Slashdot Mirror


That Awkward Moment When 'Apple Mocked Good Hardware and Poor People' (dailydot.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a DailyDot article: Phil Schiller, Apple's Senior Vice President of Worldwide Marketing, took the stage in Cupertino, California, earlier this week to explain some of the new features and specs on the new iPad Pro. Between showing off a new display and camera, Schiller also took some digs at Windows and PC users, specifically calling out those users who are on computers more than five years old. Schiller said that 600 million people are using PCs that are over five years old. 'This is really sad,' he said.
C. Custer, reporter for Tech in Asia also didn't like Schiller's remarks. He writes: If Apple's really targeting those 600 million old PC users, it seems to have done a pretty poor job. It's been more than five years since I saw the need to upgrade my primary computer, and nothing about the iPad Pro presentation made me rethink my position at all. But of course, Apple isn't really targeting those people. That was mostly just a cheap shot, a jibe at all of us poor fools who haven't yet seen the light. That's why the audience laughed knowingly, and even applauded. "Using the same machine for five years? How barbaric! Thank god we live in civilized society, where everyone throws their gadgets out and buys new ones every two years."

69 of 551 comments (clear)

  1. Meanwhile... by rwven · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...The coworker sitting next to me us using a 5.5 year old macbook pro and defending it as "still as good as anything new."

    What a barbarian.

    1. Re:Meanwhile... by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My last Mac is 10 years old now. MacBook Pro Core 2 Duel. I still use it to watch some stuff on iTunes with it.
      My Current laptop a ThinkPad is approaching 5 years now. Compared to the new tech, it still is very fast and I have no needs for an upgrade.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Meanwhile... by NotDrWho · · Score: 2

      I bet a 5-year old PC would still play games a lot better than any Macbook.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    3. Re:Meanwhile... by cdrudge · · Score: 5, Funny

      MacBook Pro Core 2 Duel

      So do the cores battle each other to see which one is better? Or how does that work?

    4. Re:Meanwhile... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My Current laptop a ThinkPad is approaching 5 years now.

      Snap! Mine's a W510. Actually, it might be older than 5 years. Well, I say laptop, I use it as a portable desktop which I take home once every few weeks or so.

      It's acceptably fast, not a speed demon nor a slacker. A very few things could be faster, but I don't bump into them often enough to upgrade. It also holds desktop sized SSDs and has 16G RAM so it's fine for just about everything I do.

      My eee900 is even older. 8 years, I think, though gmail is getting almost unusable though in the web client (50% speed, 50% screen space). Proper clients still work fine and trolling^Wbrowsing on slashdot is fine too.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    5. Re:Meanwhile... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My 6 year old macbook pro is arguably better than anything new. It has a 17" display. Apparently hipsters have some sort of size phobia, I'm not sure if its a rape trigger, or just a micro-aggression, but it offers plenty of pixels and enough room to see them all. With an SSD and an i7 it's plenty fast enough for medium games and all desktop work.

      I guess I understood Schiller's comment to be mostly about "market size", and directed towards investors, who I think are the actual primary target of the iPhone SE. I don't understand why Apple wants to chase the low end market, except that investors see "market size" and have orgasms. In fact Apple has been, and continues to be enormously successful without it. Chase it and you end up eroding your high margin, lower volume customers who don't want the thing the lessers have, they want the special one.

    6. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I set up a 15 year old PC with gentoo as a basic internet machine for my parent's kitchen, and aside from the general web bloat over the last 3 or so years, they are happy with it, and I am happy with it. The value for money in a traditional PC was and remains superb.

      Meanwhile my ~4 year old laptop is grinding to a halt for daily general use. I've been forced to turn off javascript to even get websites to load nowadays. It's the same with tablets. I have never seen computers become so obsolete quite so quickly. These devices practically have the lifecycle and resale value of cellphones at this point. Color me suspicious.

      The hardware industry has hit the jackpot in the modern consumer tablets and increasingly laptop space. People are replacing their device almost as often as they replace their cars, and it is a shame to see the waste that is going on. Meanwhile the devices are really no more usable than they were 10 years ago, and I'd argue less with the new "touch centered" OSes. There's no incentive for any company to create a valuable, usable, worthwhile product when everything is becoming, in effect, disposable.

      I don't think people are buying "Personal Computers" any more. I think they're buying disposable, restricted function digital devices, for content consumption and (social media) connectivity. In this environment, it probably makes sense for Apple to goad consumers into constant upgrades.

    7. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      my desktop is pushing 8 years now, a phenom 2 rig with 16 gig of ram and a 1 gig amd video card.
       
          it does what i need it to do, Yeah I have newer devices, but to say that a PC thats older than 5 years is no good..... it seems quite smug. Its not the early 90s where you really did need to upgrade every 2 years
       
        ~Ganjadude

    8. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      They joust prior to executing each instruction.

    9. Re:Meanwhile... by hattig · · Score: 2

      Indeed my MacBook Pro is 4.5 years old and still pretty darn powerful (4C8T, etc). Added an SSD. Bumped to 16GB. But it was top of the line back then.

      The only reason to upgrade would be to get a retina display model. Intel have done sweet FA with their CPUs since Sandy Bridge apart from save a little power and increase their profits. But the same goes for old PCs with C2D, C2Q, Nehalem, SB, etc. They're good enough for most things, still.

      But indeed I agree that the comments made could be interpreted as 'poor bashing'.

    10. Re:Meanwhile... by chihowa · · Score: 2

      I just bought a new Macbook Pro six months ago and specifically opted for the "Mid-2012" model (because you can still upgrade/replace the battery, SSD, RAM), so they shouldn't be quite as smug as they are. It's not five years old, yet, but it's actually better than their newest models in many ways.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    11. Re:Meanwhile... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 4, Funny

      What a barbarian.

      What a sad barbarian. If he bought a brand new Apple(tm) MacBook(r) he'd be a happy barbarian.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    12. Re:Meanwhile... by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When we looked at upgrading our hardware last autumn (most of our systems are Dell Vostros with 2 or 3gb of RAM bought in 2009 and had Windows Vista Pro), we decided that there was nothing new hardware could offer most of the staff. All but a few staff are basically running a browser and Office 2010, which these older systems run quite well. While I'm no fan of Windows 10, at the end of the day, it just seemed a better investment to buy Windows 10 licenses, upgrade the forty or so workstations we have, and factor attrition through hardware failure into the equipment budget. Yes, there's a bit of a gamble, in that we could have twenty of these seven year old computers crap out in one year, but we have a few spares and don't view it as a significant risk.

      Save for certain applications (mainly graphics intensive or calculation intensive applications), PCs really peaked in the last decade, and the gains to be had to updating to the newest hardware isn't likely even be noticed by most users. The chief reason to even upgrade the operating system is because Vista's EOL is approaching, and it is getting rather long in the tooth (Chrome support will be pulled soon).

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    13. Re:Meanwhile... by David_Hart · · Score: 2

      There are a couple of reasons, beyond being a gamer, to upgrade a 5+ year old computer.
      - SSD drives - faster bootup times
      - USB 3.0 - Quicker backups to external drives, faster photo transfer from memory cards (devices must be USB 3.0 as well)
      - Better battery life for Laptops - Most last around 6 hours now, about triple what they used to.

      However, most of these are not important enough to the average consumer to shell out $700 for a new computer.

    14. Re:Meanwhile... by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 2

      Going from a small desktop computer with a 2.5GHz CPU where you can upgrade the RAM to one where the CPU is only 1.4GHZ and the RAM is soldered on-board and you can't upgrade later on making the computer more expensive at the time of purchase since Apple asks for insane prices for the RAM. That's the new kind of Apple improvement.

    15. Re:Meanwhile... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Awesome -- I have the same laptop. Haven't put a SSD in there yet -- when I need to breathe new life into it I guess I should do that...

      Mine came with an SSD in the primary drive bay. However, my DVD drive died, so I bought an SSD adapter for the drive bay and shoved a half terabyte Samsung drive in there. The adapters are passive since the DVD drive is SATA based. So, you can double up.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    16. Re:Meanwhile... by kuzb · · Score: 5, Funny

      Does this exchange start with a civilized white-glove-slapping? I'd expect nothing but the highest quality challenges to get issued.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    17. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have a 2009 17" Mac book pro.

      I tossed in an SSD, removed the optical for hdd caddy and upgraded to max ram.

      From there I installed Linux mint and it's been a great laptop.

      The screen is better than most new laptops and the hardware is actually pretty nice still.

      I personally don't like new Apple products since they purposely make it difficult to do diy upgrades and are also environmentally unfriendly by gluing everything together.

    18. Re:Meanwhile... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      I use an Intel 4004, with an RS232 port for input, and a blinking LED for output. I power it with a lead acid battery, using a zener diode to step down the voltage. I works as well as the day I bought it back in 1971.

    19. Re:Meanwhile... by GuB-42 · · Score: 2

      In most 5-10 years old laptops it is easy to swap the HDD with a SSD without having to buy a brand new computer. Older than 10 years you can but you need to make sure it is SATA and it starts being a waste of money. Desktops are even less of a problem.
      On desktops, USB 3.0 controllers are around $30 if you really want it.
      About battery life you are mostly right. Especially considering that your 5+ year old battery is likely to be toast and replacements are not always cheap or easy to find. If you are mobile you are better off with a new laptop as things have improved a lot in this domain.

    20. Re:Meanwhile... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      I assume this competition is that race condition thingy I've been hearing about?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    21. Re:Meanwhile... by PRMan · · Score: 2

      I turned my eeePC netbook into a file server. It runs Windows 10 on a 256 GB SSD and only uses 10W of power so it's cheap to run 24/7. I see no need to upgrade it. It's 8 years old and works just fine as a file/media server.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    22. Re:Meanwhile... by yodleboy · · Score: 4, Funny

      "I assume this competition is that race condition thingy I've been hearing about?"

      Someone ALWAYS has to bring race into the conversation! ; )

    23. Re:Meanwhile... by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

      How do they have room for ten paces in that tiny unibody case?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    24. Re: Meanwhile... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      I've never seen a desktop SSD other than 2.5". They always need drive bay adapters. The laptop sized ones usually seem to be mini-PCIe or mini-SATA and are just an unadorned circuit board.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    25. Re:Meanwhile... by q4Fry · · Score: 2

      I disagree, maybe not completely, but mostly with your analysis of the target audience. The target audience isn't M$, but Apple's customers and event attendees. It's partly a "we're so superior; let's be smug together" crack, but there's also an undercurrent of "don't be like those people; keep being you and buying our products because that's what being you is."

  2. You mean 600 million LUDDITES. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Modern app appers know that only apps can app apps, and if 600 million LUDDITES are still using LUDDITE software, that ruins it for the rest of us app appers! Apple wants to destroy LUDDITE software and replace it with good wholesome appy app apps!

    Apps!

  3. It's official then? by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Apple Marketing really are targeting the shallow and vacuous assholes who want to feel smug about the latest shiny?

    My last PC was over 6 years old before it keeled over, and I hope this one lasts about the same.

    Know what I still don't have? My first gen iPad that Apple updated until they made it useless. Know what I do have? A 3.5 year old Android tablet.

    Huge amounts of people are running older machines ... and, once again, people in marketing are shallow idiots.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:It's official then? by avandesande · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah I had to laugh when I identified more with the friendly/dorky/pear shaped pc guy than the metrosexual twerp. I guess they don't care about our business.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    2. Re:It's official then? by wile_e_wonka · · Score: 5, Interesting

      5 years ago, using a 5 year old computer could be rough. All but the most powerful machines seemed to be largely unusable by that age. But 5 years ago, 64 bit multiple core processors became common. 8 gigs of ram or more was suddenly commonplace. Hard drives under hundreds of GBs were uncommon. And then cheap SSDs came on the scene, reviving old hardware everywhere.

      So, yeah, anymore a 5 year old computer is commonplace. I purchased my home desktop in 2010 (Dell XPS 8300, if I recall correctly, with a core i7 and 8 gigs of RAM), I added a 100 GB SSD in 2013 for use as the boot/OS drive, a second monitor around the same time, and a 4 TB drive for media storage in 2015. Although I am a relatively techie person, I see no need whatsoever to purchase a new computer within the next few years. Normally I want to be up with the times, but I am having a hard time seeing what I am missing out on. USB C, I guess? I can't think of anything else.

  4. An Apple fan being a snob?!?!? by NotDrWho · · Score: 5, Funny

    No way!

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    1. Re:An Apple fan being a snob?!?!? by NotDrWho · · Score: 5, Funny

      [Camera focuses on hipster as a barista approaches]

      Narrator: This is a rare opportunity to see an Apple customer defend his nest against attack from another species...Let's watch

      Barista: Look you can't just sit there all day if you're not going to order something

      Hipster: Are your latte smoothies organic and locally-sourced?

      Barista: I....I don't know.

      Hipster: Well, let me know if you can find out, then maybe I'll order one.

      Narrator: Brilliant! Did you notice the way he used his smug sense of self-importance to put the attacker on the defensive and fend her off? An amazing sight to behold!

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  5. Don't overreact by LichtSpektren · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It was a dumb comment for sure, but turning this into a matter of class warfare or social justice is orders of magnitude dumber.

    1. Re:Don't overreact by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It was a dumb comment for sure, but turning this into a matter of class warfare or social justice is orders of magnitude dumber.

      What's dumb is ignoring class warfare as the elite drop bombs on your head, and decrying social justice when you're having injustice inflicted upon you every day.

      But maybe you're more comfortable in the role of useful idiot. You wouldn't be the first.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Don't overreact by ranton · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It was a dumb comment for sure, but turning this into a matter of class warfare or social justice is orders of magnitude dumber.

      My interpretation goes the other way. This is similar to how a drunk man speaks a sober man's thoughts. This comment shows how he really feels about people who don't refresh their devices every other year. He would never say this publicly other than in a slip up like this.

      Ultimately it shouldn't be surprising to anyone though, which is why I think calling it awkward instead of outrageous is accurate. Anyone who is paying attention knows there is a huge chasm between the upper middle class / wealthy and the working class / poor. I grew up in a working class home and now that I am in my 30's with a $200k+ household income I find it hard to remember how I ever lived on $40k. In only a decade I have lost nearly all empathy with people who had the same upbringing as mine, and in its place is only sympathy for those who I barely understand anymore.

      I now have similar awkward moments sometimes when I talk with an old friend who has kids the same age as mine, but is raising them on a $50k household income. If I accidentally bring up how our maid is a lifesaver or how "hard" it is to afford $3200 in monthly daycare costs it could certainly come off as elitist.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    3. Re:Don't overreact by LichtSpektren · · Score: 2

      It was a dumb comment for sure, but turning this into a matter of class warfare or social justice is orders of magnitude dumber.

      What's dumb is ignoring class warfare as the elite drop bombs on your head, and decrying social justice when you're having injustice inflicted upon you every day.

      But maybe you're more comfortable in the role of useful idiot. You wouldn't be the first.

      Why exactly should I fight class war or social justice wars, to no benefit to myself but all the benefit to the wealthy politicians and other demagogues that profit off of it? Sounds like you're the useful idiot.

    4. Re:Don't overreact by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Huh? Useful idiots are Western leftists. The term was coined in the Soviet Union, whose Communists could not understand why people could live in such magnificent free societies and yet wish to turn them into authoritarian hellholes like their own. Shrugging their shoulders, they called them "useful idiots" and used them for their own purposes, showing them Potemkin villages on their pilgrimages and putting them up in the best hotels for free. Their descendants are today's Cultural Marxists who still continue with the plan but have no Soviet Union to betray the West to. I see already that the story has already been twisted from "out of touch Apple executives who want to sell more crap" into "cis white males fucking disgust me". You can misuse a term if you want but that doesn't make it right.

      "There's glory for you!"
      "I don't know what you mean by 'glory'," Alice said.
      Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. "Of course you don't - till I tell you. I meant 'there's a nice knock-down argument for you'!"
      "But 'glory' doesn't mean 'a nice knock-down argument'," Alice objected.
      "When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean, neither more or less."
      "The question is," said Alice, "whether you can make words mean so many different things."
      "The question is," said Humpty Dumpty, "which is to be Master - that's all."
      -- Alice in Wonderland

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    5. Re:Don't overreact by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Huh? Useful idiots are Western leftists. The term was coined in the Soviet Union

      Tee hee.

      In the Russian language, the equivalent term "useful fools" (ÐоÐÐÐнÑÐ ÐÑfÑÐÐÐ, tr. polezniye duraki) was already in use in 1941. It was mockingly used against Russian "nihilists" who, for Polish agents, were said to be no more than "useful fools and silly enthusiasts".[3]

      So close, yet so fail. Nice try, though.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Don't overreact by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Flamebait

      The term is a mistranslation of the Russian and yet that's how it entered the English language. The term "transmission belts" was also used. None of it changes the fact that educated Western leftists, much like yourself, worked tirelessly for decades to turn our own shining societies into totalitarian dystopias, and your masters could not understand why. The fact that you now want to take this well-defined epithet and strip it of meaning to suit your purposes sickens me.

      The purpose of Newspeak was not only to provide a medium of expression for the world-view and mental habits proper to the devotees of Ingsoc, but to make all other modes of thought impossible. It was intended that when Newspeak had been adopted once and for all and Oldspeak forgotten, a heretical thought - that is, a thought diverging from the principles of Ingsoc - should be literally unthinkable, at least so far as thought is dependent on words. Its vocabulary was so constructed as to give exact and often very subtle expression to every meaning that a Party member could properly wish to express, while excluding all other meanings and also the possibility of arriving at them by indirect methods. This was done partly by the invention of new words, but chiefly by eliminating undesirable words and by stripping such words as remained of unorthodox meanings, and so far as possible of all secondary meanings whatever.
      -- George Orwell, 1984

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    7. Re:Don't overreact by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      Fight? You're a leftist, you're terrified of firearms. You won't even be in the same room when one is lying unloaded on a table. The Second Amendment is your worst enemy, you want all the power out of the hands of the people and into the federal government. How were you planning on revolting? Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun. Moreover you're physical cowards unless you're provoking a few punches from someone while being videotaped. But you're tigers when it comes to running down the streets smashing out the windows of every car with Republican bumper stickers on it.

      A problem with highly intelligent people like you, is that you assume that your opinions are facts. The only place a "social justice war" is going on is in the social normalization of deviance that is taking place inside your head. And even if it is, the rest of us would rather live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies like yourself, because you will will torment us without end with the full approval of your own conscience.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    8. Re:Don't overreact by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      Useful idiots are leftists who wanted to turn our culture over to the Communists! Stop trying to make well-defined words into Newspeak!

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    9. Re:Don't overreact by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      The fascists make themselves known again. Seriously, are you people even listening to yourselves?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  6. herd manipulation to make profit by sittingnut · · Score: 3, Informative

    apple (and all non generic hardware pushers) needs consumers to continuously discard their old and buy its newest overpriced products with their much hyped latest features ( however unsubstantial ) in order to make profit.
    this can only be achieved by social conditioning. a herd mentality is created where members of the herd feel fulfilled and happy, and be in a satisfactory social status, only when they have the latest.
    so of course, they must laugh and mock at those outside the herd, make members of the herd join in laughing and mocking, more publicly the better.

  7. Re:What about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What about all the poor SOB's who can't afford to upgrade their broken Apple shite because it's ridiculously fragile & over priced

    Sounds like you have no experience with Apple! No experience!

    I manage about six hundred Dell Latitude laptops and almost nine hundred Apple MacBook Pro 13" laptops. Despite having around 2/3 as many Dells and that we buy the Apples used off lease so they're an average of five years-old versus less than eighteen months for the Dells, nearly 90% of our support tickets are from users with Dell laptops. When a five year-old used Apple is more than ten times less troublesome than a much newer Dell, you're full of crap with your "fragile" claim.

  8. Re:What about by Maritz · · Score: 2

    I find myself wondering if you ever say "need" when you mean "want". I'd be pretty surprised if you don't, in all honesty.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  9. Is this surprising? by non0score · · Score: 2

    Apple has been playing the class warfare/have vs have-not/status symbol card for a while now. It plays to exactly what we (the general masses) intrinsically fear -- being singled out, not being "in", not fashionable, looking like a dork, etc.... It's also one of the reasons why the 99% hate the 1% -- because the 1% flaunt their wealth in front of others. Do you want to be flaunted to? Or do you want to do the flaunting to those plebeian Android/Windows/BB/feature phone users?

    We have to realize that Apple is a fashion company first, a tech company second. Blue bubbles, anyone? Or are you "green with envy"?

  10. Is this really a surprise? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

    It is vaguely unusual for someone to say it so plainly; but I'm not sure why this position would be even slightly surprising. Apple mostly sells hardware. If you sell hardware, people who are using 5+ year old PCs are lousy customers(regardless of cause: maybe they are too poor to buy the new and shiny stuff that they do want, maybe their needs just haven't changed enough to make an upgrade worth it, though they could afford whatever new and shiny stuff they felt like, the effect is the same). Why wouldn't your marketing message be anything other than encouragement to the people who do buy new stuff frequently; with a secondary focus on encouraging people with old stuff to feel that they are missing out?

  11. Really Sad? by JustNiz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    >> 600 million people are using PCs that are over five years old. 'This is really sad,' he said.

    No it really isn't. Most people just use PCs to write emails and surf the net. Heck even 5 year old hardware is overpowered just for that.

    1. Re:Really Sad? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is the fundamental problem all computer makers face. The relentless advance of computing tech has far, far outpaced the computing needs of most people for at least the past 10-15 years. As long as the hardware keeps functioning, those people have no real need to buy anything new... so the manufacturers have to resort to other tactics (appeals to snobbery, techno-lust, inventing new "must have" features, etc.).

      And, as others have pointed out, that comment of Shiller's was especially out of place given how many Mac users point to their still functional and useful "ancient" Macs. Heck, I've got a 2006 MacBook Pro that's still happily humming along, playing the role of our home media server. The battery is basically non-functional; but that's irrelevant for it's designated task.
       

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  12. This is really sad by nimbius · · Score: 2

    For your profit margins im sure, but for the rest of us we're doing just fine.

    we can still access facebook, google, instagram, twitter, and a host of other top level sites to complete the tasks we see fit to complete on the internet. And as for Linux users, many slackware and gentoo afficionados routinely run nearly 10 year old hardware without concern.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  13. I don't know how old my PC is by Andrio · · Score: 2

    When your PC is self-built and maintained with upgrades as needed, it's hard to tell the age of it. I got one part in it that's only like a year old, but I got a secondary HDD in there that's from the last decade.

    --
    The Internet King? I wonder if he could provide faster nudity.
  14. Yet the 101 still sells by Average · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Interesting coming from a company that will sell you a 3y9m old machine today (http://www.apple.com/shop/buy-mac/macbook-pro?product=MD101LL/A&step=config#). Reports are that they still sell rather a lot of them, because they're upgradable, repairable, and work just fine.

    As for me, my 2010 MBP literally came out of a garbage skip. Found it with a bulging/burst lithium battery (far from an Apple-only issue). $50 worth of eBay grey market battery later, and I have a pretty solid machine for XCode and Mac testing. If it weren't for that, I just wouldn't test or dev anything for Macs. Couldn't afford to.

  15. The Quiet Classism of The Gadgeteers by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The rich boys and their expensive toys, about which they understand a fraction.

    It's tough to show off your new Porsche to the Marketing chippies around the watercooler, so your new Apple-thing will have to suffice...

  16. Re: Apple Sucks by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2

    Apple did get raised wages and and improved working conditions for the workers in China. But since the principle was "we hate Apple" as opposed to "protect the workers", only Apple felt pressure and only the workers on Apple products got improvements. A year or two after everybody stopped grumbling about Apple they were busted exploiting workers again.

    If you actually do care about those workers then their exploitation should be the issue regardless of Apple's involvement.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  17. Re:What about by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Apple doesn't have anything to be smug about, period. Phil Schiller is a jerk trying to sell unneeded junk to stupid people. I say "junk" because that's what all machinery eventually becomes.If it does the job you need it to do, you're an idiot for replacing it!

    That said, I may buy an iPad. My daughter had hers with her last visit, and it takes REALLY sharp photos.

  18. How it used to be by david_thornley · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Way back when, Apple was claiming that its computers lasted longer, and retained their usefulness longer, than other computers. Suddenly, this is supposed to be a problem?

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  19. From My Cold Dead Hands... by WheezyJoe · · Score: 2

    Got a Phenom X4 chugging happily since 2009. Got a Sandy Bridge i5 2500K purring along since 2010. Even my Macbook Pro is a 2010 model, doing great since I swapped out the drive for a Samsung SSD, and my iPad is from 2012, the first to use retina and the last to use the wide (non-lightning) connector.

    Sorry, Apple marketing guy. Got nothing against Apple products... they're pretty and work well. But my shit's working just fine, thank you very much, and I'll take no compulsion to trade up before I'm damn good and ready. Don't piss on me just because I know how to source reliable equipment and maintain it well.

    --
    Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
  20. Re:Burn it all to the ground; it's the only soluti by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

    No, it's not disparaging the products, it's disparaging the people who own and use those products. Big difference.

    And, uh, being a dickhead in a marketing launch does not magically excuse him being a dickhead.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  21. Re:That's an insanely stupid troll by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 2

    Or, I can take that 5 year old PC that cost me $700 5 years ago, slap a new $300 Discrete GPU upgrade into it, maybe put down $30 for a bit more RAM and still have a better mostly 5 year old computer that still outperforms a new $1500 MacBook by leagues.

  22. Seven Years... by Etherwalk · · Score: 2

    My last Mac is 10 years old now. MacBook Pro Core 2 Duel. I still use it to watch some stuff on iTunes with it.
    My Current laptop a ThinkPad is approaching 5 years now. Compared to the new tech, it still is very fast and I have no needs for an upgrade.

    My desktop is seven years old, albeit with a few updates. My laptop (a Dell E4300) I picked up off ebay for a hundred bucks and added an SSD. The desktop does almost anything I ask of it (I think XCOM2 was the only game it had a problem with, and it would probably run that with a new video card). The laptop doesn't do gaming but handles standard work tasks (web browsing, word processing) and Netflix without a problem. Most of the world doesn't need more than that.

    If you're running a lot of massive builds on your local machine, running highly processor-intensive tasks, processing a massive amount of data, or are unable to run modern programs you need, it can absolutely make sense to shell out for a new machine. But otherwise (in most cases), it's just unnecessary spending on a luxury. It pollutes the environment, it's a slap in the face to *any* poorer relations or friends you might have, if you don't have trusts set up for your kids already it's kind of a slap in the face to them, and it's far from a socially responsible way to spend your money because almost the entire nonprofit world out there is trying to serve millions of people on budgets that would make you live on rice and ramen.

    There are a few exceptions--maybe you are an engineer who designs hardware for the new system or needs to understand the customer experience better--but for most people, it's just a waste.

    1. Re:Seven Years... by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      it's just unnecessary spending on a luxury. It pollutes the environment, it's a slap in the face to *any* poorer relations or friends you might have, if you don't have trusts set up for your kids already it's kind of a slap in the face to them, and it's far from a socially responsible way to spend your money because almost the entire nonprofit world out there is trying to serve millions of people on budgets that would make you live on rice and ramen.

      I have nothing against the poor or struggling out there, and I like to think that often I'm a charitable person, and give, etc.

      But man, do you seriously base your purchases on how it might be perceived by others in your family or friends...or even strangers???

      I mean, do you and those people actually look at what kind of computer as a sort of status symbol?

      And buying things..."socially responsible"?? Wow..that's a foreign concept to me....if I see something I want or need, I buy it. I've never heard of anyone giving more thought to a purchase than that. What does "socially responsible" purchasing mean and look like???

      I mean the world is the world. There always have been and always will be...haves and have nots. That's just they way life is.

      You're years on earth are limited and you don't need to waste time on crap that doesn't matter. Get and do what makes you happy, and while at it..try to make others happy.

      But at the same time, realize you can't save the world, and life it too short to waste trying to....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re: Seven Years... by Type44Q · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What does "socially responsible" purchasing mean and look like???

      If you have to ask...

    3. Re: Seven Years... by david_thornley · · Score: 3, Informative

      The idea, I think, is to buy things in a way that doesn't cause social harm, such as by using minerals mined by child slave labor in unsafe conditions. I think we can all agree that enslaving children and forcing them to work in mines under conditions that are likely to kill them is undesirable, and as this does happen in some places, we don't want to encourage the slavers by giving them more money.

      The big problem I have with it in practice is that there's no good way to see what effects your purchase has. The "socially responsible" purchaser will be told various things about what bad things go into X, which may be true, may be random unfounded rumor, or may be spread by people hostile to those who sell X. It's possible to misinterpret things, such as assuming things are produced by coercion and exploitation when the jobs doing it may be considered good to have by the people doing it. It often comes down to someone getting a bee in their bonnet about one cause and ignoring others, or assuming that, instead of buying that new MacBook Air, you would donate that money to some charitable cause.

      I'd like to see things like the mining mentioned above policed by the international community, meaning that I'd have some assurance I wasn't contributing to the child slave trade (nothing's going to be perfect), and could get stuff made by people in generally humane conditions.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  23. What's really sad.. by kuzb · · Score: 2

    ..is that Apple execs thinks we should have to upgrade perfectly working hardware every year. I put a new video card in my intel i7 920 and it still performs pretty damn good for all the tasks I use it for. This is just more proof of how far out of touch Apple is with the real world.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  24. Maybe make computers I want to buy again. by tralfaz2001 · · Score: 2

    My newest Apple computer is a 2011 MacBook Pro. I've upgraded the memory from 8GB to 16GB and the 500GB HD to a 1TB SSD. It also has a 1680 x 1050 NON-glossy display. Back then Apple used to make computers with options and upgrade paths. Both upgrading and non-glossy displays are no longer available, so I keep hanging on to what I like. At home it gets no better. My 2008 Mac Pro is still going strong, and no way I'm buying one of those stupid Mac Cans. I even still run a G4 Mac Cube as a web server. I forgot how old that is. So Apple, either make computers that die faster, or start making computers that I would want to own.

  25. Re:What about by serviscope_minor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That said, I may buy an iPad. My daughter had hers with her last visit, and it takes REALLY sharp photos.

    If you're only after really sharp photos, you'd be better off with a recent model compact camera. They're a lot cheaper, and will take much better photos.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  26. Re:I've had the same computer since 1993 by narcc · · Score: 2

    You really need to do a search for "Ship of Theseus".

  27. Well duh! by thoughtspace · · Score: 2

    My 5 year old PC is still faster than the latest MAC and costs a quarter of the cost.

  28. Mac Pro by GrBear · · Score: 2

    My Mac Pro is 9 years old.. because the new Mac Pro's are complete shit.