Slashdot Mirror


U.S. Military Spending Millions To Make Cyborgs A Reality (cnn.com)

mmell writes: The U.S. military is spending millions on an advanced implant that would allow a human brain to communicate directly with computers. If it succeeds, cyborgs will be a reality. The goal of the proposed implant is to "open the channel between the human brain and modern electronics" according to DARPA's program manager, Phillip Alvelda. In January, DARPA announced it plans to spend up to $62 million on the project, which is part of its Neural Engineering System Design program. The implant would be small -- no larger than one cubic centimeter, or roughly the size of two stacked nickels -- according to DARPA. The implantable device aims to convert neurons in the brain into electronic signals and provide unprecedented "data-transfer bandwidth between the human brain and the digital world," according to a DARPA statement announcing the new project. DARPA sees the implant as providing a foundation for new therapies that could help people with deficits in sight or hearing by "feeding digital auditory or visual information into the brain." A spokesman for DARPA told CNN that the program is not intended for military applications.
Ordinarily, such a headline might be considered sensationalist reporting and a batch of sci-fi -- except DARPA is involved. I can remember when internetworking computers was a radical concept until DARPA came up with some serious sci-fi style communications protocols to make it all work. With only $62 million budgeted (so far), we can only hope that it'll be a while before they succeed -- but then again, this is DARPA we're talking about.

102 comments

  1. systemd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hopefully they don't run poettering shitcode,or this is going to be a giant waste of money.

  2. Asking for it by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Alert: Pay us 5 grand in bitcoin, or we'll give you amnesia, like we did to Reagan and Rick Perry!"

    1. Re:Asking for it by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I doubt that they could do something like that. More likely they'd be limited to things like beaming images of goatse directly into your brain. It could probably also be used to induce seizures, but they could make a safeguard against that.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    2. Re:Asking for it by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

      I am a Nigerian prince and I need you to overthrow my enemies to release vast wealth which is my birthright...

      --
      Nullius in verba
    3. Re:Asking for it by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I doubt that they could do something like that. More likely they'd ... beam images of goatse directly into your brain.

      hell, I'd rather take the amnesia

    4. Re:Asking for it by slashdotwannabe · · Score: 1

      like beaming images of goatse directly into your brain. It could probably also be used to induce seizures

      Goatse-to-the-brain is HOW they would induce seizures...

      --
      This comment is my opinion and does not represent an official position of Donald Trump or others I do not work for
  3. A "batch" of sci-fi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...what? Is there an editor in the house? We seem to have a batch of orangutans at the controls here!

    1. Re:A "batch" of sci-fi? by Muros · · Score: 2

      ...what? Is there an editor in the house?

      Unfortunately, the implanted device converted his neurons to electronic signals.

  4. Johnny Mnemonic Anyone? by bagboy · · Score: 1

    NT

    1. Re: Johnny Mnemonic Anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neuromancer?

    2. Re:Johnny Mnemonic Anyone? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      It though more of "True Names" by Vernor Vinge.

      But it wasn't original with him, he just took it seriously. E.E.Smith may be the first to write about it in "Skylark of Valeron" around 1946. Unless you want to include E.M.Forrester "The Machine Stops", but it wasn't clear what was going on there.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    3. Re:Johnny Mnemonic Anyone? by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      I'd love to see a True Names cyberspace. Don't think it will happen in my lifetime though. Vinge really doesn't get the credit for being the father of cyberpunk he deserves .

    4. Re: Johnny Mnemonic Anyone? by mattcoz · · Score: 1

      Johnny Mnemonic is a prequel to Neuromancer

    5. Re:Johnny Mnemonic Anyone? by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      SPARTAN program. You know it's true.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    6. Re: Johnny Mnemonic Anyone? by Shortguy881 · · Score: 1

      Was it any better than Johnny Mnemonic?

      --
      Brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.
    7. Re:Johnny Mnemonic Anyone? by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      "Cylon leader attack!" "Death to all humans!"

  5. just don't link it to the missile launch systems by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    just don't link it to the missile launch systems

  6. If it's perfected... by sls1j · · Score: 1

    Then you wouldn't need to send the soldier to the battlefield at all, just a robot with some sort of encrypted and authenticated wireless interface between the brain and the robot.

    1. Re:If it's perfected... by dsmatthews9379 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ah right, like having a radio transmitter on a robot with a constantly on, two way, broadband data link is a good idea, if it is trying to hide and not get hit. If you radiate energy of any frequency you can be detected and if you can be detected you can be targeted.

    2. Re: If it's perfected... by Frankzy · · Score: 2

      So just bring a really long wire then, duuuh...

    3. Re:If it's perfected... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Ah right, like having a radio transmitter on a robot with a constantly on, two way, broadband data link is a good idea, if it is trying to hide and not get hit. If you radiate energy of any frequency you can be detected and if you can be detected you can be targeted.

      And that's why we need to put our focus on the undead!

    4. Re:If it's perfected... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead use a laser as a tight-beam communication link.

      Or an robot that just receives commands while being used in combat, but spends most of the time self directed as it moves into position.

    5. Re:If it's perfected... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep - a real risk. I'd get the robots to plant rugged/hardened directional relay devices at key points behind them as they move forward, and then use a low power narrow beam to feed signals back - sort of like bluetooth. They'd basically be whispering. Add in some ECM to obscure the origin of any signals, and you're covered. The control signals don't have to follow the same path.

    6. Re:If it's perfected... by dinfinity · · Score: 1

      If you radiate energy of any frequency you can be detected

      Like human soldiers do, you mean? Or does infrared not count?

    7. Re:If it's perfected... by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      If that's the plan, the government should really stop trying to weaken encryption. Because the fastest way to defeat the US's new unstoppable robot army is to hijack the signal and make them turn right back around and attack your own country.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    8. Re:If it's perfected... by Muros · · Score: 1

      A mesh network supplied by a swarm of small drones could provide blanket coverage and obfuscate positioning.

    9. Re:If it's perfected... by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      A true cyborg doesn't physically separate the brain and the robot. Consider RoboCop or the 6-Million Dollar Man.

      Especially consider RoboCop. Officer Murphy had perfectly good body parts amputated just so they could more completely cyborg him. A battlefield would be an ever better place for that.

      Used to be if you suffered serious damage in battle, you could look forward to going home and dealing with years of PTSD. With cyborg technology, they could just slap on a few machine parts and send you back for more!

  7. oportunity knocks by djent · · Score: 1

    Hackers everywhere are salivating at the thought.

  8. I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one look forward to our Amurican overlords. Oh wait

  9. Not enough money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we were talking 62 billion I might worry that this could be a reality but 62 million is about how much it cost to make half of kung fu panda 3

  10. $62 million man by TimSSG · · Score: 1

    $62 million man just does NOT sound as good as the $6 million man. Tim S.

    1. Re:$62 million man by bkmoore · · Score: 1

      $62 million man just does NOT sound as good as the $6 million man. Tim S.

      Inflation my man, inflation.

  11. Obligitory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Resistance is futile.

  12. Say what? by RNLockwood · · Score: 3, Funny

    "The implantable device aims to convert neurons in the brain into electronic signals ..."

    As an additional benefit a short time after implantation the subjects will qualify as news release editors or professional climate change deniers (but not for long).

    --
    Nate
    1. Re:Say what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they plugged yours in backwards, Data.

  13. d-a-r-p-a by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    doesn't anyone realize potential advantages?

  14. Blue Brain Project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not just invest in the blue brain project? They already have an excellent plan and project management.

  15. You will be assimilated by spork+invasion · · Score: 1

    We are the United States. You will be assimilated into our American culture. We have analyzed your defensive capabilities as being unable to withstand us. If you defend yourselves, you will be punished. Resistance is futile.

    --
    I hate all anonymous shitbags. Log in, you filthy bastards.
    1. Re:You will be assimilated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then we will have it Made in China...

  16. Final Interface by rtb61 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The real problem with the computer chip, human cell interface is that final connection. Getting a connection that will not burn out or contaminate cells or even the simple physics of different densities and how that will disrupt connections from changes in inertial loading. Those chips would need to have near identical densities to the brain tissue they connect to, any electrical exchange would have to be near identical to human electrical change (which tends to be more within the cell with chemical exchange outside of the cell) and chemical exchange would require refuelling the computer chips or attempting to draw that chemical fuel from the body.

    Sure computer biological connections can be more easily obtained but they are not sustainable or desirable and their intent only really functions around concepts of torture, forced destructive extraction of data or temporary enslavement (with biologic failure in any extended application).

    Reality is, for any longevity it would require the bioengineering of a living organisation planted within the brain that could act as the connection between the human mind and any digital interface. Something that could squirm into the brain, say between the two halves of the brain and wrap itself around the corpus collosum with it's tail attached to the skull providing the digital connection. About the only means be which to create a no destructive connection, apart from say remote quantum connections, in terms of measuring and changing. Far simpler to engineer the symbiote than to attempt a quantum connection of course if you don't care about damaging the individual and your purposes are destructively perverted as expected from the US military, than well, what else would you expect from the US military industrial complex.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    1. Re:Final Interface by dbIII · · Score: 1

      the simple physics of different densities

      There are polymers that conduct these days as well as 3D printing of cells, even a nerve cell recently.

      A lot of what you've written does have a good point but is very well known even at an introductory level - eg. metal implants in bone grind the utter crap out of surrounding bone and the immune systems drills holes in the bone as well due to collatoral damage to cleaning up the little bits ground off.

      Far simpler to engineer the symbiote

      If you can go that far why not grow organic bits that match the missing ones?

      than well, what else would you expect from the US military industrial complex.

      Something they would find useful? Cardboard cutout evil geniuses from fiction still need to use the phone at times :)

    2. Re:Final Interface by Fwipp · · Score: 2

      Reality is, for any longevity it would require the bioengineering of a living organisation planted within the brain that could act as the connection between the human mind and any digital interface. Something that could squirm into the brain, say between the two halves of the brain and wrap itself around the corpus collosum with it's tail attached to the skull providing the digital connection.

      Somebody's been reading a little too much Animorphs.

    3. Re:Final Interface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that and pulling stuff out of their ass! Did you read this bit:

      > and their intent only really functions around concepts of torture, forced destructive extraction of data or temporary enslavement

      These are certainly possible risks we'll have to face, come the 23rd century. Oh dear, my bullshit detector's needle is embedded in the wall to my right...

    4. Re:Final Interface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real problem with the computer chip, human cell interface is that final connection.

      That's not the real problem. Current generation electrodes are already bio-compatible and last years, so it's just a matter of engineering to improve upon that.

      The real problem with brain-computer interfacing, is that the signals that both use are vastly different. You can't just transmit the whole of Wikipedia into the brain and exclaim "I just learnt Kung Fu!".

      Sure, the cortex is very adaptable, and is shown to integrate new signals, but only into senses that are already there. Even if the brain could interpret the data in a meaningful way, that wouldn't mean it would automatically store it. A brain is not a hard drive. At best it would store some fuzzy impressions of what it percieved.

    5. Re:Final Interface by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

      A solution for electronics/neuron interface has been around for several years. I know one of the scientists involved, and yes, the research was at least partially funded by DARPA. As I recall, the emphasis was on restoring function to combat-wounded soldiers with brain injury. . .

    6. Re:Final Interface by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      3D printing of cells, even a nerve cell recently
      You are mistaken. There is no 3D printing of cells.
      There is 3D printing with cells, as in: the "ink" is mainly composed of human cells.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    7. Re:Final Interface by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Yes - impressive isn't it - escpecially since the cells can be grown outside of a human body and then "printed" into a structure that could be implanted. It has the potential to be used to make items for transplant that will not be rejected by the body so the recipient would not have to be on drugs that compromise their immune system for the rest of their lives.

  17. Millions? Wow I'm impressed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Author fails to comprehend magnitude

  18. DARPA specs by LeDopore · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can read about the specifics here: https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=op....

    The call is for a human-deployable system after 4 years. It should read from a million neurons and be able to write to 100,000 neurons, 1000 neurons in full duplex read-write, with 60 dB channel isolation, all in a tiny package that doesn't significantly overheat the brain tissue its up against.

    Who thinks that's possible?

    --
    Expected time to finish is 1 hour and 60 minutes.
    1. Re:DARPA specs by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      I wonder what the budget is for making the human centipede real. If you're going to network brains, why not digestive tracts ?

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    2. Re:DARPA specs by virtualXTC · · Score: 1

      It seems totally doable for a electrode array to do this if you can find a reason to convince the FDA of a need for higher density electrode arrays (the max is currently 256).

      Manufactures like Imec are confident they can use photographic techniques and flexible circuit board technology to create a multi-electrode arrays (MEA) that meet the density requirements set in the BAA. The tricky part here is to ensure the final system is biologically compatible.

      I was planning on applying to the grant using an optical approach but got delayed by an industry contact / didn't have time to vet other optical technologies before the abstract submission deadline. CRISPR-CAS9 editing is already in human trials for Parkinson's patients so getting FDA approval to use optogentic techniques to control human brains for extreme cases illnesses like quadriplegia and ALS could be doable in 4 years. And while readout of 100,000 neurons using optical methods and seems doable via implantable sensors, using optics for precise writing to 1 million neurons didn't seem possible in a fully implantable device without overheating the brain tissue, although it might be possible using a though skull fiber-optic technology. In any case, it's clear more development work would be needed in an optical approach vs an MEA based one.

    3. Re:DARPA specs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not. Not for the amount of money they put up for this. We applied for the program, and unfortunately it's going to fail in it's objectives. There was a big but quiet shake-up at DARPA awhile back, and all the current PMs are new and don't really know how these sorts of programs should operate. The current technical guys are still there and are pretty good, but the staff running the money is a bit out of their depth right now.

      They have about $50M allocated but they need about $250M to $500M to achieve their objectives. So it's not going to be succeed in it's aims. What it will do though is some interesting science that may have ancillary benefits regarding the study of the brain that could lead to interesting therapeutics, but to hit what they're trying to do is technically feasible but won't be achieved with how the program is structured.

    4. Re:DARPA specs by Shortguy881 · · Score: 1

      Completely doable. They already accomplished this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      Brilliance without wisdom, power without conscience. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants.
  19. 666 the number of the beast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hell and fire was spawned to be released

  20. Slashdot editor drunk on cheap whiskey again... by gavron · · Score: 5, Informative

    > I can remember when internetworking computers was a radical concept until DARPA came up with some serious sci-fi style communications protocols

    No, son, you don't. And no, they didn't.

    E
    P.S. To add finer detail, the IMPs used the 1822 protocol developed by Bolt, Beranek, and Newman (BBN) in 1969. You were not around to "remember when ... this was a radical concept". Four years later the protocol was improved to add sequence numbers, acks, send windows, and TCP was born. While ARPA (now DARPA) financed some of this work, it wasn't anything DARPA[sic] came up with nor was there any "serious sci-fi style" whatever to it. From the IMPs of 1969 to the NSF core routers (Cisco AGS+) of the 1980s to the networks we have today, The US DoD ARPA had a hand in funding it, but it didn't "come up" with any of it (that's not what they do) and none of it is sci-fi, and you don't remember any of that personally. Here's a shout out to the many people who were around that day.

    1. Re:Slashdot editor drunk on cheap whiskey again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you. I don't have the patience to correct fools and their delusions.

    2. Re:Slashdot editor drunk on cheap whiskey again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for that! I was sitting here going "uh, that's not how I remembered it...", wondering if I'd missed the party...

    3. Re:Slashdot editor drunk on cheap whiskey again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      none of it is sci-fi

      Actually, all of it is sci-fi turned real, just not looked at that way in sci-fi that came after it.

  21. Re:just don't link it to the missile launch system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or else, some poor soldier's ex-wife would get a little surprise.

  22. Selection pressure on the brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These devices place a selection pressure on the species. The brain may evolve to better interact with electronics but become dependent on them like the Binars. Other parts of the brain may decrease in function or disappear.

  23. can you view porn site directly from the implant ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    which I cares.

  24. Here it comes.... by Kryptonut · · Score: 1

    I for one, welcome our new cyborg overlords

    1. Re:Here it comes.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one, welcome our new cyborg overlords

      Ha, US cyborg overloads won't survive for long. Russian and Chinese hackers will encrypt their memories and then threaten to shut off their heart unless they pay them 100 bitcoin.

  25. Makes sense by p51d007 · · Score: 0

    When time comes to control the masses, you think the volunteer military, most police will FIRE upon you average everyday citizen? Some will, most won't, but a "cyborg" won't care.

    1. Re:Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm afraid TV lied to you. Interfacing a person's brain with a computer does not magically turn them into an emotionless killing machine.

      But why let facts get in the way of a good conspiracy theory, right?

    2. Re:Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, we've evolved far beyond the crude need for direct physical access to your brain, we can simply poison your food supply with refined sugar and entertain you into submission.

    3. Re:Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Police lets see -Fire or lose their pension ,what will they do ? They don't seem to have much trouble firing on citizens currently.

  26. Re:can you view porn site directly from the implan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    which I cares.

    Sure! Didn't you watch "Total Recall"???

  27. Re:DARPA specs/Re:Forbidden Planet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, so the launch captain takes a nap, has a bad dream - monsters from the id?

  28. Why hope for late success? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Military technology eventually makes it to the public. I, for one, cannot wait to get my own implant. I'm not sure why anyone would fear this, in any case.

  29. Re: what nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One cyborg that can simultaneously control a hundred drones as if they were extensions of his/her own body.

    Unless they are after me.

  30. Biocompatible brain electrodes now exist by HiThere · · Score: 1

    A few years ago this would have been a foolish idea, but now electrodes can be permanently attached to neurons with no apparent damage, so it becomes a lot more reasonable. And there's one style of them that can spread out and connect to a bunch of different neurons in the same area.

    So a lot of the enabling technologies have already been developed. I must admit that I don't expect this to work, but it's no longer a totally ridiculous idea.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  31. Great Excuse by techdolphin · · Score: 1

    Honey, I did not mean to have the affair. My chip was hacked, and I was forced to have the affair.

  32. Imagine a Beowulf cluster of THESE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By networking human brains directly together, so they can jointly participate in a single thought, we remove the ceiling on the expressive power of human cognition.

    For the skeptical: consider that an ordinary human thought is data moving over a network of neurons. No single neuron fully expresses or grasps the thought completely, yet each neuron is an integral part of it. Networking our brains together is just the next logical step in our ongoing cognitive evolution.

    Many people will be scared and not get on-board. That's fine. They will simply be left behind.

    1. Re: Imagine a Beowulf cluster of THESE! by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      I see that you only use the right side of your brain...

    2. Re: Imagine a Beowulf cluster of THESE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that you Clippy? Get out of my head. aaaah.

    3. Re:Imagine a Beowulf cluster of THESE! by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      Dude, we've all read about "The Singularity" years ago.

      But personally I'm betting on it happening through a major advance in teledildonics. Nothing drives new technological adoption like porn does.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
  33. DARPA by tsotha · · Score: 1

    Ordinarily, such a headline might be considered sensationalist reporting and a batch of sci-fi -- except DARPA is involved.

    DARPA is involved in a lot of things that don't work out. If anything, DARPA involvement means it's far enough in the future most of us will already be dead even if they get somewhere.

  34. Darpa isn't magic by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    They have spectacular successes and even bigger Failures

    The Hafnium bomb https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    Their Cybernetic Menagerie : Weaponized Rats, Bees, and a mechanical elephant http://www.motherjones.com/pol...

    One of my favorites, the Connection Machine architechture http://www.inc.com/magazine/19...

    1. Re:Darpa isn't magic by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      And what exactly was a "failure" with the Connection Machine?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re:Darpa isn't magic by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      Didn't read the article ?

      The company was non functional, and there wasn't a market for the machines

      From the article

      Thinking Machines sold seven CM-1s, but only because DARPA brokered and subsidized most of the deals. If the company was going to stay in business, it would need a machine that could pull its weight outside AI research. Unfortunately, according to Resnikov, the decision to tailor the CM-1 to the AI "nonmarket" cost Thinking Machines three years in the real-world marketplace.

    3. Re:Darpa isn't magic by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      What has that to do with your argument?
      Nothing ... the machines worked fine. The company was unsuccessful in the long run. That does not make the machine a failire or something wrong but eihter the company, or 'the times' or both.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    4. Re:Darpa isn't magic by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      Define Worked Fine ?
      They were not a great leap forward. They weren't even exceptional in their target niches. They were a bad and inappropriate use of funds. Currently they are most interesting as odd pieces of decor.

    5. Re:Darpa isn't magic by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      They weren't even exceptional in their target niches.
      Erm ... are you sure know what you are talking about?

      "Connection Machines2 had up to 64k processors.

      And yes they worked fine, no idea what kind of definition you want. The ones I worked on where marvelous.

      Currently they are most interesting as odd pieces of decor.
      Har har har. If they would not suck power as insanely as they do compared to our days hardware I gladly had one e.g. as bit coin miner ... yes, they usually not even had FPUs ... I know ... do you? (Yes, that was an F not a G)

      You only seem to repeat some misunderstood propaganda.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    6. Re:Darpa isn't magic by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      "Connection Machines2 had up to 64k processors.

      64k 1 bit processors. The machine was little more than a wiring challenge.

    7. Re:Darpa isn't magic by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      And the connection machine 2 was built of up to 64k 68000 processors.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    8. Re:Darpa isn't magic by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      inefficiently connected. The entire point of parallel architectures is to have efficient scaling.

  35. So trustworthy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... not intended for military applications.

    Using a neural link to fly a plane, is an idea that appeared in the 'Cyborg: Six million dollar man' (M Caiden) and 'Firefox down' (C Thomas) novels. This specification may be a long way from that capability but it's difficult to believe the technology isn't headed towards zero-button cockpits.

    1. Re:So trustworthy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      zero-button cockpits

      Isn't that what an autopilot does (except for the button to turn the autopilot on and off)? Auto pilots have existed as far back as the 1930's. The first fully autonomous landing was in the 1960's. It's not difficult to fly a plane. Very easy in fact. Artificial intelligence is not required, a simple third order analogue feedback loop (a gyro, some op amps and servos) is more than sufficient,

  36. we can only hope that it'll be a while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    before they succeed

    Why would we hope this? Isn't that the final nerd goal?

  37. Sounds like the wrong approach. by sabbede · · Score: 1

    One device the size of two nickels? Shouldn't it be dozens/hundreds/thousands/zillions of very small IO... thingies?

  38. The future of Apple Pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The important thing is, can I use my brain chip to buy a hoagie at Subway? If so, the convenience completely outweighs any risks.

  39. Not a good idea by jasper_amsterdam · · Score: 0

    "aims to convert neurons in the brain into electronic signals" So what, you burn them and run an engine or something? As a neuroscientist, I'd have to recommend against this. You kind of need those.

    --
    Let's put the genes back in Genesis.
  40. Oh, nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a far cry ftom making someone a 'cyborg'. The masturbatory teenaged sci-fi fantasies that dominate tech news these days are worse hyperbole than we had in even the 80s or 90s (The Russians will cower at the thought of our space lasers!). Do you have any idea how much money the government spends at our national labs on experiments that never work or lead to snything useful? Beware of the words 'could', 'may', or 'might' in headlines, it means something is being looked at, not available, and in my experience a lot of that stuff never sees the light of day.

    PS - Google pulls the same fantastical, hyperbolic and theoretical shit, they just pull their shit in public.

  41. right, but what about the abuse factor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you get arrested and convicted for X. that is almost a ninety five percent in the us.
    the court then makes the brain-chip interface mandatory for all convicts.

    just a thought. those bastards figured out a way to lock up twenty five percent of the worlds prison population with only five percent of the worlds population. sounds like the next logical step for our overlords.

    start over with the constitution being the law of the land. corporate-banking-military industrial complex non-interference and punishment (prison AND triple fines) amendment being a main component.

  42. Cyborgs already a reality by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

    Just a matter of degree...

  43. Project Lazarus, anybody? by mmell · · Score: 1

    Just thought I'd ask - being an old B5 fan and all . . .

  44. "program not intended for military applications" by neo-mkrey · · Score: 1

    But it will be weaponized eventually once we get most of the kinks worked out...

  45. Re: what nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A CB is the first step to interfacing cyberware in your body. Soon: Full Conversion Borgs.

  46. What the heck? by m76 · · Score: 1

    A cyborg is a cybernetic organism. This is just a way of communication. It has nothing to do with an actual cyborg. A man with a prosthetic leg is
    more of a cyborg than this.

  47. Another movie in the archives that fits... kinda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brainstorms that is, no implant but the transmission / recording of though, feeling, and emotions, plus a bit o' pain. I just feel sorry for the guy that looped the porn film... orgasms for the rest of his life, without purpose, ie. an orgasm without a clue!