Slashdot Mirror


Fury and Fear In Ohio As IT Jobs Go To India (computerworld.com)

ErichTheRed writes: A company called Cengage Learning now joins the Toys 'R Us, Disney and Southern California Edison IT offshoring club. Apparently, even IT workers in low-cost parts of the country are too expensive and their work is being sent to Cognizant, one of the largest H-1B visa users. As a final insult, the article describes a pretty humiliating termination process was used. Is it time to think about a professional organization before IT goes the way of manufacturing?

607 comments

  1. Traitors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Any "American" company or individual that gives away American jobs to foreign countries are traitors to the USA and should be publicly murdered.

    1. Re:Traitors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only good CEO is a dead CEO.

    2. Re:Traitors by linebackn · · Score: 1

      >Any "American" company or individual that gives away American jobs to foreign countries are traitors to the USA and should be publicly murdered.

      Sounds good to me. I'll get the rope.

  2. Professional organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You mean "union"? No, thanks. I can take care of myself. I don't need someone to hold my hand.

    1. Re:Professional organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A better choice would be to cut the h1b program and start an immediate investigation of the companies involved. But what will happen instead is an expansion and our political class looking the other way.

    2. Re:Professional organization? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You mean "union"? No, thanks. I can take care of myself. I don't need someone to hold my hand.

      Not yet ... give it time.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    3. Re:Professional organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > I don't need someone to hold my hand.

      Yes you do, actually.

    4. Re:Professional organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...you say until your job is off-shored, and you can't find another one because they've all been off-shored too.

      Professional organization doesn't mean union. It means lobby group. Less focussed on helping individuals with their specific conditions and pay - no direct contact with an employer - but focussed on highlighting the issues, raising awareness of the benefits of a good, strong, local IT workforce, and playing the campaign donation game.

    5. Re:Professional organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Hell no.

      Unions are legalized bullies and borderline gangsters.

      They are a business, and their only "goal" is to stay in business.
      They force employers to keep incompetent workers.
      They force workers to pay union dues.
      They force employers to raise hourly rates for every employee, even for lazy workers who have not earned it.

      I have an uncle and 2 in-laws who have all paid union dues for 30+ years. One lost his job when the company moved to another state, another lost his job when the company outsourced, and one voluntarily moved to another state to get out of the union.

      I once turned down a job offer just because the company had a union. I'm not willing to be "out of work" just because the union wants to whine about not getting enough perks.

      My current employer had a union come into one of our facilities. Because enough of the workers wanted a union, they had to have a vote. IIRC, before the vote, more than 50% of the workers were convinced that they needed a union. For an entire month before the vote, the union lied and spread rumors about the management. The workers saw how heavy-handed and ruthless the union was, and it showed on voting day. Only 1 worker voted for the union.

    6. Re:Professional organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Yes, typical retarded american, individualism till the end. I'm sure that is why the army is ONE man strong.

    7. Re:Professional organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wow, what a phenomenal argument. I'm convinced.

    8. Re:Professional organization? by Noah+Haders · · Score: 0

      You're one of those Fox News suckers that votes against his interests.

    9. Re:Professional organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd better organize somehow. Management is organized against you.

    10. Re:Professional organization? by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

      Bingo.

    11. Re:Professional organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course you don't. Right now. So you don't support it, because you don't need it. Right now. Of course, later, when you most likely will need it, it will no longer be there. Because you didn't support it. Right now. And since enough people think like you do, right now, it'll die out.

      Short sighted. You will learn that lesson. Eventually.

    12. Re:Professional organization? by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 0

      Then you have been looking at the wrong union.

    13. Re: Professional organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a manager I can assure you we're no more organised than the rest of the world.

    14. Re: Professional organization? by Corbets · · Score: 1

      Voting only for your own interests may be rational, but it isn't moral, nor does it make sense in the long run; society as a whole suffers when people act only in their own interests.

    15. Re: Professional organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with having no Union is you don't have an effective professional body either so there's no one to do the lobbying or pay the political contributions. Grassroots campaigns rarely work for the long slog, without organisers or leadership. Without that the only voices being heard are the companies who lobby hard.

    16. Re:Professional organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anytime you vote make sure your politico is against H1-B Visas. Otherwise you vote for your own job loss.

    17. Re: Professional organization? by Stuarticus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As a manager I can assure you we're no more organised than the rest of the world.

      You certainly look like a bunch of organs to me.

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    18. Re: Professional organization? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Most professional Americans have a total combined (embedded direct tax) load of over 60% - good luck trying to compete against Indians in that kind of regime. An IT-focused lobbying group is not going to be tackling the correct issues; protectionism cannot effectively compete against market pricing forces.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    19. Re:Professional organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't understand what a Union is, then.

      I was taught the Unions were bad and socialist, then I looked at who the "teachers" were
      and realized I was almost fooled in believing them. Sadly, I'm in the minority.

      Unions represent the epitome of a functional and healthy democracy and they do NOT exist
      in other parts of the world like they do in the U.S. That fact alone should validate their value.

      I think people tend to associate Unions with "Teachers' Union"; it is not the Union that is the
      problem, but the tenure which has injured the American Education system.

      CAP === 'carbons'

    20. Re:Professional organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't need someone to hold my hand.

      What makes you think programmers are better able to negotiate the labor market than physicians (AMA), lawyers (ABA), or other "knowledge workers" (AAUP)? Those groups - especially AMA and ABA - have done an exceptional job of legislating protection for native practitioners. In many cases, a lawyer isn't even allowed to practice across state lines, nevermind international boundaries. And the hoops for a foreign-trained physician? Even a US citizen trained outside the country (say, at SGU) faces extra regulatory scrutiny returning to the US. When the AMA started, any hack with a sharp knife could do surgery; now they're among the most protected classes of workers.

      A lone wolf may be a fine programmer, but the market is a big game of prisoner's dilemma: the isolated, self-interest strategy loses.

    21. Re: Professional organization? by william.l.baker2 · · Score: 2

      Surprising that this is the only post to address the issue of H1B. It's a central part of this story. The issue is not the existence of India. The issue is government policy regarding immigration in the IT sector.

    22. Re:Professional organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The problem is that investigating H1B abuse takes a lot of man-power, and the people with the relevant skills just aren't available in the US.
      There are these guys in India that I know, who's CV is remarkably like the set of skills we require to do this investigation that you're asking for, we just need a way to get them visas to come over to the USA...

    23. Re:Professional organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have a couple friends who are in big unions... One works for a huge auto plant... the other is in construction.

      Both of these guys are constantly being forced to work overtime they dont want to... and rarely get weekends off. Well except for when they get laid off for 3 or 4 months at a stretch.

      If you want to get really good at scamming the unemployment system.. go to work for a union. You'll get to know all the latest tricks on how to maximize your unemployment benefits. And then next month youll be back to those 80 hour work weeks you love so much.

      I cant put my finger on when, but at some point the unions stopped giving fucks about their members.

    24. Re:Professional organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The AMA artificially restricts the education of Medical professionals. Setting excessively high education requirements and severely restricting class sizes.

      As such it artificially limits the number of doctors entering the market.

      All the while, people scratch their heads and wonder why medical costs are so high. Then they blame the high costs on malpractice insurance and expensive medical equipment.

      Im not against unions, I dont think the AMA is a shining example.

    25. Re:Professional organization? by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You mean "union"? No, thanks. I can take care of myself. I don't need someone to hold my hand.

      OK. There's one of you. Alone. Proud. Independent. And with bills coming due.

      There's an entire corporation on the other side of the table. They're not hiring someone who's unique and indispensible, they're hiring someone to do a job after interviewing a whole raft of "special snowflakes" just like you. And one of their decision points is who they can get cheapest, but there are enough potential hires that they can afford to pick and choose. In other words, they're holding each other's hands. Them and the corporation down the street, and the corporation downtown and so forth. They also have the reserves to play a waiting game, just like a certain company in my town I've been watching who keeps advertising even though they won't offer wages at the local market rate. Waiting for the market rate to drop when you get desperate enough that it's either buckle or lose your house. Or they'll use the "lack of available talent" to justify bringing in cheap H1-Bs.

      Sound fair?

    26. Re: Professional organization? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      True, and voting against your interests is insane.

    27. Re: Professional organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      *** SMACK*** is the sound of dave420 going down getting bitchslapped by apk http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    28. Re:Professional organization? by unixisc · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How? If you eliminated all H1Bs (and L1s), all that companies would have to do would be to send all the work offshore, and have US workers working w/ them to visit India for stints as long as required.

      Since broadband is available in both countries, it wouldn't be unworkable for companies to have their employees on both sides have GoToMeeting, Join.Me, WebEx or other such conferences. So if an Indian worker can't be brought here, he'll simply be hired there, and in case personal interaction is needed, his US counterpart can be sent to Bangalore, Gurgaon, Pune or Hyderabad.

    29. Re:Professional organization? by BitZtream · · Score: 0

      For what? More people like you to whine that someone else isn't taking care of them instead of doing it themselves? So that you can have some one come in and not improve your working conditions at all, basically tax you additionally on your working wage for no actual advantage, and then proceding to drive up costs while they fatten their own pockets at the expense of driving the business you work for out of business because of union issues such as ridiculous wages which are of course then immediately consumed in the form of union taxes ... I'm sorry 'dues'.

      You're an idiot to lazy to notice they you want to cut off your own nose to spite your face.

      The solution for the 'doers' is to do something else. The solution for people like yourself is to ... well, go back to the life style you would have had if you hadn't been lucky enough to get caught up in the IT bubble before it stabilized.

      If you think a union will save you then you are either 3 years old or just flat out haven't paid attention to history ... ever.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    30. Re:Professional organization? by Pseudonymous+Powers · · Score: 1

      Unions are legalized bullies and borderline gangsters.

      Yes, they often are. This and your other criticisms are valid. Your anecdotes are completely believable. And yet...

      Management is going to try like hell to get as much out of its workers as it can, and give them as little as possible in compensation. A union is going to try like hell to get as much as possible out of the management, and supply as little work as possible in return.

      It's an adversarial system, like the legal system, Even though you may think both sides are execrable, putrescent, double-dealing, weaselly assholes, if one side gains ascendancy over the other for too long, it leads to massive and sustained problems for everyone.

    31. Re:Professional organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modded +5, Insightful? Apparently 5 mods haven't seen the Monty Python Argument Clinic sketch.

    32. Re:Professional organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we accept that you hypothesis is true, then why is the IT profession, and only the IT profession, so inundated with H1B visas when so many professions claim they have a shortage?

      And why bring them here at all? They would require a lower salary in India, since the cost of living is so less. Financial, it is a mistake to sponsor and bring them here. Reasons other than financial could be at play?

    33. Re:Professional organization? by operagost · · Score: 1

      Typical European bigot, using words like "retarded" to project his ignorance.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    34. Re:Professional organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the shilling fuck.

      Who the fuck said "union" except you paid shills?

      Let me guess, Bar associations are unions in your book? Is the American Medical Association a union, too? Engineers and accountants that have to be certified are members of unions as well?

      No. Just what the fuck. This is getting tiring. Software developers and other IT workers badly need at least a professional association that can revoke membership after one of its members has been shown to be incompetent, same as with lawyers.

      Otherwise, kiss your job goodbye. Everyone can code!

    35. Re:Professional organization? by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Anytime you vote make sure your politico is against H1-B Visas. Otherwise you vote for your own job loss.

      And what if neither Team Blue nor Team Red are taking that position?

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    36. Re:Professional organization? by kilfarsnar · · Score: 0

      I have an uncle and 2 in-laws who have all paid union dues for 30+ years. One lost his job when the company moved to another state, another lost his job when the company outsourced, and one voluntarily moved to another state to get out of the union.

      Yeah, no kidding. My father-in-law paid union dues for 30 years too. All he got was a steady job, and is now well taken care of in retirement. Oh wait, that wasn't the argument you were making, sorry.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    37. Re:Professional organization? by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

      There is one candidate who does not support the current H1B visa program as it is being used or its expansion of this abuse. He basically called out Disney to say Give Americans their Job Back (I like how the publisher got the article title wrong, but look where it is coming from).

    38. Re:Professional organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I once turned down a job offer just because the company had a union. I'm not willing to be "out of work" just because the union wants to whine about not getting enough perks."

      Talk about cutting your own nose to spite your face... "I don't want better benefits and improved job security and a real pension! I'd rather make less and be treated worse... but freedom! Liberty!!!

      "The workers saw how heavy-handed and ruthless the union was, and it showed on voting day. Only 1 worker voted for the union."

      More like the management union busters got to them. I talked to some folk who's unionization drive failed at a big company. The compnay promised them the world if they didn't unionize. The union failed and the first thing the company did was lay a bunch of people off.

      Workers are stronger together. An individual cannot effectively compete against a billion dollar corporation. It's only by joining together that they can have any small ssay int heir working conditions. The fact that there are a few workers that don't realize this fact and try to sabotage their interests ignores the fact that most other workers realize that they are stronger together than apart.

    39. Re:Professional organization? by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      Interesting that Bernie Sanders (and Elizabeth Warren) aren't talking about this. Much as I like Hillary Clinton, I wouldn't expect her to make an issue of this, but if Sanders and Warren aren't, then either H1B cheating is too obscure or too complicated for the political class to address.

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    40. Re:Professional organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There. Right there. That's why you can't organize IT workers in the US. They are predominantly arrogant children who believe themselves too smart to be part of a collective. They are too wrapped up in themselves to see how they are complicit in destroying their own job prospects. They are too oblivious to recognize that there is organization, and lawyers, on the other side of the bargaining table. They are so naive that when they finally do realize they imagine it makes no difference, because they're tough. They're awesome. They don't need a level playing field. They don't need reality. They have The Avengers.

    41. Re:Professional organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's insane. Really... you think that little you can go head to head with a billion dollar corporation? One that has their own "union" in the chamber of commerce (which is very powerful) and the superpac's they buy into to purchase congress.

      That's cute.

      There's a fine line between being macho and stupid. Don't choose stupid.

      There's a reason why American workers keep getting the shaft. Their unions were destroyed by government stooges combined with a very effective propaganda campaign against working Americans. The first part is understandable. The second part makes no sense.

    42. Re:Professional organization? by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      The difference being that when construction and factory workers work 80 hour weeks, they actually get paid for all those hours. No free overtime in the blue collar world.

    43. Re:Professional organization? by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      I believe he means more like the AMA or Bar Association.

    44. Re:Professional organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called licensing, ala Professional Engineer for engineers. Most Civils need it to be effective, not necessary for Mechanical, Electrical, or other engineers. Computer Engineering does have Professional Engineering licensing, but it's not required for the majority of computer work.

      The only way to prevent this offshoring is to require the P.E. license for professional style programming, or to "stamp" the code.

      It would be a pain to take an 8-hour test, twice (Once for the Engineer In Training, the other for the full Professional Engineer after 5 years of experience) AND need an ABET accredited degree to even sit for a test, but it would help protect the jobs without unionization.

      On the other hand, my company pays $4.73 / hr for offshore IT support. Requiring licensing might be worth it.

    45. Re:Professional organization? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The IT bubble is not stable - whole sectors are deflating. People are hired, work their ass off, and tossed aside at an alarming rate. Remember this quote: 'Former Intel CEO Craig Barrett as saying, "the half-life of an engineer, software or hardware, is only a few years." ' It was a warning of things to come.

      There are enlightened companies (few and far between) that prefer to have an independent union (not a "company union") to bargain with because it gives them a single party to bargain with, a defined path for complaints and problems, and employees in similar jobs will get the same pay regardless of gender or age. IT is notorious for having problems in both these areas.

      Oh, and union dues aren't that bad. Half an hour's wages per week, and more than paid for itself in better benefits, etc.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    46. Re:Professional organization? by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      Multinational Companies are legalized bullies and borderline gangsters.

      FTFY!

    47. Re: Professional organization? by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      but you're not making a moral decision in the above comment, you're having an emotional reaction that's set by ideology.

    48. Re:Professional organization? by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      I've heard doctors complaining that drug companies are now making more then doctors, percentage of care wise.
      The best Unions pretend thy aren't Unions. The Patrolman's benevolence group, the AMA, the BAR association, etc.

    49. Re:Professional organization? by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

      OBSCURE!!!!. Oh, we are eliminating you job and replacing you with an H1B but you have to train him before you leave? HOW MUCH MORE OBVIOUS CAN IT GET!!!

    50. Re:Professional organization? by allquixotic · · Score: 1

      True for many traditional IT jobs, but not the case for jobs in the defense sector. Snowden only made the lock-down on sensitive work that much more stringent.

      In short, if you want job security in the IT workforce in the USA for longer than the immediate future, either work directly for the Government on classified projects, or be a contractor for the same. The Indian immigrants can't touch that work.

    51. Re:Professional organization? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      they do NOT exist
      in other parts of the world like they do in the U.S. That fact alone should validate their value.

      The way unions behave in the US scares the shit out of me. I'm glad that UK unions (blinkered, bigoted and crap as they are) are not like US unions.

      Also, you're wrong: The French are scarily similar in unionisation to the US.

    52. Re:Professional organization? by tsotha · · Score: 1

      It's not just the political class. There's also a coordinated push in the media. Every time the H-1b cap comes up for discussion the media is full of "How will we ever find the STEM graduates to fill the bazillion open positions" articles. The perception of a skilled labor shortage is deliberately generated.

    53. Re: Professional organization? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      If I don't vote for my own interests, who will? My interests are as legitimate as yours, and deserve someone voting for them just as much. A society does indeed suffer when people pursue only their own interests, but does that apply for voting?

      Also, whose interests do you think it's moral to vote for?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    54. Re:Professional organization? by unencode200x · · Score: 1

      The part you left out is that there were only two employees.

      --

      Chance favors the prepared mind.
      Perfect is the enemy of good.
    55. Re: Professional organization? by unencode200x · · Score: 1

      Interesting. How do you come up with that number? I did a little math myself, and as a home and business owner, I'm probably somewhere close to that when you include real estate taxes, income, sales, etc. But I'm not sure if most people are in the same situation.

      --

      Chance favors the prepared mind.
      Perfect is the enemy of good.
  3. A professional IT organization? by drakaan · · Score: 2, Informative

    If by that, you mean "union", then I doubt it. You'd never get enough support from the folks that are still getting paid very well (like me, who lives in Ohio), and aren't being outsourced. There's no business case to do that for anything but level 0 and 1 helpdesk jobs, and not even all of those.

    --
    "Murphy was an optimist" - O'Toole's commentary on Murphy's Law
    1. Re:A professional IT organization? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If by that, you mean "union", then I doubt it. You'd never get enough support from the folks that are still getting paid very well (like me, who lives in Ohio), and aren't being outsourced. There's no business case to do that for anything but level 0 and 1 helpdesk jobs, and not even all of those.

      You too will soon be "outsourced" and regret your opinion. I'll smile at you as I walk into Wal-Mart.

      After being laid off from the best job in the world as a DBA that paid more than I had even made, I took a much lower paying job with the Air Force, and am now a "career civil servant". Sure, I'm not making the "big money" anymore, but I have a much better health plan then you will ever have, and my job will never go away.

      Have fun at Wal-Mart.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    2. Re: A professional IT organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm an IT professional at Walmart. We're very happy, thanks. :-*

    3. Re:A professional IT organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lobby group wouldn't hurt though....

    4. Re:A professional IT organization? by DigiShaman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      WTF are you talking about?! Tier 3 and 4 (specialized) jobs are being outsourced to India too. If it's cloud computing, there is ZERO incentive to pay US wage levels when the staff is effectively performing remotely anyways. Anything from networking, Windows/*nix administration, to running the entire enterprise VMWare stack; all of it going overseas. About the only thing that remains is executive staff and grunts that rack-n-stack equipment in a data center.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    5. Re:A professional IT organization? by lgw · · Score: 4, Interesting

      WalMart pays in the top 5 nationwide for IT and devs, just so you know (per a /. story on the best-paying employers).

      And don't be so sure that civil service jobs will never go away: the pendulum has swung quite far in the "bloated government" direction, and one way or another, it has to swing back eventually.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    6. Re:A professional IT organization? by lgw · · Score: 2

      Much like manufacturing: the offshoring is a temporary measure while automation replaces human workers. Meanwhile, the companies that provide the clouds are paying top dollar for US talent. Food for thought.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    7. Re:A professional IT organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah and when they outsource those jobs they'll replace them with the minimum-wage greeter position.

    8. Re:A professional IT organization? by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Except there is next-to-no automation in the outsourced manufacturing. Why automate when depressed, third-world wages are cheaper?

    9. Re:A professional IT organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How if all in jobs fund the organisation anonymously and the organisation is furthered by those who lost jobs ?

    10. Re:A professional IT organization? by lgw · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The automation is in the US factories. US manufacturing output has never fallen, decade-over-decade. US factories have become more and more automated first as jobs went overseas, and now China is seeing declines in outsourced-from-US jobs, as the robots are taking over and manufacturing increasingly returns to the US, job-free. The outsourcing of manufacturing jobs from the US was a temporary measure, slowly dwindling.

      IT is at the front of this curve (unless you're a software dev, but I don't think of that as "IT"). The writing has been on the wall for years, and the destination is inevitable. Plan accordingly.

      This is what technology is: efficiency. This has been happening for over 300 years, it's not going to stop now.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    11. Re:A professional IT organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually China is outsourcing manufacturing back to the US.

    12. Re:A professional IT organization? by sjames · · Score: 2

      More like the AMA or the Bar Association.

    13. Re:A professional IT organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > If it's cloud computing, there is ZERO incentive to pay US wage levels when the staff is effectively performing remotely anyways.

      if you believe this then i have a bridge to sell you :)

      i've worked for countless companies over the years that have tried to outsource to India (and China, and the Philippines, etc.) and every single one of those projects was a disaster. the majority of those programmers are nothing but bad code monkeys who write terrible code and even worse documentation. the ones worth hiring are getting top dollar themselves. then you get to try to coordinate a project with people on the other side of the planet and who are 12 hours off from your work day. if you want to make it work you need to send some of your people over there to actually lead the team- and even then the results are rarely worth the trouble. the main problem- at least to India and China- is that they're often taught through rote memorization. if a problem comes up that requires a novel solution, or if you are trying to troubleshoot an obscure issue- they lack the skills to solve the problem.

      you'll get much better (higher quality and far more creative) work when you outsource to places like Poland and Ukraine- but then you often run into language barriers.

      for every company that outsources- there are 10 new startups looking to hire people.

      people have been sounding the death knell for IT workers in the US for the last 20+ years. if you think it's going to happen any time soon- well- let's just say I'm not going to hold my breath :)

    14. Re:A professional IT organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the pendulum has swung quite far in the "bloated government" direction

      Has it, though? I hear people talking about it all the time, but you'd have to show me numbers to convince me.

    15. Re:A professional IT organization? by dbIII · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Except for in steel, which is an interesting case study of how having a protected industry may help in the very short term but really fucks you up in the long run. What remains of the US steel industry is almost of interest to archeologists - steel produced at huge cost while the rest of the world has pushed on with automation resulting in both lower costs and higher quality. With no incentive to spend the capital on automation (protected market) the result was stagnation.
      Ironically some manufacturing moved offshore to get cheap steel.

    16. Re:A professional IT organization? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Don't really need numbers. Political posturing is everything and if you keep hearing people talk about it, you are seeing the motivation for it to become a political issue. They will call your job security waste and promise to streamline the government making it more efficient and less costly.

      Numbers don't really matter. The voters will eventually demand it whether it is true or not.

    17. Re:A professional IT organization? by TechFurryFox · · Score: 1

      I'm a senior automation / devops / security engineer, I quite honestly find no basis in your statement. The fact is the highest paying gigs in Ohio are $55-80/hr, all of which are to me is inadequate compensation. This is why I don't work for anyone locally and choose to have clients outside of Ohio. When you're able to work from your home in Columbus, Ohio for $125-$250/hr with occasional travel, then tell me you know what you're doing. People like yourself complain about jobs being outsourced when you don't worry about continued education to make yourself marketable. How about this, you do quality work... then you won't find yourself out of a job.

    18. Re:A professional IT organization? by sociocapitalist · · Score: 4, Informative

      If by that, you mean "union", then I doubt it. You'd never get enough support from the folks that are still getting paid very well (like me, who lives in Ohio), and aren't being outsourced. There's no business case to do that for anything but level 0 and 1 helpdesk jobs, and not even all of those.

      Read TFA:
      "Cengage...had outsourced accounting services earlier in the year"
      "The layoffs affected workers across IT, including networks, desktop support, database administration, developers, data warehouse and other systems."

      Also have a look at this, which lists the 33 jobs most likely to be outsourced...noting that many of them pay quite well indeed. Or did. They probably don't anymore.
      http://cdn.theatlantic.com/sta...

      To put it all in context, you may want to consider the quantity of jobs being outsourced - which is in the millions:
      http://www.statisticbrain.com/...

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    19. Re:A professional IT organization? by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      Look at how successful the privatisation of UK steel has been at making efficiencies and helping lower costs and increase quality.

      http://www.theprovince.com/bus...

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    20. Re:A professional IT organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets base some information here off of facts.

      First, Cengage went bankrupt last year. This is going to be part of their reorganization, and that reorganization is going to be fuelled by who? Bankers trying to make their cash back. The jobs were toast last year, that was your "get out" moment. Key point here is, remaining loyal to your employer or working lots of extra hours for them is futile. Self-education and picking up new skills is not.

      Second, we've seen repeatedly when it comes to state income taxes, that you pay the taxes of the state where you live and not where you work. That rule needs to be applied here and the argument you bring before the judge is tax money is being lost because these companies are bringing labor onto US shores through remote technology and they are not paying any tarrifs or any taxes on the labor. The work is happening on US Shores, but the workers have no protections or pay rates of US workers. In states with prevailing wage laws this should not just be a lawsuit but handcuffs for the company execs. This needs to apply to any labor or service provided through a remote technology. This fixes the situation in a very meritocratic way.

      Third, the solution here is to start donating to NumbersUSA. They have a 2 million a year operating budget. Donate $500, give them a hundred million a year operating budget and do it every year, year over year; give silicon valley something to worry about. The reason Doctors and Lawyers have it so good is they have their own monopolies and scams; lawyers have the BAR and hide case law behind all sorts of bureaucracy, Doctors have big pharma and prey on people's fears. We're too honest for that, but that doesn't mean fighting for your meritocracy and your right to the tax money you pay and the land your forefathers fought for is immoral. If you don't fight for something you don't get it, plain and simple. What we stand for is technological progress, we need to fight for it.

    21. Re:A professional IT organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All we need to do is string a few more fibres to India, then the whole data centre can be offshored.

    22. Re:A professional IT organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So an IT Workers Guild and not a Union.

      I could go for that.

      Hmm, what about an IT Workers PAC. Running political ad's on TV about the outsourcing of American jobs and the H1B's

    23. Re:A professional IT organization? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      If it's cloud computing, there is ZERO incentive to pay US wage levels

      Well, then it's becoming time to either give them an incentive, or give them a penalty if they don't.

      Tie their corporate tax rate to how many jobs they have in the US, and the more they move out of the US the higher their taxes. Any company which reaches a certain threshold and is deemed to essentially not have enough domestic staff pays a much higher amount of taxes.

      For years we've been following policies of cutting corporate taxes, because somehow magically that is supposed to improve our lives. Since that clearly isn't working, build in a penaly.

      Oh, moving 20% of your workforce offshore? That'll be a 10% higher tax rate. It's time to stop letting companies trade domestic jobs for corporate profits, and do it for free.

      But stop giving corporations the benefit of being incorporated domestically if they're going to move all of their work overseas. You want to offshore all the jobs, you move there too. But don't expect tax discounts or ANY taxpayer funded services.

      Fuck companies over the same way they're fucking us over. Make it an actual business cost to offshore workers. And stop pretending that a company which doesn't keep jobs here is entitled to any benefits here.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    24. Re:A professional IT organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And don't be so sure that civil service jobs will never go away: the pendulum has swung quite far in the "bloated government" direction, and one way or another, it has to swing back eventually.

      Which pendulum is that?

      https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/data-analysis-documentation/federal-employment-reports/historical-tables/total-government-employment-since-1962/

      Aside from the uniform numbers which were distorted by the Vietnam war, the peak was in 1990, and it's been dropping since.

      Maybe that's an issue.

    25. Re:A professional IT organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If by that, you mean "union", then I doubt it. You'd never get enough support from the folks that are still getting paid very well (like me, who lives in Ohio), and aren't being outsourced. There's no business case to do that for anything but level 0 and 1 helpdesk jobs, and not even all of those.

      You too will soon be "outsourced" and regret your opinion. I'll smile at you as I walk into Wal-Mart.

      After being laid off from the best job in the world as a DBA that paid more than I had even made, I took a much lower paying job with the Air Force, and am now a "career civil servant". Sure, I'm not making the "big money" anymore, but I have a much better health plan then you will ever have, and my job will never go away.

      Have fun at Wal-Mart.

      I'm glad you chose to serve your country in the Air Force, but perhaps you should open your eyes a bit wider as to the organization you now work for.

      Believe me when I say Reduction In Force (RIF) is not a foreign concept to our Military, or one that exists solely in the commercial sector, so that whole concept of your job not "going away" is pure bullshit. Your job is only slightly more secure than the average civilian, and came with a high cost of sacrifices, most of which you've likely not yet felt the pain (like a nice 13-month remote tour separated from your family).

      Oh, and that whole health care thing? Yeah, good luck with that shit. I left the military and that dying perk sure as hell didn't stop me.

    26. Re:A professional IT organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      WalMart pays in the top 5 nationwide for IT and devs, just so you know (per a /. story on the best-paying employers).

      I've had both the pleasure+pain of working with Walmart. Pleasure because both their IT+Dev. folks and project managers have their acts together. Pain because when they report an issue they already know its not them and they come in hot. I think the last statistic I heard (and this was several years back) was WalMart loses $15k PER SECOND when their systems go down ... do the math, that's a little over $50 million an hour.

      Walmart is not stupid. Strong logistics and strong negotiations is what gives that company a competitive advantage. You need good and well-paid IT+Dev. folks for both.

    27. Re:A professional IT organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How well did "organization" work for people in manufacturing jobs? Making labor more of a pain in the ass to deal with will drive jobs overseas faster.

    28. Re:A professional IT organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Also keep in mind that many manufacturing jobs were unionized, and that is quite likely a driving force behind sending those jobs over seas.

    29. Re:A professional IT organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dislike the racism in this comment, only because it is false. They fail because the business units try to get away with what they foisted onto internal staff. But an RFP and contract are different than employees and indentured servants(college grads and h1bs). That is why the push to get h1bs.

    30. Re:A professional IT organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for a steel company, we have 2 active locations in the US, one of them uses manually operated machinery, the other location is all automated other than someone to meet the transport truck. Of the 2 locations, the manually operated plant gets the most work. The thing about steel is that when you run it through a furnace it doesn't always come out straight and can have a variety of problems that the automated systems just can't cope with yet. The automated plant is relegated to handling simple machining jobs. The bigger problem for the industry is the switch to plastic and other materials.

    31. Re:A professional IT organization? by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      They don't stay cheaper forever, ask Japan and now China.

    32. Re:A professional IT organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting anon for reasons ...

      Why do you think big US companies have off-shore workers ? Look at all the paperwork - The big company only has US-based workers. And a "staff augmentation" contract with another tiny US company. That another tiny US company, which makes almost no profit will have another "staff-augmentation" contract with some offshore companies. It's just a technicality that all of them have @company.com email addresses. They are different companies, with different employment contracts and off-course, different benefits.

      No sir, big US companies only hire US people... You can raise the taxes on the tiny US company as much as you want - they didn't made much profit anyways - they're just shifting money from one account to another.

    33. Re:A professional IT organization? by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      Why automate when depressed, third-world wages are cheaper?

      Well you do have a point. Those 8 year olds assembling iPhones for 50 cents a day have really nimble fingers.

      That said, once you have it automated the only thing you're paying for is the electricity. The technology is getting better all the time...and yes, the USA is still (by GDP) the #2 manufacturer in the world, despite almost nobody actually working in factory jobs anymore.

    34. Re:A professional IT organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry , but , having a indian outsourced group attached to my business unit , AND having a few indians on the local team , i can tell one thing , great at grunt work , no so much at "thinking outside the box" and finding original solutions to a problem , hell i have a guy next to me with a software engineering masters , and showing him around on how to use sed and awk , for some reason i dont feel treatened , you cant outsource experience , and the experienced indian IT workers will go to any lenght to actually get the hell out of the country (acording to my punjab junior )

    35. Re:A professional IT organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's just say sysadmins work does not require too much thinking. We have done it ourselves back in the day. Nowdays you just run a few SQL stored procedures that we programmers wrote and be done with it. Same with jailed systems. Yep back in the time you just needed an Apache server in chroot that's true. Nowdays you deploy a VM with a script, populate it with an SQL script and be done with it.
      These are ripe targets for automation or outsourcing to people who are not afraid of computers.

    36. Re:A professional IT organization? by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1

      What are you doing to bill $125 to $250 per hour?

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    37. Re: A professional IT organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cannot believe that Walmart missed a perfectly good job that they can export to China.

    38. Re:A professional IT organization? by drakaan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there were plenty of guys I worked with in the Army that got RIF'ed and ended up out on their respective asses, so I wouldn't get to comfy with the idea that there's no possible way you could get booted out of the USAF as long as you were doing a good job. Thank you, by the way, for serving. As a former serviceman, I do appreciate it.

      That said, I know many, many, many companies that have outsourced competent IT staff and realized after the fact (sometimes too late), that salary is not the only big factor to profitability with respect to skilled technical people.

      I'm not saying that lots of companies can't get away with outsourcing certain functions, and maybe I was being a bit testy when I said only level 0 and 1 helpdesk, but my point is that beyond a certain level of technical expertise, you're not going to do better by outsourcing.

      As someone in the managed services field who has tried to hire technical staff on a ridiculously low budget in the not-too-distant past, I can say that there are very real barriers beyond technical skill that come into play when dealing with clients. Language barriers are real and sometimes painful for both the overseas guy and the client to deal with. That adds friction to projects, which slows them down and can put you in a position where you're effectively paying more for less work as a result.

      --
      "Murphy was an optimist" - O'Toole's commentary on Murphy's Law
    39. Re:A professional IT organization? by LDAPMAN · · Score: 1

      I've had the same experience though there are a few other things I observed:

      1. Many of their senior IT managers were Walmart lifers and had zero experience in other companies. This was not a good thing.
      2. Though they paid well, they were not willing to pay what it would take to bring in fortune 10 talent and experience. They were not competitive with senior positions in organizations of comparable size/complexity.
      3. Every incident turned into a massive CYA fest...I've worked in hundreds of companies and never seen it so bad.

    40. Re:A professional IT organization? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I keep on hearing about IT Union. But how many IT firms are there.
      Google is an advertising company, Apple makes hardware. Most of us in IT work in some sector, health care, government, manufacturing... Some of the jobs do have unions, most don't.
      We can possibly form a trade union like a plumber. However plumbers are also just in plumbing companies. And are contracted to work at different locations. So IT jobs will be more like consultants. And our job will be more at risk as for the most part we will be working independently

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    41. Re:A professional IT organization? by TechFurryFox · · Score: 1

      Various work from Chef/Ansible automation (CI and CD), complete infrastructure setup, security policies, some networking, AppArmor/SElinux/IDS/IPS set-up, 2FA... these are a small list of areas I've hit on projects I've worked on this year. Knowing how to perform set up, educate others and get to know business peeps equates to serious project work. If there are people who don't make the cut... well that's tough shit, those are the types of people who are considered the McDonalds employees of the tech world.

    42. Re:A professional IT organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And people were sounding the death knell for manufacturing 20+ years before it took a nose-dive into oblivion for the US too.

      I get that it's hard to listen to all the negativity. But at the same time you are seeing it. You've seen it in countless companies. It's not slowing down.

      Companies are chasing higher profits not through innovation, or retention, or differentiation, but through cost cutting and acquisitions. With each new acquisition comes a new round of cost cutting. Companies like Cognizant and Accenture swoop in with great offers - you can get 2 onshore developers for the price of 1 employee AND not have to pay benefits - SAVINGS! Then they sell that you can get 6 offshore developers for the price of 2 onshore developers - PRODUCTIVITY! They talk about scaling, ramp up time, reducing training overhead, they get the company to do the KT with the contracted developers and then the company cuts the employee as soon as the KT is done. Then the contracting firm might end up picking up that former employee, sometimes putting them right back in the job (or a similar job) in the same company. By then they have the contract - 6 offshore developers, 2 onshore, an offshore team lead, an onshore project manager, guaranteed 45 hour work week for their staff. Et voila! 1 employee turns into 8 contractors and oodles of overtime - not to mention that if you have any remaining employees onsite they start getting overworked trying to deal with the quality control issues coming down the pike.

      Management can't admit there's a problem, because they made the decision to go this route and their bonus (and possibly job) is on the line. They have a line item on their performance plan that says "make it work!" When it's not working the contracting firm offers all kinds of solutions - select teams, service credits, more developers, more project managers, swapping resources. At the same time they're using the company to train their offshore folks and readying them to move from that $50/hr position to a $60/hr position with that companies competitor and on up that ladder. As soon as the onsite employees find someone they think is good and they want to work with, that person is pulled to another "higher profile" job and the next trainee is slotted in. Meanwhile the contracting firm continues the upsell for better "team arrangements" and $240/hr program/project managers who'll put their SDLC in place and ensure a smoother delivery. Pretty soon a company has gone from replacing a few high-cost long term employees to outsourcing in almost every area they have from development to business analysis to support services and in doing so has made a reputation for themselves that makes it harder to get solid and knowledgeable employees back into the business. The quality of the software they're producing begins to impact the customers and they see customer losses and the next round of mergers and acquisitions plus layoffs starts. This isn't an easy cycle to just back out of once it starts and while it's happening wages are being suppressed further and further because unemployed people get desperate for work and take less pay since there is a glut of them in the local market from the layoffs. Some companies decide, with a little salesmanship from the contracting companies, that they weren't meant to write software anyway and so they outsource their whole IT operations right out the door to the contracting company.

       

    43. Re:A professional IT organization? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      All of US steel was private to start with so I really do not see what point you are making here since even the tired old "government is always worse" thing does not fit in this case.
      What I described above was private industry lobbying a government to protect them from capitalism - generally a really bad idea that in the long run only protects the lazy and drives out everyone else. You end up with all the problems of a state owned company but with none of the benefits. Private industry most definitely can fuck things up worse than government if a government is there to protect them from competition and they can force the consequences of the fuckups onto a captive market.

    44. Re:A professional IT organization? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Are you sure that is the correct link or were you being sarcastic?

    45. Re:A professional IT organization? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile in a different country I was working in an automated steelworks in 1992 which was probably way ahead of the automated plant you are describing. That's the extent of the problem. It's not an expertise problem (since US owned companies have cutting edge expertise in their offshore plants often installed by US based staff) it's just that there is no need to attempt to compete in a captive market so the capital is not spent.

    46. Re:A professional IT organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work as an IT Systems Administrator (jack of all trades, master of none). I get paid about $10,000 less than the national average, but still decent for Ohio. Granted more pay would be nice of course.

      Just a few years ago my employer wanted to outsource our department (although not to a foreign company) because they could save a lot not paying for our benefits. Sort of a flat fee rate for tech support from the helpdesk to the network to database administration all included. Well, even though I despised paying the monthly dues, the union fought hard and legally to protect us from the outsourcing. I still have my job and the other employees supported us because of the level and quality of IT support they receive form someone who is personally invested in the organization. Now I support the union and even became a steward to help protect our department. I'm not at all against joining an IT union.

    47. Re:A professional IT organization? by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      Wal-Mart isn't dumb. It recognises that automation is the backbone of it's ability to shift enormous volumes of goods. They're pioneers in a number of fields including RFID asset management, and they aren't going to start outsourcing their competitive advantage to contractors where they can't control who gets to use that competitive advantage next.

    48. Re:A professional IT organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Listen... you are not sending jobs but leaving corpses. We Humans _invented_ computing, from the math up to the latest hardware/software, then SUDDENLY India is getting it all and at Top of the World Level? Whose code was it?? India can get the dollar agreements then pay cheaply for further outsourcing to do the actual job! IF AT ALL... They can dissappear the idiot needing a particular system and forget about it, too. I consider dealing with Indians is like suicide. You will NOT get in the news the NEWS that such or such outsourced project FAILED TO COMPLETE, besides! See how SOMEHOW what is meaning in the setup is the fact that INITIATIVE goes from the USA to India but not viceversa? IN THE TECHNOLOGICAL, FRONTIER OF KNOWLEDGE AREAS!!! For my part, I find lots of TECHNICAL POSTS by Chinese and Indians which are blatant lack of knowledge, do-it-instead-of-me, or completely miss the meaning in English! But they reply authoritatively... Not to mention the impossibility to eat in places served by Indians because of bad service, fecal smells, skin diseases... Seriously: cheap labour supply is an economic MYTH but leveled enough to be dear to managers, mostly. You pay cheap labour, you get a cost in low quality. Outsource everything and you will not notice quality because it all will be low quality. It is true that you ll miss jobs home. And you ll miss the additional benefits of having the market pressure than makes you change your labour to capital ratio toward more innovation and better production capital, eventually (even assuming innovation looks like a self-driven force now). Of course, if ALL you get as labour in America is AFRICANS, you find INDIAN are something! I was wondering about turning mass production a simple gadget designed by me and I realized that BY HAND you cannot compete with machines.... but MACHINES NEED MOSTLY ONLY SUPERVISION. Even there you have to add to oursourcing the COST of NOT ACQUIRING THE EXPERIENCE (from supervision to start with). Puff... I can understand iron or steel factories outsourced to India, but CUTTING EDGE TECHNOLOGY? Maybe it is how they have nuclear power and missiles which they should not have the same way Indians in America had stones lumped together instead of galleons, castles and eventually skyscrapers. And so on... Truly, someone should inquire if behind those outsourcings there is NO AFRICAN or one of those white/yellow/bald PLASTIC PINK skins deciding outsourcing instead of local!!! Or some expected India girl bodies flow, which is actually very substandard... And so on and on...

    49. Re:A professional IT organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *what is MISSING in the setup is...

    50. Re:A professional IT organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably outsourced to the least paid code monkeys. Last time my company outsourced the work, we choose between Ukraine, China, India and Canada.
      Canadians were as expensive as Americans. Chinese were superior technically, but to understand what they said in that accent was too difficult. Ukraine and India were at tie, but India had large number of options. We interviewed, choose carefully and got the work done at top quality. We did not hire the cheapest in India, we hired the best there.

      For the work that was outsourced, we had to deal with stupid nuts who thought they were the best in the world and their ego prevented them from accepting even slightly lower remuneration number. Had to negotiate with those stupids every single project, burned our energy a lot. Finally, outsourced. My company did not kick out everyone though, those people who were good became project managers here and coordinated with the "IT" which was outsourced. I believe their pay increased too.

      BTW, not all work was outsourced. Only non-essential non-value-adding work. The crux of the products/services was built here in US using top talent who were paid multiple times the outsourced workers.

    51. Re:A professional IT organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not just code monkeys. The company I work for does a large amount of basic data entry, and the owner/boss decided she could save a ton by having a person here scan in the documents in question, then have people in India be the ones who type it up and do some other primary data stuff.

      Except that half of our local office staff spends half their time cleaning up after the folks in India. And the people in India appear to lack any critical thinking ability or handing a situation that goes even slightly off of our (admittedly poorly written) instructions.

      I'm of high mind that a gradual step down of the people in India (whose team has expanded faster than the amount of data they have to process) and replacing them with local data entry monkeys would be a world of good. Sadly, the owner avoids confrontation and problems for as long as possible so it's not even worth talking to her about fixing such a large problem if she won't even look at smaller problems with much easier "fixes".

    52. Re:A professional IT organization? by objectdisoriented · · Score: 1

      Something more like professional engineering certifications. Think structural or civil engineers.

      --
      Performance must be inherent in every aspect of the system. It is not an afterthought, but always thought. - me
    53. Re:A professional IT organization? by ancientmyth · · Score: 1

      Because automation is cheaper than third-world wages. The crux is the need for them to be engineers, too so the automation doesn't break. Knowledge will always be the power.

    54. Re: A professional IT organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are? Then fix the god damned WIRE. For a company that rakes in billions, your corporate intranet is reminds me of fucking dial-up! Also, find a new UI/UX person and redesign it. Can't find shit. The broken links are also unacceptable. Something that says "click here for your WIN," and yet it's not even hyperlinked, that's fucking pathetic.

    55. Re:A professional IT organization? by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1

      Awesome! I work with Web Development, mainly with C# and Javascript, and I do not bill that much, but I would say that I bill more than many in my sphere. Thanks for sharing.

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    56. Re:A professional IT organization? by TechFurryFox · · Score: 1

      You could also expand by learning some Ansible or Chef, it's exceptionally useful for web development. i.e. "Just prep a new server/vm and run this one line, it'll take care of the rest." Expanding one's skills doesn't take much, just some time.

  4. By Neruos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they are allowed to do it, then the People want it to be done. Vote or Deal with it.

  5. short the stock by Spazmania · · Score: 0

    Yet another company whose stock we can short. Because we all know how well offshoring works.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    1. Re:short the stock by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      Right, look how bad Apple's doing.

    2. Re:short the stock by Spazmania · · Score: 1

      In context. Offshoring of IT. Good way to crash your company.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    3. Re:short the stock by meerling · · Score: 1

      I was in a company that tried offshoring tech support. That lasted 2 years before they brought it back because the offshore just couldn't do the job.

    4. Re:short the stock by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Problem is that companies try to outsource everything offshore. Nobody seems to know where to draw the line b/w what to retain and what to move offshore

    5. Re:short the stock by murdocj · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nonsense. It isn't a company behaving rationally. It's executives who know that making the company bottom line look better for a few quarters means big bonuses. They can then move on with a great story about how the great job they did before the company crashes and burns.

    6. Re:short the stock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      No they make it too easy and cheap to source non american employees. American workers laws and protections are laughable at best and mostly non-existent.

    7. Re: short the stock by Forgefather · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Except this is bullshit. Consumers only benefit from reduced prices to a point because they have to be able to afford fixed costs such as insurance, food, and rent. Fixed costs that have skyrocketed in recent years. An iPhone being 20$ less means nothing to a family that may have 100$ a month in discretionary income after taxes.

      The healthiest economies in the world are the ones that rigorously maintain the middle class because the amount of money in the global economy means precisely dick after people's fixed costs are being met. What matters most to the economy is that money is able to freely flow through as many people as possible because when money changes hands value is created. This isn't about a few hundred thousand jobs. This is about entire communities being impacted because the buying power of the average american is being undermined by cost cutting measures, and as more and more people approach their discretionary income margins the more the economy suffers as there is less capital for luxuries and investment in new technologies.

      It is simply stupid to suggest that the economy losing middle class jobs is somehow a benefit.

      --
      "There are lies, there are damn lies, and there are statistics"
    8. Re:short the stock by haruchai · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Better would be to blame idiot politicians that make stupid rules"

      Companies work really hard at making sure those idiot politicians get elected and quite often also write the legislation for them.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    9. Re:short the stock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In context. Offshoring of IT. Good way to crash your company.

      Indians don't get the job done, they just do the needful.

    10. Re: short the stock by mwvdlee · · Score: 2

      The world isn't binary.
      There are middle grounds between corporate capitalism and communism.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    11. Re: short the stock by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's funny how executive jobs are don' seem to be off shored.. I would think a CEO from India would be cheaper for the company.

    12. Re: short the stock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure how that works for us companies but meaningful jobs cannot be easilly outsourced on basis of manhour cost only. What this means is usually this is just a stage in cost cutting process which made company unable to modify and improve eficiency in house. Outsourcing is just another step.

    13. Re: short the stock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't give a damn about India. They can handle their own problems. If history is my guide, they'll handle them badly because lying, cheating, and resume inflating don't work on overpopulation and infrastructure problems the same way they do on American executives who are also liars and cheaters.

      No, we want tax policies and tariffs that make offshoring unprofitable. One of the very first thing the founders of this nation did was engage in protectionist trade policies because they knew that having industry wad important for this country. When George Washington found out he'd been elected President he sent away to what at the time was the only fine clothing maker in the country for a new suit. You see, the British forbade the colonists from having such things because they knew that industry wad important for their nation too.

      Washington wanted to send a message. It's one that's apparently lost on herp derps like you who like to yell 'communism' every time somebody purposes not letting companies do whatever they want.

      The founders trade policies served this nation well all the way up until we were stupid enough to elect Ronald Reagan, an act which coincides precisely with the decline of the middle class and wages across the board. Since then we've engaged in these stupid globalist 'free trade' policies that have all but destroyed the economic power of most of the nation.

      It's time to return to what works, and this free trade crap doesn't work in any way that actually matters.

    14. Re: short the stock by goarilla · · Score: 1

      Yes because you can keep consuming without income. Don't you guys already have enough debt as it is.

    15. Re: short the stock by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 2

      Microsoft: Satya Nadella

      So it begins...

    16. Re: short the stock by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      The world isn't binary.
      There are middle grounds between corporate capitalism and communism.

      Precisely. Computers have freed us to be able to think great thoughts. Why is is that the more powerful computers get, the more we seem to downgrade our own, more nuanced systems of logic developed over the centuries?

      Why also does everything have to be a straight line or a hyperbola? Can't we accept that many phenomena have one or more maxima and minima or may even go abruptly discontinuous?

    17. Re: short the stock by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      The President of the United States of America routinely does a lot of his job from locations other than the White House or even withing the USA at all. Or are American CEOs so magical that they cannot do likewise?

      And if so, why do they like to move their incorporations to tax-haven countries while maintaining their real-world presence in the USA?

    18. Re: short the stock by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      Next you'll be telling us that tax cuts for the unemployed don't work either!

    19. Re: short the stock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go fuck yourself....

    20. Re: short the stock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Satya Nadella is a CEO from India. Is he cheaper for Microsoft?

    21. Re:short the stock by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      And these companies do what they do because the US government, the state governments, and the local municipalities make it expensive and difficult to employ Americans.

      These governments make the rules. Companies simply play the game the best they can under the rules. It silly to blame them for behaving rationally.

      Better would be to blame idiot politicians that make stupid rules.

      This is so hilariously divorced from reality, I have to think you're joking or trolling. Companies simply play the game the best they can under the rules? As though they are detached observers and not primary participants in the shaping of law and policy? Perhaps you should look into LASIK to deal with that myopia.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    22. Re: short the stock by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Or... Great for the rest of us, their lower costs will fight margin compression for a time, but their competitors will follow suit to remain competitive and while 3 million Americans lose out on high wages, 300 million Americans gain in lower consumption costs (after all, we are a consumption economy), and India will gain 9 million jobs. For the American and Indian economies, this is a plus. The whole world gets more economic expansion as the cheapest possible costs are applied to work, and consumption increases. Don't let the lobbies and unions bogg the rest of consumers down. Just as steel workers fought to keep the cost of construction and cars up, the IT workers are fighting to keep the cost of software and IT up, at the expense of the rest of the economy.

      Cengage doesn't serve all 300 million Americans; not even close. And what on Earth makes you think that labor saving will result in lower consumer prices? That savings goes to profit. That's the whole point.

      I see your member number isn't that low. One day maybe you'll grow up and join the rest of us in understanding that supply-side economics doesn't work.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    23. Re: short the stock by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      So, you want communism? Guaranteed jobs from the government?

      Or you want to find a way to make India just vanish into thin air?

      If you are employed, at least we're dispelled the myth that the jobs go to the most capable and intelligent people.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    24. Re: short the stock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it'll happen

      if my current gig (Datacenter Network Engineer) goes the way of the Do-do bird, I'm out if IT. Living under the constant threat of "if you can't do this then maybe we need to send this job offshore" has made me really freakin' tired of this non-sense. I'm lucky in that I've saved and we are set up well enough right now. I still have 10-15 years to go though. I can retire early, just not THAT early. I'll probably go back to a normal work and renew my CDL. Makes a good nut and you can't offshore that just yet.

    25. Re: short the stock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed!

    26. Re: short the stock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The repubs are all about free markets. Well here you have them. Good job Ohio!

      In Free Markets, corporations give jobs to slave labor until we are all slaves.

    27. Re:short the stock by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      Ok Sanjay.

    28. Re: short the stock by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Did you bitch when we started manufacturing our televisions in Japan or did you happily buy two because they were less expensive now and the quality was, "Good Enough?" Or did you do the "right thing" and simply refuse to buy electronics that were made in a different country because you wanted to make sure your fellow citizens had good jobs to be able to buy the products of your company? Did you start going without electronics because you refused to take part in that off-shoring or did you support that off-shoring of labor?

      We know the answers. Well, to butcher the idea, now there's nobody left to speak for you.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    29. Re: short the stock by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      Well, I bought one TV in the 90s, and didn't buy a new TV until 2009. Anything before that, I was too young to do anything. I do not support off-shoring and I support that by buying local as much as possible. I love my state, and as a person who is the top 15-20% earning bracket, I know where my loyalties lie if I want to keep doing that and that means that I buy local as much as possible. That's the trickle down economics that I can stand behind, when people in my bracket do that then we have a platform for success. Most my furniture is oregon made or U.S. made, my car is made in Lafayette, IN. I have a famous electric car all made in the U.S. I only go to oregon businesses for my lunch and dinner. I don't eat at national chains. I invest in my local infrastructure.

      I approve every goddam tax hike that helps my community. With wealth comes responsibility. I'm fully cognizant that my body of success lies on the success of others. I'm happy to pay higher taxes because I think it will lead to a better future for my children and my country. I will also make sure that my government spends its money wisely by participating vigorously in it.

    30. Re: short the stock by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      Except he is living in the U.S. and is pulling a U.S. salary.

    31. Re: short the stock by KGIII · · Score: 1

      You must have also hand hewn the keyboard from rugged oak trees and trained squirrels to bring those packets back and forth to the network. Those varied electronic devices you own are surely all made here and not just assembled here - like the famous car you mention, those are all locally sourced materials, after all...

      Point being, and while you have made some exceptions, people are just fine with cost cutting until it impacts them. They'll happily own and buy stuff made overseas and, likely, use the excuse that they've no choice because going without won't be a choice they're willing to make.

      Personally? I try to be a responsible citizen but I also accept reality.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    32. Re: short the stock by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 1

      So do many H1B's, I'm told.

    33. Re: short the stock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Politics aren't binary either. There are more ways to do it than communism vs capitalism. Socialism communism.

    34. Re: short the stock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft: Satya Nadella

      Google CEO: Sundar Pichai

      Adobe CEO: Shantanu Narayen

      The list goes on...

      It's a well known "secret" Indians primarily hire and promote fellow Indians. They will continue to take over American software companies up and down the whole org chart.

    35. Re: short the stock by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure he is a U.S. citizen. Having an H1B CEO would be a dangerous precedent.

    36. Re: short the stock by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      I agree, I can only control my behavior. Since the question was directed about my behavior I answered it. I agree that people will try to get the best deal possible, I do recognize that buying local is important.

    37. Re: short the stock by KGIII · · Score: 1

      The responsible aren't the ones who control the markets, it seems. While I tend to agree with you, there are limits to what one can do and buying local isn't always an option unless you're willing to go without. Far to few people even care about buying local. And they wonder why the economy is depressed and where the jobs have gone. They demanded cheaper while refusing to work for less. They got cheaper and now they seem to be on a downward spiral to the point where they'll have even fewer jobs. I'm retired so, to me, it's just a show. I can, at least, insulate myself and my family from it. Unfortunately, a lot of others are not in that position.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    38. Re: short the stock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The contracting company will make more profits which means more tax and more benefits to the unemployed,

  6. How will that "professional organization" be... by Nutria · · Score: 4, Insightful

    any more successful than unions at "saving American jobs"?

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    1. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When there are no more jobs, maybe it's time to create a new social model? You know, "do those other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard"? Where did that spirit go?

    2. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If its well-funded, it can be quite effective. Unions only failed because they were demonized so their ranks shrunk and pro-corporation lobbying efforts.

    3. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by NicBenjamin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ever looked at international Doctor Salaries? Or lawyer salaries?

      Part of the reason those are through the roof is that they have very good lobbying arms. The people who actually run the country (unlike the Dems claim, it isn't the 1%, it's more like the top 20-25% who make $100k. The basis of their power is they always vote, even in odd-year-Mayoral elections, the cheating bastards) distrust unions, so actual unions are quite restricted. But Doctors and lawyers are key components of the hundredthousandocracy, can quite clearly and cogently defend their interests, and arrange it so that even proposals designed largely to screw them (ie: anything that reduces health costs, any form of Tort Reform) don't do that shit.

      There are 4 millionish IT Workers in the US. If a few hundred thousand organized themselves into an association, hired lobbyists in every state and in DC (or, more likely, hired some of their members to lobby), they would be quite powerful. They aren't a union, so the GOP won't go into crazy-kill-death mode. Unlike Zuckerberg or San Fran tech entrepreneurs, they look and act like the suburban white-collar types who dominate the country. They say "we want these contracts investigated because we think that the rules weren't followed," and no politician has the stones to get in the fucking way.

    4. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      I can't think of a better way than forming "professional organizations" to hasten companies offshoring. No-one likes being blackmailed or threatened.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    5. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 2

      They were demonized by union members. Not because of some secret campaign from employers.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    6. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by Required+Snark · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Unions have been unable to oppose outsourcing because the Republicans have destroyed union power over the last 50 years or so. So called "right to work" legislation and other forms of legal (and illegal) union busting resulted in lower union membership, which means lower amounts of political donations and smaller voting blocks. The end game on this is Citizens United which means that the American oligarchy can spend as much dark money as they want to buy as much political power as they can get. Money doesn't always buy elections or politicians, but if one side outspends their opponents by large enough amounts for a long enough period of time they can change the rules of the game. Which they did.

      Here is a example from blue collar middle America. In the Midwest food processing, such as meat packing, used to be unionized. The unions were pretty much wiped out by the Republicans. Who got those jobs? Undocumented workers, mostly Spanish speakers. It's not like citizens went from being union workers to non-union workers. Citizens were replaced by non-citizens because they were less expensive to start out with, and undocumented workers will never complain about illegal treatment or dangerous working conditions. That's why there are so may relatively new Spanish speaking communities in places like Kansas, Ohio, Oklahoma, Nebraska, etc. And it's also why Trump is able to scream about "illegals" and get so much traction. The real perpetrators are the Republicans and massive corrupt big business interests.

      If you haven't lost your job yet it's just because they haven't gotten around to you yet.

      --
      Why is Snark Required?
    7. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Maybe we can make the Indian workers unionize then.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    8. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Make sure to include networking professionals (voice too). "Gee, we don't know why India is in a total communications blackout! It's not urgent, is it?"

    9. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by TheSync · · Score: 2

      The end game on this is Citizens United which means that the American oligarchy can spend as much dark money as they want to buy as much political power as they can get.

      Citizens United applies equally to unions being free to spend on political advertising as it does to corporations.

      If you haven't lost your job yet it's just because they haven't gotten around to you yet.

      I don't believe it is "my job" to lose, I believe I have to earn it against all competition.

    10. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by Orgasmatron · · Score: 1

      Unions always were free to spend on elections. The point of Citizens United was to allow non-Democrat organizations a voice too.

      --
      See that "Preview" button?
    11. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by Required+Snark · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Did you even bother to read my post, or are you incapable of simple logical reasoning?

      Union membership has plummeted in the U.S., from nearly one-third of workers 50 years ago to one in 10 American workers today. Under the simplest assumption, for every $30 unions had to spend on politics in 1966, they now have $10. That's a factor of three decline. Citizens United legalized unlimited untraceable political contributions. This means the disparity between, say the Koch brothers and unions is even greater.

      Unions and corporations have reporting requirements, and they have accountability to stockholders/union members. Post Citizens United, PACs have no accountability. Even if a union gives money to a PAC, the spending is at least theoretically traceable. A union member can sue the union and find out what the union spent on politics. If the money went to a PAC, they could make a good case for having the PAC audited. The same goes for a stockholder, but if I understand the law correctly a stockholder has less say in political spending. For individual money donated through PACs, there is no way the public will ever know how the money is spent. The process is opaque.

      Saying that unions are equivalent to individual PAC contributions is factually incorrect. You are just flat out wrong.

      As for the impact of spending on the political process, some people, including the Koch brothers, think it makes a big difference. That's why they're spending $889 million before the 2016 elections.

      --
      Why is Snark Required?
    12. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by Orgasmatron · · Score: 2

      First, the unions killed themselves. They became rich and powerful while solving the problems they were created to solve, and then the bosses decided they wanted to stay rich and powerful, so they couldn't fade away when their work was done. They abandoned fighting for their workers in favor of fighting for mandatory dues. Populist organizations, like unions, must support the people that support the organization. When they stop, they weaken. If they also turn evil...

      Second, the immigration mess is a central plank of the Democrat platform, and the secret desire of a tiny sliver of the Republican party, which, sadly, includes most of the federal officeholders for the last few decades. It went too far, and now the core of the Republican party is reasserting itself against the "leadership". Note that most primary polls have establishment candidates getting less support than the margin of error.

      (If the Republican base is able to drive our their progressive parasites, the country will return to sanity peacefully and in short order. If not, brace yourself for the shitstorm.)

      Also, you have cause and effect reversed. The fall of the unions did not enable immigration, immigration eroded the foundations of the unions. Teddy's immigration bill passed in like 1965. Not coincidentally, wages have been stagnant or falling since around that time. The unions should have been fighting tooth and nail against it, but instead were busy shoveling money towards the people who caused it, Teddy and his Democrat friends.

      --
      See that "Preview" button?
    13. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got to be kidding me! Democrats have declared all coal mining unions null and void! No strike, no "please get another job", no Republican in sight even asking them they outlawed coal mining jobs. Clinton pushed through Nafta dancing and singing. Democrats also treat H1-B visa indentured servants as easy votes as if they were trapped animals.

    14. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      any more successful than unions at "saving American jobs"?

      Unions were quite good at protecting American jobs in the past, and could be again if Americans weren't so impregnated with anti-union propaganda from the time we entered school that the knee jerk reaction to the word is enough to send most of us screaming in the other direction.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    15. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why were unions killed off, then,hmmm? And killed off before CU?

      Seems like it is far more "We want our rich buddies to do that because it works so well, but you have to stop otherwise it won't".

    16. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If you haven't lost your job yet it's just because they haven't gotten around to you yet."

      Actually i just got a new job doing telephone tech support. The company is hiring Americans like mad because all their customers kept complaining about Indians on the help line.

    17. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by stdarg · · Score: 2

      One problem with unions is they pit Americans against Americans. When an automaker wants to open a factory in the South, which is still America btw, the unions protest. So they are too extreme in their protectionism and that pisses off a lot of people. Same with Boeing, they wanted to build their next plane in like Tennessee or something, the unions went on strike.

      The other big perceptional problem is that unions protect lazy and ineffective workers. Protecting against unfair business practices is one thing, but the stereotype of the union requiring 3 guys standing around watching 1 guy dig and 1 guy hold a "SLOW" sign (road construction) is just too damning. That's not what we need or want, because once again, that goes beyond protecting Americans and into dividing us. Paying 4x the labor cost (for that example) is a cost that the rest of us have to absorb, and that sucks. Then people start thinking, "Oh, I know why high speed rail is so goddamn expensive... fucking unions!" And they have a point. It's really unions plus excessive environmentalism.

    18. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it's 100% the republicans, that's why jobs in Canada go to other countries as well.

      Oh wait, we don't have a republican party. Or a democrat party. Heck, our current government would make an American think we're a step away from communist.

      But still, the jobs go.

      The only way to hold onto them is to act like Venezuela, but then the economy turns to shit anyways.

    19. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Unions fail because their bosses are just as corrupt as the company bosses. All the same politics are at play. The higher you go the crookeder it gets.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    20. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by Bugler412 · · Score: 1

      they were only "good at saving union jobs" in an environment that lacked competent and economically viable competition, IE: lack of alternatives

    21. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by Spamalope · · Score: 1

      Oooh gee, your voice is down? Why don't you email your voice team? Oh, your connectivity is completely cut and all your support is overseas? Why don't you write a letter?

    22. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by sociocapitalist · · Score: 5, Informative

      One problem with unions is they pit Americans against Americans. When an automaker wants to open a factory in the South, which is still America btw, the unions protest. So they are too extreme in their protectionism and that pisses off a lot of people. Same with Boeing, they wanted to build their next plane in like Tennessee or something, the unions went on strike.

      The other big perceptional problem is that unions protect lazy and ineffective workers. Protecting against unfair business practices is one thing, but the stereotype of the union requiring 3 guys standing around watching 1 guy dig and 1 guy hold a "SLOW" sign (road construction) is just too damning. That's not what we need or want, because once again, that goes beyond protecting Americans and into dividing us. Paying 4x the labor cost (for that example) is a cost that the rest of us have to absorb, and that sucks. Then people start thinking, "Oh, I know why high speed rail is so goddamn expensive... fucking unions!" And they have a point. It's really unions plus excessive environmentalism.

      Things we have because of unions:
              Weekends
              All Breaks at Work, including your Lunch Breaks
              Paid Vacation
              FMLA
              Sick Leave
              Social Security
              Minimum Wage
              Civil Rights Act/Title VII (Prohibits Employer Discrimination)
              8-Hour Work Day
              Overtime Pay
              Child Labor Laws
              Occupational Safety & Health Act (OSHA)
              40 Hour Work Week
              Worker's Compensation (Worker's Comp)
              Unemployment Insurance
              Pensions
              Workplace Safety Standards and Regulations
              Employer Health Care Insurance
              Collective Bargaining Rights for Employees
              Wrongful Termination Laws
              Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967
              Whistleblower Protection Laws
              Employee Polygraph Protect Act (Prohibits Employer from using a lie detector test on an employee)
              Veteran's Employment and Training Services (VETS)
              Compensation increases and Evaluations (Raises)
              Sexual Harassment Laws
              Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
              Holiday Pay
              Employer Dental, Life, and Vision Insurance
              Privacy Rights
              Pregnancy and Parental Leave
              Military Leave
              The Right to Strike
              Public Education for Children
              Equal Pay Acts of 1963 & 2011 (Requires employers pay men and women equally for the same amount of work)
              Laws Ending Sweatshops in the United States

      If you have ever benefited from anything on that list then you should stop whining about unions and start realizing that without organized workers standing up for themselves the middle class is going to join the lower class in being ignorant and dirt poor.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    23. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      they were only "good at saving union jobs" in an environment that lacked competent and economically viable competition, IE: lack of alternatives

      I disagree. There were always competent and viable alternatives.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    24. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      If all this is true, why is the state of California - the most left wing US state - outsourcing to India?

    25. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by Scroatzilla · · Score: 2

      This. Probably most of the anti-union sentiment in this dicussion was ingrained via lifelong propaganda. I don't think it's a Right/Left thing. In the so-called "whitecollar" world, unions are particularly repulsive because "bluecollar" has such a negative connotation. Why?

    26. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point of Citizens United was to allow non-Democrat organizations a voice too.

      And that's why unions and Democrat organizations want it reversed. Opposing viewpoints must not be allowed to be heard.

    27. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean private unions correct?
      Public unions seem to be doing fine.

    28. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      This. Probably most of the anti-union sentiment in this dicussion was ingrained via lifelong propaganda. I don't think it's a Right/Left thing. In the so-called "whitecollar" world, unions are particularly repulsive because "bluecollar" has such a negative connotation. Why?

      Sorry, why what?

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    29. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      Right, because the problem in the 21st century was that the voice of the unions was too strong.

    30. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wages have been stagnant for a long time due to effective union busting, not the 1965 immigration bill. We can see the drop start happening right after Reagan busted the air controllers union, which set off a domino effect on the rest of labor.

      Unions "failed" due to effective union busting tactics, beginning with the odious Taft-Hartley act of 1947 which forced unions to worry more about maintaining membership instead of their overall goals. Despite this setback, the unions were effective in improving the lives of all working Americans through the initiatives they sponsored (many of which were not targeted towards union workers, but all workers). Benefiting everyone came with a cost--their services became less necessary. Combine that with a very effective anti-labor political and propaganda campaign and we can see why American workers are treated worse and worse each year.

    31. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      That would be pretty hilarious to blackhole India's IP segment.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    32. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't believe it is "my job" to lose, I believe I have to earn it against all competition.

      Good luck competing with someone on the other side of the world who will do the job for 1/4 of what you're paid.

    33. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Bullshit.

      You can pretend none of that would've happened without unions, but you're just lying to yourself.

    34. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree completely, when they gave corporations "people" status and removed 'donation/spending limits'/ aka allowed corporations to BACK a particular candidate; This was the end of any democracy in America(and elsewhere this is employed).

      There is no denying it with a sound argument, the 400 wealthiest families in the world control more than half the worlds assets(400 have more combined wealth than 7 billion) (a disproportionate number are American citizens(aka America rules the world/controls the exchange rates/financial markets).

      Think about it "google" "cnn"(all controlling shares owned by same 400 people) etc are allowed to support/endorse a political party, with user data and all the profiles built on each person they can do more than throw money at a campaign, they can steer their viewers with 'news' that can effect their vote... We are so so so #$%^$#%ed because the general population couldn't put 2+2 together if their life depended on it.

      http://www.ted.com/talks/james...

    35. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by gmadmin · · Score: 1

      Citations please, this looks an awful lot like gibberish. It is fascinating if fact, but exceedingly damaging if not and some make decisions based on it.

    36. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have never met a Doctor that made as little as 100k.

    37. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. Probably most of the anti-union sentiment in this dicussion was ingrained via lifelong propaganda. I don't think it's a Right/Left thing. In the so-called "whitecollar" world, unions are particularly repulsive because "bluecollar" has such a negative connotation. Why?

      Propoganda? I lived in Michigan and saw the thuggishness of the UAW and Teamsters in the '70s-'90s firsthand. People have long memories.

      I certainly didn't work my ass off to get a top education just to have to put up with that kind of bullshit.

    38. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      Bullshit.

      You can pretend none of that would've happened without unions, but you're just lying to yourself.

      You seem to think that business owners grant things to employees out of the goodness of their hearts where the opposite has always been the case.

      I've lived and worked all over the world, in countries with and without labor organizations and I can tell you most definitively that business owners don't give jack shit to their employees unless they have no choice (there being notable exceptions where extreme benefits are part of the company culture like Google).

      Do you imagine that things just went from seven day workweeks, sweatshops, child labor, no paid holidays, no paid sick leave, etc. to the state of things today without anyone having to group together and stand up for themselves?

      Sorry, but no. Labor organized and pushed back on companies and eventually pushed enough on the government (who has tended to support companies over individuals) to get laws enacted that give you all those nice benefits that you have.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    39. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Nice of you to dismiss the great work done by the Quakers.

      Perhaps you could at least acknowledge that labour is its own market and there's a reason companies offer employment benefits far beyond legal minimums.

      But don't let me get in the way of your unionistic propaganda.

    40. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      Nice of you to dismiss the great work done by the Quakers.

      Perhaps you could at least acknowledge that labour is its own market and there's a reason companies offer employment benefits far beyond legal minimums.

      But don't let me get in the way of your unionistic propaganda.

      Sure labour is a market (many even) and yes, some companies offer benefits above and beyond - but that is the exception and not the rule and when the benefits are higher, the salaries are lower - it's all a package one way or the other.

      The key here is that it's some and not many, not most and certainly not all companies who think like this.

      Historically (Quakers aside), and generally speaking, business owners will pay the least that they have to in order to get the most hours worked possible out of any employee.

      Incidentally I'm not particularly pro-union; I do, however, think that they (or something like them) have a role to play in balancing things out.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    41. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's hilarious is seeing a retarded mentally deranged abnormal imbecile like you attempting written speech!

    42. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on. Be nice to slashdot's own village idiot calling himself Coren22. It's his fantasy name along with thinking he is an mcse.

    43. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by stdarg · · Score: 1

      Ah, this is the one I was thinking of with respect to Boeing: http://labornotes.org/2015/09/...

      That's the union perspective, here's another one: http://townhall.com/columnists...

      They didn't go on strike, they sued Boeing before the National Labor Relations Board.

      So a union sued a company to prevent it from adding jobs in America, because it was in a state that didn't have a machinists union. This was to be a second production line so they could fill their huge backlog of orders more quickly and take market share from Airbus. They were not moving jobs, they were not laying off people in Washington state... the union prevented Boeing from adding NEW jobs for other Americans.

    44. Re:How will that "professional organization" be... by stdarg · · Score: 1

      Things we have because of unions:
                      Weekends

      Yeah.. let me stop you right there. That's wrong. We have weekends because of religion, not unions. Too many employees are (or were) religious, and too many business owners as well.

  7. No by Arkham · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If a "professional organization" means some sort of stupid union, then no. Unions did not prevent outsourcing of US jobs, and cannot. The reality is, if you want substandard work on the cheap, you're always going to get that in India. As my boss says of our products, "(software) products without revenue are built in India, products that make money are built in the US".

    We do all the design work in the US, because our 250+ Indian counterparts cannot design anything correctly. They code by trial and error. You'll never have a best-in-class product that way. We just give them menial coding tasks, and even then 1 US engineer is as productive as 3 in India.

    --
    - Vincit qui patitur.
    1. Re:No by MyAlternateID · · Score: 1

      We do all the design work in the US, because our 250+ Indian counterparts cannot design anything correctly. They code by trial and error. You'll never have a best-in-class product that way. We just give them menial coding tasks, and even then 1 US engineer is as productive as 3 in India.

      What does that single US worker cost, how does that compare to the cost of hiring three Indians, and how profitable is outsourcing in the mid-to-long term? These are the factors that will determine whether this situation will continue to get worse.

    2. Re:No by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Professional associations certainly do protect jobs. Unless you're a member of the right association, you can't be a civil engineer, doctor, lawyer, plumber, electrician, etc. Companies aren't going to import workers and then support them for a year or two while they can't practice their profession.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    3. Re:No by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 2

      What does that single US worker cost, how does that compare to the cost of hiring three Indians, and how profitable is outsourcing in the mid-to-long term? These are the factors that will determine whether this situation will continue to get worse.

      I'm sorry, "mid-to-long term"? What does that have to do with the next round of bonuses for the folks making the outsourcing decisions?

    4. Re:No by Boronx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Unions have been successfully neutered by the corporate party (all Republicans and half the Democrats). If they still had power, yes they could stop outsourcing.

      The quality of programming coming out of India is improving rapidly.

      "(software) products without revenue are built in India, products that make money are built in the US".

      40 years ago, you could say "You can go to Japan to buy a hunk of junk, but quality cars are built in the US." and you'd be right!

    5. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Unless you're a member of the right association, you can't be a civil engineer, doctor, lawyer, plumber, electrician, etc.

      That's because of mandatory licensing requirements imposed by law that are delegated to an organization, not because of membership in the organization. And plumbers, electricians, etc are not required to be a member of a professional organization, at least in my state.

      Hardly any IT workers work on life/safety critical systems that would warrant mandatory licensing (and the vast majority are people you would not want anywhere near such systems anyway) so there's no help there.

    6. Re:No by lgw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's funny, I know people who have changed countries to continue working as a doctor, a lawyer, and a civil engineer (with some retraining on local law in each case).

      What makes those jobs different is important: by their nature, you can't do them remotely. A lot of the medical industry has moved off shore, but not the part that requires direct patient interaction. Working in the trades is a great way to never be offshored, and unions have nothing to do with it: no one's going to sit in India and wire your house, or fix a busted sewer pipe. There's significant immigration into all those jobs, but it's absorbed naturally.

      America and immigration go together, get used to it. The problem with the H1-B system is its awkward, non-tenure-track nature. Have an B1-B automatically become a green card in 2 years, and the wage problem will be solved.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    7. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      bullshit. unions killed themselves and almost killed the auto industry.

      >40 years ago, you could say "You can go to Japan to buy a hunk of junk, but quality cars are built in the US."
      1975 american cars were gas guzzling boats that fell apart not long after you left the dealership. union made went from quality to overpriced shit pretty fast. even now, unions demand approval of all new car designs to ensure jobs aren't being lost. so american cars still lag behind in features & quality.

      Tell me one reason (a non-racist reason) why a company shouldn't outsource their IT to india.

    8. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one here who's had the dubious pleasure of working with them feels insecure about their job.

      That's how I felt until a few months ago, when my employer laid off 1/3 of the office, told another third that they'd be training Chinese and Indian replacements for about 9 months for the reward of a severance package. They'll be handling bug fixes and customer support escalations for some of our products that are basically being phased out. I pity our customers.

    9. Re:No by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Explain this to me, I run a small company, how is it you think you can stop me from outsourcing work to other countries (and I do that) when not outsourcing is so much more expensive in terms of regulations, taxes, laws, never mind hourly wages, so how do you do that exactly?

      What do you think you can do to prevent an owner of a company from hiring people ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD exactly? Ha!

    10. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think you will keep your nice little yuppie company afloat when no one in the good old USA can afford your services and/or products any more. What makes you think unemployed and starving Americans will let you live peacefully in your fancy yuppie house. It will do you no good to be upper middle class in a nation reduced to poverty and angry about it. Unlike other nations, our population is armed to the teeth and not prone to bowing and scraping. Try looking past the bottom line for a change, your grandchildren will thank you.

    11. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put all Americans out of work and your business dissolves in its entirety. What are you going to do then asshat? Dickheads like you are the reason that revolution is inevitable.

    12. Re:No by Dog-Cow · · Score: 2

      The quality of programming coming out of India is improving rapidly.

      That's about as useful as saying that you received a 100% raise when you got bumped up to 2 cents/hour.

    13. Re:No by Dog-Cow · · Score: 2

      Quality. If you pay Indians for the same quality, you will be paying the same amount as you would for native employees that have far fewer communications issues (dialect/language, time differences, etc.).

    14. Re:No by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      If the remaining employees didn't sabotage the incoming replacements and the company that screwed them, they were derelict in their ethical duties. I hope that company is now bankrupt and out of business.

    15. Re:No by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      This is exactly how MySQL went from a garage operation to a billion-dollar company in 10 years or so.

      They hired the best they could find, wherever they could find them.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    16. Re:No by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Indian education is primarily by rote, they don't actually promote independent thinking or out of the box thinking. This is true in general asia, where they believe as a younger person, you can't question the elder person. That kind of thinking creates an uneven power structure where the best ideas don't necessarily rise up like they do in western countries. So, until Asian countries learn to depose of centuries of ingrained thinking, the U.S. worker will always trump an Indian one or chinese one.

      Sure there are going to be exceptions, but on the whole, a U.S. worker is more productive than a Indian one and also will be able to focus on and solve complex problems. Now, some of the Indians know this and have gone back to India and is trying to fix that, but it isn't going to be easy because of the cultural and corrupt institutions in place. But who knows?

      As a person who had some exposure to both school systems, (with primarily in the U.S. education), I'll pick an American worker every time. Hell, if I was in India I would try to get an American worker because I know for my money, I'm going to get a lot more value.

    17. Re:No by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, and if thre are starving, there won't be shit for taxes, so I guess your roads and other infrastructure you take for granted will also crumble, so whatever fancy car or even a normal car will get more easily damaged because the roads will be properly maintained. I suppose your rugged individualism will somehow solve that problem, in which case, I hope you've picked up some of tradescraft.

    18. Re:No by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Or have the visa owned by the worker, so he can change jobs at will.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    19. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US built quality cars once ???

    20. Re:No by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1, Troll

      "We do all the design work in the US, because our 250+ Indian counterparts cannot design anything correctly. They code by trial and error. You'll never have a best-in-class product that way. We just give them menial coding tasks, and even then 1 US engineer is as productive as 3 in India. "

      You mean like Japan awhile ago and China, more recently, for manufacturing?

      Got news for you - they're not stupid and they can learn to design as well as we can.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    21. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MySQL is hardly alone in that. There are about a million relational and NOSQL data bases out there, and most of them are hiring the best they can find, wherever they find them.

      On the other hand, plenty of development projects fail, no matter where the developers live.

    22. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true. That is a simplistic viewpoint. I am studying in India, in a higher education program at a nice university. There are all sorts of people here - I know people who think independently, and those who don't, both students and teachers. I would assume the ratio is similar the world over, although the top US universities may have slightly more smarter and a lot more successful people, as they are more prestigious. Just read their output (papers and theses) and you should come to a similar conclusion.

    23. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I concur. Every other MNC that I have interviewed does not have design work. I am searching for design work in the embedded space and I am having a really tough time finding work where I can decide on the microcontroller or the tool chain or the overall product design. It is so frustrating that it is like recession for a person like me who loves end to end product design and development.

    24. Re:No by dwpro · · Score: 1

      The same way we would try and stop you from using child labor or sweat shops. Regulation and law is the only way.

      --
      Millions long for immortality who do not know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon. -- Susan Ertz
    25. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a "professional organization" means some sort of stupid union, then no. Unions did not prevent outsourcing of US jobs, and cannot. The reality is, if you want substandard work on the cheap, you're always going to get that in India. As my boss says of our products, "(software) products without revenue are built in India, products that make money are built in the US".

      We do all the design work in the US, because our 250+ Indian counterparts cannot design anything correctly. They code by trial and error. You'll never have a best-in-class product that way. We just give them menial coding tasks, and even then 1 US engineer is as productive as 3 in India.

      And often they can't even do the menial stuff right. We've had to send a bit of work to our Asia branch: they spent nearly a week doing wrong what one of us could do right in half a day. I doubt they are so much cheaper than us to add any actual value.

    26. Re:No by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      The more you try to tighten the fist, the fewer jibs there will be left.

      The point is by destroying individual freedoms you are not getting anything positive in return, only bad long term outcomes. But I am posing the same question once more: how is it you think you can stop anybody from hiring people anywhere in the world at all? Especially a company with revenues that are coming from around the world? A company that sells around the worls? By trying to control a company like that in the way you describe, you will sooner lose that company altogether. It makes no sense to be based in a country with laws that prevent global operations in today's world.

    27. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are not stupid. But in India, they are not taught software engineering. Just programming. I was once there interacting w/ Indian trainees at an SAP training center about ABAP, and they told me that they were never taught how to modularly split up projects and work on different parts of them. If they learnt it, it was on the job. I however don't know whether the training centers in Infosys teach that, but I doubt it.

    28. Re:No by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      No, it's because the groups affected lobbied to have licensing control themselves.

      And it has nothing to do with life/safety critical systems - and here you need to be licensed for the construction trades. Contractor gets caught hiring an unlicensed tradesman, they both get fines. A license shows at least a modicum of knowledge, same as you wouldn't hire someone to drive a tractor-trailer without the right permit.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    29. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sure the american is better but how much better? is he $10 an hour better, $30 an hour better? its not quite so back and white as to just pick the best.

    30. Re:No by lgw · · Score: 1

      H1-B workers who are software developers can change jobs at will (L1 is the slave labor visa). Oh, the new company has to sponsor them, but that's a cost of doing business. H1-Bs are fully transferable. What gives the company extra power is the role of the company's lawyers in the green card process. IMO, if someone can hold down a full time professional job here for 2 years, and pass a background check, they should get a green card with minimal fuss. Welcome aboard, taxpayer!

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    31. Re:No by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Until they're re-certified to local standards and accepted by the professional association, they can't work as a doctor, lawyer, or civil engineer. That's why you have doctors and lawyers and civil engineers from other countries driving taxis and cleaning floors while they try to get into the profession locally.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    32. Re:No by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Explain this to me, I run a small company, how is it you think you can stop me from outsourcing work to other countries (and I do that) when not outsourcing is so much more expensive in terms of regulations, taxes, laws, never mind hourly wages, so how do you do that exactly?

      What do you think you can do to prevent an owner of a company from hiring people ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD exactly? Ha!

      I don't know, the law? http://www.dol.gov/whd/immigra...

      Unless you're a business owner who doesn't mind breaking the law to make more money. In which case, go for it.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    33. Re:No by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      The law? The law cannot prevent a company from hiring people in another country since those people are not leaving their country to come in to the employer. WTH are you talking about?

    34. Re:No by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      There are a variety of ways if we actually wanted to do that. A foreign employees tax would be an obvious example.

    35. Re:No by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, how exactly would you tax a foreign employee? You are talking about taxing the company pre-expense or what? Good luck with that if the company is making money abroad.

    36. Re:No by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      You would tax the corporation obviously. I'm not saying it would ever pass congress, just that it would be fairly straightforward to actually do if the government wanted to.

    37. Re:No by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      It would achieve nothing. Buying a service from a foreign company goes right around this in a second.

    38. Re:No by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      Many jobs are not appropriate for outsourcing. If you don't believe me you've never tried to outsource critical business functions before. Sure, non-critical routine work, no problem, the rest, not so much.

    39. Re:No by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      What do you consider to be 'critical' and why should I care what you think I have tried or not tried? I am talking about development and support roles.

    40. Re:No by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      Depends on the business of course, hard to say without specific details. For example, if you're a manufacturing firm and you don't have any special talent strategy then you could probably outsource much of HR without too many negative side effects, operations or production on the other hand is how you add value and would need to stay in house.

    41. Re:No by Boronx · · Score: 1

      I can make you have to move to India to do it.

    42. Re:No by Boronx · · Score: 1

      This is called "whistling past the graveyard"

    43. Re:No by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Outsourcing does not reduce costs.

      The headline short term numbers look attractive, but the NPV is at best $0.

    44. Re:No by Magnus+Pym · · Score: 1

      By imposing tariffs on the products you are hoping to sell in the US so that the advantages you accrue by not employing American workers is nullified.

    45. Re:No by roman_mir · · Score: 0

      The thing is that for a company that sells its products globally this is quite irrelevant, the revenue streams don't have to cross, beside that the products do not cross borders either, so at which point exactly are you going to 'impose tariffs'?

    46. Re:No by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      This must be a new thing. I worked on an H1B in the early 90s and you couldn't change without your master's permission.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    47. Re:No by lgw · · Score: 1

      That wasn't true in the 90s either, though plenty of employers told that lie. There have always been companies whose whole business model is hiring kids right out of college and lying to them about everything. Fortunately, that's getting harder and harder to keep up in today's connected world.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  8. Yes, it's time, and long past time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Our politicians don't care about the American worker. Our corporations and their willing yes-men lackeys don't care about the American worker.

    But the American worker cares about the American worker, and together our shared interests can at least give us a "bargaining stick." Of course we need to be ready to swing the stick if need be to show that it's a real stick and all.

    1. Re:Yes, it's time, and long past time by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

      And when the American company of empowered workers goes to compete with foreign company offering the same services for 1/3 the cost what "bargaining stick" will the American company have to win that business?

    2. Re:Yes, it's time, and long past time by vlad30 · · Score: 1

      If the American worker cared so much why doesn't he form a company and show everyone how its done

      --
      Your'e all thinking it, I just said it for you
    3. Re:Yes, it's time, and long past time by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Well, a user's manual written in proper English, for starters. Of course, the writing and printing of that will be outsourced to Canada.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    4. Re:Yes, it's time, and long past time by msimm · · Score: 1

      If you care about the American worker, advocate to make them the better worker. Maybe if we'd put less faith in unions and the old "Made in America" campaigns (which cost Americans money to produce and advocate) and more faith in education, research, and competition we'd have been better off. We've got resources some competing countries don't have (or don't have as much) and if we can't successfully leverage those resources then perhaps we don't deserve them.

      --
      Quack, quack.
    5. Re:Yes, it's time, and long past time by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      Well I suppose they'll just have ot move their market to Asia. They should also get rid of their executives because well, they won't understand how to lead a country in an asian market. But the board of directors will be just fine. :)

    6. Re:Yes, it's time, and long past time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the American worker cared so much why doesn't he form a company and show everyone how its done

      Because starting a business requires capital, and most Americans do not have the money to do that. If you do manage to get something started, and get big enough to be on the radar, the multi-national corporations will stifle you with lawsuits or unfair competition to drive you out of business.

    7. Re:Yes, it's time, and long past time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you care about the American worker, advocate to make them the better worker. Maybe if we'd put less faith in unions and the old "Made in America" campaigns (which cost Americans money to produce and advocate) and more faith in education, research, and competition we'd have been better off. We've got resources some competing countries don't have (or don't have as much) and if we can't successfully leverage those resources then perhaps we don't deserve them.

      If you look in many home centers, you will see tools with the American flag stamped on the package. When you read the fine print, it says "Assembled in the U.S.A. out of foreign and domestic products". So you can't really trust what is "made" in the U.S.

    8. Re:Yes, it's time, and long past time by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      Clearly, you have no read the incredibly bad English written by so many college graduates from the USA.

    9. Re:Yes, it's time, and long past time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but what percentage of end users value the user's manual? This is still Slashdot, correct?

    10. Re:Yes, it's time, and long past time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must be their attention to detail...

    11. Re:Yes, it's time, and long past time by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      If the American worker cared so much why doesn't he form a company and show everyone how its done

      Sometimes they do. https://www.nceo.org/articles/...

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    12. Re:Yes, it's time, and long past time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the American worker cared so much why doesn't he form a company and show everyone how its done

      Yeah, why doesn't the average American just quit his job and spend a few hundred thousand dollars (minimum!) starting his own business competing with the multi-million dollar corporation he was working for?

  9. TFA Link? by nullchar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Holy tracking link Batman! Try this one instead:
    http://www.computerworld.com/article/3002681/it-outsourcing/fury-and-fear-in-ohio-as-it-jobs-go-to-india.html

  10. At some point by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    When the career path people are looking at the choice between McDonald's or Wendy's, there is going to be an American version of a brain drain.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    1. Re:At some point by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      If there were a better place to go, of course they'd move, currently there isn't.

    2. Re:At some point by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      If there were a better place to go, of course they'd move, currently there isn't.

      Currently. Just remember though, the Job creators are not finished yet, we must allow them to create more jobs.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  11. What Congress should do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think Congress should enact legislation around the matter of doomed workers being forced to train their replacements. That shouldn't be allowed.

    More comprehensive legislation preventing employers from moving jobs offshore would do more harm than good. There's no good way of doing that, it would just encourage creativity in matters that don't do the slightest bit of good for anyone except for high-paid lawyers and MBA consultants.

    1. Re:What Congress should do by Njorthbiatr · · Score: 1

      Not if you institute a tax on it.

    2. Re:What Congress should do by jodido · · Score: 1

      No one can force you to work. Since your job is going away anyway, quit.

    3. Re:What Congress should do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they quit they get no severance.

    4. Re:What Congress should do by Dog-Cow · · Score: 2

      The company usually blackmails the employee by threatening to withhold benefits, such as severance. This is exactly what should be illegal.

    5. Re:What Congress should do by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      Then organize and everyone quit exactly at the same time. They'd be fucked. Maybe you won't get severance, but it would be mutally assured destruction.. the impact of that will be felt everywhere as a precedence. Managers and board members understand risk more than anything else, they will stand up and pay attention...

  12. Job creators at work by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 0
    Creating jobs in other countries. But fear not citizens, with just a few more tax breaks, and easing of those Marxist regulations, they will be soon creating more jobs.

    Yeah - in other countries. But don't do all class warfare on them, it's hard being really really rich.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    1. Re:Job creators at work by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      The only trickle down we'll ever see is the urine falling on our heads.

    2. Re:Job creators at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only trickle down we'll ever see is the urine falling on our heads.

      And being reassured that it's merely raining.

  13. And here we go... by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    And here we go...the Race To The Bottom for American jobs. Yippee, thanks Corporate America!

    I recommend learning a skill or trade that can't be outsourced. Something that's hands-on, or something that most foreign workers simply can't do very well. (Tech writing and actual physical service work come to mind, but I'm sure there are others.)

    This trend won't stop until outsourced workers cost enough to make it economical to hire US workers, but I don't see that happening anytime soon.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:And here we go... by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Or until "incentives" are applied to the corporations that are doing the off shoring ...

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    2. Re:And here we go... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re "I recommend learning a skill or trade that can't be outsourced."
      Many try for a security clearance. Contractors, lawyers can often be "the no bid US company" with a long global supply chain of just in time products sold to the US gov or mil.
      The paper work is perfect, the products 100% made, owned and security cleared in the USA. Just the actual US workers jobs are all gone.
      Re "This trend won't stop until outsourced workers cost enough to make it economical to hire US workers, but I don't see that happening anytime soon."
      It is just so easy and lucrative to hide the actual origins of a product or service.
      US workers still have democracy on their side. Consider how free import agreements really work locally.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:And here we go... by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      And here we go...the Race To The Bottom for American jobs. Yippee, thanks Corporate America!

      I recommend learning a skill or trade that can't be outsourced. Something that's hands-on, or something that most foreign workers simply can't do very well. (Tech writing and actual physical service work come to mind, but I'm sure there are others.)

      Writing has served me very well in that regard. The work gets "outsourced" to me, wherever I happen to be.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    4. Re:And here we go... by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      It will happen when U.S. workers can no longer consume, and then it'll be like the depression they will save. Those depending on the U.S. market will die off or be forced to serve the asian market which will have plenty of competitors, they will in turn try to outsource to other cheaper geos like vietnam.

    5. Re:And here we go... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re " they will in turn try to outsource to other cheaper geos like vietnam."
      So true. China is even been out priced on some products by nations like Indonesia. Even with a cheap work force or new robots in place.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    6. Re:And here we go... by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      Don't forget there is still Africa, unspoiled and ready for exploitation. The chinese have already set up shop there. While we were out busy with our silly little wars, China has been putting the foundations for their own global economic domination.

  14. instead of union how about being value for money by sittingnut · · Score: 1, Insightful

    face facts. use logic. best way to prevent jobs going to non american citizens is to be truly productive and contributing value for money paid, not demanding to be paid more for doing less, than non americans who are deservedly getting these jobs. all other ways including unions are simply welfare leeching on productivity of rest of the world, who has to do the work anyway as always.

  15. Ties to National Geographic buyout? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the major things that Cengage Learning markets is National Geographic Learning for Education. The same National Geographic that just laid off 9% of its workforce after Rupert Murdoch bought them.

    1. Re:Ties to National Geographic buyout? by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      Rupert Murdoch bought National Geographic? Cripes...

  16. The Invisible Hand by EzInKy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Free markets work by encouraging competition. It makes no sense for companies to pay exuberant salaries to U.S. workers when similar results can be had for far less by outsourcing to countries whose citizens expect a standard of living far more meager than Americans. The Prophets promise to trickle upon those who worship at their alters.

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    1. Re: The Invisible Hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zune was similar to an iPod.

      Sometimes similar isn't enough, squirt.

    2. Re:The Invisible Hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Free markets work by encouraging competition. It makes no sense for companies to pay exuberant salaries to U.S. workers when similar results can be had for far less by outsourcing to countries whose citizens expect a standard of living far more meager than Americans. The Prophets promise to trickle upon those who worship at their alters.

      Society thrives when wealth is well distributed. "Free markets" are a race to the bottom in slow motion. Eventually everyone who is not rich will be sleeping on dirt floors. You better believe that they are going to be really pissed off about it.

    3. Re: The Invisible Hand by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      When it comes to corporations and cost, there is much evidence suggests that it does. By the way, how many Apple products are manufactured in the U.S. again?

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    4. Re:The Invisible Hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that is true, why are the management, PR, and executive jobs being outsourced too?

    5. Re:The Invisible Hand by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      Define "well distributed" please. The wealthy tend to define as 99% for them, 1% for everyone else.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    6. Re:The Invisible Hand by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      The invisible hand doesn't by mathematical necessity raise all boats though, times change.

    7. Re:The Invisible Hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "exuberant"? Kill yourself. Now. You are a waste of neutrons.

    8. Re:The Invisible Hand by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      Simple answer is those positions are cheaper outsourced as well. Who hasn't been desensitized to foreign accents by now?

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    9. Re:The Invisible Hand by lgw · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Society thrives when wealth is well distributed. "Free markets" are a race to the bottom in slow motion. Eventually everyone who is not rich will be sleeping on dirt floors. You better believe that they are going to be really pissed off about it.

      I, I see, redistribution is all well and good when it's someone else's wealth being redistributed, but when your job might go to someone poorer and more in need, well then that's a moral panic!

      If you have a full-time job in the US chances are high you're a "world 1%er". All this outsourcing is very much the wealth of the 1% being redistributed to those in need - just at the whole-world scale. You don't actually have the moral high ground here, just so you know.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    10. Re:The Invisible Hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like you didn't even read what I said. I never claimed to have the moral high ground. ALL people the world over will eventually be dirt poor if the current situation continues. Including me, you, everyone.

    11. Re:The Invisible Hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "All this outsourcing is very much the wealth of the 1% being redistributed to those in need - just at the whole-world scale. "

      The problem is, that it's not.

      If a United States company outsources to some poor country and pays the workers a salary that's high for the region, but tiny compared to U.S. salaries, what they've done is created some very good customers for companies in that region that sell products and services to people in that region, while simultaneously removing the same number of customers from domestic markets.

      I cannot imagine why any first-world companies allow any other first-world companies to do this; they're literally eroding each other's customer base. It's madness.

    12. Re:The Invisible Hand by lgw · · Score: 0

      It's like you didn't even read what I said. I never claimed to have the moral high ground. ALL people the world over will eventually be dirt poor if the current situation continues. Including me, you, everyone.

      Our collective average standard of living, as humans, is simply the amount of stuff we collectively made, per capita. As long as we don't start making less, as long as the centuries-old path of technology doesn't reverse itself, that standard of living will continue to improve.

      Every product and service that exists will require less labor, less energy as time passes. That's what technology is: efficiency. But we keep inventing new goods and services, new jobs no one could have imagined a century ago. And we now live in a world where as many people are obese as are starving - it's certainly doesn't look like a race to the bottom from the perspective of history.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    13. Re:The Invisible Hand by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Perhap the OP meant "exorbitant"?

    14. Re:The Invisible Hand by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      Free markets work by encouraging competition. It makes no sense for companies to pay exuberant salaries to U.S. workers when similar results can be had for far less by outsourcing to countries whose citizens expect a standard of living far more meager than Americans. The Prophets promise to trickle upon those who worship at their alters.

      Society thrives when wealth is well distributed. "Free markets" are a race to the bottom in slow motion. Eventually everyone who is not rich will be sleeping on dirt floors. You better believe that they are going to be really pissed off about it.

      I, I see, redistribution is all well and good when it's someone else's wealth being redistributed, but when your job might go to someone poorer and more in need, well then that's a moral panic!

      When I read what parent wrote your response makes no sense. No mention of "redistribution", moral panics or whining about anyone losing their job. This seems to be nothing more than a general statement about the dangers of aggregation of wealth. Something few disagree globalization significantly contributes. Specifically "Eventually everyone who is not rich will be sleeping on dirt floor" seems to make intent quite clear and unambiguous.

      If you have a full-time job in the US chances are high you're a "world 1%er". All this outsourcing is very much the wealth of the 1% being redistributed to those in need - just at the whole-world scale. You don't actually have the moral high ground here, just so you know.

      What does morality say about 85 people having the same wealth as half the worlds population?

    15. Re:The Invisible Hand by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      I cannot imagine why any first-world companies allow any other first-world companies to do this; they're literally eroding each other's customer base. It's madness.

      They're burning one another's customer bases to provide the heat needed to forge those golden parachutes.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    16. Re:The Invisible Hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The invisible hand has no eyeballs, and yet desperately needs glasses.

    17. Re:The Invisible Hand by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      No, it is not madness. The overriding goal of business is to make money, and producing products at a lower cost does much to further that goal. Combine this with the overriding goal of consumers, which is to acquire the products that they want at the lowest price possible and you get the race to the bottom others in this thread have discussed. Only regulation can protect prices and wages. I hold internet access up as a shining example of this. If it weren't for government intervention we would be paying pennies and not dollars to participate in this debate.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    18. Re:The Invisible Hand by cubist77 · · Score: 1

      ... I hold internet access up as a shining example of this. If it weren't for government intervention we would be paying pennies and not dollars to participate in this debate.

      This is some weapon's grade stupid shit right here. Government intervention causing the internet price issue? Derp much?

    19. Re:The Invisible Hand by lgw · · Score: 1

      Wealth is "ownership of the means of production", not "standard of living". Yes, it would be good if wealth were less centralized, but good luck with that idea, no one has ever made that work without complete social collapse. However, you don't have a materially lower standard of living because someone else has more wealth. The rich eat less than the poor in the US these days, and while they do have more material possessions it's not the middle ages. If the richest 0.1% consume 10x as much goods and services as the average, how much less does the average man have? Do the math.

      Confusing wealth and standard of living is the main reason so few people are wealthy.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    20. Re:The Invisible Hand by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      So we can all grab as much spectrum as we need, or lay fiber wherever we please?

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    21. Re:The Invisible Hand by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Define "well distributed" please. The wealthy tend to define as 99% for them, 1% for everyone else.

      Here you go: http://www.people.hbs.edu/mnor...

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    22. Re:The Invisible Hand by blue9steel · · Score: 2

      Society thrives when wealth is well distributed. "Free markets" are a race to the bottom in slow motion.

      Actually it's working as promised, it's just that the poor overseas are benefiting more than those here in the US. Eventually all sources of labor would equalize in price and then we'd have wage pressure like what happened prior to globalization. The problem is that automation technology is advancing so quickly that prior to full equalization most workers will have zero marginal utility.

    23. Re:The Invisible Hand by gmadmin · · Score: 1

      Free markets neither exist nor work. I want an exuberant salary! The prophets are exorbitant.

    24. Re:The Invisible Hand by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      Wealth is "ownership of the means of production", not "standard of living".

      Wealth can be anything. Wealth is how much people are worth. People can elect to spend their money any way they want. Most simply hoard it which is the biggest tragedy of all. At least building a super yacht, luxury submarine, floating airship mansion/castle or space station generates employment and contributes to the economy.

      Yes, it would be good if wealth were less centralized, but good luck with that idea, no one has ever made that work without complete social collapse.

      Good luck getting anyone to believe that one.

      However, you don't have a materially lower standard of living because someone else has more wealth.

      All of that extraneous money going to the wealthy had to have came from somewhere. Each dollar that sits idle in the collection of the rich has some form of opportunity cost associated with it. The economy suffers and with it everyone's standard of living.

      The rich eat less than the poor in the US these days, and while they do have more material

      LOL the rich eat babies and several million in the US still go hungry every year.

      possessions it's not the middle ages. If the richest 0.1% consume 10x as much goods and services as the average, how much less does the average man have? Do the math.

      This is the f****ing problem. It isn't that the rich are rich it is that they are little scrooge bitches who won't even use the money they have.

    25. Re:The Invisible Hand by lgw · · Score: 1

      Wealth can be anything.

      No, wealth is a technical term. Understanding that is a big part of becoming wealthy (something any professional in America can do). Wealth is in many ways the opposite of bling. Wealth generates goods or services, and thereby generates income, while fancy cars and big houses and so on consume income.

      All of that extraneous money going to the wealthy had to have came from somewhere. Most simply hoard it which is the biggest tragedy of all

      The wealthily don't have piles of dollars. Scrooge McDuck is not a real person (or even a real duck) and his vault is not what wealth looks like. They own businesses, productive land, and so on.

      There's no actual way to "hoard" a lot of money, Breaking Bad-style barrels of cash aside (and that strategy loses value quickly enough). You invest it in something, or you loan it to a bank that does that for you and keeps the profits. You can buy land and keep the land idle, of course. That does happen, but the value of such land is small in the scheme of things. Or you spend it on bling, which loses value quickly enough to be a solid redistribution plan.

      All of that extraneous money going to the wealthy had to have came from somewhere.

      Money does not affect your standard of living unless you spend it on goods or services. The total average standard of living of everyone is nothing more or less than the total amount we all produced, per capita. If you spend money to acquire wealth, then by definition you don't have that money, and you don't have a higher standard of living from that money: you made instead the choice to invest.

      This is not a complicated concept. It's sad that we Americans are so poorly educated about even the very basics.

      LOL the rich eat babies and several million in the US still go hungry every year.

      Almost no one in the US goes hungry except by choice - that's the fraction of the bottom 1% with too much pride or mental disability to seek aid. Vastly more people starve themselves for fashion than from need, while a single trip to WalMart should disabuse you of the notion of poor people being predominately thin.

      This is the f****ing problem. It isn't that the rich are rich it is that they are little scrooge bitches who won't even use the money they have.

      Do you seriously imagine them swimming in Scrooge McDuck money vaults?

      Just for reference, the total value of all the money in America is about $10 T, while the total value of all non-money assets in America is somewhere north of $100 T.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  17. Diebold took it to the next level in Ohio already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Diebold and the human shitstains that run it have already evolved beyond outsourcing to India.

    Ladies and Gentlemen, I present to you: INSOURCING to India.

    Diebold built a fucking IT headquarters in Hyderabad, filled it with fresh workers, and slowly rotated them over to the US a few at a time so they could get a bit of training. Then, one day, any IT jobs above helpdesk stopped being filled Stateside. Either the positions opened up over there, or the various duties and responsibilities trickled down to the help desk fellows- with no additional pay or job title changes, of course.

    I got the fuck out from under that curry ceiling right after they gave me some shiny resume bait extra duties, and never looked back. Got a huge pay boost at my next gig, too, as Diebold also paid way under industry and regional standard ALREADY!

    Taking that job during the low point of the recession was the worst mistake I ever made.

  18. I wonder.... by Puls4r · · Score: 2, Informative

    How many of them drive cars with foreign name plates? I have a friend who lost his job to someone from India a couple years ago. While we sat at his kitchen table I looked out his front windows at the two Toyota Prii that sat there. I was too polite to say anything.

    I don't want to downplay the issue. But... market forces and cheap labor. There are a WHOLE lot of Americans in Vietnam, Korea, China, and South Africa tooling up their auto plants and teaching them to be competitive. Welcome to the real world. H1-B Visas are a red herring, and the sooner IT folks realize it, the better. The bigger problem is all the jobs that are going overseas - but there isn't a fix to that.

    1. Re:I wonder.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most NA-destined Toyotas are made in the US. The wages stay there, but the profits go back to Japan. Funny about the profits since that's just like Msft, Goog, Aapl, ... and the beat goes on, and the beat goes on.

      I rust your belt!

    2. Re:I wonder.... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      drive cars with foreign name plates

      It's like speeding; if there are no speed limits, everyone speeds. But we mutually agree on a speed limit even if it inconveniences us sometimes. People didn't vote for lopsided trade, it was hoisted on us by moneyed interests.

      When it got us cheap trinkets, we liked it, but the down-sides slowly ballooned larger and larger, profession by profession.

      One of these days we may have to actively choose between jobs OR stuff, as a nation.

    3. Re:I wonder.... by TheSync · · Score: 2

      Toyota Prius are built in Japan, but the following Toyota cars are built in the US for the US market: Avalon, Avalon Hybrid, Camry, Camry Hybrid, Corolla, Highlander, Highlander Hybrid, Sequoia, Sienna, Solara, Tacoma, Tundra, and Venza.

      Toyota has seven manufacturing plants in the US.

    4. Re:I wonder.... by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      That Toyota was probably built in the US, with parts manufactured by the same companies that US automakers use. Sure, the designs were done in Japan or elsewhere, but that's the nature of foreign companies. Do you get all self-righteous when you visit Europe and see Fords everywhere?

    5. Re:I wonder.... by gnupun · · Score: 1

      But aren't they all designed in Japan and aren't some parts of those cars like transmission or engine manufactured in Japan? The car assembly is done in the US to save tariffs.

    6. Re:I wonder.... by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of Calty?

    7. Re:I wonder.... by gnupun · · Score: 1

      Never heard of it. But it looks like they don't design the Corolla or the Camry.

    8. Re:I wonder.... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You know that the Prius is made in Japan, right? Another high wage, high living standard country. 3rd largest economy in the world.

      Japanese companies opted out of the race to the bottom. Nissan sells Indian made cheap cars in the UK, but also has a factory here that makes more expensive models. Presumably they could outsource that labour to India too, but they don't. They found better ways to save money, using the skills available in the UK.

      IT will only be outsourced where quality doesn't matter. It's not that foreigners are incapable of providing a quality service, it's that to provide a quality service you need to be where the service is being provided.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:I wonder.... by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 1

      The current International (read: non-Japanese market) Corolla is based on the Corolla Furia concept car, which was penned by Calty

    10. Re:I wonder.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many of them drive cars with foreign name plates? I have a friend who lost his job to someone from India a couple years ago. While we sat at his kitchen table I looked out his front windows at the two Toyota Prii that sat there. I was too polite to say anything.

      I don't want to downplay the issue. But... market forces and cheap labor. There are a WHOLE lot of Americans in Vietnam, Korea, China, and South Africa tooling up their auto plants and teaching them to be competitive. Welcome to the real world. H1-B Visas are a red herring, and the sooner IT folks realize it, the better. The bigger problem is all the jobs that are going overseas - but there isn't a fix to that.

      No fix for that? What are you, mentally handicapped?

      Good lord, of course there is. Vote! Vote! Vote!

    11. Re:I wonder.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's far less of a problem when dealing with other first-world nations who have salaries that are comparable with those in the U.S. That doesn't result in a race to zero.

    12. Re:I wonder.... by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      The bigger problem is all the jobs that are going overseas - but there isn't a fix to that.

      We could slow it down to avoid the shock impact of too many jobs leaving too quickly instead of allowing companies to say 'Thanks for all your hard work, here's the door' by killing the H1-B program completely.

      At the very least we could stop American (and other western) companies from evacuating all of their profits overseas and force it to be taxed where it is earned thus allowing the tax money to be used to keep a decent level of public education instead of burdening students with tons of student debt, keeping infrastructure modernized and enabling inexpensive Internet access at all levels of society - even the poorest and most remote. An educated workforce has value - an ignorant workforce is more easily replaced.

      Instead we are headed back towards feudalism where only the wealthy can afford education and only the business owners have anything at all to call their own.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    13. Re:I wonder.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh... if the American companies hadnt built such shit cars for so long they wouldnt be in this mess.

      I drive Japanese cars because THEYRE BETTER CARS.

      And none of that tricky bullshit where its a toyota built in Michigan either. I do my research & make damn sure my car was assembled by hard working Japanese men & women & not some brain-dead meth-fueled clock-puncher.

    14. Re:I wonder.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And do you know why they are built in the US? Because import taxes were raised to force them to make the choice of building factories here to be more cost competitive!

    15. Re:I wonder.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People didn't vote for lopsided trade, it was hoisted on us by moneyed interests.
       
      People voted with their dollars even when they didn't realize that they were voting.
       
      The sooner you stop acting like "moneyed interests" didn't take advantage of what the people begged for in the first place the sooner you'll find that we sold ourselves down river.

    16. Re:I wonder.... by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      The bigger problem is all the jobs that are going overseas - but there isn't a fix to that.

      Oh there's a fix for that. But corporate greed isn't going to allow that to happen. Instead they're going to continue to buy politicians to push through even more crap in Congress to increase their profits at the cost of systematically destroying everyone who isn't already wealthy.

      The wealth gap continues to increase. The 1% continue to gain wealth while everyone else loses. It's only a matter of time before this fucked up system of ours that is touted as a bullshit "free market" collapses on itself.

      --
      ~X~
    17. Re:I wonder.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Toyota Prius are built in Japan, but the following Toyota cars are built in the US for the US market: Avalon, Avalon Hybrid, Camry, Camry Hybrid, Corolla, Highlander, Highlander Hybrid, Sequoia, Sienna, Solara, Tacoma, Tundra, and Venza.

      Toyota has seven manufacturing plants in the US.

      Some years back I had some old lady attempt to chastise me for driving a Honda and putting fellow Americans out of work. She had no response when I told her that my car was built in Ohio by Americans while her Ford was most likely built in Mexico.

      Another difference is that the Japanese and German car makers actually do build superior products, while the Indians and Chinese just build cheap crappy knockoffs.

    18. Re:I wonder.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy was buying fuel efficient cars - compared to American gas guzzling SUV's. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

    19. Re:I wonder.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Japan produces quality products to compete with American mfg. Indians suck at programming, period. The .com codebase for my employer is an embarrassment, but it kind of works and there's enough web app security injected between people and the servers that it can survive.

      2) Japanese mfg. have plants in the US hiring US workers.

    20. Re:I wonder.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Foreign auto companies have plenty of North American factories. I don't see what your point is.

    21. Re:I wonder.... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      People voted with their dollars even when they didn't realize that they were voting.

      That's true, but it was still snuck into place. People are less likely to say something if the change seems good.

      Overall, people saw the advantages of lopsided trade at the shopping market, but the disadvantages were targeted at a relatively small segment of society, such as factory and agriculture workers. However, it's spreading to more careers.

      Early:

      "Hey look, $7 lawn chairs. Nice!"

      Later:

      "Hey look, $7 lawn chairs! I wonder if I can afford that with my unemployment check now that my job went to Asia."

    22. Re:I wonder.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. I own a Honda Element, which my buddy in Ohio always called a "rice burner", until I told him that it was assembled in East Liberty, OH by American workers. Our other Honda is an Odyssey, which is currently ranked as having the 4th highest "American Made Index" on cars.com.

    23. Re:I wonder.... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I suppose you could buy GM where the profits....err losses... are picked up by the taxpayers?

    24. Re:I wonder.... by TheSync · · Score: 1

      This story claims "All three of Japan's largest automakers are pushing to locate production of cars meant for the U.S. market in North America, primarily in Mexico and the United States. Toyota, Honda and Nissan are all recovering from supply chain disruptions caused by last year's tsunami in Japan and floods in Thailand, and localizing production for the U.S. market provides a natural hedge against supply chain disruptions. Moreover, the continued high value of the Japanese yen against the dollar means that it is now more expensive for Japanese car companies to ship cars overseas to the U.S. than it is to build them locally."

      US tariffs on Japanese car imports are only 2.5%.

  19. worked out well for manufacturing, right? by raymorris · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Those unions worked great for manufacturing and prevented having those jobs go overseas, didn't they.

    A friend of mine who can't get recruiters to leave him alone tells me he makes a point to study weekly, constantly learning. Anyone who is concerned about the level of outsourcing and illegal H1-B usage might keep that in mind.

    1. Re:worked out well for manufacturing, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > A friend of mine who can't get recruiters to leave him alone

      Recruiters will take any warm body they can shoehorn into a job, as long as 1 or 2 of the required acronyms appear on your resume.

      I'm always flabbergasted by people who say the job market must be great, because of all the recruiters calling them. First of all, those recruiters all get the same leads so you may be contacted by 3 or 4 for the same job. Secondly, they will chase you regardless of your qualifications because they are paid on commission. Third, they are not your friend. They are there to make money by supplying "human capital" to the Evil HR departments who haven't a clue about how to find good qualified people themselves.

      Recruiters are nothing but leeches. They have a huge turnover rate because nobody in the game can stand the stink for long.

    2. Re:worked out well for manufacturing, right? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Those unions that had been driven out of town or castrated?
      Don't blame the union for black leg miners taking your job.

    3. Re:worked out well for manufacturing, right? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Those unions worked great for manufacturing and prevented having those jobs go overseas, didn't they.

      Yes they did, absolutely. Germany, for example has strong unions, strong worker protections and a strong manufacturing economy.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    4. Re:worked out well for manufacturing, right? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Fourth, the job might not exist. The CEO's cousin might have already been offered it but they have to go through the motions. Alternatively, the recruiter might just be fishing for sales leads.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:worked out well for manufacturing, right? by unixisc · · Score: 2

      So how did Mercedes and BMW move so much of their manufacturing to South Carolina?

    6. Re:worked out well for manufacturing, right? by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Those unions worked great for manufacturing and prevented having those jobs go overseas, didn't they.

      Yes they did, absolutely. Germany, for example has strong unions, strong worker protections and a strong manufacturing economy.

      Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    7. Re:worked out well for manufacturing, right? by Not-a-Neg · · Score: 1

      To add to the above, most of the recruiters calling me are Indians working for firms who outsourced their recruiting. Outsourced recruiters are just as bad at their job as outsourced Help Desk reps.

      --
      -==- Buy a Mac and leave me alone!
    8. Re:worked out well for manufacturing, right? by internerdj · · Score: 1

      "A friend of mine who can't get recruiters to leave him alone tells me he makes a point to study weekly, constantly learning. Anyone who is concerned about the level of outsourcing and illegal H1-B usage might keep that in mind." This might be a good short term strategy, but I don't think it works in the long term. Even if I'm cream of the crop, if enough of my industry shifts out of country then I'm going to see a wage drain and eventually even probably lose my job. And even if I'm the best the US has to offer in my field (which I'm not), odds are India has 4 people with at the very least my potential if not my capability.

    9. Re:worked out well for manufacturing, right? by Notorious+G · · Score: 1

      Recruiters suck. When I was laid off (due to offshoring of course), I worked with dozens of recruiters. They called/emailed me constantly or worked my LinkedIn profile, etc. They *always* had a job I'd be a perfect fit for - more than a few looked like it was a buzzzword list cobbled from my resume even. They're just building a talent list. If you have a friend that is being contacted by recruiters and thinks there really is a job behind it, you have a friend that is oblivious to how this game is working.

    10. Re:worked out well for manufacturing, right? by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1

      I must say that there is one thing that recruiters are really good for: you can comfortably ask them questions about the job that you wouldn't want to ask at the interview. For example, you might ask questions about remote work and paid holidays to the recruiter, while those same questions could raise doubts about your candidacy to the hiring manager.

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    11. Re:worked out well for manufacturing, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those unions didn't do their job in lobbying government effectively to prevent those jobs from going overseas, did they?

      Besides, who the fuck is talking about a union? Think more like a SuperPAC for US IT workers.

    12. Re:worked out well for manufacturing, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > A friend of mine who can't get recruiters to leave him alone

      Recruiters will take any warm body they can shoehorn into a job, as long as 1 or 2 of the required acronyms appear on your resume.

      I'm always flabbergasted by people who say the job market must be great, because of all the recruiters calling them. First of all, those recruiters all get the same leads so you may be contacted by 3 or 4 for the same job. Secondly, they will chase you regardless of your qualifications because they are paid on commission. Third, they are not your friend. They are there to make money by supplying "human capital" to the Evil HR departments who haven't a clue about how to find good qualified people themselves.

      Recruiters are nothing but leeches. They have a huge turnover rate because nobody in the game can stand the stink for long.

      True, I had a co-worker tell me about 3 of them were trying to recruit him for the same "confidential client" in Texas. It wasn't hard to find out who was building a large new chemical plant there.

  20. The fate of Indian IT outsourcing by invictusvoyd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Will be sealed with the advent of better systems and automation technologies. Most of the jobs that go to India are menial tasks which require no or very little skill .The core stuff still happens in the west. There are extremely few kernel programmers in India. So think these layoffs as having been replaced by a robot.

    1. Re:The fate of Indian IT outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      India will eventually take ALL IT jobs, including kernel programming and supercomputing applications. You seem to have not realized that the systems you take for granted today were developed with Indian programming labor, either in the US or abroad.

    2. Re:The fate of Indian IT outsourcing by invictusvoyd · · Score: 1

      have you been to India lately ? The educational institutions there are tuned to IT outsourcing . I'm not talking of the oldies like Vinod Khosala but the new crop . Cognizant does not do kernel programming nor does Infosys and the etc .

    3. Re:The fate of Indian IT outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      India will eventually take ALL IT jobs, including kernel programming and supercomputing applications.

      Have you ever been to India? The people you're talking about, the ones that work on the well manicured corporate campuses, are less than 1/10 of 1 percent of the Indian population. The majority of Indians still live in poverty, practice marginal farming or other forms of subsistence living, defecate in the open and have less than an 8th grade education. The Indian government goes to great lengths to hide these facts from the world. They want you to see the glittering IT campus handling all of the outsourced technology work, not the guy with his pants around his ankles taking a shit in the gutter a few miles away. In fact, India is way behind China and has at least 20 more years of economic growth and development ahead of it to even begin to approximate the Chinese economy today. I think that you overestimate the capabilities of the Indians, but that's actually not surprising. If there's one thing about Indians that you must admire it's their shameless self promotion, even though most of the time it amounts to nothing more than the ultimate used car salesman pitch.

    4. Re:The fate of Indian IT outsourcing by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

      it's a little hard to outsource "open source programming" considering that a community still has to approve and merge any of hte code into the main codeline. You can write all the kernel code you want, but it better be good code. :)

    5. Re:The fate of Indian IT outsourcing by dbIII · · Score: 2

      Software development requires "no or very little skill"?
      I suppose an attitude like that explains why some software is utter shit and why we are neck deep in malware, but I would suggest that software fit for purpose requires skilled developers.

    6. Re:The fate of Indian IT outsourcing by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      India has its share of qualified coders; I've worked with them. The issues we had with them were mostly cultural in nature, and those were solved early on. Best thing you can do is spend some quality time with them at the office, work with them rather than next to them (go to India if you have to), then go and have beers with them after work. Oh, and work with companies where you hire people rather than resources; Indian outsourcing firms have a habit of swapping the most valuable members of your team with newbies. Not every individual can be convinced to stay on your team forever, but if you treat them well and offer interesting work, most will stick around long enough for the team to gel.

      Even places like India and Malaysia are getting too expensive, though. Some shops move from Bangalore to New Delhi to save costs. Others go to China. Which should worry you; China has plenty of good coders too. They might not be very visible in the FOSS community, but they're there.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    7. Re:The fate of Indian IT outsourcing by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      Have you ever been to India? The people you're talking about, the ones that work on the well manicured corporate campuses, are less than 1/10 of 1 percent of the Indian population.

      That's the problem with large numbers... when talking about the Indian population, 0.1% is 12.5 million people. You might be one in a million, but that only means that there are 1200 of you in India, and 1300 more in China.

      There's a quote attributed to both Lenin and Stalin along the lines of "when we hang the capitalists, they will sell us the rope to do it with," Honestly, that is why the east will eventually take over from the west. The amount of time, effort, and resources that the west has spent offshoring jobs has built some serious economic muscle in nations with staggeringly large populations. Eventually, they will eat our lunch.

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    8. Re:The fate of Indian IT outsourcing by unixisc · · Score: 2

      I dunno about Khosla, but there are 2 types of Indians. The ones who came here on F1 visas, studies here, joined the workforce here and settled down. That group is more compatible w/ the American way of doing business, and have the same business culture as the rest of America. That group is not a part of the outsourcing crowd.

      The other are the employees in India of the Infosys's, Wipros, HCLs and Mahindras who are employees of those companies' main i.e. Indian branches, and who are sent here on H1Bs. A lot of them do that just temporarily, while some may want to ultimately get green cards and settle here. Those are the ones who are more oriented to outsourcing. Those companies - Cognizant, Infosys, Mahindra, HCL, Wipro - don't do kernel development. Heck, the last time Wipro and HCL did computers of any sort was in the late 80s. Wipro at that time had a partnership w/ Sun, and HCL had one w/ HP - the HP that still had PA-RISC based unixstations and servers. Most of the Indian companies at that time were SCO OSE shops.

    9. Re:The fate of Indian IT outsourcing by Spazmania · · Score: 1

      India does have good coders, but you won't get them by having a cost-concious third party hire for you. You'll get the 90% of Indian coders who are bad at the job but have a degree from an unaccredited university.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    10. Re:The fate of Indian IT outsourcing by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why you think a culture dealing with hyper-competitive cheaters and a huge underclass that is on the edge of tipping over to violence is going to surpass a culture in a competitive country that rewards hard work while letting the more average people still live well enough to avoid violence.

      We're working on undermining ourselves, but developing economies have a long way to go.

    11. Re:The fate of Indian IT outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most software in the US is still internal corporate LOB applications performing various CRUD operations. I won't assert that innovation, creativity, and education aren't useful in writing and maintaining such software, but it's not critical. Low-skilled coders can produce results which are considered good enough for internal use. The actual corporate users aren't customers in the usual sense, so the difficulties they experience with buggy or incomplete software is often ignored or dismissed - they'll just have to deal with it as part of their jobs. A broad analysis might show that such an approach actually costs the company more money in lost productivity than "fit for purpose" LOB software, but few are doing that kind of analysis.

      - T

  21. Re:instead of union how about being value for mone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These decisions are made by accountants and executives looking at spreadsheets. There is no line item for productivity or work ethic.

    The logical choice it to not go into STEM or at least not into IT services.

  22. Get a grip! by Tokolosh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you are an American, with all the benefits that citizenship entails - education, infrastructure, living conditions, security, stable government, rule of law, material and spiritual abundance - that make you the envy of the rest of the planet... why the hell can you not compete with third-world peasants, struggling against oppressive governments, scarcity of resources, illiterate parents, crime and pollution?

    --
    Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
    1. Re:Get a grip! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are an American, with all the benefits that citizenship entails - education, infrastructure, living conditions, security, stable government, rule of law, material and spiritual abundance - that make you the envy of the rest of the planet... why the hell can you not compete with third-world peasants, struggling against oppressive governments, scarcity of resources, illiterate parents, crime and pollution?

      Because it's cheaper to pay third-world peasants, genius.

    2. Re:Get a grip! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Maybe cheap labor trumps* all those advantages. Does a CPU factory make a super fast single-core chip, or a chip with 4 medium-speed cores? Seems the 4-er is winning.

      And I'm not sure we are the envy of the world anymore. The median wage of other socialistic-leaning countries is growing quite competitive with ours even with their higher taxes, and they have a bigger safety net.

      We are the favored destination of entrepreneurs, but losing in most other categories.

      * No pun intended

    3. Re:Get a grip! by sjames · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because a single house payment here in the U.S. is more than the 3rd world workers make in a year. Give us a 3rd world cost of living and we will easily out-compete 3rd world workers.

    4. Re:Get a grip! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is already happening. Why do you think more and more of the population are making minimum wage? Slowly salaries will be ground down to competitive levels. It's sad, but think about it. Why does an employee in Africa or Asia need to make less than one in America or Europe, given equal qualifications? Once the disparity is closed, everyone will compete for the same jobs.

    5. Re:Get a grip! by Calydor · · Score: 1

      education

      Scholarship or bust.

      infrastructure

      Toll roads, various internet speed/cost issues.

      security

      Weekly stories of police shooting innocent civilians.

      material ... abundance

      Jobs being outsourced left and right.

      that make you the envy of the rest of the planet

      Citation needed. I know large portions of Europe look to America and think, "WTF happened?"

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    6. Re:Get a grip! by sjames · · Score: 1

      Why does an employee in Africa or Asia need to make less than one in America or Europe, given equal qualifications?

      I already answered that, because their cost of living is MUCH lower than ours. If I could have their rent and electricity, etc costs, I could afford to work for what they do. But I'll bet the companies doing all that outsourcing won't be so willing to accommodate that.

    7. Re:Get a grip! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are an American, with all the benefits that citizenship entails - expensive and mediocre education, crumbling infrastructure, poor living conditions, declining security, unstable government, rule of law if you're rich, material and spiritual abundance if you're rich and/or crazy, sky high crime rates, drugs everywhere you look, tens of thousands of gun deaths a year - that make you the envy of the rest of the planet that doesn't live in Europe, Canada, Japan, Australia or New Zealand...

      There, fixed that for you.

    8. Re:Get a grip! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citation needed. I know large portions of Europe look to America and think, "WTF happened?"

      Not anymore. The same things are happening here as well now, as more and more US laws are being illegally imported into European countries by means of "trade agreements" that threatens to demolish democracy and freedom for all human beings - not for "international" tax-evading corporations though.

      Ie. when police got armed by default in our country, innocent civilians started getting shot down here too. It's not like Americans are crazy, it's just the policies and corporate fascism that is.

    9. Re:Get a grip! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that make you the envy of the rest of the planet...

      Not me. I do not envy the USAmericans a bit. At all.

    10. Re:Get a grip! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because this is Slashdot, home of posters who are visionary when it comes to other folks' professions, reactionary when it comes to their own.

    11. Re:Get a grip! by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      If you are an American, with all the benefits that citizenship entails - education, infrastructure, living conditions, security, stable government, rule of law, material and spiritual abundance - that make you the envy of the rest of the planet... why the hell can you not compete with third-world peasants, struggling against oppressive governments, scarcity of resources, illiterate parents, crime and pollution?

      Compete? How? By turning America into a third world country? Our sociopathic corporations only care about corporate profits. Hence why they offshore to places that have no standards of living, no worker protections, no minimum wages, no regulations, etc.

      They offshore the jobs because they can pay slave wages to people working in death traps and not lose a wink of sleep.

      --
      ~X~
    12. Re:Get a grip! by dwpro · · Score: 1

      comparing the USA labor market conditions favorably to a 3rd-world shithole will not advance your argument.

      --
      Millions long for immortality who do not know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon. -- Susan Ertz
    13. Re:Get a grip! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because those 3rd world peasants are the same as YOUR ancestors - hard working people that do not complain much, but get much done. They built your country for future generations ... that wasted almost all of it away. Laziness, money printing, invading other countries on credit, come to mind.

    14. Re:Get a grip! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's because outsourcing has nothing to do with quality of work, but cost. So the competent American gets replaced by the incompetent Indian for a fraction of the cost, and the remaining Americans have to work extra fixing the Indians' mistakes.

      Source: Fixing those mistakes is now the job I do on top of my actual job.

    15. Re:Get a grip! by gmadmin · · Score: 1

      American education is not universally well thought of and is getting demonstrably worse. American infrastructure is collapsing. 'Living conditions' is meaningless, could you be less specific? If by 'security' you mean the most massive military industrial complex in the world, granted. If by 'stable government' you refer to the oligarchy that supports that MIC, granted again. 'rule of law' for those who can afford lawyers, sure. 'material and spiritual abundance' again, meaningless, what are you talking about? Travel much? America is the third world and most Americans are peasants. The rest of your list applies equally well everywhere. -- Preemptively discarding accurate comparisons is not an argument.

    16. Re:Get a grip! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps because your view of the 'third world' is 25 years out of date?

    17. Re:Get a grip! by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      So Americans are not getting higher value for their higher cost of living?

        If so Americans are inefficient. If not, the higher value should enable them to compete better with cheaper labour.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    18. Re:Get a grip! by sjames · · Score: 1

      No, they're not, especially on the basics like food, clothing, and shelter.

      But the condition is hardly U.S. only. All generally wealthier countries have a higher cost of living than developing countries.

    19. Re:Get a grip! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that make you the envy of the rest of the planet

      [Citation Needed]

    20. Re:Get a grip! by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      OK then. Inefficient people can hardly complain about being replaced.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    21. Re:Get a grip! by sjames · · Score: 1

      Tell it to the corporations that won't budge on their price. It's not the workers who are inefficient. In fact, our GDP/capita is higher than ever.

    22. Re:Get a grip! by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      It is the land of the free, or something like that. Why don't the "workers" compete with their erstwhile masters and tell the new price to the market?

      They can't? The voters/customers/patrons have genuflected in front of the corporate/political engine? Too bad.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
  23. IT is pretty broad. by flerchin · · Score: 1

    Seems like many jobs that are "IT" are not really. I can't find anything that says a single development job was lost.

    --
    --why?
  24. Bad Business Either Way by Derkec · · Score: 1

    The rote IT jobs that are best suited for labor arbitrage outsourcing are also the ones that should just be automated out of existence anyway or handled auto-magically by your cloud provider. The remaining jobs are the ones where close collaboration with the business makes them far more effective and those are going to be ones that you're going to regret offshoring.

    The number of jobs that don't fall into either of those buckets is getting smaller by the day. It's hard to see how this kind of outsourcing has a long term future.

  25. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Then again, I'm not a plebian bitch, whining about the 1% on one hand while screaming my head off about redistribution of the 1%'s wealth on the other.

    Protip, chucklefucks - you are the 1%. Why aren't you reveling in the fact that poor, downtrodden third-worlders are being raised up with your money?

    1. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the result won't be raising them up, it'll be dragging down our countries to the shit quality of life available at the lower pay levels in the countries the work is going to.

  26. Unions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Where are your unions? I'm not talking about the american maffia organisations calling themselves unions, but unions like you can find in Europe that negotiates fair conditions for workers and work against wage dumping, and sometimes allows lower wages during short periods when company is going bust. Oh, yeah, the american greed killed all that, and now you are paying the price.

  27. Not a union, a professional organization by ErichTheRed · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I already see the posts coming in saying "No union for me, thanks, I can take care of myself." I honestly used to think that, back when companies were only outsourcing routine tasks and qualified people were still being treated well everywhere. All I can say is, just wait until you're 40 or end up at one of these places offshoring their entire IT department. I am incredibly lucky and (for now) have a great senior-level position doing systems engineering work. However, between age discrimination, the loss of entry-level work, and the relentless drive to offshore anything that costs real money, we run the risk of driving talented people away from IT.

    Here's my idea -- form a profession similar to the one engineers have and a related trade guild, not a traditional labor union. Unions will never fly with the Libertarian, lone wolf, I'm-better-than-everyone-in-my-field crowd. It would have to be structured around the professional licensure model, like the AMA. The AMA and related organizations keep doctors employed and making serious money. How do they do this?
    - Limiting labor supply by not allowing new medical school slots to be opened
    - Paying for laws their members need passed, such as forcing recent health care reform to rely on the insurance model that keeps their reimbursement rates high
    - Ensuring quality of profession members by licensing new medical school grads, and training them through residency and fellowship programs
    - Requiring continuing education

    I would say the biggest benefit to members of the profession would be standardizing basic education. I'm not talking about handing Microsoft or Oracle or Google the reins, I'm talking about making sure people understand the fundamentals of IT and development, not just how to feed code into the magic black box. This would mean evil tradesy things like apprenticeships and OJT for new members, but it would ensure that we wouldn't get the typical MCSE bootcamp or coder academy graduates who only know one way to solve a problem.

    The first step beyond getting people to agree would be to basically do what the other professional organizations do -- take up a collection and pay for laws to be passed limiting the ability to offshore work. It's time we admit that the only way to get anything passed in Congress is to pay for it, and lobbyists are the equivalent of handing lawmakers paper bags of money.

    To make this fair to employers, they would need to get something too. I would say the best approach would be to promise no union style work rules would be enforced, while quality would be maintained by self-regulation. I think it's horrible that someone can screw up a job so badly they get fired, then just clean up their resume and get another job without any repercussion -- and I've seen this happen many times. If companies could be assured that their job would get done without the need to bring it back onshore to clean it up at consulting rates, they'd be open to this possibility.

    1. Re:Not a union, a professional organization by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      All I can say is, just wait until you're 40 or end up at one of these places offshoring their entire IT department

      Unions won't keep your job from getting off-shored. They'll just make sure the people with least seniority get fired first.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:Not a union, a professional organization by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      They'll just make sure the people with least seniority get fired first.

      As a member of a union, I can attest to this. Unions exist to protect the most senior, and its not just during layoffs. Everything goes by seniority once you unionize.

      People keep saying that unions were demonized by republicans or whatever... wrong. They are demonized by themselves.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    3. Re:Not a union, a professional organization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without unions, they fire the newest first anyway, because severance is more costly and hiring experienced staff more costly.

      Plus the management are more senior too, so have some fellow feeling.

      Please show how unions cause this when it happens without unions existing.

    4. Re:Not a union, a professional organization by dwpro · · Score: 1

      The only group I've heard speak up to the media on our behalf is IEEE, which is why I am a member of the main group and their computing society.

      --
      Millions long for immortality who do not know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon. -- Susan Ertz
    5. Re:Not a union, a professional organization by dave420 · · Score: 1

      In the US maybe. In other countries they serve a very real purpose, and do it relatively well.

    6. Re:Not a union, a professional organization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *** SMACK*** is the sound of dave420 going down eating his words getting bitchslapped by apk http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    7. Re:Not a union, a professional organization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey dipshit, learn what DNS is and start taking your meds.

    8. Re:Not a union, a professional organization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *** SMACK*** is the sound of dave420 going down eating his words getting bitchslapped by apk http://slashdot.org/comments.p... hahahahaha

    9. Re:Not a union, a professional organization by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      In other countries they serve a very real purpose, and do it relatively well.

      Thats what they tell you.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
  28. Re:instead of union how about being value for mone by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

    If the US stops being the world's consumer of last resort there will be no one to take it's place. The global race to the bottom wage wise can not work, someone has to leech away rent/income away from capital and give it to consumers. It might be better if the redistribution was more equitable globally, but it would be far worse if it wasn't there at all.

  29. Why outsource? USA is No. 1 in the IT sector. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://news.slashdot.org/story/15/11/09/1748237/us-spends-1bn-over-a-decade-trying-to-digitize-immigration-forms-just-1-is-online

  30. You can't will the free market to your desires by JoeyRox · · Score: 2

    No 'professional organization' is going to stop free market forces. Many have tried, all fail eventually. What you're up against is labor arbitrage, brought about by the globalization of the workforce. It first started in blue-collar professions; with advances in technology it has moved to knowledge work as well. Instead of thinking about India being some distant country think of it like the business next door, competing for the business that your employer provides. Why would a customer pay 3x for your employer's output than they would the Indian company? Do you think passing a law that prevents the business next to yours from competing would ever work?

    1. Re:You can't will the free market to your desires by empleoschihuahua · · Score: 1

      I have a job board website, [url]www.empleoschihuahua.com[url] it is a local job site

    2. Re:You can't will the free market to your desires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      > Why would a customer pay 3x for your employer's output than they would the Indian company?

      As someone who has seen bargain-basement Indian IT work from one of the big offshore body shops, because American IT workers are worth it.

      All but two of the Indians I have worked with in the last 3 years have been fucking useless. They have no drive, no curiosity, and no initiative. If it's not in a runbook in front of them, they don't know how to do it. Hell, if it's a slight variation of something that IS in the fucking runbook, they don't know how to do it. Anything that requires thought or reasoning skills? Forget it. All they care about is closing tickets, not whether the work is done right. They love to play hot potato and dump tickets on other teams whenever possible, rather than take ownership of anything. They will close a hundred identical tickets without it occurring to them to do a root cause analysis to find and fix the problem that is generating those tickets. When submitting tickets you have to explain the problem like you're talking to a five year old. Many times it is clear they only read and acted on the first sentence or two while ignoring crucial details in the rest. The only things they excel at are ass covering and buck passing.

      There is constant, constant turnover among the teams serving my company. The body shop gets someone fresh out of school who knows enough to be dangerous, they get a little bit of experience while frequently making terrible mistakes on enterprise systems in production, and then they're gone as soon as they get offered a little more money from a competing body shop. Constantly losing the ones who have managed to learn anything about the company's network leads to exactly the kind of shit tech support you would expect.

      Some American IT staff were spared in the great offshoring purge, and it's a damned good thing, because they are usually the ones who have to step in and clean up the Indians' messes. When we saw just how terrible they were at everything, a back channel network was quickly established for when we need to get things done quickly and correctly.

    3. Re:You can't will the free market to your desires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No 'professional organization' is going to stop free market forces. Many have tried, all fail eventually. What you're up against is labor arbitrage, brought about by the globalization of the workforce. It first started in blue-collar professions; with advances in technology it has moved to knowledge work as well. Instead of thinking about India being some distant country think of it like the business next door, competing for the business that your employer provides. Why would a customer pay 3x for your employer's output than they would the Indian company? Do you think passing a law that prevents the business next to yours from competing would ever work?

      In the long run, there is nothing that can be done. Or, who knows what will happen in the long run.

      In the short term we can create enough noise and bad publicity until we retire.

    4. Re:You can't will the free market to your desires by Xyrus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No 'professional organization' is going to stop free market forces.

      Ah yes. The free market. That wonderful ideal the true red-blooded 'murican idolizes, regardless of how hard or how often it bends them over. In fact, they beg for more as they continually elect these "real Americans" back into office again and again no matter how badly they get screwed by them.

      The free market. Capitalism. Nonsense. It all ends up, one way or another, of stealing from you and giving to the few. I bet those company execs agonized terribly over doing this. I'm sure they all gave a sociopathic chuckle when they cooked up how they were going to shaft their employees while giving themselves a tasty little bonus since making 1000x the average worker just isn't enough to build a house made of money.

      Many have tried, all fail eventually. What you're up against is labor arbitrage, brought about by the globalization of the workforce. It first started in blue-collar professions; with advances in technology it has moved to knowledge work as well. Instead of thinking about India being some distant country think of it like the business next door, competing for the business that your employer provides. Why would a customer pay 3x for your employer's output than they would the Indian company? Do you think passing a law that prevents the business next to yours from competing would ever work?

      Of course not, because you know just as well as I do that any such legislation would either be lobbied into uselessness or have so many loopholes you'd swear it was a sweater. Congress is a free market. The lobbyists have known this for decades and the Supreme Court all but legalized paid for politicians. Few, if any, give a rat's ass about me, you, or the American people. As long as Wall Street keeps the money flowing into SuperPACS and Congressional pockets, they can continue the "Us vs. Them" bullshit and stay in office.

      Aside from that though, you're argument is ridiculous. Basically you're saying if you accept the same pay as someone working in a third world shithole, you can keep your job. But you can't because in this country we actually have laws and regulations regarding health and pay, things that third world shitholes don't have to care about. Somehow, I don't think repealing labor laws and turning America into a land of suburban third world slums to feed the corporate fat asses their million dollar bonuses is going to work out well.

      --
      ~X~
    5. Re:You can't will the free market to your desires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why would a customer pay 3x for your employer's output than they would the Indian company?"

      What exactly do you think you're getting when you outsource to India? A crack team of IIT grads ready to airdrop into the trenches and kick some serious ass?

      Or mediocre washouts that barely know how to do The Needful?

      There are tons of brilliant engineers in India. As there are in the U.S. Over here, if someone is the shit, you really think they're going to work for Cybercoders? So why do you think in India they'd work for Cognizant?

      When you engage companies offshore because you're a cheap ass, you're not going to get the shit. You're just going to get shat on.

    6. Re:You can't will the free market to your desires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So pay a third and the spare money drops by more than a third. Spare money that was previously going in part to buying your product.

      You DO know that you need customers with money if you want to SELL your product, and that if you don't sell it, you don't actually have a business?

    7. Re:You can't will the free market to your desires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would a customer pay 3x for your employer's output than they would the Indian company?

      If all the American jobs are outsourced to Indian companies, there aren't going to be any American customers.

    8. Re:You can't will the free market to your desires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Business wise, it has always been a globalized world from centuries ago. India got pillaged, raped and divided by the British and Dutch East India Companies. All you Westerners supported the Company and the ensuing British Empire at the time because it brought you the plundered riches of the Indian subcontinent. The East India Company factories in India treated Indian laborers like sub-human dirt.

      Now it is poetic justice that this very same globalization of labor is coming back to bite you Westerners in your fat privileged asses. The riches and wealth of the world is for everyone to share and not just for you whities.

    9. Re:You can't will the free market to your desires by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

      You mean how the free market stole from the people who earned low wages to make the computing device you had the luxury to type your missive on? Were you showing solidarity with their plight by buying a device made with underpaid labor and supporting their masters? Those third-world shitholes you describe are full of millions of people who don't have a pot to piss in. Capitalism is giving them a chance to emerge from their abject poverty into the lower middle class. Will they be taken advantage along the way? Sure they will. Are you or anyone else offering them an alternative to better their lives? No. In fact what you and other westerners want is to protect your own standard of living at their expense. You made it, on the back of free market, so lets turn off the spigot and protect it, right?

    10. Re:You can't will the free market to your desires by Spamalope · · Score: 1

      > Why would a customer pay 3x for your employer's output than they would the Indian company?

      All but two of the Indians I have worked with in the last 3 years have been fucking useless. They have no drive, no curiosity, and no initiative. ... Anything that requires thought or reasoning skills? Forget it. When we saw just how terrible they were at everything, a back channel network was quickly established for when we need to get things done quickly and correctly.

      The Indians working at the outsourcing firms are at the equivalent of a soul-less telemarketing job. They are rewarded for following a script, closing tickets quickly and are punished for any initiative that would take time. Of course your view of them looks like that. The management of the body shop trained them to do that to maximize profit under the stupid contract the US management signed. The Indian's themselves aren't stupid.(though the body shops may pay too little to attract the brightest) US companies could pay for better service, or open a 'support branch' in India so they could keep experienced people and train them to own problems while still paying lower wages.

      It seems the US management doesn't care if the current support agreement doesn't work well and frustrates the US workers, and they're happy to try and turn employment at their company into share cropping. That's your problem.

    11. Re:You can't will the free market to your desires by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 2

      Listen ass-hole. H1B Visas are work Visas issued by the government. They are meant to SUPPLEMENT the US workforce not replace it. So Yes we can control it. You don't like it, you can fuck off. If businesses don't like it they can move their sorry ass to India or China or whatever 3rd world labor resource they are looking for.

    12. Re:You can't will the free market to your desires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the AMA and Bar Associations have done a pretty good job at fighting and defeating the free market forces.

    13. Re:You can't will the free market to your desires by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

      What do H1B visas have to do with it? This article is about moving the work offshore entirely. The US can try to limit competition for engineering work domestically but in a global economy that wont help very much to protect American engineering jobs.

    14. Re:You can't will the free market to your desires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The free market. Capitalism. Nonsense.

      Thank you Karl Marx.

  31. Re:instead of union how about being value for mone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    us citizens are the most overworked people. They have long days, work a lot, low wages and very good 'value for the money'. But you americans buy all the US corporate propaganda and sell out your rights because maybe you'll be the one getting rich by a fluke chance somewhere in the future. Egoism, everyone for themselves results in this.

    The funniest thing is that taxes are pretty high in the USA, but instead of producing services and regulations helping citizens, it ends up in social services for corporations and deregulation of corporate america and laws that denies rights to citizens.

  32. Where do the consumers come from? by PeterM+from+Berkeley · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If no one in the US has a good job to earn money to buy things with, how is anyone in America going to "consume" anything?

    No jobs, no money in consumers hands, no demand.

    What "rest of the economy" is left after all the good jobs have gone overseas?

    --PM

    1. Re:Where do the consumers come from? by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 2

      I have often wondered about that as well.

    2. Re:Where do the consumers come from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With Jesus, Guns and Football all will be right with the world.

      So don't worry! be happy!

    3. Re:Where do the consumers come from? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      If no one in the US has a good job to earn money to buy things with, how is anyone in America going to "consume" anything?

      One word: China.

      The middle class is growing over there, so it seems like a good place to look for improved sales.

    4. Re: Where do the consumers come from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except the middle class isn't growing in China anymore.

    5. Re:Where do the consumers come from? by peragrin · · Score: 4, Funny

      it is called trickle down economics. The 1% will hire us still right?

      we should give them more tax breaks just to be certain.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    6. Re: Where do the consumers come from? by DaMattster · · Score: 1

      The consumers will buy on credit like they do now. How many people do you know buy an iPhone outright?

    7. Re:Where do the consumers come from? by ATMAvatar · · Score: 1

      The stuff that trickles down is yellow, not green.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    8. Re:Where do the consumers come from? by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      If no one in the US has a good job to earn money to buy things with, how is anyone in America going to "consume" anything?

      No jobs, no money in consumers hands, no demand.

      What "rest of the economy" is left after all the good jobs have gone overseas?

      --PM

      Then there will be overseas consumers.

      Consumers are consumers. American consumers aren't more sacred than overseas consumers.

      And why should they buy consumer goods from American companies with their overpaid executives? Logic dictates that the way to get the true low price is to eliminate all excessive costs.

      So just cut the USA out of the loop entirely and buy from a Chinese or Indian company.

    9. Re:Where do the consumers come from? by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      What "rest of the economy" is left after all the good jobs have gone overseas?

      Luxury goods, of course! Since all the money is being funneled to the top, the market will explode for yachts, Gulfstreams, and the ultimate status symbol, US Congressmen.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    10. Re:Where do the consumers come from? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      When the growing middle class in China becomes too expensive to employ for manufacturing jobs, corporations will come back to the U.S. to hire Americans at lower wages than China. That's happen now.

    11. Re:Where do the consumers come from? by WhatHump · · Score: 1

      Right now I imagine it's floating on a cushion of debt. At some point people will stop paying their credit card bills and line of credit payments, and file for bankruptcy. Then we could have a credit meltdown similar to the housing meltdown of 2008.

      --
      "Could be worse...could be raining." Igor
    12. Re: Where do the consumers come from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen

  33. Re:instead of union how about being value for mone by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2

    Fine, as long as all C-level pay is drastically cut as well. Unless you truly think most CEOs are dozens to thousands of times more productive than a lowly employee to be getting their hugely inflated salaries.

    Sorry, but it's not being greedy to actually want non-stagnant wages when CEOs are making record salaries.

  34. dogwhistle anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Popular calls for xenophobic scapegoating. Corporate ownership of government officials. Rampant police corruption. Domestic surveillance.

    Do I need say it?

    (captcha: disobey)

  35. Pretty dumb move by tompaulco · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They moved all of these IT jobs to Cognizant, which is a company made up almost entirely of H1bs. Cognizant is blatantly in violation of the H1b laws, and if they are taken down, as they should be, all of the companies that are depending on Cognizant for outsourced labor will be up a creek without a paddle.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    1. Re:Pretty dumb move by wh1pp3t · · Score: 1

      They moved all of these IT jobs to Cognizant, which is a company made up almost entirely of H1bs. Cognizant is blatantly in violation of the H1b laws, and if they are taken down, as they should be, all of the companies that are depending on Cognizant for outsourced labor will be up a creek without a paddle.

      And the disruption to the economy is why Cognizant's visa abuse won't be investigated or acted on.

    2. Re:Pretty dumb move by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Congress doesn't give a shit about Americans who don't pay them, and employees who are replaced by H1B visa holders are in no position to pay their Congressman. This will not change. It's the American equivalent of Nero and his fiddle.

    3. Re:Pretty dumb move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think Cognizant will suffer any penalties, much less be "taken down?" It's not like this kind of thing is new, so I really doubt *this* will be the straw that breaks the camels back. All the companies involved with offshoring -- both the domestic ones getting rid of local hires, and the foreign ones who depend on offshore wages -- are basically throwing deck chairs off the Queen Mary; nobody notices except the person sitting in the deck chair.

    4. Re:Pretty dumb move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. The only way things will change is when one of the American workers decides that instead of coming in during his last weeks to train his H1B replacement, he will come in and shoot as many of them as he can before the SWAT team takes him down. It's only a matter of time before someone snaps.

      Since the US government won't act in US citizens' interest, the only way to keep the H1B tide from drowning American workers is to demonstrate to the foreign folks that if they come to the US, they will probably be killed.

      I read often that American is devolving into a third world country. Alas, no... we're devolving into the middle ages, where it will be kill or be killed. Damn, I hope I'm wrong; civilization was kind of nice while it lasted.

    5. Re:Pretty dumb move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They moved all of these IT jobs to Cognizant, which is a company made up almost entirely of H1bs. Cognizant is blatantly in violation of the H1b laws, and if they are taken down, as they should be, all of the companies that are depending on Cognizant for outsourced labor will be up a creek without a paddle.

      And the disruption to the economy is why Cognizant's visa abuse won't be investigated or acted on.

      An action similar to the Boston Tea Party could be an option.

    6. Re:Pretty dumb move by Dorianny · · Score: 1

      Whats really the problem is the current H1-B system which basically makes foreign workers Indentured servants to the corporation that hires them. If they get fired for demanding fair pay and benefits then they are sent back home. A good way to end the abuse and make H1b less attractive as a source of cheap labor is to simply make it a 10 year non-conditional work visa. If they can actually compete in the jobs marketplace without fear of loosing their visa they will be far less inclined to accept unfair pay/benefits/working conditions.

    7. Re:Pretty dumb move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying they're too big to fail? I feel like I'm reading Snow Crash...

    8. Re:Pretty dumb move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An action similar to the Boston Tea Party could be an option.

      So instead of a bunch of guys dressed as Indians throwing tea overboard, we'll have a bunch of IT nerds dressed as tea-partiers throwing Indians overboard?

  36. I wonder how flexible the IT department was... by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    I don't know what the situation was like at that company in particular.

    But having worked for and with a few large companies, it's not that hard to imagine why they were offshored - the article mentions the company "needed a more flexible staffing model that could better serve the cyclical nature of our business". I'm pretty sure from seeing other IT departments in action, that they in fact could not handle bursting kinds of workload, nor a cyclical business that ebbed and flowed to a large degree. IT departments are typically extremely rigid, and scared of even the smallest change.

    IT as a role in a company must evolve or die off altogether. It must change to a form that truly helps a business instead of shackling it.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:I wonder how flexible the IT department was... by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      It's also possible that you're a complete asshole who deserves to have a tire iron rammed down his throat. In fact, that's a trillion times more likely than the scenario you proposed.

      This is a cost-savings measure. Trying to read any more into it is to justify the complete destruction of the American economy for the benefit of the few who already have vacation homes in half a dozen other countries.

    2. Re:I wonder how flexible the IT department was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IT departments are typically extremely rigid, and scared of even the smallest change.

      IT as a role in a company must evolve or die off altogether. It must change to a form that truly helps a business instead of shackling it.

      More likely it is management that is scared of a changing and adapting IT department. Most see IT as a cost only and not as an integral part of the business.

    3. Re:I wonder how flexible the IT department was... by pr0t0 · · Score: 1

      I took "flexible" in the context of "cyclical nature of our business" to mean something like: willing to work and be paid six months out of the year instead of an annual salary. Seasonal work in the U.S. for IT isn't a thing. Well, it probably is in some circles, but I've never encountered it. Offshoring provides a constant pool of workers that can be pulled from when the need arises. In my experience though, the quality of work isn't very good; and the level of communication and professionalism is considerably worse. I'd never subject my customers to the poor experiences I've had in the hands of an off-continent workforce.

      If your only motivation is the near-term bottom-line, offshoring may make sense. But that is a blunt instrument generally used by unskilled leadership that has failed to plan properly. When I take the full measure of a man or woman who's built their company, having used such techniques is tarnishing to say the least. Their estate is built on "soft ground".

      --
      I'm sorry, but your opinion seems to be wrong.
    4. Re:I wonder how flexible the IT department was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IT departments are typically extremely rigid, and scared of even the smallest change. IT as a role in a company must evolve or die off altogether. It must change to a form that truly helps a business instead of shackling it.

      That's an issue with the company culture - not an issue with IT. If IT isn't a strategic part of your company - outsource it and spend your time/focus on running other parts of your business. If IT is a strategic part of your company - fix your company culture so IT works in your favor.

      Note - you can replace "IT" with "HR" or "Finance" or ____ (insert function here) and get the same outcome.

    5. Re:I wonder how flexible the IT department was... by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      Look another post from Sanjay....

    6. Re:I wonder how flexible the IT department was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But having worked for and with a few large companies, it's not that hard to imagine why they were offshored - the article mentions the company "needed a more flexible staffing model that could better serve the cyclical nature of our business".

      The thing about a BS marketing-speak sentence like that is, it means nothing. So the reader will apply whatever they feel fits. In reality, it wasn't about function at all. It was about money.

    7. Re:I wonder how flexible the IT department was... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      It's also possible that you're a complete asshole who deserves to have a tire iron rammed down his throat.

      Ask me how I know you work in IT.

      This is a cost-savings measure.

      Probably - but what led to the IT department being an acceptable cost to save? IT should be core, not a fluffy expenditure you can trim. Outsourcing IT is kind of insane on many levels, the fact that businesses are so desperate to do so to escape corporate IT as we know it - well that speaks volumes to what IT has become.

      That the business felt restricted by IT is absolutely the fault of IT. IT should be there to enable rapid change, not lock it down.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  37. Cengage?!? by phaggood · · Score: 1

    Damn; so glad I never got around to sending them that resume'.

  38. Do you still think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... unions and employment protections are for pinko commie socialists?

    1. Re:Do you still think... by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Yes, because this is what results from those "unions and employment protections".

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  39. Never Learn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

            First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak outâ"
            Because I was not a Socialist.

            Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak outâ"
            Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

            Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak outâ"
            Because I was not a Jew.

            Then they came for meâ"and there was no one left to speak for me.

  40. No no no by s.petry · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Doctor and Lawyer salaries are through the roof because those are two of very few jobs that can not be outsourced to a third world country. If Blue Cross could ship you to Haiti for a 40c an hour doctor you don't think they would?

    Welcome to the "Global Economy". You have heard all about it I'm sure, and how great it is. A real Utopia where everyone benefits. Assuming of course you are already extremely wealthy, because the rest of the people are expendable. As long as a company can stay afloat using dirt cheap labor, they will. Zuckerberg won the lottery, nothing more. That is your shot to getting out of the cesspool we are creating by complacently watching the government be run by the same people profiteering.

    History is cyclical, we have seen this all before. The same result will come eventually, because people never learn to learn from history.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:No no no by silentbozo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The outsourcing is already in progress. Look up the term "nighthawk radiologist".

      http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org...

      That was in 2004. As digitization has spread through healthcare, the practice has only gotten more prevalent.

      If you can pipe the data to somewhere else and get someone accredited to sign off on your work so they are the professional of record, you can outsource anything to anyone anywhere. Use a nurse practitioner for in-office visits, outsource case review to a medical professional somewhere else.

      Same deal for lawyers. For contracts, research, etc. you can outsource to paralegals. For discovery, have someone else scan, index, and cross correlate everything before you turn it over to the junior partners, but bill at the senior rate.

      BTW there are a lot of unemployed/underemployed lawyers...

    2. Re:No no no by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Doctor and Lawyer salaries are through the roof because those are two of very few jobs that can not be outsourced to a third world country.

      Yep, it has nothing to do with the intentional artificial scarcity created by the AMA and BAR associations.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    3. Re:No no no by Hadlock · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Have you EVER shopped for doctors based on price? Did you even know that was a thing? Docs just seem to set a price based on whatever, and you and your insurance company figure it out from there.
       
      General practitioners/family doctors could be in every strip mall for in and out service, yet they're not. Anything outside of routine service would go to a specialist which you would pay closer to current market rate for, but the AMA has closely limited the number of doctors in America. I looked at getting a medical degree to go work in third world countries, but they've raised the barrier of entry by charging about half a million dollars in tuition, plus 6-7 years worth of apprenticeship to enter the field. Plus entry tests, etc. The tuition and time alone makes me look elsewhere for a profession.
       
      If you brought down the standard for med school training for general practitioners, you could easily outsource about 60% of general doctor health care. In fact, to meet this gap they have a Physician's Assistant (PA) who is effectively a doctor with a much shorter training schedule at about 90% pay level.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    4. Re:No no no by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      "... Assuming of course you are already extremely wealthy, because the rest of the people are expendable..."

      This. Welcome to the Plutocracy.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    5. Re:No no no by sociocapitalist · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Doctor and Lawyer salaries are through the roof because those are two of very few jobs that can not be outsourced to a third world country. If Blue Cross could ship you to Haiti for a 40c an hour doctor you don't think they would?

      Welcome to the "Global Economy". You have heard all about it I'm sure, and how great it is. A real Utopia where everyone benefits. Assuming of course you are already extremely wealthy, because the rest of the people are expendable. As long as a company can stay afloat using dirt cheap labor, they will. Zuckerberg won the lottery, nothing more. That is your shot to getting out of the cesspool we are creating by complacently watching the government be run by the same people profiteering.

      History is cyclical, we have seen this all before. The same result will come eventually, because people never learn to learn from history.

      Doctors are being outsourced:
      http://www.nbcnews.com/id/6621...
      http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/1...

      Lawyers are being outsourced:
      http://www.americanbar.org/pub...
      http://www.economist.com/node/...

      Doctor and lawyer salaries are not high because they can't be outsourced (they can), but because of the fucked up healthcare and legal systems in America.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    6. Re:No no no by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      And that doesn't apply to everydamn-body-else too? You'll note the only country on the list that pays Doctors more then us is the Dutch, and the Canadians could actually get a $59k raise simply by moving south of the border. With lawyers it's only a $23k raise.

      But, of course, it's not actually that easy to switch countries if you're a lawyer or a Doctor. Why? Because Legal and Medical associations are quasi-governmental bodies who would not like it if Physicians from Ontario all started commuting to Detroit for $30k less then the local heart specialists. It is that easy if you're a programer, because nobody in DC thinks of programmers as a voting block to be courted, because there's no guy in DC telling them that programmers are such a thing.

      BTW, the difficulties in out-sourcing medical care are pretty much identical to the difficulty out-sourcing database administration. In both cases you're sending info to India, and getting info back, and as long as the Nurse/tech guy is smarter then paste in theory you can out-source all the really expensive/hard shit to India. In practice it's very difficult to get that to work because if the smart guy isn;t sitting in the office looking at the problem with his own eyes it increases his error rate, and it also pisses off the people he has to work with.

    7. Re:No no no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Teaching can't be outsourced either - look at all those well paid teachers.

    8. Re:No no no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you think they keep trying to put laptops/tablets into schools? Once they can get everybody to submit work and view lessons on the tablet is when schools start hiring babysitters which don't cost anywhere the same as a certified teacher. One of these days it will stick.

    9. Re:No no no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to capitalism.

    10. Re:No no no by i+work+on+computers · · Score: 1

      the AMA has closely limited the number of doctors in America. I looked at getting a medical degree to go work in third world countries, but they've raised the barrier of entry by charging about half a million dollars in tuition, plus 6-7 years worth of apprenticeship to enter the field. Plus entry tests, etc. The tuition and time alone makes me look elsewhere for a profession.

      It may make you look elsewhere, but there are still hundreds or thousands of medical school applicants that aren't accepted into a program and move on to a different career each year.

    11. Re:No no no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That does not explain the lack of nurses in USA and most western countries.

    12. Re:No no no by mjr167 · · Score: 1

      OMG! How horrible that we have strict training requirements for doctors! We should just let anyone with a 4 year degree practice medicine, do surgery, and prescribe drugs to babies. That whole apprenticeship and practice thing is a waste of time! Learn by doing!

      I have a friend that got all the way into his residency and then while doing an ER stint that involved lemons in an awkward place, decided to change careers to nuclear engineering. He realized he didn't really want to ever deal with something like that again and he didn't want to be a doctor that badly. There is a reason the bar is high.

    13. Re:No no no by scamper_22 · · Score: 1

      All true, and this really where society has hit that fan.

      You can't have two vastly differently set of rules for different parts of society.

      To private sector workers:
      You're on your own.
      You compere globally with 6 billion people.
      You compete for jobs with everyone including people making pennies on the dollar.

      To public sector/government protected (doctors, lawyers):
      We'll keep your salaries high by restricting access
      We will make sure your work can't be outsourced

      What's especially troublesome is seeing how people have begun to internalize this mindset.

      Ever heard a public sector worker talk about free trade? That's just reality and private sector workers must deal with it.
      I did X years of school. Of course I should get more money than an auto-worker!
      They'd never think of not being able to buy an IPhone and being restricted to buying a blackberry just because they're Canadian.

    14. Re:No no no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Physicians Assistant (non-possessive), apparently. Identity Management (RBAC, specifically) on these seemingly idiosyncratic details is such a PITA.

    15. Re:No no no by swb · · Score: 1

      I sometimes wonder if what makes medicine so difficult isn't the actual complexity of the practice, but the nature of "becoming a doctor" -- ie, the structure and process associated with going to medical school, residency, etc.

      Prescribing drugs, for example. So many facts about drugs are already organized in really good databases with detailed dosing information, contraindications, side effects, safety in pregnant women, etc.

      How much education do you need to prescribe a drug if the known information about almost all drugs is already available in a reference system?

      Of course you have to know what you're treating, but again, either the symptoms are obvious and/or self reported or there's some canned diagnostic test that tells you what the test is. And I'm sure there are reference systems that let you cross-reference various symptoms and/or suggest tests to refine diagnoses.

      Sometimes it feels like we educate doctors for the world of the 1920s, where it was like you had to fill them with all the information they'd ever need to practice medicine because they'd be doing it in a complete vacuum with no other information.

    16. Re:No no no by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      I dated a girl who worked as a vet at a local banfield vet clinic. They have a flowchart-type of software that is basically a jump to conclusions mat and leads the vet to a safe conclusion. $150,000 worth of tuition, condensed down in to 400kb worth of decision data inside of a script on a computer. I think a human life is worth more than that, but clearly they're on to something here, as Banfield corporate lawyers signed off on it as being less risky than having a human make the initial diagnosis.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    17. Re:No no no by mjr167 · · Score: 3, Informative

      When I was a teenager I ended up having my tonsils removed. The doctor thought they looked "funny" and sent off to pathology. Pathology came back and said "lymphoma". So we got to go visit the pediatric oncologist who started doing blood tests, bone marrow samples, and scans looking for cancer.

      They were going to crack my chest open to put a center line and start chemo. But the oncologist thought things weren't adding up. I wasn't sick enough. So he ordered a DNA test for the ebstein bar virus (mono). That test came back positive when three other of the regular mono tests came back negative. Apparently mono can look identical to lymphoma under a microscope.

      The protocol was to crack my chest open. The doctor, realizing things weren't adding up, ordered one more test and saved a teen age kid from going through chemo for no reason. Medicine isn't always a cut and dry if A then do B.

    18. Re:No no no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More than effectively. In my state new PAs and NPs need a doctorate. So they aren't MDs, but they are doctors.

    19. Re:No no no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you really don't understand anything about healthcare...

      Have you EVER shopped for doctors based on price? Did you even know that was a thing? Docs just seem to set a price based on whatever, and you and your insurance company figure it out from there.

      Docs actually generally set their prices according to the schedules that "independent" references set for them. ("Independent" in quotes because the biggest one out there is actually a subsidiary of United Healthcare.)
      These days insurance companies offer the contract to the physician, and for any physician outside of a major hospital system's Accountable Care Organization it is a take-it-or-leave-it deal. The physician cannot negotiate the price lower than the HIGHEST of these contracts, lest the doc be caught by the insurance companies and be forced to refund the difference to the insurance company.
      Insurance companies ARE the tail that wags the healthcare dog now. Physicians cannot make a living without them.

      General practitioners/family doctors could be in every strip mall for in and out service, yet they're not. Anything outside of routine service would go to a specialist which you would pay closer to current market rate for, but the AMA has closely limited the number of doctors in America.

      Yeah, those are called Urgent Care centers. Not heard of them?

      I looked at getting a medical degree to go work in third world countries, but they've raised the barrier of entry by charging about half a million dollars in tuition, plus 6-7 years worth of apprenticeship to enter the field. Plus entry tests, etc. The tuition and time alone makes me look elsewhere for a profession.

      But you didn't look at going to a third world country and getting your medical degree there? You know, study in the local economy you're planning to operate in, so that your education costs match in with what you'd expect to earn? (And then you could always take your ECFMGs and practice in the US, just like those who want to take that route natively do...)

      If you brought down the standard for med school training for general practitioners, you could easily outsource about 60% of general doctor health care. In fact, to meet this gap they have a Physician's Assistant (PA) who is effectively a doctor with a much shorter training schedule at about 90% pay level.

      The term you're actually looking for is Midlevel Provider, which also covers Nurse Practitioners as well (who may also operate under supervision of, yet independent from, a physician.) And yes, basically the industry is adjusting to provide such care. They actually earn 70-80% of a full physician, so a physician can supervise 2-6 of them - depending on if the physician is also practicing or just supervising. So what's the problem there, again?
      And with telehealth, sooner or later you will have to justify your need to actually use a physician's time in person. This will be a feature, not a bug, right?

    20. Re:No no no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's quite a bit more complex than that. Your argument is akin to saying that software development is easy, because developers just have to type on their keyboards and google things.

    21. Re:No no no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, its already happening...my local hospital network sends all their x-rays to a radiologist out of state. I only notice this because I recieved a bill from her for what my insurance didn't cover when I had some xrays done a while back.

      No reason they can't do this anywhere out of country except (as the article you linked to indicates) these have to be "american trained" (ie, medically licensed in the US) doctors. Since the doctor's lobby prevents large numbers of American trained doctors from ever becoming a thing, they're still relatively safe.

    22. Re:No no no by swb · · Score: 1

      The protocol was to crack my chest open. The doctor, realizing things weren't adding up, ordered one more test and saved a teen age kid from going through chemo for no reason. Medicine isn't always a cut and dry if A then do B.

      I'm not sure how that's a defense of the existing highly disciplined and educated practice of medicine as we know it. What you're arguing is that there is some emphemera based on hunches and intuition, not actually quantifiable learned skills.

      That, or you're justifying that the current practice of medicine is deeply flawed and despite the rigorous training and bullshit, the entire process involving multiple doctors just plain doesn't work sometimes.

    23. Re:No no no by swb · · Score: 1

      I would argue that a system like that with a less rigorously trained person could possibly handle a lot of what we now require a guy with a six figure income and the college debt to match it to diagnose.

      You still would need highly trained specialists for when the analytics didn't have an answer or you were dealing with problems outside their scope.

      But right now, I go see a doctor and I'm out $75 and it takes a week to get an appointment and compared to most people I have it *good*. I wonder if medicine could be improved by cutting out some chunk of the MDs and replacing them with something that could treat common stuff with data versus always relying on a really expensive guy.

    24. Re:No no no by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Price for medical services are based on the cost of living in the zip code where they bill from. Then each procedure they perform has a different price.
      That is why a lot of doctors bills will have a bill to address in a major city.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    25. Re:No no no by mjr167 · · Score: 1

      What I am suggesting is that experience counts. Just like in any field. Before you can know that something doesn't look right, you need to know what it's supposed to look like. But you also need to know what all the variations are, etc. If we are just going to give doctors a flow chart and replace them with a computer program like WebMD, we are going to end up doing needless, invasive procedures on a lot of people because diagnosing a lot of conditions isn't as simple as "you have a stuffy nose and a headache. Its a sinus infection, have some anti-antibiotics".

      If the troubleshooting tree doesn't work for "my computer won't turn on", what makes you think it will work for "I have chronic headaches"?

    26. Re:No no no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you had lympho, then do chemo. A, then B.
      If the biopsy clearly has four-pointed acidic apoptosis, you have lympho. A, then B.
      If the biopsy is dubious and not 100% definitive, then you don't have a cut and dry 100% determination of "A".

      "A then B" is perfectly valid, the problem is that "A" can't always be certain. Is never certain. Is rarely even confident, you might argue. So it's rare "A then B" has a situation to apply anyway.

    27. Re:No no no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > diagnosing a lot of conditions isn't as simple as "you have a stuffy nose and a headache. Its a sinus infection, have some anti-antibiotics".

      Funny, as far as I can tell, that's all my doctor does.

      As Greg House put it, "for most of you, this job could be handled by a monkey with a bottle of Motrin!"

    28. Re:No no no by swb · · Score: 1

      You're implying that doctors know and remember every last detail of every drug and disease they've ever learned.

      Shit, I was a hard-core expert on Novell Netware 3.x and 4.11 fifteen years ago. I managed a 5 site meshed network of over 800 users and a dozen servers (including Groupwise).

      If someone came to me with a Netware problem today? I probably wouldn't even know where to start without a shit ton of time and probably building out a lab (how? with what unsupported hardware?) just to try to regain lost knowledge.

      The idea that because doctors went to medical school means they know everything they learned in medical school is ridiculous. GPs know the common problems they see people for and refer them off for things they don't. Specialists know their specialty area in depth, but likely don't remember much otherwise outside of their practice area.

      My basic argument is that most general practitioners are over-educated and way too expensive for the kinds of medicine they do practice, which is mostly treating simple, common problems they can solve with what amount to fewer than 50 drugs.

  41. We need to look at cutting full time to 32 hours a by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    Shipping costs and more control drive automation in US manufacturing.

    We need to look at cutting full time to 32 hours a week to start with a slow slide down to say 20 from that. Just to make automation fit in better while softening the blow of people going on welfare / disability. Also need some kind of basic income system to replace disability / welfare / etc.

    Now there is some abuse of disability / welfare but some times the system penalizes work in a way that people are better off not working. Or in other cases the cost of getting to work does not really cover what they make there.

  42. Wage growth comparison between US and India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For quite a few years, the salary growth in the US has been capped at more or less 2.5 to 3.5%. The salary growth in Bangalore, India has been about 10%.

    This difference is reducing the cost benefit of having offshore employees in India. And it's eroding it very quickly.

    Senior (architect level) have a Bangalore:Silicon Valley of about 2:1.
    Junior (new grad) have a Bangalore:Silicon Valley ratio of about 5:1.

    In probably under 5 years, it will cost about the same for a company to have a Bangalore employee as it is in Silicon Valley. This ignore costs of US employees elsewhere.

    I've personally seen an avoidance of junior staff in the US and in Bangalore under the guise of "independent workers". So I'd say that by 2020, we'll be looking less at the India tech hubs as low cost centers for smart staff. Bangalore will probably be as interesting as any other 'mostly interesting' technical locations.

  43. Dollar Index by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The dollar index is at 99. So, its not surprising to see the pressure to outsource right now.

    1. Re:Dollar Index by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The higher it gets the more expensive work in the US is ...

      http://quotes.ino.com/chart/index.html?s=NYBOT_DX&t=l&a=12&w=5&v=dmax

  44. Re:instead of union how about being value for mone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you think US has long days, you should check the work culture in India... 60-70 hour weeks are required at a minimum to get promotions, and at 10% inflation, your effective wage reduces year on year without promos

  45. Or put another way. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1
    From TFA:

    "This was a very difficult decision, as we value all of our nearly 4,000 U.S. employees and their contributions."

    Truthfully phrased:
    "This was a very simple decision, as we nearly value all of our 4,000 U.S. employees and their contributions."

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Or put another way. by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      The original phrasing is perfectly accurate. Firing them just happens to show how much they valued them.

  46. First Krokus 1:1 by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

    I've been down, I've been beat
    I've been tossed into the street
    Beggin' nickels, beggin' dimes
    Just to get my bottle of wine

    Some say life she's a lady
    Kinda soft, kinda shady
    I can tell you life is rich
    She's no lady, she's a bitch

    They suck my body out
    But friend there is no doubt
    I'm gonna pay the devil his dues
    'Cause I'm sick of being abused

    Eat the rich, eat the rich
    Don't you know life is a bitch
    Eat the rich, eat the rich
    Out of the palace and into the ditch

    Steal my money, steal my car
    Took my woman and my old guitar
    Runnin' crazy, runnin' wild
    Blind alley in my mind

    Just can't fight the temptation
    It's become my inspiration
    Gonna get myself an axe
    Break some heads, break some backs

    They suck my body out
    But friend there is no doubt
    I'm gonna pay the devil his dues
    'Cause I'm sick of being abused

    Eat the rich, eat the rich
    Don't you know life is a bitch
    Eat the rich, eat the rich
    Out of the palace and into the ditch

    Don't stop me

    Eat the rich, eat the rich
    Don't you know life is a bitch
    Eat the rich, eat the rich
    Out of the palace and into the ditch

    Eat the rich, eat the rich
    Don't you know life is a bitch
    Eat the rich, eat the rich
    Out of the palace and into the ditch
    Out of the palace and into the ditch

    They suck my body out

    --
    This space unintentionally left blank.
  47. doubled my income twice; but I learn, not complain by raymorris · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > Secondly, they will chase you regardless of your qualifications because they are paid on commission. Third, they are not your friend.

    They get paid their commission if and when they provide the best candidate, the one who gets hired. Twice, a call from a recruiter has resulted in a job offer that doubled my take-home pay - that's pretty friendly in my book. Of course my experience may be different from yours because as I said I make it a point to study my field weekly, not to bitch and moan about "the evil HR departments" who won't recommend me for an interview.

    You can continue to complain because people as people continue to not hire you, or you can do something different; your choice.

  48. Licensure is the only way to stop this by nbritton · · Score: 1

    The only way to stop this is to make IT a licensed profession just like with doctors, attorneys, and electricians.

  49. UAW anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No unionizing is going to stop offshoring. The only thing stopping offshoring would be putting tariffs on imports. This would just raise the cost of everything. Like that iPad at $800? Well, if you wanted to produce it locally it'd probably cost 1000s. And you'd have to get NAFTA and TPP thrown out first.

    And how is that fair to people competing with lower costs? Why does John Smith from USA deserve a job more than Juan Perez or Wang Zhang? You don't care about that? Well, people who don't care aren't going to be cared for either.

  50. and why did they outsource? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The unions didn't know when to stop. They got greedy, making us uncompetitive.

    You imagine that businesses have two choices, outsource or keep running with all that union labor. No, the second choice is to go out of business. Union labor isn't a viable choice.

  51. Re:We need to look at cutting full time to 32 hour by TheSync · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We need to look at cutting full time to 32 hours a week

    France has a 35 hour work week and an unemployment rate that is double that of the U.S, and also France has a lower labor force participation rate overall (by about 10%).

  52. Re:instead of union how about being value for mone by TheSync · · Score: 1

    it's not being greedy to actually want non-stagnant wages

    Non-farm business sector real compensation per hour is up 2.7% since 2014, after a long plateau due to the recession and formerly high unemployment rate, which is now down to 5%.

    CEO pay is down over 30% (as a ratio with average worker pay) since 2000 though.

  53. E-Learning was dead 10 years ago. by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    I don't get it. I was doing that kind of work in 2002, and it was shitty then already.

    What's there left to E-learn? We've got YouTube, Kahn Academy and world-class universities dumping their entire curriculum online and into BitTorrent.

    What's left to outsource to India, I'm wondering? Looks like this was a shit company anyway. It's probably gonna fold anytime soon anyway. I wouldn't be surprised.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  54. There is no good way by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    There is no good way to lay people off and replace them. It's always humiliating and degrading.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  55. Straw man alert by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... If no one in the US has a good job to earn money to buy things with, how is anyone in America going to "consume" anything? ...

    The above scenario will never happen, because there will always be someone making a lot of money

    The point being that the jobs that got outsourced are jobs that are no longer creating enough added value to keep them inside a high-wage location, such as Ohio, USA

    Even at Silicon Valley there are jobs that have been outsourced, but if we examine what kind of jobs that had been outsourced and which jobs still remain we will find that the jobs still remain (and are still being created) in America are jobs that are heavy on the side of creativity

    Data entry jobs, even some of those so-called 'programming' jobs have become so routine it no longer makes any sense to employ people doing this low-value jobs in America

    In other words, if you are Americans and still want to work in America, find yourself a niche, a niche which add a lot of value to what you do, a niche that no one outside of America can easily duplicate, and you will get to enjoy your job as long as what you do creates more money to your employer than what they pay you every month

    You guys may not like what I am saying, but we need to face the reality somehow --- this world's competitiveness has heat up tremendously. USA and Europe are no longer the only places in the world where innovations happen

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Straw man alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ... If no one in the US has a good job to earn money to buy things with, how is anyone in America going to "consume" anything? ...

      The above scenario will never happen, because there will always be someone making a lot of money

      Yes, but the economy is still harmed. Its just reflected on the national level, not a direct individual level. The 1% can't possibly outspend the 99%, because they have more money than they can transact in consumption. Its in the national interest for a majority of the population to secure wealth, even if it means a form of "income redistribution", but the devil is always in the details. Ideally, you want the market to manage this, not the gov't. When the Congress passes laws "protecting" the outflow of economic activity, the market is only taking advantage of the wealth the rich possessed to accumulate more wealth.

      Even at Silicon Valley there are jobs that have been outsourced, but if we examine what kind of jobs that had been outsourced and which jobs still remain we will find that the jobs still remain (and are still being created) in America are jobs that are heavy on the side of creativity

      What jobs remain and created still does not amount to an increase in employment, does not result in an aggregate increase in national wealth (more unemployed people not making wealth, fewer "creative" jobs that are paying more than the old jobs), and requires an educational system which is producing more educated/creative people, while voters/"the rich" which continually try to freeze/drive down teacher salaries, or demolish a public education system, for a capitalist system, where education investment is decreased, and the savings go to the 1% in the position to profit from it.

      In other words, if you are Americans and still want to work in America, find yourself a niche, a niche which add a lot of value to what you do, a niche that no one outside of America can easily duplicate, and you will get to enjoy your job as long as what you do creates more money to your employer than what they pay you every month

      If you're not careful, you're going to create a self-perpetuating niche, where people have to kill the "haves", in order to secure enough "wealth" to survive. A lot of good that "niche" carving will do, when it gets shrunk by technology or market forces. Ask any aerospace engineer, back in the 1980's. What "niche" will be left when automation replaces truck drivers, taxi drivers, farmers, plumbers, auto repair techs, financial analysts, etc.?

    2. Re:Straw man alert by xrobertcmx · · Score: 1

      Heard this in the 80's about the Auto industry, then in the 90's about call centers, and now about programming and help desk. The truth is, we aren't talking about low paying jobs, or unskilled labor. Management fails to understand or even attempt to understand the value added by some departments. Accounting, IT, Customer Service, and anything not directly revenue generating. In many cases, such as Disney and Edison the jobs are now filled by H1B holders. Toys R Us is already going down the tubes and as far as I'm concerned the news about what they did only hastened it slightly. The last company I worked at tried this and it ended in disaster, you hire the high value/educated people for a reason. They are trained and able to adapt, they are not simply taught to click here, click here, and initial there when done. We ended up with a huge mess, some low level exec was made a scapegoat even though everyone knew it came from the COO's office, and we had to hire and train a bunch of people which was not easy as everyone who knew the job had been let go and moved on. Accountants cost money for a reason. It pays to hire local because they tend to know the laws applicable to locality.

    3. Re:Straw man alert by BonThomme · · Score: 2

      I've always found it amusing that outsourcing consultants instruct companies to never outsource their core competency. And the first thing they outsource is Customer Service.

    4. Re:Straw man alert by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      The above scenario will never happen, because there will always be someone making a lot of money

      Maybe. The shift seems to be towards people who have a lot of money separating from people who make money. They are more likely to trade large sums of money back and forth as game counters than they are to go out and consume.

      After all, if 1 million unemployed formerly middle-class people can no longer afford steak dinners, are Bill Gates, Warren Buffet and the Koch brothers going to use their fortunes to go out and consume 1 million steaks a week in the place of the unemployed? Are they going to buy enough cellphones and Xmas toys to keep those industries afloat?

    5. Re:Straw man alert by boristdog · · Score: 1

      This has nothing to do with competitiveness. It has to do with cheapness. If labor can be exploited at 1/10 the cost, who cares if it takes 4x as many overseas employees to do the job of 1 US employee?

      Worker efficiency and competitiveness never enter the equation. Exploitation of cheap wages does.

    6. Re:Straw man alert by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      In other words, if you are Americans and still want to work in America, find yourself a niche, a niche which add a lot of value to what you do, a niche that no one outside of America can easily duplicate, and you will get to enjoy your job as long as what you do creates more money to your employer than what they pay you every month

      You guys may not like what I am saying, but we need to face the reality somehow --- this world's competitiveness has heat up tremendously. USA and Europe are no longer the only places in the world where innovations happen

      I see, so most of us are fucked, is what you're saying. A niche, by definition, is a small slice of the market. So a very few people can earn a good salary and everyone else just has to start a new career or work for peanuts. Let me guess, you've found a niche.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    7. Re:Straw man alert by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Do you have some kind of source for anyone actively trying to lower teacher salaries? As far as I can tell from the almighty google, teacher salaries have been pretty flat. The Teacher's Union is always complaining that teachers don't make enough money, but I don't see any evidence of them having their pay actually reduced.

      If you tried to say that no child left behind needed to be repealed, as it actually is regressive, and gives more money to the successful schools that have a high tax base compared to the unsuccessful schools that don't have enough income from taxes to run, that I could support. Blindly giving raises to teachers is kind of silly, and appears to be what the Union always wants.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    8. Re:Straw man alert by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Part of the added value of these low level jobs is the training they provide so there is a guy sitting there who has learned the simple stuff and can easily move onto the difficult stuff.
      Granted, there is a lot of chaff, for every guy that moves up, there are probably three that are not capable of moving up and will hang on to that entry level job like grim death.

      The major problem with outsourcing, IMHO, is we're cutting off our legs. We haven't noticed yet, but we'll certainly fall when we don't have the foundation guys moving up over the next decade.

    9. Re:Straw man alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Protip: "Strawman" doesn't mean "argument I don't like".

      Your post fails to refute the question of what happens if too few people are making enough money to afford, say, dinner out. What happens to restaurants, and by extension, the people they employ? Then those people can't afford anything either and the service economy starts crashing because no one can pay for services anymore.

      In fact I've never found an actual rebuttal to the question to GP poses: what happens when we destroy the economy's foundation? All answers like yours are handwavy bullshit that ignore a very real problem.

    10. Re:Straw man alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... But, but... Coren22, you say people don't need proof http://slashdot.org/comments.p... so why're you asking for it, hypocrite?

    11. Re:Straw man alert by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The point being that the jobs that got outsourced are jobs that are no longer creating enough added value to keep them inside a high-wage location, such as Ohio, USA

      No, the point is that the companies can find cheaper labor. Maybe its a better deal for them, maybe not. There's no reason to think the value produced by the job has gone down, when we've got a perfectly good explanation.

      There's two values of a job, that you have to keep track of or you'll wind up saying nonsense. One is the value the employer has to pay to get someone who can do the job. The other is the value the job gives to the employer. When the first value is greater than the second, the job goes away. When an employer can reduce the first value by hiring elsewhere without reducing the second value to match, the employer will probably hire elsewhere.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    12. Re: Straw man alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You talk like someone who came from a 3rd world country. The reality is the US government has been screwing the high tech worker for 25 years now with the h1b visa. Witout it there would be more middle class jobs because companies can afford American workers but they have a cheaper alternative which allows the executive class to buy another vacation home.

      What should be more important an employed American or more vacation homes for the wealthy?

    13. Re:Straw man alert by toddestan · · Score: 1

      That's something a lot of people seem to miss. All those people in senior level jobs that require heavy creativity started off at the bottom of the ladder in some menial job, and as they gained experience they worked their way up. Get rid of those low-level menial jobs, and eventually the pool of experienced senior level people will dry up.

      That's why I always find it kind of hypocritical when a company complains they can't find experienced people to fill high level roles, while at the same they've outsourced all the lower level jobs that provide the experience they're looking for.

    14. Re:Straw man alert by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      They are more likely to trade large sums of money back and forth as game counters than they are to go out and consume.

      - which is wonderful. Do you know what happens when a bunch of super wealthy people are bidding for items on the market? 170 million dollar paintings

      The entire idea that economy is based on consumption is intellectually retarded to the point of no redemption. The only problem is lack of production, not lack of consumption. Consumption is trivial and the less money is bidding for the existing products, the lower the prices are (items go on sale when there are very few buyers, not when people are engaging in bidding wars).

      The problem in USA (and Europe and Japan and Russia and so much of Africa and Australia and South America) is lack of production, not lack of consumption. It is the people who do not produce who cannot afford to consume and the real problem is lack of savings, which prevents increased production and this problem is created by the gigantic governments of the world, borrowing and printing money, controlling prices, taxing savings out of existence.

    15. Re:Straw man alert by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      If your thesis was correct, then Trickle-Down Economics would have worked. And while I won't write Trickle-Down off as 100% failure, it has definitely shown itself to be roughly as effective rowing a boat using a piece of rope. In something like 30 years of varying political and economic climates, Trickle-Down has never been credited with creating massive prosperity - in fact by most metrics the people on the "down" side are worse off economically now that they were when Reagan took office.

      Poverty, on the other hand, can bubble up pretty darned fast. Just ask my creditors when I'm not getting paid.

      Economists do consider consumption as a vital metric. The US economy has, in fact been designed around it since the end of WWII - think "planned obsolescence". So don't discount it.

      On the other hand, the price of luxury items factors very lightly. Very few items will sell for $170 million in a given year. Almost nobody buys another $170 million painting every year. On the other hand, you can be assured that more than 170 million rolls of toilet paper will be sold in the USA alone this year. And again next year, and so forth until something better obsoletes it (or at least some marketer persuades us). And in addition to toilet paper, of course, there's shampoos, soaps, laundry aids, appliances, etc., etc., etc. Again, the wealthy may have laundry rooms with 15 high-end appliances in them, but laundromats have more than that, and those units, being industrial-grade, aren't cheap either. And there's a LOT more laundromats than there are billionaires with tricked-out laundry rooms. Until no one can afford to pay for laundry and they have to go fighting for places down by the river where they can beat clothes with rocks because no one gets paid any more.

      Just to hammer it home, who employs more people, Sotheby's Auction House or Kimberly-Clarke, maker of toilet paper? Since, as demonstrated, putting more money in the hands of fewer people has proven ineffective considering that a "healthy" economy is measured in large part by cash in flow, which employer has a greater influence?

    16. Re: Straw man alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they aren't getting real cost of living raises, then in effect their salaries are being reduced.

    17. Re: Straw man alert by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      The graphs I found on Google were inflation adjusted, so no, they are getting cost of living raises.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  56. Re:We need to look at cutting full time to 32 hour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People here are struggling with dual-income households and working overtime. If France can get by with far less workers and less hours, we should be doing what they are doing.

  57. Meanwhile: Corporate profits just hit All Time Hig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  58. Long term outlook bleak by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    The long term outlook bleak.

    Outsourcing may cut costs in the short term. If done well it will also cut costs in the long term. But hardly any outsourcing job gets done well. If the outsourcing company had developed their system well, then they would have had a system that operates at minimal costs and outsourcing wouldn't even be an issue.

    I see the following scenario: Cognizant et all will gain bargaining power over their customers and prices will rise. Wages will go up and prices will rise even more. A fine equilibrium will be reached so that outsourcing will not be reversed. Then cockiness will tip the balance and insourcing threats will introduce a period of mistrust and negotiation. Eventually perhaps the tables will turn.

    In short: Companies that take their system development seriously will gain over ones that don't. The former will have strong systems that are kept running by a minimal work force -Like us CS dudes actually think is sensible. Make your choice.

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  59. If you do that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you do that, then IT will die off anyway as most of the people in IT are in over their heads in a big way.

  60. Re:We need to look at cutting full time to 32 hour by tigersha · · Score: 1
    --
    The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
  61. Re:instead of union how about being value for mone by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

    There is no way you can argue logically with CEOs who are concerned only with a good quarterly report to ensure the golden parachute for them. Only bullets solves something in this situation.

    --
    Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
  62. an IT company without IT guys and gals by bigtreeman · · Score: 1

    isn't an IT company.

    I watched an IT (manufacturing and research) company slowly die.
    Started with printed circuit boards from Hong Kong,
    then they arrived stuffed and flow soldered,
    then they arrived machine tested,
    then the repairs were done over there,
    then new systems were developed in China.

    With each cost saving a few more people were made redundant,
    until they just had a manager, accountant and secretary.

    --
    Go well
  63. Re:We need to look at cutting full time to 32 hour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi Jeb! Except that France is doing better than that, the lower participation is lower retirement and students not having to work. For Americans it seems the worse you are treated the better it is.

    http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/11/07/cheese-eating-job-creators-2/?module=BlogPost-Title&version=Blog%20Main&contentCollection=Opinion&action=Click&pgtype=Blogs&region=Body

  64. The name plate is (somewhat) irrelevent.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have a Ford built in Mexico and a Toyota built in Kentucky.

  65. Re:instead of union how about being value for mone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Egoism, everyone for themselves results in this."

    What happened to: E pluribus unim. One for all, all for one?

    America forsook its Christian heritage and got in bed with the corporate whores of Babylon.
    You reap what you sow.

    Now they have flooded the country with all kinds of foreigners who have no understanding
    of our American Heritage. Not that it matters because most Americans have little
    understanding either. We need another revolution, but it's not going to happen with such
    a diverse and uninformed populace. This country's window of recovery is almost shut
    and the hand is at the lock.

  66. Re:Meanwhile: Corporate profits just hit All Time by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Duh! We don't have a trickle-down or trickle-up economy anymore; either one would be preferred to the "trickle-out" that we have now as it least moves money in the system. No, our nation is (and has been for quite some time now) been hemorrhaging wealth overseas. Meanwhile, our national debt is growing at warp speeds and when it finally crashes, the nation, "the union" as you know it dissolves. And as for China and everyone else, they can all go fuck themselves as there won't be an dollars to collect on!

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  67. Job Growth by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    The job growth, sadly, is in retail and service sector jobs. I gave up on IT altogether after being effected by another layoff. I went ahead and got a CDL and now I drive for a living. Ironically, the joy of tinkering and experimenting with technology has returned.

  68. Vote for Trump if you want H1Bs fixed. by DirkDaring · · Score: 2

    http://politics.slashdot.org/story/15/08/18/029216/trump-targets-the-abuse-of-h-1b-visas

  69. How hypocritical we are... by manu144x · · Score: 2

    It's funny how after 20 years of us "IT guys" obliterating entire industries, destroying millions of jobs (and no, no new job is created when the a software replaces a department) now that we are the victim of the same thing (efficiency) we cry out loud like crazy. This is what happens, unfortunately. At some point everything will be a commodity, and the only real value will be the people with real business instincts to make the right decision for the company. Even software development that right now is considered highly creative and safe, yes, it may be, but can also be done from anywhere in the world you have a connection. The only value in the future of software development will be the people who will be able to come up with software that sells. Once they have the idea, there are thousands of technologies, frameworks, pre-made libraries that can help with that. Even now, I am working with a framework and libraries for functionalities that 2 years ago I would have needed to write myself. Now it's all done I just have to execute them. What I could bill 60 hours in the past, I now finish in 10. Yes, it's more efficient, it's also cheaper. Today all I have to do is to come up with an idea, I can probably execute it incredibly fast and cheap with no employees. Is that good, is that bad?

  70. IT workers need to become politically active by zerofoo · · Score: 1

    My experience in the tech world has been that most tech people lean libertarian....a kind of "don't bother me and I won't bother you" culture. This culture is reflected in the early days of software and networks where most code and communications protocols weren't designed with security built in.

    Unfortunately, this world has ended. The world is a nasty place of people competing for resources and politics is part of that world.

    The IT world needs a lobby group - maybe many groups to represent its interests in our government policies and our interactions with the world.

    Rough consensus and running code are no longer enough.

  71. Fear Mongering by urmomnom · · Score: 1

    Clearly fear mongering. Outsourcing IT is nothing new, it happens here and there and sometime it works and sometimes it fails. IT and manufacturing have nothing to do with each other and in all reality the US has tons of manufacturing jobs. We need better education if we want people to grow up with ambition and a skillset that isn't so easily replaced. We have to invest into out citizens to ensure we have a good workforce. OR, we accept that every country has a 10% demographics that is pretty darn smart and those 10% globally are the people that do a huge majority of the necessary work. The other 90% are just there mostly contributing to their own existence. Once you tap the 10% of your country, you need to get tap the 10% of the rest of the world. That being the case, we problem need to accept that fact that the 10% need to subsidize the 90% in both brainpower and a fair piece of the pie. Income inequality really isn't good for anyone, it just slows down the economy because hording money never increases production or profits. Either way you have to subsidize the dumb people and as we automate more, we have to subsidize more and more people. People won't just go away quietly or be swept under the rug. They will keep reproducing even with the lowest possible standard of living you can image. Adaption is the human superpower, so wage inequality is not going to fix itself. It will take an act of democratic power. The idea that there can always be enough jobs in the country for everyone to be employed is just false and it's getting less and less true every decade.

  72. Take the long view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What so many don't seem to realize about this is what the long view holds. You see, the first world west is consumer exhausted. We have so many products, so many services, so many "me toos", we're over it. It is so hard to sell us anything more. So, the path of least resistance for the global companies is to go where its easier to sell. Of course, you have to create a market first. So, by employing the third world you are creating markets for your products. This can take decades. It has been happening for decades. We are already seeing the "fruits". The next big consumer product markets are India and China. They have swaths of uninformed people who are crazed to have a "better life" which of course according to the west is "more stuff". The craving for "more stuff" is thousands of years old. None of this is new. Our globalist corporate masters are very smart, very shrewd and very patient. They are creating wealth to sustain their legacies of power. Remember, the white man's obsession with finding routes to India was what begun the creation of America. It's time to give back.

  73. Fight back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So let's see, manufacturing is gone, we were all told to get an education and prepare for the high-tech jobs of the future. Except those are going away too now. The solution is to raise awareness and boycott those companies that boycott the american people. There should be an app for that. People should know how many american workers were humiliated and left without a job to feed their families out of pure greed before they take that Disney park vacation or go to ToysRUs for their Christmas shopping.

  74. Re:doubled my income twice; but I learn, not compl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't say I've never gotten hired through them. I have, but more often than not, I've been cut loose once they find the "best" candidate (who is frequently the "best" only on paper). They feel no obligation to you, only to the client. The point is it doesn't take too many rounds to see the game stinks even if you can play it well.

    Heck, I even got passed up on a job once that I'd been doing well for three years under contract, because HR decided I wasn't qualified. My former co-workers told me the guy they actually hired was a disaster and couldn't do shit.

    Recruiter interest is no way to judge your employability.

  75. Keep telling yourself that by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    Feel good, don't it? You can keep telling yourself you'll work at all the companies that survive when this one crashes. Thing is they've been outsourcing and bringing in h1-bs for 20 years, and I don't recall that happening once. What I do recall is several companies put out of business by the outsourcers. I also see wage stagnant for everyone but a few at the top...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  76. You've heard of Cengage. by goodmanj · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you're not sure who Cengage is, they're one of the the companies that charges $300 for a college Intro Physics textbook and then locks half the content and all the problems behind a website that requires a one-time-use registration card, so that used textbooks are worthless.

  77. pol views on H1Bs by unixisc · · Score: 2

    Wonder what Trump and Carly think? If Carly opposes it, she'd have to explain why she presumably supported it while in HP. The Don has said that he's for all immigration that's done legally! Just b'cos he's fond of the wall and wants to end illegal immigration doesn't imply that's he's opposed to legal immigration as well

    Dr Ben has talked about the need to get the entire US population productive to match the likes of India & China. Would like to see his proposals

    1. Re:pol views on H1Bs by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Dr Ben has talked about the need to get the entire US population productive to match the likes of India & China. Would like to see his proposals

      Legalizing powerful drugs so their employees can work 24 hours straight without even noticing it? And if they try to quit, the monkey on their back won't let them? We've already seen both students and employees doing this so they can be more "competitive." Employers know that some of their employees are doing this, but as long as they keep producing at top levels, they'll turn a blind eye to it. So then others start doing the same. It's like steroids in cycling - if almost everyone is doping, you feel you kind of have to if you want to race, just to level up the playing field, not to seek an advantage.

      Or maybe he just wants us to eat more rice ...

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    2. Re:pol views on H1Bs by Karzz1 · · Score: 1

      Honestly, whatever Carly believed while at HP is irrelevant. She used a *legal* tool to do her job as CEO in the best interest of the company. Even if she disagreed with H1B on a philosophical basis, she would be grossly negligent if she did not consider the use of H1Bs as CEO of a publicly traded company.

      Re: The Don, H1B is *not* immigration; your comments in that regard almost read like a straw man. I don't think most people are opposed to *legal* immigration but that has nothing to do with H1Bs.

      --
      Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master.
  78. Re:Meanwhile: Corporate profits just hit All Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China will invade and take what they are owed.

  79. Re:instead of union how about being value for mone by dave420 · · Score: 1

    E pluribus unum means "out of many, one".

  80. Re:instead of union how about being value for mone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *** SMACK*** is the sound of dave420 going down eating his words bitchslapped by apk http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

  81. So you can take care of yourself??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I take it therefore you're saving up money so you don't need to rely on handouts (from, for example, companies, whose profits you would extract at their expense, relying on their efforts to feed you)?
    I take it you built your own car, your own house, your own power generation system, your own road.
    I take it you grow your own food, do your own doctoring, look after your kids, and don't rely on someone giving you a job, or sell things to customers who you rely on for your livelihood?
    And you refuse the courts and police to protect you and yours from others.

    Because if not, you're relying on others for your wellbeing.

  82. Re:doubled my income twice; but I learn, not compl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, they get paid when they supply a candidate that gets accepted.

    Whether they are any good at actually DOING the job rather than passing the interview is irrelevant.

  83. Not Even Pretending by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

    ...even IT workers in low-cost parts of the country are too expensive and their work is being sent to Cognizant, one of the largest H-1B visa users.

    So are we not even pretending anymore that H-1B visas are for workers possessing skills not found locally? Because that's what they are supposed to be for. And that's what we have been told over and over when we made the observation that it's really about wage suppression. And yet, it seems to be about wage suppression. I guess we're one more industry that's finding out that unregulated Capitalism is not our friend.

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    1. Re:Not Even Pretending by manu144x · · Score: 1

      That's the whole point. Capitalism is nobody's friend. It's just a system in which everybody competes freely.

      As a european working for an american company all I see is little whiners whining that other people are better and cheaper and it's not fair.

      Sure, when they go to Wallmart and they expect the products to be better and cheaper, they never care about the wages of the chinese who make them.

      It's a free global market, accept it and get ready, it's gonna be much worse soon.

    2. Re:Not Even Pretending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > That's the whole point. Capitalism is nobody's friend. It's just a system in which everybody competes freely.

      This isn't really true, but it's a popular misconception - that "capitalism" and "free market" are interchangeable.

      "Capitalism" really means you can use money to make money. Thus, the people with more wealth can generate more income than people who rely only on their labor.

  84. Re:instead of union how about being value for mone by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

    Non-farm business sector real compensation per hour [stlouisfed.org] is up 2.7% since 2014, after a long plateau due to the recession and formerly high unemployment rate, which is now down to 5%.

    Oh wow, 2.7%. That's an amazing pay raise especially when you factor in inflation. Oh and according to your Atlantic link's study, by comparison CEO pay is up anywhere from nearly 13% to over 37%. So sorry if I don't furiously masturbate of a pittance of a 2.7% wage increase.

    CEO pay is down over 30% [theatlantic.com] (as a ratio with average worker pay) since 2000 though.

    And yet it is still up to 273 times the average workers salary per that article. And even being off by 30%, their pay is still at near record highs historically. On the other hand, inflation adjusted wages for everyone else is still stagnant. Am I supposed to shed crocodile tears at the misfortune of CEOs that they are only making slightly less than obscene wages?

  85. Re:doubled my income twice; but I learn, not compl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You do realize that if a recruiter could find you a job that "doubled my take-home pay" then you were working at "offshore rates" in the first place. Why don't you just admit that you are willing to sell yourself cheap and save us the crap about studying hard.

  86. Re:instead of union how about being value for mone by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

    face facts. use logic. best way to prevent jobs going to non american citizens is to be truly productive and contributing value for money paid.

    Is that really how you think these decisions are made? They somehow measure the value and productivity of the worker and decide whether they are getting their money's worth?

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  87. Re:instead of union how about being value for mone by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

    Then explain CEO compensation....

  88. Indians are racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Possibly the most racist in the world (i.e. the Caste system, etc.) so good luck trying to work for an Indian company.

  89. H1B No Longer Cheap by Kagato · · Score: 1

    H1B's contractors now cost more than $100K (although the actual person doing the work gets a fraction of that money). The reason is there's a shortage. Supply and demand. That's why companies are pushing to list the H1B caps.

    No one looks at how we go into this situation. Around the 2000s the bean counters had a choice between adding more college hires and H1B/Off-shore resources. They cost a similar amount of money, but a H1B resource can be leveraged because they need an employer to sponsor their visa. Thus begins the cycle. No one is hiring the next generation of workers and the hole gets bigger and bigger.

    Between 2005 and 2011 I didn't work in a single shop that had programming Interns or college hires (I consult and see a lot of large IT shops). As H1B and offshore rates ratcheted up companies were forced to look at college hiring again. So naturally the first thing congress wants to do is entirely remove H1B caps* (This by the way has bi-partisan support).

    Back in my world I make a crap-ton of money with On-Shoring projects. Companies that tried it the 2000s are pulling development back into the US. We cost a lot more than off-shore workers, but the we get so much more done with a significantly higher degree of success.

  90. Re:doubled my income twice; but I learn, not compl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so totally agree with you , IT is a never ending learning experience , very important to learn something new every day , but also very important to make sure the recruiters know about it

  91. But they said there was a talent shortage!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "talent shortage" is not really a myth, designed to lobby for more H1B visas and offshoring?

    They wouldn't lie to us, right? Right?

    Of course, they lied.

  92. They'll be sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I came from a place where we trained our replacements from Cognizant years back. Lets just say that the longest tenured employee was laid off given a year of severance for his 20 years of service to the company, was back as a consultant a few months later, and later rehired as an employee because the clowns from Cognizant couldn't figure out what end was up. I don't care how cheap these people were they were worthless. Mind you this was for a large Swiss bank, when I was going on vacation one of the H1B guys asked where I was going, to which I replied Skiing in the Alps, he responded..... no joke is that in Colorado to which I said no Switzerland where this company is headquartered. I was re-purposed and left 6 months later to greener pastures, but is is astounding how ignorant the contract engineers from India are, they really are not well educated. Mind you there are some good people but between the ridiculous business culture(seriously you haven't lived until you've done business in india) and the 1 useful person for every 4 worthless people means it is hard to get things done, couple that with high turnover and you soon realize why this doesn't work. It takes twice as long, costs half as much and is generally a piece of junk when it come back.

    Where I am now we are getting rid of our Americans, my American employees know they are going away yet they still do a good job work 50+ hours a week and often support on weekends, the people who are replacing them just say yes to everything and then don't do anything, tell me how that is going to work? Companies need to wise up, yes have some offshore resources they can handle night support and also you can code and QA 24 hours a day, a global team but more often than not it is wholesale replacement and an assault on the US worker. They need the H1B's/L1 visas or else it doesn't work. Without a US presence it is too difficult to get the work done.

    1. Re:They'll be sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would I hire an American if they are all like you? Arrogant, yet often unable to string together a coherent thought. Your people demand a premium, but I never see results, only complaints.

  93. it's not what you know, it's who knows what you kn by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Absolutely. I wish I had known this, and knew how to do it, before.

    It could be said:
    It's not what you know, it's who knows what you know.

    It was only fairly recently that I discovered a good way to make it easy for recruiters to discover what my skills are, working with their system.

    That put me in a job pretty well matched to my skillset. Since I built skills around what I enjoy, I enjoy my job pretty well. I kind of people I work with now are the types of nerd who read Slashdot, so my boss and his boss might be reading this thread. Did I mention I enjoy my job, and my comments about recruiters refer to how I got into my current position?

  94. Coren22 likes lying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "APK doesn't think that DNS servers are worth running and seems to believe that somehow Microsoft Active Directory can run without DNS." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday October 27, 2015 @12:58PM (#50811615)

    Where'd I say AD will run minus DNS Coren22? I've said AD = internal network DNS dependent as far back as 2007 http://forums.tweaktown.com/wi...

    (Search this in BOLD there "To warn users who have ActiveDirectory/AD LAN-WAN setups to NOT use external DNS servers!" referring to OpenDNS suggestions for those using AD stupid in the POSTS BEFORE IT in my security guides for users (geared to stand alone single machines no less), & right there on that page proves it stupid - so even if you posted as myself someplace here on /. "impersonating me", I have your ass NOW, shithead!)

    I've also stated MANY TIMES I use remote DNS in OpenDNS @ home (but not @ work on AD networks + exchange/outlook: Free OpenDNS model doesn't work with AD dependent Exchange + Outlook specifically you lying little imbecile).

    I also don't hardcode in "every site there is under the sun" is why, so I have to use DNS, but OpenDNS & rarely.

    I also RARELY MISS A LOOKUP since I put where I spend a good 95++% of my time online in my favorite sites into hosts @ the TOP of hosts for utmost LOCAL FASTER RESOLUTION SPEEDS and more reliability vs. Open DNS (not OpenDNS) resolvers being abused, Kaminsky redirect poisoned DNS servers (of which 99.999% of ISP DNS are not proofed against to this very day even though a patch exists which OpenDNS uses), rogue DNS servers, and yes ROUTERS with bushwhacked by malware DNS settings (happening a LOT lately).

    Hardcodes in hosts are faster than remote DNS, waste less resources than local dns in power, cpu cycles, RAM, & other I/O by FAR considering ALL THE PARTS of such a setup in programs, data, I/O, & power (especially if setup as a separate machine).

    APK

    P.S.=> You're a disgusting liar... apk

    1. Re:Coren22 likes lying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow Coren22, you must be doing something right to get APK this butt-hurt.

    2. Re:Coren22 likes lying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coren22 silenced by his own mistakes and running away is 'something right'? We all know Coren22 knows he blew it http://slashdot.org/comments.p... once he quit running from apk finally and got shot down by him.

  95. Coren22 likes being bitchslapped 65++:1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I guess we should avoid your crap, it looks like it is marked as malware. Good luck getting that removed." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:52PM (#50850445)

    It's safe proven by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    Its 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    &

    More "SALT IN YOUR WOUNDS" -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

    ---

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus per this VERY recent testing of them all http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    APK

    P.S.=> /.'ers say my work is good too:

    "his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)

    "I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)

    "APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)

    "his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)

    ... apk

  96. Coren22 likes failing security & coding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coren22 says "hosts=bad" (they add security, speed, & reliability) & bitches on admin priv to UPDATE vs. threats

    "So, have you figured out why privilege escalation is a bad thing yet?" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015 @05:15PM (#50577809)

    & admits using admin priv himself

    +

      How else can I programmatically update hosts minus it in Windows?

    ---

    "Of course it requires elevation to write to the hosts file" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @05:35PM (#50585879)

    You FINALLY later admit there's no other way!

    FACT:

    Even MalwareBytes AntiMalware (best one) DEMANDS you use admin privelege (you saying it's "bad" too?) it can't do its job fully otherwise, like many security tools do!

    APK

    P.S.=> Lastly - Coren22, there is a CURE for your "outism" due to your retarded by assburgers clearly defective brain (lol) - quit making childish sigs about me & sockpuppet accounts as well as telling lies about me - I'll stop OUTING you... apk

  97. Coren22 likes lying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "APK doesn't think that DNS servers are worth running and seems to believe that somehow Microsoft Active Directory can run without DNS." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Tuesday October 27, 2015 @12:58PM (#50811615)

    Where'd I say AD will run minus DNS Coren22? I've said AD = internal network DNS dependent as far back as 2007 http://forums.tweaktown.com/wi...

    (Search this in BOLD there "To warn users who have ActiveDirectory/AD LAN-WAN setups to NOT use external DNS servers!" referring to OpenDNS suggestions for those using AD stupid in the POSTS BEFORE IT in my security guides for users (geared to stand alone single machines no less), & right there on that page proves it stupid - so even if you posted as myself someplace here on /. "impersonating me", I have your ass NOW, shithead!)

    I've also stated MANY TIMES I use remote DNS in OpenDNS @ home (but not @ work on AD networks + exchange/outlook: Free OpenDNS model doesn't work with AD dependent Exchange + Outlook specifically you lying little imbecile).

    I also don't hardcode in "every site there is under the sun" is why, so I have to use DNS, but OpenDNS & rarely.

    I also RARELY MISS A LOOKUP since I put where I spend a good 95++% of my time online in my favorite sites into hosts @ the TOP of hosts for utmost LOCAL FASTER RESOLUTION SPEEDS and more reliability vs. Open DNS (not OpenDNS) resolvers being abused, Kaminsky redirect poisoned DNS servers (of which 99.999% of ISP DNS are not proofed against to this very day even though a patch exists which OpenDNS uses), rogue DNS servers, and yes ROUTERS with bushwhacked by malware DNS settings (happening a LOT lately).

    Hardcodes in hosts are faster than remote DNS, waste less resources than local dns in power, cpu cycles, RAM, & other I/O by FAR considering ALL THE PARTS of such a setup in programs, data, I/O, & power (especially if setup as a separate machine).

    APK

    P.S.=> You're a disgusting liar... apk

  98. I can haz skillz? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You shouldn't be worried about H1-Bs, or even contractors for that matter. I've found throughout my career that when my company brings in contractors, the following inevitably occurs

    1) The contractors are not told about critical resources, systems, or standards
    2) They are given weak instructions, no supervision, and are just 'let loose'
    3) They come up with some cool 'toy' that will solve all my problems (without even talking to me first)
    4) Their contract ends, and they leave, without providing any documentation on what they did, and even leaving before their tasks are complete or in prod
    5) I get to pick up the pieces, and spend the next X weeks cleaning up the mess, checking stuff into SVN/Git that was missing/lost/broken, and generally once again proving beyond a shadow of a doubt to my managers that I actually KNOW my shit, and should never be let go

    There has been very few times where this doesn't happen, and those times I look back on and think "There goes another that we should have just hired"

    If you've had better experiences, good for you. But I simply pity any company that thinks they can whole-sale replace their IT dept. with contractors/H1-Bs and not immediately have their IT dept. sink into the bowels of mediocrity.

    1. Re:I can haz skillz? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      As an I.T. support contractor, I get paid big bucks to clean up other people's messes. Sometimes literally. I was doing a PC refresh project at a hospital when I took on an unassigned side project to clean up a storage room filled with so much surplus PC equipment that no one had seen the floor in eight years. Took me six weeks in between regular assignments to sort through, haul out to the warehouse, and palletize for recycling all that crap. After facilities sanitized and waxed the floor, I presented an empty room to my manager and the I.T. staff.

  99. Coren22 likes being bitchslapped 65++:1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I guess we should avoid your crap, it looks like it is marked as malware. Good luck getting that removed." - by Coren22 (1625475) on Monday November 02, 2015 @03:52PM (#50850445)

    It's safe proven by 57 antivirus programs recently in BOTH its 64-bit model https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    +

    Its 32-bit model too https://www.virustotal.com/en/...

    &

    More "SALT IN YOUR WOUNDS" -> http://f.virscan.org/APKHostsF...

    ---

    MalwareBytes' hpHosts Admin (MalwareBytes employee) hosts & recommends it -> http://hosts-file.net/?s=Downl... & MalwareBytes = BEST antivirus per this VERY recent testing of them all http://www.av-test.org/en/news...

    APK

    P.S.=> /.'ers say my work is good too:

    "his hosts program is actually pretty good" - by xenotransplant (4179011) on Monday August 10, 2015 @03:34PM (#50287195)

    "I like your host file system." - by Karmashock (2415832) on Wednesday September 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#50489401)

    "APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works." - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015 @11:30AM (#50736071)

    "his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources" by alexgieg (948359) on Friday September 25, 2015 @09:57AM (#50596461)

    ... apk

  100. Coren22 likes failing security & coding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coren22 says "hosts=bad" (they add security, speed, & reliability) & bitches on admin priv to UPDATE vs. threats

    "So, have you figured out why privilege escalation is a bad thing yet?" - by Coren22 on Tuesday September 22, 2015 @05:15PM (#50577809)

    & admits using admin priv himself

    +

      How else can I programmatically update hosts minus it in Windows?

    ---

    "Of course it requires elevation to write to the hosts file" - by Coren22 (1625475) on Wednesday September 23, 2015 @05:35PM (#50585879)

    You FINALLY later admit there's no other way!

    FACT:

    Even MalwareBytes AntiMalware (best one) DEMANDS you use admin privelege (you saying it's "bad" too?) it can't do its job fully otherwise, like many security tools do!

    APK

    P.S.=> Lastly - Coren22, there is a CURE for your "outism" due to your retarded by assburgers clearly defective brain (lol) - quit making childish sigs about me & sockpuppet accounts as well as telling lies about me - I'll stop OUTING you "signature boy" troll... apk

  101. Witness. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a first hand witness and can confirm this is what Gov. Kasich (Presidential Candidate) did to Ohioan's.

    I live in Ohio, and a vast majority of my neighborors are from India. And those that get into top positions, quickly make sure everybody they hire in subordinate positions are also Indian. Nepotism is at extreme levels and I experienced this myself also.

    And so we are clear, there are plenty of Americans capable of those jobs, I worked with a lot of them that got laid off because of Indians coming in and taking them for less money.

    I would never vote for Kasich, nor do I recommend you do

  102. No jobs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Legal immigrants from India are taking the high paying jobs, and illegals from mexico are taking the low paying jobs. What's left for the rest of us?

  103. Cowardly lion alert by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    Yes, but the economy is still harmed.

    The US economy. But the Indian economy is boosted. Do you think that we listen to India whine every time we build a new robotic assembly line that puts one of their manual assembly lines out of business? Of course not. This whole 'us and them' argument is kinda bullshit, as we all live on the same planet, and in the end anything that improves productivity globally is probably a good thing.

    Now, you may have some other valid problems that need to be solved, such as finding enough work for every person on Earth, or preventing total wealth aggregation by the top 1%, but don't entangle that with globalization.

    A really sensible complaint would be, 'We have companies in the US that are taking advantage of our infrastructure, but aren't employing the local taxpayers, or are hiding funds overseas to avoid paying their taxes.'

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  104. Re:instead of union how about being value for mone by bingoUV · · Score: 1

    Shareholders not demanding value for money ?

    --
    Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
  105. Same thing we had in the robber Baron era by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    A small group of Ultra Wealthy who own the means of production, a miniscule middle class that serves them and the rest in abject poverty. As long as the 1% are taken care of the rest of us are left to fend for ourselves...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  106. I'm seeing plenty of real jobs going by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    Like scrum master, project manager, lead developer. When they can't outsource it they try for an h1-b and if that fails they try to make do without. Only when all other options have been exhausted do they consider an American. Usually for 80% of what the same job paid in 2000 but with more responsibility.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  107. We need to worry about whether US workers CAN do t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something that I'm not seeing (or apologize if I've missed) is that, given the sad start of our public education system and highschool/college drop out rates, there's some question whether the U.S. labor pool can provide the level of knowledge and experience that other countries' workers can. No plan can work without investing more in our education system to ensure there IS a sufficient labor force to do the job here.

  108. Americans taking calls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, would you rather have American workers taking calls for Indian consumers! No thank you - that would be humiliating.

  109. What are you talking about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can this post earn +5 Insightful? Medical Doctors didn't form unions and now they are paying for it dearly.

    Doctors get paid whatever insurance companies (and the government) feel like paying them. They are also told how long a person can be in the hospital for a given condition, because beyond that they get $0. Doctors need to see patients by volume to break even. Doctors are rewarded by returning a significant chunk of money in the form of "Malpractice Insurance".

    Hospitals create groups to negotiate with the insurance companies, while virtually all services (except for surgery) run at a net loss. Meanwhile, the hospital administrators and insurance companies make bank. Insurance is a scam!

  110. Coren22 can't keep his word... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & links where I tried to make peace - says it all w/ proof of it from his trolling "signature boy" mouth http://slashdot.org/comments.p... & here too http://slashdot.org/comments.p... + here http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    * :)

    (I've discovered that trying to make peace with a mental retard due to assbergers & OUTISM is a difficult thing & largely apparently unachievable...)

    APK

    P.S.=> You brought it on yourself Coren22, nobody else - you sow the wind? Here comes the whirlwind, & all your sockpuppets, signatures, & fellow trolls can't stop it (lol, you're 'outta bullets' in downmods) - so "the beatings will continue" until you stop your immature childish signature bs... apk

  111. Coren22 likes being crushed (crushed himself) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Says it all & this link, dismantling him point-by-"so-called 'point'" of his publicly http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    * :)

    (Coren22, I tried to give you a chance, 3x no less - you're a fool: You mistake mercy for weakness, like cretin brutes in the streets do... you paid the price!)

    APK

    P.S.=> I notice you stopped responding there - "Gosh, golly gee - why's that?" (not) - but I expect you'll TRY some more b.s. as that's all "your kind" (trolls) understand - crap like downmodding my posts or ac troll me!

    (Which you & your sockpuppets OR fellow trolls have here already NOW TELLING OTHERS TO TROLL ME BY UNIDENTIFIABLE AC POSTS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... as I've torn you ALL up 1 by 1 every time as I have yourself above... you did this, to yourself "signature boy")... apk

  112. Coren22 can't keep his word... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & links where I tried to make peace - says it all w/ proof of it from his trolling "signature boy" mouth http://slashdot.org/comments.p... & here too http://slashdot.org/comments.p... + here http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    * :)

    (I've discovered that trying to make peace with a mental retard due to assbergers & OUTISM is a difficult thing & largely apparently unachievable...)

    APK

    P.S.=> You brought it on yourself Coren22, nobody else - you sow the wind? Here comes the whirlwind, & all your sockpuppets, signatures, & fellow trolls can't stop it (lol, you're 'outta bullets' in downmods) - so "the beatings will continue" until you stop your immature childish signature bs... apk

  113. Coren22 likes being crushed (crushed himself) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Says it all & this link, dismantling him point-by-"so-called 'point'" of his publicly http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

    * :)

    (Coren22, I tried to give you a chance, 3x no less - you're a fool: You mistake mercy for weakness, like cretin brutes in the streets do... you paid the price!)

    APK

    P.S.=> I notice you stopped responding there - "Gosh, golly gee - why's that?" (not) - but I expect you'll TRY some more b.s. as that's all "your kind" (trolls) understand - crap like downmodding my posts or ac troll me!

    (Which you & your sockpuppets OR fellow trolls have here already NOW TELLING OTHERS TO TROLL ME BY UNIDENTIFIABLE AC POSTS http://slashdot.org/comments.p... as I've torn you ALL up 1 by 1 every time as I have yourself above... you did this, to yourself "signature boy")... apk

  114. I'm going to be kind enough to piss you off by raymorris · · Score: 1

    I'm going to tell you something that may be very helpful to you, and which you won't want to hear. Recruiting and on-boarding, then training, a new employee is expensive. Their total cost to hire an IT professional who then needs to be replaced is at least three months of your salary, normally more. Keeping that in mind ...

    > I didn't say I've never gotten hired through them. I have, but more often than not, I've been cut loose

    If they cut you loose after spending ~ $24,000 recruiting you, on-boarding you, and trying to get you up to speed, but still found it made more sense to try again with another candidate rather than to keep you, that means something. It means your work not as actually as good as your resume and what you told them in the interview. Maybe you used to be really good, you're an expert at Perl 5.2, PHP 4, and MySQL 4 perhaps, but haven't kept up. Maybe you know what you're doing, so you give good interview answers but you're sloppy, so your work isn't as good as knowledge. For some reason, you're not worth the salary they offered you. Maybe you're kinda like me - a genius asshole.

    If it happened once, that might be just a bad fit. Twice and maybe you're unlucky. If you keep getting "cut loose" repeatedly, there's a reason. And it's not everybody getting let go, it's you who are the common denominator. It might do you a lot of good to talk to your boss and co-workers and find exactly out what the problem is.

    1. Re:I'm going to be kind enough to piss you off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they cut you loose after spending ~ $24,000 recruiting you, on-boarding you, and trying to get you up to speed, but still found it made more sense to try again with another candidate rather than to keep you, that means something.

      No, that's not what I mean.

      "Cut loose" in this case means, off the radar. Once they know some other candidate is getting the job, I can't even get a call back or e-mail reply. It's like I'm dead to them. They really don't care about candidates at all, apart from how much they can make off you.

      This is not about me or my skill level. I've heard the same stories from other contractors and from people who used to be in the recruiting racket.

  115. Re:We need to look at cutting full time to 32 hour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    32 hours would be a great improvement. Even 4 days at 9 hours would work better.

    France isn't the US, but the French are happier and have better work-life balance I'm sure. Taking a month off in August each year isn't too bad either. With Congress voting to up the retirement age, I should be getting a month off each year now to make up for the extra years I will have to work when I'm 65-70.

    And quite honestly, my main goal is to be able to drop out of the workforce because I have enough money and my expenses are so low. That is 'winning' to me. I will be able to work on what I want to work on, on my own schedule.

  116. I have seen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have personally seen employers routinely get away with violating EVERY SINGLE ITEM ON THAT LIST.

    So much for your unions.

    1. Re:I have seen by ToddInSF · · Score: 1

      And you personally let them. Nobody said unions could preform miracles. You have to make some sort of effort, instead of laying around on your lazy ass waiting for someone else to take car of you. Idiot anon.

  117. OIC. I misunderstood what you meant by raymorris · · Score: 1

    I see, I misunderstood what you were saying. I heard "I've been hired through a recruiter and then the company cut me loose - repeatedly".

    > They really don't care about candidates at all, apart from how much they can make off you.

    Yeah, I'm sure most are focused on getting their job done, not on you personally. There job is to find someone whom the company will hire. I suppose if someone expected anything different they'd often be disappointed. On the other hand, since they get paid by getting someone hired, they're an ally (not friend) when I'm trying to get hired.

    1. Re:OIC. I misunderstood what you meant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the least they could do is let me know someone else got the job. That's just professional courtesy.

  118. Re:We need to look at cutting full time to 32 hour by macpacheco · · Score: 1

    You do understand that will just massively increase labour costs, giving further incentives to outsourcing...
    32 hours/wk is a gift. Keep it.

    The issue people can't see is productivity will keep increasing, eventually leading to a massive unemployed force.
    Massive social programs are indeed inevitable, but that will only work when all countries have them, otherwise a lot of labour will jump to the countries where they don't have to pay for that.

    Its the big problem with the democrat / republican polarization. Both sides have some merits, but until they can see the whole picture by accepting both sides valid points, the disfunctionality will just continue, hurting the US economy.

  119. on the free market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've seen a perfect example of the free market working in air fares. We all want the cheapest ticket, and will suffer any amount of indignity on the ground and in flight to save a few dollars. If one assumes that off-shore software is poorly designed but cheaper, and if the companies selling that software pass the savings along to the consumer (a big if there), there's reason to believe that customers will put up with shoddy software to save a few bucks, no?

  120. Attempted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was being replace by three offshore workers, I trained them as well as I could.

    Then I tried to get a job offshore. Apparently it doesn't work that way. Workers can be exported, but they cannot be imported.

    So much for a global economy.

  121. It's WAY too late for that. by ToddInSF · · Score: 1

    IT people waited too long, that ship has sailed. They kind of deserve it for not bothering to organize 20 years ago.

  122. You think you've got it bad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tough Luck, We've been having this problem in Europe for the last 3 or 4 years!

  123. One more reason by NewYork · · Score: 1

    Expel Brahmin From Your Country;
    http://wh.gov/iyhMK

  124. Re:instead of union how about being value for mone by TheSync · · Score: 1

    Oh wow, 2.7%. That's an amazing pay raise especially when you factor in inflation.

    2.7% is real compensation per hour, i.e. inflation-adjusted.

  125. Worked for Cognizant did the humiliating process by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Strange to see this. Some years when I was in Cognizant, I was part of the team which had to transition from US to India, And it was so painful because The US guys had worked 20-25 years at this job and we were people with less than 8 years exp taking over. And it made it more difficult to get the transition as we were putting them out of work and practically on streets.It was the sickest thing to do as some had health issues and were losing health insurance and you hated yourself.I respected everyone of those US guys for experience and knowledge they had.Also back in India you practically are slave driven with insane hours.
    First thing I did was to quit the company back in town and take a job where I didnt cause someone else to lose theirs as far as possible.