Slashdot Mirror


Unprecedented DDoS Attack At Swedish Government, Media Outlets (www.dn.se)

Flu writes: Yesterday, at 19:30 CET, an unprecedented DDOS attack shut down both Swedish government sites and all major news outlets, including www.aftonbladet.se, www.expressen.se, www.svd.se, www.dn.se, www.di.se and others. The attack was announced in advanced in a tweet stating 'The following days attacks against the Swedish government and media spreading false propaganda will be targeted'. A large amount of traffic was detected from Russia. Tension between Russia and Sweden has slowly but steadily intensified during the latest years, causing Swedish relocation of military forces to strategic location and increased cooperation with NATO.

57 of 125 comments (clear)

  1. How to cope with DDoS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    These sites are the largest in Sweden and still they are vulnerable to DDOS. So: ask Slashdot: how do you cope with DDoS? What are the best tools to protect yourself and what to do when the attack is on?

    1. Re:How to cope with DDoS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      how do you cope with DDoS?

      Send all packets back where they came from. They are raping our servers. They flood our network routers. They bring in DOS. Some of them, I suppose, are nice packets.

      I love network packets, I have thousands and thousands sent to me every day. But these packets were sent by nasty, nasty criminals. You know what we did in the old days with these criminals. They are drowning our servers in packets.

      What are the best tools to protect yourself

      Build a firewall, and let the hackers pay for it.

      and what to do when the attack is on?

      Vote for Donald J. Trump.

    2. Re:How to cope with DDoS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh, I misunderstood. I assumed what you meant largest sites over all in Sweden. Not largest "old media" sites.
      KIA only lists traditional media. Forums like Flashback or Xhamster are not listed there.

      As for the particular DDoS it is probably hard to target only one of them. They all have their offices in the same part of Stockholm and probably share the same servers anyway. Mainstream journalism in Sweden is a monoculture of people that seldom travel outside the same half of Stockholm.

    3. Re:How to cope with DDoS? by phorm · · Score: 1

      Send all packets back where they came from.

      Actually that could be an amusing solution. Perhaps temporarily changing the ARP records for Russian so that the DDOS'ing machines start sending traffic back at some internal target would get the problem cleaned up quickly....

    4. Re:How to cope with DDoS? by Eunuchswear · · Score: 2

      You appear not to know how TCP/IP works.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    5. Re:How to cope with DDoS? by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Whenever a DDoS appears just shut down for a while and wait until the shitstorm passes. Nobody can run an attack forever.

      Another way to cope with attacks like this is to run servers on multiple IPs but have different IPs serving domestically compared to foreign traffic. Not a perfect solution but would at least make a DDoS attack a bit harder to execute. Even having transparent proxies may make a DDoS attack harder. Traffic shaping slowing down requests from high frequency sources is also possible.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    6. Re:How to cope with DDoS? by phorm · · Score: 1

      It's not TCP/IP so much as BGP, which is often already used in DDOS protection. Normally it would be used to filter traffic through a DDOS (protection) provider but perhaps instead they could push a route change to the Russian side and send all the "fun" traffic back at some networks in the homeland.

    7. Re:How to cope with DDoS? by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      You said ARP, not BGP. If you'd said BGP I wouldn't have commented, as it would nearly make sense.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
  2. Re: Sweden gets what they deserve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, both government and media sites were attacked. It's misleading to simply say that Assange was in the UK. He was, but at the Ecuadorian embassy. The diplomatic status of the embassy prevented the UK from arresting Assange while he was in the embassy. Your post is quite misleading and inaccurate. And yes, going to Sweden might mean extradition to the US, provided the US requests it and the extradition treaty would allow for it.

  3. Information warfare by haeger · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It's a bit scary how easy it is to knock peoples main source of information offline. This time I don't think there was anything more to it, but in case a real attack is happening, cutting people off from what's happening is one of the first things that you do.
    Could we use p2p in some form here, making sure that information can be distributed as long as there are people connected?

    .haeger

    --
    You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. -- Harlan Ellison
    1. Re: Information warfare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ham radio.

    2. Re: Information warfare by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      AMPRNET - Internet network 44.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  4. This might be part of the reason... by aralin · · Score: 1, Informative

    Here is an article describing what is happening in Sweden with security services and press and might help to explain partly why this attack might be happening.

    http://theindicter.com/paid-ag...

    --
    If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    1. Re:This might be part of the reason... by skastrik · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Here are couple more articles. The level of government sponsored propaganda in Sweden is reaching pretty unprecedented levels ...

      How on earth can this be tagged as informative?
      The first article discusses possible responses to real growing tensions with Russia. The second is a neo-nazi website, which either tells something about the poster or that he just blindingly googled some crap.

    2. Re:This might be part of the reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      I modded so posted as AC!
      From right-wing so it must be wrong!?
      I consider myself left-wing, but fact is the fact, your argument just like German media, "you should not be convinced by right-wing populist propaganda, believe me!".
      OK, if the links aarlin posted above is from neo-nazi, how about this:
      It’s not only Germany that covers up mass sex attacks by migrant men... Sweden’s record is shameful
      Now Swedish officials face claims of covering up migrant sex attacks

      For the first link, it's so FUNNY that Sweden mentioned 'fighting Russian propaganda war'. I wonder whether if they found out the Russian sub? Oh, how panicked Sweden media reacted as they found a Russian sub sank in early 1900s? or French fighter violated Sweden's airspace was missed identifying as Russian one? or use 'gay ads' to repel Russian submarine?

    3. Re:This might be part of the reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Considering the current political climate in Sweden right now it is way more likely that the DDoS was made by some neo-nazi that "doesn't have ties with a particular right wing party other than being friends with some dude high up."
      An attack form Russian computers doesn't mean that the Russian government is involved. It's not like you can't buy time on botnets.
      OTOH a lot of neo-nazi movements in Europe have gotten Russian support lately, so you can't really rule that out either.
      The nationalist movements like to push the "other nations aren't our problem" and get out of EU agenda so it's a cheap way to make it easier to do landgrabs in eastern Europe.

    4. Re:This might be part of the reason... by Archtech · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's quite simple: Assange raped a Swedish woman, and sexually assaulted another one. And now he refuses to face the court. He's a refugee from justice.

      In fact, Assange raped no one. He slept with two Swedish women, both of whom were so eager to do so that they bragged about it to their friends for days before and after. He raped neither of them, and in fact neither of them has ever said that he did. When the charges were first brought, Assange waited in Sweden - despite his busy schedule - until it was made entirely clear that the charges were dropped (because the women said he had done nothing wrong). He then travelled to Britain, at which point a wholly new prosecutor popped up (obviously politically motivated) and began saying Assange should be charged (again).

      Here is the BBC's "timeline" of the charges against Assange: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/worl...

      There are a couple of things missing from this timeline, however. They happened before the BBC's record of events begins.

      "In April 2010, WikiLeaks published gunsight footage from the 12 July 2007 Baghdad airstrike in which Iraqi journalists were among those killed by an AH-64 Apache helicopter, known as the Collateral Murder video. In July of the same year, WikiLeaks released Afghan War Diary, a compilation of more than 76,900 documents about the War in Afghanistan not previously available to the public". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      April 2010: WikiLeaks published gunsight footage of the murders in Baghdad.
      July 2010: WikiLeaks releases "Afghan War Diary"
      August 2010: Assange charged with rape (although he had never before been accused of any such behaviour)

      The pattern is all too familiar to those of us who are familiar with the US government's methods in moving against anyone it wants to destroy.

      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    5. Re:This might be part of the reason... by Kiuas · · Score: 1

      Assange likely has very little to do with this, although the Russians will probably be delighted if people think so. If it is the case that the attacks originated from Russia, then this is likely to be just the latest addition in the information warfare campaign that Russia is waging across Europe. It's very much within Russia's interest at the moment to play as much with the migrant crisis and the media as they possibly can to sow political distrust. They've been running their own 'news' channels (Sputnik) with English language content but additionally they're supporting the so called "anti-media" or "underground media" sites which are basically anti-immigration/anti-EU blogs that run hearsay or entirely made up stories mixed in with bits and pieces of actual news.

      Russia does not give a flying fuck about Assange, or Snowden for that matter. They might say they do, but again, do you think Russia for example is not doing exactly the same type of surveillance on its people than what Snowden revealed in the US? Hell, this is the country in which people have recently been jailed both for being openly atheist as well as for criticizing the invasion of Crimea or calling for a change of leadership.

      So what are the odds that this country launches a cyber attack against a north-European nation because they care so much about justice and the rights of individuals for a fair trial, or any of that? Slim. Extremely slim.

      This is geopolitics, plain and simple. Divide and conquer etc.

      --
      "It is the business of the future to be dangerous" -Alfred North Whitehead
    6. Re:This might be part of the reason... by jodido · · Score: 1

      First of all, what government does not do all this? Second, this is the result of thinking it's OK to not let people you disagree with have the same right to speak as you do. How is this different from what Anonymous does? Or in the US, the people who think it's a good idea, because they don't like Donald Trump, to keep him from speaking?

    7. Re:This might be part of the reason... by Archtech · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Interweb screamed "Oh Noes, War Crimes!" in it's collective ignorance of what a war crime actually is. But nobody (Nations) that actually matters or understands combat and the Laws of Land Warfare was upset. They understand what is actually a war crime and what is not.

      Every single act of violence done (or provoked) by Americans and their allies in Iraq was a war crime, and that continues to be the case. The invasion was a perfect example of what the Nuremberg Tribunal called "the ultimate international crime" - an unprovoked war of aggression. The USA attacked and invaded Iraq, overthrew its government, killed more than a million of its people, and quite deliberately destroyed its infrastructure. Ask yourself what those Americans in that helicopter were doing even being inside Iraq. They had no business being in the country, let alone killing people for any reason at all. If Iraqis wish to carry guns in their country, that is their affair. (In any case, the objects were not guns - that is just what the bloodthirsty, highly imaginative US soldiers said).

      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    8. Re:This might be part of the reason... by ultranova · · Score: 1

      I still laugh uproariously every time that Assange thing comes up.

      I just think it's sad that a nation that aspired so high has fallen so low.

      If he would have just kept his dick in his pants, he'd be a free man today.

      Any excuse will serve a tyrant.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    9. Re:This might be part of the reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How!? Did you read those articles?
      My point is they blame everything on Russia, just for convenience, now they blame the rightists are bribed by Russia.

      The first article, Spiegel whines how good they are, but the people don't understand, and too easy to be lure by populists.
      The second one, they show the fact that most of Germans don't believe in MSM. If one doesn't know why, read the previous article.

      It's not Russia's fault or 'rightwing populist', their fault!

    10. Re: This might be part of the reason... by Prune · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with 4chan? Come at me bro

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    11. Re:This might be part of the reason... by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      http://politics.slashdot.org/c...

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Unprovoked? What crack are you smoking. War crimes? Again, that must be some good shit. The UN said, in a resolution, the equivalent of if you don't let us inspect everything, we will attack you. Iraq didn't let the inspectors in, but we are horrible mass murders for following through with the UN's threat?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    12. Re:This might be part of the reason... by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Um, having sex with a woman while she sleeps because she said no the night before is rape in most countries.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    13. Re:This might be part of the reason... by Archtech · · Score: 1

      From the Wikipedia page you cited:

      'On 8 November 2002, the Security Council passed Resolution 1441 by a unanimous 15–0 vote; Russia, China, France, and Arab states such as Syria voted in favor, giving Resolution 1441 wider support than even the 1990 Gulf War resolution.

      'While some politicians have argued that the resolution could authorize war under certain circumstances, the representatives in the meeting were clear that this was not the case. The United States Ambassador to the United Nations, John Negroponte, said:
      “ [T]his resolution contains no "hidden triggers" and no "automaticity" with respect to the use of force. If there is a further Iraqi breach, reported to the Council by UNMOVIC, the IAEA or a Member State, the matter will return to the Council for discussions as required in paragraph 12. The resolution makes clear that any Iraqi failure to comply is unacceptable and that Iraq must be disarmed. And, one way or another, Iraq will be disarmed. If the Security Council fails to act decisively in the event of further Iraqi violations, this resolution does not constrain any Member State from acting to defend itself against the threat posed by Iraq or to enforce relevant United Nations resolutions and protect world peace and security.[3]'

      As it happened, Iraq could not be "disarmed", as it had no WMD of the type discussed in the UN proceedings. And the resolution emphatically did not authorize the use of force, even if Iraqq had had any WMD.

      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
  5. Re:Sweden gets what they deserve by Mats+Svensson · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, the papers that were targeted had mostly Assange-positive articles. And The current regime in the Kremlin, are those that has been yelling the loudest about how we all deserve to die for standing up to their ministry of lies. Fuck Putin! Sincerely, Sweden

  6. Please down vote this thread. by emj · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you have any accusations of the government doing any sort of propaganda then post them, insinuations have never helped against propaganda. Those links are not informative in any way, I would say that the second link is propaganda of the worst kind, and the first is made into propaganda from you by a strange context.

    1. Re:Please down vote this thread. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Provide evidence or prepare to look indistinguishable from propaganda peddlers. Do you not see the irony in railing against baseless assertions by making baseless assertions? I guess not...

  7. Re:Sweden gets what they deserve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    WTF are you talking about? As if the two events would be related in any way.

  8. Re:Sweden gets what they deserve by Archtech · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Come on Mats, you guys are still just smarting from the Battle of Poltava, when you got as far into Russia as (roughly) modern Novorossia, and then were sensationally obliterated in one of the great battles of history. Matter of interest, why did you feel the need to invade Russia? It's not smart and it's not funny, and everyone who does it regrets it.

    Unfortunately, they often end up with a lingering, festering hatred of Russia. Which isn't really fair, because all the Russians did was defend themselves.

    --
    I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
  9. Re: Fair is Fair by Archtech · · Score: 1

    Note to Facebook administration: we really badly need a moderation score of "Irony". It's used a lot, and I feel all too often unrecognised by some.

    --
    I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
  10. Re:Sweden gets what they deserve by Place+a+name+here · · Score: 2

    It's not smart and it's not funny, and everyone who does it regrets it.

    Tell that to Genghis Khan.

  11. Re:Sweden gets what they deserve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Historically Russians are a mix of Fenno-Ugric and Proto-Slavic people governed by "Swedish" kings, with later mix-in of Mongolian blood and governance.

    In Finnish and Estonian we still call Sweden "Rossi" and the country east of us is "Veneja" (or Boat People) :)

  12. Re:Sweden gets what they deserve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You fucking dumbshits still going on about battles that happened hundreds of years ago? Who gives a rats ass?

  13. Re:Sweden gets what they deserve by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1, Informative

    Which isn't really fair, because all the Russians did was defend themselves.

    The war started when the Russians invaded Poland. Also, Poltava isn't in Russia, it is in Ukraine. It is silly to say the Russians were only defending themselves when the war both started and ended outside their territory. And the Swedes only lost that day because Charles XII wasn't feeling well. There should be a re-match.

  14. No goverment sites was attacked by a_n_d_e_r_s · · Score: 1

    It was just commersial newspapers. Public service companies was not targeted and their web sites was not down during the attack.

    --
    Just saying it like it are.
    1. Re:No goverment sites was attacked by ddtmm · · Score: 1

      I visited all the sites listed. They all load fast. Not sure what the problem is.

  15. Sweden has two government websites? by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

    Such profligacy.

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  16. Re: Sweden gets what they deserve by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

    Considering that there are people that have evaded the Vietnam War Drafts in Sweden that aren't extradited then it's not too likely he would be sent to the US.

    Today Assange is a moot point anyway, he's actually not that important (he may think so himself, but that's another issue). Also realize that he was primarily wanted for a hearing. If that hearing hadn't yielded anything of value then he would most likely have been sent on his way. As it is now he basically imprisoned himself at the embassy. The time he spent at the embassy is also very likely to have exceeded any imprisonment by a great deal when it comes to a first time offense in Sweden. People sent to prison for 6 months are often let out after 3 provided they don't behave badly.

    So it's hardly likely that it was Assange that was the factor that drove this attack. It's more likely that it had something to do with submarines or islamists.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  17. Re: news that matters? by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

    The US have 10 states that have a larger population than Sweden (9,858,794 at January 31st 2016).

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  18. Re:Hello cold_fjord by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

    Pay zero regardless, no difference when posting as AC.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  19. Re:Sweden gets what they deserve by johanw · · Score: 1

    You should hear some Americans talk about that skirmisch they call "civil war".

  20. It is the Russians by Cederic · · Score: 1, Troll

    There's a level of irony that the confirmation this is the Russian state is the sheer volume of astroturf posts on here.

    Just check the Anonymous Coward posts. It's truly comical.

    1. Re:It is the Russians by Nostalgia4Infinity · · Score: 1

      And you went out of your way to prove his point.

    2. Re:It is the Russians by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      Ha! That didn't take long, did it?
      --
      Strastviy, tovarishchi!

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    3. Re: It is the Russians by aralin · · Score: 2

      I give you that sure. Now when is US going to stop the annexation of Guantanamo Bay? And please, don't give me any of that crap you lawfully rent it from the Cubans against their will. :)

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
  21. Re:Sweden gets what they deserve by GNious · · Score: 1

    Also, Poltava isn't in Russia, it is in Ukraine.

    To be fair, he did say Nonorossia, which is Putin-speak for Ukraine.

  22. Re: Sweden gets what they deserve by dwillden · · Score: 1

    Further Assange never broke US law. He didn't steal the classified information. Manning did. He didn't reveal the classified information to unauthorized persons (he is one). Manning did. The US has no case against him, he never signed an SF-12 NDA regarding classified information. The old Intel community joke of I'd tell you but then I'd have to kill you is wrong. It should be I'd tell you but then I'd have to kill myself is more accurate. A non-cleared person is not at fault when a person with a clearance reveals classified information to them.

    --
    I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
  23. Re: Sweden gets what they deserve by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Which is exactly why I continue to believe that America will do nothing to him. We have nothing on him. OTOH, Sweden does and may go after him.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  24. Re:Sweden gets what they deserve by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Modern DDOS are botnets. You don't need, and few have, a giant pipe from their computer sufficient to deny a company or government anymore, as they themselves have cheap large connections for daily business.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  25. Re: Sweden gets what they deserve by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

    And since he's not an US citizen he's the one outside the fence that did receive it. And if he did receive it outside US turf then he can at worst be prosecuted on that turf for something.

    The only thing left for the US to do is to discredit him, kill him illegally or just stress him to do something stupid.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  26. Can only mean one thing: by fard69 · · Score: 1

    Invasion.

  27. Re: Fair is Fair by Stoutlimb · · Score: 1

    Facebook bought Slashdot?

  28. Re: Sweden gets what they deserve by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, because Greenwald is really living a life in a work camp because of publishing all of Snowden's stuff? Nope, he is living quite comfortably in Brazil.

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  29. Re: Sweden gets what they deserve by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, just like the US did to Glenn Greenwald for publishing all that stuff Snowden gave him. I hear he is dying from all the hard labor they put him to.

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  30. Re:Sweden gets what they deserve by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    Also Assange is not even accused of rape.

    http://www.theatlantic.com/int...

    Considering the only charge left is rape, how do you get to that assertion?

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?