Slashdot Mirror


Over 10,000 Problems Fixed In Detroit Thanks To Cellphone App (motorcitymuckraker.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Six months ago, Detroit's city officials launched a smartphone app called "Improve Detroit." The idea was to give residents a way to easily inform city hall of problems that needed to be fixed. For example: potholes, abandoned vehicles, broken hydrants and traffic lights, water leaks, and more. Since that time, over 10,000 issues have been fixed thanks to reports from that app. "Residents have long complained about city hall ignoring litter and broken utilities. But the app has provided a more transparent and direct approach to fixing problems." Perhaps most significant is its effect on the water supply: running water has been shut off to almost a thousand abandoned structures, and over 500 water main breaks have been located with the app's help. Crowd-sourced city improvement — imagine if apps like this become ubiquitous.

159 comments

  1. What? by ArchieBunker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How is this any different than calling them up and telling them what is broken?

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:What? by fisted · · Score: 4, Funny

      Because it is an app. Like, the future! Also very cyber.

    2. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Who calls anyone?

    3. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      FTFA:
      “It saves time, it gets results, and I love how I can follow the progress being made on the complaint,” said Dan Wroblewski, who lives on Detroit’s far west side and uses the app to report issues while patrolling his neighborhood.

    4. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You have to wait for ppl to answer the phone, you have to call during office hours, they can ignore your complaint, it is difficult to track the progress..
      It's like saying why do you need an app to bank when you can just call the bank...

    5. Re:What? by gman003 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Automatically goes into an issue-tracking system, instead of needing to be manually entered. Cutting out the person on the other end makes things faster, and lets more of the budget be put to fixing problems instead of overhead.

      There may be other, lesser advantages. It could let them provide photos or GPS coordinates, or have an easier follow-up process to make sure the problem was actually fixed.

    6. Re:What? by Hadlock · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You get to skip the phone tree system, the hold music, the condescending tone of the person on the other side. You also get more accurate location information, and the whole system is routed directly in to an electronic ticketing system - no paper TPS reports required!

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    7. Re:What? by fragMasterFlash · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How is this any different than calling them up and telling them what is broken?

      Thank you for calling the City of Detroit. Para obtener instrucciones en español por favor presione 1 ahora. Your call is very important to us. Due to the current high volume of calls it will be approximately NINETY-ONE minutes until a representative is available to take your call. To leave your phone number for a call back instead press 3 now,

    8. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Liberalism is a mental disorder." I love how the only thing RWNJs can do is just keep repeating slogans and talking points in the place of any kind of real thought or argument.

    9. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the Republican's thugs in blue are the Republican's thugs in blue.

    10. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, what in Detroit is run by the Republicans? The last Republican mayor we had left office in 1962 when I was an infant. Sounds like you're the one without the ability to defend your argument.

    11. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just because the Demicrats rule here doesn't mean that the Republican's aren't the ones behind the curtains pulling the strings. Republicans are the real rulers of Detroit and have been for more than 100 years.

    12. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There has never been a real liberal in office anywhere here in Michigan so this is the fault of the Repukians.

    13. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are racists so by definition they are Republicans.

    14. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. This city is infested with and run by Republicans.

    15. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're pretending that they don't control Detroit when they do.

    16. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are no true progressives here so we are ruled by CONservatives.

    17. Re:What? by invictusvoyd · · Score: 1

      Lets just hope it does not breed vigilantes .

    18. Re:What? by elal1862 · · Score: 2

      And spend 10 minutes on hold, having to explain the situation to some dime-a-dozen call center serf who's not competent for the job and unfamilliar with the neighborhood...

    19. Re:What? by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Other than having to wait on the phone for an hour to lodge a complaint, assuming you even know the right number to dial?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    20. Re:What? by radarskiy · · Score: 2

      The phone's camera and GPS mean you don't have to depend on the user to verbally describe the problem and location.

    21. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just Muchigan, but in general there are no real liberals anywhere in the US.

    22. Re: What? by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      but they're moderate republicans. They have to run as democrats now. The extremists chased them out of the GOP

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    23. Re:What? by davester666 · · Score: 1, Funny

      She was ...busy...

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    24. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just how they be.

    25. Re:What? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      Fundamentally? Not at all. In terms of convenience? The fancy tech toys presumably make it fairly trivial to construct a nice machine-readable trouble ticket, with GPS coordinates, user submitted text, pictures, etc. that drops right into the trouble ticket without needing anyone to man the phone; or depending on their ability to reliably interpret and record what the caller is reporting, write it up, and send it to the appropriate person.

      Given that the input is still coming from people, I suspect that you can't automate all the labor out of cleaning it up(if there is a way for data you attempt to collect about the world to be messy and intractable, it will find it; and even if you think that there isn't, it might just invent one...); but there's a lot to be said for cutting out tedious, error-prone, steps, especially once you are dealing with a system large enough that providing 'the personal touch' simply isn't possible. These sorts of systems can be somewhat prone to being impersonal or inflexible(especially if the implementation tries to use a bunch of drop-down options to shove you through the decision tree and your problem is some flavor of 'other' that they don't provide for); but if the userbase is large enough that you'd need a call center to do it with humans, you don't really have the option of interpersonal familiarity; so you might as well go for efficiency.

      If this were Ye Olde Smalle Towne, where you could just ring up the mayor's office and the kindly secretary who has been there forever and knows everybody would pick up and you could tell her about it, the 'app' thing would be a pointless gimmick; but that's not exactly the scope of the problem here.

    26. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Republicans control every aspect of your life. They are personally out to get you (and your dog too). Not that they aren't out for others personally either. They have detailed records of you, your family and your associates. They know an control you better than you do yourself which is why they should be allowed to continue. They know this level of detail on over 150million Americans just like yourself. When they are done with you (and the others), you will all meet an unfortunate and freak end. Watch your back and don't let them prescribe you any medication. They will come for you. They are coming for you. You personally. They talk about you. They have files on you. There is no escape.

    27. Re:What? by devvmh · · Score: 1

      How is this any different than calling them up and telling them what is broken?

      If you've ever called your municipal government, you'll know exactly how it's different than calling them up. With an app, you'll take 45 seconds. With a phone call, you might be on there for 45 minutes...

    28. Re:What? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      How is this any different than calling them up and telling them what is broken?

      *brring*
      Voice: "Welcome to Detroit council, all our operators are busy at the moment, please hold the line."
      *smooth jazz*
      Voice: "You're call is impor"
      *Click*

      And the pothole remains.

    29. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And spend 10 minutes on hold, having to explain the situation to some dime-a-dozen call center serf who's not competent for the job and unfamilliar with the neighborhood...

      Having worked in a technical support centre (cum call centre for a once major telecommunications company) let me say the job was thankless in the eyes of management. It was not the clients who were abusive to the staff, it was management. As the company continued loosing market share the push to outsource technical support to lesser qualified support staff intensified.

    30. Re:What? by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 2

      An operator costs money and is easily occupied. A ticket system can take multiple requests simultaneously and saves money on a real person that can be spent on fixing the problems instead.

    31. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this any different than calling them up and telling them what is broken?

      Text someone? How is it any different than calling them up and talking to them?

      (I hope I've made my point clear, since hipsters would prefer being waterboarded over actually talking to another human on a phone.)

    32. Re:What? by swb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In Minneapolis we have a "311" system which is supposed to serve a similar purpose -- report potholes, etc. I was just thinking how much better it would be if I could go stand right on top of this one pothole and get the GPS coordinates of it and send in a picture of it.

    33. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No Indian/Philippine drone tech support middleman to frustrate the customer into giving up. Where have you been since Fiorina ?

    34. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are. Look at the crowds Bernie Sanders draws for proof.

      Problem is they are aren't a majority, and the mainstream media, corporations, and rich people who control the political process in America routinely work together to suppress their voices in order to keep their position as gatekeepers.

    35. Re:What? by Joe+Haskins · · Score: 5, Informative

      gman003 is correct on all counts. Photos and GPS coordinates make it easier for the workers to find the problem (some, but certainly not all, of the workers aren't very motivated & don't exactly look hard). It also allows anyone to see tickets, comment on them, or even reopen closed tickets. If something gets marked as resolved when it wasn't, any citizen can reopen that ticket and add a comment saying that is wasn't done.

      Years ago, Detroit has a 311 system that was supposed to track complaints and give you a ticket number. Besides the obvious disadvantages of the phone system, a number of city departments did not participate so you never knew who to call. If you had to call the department directly, it wasn't always immediately obvious what number to call to report a problem and there was zero accountability.

      As Dan mentioned in the article, the app does get results. The resolution times can vary depending on what type of issue it is and what department handles that. I've seen dumping issues take up to a week to get someone out to investigate but I've also seen pothole issues resolved within a couple days (previous response time was often measured in months if you were lucky).

      I don't know how true it is, but I've also been told that the mayor watches the system and uses it to hold department heads accountable. I do know if something does go unresolved for a long time, I have proof that I can take to my city council member. Even though the departments don't technically report to the city council, getting a call from a council member's office does seem to motivate them.

    36. Re:What? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      You've never worked with a ticket system where submits come directly from end users, have you?

      The human taking the input will almost always have a better output that will save time on the other end by clarifying and confirming things that aren't going to happen in the app.

      The only difference here is that they told people about the app, causing interest in it.

      Running an ad campaign reminding people that they could call in would have been just as effective

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    37. Re:What? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      I want an app that uses my phone's accelerometer to report problems with the road surface automatically. Combining reports over time and a number of users to get rid of false positives.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    38. Re:What? by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      I don't know how it is in the US but did you call you city hall?
      If you are lucky enough to call them during opening hours then you are put on hold for 10 minutes, then redirected through 3 different services to reach the right person, who, hopefully, isn't on vacation. Then they ask you for information that no mortal can possibly know and log the incident in what must be a write-only database because no one seems to know what happened to the report.
      Well, to be fair, sometimes they really are helpful. However, for people how had an bad experience, it is likely that they will just drive around that pothole than repeat the ordeal.

    39. Re:What? by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How is this any different than calling them up and telling them what is broken?

      I can answer that. I've had a lot of experience fixing up information flows in public agencies. The difference is in what happens to the information in your call once it's in the hands of the agency. It often falls into an irrationally complex morass of criss-crossing processes. Watching a government or non-profit organization respond to a new piece of information can be like watching an individual pachinko ball drop through the machine's forest of pins, only you can be sure that it will eventually drop into the right slot, the question is will it make it there in time? The morass into which your request falls isn't designed; it has evolved, and chances are nobody has ever had the job of seeing whether what it has evolved into makes any sense -- until a new system is planned.

      One way to think about an organization is to compare it to the best organizations of that kind. And the best governmental organizations excel at performing routine tasks. None that I have ever seen excel at reinventing themselves; that takes the introduction of an outside force. It also takes the eyes of an an outsider with a knack for seeing which processes generate value and which processes simply support other processes. That's not always clear. I've had clients, with a simultaneously smug and hopeless air, hand me a fat ream of "critical reports" that a system absolutely had to generate. The first time this happened I was alarmed given my slim budget, but I quickly learned to ask this question: which of these "reports" do you actually use to make decisions with? Inevitably causes the ream of "reports" to slim down to a half dozen or so.

      But if the hundred or so other things in that stack aren't things the organization uses to make decisions with, then what are they and why are they produced? Inevitably the answer is that they're produced to carry data from one process to another -- something that a computer system can do without any marginal input of labor. That means that upwards of 90% of the office work can be eliminated.

      The result of eliminating that work isn't (as is often feared) that jobs disappear; it's that the organization becomes orders of magnitude more responsive. I've worked with mosquito control agencies that went from sending an inspector out days or weeks after the report of a problem (by which time it is certainly past) to sending out an inspector the same day and if necessary a spray truck that very night. I've worked with non-profits where donations took weeks or months to be deposited go to depositing the check and sending out the thank you letter the very same day. It's not hard to be responsive when you have a system that gets the right information to the right person immediately; it's impossible when your systems take weeks to get you information you need right away.

      How do things get that bad? Not because you have bad people. You start with inexperienced people who learn how to do their jobs from the people who came before them; and since nobody has a full view of the entire system they come to see their job as keeping the system running more or less as it has been. That's not because they're bad or stupid; it's the best anyone can do under the circumstances. When there's was a problem in their part of the system the do their best to patch that part so the problem goes away.

      Experienced programmers will recognize this anti-pattern; it's called "lava flow". Eventually the system becomes more patch than productive process and the effort to keep it running approaches or exceeds the effort spent on doing things that are intrinsically valuable.

      So yes, I absolutely believe installing a system, particular a system with mobile data input, can have a massive impact on a public agency's responsiveness. I've seen it happen repeatedly. Imagine you're in charge of dispatching workers to deal with problems, but all you hav

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    40. Re:What? by TarpaKungs · · Score: 1

      No one likes calling councils. Phone menus, long waits, many transfers to get the right dept, or just to be told "that road is maintained by the national government as it is an A road, that's a different number..."

      In the UK, we have a website/app called FixMyStreet. Councils can pay to use the service to manage reports, but if they don't the app simply emails to their general email so it does have national coverage.

      It does seem to work and the app makes it easy to take a photo, geotag, check the geotag is right, add a few words and send the report, all in a couple of minutes whilst walking along. Much more stuff gets reported and more usefully, others know what's been reported, so no need to re-report the same hole in the road.

      --
      Why can't women be like Hedy Lamarr - beautiful, talented and inventors of frequency-hopping spread-spectrum techn
    41. Re:What? by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 2

      How is this any different than calling them up and telling them what is broken?

      We could say the same about people using amazon.com for shopping instead of calling a telemarketer or, snail-mailing a purchase form tore up from one of those Sears shopping magazines of old.

      Voice calls are not parseable or amenable for categorization. They are certainly not traceable from root cause/complaint to action teams. You can't autonomously prioritize.

      Form data is. Welcome to the world of automation.

    42. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You have selected regicide! If you know the name of the king or queen being murdered, please press 4...

    43. Re:What? by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      Yup. After a while one feels like a janitor -- only noticed when part of the floor goes unwaxed. Which is why companies like Intel thrive -- CEO is/was a major techie (Chem Eng). Same for Microsoft, of course. Companies ignore their technical side at their peril.

      --
      I come here for the love
    44. Re:What? by Dereck1701 · · Score: 2

      Problem ticket tracking, this should of course also happen with phone calls but often doesn't. When you note an issue in an app by necessity it creates a database entry, that database entry has to be checked "fixed" by someone and in most systems that persons ID is logged by the system, so it creates a "paper trail" and a query-able list of what has been fixed, by who, and what is yet to be fixed. Don't do your job, or worse say you did without doing it and there is a trail that leads right back to you with your boss/the mayor breathing down your neck. Often because these systems are expensive ($100k on up for even a smaller city) they are used for far more than just complaint tracking, they are used for city wide asset management such as manhole, water valve, pipeline, address, fire hydrant, etc location information.

    45. Re:What? by swb · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure how easy it would be to normalize different vehicle suspensions. You'd have to have some kind of test road with a known surface quality that the car could be driven on the calibrate the app to the car.

      I'd like to see municipal vehicles and maybe buses equipped with scanners that could map the actual road surface.

    46. Re: What? by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 1

      Hi, have you ever tried to call anyone in local gov't? 2 hour wait, they can't understand you, they transcribe incorrectly, nothing gets done. Email or app is far more time efficient, except emailing from a phone is a PITA.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    47. Re:What? by v1 · · Score: 2

      well-said. wish i had some mod pts to give you. looks like you're in the ideal position to comment on this issue.

      One thing I haven't seen addressed here is the possibility of combining tickets. I've worked help desks in several places before and used different ticket tracking systems. Most of them had the ability to take automated entries, either generated via a service desk web page or just from sending an email to the service@ address. Obviously the heuristics of filing/assigning the ticket were poor with the email route, but the online ones usually work pretty good.

      The customer gets to enter in a brief description of the problem, then the form attempts to auto fill the fields. The user then has the opportunity to correct fields that were incorrectly selected.

      In the end none of these systems combined tickets (that's tough for a compiuter to do) but they always sent the user a link they could click on to check ticket status. Only about 15% of users actually took advantage of this, but if you get someone that's getting upset over our response time, sitting down with them for a few minutes and training them on it (really doesn't require training, more of a hand-hold) that usually calms them right down. "no your request wasn't thrown away, yes we are still aware of the problem, no it hasn't been fixed yet, yes the right person has been informed, yes you will hear back from us when it's resolved."

      Combining tickets was always a manual process. One place when I started I had over 100 tickets in the system, many of which were months old. Users would just enter a new ticket every few weeks (or days!) if they didn't physically see a problem get fixed. (did not check ticket status, maybe it can't be fixed, or we need more information than "it doesn't WORK!", etc) I spent the first few days simply combing over the list repeatedly, combining entries. Some tickets were in the system as many as 13 times, by three people. That makes the tickets a lot more manageable. It also has the effect of letting you know how many people a problem is affecting.

      One improvement I didn't see was the ability for a user to look in the ticket system, FIND an open ticket for the problem they were having, and allow them to either (A) add notes, or (B) click a "ME TOO" button to add a counter to let the staff know it was affecting more people and should get higher priority. But given the average user's low ambition to even look at the status of their own tickets, sadly, this very useful feature would probably be very difficult to get into any reasonably high usage. People would much rather take the laziest approach and fire off a 20 second email, than fill out a 2 minute form, or do a 5 minute search. So it usually comes back to me to merge tickets and dedup.

      IMAGINE THIS: big pothole opens up in front of your apartment, right outside the entrance to the lot. You put in a ticket. It's a residential low traffic street so it has low priority. Week or two goes by. OK... print out a note and stick it on the mailbox panel inside the apartment, "want that pothole out front fixed? go to www.mycity.com/maintenance and look up ticket #12345. Click the "ME TOO" button. If we all click that, it'll be fixed fast!" A week goes by, and five other tennants click ME TOO. The priority on that pothole goes from 1/10 to 6/10 due to having 6 complaints on it. Street department has it filled in two days later.

      That's how it's supposed to work.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    48. Re:What? by Simulant · · Score: 1


      Seriously? Call any government agency to report a problem and let me know how far you get and how long it took you.

      This is about CONVENIENCE. Also the report is automatically documented. ''

    49. Re:What? by mspohr · · Score: 1

      I bet you call Amazon and place your order over the phone rather than using that Internet thingy.
      Then you get to call them back when they couldn't quite understand exactly what it was that you wanted and they have to find the piece of paper they wrote the order on and correct it. Then they have get their calculator out and add up the numbers again so you can write a new check for the new amount. Then you call up UPS and ask them when the package will be delivered and they go through all of the pieces of paper they have received last week from Amazon to find yours and then they call the driver and ask him when he'll be going to your house.
      Or... maybe there are some advantages to using common communications technology?

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    50. Re:What? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Just use an average and look for outliers. With many vehicles covering the same roads the odd clunker will be quickly filtered out.

      I like your scanner idea. In Japan they use tunnel inspection vehicles with cameras and lasers to produce a 3D map on the inside. A simpler system could be fitted to public vehicles. In fact even just a downward facing camera would be very useful, as it could be paired up with accelerometer data to give staff an instant view of the road surface at problem locations.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    51. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, except that I disallow location for all apps and turn off geotagging of photos. I refuse to have to allow my city to track me around just so I can report problems.

      I also refuse to install a damned app for every stupid thing like everyone wants just so they can say 'look at us, we have an app'. A mobile friendly website would work too for a lot of this, but of course that's not cool and sexy and resume inflating--despite that most crappy mobile apps are just containers for web pages anyway under the covers.

    52. Re: What? by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 2

      Problem is they are aren't a majority

      That's a problem with democracy. Nobody ever wants what I want.

    53. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are they like the CONservationists and the new age eco-religion?

    54. Re:What? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I've had a lot of experience fixing up information flows in public agencies.

      Which is why, for the most part, your post has been ignored. You've been here long enough. We don't seem to take kindly to informed opinions or even expert opinions. Knowing what you're talking about is probably worse than reading the article.

      Anyhow, it was a nice read. It's always interesting to hear from people who have worked within the system. I've dealt with many different municipalities over the years and dealt with them exclusively until we moved into pedestrian traffic modeling. People complain about the bureaucracy associated with private enterprise but, in my experience, it's much worse in the public sector.

      I've had signed and registered mail, to a large municipality, still get lost and the person who signed for it wasn't so much as reprimanded as far as I know. To be honest, I am not sure (nor are they) if it was the fault of the person who accepted delivery.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    55. Re:What? by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Running an ad campaign reminding people that they could call in would have been just as effective

      You must not actually deal with people. I am not sure that hermits living in their mothers' basements really have a proper perspective. On anything.

    56. Re: What? by Dog-Cow · · Score: 2

      So get on the phone and sit there for untold number of hours to report your issue. No one is stopping you from wasting your time due to your own paranoia.

    57. Re:What? by liquidsin · · Score: 1

      the city of Edmonton, Alberta has this in their 311 app. took a pic of a pothole earlier this year, phone asked to use location, allowed it and entered a description/location. i put a takeout coffee cup in the hole for scale, and also because it amused me. hole was fixed within a month. you can track all of the various reports made (road damage, graffiti, abandoned vehicles) on a map right in app. even allows anonymous submissions, though who really knows just how anonymous it is. pretty damn handy.

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    58. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's some mighty powerful cognitive dissonance at work here, friend.

    59. Re:What? by danomac · · Score: 1

      Hmm, in my city it'd be going off all the time. It seems construction crews around here can't install a manhole cover level with the road to save their life...

    60. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My morning drive here in GA had a very bad pothole. Dented the wheel of my car. I called, it took 4 calls before I was actually able to report it. The person was going to check the maps and call me back. Never heard back.

      Then I remembered tagging a pothole about 6 months ago on waze. So every morning, I made sure that pothole was tagged. It was fixed in a few weeks.

      Coming up next: The App is going to reduce at least one person's job. There is now an automated way to log the problem, put it in a database, and schedule service.

    61. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I can follow the progress..." What? Do they have a progress bar or an icon that looks like a city employee running with an appropriate tool and doing tiny little Kung Fu moves with it?

      There's no mention of efficiency in scheduling or time saving in any other way than for the person who previously had to take the call, write up the complaint and route it properly. As usual, there's little substance in the reporting.

    62. Re:What? by Altrag · · Score: 1

      Vigilante pothole repair can be the plot of next summer's blockbuster!

    63. Re:What? by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      You mean aside from the GPS coordinates and a picture of the issue? This day in simple answers for simple people...

    64. Re:What? by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

      Haven't RTFA yet, but if I do, will it indicate that unfixed problems remain on the list or on the map, and maybe indicate how many people have reported it?

      If so, that's an important feature that making a phone call that maybe gets ignored doesn't have.

      Also, if the app is not run by the city government, that might also provide a nudge that the city government might not have provided itself: looking bad when being unresponsive.

      --
      There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
    65. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys are being stupid. Just because you are a Democrat, doesn't mean you must defend all Democrat politicians everywhere.

      The mayor of Detroit is a Democrat. But Droit has fallen on such hard economic and social conditions, the political philosophy may not be the problem at this point.

      You can have a thriving metropolis with either a Democrat or republican in office .

    66. Re:What? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      This is very different from reporting software defects.

      If there's a pothole, all you really need is a photo of the pothole, and the GPS coordinates. Selecting a category of "pot hole" or "roads" would be useful.

      It doesn't need software version, OS version, steps to reproduce, test data etc. that you may need on a software defect.

    67. Re:What? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Many people would rather use an app than ring a cab company. And a cab company phone call is a lot quicker and more efficient than ringing the city/council about some arbitrary problem.

    68. Re: What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love how the only thing Neo-leftists can do is call other people names and reuse bogus labels without engaging in any meaningful dialogue. /Oh, and they're hypocrites!

    69. Re:What? by swb · · Score: 1

      I read an interview with a local municipal maintenance guy who said that they use plastic shims on manholes to get them up to level with the road.

      They must not use them much, because seldom are they flush. Usually they're obnoxiously below grade.

    70. Re:What? by nessman · · Score: 1

      Because you're not pulsando dos si usted habla español and/or having to navigate a confusing auto-attendant, only to either get someone's voice mailbox that's full (because they retired 6 months ago), or if you do get someone, it's some bottom-feeder civil servant with a 10th grade education who speaks Ebonics and has a shitty attitude.

    71. Re:What? by WallyL · · Score: 1

      You have FILLED this city's pothole!

    72. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if the hundred or so other things in that stack aren't things the organization uses to make decisions with, then what are they and why are they produced? Inevitably the answer is that they're produced to carry data from one process to another -- something that a computer system can do without any marginal input of labor. That means that upwards of 90% of the office work can be eliminated.

      There are 2 other reasons I've seen for such reports.

      1) Because we've ALWAYS gotten that report. The old system gave us that report.
      2) Somebody likes to look at such and such a report, often maybe only one figure on that report.

      CSB:

      One late weekend night while doing a major system upgrade there was one of the younger execs working late. He was printing a report on wide-bar continuous form paper hundreds of pages long. The stack of paper produced was at least 6 inches thick but only after we had gotten it to fold neatly instead of into a big jumble of paper.

      It wasn't from a system I was responsible for but I couldn't help but think - and I really should have asked (my boss should have asked as well), WTF do you want all this paper for? There was no way in hell anyone was going to pore over each page of that report and glean any useful information.

      He seemed to be flipping through numerous pages looking for totals by account or something.

      What was he looking for? Why couldn't something be produced which would more easily and efficiently given him whatever it was?

      Well, the answer was simple - That's the way it had been since that software had first been installed, oh 15-20 years earlier. It was probably too expensive to have it customized back then and he probably believed it was impossible to give a more succinct or useful look at the data.

      Hell, they didn't even have to pay for customizations to that software anymore - they had hired 3 people (including my boss) who used to work for the company that made it years earlier.

      I'm sure another aspect of the problem was "Don't touch the code unless you absolutely have to - it works, but it's a house of cards and we can't risk breaking it."

  2. Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All these ghetto folk be hitting up the police on their Obama phone, you feel me, complaining there ain't no mo money in Detroit, so they gonna bust a cap in some coppers ass, you feel me, we gotta bring back black power and all us niggas gotta take back da city, you know what I mean

    1. Re: Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Obama phone

      There is no such thing so you have proven yourself to be a Republican. Your kind lies constantly.

    2. Re: Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh really? From Wikipedia:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Obama_phone

    3. Re: Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clinton created the USF in 1996, so this is his fault and since he is a DINO, thus the Republican's fault.

    4. Re: Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh you mean that program that started in 1996? ...Dammit Obama

  3. Boston has an app like this. It's useless. by SuperBanana · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Boston has had an app like this; it's called "Citizens Connect."

    Essentially, it's a very half-assed ticketing system. You open a ticket, and that's it - you can't provide any further information, or challenge a request, or re-open it. There is only one action city worker can do - "close" the ticket. About the only thing they got right was not forcing people to select a category; a team of staffers handle that.

    What people quickly discovered was that city workers would just close tickets, regardless of whether the work actually got done or not. So, what you saw increasingly were tickets that said "STOP CLOSING MY REQUESTS WITHOUT FIXING IT."

    That said...it beats Cambridge, MA's system, which has horrendously poor geotagging and only accepts requests in a few limited, narrow issue categories.

    I have three or four of these apps for the various cities I spend time in now. It's stupid. There is a national service set up, but cities don't like it because it provides a lot of reporting to the public. City workers don't like Joe Q Public seeing how long requests take to clear and stuff like that. Makes 'em look bad....

    1. Re:Boston has an app like this. It's useless. by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 3, Insightful

      An app for this sort of thing is a cool idea, but of course, only if the app doesn't suck and the city actually makes an attempt to fix the issues it receives. Call me crazy, but I suspect the app's effectiveness will have a strong correlation with the local government's effectiveness in dealing with it's other day to day issues. Competent local governments will probably make good use of this technology. Incompetent local governments will continue to run things (including new programs like this) in a bumbling, half-assed fashion.

      According to the article, in Detroit's system, the person who submitted the request can see the progress of the ticket item as it makes it's way through the system. That sort of feedback is important, as it lets people know they aren't being ignored. So, the city workers must have a way to update the status of individual requests as they process them. Seems like a reasonably good system.

      I'm not sure how Boston's compared to that. It sounds like their system needs a way to allow users to give some feedback per ticket, so they can let the city know who's not actually doing their jobs.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    2. Re:Boston has an app like this. It's useless. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      I suspect that it depends on the attitude as well. At least in IT, there seem to be two basic flavors(in varying levels of competence, there are some commendably diligent but not terribly sharp ones; and there are some total slackers with the annoying ability to pull off something brilliant just when it looks like their slacking might catch up with them; then go back to slacking): There are the people who say "The problem is that you are bothering me about some 'problem', so now I have to go look at it." and the ones who say "The problem is that there might be a problem I don't know about yet."

      The former is...unlikely... to welcome better reporting systems. The latter is likely to be delighted that they can spend less time hunting for problems and more time fixing them.

    3. Re:Boston has an app like this. It's useless. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Boston has had an app like this; it's called "Citizens Connect."

      Oh, I thought that was a dating app. That explains why those guys from Streets and Sanitation showed up and found me dressed as Princess Leia when I was expecting a swarthy Luke Skywalker.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    4. Re:Boston has an app like this. It's useless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      found me dressed as Princess Leia when I was expecting a swarthy Luke Skywalker.

      There are so many things wrong with statement I don't know where to begin.

    5. Re:Boston has an app like this. It's useless. by Dereck1701 · · Score: 1

      "city workers would just close tickets, regardless of whether the work actually got done"

      Sounds like a good basis for finding people who may not be doing their job, and disciplining/firing them. It should be noted though that a lot of people seem to fail to understand the limits/capabilities of government departments (I work in county government), for example in your situation people may be noting potholes in private roads, or trash in private property, things which are not the responsibility of the local government. I used to work for a Drain Commission, given the name people constantly came in thinking that all drain related issues were our responsibility not realizing that the only drains that we could work on were ones where a "drain district" had been created (requested by and voted on by property owners within that district).

    6. Re:Boston has an app like this. It's useless. by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Seems to me here's an example where Free Software actually DOES make sense. Why have every city creating their own apps and issue tracking systems. Or having companies taking public money to provide them. Isn't this a perfect area for the public to create their own system that any public body in the word can just adopt free of charge.

      This would be actually serving the community. The REAL community, not just a small group of geeks with a particular interest.

  4. TMI? by Ichijo · · Score: 1

    Is it possible for a city to have too much infrastructure? What would that look like, and is there an objective way to determine whether a city like Detroit has that problem?

    --
    Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    1. Re:TMI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, too much infrastructure looks like a thousand abandoned buildings to which water has been shut off, five hundred of which had broken pipes.

      Captcha: Handgun. Another way to determine if there is too much infrastructure: the prevalence of handguns in street muggings.

    2. Re:TMI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have infrastructure in an area where nobody lives and there are no businesses, then it's just not necessary to have any infrastructure there.

      Of course - tearing up streets is usually not cost effective but taking down utility lines and shutting off water may be beneficial.

    3. Re:TMI? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      More likely, a city will have the wrong infrastructure rather than it being "too much." Infrastructure has to be built for peak actual or anticipated loads. When a neighborhood goes from a high population density to abandoned, you do end up with too much. Unfortunately, neighborhoods are rarely 100% abandonded, so you still need to serve the people that are left.

      Is it cheaper to convert a 4-lane road to a 2-lane road rather than fix the potholes? (It might be for bridge repairs, or water mains at end of life.) these things require major investment, and the money just isn't there.

      I hope Detroit uses the app to actually gain revenue from other communities-- selling the service and customization. It sounds like they have a much better solution than many other cities.

  5. Informing them wasn't the problem by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

    Informing the Detroit city government what the problems are has never been the problem. Getting them to do something about it is the problem. The telephone worked just fine, it's that the city government either just doesn't care or is blatantly incompetent. Detroit, ruled by Democrats since 1962. A city whose Golden Age included the Purple Gang. Yeah, I think an app wasn't why their streets were full of potholes and the sidewalks were full of litter. Giving it credit for cleaning things up is typical journalistic thinking.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:Informing them wasn't the problem by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      Informing the Detroit city government what the problems are has never been the problem. Getting them to do something about it is the problem.

      So TFA has it completely ass-backwards then?

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    2. Re:Informing them wasn't the problem by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      So, you're saying that next time the democrats need to the remember to release the parking brake?

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  6. SeeClickFix by The+Darkness · · Score: 1

    Raleigh, NC, uses SeeClickFix, supposedly.

    One road issue I entered (with a picture) was just ignored until it aged out of the system. They're doing a city wide resurfacing program to address multiple road issues, but it would have been nice to get that response instead of Jack Squat.

    I put another request in for tree servicing (as required by law) and nothing happened on it for three months. I finally called the city directly and the issue was taken care of within two days. Again, it would have been nice to be told "hey you need to call so-and-so" instead of having to hunt that down myself, since (I think) they advertised this application as the way to submit issues to them.

    Someone has to be monitoring these apps or they are just useless to the citizens. They are, however, useful for a limited time to the City Council since people can vent into the void (the app), but that only works until people realize the app requests are ignored.

    --
    There are two kinds of people: 1) those that need closure
  7. Welcome to direct democracy ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which is now possible thanks to the technology of globalization...As opposed to 'representative democracy ' which is in fact a misnomer given the fact that over 90% of the polices passed by congress since the 1980s have been either to no benefit to the public or detrimental.

    1. Re:Welcome to direct democracy ... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      If you're even remotely associated with a protected class then you probably don't want a direct democracy no matter how much you think you do. Keep in mind that the majority of citizens, in the United States, still self-identify as believing in religion. The adage about democracy is fairly accurate; Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to have for dinner.

      Direct democracy requires things like empathy, intelligence, and energy. Without those it will not be effective. It's a great ideal to aspire to but, frankly, I think it's about as realistic as an invisible unicorn. Ego, superstition, and tribal mentalities are the largest barriers that I can think of. I absolutely love the idea but, like many such ideas, there's just no realistic way to accomplish it on a large scale. I liken it to Communism. Sure, that's a beautiful idea. Let me know when you've changed the basic human into a being capable of behaving like that.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  8. Ha! --- I don't want to be on hold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    1) I don't want to be on hold.
    2) The person on the other end of the phone may not be right person, I may need to be transferred.
    3) The person may say they wrote it down, but didn't.
    4) The person may say they wrote it down, but wrote it down wrong.
    5) I may be told I called the wrong number.
    6) The person may be out to lunch.
    7) Voice mail could be full.
    8) Voice mail might be wrong number with no human to tell me otherwise.
    9) Automated systems, if they have one, are a major hassle listening to each option and consumes tons of time.
    10) The office might be closed
    11) It might be a holiday, weekend, etc.

  9. Um. by tlambert · · Score: 2

    Just because the Demicrats rule here doesn't mean that the Republican's aren't the ones behind the curtains pulling the strings. Republicans are the real rulers of Detroit and have been for more than 100 years.

    Um. Is this your opinion because you know how well Republicans and Labor Unions "get along" (e.g. like matches and gasoline), or because of some other reason, like "Eat your broccoli Johnny, or the Republicans will come out of your closet and eat you while you're asleep"?

    1. Re: Um. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is some truth to that. Republicans hate children. Just look at what they want to do to WIC.

    2. Re: Um. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Republicans never come out of the closet..

    3. Re: Um. by tlambert · · Score: 1

      There is some truth to that. Republicans hate children. Just look at what they want to do to WIC.

      Is this why they are such strong supporters of Planned Parenthood?

      Seriously, quit ascribing properties to the right wing nutjobs that are even nuttier than reality, or no one is going to believe you when you cry "Wolf!" and there's actually a wolf there...

    4. Re: Um. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is some truth to that. Republicans hate children. Just look at what they want to do to WIC.

      Is this why they are such strong supporters of Planned Parenthood?

      They hate Planned Parenthood. Every child not conceived and every child aborted is another child not living in miserable, grinding poverty.

    5. Re: Um. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is some truth to that. Republicans hate children. Just look at what they want to do to WIC.

      Is this why they are such strong supporters of Planned Parenthood?

      They hate Planned Parenthood. Every child not conceived and every child aborted is another child not living in miserable, grinding poverty.

      Yup.

      Abortion kills democrats. Therefore, no sane republican would be against it.

      Complete, one line proof that republicans are insane.

      Of course, that's irrelevant, as the killers are also insane, and for the most part, are democrats.

    6. Re: Um. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are actually the insane one.

      And for the record, republicans are not supporters of planned parenthood. Because God.
      http://www.ontheissues.org/Abortion.htm

  10. Detroit is the future of American cities by Nova+Express · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And by that I mean "Bankrupted by corrupt one-party machine politics, deindustrialization, and overly generous union pensions, and where the police can no longer afford to light up streetlights or to investigate any but the most serious crimes.

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

    1. Re:Detroit is the future of American cities by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Everyone has seemingly skipped your post and someone has moderated your post in the downward direction. I, on the other hand, am not scared.

      So, elaborate - if you will. You've stated your emotional reply but not included any of the salient issues such as why you reached that conclusion. You don't appear to argue any of their points. You simply call them a 'cunt' and move along with a 'hugs and kisses.'

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    2. Re:Detroit is the future of American cities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. We only have one party in the US as it is, the Politician Party.
      2. If union pensions really were generous, Detroit wouldn't be so poor now would it?
      3. Police don't pay to "light up streetlights". Property taxes does that. It was the housing bubble burst that caused over half of all homes in Detroit to be foreclosed or abandoned. The banks forced out the people that were paying property tax.
      4. Crime prioritization happens in every city. Harsher prioritization happens when the crime-to-budget ratio is high.

  11. Pretty sure you're wrong... by tlambert · · Score: 1

    But the Republican's thugs in blue are the Republican's thugs in blue.

    Pretty sure you're wrong... the Omni Consumer Products cops uniforms were actually black.

  12. So did they shut off the water to the buildings... by tlambert · · Score: 1

    So did they shut off the water to the buildings... because it was wasting water, or because there were squatters living in the buildings, and they wanted to render them uninhabitable, instead of providing city services in the area?

  13. Re:So did they shut off the water to the buildings by TurboStar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Detroit gets real winters. Abandoned buildings aren't heated. Freezing water expands and breaks pipes. Now the building has structural damage in addition to wasting clean water. This is a win for everyone, including the squatters who won't be living with mold or falling through water-damaged floors. It's easy to bring in water in jugs and any drains will still work. You can even make the toilets work. Annoying, sure, but hardly uninhabitable.

  14. Why so late? by irp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We've had this in major cities in Denmark for years. Really nice: spots vandalism or a broken light. Fire up the app. Take a photo. The app logs GPS and gives option to move found position on map. Add optional comment and press send. Then the app keeps track of ticket status.

    Other stuff we've had for years includes sms/app based mobile payment between individuals and stores. Sms/app based purchase of stamps when sending letters. Tickets for train/bus. Etc.

    Slashdot.org has really become a blast from the past :-)

    1. Re:Why so late? by GNious · · Score: 1

      We've had this in major cities in Denmark for years.

      We have? Not aware of any ..

    2. Re:Why so late? by Nemosoft+Unv. · · Score: 1

      Just a city? What about for a whole country! Buiten Beter (Dutch for "Improve Outside") is something similar here in the Netherlands and has been around since 2010. I've used it a few times to report issues. It's a simple 4-step process, and after you report an issue you get an email. The only minor fault is that I've had issues reported as "Closed" when it wasn't yet fixed, but a few days later someone always showed up to fix the problem. I guess "Closed" means in this case "The department has reviewed your report and placed a workorder."

      --
      "Fix it? It has been disintegrated, by definition it cannot be fixed!" - Gru in Despicable Me.
    3. Re:Why so late? by tlambert · · Score: 1

      We've had this in major cities in Denmark for years.

      We have? Not aware of any ..

      There are *plenty* of major cities in Denmark...

    4. Re:Why so late? by GNious · · Score: 1

      We've had this in major cities in Denmark for years.

      We have? Not aware of any ..

      There are *plenty* of major cities in Denmark...

      *golfclap*

    5. Re:Why so late? by petervandervos · · Score: 1

      Even better: http://www.verbeterdebuurt.nl/ is an updated version for the Netherlands. I used it a couple of times in Enschede and if you report something that is fixable (not complaining about your neighbor) they normally fix it within 1 or 2 weeks.

      One time there seem to be a problem with the water (the pavement was wet on a dry day) which was fixed the next day.

  15. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It provides more information publicly, so the results are easier to manipulate to justify spending less on public works. At least they need to keep the website running.

  16. The international open source alternative by zypres · · Score: 5, Informative

    The open source alternative would be https://www.fixmystreet.com/ It got many forks on github for other countries, and it was first made by mysociety in the UK. Currently that version is used in 8 countries.

    1. Re:The international open source alternative by mockduck · · Score: 1

      You are right, thanks for the mention (I work for mySociety)! Except that I believe that that number is now up to ten. Perhaps interestingly, the software is flexible enough that it can also be repurposed for any purpose that needs reports to be a) geolocated and b) sent to a specific location which is dependent on the location plus the chosen category - see collideosco.pe, for example (for reporting cycle/traffic collisions and near misses), and it's also been used to report empty homes, to report medicine shortages in Indian clinics, and to report anti-social behaviour on public transport. The open source platform and documentation can be seen at fixmystreet.org. All the benefits mentioned above are correct, but when we talk about it, the main one is from the user's POV. Here in the UK, we have multi-tier councils, so one spot can be the responsibility of a town council, a county council, a borough council or a parish council - or more likely, they split the different types of problem between them, with say the country council fixing potholes and the borough council tending parks and open spaces. The average citizen might well know that their problem is for 'the council' to deal with, but they won't always know which council, and even if they do, it might require finding the right page deep within their website and then filling in a clunky form. With FixMyStreet all you have to know is the one URL, for any council in the country, and it tries to ask as few questions as possible while still getting all the vital information to the council. Councils are keen too, generally speaking, because reports submitted online require a lot less staff resource, and, if they use Open311 as mentioned above, the reports will be placed directly into their workflow. As a result, we also offer FixMyStreet as a commercial product for councils, the revenue for which goes to support our charitable work.

  17. lol Detriot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    10,000 fixed, 100,000,000 to go!

    1. Re: lol Detriot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it's abandoned. Riches all gone.

  18. Re:So did they shut off the water to the buildings by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

    I'd not thought about winder freezing pipes. I've actually had it happen when an upstairs tenant in an office building turned down the heat for the weekend, and pipes in the hot water heating system broke.

  19. I could have used something like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was a courier, I used to call the DOT to report malfunctioning traffic lights. This meant I had to figure out which intersection I just went through, which direction I went through it and which light was out. I would gladly have left the app running on my phone so that all I had to do was push a report button and state the issue and push a send button.

  20. Re:So did they shut off the water to the buildings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so now they've got 99 problems, but a breech aint one.

  21. SeeClickFix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Locally, we use http://www.seeclickfix.com/.

    The smart-phone app makes reporting problems easy, allowing the inclusion of not just descriptions, but GPS coordinates and photos along with follow-up. I find it very useful and I'm sure that makes is easy for crew to actually locate the problems

    The thing that makes it work so well is that there is a designated person in the city managers' office that coordinates the distribution of issues and follows up and has the authority of the city manager behind them. Otherwise, I believe the project would fail.

  22. Scary Movie 4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YSp2KGMQEk8

  23. Over 10,000 Problems Fixed in Detroit? by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 1

    That's great. Too bad Detroit has millions of other problems. I hope there is an app for that.

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!

    1. Re:Over 10,000 Problems Fixed in Detroit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vote democrat at the next election.

    2. Re:Over 10,000 Problems Fixed in Detroit? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Are you really an engineer? What *kind* of engineer are you?

      The majority of engineers that I've worked with are pretty logical. They'd likely opine that this is a good place to start and be happy that there's evidence suggesting that this is effective. They'd further opine that consideration should be given to seeing how this can solve other problems. They'd also be willing to discuss the other problems without a need for rhetoric and hyperbole.

      You're not really an engineer, are you?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    3. Re:Over 10,000 Problems Fixed in Detroit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've been trying that in Detroit for about 40 years now and it hasn't worked yet....

    4. Re:Over 10,000 Problems Fixed in Detroit? by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 1

      Are you really an engineer? What *kind* of engineer are you?

      I'm an Irate Engineer, though I am feeling pretty relaxed right now. You must have stolen my irateness.

      You're not really an engineer, are you?

      As a matter of fact, I am a mechanical engineer.

      I'm really not sure why you're getting your panties in a bunch, and I don't think anyone else does either, seeing you're getting modded down to nothing. I was not slamming this particular app - I was just noting that it is a very serviceable and shiny teaspoon being used to empty the sea of problems that is Detroit. More spoons are needed, maybe even a few buckets.

      --

      Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

      Vote for Bernie in 2016!

    5. Re:Over 10,000 Problems Fixed in Detroit? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Umm... Okay then? I can only conclude you're delusional. I'm still moderated at 1. I post without a karma bonus even though I'm eligible for one, I consider it an unfair advantage. If you click the score, not the number, you'll see a popup that shows that my post hasn't been moderated at all. The post's moderation history is available for public viewing. (Of course, this is subject to change.)

      Anyone can verify this. Even you.

      Again, I don't post at +1 - that would be unfair. I'd post at -1 if I were able. Somehow, I'm not sure how, I've managed to achieve the highest possible karma rating. I could post at +1 but that'd just be silly. It's not that important, really. It just makes me wonder what else you mess up on. Most engineers are pretty cautious, especially mechanical engineers where things like faults and inaccurate assumptions result in tangible harm.

      Given your desire to, again, act impulsively, with little information and no verification... Well... I'm really starting to think you're just irate and not actually an engineer. It's okay. On the internet nobody knows you're a fast food worker.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    6. Re:Over 10,000 Problems Fixed in Detroit? by nessman · · Score: 1

      That's great. Too bad Detroit has millions of other problems. I hope there is an app for that.

      There is. Ask Nagasaki and Hiroshima.

  24. Then they are using the wrong technology. by tlambert · · Score: 1

    Then they are using the wrong technology.

    They should have cold temperature relief valves, and use PEX piping, so that it can freeze without damage. The building itself should be equipped with an excessive flow shut-off valve, such as the Dorot 100FE (which is an entirely mechanical design, mediated by water pressure differential over time).

    Then they could leave the water on, and not have a problem.

    BTW: if they had excessive flow shut-off valves throughout the system, the broken water lines would never have risen to the level of a problem in the first place; the first they would have heard about it would have been complaints of not water.

    The reason that a fire hydrant doesn't freeze is that there's no water in it; it's called an "anti-siphon valve" and it's located below the frost line. When water is shut off, the valve drains the water out of the plug; the same thing should be employed in structures so that when the excessive flow cut-off triggers, the water drains out of the system, and it's protected against freezing.

    You could literally abandon a properly equipped building for yeas, it'd get close to the freeze point, and the entire plumbing system would protect itself.

    Such systems are common in areas where a power failure could result in a loss of heating; I've seen them used in Utah, Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, Minnesota, and Wisconsin (among others) for apartment complexes and horse stables. You'd think that Detroit, having so many mechanical engineers at one point, would have adopted this into their building code already.

    1. Re:Then they are using the wrong technology. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Your suggestion is that somebody should go retrofit extensive tracts of abandoned buildings, most of which were built many decades ago, instead of simply turning the water off?

    2. Re:Then they are using the wrong technology. by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 2

      Detroit has been deteriorating since the 50's. It's unreasonable to expect buildings and water infrastructure that old to be retrofitted with new technology when the city is broke.

      You're talking about a city that will let abandoned buildings burn because their fire service is broke.

    3. Re:Then they are using the wrong technology. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're saying that if you were being foreclosed the first thing you'd think about wouldn't be leaving the plumbing in good order?

      What kind of monster are you?

    4. Re:Then they are using the wrong technology. by KGIII · · Score: 1

      They probably live in Detroit and aren't the person who is going to pay for it. Free costly infrastructure overhauls!!! WOOHOO!!! I bought four plots in Detroit a while ago. (Long but interesting story.) I had everything disconnected and razed the buildings. They're an investment. The buildings were beyond repair. Had the buildings been habitable, I'd have found someone to live there in exchange for keeping the property properly maintained.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    5. Re:Then they are using the wrong technology. by tlambert · · Score: 1

      Your suggestion is that somebody should go retrofit extensive tracts of abandoned buildings, most of which were built many decades ago, instead of simply turning the water off?

      Since the technologies have all been available since 1972, for the latest one (the mechanical excessive flow shutoff valve)... unless the thing was built more than 43 years ago, yeah, they should have had the damn things since day one.

      But if it was built more than 43 years ago... are you saying that things like plumbing and seismic retrofits of *in use at the time* buildings couldn't have been accomplished over a period of more than four decades?!?

  25. The most important part of this system... by tlambert · · Score: 1

    The most important part of this system is the issue tracking feedback, as it provides positive reinforcement to the reporting party, and it provides incentive to not just blow off the report to the city.

    Systems such as this, but without the feedback loop, exist in many cities; without the feedback loop, there's no way to detect the difference between an ignored report and one which is scheduled for a fix (including a "cable TV guy" style estimate as to when).

  26. Chicago by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

    Chicago has an app too. http://www.chicagoworksapp.com... Their 311 dial-a-problem service will also send you updates via SMS.

  27. old news by zmooc · · Score: 1

    Many, if not all, dutch municipalities have had this for years. I still remember when slashdot was news for nerd but the memory is fading quickly:p

    --
    0x or or snor perron?!
  28. This is the difference that recording makes by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

    A phone call is not recorded, it can be ignored or forgotten. Logging the complaint means that it stays on a list and doesn't fall through the cracks. At least in theory. A fair question would have been how many water leaks and such were found before the app to see if the stats actually improved.

  29. Re:Um, no thanks by KGIII · · Score: 1

    Because it also helps them to help you better and because there's more than just you and you are a part of a whole who has done nothing by themselves, ever. Not only that, you'll do nothing by yourself. Ever. Even though you're a miserable failure you're still left alive at the grace of others.

    Please, don't try to explain that you're a libertarian (you're not and wouldn't actually know the first thing about our platform). You're a petulant and selfish child with no experience that has never experienced success. In short, you're a pathetic human being who deserves to be physically punished because there's little hope of you actually understanding anything but violence.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  30. Sounds to me .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .... like the real problem was that people weren't reporting the problems and the app just encouraged people to do so.

  31. Improve Detroit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sell it to Canada.

  32. Future, or brain dead zombie bullshit by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    and overly generous union pensions

    That's earned compensation agreed to in a contract, you worker-hating fascist, you.

    That's one of the "neat" tricks of neoliberalism: cut taxes on the rich, gut the standard of living for the working class, then blame the victims for the results.

  33. Boston is a clusterfuck of separate services/DBs by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

    Boston's system does not show a flow through the system, because there is no system. Every department in the city has its own computer system, and it appears they've refused to unify them or link them together.

    Essentially, your ticket with CC is closed when it gets entered into a department's worklog. Whether it actually gets done or not, you have no idea.