Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Is There a Bookmark Manager That Actually Manages Bookmarks?

hackwrench writes: Most reviews of so-called bookmark managers focus on the fact that they can share bookmarks across browsers and devices and whether or not they can make your bookmarks public or not. Sometimes they mention that you can annotate bookmarks. Little is said about real management features like making certain bookmarks exclusive to one or a set of browsers or devices, checking for dead links and maybe even looking them up on archive.org. I'm sure this isn't an exhaustive list of features that would be good to have. What bookmarks managers do you use and why, and what features would you like to see in a bookmark manager?

62 of 100 comments (clear)

  1. Xmarks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Lets me set bookmark profiles for different devices/environments, so I have my "Work" bookmarks distinct from my home use ones. Automatically synchronizes between all major browsers and devices. I mainly only keep smart bookmarks and daily-use ones, so I don't ever need dead link checking or any frills like that. Covers my needs.

    1. Re:Xmarks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Did Xmarks ever re-enable the ability to use your own FTP server, so your bookmarks don't go to "the cloud"? I did that for several years when the extension was called Foxmarks, then they sold out and Xmarks discontinued that feature. Last I checked the only way to use Xmarks with your own server was to deploy an installation of Apache with mod_dav, and I'm not going to that much trouble, I just ditched Xmarks.

    2. Re:Xmarks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Lets me set bookmark profiles for different devices/environments, so I have my "Work" bookmarks distinct from my home use ones. Automatically synchronizes between all major browsers and devices. I mainly only keep smart bookmarks and daily-use ones, so I don't ever need dead link checking or any frills like that. Covers my needs.

      Perhaps the requestor should have included "does not steal/monitor my stuff", where stuff is bookmarks, sites visited, etc. When I nearly installed xmarks in Chromium, there was no way to avoid setting up a free account, so the setup was cancelled at that point and xmarks removed from Chromium. I imagine it's the same in Firefox.

      My need is to manage bookmarks:
        - with a master file on a server
        - across PCs (I have the same account on several)
        - without monitoring or stealing
      Is that too much to ask? I'm even willing to pay, despite using Linux (I've paid for a few packages, and donated to others).

    3. Re:Xmarks. by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Lets me set bookmark profiles for different devices/environments, so I have my "Work" bookmarks distinct from my home use ones. Automatically synchronizes between all major browsers and devices. I mainly only keep smart bookmarks and daily-use ones, so I don't ever need dead link checking or any frills like that. Covers my needs.

      I also use Xmarks and the related Lastpass. I'm so happy with them that I have no problem with paying them $12 yearly for the Premium version, just to ensure that the company stays in business.

      The only thing really missing for me is the horrible Firefox bookmarks search. You cannot search for folders, and you cannot see in which folders reside the bookmarks found. Here is my Python script for searching the Firefox bookmarks, tested on a few Debian-based Linux distros:
      https://github.com/dotancohen/...

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    4. Re:Xmarks. by 1u3hr · · Score: 2

      "you cannot see in which folders reside the bookmarks found. "

      https://addons.mozilla.org/en-...

      https://addons.mozilla.org/en-...

    5. Re: Xmarks. by warren.e.nelson · · Score: 1

      Yes! A "master" file I can access!

    6. Re:Xmarks. by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Nice, thank you.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  2. Github Issues Database by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I use the github issues database. It allows me to quickly tag each bookmark and add descriptions. Works good. The side benefit is that it pretty useful for lots of other things too.

  3. Windows: Use .URL files by macraig · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you use Windows .URL files, you gain several critical abilities: browser-independent storage, cross-browser utility, and searching and filtering driectly from Windows Explorer. The browsers I have used all support the ability to drag URLs directly from the browser address bar into Explorer or the Desktop to create these shortcuts. Not sure if you could then create methods and tools to support your other desired features like browser-exclusive shortcuts, but completely detaching URLs from any application-specific database is a good place to start.

    1. Re:Windows: Use .URL files by tshawkins · · Score: 1

      Wont work on linux or mac osx though :-(

    2. Re:Windows: Use .URL files by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      I tried a drag'n'drop in linux. Seemed to do nothing then a file manager copy window popped up, trying to copy "/" into the target directory.
      It failed with a nonsensical error message thankfully (can't copy "/" : "/" is a directory).

    3. Re:Windows: Use .URL files by macraig · · Score: 3, Informative

      Drag and drop from the browser's address bar, specifically the "identity information" icon that precedes the URL. That saves the URL itself in a .URL shortcut file, not an attempted copy of the Web page as HTML/MHTML.

    4. Re:Windows: Use .URL files by dotancohen · · Score: 2

      Wont work on linux or mac osx though :-(

      Works in KDE. This is a very basic feature, I have a hard time believing that any modern Linux desktop doesn't support opening a .URL file.

      Here is a description of the format if you want to write a Python script to handle it:
      http://www.fmtz.com/formats/ur...

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    5. Re:Windows: Use .URL files by WinstonWolfIT · · Score: 1

      Win win.

    6. Re:Windows: Use .URL files by Blaskowicz · · Score: 2

      Wow, that worked. Either URL bar, icon on the left of URL bar or from a bookmark.
      It creates a .desktop file, which on inspection is very simple, so that's probably an old, long available feature that few people know about.

      The error I got was likely from a slight mess up : weird outcomes are not rare with drag'n'drop, that's why you end up with computer users whose task bar accidentally takes up half of the screen, or music folders that got "nested" by accident.

      [Desktop Entry]
      Encoding=UTF-8
      Name=Lien vers Ask Slashdot: Is There a Bookmark Manager That Actually Manages Bookmarks? - Slashdot
      Type=Link
      URL=http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=8400015&cid=51016103
      Icon=mate-fs-bookmark

      You can put comments in the file, even possibly unofficial entries.

    7. Re:Windows: Use .URL files by macraig · · Score: 1

      Awesome. I thought I recalled being able to do the same in Ubuntu or Suse Linux a few years ago, so it was worth mentioning even though I described it as though only for Windows.

  4. My other by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 3, Funny

    My other bookmark manager is Google.

    --
    Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
    1. Re:My other by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Google Bookmarks kind of ruins the joke, eh? ;)

  5. Re:All of them by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    So they all will tell me the last time I visited that site? They'll let me sort/search by keywords inside the URL? Easy drag/drop of bookmarks between folders?

  6. Two thoughts by Chewbacon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1. Sometimes I have to rename the bookmark to something more meaningful than what's in the tags.
    2. Use tags. Firefox has them and it makes my life so much easier. It beats sorting them into folders.

    I'm not sure what to do about dead links. It happens. If you really, really need to save something forever, I assume it is something for reference, then save it to PDF and upload it to a cloud service.

    --
    Chewbacon
    The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
    1. Re:Two thoughts by John.Banister · · Score: 1

      If you've ever wanted to categorize things into folder and subfolders, tag names are the folder names. So, If you had a category of "how to do photography" websites, you might want them in a "how-to" category under "photo" or you might want them in a "photo" category under "how-to." The notion with tags is that if you give them each both a "photo" and a "how-to" tag, the computer can quickly sort them to match which organizational preference you have at time of use.

  7. My Slashdot bookmark by sk999 · · Score: 2

    http://slashdot.org/?nobeta=1

    To be honest, doesn't need much management.

    1. Re:My Slashdot bookmark by XB-70 · · Score: 1

      I will stop reading Slashdot if they force the beta version on me. nobeta=1 rocks!!

      --
      *** Don't be dull.***
  8. I realize I'm not answering the question... by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    but I stopped managing my bookmarks when Firefox & chrome started searching them and the text they contained. That plus google pretty much made bookmark management a waste of my time. Kinda like organizing my email. I just don't do it anymore. Use the search feature in your browser bar and give the bookmark a name with some useful keywords and blam, no more managing. If it's something you use a lot drop it in your bookmark bar. Come to think of it, that's one of the key things that keeps me on Firefox: I can drag and drop a tab directly onto my bookmark bar.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  9. i loved delicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I really loved simplicity of delicio.us until it was broken by yahoo some years ago.
    After that I was too suspicious to use on-line tools.
    Later, Opera with one update got rid of my historical bookmarks.
    Got sick with this. Now, if I may need it, I just email it to myself with set of probable keywords in the message for which I might be looking for in the future.

  10. Re:Put some effort into it by hackwrench · · Score: 2

    Little is said about real management features like making certain bookmarks exclusive to one or a set of browsers or devices, checking for dead links and maybe even looking them up on archive.org.

    Are the features I want, but to say that the reviews said little about such features may be generous, because they actually said nothing at all about it.

  11. "Clip to Evernote" by jim6762 · · Score: 1

    was using X-Marks until recently. Works pretty well and syncs across desktops, laptops, & portable. Lately, I've been moving all of it to Evernote using their "Clip to Evernote" & Evernote's "Clearly". It's still free and accessible on all my devices. Evernote will index all the pages by the contents of the saved pages. Evernote often even does OCR on the graphics in the saved pages and includes that in the index. You can have your Google searches include your Evernote account (makes it easier to find stuff). It's hard to figure out which bookmark you want by the bookmark name.

  12. Re: Put some effort into it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What? No it doesn't.

    Most reviews of so-called bookmark managers focus on the fact that they can share bookmarks across browsers and devices and whether or not they can make your bookmarks public or not.

    Defines existing tech and excludes those features as insufficient.

    Sometimes they mention that you can annotate bookmarks. Little is said about real management features like making certain bookmarks exclusive to one or a set of browsers or devices, checking for dead links and maybe even looking them up on archive.org.

    Suggests three features they want.

    I'm sure this isn't an exhaustive list of features that would be good to have. What bookmarks managers do you use and why, and what features would you like to see in a bookmark manager?

    Asks for suggestions for existing tech, and features that your choice of tech doesn't do that you wish it did.

    Seems pretty simple and straight forward.

    I don't use a bookmark manager, I use google and my browser history. If I did use one though, I'd like it to archive to my desktop as html, then each time I request the page check for updates. If it differs then only backup the modified files. Let me access the site in an Apple Time Machine style interface.

    (Oh no, I said Apple. Label me troll/flame bait/skatrboi.)

  13. Re:Google by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Back when Web directories could keep up with changes or something like that, I tried a lot to use them. My bookmark collection is practically one of those sites. When I find a bookmark where the link it is pointing to has disappeared, I go to archive.org and plug it in to see if it got the site. If it does, I update the bookmark to point there. I start out with a alphabet sprawled across the bookmarks toolbar, and then topics under that letter So I have P on the toolbar and under that I have Programming, and under that Game for game programming. I also have a G which has a Game folder for more general game playing topics. I would like most of my bookmarks to sync across all browsers but there are some sites that won't render very well with how I have a given browser set up, so I want those links exclusive to the browsers that they work right in. None of the search engines index archive.org and under A I have an archive folder that points to various collections on archive.org.

  14. Pinboard, Venn viewing/editing by tag by Rademir · · Score: 1

    I use Pinboard, which doesn't sync to browsers at all, though it does import from them and there are extensions for most(all?) browers. It has excellent tagging capabilities. Every once in a while I switch browsers or do a fresh install of one, over time set up the bookmark toolbar. In theory it would be nice to have that stored in Pinboard, but on the other hand being forced to rethink what I most want easy access to can be a good thing. Having a different set that sync to mobile would be good.

    With a monthly fee, Pinboard archives all of the pages you bookmark, so that handles dead links very well, and as we've all learned by now I hope, if we like a service we're usually better off paying for it than suffering ads, or the buyout from some giant corporation that will end or ruin it.

    The managing that I would really like to see is the ability to view bookmarks based on tag in a graphical way with overlapping circles (think Venn diagram), and edit the tags on a bookmark simply by dragging it from one part of he overlapping circles to another.

    --
    ourpla.net is your planet
    1. Re:Pinboard, Venn viewing/editing by tag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "With a monthly fee, " -- so, it is an online service? Then what you do when it goes titsup in October 2016?

      That is always a risk... but I take regular backups and could probably hack together a simple web app, should the service ever go dark, to serve up my data until a suitable replacement could be found.

      Pinboard is a great little service. It has really liberated my bookmarks - now I keep about ten common sites synced via Firefox and have the rest of my oodles of bookmarks on pinboard tagged and easily searchable. I use the pinboard browser plugins to quickly add new stuff. It works really really well - better than sync in any of the major browsers has for me.

    2. Re:Pinboard, Venn viewing/editing by tag by burk3 · · Score: 1

      The guy that runs it doesn't seem to be in it for the money. It looks more like he's trying to run a no-frills bookmarking service with a sustainable business model. He regularly, openly, and humorously criticizes other sites that get bought or go "tits up" and blow away all user data (via the @pinboard twitter). The service used to have a one time fee, and the one-time fee would increase slightly for each user. He has since switched to $11 yearly because users were getting too confused about the one-time fee increasing.

  15. Re: Put some effort into it by unixisc · · Score: 1

    In the past, when I used to use bookmarks, I would have certain sites viewed on IE, certain sites on Netscape/Firefox and later certain sites on Chrome. Depending on the DE I was in, I'd even toss in Konqueror/Epiphany. Main issue was that certain browsers used a html file to store bookmarks, while some, like IE, used a Windows Explorer like file manager to sort them. Main issue was I couldn't migrate some of the bookmarks from one browser to the other.

    However, of late, I've given up using them altogether. I have a whole bunch of tabs open, and then I also have some RSS feeds staged on the Bookmarks toolbar. That serves me pretty well.

  16. Re:All of them by meadow · · Score: 2

    One thing that is totally brain dead about any bookmark sync features I've tried with browsers is that if you delete a bookmark on one device, it will not delete it for all devices. That to me is just stupid. Its like they only half-sync: only added bookmarks, not deleted ones.

  17. ReOnly:added bookmarks, not deleted ones by hackwrench · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Worse, they can go, "Oh, I see that the browser you deleted a bookmark from is missing it. Let me add it back into your browser.

  18. TagSieve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    FireFox bookmark tagging is very good, but what really rounds it out is TagSieve, a fantastic FireFox extension that really should be added to FireFox itself:
    https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1092878
    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/tagsieve
    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/tagsieve/#reviews

    1. Re:TagSieve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If we added it then people would whine because they don't use it and call it bloat.

  19. How about anything that isn't stored remotely? by cfalcon · · Score: 1

    How about something that is never stored in plaintext remotely? Like you can manage your bookmarks, put them in subgroups, ideally move them across browsers and devices, but no one but you ever knows what bookmarks you saved?

  20. Re:Real Programmers by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    Can you please find a newer cartoon, this one 378 has been seen at lest 100 times on /.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  21. Step away from the Bookmarks by jetkust · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've bookmarked a thousand web pages and haven't clicked on a single one of them. Let them go, people. Just let them go.

  22. Re:ew. by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    So what's so bad about it, in your opinion. Someone broke down the post for another user who complained and the complainer did a better job than you at expressing what he felt was wrong with it?

  23. archive.org page check by Badooleoo · · Score: 3, Informative

    To check if a current site you are on is on archive.org have the following as a bookmark

    javascript:location.href='http://web.archive.org/web/*/'+document.location.href;

  24. Re:All of them by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2

    It would have helped if you read the frgging summary. Can you name one that synchronizes across all your devices (and perhaps a shared section with appropriate auth system), and allows customizations on a per device basis? No? Yeah. You should read the summary next time.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  25. Re:All of them by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

    I'd settle for "do anything". Something that's a dumb storage device isn't "management". Maybe that's why so many slashdotters hate managers and management, they don't know what the word means.

  26. Shameless Plug by feedmelazers · · Score: 1

    I have been working on this project for the past year now, and it has a lot of the features you are looking for. For instance, about dead links: Any time you bookmark a page, it is automatically archived to archive.org and archive.today, and then if the page goes down, you can view those archives instead. Similar to how some mentioned Evernote, we also index the full text of pages you bookmark, so you do not have to remember the names of the bookmarks, but can instead search through the text of the page. If you want to separate your work & home bookmarks, you can just tag them as such, and then later you can filter bookmarks using tags. There's also browser extensions for Chrome/Firefox/Opera, and a bookmarklet for others. Without further ado, here's the sign-up link(in case you like what you've heard): https://www.crestify.com/regis.... Invite code is needed too: "slashdot"(without quotes). I will be here to answer any questions you have, so feel free to ask.

    1. Re:Shameless Plug by Herve5 · · Score: 1

      your registration does not work. Or at least, I detailed my email for your database three times, worked for Google image recognition three times too with their captcha thing, then nothing.

      --
      Herve S.
    2. Re:Shameless Plug by feedmelazers · · Score: 1

      Sorry about that, seems like the registration is having some issues. I will look into that. Meanwhile, I have activated your account and you're good to go. If anyone else is having such issues, please PM me and I will get your account working.

    3. Re:Shameless Plug by feedmelazers · · Score: 1

      For anyone else that had trouble registering, there was an issue with our signup system that has now been fixed, and confirmation emails have been sent out. Sorry for the trouble.

  27. Diigo by Dmitri_Yuriescu · · Score: 1

    Diigo all the way. To me, Diigo's killer features are in annotation by highlights and sticky notes ("Highlight text directly on any web page for personal reference or collaboration" and "Add text, comments or reminders directly on any web page with sticky notes"). Really makes paper obsolete.

    1. Re:Diigo by LegionX · · Score: 1

      I tried Diigo, but it always, ALWAYS, logged med out.

      Having to log in again doing every damn thing on the web didn't suit my style.

  28. Re:All of them by peragrin · · Score: 1

    I will settle for one that just synchronizes across all devices. like biology i prefer a mixed os lifestyle, even if I have a mac book and iPhone, My tablets are android just to be safe.

    At the moment I manually deleted and re-add chrome bookmarks to Safari every once in a while. This keeps all those fairly close in sync. I have to do the same for contacts, too. fortunately I use google calendar, and gmail already so those stay in sync.

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  29. Here you go by WinstonWolfIT · · Score: 1

    http://lmgtfy.com/?q=bookmark+...

    Enjoy, I can do this all week.

  30. Re:Real Programmers by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 3, Funny

    I haven't seen an announcement about systemd doing it yet, but there are a few hours left in this week's release cycle. And i'm sure it will be incompatible with all other bookmark managers and, in fact, all browsers.

  31. Private Homepages by movdqa · · Score: 1

    I don't use bookmarks that much. Instead, I create a simple HTML page with links, with similar pages categorized together. I will benchmark pages that I'm interested in and eventually move them to the home page or delete them if they've been there for a while with me not using them. I manually propagate the homepage to other systems.

  32. Re: Opera 12 by obsess5 · · Score: 2

    Yes. I was a long-time Opera user; used to pay for it on Windows (version 3?) and then, when it came out, I paid for the Linux version. I loved the bookmark system in the 12 and below versions. Like you, I had themes: folders and subfolders for certain topics. For example, a programming folder with different language/platform subfolders. Nearly everything was possible with just the mouse. To bookmark a page, you simply moused down to the desired sub-sub-folder, for instance, and clicked the bookmark-current-page-here entry. Ditto for locating and visiting a bookmarked page. I very rarely had to type anything: very rarely to search for a bookmark and just occasionally to rename the title of a page I was bookmarking.

    I stayed on Opera 11.64 (there was some annoyance in 12) until about 6 months ago, when, because of an increasing number of page-rendering problems, I began trying out various browsers (including Vivaldi and Otter), and finally settled on Pale Moon (on Windows and Linux). I imported my Opera bookmarks and I can get close to the Opera bookmarking experience, but it's still not as smooth as the old Opera was.

  33. Shaarli!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Personal bookmarks manager available from anywhere.
    https://github.com/shaarli/Shaarli

    1. Re:Shaarli!!! by schklerg · · Score: 2

      Accidentally posted this as AC. Seriously, tagging, descriptions, nice layouts, themes, well maintained, easy addition of links, I could go on. It's nice having my own bookmarks and not having them mined by every company out there.

      --
      Be Excellent To Each Other
  34. Xmarks - handy but flawed and stagnant by Fencepost · · Score: 2

    I use Xmarks (paid customer for it and LastPass, do they even have a free version?) but it definitely has its flaws and I don't get the impression that the company puts ANY resources into it beyond basic maintenance and support. I've had times where bookmarks simply disappeared (e.g. 80% of a folder of links to client sites), and there's no reasonable way to go back and track down when or why.

    In my case I assume it was a sync issue between browsers on multiple systems, but since it was a folder of sites I only needed to access every few months it left me with a big window for when the loss occurred. I could have downloaded all of the bookmark sets to be able to search (or otherwise track changes) but that's a one-at-a-time process through a clunky web interface. Last time I looked there was no way to search through the old bookmark sets, nor is there any kind of automated changelog or indication of what changed - not even a count of number of bookmarks in each saved backup. Even having a count of the # of bookmarks would have helped, because I could have looked for spots where the total number declined since I'm bad about doing cleanup.

    Overall I'd call Xmarks "just good enough to keep me from actually deciding to try to roll my own solution" which is really a pretty low bar since I have some idea of the development scope I'd be facing.

    --
    fencepost
    just a little off
  35. Doing it Wrong by Aero77 · · Score: 1

    You are doing it wrong. Bookmarks should be used a marker for hard to find sites that required a lengthy search process to find, or for sites that you open every day (right-click bookmark folder "Morning News", choose 'open all bookmarks'). If you have a thousand bookmarks and haven't spent the time to organize them in a system, you will never find what you are looking for; which requires you to use search for everything.

    1. Re:Doing it Wrong by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      Performance issues can prevent me from opening sites I use everyday all at once. Trying to do so not only makes the computer run slower but is harder to navigate as well. Besides I frequently have autocomplete find them for me, or they show up under the most frequntly used list on the new bookmarks tab. I have categories off the bookmarks toolbar. I have YouTube, Programming|Games Games DeviantArt, email, philosophy, portal, physics Printer, P2P, Indie Bundle sites, Books, so on and so forth.

  36. Re:Crestify by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    I like to do a little poking around before registering for a site, so I went to the top level and there's a link for joining a waitlist?

  37. Re:Crestify by feedmelazers · · Score: 1

    So sorry about the late response, I am not a regular on /. and I totally missed the notification. Currently, since we are in beta, we have a waitlist system. Once you are cleared from the waitlist you receive an invite code. However, for slashdot users, the invite code "slashdot" will let you bypass the waitlist.