on the rolling bed, and not realized that the nature of doing multiple optimizations sequentially like this will result in:

    {road AND smooth} OR {rolling-road AND clean}

    *not*

    {road AND smooth AND clean}

    Tough luck, they're supposed to know these things, theirs to fix and fines to pay.
    But I bet a lot of car makers did their emissions testing and optimization separately on a rolling road, and I bet a lot of them will fail!

    1. Re:One guy is plenty by mrchaotica · · Score: 5, Informative

      I know they say VW cars detected complex heuristics to determine if they're on the rolling bed....

      According to one article I read, the heuristic was "did the emissions testing technician put the car into emissions testing mode." Apparently, the cars need a separate setting for that to prevent the electronic stability control from going haywire when it starts reading the front wheels going 50 MPH while the back wheels are stationary.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:One guy is plenty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That wouldn't pass the emissions test (which are done on all wheel rolling roads):

      http://i00.i.aliimg.com/photo/v0/11817378/4x4_Rolling_Road_Dynamometer_Test_Bench.jpg

    3. Re:One guy is plenty by TWX · · Score: 1

      Given that OBD-II/CANBUS is used for modern emissions testing (basically ask the car's computer if the car is passing) it's very likely that as long as an OBD-II code reader capable of asking about emissions or doing live-monitoring was plugged in, the car went into the alternate emissions mode. I expect that even a roadgoing test with a sniffer test would probably involve that kind of interface to the car's computer, so unless someone was concerned that they were being duped they probably wouldn't have done a solely-sniff test without the computer interface.

      Obviously someone eventually did feel that they needed to do the sniff test with no other aspect involved, and got quite a surprise.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    4. Re:One guy is plenty by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Which would not play out well if someone was performance testing on a dyno under the same conditions.

      That theory doesn't pass the smell test.

    5. Re:One guy is plenty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are not put on a dyno during emissions testing.

  29. Lemme let you in on the secret... by rtkluttz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Its not just VW. Its not just the auto industry. It's all over the corporate world and our governments. Everywhere there is closed source software, your stuff that uses that software is being used in anti-consumer ways. I wish people would wise up and say enough is enough. If 99% of the source code for the stuff we use every day were suddenly made public, there would be nothing short of riots in the streets. I'm not advocating that people and companies who write firmware or software should not be compensated, but I am absolutely advocating that the public be allowed to see and change the software for the stuff we purchase.

    --
    Digital is, by definition, imperfect. Analog is the way to go.
    1. Re:Lemme let you in on the secret... by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, I fail to see why software that my team and I have spent months/years writing should be open sourced so you can download and change it for free. Open source has it's place, but making money is generally not one of them. Sure there are exceptions, but the vast majority of open source software is written by people for free. One last thing most people outside the IT industry don't realise is that writing software is VERY expensive, that expense needs to be justified and recouped otherwise it won't get done.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    2. Re:Lemme let you in on the secret... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      " Open source has it's place"

      So does an apostrophe. That wasn't it.

    3. Re:Lemme let you in on the secret... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I'd agree with "the vast majority of open source software is written by people for free" unless you are simply begging the question that anything released as open source was written for free.

      There are certainly a vast number of little hobby projects out there, often abandoned in place with their first publication. But, if we count by lines*utility, I think the vast volume of open source code that is actually in use was written by developers who were tasked to do that work by their employers. That includes complex systems software like OS kernels, filesystems, compilers, language runtimes, database managers, and various network services and frameworks. It also applies to applications like web browsers and office suites. Those developers worked for employers that made strategic decisions to open source this work as it would benefit their core missions. These include universities and large corporations as well as smaller consultancies.

    4. Re:Lemme let you in on the secret... by rtkluttz · · Score: 0

      Firmware and Software does not equal hardware. Everyone should have the right to modify software after they pay for it. Or they should not have to use it at all. If they want to buy a device for the devices sake and put whatever software they choose on it, there should be no restrictions to them doing so.

      --
      Digital is, by definition, imperfect. Analog is the way to go.
    5. Re:Lemme let you in on the secret... by rtkluttz · · Score: 1

      Also, one of the first things I said was that I am not disputing the compensation system we have in place. Only that people have access to see and change source code for everything they purchase.

      --
      Digital is, by definition, imperfect. Analog is the way to go.
    6. Re:Lemme let you in on the secret... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Open source does not have to be free in either sense of the word. The GP specifically said making money on software is okay but hiding what it does and forbidding modifications is not. By default, if you include the source with your commercial software it is no more legal to redistribute the source than it is to redistribute the binaries.

    7. Re:Lemme let you in on the secret... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Opening the source to public inspection doesn't mean it has to be released under an OSS license.

      Consider a copyright example from another writing field: novels. You buy a novel, you've bought the source (less any formatting rules in the author's word processor). You haven't, however, bought the right to make derivative works from that novel. (Sure, a few folks do anyway, it generally doesn't have much impact on authors' incomes.)

      Release the source so that it can be inspected. There are plenty of cases where this is required anyway, not to make the source public, but at least to make the source available to some third-party for inspection. (I used to do precisely this for voting machine software, it's required if the vendor wants the machine certified. In this case we got the actual source and build files and verified that the binaries we built matched the binaries the vendor shipped.)

    8. Re:Lemme let you in on the secret... by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      software is being used in anti-consumer ways.

      The average consumer couldn't give 2 shits about NOx emissions if they could squeeze another horse or two out of the engine.

    9. Re:Lemme let you in on the secret... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please stop spreading bullshit, this has nothing to do with closed vs open source software. It's greedy business men who think the rules don't apply to them and they don't since they're never directly punished. It's as simple as that. No one is going to riot over software quality. Everyone already knows software sucks, no one cares. It's not important to the average person.

    10. Re:Lemme let you in on the secret... by rtkluttz · · Score: 1

      This does have everything to do with open vs closed source. You can't blame big business for doing anything they can get away with to make more money. The only reason they do shit like this is because they can. The only TRUE way to combat it is transparency. Even laws don't stop it as evidenced by VW and emissions requirements. If the code they put in their car was 100% transparent, you can be damned sure they wouldn't have done it.

      --
      Digital is, by definition, imperfect. Analog is the way to go.
  30. Re:The real guilty party by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
    2 + 2 = 5, for very large values of 2.

    Even worse, 2+2 != 4 (depending on the quirks of your floating-point implementation).

  31. Re:The real guilty party by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2 and 2 equals 22.

  32. Re:Slap on the wrist by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hmm... how about, a big message telling the rest of the free market to not fuck around with regulation and try to cheat the system. Someone, somewhere, probably many times, will say to themselves 'Well.. I could shortcut x,z,y... not legal but...' And then 'well... then again, remember what happened to VW'

    I blame the long history of governments 'letting it slide' with the banks, Intel, Microsoft, and numerous other big companies for a lot of the major corporate abuses we are seeing today.

    --
    while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
  33. Re:The real guilty party by GuB-42 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Putting aside the debate about global warming, this it completely off-topic.
    The WV scandal is not about global warming. Global warming is mostly about CO2 and CO2 is mostly about fuel economy.
    Here the problem is that they cheated on NOx emissions, which are toxic (known to cause acid rains) but do not contribute to global warming. If anything, NOx cause global cooling.

    I think that "fuck you" is a totally valid reaction to highly loaded and off-topic "information".

  34. Configuration not programming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It won't even be a programming thing. These ECUs are standard across a company, a set of parameters determine how it behaves, you use a software configuration tool, and edit the parameters and the map to make the engine perform as needed. Sports model of a car? Same software, different settings. Hot climate? Same software, settings based on outside temperature.

    I bet its really as simple as them doing the tweaking for driving while driving and tweaking for emissions on the rolling road, and simply assuming that the rolling road is exactly identical to driving.

    But it isn't, it will be subtly different, perhaps its less torque for the same speed or some slight difference. Which means the map cells for rolling road won't exactly overlap the maps cells for driving, they tweak the map separately for each driving situation and bingo, the VW problem.

    1. Re:Configuration not programming by EETech1 · · Score: 1

      The law just lists test points and emission levels.

      So lots of time is spent making those points meet those levels.

      Everywhere else, you give the motor what it wants.

    2. Re:Configuration not programming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think VW could make some money off this 'feature'. Just have a toggle
      switch on the dash that switches between the maps. Some motorcycles have
      this feature already, right on the handle bars. The up position could be
      labeled, "EPA Compliance" and the down position could be "FUCK THE EPA!".

  35. Re:Slap on the wrist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That approach really worked well with the financial industry. Still lamenting my decision to stay in the sciences rather than just go get rich bending the rules somewhere else.

  36. Re:So, does this news item essentially boil down t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Theres been stories circulating that the identical Seat/Skoda engines have always been in a different emissions band than the VW engines. VW/Seat/Skoda are essentially the same people, just rebranded as the cheaper end.

    I suppose the theory would be that VW supply engines to the subsidiaries but without the defeat code. They can then claim their premier marques get far better performance, whilst the cheaper brands just arnt as good. Yet they can cash in on the economy of scale that infact theyre all the same engine with a couple of memory registers flipped.

  37. Spanish SEAT too; CEO climbing in the group... by enriquevagu · · Score: 1

    The Spanish brand SEAT, part of VW group, used some 500.000 of these tampered engines. Jürgen Stackmann, the CEO of SEAT is also leaving this company.

    However, apparently he is not being fired, instead he will become the group worldwide sales chief (link in German).

    Interesting and sad to see how some people are being blamed and fired, while others (in the same position in other company of the group) manage to leave unpunished and even use this opportunity to climb in the group.

  38. Why cant we make an example of them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Obliterating VW will put a lot of people out of work sure.

    But we have to make an example out of them.

    Right RIAA?

  39. Just taking their cue from Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, VW didn't even need a pen and a phone to violate the law.

  40. Re:Slap on the wrist by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

    Winterkorn gets a bonus of 30 mil Euros for going. Yeah, I bet he feels really punished.

  41. Re:Go away teenagers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How predictable. Modded -1 by angry teenagers.

  42. It's about fraud by sjbe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I suppose it depends on how you feel about car emissions.

    No it depends on how you feel about fraud. The reason this is a big deal isn't the pollution though that is not a trivial part of it. No the big deal is that this company intentionally defrauded millions of customers. They promised their technology worked in a way that it didn't.

    In my opinion the people who ordered and the people who carried out this fraud should see some time behind bars. They committed a crime that cost customers and taxpayers many millions of dollars.

    1. Re:It's about fraud by pastafazou · · Score: 0

      Horseshit. Find me a single customer who cared about the emissions output. People buy diesel cars for the durability and the fuel economy, and VW delivered on those. The only people they defrauded was the EPA. How did this cost customers money? How did it cost taxpayers money? The only people this really affected were the shareholders.

    2. Re:It's about fraud by beelsebob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Every single one of those customers cared about being able to pass an emissions test, because every single one of those customers wants to drive their car legally on the road.

    3. Re:It's about fraud by unimacs · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Heard a couple of TDI owner's interviewed on the radio. They were pissed. One guy's previous car was a Prius. He bought into VW's marketing that their diesels burned clean. I would also been tempted by a TDI, but only if they met emission standards.

      Even if an owner doesn't give a crap, what do you suppose the resale value on these cars is right now?

    4. Re:It's about fraud by TWX · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They will also care greatly when those cars must be retrofitted to force emissions-compliance, stripping them of their roadgoing performance. I fully expect a complete list of VINs to be provided to state motor vehicle departments, and regardless if those cars are operated in emissions-test zones or not, unless proof of retrofit is supplied, they will not be able to renew their registration after a certain point.

      I think that as punishment, given that most of these cars are probably still in the hands of their original owners, VW should be forced to buy-back at original transaction price all of these cars, as no owner will be satisfied by the performance of the cars post-retrofit. Other industries have been forced to buy-back product during a recall and couldn't depreciate that purchase price, I don't see how VW and automobiles should be any different in this circumstance.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    5. Re:It's about fraud by tehcyder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Horseshit. Find me a single customer who cared about the emissions output. People buy diesel cars for the durability and the fuel economy, and VW delivered on those. The only people they defrauded was the EPA. How did this cost customers money? How did it cost taxpayers money? The only people this really affected were the shareholders.

      Not everyone is a selfish loon who thinks everything done by The Government is evil.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    6. Re:It's about fraud by jpapon · · Score: 1

      VW should be forced to buy-back at original transaction price all of these cars, as no owner will be satisfied by the performance of the cars post-retrofit.

      That doesn't make any sense - the car worked as promised (except for the extra emissions) for the time the driver's used it. If anything they should have to buy back the car at its current resale value, but even that is pushing it.

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    7. Re:It's about fraud by kellymcdonald78 · · Score: 1

      The main reason why diesel consumer vehicles all but died in North America in the 90's was that they had developed a reputation as being "dirty", the more recent growth in demand was a result of the new TDI vehicles as being portrayed as "clean" diesel

    8. Re:It's about fraud by Wain13001 · · Score: 1

      Except the emissions were a big part of the sales pitch to begin with, so no, the car didn't work "as promised".

    9. Re:It's about fraud by zieroh · · Score: 1

      Horseshit. Find me a single customer who cared about the emissions output.

      Please don't project your Libertarian values on everyone else. That kind of selfish ME-ME-ME crap isn't actually a universally-held belief.

      --
      People who say "sheeple" have about as much sophistication as an AOL user, and in fact are probably actually AOL users.
    10. Re: It's about fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "How did this cost customers money? How did it cost taxpayers money?"

      It costs us in environmental damage, which ultimately will cost us money to repair. It's like a debt that will need to be paid at some point in time.

    11. Re:It's about fraud by radarskiy · · Score: 2

      As always, the coverup is worse than the crime.

    12. Re:It's about fraud by towermac · · Score: 1

      To me, the EPA has culpability here too. The reason it's so bad is that they sold the motor for 6 years.

      How come they weren't caught when the first ones made it over here? That would have been a handful recalled, and VW would have had to redesign. Which still would have been hard on them. But not devastating for them, as well as all these customers.

      What the fuck has the EPA been doing for 6 years?

    13. Re: It's about fraud by Izuzan · · Score: 1

      Sounds like an AWESOME time to buy a VW tdi for much less than they normaly are :)

    14. Re: It's about fraud by Izuzan · · Score: 1

      Not emissions, fuel mileage. At least here in canada i dont remember seeing any commercials stateing anything about clean emissions, but a lot about excellent gas mileage.

    15. Re:It's about fraud by TWX · · Score: 1

      The EPA does not have the resources to do all of the testing itself. It relies on the automakers to follow the rules, but it also makes those rules very clear. The EPA probably did spot-checks, but again, if their testing regimen involved connecting to the OBD-II / CANBUS interface on the car (which put the car into emissions-mode) they can't necessarily be expected to detect that this has happened.

      You want the EPA to be able to do this? Fund them with a mandate to emissions-certify every drivetrain configuration.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    16. Re:It's about fraud by TWX · · Score: 2

      Even if the emissions was not part of the sales-pitch, it's a defective product that was fraudulently manufactured and distributed. Fault lies entirely with the company, not with the consumer in any way, so the consumer should not have the burden of any loss on themselves.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    17. Re: It's about fraud by unimacs · · Score: 1

      Sounds like an AWESOME time to buy a VW tdi for much less than they normaly are :)

      I know, but it kind of depends on what happens and what's important to you. If VW is forced to recall these cars for some firmware modification that decreases their performance, and the owners are somehow compelled to have the modifications made, you might be stuck with something you don't want and can't get rid of.

      If on the other hand, if current owners aren't obligated to get the likely firmware update, and you don't care about the emissions, you could get a great deal.

    18. Re: It's about fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes and no... Not all places require emissions testing after sale.

    19. Re:It's about fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I live the tax rate for private use of a business car is severely dependent on the CO2 emissions. If bringing NOx in line raises CO2, well, I'd think is fair that VW would pay the difference that they cheated with.

    20. Re:It's about fraud by jpapon · · Score: 1

      Yes, but it doesn't make any sense to give back the full value of a car after five years. It's just stupid, and you know very well it's stupid. The car is not worth that much - not even close. All a consumer could really hope for would be to get the value of the difference in value of the car before and after this information was released. If this scandal suddenly made the car worth 30% less on the used market, well, that's what the consumer is owed.

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    21. Re:It's about fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except a huge number of people don't even have to have emissions tests in the US.

    22. Re:It's about fraud by BitterOak · · Score: 1

      No it depends on how you feel about fraud. The reason this is a big deal isn't the pollution though that is not a trivial part of it. No the big deal is that this company intentionally defrauded millions of customers. They promised their technology worked in a way that it didn't.

      Did they really? Did they actually promise their customers in writing that their cars emit below a certain level of NOx? Did they promise anywhere that their cars would emit the same on the highway as in an emissions testing facility? If not, I'm really not sure how the customers were defrauded.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    23. Re:It's about fraud by jafac · · Score: 1

      A lot of people in states with tight emissions standards are going to be selling their cars to people in states where they don't check. That's my prediction. It's going to be a fire-sale. I wish I lived in a loose-emissions state, because I'd be able to look at autotrader in california, and find one of these cars cheap as hell.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    24. Re: It's about fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's true, and thanks. These anti environmentalists are the ultimate freeloaders. They expect everyone else to pick up the tab for what they ruin. Then they complain about individual welfare while ignoring the much larger costs of corporate welfare.

    25. Re:It's about fraud by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Go to Europe. The low emissions were a major part of their marketing. The fraud goes beyond the EPA most likely, there is evidence of test cheating in Europe now too, and many countries are opening up investigations. Sure, in the US many people here don't give a shit about clean air, but the fraction of VW diesels in the US is tiny. In Europe VW is much bigger and the percentage of diesels is much higher, so this is a much bigger scandal than just the insular United States.

    26. Re: It's about fraud by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      VW diesels are a very small market segment in US and Canada. But it's a large market segment in Europe, and in Europe the DO care about emissions and it is a part of their marketing.

    27. Re:It's about fraud by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      This goes beyond the EPA. These defects are very likely in cars sold in other countries. Including countries where they claim their inspection system is better than the US system.

      (that claim is suspicious though as they tend to test during auto manufacturing by having an inspector do spot checks in the plant, rather than testing the vehicles after they're purchased, and it's a lot cheaper to bribe those inspectors than to bribe every local gas station in the US)

    28. Re:It's about fraud by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      That's because some people actually work for the government.

      (it's a joke!)

    29. Re:It's about fraud by towermac · · Score: 1

      What? Over 8 billion dollars and 15,000 employees and all they can do is hook up an ODB reader to the port?

      Dude I can make a quick trip to NAPA and do that myself on my tiny little salary.

      Yes, I totally expected that they actually tested the cars.

    30. Re:It's about fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I followed the contract as agreed (except for the part I didn't)

    31. Re:It's about fraud by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 1

      What the fuck has the EPA been doing for 6 years?

      Oh, how about operating under seriously underfunded conditions, while being attacked constantly by the usual types in Congress and their friends in the right-wing media?

    32. Re: It's about fraud by JasonRyan75 · · Score: 1

      You're a damn idiot.

    33. Re: It's about fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consider the difference between the Orig price and resale as asshole tax. This is an egregious breech of trust.

    34. Re: It's about fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Environment damaged by these Germans

    35. Re: It's about fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While we may question how "represented" we actually are by our elected representatives. The fact that our government agreed on a law must reflect the wishes of the majority. And before somebody argues that it's only the wishes of tree hugging liberals (which I am not). Let's just remember how much power and influence the oil & auto industry have when it comes to making these laws. So for example you may not agree with the laws governing the sale and consumption of tobacco but no one should be arguing that this is all bullshit because the people who bought cigarettes don't care about second hand smoke etc.

    36. Re: It's about fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Diesel mileage ðY

    37. Re: It's about fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In europe they care about co2. Because many countres have that as tax calculation. This doesnt affect co2.

    38. Re:It's about fraud by TheRealLifeboy · · Score: 1

      Of course, the false assumption that CO2 is detrimental in any way to our environment, makes the whole house of cards that is built by wrong legislation, collapse. NO2 is heavy and doesn't float around and oxidises other materials easily, so in the long term ( a day or longer) it has no effect on our air. In the short term (high motor vehicle traffic volume) it is a problem, so lowering emissions of it is a good thing, but then do it for the right reasons, not for brain-dead AGW hysteria reasons.

    39. Re:It's about fraud by TheRealLifeboy · · Score: 1

      I disagree. The problem here in the first instance, as someone else has already pointed out, is that the EPA doesn't actually test the emissions! How stupid is that? Hooking up a car's exhaust (tail pipe, for US slashdotters!) to an emissions tester should be the only way to get a new vehicle certified for sale. And the manufacturer doesn't get to supply the vehicle, the EPA should select a random one. To be repeated every month on a new set of random vehicles.

      Yes, VW defrauded the EPA and them alone, unless they advertised specific emission standards to the public which were not achieved. However, that is what almost all corporations do, unless they know they can't get away with it. VW knew the EPA won't test their vehicles, so they said, what the hell, let's fool them since we can. And so they did.

      This is what's wrong in the US. The watchdog asks Monsanto: Are your poisons safe. Monsanto says, yes, they are. Watchdog says it's safe now. Replace Monsanto with other corporation's name. Repeat.

      Of course the next question is: What do they do with $18 billion annually??

    40. Re:It's about fraud by dl_sledding · · Score: 1

      And they all did. Problem solved.

  43. Re:Slap on the wrist by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

    Cummins did exactly the same thing about five or six years ago. Their fraud was a lower-tech version of the same scheme. They paid their billion dollar find and moved on.

  44. They'll survive by sjbe · · Score: 1

    The penalties and lawsuits will quickly exceed VW's $126bn valuation.

    No it won't. VW is a vital piece of the German economy and is part owned by the German government. They are almost certainly going to get slapped hard over this but it isn't likely to drive them out of business. It will cost them billions of dollars in fines and recalls and probably more in lost sales but they'll probably survive. Hopefully they will get slapped hard enough that they'll serve as an example to other auto makers who might be tempted to pull the same stunt.

    1. Re:They'll survive by tipo159 · · Score: 1

      The penalties and lawsuits will quickly exceed VW's $126bn valuation.

      No it won't. VW is a vital piece of the German economy and is part owned by the German government.

      Lower Saxony (a German state) is part owner (13% of shares, 20% of voting rights). The majority owners are the Porsche and Piech families.

  45. Re:Slap on the wrist by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

    Proponents of the free market don't say there aren't cheats and unless they are anarcho-capitalists free-market capitalists consider the role of government is to prosecute companies for fraud.

    --
    If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
    Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
  46. VW quality by sjbe · · Score: 2

    VW make better cars than American companies.

    Not according to any of the industry quality surveys. VW is perennially near the bottom of the quality rankings, almost always lower than the US makers.

    1. Re:VW quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Volkswagen is by far the longest-lasting brand on average and VW models have very few breakdowns, while American brands score well below average.

    2. Re:VW quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.jdpower.com/press-releases/2014-uk-vehicle-ownership-satisfaction-study-voss

      Don't really know why you think 'initial quality' is a useful marker, it tells you nothing about the actual car, just how 'shiny' people think it is. Ownership time studies are clearly a better marker.

    3. Re:VW quality by rch7 · · Score: 1

      Volkswagen is by far the longest-lasting brand on average and VW models have very few breakdowns, while American brands score well below average.

      ADAC looks just like VW - bunch of crooks. Why it doesn't surprise me?
      http://www.thelocal.de/2014012...
      http://totalcarmagazine.com/fe...
      You can buy a lot of advertising in your own country and take market just on patriotism. It doesn't work in the rest of the world.

    4. Re:VW quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ADAC may have done things wrong, but that doesn't change the facts. Volkswagens last longest and have the fewest breakdowns. You may not like it and attack the messager, but that is the truth.

  47. More details on how they did it... by dkegel · · Score: 1

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/... says " Emissions testers at a site in Westlake Village, California, evaluated all the cars involved... If any vehicle failed to meet emissions targets, a team of engineers from Volkswagen headquarters or luxury brand Audiâ(TM)s base in Ingolstadt was flown in, the person said. After the group had tinkered with the vehicle for about a week, the car would then pass the test. "

  48. Testing 123 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's test the theory of justice. I say that it's really a way for government cartels to seize control over people and car companies.

    Communications companies pull all kinds of stunts like this on subscribers all the time, as do banks, health care providers, and government agencies.

    For example, a lot of government agencies are legally required to protect social security numbers, names and addresses etc in accordance to HIPAA, PCI and IRS requirements, but it usually goes unchecked. Unpunished.

    Telecommunication companies often tack on other fees, under the radar, and switch services of customers without the customer approving it.

    This issue has nothing to do with global warming, or NOx or CO2; it has to do with CONTROL. Government control over a corporation. I assure you they offer some sort of blackmail deal where the car company gets off easy if they agree to other "conditions"

  49. Re:The U.S and its heaven of protectionism by rubycodez · · Score: 2, Informative

    oh the U.S. companies who actually abide by the emissions law should somehow roll over for the poor foreign competition who didn't. go fuck yourself

  50. Re:Slap on the wrist by avandesande · · Score: 2

    Yes, behave yourself unless you are a bank. Banks get slaps on the wrist.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  51. Re: Slap on the wrist by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

    The whole issue is based on ethics of business. If they are willing to cheat the emissions, what else are they willing to cheat? It breaks trust between the regulators, governments and customers.

    Worse now, there are over what, over a million people driving around in cars that are operating illegally. What happens now? Do they get a special pass and let the cars keep operating? Will they be allowed to legally transfer then to another owner? Or will they be forced to update the computer and possibly face the possibility of reduced performance and fuel consumption, essentially gimping the vehicle. The best approach would be to suspend all VW diesel sales, grandfather in all the cheat cars and slap the shit out of VW. It's a good compromise which protects the consumer and punishes the manufacturer.

  52. Re:Slap on the wrist by njnnja · · Score: 2

    On the flip side, Arthur Andersen was put out of business because of a court ruling that was eventually overturned. A lot of people who never had anything to do with Enron lost their jobs as a result. In VW's case, the number of managers and engineers who had anything to do with the emissions testing of diesel vehicles for export to the US is probably dwarfed by the number of people would could be hurt by an overreaction.

    This doesn't mean don't punish the wrongdoers, but saying that you want to "hurt" VW means that you are going to hurt a lot of people who didn't benefit from the original wrongdoing.

  53. Why is anyone surprised? by BCW2 · · Score: 1

    As soon as most inspections went to a computer hookup instead of an actual "sniffer" in the tailpipe it was bound to happen. Any code can be cracked and a work around found. If someone can write the program someone else can find a way to screw it up.

    --
    Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
  54. really how long has it gone on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if only 2009 onward what were the diesel motors doing before then to pass SMOG tests? Did they switch to a new motor and find out it was not SMOG efficient and then had to fake the tests to get it to market? If this really was an engineering cheat I wonder why so many in management are leaving? One symbolic departure like the CEO would be enough unless it really was known all the way up the chain.

    Then again, maybe management knows the company is sunk and they are leaving for new positions while they are still "innocent" and can claim to the new employers they were scape goats.

    It's getting more interesting every day.

    1. Re:really how long has it gone on? by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      Automakers routinely game the tests, they just do so "legally" by engineering to the test at the expense of real-world use. This is exactly why not just the EU but the US and the rest of the world are trying to compile a test that actually reflects driving conditions: WLTP. VW got caught first, but don't expect them to be the only ones revealed at gaming the system. It will be legal, but you will see that almost nobody can make a diesel engine that simultaneously meets the mandates of fuel economy and low emissions without pricing it well above other options. As fuel economy standards continue to tighten, expect to see the pinch affect gasoline engines as well.

      The real problem with all this cycle-beating (as opposed to VW's cycle-cheating) is that it gave the EU an overly optimistic view of what could actually be accomplished. Now that they're going to start using tests more representative of real-world usage, they are going to find that the numbers just can't be met. Goodbye >50% diesel market share.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  55. Re:The real guilty party by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aside from the pure "letter of law" legality, it is interesting to note the "spirit" of the standards.

    The US standards are very strict about the emissions per unit of fuel consumed, rather than the total emissions per unit of distance traveled. This means that very inefficient vehicles with larger total emissions are acceptable while a small and efficient vehicle with lower total emissions could be in violation. This feels a lot like the US exceptions for light-duty trucks which supports the whole SUV craze that sidesteps fleet mileage requirements. Whether or not we consider CO2 and global warming, it feels like a big "fuck you" to the inhabitants of the country to allow such gross polluters to pump more toxic crap into the air simply because they feel like driving massive vehicles and profiteering manufacturers have been sure to lobby for such exemptions.

    I think we should be rewriting our own EPA regulations to actually limit per-capita emissions if we are going to pretend we care about such things. Maybe we need cap-and-trade for all NOx emissions from the smallest lawnmower to the largest freight trucks. Freight shipping, farm work, or soccer mom driving should not get an exception but rather have these real externalized costs reflected in real product and service costs so the economy can optimize for actual total costs to society.

  56. Re:Slap on the wrist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's Total War. There are no innocents, burn Wolfsburg down and salt the earth.

  57. General motors ignition scandal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So... VW cheats on emissions -> 18 billion fine.
    GM neglects ingition -> more than a hundred people die -> 900 million fine.

  58. Punish the company AND the perpetrators by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Why? Because the people who profited from this don't care if the company is fined into nothing in 5 years, they got theirs today.

    The shareholders who are the actual owners of the company will care very much. Furthermore it's quite possible that criminal penalties will be handed out for this since it was fraud and I don't think it will be too hard to identify some/all of the guilty parties.

    The CEO is leaving, he has his money from the past X years. What difference does it make to him what happens in the next X years?

    He may or may not care but the guy who takes his place will have to care quite a lot. It's actually quite unlikely that the CEO was aware of this problem himself. It's not really the sort of thing he would normally deal with. If he didn't actually know then it's reasonable to assume he probably didn't condone or sanction this fraud. He's responsible since it happened on his watch but that doesn't mean he didn't care.

    You need to find the people who actually did this, and punish them, not the millions of employees of a huge corporation who had no idea it was going on.

    You need to punish both. The people who perpetrated this crime (and it IS a crime) as well as the corporation so that there is no temptation to do something similar again. There obviously needs to be controls in place for this sort of thing to ensure it doesn't repeat and the way to ensure that happens is through economic pain to the corporation.

    1. Re:Punish the company AND the perpetrators by quintessencesluglord · · Score: 1

      As it is, you have had a long running attempt by shareholders to disciple corporate boards (read: gain more say in the operation of business) that has gone basically nowhere. On the other hand, you have corporate boards claiming short-sighted demands from shareholders irrevocably harming business.

      And to be fair, both sides have merit, and both sides are corrupt, so exactly how to do you intend to pursue something as nebulous as accountability in such a scenario? It's wolves all the way down.

      And in the unlikely scenario that criminal charges are leveled from this, you can almost be certain a degree of amnesty will be helped along from a few well placed campaign contributions. After all, (camera shot) you are hurting underlings that had nothing to do with this criminal activity.

      The past few business scandals have made clear it is near impossible to address problems like these under current structures. At best, you can expect a slew of onerous compliance mandates, which even then, just end up fucking over the few honest players in this.

      I mean I would delight if someone had a balanced approach to all this, but more and more it's just bad and worse threatening an even greater cesspool.

    2. Re:Punish the company AND the perpetrators by towermac · · Score: 1

      You've nailed it; there is no decent way to address this now, anymore than there is a way to change the past.

      The only thing that could be done is to enforce the regulations in a timely manner.

  59. Re:Slap on the wrist by TWX · · Score: 1

    This doesn't mean don't punish the wrongdoers, but saying that you want to "hurt" VW means that you are going to hurt a lot of people who didn't benefit from the original wrongdoing.

    And while that is not fair, that is life.

    Are you willing to have the state take over and operate the company as a wholly-owned subsidiary to keep those people employed?

    Automotive engineers and designers, and even manufacturing workers are not the people that I would be too worried about so long as they weren't part of the diesel engine team. People working in those aspects of the automotive industry move around a lot as the industry is ever in flux with new models and shifting ideas. Even executives move around a lot. I'd be more worried about the office/clerical staff.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  60. Re: Slap on the wrist by TWX · · Score: 1

    Retrofit happens. All of these cars will have to be recalled to dealerships and their computers flashed to not be in this state. The owner will be upset as soon as he or she drives it off the lot.

    I fully expect all states to be given lists of VINs that are subject to the problem, and unless proof of retrofit is supplied either by the manufacturer through the EPA to the states, or by the dealership through the owner or through the EPA, the cars will not be able to have their registration renewed.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  61. Refund by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this company intentionally defrauded millions of customers. They promised their technology worked in a way that it didn't.

    Buy cars back, full price. Or you will get sued.

    1. Re:Refund by PPH · · Score: 1

      this company intentionally defrauded millions of customers.

      Implying that all these customers care about the NOx/CO2 tradeoff. I see a big market for these higher performance/lower maintenance VWs on the used car market.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  62. Company, shmompany, how about the PEOPLE?? by swb · · Score: 1

    I want an FBI-intensive investigation that finds out who knew what and when, and then the HUMAN BEINGS responsible for it punished.

    I don't see why RICO provisions don't apply here. This is an organized conspiracy to violate pollution laws and commit fraud. Fraud at this scale is a felony easily, and while I don't doubt the pollution laws are civil, not criminal violations, the felony is the the organized conspiracy to evade them.

    Punishment SHOULD include jail time for those responsible for green lighting this scheme and probably financial penalties that claw back all monies made during the period of fraud -- not just what was left in the bank, but every dollar earned no matter where it ended up, including investment gains made with this money.

    And personal financial culpability -- no corporate paybacks, executive insurance compensation. Let the cops auction off your personal property if necessary to pay the fines.

    1. Re:Company, shmompany, how about the PEOPLE?? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      RICO might well apply, and I think most people would agree that anyone who was responsible for the decision to do this should be charged with a crime.

      Regarding payback, often times they do go after money, but they can't take what has been already spent and there often isn't as much to get as one would like.

      The issue of course is that punishing people doesn't seem to stop this type of thing, and a more useful conversation might be "why?".

      Bernie Madoff will spend the rest of his life behind bars, but that won't stop someone else from doing the same thing. They just don't think they'll be caught.

    2. Re:Company, shmompany, how about the PEOPLE?? by swb · · Score: 1

      Regarding payback, often times they do go after money, but they can't take what has been already spent and there often isn't as much to get as one would like.

      You bet they can take back what was spent. It's called a clawback. Here in Minnesota, our local version of Bernie Madoff Tom Petters stole "only" 3.6 billion in a ponzi scheme and the court-appointed receiver had the authority take back money from a lot of people.

      Basically he had the authority to say "this documentation says Tom Petters gave you $x, give it back or we'll take it from you." They did this with charities, even. It didn't matter if you had already spent it -- that only made your repayment obligation more complicated.

    3. Re:Company, shmompany, how about the PEOPLE?? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      I guess you've never heard the saying, "you can't squeeze blood from a turnip".

      You can try and claw some of it back, and the big fish are perhaps worth going after. But that money may have changed hands multiple times, it may have been spent elsewhere, etc.

      It also depends on why it was spent. If I sell my house to Tom Petters with no knowledge of who he is (it was listed on the open market, via an agent, sold to the highest bidder), you might be able to take the house away from him, but you can't ask me for the money, I traded the house for it (the money), and I don't want the house back now.

      If Tom Petters walks into a car dealership and buys a car, you can't then go ask the car dealership for the money back. You can take the car, if Tom still has it, but the dealership wasn't party to the fraud.

    4. Re:Company, shmompany, how about the PEOPLE?? by swb · · Score: 1

      If I buy a car that turns out to be stolen, it doesn't matter. The cops will take it away from me and I won't get a refund.

      I'm not sure that the fungible nature of money necessarily changes this.

      It may also be that if the receiver believes the transaction to be fraudulent or suspicious (he buys your house for more than market value) then he may hand you the title back and ask for the money.

  63. Collateral damage by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Punishing the employees and shareholders does nothing, the vast majority of them had no idea this was happening.

    Yes it does. It forces the corporation and management to take measures to ensure something like this does not happen again. Unfortunately there will be collateral damage here but that's not avoidable. If you do not punish the corporation for violating the law then you are effectively sanctioning company management to try again. The shareholders are the owners of the company. If the company commits fraud then the shareholders should feel the pain.

    Never punish the innocent, it is worse than letting guilty people go free.

    In cases like this the economic fallout even if the company wasn't punished at all would mean that innocent people are going to lose their jobs. It's unavoidable. There is no solution to this problem that does not involved economic pain to some people that don't really deserve it. That's just a fact of life in working in a large corporation sometimes. Would be no different if the company management made dumb (as opposed to illegal) decisions.

    1. Re:Collateral damage by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Yes it does. It forces the corporation and management to take measures to ensure something like this does not happen again.

      Except, that it doesn't...

      Do you honestly think McDonald's is changing anything they do based on this? How about Coke? Apple? John Deere? Bank of America?

      The situations are too far removed to have any real effect. Maybe, if you're REALLY lucky, Ford and Toyota will care and double check their cars, but then life moves on.

      In cases like this the economic fallout even if the company wasn't punished at all would mean that innocent people are going to lose their jobs. It's unavoidable. There is no solution to this problem that does not involved economic pain to some people that don't really deserve it.

      Sure, that is true... but my point is that some people are screaming for over the top destructive punishments that do nothing but put millions of people out of work.

      Should VW have to fix the cars so they comply? Yes.

      Should VW have to buy back every car at full price, even when they are 5 years old? No.

      ---

      Flashing the ECU to be in "test mode" all the time might be one option, but even that solution needs to be tested and checked. There might be a middle ground solution for the ECU as well, where it is cleaner than it has been, but not all the way to test mode.

      It might even be cheaper to simply replace the engines outright with gas motors, which also likely makes more sense than buying them back.

    2. Re:Collateral damage by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      Do you honestly think McDonald's is changing anything they do based on this? How about Coke? Apple? John Deere? Bank of America?

      you can count on corporations to maximize profits. if cheating is profitable, they will. and vice versa. the *only* way to keep them from cheating is to make it not profitable, and that means fining them disproportionately to the profits gained from the act.

    3. Re:Collateral damage by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      No, that isn't how you do it...

      The way you stop cheating is via enforcement before the cheating happens, otherwise it always will, that is human nature.

      Humans do whatever is in their own best interest, you should do some reading up on game theory.

      Had the vehicles been properly inspected instead of the manufacture rigging the tests, this never would have happened.

      Lax enforcement and checking of compliance is the real problem, without that, no amount of punishment or rules will ever make a difference.

  64. the law of conservation of energy by Max_W · · Score: 1

    I don't get it. Giant heavy SUVs' emissions are OK, but puny light VWs' are not OK. It just does not make sense. It is sort of against the law of conservation of energy. The bigger is the mass the more energy (fuel) one needs to move it. No way around it.

    1. Re:the law of conservation of energy by seth_hartbecke · · Score: 1

      The emissions problems described are not about CO2 emissions. One of the unfortunate side effects of variable rate internal combustion engines (like the ones in every car) is frequently the burn is not complete, and at other times far too hot. Either of these conditions can cause the production of other components, more then CO2 and Water that would be the intended output of a hydrocarbon + O2 reaction. Things like NO (nitrous oxide), which can combine with atmospheric water and turn it slightly acidic and soot.

      Reducing production rates of NO and soot is all about ensuring the engine is fueled properly, and sometimes installing filters in the exhaust system. However, nearly all of these things actually result in a loss of performance AND a loss in fuel efficiency. Filters cause back pressure on the engine, reducing the pumping efficiency and frequently to ensure proper burns you have to fuel the engine *more* to achieve proper temperatures for complete combustion, while also limiting the amount of fuel allowed to be injected when you step on it as this can cause the engine to exceed the optimal temperature zone and produce more things like NO output.

      So, yes ... to get cleaner air ... the engines actually loose both performance and efficiency. None of these are desired by the customers.

      --
      END
    2. Re:the law of conservation of energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's even worse. High temperatures and lots of oxygen result in efficient combustion with very little soot, PM, CO and hydrocarbons, but lots of NOx. Reducing NOx emissions means increasing all others (and vice versa). This is usually accomplished by feeding oxygen-poor exhaust gases back into the engine.

  65. Re: Slap on the wrist by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    The fact that this happened again shows that the fine was not enough. Need to block VW and subsidiaries from selling in America for a decade, or hit them so that it costs them 5-10 years in profits. Also, all those involved in this scandel need prison time.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  66. Re:Hilarious! by jpapon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Except it's not because of the ludicrous amount of fuel you burn to move that hunk of steel a mile.

    --
    -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
  67. Re:Slap on the wrist by ebh · · Score: 1

    Zetsche, is that you?

  68. Certain owners do this ALL THE TIME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not a bug, it's a feature. People want this feature, and VW was just giving them what they want.
    Why do you think there's a market for "CRC Guaranteed to Pass" and similar?

    (Not to mention asshats "rolling coal" up and down main streets to see just how much smoke they can spew to give us all lung cancer to show off how f'n 'cool' they are, but that's another topic).

    Anyway, a lot of people apparently desire this behavior from their cars. They want more power and fuel economy on the road and they don't give a crap what comes out the back of it as long as it will pass the required testing every year or two. Some "tuners" even go as far as pulling out most of the emissions control devices alltogether, including the catalytic converter, to get more power (and likely also fuel economy), and then put the cat in again when they're due for a test.

    In the olden days, people would fiddle with the carb or throttle, or put in more alcohol, etc, before test. If the ECU now does it for you, it just saves you the extra work.

  69. Re:Slap on the wrist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm... how about, a big message telling the rest of the free market to not fuck around with regulation and try to cheat the system....

    So I guess you are all in for impeaching Obama for picking and choosing which federal laws he will enforce and which ones he will flaunt.

  70. Engineering ethics fails here by ErichTheRed · · Score: 3, Insightful

    One thing I'm convinced of, based on my experience working with German companies, is that the audit trail *will* eventually lead one of two places -- the actual person who wrote the "benchmark mode" code and checked it in, or a black hole where records have mysteriously disappeared. German companies are fastidious record keepers, especially engineering companies. The CEO leaving is just to appease the shareholders -- the other departures are more telling, and if it got up to the VP of engineering level, there could be a lot more heads rolling.

    Honestly, without trying to sound like a finger wagging do-gooder, this is going to be a really good case study in engineering ethics, or the lack of them. Especially in the software world, this is seriously lacking. Over-stressed corporate managers or crazy inexperienced 23-year-old Silicon Valley startup CEOs have software engineers over a barrel when it comes to ethical behavior. Without PE-style personal liability, every engineer is subject to the uncomfortable conversation that goes like, "Look, we need this feature in or the product can't ship/won't pass regulation tests/won't let us do something nefarious with customer data. And if you don't want to put it in, I have 500 H-1Bs and other hungry engineers who will be happy to."

    It's too bad - most people can't afford to take a stand, and a lot just don't care enough to even if they could. They have families to feed, or debts to pay, or are worried about being blacklisted from the industry. I see a lot of posts saying the EPA was too strict with their limits -- VW has less than 3% of the US car market; they could have easily just expanded sales to China where emissions controls just don't exist at the same level. Unfortunately, the temptation is always there, and corrupt corporate executives always get away with these things, so I can see how some people think that if they just act like these guys they can join the party too.

    1. Re:Engineering ethics fails here by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      the audit trail *will* eventually lead one of two places -- the actual person who wrote the "benchmark mode" code and checked it in,

      That should be easy, right? CVS annotate (or whatever they are using) should bring it up. Are they not using some kind of source control?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  71. What's the matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not enough teenage moderators on here to keep you pegged at +5 "insightful"?

  72. This affects everybody by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Find me a single customer who cared about the emissions output.

    20 seconds on google will find plenty for you. You simply haven't bothered to look.

    People buy diesel cars for the durability and the fuel economy, and VW delivered on those.

    Those are some but not all of the reasons people buy these. VW quite explicitly marketed these cars and won awards for their "green" credentials.

    How did it cost taxpayers money?

    Customers who bought these cars received tax credits. Ergo this fraud cost US taxpayers millions of dollars in tax credits that never should have been issued since the car was not as Eco-friendly as VW claimed it was.

    The only people this really affected were the shareholders.

    Wrong. It affects customers, shareholders, management, employees, suppliers to VW, taxpayers, regulators, dealers, the German economy and pretty much anyone else even remotely connected to VW. It will probably even have spillover effects to other auto makers selling diesel engines.

    1. Re:This affects everybody by godel_56 · · Score: 1

      The only people this really affected were the shareholders.

      Wrong. It affects customers, shareholders, management, employees, suppliers to VW, taxpayers, regulators, dealers, the German economy and pretty much anyone else even remotely connected to VW. It will probably even have spillover effects to other auto makers selling diesel engines.

      It basically affects anyone who breathes. (cough)

  73. Recall options by sjbe · · Score: 1

    They will also care greatly when those cars must be retrofitted to force emissions-compliance, stripping them of their roadgoing performance.

    There are two ways to fix the problem. One is to detune the motor. The other is to add emissions control equipment, most likely a urea injection system. Detuning is less expensive but makes the car perform worse. Emissions control equipment is MUCH more expensive and will have to be developed and produced since none currently exists for that motor. (not even clear if it is actually possible) Frankly VW is in a bad situation either way.

    1. Re:Recall options by TWX · · Score: 2

      It's probably not possible to add the emissions control equipment necessary to make these cars pass, or at least not cost-effectively. These are generally small cars, so it comes down to a physical space/packaging problem, and they're probably not going to be allowed to just cobble something together and hope that the dealerships can install it correctly.

      There are three reasons a product is recalled. The first reason is user-error that's so widespread that the company cannot afford the liability even though the product, if used properly, is safe. The second reason is for a defect that's not fatal to the function of the product but is too expensive/difficult to field correct. Third reason is a fatal flaw in a product that poses a significant danger and for all practical purposes, cannot be corrected.

      We had received a recall notice for a barbecue grille several years ago. We really liked the grille, so we researched the nature of the recall, expecting the first or second reasons (ie, widespread incorrect unsafe use or a flaw that could be remedied but was too expensive for the manufacturer to have field-fixed), figuring we were smart enough to not use it wrongly or could field-fix a simple problem, and we instead discovered that it was a fundamental flaw in the product, the grille housing was made out of magnesium . The outer layers of magnesium would oxidize, leaving a protective coating between raw metal and the flames and grease and other flammables, but if one was studious about cleaning one's grille one would scrape-off that layer of oxide and expose raw magnesium to the fire, which would then ignite the grille itself, over the propane tank, and could not be readily extinguished.

      This emissions control problem, assuming that the goal is to maintain performance, will probably cost more to correct in the field than buying-back the cars would cost. It's not fatal to the product, but if it can't be corrected properly then it's going to be subject to recall.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re:Recall options by deadweight · · Score: 1

      A magnesium grill !!!!! WTF!!!! Good thing they didn't give you some nitroglycerin for fuel and cyanide for meat sauce or it might have been dangerous.

    3. Re:Recall options by TWX · · Score: 2

      Yeah. Magnesium, for its weight-saving properties, has been used for automobile engine blocks and wheels ("mag" wheels were literally magnesium wheels originally) but there's some form of isolation between the magnesium part and that which is likely to cause the friction or other ignition to light it. Engine blocks have steel or iron sleeves and the cylinder heads aren't magnesium, and the wheels have tires that keep them separated from the road. On top of that these are usually performance or aftermarket applications only, so random customer isn't going to end up with these magnesium parts and not understand the risks involved.

      That grille had wonderful even heat distribution. It was literally the best performing grille we've ever had. Unfortunately as a very casual griller using propane, I could not justify the risks associated with keeping it, even knowing what its flaw was. We got the recall notice right after I had thoroughly cleaned it for the first time, and as we were loading it into the truck to take back to the store I saw where I had gouged through the oxide layer to the fresh magnesium underneath. Not a guarantee that we would have had a fire next time we used it, but the coincidental timing was a little chilling.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  74. Re: Slap on the wrist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The word is "flout," you idiot.

  75. Re: Slap on the wrist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nonsense. Lots of places don't even emission test. These cars pass the testing regime just fine. I had a 2012 Jetta TDI that passed with flying colors. Note that these cars are private property, not owned by the EPA. People modify their vehicles all the time, and as long as they still pass whatever emissions regime where they live, it is all perfectly legal. If I still had that car, no way would I allow the dealer to re-flash it to give worse fuel economy and less power.

  76. Why diesel struggles in North America by sjbe · · Score: 1

    The main reason why diesel consumer vehicles all but died in North America in the 90's was that they had developed a reputation as being "dirty"

    Diesel engines of passenger cars died back in the late 70s and early 80s, mostly due to a bunch of absolutely terrible vehicles produced by the Big 3 during that time. It wasn't just that they were dirty (though they were) but they were incredibly unreliable and badly designed. They did things like converting gas engines to run diesel with disastrous results. It was so bad that demand for diesel vehicles in the US dried up for nearly 30 years. Now it appears that diesel has gotten another black eye which is unfortunate.

    1. Re:Why diesel struggles in North America by towermac · · Score: 1

      Agreed. They belched clouds of black smoke while unable to pull a greasy string from a cat's ass.

      Night and day difference here, even with the increased NOx.

  77. The engineers committed a crime by sjbe · · Score: 1

    I'm sure at some point someone in engineering said that this was wrong, that they shouldn't cheat like this. I'm sure he/she was quickly told to drop it or start looking for a new job.

    Spare me. The engineers (plural) carried out this and were just as culpable as the management. The guy who executes a crime is just as guilty as the guy who orders the crime to be committed. They had to know this was illegal and they did it anyway and said nothing. They are criminals and deserve to be punished. The "nerds" are not innocent here any more than the "suits". This was fraud and any engineer that was involved and said nothing should go to jail.

    1. Re:The engineers committed a crime by BVis · · Score: 1

      Boss says do thing. You say thing is wrong. Boss says do thing or you're fired. You have to feed and house 4 people.

      You do the thing and document the hell out of it. You start looking for a new job.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    2. Re:The engineers committed a crime by rch7 · · Score: 1

      Boss is not a slavemaster. If you are good, hard to replace, engineer, he will not piss you, he will want you to stay and work for the company instead of going to competitor.
      This is company culture thing, not just some boss or some engineer going nuts and forcing his way, they should have had consensus that it is acceptable. They still have an idea that NO emissions are just for nothing, some stupid invention of bureaucrats, or made to restrict them from US market, and that they can do anything as they "know better" and are more perfect persons.

  78. Re:The real guilty party by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is a very extremist position. One of the reasons why the EPA is held in such contempt by a large percentage of the electorate. I am all for clean air and water, but there is also the practicality of moving massive amounts of materials around the country. How do you think the food shows up in your grocery store that you are completely dependent on? Every single segment of the food chain is dependent on diesel power. We don't need more taxes to fund your Utopia.

  79. Audi diesels weren't a secret by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Between the two badges, that might be all of a few dozen cars sold in this country since 2008

    There were quite a lot of Audi diesels sold in the US. Heck my sister owned a diesel A3 for a while. The Audi A3 diesel won all sorts of eco awards and it was hardly a secret in the US. The car sold reasonably well and they're not hard to find.

    Porsche diesel on the other hand to my knowledge never did much in the US. I'm pretty sure I've never seen one myself.

  80. Engine ECU by xarragon · · Score: 1

    If you are smart you realize the potential savings of having a common hardware and software platform for engine ECU across manufacturers, cutting down on the "VERY expensive" development costs. Simplified logistics, less expensive diagnostics. There is a reason embedded development has converged to Linux; it makes economic sense. Unfortunately the auto industry only seems interested in making cars more expensive, usually a sign of stagnation.

    1. Re:Engine ECU by macs4all · · Score: 1

      There is a reason embedded development has converged to Linux

      Actually, as an embedded Dev. of nearly 40 years' experience, I would say that, by and large, with the exception of networking equipment, embedded Development projects use NO formal Operating System whatsoever, or at most, use a lightweight RTOS.

    2. Re:Engine ECU by xarragon · · Score: 1

      You are right to a point. When I said "embedded" I was referring to SOCs more than microcontrollers. I see plenty of Linux, or rather ucLinux on IP cameras, SOHO routers digital picture frames etc. But yes, there are a lot of competition, often leaner. Having a familiar system and tools available is a boon though.

    3. Re:Engine ECU by macs4all · · Score: 1

      You are right to a point. When I said "embedded" I was referring to SOCs more than microcontrollers. I see plenty of Linux, or rather ucLinux on IP cameras, SOHO routers digital picture frames etc. But yes, there are a lot of competition, often leaner. Having a familiar system and tools available is a boon though.

      Yeah, SoCs really blur the lines between traditional embedded systems and full-blown computers, that's for sure.

      I personally haven't worked with a true SoC, although some of the ARM stuff I have worked with gets kinda close. I don't know where the line really is between SoC and microcontroller, but it seems to revolve around having either a GPU subsection, or a pretty evolved networking subsection.

      And it seems like it is the networking stuff that seems to drag ucLinux along with it, because who wants to write a network stack from scratch?

  81. Quality of Ford? by bradley13 · · Score: 1

    "the quality of Ford vehicles to have jumped leaps and bounds"

    Well, yes. Given the starting point, there is plenty of room for leaps, and space for lots of bounds. I imagine it's the same for most American cars built in union territory. Given the crazy labor costs, driven by the big unions, you have to cut corners somewhere.

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
    1. Re:Quality of Ford? by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      You should drive some of the newer vehicles, they are a cut above...

      Give the Ford Fusion a try, a really nice car all things considered. In many ways, nicer than a Camry or Accord...

      GM is still working its way out of the crap dept, but some of the newer vehicles are nice. Their cars have improved leaps and bounds over the past, in fact the new Impala is one of the best cars on the road, from anyone.

      http://www.caranddriver.com/ch...

      It is right up there with the Toyota Avalon and Nissan Maxima...

      http://www.consumerreports.org...

      If you don't like Car and Driver, try Consumer Reports...

      Time will tell of course, but the American Auto Companies have finally figured out that quality sells cars.

  82. Re:Slap on the wrist by njnnja · · Score: 1

    That's a solid point. It's not like VW wouldn't fire a bunch of people themselves if they thought it was in their interests to do so. But even still, there's a self-righteous mob mentality that seems to be developing and historically those kinds of movements haven't ended well.

  83. Wow! Now Apple can get a Three-Fer! by macs4all · · Score: 1

    Soon, they'll be able to pick up The ENTIRE Volkswagen Group for a SONG!

    Well, at least we know who will be building the Apple Titan...

  84. Re:So, does this news item essentially boil down t by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    Actually I would check all of the competitors. This could be the work of a rogue engineer (or manager or tester) who was paid a ton to do this to hurt VW.

  85. Re:The real guilty party by afidel · · Score: 1

    The US standards are very strict about the emissions per unit of fuel consumed, rather than the total emissions per unit of distance traveled

    What ever are you prattling on about, the EPA Tier 2 Bin 5 standards apply to all cars and light truck models regardless of engine type, and they call out pollution per mile (.07g/mi for NOx for the entire fleet over 10 years and 120k miles).

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  86. Accountability & prevention: AGPL3 or later by jbn-o · · Score: 1

    We need accountability and prevention. Accountability should come in the form of corporate death penalties (as in the corporation's assets are seized to pay debts and the corporation no longer exists), and prevention in the form of publishing complete corresponding source code to all cars sold in the US as a part of the car. When you buy a car, you should own the car including all software installed on that car. Other countries would be wise to follow suit to protect their citizens and the environment from apparently malevolent multi-year fraudsters who wish to dodge ecological regulations.

    The Free Software Foundation was right: all published software must be free. But since this situation highlights how fraud and abuse can be hidden in nonfree software, we can defend ourselves from this with strongly copylefted free software (right now that means AGPL v3 or later). I don't want anyone taking any car in for any work and coming out with nonfree software thus reintroducing this problem. You cannot have safe computer software without software freedom. And a strong copylefted free software license plus multiple freedom-minded contributors who are willing to pursue lawsuits will help defend against proprietary derivatives (as such legal work has done for the Linux kernel). As I said in the recent VW thread on this: I don't care about upstream copyright excuses should VW claim to have built their software on nonfree upstream code. Our individual and collective safety is far too important. This, like virtually everything else we do, is a matter of political will to do the right and just thing.

    When people come around to seeing how an increasing dependence on computers (namely, putting computers in everything) means risking our lives, our civil liberties, our health, our freedom to move without being tracked, and more, we can easily justify pushing for more strongly copylefted free software.

  87. Re:The U.S and its heaven of protectionism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets look at a small sampling of previous examples of EPA emissions blunders in diesels: http://www.truckinginfo.com/channel/equipment/news/list/tag/litigation.aspx

    Yes - everyone pushes the boundaries of the regulations to make money.

  88. Re:Slap on the wrist by towermac · · Score: 1

    Well they let this slide for 6 years didn't they?

    I guess the message is, we will wait until restitution is not possible, and then come down on you and likely destroy you. Who does that help again?

    I'd rather see actual, timely law and regulation enforcement. "Hey, your car pollutes too much. You can't sell them here until you fix it."

    That way, we get the clean air we wanted, and nobody dies. I bet most were unaware that the whole thing works on the honor system, and the EPA doesn't actually test anything. I sure didn't know it.

  89. Re:Slap on the wrist by towermac · · Score: 1

    I love when people go there to justify their arguments.

    Since life is unfair, you are justified in acting unfairly.

  90. Re: Slap on the wrist by towermac · · Score: 1

    Without any law enforcement, assume they are willing to cheat everything. If you trusted the regulated, then there would be no point in regulators.

    At this point you're right about the remedy. Allow the already sold engines to remain as they are, and fine the shit out of VW. But fining them so much as to kill the company doesn't help anyone now.

    It would have been far better to catch them 6 years ago.

  91. Re: Slap on the wrist by hudsucker · · Score: 1

    The whole issue is based on ethics of business. If they are willing to cheat the emissions, what else are they willing to cheat?

    Engine sound.

  92. Disabling emission control is actually good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The result of disabling emission control the way VW did, will actually IMPROVE fuel economy and power output. Yes, there will likely be more NOx, but I'd actually be quite happy with leaving the calibration the way it is if I currently owned a VW vehicle. Unless it impacts emission based tax bands, I doubt anyone with any understanding of the topic will care at all. Remember that the calibration of the vehicle is some tradeoff between performance and emissions. To meet legislation, performance and fuel economy are typically reduced to meet these emission targets (eg. running more EGR). As an ex-owner of a VW diesel, I can vouch for their excellent fuel economy. 50+mpg was worst case, even around the town. This was in a pretty heavy vehicle (with the old 1.9L).
    It is actually quite surprising to see Americans whining, given that the majority of vehicles on the US road have an abysmal environmental footprint, compared to a typical VW direct injection turbodiesel. Also, do these people who are complaining, even know have any understanding of what they are complaining about. These vehicles may not have as quite as good emissions characteristics as documented by their test results, but they are still vastly superior to almost anything else on the US roads, given the lack of availability of modern turbodiesels in this market.

  93. The Subject is misleading by tipo159 · · Score: 1

    The VW diesel issue only impacts Porsche and Audi because a) the two additional execs who are leaving were at VW when the diesel issue started and b) the Audi A3 used the same EA189 engine.

    People continue to post stuff here like this issue effects all VAG diesels, when the problem is just the EA189 engine and not the more expensive engines that use urea to reduce NOx emissions. Do you homework before you post.

  94. Re: Slap on the wrist by Izuzan · · Score: 1

    It also shows that the EPA's emissions standards are idiotically high. When a VW car in eruope gets 80mpg and wont pass emissions standards here in NA. There is something really wrong with the standards.

  95. Re: Slap on the wrist by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

    Yes something wrong with the European standards. http://www.theguardian.com/env... Volkswagen’s rigging of emissions tests for diesel cars comes after nearly 20 years of the technology being incentivised in Europe in the knowledge that its adoption would reduce global warming emissions but lead to thousands of extra deaths from increased levels of toxic gases.

  96. Re: Slap on the wrist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it shows that we have different standards, as documented in several articles.
    The US has had more issues with acid rain, etc. and therefore regulates NOX more carefully.

  97. Re:Slap on the wrist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let the shareholders pay. The bankrupt VW can be bought - by the workers perhaps - and continue to operate one it is free of debts. What? Shareholders do not go to shareholders meetings and only appoint management that makes for most short term profit? Shame on them.

  98. Re:The real guilty party by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bullshit. 2+2=4 because 2 has an exact fp representation, being a power of 2.

  99. Also: GM and Chrysler bailouts raped investors by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Ford's been repaying that loan at ~$465M per quarter and will have it payed off in 2022. They are paying US Treasury interest rates which are just below current market rates for large credit worthy companies.

    And over an order of magnitude higher than the rates banks pay the Federal Reserve for money.

    Meanwhile, the bailouts of GM and Chrysler were a payoff to the auto workers unions and raped the investors. The government massively violated the rules of how the assets of a bankruptcy-protected company are to be handled, giving the bondholders a small fraction of what they were owed (according to the laws in force when they invested their money into trying to turn the failing companies around). I think they ended up getting less than a third of what they were owed, after many months of having their money locked up.

    One result of this is that, thanks to the government, the US bond market is no longer considered a good investment, because the government now has a track record of changing the rules, when trouble arises, to seize investors assets and bail out their corporate cronies. So loans from the government are practically the only option (and certainly the only affordable one) for a company in an industry perceived to be troubled. This was fresh in investors' minds when Ford had to go shopping for money.

    IMHO Ford stayed away from government "assistance" to the extent it was possible to do so and stay in business, paid about what WOULD have been free-market rates (absent the government's retroactive meddling) for their working money loans, and protected their stockholders', bondholders', and employees' interests.

    And they did it beautifully.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  100. Re: Slap on the wrist by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

    Then they get their little flag in the VIN database, the owner re-flashes the old profile, and life goes on. Only now the owner is on the hook for the "performance modifications", not VW, should someone call the discrepancies into question.

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  101. Re:So, does this news item essentially boil down t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A little article in the free newspaper in the subway to Paris today implicated Seat too. PSA (the major French automaker, owner of Peugeot and Citroen) apparently claims to be innocent, buuut I'm not going to put any money on that yet.

  102. Re:Slap on the wrist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you think they already are?

  103. Re: Slap on the wrist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Punishing the shareholders, vehicle owners and most employees for the actions of a few is not fair. Find the culprits and send them to jail.

  104. Re:The real guilty party by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bullshit. 2+2=4 because 2 has an exact fp representation, being a power of 2.

    You're assuming a sane fp implementation, and not one that's base e.

  105. Re:Also: GM and Chrysler bailouts raped investors by Cyberax · · Score: 1

    One result of this is that, thanks to the government, the US bond market is no longer considered a good investment, because the government now has a track record of changing the rules, when trouble arises

    Lemmesee... US bond market in 2007: 36 trillions, US bond market size in 2015: 41 trillions. Yeah, investors surely lost all hope in the US bond market.

    In the _actual_ reality, bondholders were given a much sweeter deal than they could have hoped for without government intervention. A firesale of all assets would have resulted in them getting pretty much nothing at all.

    As for unions and workers getting their due before the bondholders - I fail to see issues there. Bondholders are paid interest because they are taking the risk, workers are paid because they actually do the work.

  106. Re: Slap on the wrist by WindBourne · · Score: 2

    Uh no.
    First off, when VW makes the change, it wil not change the mileage. What it WILL drop the performance. The standards are fine (if not tight enough), What is wrong is that VW and these car companies simply have no morals esp. since they are the ones pushing for tighter regulations.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  107. BS by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    First off, we treat companies as individuals. As such, the company should be punished. That means either denying sales in locations where they cheated, or simply remove all profits for next 10 years. But when we allow companies to pay politicians, etc, then it is obvious that we must go much further on punishment.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  108. I am shocked that Fossil Fuel cheating is here! by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    I am shocked that auto manufacturers are gaming the system.

    Shocked I tell you!

    (croupier hands speaker a fat envelope filled with bribes)

    Look, if you want to cut emissions, you know what you have to do:

    1. Buy a plug-in electric car, hybrid or full electric.

    2. Purchase green power (your own solar, wind, micro-hydro turbines, biofuel you grew; or through a utility (like in Seattle))

    3. Laugh all the way to the bank as your ride costs 1/10th to 1/20th in energy as those poor fossil fuel users.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  109. Re:The real guilty party by jafac · · Score: 1

    To comply with NOx emissions; there is a trade-off, and that is fuel economy. More fuel you burn, more CO2 you produce. Robbing Peter to pay Paul.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  110. Re:Also: GM and Chrysler bailouts raped investors by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Lemmesee... US bond market in 2007: 36 trillions, US bond market size in 2015: 41 trillions. Yeah, investors surely lost all hope in the US bond market.

    I consider gold to be "stable money" for looking at REAL inflation (as opposed to things like the consumer price index, which has been politically hacked of late to make inflation look small and inflation-"corrected" entitlement payments lower.)

    Using approximate values off a graph: 10 Year gold price in USD/oz, for a quick reply:

    Gold price in 2007: Call it $650 (to err on the high side and bias it in favor of your position). Latest close from the same graph's heading: $1153.80. Denominated in gold, that 36 trillion would be worth about 64 trillion in today's dollars. That makes 41 trillion about a 36% loss, more than a third of the market, not a 14% gain.

    In the _actual_ reality, bondholders were given a much sweeter deal than they could have hoped for without government intervention. A firesale of all assets would have resulted in them getting pretty much nothing at all.

    No, a firesale of assets would have produced a lot of money, and the bondholders were in line after the workers getting back pay but ahead of the stockholders. For GM it would have worked something like this:
      - The workers would have gotten some - but been out of a job unless/until somebody who bought the assets at the fire sale something new and rehired them - initially without a union. If any was left over...
      - The bondholders - later investors (private-sector bailers-out) first - would have been next in line and gotten the bulk of the procedes. They might not have gotten full face value. But the late investors would have gotten more than the paltry sum they ended up with.
      - Stockholders would have been last in line, and would have ended up with zilch unless there was more than enough to pay off the workers and all the bonds.
    So the meddling shafted the bond holders in favor of the unions - mainly the union organization rather than the workers themselves.

    As for unions and workers getting their due before the bondholders - I fail to see issues there. Bondholders are paid interest because they are taking the risk, workers are paid because they actually do the work.

    Which is approximately the way the law worked BEFORE the government meddled.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  111. Re:Also: GM and Chrysler bailouts raped investors by Cyberax · · Score: 1

    I consider gold to be "stable money" for looking at REAL inflation (as opposed to things like the consumer price index, which has been politically hacked of late to make inflation look small and inflation-"corrected" entitlement payments lower.)

    Ok. Let's look at the real inflation measured by directly checking the prices of a wide variety of services and goods: http://bpp.mit.edu/usa/ - inflation is actually below the target rate.

    Oh, but I see. You're a goldbugger (i.e. you have a load of bug instead of brain). Sorry, can't be helped. But don't worry, you'll die pretty soon of terminal cognitive dissonance.

  112. Re:Slap on the wrist by ftobin · · Score: 1

    In VW's case, the number of managers and engineers who had anything to do with the emissions testing of diesel vehicles for export to the US is probably dwarfed by the number of people would could be hurt by an overreaction.

    I would argue that all employees of VW benefited from one degree to another from this decision, since it improved VW's bottom line. In general, when a company's bottom line improves, it benefits the current employees (in addition to shareholders, obviously).

  113. Re:Also: GM and Chrysler bailouts raped investors by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Ok. Let's look at the real inflation measured by directly checking the prices of a wide variety of services and goods: http://bpp.mit.edu/usa/

    Unfortunately, that site's ouput is only provided as flash interactive something-or-other, which Firefox with noscript is unwilling to display for me today, even with everything unblocked. Their links to commercial distributors of the same information seems to require a subscription. Do you have a link to a less problematic way to view their results? Or can you quote their claims for the dates in question?

    Oh, but I see. You're a goldbugger (i.e. you have a load of bug instead of brain).

    Ad hominem. I win.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  114. Re:Also: GM and Chrysler bailouts raped investors by Cyberax · · Score: 1
    Here you go: http://www.pricestats.com/infl... . Again, this is measured directly by checking prices, no BLS or other government agencies are involved.

    Ad hominem. I win.

    No, you don't. You're terminally diseased and will die soon of brain explosion. It's been almost 10 years and there's still no hyperinflation in sight.

  115. Re:The U.S and its heaven of protectionism by haruchai · · Score: 1

    GM & Toyota were both busted in the 90s for cheating on emissions tests. VW did it longer & better.
    I'm sure others have tried, perhaps some have done it so well they have never been caught or have yet to be caught.

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  116. Re:Slap on the wrist by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Sure we gain more. We send a big mesasge that no one is too big to fail or too big to be above the law.
    If a company gets only a slap on the wrist, you can never trust them again to have learned their lesson.

    This scandal is going to be huge, and they're going to lose a massive amount of stock price and market share. This is not just an issue with EPA rules and tiny fraction of the US market. VW is so much bigger in Europe, there are so many more diesels sold there, and the market there in general cares a lot more about low emissions than in the US. In the US it may be fraud that can be overlooked because we like powerful cars here, but in EU the fraud won't be brushed off as petty shenanigans. Investigations are opening up around the world and there are hints that this cheating also is going on beyond just the American market. Then going further, there's going to be a huge scandal all over if it turns out the government testers in the EU who were posted inside the auto plants failed to detect these problems (or more likely, failed to report).

  117. Re:Slap on the wrist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ja, it is me, I confess. Although I am hiding on my island of undisclosed location now I still have the internets here.

  118. Re: Slap on the wrist by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    And they are opening investigations of whether similar vehicles are being sold in Europe and other countries. This scandal isn't stopping at the US borders.

  119. Re:Also: GM and Chrysler bailouts raped investors by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Here you go: http://www.pricestats.com/infl... . Again, this is measured directly by checking prices, no BLS or other government agencies are involved.

    It also is useless, because:
      - It's missing the explanation of what the brown and green lines represent.
      - It only goes back to 2008
      - It's the inflation rate, not the inflation. You need the integral of that.
      (I note that the area between the lines and zero seems to be substantially larger in the section above the zero line than the section below. That would mean the inflation graph was climbing similarly to the gold price graph I referenced previously.)

    So again feel free to post a reference to this project's data, in a form that can be actually used to compute the expansion or shrinkage of the bond market in terms of it, or similarly with some other value measure you're comfortable with.

    I am perfectly willing to use any reasonable commodity basket to measure inflation. I just picked gold because it is usually a good indicator and generally recognized as such: It has little use except as a store of value (even when being used in jewelry) and its production costs don't vary much, so its pathologies when used as a reference for measuring value of a currency are minimal (and mainly related to short-term madness-of-crowds swings due to monetary system problems, rather than things like crop failures, wars, or inventions improving production of goods). For example, a high-end business suit has cost about an ounce of gold from colonial times to now. Gold will probably continue to be a good indicator until asteroid material mining drops its cost, decades from now.

    It also can't be printed, so the gold price tends to expose governments that are trying to fake their currency's value by manipulations of markes and their legal system. This tends to make them want to discredit those who use it to point out their macinations. B-)

    You seem to be projecting some personal mental image and reacting to it, rather than to what I'm actually saying. I'm sure you can do better if you back up and think a little. Meanwhile...

    Ad hominem. I win.

    No, you don't. You're terminally diseased and will die soon of brain explosion. It's been almost 10 years and there's still no hyperinflation in sight.

    Bigger ad hominem. I win again. B-)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  120. Re:Also: GM and Chrysler bailouts raped investors by Cyberax · · Score: 1
    Dude, that site actually has explanation _and_ _code_ of the way they do calculation. Datasets are not public but they can be obtained by signing an agreement with them. But you can skip all that - the result won't fit into your world-view, so it's invalid anyway.

    I just picked gold because it is usually a good indicator and generally recognized as such: It has little use except as a store of value (even when being used in jewelry) and its production costs don't vary much

    No, it's not. It's a regular commodity with a price determined mainly by fear and gullibility of the folks. By choosing a period it can be used to justify anything. For example, let's compare price of a can of Diet Coke at Jul 24, 2011. Costco says that it was $5.75 for a 4-pack, so that translates to 320 4-packs of Diet Coke per ounce of gold (price $1837.8 per troy ounce). Today Costco sells the same Coke for $5.87 for a 4-pack - and that translates to 196 packs of Diet Coke per ounce of gold (closing price today is $1146 per troy ounce).

    OMGWTF!!@#!111 We have a huge inflation, run for cover!!!11111

    But if we instead choose 31 Dec, 2006 when the price was $545 per troy ounce (or 98 cases of Diet Coke), then we have a huge _de_flation.

    So the best way to calculate the size of the US bond market is to use the currency in which it is nominated - the US dollar. The market grew, without any trust problems.

  121. Compare those to muscle cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It still pollutes less than a V8 or a V10 and those aren't recalled for excessive emissions.

  122. EPA Asleep at the wheel.....again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The side story is that the VW fraud was found by a couple of grad students doing a project for a non-government agency. Are vaulted and very expensive EPA didn't catch this.
    So, why again are we allowing this massive tax sucking machine to continue to grow?
    Oh, of course, a place to put loyal DNC voters. Can't get jobs in the real world.

  123. Re:Slap on the wrist by termineite · · Score: 1
    True! Wrist slapping should be common practice for all industrial consciously wrong-doing!

    Give them a slap on the wrist. Do we really stand to gain more by dragging these guys over the coals.

  124. Just terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This emissions scandal is a real stain on the reputation of VW's founder.

    Adolf Hitler.

  125. "It's all BS, and it's bad for you" by paul+mafinga · · Score: 1

    This is starting to sound like another pee pee dance media frenzy for the political left green weenies.

    Hopefully VW, BMW, and all of the rest -- who are being convicted in the press -- will perform discovery on California's EPA and demon spawn, CARB. It's the only state level EPA, which due to the legal timeline, is allowed by the federal clean air act.

    Circa 2009, CARB dropped the NOx limit to 1/2 that of the EU. Note that California has a consumption tax on gasoline making it $1 higher, per gallon, than the rest of the nation, and diesel fuel is exempt from at least some of these taxes. Every diesel sold in California is a huge loss of consumption tax revenue.

    Apparently VW's emissions team went to management and told them that the only way to meet the new standard was to install the expensive AdBlue / Urea injection system on the little 4 cylinder, E189 diesel engine. VW refused to authorize the addition of AdBlue technology, claiming that it would price the low cost diesels out of the market.

    All it really takes is one manager to do something like this. The so-called "defeat device" could be nothing more than implementing a test mode and setting a flag before shipment. How many times have Linux or other distros done exactly the same thing, sometimes by mistake? Thousands of times. Note how the press is starting to demand "real world testing" of the suspect cars. That's going to be thrown out immediately if adults start to get involved. Even the enviro-nazis in California test three speeds over a handful of minutes. There is no reason for a carmaker to accommodate a rule beyond the rule, and no legal justification to alter the test after the fact, to harm a defendant.

    Apparently a few of VW's emissions engineers, stuck between the arbitrary California demands and their employment with VW, flipped California the bird. The real question is -- given the same choice -- serving a foreign government, a state that is biased against your product, and your paycheck and employment, what is the decision? Quit or hope you don't get caught? Apparently they didn't quit.

    Today we're seeing demands for real world testing of all diesels and the elimination of diesel technology. What immense stupidity. Diesels, especially with AdBlue / Urea system, are often cleaner and more powerful than their gasoline alternatives. Changing the test in the middle of an investigation and flooding the news is the act of defective child mind, as are extreme solutions.

    It's likely that practically every fossil fuelled engine routinely emits 25-40x the emissions limit. That's why we test on rollers at a few, specific RPMs. Drivers who continually mash the pedal and brake, like first responders, probably exceed the limits significantly, for very short periods of time, many times a day. The goal is to help clean the air, not perform 24/7 monitoring of every human on the planet, although there are a lot of people on the political left who want exactly that. The same kind of people that have caused millions in vandalism and property damage for their "cause".

    At some point the California EPA and CARB are going to need to be dissolved. It's insane to have so many standards bodies for emissions -- EU, US, CARB. No employer should be based with this nonsense. Especially when the California governor simply appoints his pals and lets them run rampant over the global economy and what is, in reality, a pretty good automaker.

    Until there is discovery on CARB, we can't know what processes were used, and why they chose to suddenly lower the NOx requirements so drastically below the levels of the EU. If it was to enhance tax revenue, CARB and CAL-EPA should be dissolved immediately for violating the restrictions against taxation without representation, and VW should be unconditionally pardoned.

  126. WAIT A MINUTE!!! There' s a larger issue: KISS! by martinfb · · Score: 1

    Let's get this straight: A large, trusted organization that had been providing (supposedly) efficient, economical, and environmentally friendly vehicles we can trust has actually been deceiving us about this?! (Do you think this is the first?!) Does it not seem that this is a mere symptom of the abilities (of technologically savvy companies) for circumvention of the regulatory system in place? How about testing the ACTUAL emissions without telling the car's electronics that they are being tested? WTF?!?!?! Keep It Simple, Stupid! Sample exhaust without connecting to the car's computer. What am I missing here?

    --


    Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.
  127. Easy Solution : Go Open source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can have cake and eat it too.

    1. Re:Easy Solution : Go Open source by TheRealLifeboy · · Score: 1

      Thank you! Probably the first sensible post in the this!

  128. Re:The U.S and its heaven of protectionism by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    so what's your point? they got busted and had to pay the price

  129. Re:The U.S and its heaven of protectionism by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    I see a page where the rule of law is happening. that's good

  130. Re:The U.S and its heaven of protectionism by haruchai · · Score: 1

    I'm wondering who are the "US companies who actually abide by the emissions law" given that Honda, GM, Toyota and SEVEN makers of diesel engines have been busted for cheating on MILLIONS of vechicles.

    So who has NEVER cheated? Or is it that many have simply never been caught?

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  131. Re:Hilarious! by dl_sledding · · Score: 1

    No, no, no, fuel economy has nothing to do with it, according to the EPA. The trouble VW is in HIGHLIGHTS this fact.

    When VW tunes the TDI to run at maximum fuel economy, it created more NOX. When they detune it (and the mileage drops from 50 to 30 MPG), the NOX goes away. Why? Because, a "properly" (read: efficiently) tuned TDI runs at such a high EGT that the nitrogen and oxygen are combined into NOX. When they detune, and lower the EGT, it isn't hot enough to form much NOX.

    You cannot use fuel mileage in this arguement: it's not a logical answer in any way, shape, or form.

    You can, however, use a power-tuned Cummins (or Duramax, or, maybe, a Powerstroke on a good day) rolling coal. That's a sure sign of higher EGT temps, thus most likely a higher than normal source of NOX. Not to mention lots of other stuff too; AND it ain't gettin' good mileage at that point. But, that's the point of rollin' coal, power, not mileage.

    VW is getting slapped around by the EPA for making them look like fools, especially since they have to admit they can't figure out how VW did it (figure out when it was being tested, and automatically detuned the engine for the test). Considering the fine is 20 times as high as the GM ignition switch fine (a decade of prior knowledge by GM, over 120 lives lost and hundreds of injuries attributed), one has to wonder how idiotic the EPA must feel. Or, GM is just simply being protected.... Again...

  132. Re:The U.S and its heaven of protectionism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh the U.S. companies who actually abide by the emissions law should somehow roll over for the poor foreign competition who didn't. go fuck yourself

    so none of them then?