Slashdot Mirror


New Research Shows You Can Grow Sperm In a Dish (sciencemag.org)

sciencehabit writes: How the male body produces sperm has long been hidden inside its genitalia. Trying to recreate the process in a lab for humans and other mammals has led to many failures - sperm development appeared to be dependent on unique conditions in the testes. But a new technique may finally be bringing that process into the open. A team of Chinese researchers reports turning a dish of a certain type of mouse stem cell into spermlike cells, which were then used to fertilize eggs and produce healthy mouse pups. The approach could help researchers study mammalian sperm development more directly, and it could spur efforts to develop treatments for male infertility in people.

88 of 158 comments (clear)

  1. No more domestic violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Seems that we've solved that problem.

    1. Re:No more domestic violence by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      For Great Social Justice!

    2. Re:No more domestic violence by B33rNinj4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh? Does it solve violence against men from women? Go back to your anonymous hole.

    3. Re:No more domestic violence by cayenne8 · · Score: 2
      Sure...but just TRY to get a petri dish to mow the fucking lawn.....

      :)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  2. Why? by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    I produce plenty, don't need a dish, only a web connection.

    1. Re:Why? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Not for a biologist.

    2. Re:Why? by flopsquad · · Score: 1

      This could lead to the grossest science fair projects yet!

      "But Doug, the lab-grown meat booth doesn't even have Hollandaise sauce!"

      --
      Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
  3. or... by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    perhaps one of the male lab assistants had a sense of humour and was left alone in the lab for a while.

    1. Re:or... by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      If he's making mouse sperm, it's a major discovery.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:or... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Just imagine the babies

      We don't have to imagine. We've already seen the first human-rodent hybrid:

      http://inthesetimes.com/images...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:or... by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Indeed. We could finally make true human-mouse hybrids for those that want offspring, but without all the hassle of human children!

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  4. Re:Why is this a good thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    >> it could spur efforts to develop treatments for male infertility in people. ...because the one thing this planet needs is even more humans?

    A few years of unsuccessfully trying to have a baby would change your opinion and attitude on the subject.

  5. Men No Longer Needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Well guys, it took millions of years but we're finally redundant.

    1. Re:Men No Longer Needed by Punko · · Score: 3, Funny

      The only reason females of our species haven't done away with us already, is that we were the only route for children. If we lose that, there is no way they'll put up with us any longer. We're doomed, I tell you, doomed !

      --
      If only we could fall into a woman's arms without falling into her hands
    2. Re:Men No Longer Needed by Lotana · · Score: 1

      Have no fear, we are still valued for our different approach to problem solving and directness. My friend resigned from an all-female office job after she got sick of all the gossiping and backstabbing going on. In her next job she specifically asked in the interview if there were men on the team.

    3. Re:Men No Longer Needed by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Nah, they'll still need someone to get the lids off jars and kill spiders.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Men No Longer Needed by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Smart lady.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    5. Re:Men No Longer Needed by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      What's that whooshing sound I hear?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:Men No Longer Needed by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

      The only reason females of our species haven't done away with us already, is that we were the only route for children. If we lose that, there is no way they'll put up with us any longer. We're doomed, I tell you, doomed !

      That and the fact we can smash them if they step out of line.

    7. Re:Men No Longer Needed by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      The only reason females of our species haven't done away with us already, is that we were the only route for children. If we lose that, there is no way they'll put up with us any longer. We're doomed, I tell you, doomed !

      What makes you think that men currently *are* the only route for children? A single man, throughout his life, can provide sperm cells for hundreds of thousands of women, yet we haven't gotten to that state yet?

      The ability to grow sperm cells won't suddenly make women think "Oh - I don't need a man to have a child" because they already have that option, and yet are not choosing it.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  6. Takes the men out of the equation by da_guy2 · · Score: 1

    This is probably a great thing for lesbian couples trying to conceive. No more going to sperm bank and picking out some random stranger to be the father of your kids. Now just make sperm from your partners stem cells.

    1. Re:Takes the men out of the equation by slew · · Score: 1

      This is probably a great thing for lesbian couples trying to conceive. No more going to sperm bank and picking out some random stranger to be the father of your kids. Now just make sperm from your partners stem cells.

      Or single women who want to marry themselves...
      Why would such a woman want to have any random child, if they could have themselves as a child?

      Maybe we should stop this line of discussion before George Lucas's lawyers start chiming in...

    2. Re:Takes the men out of the equation by da_guy2 · · Score: 1

      Actually.. Randall Munroe (xkcd.com) discusses the genetic implications of this in his book What if? https://whatif.xkcd.com/book/ . Kinda scary.

    3. Re:Takes the men out of the equation by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      They can already create a new (female) child out of just two eggs.. Heck, that was from the 80s, likely on "That's Incredible".

  7. Re:Well, so much for that business plan by Ann+O'Nymous-Coward · · Score: 2

    Oh, so you're where all those old mouse balls went...

  8. grow your own evidence by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    for the rape kit. a little gene mod here/a little there...profit!

  9. I can't wait by Krishnoid · · Score: 2

    I, for one, welcome the new tidal wave of science fiction, social justice flamewars, and legislation that follows this. This is so promising, I may buy popcorn futures.

    Mz. Sheldon, your future has arrived.

  10. Worrying by Bruce66423 · · Score: 1

    There is a nasty strand within feminism that regards all men as inherently evil. The prospect of being able to finally declare us redundant is therefore quite attractive to such people.This story is about one who had an abortion just because it was a boy http://www.inquisitr.com/18276...

    1. Re:Worrying by macs4all · · Score: 1

      That's ok cause there is a strand within humanism that follow the three rules: 1. Women are Evil 2. Men are Stupid 3. Beer is Good

      Todd Rundgren said (sang) it best...

    2. Re:Worrying by gweihir · · Score: 1

      No real problem. Most women are actually fine with how things are set up gender-wise. A minority of loud female fascists does not a real problem make. May just take a while for the rest to wise up about them.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    3. Re:Worrying by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Well, I knew a woman who had an abortion because the baby was going to be the wrong color, so her husband would have known she was cheating. People are strange.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    4. Re:Worrying by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      You can't "convert" someone to become a lesbian. Or straight, for that matter. Sexual attraction is fixed before birth.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    5. Re:Worrying by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      The vast majority of psychiatrists disagrees with you. So, who am I going to listen to - some crank on the Internet who cites a viewpoint that was disproved by empirical evidence? I think not. Go peddle your bible crap somewhere else.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    6. Re:Worrying by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Oh, some psychiatrists said so? Okay then.

      Let me know when the geneticists and neuroscientists have something to show on the topic.

      They already have weighed in as well, and they're on board. Don't believe it - do your own research. Go suck wind, pound sand, or whatever ignorant losers like you do.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  11. Have you looked in my fridge?!?? by jddj · · Score: 1

    You can grow ANYTHING in a dish!

  12. Only good for opening jars by tekrat · · Score: 1

    And fixing the washing machine. That's about it guys. Other than that we are no longer needed by women.

    Us guys need to get Boston Dynamics to develop the ultimate sex-bot, and then men and women can forevermore go their separate ways....

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:Only good for opening jars by slew · · Score: 1

      And fixing the washing machine. That's about it guys. Other than that we are no longer needed by women.

      Us guys need to get Boston Dynamics to develop the ultimate sex-bot, and then men and women can forevermore go their separate ways....

      Ah, the givers of pain and delight...
      You can't live with them and apparently (w/o advanced technology), you can't live w/o them.

    2. Re:Only good for opening jars by darthsilun · · Score: 2

      If my wife had to pay the mortgage – on her income alone––

      Yeah, I feel pretty secure.

    3. Re:Only good for opening jars by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      If my wife had to pay the mortgage – on her income alone–– Yeah, I feel pretty secure.

      You do realize just how pathetic what you just wrote is, don't you?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    4. Re:Only good for opening jars by darthsilun · · Score: 1

      Sometimes the truth hurts! And get a sense of humor. Ever hear of "black humor." Yeah, it's a thing. Look it up. Also sarcasm.

    5. Re:Only good for opening jars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is a thing called divorce...where you will be destitute and will keep paying for her style of life.

    6. Re:Only good for opening jars by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Sometimes the truth hurts! And get a sense of humor. Ever hear of "black humor." Yeah, it's a thing. Look it up. Also sarcasm.

      Oh, I got's me a sense of hoomer. You're still kinda pathetic. I mean that in the nicest way possible.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  13. Re:Why is this a good thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Don't make me Godwin you, because, so help me, I'll do it!

  14. Re:Why is this a good thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So adopt. Plenty of kids out there who could use a good home. I have several friends who've done cross-racial adoption too... there's no reason your kids need to look like you.

  15. Re:Why is this a good thing? by avandesande · · Score: 1

    Not to mention having bad genes- ie can't make sperm. Might be interesting idea though for Vets that have had their genitalia blown off.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  16. Re:Why is this a good thing? by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 1

    Birth rates in advanced countries are already well below the rate of replacement. In some countries, it's so low they're going to see significant population declines. The only place birth rates are still up are in the most underdeveloped parts of the world, and even in moderately developed countries it's tapered off quite a bit. China panicked about their birth rate, instituted draconian measures, and now has a significantly negative birth rate, to the point that they're going to have a huge demographic swell of the elderly, followed by a massive drop as the old generations die off.

    This will basically just be a drop in the bucket, no pun intended. It's going to be way too expensive to really have any impact in any place but the more developed world, and those are the places that have birth rates below replacement level.

  17. Does this require the Y chromosome? by niaxilin · · Score: 1

    If this doesn't require the Y chromosome, then it could pave the way for female-only reproduction.

    I'm male, but I have no qualms with the continuation of our species being without the Y chromosome (males). It's not an affront to my gender identity to wonder if the future would be better off that way. I'm not talking about killing off the males; just not making any more.

    We should keep some male sperm frozen behind a glass door: "Break in case of extreme reproductive emergency."

  18. Re:Why is this a good thing? by nospam007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "A few years of unsuccessfully trying to have a baby would change your opinion and attitude on the subject."

    It's just hormones pumped into your body by your genes who want to replicate. Since we know that, you can easily overcome the need, since it's not _you_ wanting this unpaid job for decades.

  19. Re:Why is this a good thing? by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    Sorry but I believe that its in humanity's best interests that we shouldn't try and work around the little natural selection that we haven't already circumvented.

  20. in vitro breeding (livestock, pets, conservation) by staalmannen · · Score: 1

    This is very cool and could potentially be extremely useful in animal breeding for livestock, pets or conservation biology. Basically, differentiate stem cells into eggs and sperm, cross, differentiate the new stem cells and repeat. A cool thing in animal breeding is that this could overcome species barriers, so traits could be introgressed by crossing species where the first generation offspring normally would have been sterile.

  21. Our Ford by pullphinger · · Score: 1

    I can't need to stop reading these post. Now where did I put my soma...... ?

  22. Wonderful by ronmon · · Score: 1

    Millions of babies without fathers is just what the world needs.

    1. Re:Wonderful by techno-vampire · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just wait until the women who've used this realize that there's nobody around for them to stick with child support.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
  23. Re:Sex bots by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    Sex bots? As soon as a robot can kill a spider in a bathtub, it's all over for penile-Americans.

  24. Helping the machines by skaag · · Score: 1

    Good, by the time the machines rule humans, we'll have all of that information on how to clone human batteries ready for them.

    --

    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain... time... to... die...

  25. Re:Sex bots by gweihir · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The 3rd-wave feminists need men urgently as the suppressed class that works for them and fulfills all their needs. As none of them have any actual skills besides grandstanding and claiming to be victims and bossing others around, they would just die on their own, like any other parasitic life-form.

    Of course, they do not want to pay with sex for all that either, so I really do not see why they are opposed to sex-bots and porn in the first place. May just be a result of general stupidity and inability to connect causes and effects.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  26. Re:Why is this a good thing? by gweihir · · Score: 1

    You assume humans are rational. Most are not and are great big narcissists in addition. Those with reproductive problems that are rational refrain from giving their children even worse problems than they themselves have and adopt or do without children.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  27. Re:One MAJOR issue. by macs4all · · Score: 1

    A woman at that point could possibly get sperm from a man without his consent or knowledge and then use that child as a golden ticket against them.

    There was a Law & Order episode about EXACTLY this!

  28. Re:Sex bots by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    Third-wave feminism is pretty much dead nowadays, and 4th wave is having a very hard time figuring who they should hate.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  29. Re:Great, one less reason for males by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    Never heard of a vasectomy, have you? If you don't want to father kids, then it's your responsibility to ensure it doesn't happen, not hers.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  30. Re:Um, why? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    There are SEVEN BILLION of us already here, and we are adding TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND more people, EVERY SINGLE FUCKING DAY!!!!

    ENOUGH!

    I think I have identified the problem :-)

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  31. Re:Great, one less reason for males by Rockoon · · Score: 1

    Never heard of a vasectomy, have you? If you don't want to father kids, then it's your responsibility to ensure it doesn't happen, not hers.

    Sounds like a good argument against abortion too.

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  32. And Donald Trump can't win... by Bruce66423 · · Score: 1

    I hope you're right. The joy of being a pessimist is that you get pleasantly surprised when the worst doesn't happen

  33. Re:Why is this a good thing? by hey! · · Score: 1

    Well, the planet doesn't need more humans, but each generation of humans needs the next generation of humans to take care of it in their senescence. Not that there's likely to be a shortage of new humans in any case.

    On the flip side curing infertility isn't going to make any measurable or perceptible difference in population growth. For that there are two extremely powerful and effective cures: (1) raising the level of economic security so people don't try to procreate their way to a secure old age and (2) raising the status of women to the point where they have other things to do beside take care of children (important as that may be). If overpopulation bothers you, that's where your attention should go.

    So you may as well cure infertility. Yes, there's a cost to overpopulation, but there's a benefit to having a next generation too; but neither is going to be impacted by helping a handful of people obtain the benefits of having children.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  34. Re:Great, one less reason for males by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    Yep - all those fundies who are against abortion need to get their tubes snipped (male AND female. We don't need any more Duggar clans.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  35. Not new by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Not new.
    A google search for sperm in a dish shows a huge number of links for ... oh dear.

  36. Re:Why is this a good thing? by penguinoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    >> it could spur efforts to develop treatments for male infertility in people. ...because the one thing this planet needs is even more humans?

    A few years of unsuccessfully trying to have a baby would change your opinion and attitude on the subject.

    A few successes might change yours.

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  37. Re:Why is this a good thing? by Jack+Griffin · · Score: 1

    ...because the one thing this planet needs is even more humans?

    In the developed world, birth rates are fairly stable (ie every 2 people have less than 2 babies each on average). So the only over-population problem is people in poor countries breeding like rabbits.

  38. Pfft. Amateurs! by Chas · · Score: 1

    I can grow sperm!

    No dish required!

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  39. Re:Why is this a good thing? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    >> it could spur efforts to develop treatments for male infertility in people. ...because the one thing this planet needs is even more humans?

    A few years of unsuccessfully trying to have a baby would change your opinion and attitude on the subject.

    A few successes might change yours.

    Awesome when a post is interesting, insightful. and funny at the same time. Well played sir, well played indeed!

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  40. Re:Great, one less reason for males by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    Yep - all those fundies who are against abortion need to get their tubes snipped (male AND female. We don't need any more Duggar clans.

    Actually all those *women* who don't want abortions should get their tubes snipped - men get no say in abortion.

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  41. Re:Great, one less reason for males by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    Never heard of a vasectomy, have you? If you don't want to father kids, then it's your responsibility to ensure it doesn't happen, not hers.

    If she doesn't want to have kids, then it's her responsibility to ensure it doesn't happen - I don't know when she ovulates, she does.

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  42. Coming to a take-away near you by jandersen · · Score: 1

    Well, I knew that the Chinese have some exotic things on the menu, but this one is a bit novel, all the same.

  43. Re:Why is this a good thing? by hey! · · Score: 1

    Nobody knows whether it's possible.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  44. Re:Great, one less reason for males by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    Sure men get a say in abortion - you don't make a baby, there's no abortion. Or did you miss sex ed? :-)

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  45. Re:Great, one less reason for males by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    You miss the point - even if she wants kids, you still have the option of not having any by a simple snip-snip. After all, you might not know when she ovulates, but you know when you cum, and the potential consequences. And you know what we call people who use ovulation date as a birth control method? Parents.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  46. Re:Great, one less reason for males by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    Okay, that has got to be one of the stupidest AC comments I've ever seen. I'm not even going to reply to what you wrote except to say that if you want a reply, log in. Otherwise, DIAF :-)

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  47. Re:Sex bots by gweihir · · Score: 1

    The sentiment is appreciated...

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  48. Sperm in a dish eh? by dhaen · · Score: 1

    Is that because there's so much porn on satellite TV?

  49. I read that as Spam by trevc · · Score: 1

    I was disappointed when I realized they were not growing Spam.

  50. Re:Great, one less reason for males by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    You miss the point - even if she wants kids, you still have the option of not having any by a simple snip-snip. After all, you might not know when she ovulates, but you know when you cum, and the potential consequences. And you know what we call people who use ovulation date as a birth control method? Parents.

    Even if I want kids, she still has more options than I do: she can snip, use an IUD, take a pill, refuse sex-without-a-condom, take a morning after pill or, as a final resort, terminate.

    She has three more options than I do, so why are you stating that's its the guys responsibility? Are you presuming that all women are too stupid to practice birth control, hence the guy must practice abstinence? Why not ask the female to practice abstinence?

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  51. Re:Great, one less reason for males by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    Bullshit. You are responsible.for your sperm. If you don't want kids, it is only your responsibility because it your body. Same with women, it is their body, their choices, if she doesn't

    Why should someone else be responsible for your fertility? Also, if you can't control yourself, go fap yourself looking at porn. Problem solved. Or get ready to pay child support for the next couple of decades. Your decision. A woman isn't just a bucket for your cum. You sound like a horny teenager. Grow up, because right now you don't need to worry about birth control - your personality is more than sufficient.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  52. Re:Great, one less reason for males by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    Bullshit. You are responsible.for your sperm. If you don't want kids, it is only your responsibility because it your body. Same with women, it is their body, their choices, if she doesn't

    Why should someone else be responsible for your fertility?

    You deny women agency over their own body. If they get pregnant, you say it can't be their responsibility.

    Also, if you can't control yourself, go fap yourself looking at porn. Problem solved. Or get ready to pay child support for the next couple of decades. Your decision. A woman isn't just a bucket for your cum. You sound like a horny teenager. Grow up, because right now you don't need to worry about birth control - your personality is more than sufficient.

    Jokes on you. Since this year I've got custody and she's paying me child support. By what you just said, if she didn't want to be on the hook for child support she should have just kept her legs closed or used a vibrator, right? She should have controlled herself if she didn't want to pay child support, right?

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  53. Re:Great, one less reason for males by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    Fuck you, troll. I also said that women have control of their body and their choices. Grow up (oops - too late). The courts will say it's both your responsibilities, so both of you pay, and that's how it should be.

    And yes, if she didn't want this to happen, she could have told you to go screw yourself instead of sleeping with you. Or just demonstrated better taste in men.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  54. Re:Great, one less reason for males by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    Fuck you, troll. I also said that women have control of their body and their choices. Grow up (oops - too late). The courts will say it's both your responsibilities, so both of you pay, and that's how it should be.

    That s quite a change from your oft-pronounced usual opinion. You always say it's the man's responsibility for kids, you even repeat that opinion in this thread.

    And yes, if she didn't want this to happen, she could have told you to go screw yourself instead of sleeping with you. Or just demonstrated better taste in men.

    This may or may not come as a surprise to you, but women in general have the freedom to sleep with whoever they want to. Trying to slut-shame them when they favour men like me is bound to backfire.

    Besides, I've been married more than once, to beautiful and highly qualified women. It's a fantasy of yours that someone like me begs for sex.

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  55. Re:Great, one less reason for males by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    I never said that, asshole. I said that if a man doesn't want kids, he has to take precautions, same as the woman. The two are not mutually exclusive.

    Never said anyone couldn't sleep with anyone else, except kids and people who don't want to sleep with them. However, your attitude that it's the woman who should bear all the responsibility is misogynistic. That you don;t see it just means that you're an asshole.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  56. Re:Great, one less reason for males by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    I never said that, asshole. I said that if a man doesn't want kids, he has to take precautions, same as the woman. The two are not mutually exclusive.

    This is my post that you disagreed with upthread:

    If she doesn't want to have kids, then it's her responsibility to ensure it doesn't happen

    Good thing slashdot doesn't allow editing of posts, it's still for you to read.

    Never said anyone couldn't sleep with anyone else, except kids and people who don't want to sleep with them.

    No, you hypocrite, you just judged them for their sexual choices when you said:

    Or just demonstrated better taste in men.

    You want to be judged for your sexual choices? You think slut-shaming I a good thing?

    However, your attitude that it's the woman who should bear all the responsibility is misogynistic. T

    I never said nor implied that. I said women have more options. I never said that it's the women's responsibility, I repeatedly pointed out that the women simply have more options. That's a fact.

    hat you don;t see it just means that you're an asshole.

    I might be an asshole, but I get laid whenever I want to, usually with whoever I want to. Maybe it's because I don't go around judging others. Your bitterness over sexual freedoms suggest that perhaps you should get out once in a while, because it's usually those people who have unsatisfying sexual lives who are the loudest in denouncing other people's sexual lives.

    You've spen this whole thread telling me how poor my sex life must be, or how poor a females taste must be to want to sleep with me and I never, until now, even responded to those remarks. You're displaying an insane amount of frustration.

    oh, yeah, BTW I had satisfying sex last night, and am preparing to receive satisfying sex now. Remember that, while you type out your frustration into a vitriolic response to this, all alone, later tonight while I am getting it on :-)

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  57. Re:Great, one less reason for males by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1
    I made it quite clear that if EITHER doesn't want to have kids, it is each individuals responsibility to take the necessary precautions. Only a fool would assume that the other person is telling the truth when they said they had a vasectomy or were on the pill. Get a clue.

    Same as the rest of your post is also garbage and lies.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.