Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Telemetry Collection, Explained (theregister.co.uk)

New submitter Poohsticks writes: There's a nice breakdown of the updated information from Microsoft about what they are doing with the telemetry data that Windows 10 is collecting (original Technet article here) by Chris Williams at The Register. Interesting finds that better explain what's happening with that data (and how to control it).

213 comments

  1. SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by lesincompetent · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Very little is explained. And there's no OFF setting.
    Fuck Microsoft, hard.

    1. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Much of the info about how Windows and apps are functioning is deleted within 30 days."
      Yeah right. They won't even toll you how long exactly they store anything.
      This 'data collection' is a gaping wound in the Microsoft beast, infected with worms. I just hope the professional user will finally realize what is happening here and leave the sinking ship.

    2. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by buck-yar · · Score: 5, Informative

      Found this on reddit:

      I've seen theres a lot of speculation on whether the observed network connections from Windows 10 with privacy options on are actually spying or not, and figured some actual evidence would be in order.

      Anyone can recreate this for themselves:

                      Fresh install of Windows 10.
                      Set all privacy options to off, disable cortana, disable web search
                      Ensure all updates are done. Close all programs.
                      Install Fiddler, and enable HTTPS sniffing. (If you use wireshark, you wont be able to view the HTTPS)
                      Press stream in fiddler.
                      Click the windows search bar, type any letter, watch the HTTPS session to bing.com appear.

      Im still trying to figure out exactly what it is that it is transmitting, but its for sure sending a user-agent string that identifies itself as Cortana.

      Some observed behaviors:

                      Clicking on a link from an application (in this case, a download link from within Fiddler) submits the URL you are visiting to urs.microsoft.com.
                      Opening applications-- even with SmartScreen disabled-- opens sessions to apprep.smartscreen.microsoft.com and, among other things, submits the hash of the application. EDIT: Apparently you must also disable smartscreen in edge. Even so, it will initiate a connection to w.apprep.smartscreen.microsoft.com
                      Typing anything into the search bar will, regardless of settings, initiate an HTTPS session to www.bing.com. It will transmit a cookie, though so far I have not seen anything in there that looks like keystroke monitoring, as the only thing that appears to change between attempts is an HV section of the cookie. It appears to be downloading javascript, and submitting identifying data (screen resolution, install date, SID). The URL it uses is https://www.bing.com/manifest/... [bing.com]
                      Opening the settings app and going into account options sometimes opens a session to public-family.api.account.microsoft.com:443. I suppose this would be expected.

    3. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can turn off Windows Update by setting the following registry entries:
      Add a REG_DWORD value called DoNotConnectToWindowsUpdateInternetLocations to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\WindowsUpdate and set the value to 1.
      -and-
      Add a REG_DWORD value called DisableWindowsUpdateAccess to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\WindowsUpdate and set the value to 1.

      Fuck microsoft very hard - to disable the We'reInstalling10WhetherYouAskedForItOrNot "recommended update", my grandmother has to open the registry and create 2 REG_DWORD variables. In that craptacular interface. Legendary stuff. Like grandma is going to do that without screwing up.

      It will be about 2 hours before someone publishes an MSI that does ALL of the ShutDownTelemetry tasks, and proves once again, that there are still undocumented telemetry messages being passed. Would it be TOO much trouble for Microsoft to provide a tool that performs the 40+ tasks to turn off all telemetry? Apparently far too hard for the world's largest software team to handle.

      What the fuck is Nadella doing? And why is he overseeing the worst abuses that ms have ever embarked upon (and that's saying something)?

    4. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what? All browsers do that. Go check yourself. Typing into the search bar sends data to www.google.com. That is how typeahead works. Clicking on links, ditto.

    5. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blocked at router. Thanks for the info.

    6. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by buck-yar · · Score: 3, Informative

      I see you missed the "regardless of setting" part

    7. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "...submits the URL you are visiting to urs.microsoft.com"

      URS = URL Reputation Service - have you also disabled the phishing protection options in IE/Edge..?

    8. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've done this myself and the behaviour was different. No access to bing.com. He seems confused by Smartscreen as well, not realizing that it works by submitting URLs to Microsoft for auditing when they are opened in Edge.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple. Don't use bing and send all links/uris‘ to 127.0.0.1 via hosts file. Done.

      If you want to know how to modify the hosts file just Google search for mvps hosts. Their website has a guide.

      Why complain when you can just black hole these things?

    10. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So would it help to run non-MS browsers?

    11. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      No, most search bars do that by default, but allow you to disable the search suggestion logic.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    12. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      It's how type ahead works.

      [Citation needed] * I think you are wrong here :P

    13. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      Simple. Don't use bing and send all links/uris to 127.0.0.1 via hosts file. Done.

      Someone will say then: "China-like dictatorship!" :P

    14. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by buck-yar · · Score: 2

      So if he disabled search suggestions, you still expect it to communicate the search to MS? Your logic is puzzling.

    15. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hosts is almost always the wrong solution to any given problem. It would be better if it did not exist.

    16. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You should think more and use caps less. That might (note: might) make you look less stupid in the future.

      Yes, I'm being snarky. You deserve it.

      You're welcome.

    17. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So i just checked this on my machine and this is bullshit. I am running enterprise however and know how to actually manage the privacy settings, so that may be helping.

    18. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by jon3k · · Score: 1

      That's a little vague, isn't it? The list exactly what settings they disabled and nowhere did they mention turning off search suggestions. So I'd like to know specifically if they disabled that feature.

    19. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually after thinking about this a bit more i think i know what buck missed. There is nothing in the directions about removing the built in bing apps, typing in search opens the start menu and displays live tiles, and shockingly enough "bing weather" and the like need to communicate with bing.

    20. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Simple. Don't use bing and send all links/uris‘ to 127.0.0.1 via hosts file. Done."

      Doesn't work, Windows 10 is capable of bypassing its own HOSTs file when it wants to, which is why HOSTs is a stupid option to even consider as a security measure.

    21. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What? You mean that nice APK guy is wrong?

    22. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by Toad-san · · Score: 2

      I found my Win10 Pro's Feedback settings were set to "Always" and "Full". They're now "Never" and "Basic". No dire warnings or threats from Microsoft .. yet.

      Thanks for those URLs above .. something else to put in my "blocked IP's" Host file maybe.

    23. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So why aren't we making applications that fill Microsoft's logs with bogus data? It should be easy to deconstruct the format of the network traffic to get a template for submitting bogus data.

    24. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by buck-yar · · Score: 2

      "Typing anything into the search bar will, regardless of settings, initiate an HTTPS session to www.bing.com. "

      How is that vague?

    25. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "and nowhere did they mention turning off search suggestions."

      How is that vague?

    26. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      Yeah right. They won't even toll you how long exactly they store anything.

      They did. Up to 30 days. If the data isn't relevant or redundant they may just delete right away. If you feel you need that much control I suggest you disconnect yourself from the Internet all together as I'm sure tones of your data published 5 years ago still lingers.

      This 'data collection' is a gaping wound in the Microsoft beast, infected with worms. I just hope the professional user will finally realize what is happening here and leave the sinking ship.

      Many IT departments are fast tracking Windows 10 deployments. Reason being that many are still on Windows 7 and those on Windows 8 want off. Windows 10 has had mostly positive feedback from its users contrary to Windows Vista and Windows 8 and 8.1.

    27. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 1

      hosts file

      If I can't trust my OS to respect my privacy, I can't trust its network stack to respect networking standards.

      --
      "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
    28. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reddit, AKA this decade's slashdot.

    29. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The professional user is probably at least as locked to Windows (to be able to serve customers who are overwhelmingly using Windows) as the Home user who just gets it as the bundled OS from Dell or whoever. The SMART professional user will pad the overhead enough to get a Mac and/or Linux box to test alternatives and be able to continue serving the customers once everything really goes to &#*$.

    30. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't understand computer security in the slightest.

    31. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by jon3k · · Score: 1

      They never mentioned specifically turning off search suggestions. Every browser does this. Chromium on Linux does this. They never said they never specifically said they turned off search suggestions.

  2. oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    great, let's learn what the black box does by listening to what the purveyor of that black box says it does. and if you have time i was thinking you might also like to hear the child molester down the street tell you about the fun and wholesome games he plays with your children when you aren't around.

  3. Stop Writing Software for Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Most people here have been commenting with something like "Stop Using Windows", but I think this is the wrong message.

    Considering the audience here on Slashdot, the true message to share and discuss is: "Stop Writing Software for Windows".

    My software company has just ruled out all future Windows development. Yes, that means we'll lose some clients, and yes, that means we will have some customer training issues to resolve. But compared to the clusterfuck that is Windows10, it was actually a pretty easy decision for us to make. If Microsoft wants to be a part of the future of software development then they will need to continue to push .NET onto cross platform, and clean up that Mono license so that we can all use it with confidence. Otherwise, Microsoft software development is dead. Sure, not now, not in five years, but this is it: the beginning of the end.

    So stop writing software for Windows and watch the world change...for the better.

    1. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're asking if people still write software for the most popular desktop OS on the planet? Yes. Yes, they are.

      Whether Windows is any good or not, it commands the vast majority of the market.

    2. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You're asking if people still write software for the most popular desktop OS on the planet?"

      So where is it all hiding?

    3. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by Maritz · · Score: 1

      In plain sight?

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    4. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by ThunderBird89 · · Score: 2

      The entire Adobe family, Eclipse, Webstorm, Skype, Paterva's analysis suites (Maltego and CaseFile), and the list could go on until Slashdot's storage is filled up.

      Basically 90+% of software is present on Windows. Sure, you can skew the numbers if you include all the little utilities rolled into Linux distros as separate programs, but the majority of those are either "one-liners" or they are not viable without a plethora of other utilities.

      --
      Hyperbole: I use it liberally!
    5. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're interpretting that wrong. Noone makes boxed software anymore. And fewer and fewer places sell their software through third-party sites. It's all download-only and bought through the software maker's site.

    6. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      What kind of software does your company write? Mine does applications for the water industry for managing networks, and there is no way we could switch to Linux because our customers would never accept it. They run a variety of apps on their computers, almost all of it Windows only.

      WINE isn't an option either, because it is unsupported. If an app doesn't work in WINE the vendor probably won't be interested in fixing it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What in god's name are you rambling about now?

      You do realize Steam started on Windows, and has by far the largest catalog of games on Windows, right?

    8. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WINE isn't an option either, because it is unsupported. If an app doesn't work in WINE the vendor probably won't be interested in fixing it.

      CodeWeavers sells a supported version of Wine called CrossOver. They will also make almost any Windows application work on it if you cover development costs.

    9. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by coofercat · · Score: 1

      ...then your choices appear to be:

      1) Mac
      2) "Cloud" apps, online, in a browser

      In many cases, option (2) works well for a lot of people. I know all the reasons not to go that way, but most companies are more interested in having a solid contract and a working solution than they are worrying about things that may never happen (and supposedly if they do, then the contract is there to help).

    10. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as there is one viable competitor who continues to support Windows, your suggestion will send most businesses straight into bankruptcy.

    11. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by DogDude · · Score: 2

      My software company has just ruled out all future Windows development.

      I call bullshit, AC.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    12. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Basically 90+% of software is present on Windows.

      And always will be!

      Microsoft - number one, forever and ever, world without end, amen.

      Hubris is such a hoot.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    13. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Mine does applications for the water industry for managing networks, and there is no way we could switch to Linux because our customers would never accept it.

      Yep, you are pretty well trapped. But ya gotta write for the customer.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    14. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Actually, we are moving a lot of our software into the cloud. People like the mobile access to their data.

      The problem is that you still need a lot of Windows software to do things like interface with hardware.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    15. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by Voyager529 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Do they still write software for Windows? [...] I think if you have 3 pages of anti-virus software and 1 page of education titles, that's a dead OS! There's still quite a few games for Windows, but nothing like the choice on Steam.

      Yes, plenty. It's just not sold on Newegg.

      Every law firm I do work for uses a program called Worldox to keep case documents together, and most use TimeMatters to keep track of their billable hours.

      While Electronic Medical Records are usually done via a website of some kind, the software that runs the X-Ray machines and 101 other medical diagnostic devices all run on Windows. So do Dentrix and Dexis, the software that probably runs your dentist's office.

      The applications used by auto mechanics to diagnose issues with cars, like Mitchell, is almost all Windows-only.

      While browser-based CRM applications like SugarCRM are making definite inroads, a number of companies are still locked into Act.

      Quickbooks runs on Windows, and if you think Microsoft has a lock-in with Office, you have yet to see the death stares that you'll get at the mention of the possibility of moving away from Quickbooks...and the browser based alternatives are not drop-in replacements just yet.

      Some very new, low-volume startup restaurants can use iPads as point-of-sale machines, but the vast majority of PoS systems are Windows specific, especially if they need to integrate with other software.

      While there was an article last week about doing audio engineering on Linux, Windows and OSX are the places where you'll find formal support from the hardware developers and plug-in creators, and the story repeats itself for video creation.

      Most reasonably-sized offices have had their furniture layout rendered in something like 20/20 Giza, which conveniently segues me to the whole cottage industry around AutoCAD.

      The LED marquee signs in storefront windows and the scoreboards at sporting events have their content designed and uploaded with something like Venus 1500, and the intelligent lights at those ballgames may well be controlled with Lightjockey or Compushow - even many of the dedicated hardware lighting boards run on an embedded version of Windows.

      Your local moderate-sized accounting firm probably uses something like ProsystemFX Engagement, which is kinda like Git for accounting ledgers. Circling back to Office, much of the value-add for the heavy users is not necessarily that LibreOffice isn't as good as Excel, but that there are many Excel-specific plug-ins that pull data from other places and streamline layouts.

      The list of niche industry-vertical software that's Windows only is about as large as your most recent Yellow Pages - virtually every industry has a handful of software vendors specializing in that niche. If you're a software developer, sure, Eclipse, notepad and a web browser are interchangeable on basically everything, so writing C++ code on one OS is basically the same experience as writing C++ on another. Even server-side, Samba shares on Windows Server and Samba shares on FreeNAS are functionally identical to end users. The long tail, on Windows, is a very powerful thing - and you won't see that software for sale on Newegg.

    16. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I did stop writing professionally software to Windows when Microsoft started to screw the Visual studio with their marketing message. If one updates VS, then she can no more support older Windows versions with the software. So, end result is that soon no more VS updates are available and one needs to live with all the bugs old version has. After a while, if one wants to use more recent language standards one needs to change development tools and libraries. And as a bonus, there comes cross platform support.

    17. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are open languages like Python, Ruby and Perl. Python is my preference. It will run on any platform and can be compiled for a specific target OS to binary if need be.

      Also consider that web applications are platform agnostic now. The OS means considerably less than it used to.

      Do yourself and your customers a favor by preferring open platforms.

    18. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by EndlessNameless · · Score: 1

      That means basically nothing.

      Who buys boxed software anymore?

      Enterprises don't, and they're the ones who still pay money for Windows.

      I don't. There are Steam and GoG for games in general, and most major publishers have their own purchase and distribution infrastructure. Blizzard, for example, lets you create an account, pay on their web site, and download the installers for any/all games you own.

      Professional apps are available directly from the publisher's site, even in cases where purchases must be made through resellers.

      The physical software market is dying for all platforms. The Windows market is still quite robust---Valve pulled in nearly a billion in revenue from Steam alone.

      --

      ---
      According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
    19. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can also choose to write OS agnostic applications. Write once/Compile everywhere is an option. I've been writing Qt client side programs for this purpose because our B2B had customers that could use any OS (Mac/Linux/Windows). But lately we have moved to a system agnostic model, so we can run our services on any type of device, including phones and tablets. This mean that desktop/laptops now use 'websites' and we build apps for Android and iPhone. Windows phone is not supported and probably we will never support Windows phone. They'll have to use the mobile websites instead.

    20. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      At some point, he’s either in the applications development market for the water industry, or in the promoting Linux political advocacy business. He’s in the former. He can still run Linux at home.

    21. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Most people here have been commenting with something like "Stop Using Windows", but I think this is the wrong message.

      Considering the audience here on Slashdot, the true message to share and discuss is: "Stop Writing Software for Windows".

      My software company has just ruled out all future Windows development. Yes, that means we'll lose some clients, and yes, that means we will have some customer training issues to resolve. But compared to the clusterfuck that is Windows10, it was actually a pretty easy decision for us to make. If Microsoft wants to be a part of the future of software development then they will need to continue to push .NET onto cross platform, and clean up that Mono license so that we can all use it with confidence. Otherwise, Microsoft software development is dead. Sure, not now, not in five years, but this is it: the beginning of the end.

      So stop writing software for Windows and watch the world change...for the better.

      An overwhelming majority of the software for Windows is legacy software that was written for Windows 7 or earlier. Software for which you buy the CDs or download from their website. That same stuff can also be installed on Windows 10, and it'll do just fine.

      If, in contrast, you look at the Windows App Store, it's a completely different story. Any time you see any entity in the market that also advertizes the existence of an app, you'll notice that it's either iOS only, or iOS and Android only. Even Wintel versions don't exist. In Windows Phone 8, Microsoft tried playing around that by having web apps i.e. invoking an instance of IE to go ahead and open the website of the entity in question, but that experience was not remotely similar.

      However, one question does come up - what is the replacement? Sure, people use iPads and Galaxy tablets, but that's not remotely similar to using laptops. People still need laptops, and on that, there ain't an alternate OS that's caught fire. Macs are expensive, ChromiumOS is too dependent on web apps, while Linux and the BSDs are still way behind Windows when it comes to applications.

    22. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by Alumoi · · Score: 1

      And I bet the software used to access the cloud only runs on Windows. But hey, the cloud!

    23. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      not a change by night-to-day, but a slow and steady one: support it always when you can :-)

    24. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      and clean up that Mono license

      What's wrong with the Mono license?

    25. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      start by developing more software web-based (making the user only have to use a browser, OS agnostic)

    26. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1

      "Mine does applications for the water industry for managing networks"

      umm... H20-water, H20-Sewer? Am I close?

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    27. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      Try to not use "I'm not guilty for it!": everyone has a part on it!

    28. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Never heard of them. Are they companies?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    29. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      Most people here have been commenting with something like "Stop Using Windows", but I think this is the wrong message.

      Considering the audience here on Slashdot, the true message to share and discuss is: "Stop Writing Software for Windows".

      This is tree hugging. Impractical and in many cases suicidal.

      What would be more effective is if everyone contributed some of their time to WINE or heck even ReactOS. With enough effort this would provide the world with a low impedance path away from Windows.

    30. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't. Another company here investigating all options to avoid Windows for future development. We are in the medical industry and are concerned about hipaa implications. These actions by MS will cause significant long term harm to their business.

    31. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    32. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Original AC poster here. There have been some great replies so far, but yours is the one I really wanted to reply to first. It's not bullshit, and if I can explain a little, maybe it will become clearer why.

      Some people have asked me what my software company does. Well, I'm not going to start advertising here, but we solve problems. People come to me with their problems asking for a solution. These problems span a range of fields: managing people, data, logistics, science and R&D. The solutions that my clients are looking for go way beyond just what kind of operating system to use. They ask me to help with the policy, and listen to our recommendations, which means we typically end up designing the entire stack from top to bottom. Of course every project is different, and some are more restricted than others. Where we do choose (about 75% of projects) in the past we would use Windows for a lot of the user-facing parts since the perception was that it would save on staff training. Now, for all the reasons I have stated above we will no longer be using it.

      Let me give one more example. For some other projects, such as instrument control, the new Windows 10 is completely unsuitable. To be clear, I mean rather advanced instrumentation that requires a multi-core x64 CPU, and sometimes a GPU, as well as lots of RAM. Most of the interfaces are rather dynamic as well, so embedded systems are not up to the task. We have spoken to all of our hardware vendors and we are pleasantly surprised to find that they are now sick of Windows as well, and nearly all of them either have Linux drivers developed, or are in the development stage. The ones that don't have been told we may not be able to work with them in future, and they'll either come to the party or we'll move on. This is an important decision, I mean how can we put together an instrument/science machine that requires a computer for control, choose Windows 10 and then have that OS show ads, promiscuously update, and change settings without warning? And that's not even getting started on the telemetry. So yes, ten to fifteen years ago Windows was an OK choice for a project like this because all the hardware out there had really good driver support, there were great software libraries for rapid development, and the users were familiar with the interface. That is no longer the case.

      So yes, I do get to choose the OS for my projects and as I stated above, that choice will no longer be Windows.

    33. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by ThunderBird89 · · Score: 1

      Take a look at my signature, will ya?

      All I'm pointing out is that for the time being, the vast majority of software has a Windows port/edition, showing that it's not in decline. Yet - this will inevitably change in the future, but for now, it's fairly stable.

      --
      Hyperbole: I use it liberally!
    34. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by HiThere · · Score: 1

      The cloud isn't a bad choice if you host your own cloud, and control access to the degree indicated by your security needs. A cloud running on a local device can be insulated from external access.

      To help you think of this, a cloud is what a mainframe used to be, with distributed access over a network, like a timeshare system used to have. Computers have gotten smaller and faster, and storage has gotten cheaper and bigger, so hosting your own cloud (i.e., tmeshare service) has gotten reasonable. You can allow or deny external access, or even allow external access to only particular TCP addresses, and only over custom protocols. It all depends on what you need. Most existing software can easily be modified to handle custom protocols if you have the source. You can even combine public-key with one-time pad encryption without too much difficulty. So it can be nearly as secure as local hard wired. (DON'T fiddle with the encryption code unless you're a real specialist, instead pipeline it. You don't need a high bandwidth one-time pad to make public-key essentially unbreakable.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    35. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by HiThere · · Score: 1

      As someone else said "you've got to write to the customer". For many purposes Python and Ruby are quite practical. I'm less sure about Perl for anything of any size. Even Perl programmers are likely to call it write-only code.

      That said, there are lots of alternatives. Once upon a time I hooked some Eiffel code into an MSAccess program because MSAccess kept making arithmetic errors. A simple translation of the same code worked without flaw, and was faster. (These days that probably wouldn't work, but C++ would probably have done the job, I just liked Eiffel better. Besides, I didn't need to buy the Eiffel compiler.) Were I looking for alternatives and if I didn't like any of the major languages, I'd start looking at things like D, Go, Nemerle, Haxe or Rust. (Rust is still a bit raw.) Some of those are easier to use, some have better documentation, some have more libraries, etc. All are cross-platform, though whether the libraries are depends on what you are doing.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    36. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Actually is only "Linux and the BSDs are still way behind Windows when it comes to applications in some areas". But they are far behind when it comes to advertising in all areas. And, to be fair, even when the Linux or BSD version is better, it will be significantly different, and they those who have learned the MSWind version find them less desirable. (It also works in the other direction.)

      So there is considerable entrenched opposition to switching away from MS even where there isn't a good reason. And this is sufficient to mean that the alternatives need to be considerable better. AND THIS IS A VALID REASON.

      I, personally, don't have that reaction to switching software choices, but I'm a developer. I even like to switch programming languages. But it's unreasonable to expect other people to share my preferences.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    37. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      My software company has just ruled out all future Windows development.

      I call bullshit,

      I call his "my company" is him and three friends in the evening.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    38. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Actually, I doubt that 90+% of software is present on Windows, due to the popularity of iOS and Android. That's how things progress.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    39. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a fuck ton of stuff that newegg doesn't sell, which for the record includes a lot of popular computer hardware components.

      ...and don't even get me started on their pricing. If they didn't have a penchant for fast shipping, they'd be utterly useless.

    40. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by ThunderBird89 · · Score: 1

      Point, yes. I actually completely glossed over mobile OSes, and in retrospect, it may have been a mistake, given how Windows is attempting to span the entire device spectrum since Win8.

      --
      Hyperbole: I use it liberally!
    41. Re:Stop Writing Software for Windows by toddestan · · Score: 1

      If it was me, I would write software in a way that would as platform agnostic as possible. That way you can run your software on Windows, if that's what they want. And at some point, if the software needed to run on something that wasn't Windows, you'd be ready with hopefully very little effort.

      Unfortunately, I've seen software like that, and you're usually talking something that's decades old, built with tools and dependencies based upon decisions made in the 90's, which would make moving off of Windows very difficult. And there's no way the company is going to spend the resources to do that.

  4. Group Policies by ChadSmith4920 · · Score: 1

    I see no mentioned of "Let apps manage Android app"

  5. Don't Care About The Telemetry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The telemetry can be easily disabled with a single registry key. For privacy Cortana is a much bigger worry since there's no way to uninstall or disable it. The only way to stop it is the kill the process and quickly rename the C:\Windows\SystemApps\Microsoft.Windows.Cortana_cw5n1h2txyewy folder before it restarts.

    Really though, my bigger concern about Windows 10 is that it's just really bad. Every decision seems to have been made for Microsoft's benefit rather than for the users. Like OneDrive integration that there's no way to fully rid yourself of (I've disabled it in the Group Policy editor, removed it from explorer, removed the run registry value but it still shows up in various places). Then there's the continued forced march towards the "Modern UI" with some settings no longer available in the Control Panel and only available in the Settings app, and some applications like Calculator being replaced with Modern UI crap. There's also the fact that it looks like crap with it's lack of colour and detail, and the problem that there's a total lack of customisation.

    I was about to start writing a big application in MFC, but Microsoft are headed to destruction so I'm now instead learning Qt. I think they year of Linux on the desktop may only be five to ten years away, and it'll be Microsoft we have to thank for it.

    1. Re:Don't Care About The Telemetry by Flavianoep · · Score: 1

      (...) and the problem that there's a total lack of customisation.

      I was about to start writing a big application in MFC, but Microsoft are headed to destruction so I'm now instead learning Qt. (...)

      It seems like you really enjoy customisation!

      --
      Linux is for people who don't mind RTFM.
    2. Re:Don't Care About The Telemetry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was about to start writing a big application in MFC

      I thought people stopped using Microsoft Foundation Classes (MFC) 15 years ago. Perhaps you meant Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF)? The names are similar.

    3. Re:Don't Care About The Telemetry by unixisc · · Score: 1

      The telemetry can be easily disabled with a single registry key. For privacy Cortana is a much bigger worry since there's no way to uninstall or disable it. The only way to stop it is the kill the process and quickly rename the C:\Windows\SystemApps\Microsoft.Windows.Cortana_cw5n1h2txyewy folder before it restarts.

      Really though, my bigger concern about Windows 10 is that it's just really bad. Every decision seems to have been made for Microsoft's benefit rather than for the users. Like OneDrive integration that there's no way to fully rid yourself of (I've disabled it in the Group Policy editor, removed it from explorer, removed the run registry value but it still shows up in various places). Then there's the continued forced march towards the "Modern UI" with some settings no longer available in the Control Panel and only available in the Settings app, and some applications like Calculator being replaced with Modern UI crap. There's also the fact that it looks like crap with it's lack of colour and detail, and the problem that there's a total lack of customisation.

      I was about to start writing a big application in MFC, but Microsoft are headed to destruction so I'm now instead learning Qt. I think they year of Linux on the desktop may only be five to ten years away, and it'll be Microsoft we have to thank for it.

      I got around the Modern UI by installing Classic Shell. Yeah, that same Classic shell that we could download for Windows 8, actually works BETTER in Windows 10. You get to customize that menu according to whatever you liked before - Windows 7, Aero, Classic,...

      The only issue that I had w/ OneDrive was that in Windows 8, one could map its local directory to an SD card, if one was short of main storage space (which was the case w/ Winbook, where I only had 32GB of Flash drive): for a while, that ability to map to D:\ instead of C:\ was lost. Otherwise, one can just ignore OneDrive. Also, if you are using a non Microsoft address for your login - like gmail or yahoo, then you don't get to use OneDrive.

      As for calculator, I really prefer this calculator to the ones elsewhere - be it in Windows 7, or the ones in iOS or Android. Yeah, it looks less pretty, but is more functional - has Scientific, Programmer and Date calculation, as well as a converter for volume, length, weight/mass. I'd like them to add things like temparature, fuel consumption (miles/gallon km/l) and so on. But it beats any other calculator that I've ever seen (and no, I never saw an HP calculator).

    4. Re:Don't Care About The Telemetry by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      I really like your sig ("Linux was not for everyone; then came Android."), man!

  6. Remember "Secure your digital media?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Does anyone remember the "Secure your digital media" checkbox in Windows, which sounded like a positive thing (security!) but actually DRM'd any music you ripped onto the computer so it couldn't be played on other devices?

    I was reminded of that when reading the page:

    "Security: "Information that’s required to help keep Windows secure, including info about the Connected User Experience and Telemetry component settings, the Malicious Software Removal Tool, and Windows Defender.""

    Probably hiding your logon and password information.

    "Basic: "Basic device info, including: quality-related info, app compat, and info from the Security level.""

    Probably hiding a list of apps you have installed plus ID of the computer and spec and location, wifi networks around you etc.

    "Enhanced: "Additional insights, including: how Windows and Windows apps are used, how they perform, advanced reliability info, and info from both the Basic and the Security levels.""

    Web pages surfed, emails, .... will be hiding in this one.

    "Full: "All info necessary to identify and help to fix problems, plus info from the Security, Basic, and Enhanced levels.""

    And stuff accessible on your network too, any servers that the computer can connect to,...

    That's the thing about Microsoft's vague doubletalk, if it can hide insanely nasty stuff it probably does.

    1. Re:Remember "Secure your digital media?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That’s why I won’t buy Apple products. Does anyone remember when they tried to push Lisa and Apple /// onto the market? And then years later they discontinued OpenDoc. Listen, at some point, you have to look at today, not yesterday.

  7. Ok, let's suppose its all true. by Z80a · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We're still talking about a lot of basically untested internet aware services running on your background that have a microsoft tier of security, which means it is probably exploitable the hell and back, and basically identical on every single windows 10 box.

    That sounds like a gros michel banana scenario here pretty much, where someone with evil intentions would be able to abuse one of those flaws and pretty much wipe out a large quantity of windows 10 machines if not all of em in a whim.

    1. Re:Ok, let's suppose its all true. by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      If that happens, there won't be some movement to drop Windows and migrate to Linux / OSX. No, what will happen is that "out of the interesest of national security", The US Government will create a whole new Department Of Federal IT policy (DOFIT) which includes OS, app, and encryption standards (back doors); the most basic of course. For now. And Microsoft will lead (surprise surprise!!) the way in this endeavor (failure rewarded). The ultimate idea is to get all the young, hip, creative people to have as close as a relationship in US politics so as to keep them under the wing of the Gov. Keep your friends close, keep your enemies closer and all that.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re: Ok, let's suppose its all true. by ljw1004 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's a FUD stretch. There's been no suggestion that any telemetry stuff accepts inbound connections.

    3. Re:Ok, let's suppose its all true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If OSes were secure and hacking impossible, then there wouldn't be any computer crime to investigate. There wouldn't be any hacker to identity and to put in jail. Many jobs would be lost.

    4. Re: Ok, let's suppose its all true. by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That's a FUD stretch. There's been no suggestion that any telemetry stuff accepts inbound connections.

      Sorry, but that is complete and utter bullshit .. or at least, there is an indirect mechanism:

      Full is where things get a little dicey, depending on how much you prize your privacy. If your system reports back strange crashes that Microsoft techies can't get their heads around, they can request extra data from your machine, which Windows 10 will hand over under remote control if management approves. This extra information can include some of your files so the engineers can recreate the exact crash in their labs using your data and apps. Microsofties can also run diagnostic tools on your system to gather more evidence. Here's Microsoft's explanation of the process:
      Before more info is gathered, Microsoft's privacy governance team, including privacy and other subject matter experts, must approve the diagnostics request made by a Microsoft engineer. If the request is approved, Microsoft engineers can use the following capabilities to get the information:
      Ability to run a limited, pre-approved list of Microsoft certified diagnostic tools, such as msinfo32.exe, powercfg.exe, and dxdiag.exe.
      Ability to get registry keys.
      Ability to gather user content, such as documents, if they might have been the trigger for the issue.

      If Microsoft engineers can request information about your machine -- like we're meant to believe they're sitting around looking for problems on everybody's machine -- then that either has to be a push to you, or on your next upload you get sent a payload which says "gather the following".

      But you'll notice it says "remote control" and provides a mechanism to run programs - which tells me there is now a mechanism to remotely control machines and run software. Like that won't get exploited real quick.

      They're using this because Windows 10 is essentially an extended fucking beta where they're building it as they go, and want to measure how much of a shit job they're doing.

      And if most versions can't select the Security only policy, what's to say that it won't be long before you can't deselect full?

      Sorry, but Microsoft has given themselves the right to do remote administration and data gathering ... and for all but the ones which can select Security, they'll do it in such a way that they can personally identify you. Oh, and apparently they'll gather some of your documents as well.

      No fucking way we can trust them with this, because as soon as they have the ability to tell your computer to package up some data and send it to them, some asshole in law enforcement is going to demand they misuse it. And don't say they won't, because that's exactly the kind of shit law enforcement and the security agencies are doing. No way they won't show up with an NSL demanding information and forbidding Microsoft from admitting to it.

      There needs to be a setting which says "you mayyro.slashdot.orgumstances collect any information as I do not consent to it". If there isn't, Windows 10 is going to cause Microsoft headaches they can't even begin to imagine ... starting with any country which has privacy laws that a fucking EULA can't overrule.

      Some of what is described should be illegal for them to do. In fact, in some places, I'm pretty sure it is.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    5. Re:Ok, let's suppose its all true. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      That sounds like a gros michel banana scenario here pretty much, where someone with evil intentions would be able to abuse one of those flaws and pretty much wipe out a large quantity of windows 10 machines if not all of em in a whim.

      Remember the 20 lines of code needed to brick a UEFI based computer?

      Now imagine the Angler exploit kit.

      Now imagine sites that have been used to distribute it via advertisements

      Now imagine the move to make adblockers illegal.

      This house of cards is in pretty bad shape already, Microsoft's frontdoors only make it worse. Apocalyptic scenarios aside, the large push to discard all privacy ends up being as bad, or maybe worse for the vendors.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    6. Re: Ok, let's suppose its all true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's also been no evidence that any system can be set to "Full" reporting without local admin access, but that never stopped the Slashdot nerdrage from assuming that the whole purpose of the telemetry was to steal people's reddit logins and compile a list of cracked software to forward to the NSA.

    7. Re: Ok, let's suppose its all true. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      then that either has to be a push to you, or on your next upload you get sent a payload which says "gather the following".

      But you'll notice it says "remote control" and provides a mechanism to run programs - which tells me there is now a mechanism to remotely control machines and run software. Like that won't get exploited real quick.

      So you admit it's FUD. There is no suggestion that they have network listeners (which wouldn't work anyway because most people have some kind of router level firewall, and many don't support UPNP).

      Then you go on to wildly speculate about the mechanism being insecure. Tell me, when was the last time someone exploited Windows Update? That connects to a remote server, downloads executables and runs them.

      There is a lot to be upset about with Windows 10, but I'm fed up of people making stuff up just to jump on the bandwagon. Some of us are looking for hard, objective data. I'm going to see if I can find time to create and post some Wireshark and Fiddler dumps to settle this once and for all.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re: Ok, let's suppose its all true. by wbr1 · · Score: 1

      There is no suggestion that they have network listeners (which wouldn't work anyway because most people have some kind of router level firewall, and many don't support UPNP).

      So, network listeners can't listen on normally open ports? Wow, when did things get so secure without me looking?

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    9. Re:Ok, let's suppose its all true. by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Like "rm -rf /sys" on Linux boxes. A lot less than 20 lines and could nuke the UEFI.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    10. Re:Ok, let's suppose its all true. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Like "rm -rf /sys" on Linux boxes. A lot less than 20 lines and could nuke the UEFI.

      Your point? It's like being excited about falling off a thousand foot cliff instead of a 300 foot cliff.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    11. Re: Ok, let's suppose its all true. by WaffleMonster · · Score: 2

      So you admit it's FUD. There is no suggestion that they have network listeners (which wouldn't work anyway because most people have some kind of router level firewall, and many don't support UPNP).

      What difference do modalities make? The fact capability exists and is used without explicit end user knowledge or approval is what matters.

      Then you go on to wildly speculate about the mechanism being insecure. Tell

      Security is nothing more than expression of value judgments made by individuals. It is not an objective measure. What is deemed secure or not differs with context, value of what is secured, consequence of failure and level trust the individual has developed in individuals and technology charged with implementing security.

      The existence of an explicit targeted remote access capability that operates without user knowledge or approval is the definition of insecure in my opinion. I don't know how to trust a corporation that demonstrates such disrespect for the security and privacy of its customers. Without trust there is no security. Without security computers are worthless for many purposes.

      There is a lot to be upset about with Windows 10, but I'm fed up of people making stuff up just to jump on the bandwagon. Some of us are looking for hard, objective data. I'm going to see if I can find time to create and post some Wireshark and Fiddler dumps to settle this once and for all.

      I don't understand. People are complaining about shit coming from Microsoft's own site and expressed in their own privacy "agreements". Microsoft openly admits to having a backdoor to exfil whatever they want and your fed up with people making stuff up?

      https://technet.microsoft.com/...

    12. Re: Ok, let's suppose its all true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The name changes, but Windows has had build-in remote access features since XP. When you give someone control of your PC, it asks you first and you can see what they're doing (and you can disable the feature). It's basically VNC and is used a lot in remote troubleshooting and fixing of peoples' PCs.

      Every modern piece of software, including FOSS, has options to report crashes back to their corporate home. You tend to have the choices of a little data, a lot of data, and contact info to get back in touch with you. Since Windows wants everyone to use a Microsoft account, that contact info is now sort-of build-in.

      There will be an issue if it is all done behind the scenes, but if there's a checkbox on the crash report that says it'll do this then fine. Features like these do improve the quality of software.

    13. Re: Ok, let's suppose its all true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Features like these do improve the quality of software."

      No they don't.

      They allow companies to ship unfinished software, have the first round of customers/users beta test the pile of crap, and eventually, many years later, the software may approach an unfinished state.

      All so the company can make more money by not hiring a decent testing team in the first place.

      Is that worth it?

      If software was hardware (and I know it isn't) you would *not* tolerate that shit and would take it straight back to the store!!!!

    14. Re:Ok, let's suppose its all true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least with the 1000-foot cliff you get a couple more seconds to enjoy the view ...

  8. Nothing to See here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing to see. Everything is OK. Go back to sleep.

  9. Re: SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTF by UVB-76 · · Score: 1

    This. I shouldn't have to try to filter their data theft at the router, there should be an OFF setting for this. Does anyone have any working iptables rules to stop them?

  10. 'how to control it'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Easy. Don't install Windows 10.

    1. Re:'how to control it'? by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

      That's great if you can do that. Some of us aren't being given the choice, we've been told that the Enterprise WILL be updated to Win10 at an unspecified date in the future, like it or not. . .

    2. Re:'how to control it'? by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      really: I've seen a lot of people (not tech-savy ones) from universities with a recent update to Windows 10 leading to some "minor problems" (monstrous problems for the IT dept!)

  11. Every key-press is recorded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    but where is the mention of this and its purpose? Any text you put in an e-mail, a comment, or a blog, using Windows 7, 8, 8.1, or 10, can be used to identify you.

    It doesn't matter how many secure channels are between you and the destination of your text, once a piece of text is seen and has garned the interest of U.S "law enforcement", it can be used for an approximative search against the key-logged text over at Microsoft, and with all other information sucked up from your computer, you can most likely be personally identified.

    Your simple criticism of U.S politics in a discussion forum can lead to you being identified and labelled as an "insurgent", a "security risk to the country", forbidden to enter the country, your business prevented from selling to or buying from American companies, and more.

  12. Retention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    From TFA: Other info may be retained longer, particularly if there is a regulatory requirement to do so.

    What "regulatory requirement"? Is there any regulatory need for Microsoft to store user telemetry? Can anyone explain this?

    1. Re:Retention by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      It probably just means that some user data might be useful later in criminal investigations.

    2. Re:Retention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      since this also covers edge I'd guess it's the latest crappyness to save the children of "store all internet activity for a period of X years" that many countries are rolling out.

    3. Re:Retention by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      And "regulatory requirement" varies by country, so they may in one country be required to store it forever and in another be prohibited to even collect it.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    4. Re:Retention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That kind of stuff, if the interpretations in this discussion are anywhere near valid, may run into adamant opposition from a lot of big organizations who take protecting their Intellectual Property (IP) rights and responsibilities very seriously.

      I know when I worked in big pharma and IBM that was a huge constraint on any kind of software adoption/upgrades for smartphones, to PC's, to mainframe Oracle databases. I think the big pharma corp I just retired from last year had "almost" finished converting various desktop apps from being dependent on IE 6 last summer so they could finally migrate the last "critical" Win XP PC's (probably still in the 100's vs 100K worker PC's - desktop/laptop/tablet/etc) scattered around the globe at various sites to ... Windows 7. One big delaying factor there was pharma regulatory requirements in various countries to "validate" that the apps produced reliable results (people's health/lives y'know - for all the good that does sometimes...). Proving that for an app/platform update can take a lot of IT resources in terms of people's time and money.

      They also protect their IP with firewalls that use Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) to protect that IP from leaving the biz via the Internet (and "inappropriate" use of IT resources, i.e. pr0n viewing at work), HTTPS be damned, so I think most of the telemetry data-gathering mechanisms ascribed to MS so indignantly here would be shot down in short order. To send any diagnostic data to Oracle or MS always took formal approvals within the company, or it was something to get fired for if the process was not followed. Automatic and unauthorized sending from the OS or apps would never be tolerated.

      If all those juicy data can only be gathered from individuals and SOHO class organizations who don't have the resources or savvy to be concerned with all this supposed data gathering, what's the point? Does that mean MS is only snooping and data-mining the small-timers? And would that not trigger a lot of EU official privacy protection outrage? This Win10 "privacy invasion" furor is not making a lot of sense to me.

  13. Lockscreen Ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what.

  14. One Word! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tears! For! Fears!

    SHOUT!

    and! the! other! one!

  15. Personally, I don't care by jenningsthecat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The founder of the company has sided with the DOJ against Apple. And Microsoft seems only to have gotten worse since Gates handed over the reins. That tells me all I need to know about Microsoft's trustworthiness as far as user privacy is concerned. Even if telemetry truly can be fully disabled, who's to say it won't be re-introduced without notice? Microsoft is sneaky that way.

    I almost wish I was still a Windows user so I could quit in protest, but I moved to Linux almost 10 years ago and haven't looked back. I feel for those who are stuck with it, for whatever reason. I never thought I would say this, but if my only two choices were Apple and MS, I'd choose Apple.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    1. Re:Personally, I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That tells me all I need to know about Microsoft's trustworthiness as far as user privacy is concerned.

      Yeah, as a long-time Windows user who is on the lookout for a new laptop, I'm mulling over doing my usual hard drive scrub but then instead of doing a fresh Windows install going with Linux. For a long time the thing which kept me with MS was games, and I hear that is significantly improving on Linux these days. I could deal with some minor issues if it means not being bothered by MS advertising and telemetry.

      The last time I bought a laptop and tried running Linux on it the OS threw a fit because it didn't like some of the hardware (a Broadcomm wifi card if I remember right, plus some sort of bug with the CPU temperature probe which made it think the CPU was always overheating). If that has improved I might just hop over. I guess the fact I've been palying with a Raspberry Pi recently as a hobby will make it easier to make the change.

    2. Re:Personally, I don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I never thought I would say this, but if my only two choices were Apple and MS, I'd choose Apple.

      If my only choice was between Apple and MS, I'd still choose Linux.

    3. Re:Personally, I don't care by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      I didn't see BG say anything that Google didn't also say. I saw that BG's lukewarm "we should start a discussion, this is important" was interpreted as support for the DOJ, and Google's "this is important, we should start a discussion" was interpreted as support for Apple.

      But I could have misread their statements. But I didn't see it.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    4. Re:Personally, I don't care by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The founder of the company has sided with the DOJ against Apple.

      So have the majority of Americans if polls are to be believed. That stance carries no weight.

    5. Re:Personally, I don't care by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      The last time I bought a laptop and tried running Linux on it the OS threw a fit because it didn't like some of the hardware (a Broadcomm wifi card if I remember right, plus some sort of bug with the CPU temperature probe which made it think the CPU was always overheating). If that has improved I might just hop over.

      Researching a laptop's compatibility with Linux before buying can save a lot of grief. Also, there are companies that sell laptops with Linux pre-installed - not likely to be any compatibility problems there.

      Moving from Windows to Linux can be made less stressful by moving in stages. Starting out with a dual-boot setup allows you to go fully back to Windows if necessary. As your Windows use decreases you can move to a VM, if peripherals and/or dongles you use will still work. You may find that in a while you no longer need Windows. I still keep a Win2K VM on my machine, because I have some old software that I suspect wouldn't work well with WINE and I'm at the stage where I'm more interested in doing stuff WITH my computer than TO it.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    6. Re:Personally, I don't care by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      I didn't see BG say anything that Google didn't also say. I saw that BG's lukewarm "we should start a discussion, this is important" was interpreted as support for the DOJ, and Google's "this is important, we should start a discussion" was interpreted as support for Apple.

      But I could have misread their statements. But I didn't see it.

      Thanks. Bill's stance is indeed a bit ambiguous. I made the mistake of letting other people interpret his statements for me instead of reading them myself. I would say that he's being a bit cagey - it almost sounds as though he said something because he thought it was expected, and not because he has a strong opinion. This story filled in some of the blanks for me: http://www.breitbart.com/tech/...

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
  16. Re:A Nice Breakdown from Microsoft!! by Maritz · · Score: 2

    They're only equivalent if you're completely incapable of nuanced thought.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  17. And yet Windows Update fucked itself beyond repair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Windows update fucked itself and were unable to install an update to .net. Even downloading it by hand did not work so It was the Windows update system that had been f-ed and not only Windows update. All the fixes that MS offered failed. Uninstalling .net and trying again failed. This was a brand new machine with no software but MS own and the network drivers on it! I finally got the tip that fixed it from a MS support rep; Uninstall Windows and try again from scratch. That fixed it. This time all the updates went the way they should... I see no way that monitoring the users will compensate for pure incompetence!

    BTW. This is NOT a joke even if it might sound that way.

  18. I've seen this before by Sax+Russell+5449D29A · · Score: 2

    Microsoft sure knows how to dig a big hole and fall in it. With Windows 8 it was the infamous Metro UI. Now with Windows 10 it's an all-out user spying program, one you can't really even turn off. Who the hell makes these decisions?! Anyone here could've told them it's a really bad idea and skilled security analysts would easily find out about all the semi-hidden "features".

    It's as if they want to fail time after time, like a sadomasochistic hamster that enjoys electric shocks.

    --
    -SR
    1. Re:I've seen this before by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Grandma isn't going to use Linux, sorry people

      Depends on what you mean by 'Linux'. If you mean GNU/Linux with X11, I agree. If you mean something running on a Linux kernel... a lot of people are using cheap Android tablets as their primary computing device.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:I've seen this before by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      No, it's as if they know there's limited alternatives for the consumer market. Grandma isn't going to use Linux, sorry people -- and Apple costs money.

      You are quite wrong there. I've got a lot of grandmas to run Linux - Mint is more like their old computer than W8 or W10 will ever be.

      OSX? That too expensive meme is getting old and creaky. Forgetting for a moment that buying an equivalent Windows machine exposes the canard, but the machines tend to last longer before needing a new one. But yes, it is true that you can go buy a cheap desktop at WallyWorld for maybe 350 dollars, which is a lot cheaper than my iMac. But that's like saying a Toyota Corolla is better than a (fill in your favorite luxury car here.)

      Grandma doesn't call me telling me her OSX machine doesn't work after an update, or her Linux machine either. The biggest thing I'm doing these days is "fixing" their computers by installing ad blockers.

      And one thing I've found out is Grandma-net is fast!

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    3. Re:I've seen this before by steveha · · Score: 1

      Grandma isn't going to use Linux, sorry people

      The thing is: why not? If you are volunteering as tech support for Grandma, you can make things easy for yourself by setting her up with Linux instead of Windows.

      That's what I have done. My father is over 80 and he is exclusively running Linux. (Specifically: Linux Mint 17.3, 64-bit with MATE)

      Once it's set up, it Just Works. It keeps on working. My father is completely happy. He has one must-have Windows app (Adobe FrameMaker, versions 5.5.6 and 7) and that runs great under WINE. (The default WINE in Linux Mint just works, no tweaking needed and no need to buy CrossOver or whatever.)

      Now, if your point is "Grandma is going to buy computers with Windows pre-installed and isn't going to install Linux for herself" then sure, I'll agree. But if you set it up for her, she will be able to do the most common things: web (including YouTube and Facebook) and email.

      A friend of mine once, as a prank, installed a Windows XP desktop theme on his Linux computer. Then visiting relatives used his computer and none of them even realized they were using Linux. It really wasn't very much of a prank; they didn't realize anything was out of the ordinary.

      People who have specialized software needs may be chained to Windows; but even they could probably run Windows inside VirtualBox, and do their web surfing and email in Linux. But for the stereotypical Grandma, Linux is already just fine.

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    4. Re:I've seen this before by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      "I don't want to be spied on... I know, I'll make sure to run Google" said someone non-sarcastically on the internet.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    5. Re:I've seen this before by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Depends on what Grandma does with her computer. People like her are likely to be happy with something like Ubuntu, because they tend to do web browsing, light word processing, and maybe email and/or casual gaming, and not anything else. Someone who is more into computers is much more likely to want software that's only on Windows, or Windows and Mac OSX, and won't be happy with Ubuntu.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    6. Re:I've seen this before by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      But I agree with the OP, Grandpa may still use windows, hell mom and dad might still use windows, but they are basically hammering nails into their coffin. It may take a while, but as Linux gets more and more user friendly (and free) in a generation or two Windows will be dead. The one thing still heavily in favour of windows for teenagers is the gaming, but with Steam leading the charge to get games cross platform how long is that going to last? If I was Microsoft I would have done my utmost best to make the "final" version of windows as attractive as possible, not embed it with spyware and crap. I mean seriously, how much money are they making on showing ads on the fucking lock screen? They should be more concerned about whether they have a lock screen to display crap on then actually displaying stuff on it. Look how much kicking and screaming it took for them to bring back the start button, my wife HATED Windows 8, and dislikes 10 because it reminds her of 8, it's just a matter of time before I find her formatting and putting 7 back on. I think the bean counters at MS have way to much say in what their products do, they should be muzzled before they run the company into the ground, all for the sake of short term profit and short sightedness about the long term damage they are doing to the company. But hey, they will get their bonus this year, and when the company is fucked they will move on.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
  19. Re: SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTF by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

    Send her a .reg file. I do such changes once, store the .reg file and reuse that file on any computer I get my hands on (where the behaviour is desired, of course)

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  20. Valve will save me by some+old+guy · · Score: 2

    I run a windows boot for gaming only. Tried the *free win 10 upgrade* and after 20 minutes of unidentified net traffic and hideous I lag was reinstalling win 7.

    Solution? Since Steam now has Mac ports for pretty much everything I play, the next gaming rig will be an incredibly over-priced Mac Pro.

    I feel for the poor sods who are stuck with win 10 as a work platform or are too uninterested/uninformed to make a better choice for home use.

    --
    Scruting the inscrutable for over 50 years.
    1. Re:Valve will save me by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      Solution? Since Steam now has Mac ports for pretty much everything I play, the next gaming rig will be an incredibly over-priced Mac Pro.

      Why don't you try a "Hackintosh" build? That's a PC with carefully selected components so that you can run OSX on it.
      The Mac Pro is good but unless you actually are a pro and need it for your work, it is simply too expensive for what it has to offer.

    2. Re:Valve will save me by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Seconded. These days, with good EFI support across the board on new hardware and better bootloaders, you can install full OS X upgrades within the OS without having to know that it's a Hackintosh.

    3. Re:Valve will save me by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Since Steam now has Mac ports for pretty much everything I play, the next gaming rig will be an incredibly over-priced Mac Pro.

      But they are so sweet. I've moved onto iMacs since retiring, but at work, I used Mac Pros since they were available.

      But you have me thinking - I'm going to blame you if the wife gets pissed at me buying a new Pro.......

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    4. Re:Valve will save me by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      Since Steam now has Mac ports for pretty much everything I play

      Linux don't attends you just yet (there's no strong reason to a Mac build has no Linux build: it's a matter of time!)

    5. Re:Valve will save me by some+old+guy · · Score: 1

      Not a bad idea....thanks!

      --
      Scruting the inscrutable for over 50 years.
    6. Re:Valve will save me by antdude · · Score: 1

      What about Linux?

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  21. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  22. Be informed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I work in an enterprise and can tell you that Microsoft does provide the ability to disable all remote connectivity, including those connections used for its telemetry services. You just need to actually do the research on how to achieve the desired results. I have seen the Win 10 hate thread abound, and would just like to say that rather than childishly gripping about the company that produced the software, how about an intelligent conversation about what MS improved from a UI, usability, and security perspective? I am a firm believer in the right tool for the right job, and personally employ several flavors of Linux to achieve the technology goals I set. Blind hate only makes you uniformed, come to the light side.

    1. Re:Be informed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the privacy issues are way more important to some people than any improvements they might make in other areas. It has nothing to do with blind hate or being unenlightened.

    2. Re:Be informed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      I work in an enterprise and can tell you that Microsoft does provide the ability to disable all remote connectivity, including those connections used for its telemetry services. You just need to actually do the research on how to achieve the desired results. I have seen the Win 10 hate thread abound, and would just like to say that rather than childishly gripping about the company that produced the software, how about an intelligent conversation about what MS improved from a UI, usability, and security perspective? I am a firm believer in the right tool for the right job, and personally employ several flavors of Linux to achieve the technology goals I set. Blind hate only makes you uniformed, come to the light side.

      The only job that Windows is the 'right tool' for is running programs that were written for Windows, where no Free alternative exists, and that can't be made to run via WINE or something similar.

      Besides, this is not only a matter of being pragmatic. Using the right tool for the right job makes sense, but an operating system that contains telemetry with no easy way to turn it off (not all home users have access to Enterprise editions, and even fewer would know how to edit the registry, etc, without fouling something up) means that the Operating System now not only doesn't do what I tell it to do (disable all telemetry), but it now gives ads on the lock screen, reinstalls apps to "try Office" or "try Skype" after updates, and so on. That's the definition of malware, and, as such, has no place on any computer that I have control over.

    3. Re:Be informed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, another fanboy.

    4. Re:Be informed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work in an enterprise and can tell you that Microsoft does provide the ability to disable all remote connectivity, including those connections used for its telemetry services.

      Read the article written by Microsoft and you'll see that there is no way to disable telemetry, not even in the Enterprise version (it can only be set to a lower level).

    5. Re: Be informed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I'm sure your tech toolkit limits you from using an autoconfigurl parameter?

    6. Re:Be informed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An operating system with so many gotchas in the default install is a good thing for us. My company even created a new full-time position called "Windows configuration engineer" to deal with it.

    7. Re:Be informed by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 1

      I work in an enterprise and can tell you that Microsoft does provide the ability to disable all remote connectivity, including those connections used for its telemetry services. You just need to actually do the research on how to achieve the desired results

      Alright, since you've done the research and implemented the necessary GPOs etc. to disable all of this, how about sharing what you've learned?

      --
      "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
    8. Re:Be informed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please provide a link with information on how to simply disable all remote connectivity. Something that should not take hours of research, and that is actually tested to verify it works. And how do you know a new windows update won't undo your fixes?

    9. Re:Be informed by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      Can you provide links, dear AC?

    10. Re:Be informed by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      From what I've read, the telemetry can be disabled in the enterprise versions, but not home or pro.

      We're having a conversation about what Microsoft changed in UI, usability, and security. If you think we should talk only about what (if anything) improved, you're not helping.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    11. Re:Be informed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that's Enterprise, which only a fair-sized business can buy (for a pretty substantial price). Then, to make it all work right, you need to set up your own updates server (requres Win Server; no Linux) and maintain a testing lab to make sure updates aren't going to do something nasty before pushing them to the rest of the business. For the Rest Of Us, the best we can do is get Pro, use and re-check the settings religiously, postpone updates for at least a month if possible, so the problems with each update package can maybe be corrected in the next one. And check Technet religiously for update descriptions (which aren't tied directly to the WU packages that are downloaded, but give a clue). And use W10Privacy to lock things down in and beyond the open settings to the extent reasonable and feasible with the edition of W10 we have.

      At one time MS updates were worth accepting because they usually did fix actual bugs. Now they often ARE the bugs. Windows usually just worked in the past, and didn't intrude on life too much. Now ... I have one laptop with W10 and as far as I'm concerned that will be the only one I do - an auxiliary machine for checkout, with most of the available lockdowns done (some firewall rules cause too many other problems, and I don't have a full-coverage tinfoil hat), and with the need to re-check settings etc. at least once a month due to update fiddles it's just not worth the effort to have more. I'm otherwise sticking with W7 as long as I can, and have some Linux installs in testing environments hoping to have the rest of my Win-only software collection running in Wine or replaced with Linux alternatives (only a few things, actually, because I never bought into the rest of the MS "ecosystem") by the time it's really needed.

  23. Change registry settings? by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You can turn off Windows Update by setting the following registry entries:
    Add a REG_DWORD value called DoNotConnectToWindowsUpdateInternetLocations to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\WindowsUpdate and set the value to 1.
    -and-
    Add a REG_DWORD value called DisableWindowsUpdateAccess to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\WindowsUpdate and set the value to 1.

    Even something as straightforward as changing a registry setting, is beyond the skillset (or willingness, or caring enough) of the majority of average PC users. That is: if PC is actually under users' direct control - in a corporate setting, it often won't be. Imho any OS should by default send out / retrieve as little as practical from network sources. Beyond that, network access should be user-triggered, enabled on an individual services / application level.

    But what struck me while going through the TechNet article, is its length. Are you supposed to check that many settings all over the place, and then repeat to check or re-set those settings each time some update(s) are applied?

    That could be a full-time job. Unless you bring in the help of 3rd party software, which -under the hood- may behave as nasty as Win10 itself. Given these facts, I'd say that if you control PC('s) you work on, you have basically 3 choices at this point:

    • a) Even if you're just a regular user, act like a sysadmin and spend a disproportionate amount of time to re-set settings & regularly re-check those after updates are applied.
    • b) All your data are belong to MS (and perhaps 3-letter US agencies, too). Or run some random 3rd party software to fix (?) things, and possibly have all your data are belong to them. :-)
    • c) Side-step the problem entirely and run some other OS.

    Choose wisely, and know this: your time isn't "free".

    1. Re:Change registry settings? by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      That is: if PC is actually under users' direct control - in a corporate setting, it often won't be.

      +1 Informative (how I miss mod points!)

    2. Re:Change registry settings? by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      The length of the TechNet article is probably due to how this probably isn't some coordinate evil conspiracy from Microsoft leadership. Even though there's a push for One Microsoft, there's still plenty of places where each team and sub team is responsible for developing and testing their one thing, and so they create their one setting for it. As a result there are lots of settings. Plus lots of the work was probably under way before Windows 10, or the One Microsoft push.

      You may want one big switch to do all that you want, but Microsoft is going to have customers who don't. They want partial settings, knobs, levers, dials, and lots of them. Microsoft also has to provide solutions for those customers.

    3. Re:Change registry settings? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      So? I don't care whether Microsoft is cleverly serving its masters from Yuggoth, or if this was a result of thoughts telepathically inserted into the minds of each lowly project manager by lizardmen. I care what information Microsoft is taking, and what I have to do to stop it, and how much work that is, and how much work I have to do after every update that Microsoft forces on my computer when I'm not looking.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  24. Telemetry = spying END OF DISCUSSION. by TractorBarry · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > what they are doing with the telemetry data that Windows 10 is collecting ?

    They're spying on you with no way to turn it off. That *IS* what they're doing. Windows 10 *IS* spyware. let's go through the questions... again...

    1 Downloads itself to your machine without you specifically asking for it ? YES

    2 Aggressively attempts to install itself taking over your computer in the process ? YES

    3 Sends unknown and/or encrypted data to unknown third parties ? YES

    4 Sends personally identifying information to unknown third parties ? YES

    5 Easy to remove ? NO

    Hmmm... Looks like spyware, smells like spyware, walks like spyware and talks like spyware. Windows 10 *IS* spyware.

    Anyone willingly using it is a moron. Microsoft shills go f**** yourself.

    --
    Sky subscribers are morons. They pay to be advertised at !
    1. Re:Telemetry = spying END OF DISCUSSION. by malditaenvidia · · Score: 1

      Sounds more like a trojan than spyware, really.

    2. Re: Telemetry = spying END OF DISCUSSION. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      For people not wearing a tin foil hat telemetry=convenience, and that's most of the world. I personally choose which data to feed based on the convenience levels I desire.

    3. Re:Telemetry = spying END OF DISCUSSION. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1 Downloads itself to your machine without you specifically asking for it ? NO

      2 Aggressively attempts to install itself taking over your computer in the process ? NO

      3 Sends unknown and/or encrypted data to unknown third parties ? YES

      4 Sends personally identifying information to unknown third parties ? NO

      5 Easy to remove ? YES

      FTFY.

      I have a Win7 install that I have no intention of upgrading. I removed GWX and removed its scheduled tasks. In doing so, I b0rked the tasks that the task scheduler thinks it has. Basically, it's a partial uninstallation from the registry. This prevents GWX from re-installing itself (because it's still partially installed), but it also can't run. This came from one of the earliest how-to-remove-GWX tutorials on the 'net.

      And since GWX won't run, it also can't trigger the upgrade without my permission.

      And on the systems I have upgraded to Win10, they're configured to only send "basic" telemetry. Do you know what basic telemetry includes? Crash dumps and error codes. That's it. And that functionality has been in Windows since Win2k SP3. The only personally identifying info that might possibly get submitted is your username on your local machine, because inevitably something installed in your user folder is going to be part of a running executable and your username is going to leak in the folder path of that file. So make up a generic or pseudonymous username when you set up your account, and make sure it's a local account. Problem solved.

      And removing Windows is not so hard. Boot from a Linux installer disc/thumbdrive and select the Windows partition and delete it. Done.

      TL;DR: You're an idiot and you're wrong. Lrn2ply n00b.

    4. Re: Telemetry = spying END OF DISCUSSION. by jfbilodeau · · Score: 1

      What???

      When the CIA listens in on phone conversation it's convenience?

      --
      Goodbye Slashdot. You've changed.
    5. Re: Telemetry = spying END OF DISCUSSION. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I don't want them having any data whatsoever about me, so zero is the level I want. And zero is the level I get. I have to work around it, firewall it, reroute IPs and so on, but in the end is MY computer and MY data. If they want to know how I use my computer, get a court order or GTFO. As simple as that.

    6. Re:Telemetry = spying END OF DISCUSSION. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And on the systems I have upgraded to Win10, they're configured to only send "basic" telemetry. Do you know what basic telemetry includes? Crash dumps and error codes. That's it. And that functionality has been in Windows since Win2k SP3.

      And that functionality has been disabled, by me, on every installation of Windows I've run since Win2K SP3.

      At first it was out of paranoia, because fragments of documents can appear in memory dumps.
      Then it was out of the fact that overclocking was fun. And the only reason my rig ever crashed was running Prime95 as I fucked around trying to squeeze out the last 1% of power without destabilizing it, so no crash dumps I could ever have sent would have helped any developer improve the quality of anything
      Now it's out of principle. Fuck agile. QA your shit and make it work the first time, or don't ship it. My system is stable. If your software is unstable, I'm not going to install it. Fucking fix it yourself.

    7. Re:Telemetry = spying END OF DISCUSSION. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use it because I'm not an asshole like you. You are the one that needs to go fuck yourself. Don't like Windows 10? Then don't use it and stop crying about it. Faggots like you belong on Linux.

    8. Re:Telemetry = spying END OF DISCUSSION. by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Today malware is multi-purpose.

      Sometimes I wish going back to the time of DOS viruses. At least they were more entertaining even though they were annoying.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    9. Re: Telemetry = spying END OF DISCUSSION. by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 1

      I personally choose which data to feed based on the convenience levels I desire.

      You personally choose, are you sure? Millions of people personally chose Chrome as their browser, or Sumatra as their PDF reader, or ACDSee as their image viewer, only to have those choices reset by Microsoft. It happened in November. It happened again last week. Some people have it happen frequently.

      "You choose" does not seem to be a concept supported by Windows 10.

      --
      "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
    10. Re: Telemetry = spying END OF DISCUSSION. by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      I personally choose which data to feed based on the convenience levels I desire.

      In your dreams, buddy. In your fucking dreams.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    11. Re:Telemetry = spying END OF DISCUSSION. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and displays ads.

  25. Re:A Nice Breakdown from Microsoft!! by PetiePooo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A new record! The top post immediately invokes Godwin's Law. WTG!!!

    All references to that aside, though, holy cow! Let's not make it easy for anyone, and make sure those running the cheapest versions have no choice...

    No thanks.

  26. O&O ShutUp10 FTW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    O&O Software's ShutUp10 squashes a lot of this foolishness. It has a simple, push-button GUI that shows the entire list of undesirable settings and enables them to be toggled individually or applied en masse. Best of all, it is able to detect when Windows Update or some other mechanism has modified the settings, and asks the user if he wishes to revert them. Perhaps not perfect, but much better than fiddling in the registry directly (especially for Grandma).

  27. Re: SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Watch out! We got a badass over here!

  28. Data uploading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While gathering files from someone's computer to fix a problem, Microsoft is going to alert the authorities if they come across child porn, right? What about if they find anti-west literature?

  29. A question if I may. by vtcodger · · Score: 1

    It seems to be a state secret, but a significant number of rural Americans are stuck with noisy phone lines for connectivity. They get 32K connections. Maybe. On good days. I, fortuitously, live in the big city and have a DSL connection that typically runs at maybe 20% of it's asserted speed. Hell, we can even stream Netflix. Most of the time.

    With all this telemetry nonsense can Windows 10 even run on rural user's PCs?

    --
    You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    1. Re:A question if I may. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had AT&T 3.0 dsl for 10 years before charter moved in. Now I have real internet.

      I plan on blocking all the URLs I can find at the router. This includes bing.com.

      I'd like a good set of whitelists for things like windows update and "safe" content (knowledge base like stuff) so I can just blackhole the rest of microsoft.com, but that seems like it would take a lot of work and I've got no time for playing this game these days.

    2. Re:A question if I may. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Tell Windows that it's a "metered" connection and it will help somewhat.

    3. Re:A question if I may. by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      What about dial-up?

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    4. Re:A question if I may. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      I was talking about dial-up.

    5. Re:A question if I may. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was talking about dial-up.

      I believe a dial-up connection is considered by Windows to be a physical connection and cannot be set as metered, just like Ethernet or connections via USB phone tethering. Only WiFi connections can be set to metered. Metered connections have some advantages, such as Windows updates not being downloaded or installed automatically. It has been reported that Windows 10 telemetry activity is less over metered connections but supposedly only a few kb an hour, so this is negligible data transmission.

  30. I'm a sheep, I know by jitterman · · Score: 0

    Unless they are taking my financial data, I just don't care about any of this. Let them research my use patterns, etc. Let them know if I want a Slap-Chop or visit the Pirate Bay. Don't steal my banking data, don't buy stuff online using my logins, and don't steal my identity. Otherwise, it doesn't matter to me.

    Can someone convince me otherwise? Not being sarcastic here. I see a lot of "I hate this" posts, and "see, this is what they're doing," "this is how you get around it," etc., but I haven't noticed anyone (could have missed it) pointing out, other than general principle, which I do get, why I should care.

    I'm by no means new to /. or to computing - maybe I'm just tired in my middle age, but I'm not just not angered by this. And you won't convince me (without actual proof) that the iPhone/Android devices we use doesn't do similar things, almost entirely in attempts to make the products we use better for us, to make our interactions with them smoother and more intuitive. Human-machine interaction is NOT an easy thing to get right, and it takes a lot (understatement there) of research and information to improve it. From everything I see, MS, Google, and the (much hated by me personally) Apple are simply doing just that - trying to make their products more intuitive so as to appeal to their user bases in an effort to gain market share. In the end, this is aimed at benefiting both us as users AND the companies who provide the devices and OSes that run them.

    TLDR: I left all that shit on. My bank account is intact, and my children haven't been kidnapped.

    --
    For conscience is the wound, and there's naught to staunch it
    1. Re:I'm a sheep, I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Microsoft, and by extension, your government is compiling an extensive log of everything you do, everyone you talk to, and essentially a lot of what you think about doing.

      If you honestly think that this information grants no power or control over you then you are a fool beyond reach of rational thought and I wish you good luck.[you're going to need it]

    2. Re:I'm a sheep, I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can someone convince me otherwise? Not being sarcastic here. I see a lot of "I hate this" posts, and "see, this is what they're doing," "this is how you get around it," etc., but I haven't noticed anyone (could have missed it) pointing out, other than general principle, which I do get, why I should care.

      In 1920s Germany, who would possibly have a problem with ticking the "Jewish" box on the Census? Or showing up at the swankier clubs where the waiters were gay -- it's a little kinky, but there was a nascent "Not that there's anything wrong with that" attitude during the latter years of the Weimar Republic. Show me the evidence that the Kaiser has any intention of abusing that information. And who cares what kind of clubs people go to?

      In 1930s USA and Canada, who could possibly have a problem with ticking the "Japanese" box on the census? They're just trying to get a handle on how many people have moved over from across the Pacific. The US and Canada have strong property rights, and there's no way they'd just seize people's stuff. We're not at war with Japan, we're never going to go to war with Japan, and even if, hypothetically, we were, there's no law against having Japanese parents.

      In 2010s USA, gay marriage was legalized. Some of the current candidates have a real problem with this. (Tim Cook is gay, and is old enough to remember when being gay - not just the physical act of "sodomy" (illegal in 15 states as recently as 2003), I mean simply having same-sex attraction) was illegal. There are at least two Republican candidates who would like to bring that back as early as next year. Not just banning gay marriage, but banning gays altogether. Some of my friends are homosexual. They should probably be concerned about that.

      In 2016 USA, some of my friends smoke pot - and they're currently subject to arrest for it by state police in all but three states - and subject to Federal arrest in all fifty states.

      I'm a white, male, heterosexual, beer-guzzling carnivore who does not indulge in pot. Perhaps pot will be legalized, but in 2020, in recognition that alcohol (my drug of choice) is more harmful than cannabis (I've never imbibed), I'll be arrested for having a https://picobrew.com/ turnkey setup, because the continued traffic between the Picobrew and the Cloud serves as probable cause that I'm homebrewing beer. Perhaps the animal rights crew / sustainability crowd take over and I'll be subject to arrest for buying a couple of pot-bellied pigs every year to get my bacon fix in 2030 (in much the same way as we'd probably investigate someone whose credit card purchases show the purchase of a new new cat every six months.)

      The general principle, in case you're too fucking dense to figure it out, is that it's impossible to predict what currently legal things will be made illegal in a 10-year timeframe.

      It's important to vote for representatives that will expand your freedoms, not restrict them. Of course, that's what the religious right says about electing people who'd imprison Tim Cook not for his stance against the FBI, but because of his sexuality. It's an affront to their "religious freedom."

      Which is why it's also important to hedge one's bets in case that fight is lost. To that end, the only way to make sure data is not abused by future administrations is to never let it be collected in the first place.

    3. Re:I'm a sheep, I know by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Until random terrorist dies with file X.doc on his machine, the NSA ask Microsoft who else has that file and you find out because a SWAT team took down your front door at 5am and shot your dog.

      It will happen. See also: DNA and fingerprint false positives.

    4. Re:I'm a sheep, I know by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      If Apple can be forced to crack open phones without clear benefit, what do you want to bet that Microsoft can't be induced to hand over all the stuff you did at Pirate Bay to the MAFIAA?

      Ever known a professional writer? Ever looked at what they do web searches on? Do you think they want the FBI investigating them for that?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    5. Re:I'm a sheep, I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have an application that fails and sends information to MS, or causes some glitch in Windows that triggers notice to MS (that telemetry stuff...), and MS in its internal review (based on what verifiable standards, and with what due process and user consent?) decides that they need the data files you were using at the time of the error report, W10 allows them to enter your computer by remote control and retrieve those data files - financial or otherwise. In theory, you have to have your telemetry setting at "Full" - the default for anything you can buy as an Ordinary Person, but easy to change - for that to happen. But my tinfoil beanie is still there because I suspect they can override the limits if they really want to. If you want to stop it all and don't have Enterprise, you can set rules in the computer's firewall and the router firewall that block any connections to MS, but that can cause other problems and could, potentially, cause W10 to stop working if it can't call home occasionally to verify that it's legal. Plus, of course, they probably change things occasionally to get around firewall users. BTW, from MS' description of the "Basic" telemetry level, it sounds much like what was standard in WinXP-7, and possibly in 8.

  31. Topics Vary by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 1

    The subject of the post is not always the topic of the article. It's often a tangential or unrelated matter. I usually change the subject line of a thread when posting, not because I expect anyone to read it, but so I'll have a better idea what is being responded to if I get any reply notifications in my email.

    Just because you don't use something does not make it stupid.

    --
    Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
    1. Re:Topics Vary by lesincompetent · · Score: 1

      You are off-topic. Now i am too. Thanks.

    2. Re:Topics Vary by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 1

      So what? It's not like there's a forum for meta-discussion here, and most of the discussions for any given article are tangential. The only time the moderators get involved is if the discussion is both off-topic and not worth discussing.

      From your comment history it really seems like Twitter is more your style. Maybe you should spend some more time there rather than trying to drag this forum down to your level.

      --
      Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
  32. Does it so WHO it is shared with, not just WHAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and what it can be used for.

  33. Beta Test by ISoldat53 · · Score: 2

    Didn't MS test this OS? Telemetry collection seems like a universal beta test. "Let put this stuff out there then see what happens. Then fix that."

    1. Re:Beta Test by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      Sure it's tested. But if their tests don't line up with customer experiences and behaviors, the tests are falling short. So by gathering telemetry, they can know what the end to end tests need to be testing.

    2. Re:Beta Test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure it's tested. But if their tests don't line up with customer experiences and behaviors, the tests are falling short. So by gathering telemetry, they can know what the end to end tests need to be testing.

      That's a large part of what testing is about. They pay people to test their software in a controlled environment, gathering telemetry.

      You're also supposed to pay competent usability and accessibility experts, who are supposed to know most of what is needed and what could cause problems.

      Sure there will always be the few odd cases, on specific hardware, with specific config and files, and sometimes even long technical chats on bug reports won't be able to solve them. That for sure is no reason at all to spy and Trojan horse billions of users, additionally weakening their security against abusive governments and third-parties.

      This is treason, plain and simple.

  34. No explanation needed by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    I don't care, I block them all.

  35. Re: Liar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are lying.

  36. Re:A Nice Breakdown from Microsoft!! by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

    And there was no real explanation on what data that's sent, only some fuzzy statements. How can they be sure that "Security" don't profile me?

    Any information pulled will be useful to profile me as a user.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  37. Bill Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hardened heart.

    Buy Linux in Hell.

    http://drbo.org/x/d?b=drb&bk=47&ch=19&l=24#x

    Global Mother Fucking Spyware.

  38. Fantasyland. by westlake · · Score: 1

    Considering the audience here on Slashdot, the true message to share and discuss is: "Stop Writing Software for Windows".
    My software company has just ruled out all future Windows development. Yes, that means we'll lose some clients...

    Most of us here don't have the luxury of pissing off 90% of our potential market and 100% of our existing Windows customers.

    1. Re:Fantasyland. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is exactly how you get businesses big and small behaving like sociopaths. Completely rational but generally considered not the greatest for society.

    2. Re:Fantasyland. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, original poster here.

      I haven't pissed off any clients. It obviously depends on what you do, but if you speak honestly with your own clients you'll find that they're pissed at Windows 10 themselves. All of these features that we've been discussing here on /. are very unattractive to *everyone*. We've even have a few (granted, only a couple, I'm not one to exaggerate) clients ask for non-Windows solutions based on what they've heard so far.

      So obviously we are supporting all of our existing customers. No one is migrating from Win7, and their software will continue to run without incident for as long as they want. Yes, EOL for Win7 is 2020, but if Microsoft support truly ends at that time, then those systems will be isolated from the network and continue to work.

      All new projects will be Linux or *BSD based, as needed.

      Wish us luck?

    3. Re:Fantasyland. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead you do the death spiral of increasing support costs as your target platform gets harder to support. Then, when your support department is larger than your development department, you outsource to India. Finally, when all your customers ditch your shitty support for a web-based application that is platform agnostic, you hit the bottom and die.

      But hey, at least you didn't piss off the potential market, except for your shitty support.

  39. Worse than I could have imagined by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    Granting themselves a backdoor by default whereby humans are able to selectively exfiltrate whatever data and configuration they please from your machines without your knowledge or approval.

    Absolutely stunning criminal trespass. No secret my opinion of Microsoft has taken a nose dive as of late but this is insane.

    1. Re:Worse than I could have imagined by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

      But its not criminal trespass see any privacy groups up in arms?? its a free OS no ones pointing guns at peoples heads to get it. The ones who pay are i guess getting enterprise editions which are more controllable by the owners but not 100%they are the ones IMO who can complain.Not the free installers though, brilliant move making DX12 win 10 compatible only that garunteess gamers will get 10.

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
    2. Re:Worse than I could have imagined by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "its a free OS no ones pointing guns at peoples heads to get it."

      Er, what happens when a Win7 machine spontaneously upgrades itself to Win10?

      How is that not criminal trespass?

  40. Re:A Nice Breakdown from Microsoft!! by sexconker · · Score: 1

    No, you invoked it.
    He made the comparison which you feel satisfies the law, but you were the one who invoked the law.

    http://dictionary.reference.co...

  41. Re:A Nice Breakdown from Microsoft!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or if he doesn't hold the same opinions and values as you do.

    Try getting out into the world at least once in your life. There are many people out there who don't think exactly the same as you do, you uncultured, self-centred mook.

  42. Are You a Complete Fucking Moron? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you a complete fucking moron?

    Or, are you just a massive tool?

    They can, at their choosing and without your consent, remotely run commands of their choosing on your machine! They clearly state this. They also state that unless you are running an Enterprise version, that you cannot turn this off or prevent them form doing so!

    Read the article or the TechNet document and stop with your own bald faced lies.

  43. Hum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't there a way to spoof MS Own Servers by tricking Windows 10 to send the telemetry to your own MS Servers? Even if the data is encrypted I'm sure gigabytes of data send to your servers would raise a red flag.

  44. Re: subjects in comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Subjects in comments are an important part of Slashdot, because they allow us to narrow the focus of the discussion in a given sub-thread.

    But apparently the importance of the feature is lost on newbies with UIDs north of 2.8 million.

  45. APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit http://www.start64.com/index.p...

    Gets data for blocking ads, trackers + known bad sites via 10 reputable security community sites.

    * Better on power/cpu/ram+ other IO resource use vs. local DNS servers & certainly less security issues vs. DNS servers + routers - Blocks all ads + known bad sites, all the time (not like "AlmostALLAdsBlocked" bribed by google to let ads through)

    APK

    P.S.=> Does more for speed (hardcoded favorites + adblocking), security (adblocking + blocking known bad sites/servers & dns issues avoiding DNS), reliability (vs. downed or dns poisoned dns), & anonymity (avoids dns request logs) vs. ANY other SINGLE "so-called -solution'" out there, bar-none using what you already natively have. Unlike Adblock\UBlock\Ghostery it's also not detectable & blockable by ClarityRay/BlockIQ + it uses FAR LESS RESOURCES yet does far more (especially vs. DNS security issues)

    ... apk

  46. Gros Michel banana scenario=dangers of monoculture by rsborg · · Score: 1

    For those of you who were wondering what z80a meant, apparently the Gros Michel banana was one of the main banana species used and was wiped out by a fungal plague.

    In the 1950s, Panama disease, a wilt caused by the fungus Fusarium oxysporum, wiped out vast tracts of ‘Gros Michel’ plantations in South America and Africa, but the cultivar survived in Thailand.

    By 1960, the major importers of Gros Michel bananas were nearly bankrupt, and had waited to deal with the financial and environmental crisis. The Cavendish was cultivated so consumers would still be able to obtain bananas.[2]

    So, a monoculture nearly wiped out the industry. A tale of caution.

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  47. Re:Gros Michel banana scenario=dangers of monocult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cavendish (or whatever is prevalent now) is facing a similar fate now. We may not be able to get any kind of bananas in the not so distant future as the corporate monoculture mode continues ...

  48. says microsoft tech reading your docs...AND remote by johncandale · · Score: 1

    . If your system reports back strange crashes that Microsoft techies can't get their heads around, they can request extra data from your machine, which Windows 10 will hand over under remote control if management approves. This extra information can include some of your files so the engineers can recreate the exact crash in their labs using your data and apps. Microsofties can also run diagnostic tools on your system to gather more evidence. Here's Microsoft's explanation of the process: Before more info is gathered, Microsoft’s privacy governance team, including privacy and other subject matter experts, must approve the diagnostics request made by a Microsoft engineer. If the request is approved, Microsoft engineers can use the following capabilities to get the information: Ability to run a limited, pre-approved list of Microsoft certified diagnostic tools, such as msinfo32.exe, powercfg.exe, and dxdiag.exe. Ability to get registry keys. Ability to gather user content, such as documents , if they might have been the trigger for the issue.

  49. WINDOWS 10 ENTERPRISE LTSB by scumfuker · · Score: 1

    Doesn't this seem the better option if you're able to get your mitts on it?

    No Edge, Store/Apps, Cortana, and telemetry (even the extra bits) all stoppable. Essentially a clean desktop edition of Windows 10 that gets all major bug-fixes and security updates without all the extra cruft for a period of 3-5 years (depending on when they choose to integrate the current branch features and release the next LTSB).

    Here's a couple links:

    http://blogs.technet.com/b/ukt...
    http://www.techworld.com/secur...

    Now, I've looked around online and people seem to proclaim the end of the world if you would like to use this as a desktop OS: 'Oh you can disable all of that crap yourself and spend hours gutting and tweaking it to suit your needs. LTSB is meant for ATMs and nuclear subs and you won't get any of the new features, why wouldn't you want them? Blah blah blah'... Frankly in techminded circles that sort of reasoning flabbergasts me, it's spouting off of ideology on no basis of reality. (Though you see the same end-of-the-worlders rear their head when you talk about the pros/cons of disabling UAC.)

    If you can legally acquire it, I'm really not seeing the downsides as you get many of the little quality of life updates from Win 8/8.1/10 (task manager, DX12, file copy dialogue) without many of the obnoxious ones (lockscreen ads, Candy Crush, 'helpful suggestions'). Not to mention nothing like the 'fall update fiasco' bulldozing your settings whenever MS pleases by providing and presenting an OS in-place upgrade as a normal Windows update.