Slashdot Mirror


AMD To Retire Catalyst Control Center Drivers, Rolling Out New Crimson Platform (hothardware.com)

MojoKid writes: AMD has gone through significant changes as a company over the last few months. Recently, we've seen them enter into a joint venture with Nantong Fujitsu for final assembly and test operations. They've also formed the new Radeon Technologies Group, led by longtime graphics guru Raja Koduri. Today, AMD is announcing another big change, and this one affects a piece of software that you may have running on your systems right now, if there's a Radeon graphics card on board. AMD is ditching Catalyst Control Center in favor of software dubbed Radeon Settings, which is a critical part of what AMD is calling the Radeon Software Crimson Edition. Radeon Software Crimson Edition is completely re-architected and is claimed to offer new features, improvements to stability and responsiveness, and performance improvements as well. The update will include a new Game Manager, video quality presets, social media integration, simplified EF setup, a system notifications tab, and more. It looks as though the first version of the software will be out this month.

113 comments

  1. Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I've always wanted Facebook in my drivers. Now I can automate the process of telling me when my AMD card shits out. That should make for a fast paced news feed...

    1. Re:Facebook by Dracos · · Score: 2

      What the fuck, right?

      I just want to get the drivers installed on my Mint system that will allow me to use my R280X for rendering in Blender. No games, just Blender.

    2. Re:Facebook by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Don't you want the world to immediately know what you are using your video card for....hmm, Big&Black&RoughAllOver.mp4 is currently fullscreen.

      OK, so maybe not everything.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    3. Re:Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't see why this was modded "Offtopic", he's spot on. Why the hell does a video driver package need social media integration!?!?

  2. A friggen video driver... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A friggen video driver with 'social integration' and 'system notification' - and then they cannot understand why their driver runs slow, is full of bugs and users prefer the Free driver.

    1. Re:A friggen video driver... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0, Troll

      As long as you don't have to register just to download the damn thing, it's still better than Nvidia's drivers. At least you can ignore the social media and notification features, you can't even get an Nvidia driver without handing over a working email address and creating an account.

      Maybe Intel are the way to go, but even they have a system notification feature. Like AMD's, it can be disabled.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:A friggen video driver... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I want my Facebook and Twitter account full of "Doug's Radeon Driver has successfully been restarted after an error."

    3. Re:A friggen video driver... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      you can't even get an Nvidia driver without handing over a working email address and creating an account.

      You're absolutely full of shit.

      I went to nvidia.co.uk just now, clicked on 'Drivers > All NVIDIA Drivers'. There are five boxes that list type of card (GeForce, etc), series (9xx, etc) and card (950, etc), operating system and language. You click the 'Search' button and it brings you to a clickthrough license agreement page, where if you click 'AGREE & DOWNLOAD', you get the (288mb) install file as a normal http download.

      I don't know what you're doing, but whatever it is, you're doing it wrong.

    4. Re:A friggen video driver... by FictionPimp · · Score: 3, Informative

      I just went to nvidia.com and downloaded their drivers and installed them without giving them an email address or creating an account.

    5. Re:A friggen video driver... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as you don't have to register just to download the damn thing, it's still better than Nvidia's drivers. At least you can ignore the social media and notification features, you can't even get an Nvidia driver without handing over a working email address and creating an account.

      Maybe Intel are the way to go, but even they have a system notification feature. Like AMD's, it can be disabled.

      Where on Earth are you trying to download Nvidia's drivers? Nvidia's download page and the results page don't have anything even resembling a demand for an email address, unless you count the 'Subscribe to our newsletter' nonsense at the top-right corner of the page (which you shouldn't be, because you can download drivers all day long without doing that).

    6. Re:A friggen video driver... by SQLGuru · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You're also missing the other side of it.......

      While you're playing COD, rendered right on top of the guy you're trying to kill is a notification because your mom wants you to send her another Candy Crush ticket. And because of that --- BOOM, headshot.....only you're the recipient, not the giver.

    7. Re:A friggen video driver... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just robbed them at daytime.

    8. Re:A friggen video driver... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:A friggen video driver... by spire3661 · · Score: 2

      While true, if you want to use shadowplay, you have to install Geforce Experience, which will soon require a login. Nvidia has no high ground here and in fact im betting AMD is just following the green team. For reference, i own a 570GTX, 770 GTX and 980ti GTX

      --
      Good-bye
    10. Re:A friggen video driver... by dreamchaser · · Score: 0

      You're not just a troll, you're an idiot if you actually believe what you just wrote, or a plain liar if you are astroturfing or being a fanboi.

    11. Re:A friggen video driver... by LuniticusTheSane · · Score: 1

      "That doesn’t mean you won’t be able to download a driver from Nvidia.com — it just means that the drivers on the website will be updated periodically, not on a per-release basis. Nvidia has stated that it will push a new driver through its website at least once a quarter, but it hasn’t ironed out the exact timing details yet."

    12. Re: A friggen video driver... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends what country you are coming from... GeoIP. The web is no longer a static thing.

    13. Re:A friggen video driver... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does that mean that all the extra shit won't be installed when I refuse to sign up for that? Last thing I want is more "experience" slowing my PC down (irregardless of the company adding it)

    14. Re:A friggen video driver... by IMightB · · Score: 2

      Who the fuck cares? you'll respawn in 30 seconds either way. If you really care about not having notifications popup, how about logging the fuck off of facebook before you start playing. Are you really going to be playing a serious game, and expect Social media notifications at the same time?

      I say let drivers be drivers, let social media be social media and never should the two meet.

    15. Re:A friggen video driver... by CrashNBrn · · Score: 2

      LOL. It's COD. It's Important dammnit!

    16. Re: A friggen video driver... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you seriously just come on /. And use the word irregardless? All I can say is WTF

    17. Re:A friggen video driver... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Can no one disagree in a civil manner and speak to each other like grown men?

    18. Re:A friggen video driver... by JohnStock · · Score: 1

      That's the thing, it's not just a video driver and hasn't been for many years now. We have things like the internet and streaming. Stuck in 1999?

    19. Re:A friggen video driver... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > you can't even get an Nvidia driver without handing over a working email address and creating an account.

      False. I have been downloading Nvidia drivers for years without providing any information. As for the AMD drivers, they can call them whatever they want - just make sure they are as simple to install under Linux as Nvidia's, and that they work - something still in my to-do list.

    20. Re:A friggen video driver... by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Can no one disagree in a civil manner and speak to each other like grown men?

      That was a civil manner between men, you cock gurgling mother fucker.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    21. Re:A friggen video driver... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Can no one disagree in a civil manner and speak to each other like grown men?"

      No, because the brain is bad at thinking.

      Science on reasoning:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYmi0DLzBdQ

    22. Re:A friggen video driver... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, basically you can buy a new game and you won't get the up-to-date driver unless you've given up your e-mail address to them or wait a quarter. Wonderful. It's not as bad as the original comment about requiring e-mail to get the driver, but it looks like they're taking a small step in that direction. Perhaps they're testing the waters to see just how much hate mail they'll get over such a change (a lot, I suspect).

    23. Re:A friggen video driver... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can no one disagree in a civil manner and speak to each other like grown men?

      That was a civil manner between men, you cock gurgling mother fucker.

      I know you are, but what am I?

    24. Re:A friggen video driver... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you gurgle cock and fuck your mother at the same time? Is there a rule 34 for this?

    25. Re:A friggen video driver... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Can you gurgle cock and fuck your mother at the same time? Is there a rule 34 for this?

      Oh there's probably rule 34 for it, it'd likely fall into the lines of incest related threesomes. This is the internet after all.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  3. Just the driver, thanks by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2

    I don't want a control center, and I certainly don't want a "game manager". Tell your marketing critters to focus on the bitmaps on the cardboard carton the hardware ships in.

    I just want a driver. Hint: that's not a 100 Mb downloaded installer.

    1. Re:Just the driver, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nonesense! You want something that let's AMD know what games you are playing, when you play them and for how long so they can provide you with optimised settings! (and also ads for other games you may like :) )

  4. Social media integration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just what my graphics driver needs.

  5. Social by Allicorn · · Score: 1

    I'd stop to post about how useful social network integration will be for my graphics driver's settings manager prog but I need to go visit the bike shop to buy some birthday presents for my koi.

    --
    OMG!!! Ponies!!!
    1. Re:Social by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      I'd stop to post about how useful social network integration will be for my graphics driver's settings manager prog but I need to go visit the bike shop to buy some birthday presents for my koi.

      Don't forget to buy them the tight little shorts, you don't want your fish to look silly when they are out riding around!

      Seriously, these morons should have to call the install "Useless Crap & Drivers". It's the same thing with updates for Flash, Java, or almost anything these days. If you are going to try and install software not already on my system, then you should be required to call it something like "Chrome Browser Installer with Flash Update" or "Ask Toolbar Installer with Java Update". Put the name of the new software first because it is an install, not an update.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    2. Re:Social by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I'm super seriously hoping these features make it in to the nouveau package! "David's breaking random shit again, watch now!"

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  6. lol amd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i dont even look at amd cards BECAUSE of their drivers, id rather get aids than have amd drivers in my computer, thank you

  7. Just another thing to delete... by FatRichie · · Score: 2

    I've always removed CCC from my startups, I'm sure I'll do the same with Crimson.

    1. Re:Just another thing to delete... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use it to enable and disable displays a couple of times per week. I just hope that this fixes the bug where when enabling an HDMI connection, it stops recognizing it having audio output. Having to restart my computer to get audio to my tv is annoying. It is the only reason I restart now.

  8. Wow. by cloud.pt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Game Manager, social media integration, system notifications tab...

    Seems to be ticking all the right boxes on my graphic driver customization shit list. Please bring more clutter to an already confusing piece of software that should have as main focus its simplicity, transparency, and not meddling in tasks my OS and Browser are supposed to be doing...

    1. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like it needs systemd to clean it up.

  9. This sounded like good news... by Shark · · Score: 1

    ... until the 'social network interaction' bit. For a moment there, I thought they were getting rid of the bloat that has been plaguing these drivers for years.

    --
    Mind the frickin' laser...
  10. 3rd party by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Between this and the geforce experience, now I'll have to go to some shady 3rd party to get my graphic drivers.

  11. Last nail in their coffin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Integration of social networking into my fucking graphics driver? No but fuck no! Hopefully team green doesn't follow them like this is some sort of good idea.

  12. Social media, game center? by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 2

    Why can't they just provide a working graphics card driver and a simple, straightforward and working settings manager for it? What is wrong with AMD?

    My next graphics card will be an Nvidia for sure.

    1. Re:Social media, game center? by RogueyWon · · Score: 4, Informative

      Hate to break it to you, but even as a fully signed up supporter of the green team, I have to admit their driver-bloat situation is no better. It's around 170mb for a set of Nvidia drivers these days, most of which is for their ludicrously over-engineered "Geforce Experience" crap. Oh, plus all of the Nvidia Shield intergration, which I'm sure is of huge interest to both of the people who've bought a Shield tablet.

      There are valid reasons to go for an Nvidia card - heat, power consumption, general stability - but a lack of driver-bloat sadly isn't one of them.

    2. Re:Social media, game center? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why can't they just provide a working graphics card driver and a simple, straightforward and working settings manager for it?

      They can't. So they are making this instead.

    3. Re:Social media, game center? by TypoNAM · · Score: 0

      Yes, nVidia's installer file is getting bigger and bigger each year, however at least most of it is optional (graphics drivers and control panel for it aren't), unlike AMD's installers where it wasn't possible to opt out of Raptr garbage. GeForce Experience, PhysX, 3D stereo features, and such are completely optional even in their latest driver for my GTX 970.

      When I last had to install AMD drivers for Windows for a family member late last year, cause their laptop had a ATI embedded card in it, it feels like AMD has sold by not providing an option at all to not install Raptr which caused a lot of problems until I finally figured out what the hell it was causing the non-closable dialog prompt/splash screen, something about 'gaming membership', every Windows startup without killing it via task manager.

      --
      This space is not for rent.
    4. Re:Social media, game center? by ADRA · · Score: 2

      Whine much? Really, if 170 MB is spilled milk, look at your NV driver download directory to see every copy of your installer every downloaded.

      I think Geforce experience is great. I optimize to play games, and they seem to do their darnedest to 'optimize' the gameplay graphics experience. I couldn't be more happy wasting some bits on making my life easier.

      --
      Bye!
    5. Re:Social media, game center? by Xenx · · Score: 2

      It's entirely possible to opt out of Raptr during install, as long as you do custom install. I've been doing it for years when updating the driver.

    6. Re:Social media, game center? by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      GeForce Experience is NOT optional if you want to use Shadowplay, a hardware feature i paid for.

      --
      Good-bye
    7. Re:Social media, game center? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah the Nvidia stack is pretty big but that's the nature the market today. People want auto-updates, recording/streaming, and a general management suite and that means a pretty heavy install.

      That said, AMD's counterpart to Nivdia's "Geforce Experience" is a pile of hot fucking garbage right now. It's a good thing that they're going to clean it up because it makes me avoid AMD products like the plague.

    8. Re:Social media, game center? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. And you can be treated to such wonderful things as GeForce Experience automatically updating and breaking itself in the process, requiring you to uninstall and reinstall approximately half the time before you actually get around to recording anything.

      With any luck, you will not have random frame loss and audio problems in the recording, to boot.

      I wish Fraps wasn't complete shit. I wish there was a viable alternative to Shadowplay. But when it actually works, oh god, it is glorious.

    9. Re:Social media, game center? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it very hard to believe that you paid extra for this feature. Even if you somehow paid for a feature ala cart, the feature is online-based, so of course you have to enter credentials.

    10. Re:Social media, game center? by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      I paid for the h.264 hardware encoder on the card itself. I bought the card in large part because my last card didnt have one. I shouldn't have to register and log in to access it.

      --
      Good-bye
    11. Re:Social media, game center? by TypoNAM · · Score: 1

      I always do custom/advanced option when using installers, provided when they actually have that option. I can definitely say that there was no such optional component labelled "Raptr" -or- "AMD Gaming Evolved App" at the time I last used their installer. They probably finally made it optional after so many complaints. It says a lot when you enter "raptr" very first search suggestion is "raptr uninstall".

      --
      This space is not for rent.
    12. Re:Social media, game center? by JohnStock · · Score: 1

      Because it's not 1999 and gaming is a LOT more than what it was back then.

    13. Re:Social media, game center? by Xenx · · Score: 1

      At most, only once in the last 2+ years has raptr ever installed without me wanting it. I say at most, because I cannot be sure I didn't just forget to uncheck it. I also constantly update my drivers both with release and beta drivers. I'm not doubting your experience, just stating it's atypical from the behavior of the installer since they started including Raptr.

    14. Re:Social media, game center? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shield is actually cool, you don't need an Nvidia tablet to use it. See Moonlight. It even works with Raspberry Pi, which is pretty damned awesome.

    15. Re:Social media, game center? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it's a lot more boring and mindless.

  13. How about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something less that a 1 gig download.
    10 megs at most to configure your card.

    1. Re:How about by ledow · · Score: 1

      But that would mean having to write in a "non-cool" language that just integrates and does stuff.

      How else are they going to write one line of code instead of two if not to bundle the entire Microsoft .NET Framework in several versions, Silverlight for good measure, complete installs of DirectX for those people on computers so old they don't have them, several versions of the Microsoft Visual C++ Runtimes, etc.?

      This is the thing that drives me mad about modern computing. I get a game having 60Gb of content. 3D models and HD textures are huge. I get a large program needing support libraries,etc. But when something is more than 100-200 Mb of download just to install some tiny freeware utility, you have to consider what the hell you are doing wrong to get that far.

      X needs runtime Y? Write an installer that downloads that if its really needed rather than bundling it by default. But to do that, of course, you need to be able to write in a language that needs no runtimes but the built-in Windows ones.

    2. Re:How about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like the package managers on Linux working for years now?
      A program says I need library A, D and H and de package-manager takes care of it.

  14. why the hate with social media? by Necroloth · · Score: 1

    Have I misunderstood what they could do with social media integration? I wouldn't mind being able to link it to my YouTube or Fb account and then get my gameplay or sketching recorded and posted up with a quick click.

    1. Re:why the hate with social media? by slaker · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing the social integration has more to do with streaming/recording for Twitch and Youtube than anything to do with Facebook.That stuff is kind of a PITA to set up,so if it's automated somewhere or other, I can see a case made for that adding value, sorta.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    2. Re:why the hate with social media? by Xenx · · Score: 1

      There's also the fact that Raptr had community game profiles to optimize settings. They could quite easily also be expanding upon that idea.

    3. Re:why the hate with social media? by RKThoadan · · Score: 1

      I guess that wouldn't be so bad. If so somebody needs to notify the marketing department that "social media integration" has gone from buzzword to electro-shock word.

    4. Re:why the hate with social media? by dinfinity · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That would actually be useful, but considering that one of the screenshots shows 'Follow AMD' with the mandatory shitload of social media icons in the main overview of the settings interface of a fucking driver makes me think that this has marketing department vomit sauce all over it.
      You know: "We need to raise the profile of AMD and generate buzz on social media' or whatever the fuck it is they say.

      I'm betting that in the overview where you can change clock settings there's going to be a share button which automatically posts a Twitter message and Facebook status update saying: "Just overclocked my AMD Radeon 1234XX to 1000Mhz, bitches! #AMDrulez #overclockingBoss #beastmode #caturday"

  15. But does it have an email client? by xtal · · Score: 2

    /emacs

    Seriously WTF. I never forgave AMD/ATI for the OpenGL Rage driver debacle in the late 90s. Haven't looked back. nVidia, for their sins, at least have decent and timely driver updates.

    --
    ..don't panic
    1. Re:But does it have an email client? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nVidia, for their sins, at least have decent and timely driver updates.

      Which they're going to release less often unless you give them an email address:

      In the future, only GeForce owners who both install GeForce Experience and register the service by providing Nvidia with an email address will have access to Game-Ready driver downloads, which will be pushed exclusively through GFE. That doesn’t mean you won’t be able to download a driver from Nvidia.com — it just means that the drivers on the website will be updated periodically, not on a per-release basis. Nvidia has stated that it will push a new driver through its website at least once a quarter, but it hasn’t ironed out the exact timing details yet.

    2. Re:But does it have an email client? by spauldo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I had a Rage Fury MAXX (or something like that) that only had Windows drivers for 98.

      Didn't matter on Linux, but I had some work to do on IIS for work and installed W2K Server on a second drive and set up dual boot. It gave me 640x480, 16 colors.

      Their excuse: it's a gaming card, and people only game on Windows 98.

      It really didn't matter that much to me from a practical standpoint - my home machine was Linux-only most of the time. But I decided since ATI wanted to dictate what their users could use their products for, I didn't need ATI.

      Blender now supports OpenCL on AMD cards, so I could theoretically switch now, but I never hear good things about AMD. I'll stick with NVidia.

      --
      Those who can't do, teach. Those who can't teach either, do tech support.
    3. Re:But does it have an email client? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 0

      so when I give them the email address 'roundfile@' and only use that account for their stupid bullshit, they'll get nothing.

      Yes, it's an asshat thing to do, but there's a million ways around it. Setting up a junk mailbox takes me 10 seconds, and allows me to see exactly what Nvidia plans to do with it by way of analyzing what junk arrives in it.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    4. Re:But does it have an email client? by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      I see you weren't one of the unfortunate people with a DX9-only NVidia laptop card when Vista came out. From the Beta 2 days through until around six months after release, there were two choices of driver for my GeForce GO 7600:
      1) The "official" driver, which ran at about 40% of the framerate the card was capable of and lacked such basic features as "preserve aspect ratio" scaling.
      2) The current "beta" or "unsupported" driver, which ran at full speed with full features but was so unstable it would crash every time I alt-tabbed out of a full-screen game, and most times that I changed resolution. At least it was WDDM, so a video driver crash usually just meant a few second of black screen instead of a BSOD, but on occasion it would crash *twice* within a few seconds, causing the kernel to give up on the user-mode driver and resulting in a BSOD.

      Meanwhile, AMD (well, ATi) had a working, full-performance driver for my other laptop (also a DX9-only chip) six months before Vista released - a full year before NVidia got their act together, at least for the pre-8000-serieis GPUs - and only minor issues before that. Then I had a Win7 laptop with an NVidia card - a DX10-capable 9600 something-or-other - and it had its own plethora of driver issues.

      While AMD graphics cards definitely run hotter than NVidia ones, I'm extremely skeptical of claims that NVidia drivers are superior. My home-built gaming desktop has been using AMD graphics for three years now, and has had fewer driver problems in that whole time than my roommate's machine has had since he switched to NVidia graphics a mere six months ago (also a homebuild, though he uses Intel CPUs).

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
  16. Re-architected by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

    Re-Archtitected? Architected isn't even a word.

    No. Just....no.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Re-architected by Virtucon · · Score: 1
      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    2. Re:Re-architected by ADRA · · Score: 1

      Words don't become words until people use them... so your point? I've heard Architected enough over my career to know its common vernacular if it's in your dictionary or not.

      --
      Bye!
    3. Re:Re-architected by DanJ_UK · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is.

      --
      - Dan
    4. Re:Re-architected by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Some may say the word is overzeetop in this case but it is still a word.

    5. Re:Re-architected by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Architected is a verb.

      verb (used with object)
      4.
      to plan, organize, or structure as an architect:
      The house is well architected

      http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/architected

  17. AMD gets it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AMD knows that only apps can app apps, so they're apping their LUDDITE Video Driver to turn it into a modern appy app!

    Apps!

  18. A name change and a bigger pile by grimmjeeper · · Score: 1

    A bigger pile of steaming horse droppings by any other name, will still smell...

  19. A tiny step forward by Hydrian · · Score: 1

    Not much real news here. The only thing that sounds good here is that they are unifying the UI on a cross platform toolkit. Instead of using .net (and some odd port to linux) they are going to be using QT.

    --
    No good deed goes unpunished.
  20. Will the new GUI be a native app? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Or will they make all the same mistakes all over again? A big part of what was wrong with CCC is that it was super-bloated. I understand when a driver package has a large footprint because it supports a lot of hardware. I don't understand when it has a large footprint because the configuration GUI is a gigantic turd.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Will the new GUI be a native app? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was mention that it will be done in QT rather than .NET, so there might be some change in how responsive it is. The size of the driver is (as others have pointed out) silly, but Nvidia are as bad. I watched the video on the linked site and I do hope all the "discoverability" (another non-word) is easy to turn off as I really don't care for yet more corporate overlords poking through the PC to see what they can sell me. Social media is also not hugely interesting to me, so it would be nice if I could just turn that off too. A bare minimum just-the-driver install would be great and if AMD's previous installers are anything to go by, they'll give you that option. Still, this is all supposition until it escapes from AMD's software team.

  21. Post Windows 10 Mortum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After the Windows 10 roll-out all my Radeon supported video on my laptop is junk.

    Huge buffering issues, audio no longer synced to video - this is across all software and streaming video.

    Finding updated driver led to this crazy install of Catalyst which slowed and confused everything more.

    I just wanted to play a Youtube video and now all THIS?

    Might be a death rattle at AMD.

    1. Re:Post Windows 10 Mortum by Xenx · · Score: 1

      It couldn't possibly be something else causing the problem.... I'm not saying it's definitely not AMD, but you having trouble doesn't instantly mean it's AMD's fault.

  22. Feel like I'm taking crazy pills here. by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 1

    What is this madness? Why is everybody trying to push stupid shit on me? I've been avoiding the Gaming Evolved app for years now. Why do I need this? Has the world gone mad?

    1. Re:Feel like I'm taking crazy pills here. by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Yes. This is the future we feared when Steam raised its head. A hundred different logins and services running on your machine that demand to be updated or refuse to work. We are squarely back in the mainframe era again. For the record, i like Steam a lot, but i saw where it would lead. Now i have Steam, Origin, Gog.com, Blizzard, Ubisoft, and Epic game launchers on my machine, plus the graphics drivers will soon require a login. Windows 10 all but requires a MS account so another service login there. Yes the computing world has gone quite mad.

      --
      Good-bye
    2. Re:Feel like I'm taking crazy pills here. by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      This is the future we feared when Steam raised its head. A hundred different logins and services running on your machine that demand to be updated or refuse to work. We are squarely back in the mainframe era again. For the record, i like Steam a lot, but i saw where it would lead. Now i have Steam, Origin, Gog.com, Blizzard, Ubisoft, and Epic game launchers on my machine,

      Agreed. It's a train wreck. It makes me sad when the only non-connected version I can get is for game consoles.

      The good news is (at least for Gog) the games shouldn't need to be connected to actually work. AFAIK it's just a launcher/installer.

    3. Re:Feel like I'm taking crazy pills here. by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      GOG Galaxy doesn't require you log in to launch games. It isn't required for anything in any game at all, in fact. I'm not saying that GOG won't eventually change their tune, but their promise right now is that Galaxy will never be required for any gaming. You can download the games, install the games, update the games, and play the games without needing Galaxy. If you do have Galaxy, you can use it as a simple launcher without signing into your GOG account.

      You do (legally) need a GOG account to download GOG games, which is suboptimal, but the installers and the games themselves are free of all DRM, including sign-in requirements.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    4. Re:Feel like I'm taking crazy pills here. by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      the games themselves are free of all DRM, including sign-in requirements.

      They kind of have to be since most of them are just glorified batch scripts that run games via dosbox.

      It's technically possible to DRM it (encrypt the game image and only decrypt it once you're signed in) but I'd be very surprised if Gog ever did it.

  23. Stay in school, kids. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't pay attention in class, then you can't write the part of the video driver that drives video. The good news is, you can still get a job writing drivers for ATI! But not nVidia.

    Trust me, I speak as one who knows. I didn't work hard enough nor take graduate courses. :(

    It makes me sad about the world that people capable of writing useless software are:
      - indistinguishable from programmers with a more grounded profession. Both are treated as autistic freaks by "normal" people who are useless at programming.
      - still paid really well. In fact they might even be paid more because game development has a burnout / glamour tax on it.
      - hyped _more_ than legitimate programmers. Pet food ordering "Apps," connect4 clones, and OS updates that distractingly rearrange a bunch of UI wallpaper are all the hotness. Graphics drivers? meh, so what. will it be done before christmas? Then go back to the basement and get to work.

  24. Cool except NO to social media integration! by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Have to agree wholeheartedly with the other people commenting here who dislike the social media integration aspect of these new drivers!

    IMO, this sort of functionality NEVER belongs in a device driver package (even IF the package also bundles related applications such as control panels or optimization tools). Social media integration should be handled at the application level, by the games or other software someone chooses to install on a machine.

    I'm even willing to go so far as to accept than an operating system itself might embrace social media, in the sense that it provides "hooks" so popular social media services can OPTIONALLY pop notifications on an all-purpose status bar or screen. (Apple and Microsoft both do some of this now. I dislike it in the sense that you're now developed an OS that has ties to 3rd. party services outside of the direct control of the people coding the OS. History shows us that this leads to broken features in the OS down the road. At the very least, this looks "ugly" when someone wishes to keep using an older operating system and now has entire menu configuration options that simply don't work when clicked. But at the end of the day, I suppose an OS should offer whatever functionality its users find useful. And enough people use Twitter or Facebook that they'd like their OS's notification bar to incorporate those updates.)

    I just don't see where any value is added by rolling this stuff into the device drivers that make hardware "go", though? If I want to discuss my driver settings with other people, I'll visit an online support forum to do that. I don't need bloated drivers providing built in windows to do that stuff!

  25. Social Media Integration? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF, why would anyone want this in a video driver?

  26. Name Change + by truck_soccer · · Score: 1

    Change the name of the software, add some obnoxious and invasive "features" = Profit????

  27. Why all the bloat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why can't I just have an AMD property sheet/page in display settings and be done with it? I'm hoping this is optional like the existing control center.

  28. All people want are drivers that don't suck by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    The problem is "graphics mini operating system" koolaid drunk by AMD. I just want to run my shit and not be hampered by delusions of grandeur and scope creep of vendors. As a consumer I don't want an operating system I want a driver. Sure as heck won't stand for graphics drivers communicating with Facebook.

    For years I made a point of staying away from AMD because their drivers have always sucked/crashed and CCC is a bloated piece of crap. It is good they want to focus on fixing these problems yet all I really want are drivers that work. Social media integration is evidence AMD has no discipline and will continue to annoy people away from its products with unnecessary bullshit.

  29. Long overdue by Kichigai+Mentat · · Score: 1

    About freaking time. Software has always been ATI/AMD's biggest problem, and the Catalyst Control Center at this point is ancient and awful. They've just been tacking new stuff on to it, kludging together something for each successive release to try and keep up with Nvidia, but making it worse each time. All they're doing here is integrating the Gaming Evolved Experience features into the software for manually controlling the GPU. It's to simplify things for the majority of people who wouldn't know the difference between Anti-Aliasing and Ambient Occlusion. The Game Manager is no big deal. They've been trying to do that for a little bit, but Nvidia has been mopping the floor in that department with the GeForce Experience. It's just optimal settings for people who don't have the know-how to hand optimize games, which is probably the majority of PC gamers; not the PC gaming enthusiasts who know what they're doing, but people who buy a PC and play games on it. I also don't get why people are so bent out of shape about the "social integration." That's been a part of the Radeon software ever since AMD bought up Raptr. Chances are they'll roll in support for Twitch or YouTube or something, too. Streaming gameplay has become such an enormous thing that they'd be foolish not to get in there, because Lord knows Nvidia isn't, but Microsoft is (see: Xbox One streaming). If you don't like it, don't use it. Same thing I do with the Nvidia equivalent.

    --
    Rawr
  30. AMD... by bogie · · Score: 1

    Lures you in with cheaper prices...

    Screws you over with buggy drivers...

    Will it tweet @AMD every time the gpu driver crashes?

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  31. Back in my day... by Voyager529 · · Score: 2

    In the days of yore, ATI Radeon drivers were easy to work with - a simple, clearly labeled set of tabs that allowed monitors and GPU settings to be manipulated in the least amount of time possible...and the files were >50MB.

    The latest iterations of the Catalyst Control Center are highly convoluted, poorly labeled, oversized, and just generally terrible to work with. If the interface from the Radeon 9000 series made a comeback with nothing but the required INF/CAT/CAB files for the new cards, that would be the single greatest thing they could do, and I see no reason why this isn't completely possible.

    I'm unopposed to there being a "Radeon Studio", where other functionality can be used. If they made it a place to use their hardware accelerated video transcoder and allowed the creation of a RAM disk (and provided a place to put a Twitter feed, I guess...), that would be wonderful. There is not, however, a need for these functions in the drivers.

    This really isn't that complicated.

    1. Re:Back in my day... by del_diablo · · Score: 1

      Even then, since they bought out the Radeon Pro dev, quite some time ago, I still do doubt will grant Crimson will some of the same things.
      I.E
      The biggest being all those options related to Vsync, tripple buffering, and max render FPS

  32. Bloated crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would rather just use generic drivers

  33. Crosses fingers and hopes; not holding breath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does ATI have the longest history of producing crap software/firmware of any company in existence? I mean even Microsoft eventually fixes their stuff for the most part. Why do they refuse to hire people that know how to develop software? They continuously rely are what are essentially hardware engineers to write all their code. The result is shit.

    They produce some of the best hardware in the market yet it's always broken by shit software. They continue to do this, decade after decade. I believe whoever is in charge over there must be clinically insane to continue the same stupid path for this long.

  34. Social video drivers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only benefit I can see of trying to get people to socialize via their video software is warnings to not install a new version that causes problems, or maybe to share optimal game settings with people who have the same video card. I suppose it's also one more outlet for miserable people to spew hate, like on all the social websites.

  35. new and improved with the things you don't want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Game Manager, social media integration, system notifications - Are you fing kidding me?

    All the things I don't want in a video driver installation.
    So basically AMD is saying we're going from rather bad to much worse!

    Thanks AMD! /s

    It would be one thing if they said they were moving to a new platform that focuses more on improved drivers, improved\cleaner install\re-installation experience, and one that didn't force me to use third party to actually set my cards settings the way I want for particular game, but I any of those three are the focus.

  36. Good? by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    I've been an AMD user for some time, and I can only describe their drivers as bloated and clunky. So it is good that it is getting replaced. That said, it sounds like they are replacing it with something even more bloated. Hopefully it works better. What they really need to work on is getting it to actually run video well, and handle basic features like multi-monitor setup well. Some improvements might include an install process and upgrade process that doesn't require some sort of voodoo dance, reading the necronomicon backwards. while praying to the elder gods that it doesn't totally screw your system. Like codecs, I've found once you get it working, don't effing touch it ever again if you can help it. Still better than nVIDIA, but they have some of the same issues.

  37. "and more"! by jlv · · Score: 1

    All those great new features... "and more"! I can't just wait to install the very first version of their completely re-architected software on my system to find out what "more" they will do to me!

  38. Please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can we have just the drivers, and none of the other bloat shiteware that you package into the distrubution?

    No? Then fuck off.

  39. FYI... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wikipedia had a good explanation for that. Microsoft, as M$ is wont to do, changed the way NT5/2000 enumerated PCI bus devices between 9x and NT such that it was either impossible, or an entire rewrite to provide an NT5 driver for the Rage Fury MAXX on Windows due to the altered design. Given that the MAXX was merely a stopgap solution before the Radeon came out, it made no financial sense for ATI to even attempt to work around the new NT design and rather focused on the single chip drivers which would actually make them new sales.

    That said, I'm not sure why you couldn't install a driver, as far as I was lead to understand, it would run as a single GPU card and simply lose half the ram/performance.

    1. Re:FYI... by spauldo · · Score: 1

      2K was the future of Windows. Microsoft was attempting to move everyone from the old 9x architecture to NT. Yes, it uses different drivers (it's a different operating system altogether, just with some compatability stuff and the Win32 API), but your average user didn't know that. Microsoft went to great pains to make the transition between 9x and NT as transparent as possible.

      ATI effectively abandoned the product when they didn't write drivers for it. That decision had consequences - one of which was losing me as a customer.

      I didn't think of trying a driver for just one of the chips. Nothing showed up in any of my searches talking about that. Of course, that was fifteen years ago, so I don't remember everything I tried.

      It's not the reason I don't buy AMD cards. It's not even the same company making them. But since I don't use them myself, I only have the word of other people to go on, and I haven't heard very many people saying good things about AMD video.

      --
      Those who can't do, teach. Those who can't teach either, do tech support.
  40. Release the f'ing code!!!! That's all i care about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't care how suucky it is. We can't fix what we don't really own or control.

  41. How about fixing age annoying old bugs first? by rch7 · · Score: 1

    What is the point of bloating drivers with some social networking crap when you are unable to get simple things like reliable HDMI sound after windows wakes from sleep?

  42. Oh, thats just great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because the software to run my graphics card needs fucking social media integration. Next thing you know, im going to need to sign in with facebook to change my display settings and it will auto-tweet my configuration settings. Srsly AMD, get fucked. Stop putting shit in your software that nobody fucking needs or wants.