Slashdot Mirror


15,000 Hoverboards Seized As Unsafe In United Kingdom (nationaltradingstandards.uk)

puddingebola writes: National Trading Standards and trading standards services in Scotland have released figures that 15,000 of 17,000 hoverboards have been seized at ports of entry in the UK because of safety concerns. The boards were seized "due to a range of concerns, such as safety issues with the plug, cabling, charger, battery or the cut-off switch within the board, which often fails." Are we pushing hoverboard technology too far too quickly, or are there just a group of criminal sociopaths manufacturing unsafe devices at Christmastime and pumping them into the market? Mashable has a story summary with links to video of a man in Alabama with his hoverboard on fire. The government of New York City isn't so hot on hoverboards, either.

178 comments

  1. Wait, what? by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hoverboards? What year is this?

    1. Re:Wait, what? by rodrigoandrade · · Score: 5, Funny

      2015, obviously.

    2. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      2015, the year they went to in Back to the Future 2.

      However, being this is reality, it should come as no shock that "hoverboard" is a marketing gimmick for shitty electric skateboards. The Daily Show covered this well.

      Learning that not only are they shitty electric skateboards but they're also poorly made, dangerous shitty electric skateboards comes as no shock.

    3. Re:Wait, what? by TWX · · Score: 5, Funny

      Learning that not only are they shitty electric skateboards but they're also poorly made, dangerous shitty electric skateboards comes as no shock.

      That depends on the failure mode...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    4. Re:Wait, what? by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      The year of stupid people, really really REALLY stupid people call these hoverboards.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:Wait, what? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In a perverse sort of way, I suppose it counts as 'progress' that Li-ion batteries big enough to be dangerous are also cheap enough to find their way into dangerously shoddy crap that is just an electrical fire waiting to happen; but that doesn't change the fact that dangerously shoddy crap is just an electrical fire waiting to happen; and now it has moved into devices large enough to burn reasonably enthusiastically; which used to be the preserve of fairly expensive gear, with Ni-Cd batteries in the cheap seats.

    6. Re:Wait, what? by The-Ixian · · Score: 2

      probably the same people who name everything "smart"

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
  2. Not hoverboards by ickleberry · · Score: 5, Informative

    These are those silly two-wheeled "segway with no handle" contraptions that are all the fad this year. Bought in by the container load from the Pearl River Delta for half nothing and sold in shops for £499 a pop.

    1. Re:Not hoverboards by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
      Can't we sue them? It's farking ridiculous.

      It's kind of like taking an airplane and calling it a "Starship".

      It's fraud. No ifs, ands or buts about it.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    2. Re:Not hoverboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The manufacturer doesn't typically call them like that. This is the media name for the product.

    3. Re:Not hoverboards by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They aren't being sold for 500 quid, they are being sold for half that direct to consumers on sites like Banggood, eBay and Deal Extreme.

      Consumers directly importing unsafe goods is a growing problem. Drones, hoverboards, chargers, batteries... While European shops have to abide by common safety standards, you can basically import anything you like and most of the time it won't be checked. The only reason hoverboards are is that they cost enough to be charged duty and VAT on.

      I wonder what will happen to all the consumers who bought these things. Most of these sellers make it clear that customs is your problem, and Trading Standards won't pay to return them. The best option is probably to claim on your credit card under section 75, unless you paid by PayPal in which case you are likely screwed.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Not hoverboards by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 0

      It's farking ridiculous.

      So is typing "farking" when you meant "fucking", were thinking "fucking", and everyone else reads it as "fucking".

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    5. Re:Not hoverboards by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      It's kind of like taking an airplane and calling it a "Starship".

      Been done. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    6. Re:Not hoverboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    7. Re:Not hoverboards by Aaden42 · · Score: 1
    8. Re:Not hoverboards by s.petry · · Score: 1, Troll

      PC stands for Pussy Crushing!

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    9. Re:Not hoverboards by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Of course I hate the fact that there are cheaply made, bad component unsafe versions of these things and they should be pursued and dealt with....

      However, the blurb about NYC, trying to ban them because they "weren't licensable" just chaps my ass....

      More and more, govt seems to be there for NOTHING more than regulating everything, and charging you money for the "privilege".

      With this type of regulation and down neck breathing of govt to the public back in decades past...we'd certainly not have the nice things we do today, and buggy whips would still be the fashion everywhere!!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    10. Re:Not hoverboards by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not that silly; some people will find them useful and they are a lot easier to ride than the Solowheel, without adding the bulk of a full Segway. With that said, it makes sense to ban them if they explode and cause fire when charging. Over here (NL) they have just been banned, not because of fire hazards, but because they constitute a "motorized transport" and thus do not fit in our century old definition of traffic. Never mind the fact that these things are safer than roller skates. Of course at some point they will be made legal, as soon as the state makes a law to extract their 30 pieces of silver from riders: mandatory lights, license plates, taxes, and insurance.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    11. Re:Not hoverboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So is typing "farking" when you meant "fucking", were thinking "fucking", and everyone else reads it as "fucking".

      Yeah, but if he had your name, it'd be translated to "boobies," so there you go...

    12. Re:Not hoverboards by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Of course at some point they will be made legal, as soon as the state makes a law to extract their 30 pieces of silver from riders: mandatory lights, license plates, taxes, and insurance.

      What's next?

      Are they going to start trying to require us to register, license and pay tax on fucking bicycles next?!?!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    13. Re:Not hoverboards by Locke2005 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Right, the product name "Hovertrax" is in NO WAY misleading, is it?


      Hint: IT. DOESN'T. HOVER!!!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    14. Re:Not hoverboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      More and more, govt seems to be there for NOTHING more than regulating everything, and charging you money for the "privilege".

      NYC, yes. Most the rest of the US, there's a strong desire to return to the Gilded Age. Except not really. Because people oddly don't like drinking shit and river fires.

      With this type of regulation and down neck breathing of govt to the public back in decades past...we'd certainly not have the nice things we do today, and buggy whips would still be the fashion everywhere!!

      You should really really read history. The fact is, the public generally demands of government that such things exist. There's a reason the first cars were little more than horseless carriages in design, no matter how stupid that was. It's also why there was such a push for speed limits for the longest time ("to not scare the horses").

      Meanwhile, it took over half a century before things like actual safety took center stage. Or fuel economy. Or really any consideration about anything more than the general aesthetics of the damned thing. Which boils down to the market (and regulation) being more in line with public opinion than anything to do with doing things "right", efficiently, or whatever.

      tl;dr - You really should read some more history, take some context on the actual who is regulating (NYC isn't most of America), and actually have some respect for the degree which things aren't regulated but the regulation we do have frequently came about precisely because of how much of a clusterfuck "the free market" runs if left to its own devices. Still, free to complain about NYC specifically in this example. It's just a bad basis for generalization.

    15. Re:Not hoverboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's kind of like taking an airplane and calling it a "Starship".

      You mean like Beechcraft did?

    16. Re:Not hoverboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Been done and the related movie sucked:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starflight:_The_Plane_That_Couldn't_Land

    17. Re: Not hoverboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does for certain definitions of "hover". (I'm joking, but still, consider the 2nd definition in the dictionary.)

    18. Re:Not hoverboards by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      > They aren't being sold for 500 quid, they are being sold for half that direct to consumers on sites like Banggood, eBay and Deal Extreme.

      The cheap ones that will catch on fire and burn your house down sure. But the reputable quality ones are still in the upper 3 figures.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    19. Re:Not hoverboards by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      my vaccum cleaner is called hovertrax. wait, hoover trax. also my blacksmith.

    20. Re:Not hoverboards by Jahoda · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While I am not surprised that clearly- unbiased source, "reason.com" calls this an example of runaway nanny-state regulation, the fact remains that millions use the sidewalks of NYC every single day, and those people have the right to safety.

      Digging a bit deeper into the question of their legality, we find this article from the NY Daile News

      It appears that these motorized electric scooters - which I've personally only recently become aware of, and until reading this article had no idea they were becoming so popular, essentially fall under a broad "motorized transport" classification.

      I guess that it is easy to paint a picture of "big government wants its pound of flesh" surrounding their registration. However, the interpretation I take is that any tom, dick, or harry can't just go driving a motor-propelled vehicle on the streets and sidewalks of NYC. In fact, the whole topic of this thread is that 15,000 of these things are siezed in the UK for being unsafe. Are the scooters being sold on the streets of NYC coming from a different chinese factory? Is there any less of a problem of bootleg, unsafe goods?

      I'm sorry, but I'f I'm walking down the streets of brooklyn or wherever, I don't want someone slamming into me on their unsafe, unregulated, apparently-on-flames motorized fad-scooter.

      But you're right, government only exists to regulate, regulate, regulate. It's all just rules and red tape, isn't it?

    21. Re:Not hoverboards by operagost · · Score: 1

      That's the first thing I thought of. Sorry, no mod points!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    22. Re:Not hoverboards by operagost · · Score: 1

      Where are you going to put the license plate? On your backside?

      I guess a miner's helmet for the headlight...

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    23. Re:Not hoverboards by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Never mind the fact that these things are safer than roller skates.

      I have never seen roller skates burst into flames.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    24. Re:Not hoverboards by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Are they going to start trying to require us to register, license and pay tax on fucking bicycles next?!?!

      When bicycles start bursting into flames, maybe.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    25. Re:Not hoverboards by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Most components I buy off Amazon.com are direct shipped from the far East these days - usually arrive in less than a week, cheap, same quality as domestic, what's not to like?

    26. Re:Not hoverboards by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      With enough speed and friction it can happen, so it just means you've never seen anyone skate really hard.

    27. Re:Not hoverboards by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      Well, public safety is pretty much in the purview of government responsibility, I think.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    28. Re: Not hoverboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hysterical much?

    29. Re:Not hoverboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.spaceport.org.uk

      Disappointing Disclaimer - not a real space port - not the UKs hub for XPrize development

    30. Re:Not hoverboards by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Didn't they also ban the Segway here? That hasn't stopped any of the people I've seen riding them. One of the justification for banning the hoverboard I read said that it's motorised so needs to be regulated as a scooter, but you need to be able to sit on it for that to happen. I instantly thought of the Segway tours you can take through Amsterdam and Rotterdam.

    31. Re:Not hoverboards by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Not as silly as taking a group of musicians and calling them a "Starship".

    32. Re:Not hoverboards by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      The problem is not that all of them catch fire, but the cheap ass Chinese knockoffs are catching fire because they don't conform to UK safety standards. (cue the angry libertarian who will point out that it's not the governments business to protect us if we want to burn our own homes down)

    33. Re:Not hoverboards by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I registered and licensed my bicycle when I was a kid.

    34. Re:Not hoverboards by crow_t_robot · · Score: 1

      Hoverboard 360 Specializes in High End 2 Wheel Motorized Hoverboards

      http://www.hoverboard360.com/

      The owner should be repeatedly kicked right in the dick for this.

    35. Re:Not hoverboards by BancBoy · · Score: 2

      Prior art! Jefferson Airplane

      --
      [UID-HeinzIntel]
    36. Re: Not hoverboards by crow_t_robot · · Score: 1

      The staggering amount of conservative post diarrhea now on these boards is AC......

    37. Re:Not hoverboards by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      I registered and licensed my bicycle when I was a kid.

      Seriously???

      Where do you live? I was being half sarcastic...I never thought they'd really do this somewhere...?!?!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    38. Re:Not hoverboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll bet you've never seen one of these 'hoverboards' burst into flames either.

    39. Re:Not hoverboards by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      The only good thing about these PR=B$ fad units is the limited weight capacity. So lard arses who want to use them, have to walk to burn off the fat before they can use them, in order to stop walking. This kind of makes America a very limited market ;).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    40. Re:Not hoverboards by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I'll bet you've never seen one of these 'hoverboards' burst into flames either.

      You would lose that bet. Did you even glance at the summary?

      Mashable has a story summary with links to video of a man in Alabama with his hoverboard on fire.

      I mean, brother: there's a link to the video right in the story.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    41. Re:Not hoverboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recently saw one of these advertised in a Bed, Bath & Beyond junk mail flyer for $500 and thought it looked kind of neat. Then I noticed it has a maximum speed of 6mph, which is only slightly faster than I walk with the added downside of not providing for exercise.

    42. Re:Not hoverboards by Immerman · · Score: 1

      In fairness, the early history of the automobile was littered with the bodies of people killed by reckless drivers. If the early drivers had behaved responsibly then there wouldn't have been such a strong push for regulation.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    43. Re:Not hoverboards by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It was basically a combo safety and anti-theft program. Kids took a bicycle safety class sponsored by the police force, then you get a little numbered tin tag that got attached to your bike, so if it was stolen and recovered it could be tracked down. Wasn't mandatory but most parents wanted their kids to use it. So technically it wasn't a real license, but that's how a lot of people referred to it.

    44. Re:Not hoverboards by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 1

      "More and more, govt seems to be there for NOTHING more than regulating everything, and charging you money for the "privilege".

      Didn't you get the memo?

      The job of government is to take your rights and sell them back to you as a privilege, subject to an annual (or other) fee and license.

      And honestly, I am *NOT* kidding... just think about it!

    45. Re:Not hoverboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "More and more, govt seems to be there for NOTHING more than regulating everything, and charging you money for the "privilege"."

      That's how socialism acts as the cancer that it is. It spreads to every facet of your life, until you can do nothing unless the government "permits it". You are defacto enslaved at that point.

    46. Re:Not hoverboards by s.petry · · Score: 1

      It is a quote from the new South Park episode you morons with mod points.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    47. Re:Not hoverboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fairness, the early history of the automobile was littered with the bodies of people killed by reckless drivers.

      Unlike horses, guns, or just about any other invention with the potential of lethality with "reckless" behavior.

      If the early drivers had behaved responsibly then there wouldn't have been such a strong push for regulation.

      Or it could have been that early drivers were early "enthusiasts" (ie people rich enough to afford the large upfront cost for a device where one could not get ready fuel (sound familiar?)) and there's a tendency to shun such people either for the eccentricity or their showy use of their wealth. Meanwhile, when there was the threat that hackers could launch nukes--not that they ever could--we saw the passage of insane computer crime laws, which thanks to the internet and international crimes are basically never enforced--not once the deluge of such events happened and became clear it was a lost cause (the idea that large punishment or even several high profile cases are a deterrent...).

      PS - Not how said regulations, especially the ridiculously low speed limits (12MPH), have basically gone away, traffic deaths are one of the major causes of deaths in developed countries, and we don't really see much push for regulation requiring those collision avoidance devices. Nah, popular will tends to override most of that and cost is a big thing.

    48. Re:Not hoverboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thankfully, this is not Fark.

    49. Re:Not hoverboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the nanny-staters come down on everyone versus punish those responsible.

    50. Re:Not hoverboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Right to safety" is slang for control anything and anyone who does something you don't like. Don't like "hoverboards?" Ban them under the guise of safety.

      Meanwhile bicycles continue to be more dangerous than mass murders (twice the deaths in 1 year than in 15+ years of mass murders). But I don't see anyone banning the far more dangerous bicycles

    51. Re:Not hoverboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This x1000. Our country was founded during a time when the thinking was "Everything is ok except that which is forbidden."

      Now it is "Everything is forbidden, except that which govt deems ok."

      People with wooden hammers decide how we live.

    52. Re:Not hoverboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about this..

      CDC, FBI: Bicycle and Falling Deaths Far Exceed Deaths from 'Mass Shootings'

      http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2014/10/02/cdc-fbi-bicycle-and-falling-deaths-far-exceed-deaths-from-mass-shootings/

    53. Re:Not hoverboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're catching on fire while charging. Nothing to do with safety on the sidewalks.

    54. Re:Not hoverboards by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      yes but that's for rich people to use.

      ---

      Snark aside, if the Segway had actually been successful, it would have had to have been licensed. Picture the streets and sidewalks full of people on segways tooling around at 12mph while texting and not paying attention.

      As a novelty item for people to use in a fairly controlled setting, the government doesn't care so much.

      I think hover boards / smart boards are cool. I'm too big (6'5")/249 pounds and wish they'd make them a little larger.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    55. Re:Not hoverboards by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It just seems counter intuitive to ban hoverboards when skateboards can do equal amount of damage.

      But I've only been in NL for 2 months so everything still seems counter intuitive to me, especially the way you pronounce your "g" and "gr" s :-)

    56. Re:Not hoverboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hijack the Starship!

    57. Re:Not hoverboards by Zeroko · · Score: 1

      Neither such offense is nearly as bad as Starbridge Systems calling their supercomputer a "hypercomputer"...they are infinitely far from it. Marketers love blowing things out of proportion.

  3. Why are they even called "hoverboards"?! by tonyyeb · · Score: 1

    I still don't get why they are called "hoverboards" when they are in constant contact with the ground?!

    1. Re:Why are they even called "hoverboards"?! by present_arms · · Score: 2

      Because they have lights and in the dark they appear to hover :)

      --
      http://chimpbox.us
    2. Re:Why are they even called "hoverboards"?! by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Hmmm ... I've seen crappy cars with ugly neon lights along the running boards ... we don't call them hovercars.

      Sorry, 'hoverboard' is some asshole in marketing who things lights and hovering mean the same thing.

      This is a sideways, motorized skateboard.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:Why are they even called "hoverboards"?! by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

      I still don't get why they are called "hoverboards" when they are in constant contact with the ground?!

      To a 3rd party, the person riding one seems to be moving without actually walking, as if hovering.

    4. Re:Why are they even called "hoverboards"?! by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      because it fools the arseholes into buying them so they can boast down the pub/club/wimpy bar - equivalent to a fashion victim

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    5. Re:Why are they even called "hoverboards"?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because marketing. And because the actual hoverboards are still in the prototype phase, and not yet practical to bring to market.

    6. Re:Why are they even called "hoverboards"?! by TWX · · Score: 2

      One person's asshole in marketing is another person's genius in marketing. Given that these things have caught the public's attention and are being perceived as being cool when they function properly, arguably this leans toward the latter.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    7. Re:Why are they even called "hoverboards"?! by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      "Perceived as being cool", by whom? Everyone I know who's seen one had the Daily Show reaction: "So... it's just a Segway without the handlebars?". No one thinks Segways are cool, and no one thinks "hoverboards" are cool. Rather; *everyone* thinks that an actual hoverboard would be awesome and cool, if they were to be brought to market. But no one is fooled by these frauds.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    8. Re:Why are they even called "hoverboards"?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To a 3rd party, the person riding one seems to be moving without actually walking

      So just like EVERY OTHER VEHICLE EVER?

    9. Re:Why are they even called "hoverboards"?! by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Not yet practical to bring to market? You mean that entire cities, or at least skate parks aren't paved with superconducting magnetic blocks and massive LN reservoirs?

      That's a pretty interesting interpretation of "not yet practical"

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    10. Re:Why are they even called "hoverboards"?! by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2

      Lot of hot youtubers like them so fans of those hot youtubers will have seen them and like them.

      There are already cool videos of a 7 year old doing skatepark stunts on one.

      The fact you can do 7 to 8 mph on one and well made ones have a 15 mile range is pretty damn impressive.

      A sub 3 hour charging time too.

      I'm 6'5" and I'm 25 pounds over the weight limit (so probably greatly reduced range) or I'd own one yesterday.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    11. Re:Why are they even called "hoverboards"?! by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      The Lexus hoverboard ONLY works on a very expensive prebuilt metal track, which gets around the biggest drawback of a real hoverboard: there is no way to turn it. Once set in motion, it obeys Newton's First Law. The Hendo only requires a ferrous surface, but I can't believe the batteries last very long, and see the above reference to Newton's First law of motion: it doesn't turn.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    12. Re:Why are they even called "hoverboards"?! by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      "Hmmm ... I've seen crappy cars with ugly neon lights along the running boards ... we don't call them hovercars."
      It just takes one marketing exec to read your sarcastic comment to make it reality.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    13. Re:Why are they even called "hoverboards"?! by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      It just takes one marketing exec to read your sarcastic comment to make it reality.

      It happened before and it will happen again.

    14. Re:Why are they even called "hoverboards"?! by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      I've done it before. It's quite easy actually.

    15. Re:Why are they even called "hoverboards"?! by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Well, it will take someone in marketing to arrive at an interpretation of "reality" which coincides with how you used it. ;-)

      Slapping a sticker on a normal car to call it a hovercar, well, let's just say that's not "reality".

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    16. Re:Why are they even called "hoverboards"?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to be angrily agreeing with the OP.

    17. Re:Why are they even called "hoverboards"?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Higgs boson will provide a way. We will eventually be able to convert potential energy directly into momentum without mechanical instrumentation. Then it will be easy to hover, accelerate, turn, stop, etc., without needing to touch anything.

      And, since we are getting that anti-aging gene therapy in a few years, some of us will live to see it!

      It'll happen. Just you watch.

    18. Re:Why are they even called "hoverboards"?! by TWX · · Score: 1

      It's the Segway without the Segway. The Segway looks stupid because of the huge wheels and handle. Take that away and you're down to as minimalist a powered vehicle as has realistically existed.

      The idea itself is kind of interesting. The name is dumb and the implementation from both design and implementation perspectives needs work, but this thing takes the concept that the Segway attempted to create, which was a small machine capable of transporting a person, and reduces it to the size of a personal possession.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  4. Confusing Name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here I was thinking 2015 had actually arrived and then I read TFA and found out its only those stupid handleless segways.

  5. Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me guess. Made in China?

    1. Re:Hmmm... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well... duh. What't not made in China these days?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Hmmm... by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

      By many, many factories that quickly retooled to create competing variations on the concept, presumably many of these are poorly designed and could ruin the potential market for ones that work well.

      http://boingboing.net/2015/11/...

  6. Unsafe unbranded clones prone to combustion by RogueyWon · · Score: 4, Informative

    The BBC article on this subject makes clear that these are cheap, unbranded Chinese and East Asian knock-offs with a documented history demonstrating that they (and specifically their chargers) are a fire risk. That BBC piece really should have been TFA.

    There are some oddities around these "hoverboards", in the UK, though. Specifically, it's illegal to operate one on either a public road or a pavement, meaning that they are legal only for use on private land. Technically, I think, the same is true of Segways.

    1. Re:Unsafe unbranded clones prone to combustion by DrXym · · Score: 2

      These devices also look perfect anyone wishing to increase their chance of suffering severe front or back skull trauma.

    2. Re:Unsafe unbranded clones prone to combustion by JBMcB · · Score: 4, Informative

      They aren't really "Knock-Offs," there really isn't an official manufacturer of "Hoverboards."

      http://www.npr.org/sections/mo...

      --
      My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    3. Re:Unsafe unbranded clones prone to combustion by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      The hoverboard charger isn't the only thing from China that's a fire risk. The cheap knockoffs of the iPhone charger have the same risk. If you're lucky, they will just stop working after about a week.

    4. Re:Unsafe unbranded clones prone to combustion by chispito · · Score: 1

      these are cheap, unbranded Chinese and East Asian knock-offs

      I'm not sure I've ever seen the "genuine" product.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    5. Re:Unsafe unbranded clones prone to combustion by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      I saw the genuine product in a movie once... but it still bogged down going over water!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    6. Re:Unsafe unbranded clones prone to combustion by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      These devices also look perfect anyone wishing to increase their chance of suffering severe front or back skull trauma.

      We can only hope.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:Unsafe unbranded clones prone to combustion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They aren't really "Knock-Offs," there really isn't an official manufacturer of "Hoverboards."

      http://www.npr.org/sections/mo...

      Bullshit, Inventist/Solowheel's Hovertrax was the first and patented. They did a kickstarter though to get started and every Shenzen factory compied it en mass before they could even ship to their backers though. Problem is, patents don't mean shit with the ITC in the US unless you have big money to back you, and it's a whack-a-mole game as blocking import of one manufacturer/shipper doesn't stop the next bastard from renaming and re-exporting again.

      Hell, I think the Hovertrax might be the only one with regenerative braking to boost range, and their chargers aren't going to fry your house. But they are still kinda expensive compared to the clones.

    8. Re:Unsafe unbranded clones prone to combustion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love the way that things are "Chinese knockoffs" of products that are originally made in China anyways -

  7. cars are unsafe too by deodiaus2 · · Score: 1

    Why not grab a shipment of Ford cars being brought into the country too. And how about them iPhones with pesky rare earth minerals extracted from war torn nations? And lets not forget DeBeer's stash of diamonds illegally exported from South Africa. We should take them as they have the potential to release CO2 into the atmosphere if they were super cooled and dropped into a vat of liquid oxygen!

    1. Re:cars are unsafe too by RogueyWon · · Score: 2

      If somebody tried to import a shipment of fake Ford cars, which didn't meet safety standards and were prone to catching fire while parked, you can bet that they would be seized and destroyed.

      It's legal to sell these "hoverboards" in the UK, provided they comply with the safety standards for electrical devices. It's not legal to operate one on a public road or pavement, but that wasn't the issue here.

    2. Re:cars are unsafe too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are confounding 2 things: counterfeiting and safety. Counterfeiting is illegal. Having an unsafe electronic device - not so much. It might be illegal to sell to the general public, illegal to market it as safe, etc etc, but ultimately, if the consumer is aware of the risks, then it should be an option. Seizing due to safety concerns alone is way too far down the slippery slope for me to be comfortable with - it effectively means the government can seize anything.

    3. Re:cars are unsafe too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you a retard? These are electrically unsafe. They are illegal devices that do not conform to the stringent electrical safety laws of the UK. China do not understand how the UK power system operates, many devices fall foul of the most elementary standards. The UK has requirements for AC plugs, from size, fuse (China even makes fake fuses), earth pin configuration based on supply requirements, cable current rating, et al. You wouldn't know this, but cunts like you think you know everything there is to know.

      Perhaps if you weren't such a wanker, or a dumb fucking cunt, you'd learn a little about why something is impounded. It has nothing to so with falling off the glorified motorised skateboard, you fucking tosser of the first order.

      Stick to being gay, the world will be better off with your out the gene pool.

      Thanks,
      the rest of the world.

    4. Re:cars are unsafe too by RogueyWon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's legal to buy plenty of things which can be dangerous if used improperly, from cars to parachutes to kitchen knives.

      What we do have, however, are laws on issues such as electrical safety standards. These exist to provide the public with a degree of reassurance that devices which are not being used in a manner which is inherently unsafe - which are, for instance, just charging their batteries from the mains, will not do things like catching fire and burning down their homes.

      I regard that as a good thing. If you want to buy a hoverboard, then go out and buy one which has passed those basic electrical safety checks. Nobody's preventing you from doing that.

      This is about giving people a basic level of confidence that every last electrical device they buy isn't going to put them at significant risk of their house burning down. I'm in favour of that.

    5. Re:cars are unsafe too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not grab a shipment of Ford cars being brought into the country too.

      http://www.wired.com/2011/04/cars-uncle-sam-says-you-cant-have/
      http://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/local-media-release/2013-08-15-040000/illegally-imported-and-unsafe-land-rover-defender
      http://jalopnik.com/why-are-the-feds-obsessed-with-seizing-these-peoples-ol-1672381729?newstream=off&utm_expid=66866090-71.ZDl_b8uGQgG7HBI5sxDRgQ.1&utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F

      Don't know about the UK, but the US does it. Oddly, the examples that came up are mostly Land Rovers. Heh.

      And how about them iPhones with pesky rare earth minerals extracted from war torn nations?

      https://www.apple.com/supplier-responsibility/pdf/Conflict_Minerals_Report.pdf

      How about them?

      And lets not forget DeBeer's stash of diamonds illegally exported from South Africa. We should take them as they have the potential to release CO2 into the atmosphere if they were super cooled and dropped into a vat of liquid oxygen!

      We should put DeBeer's out of business, that's for sure.

    6. Re: cars are unsafe too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The above poster owns one. From the looks of it, it looks like he's fallen off of it a couple times. I think he's suffering from Assholeism. Wot m8 you wanker retard.

    7. Re:cars are unsafe too by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      Seizing due to safety concerns alone is way too far down the slippery slope for me to be comfortable with - it effectively means the government can seize anything.

      They're not seizing them from consumers, doofus. They're seizing them at the port of entry. The same way they would seize a shipment of defective propane tanks.

      They're not saying you can't sell a hoverboard. They're saying you can't sell a hoverboard that will blow the fuck up.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    8. Re:cars are unsafe too by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      Are you a retard? These are electrically unsafe. They are illegal devices that do not conform to the stringent electrical safety laws of the UK. China do not understand how the UK power system operates, many devices fall foul of the most elementary standards. The UK has requirements for AC plugs, from size, fuse (China even makes fake fuses), earth pin configuration based on supply requirements, cable current rating, et al. You wouldn't know this, but cunts like you think you know everything there is to know.

      If you read that with a thick Scottish accent, it's much more entertaining.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    9. Re:cars are unsafe too by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      We should put DeBeer's out of business, that's for sure.

      Aye man. Den we only drink DeWhiskey.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    10. Re:cars are unsafe too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you read that with a thick Scottish accent, it's much more entertaining.

      So is the phonebook, but nobody ever paid Sean Connery to do it.

      We did get one read by Dick van Dyke though.

    11. Re:cars are unsafe too by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      All the Libertarians in my country think this is a bad idea. They really want to remove all these regulations and "let the market decide". I often wish there was a way to allow JUST them to do this, since it wouldn't take too long before they would all be dead from some faulty cheap stuff like this.

    12. Re:cars are unsafe too by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      meh, it's not "do not understand" it's "understand but don't care". This is the Libertarians dream come true...capitalism with no government regs! Because we consumers will be able to just "blacklist" all these "bad actors" before anyone dies, and someone magically just know when they switch company names.

    13. Re:cars are unsafe too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you not see that banning the sale of the damn things is different from seizing them at the port of entry, doofus?
      Fine - if they're electrically unsafe, they're not legal for sale to consumers. That means the retailer that bought them has 15,000 units it can't sell and must either return for a refund, eat the cost, or come up with some other way to get some money back (like selling it for scrap). In any case, they own the crap they bought - the government has no right to seize it, unless they try to do something illegally with it - like sell it if it doesn't meet electrical code. The government should not have the right to seize whatever they want because it doesn't meet their ideas of quality. Why do you not see how dangerous a precedent this is?

    14. Re:cars are unsafe too by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      The government should not have the right to seize whatever they want because it doesn't meet their ideas of quality.

      Not quality. Safety.

      Why do you not see how dangerous a precedent this is?

      This isn't a precedent, it's been going on for as long as there have been governments. Do you realize if the government finds animals that are being shipped into the country that are infected with mad cow disease that they don't just send them back, they seize and destroy them? If there's tainted medicine government doesn't just tell the company, "Oh, you'll have to sell this somewhere else, sorry".

      Do you remember a few years ago when the Chinese were trying to import pet foods that were poisonous and killing animals? The government seized shipping containers full of the stuff.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  8. Not surprising by Drethon · · Score: 1

    Radio control enthusiasts have known those batteries are very sensitive for years. Don't over heat them and don't shock them. Between the lowest bidder manufacturing these things and the number of crashes that occur in use of the hoverboards, this was probably bound to happen.

  9. Hoverboards and universal health care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would governments ban hoverboards (or other fun yet somewhat less safe devices, like bicycles) if it was determined there were savings to be made to universal health plans? Does the public good of tax savings/resources outweigh individual choice of risks?

    1. Re:Hoverboards and universal health care by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Would governments ban hoverboards (or other fun yet somewhat less safe devices, like bicycles) if it was determined there were savings to be made to universal health plans? Does the public good of tax savings/resources outweigh individual choice of risks?

      What about universal fire fighting service? Which is probably more relevant, since the BBC article references two fires in two weeks in London due to these devices.

      Bicycles are considered healthy, and are slightly subsidised (reduced tax if bought through your employer to use to cycle to work).

    2. Re:Hoverboards and universal health care by Malc · · Score: 4, Informative

      What about universal fire fighting service? Which is probably more relevant, since the BBC article references two fires in two weeks in London due to these devices.

      Three fires in London over ten days in October:
      http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/busi...

    3. Re:Hoverboards and universal health care by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

      Is the government going to seize matches now?

      Matches have been known to start fires, btw.

    4. Re:Hoverboards and universal health care by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Is the government going to seize matches now?

      Matches have been known to start fires, btw.

      People are well aware of the danger of matches, and of the two kinds of matches (safety / traditional) all brands are similar. They aren't well aware of the significantly greater danger of some brands of these toys.

      I don't know the detail of the law, but I think you can still buy one of these dangerous toys -- but you'd need to import it yourself, and it needs to be clear that you don't intend to resell it. (The regulations are called "trading standards", they're rules for retailers.) This is how things like cheap Android development boards are imported, since they don't meet the criteria for shielded electronics etc.

    5. Re:Hoverboards and universal health care by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Yeah evil gubbermint banning the sale of dodgy things liable to catch fire.

      Your house burns down and you die? Vote with your wallet and don't buy from that company again. FFS people should take personal responsibility for their actions.

      Sodding nanny state. I'll bet it's the EU's fault. Yeah.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    6. Re:Hoverboards and universal health care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I strike a match, I expect a fire to start. And I'm going to be there when it does.

      When I plug a device in to recharge, I don't expect a fire to start. And personally, I don't want to have to spend the next 12 hours watching the charger just in case it does.

      Your mileage may, of course, vary.

  10. Cameron Super Nanny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of them caught fire while being recharged, ergo to save us from the danger these dangerous things are being confiscated at the border! And yet when an iPhone bursts into flames, nothing is done:

    https://uk.news.yahoo.com/iphone-4-catches-fire-on-plane.html

    Isn't it funny, that someone elected to be a leader is now the worst super nanny of all time?

    1. Re: Cameron Super Nanny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The chargers are out of standard measurements for safe handling - that's pre Cameron. The charge cut off/faulty cells are in the knock offs only and the risk they pose is different to the general risk of vehicles in public. If you deal with these batteries and poorly made crap often you'll know to charge in an ammo tin or bricked off area and to never leave it alone etc but real people don't do this.

      Cameron is totally a cunt, but for other reasons

    2. Re:Cameron Super Nanny by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      How is it Apple's fault, when it was a replacement battery, and the third party person who replaced it left a tiny screw that punctured the battery, when the put everything back together?

  11. That's not a reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Specifically, it's illegal to operate one on either a public road or a pavement"

    There is no law letting them ban import of these, they are perfectly legal for private roads and surfaces. What they're trying to do is find a way to ban them claiming unsafe chargers or non certified plugs.
    But yet lots of devices are imported with a charger for a different market that is later adjusted for sale. The ban is on the sale not the import.

    1. Re:That's not a reason by RogueyWon · · Score: 2

      No, and plenty of "hoverboards" are legally imported into and sold in the UK without being impounded. Just as plenty of Segways are imported and sold, despite being subject to similar restrictions around use on public roads.

      The problem here is that for a story which has had a fair bit of coverage in the press today, the article selected as TFA is a really bad one and gives very little detail of the case. The hoverboards which were seized were cheap knock-offs, sold for substantially less than the "branded" devices. They don't meet UK electrical safety rules, so they are seized and destroyed. The same would go for any other electrical device that didn't meet those rules.

  12. because TFA ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uhh, because you didn't read TFA, it's like impounding a shipment of Ford knockoffs that don't have airbags and have steering gears that are likely to fail.

    1. Re:because TFA ... by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      He probably thinks the Nanny State passed Ohm's Law.

    2. Re:because TFA ... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      He probably thinks the Nanny State passed Ohm's Law.

      Georg Ohm was an SJW.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:because TFA ... by shadowrat · · Score: 1

      He probably thinks the Nanny State passed Ohm's Law.

      there was a lot of resistance to that one. but it's currently on the books because it passed with enough volts

      gah. i really had to force that last one in there :/

  13. I wish they wouldnt call those things hoverboards by JustNiz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    they clearly DONT hover.

  14. Dumb question by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    Are we pushing hoverboard technology too far too quickly, or are there just a group of criminal sociopaths manufacturing unsafe devices at Christmastime and pumping them into the market?

    It's the latter, obviously.

    Unsafe charging has nothing to do with the, ahem, "hovering" technology.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  15. Annoyance will be outweighed by humor by coldsalmon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hoverboard users running into me on the sidewalk will be balanced by watching them accidentally run into small bumps and fall flat on their stupid faces.

    1. Re:Annoyance will be outweighed by humor by Lilliparker12 · · Score: 0

      Health is wealth. Health is the main and most important part of every person life. These days the youth waste there health in dirty things like drug addiction. christmas picture messages

    2. Re:Annoyance will be outweighed by humor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Health is wealth. Health is the main and most important part of every person life. These days the youth waste there health in dirty things like drug addiction. http://www.bestchristmasmessages.com/

  16. Option #3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Are we pushing hoverboard technology too far too quickly, or are there just a group of criminal sociopaths manufacturing unsafe devices at Christmastime and pumping them into the market?"

    No, the answer is the third option: The nanny state is in full swing and needs to justify their existence.

  17. Re:Welcome to the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You racist!

    We also like Rugby, Cricket, tea and hobnobs.

  18. sympathy for the retailers/manufacturers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean they paid for that product. If it retails for £499, then it's likely that each board cost them £400 or so to buy/make.
    That makes for a £6,000,000 seizure of devices which really have no business being illegal. (I mean the Wright Flyer was not exactly safe either - Imagine if we had the government seizing those sorts of things...)

    1. Re:sympathy for the retailers/manufacturers? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, except these are knockoff devices, with unsafe electrics.

      Some idiot falling off his stupid not-a-Segway isn't what the concern here is. The concern is same idiot plugging it in to charge, and burning down his apartment complex because it's a cheap knockoff that was wired by an incompetent, and has batteries with known failed cells that rupture when bumped around too much... you know, kind of like when an idiot falls off his stupid not-a-Segway.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    2. Re:sympathy for the retailers/manufacturers? by crow_t_robot · · Score: 1

      Sympathy for some shady fuck that makes an unsafe product very liable to burn your fucking house down? What is your planet of origin? Oh, right, another AC neocon/free market jerk-off post.

  19. It's very simple: by kheldan · · Score: 1

    There are 'manufacturers' (using the term very loosely here) in China and other Asian countries, who produce whatever cheap shitty garbage they can, and sell it to the West. There's little to no quality control of any kind, and they really don't give a damn about the consequences, they only care about profit.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  20. You linked to an article in Reason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously? The author is literally frothing at the mouth in that one.

    Couldn't you find something more objective? This is supposed to be journalism.

  21. Not knockoffs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're not knockoffs, there is no complaint of IP rights infringement against these hoverboards there is no "branded" device you speak of that they are knock offs for.

    What they're doing is trying to find excuses to seize them, but its pure nanny state, the law doesn't let them seize stuff that MIGHT be used illegally on a road.

    "They don't meet UK electrical safety rules, so they are seized and destroyed"
    No, *some* of the charging cable doesn't meet the standards, and the charging cable can be seized and destroyed only if they can show it is shipped with the unit. Its very common to see goods imported and then modified for UK market compliance.

    This is a full on nanny state ism.

    1. Re:Not knockoffs by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      UK is the only place I know of where appliances are sold without power cords.

      This law they are afraid of driving it needs rethinking.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    2. Re:Not knockoffs by raburton · · Score: 4, Informative

      UK is the only place I know of where appliances are sold without power cords.

      Really? I live in the UK and regularly buy appliances of various kinds and they have always come with a power cord, so this is news to me. I can just about remember a time when it was standard for devices to come without a plug and you were expected to wire your own on (presumably a hang over from the change in plug types and the fact that older ones were still in common usage for a while), but it's been a requirement for them to come with plugs for probably 20+ years.

    3. Re:Not knockoffs by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      No, electric dryers and stoves in the US have cords that are sold separately, since there are apparently several different plug configurations. (Strange that there is no standard.)

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    4. Re:Not knockoffs by operagost · · Score: 1

      Several = two.

      There are two standards, since some mid-1990s NEC. Before then, 208/240V 3-prong was the standard. In the 1990s, the NEC added an equipment ground requirement for 240V appliances and all new installations in the USA since 2004 require the use of 4-prong receptacles. Since most houses still have 3-prong receptacles, you need to buy the appropriate cord.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    5. Re:Not knockoffs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are two standards, since some mid-1990s NEC. Before then, 208/240V 3-prong was the standard. In the 1990s, the NEC added an equipment ground requirement for 240V appliances and all new installations in the USA since 2004 require the use of 4-prong receptacles. Since most houses still have 3-prong receptacles, you need to buy the appropriate cord.

      Right, two standards, but the new standard has a lot of plugs driers and ovens can use all of these: L14-20, 14-20, L14-30, 14-30, 14-40 and 14-50. See the thing is, you don't know how many amps the outlet can handle. They aren't all the same, so the socket will be different. That's why you put the right cord on you drier/oven for that outlet. I agree 30 amps is pretty common, but it's not a sure thing.

    6. Re:Not knockoffs by virtual_mps · · Score: 1

      Dryers have to be 30A. If you have some kind of older circuit with a higher rating, it should be downrated (with a lower breaker). I think the biggest reason the cord isn't included is so that the warehouse store can charge an extra $20.

  22. Obligatory dirty Hungarian phrasebook reference by GbrDead · · Score: 4, Funny

    My hoverboard is full of eels.

    1. Re:Obligatory dirty Hungarian phrasebook reference by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Drop your panties Sir William, I cannot wait 'til lunchtime.

    2. Re:Obligatory dirty Hungarian phrasebook reference by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      I've had it with these motherfucking eels on this motherfucking hoverboard!

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  23. From the PCMag Review by wiredog · · Score: 2
    1. Re:From the PCMag Review by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      "The MonoRover's power adapter is legitimately scary."

      It's scary because it has a fan in it? That probably makes it about ten times safer.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  24. NPR's Planet Money on Hoverboard Development by Koreantoast · · Score: 2

    There was actually a very timely Planet Money podcast on how the hoverboards were developed. Apparently the concept was created by a Chinese inventor who quickly lost control of the idea to the Shenzhen wild west where dozens of firms began creating variants of the hoverboard. Given the nature of how the product was introduced, through numerous companies with no clear originating firm, it's no surprise why you have so many quality control issues without a single manufacturer that has a "brand" on these hoverboards they're trying to maintain.

    1. Re:NPR's Planet Money on Hoverboard Development by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chinese American inventor Shane Chen is the brains behind the original. See inventist.com

  25. yeah... no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Are we pushing hoverboard technology too far too quickly,"

    1. Re:yeah... no. by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      and by "hoverboard technology" the writer actually means "cheap chinese knockoffs with bad wiring"

      By the way, why the fuck are we calling these things 'hoverboards' when there is absolutely no hovering involved? It's a segway without the handle thing, and less capable.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  26. Sorry kids by PPH · · Score: 2

    It's going to be Jarts again for Christmas.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  27. Brits of /. by GregoryOakley-steven · · Score: 1

    BBC One's Watchdog episode on later today has a segment on so called "hover boards".

  28. Hoverboards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why can't we just call these rollerboards? And while you're at it stop calling quad-copters drones.

  29. STOP CALLING THEM HOVERBOARDS by PPNSteve · · Score: 1

    Please stop. PLEASE
    .
    These are silly two-wheeled "segway with no handle" contraptions, not hoverboards. Not even close.

    --
    PPN
  30. Where is my self drying jacket? by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

    I am still waiting for my self drying jacket and self lacing shoes.

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  31. They aren't "hoverboards". by koan · · Score: 1

    They are for idiots, be thankful you no longer have to guess who is the douche, you can tell right away by the wheels under their feet and the Apple watch on their wrist.

    You thought multirotors ("drones") were the threat? Think again; as you are far more likely to be injured by an idiot on one of these than by a multirotor.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    1. Re: They aren't "hoverboards". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems like it's kids or children who want one of these. My 14 year old son wants one. I told him ask your mother ;)

  32. Keep it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got a Pitbull, now!

  33. These "hoverboards" never made sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want something n00b-friendly then you need a control stalk like the Segway has. These "hoverboard" devices on the other hand require skill and practice. The simple fact is, you would be better off with an electric skateboard which can be the same size but has a more reliable steering mechanism and the whole mechanics are way simpler, more efficient (much longer range), and more reliable.

    I honestly don't understand why there isn't a "mini" segway clone that is the size of these "hoverboards" except with a segway-like control stalk that could be folded up. No need for the complicated dual foot steering/balancing mechanism. It would be a much simpler design both in control and mechanically. The fact that I have to point this out proves that most of these clone makers have no innovation skill whatsoever. There is actually some good innovative work being done in China, but these "hoverboards" are not it... Not at all.

  34. Oh shit, I just got one delivered LAST NIGHT! by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

    It came in the mail yesterday, direct from China. I tested it last night, seems to work fine. Haven't charged it yet, it was already charged up when I unboxed it.

    Mine is the larger 8-inch second generation unit with the Bluetooth connection. This type: http://g02.s.alicdn.com/kf/HTB...

    According to the info I just gleaned from this thread, the device itself is fine and it's a defective charger that could cause a fire, specifically the power cut-off that detects a fully charged battery and automatically stops delivering juice to the battery.... this feature could be non-functional. So my plan for tonight is:

    -Test charge the unit for the first time, keeping it and the charger in a relatively safe area in case of a fire, and keeping a fire extinguisher on hand.

    -According to the (very poorly written, in broken English) manual, a normal charging cycle takes about 2-3 hours. So make sure to always manually disconnect the charger after 2 hours and not rely on the auto power cutoff.

    Lucky I didn't have time to play around with the thing more yesterday, if I did then I would've probably left it charging overnight. Also lucky I came across this information literally hours after I took delivery of the device.

  35. Re: Welcome to the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And buttfucking kids. England only exports two things: shit and lineys. But I'm repeating myself.

  36. Airplanes weren't safe for the first ten years by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Didn't stop people described as "aviation hobbyists" from building and using them.

    Lots of people did lots of unsafe things in those.

    And now they're safer than cars.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  37. Happy Fun Board by T.E.D. · · Score: 5, Funny
    You can kinda see their concern, if you read the disclaimer on its own marketing material:

    Yes, it's Happy Fun Board! The toy sensation that's sweeping the nation! Only 14.95 at participating stores! Get one today!

    Warning: Pregnant women, the elderly, and children under 10 should avoid prolonged exposure to Happy Fun Board.

    Caution: Happy Fun Board may suddenly accelerate to dangerous speeds.

    Happy Fun Board contains a liquid core, which, if exposed due to rupture, should not be touched, inhaled, or looked at.

    Do not use Happy Fun Board on concrete.

    Discontinue use of Happy Fun Board if any of the following occurs:

    • itching
    • vertigo
    • dizziness
    • tingling in extremities
    • loss of balance or coordination
    • slurred speech
    • temporary blindness
    • profuse sweating
    • or heart palpitations
    • If Happy Fun Board begins to smoke, get away immediately. Seek shelter and cover head.

      Happy Fun Board may stick to certain types of skin.

      When not in use, Happy Fun Board should be returned to its special container and kept under refrigeration. Failure to do so relieves the makers of Happy Fun Board, Wacky Products Incorporated, and its parent company, Global Chemical Unlimited, of any and all liability.

      Ingredients of Happy Fun Board include an unknown glowing green substance which fell to Earth, presumably from outer space.

      Happy Fun Board has been shipped to our troops in Saudi Arabia and is being dropped by our warplanes on Iraq.

      Do not taunt Happy Fun Board.

      Happy Fun Board comes with a lifetime warranty.

      Happy Fun Board! Accept no substitutes!

  38. there are 2 standards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The old 3-prong standard where the neutral doubled as safety ground, and the newer 4-prong standard that separates out safety ground from the neutral conductor.

    In Canada new appliances generally come with the 4-prong plug attached, and if you have an old house you replace the cord with the older version.

  39. Euphemism for 'Chinese'? by sethstorm · · Score: 1, Funny

    a group of criminal sociopaths manufacturing unsafe devices at Christmastime

    I believe they're called Chinese.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  40. MOD PARENT -=DOWN=- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your an idiot. No one cares, english is a living language..

    1. Re:MOD PARENT -=DOWN=- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Your an idiot. No one cares, english is a living language..

      It was, until you murdered it.

  41. Oh, for fuck's sake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the last time, they're NOT GODDAMNED FUCKING HOVERBOARDS IF THEY DON'T ACTUALLY FUCKING HOVER!

    They're sideways skateboards. Whoopidy fucking doo! Who gives a fuck? Riding one of there things doesn't make you a goddamned fucking douchefag-fucktard, they just make you LOOK like one. On the other hand, maybe I'm wrong. Maybe riding one DOES make you a goddamned fucking douchefag-fucktard. They go well with Google Glass and Bain masks.

    Go buy a real skateboard, and actually skate, you bunch of shitheads. Or don't. It makes no difference, because being the kind of person who would ride one of these things is its own punishment.