Slashdot Mirror


Nexus 5X and Nexus 6P Reviews Arrive (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader writes: A few weeks ago, Google announced its new Nexus phones — the 5X built by LG, and the 6P built by Huawei. The phones are starting to ship, and reviews for both devices have landed. So far, they're largely positive. Ars Technica calls them the Android phones to beat, though criticizes them for having fairly large bezels and no wireless charging. Android Police says the 6P's form factor is an improvement over the Nexus 6, being slightly narrower and taller. Meanwhile, most publications report that the 5X does a good job at carrying on the legacy of the excellent Nexus 5. It's their lower end phone, and most reviews mention that it feels that way in the hand — but battery life is reportedly excellent. The Nexus 6P's battery is capable, but doesn't last as long. Fortunately, the worries about overheating with its Snapdragon 810 chip seem overblown.

190 comments

  1. Huawei? No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't need the chinese government seeing everything I do. It's bad enough the US government see it too.

  2. 16GB by tripleevenfall · · Score: 4, Interesting

    " Starting at $379 for a 16GB version, the Nexus 5X is nearly as cheap as the 2013 Nexus 5, which started at $349."

    I wish Nexus had taken a different tack than Apple, marketing a 16GB phone as entry level when few people are going to be happy with that. I understand that some suits somewhere told them to hit a certain price point, but 16GB is not going to leave users happy.

    And on the high end, only having a 16GB and 32GB option are not going to leave power users very happy. Some of us might want a lot of storage for music and other media, but not want a phone that's too large to use one handed like the "P" phones.

    1. Re:16GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In other news: You cannot make everyone happy all the time.

      21st century woes.

    2. Re:16GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Power Users" are a tiny fraction of a percent of the market for things that are now mainstream. Like smartphones.

      Apple, Google are not stupid. They crunched the numbers and found that 16 gigs is more than enough for not some, but most users.

      Most people won't do anything that requires storage outside what's needed for the most popular internet services, the most popular handful of apps, and photos.

      That 16 gigs isn't really user storage on those devices. It's mostly a local cache for smart phone services.

    3. Re:16GB by kamapuaa · · Score: 2

      I have 16gb, so does my wife. I'm not so into apps, but my wife has like a hundred. Neither of us has any problem (and anyway, doesn't it allow a micro-SD card?)

      Just Googling, it looks like 91% of iPhone users have 16gb or less.

      While 16gb isn't enough for everybody, it's enough for most people.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    4. Re:16GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish Nexus had taken a different tack than Apple, marketing a 16GB phone as entry level when few people are going to be happy with that. I understand that some suits somewhere told them to hit a certain price point, but 16GB is not going to leave users happy.

      Yeah, but it's an Android phone, so you can just slap a microSD card in there, and Android Marshmallow greatly improves support for using SD cards.

      I mean, it does have a microSD slot, right? It must, with a starting size that small.

      What do you mean they don't?! Neither one?!!

      Yeah, OK, you're right, I wish they weren't copying Apple. 16GB storage isn't a bad base size when you can just slap in more, but no expandable storage? On an Android phone?!! What the hell!

    5. Re: 16GB by Ahnahmoley · · Score: 1

      Please speak for yourself. I root my phone and use many different tools on external devices via USB, including formatting and running diagnostics. I'd be considered a power user. I'm not a data hog. Google up how to transfer data off your phone. If you mean you hoard apps, then I doubt this phone was for you anyway.

    6. Re: 16GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nexus 4 and Nexus 5 don't have expandable storage either (batteries aren't user-replaceable either) -- same as iPhones.

    7. Re:16GB by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I have a phone with 8GB, and I'm perfectly happy. But only because it has an SD card slot where I can store my music and pictures. I don't know why everybody thinks it's such a good idea to not have an SD card slot. Personally, I thought I was making a compromise because my phone only came with SDHC and not SDXC. I really don't care what reasons they come up with. I will never buy a phone without expandable storage options.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    8. Re:16GB by CastrTroy · · Score: 2

      91% of iPhone users have 16GB of less because it costs an extra $100 for the next model up, and it already costs around $650 to begin with. I don't have any hard statistics, but the vast majority of people I know with phones that have SD card slows have an SD card in there. Most of them have 16 or 32 GB cards in there on top of what's already in the phone. Also, a large percentage of people I know with an iPhone constantly complain that there is too little space for them to store their stuff.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    9. Re:16GB by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Or, you know, you could just include a microSD card slot, and sell the phone with no flash memory at all for even less...

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    10. Re:16GB by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      16GB works fine if you have cloud backup, unlimited data plan, and are always close enough to a 4G cell tower. Otherwise, you're probably going to need more memory, especially if you're constantly taking pictures and videos like my daughter. Of course, if you only use your phone for phone calls, you also don't need much memory.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    11. Re:16GB by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      Get over it, 16GB is more than enough for most buyers. It's always the most popular option. For $379 including free shipping (shipping was extra on Nexus 5), it's hard to beat.

    12. Re:16GB by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sure you can. You can put in a SDcard slot, so people can upgrade the memory to whatever they want.

      But since they didn't bother doing this, because they want everyone to store everything in "the cloud" and pay high data-access fees to get to it, I for one won't be buying one of these devices.

    13. Re:16GB by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      and anyway, doesn't it allow a micro-SD card?

      No, they don't. These are just like Apple phones that way. That's the whole problem.

    14. Re:16GB by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Replace the 16gb model with a 64gb. There, almost everyone is happy. The problem isn't that you can't make everyone happy, the problem is offering an option that makes almost no one happy.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    15. Re:16GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's almost like somebody should invent some sort of way to allow the user to supply their own, removable storage medium in a phone. As long as it was small enough to fit inside a slim phone I think it would be a hit. We could call it "microSD" or something cool like that. Now, how do we sell Google on our idea?

    16. Re:16GB by Ayanami_R · · Score: 2

      Someone else with some sanity! I have a family full of 16GB users and it's NEVER been an issue. I am the family tech person and have fielded 1 question about running out of storage, in the 5 years I have owned smartphones. Luckily, it was my Android using cousin, and I taught him about microsd. I think it is hard for a lot of slashdotters to wrap their heads around the fact that most people do very little with these 650 dollar devices.

      --
      "Science is the power of man"
    17. Re:16GB by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      Why would Google sell an upgradeable phone with a replaceable battery, when they can just sell you a new one in a year or two?

    18. Re:16GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      among the reasons for not including SD slots or removable batteries would be increased waterproofing and the ability to custom make the battery to fill up every possible space inside the case.

      this allows you to have both a smaller phone and a larger battery.

    19. Re:16GB by kamapuaa · · Score: 2

      It's possible to do a lot with these $650 devices in 16gb...personally I watch movies, Facebook, browse web, do stuff for my job, play a game or two, stream music, blah blah blah. Just, I'm not recording & storing much in the way of 4K video.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    20. Re:16GB by danbob999 · · Score: 2

      People will buy more 16GB than 32GB, proving you wrong.
      And the 128 GB 6P will not sell at all.

    21. Re:16GB by Teun · · Score: 1

      16GB is enough for me, I use KDE Connect for fast exchange of data with my computers and other Android devices.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    22. Re:16GB by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Android phones seem to be largely going the way of Apple devices, in a dumb attempt to copy them, with the dumb idea that they're going to get Apple users to convert to Android. They haven't figured out that Apple users like Apple devices and aren't going to switch, and Android users **don't** want Apple devices, or else they would have bought them instead.

      On top of that, these phones are made by Google. Google doesn't *want* you to store stuff on your device, besides apps and caches and such. They want you to store all your data in "the cloud", where they can index it, and also where the carriers can charge you lots of money to access it when you exceed your monthly data allowance.

      Just look at the very popular Samsung Galaxy S series: up to the S5, they had removable batteries and an SDcard slot. Now with the S6, those features are gone (as well as the waterproof case), in favor of a curved screen. And S6 sales have been lackluster; gee, wonder why?

    23. Re:16GB by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Everyone thinks it's a great idea because everyone thinks you should just store all that data in "the cloud". Then you can pay extra money to access it at 4G data rates.

    24. Re:16GB by grilled-cheese · · Score: 1

      In terms of modern android phones, only the LG G4 and the lesser known OnePlus Two still have microSD. It's a shame because marshmallow finally is treating external storage correctly instead of a red-headed stepchild.

    25. Re:16GB by Snotnose · · Score: 1

      but 16GB is not going to leave users happy.

      It would be plenty if users could delete the bloatware they'll never use and didn't want.

    26. Re:16GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      either it is already sold out, or they didn't make any because the preorder page for both the 64gb and128gb models of the 6p on the google play store say their are currently out of stock.

    27. Re:16GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would Google sell an upgradeable phone with a replaceable battery, when they can just sell you a new one in a year or two?

      Because I own a Samsung Galaxy S3, which I've owned for 3 years. It has internally 16GB of memory and another 64GB in its SD card slot. Looks like I'll be sticking with the S3 for another year or two, if the alternative is a downgrade to 16GB with no SD card.

    28. Re:16GB by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Informative

      In terms of modern android phones, only the LG G4 and the lesser known OnePlus Two still have microSD.

      bollocks. You're forgetting Motorola, it seems like pretty much all of their big phones have them, and most of them are available in dual sim versions — even the sub-$200 Moto G.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    29. Re:16GB by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      yeah, all 2 of them were sold already.

    30. Re:16GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no bloatware on Nexus devices -- that's the point of these devices and why they are so attractive.

    31. Re:16GB by Vlado · · Score: 1

      Only problem is, that there is no 64GB model. At lest not for the 5X. There are 16 and 32GB models and then there are 64 and 128GB Nexus 6P models.

      So you either get a small phone with small storage capacity or a large phone with large storage capacity. No small phone with large storage capacity is available here.

    32. Re:16GB by Vlado · · Score: 1

      Why wouldn't it?
      People like having large capacities for storage. I know a lot of people who start fidgeting very nervously, when they' re forced to delete anything from their devices.

      For me, 64GB hits the sweetspot. Although with 4K recording capabilities that would also be on the low end, if I were more into recording video, than I am.

    33. Re:16GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure you can. You can put in a SDcard slot, so people can upgrade the memory to whatever they want.

      Yes, and a whole bunch of cheap-ass SOBs will put in the cheapest SD card they can find, then complain to the manufacturer "my phone is slow". Those support calls cost the company more money, which raises the cost of the phone. You end up paying way more than necessary for a phone with an SD slot. In the end, planned obsolescence is actually a more economical model.

    34. Re:16GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck off with your trite comment you stupid little cunt.

    35. Re:16GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      File systems for higher capacity SD is an issue. 16 & 32 can use fat. 64 can still use fat but I understand its not as efficient. Haven't seen really good NTSF support for Android. My Nexus 7 supports OTG and I had to limit myself to a 64 gig USB key for this reason. After 64, you have to licence from Microsoft (forgot the name) wich most vendors don't want to do. I suspect that has more to do with the current size offerings.

    36. Re:16GB by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 2

      So they decided not to include a removable SD card storage, huh? Unfortunate.

      I looked at the Nexus phones when I decided I needed to replace my aging HTC "Vivid", which was becoming pretty unreliable. I looked at a LOT of phones, including ones made by LG and Huawei. Samsung was at the top of my list, but even the previous gen phones were a little over my budget. I ruled out HTC because of their awful updates (or should I say lack of them). It was still running Android 4.0.4 - same thing it had when I bought it.

      To make a long story short, I ended up with one most of you have never heard of - the Alcatel OneTouch Idol 3. I got the 4.7" version (with 16 GB and an SD card slot), which was $179 retail. VERY happy with this phone. Very snappy (it's a quad-core proc with 1.5GB RAM), latest Android (well, Lollipop, anyway), and a very stock Android experience.

      Damn, this sounds like a f'n marketing ad. Yea, I don't need the latest/greatest. I wanted fairly stock Android, 4G LTE capability, GSM, unlocked. This one met my req's at a very nice price.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    37. Re:16GB by danbob999 · · Score: 2

      One word: Price.
      They sell these 64 and 128 GB for way too much. They make a lot more profit on these phones than on base (16/32GB) variants.
      I'd pay an extra $20 to get 128 GB. I won't pay $200 for it, however. Not on a phone that I expect to last 4 years (after which it will be too slow) and that can break long before that.

    38. Re:16GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      File systems for higher capacity SD is an issue. 16 & 32 can use fat. 64 can still use fat but I understand its not as efficient. Haven't seen really good NTSF support for Android. My Nexus 7 supports OTG and I had to limit myself to a 64 gig USB key for this reason. After 64, you have to licence from Microsoft (forgot the name) wich most vendors don't want to do. I suspect that has more to do with the current size offerings.

    39. Re:16GB by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      That doesn't prove anything? Are they happy with only 16GB, or do they just not want to get ripped off paying an extra $100 for 16GB of memory?

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    40. Re:16GB by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      Of course they would be happier with a 1TB phone for $2 in a fantasy world.
      But the facts remain. More people buy cheaper phones with less storage. If they weren't happy with that phone, they'd buy another one.

    41. Re:16GB by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      They should use ext4. Most people will never put it in a Windows PC anyways. And they could release a Windows program to read/write the ext4 SD for the rest.

    42. Re:16GB by Tough+Love · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The missing sd slot is the only thing that keeps me from buying this phone.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    43. Re:16GB by Geeky · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And Sony, at least on the Xperia Z5. I know Sony isn't popular around here, but I like the fact they also offer a compact version for people who want a pretty decent spec phone that will actually fit in a pocket.

      --
      Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
    44. Re:16GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Android phones seem to be largely going the way of Apple devices, in a dumb attempt to copy them, with the dumb idea that they're going to get Apple users to convert to Android.

      No it is that they want to produce sturdier devices with a high quality feel. When you start adding removable parts and compartments it compromises that, you also have more points of failure. They could turn a tidy profit selling their customers extra batteries but it makes the device more flimsy and prone to breakage.

      They haven't figured out that Apple users like Apple devices and aren't going to switch, and Android users **don't** want Apple devices, or else they would have bought them instead.

      No they have realized that the market for people who want user-replaceable batteries and sd cards is a *lot* smaller and less profitable than that of the people who want high quality devices and have a high turnover of those devices.

      On top of that, these phones are made by Google.

      No they are not, they arent even designed by Google they just carry Google's nexus branding. These are made by LG and Huawei.

      Google doesn't *want* you to store stuff on your device, besides apps and caches and such. They want you to store all your data in "the cloud", where they can index it and also where the carriers can charge you lots of money to access it when you exceed your monthly data allowance.

      Yes it is all a big conspiracy between Google, LG, Samsung, Huawei and all carriers, I suppose Apple must be in on this too...oh hang on...why has Google gone to so much effort to improve the features of SD card use in Android then? If they dont want you to use it then they would just leave it crippled so that doesn't make much sense now does it? Sorry your conspiracy theory does not follow.

      And S6 sales have been lackluster; gee, wonder why?

      Because they havent introduced any decent new features, it isnt as though potential S6 buyers are flocking to something else that has a removable battery and sd card slot so if you're insinuating that this has anything to do with sales numbers then clearly it does not.

    45. Re:16GB by jareth-0205 · · Score: 0

      Sure you can. You can put in a SDcard slot, so people can upgrade the memory to whatever they want.

      But since they didn't bother doing this, because they want everyone to store everything in "the cloud" and pay high data-access fees to get to it, I for one won't be buying one of these devices.

      And then I'd be less happy because it would have taken space that could have battery and/or put the cost up. All product development is a compromise to a price. *Your* priorities are not everybody else's.

    46. Re:16GB by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      And then I'd be less happy because it would have taken space that could have battery and/or put the cost up.

      -1 Stupid.

      An empty SDcard slot costs a lot less than 64GB of flash memory.

      If you want a phone that sacrifices these things, then go buy one. It's not like there's a shortage of phones which have made this sacrifice. We're bemoaning the fact that phones *with* these features are disappearing. One of the main points of the whole Android ecosystem is that there's a bunch of different phone makers and an absolutely huge variety of phone models to choose from; there's no reason people with both sets of priorities can't be satisfied. Instead, the dumb phonemakers are all envious of Apple and are trying to copy them, poorly.

    47. Re:16GB by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      No it is that they want to produce sturdier devices with a high quality feel. When you start adding removable parts and compartments it compromises that, you also have more points of failure. They could turn a tidy profit selling their customers extra batteries but it makes the device more flimsy and prone to breakage.

      That's total bullshit. The Samsung Galaxy S4 and S5 are very sturdy devices; the S5 is even waterproof.

      No they have realized that the market for people who want user-replaceable batteries and sd cards is a *lot* smaller and less profitable than that of the people who want high quality devices and have a high turnover of those devices.

      More bullshit. The Galaxy S6 did just as you say, and the sales have been miserable. The S4 and S5 are commanding huge prices on the used market.

    48. Re:16GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's total bullshit. The Samsung Galaxy S4 and S5 are very sturdy devices; the S5 is even waterproof.

      No it is not "bullshit". The S4 and S5 had creaky, flexing plastic that was not at all sturdy.

      More bullshit. The Galaxy S6 did just as you say, and the sales have been miserable.

      Lower than expected sales are due to lack of new features, I already pointed this out. You seem to think the lack of new features is irrelevant and that people would just buy it anyway, maybe you are that stupid but not everybody else is. This is why users are not flocking to vendors that provide SD cards and user replaceable batteries.

      Samsung sold batteries and SD cards but they realized the low quality feel this introduced is something people do not want. So this isnt the big conspiracy you dream it to be.

    49. Re:16GB by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      These Moto phones look interesting; I'll have to keep them in mind next time I'm in the market for a phone.

      With a dual-sim in the US, is it possible to use multiple networks, such as Sprint & T-Mobile? I really haven't heard much about dual-sim phones before.

    50. Re:16GB by shellbeach · · Score: 3, Informative

      They should use ext4.

      As of Marshmallow, SD cards can finally be formatted as ext4 by the OS and used as "internal" storage.

      Pity Google didn't actually put a card reader in their Nexii to demonstrate the potential ...

    51. Re:16GB by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      Only problem is, that there is no 64GB model. At lest not for the 5X. There are 16 and 32GB models and then there are 64 and 128GB Nexus 6P models.

      you are so right it's a serious problem. every phone should have a model for every permutation of possible options. it's a very sound basis for product development. i hear that it's cheaper to produce many different phones at smaller numbers.

    52. Re:16GB by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      gotta love it. massives profits to be had by including SD card slots and replaceable batteries. but can you believe it? HTC, Motorola, LG, Samsung? all too stupid to capitalize. if only they had you on their BoD you'd turn those companies around in a few months wouldn't you?

      if there's one thing you can trust in a company is that they'll follow the money. if such phones sold better, they'd be making them.

      More bullshit. The Galaxy S6 did just as you say, and the sales have been miserable. The S4 and S5 are commanding huge prices on the used market.

      so samsung's poor sales on the S6 are all attributable to the lack of an SD card slot? amazing.

    53. Re:16GB by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Everyone thinks it's a great idea because everyone thinks you should just store all that data in "the cloud".

      Who is "everyone"? Plenty of manufacturers offer SD cards in their devices and plenty of manufacturers offer large amounts of built-in storage. It often is a good idea to store data somewhere other than a smartphone that can be lost, stolen or destroyed pretty easily. Indeed taking photos and sharing them online is one of the key uses of smartphones these days as is using streaming music services over buying, maintaining and synchronizing your own music collection.

      Then you can pay extra money to access it at 4G data rates.

      Convenience and security costs money, thankfully data caps are going up and encrypted wifi is pretty prevalent these days.

    54. Re:16GB by KGIII · · Score: 1

      About three months ago, I went on a spree of mad deletion. I deleted nearly 15 TB from my NAS. A goodly portion was old installers from shit fifteen years old. Another chunk was movies. I couldn't be happier but, I admit, it was tough to do. The funny thing is, I remember the days of old and it's hard to not save all that stuff - even though you have 57 version of old Firefox installers like a mad collector. It used to suck to download stuff - it took forever.

      Now, in just a short time, I have kind of changed my view on things. WTF do I do with all this empty space? These days, I'm just deleting stuff on a regular basis and not even worrying about it. It's the Internet - it's going to be there when I come back. If there's a problem with connectivity then I still have plenty of stuff saved for the apocalypse.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    55. Re:16GB by mjwx · · Score: 1

      I wish Nexus had taken a different tack than Apple, marketing a 16GB phone as entry level when few people are going to be happy with that.

      I'm not.

      Also I think you're seriously overestimating the number of people who require a lot of storage on their phones. I'd bet that the only reason that people get larger capacity phones is because they're offered to them at the same price with their contract.

      Making a small capacity phone that is cheap is a very smart move by Google, there's a lot of people like me who aren't using much storage space on their phone because strangely enough, we're only using it as a communication device (odd concept, I know).

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    56. Re:16GB by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      With a dual-sim in the US, is it possible to use multiple networks, such as Sprint & T-Mobile? I really haven't heard much about dual-sim phones before.

      AFAIK you just switch between them in software. But I don't have dual-SIM. I do have a Moto G 2nd, with a 32GB class 10 uSD in.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    57. Re:16GB by exomondo · · Score: 1

      On top of that, these phones are made by Google. Google doesn't *want* you to store stuff on your device, besides apps and caches and such. They want you to store all your data in "the cloud"

      So why did they come out announce Adopted Storage Devices as a big feature of Marshmallow then? Runs totally contrary to your theory.

    58. Re:16GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only reason I skipped on getting a Samsung current generation flagship / Nexus is cos of lack of micro SD card slot.

      Thats why I got myself an LG G4.

      Whoever provides a micro SD slot in tab / phones will always get my business.

    59. Re:16GB by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      I went for a Moto G 2nd gen 8 months ago for this very reason. I usually carry a lot of music and misc files with me, and 16Gb just doesn't cut it. That, and the fact that it has a radio tuner - it cant beleive listening to radio is impossible on most high end phones.

      It is a very neat device as well, a Moto X-lite. Best bang for the buck in the market, hands down.

    60. Re:16GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The SDcard slot is missing because for other devices to read the SDcard Google would have to license patents from Microsoft which means that AOSP would not be freely distributeable.

    61. Re:16GB by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It is a very neat device as well, a Moto X-lite. Best bang for the buck in the market, hands down.

      Moto G 3rd is going to be available with either 1 or 2GB RAM... I'd like more memory, 1GB just doesn't cut it for multitasking. Otherwise, yes, it's a peach.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    62. Re:16GB by Vlado · · Score: 1

      You're right, but the case that you're describing is slightly different.

      In your scenario you got rid of the things that you acquired, not the things you created. It's much more of a struggle, when you have to get rid of some of your text messages, photos and/or videos that you took and so forth.
      And phones (at least in my opinion) are most of the time used to store the data that we create, rather than the data that we acquire. One exception being the apps, of course. Music and video content, that I consume on my phone is mostly streamed. There is some downloaded content but, like you said, that's not a problem when you have to get rid of it.

      Now, I do agree that backups are crucial. And if you've backed stuff up, you should kind of let go and not need the local capacity anymore. But have you ever seen people showing you photos of their kids on their phone? Those are often a few years old. And no, it's also usually not a selection :-)

    63. Re:16GB by Vlado · · Score: 1

      By that logic there should be just one model out there and that's that. At the end of the day, Nexus phones are supposed to be devices mainly targeted at developers as testbed, reference devices. So why would you need more than a few GB of storage capacity anyway?

      On the other hand, I was simply pointing out to the OP that the option which he was suggesting, doesn't exist and he should consider alternatives.

    64. Re:16GB by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      By that logic there should be just one model out there and that's that.

      yep, that's exactly what i was getting at.

      Nexus phones are supposed to be devices mainly targeted at developers as testbed, reference devices. So why would you need more than a few GB of storage capacity anyway?

      are you head of marketing at google nexus? really, what'd you think? "oops! these were supposed to be developer phones but we accidentally produced one with 128GB! man, what was i thinking?!?" OTOH, maybe you aren't right in your assumptions?

    65. Re:16GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And HTC which generally has SD card slot

    66. Re:16GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't really have any experience with Moto phones but with the dual sim phones I've come across in the past (HTC and a few cheap/mid-range Chinese Androids), one of the sims is limited to Edge connectivity but as long as a sim is compatible with the frequency bands supported by the phone's hardware, using two sims instead of one shouldn't be a problem (of course my experience is centered around a couple EU countries and Pakistan. I don't know much about US networks which from what I've read, seem over complicated and designed with consumer lock-in as the primary goal so I can't be certain...only replied because no one else had, hope it helps).

    67. Re:16GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and here I thought 640K ought to be enough for anybody

    68. Re:16GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I highly doubt you'd get any updates...although you might be able to get cyanogenmod on it in which case who cares what Alcatel do ;)

    69. Re:16GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, in just a short time, I have kind of changed my view on things. WTF do I do with all this empty space?

      Offsite backup for friends/family?

    70. Re:16GB by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Well they could just *not license the patents* and tell MS to go fuck themselves. All they have to do is leave out support for exFAT filesystems. ext4 is much better anyway. Then offer some option, for an extra fee or something (maybe an app from the app store) which provides exFAT capability for people who want it.

      I don't give a shit about exFAT support, I just want the slot. The slot doesn't require patent licenses.

    71. Re:16GB by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that consumer lock-in design is what I'm worried about. Thanks for the reply though!

    72. Re:16GB by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I did get rid of a bunch of pictures and videos but I was more selective. It was really quite exhilarating. I had stuff that I'd acquired years ago. And yeah, I could probably restore every single bit of it - I've got redundant backups even, off site actually. So, I could... I'm not going to. It's kind of liberating, in a way.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    73. Re:16GB by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that consumer lock-in design is what I'm worried about. Thanks for the reply though!

      I can't speak to whether you can do 4G from slot 2, but I can tell you that these Motorola phones have unlockable bootloaders when you buy them on the open market... the Moto G is under $200, I think the Moto G 3rd with 2GB RAM (the others and even the low-spec G 3rd have 1GB) is supposed to be around $250.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    74. Re:16GB by leonardluen · · Score: 1

      what profits? the profits for selling SD cards at least don't go to the phone manufacturers they go to either kingston or sandisk.

  3. Never again by null+etc. · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Android devices might be absolutely, ecstatically awesome, but I'm never buying one again. The manufacturers and carriers guaranteed that my first Android device would be my last, by failing to allow me to upgrade to the latest, most secure version of the operating system.

    Samsung wants to sell me an $800 tablet, but won't let me upgrade operating systems when critical security flaws are found? Screw them, and screw Google for allowing this type of ecosystem.

    I'm sticking with Apple devices from now on.

    1. Re:Never again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Then I guess you missed the bit where the Nexus devices have no such problem? They are always the FIRST to get the OS updates...

    2. Re:Never again by iONiUM · · Score: 1

      That's the price of the openness. You support fragmentation in Linux distros, but hate the fragmentation in Android distros? It's the same thing, and you're free to wipe and root your tablet and install your own version.

      That being said, this is about Google's Nexus devices, which are vanilla and have a perfect track record of getting updates.

    3. Re:Never again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem really is the hardware makers and the carriers. Apple solved that problem by being the hardware provider, and slapping around the carriers with agreements

      Notice how there's never any un-removable carrier shitware on your iphone? How's Verizon Nascar app your Samsung... whatever treating you? (Samsung released enough phones in 2014 to debut 4 new ones every week. This is the literal truth and not an exaggeration)

      Google's doing what they can to reign things in, and they are getting better at it. With ever iteration of Android more applications and functions and services get moved to play store uneatable apps away from the OS image so they can be updated and fixed.

      Know what I think the end game will be? Virtualization - Phone running a thin hypervisor that presents services to an OS image. Imagine Android being a VM and data, phone, gps, motion sensors, etc being made available through a generic API.

      Have an OS image for work. Work number, work apps, work data, secured and remotely administered and sepearate from your personal phone's OS image. Leave your job? OS system image gets deleted remotely but the rest of your stuff is still yours.

    4. Re:Never again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Then, my friend, you have a very old nexus device that is long past it's 'best before'.

      All devices will get abandoned eventually. The issue that people like the original poster has, is that even on CURRENT devices, the carriers and manufacturers do not allow for timely updates. Nexus does.

    5. Re:Never again by vux984 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The manufacturers and carriers guaranteed that my first Android device would be my last, by failing to allow me to upgrade to the latest, most secure version of the operating system.

      Yeah... android is worse than Apple.

      I'm sticking with Apple devices from now on.

      My daughters iphone 4 purchased in 2013 didn't get ios8 last year, nor ios9 this year. It stopped receiving security updates 15months ago... barely 9 months after we got it.

      Sure it was nearing the end of its run when we bought it, and we new that. But Apple pretty much dropped software support for it completely -- while it was still under its 1 year warranty.

      Apple's a better vender then most (all?) android vendors. But you still can get burnt. At least with android you can install alternative builds after the vendor forgets you exist; especially if you buy a popular model that has lots of support.

    6. Re:Never again by shess · · Score: 1

      That's the price of the openness. You support fragmentation in Linux distros, but hate the fragmentation in Android distros? It's the same thing, and you're free to wipe and root your tablet and install your own version.

      Really? There are basically Debian-based distros and RedHat-based distros. Unless you have very specific needs, you just update yourself along as new versions come out. If you don't want to play the upgrade game, they have specific releases which get longer-term support. And if you want to just stick with a single version forever, go for it.

      Meanwhile, I have a 2013 Moto X which was promised Lollipop over a year ago, and indeed Motorola released it, but maybe it didn't work well, maybe they fixed it, but maybe Sprint isn't allowing it ... all of the "maybes" are because nobody from Motorola or Sprint (or Verizon or AT&T or ...) is willing to step up and say anything concrete.

    7. Re:Never again by OhPlz · · Score: 1

      Only if you side-load it yourself. The Nexus updates are now at the mercy of the carriers, even if they're unlocked phones purchased from Google directly, even on a prepaid monthly plan.

    8. Re:Never again by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I went with Windows Phone this time around for the exact same reason. Android has a huge problem with getting updates out to phones and tablets. The iPhone was a little too expensive for my tastes, so the only other option was Windows Phone. I actually like it a lot. Best phone experience I've ever had.

      For tablets, I would probably also go with a Windows tablet like the Surface 3 (not pro), which is comparable in price to the iPad, while offering so much more. If you want to spend $800, just go for Surface Pro, it's really the only option worth considering at that price. Or if I was looking for something smaller and cheaper. than something like the Dell Venue with Windows would be a good option too. Once you get up to tablet size, having the option of running full desktop applications is nice.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    9. Re:Never again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Buddy the 4 was launched mid-2010. It's more than 5 years old. You likely knew what you were getting in to when you picked it up.

      It's a device from a different era. Single core, older arm cpu, not that much memory. Apple probably would update it if it were practical. They still update the 4s and it's more than 4 years old (So the 4s has had a longer service life than the 4. Apple is still updating all of their dual core devices, including the ipad2)

    10. Re:Never again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know the IPhone 4 was introduced June 24, 2010 and released soon afterwards right?

    11. Re:Never again by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say perfect. Google is getting better, but the earlier Nexus devices had pretty disappointing support lifetimes

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    12. Re:Never again by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      Side-loading a new factory image isn't exactly difficult. Sure, you need the adb and fastboot tools, and it helps to be running Linux, but for the most part it's simpler than most desktop OS upgrades.

      The only part I find annoying about the factory load process is that the default scripts will wipe out the user data area on the phone. There is no need for that—assuming the bootloader is already unlocked, if you just delete the -w option from the flash-all.sh script you can load new factory images while keeping your data intact.

      My Nexus 5 was running Android 6.0 within days after the official release. It probably took longer to download the image than it took to perform the upgrade (not counting the interminable "Optimizing app N of 10000" sequence the phone goes through after any system update).

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    13. Re: Never again by afgam28 · · Score: 2

      In the Android world, manufacturers release low spec phones to serve the budget end of the market. Apple does the same thing by using newly manufactured iPhones from an old design. Saying that these old iPhone models shouldn't get updates is exactly the same as saying that low spec Android phones shouldn't get updates, which is crazy.

      It doesn't matter when the phone was designed - if a phone was purchased recently, customers should be able to expect updates for a reasonable period. It's completely unreasonable to stop providing updates during the warranty period!

      It should be illegal for manufacturers to stop providing security updates during the 2-year contract period, if it isn't already.

    14. Re:Never again by steveha · · Score: 1

      I'm sticking with Apple devices from now on.

      If you really want total control over your own devices, you can't beat Android. The trick is to choose a cell phone carrier that lets you own your own device.

      I was a customer of Verizon for years and years, and I was happy with the quality of the cell phone service. I bought a Galaxy Nexus, happy that I would get updates (it's a Nexus device, right?).

      Then I didn't get updates. Google released the updates, but Verizon didn't let them through. My Galaxy Nexus became so slow it was almost unusable, and I firmly believe that the Android 4.3 update (which added "TRIM" support) would have fixed my speed problems. All Galaxy Nexus users got the 4.3 update... except Verizon customers.

      So I switched carriers. We are on T-mobile now and we have Nexus 5 phones. Overall, we are happy with T-mobile.

      The Galaxy Nexus is past its end-of-life and Google isn't supporting it... but if I were to root it, I could put Cyanogenmod on it and get KitKat and the latest security patches. With the Nexus 5, I wouldn't even need to root it to use community-supported firmware builds; the devices aren't locked.

      If you want total control of your own devices, Android devices plus a carrier that lets you buy your own devices is the way to go.

      Samsung wants to sell me an $800 tablet

      I love my Nexus 9 tablet. I got it, new, for about $365 and it is on my T-mobile cellular data plan, not just WiFi. And as it is a Nexus device it gets updates.

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    15. Re:Never again by danbob999 · · Score: 2

      The real question is when did they stop selling it. Apple do not releases cheaper iPhones (except the 5C). Usually, they just continue selling their old phones for less.

    16. Re:Never again by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Windows Phone... yeah, I've heard it's nice from people who actually have one. But aren't you missing out on the app ecosystem of the Android or iPhone marketplace?

      Unfortunately, an ecosystem feeds on popularity, and popularity feeds on the ecosystem. As we've seen from Windows' death-grip on the PC market, it's hard for competitors to break into an existing market, even with solid alternative offerings.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    17. Re:Never again by rsborg · · Score: 1

      Side-loading a new factory image isn't exactly difficult. Sure, you need the adb and fastboot tools, and it helps to be running Linux, but for the most part it's simpler than most desktop OS upgrades.

      Ok, you see, I buy a phone, I expect my security upgrades to be as seamless as the competition. The alternative is that much fewer people buy the phone again after having been left out to do the manufacturer's work.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    18. Re:Never again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >All devices will get abandoned eventually.

      There is no reason it has to be that way. It's not like they have to modify the damn software from upstream. They could just run Debian on it and whatever GUI they want. It would never be abandoned as far as security patches go then.

      It's worrisome that people are starting to see abandonment as normal. One of the major advantages of free software is that it DOESN'T get abandoned as long there is one knowledgeable user in the world that fixes it.

      With the Nokia N9 we almost had it working. Grrrr.

    19. Re:Never again by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      That being said, this is about Google's Nexus devices, which are vanilla and have a perfect track record of getting updates

      FWIW, my Initially-4.0 Galaxy Nexus only ever got to 4.3 before Google pulled the plug on updates. I haven't gotten a smartphone since, but I seriously doubt Google has had a change of policy on the subject.

      That said, the Nexus phones have a decent track record of being open enough that third parties can supply upgraded operating systems.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    20. Re:Never again by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      WTF are you talking about? Android isn't open in the least. Things like CyanogenMod are iffy, because so many parts of a typical Android install are closed-source, including many device drivers needed for the devices. And that's once you figure out how to "root" the phone, which they intentionally make difficult.

    21. Re:Never again by jon3k · · Score: 1, Informative
      http://www.stuff.tv/news/googl...

      According to the source, major Android system updates will be provided to Nexus phones and tablets for two full years after the starting operating system's release date, while security patches will be provided for three years from that date.

      Meanwhile, iOS 9 was available on the iPhone 4S (from 2011) the day it was released.

    22. Re:Never again by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      That's one of the few downsides I've found with my phone. There's a few apps that I would like to have that aren't available. Fortunately, I've been able to find alternatives for basically every single app. So I can still do everything I want to do. I think the biggest complaint I hear from other windows phone users is the lack of a SnapChat app. I really don't care about that, so I don't feel like I'm missing anything. But I definitely see how some people could be put off by the fact that certain apps just aren't available.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    23. Re:Never again by OhPlz · · Score: 1

      I think that's why it's now at the mercy of the carrier. The carrier wants to ensure a seamless upgrade, so they want to validate major releases first and then make them available for their customers' phones to grab. Carriers aren't exactly in a hurry though, so why Google would let them do this is beyond me. What's annoying is that if you're using an MVNO, you're not technically the carrier's customer yet you're on hold for the OTA upgrade until they bless it.

    24. Re:Never again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a stupid comment written by some twat with a modicum of technical prowess attempting to show off he knows what ADB fastboot is.

      Operating systems, desktop applications, browsers, including Chrome, games all ditched manually fucking about with updates a long, long time ago because it's a profoundly stupid way to go about keeping a user's system updated. Instead they all perform automated seamless updates in the background, yet for some idiotic reason you think it's acceptable to fuck about installing the Google SDK just so you can update a phone that's a few years old.

      Jesus you're a twat. This is why fragmentation is shocking on Android.

      http://developer.android.com/about/dashboards/index.html

      How's about get a clue and accept it's bog standard in 2015 to have automatic and seamless updates to software, whether it's a phone or a laptop. Google should get off their arse and figure this out. I like vanilla Android, but the most recent Nexus devices are awful.

    25. Re:Never again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With that attitude, I hope you are still using your 286 from the 90's.

      Sure, you *can* still use your 286 if you want to source up to date software for it, just like you *can* still use abandoned Nexus devices by using cyanogenmod or whatever the current rom is.

    26. Re:Never again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      funny, my nexus 5 has had marshmallow installed for a week.
      so i think your extremist position doesn't square with the facts.
      perhaps if you said, i'm not getting a samsung again, i could agree.

    27. Re:Never again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nexus devices bought from google receive automatic updates from google.

    28. Re:Never again by exomondo · · Score: 1

      There is no reason it has to be that way. It's not like they have to modify the damn software from upstream. They could just run Debian on it and whatever GUI they want. It would never be abandoned as far as security patches go then.

      People have been able to do that on the desktop for decades if they wanted to and if you really wanted that you can do it with devices like the N900 (which you can still get on ebay). Sure I can run debian on my N900 and it's a neat trick but it's shitful as a smartphone.

      That phone is an awesome device to play with but it's a toy. Running The Gimp, emacs and gcc on that thing was cool but not practically useful. Yes I could hack the OS and fix things but I don't want that on a smartphone, my iPhone gets updates for many years and by the time it stops getting updates the technology has advanced so far (processor/battery/screen/radio efficiency, camera technology, etc) that I want to replace it.

      One of the major advantages of free software is that it DOESN'T get abandoned as long there is one knowledgeable user in the world that fixes it.

      AOSP is free software, it's a perfect basis for a free mobile operating system so if free software is so advantageous and innovative then why hasn't some free fork of AOSP surpassed the proprietary incumbents?

    29. Re:Never again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? There are basically Debian-based distros and RedHat-based distros.

      And from those (and Slackware) there are hundreds of different versions just like every version of Android is an AOSP-based distro.

      Meanwhile, I have a 2013 Moto X which was promised Lollipop over a year ago

      So update from the upstream repo...oh right you cant because this openness allows hundreds of different customized distributions with their own little incompatible tweaks because everybody ends up suffering NIH syndrome.

      This same thing happens on the linux desktop, hundreds of slightly different distros that are completely unnecessary which just ends up with a crapload of wasted effort and eventually abandoned projects.

    30. Re:Never again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got a Lumia 635 when they had a huge price drop recently ($10 for a used one). WP8 is a pretty nice OS, but I've found that, unfortunately, I don't very much like any of the available web browsers. The obvious options are IE and Opera Mini. I've found that a number of sites don't like Opera Mini (same as the situation with Opera Mini on Android, to be fair). IE works much better than Opera Mini, but it still has various rendering issues (pages will decide to turn white instead of showing content, ads will be placed over article content, etc.) Also, I frequently have to deal with foreign language websites, and having a browser which supports translation is a huge benefit, but IE doesn't.

      So, I like the OS, but I'd actually probably buy into it seriously if there was a port of Chromium or Firefox for it. Especially Firefox, since Firefox mobile even supports add-ons, and I could have my adblocker with me.

    31. Re:Never again by exomondo · · Score: 1

      I'm sticking with Apple devices from now on.

      If you really want total control over your own devices, you can't beat Android. The trick is to choose a cell phone carrier that lets you own your own device.

      It's more about that device manufacturer since almost all of them have binary drivers - particularly in critical parts like the radios - and it also means avoiding things like Google Play Services. I'm not sure which devices give you "total control over your own devices" but if there are some then they certainly aren't the norm as far as Android (or indeed any other mobile system) is concerned.

    32. Re:Never again by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Meanwhile, iOS 9 was available on the iPhone 4S (from 2011) the day it was released.

      Sure, but it's cripplingly slow. It would be better if you could stick with an older, faster version of iOS and just get security updates like you can with Android.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    33. Re:Never again by jon3k · · Score: 1

      It would be better if you could stick with an older, faster version of iOS and just get security updates like you can with Android.

      Except even on Nexus devices you can only get security updates for 3 years. On anything else you're lucky to get them after one year, let alone two. And when you do get them they arrive months late.

      Android "security" is an absolute joke.

    34. Re:Never again by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You only get OS updates for three years. Security updates keep coming via the Play store, which includes patching OS components to mitigate security issues.

      Rather than take click-bait articles written by clueless journalists as fact, let's look at the evidence. Stagefright was supposed to be the end of the world, but actually there is no a single instance of it being exploited in the wild on one of the "billions" of affected devices. That's because in reality it isn't easy to exploit and Google moved pretty quickly to mitigate even that, including on older devices.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  4. Support by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, how long will a $400-500 phone last us?

    Google supports Nexus phones with major updates for "at least two years" now, and security updates for "the longer of three years from initial availability or 18 months from last sale of the device via the Google Store," which is better than any other Android OEM out there. After the Stagefright vulnerability cropped up, Google instituted a monthly security update schedule, and so far Nexus devices have gotten OTAs in August, September, and October, right on schedule.

    It's good to see this stated up front. I'm hoping that this becomes a trend in the industry. The expected lifetime of the phone is going to be a very important factor when deciding on my next one.

    --
    Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    1. Re:Support by jittles · · Score: 1

      So, how long will a $400-500 phone last us?

      Google supports Nexus phones with major updates for "at least two years" now, and security updates for "the longer of three years from initial availability or 18 months from last sale of the device via the Google Store," which is better than any other Android OEM out there. After the Stagefright vulnerability cropped up, Google instituted a monthly security update schedule, and so far Nexus devices have gotten OTAs in August, September, and October, right on schedule.

      It's good to see this stated up front. I'm hoping that this becomes a trend in the industry. The expected lifetime of the phone is going to be a very important factor when deciding on my next one.

      I have a Nexus 4 that has been getting major updates for about 3 years now. If you look at Apple's compatibility chart for iOS 9 you'll see that it supports devices about as old as the Nexus 4. So it looks like they are maintaining status quo with Apple.

    2. Re:Support by swillden · · Score: 1

      I have a Nexus 4 that has been getting major updates for about 3 years now. If you look at Apple's compatibility chart for iOS 9 you'll see that it supports devices about as old as the Nexus 4. So it looks like they are maintaining status quo with Apple.

      Perhaps a bit better in that Google is committing to updates for a defined duration. Apple has done a good job with deploying updates to older devices, but they don't actually make any promises about what they'll do in the future, as far as I can tell.

      I'm hoping Google's move here will start an industry trend to specific support commitments, across and perhaps even beyond the Android ecosystem.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    3. Re:Support by jittles · · Score: 1

      I think the reason that Apple still supports these older devices is the iPad 2. They have a bunch of education contracts that require them to make devices available to school districts for a specific price (replacement devices for iPad 2). If they stop manufacturing the iPad 2 then they have to supply newer hardware to schools at the same price, thereby decreasing their profit margins. This is pure speculation on my part, however.

    4. Re:Support by sad_ · · Score: 1

      or pick a phone supported by the many custom rom projects available, even better and longer support.

      --
      On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  5. 6P battery life by iONiUM · · Score: 2

    First, the actual comment from TFA was:

    Daily battery life was nothing short of astounding and ranks among the best any modern smartphone can offer. The larger battery certainly helps and it’s likely that optimizations within Android 6.0 Marshmallow are doing quite a bit of work here too. I was able to get over 6 and a half hours of screen on time here with normal web browsing, chatting and video watching during a full day. This is among the best battery life you’ll find on any smartphone regardless of the specs, you’re looking at something truly magical here.

    Second, as discussed extensively on reddit, it's way too early to draw any conclusions about the battery. Nobody has had the phone for more than a few days.

    1. Re:6P battery life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While that's true, based on my experience with Marshmallow on my Nexus 6 and nexus 7, I expect both the nexus 6p and 5x should have very good/great battery life just from the size of the battery and the efficiency of 6.0

    2. Re:6P battery life by iONiUM · · Score: 1

      I tend to agree. What bothers me about 6.0 (I have a Nexus 5 with it) is that doze often will also stop notifications from other apps that check data, such as Whatsapp or BBM. It doesn't always happen, but often enough that when I unlock it I'll end up getting maybe 10 notifications that were all waiting.

      So while I do appreciate Google's attempt to solve battery issues with 'doze', I feel like they should instead just concentrate on fixing the issue in a more general way instead of just "let's shut down everything if you aren't touching your phone." Google play services causes a lot of wake-locks, especially with Bluetooth and WiFi, as one very simple example.

    3. Re:6P battery life by CastrTroy · · Score: 2

      I think that Android is doing something wrong when it comes it battery life. I'm not sure what it is about Android, but it seems that the battery drains even when it's just sitting there on my desk. My Windows phone on the other hand does not have this problem. It's been sitting on my desk all day, and it's sitting at 93% battery remaining. It still get's plenty of live notifications. Fetches email, get's Facebook notifications, Reddit inbox, and a few other things. Very little battery gets used unless I'm actually actively using it. With my old Android phone, the battery would be half dead by the end of the day, even if I didn't use actively use the phone at all.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    4. Re:6P battery life by iONiUM · · Score: 1

      I agree. But Google doesn't seem to want to admit this, or deal with it.

    5. Re:6P battery life by swillden · · Score: 1

      Doze?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    6. Re:6P battery life by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      There are lies, damn lies and battery level indicators. Estimating remaining battery capacity is tricky, and it's always an estimate. Perhaps try re-calibrating your phone's battery level, but I bet it's not really 7% lost after say 8 hours of being connected to a cell or wifi network. The battery would have to be huge to enable that.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:6P battery life by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Well, if the indicator is wrong, then it can also be wrong for multiple days. I've 3 days without plugging my phone in and the batter indicator still being up over 60%, with no sign of it dropping. My old Android phone could do the same thing. But only after I did a full reset on the phone and making sure I didn't connect it to Google play services, and installing any apps. The simple act of setting up my Google Account on that phone would bring it back to it's old ways of draining 50% of the battery over the course of the day.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  6. Bezels, everyone's always complaining by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

    I like bezels and I wish my phone had a bigger one. I like to be able to lean back or lay down but I'd rather use my thumb and finger to push the phone up by using the bezel instead of having to hold it from the sides.

  7. They must pass two tests to proceed: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Must have a removable battery
    2) Must have an SD slot

  8. Yawn. Who gives a crap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like 99% of the rest of the people with good jobs, hot wives, nice cars and big houses, I'm buying an iPhone.

    1. Re:Yawn. Who gives a crap? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Like 99% of the rest of the people with good jobs, hot boyfriends, nice cars and big houses, I'm buying an iPhone.

      Fixed that for you.

    2. Re:Yawn. Who gives a crap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, thanks for accepting the basis of my distaste for Android and reminding everyone that Android users are also flaming homophobes.

    3. Re:Yawn. Who gives a crap? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      I never said anything about homosexuality. Insecure about your own much?

    4. Re:Yawn. Who gives a crap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again, thanks for making it clear that Android users are bigoted assholes. Nice that you are upfront about it. So many Android users are "in the closet" so to speak about their douchy tendencies.

  9. Why is everyone so obsessed with wireless charging by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

    While there are advantages to wireless charging, the drawbacks for mobile phones make it somewhat less practical. I suppose the penultimate goal is that your device is charged all the time while in your pocket while you are in an area. The reality is that inductive charging 1) requires the device to be somewhat close to a charging station, 2) is less efficient than wired charging, and 3) takes more time than wired charging.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  10. Other options for pure android? by hawguy · · Score: 1

    I was disappointed by the lack of wireless charging and "only" 32GB for the Nexus 5X so am holding onto my Nexus 5 for now. Are there any other good options for a pure android phone (I bought a Samsung S5, but sold it after a month since I couldn't get used to their Touchwiz interface)? I don't really want to go down the route of Cyanogen mod or other releases where I have to flash the phone myself and some features may or may not be supported.

    I'd really like the better camera of the 5X, but don't want to give up wireless charging.

    1. Re:Other options for pure android? by mrops · · Score: 2

      MOTO X Style (Pure) is awesome.
      Xperia Z5, particularly the Compact comes to mind, Sony is going to go minimalistic on the UI.
      Oneplus 2 also come to mind, but thier invite system leaves much to be desired.

    2. Re:Other options for pure android? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moto X Style is close to stock but is not quite stock, they call it 'pure'. Moto G 3rd Gen is similarly close from what I can figure out. Mostly they just have included moto apps, tethering entitlement was also turned on so you couldn't tether without paying the, ever exciting and complete BS, tethering fee. Though that feels like an oversight on their part which will hopefully be fixed.

    3. Re:Other options for pure android? by Toothpick · · Score: 1

      The Nexus 6 is the obvious answer, even if its camera is possibly not as great as the [P|X]. You get pure Android and Qi.

    4. Re:Other options for pure android? by hawguy · · Score: 1

      The Nexus 6 is the obvious answer, even if its camera is possibly not as great as the [P|X]. You get pure Android and Qi.

      That's a good point - the Nexus 6 is a reasonable option, except that it's just too big. I borrowed one from a friend for a few days, and just couldn't get used to the size.

  11. Re:Huawei? No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    so, you don't buy much do you?

    Foxconn assembles nearly 40% of the worlds consumer electronics and has a sizable operation in china...however china has been starting to get too expensive for them so they have started offshoring.

  12. Re:Why is everyone so obsessed with wireless charg by OhPlz · · Score: 2

    It's convenience. It's easier to lay your phone on the charging pad in a car, for example, than plugging in a micro-USB cable. Plus you don't have cables lying around everywhere, in the car, in the house, at work, etc.

  13. I have a Huawei Ascend P7 by jmd · · Score: 1

    I'm sill on Android 4.4.4. This phone has never had an update, This phone was released in June 2014. Hardly an old phone. It was the flagship phone then.

    The built in file manager shows all of my files stored in internal memory. All of my pictures etc are actually stored on the sdcard. When I remove the sdcard I can view these files on my pc.

    The alarm works most of the time. The snooze button works once then the second time fails.

    With this in mind I was very surprised that Google thought this was a good idea to have Huawei make their flagship phone. But maybe now we will get some support.

    1. Re:I have a Huawei Ascend P7 by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      Google releases the updates to nexus phones, so it doesn't matter who the manufacturer is. As long as the hardware is good, then that's all that matters for a nexus phone.

  14. Re:Huawei? No thanks by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

    Buying stuff from China is only an issue in this way if it's some kind of network-connected computing device and the software is preloaded and not easy to replace. This basically means cellphones, and not much else.

    If you buy a toilet valve made in China, for instance, I don't think that's something you need to worry about spying on you.

    Even a laptop computer shouldn't be a problem, if you're just going to wipe the HD and install Linux. (If you're stupid and you use Windows, however, you're going to get spied on by Microsoft thanks to their new "telemetry" keylogger, and I don't see how it's any better or worse for China to spy on you than MS.)

    But cellphones are definitely a different matter, since it's not so easy to change the software on them.

    But when you, as a society, have made yourself completely dependent on China for all your manufacturing needs, including very high-end technological devices, I do think it's a bit silly to complain about them spying on you.

  15. Re:Why is everyone so obsessed with wireless charg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plus you don't have cables lying around everywhere, in the car, in the house, at work, etc.

    Instead, you have cables to plug in your wireless chargers everywhere......yeah. Neat.

  16. Re:Why is everyone so obsessed with wireless charg by alcmena · · Score: 3, Informative

    I like it because it doesn't create any wear on the USB connector.

  17. Painted into a tiny corner by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 2

    I have a Gen1 Moto G and given it is on the POS Verizon network, I have all but two of the Stagefright vulnerabilities and no doubt will until the sun explodes. The normal advice is to get a new phone that has a chance of a decent length of support, meaning Apple [insert walled-garden retching sounds here] or the Nexus line.

    But the enlarged heart of the problem is the GIGANTISM that still runs amok among capable phones. I don't want anything larger than what I have (needing a backpack to lug around what are now basically phablets that won't fit into even American-sized pockets), which leaves me virtually no choice than the screendoor security I already have.

    I guess I could try the hacked ROM path, but even now it seems so patchwork and stable as a house of cards (nightlies? for a fucking phone?) and I just can't imagine such rag-tag bands has perfected true security, leaving one open for the next lucrative zero-day (or taking a big check from organized crime to build-in a backdoor).

    1. Re:Painted into a tiny corner by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Has there been a single instance of Stagefright being exploited in the wild? It really seems to have been massively overblown.

      You could install Cyanogenmod too. 12.1 is supported and includes a fix for Stagefright. You download a single app and it installs automatically, no hassle at all.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Painted into a tiny corner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy Sandy vagina Batman. Drama queen doesn't begin to describe you.

  18. Nope, another fail. by snarfies · · Score: 1

    No MicroSD is a dealbreaker for me.

    No removeable battery is a dealbreaker for me.

    These have both flaws. Will not buy, at any pricepoint.

  19. Re:Huawei? No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Foxconn: "Notable products that the company manufactures include the BlackBerry,[5] iPad,[6] iPhone,[7] Kindle,[8] PlayStation 4, Xbox One, and Wii U."

    But cellphones are definitely a different matter, since it's not so easy to change the software on them.

    let's see...blackberry, and iphone are included in there. those are exactly the types of devices you said are worrisome.

    and i would point out that software isn't the only thing you need to worry about. since the NSA was caught tampering with cisco switches. they are concerned they may be installing compromised chips.

    the point is if you have access to the hardware you can make it do anything you want. including installing a rootkit that can't be removed by a simple OS reinstall.

  20. Re:Why is everyone so obsessed with wireless charg by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

    Exactly. Cables plugged into chargers that never move and can be tucked away neatly. I'm glad you appreciate how much nicer this is than having several feet of loose cable lying around.

    --
    We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  21. Re:Huawei? No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  22. Battery life by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

    [The Nexus 5X is] their lower end phone, and most reviews mention that it feels that way in the hand — but battery life is reportedly excellent. The Nexus 6P's battery is capable, but doesn't last as long.

    In both battery benchmarks in the article, the Nexus 6P scores better. 631 vs. 548 and 277 vs. 207. It would seem at least from this article that the 6p battery situation is just better than the 5x, contradicting the article summary.

  23. Re:Huawei? No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Foxconn assembles. They don't create, dumbass.

  24. Re:Huawei? No thanks by danbob999 · · Score: 0

    So you think that would stop the Chinese from spying on you if they wanted to?

  25. Re:Huawei? No thanks by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

    The software on a nexus phone is is stock android *and* it's easy to replace.

  26. Re:Huawei? No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and at the assembly stage is the perfect place to install rogue hardware and/or sfotware, dumbass.

  27. Google Fi project by supernova87a · · Score: 1

    The only reason I've been considering this phone is to let my family join the Google Fi project, because of the reasonable plan $ options ($20/month, and good data rates), and the ability to roam globally without extortionate fees. (and just to stick it to the major carriers assholishness).

    However, regardless of how good the phone may be relative to past versions of Nexus, they're all familiar with iPhone and iOS now, and to break out of that is a big hurdle in itself. The tie-ins of iMessage, ease of using apps, user interface, etc, all conspire to keep us using iOS.

    This is why it's hard to break up ecosystems... iPhone does most everything we want, but it just costs too much to switch.

    1. Re:Google Fi project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might also consider the Nexus 6, which can be found new for $299 right now. I just received a new one today (I completely demolished my first Nexus 6 in a horrible kickball accident). I'll also add that the Fi service isn't completely worked out yet. The radio doesn't connect to LTE reliably. I often have to restart, toggle airplane mode, enter manual carrier switch codes in the dialer app, etc. to get it to connect.

  28. Re:Huawei? No thanks by _UnderTow_ · · Score: 1

    To be honest, I'd rather the Chinese government spy on my than my own government.

  29. Re:Why is everyone so obsessed with wireless charg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because Micro USB port is mechanically a point of failure, so reducing plug-in charging is nice over the long run.

  30. You don't miss out on much anymore by RobinEggs · · Score: 1

    Desktops, laptops, and new windows phones can all run the exact same programs now as I understand it, hardware allowing. That's what Microsoft has been working on for the past five years, cutting down the system requirements for windows on all platforms and unifying all the market segments of computing under more or less one operating system so programs can be written just once and target every device type.

    Dealing with a shitty, highly limited app ecosystem in Windows phones is ending. Windows phone could have some of the *best* app support in a couple years, let alone the worst.

    1. Re:You don't miss out on much anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows phone could have some of the *best* app support in a couple years, let alone the worst.

      I could have ten million dollars in a couple years or I could not. Who knows?!

  31. Re:Why is everyone so obsessed with wireless charg by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

    Micro B might be a failure but both devices have USB-C connectors which should be, by design, more failure resistant.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  32. Re:Why is everyone so obsessed with wireless charg by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    Lack of wireless charging is a huge loss. I'd have pre-ordered a 6P if it had wireless charging. Not only an I used to it now, but I've got a lot of chargers.

    It really marrs an otherwise great product.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  33. Re:Why is everyone so obsessed with wireless charg by OhPlz · · Score: 1

    Some cars have them built in now. There are also companies building them into furniture for home and office. It's 2015, welcome to the future.

  34. No Qi no sale by ukoda · · Score: 1

    I guess my run of always buying the latest Nexus phones is over. Wireless charging is just to damn convenient to give up. I just can't go back to plugging in every time I return to my desk/couch, or risking a flat battery. If it hasn't got wireless charging it isn't a premium phone, it is just another compromise product.

    1. Re:No Qi no sale by Socguy · · Score: 1

      Talk about your 1st world problems...

  35. Re:Why is everyone so obsessed with wireless charg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No doubt you find charging with a cable traumatic! The sexually masculine nature of inserting a phallus into a slot is yet another attempt by the patriarchy to subvert the phallicly-challenged.

    btw, trigger warning: cocks

  36. Re:Why is everyone so obsessed with wireless charg by swillden · · Score: 1

    I like it because it doesn't create any wear on the USB connector.

    It's also a nice solution for devices whose USB connectors are broken. For a lot of Android devices with removable batteries (not Nexus devices) you can get after-market charging antennas to install inside the back cover and make it possible to charge a device that would otherwise need a potentially-expensive repair.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  37. Are google paying the Microsoft Android tax? by nickweller · · Score: 1

    Will Google be paying the Microsoft Android tax on these Google Nexus mobile devices?

  38. Re:Why is everyone so obsessed with wireless charg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Micro B might be a failure but both devices have USB-C connectors which should be, by design, more failure resistant.

    It's rubbing two pieces of metal together that are both critical for charging the device instead of putting a functionally unimportant piece of plastic next to another piece of plastic. Anything that you plug is equally bad.

  39. Re:Huawei? No thanks by cheater512 · · Score: 1

    You missed the whole Lenovo debacle didn't you?
    Where wiping the hard drive didn't in fact save you from their crap.

  40. Re:Why is everyone so obsessed with wireless charg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No doubt you find charging with a cable traumatic! The sexually masculine nature of inserting a phallus into a slot is yet another attempt by the patriarchy to subvert the phallicly-challenged.

    btw, trigger warning: cocks

    I was raped by this post. And posts are shaped like phalluses, you just made me imagination rape myself, you insensitive clod.

  41. Re:Why is everyone so obsessed with wireless charg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've gotten very used to plopping my phone on the charging pad at the end of the day, and having it charged fully the next morning. I'm going to miss wireless charging, personally.

  42. Re:Huawei? No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shhhhh. He is walking around with blinders on. Let him live in his own world.

  43. OR not XOR by rsborg · · Score: 0

    To be honest, I'd rather the Chinese government spy on my than my own government.

    Think logical OR, not an exclusive-or (XOR).

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  44. Re:Why is everyone so obsessed with wireless charg by msevior · · Score: 1

    Wireless charging is an awesome feature. Its really easy to slot my Nexus 5 in and out of the cradle of my car system. Bingo! No fiddling to things connected etc. I can't believe they dropped the feature. My partner has an iPhone 6P and she's really jealous she can't do that with a phone that costs 3 time more than mine.

  45. Re:Huawei? No thanks by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but the way I remember that, they put some malware into the BIOS which modified some Windows files, so re-installing Windows wouldn't get rid of whatever it was they were injecting into it, because the BIOS would just see the Windows file wasn't the modified version, and go modify it for you.

    This isn't a problem if you don't install Windows in the first place.

    Heck, it probably isn't even a problem if you "upgrade" to Windows 10, as the BIOS malware would have been hard-coded for an earlier version.

  46. it's too big by Cederic · · Score: 1

    The Nexus 5, like the Nexus 4, like the Galaxy Nexus, was a 5" device that fits into a pocket. I've used the same sleeve case for all three.

    The 5x is bigger. It's too big.

    Given the Nexus 6 debacle I'd hoped Google would realise that there are a bunch of people that don't want to walk around with a fucking handbag just to hold their phone. Who find holsters inconvenient, awkward and uncomfortable. Who want a sensibly sized fucking phone.

    But no. They want you to buy the humungous 6p or the stupidly oversized 5x.

    Sticking with my Nexus 5. It's perfectly usable still, Marshmallow works nicely on it, and there just isn't a phone out there that's a reasonable upgrade.

  47. Re:Huawei? No thanks by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I remember that from a while ago. However, tampering with rack-mount network switches is a bit different from tampering with a cellphone. There just isn't any extra room in there for adding anything. And how could the NSA make a "compromised chip" anyway? I don't think the NSA owns any $5 billion fabs; that would be very hard to hide. Back to the switches: wasn't that just a software mod they did?

  48. Re:Huawei? No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    here is another relavent article Hiding backdoors in hardware. it references the NSA operating its own chip fab plant. it is in Fort Meade, Md. i don't know if it is still operating though.

    other searches shows that the NSA recently took over an old Sony chip fab in san antonio

  49. Re:Huawei? No thanks by cheater512 · · Score: 2

    Linux would be immune of course.

    Windows 10 not so much. It wasn't malware - it was a Windows feature being abused where Windows would execute arbitrary code stored in the BIOS.
    No exploit or vulnerability.

  50. Re:Why is everyone so obsessed with wireless charg by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

    ^

    This... My Nexus 5 has QI wireless charging, wonder why they took that feature away...

    --
    I've got better things to do tonight than die.
  51. Re:Why is everyone so obsessed with wireless charg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In all of the solutions I've researched the antenna plugs into the USB. You would want to install the antenna BEFORE the USB is damaged.

  52. Re:Why is everyone so obsessed with wireless charg by swillden · · Score: 1

    The ones I've seen, it attaches directly to the battery contacts.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  53. The missing perspective from this thread by Skythe · · Score: 1

    This is going to get downvoted to oblivion, but here it goes.

    Normal people do not care about software updates. They care even less about security updates. They are on their contracts and happy to pick up a new phone every 2 years or so, and there is little elapsed time before their phone's current OS will go out of fashion.

    Nerds do care about this stuff (myself included). This is the specific reason I buy the Nexus line. I have had non-Nexus devices before, and gotten bored (rather than frustrated) over lack of OS update, so I've flashed custom ROMs.

  54. Re:Huawei? No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    linux would be immune in the example above simply because it wasn't targeted, not because it has some magical ability to protect itself from such an attack.

    what is stopping someone from building their own little micro kernel in the bios that can accept commands that would allow a remote attacker to control any operating system installed on the hardware. This could control the whole system and just run the installed OS as a VM.

  55. Re:Huawei? No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it was done at the manufacturing stage, then sure there is room, you just need a modified version of one of the chips, if the main SoC isn't an option for modification, then perhaps the storage controller, or any chip in the phone that is capable of DMA. And who said it would be the NSA doing it, they are just an example as they have been caught tampering.